Difference between revisions of "Category:Good pages"
(Created page with "To be "good," a page must be: *fully referenced *well written *broad, yet focused *fully neutral *static (that is, not changing constantly) *well illustrated *generally helpful") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
To be "good," a page must be: | To be "good," a page must be: | ||
| − | * | + | *well referenced or otherwise authentic |
| + | *relevant to Bitcoin | ||
*well written | *well written | ||
*broad, yet focused | *broad, yet focused | ||
| Line 7: | Line 8: | ||
*well illustrated | *well illustrated | ||
*generally helpful | *generally helpful | ||
| + | *either about a defunct company/service or not about one at all | ||
| + | *not a stub | ||
| + | *in the mainspace and not a redirect | ||
| + | |||
| + | To mark a page as good put <nowiki>{{good}}</nowiki> anywhere on it. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Don't mark a page as good when it clearly is not. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Don't mark a product, company, organization, service or program page as a good page (unless it is defunct). | ||
Revision as of 04:19, 18 August 2014
To be "good," a page must be:
- well referenced or otherwise authentic
- relevant to Bitcoin
- well written
- broad, yet focused
- fully neutral
- static (that is, not changing constantly)
- well illustrated
- generally helpful
- either about a defunct company/service or not about one at all
- not a stub
- in the mainspace and not a redirect
To mark a page as good put {{good}} anywhere on it.
Don't mark a page as good when it clearly is not.
Don't mark a product, company, organization, service or program page as a good page (unless it is defunct).
