Difference between revisions of "Comparison of mining pools"

From Bitcoin Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(This all took me forever, so how does it look? :D)
 
(405 intermediate revisions by 78 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Reward Types==
+
Reward types & explanation:
 
+
* '''CPPSRB''' - Capped Pay Per Share with Recent Backpay. [http://eligius.st/wiki/index.php/Capped_PPS_with_Recent_Backpay]
 
* '''DGM''' - Double Geometric Method.  A hybrid between PPLNS and Geometric reward types that enables to operator to absorb some of the variance risk.  Operator receives portion of payout on short rounds and returns it on longer rounds to normalize payments. [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=39497.0]
 
* '''DGM''' - Double Geometric Method.  A hybrid between PPLNS and Geometric reward types that enables to operator to absorb some of the variance risk.  Operator receives portion of payout on short rounds and returns it on longer rounds to normalize payments. [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=39497.0]
 +
* '''ESMPPS''' - Equalized Shared Maximum Pay Per Share. Like SMPPS, but equalizes payments fairly among all those who are owed. [http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=12181.msg378851#msg378851]
 +
* '''POT''' - Pay On Target. A high variance PPS variant that pays on the difficulty of work returned to pool rather than the difficulty of work served by pool [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=131376.0]
 +
* '''PPLNS''' - Pay Per Last N Shares. Similar to proportional, but instead of looking at the number of shares in the round, instead looks at the last N shares, regardless of round boundaries.
 +
* '''PPLNSG''' - Pay Per Last N Groups (or shifts). Similar to PPLNS, but shares are grouped into "shifts" which are paid as a whole.
 +
* '''PPS''' - Pay Per Share. Each submitted share is worth certain amount of BTC. Since finding a block requires <current difficulty> shares ''on average'', a PPS method with 0% fee would be 12.5 BTC divided by <current difficulty>. It is risky for pool operators, hence the fee is highest.
 
* '''Prop.''' - Proportional. When block is found, the reward is distributed among all workers proportionally to how much shares each of them has found.
 
* '''Prop.''' - Proportional. When block is found, the reward is distributed among all workers proportionally to how much shares each of them has found.
* '''PPLNS''' - Pay Per Last N Shares. Similar to proportional, but instead of looking at the number of shares in the round, instead looks at the last N shares, regardless of round boundaries.
 
* '''PPS''' - Pay Per Share. Each submitted share is worth certain amount of BC. Since finding a block requires <current difficulty> shares ''on average'', a PPS method with 0% fee would be 50 BTC divided by <current difficulty>. It is risky for pool operators, hence the fee is highest.
 
* '''SMPPS''' - Shared Maximum Pay Per Share. Like Pay Per Share, but never pays more than the pool earns. [http://eligius.st/wiki/index.php/Shared_Maximum_PPS]
 
* '''ESMPPS''' - Equalized Shared Maximum Pay Per Share. Like SMPPS, but equalizes payments fairly among all those who are owed. [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=12181.msg378851#msg378851]
 
 
* '''RSMPPS''' - Recent Shared Maximum Pay Per Share. Like SMPPS, but system aims to prioritize the most recent miners first. [http://eligius.st/wiki/index.php/Shared_Maximum_PPS]
 
* '''RSMPPS''' - Recent Shared Maximum Pay Per Share. Like SMPPS, but system aims to prioritize the most recent miners first. [http://eligius.st/wiki/index.php/Shared_Maximum_PPS]
* '''CPPSRB''' - Capped Pay Per Share with Recent Backpay.
 
 
* '''Score''' - Score based system: a proportional reward, but weighed by time submitted. Each submitted share is worth more in the function of time ''t'' since start of current round. For each share score is updated by: score += exp(t/C). This makes later shares worth much more than earlier shares, thus the miner's score quickly diminishes when they stop mining on the pool. Rewards are calculated proportionally to scores (and not to shares). (at slush's pool C=300 seconds, and every hour scores are normalized)
 
* '''Score''' - Score based system: a proportional reward, but weighed by time submitted. Each submitted share is worth more in the function of time ''t'' since start of current round. For each share score is updated by: score += exp(t/C). This makes later shares worth much more than earlier shares, thus the miner's score quickly diminishes when they stop mining on the pool. Rewards are calculated proportionally to scores (and not to shares). (at slush's pool C=300 seconds, and every hour scores are normalized)
[http://eligius.st/~luke-jr/samples/800MH-3/ Visual examples of the various payout methods]
+
* '''SMPPS''' - Shared Maximum Pay Per Share. Like Pay Per Share, but never pays more than the pool earns. [http://eligius.st/wiki/index.php/Shared_Maximum_PPS]
 +
* '''FPPS''' - Full Pay Per Share. Similar to PPS,but not only divide regular block reward (12.5 BTC for now) but also some of the transaction fees.  Calculate a standard transaction fee within a certain period and distribute it to miners according to their hash power contributions in the pool. It will increase the miners' earnings by sharing some of the transaction fees.
  
