<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3AMining_hardware_comparison%2FArchives%2F2013</id>
	<title>Talk:Mining hardware comparison/Archives/2013 - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3AMining_hardware_comparison%2FArchives%2F2013"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Talk:Mining_hardware_comparison/Archives/2013&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-13T14:57:44Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.8</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Talk:Mining_hardware_comparison/Archives/2013&amp;diff=54680&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Taras: Created page with &quot;{{archive|Talk:Mining hardware comparison}}__TOC__ == ASIC section ==  I want the ASIC section in here. It&#039;s very interesting and informative, and we can put a note there, tha...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Talk:Mining_hardware_comparison/Archives/2013&amp;diff=54680&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2015-02-27T15:04:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;{{archive|Talk:Mining hardware comparison}}__TOC__ == ASIC section ==  I want the ASIC section in here. It&amp;#039;s very interesting and informative, and we can put a note there, tha...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;{{archive|Talk:Mining hardware comparison}}__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
== ASIC section ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I want the ASIC section in here. It&amp;#039;s very interesting and informative, and we can put a note there, that this is preliminary data. darsie&lt;br /&gt;
: @darsie, I don&amp;#039;t think it is a good idea to put ASIC data here, as the data itself is pretty much &amp;quot;vaporware&amp;quot;. I would prefer to have a separate page with expected ASIC data and on this page just a link to the expected data page. Things will change dramatically once *&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;real&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;* ASIC&amp;#039;s become available *&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;and&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;* someone was able to test it. To compare: we have also no information for &amp;quot;future&amp;quot; developments of graphic cards although their roadmaps and data is already available. [[User:Lowflyer|Lowflyer]] ([[User talk:Lowflyer|talk]]) 10:07, 2 January 2013 (GMT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== GenBTC&amp;#039;s Card Comparison Spreadsheet ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anyone else find this redundant/useless? --[[User:Luke-jr|Luke-jr]] ([[User talk:Luke-jr|talk]]) 04:30, 26 February 2013 (GMT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not so much as redundant, but horrifically misleading.  I have developed a spreadsheet that makes predictions of eventual profitability based on extrapolation of difficulty into the far distant future.  For example, if you&amp;#039;re planning to buy a mining rig that won&amp;#039;t get delivered for 6 months, you can get a reasonable prediction of the eventual payback on your investment based on the predicted evolution of difficulty.  Please update here and I&amp;#039;ll post it if there is interest.  This is not so much targeted at GPU miners as it is at ASIC mining hardware. [[User:TominTX|TominTX]] ([[User talk:TominTX|talk]]) 20:34, 1 September 2013 (GMT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Taras</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>