Difference between revisions of "PayJoin adoption"
(Add Zeus) |
(Alphebatize) |
||
(11 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | [[PayJoin]] is a privacy improvement for bitcoin. | + | [[PayJoin]] is a privacy improvement for bitcoin. Payjoin solves the sole privacy problem left open in the [[Bitcoin whitepaper]], that transactions with multiple inputs "necessarily reveal that their inputs were owned by the same owner," because both the sender and receiver of a transfer contribute inputs to the transaction. |
− | [[Transaction surveillance company|Transaction surveillance companies]] heavily depend on the [[Common-input-ownership heuristic|common input ownership assumption]] which is broken by PayJoin transactions. So if those transactions became even a little bit widespread they could massively decrease the reliability of blockchain surveillance. | + | [[Transaction surveillance company|Transaction surveillance companies]] heavily depend on the [[Common-input-ownership heuristic|common input ownership assumption]] which is broken by PayJoin transactions. So if those transactions became even a little bit widespread they could massively decrease the reliability of blockchain surveillance. Those who adopt PayJoin would find their privacy improved from strangers analyzing the blockchain. For example a surveillance company spy would find it much harder to figure out which addresses and transactions belonged to a particular merchant that was using PayJoin, or who else transacted to them. |
− | PayJoin transactions | + | PayJoin transactions can be made indistinguishable from regular bitcoin transactions by design, so it's very hard to get an accurate number for how common they are. |
− | The PayJoin protocol standard | + | The most widely adopted PayJoin protocol standard is [[BIP 0078]]. |
− | |||
− | |||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
Line 13: | Line 11: | ||
| {{No}} || | | {{No}} || | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | {{Evaluating | + | | {{Evaluating}} || |
|- | |- | ||
| {{Planned}} || The developers said they plan to | | {{Planned}} || The developers said they plan to | ||
Line 19: | Line 17: | ||
| {{Weak|Non-BIP78}} || Implements a form of PayJoin but not BIP78 | | {{Weak|Non-BIP78}} || Implements a form of PayJoin but not BIP78 | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | {{Acceptable| | + | | {{Acceptable|Extension}} || Can PayJoin using additional software |
|- | |- | ||
| {{Yes}} || Feature has been released | | {{Yes}} || Feature has been released | ||
Line 29: | Line 27: | ||
! Name !! Sending !! Receiving !! Notes | ! Name !! Sending !! Receiving !! Notes | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | | ACINQ || {{No}} || {{Evaluating}} || https://github.com/ACINQ/phoenix/issues/161 |
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Armory || {{No}} || {{No}} || | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | bcoin || {{No}} || {{No}} || | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | [https://bitcoindevkit.org/bdk-cli/ BDK-CLI] || {{Planned}} || {{Evaluating}} || https://github.com/bitcoindevkit/bdk-cli/issues/149 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Bitcoin Core || {{Acceptable|Extension}} || {{Acceptable|Extension}} || [https://github.com/payjoin/rust-payjoin Beta CLI payjoin-client via RPC], native support [https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/19148 under evaluation] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Bitcoin Knots || {{Acceptable|Extension}} || {{Acceptable|Extension}} || [https://github.com/payjoin/rust-payjoin Beta CLI payjoin-client via RPC] | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | | [https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=de.schildbach.wallet Bitcoin Wallet for Android] || {{No}} || {{No}} || |
|- | |- | ||
| [https://segwit.bitmask.app/ BitMask] || {{Yes}} || {{No}} || Chrome extension only https://github.com/diba-io/bitmask-core/pull/121 | | [https://segwit.bitmask.app/ BitMask] || {{Yes}} || {{No}} || Chrome extension only https://github.com/diba-io/bitmask-core/pull/121 | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | | [https://blixtwallet.github.io/ Blixt Wallet] || {{Evaluating}} || {{Evaluating}} || https://t.me/blixtwallet/122197 |
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Blockstream Green || {{No}} || {{No}} || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| BlueWallet || {{Yes}} || {{Planned}} || https://old.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/j6qswf/bluewallet_releases_payjoin_bip78/ | | BlueWallet || {{Yes}} || {{Planned}} || https://old.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/j6qswf/bluewallet_releases_payjoin_bip78/ | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | | [https://github.com/Bitcoin-Brainbow/Brainbow Brainbow] || {{Evaluating}} || {{Evaluating}} || https://github.com/Bitcoin-Brainbow/Brainbow/issues/98 |
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Breadwallet || {{No}} || {{No}} || | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | | BTC.com || {{No}} || {{No}} || |