==Table Explanations==
+
A statistically valid analysis of some pools and their payout methods: [http://organofcorti.blogspot.com/ Bitcoin network and pool analysis]
  
* '''GH/s''' - Conjoined hashrate of everyone mining at the pool. Note that pool hashrate is largely irrelevant but can be seen as a popularity measurement. Note however that it is a theoretical security issue if one pool gains above 50% of the total computational power of the network, thus consider joining a pool based on other metrics.
+
{| class="wikitable sortable" border="1"
* '''Merged Mining''' - Merged mining allows miners to mine on multiple block chains at the same time with the same hashing, at no cost to the miner.
+
|-
* '''Reward Fee''' - The percent of your reward the pool keeps for itself, usually to help pay server costs and to reward the pool maintainer(s).
+
! Name                !! Location            !! Size<ref name="hashrate2"/>
* '''Difficulty''' - The share difficulty the pool uses. Most pools use a default difficulty of 1. Some pools allow you to select your own difficulty, useful for larger miners. Some pools use a dynamic difficulty that changes to be perfect for your own hashrate.
+
!                                                        Merged Mining<ref name="merged"/>
+
!                                                                    Reward Type            !! Transaction fees!!PPS Fee!!Other Fee!! [[File:Stm.png|link=Stratum_mining_protocol]] !! [[getblocktemplate|GBT]]
 
+
! Launched  !! Variance                    !! Forum                                      !! Website
==DGM Pools==
 
 
 
{| class="wikitable sortable"
 
 
|-
 
|-
! Name !! Location !! GH/s !! Merged Mining !! Transaction fees !! Reward Fee !! Protocol !! Launched !! Difficulty !! Forum !! Website
+
| [[AntPool]]        || China                || Large || No      || PPLNS & PPS            || {{PoolFees}}    || 2.5%  || 0%      || {{Yes}} || {{No}}
 +
| ?          || ?                            || [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=855548 link]  || [https://www.antpool.com/ link]
 
|-
 
|-
| [[Coinotron|Coinotron]] || Poland || 70 || No || kept by pool || 0% || [[getwork]] || 2011-07-06 || 1 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=26727.0 1] || [http://www.coinotron.com Link]
+
| [[BCMonster.com]]       ||{{flag|us|}}{{flag|eu}}{{flag|cn|}} || Small || No     || PPLNS                  || {{SharedFees}}  ||      ||      0.5% || {{Yes}} || {{No}}
 +
| 2016-01-13 ||   Dynamic ||   [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1327077.0 link]                               || [http://www.bcmonster.com link]
 
|-
 
|-
| [[Eclipse Mining Consortium]] || USA/EU/AU/Asia || 2000 || [[NMC]] || kept by pool || 0% || [[getwork]], [[getblocktemplate]] || 2011-06-14 || Choosable/Dynamic || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=16385.0 1] || [https://eclipsemc.com Link]
+
| [[BitcoinAffiliateNetwork]]     || {{flag|us|}}{{flag|eu}}{{flag|cn|}}{{flag|nl|}}{{flag|au|}}      ||   ?  || [[NMC]], [[DOGE]] || ?        || {{PoolFees}}    ||  ? ||    ?    ||    {{Yes}}    ||
 +
| 2014-07-15 || User/Dynamic           || [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=722202.0 link] || [http://mining.bitcoinaffiliatenetwork.com/ link]
 
|-
 
|-
| [[MaxBTC]] || USA || 220 || [[NMC]] || kept by pool || 0% || [[getwork]] || 2012-03-15 || 1 || [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=68734.0 1] || [https://www.maxbtc.com/ Link]
+
| [[BitMinter]]       || {{flag|us}}{{flag|ca|label=1}}{{flag|eu}}          || Small || [[NMC]] || PPLNSG                  || {{SharedFees}}  ||      ||      1% || {{Yes}} || {{No}}
 +
| 2011-06-26 || User<ref name="changeable"/>/Dynamic || [https://bitcointalk.org/?topic=788753  link] || [https://bitminter.com link]
 
|-
 
|-
| [[Ozco.in]] || USA/EU/AUS || 750 || [[NMC]] || shared || 2% || [[getwork]] || 2011-06-07 || 1 || [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=14085.0 1] || [https://www.ozcoin.net Link]
+
| [[BTC.com]]         || {{flag|cn}}{{flag|us|}}{{flag|eu}}              || Medium || [[NMC]]     || FPPS          || {{SharedFees}}    || 0% || 4%      || {{Yes}} || {{No}}
|}
+
| 2016-09-13          ||     User                    || [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1827718.0 link] || [https://pool.btc.com/ link]
<references/>
 
