Talk:Bitcoin symbol - Revision history

Geremia: /* Bitcoin's ISO 4217 numeric code? */

2016-12-10T05:38:37Z

Bitcoin's ISO 4217 numeric code?

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:38, 10 December 2016
Line 21:		Line 21:
	== Bitcoin's ISO 4217 numeric code? ==		== Bitcoin's ISO 4217 numeric code? ==

	Bitcoin's proposed ISO 4217 alpha code is BTC or XTC, but does it have a proposed ISO 4217 numeric code?		Bitcoin's proposed ISO 4217 alpha code is BTC or XTC, but does it have a proposed ISO 4217 numeric code?--[[User:Geremia\|Geremia]] ([[User talk:Geremia\|talk]]) 05:38, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Geremia: /* Bitcoin's ISO 4217 numeric code? */ new section

2016-12-10T05:38:20Z

Bitcoin's ISO 4217 numeric code?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:38, 10 December 2016
Line 18:		Line 18:
	You can view the [[Units]] discussion		You can view the [[Units]] discussion
	What do you think?		What do you think?

			== Bitcoin's ISO 4217 numeric code? ==

			Bitcoin's proposed ISO 4217 alpha code is BTC or XTC, but does it have a proposed ISO 4217 numeric code?

Igarciaes: /* Unit and subunit symbols */

2014-10-28T19:47:05Z

Unit and subunit symbols

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:47, 28 October 2014
Line 16:		Line 16:
	== Unit and subunit symbols ==		== Unit and subunit symbols ==
	The proposal is to use existing unicode symbols. My preference is to use the unicode \u243 html Ƀ for bitcoin and the unicode \u289 html ʉ for microcoin where 1 bitcoin = 1,000,000.00 microcoins		The proposal is to use existing unicode symbols. My preference is to use the unicode \u243 html Ƀ for bitcoin and the unicode \u289 html ʉ for microcoin where 1 bitcoin = 1,000,000.00 microcoins
			You can view the [[Units]] discussion
	What do you think?		What do you think?

Igarciaes: /* Unit and subunit symbols */

2014-10-28T19:45:38Z

Unit and subunit symbols

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:45, 28 October 2014
Line 15:		Line 15:

	== Unit and subunit symbols ==		== Unit and subunit symbols ==
	The proposal is to use existing unicode symbols. My preference is to use the unicode \u243 html Ƀ for bitcoin and the unicode \u289 html ʉ for ~~microcoins~~ where 1 bitcoin = 1,000,000.00 microcoins		The proposal is to use existing unicode symbols. My preference is to use the unicode \u243 html Ƀ for bitcoin and the unicode \u289 html ʉ for microcoin where 1 bitcoin = 1,000,000.00 microcoins
	What do you think?		What do you think?

Igarciaes at 19:45, 28 October 2014

2014-10-28T19:45:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:45, 28 October 2014
Line 13:		Line 13:
	* I object because B⃦ is already more or less universally accepted (Bitcoin.org, Bitbills.com, Bitcoin Charts/Watch/OTC, etc) as the standard BTC symbol. Unicode isn't going to accept any new symbol for a niche currency, so anything new would be relegated to the PUA anyway. Let's stick to what works. In fact, even if Bitcoin were to get enough non-niche use, both "submissions" currently listed are basically just font variants of B⃦. --[[User:Luke-jr\|Luke-jr]] 17:01, 21 July 2011 (GMT)		* I object because B⃦ is already more or less universally accepted (Bitcoin.org, Bitbills.com, Bitcoin Charts/Watch/OTC, etc) as the standard BTC symbol. Unicode isn't going to accept any new symbol for a niche currency, so anything new would be relegated to the PUA anyway. Let's stick to what works. In fact, even if Bitcoin were to get enough non-niche use, both "submissions" currently listed are basically just font variants of B⃦. --[[User:Luke-jr\|Luke-jr]] 17:01, 21 July 2011 (GMT)
	* I think it would be a good idea to get our own symbol, but as B⃦ is already fairly universally accepted, it isn't a huge priority. I think the Existing Unicode symbol section should stay. I don't think though we should discard the two submissions based on them being stylized B⃦'s. I think they are sufficiently different from B⃦ for our purposes. [[User:Zellfaze\|Zellfaze]] 15:37, 11 April 2012 (GMT)		* I think it would be a good idea to get our own symbol, but as B⃦ is already fairly universally accepted, it isn't a huge priority. I think the Existing Unicode symbol section should stay. I don't think though we should discard the two submissions based on them being stylized B⃦'s. I think they are sufficiently different from B⃦ for our purposes. [[User:Zellfaze\|Zellfaze]] 15:37, 11 April 2012 (GMT)

			== Unit and subunit symbols ==
			The proposal is to use existing unicode symbols. My preference is to use the unicode \u243 html Ƀ for bitcoin and the unicode \u289 html ʉ for microcoins where 1 bitcoin = 1,000,000.00 microcoins
			What do you think?