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | | BTCPay Server || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || https://docs.btcpayserver.org/Payjoin/ |
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | | Casa || {{No}} || {{No}} || |
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Coinomi || {{No}} || {{No}} || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Electrum || {{Planned}} || {{Planned}} || https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum/issues/6585 | | Electrum || {{Planned}} || {{Planned}} || https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum/issues/6585 | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | [https:// | + | | [https://foundationdevices.com/envoy/ Envoy] || {{Evaluating}} || {{No}} || https://github.com/Foundation-Devices/envoy/pull/84 |
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | | Fedimint || {{Evaluating}} || {{Evaluating}} || https://github.com/fedimint/fedimint/discussions/1764 |
+ | |- | ||
+ | | [https://fullynoded.app Fully Noded] || {{Evaluating}} || {{Evaluating}} || https://github.com/Fonta1n3/FullyNoded/issues/126 | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | | Gordian Wallet || {{Evaluating}} || {{Evaluating}} || https://github.com/orgs/BlockchainCommons/discussions/49 |
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | | Guarda Wallet || {{No}} || {{No}} || |
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | | [https://jamapp.org/ JAM] || {{Planned}} || {{Planned}} || [https://github.com/joinmarket-webui/jam/blob/4d9171e15fe45100dd26db621576739af9b7e012/README.md?plain=1#L74 roadmap] [https://github.com/joinmarket-webui/jam/issues/406 issue] |
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | | JoinMarket || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || https://github.com/JoinMarket-Org/joinmarket-clientserver/blob/master/docs/PAYJOIN.md |
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | | LND || {{Acceptable|Extension}} || {{Acceptable|Extension}} || [https://github.com/chaincase-app/nolooking nolooking web app alpha] |
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | | [https://mutinywallet.com Mutiny Wallet] || {{Evaluating}} || {{Evaluating}} || https://github.com/MutinyWallet/mutiny-node/issues/194 |
|- | |- | ||
| Mycelium || {{No}} || {{No}} || | | Mycelium || {{No}} || {{No}} || | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | [https:// | + | |[https://nunchuk.io/ Nunchuk] || {{Evaluating}} || {{Evaluating}} || https://stacker.news/items/129571 |
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Samourai Wallet || {{Weak|Non-BIP78}} || {{Weak|Non-BIP78}} || https://samouraiwallet.com/stowaway | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Sparrow Wallet || {{Yes}} || {{Weak|Non-BIP78}} || https://github.com/sparrowwallet/sparrow/releases/tag/0.9.7, https://github.com/sparrowwallet/sparrow/releases/tag/1.5.3 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | [https://specter.solutions/desktop/ Specter Desktop] || {{Evaluating}} || {{Evaluating}} || https://github.com/cryptoadvance/specter-desktop/issues/1369 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | [https://stackwallet.com Stack Wallet] || {{Evaluating}} || {{Evaluating}} || https://github.com/cypherstack/stack_wallet/issues/445 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Trust Wallet || {{No}} || {{No}} || | | Trust Wallet || {{No}} || {{No}} || | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | | [https://lnvortex.com Vortex] || {{Evaluating}} || {{Evaluating}} || https://github.com/ln-vortex/ln-vortex/issues/407 |
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Wasabi Wallet || {{Yes}} || [ {{Evaluating}} || https://docs.wasabiwallet.io/using-wasabi/PayJoin.html [https://github.com/zkSNACKs/WalletWasabi/pull/3582 receiver draft] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [https://zeusln.app/ Zeus] || {{Planned}} || {{Planned}} || [https://github.com/ZeusLN/zeus/blob/6f0e4568ce81ae9193ec8c272b0c7ac1299c2e8f/README.md?plain=1#L68 on feature roadmap] | | [https://zeusln.app/ Zeus] || {{Planned}} || {{Planned}} || [https://github.com/ZeusLN/zeus/blob/6f0e4568ce81ae9193ec8c272b0c7ac1299c2e8f/README.md?plain=1#L68 on feature roadmap] | ||
Line 95: | Line 121: | ||
| [[BTCPay]] || {{Yes}} || First implementer of BIP78 payjoin for merchants. | | [[BTCPay]] || {{Yes}} || First implementer of BIP78 payjoin for merchants. | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | | [https://satsale.org/ SatSale] || {{Evaluating}} || https://github.com/SatSale/SatSale/issues/39 |
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 19:39, 29 April 2023
PayJoin is a privacy improvement for bitcoin. Payjoin solves the sole privacy problem left open in the Bitcoin whitepaper, that transactions with multiple inputs "necessarily reveal that their inputs were owned by the same owner," because both the sender and receiver of a transfer contribute inputs to the transaction.