 
 
==*MPPS Pools==
 
 
 
{| class="wikitable sortable"
 
 
|-
 
|-
! Name !! Location !! GH/s !! Merged Mining !! Transaction fees !! Reward Fee !! Protocol !! Launched !! Difficulty !! Forum !! Website
+
| [[BTCC Pool]]            || China, Japan      || Large    || [[NMC]]      || PPS                      || {{PoolFees}}    || 2.0%    || 0%      || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}}
 +
| 2014-10-21          ||  Dynamic                            || ?                                      || [https://pool.btcc.com link]
 
|-
 
|-
| [[Eligius]] || Germany || 300 || [[NMC]] || kept by pool || 0% || [[getwork]], [[getblocktemplate]]<ref name="local">Miner-local getwork proxy available.</ref> || 2011-04-27 || 1 || [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=23768.msg298069#msg298069 1] || [http://eligius.st Link]
+
| [[BTCDig]]         || {{flag|us|label=1}}||    Small || No      || DGM                  || {{PoolFees}}    ||     ||     0% || {{Yes}}    ||
 +
| 2013-07-04 || User<ref name="changeable"/>/Dynamic 20SPM                      || [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=249627  link] || [http://btcdig.com/ link]
 
|-
 
|-
| [[pool.itzod.ru]] || Russia || 360 || Converted to BTC || shared || 0% || [[getwork]] || 2011-08-01 || 1 || [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=25127.0 1] [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=44024.0 2] || [https://pool.itzod.ru/ Link]
+
| [[btcmp.com]]       || {{flag|de|label=1}}||   Small || No      || PPS                    || {{PoolFees}}    ||   4% || || {{Yes}} ||
|-
+
| 2011-06-28 || Diff 1                       ||                                            || [http://www.btcmp.com/ link]
| [[PolMine]] || Poland || 160 || No || shared || 1% || [[getwork]] || 2011-06-13 || 1 || [http://forum.polmine.pl/ 1] || [https://polmine.pl/?setlang=en Link]
 
|}
 
<references/>
 
 
 
==PPLNS==
 
 
 
{| class="wikitable sortable"
 
 
|-
 
|-
! Name !! Location !! GH/s !! Merged Mining !! Transaction fees !! Reward Fee !! Protocol !! Launched !! Difficulty !! Forum !! Website
+
| [[btcZPool.com]]      || {{flag|us|label=1}}||    Large || BitCoinZ      || PPLNS                    || {{SharedFees}} || 1% ||      0% ||  {{Yes}} ||
 +
| 2017-06-25 || VarDiff                      ||                                            || [http://www.btcZPool.com/ link]
 
|-
 
|-
| [[BitMinter]] || Germany || 1100 || [[NMC]] || shared || 0% || [[getwork]] || 2011-06-26 || 1 || [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=27062.0 1] || [https://bitminter.com Link]
+
| [[BW Mining]]     || China                || Medium || ?      || PPLNS & PPS            || ?              || ?    || ?      || {{Yes}} ||
 +
| ?          || ?                            || ?                                           || [https://www.bw.com/pool link]
 
|-
 
|-
| [[BTC Canada]] || Canada || 2 || No || kept by pool || 1.5% || [[getwork]] || 2012-08-08 || 1 || [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=99741.0/ 1] || [https://btccan.com/ Link]
+
| [[Eligius]]         || {{flag|us|label=1}}|| Small || [[NMC]]  || CPPSRB                  || {{SharedFees}}  ||    ||    0%   || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}}
 +
| 2011-04-27 || Dynamic: 32 shares/m        || [https://bitcointalk.org/?topic=441465  link] || [http://eligius.st link]
 
