Difference between revisions of "Talk:Alt-chain release RFC"
(Created page with "== Reverting 'why compete' again === The 'why compete' section is anti-competitive. It assumes "there should be only one". Alt chains are interesting economical and technical...") |
(→Reverting 'why compete' again =) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
[[User:Ripper234|Ripper234]] ([[User talk:Ripper234|talk]]) 01:35, 20 December 2012 (GMT) | [[User:Ripper234|Ripper234]] ([[User talk:Ripper234|talk]]) 01:35, 20 December 2012 (GMT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | You are the one reverting/vandalizing here. --[[User:Luke-jr|Luke-jr]] ([[User talk:Luke-jr|talk]]) 04:07, 24 December 2012 (GMT) | ||
Revision as of 04:07, 24 December 2012
Reverting 'why compete' again =
The 'why compete' section is anti-competitive. It assumes "there should be only one".
Alt chains are interesting economical and technical experiments. Some are scams, some are just meangingless ... but some might offer some technical or economical innovation Namecoin and possibly PPCoin. Hell, even Litecoin has some properties that could be more secure than Bitcoin - its 2.5 minutes between confirmations might be inherently safer than Bitcoin.
Luke, please do not revert again without discussing.
Ripper234 (talk) 01:35, 20 December 2012 (GMT)
You are the one reverting/vandalizing here. --Luke-jr (talk) 04:07, 24 December 2012 (GMT)