Taras: Unsigned comment

2014-08-15T00:22:38Z

Unsigned comment

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:22, 15 August 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== ϭ has relation to bitcoin ==		== ϭ has relation to bitcoin ==

	<font style="font-size:1.5em;">ϭ</font> actually does have a visible relation to bitcoin, seeing as it is the lower-case russian B. :)		<font style="font-size:1.5em;">ϭ</font> actually does have a visible relation to bitcoin, seeing as it is the lower-case russian B. :) {{unsigned\|Nanotube\|06:15, 2 January 2011}}

	== Pros and cons as different collums? ==		== Pros and cons as different collums? ==

Zellfaze: Added my 0.1B⃦

2012-04-11T15:37:53Z

Added my 0.1B⃦

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:37, 11 April 2012
Line 12:		Line 12:

	* I object because B⃦ is already more or less universally accepted (Bitcoin.org, Bitbills.com, Bitcoin Charts/Watch/OTC, etc) as the standard BTC symbol. Unicode isn't going to accept any new symbol for a niche currency, so anything new would be relegated to the PUA anyway. Let's stick to what works. In fact, even if Bitcoin were to get enough non-niche use, both "submissions" currently listed are basically just font variants of B⃦. --[[User:Luke-jr\|Luke-jr]] 17:01, 21 July 2011 (GMT)		* I object because B⃦ is already more or less universally accepted (Bitcoin.org, Bitbills.com, Bitcoin Charts/Watch/OTC, etc) as the standard BTC symbol. Unicode isn't going to accept any new symbol for a niche currency, so anything new would be relegated to the PUA anyway. Let's stick to what works. In fact, even if Bitcoin were to get enough non-niche use, both "submissions" currently listed are basically just font variants of B⃦. --[[User:Luke-jr\|Luke-jr]] 17:01, 21 July 2011 (GMT)
			* I think it would be a good idea to get our own symbol, but as B⃦ is already fairly universally accepted, it isn't a huge priority. I think the Existing Unicode symbol section should stay. I don't think though we should discard the two submissions based on them being stylized B⃦'s. I think they are sufficiently different from B⃦ for our purposes. [[User:Zellfaze\|Zellfaze]] 15:37, 11 April 2012 (GMT)

Luke-jr: /* Removal of section called Existing Unicode symbol */

2011-07-21T17:04:59Z

Removal of section called Existing Unicode symbol

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:04, 21 July 2011
Line 11:		Line 11:
	Unless good reason are given, I would like to delete the section called "Existing Unicode symbol" [[User:Pander\|Pander]] 12:04, 21 July 2011 (GMT)		Unless good reason are given, I would like to delete the section called "Existing Unicode symbol" [[User:Pander\|Pander]] 12:04, 21 July 2011 (GMT)

	* I object because B⃦ is already more or less universally accepted (Bitcoin.org, Bitbills.com, Bitcoin Charts/Watch/OTC, etc) as the standard BTC symbol. Unicode isn't going to accept any new symbol for a niche currency, so anything new would be relegated to the PUA anyway. Let's stick to what works. --[[User:Luke-jr\|Luke-jr]] 17:01, 21 July 2011 (GMT)		* I object because B⃦ is already more or less universally accepted (Bitcoin.org, Bitbills.com, Bitcoin Charts/Watch/OTC, etc) as the standard BTC symbol. Unicode isn't going to accept any new symbol for a niche currency, so anything new would be relegated to the PUA anyway. Let's stick to what works. In fact, even if Bitcoin were to get enough non-niche use, both "submissions" currently listed are basically just font variants of B⃦. --[[User:Luke-jr\|Luke-jr]] 17:01, 21 July 2011 (GMT)

Luke-jr: /* Removal of section called Existing Unicode symbol */

2011-07-21T17:03:27Z

Removal of section called Existing Unicode symbol

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:03, 21 July 2011
Line 11:		Line 11:
	Unless good reason are given, I would like to delete the section called "Existing Unicode symbol" [[User:Pander\|Pander]] 12:04, 21 July 2011 (GMT)		Unless good reason are given, I would like to delete the section called "Existing Unicode symbol" [[User:Pander\|Pander]] 12:04, 21 July 2011 (GMT)

	* I object because B⃦ is already more or less universally accepted as the standard BTC symbol. Unicode isn't going to accept any new symbol for a niche currency, so anything new would be relegated to the PUA anyway. Let's stick to what works. --[[User:Luke-jr\|Luke-jr]] 17:01, 21 July 2011 (GMT)		* I object because B⃦ is already more or less universally accepted (Bitcoin.org, Bitbills.com, Bitcoin Charts/Watch/OTC, etc) as the standard BTC symbol. Unicode isn't going to accept any new symbol for a niche currency, so anything new would be relegated to the PUA anyway. Let's stick to what works. --[[User:Luke-jr\|Luke-jr]] 17:01, 21 July 2011 (GMT)

Luke-jr: /* Removal of section called Existing Unicode symbol */

2011-07-21T17:01:18Z

Removal of section called Existing Unicode symbol

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:01, 21 July 2011
Line 10:		Line 10:

	Unless good reason are given, I would like to delete the section called "Existing Unicode symbol" [[User:Pander\|Pander]] 12:04, 21 July 2011 (GMT)		Unless good reason are given, I would like to delete the section called "Existing Unicode symbol" [[User:Pander\|Pander]] 12:04, 21 July 2011 (GMT)

			* I object because B⃦ is already more or less universally accepted as the standard BTC symbol. Unicode isn't going to accept any new symbol for a niche currency, so anything new would be relegated to the PUA anyway. Let's stick to what works. --[[User:Luke-jr\|Luke-jr]] 17:01, 21 July 2011 (GMT)