|-
 
|-
| [[P2Pool]] || Earth (P2P) || 300 || Solo Mining<ref>P2Pool supports merged mining but payouts in the merged chain are not pooled.</ref> || shared || 0%<ref>People are donating ''to'' P2Pool miners to encourage people to use it. The P2Pool author also accepts optional donations.</ref> || Proprietary<ref name="local">Miner-local getwork proxy available.</ref> || 2011-06-17 || Choosable || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=18313.0 1] || [https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/P2Pool Link]
+
| [[F2Pool]]         || {{flag|us|}}{{flag|eu|}}{{flag|cn|}}                || Large || LTC, NMC, SYS, EMC || PPS+                    || {{SharedFees}}    || 2.5%    ||   0%     || {{Yes}} || {{No}}
 +
| 2013-05-05 || Dynamic              || [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=700411.0 link] || [https://www.f2pool.com link]
 
|-
 
|-
| [[Triplemining]] || EU || 90 || No || kept by pool || 0% || [[getwork]], getmemorypool<ref name="local"/> || 2011-06-28 || 1 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=23664.0 1] || [http://tinyurl.com/triplemining Link]
+
| [[GHash.IO]]       || {{flag|nl|label=1}}|| Small || [[NMC]], IXC, [[Devcoin]]      || PPLNS                  || {{SharedFees}}  ||       ||     0% || {{Yes}} || {{No}}
 +
| 2013-07-01 ||          User<ref name="changeable"/> ||   [https://support.cex.io  link]                               || [https://ghash.io/ link]
 
|-
 
|-
| [[pool.mkalinin.ru]] || Russia || 70 || No || kept by pool || 0% || [[getwork]] || 2011-07-20 || 1 || [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=30703.0 1] || [http://pool.mkalinin.ru/ Link]
+
| [[Give Me COINS]]   || {{flag|us}}{{flag|eu}}          || Small || [[NMC]]  || PPLNS                  || {{SharedFees}}    ||    ||  0%|| {{Yes}} || {{Yes}}
 +
| 2013-08-12 || Dynamic        || [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=272017.0 link] || [http://give-me-coins.com link]
 
|-
 
|-
| [[alvarez.sfek.kz]] || Kazakhstan || 3 || No || kept by pool || 0% || [[getwork]] || 2012-04-19 || 1 || [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=80135.0 1] || [http://alvarez.sfek.kz/ Link]
+
| [[Golden Nonce Pool]]         || {{flag|us}}{{flag|eu}}|| Small || No     || DGM                || {{PoolFees}}    ||      ||      0% || {{Yes}} ||  
|}
+
| 2018-03-27 || Dynamic || [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3208073;all  link]   || [https://goldennoncepool.com link]
<references/>
 
 
 
==PPS Pools==
 
 
 
{| class="wikitable sortable"
 
 
|-
 
|-
! Name !! Location !! GH/s !! Merged Mining !! Transaction fees !! Reward Fee !! Protocol !! Launched !! Difficulty !! Forum !! Website
+
| [[Jonny Bravo's Mining Emporium]]        ||{{flag|us|}}{{flag|eu}} || Small || No      || PPLNS                  || {{SharedFees}}  ||      ||      0.5% || {{Yes}} || {{No}}
 +
| 2015-11-19 ||  Dynamic ||  [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1330452.0  link]                                || [http://www.bravo-mining.com  link]
 
|-
 
|-
| [[50BTC]] || Germany || 3200 || No || kept by pool ||3% || || [[getwork]] || 2011-11-11 || 1 || [http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=54673.0 1] || [http://50btc.com/ Link]
+
| [[KanoPool]]         || {{flag|us}}{{flag|sg}}{{flag|de}}{{flag|jp}}{{flag|nl}} || Medium || No     || PPLNSG                || {{SharedFees}}    ||     ||     0.9% || {{Yes}} || {{No}}
 +
| 2014-09-20 || User<ref name="changeable"/>/Dynamic 18SPM || [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=789369.0 link]   || [http://www.kano.is link]
 
|-
 
|-
| [[Bitclockers|BitClockers]] || USA/EU || 250 || [[NMC]] || kept by pool || 8% || [[getwork]] || 2011-05-27 || 1 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=10127.0 1] || [http://bitclockers.com/ Link]
+
| [[kmdPool.org]]       || {{flag|us|label=1}}||    Large || Komodo      || PPLNS                    || {{SharedFees}} || 1% ||     0% || {{Yes}} ||
 +
| 2017-11-25 || VarDiff                      ||                                            || [http://www.kmdPool.org/ link]
 
