Difference between revisions of "Category:Good pages"

From Bitcoin Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "To be "good," a page must be: *fully referenced *well written *broad, yet focused *fully neutral *static (that is, not changing constantly) *well illustrated *generally helpful")
 
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
To be "good," a page must be:
 
To be "good," a page must be:
*fully referenced
+
*well referenced or otherwise authentic
 +
*relevant to Bitcoin
 
*well written
 
*well written
 
*broad, yet focused
 
*broad, yet focused
 
*fully neutral
 
*fully neutral
 
*static (that is, not changing constantly)
 
*static (that is, not changing constantly)
*well illustrated
 
 
*generally helpful
 
*generally helpful
 +
*not a stub
 +
*in the mainspace and not a redirect
 +
 +
To mark a page as good put <nowiki>{{good}}</nowiki> anywhere on it.
 +
 +
'''Don't mark a page as good without discussion.'''

Latest revision as of 00:37, 10 November 2014

To be "good," a page must be:

  • well referenced or otherwise authentic
  • relevant to Bitcoin
  • well written
  • broad, yet focused
  • fully neutral
  • static (that is, not changing constantly)
  • generally helpful
  • not a stub
  • in the mainspace and not a redirect

To mark a page as good put {{good}} anywhere on it.

Don't mark a page as good without discussion.

Pages in category "Good pages"

The following 2 pages are in this category, out of 2 total.