Transaction surveillance companies heavily depend on the common input ownership assumption which is broken by PayJoin transactions. So if those transactions became even a little bit widespread they could massively decrease the reliability of blockchain surveillance. Those who adopt PayJoin would find their privacy improved from strangers analyzing the blockchain. For example a surveillance company spy would find it much harder to figure out which addresses and transactions belonged to a particular merchant that was using PayJoin, or who else transacted to them.
PayJoin transactions can be made indistinguishable from regular bitcoin transactions by design, so it's very hard to get an accurate number for how common they are.
The most widely adopted PayJoin protocol standard is BIP 0078.
No | |
Evaluating | |
Planned | The developers said they plan to |
Non-BIP78 | Implements a form of PayJoin but not BIP78 |
Extension | Can PayJoin using additional software |
Yes | Feature has been released |
Contents
Software Wallets
Hardware Wallets
Name | Signing | Notes |
---|---|---|
Coldcard | Yes | Hardware can sign bip78 payjoins and also http://ckbunker.com/ |
Payment processors
Name | Receive | Notes |
---|---|---|
BTCPay | Yes | First implementer of BIP78 payjoin for merchants. |
SatSale | Evaluating | https://github.com/SatSale/SatSale/issues/39 |
Exchanges
P2P exchanges make the most sense as early adoptors of PayJoin. All exchanges are welcome on this list of course.
Name | Send to exchange | Receive from exchange | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
AgoraDesk | No | No | |
Bisq | No | No | |
Bull Bitcoin | Planned | Planned | https://twitter.com/francispouliot_/status/1138131827258986499 |
Hodl Hodl | Planned | Planned | https://twitter.com/hodlhodl/status/1352266122389827584 |
LocalBitcoins | No | No | |
LocalCoinSwap | No | No | |
LocalCryptos | No | No | |
Paxful.com | No | No | |
Sideshift.ai | Yes | No | For "To send" choose "Bitcoin PayJoin" |
Non-profits
Name | Receive | URL | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
payjoin.org | Yes | https://payjoin.org/ | |
Human Rights Foundation | Yes | https://hrf.org/donate-bitcoin/payjoin/ | |
Waxwing's personal donation page | Yes | https://joinmarket.me/donations/ | |
Max Hillebrand's donation page | Yes | https://towardsliberty.com/btcpay/apps/27jLc1qpN8UXcQanHgeAsaEgLAio/pos |
Casinos
Bitcoin casinos are very natural early-adopters of PayJoin. An early protocol specification for it, called bustapay, was created by the owner of a bitcoin casino.
Name | Send to | Receive | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
Bustabit | No | No |
Stores
Name | Receive | Notes |
---|---|---|
The Kratom Syndicate | Yes | https://thekratomsyndicate.com/blog/buying-kratom-with-payjoin.html |
Ideas Like Flames | Yes | https://twitter.com/ideaslikeflames/status/1389746824009949191 |