|-
 
|-
| [[Bitparking]] || USA || 130 || [[NMC]], I0C, IXC, [[Devcoin]] || kept by pool || 2.5% || [[getwork]] || 2012-01-08 || Choosable || [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=57148.0 1] || [http://mmpool.bitparking.com/pool Link]
+
| [[Merge Mining Pool]]     || {{flag|us|label=1}}|| Small || [[NMC]], IXC, [[Devcoin]]
 +
|                                                                    DGM                    || {{SharedFees}}    ||     || 1.5%   || {{Yes}}    || {{No}}
 +
| 2012-01-08 || User<ref name="changeable"/> || [http://bitcointalk.org/?topic=57148 link] || [http://mmpool.org link]
 
|-
 
|-
| [[btcmp.com]] || Germany || 60 || No || kept by pool || 4% || [[getwork]] || 2011-06-28 || 1 ||  || [http://www.btcmp.com/ Link]
+
| [[MergeMining]]         || Global          ||   Small || CRW, DVC, HUC, I0C, IXC, XMY/MYR, NMC, SYS, UNO, TRC, ARG, EMC || PPLNS  || {{SharedFees}}  ||     ||     1% || {{Yes}} || {{No}}
 +
| 2016-12-01|| User<ref name="changeable"/> ||  || [https://mergemining.com link]
 
|-
 
|-
| [[CoinLab Protected Pool]] || USA || ? || No || kept by pool || 2-5% || [[getwork]] || 2012-08-09 || 1 || [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=99643 1] ||[https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=99643 Link]
+
| [[Multipool]]         || {{flag|us}}{{flag|eu}}      ||  Small || [[NMC]] || Score                    || {{SharedFees}}    ||     ||     1.5% ||     {{Yes}}    || {{No}}
 +
| 2012-03-15 || User                      || [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=311067.0  link] || [https://www.multipool.us/ link]
 
|-
 
|-
| [[DeepBit|DeepBitPPS]] || Germany || 4200 || No || kept by pool || 10% || [[getwork]] || 2011-02-26 ||1 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=3889.0 1] || [http://deepbit.net/ Link]
+
| [[P2Pool]]         || Global (p2p)          ||  Small || Merged mining can be done on a "solo mining" basis <ref name="solomm"/> || PPLNS  || {{SharedFees}}  ||     ||     0% || {{Yes}} || {{No}}
 +
| 2011-06-17 || User<ref name="changeable"/> || [http://bitcointalk.org/?topic=18313  link] ||
 
|-
 
|-
| [[Eclipse Mining Consortium|Eclipse Mining Consortium PPS]] || USA/EU/AU/Asia || 1900 || [[NMC]] || kept by pool || 5% || [[getwork]], [[getblocktemplate]] || 2011-06-14 || Choosable/Dynamic || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=16385.0 1] || [https://eclipsemc.com Link]
 
 
|-
 
|-
| [[Horrible Horrendous TT]] || USA || 15 || No || kept by pool || 1% || [[getwork]] || 2012-08-29 || Choosable || [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=95378.0 1] || [http://hhtt.1209k.com/ Link]
+
| [[Poolin]]         || Global                ||   Medium ||[[NMC]] [[DOGE]] VCASH || FPPS  || {{SharedFees}}  ||      ||      4% || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}}
 +
| 2017-10-01 || Dynamic || [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5169994.0 link] || [https://poolin.com/ link]
 
|-
 
|-
| [[Mining Team Reddit (MtRed)]] || USA/EU || 650 || [[NMC]] || shared || 0% || [[getwork]] || 2011-05-25 || 1 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=15929.0 1] [http://reddit.com/r/mtred/ 2] || [http://www.mtred.com/ Link]
+
| [[Slush Pool]]
 +
|                       Global              || Medium || [[NMC]] || Score                  || {{SharedFees}}  ||      ||     2% || {{Yes}} || {{No}}
 +
| 2010-11-27 || User<ref name="changeable"/> || [http://bitcointalk.org/?topic=1976  link] || [https://slushpool.com/ link]
 
|-
 
|-
| [[NMCBit|NMCBitPPS]] || USA || 20 || [[NMC]] || kept by pool || 6.6% || [[getwork]] || 2011-08-01 || 1 || [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=33612.0 1] [http://dot-bit.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=268 2] || [http://www.nmcbit.com/ Link]
+
| [[ZenPool.org]]       || {{flag|us|label=1}}||   Large || ZenCash      || PPLNS                    || {{SharedFees}} || 1% ||     0% || {{Yes}} ||
 +
| 2017-10-25 || VarDiff                      ||                                             || [http://www.ZenPool.org/ link]
 
