Template talk:Pools - Revision history

Newar at 17:39, 24 December 2014

2014-12-24T17:39:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:39, 24 December 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	What is considered "Major"? Looking at http://organofcorti.blogspot.com/ the current "categories" are pools over 20%, some around 10% and the big majority is below 5%. Why have that separation Major/Active to begin with? "Major" is not necessary a good thing in a decentralised network. If there is no objections, I would change it to Active/Defunct only. [[User:Newar\|Newar]] ([[User talk:Newar\|talk]]) 12:11, 1 November 2014 (UTC)		What is considered "Major"? Looking at http://organofcorti.blogspot.com/ the current "categories" are pools over 20%, some around 10% and the big majority is below 5%. Why have that separation Major/Active to begin with? "Major" is not necessary a good thing in a decentralised network. If there is no objections, I would change it to Active/Defunct only. [[User:Newar\|Newar]] ([[User talk:Newar\|talk]]) 12:11, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
	:Maybe we should consider grouping them by network share? Active/Defunct only would be okay. I have to think however that most users would prefer to join an established, powerful pool (which is not necessarily a good thing). [[User:Taras\|Taras]] ([[User talk:Taras\|talk]]) 01:54, 4 November 2014 (UTC)		:Maybe we should consider grouping them by network share? Active/Defunct only would be okay. I have to think however that most users would prefer to join an established, powerful pool (which is not necessarily a good thing). [[User:Taras\|Taras]] ([[User talk:Taras\|talk]]) 01:54, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
	::I agree on active/defunct being enough. We always can link to pages like http://blockorigin.pfoe.be/chart.php or organofcorti's blog, as the information on ~~the~~ the top pools changes quicker than this wiki is edited. [[User:Newar\|Newar]] ([[User talk:Newar\|talk]]) 17:37, 24 December 2014 (UTC)		::I agree on active/defunct being enough. We always can link to pages like http://blockorigin.pfoe.be/chart.php (outdated actually...) or organofcorti's blog, as the information on the top pools changes quicker than this wiki is edited. ^^ [[User:Newar\|Newar]] ([[User talk:Newar\|talk]]) 17:37, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Newar at 17:37, 24 December 2014

2014-12-24T17:37:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:37, 24 December 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	What is considered "Major"? Looking at http://organofcorti.blogspot.com/ the current "categories" are pools over 20%, some around 10% and the big majority is below 5%. Why have that separation Major/Active to begin with? "Major" is not necessary a good thing in a decentralised network. If there is no objections, I would change it to Active/Defunct only. [[User:Newar\|Newar]] ([[User talk:Newar\|talk]]) 12:11, 1 November 2014 (UTC)		What is considered "Major"? Looking at http://organofcorti.blogspot.com/ the current "categories" are pools over 20%, some around 10% and the big majority is below 5%. Why have that separation Major/Active to begin with? "Major" is not necessary a good thing in a decentralised network. If there is no objections, I would change it to Active/Defunct only. [[User:Newar\|Newar]] ([[User talk:Newar\|talk]]) 12:11, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
	:Maybe we should consider grouping them by network share? Active/Defunct only would be okay. I have to think however that most users would prefer to join an established, powerful pool (which is not necessarily a good thing). [[User:Taras\|Taras]] ([[User talk:Taras\|talk]]) 01:54, 4 November 2014 (UTC)		:Maybe we should consider grouping them by network share? Active/Defunct only would be okay. I have to think however that most users would prefer to join an established, powerful pool (which is not necessarily a good thing). [[User:Taras\|Taras]] ([[User talk:Taras\|talk]]) 01:54, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
			::I agree on active/defunct being enough. We always can link to pages like http://blockorigin.pfoe.be/chart.php or organofcorti's blog, as the information on the the top pools changes quicker than this wiki is edited. [[User:Newar\|Newar]] ([[User talk:Newar\|talk]]) 17:37, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Taras at 01:54, 4 November 2014

2014-11-04T01:54:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:54, 4 November 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	What is considered "Major"? Looking at http://organofcorti.blogspot.com/ the current "categories" are pools over 20%, some around 10% and the big majority is below 5%. Why have that separation Major/Active to begin with? "Major" is not necessary a good thing in a decentralised network. If there is no objections, I would change it to Active/Defunct only. [[User:Newar\|Newar]] ([[User talk:Newar\|talk]]) 12:11, 1 November 2014 (UTC)		What is considered "Major"? Looking at http://organofcorti.blogspot.com/ the current "categories" are pools over 20%, some around 10% and the big majority is below 5%. Why have that separation Major/Active to begin with? "Major" is not necessary a good thing in a decentralised network. If there is no objections, I would change it to Active/Defunct only. [[User:Newar\|Newar]] ([[User talk:Newar\|talk]]) 12:11, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
			:Maybe we should consider grouping them by network share? Active/Defunct only would be okay. I have to think however that most users would prefer to join an established, powerful pool (which is not necessarily a good thing). [[User:Taras\|Taras]] ([[User talk:Taras\|talk]]) 01:54, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Newar: Created page with "What is considered "Major"? Looking at http://organofcorti.blogspot.com/ the current "categories" are pools over 20%, some around 10% and the big majority is below 5%. Why hav..."

2014-11-01T12:11:04Z

Created page with "What is considered "Major"? Looking at http://organofcorti.blogspot.com/ the current "categories" are pools over 20%, some around 10% and the big majority is below 5%. Why hav..."

New page

What is considered "Major"? Looking at http://organofcorti.blogspot.com/ the current "categories" are pools over 20%, some around 10% and the big majority is below 5%. Why have that separation Major/Active to begin with? "Major" is not necessary a good thing in a decentralised network. If there is no objections, I would change it to Active/Defunct only. [[User:Newar|Newar]] ([[User talk:Newar|talk]]) 12:11, 1 November 2014 (UTC)