<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=User%3AGenjix%2FGene-centred_evolution_is_wrong</id>
	<title>User:Genjix/Gene-centred evolution is wrong - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=User%3AGenjix%2FGene-centred_evolution_is_wrong"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=User:Genjix/Gene-centred_evolution_is_wrong&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-28T19:13:24Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.8</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=User:Genjix/Gene-centred_evolution_is_wrong&amp;diff=6430&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Genjix: Created page with &quot;Evolution is undisputed fact and singly states: organisms change over time. The dominant theory explaining this observed change is natural selection. An unfixed theory, revised a...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=User:Genjix/Gene-centred_evolution_is_wrong&amp;diff=6430&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2011-03-30T19:38:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;Evolution is undisputed fact and singly states: organisms change over time. The dominant theory explaining this observed change is natural selection. An unfixed theory, revised a...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;Evolution is undisputed fact and singly states: organisms change over time. The dominant theory explaining this observed change is natural selection. An unfixed theory, revised and tinkered since inception.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Darwin&amp;#039;s survival of the fittest, the first iteration, postulated nature to be a gigantic deadly embrace of individuals fatally competing for limited resources. Only the best survive; winners take all. But theory did not mesh with observation. Having the individual at the centre of natural selection explained the majority of developments in nature. But not all.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hymanopterian social structure was a chronic migraine for Darwin. Ants self assemble large organisations enterprising homely megastructures from dirt. Yet detrimentally to themselves, disobeying Darwin&amp;#039;s fundamental rule of self preservation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* the next usurping of established evolutionary thought occured with dawkin&amp;#039;s book, &amp;quot;the selfish gene&amp;quot;. dawkins argued that evolution did not happen on the individual, but the gene level.&lt;br /&gt;
* dawkins gene centred view   the selfish gene&lt;br /&gt;
* resolution o paradoxes&lt;br /&gt;
* social insects and relatedness&lt;br /&gt;
* sex. reciprocity- examples of groups warning of predators at -ev cost to themselves&lt;br /&gt;
* anecdotal contrary evidence. altruistic selflessness&lt;br /&gt;
* chimps adopting orphans. human self sacrifice jumping on grenade. hippo protect antel de croc.&lt;br /&gt;
* dawkins blames gene misfiring.&lt;br /&gt;
* multilevel hypothesis&lt;br /&gt;
* predicted by computer models and thought experiments&lt;br /&gt;
* elegantly explains development of social species without need of crutches like gene misfiring&lt;br /&gt;
* how sex developed (net loss for individual/gene but gain for group)&lt;br /&gt;
* fits early human model of wandering tribes&lt;br /&gt;
* current consensus of researchers.&lt;br /&gt;
* not everyone thinks nat sel is only driver.&lt;br /&gt;
* sex sel&lt;br /&gt;
* sym breaking in a gas. genetic drift&lt;br /&gt;
* sexual selection&lt;br /&gt;
* recursive vs linear equationns&lt;br /&gt;
* parameters. (chaos theory map)&lt;br /&gt;
* cellular automata.&lt;br /&gt;
* small initial changes =&amp;amp;gt; small changes in outcome&lt;br /&gt;
* pass critical boundary&lt;br /&gt;
* prop changes wildly larger disproportionate outcomes&lt;br /&gt;
* rice pile model. critical point like snow on hillside causing avalanche. forests in australia or thermal chem&lt;br /&gt;
* horse zebra stripes&lt;br /&gt;
* fitness landscape and fitness function. explains ability to pass area of lower fitness&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====other tb placed====&lt;br /&gt;
* phyletic gradualism (dawkins) vs punctuated evolution (gould)&lt;br /&gt;
* rk selection. pt extinction lystrosaurus&lt;br /&gt;
* cialdini reasons we act based on self image to be congruent. which he terms &amp;quot;consistency&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
* if u found single sole motivator for human behaviour u would win noble prize&lt;br /&gt;
* expl&lt;br /&gt;
* past att game theory in 20s we as selfish rational agents&lt;br /&gt;
* pris dilemme&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
genecentr. contradictions-&amp;gt; multilvel hypothesis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
natsel -&amp;gt; sexsel -&amp;gt; emergent phenomena -&amp;gt; cellular automata.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Genjix</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>