|-
 
|-
| [[Ozco.in|Ozco.in PPS]] || USA/EU/AUS || 750 || [[NMC]] || shared || 4% || [[getwork]] || 2011-06-07 || 1 || [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=14085.0 1] || [https://www.ozcoin.net Link]
 
 
|}
 
|}
<references/>
 
  
==Proportional Pools==
+
== SPV Mining / Old Bitcoin Core ==
 +
 
 +
The following pools are known or strongly suspected to be mining on top of blocks before fully validating them with Bitcoin Core 0.9.5 or later.  Miners doing this have already lost over $50,000 USD during the 4 July 2015 fork and have created a situation where small numbers of confirmations are much less useful than they normally are.
  
{| class="wikitable sortable"
+
* BTC Nuggets
|-
+
* [https://www.f2pool.com/ F2Pool]<ref name="spv_despite_incident">[https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=700411.msg11790734#msg11790734 Intention to continue SPV mining], Wang Chun, 4 July 2015</ref>
! Name !! Location !! GH/s !! Merged Mining !! Transaction fees !! Reward Fee !! Protocol !! Launched !! Difficulty !! Forum !! Website
+
* AntPool<ref name="spv_despite_incident" />
|-
+
 
| [[BitArena]] || EU || 1 || No || kept by pool || 0% || [[getblocktemplate]] || ? || 1 || [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=112243.0 1] ||[https://www.bitarena.net/ Link]
+
The following pools are believed to be currently fully validating blocks with Bitcoin Core 0.9.5 or later (0.10.2 or later recommended due to DoS vulnerabilities):
|-
+
 
| [[Bitcash.cz|Bitcash.cz]] || Czech Republic || 5 || No || kept by pool || 0% || [[getwork]] || 2012-09-14 || 1 || [http://bitcash.cz/forum/ 1] ||
+
* [[BitMinter]]
[http://bitcash.cz/pool/ Link]
+
* BTC China (described as SPV mining<ref name="spv_despite_incident" />, but they're performing effective valiation)
|-
+
* [[BTC Public Mining Pool]]
| [[Bitcoin_Pool|Bitcoin Mining Pool]] || USA || 70 || No || kept by pool || 0% || [[getwork]] || Unknown || 1 || [http://bitcoinpool.com/forum/ 1] || [http://www.bitcoinpool.com/ Link]
+
* [[CKPool]]
|-
+
* [[Eligius]]
| [[Bitcoins.lc]] || EU || 60 || No || kept by pool || 0% || [[getwork]] || 2011-05-27 || 1 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=10121.0 1] || [http://www.bitcoins.lc/ Link]
+
* [[Golden Nonce Pool]]
|-
+
* [[P2Pool]]
| [[DeepBit]] || Germany || 4200 || No || kept by pool || 3% || [[getwork]] || 2011-02-26 ||1 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=3889.0 1] || [http://deepbit.net/ Link]
+
* [[Bitcoin Pooled Mining|Slush Pool]]
|-
+
* [[BCMonster.com]]
| [[NMCBit]] || USA || 20 || [[NMC]] || kept by pool || 3% || [[getwork]] || 2011-08-01 || 1 || [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=33612.0 1] [http://dot-bit.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=268 2] || [http://www.nmcbit.com/ Link]
+
* [[Jonny Bravo's Mining Emporium]]
|}
+
 
<references/>
+
== References ==
 +
 
 +
<references>
  
==Score Based Pools==
+
<ref name="hashrate2">Note that pool hashrate is largely irrelevant but can be seen as a popularity measurement. It is a theoretical security issue if one pool gains above 50% of the total computational power of the network, thus consider joining a pool based on other metrics. The pool's total hash rate is very dynamic on most pools. Over time, as the network grows, so does most pool's hash rates. The displayed values are the pool's relative sizes based on the network: Small: less than 2%, Medium: 2%-10% Large: greater than 10% of the network.</ref>
  
{| class="wikitable sortable"
+
<ref name="merged">Merged mining allows miners to mine on multiple [[block chains]] at the same time with the same hashing.</ref>
|-
 
! Name !! Location !! GH/s !! Merged Mining !! Transaction fees !! Reward Fee !! Protocol !! Launched !! Difficulty !! Forum !! Website
 
|-
 
| [[Bitcoin_Pooled_Mining|Slush's pool (mining.bitcoin.cz)]] || EU/France || 1600 || [[NMC]] || kept by pool || 2% || [[getwork]], [http://mining.bitcoin.cz/stratum-mining stratum] || 2010-11-27 || Dynamic || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=1976.0 1] || [http://mining.bitcoin.cz/ Link]
 
|-
 
| [[BTCMine]] || UK || 65 || No || kept by pool || 0% || [[getwork]] || 2011-03-11 || 1 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=4251.0 1] || [http://www.btcmine.com/ Link]
 
|-
 
| [[BTCWarp]] || USA || 50 || No || kept by pool || 0% || [[getwork]] || ? || 1 || [http://www.bitcoinbalkan.com/forum 1] ||[http://www.btcwarp.com/ Link]
 
|}
 
<references/>
 
  
==See also==
+
<ref name="changeable">The difficulty of the shares can be changed by the user.</ref>
*[[Pooled mining]]
+
<ref name="solomm">Merged mining can be done on a "solo mining" basis (payouts in the merged chain are not pooled).</ref>
*[http://bcx.me/ Bitcoin Mining Pool Tracker]
+
</references>
*[http://blockorigin.pfoe.be/chart.php Hashrate distribution pie chart]
 
  
 +
== See also ==
 +
* [[Pooled mining]]
 +
* [https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/pools Pool Distribution Summary]
 +
* [https://www.bitcoinmining.com/ Bitcoin Mining]
 +
* [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GmOzih6I1zs Video: What is Bitcoin Mining]
 +
* [https://www.bitcoinmining.com/bitcoin-mining-pools/ Bitcoin Mining Pools]
 +
* [https://bitcoinchain.com/pools Bitcoin Mining Pools Comparison]
 
[[Category:Mining]]
 
[[Category:Mining]]
 +
{{Pools}}

Latest revision as of 04:43, 25 September 2019

Reward types & explanation:

  • CPPSRB - Capped Pay Per Share with Recent Backpay. [1]
  • DGM - Double Geometric Method. A hybrid between PPLNS and Geometric reward types that enables to operator to absorb some of the variance risk. Operator receives portion of payout on short rounds and returns it on longer rounds to normalize payments. [2]
  • ESMPPS - Equalized Shared Maximum Pay Per Share. Like SMPPS, but equalizes payments fairly among all those who are owed. [3]
  • POT - Pay On Target. A high variance PPS variant that pays on the difficulty of work returned to pool rather than the difficulty of work served by pool [4]
  • PPLNS - Pay Per Last N Shares. Similar to proportional, but instead of looking at the number of shares in the round, instead looks at the last N shares, regardless of round boundaries.
  • PPLNSG - Pay Per Last N Groups (or shifts). Similar to PPLNS, but shares are grouped into "shifts" which are paid as a whole.
  • PPS - Pay Per Share. Each submitted share is worth certain amount of BTC. Since finding a block requires <current difficulty> shares on average, a PPS method with 0% fee would be 12.5 BTC divided by <current difficulty>. It is risky for pool operators, hence the fee is highest.
  • Prop. - Proportional. When block is found, the reward is distributed among all workers proportionally to how much shares each of them has found.
  • RSMPPS - Recent Shared Maximum Pay Per Share. Like SMPPS, but system aims to prioritize the most recent miners first. [5]
  • Score - Score based system: a proportional reward, but weighed by time submitted. Each submitted share is worth more in the function of time t since start of current round. For each share score is updated by: score += exp(t/C). This makes later shares worth much more than earlier shares, thus the miner's score quickly diminishes when they stop mining on the pool. Rewards are calculated proportionally to scores (and not to shares). (at slush's pool C=300 seconds, and every hour scores are normalized)
  • SMPPS - Shared Maximum Pay Per Share. Like Pay Per Share, but never pays more than the pool earns. [6]
  • FPPS - Full Pay Per Share. Similar to PPS,but not only divide regular block reward (12.5 BTC for now) but also some of the transaction fees. Calculate a standard transaction fee within a certain period and distribute it to miners according to their hash power contributions in the pool. It will increase the miners' earnings by sharing some of the transaction fees.

A statistically valid analysis of some pools and their payout methods: Bitcoin network and pool analysis

Name Location Size[1] Merged Mining[2] Reward Type Transaction fees PPS Fee Other Fee Stm.png GBT Launched Variance Forum Website
AntPool China Large No PPLNS & PPS kept by pool 2.5% 0% Yes No  ?  ? link link
BCMonster.com United StatesEuropeChina Small No PPLNS shared 0.5% Yes No 2016-01-13 Dynamic link link
BitcoinAffiliateNetwork United StatesEuropeChinaNetherlandsAustralia  ? NMC, DOGE  ? kept by pool  ?  ? Yes 2014-07-15 User/Dynamic link link
BitMinter United StatesEurope Small NMC PPLNSG shared 1% Yes No 2011-06-26 User[3]/Dynamic link link
BTC.com ChinaUnited StatesEurope Medium NMC FPPS shared 0% 4% Yes No 2016-09-13 User link link
BTCC Pool China, Japan Large NMC PPS kept by pool 2.0% 0% Yes Yes 2014-10-21 Dynamic  ? link
BTCDig United States Small No DGM kept by pool 0% Yes 2013-07-04 User[3]/Dynamic 20SPM link link
btcmp.com Germany Small No PPS kept by pool 4% Yes 2011-06-28 Diff 1 link
btcZPool.com United States Large BitCoinZ PPLNS shared 1% 0% Yes 2017-06-25 VarDiff link
BW Mining China Medium  ? PPLNS & PPS  ?  ?  ? Yes  ?  ?  ? link
Eligius United States Small NMC CPPSRB shared 0% Yes Yes 2011-04-27 Dynamic: 32 shares/m link link
F2Pool United StatesEuropeChina Large LTC, NMC, SYS, EMC PPS+ shared 2.5% 0% Yes No 2013-05-05 Dynamic link link
GHash.IO Netherlands Small NMC, IXC, Devcoin PPLNS shared 0% Yes No 2013-07-01 User[3] link link
Give Me COINS United StatesEurope Small NMC PPLNS shared 0% Yes Yes 2013-08-12 Dynamic link link
Golden Nonce Pool United StatesEurope Small No DGM kept by pool 0% Yes 2018-03-27 Dynamic link link
Jonny Bravo's Mining Emporium United StatesEurope Small No PPLNS shared 0.5% Yes No 2015-11-19 Dynamic link link
KanoPool United StatesSingaporeGermanyJapanNetherlands Medium No PPLNSG shared 0.9% Yes No 2014-09-20 User[3]/Dynamic 18SPM link link
kmdPool.org United States Large Komodo PPLNS shared 1% 0% Yes 2017-11-25 VarDiff link
Merge Mining Pool United States Small NMC, IXC, Devcoin DGM shared 1.5% Yes No 2012-01-08 User[3] link link
MergeMining Global Small CRW, DVC, HUC, I0C, IXC, XMY/MYR, NMC, SYS, UNO, TRC, ARG, EMC PPLNS shared 1% Yes No 2016-12-01 User[3] link
Multipool United StatesEurope Small NMC Score shared 1.5% Yes No 2012-03-15 User link link
P2Pool Global (p2p) Small Merged mining can be done on a "solo mining" basis [4] PPLNS shared 0% Yes No 2011-06-17 User[3] link
Poolin Global Medium NMC DOGE VCASH FPPS shared 4% Yes Yes 2017-10-01 Dynamic link link
Slush Pool Global Medium NMC Score shared 2% Yes No 2010-11-27 User[3] link link
ZenPool.org United States Large ZenCash PPLNS shared 1% 0% Yes 2017-10-25 VarDiff link

SPV Mining / Old Bitcoin Core

The following pools are known or strongly suspected to be mining on top of blocks before fully validating them with Bitcoin Core 0.9.5 or later. Miners doing this have already lost over $50,000 USD during the 4 July 2015 fork and have created a situation where small numbers of confirmations are much less useful than they normally are.

The following pools are believed to be currently fully validating blocks with Bitcoin Core 0.9.5 or later (0.10.2 or later recommended due to DoS vulnerabilities):

References

  1. Note that pool hashrate is largely irrelevant but can be seen as a popularity measurement. It is a theoretical security issue if one pool gains above 50% of the total computational power of the network, thus consider joining a pool based on other metrics. The pool's total hash rate is very dynamic on most pools. Over time, as the network grows, so does most pool's hash rates. The displayed values are the pool's relative sizes based on the network: Small: less than 2%, Medium: 2%-10% Large: greater than 10% of the network.
  2. Merged mining allows miners to mine on multiple block chains at the same time with the same hashing.
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 The difficulty of the shares can be changed by the user.
  4. Merged mining can be done on a "solo mining" basis (payouts in the merged chain are not pooled).
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 Intention to continue SPV mining, Wang Chun, 4 July 2015

See also