Talk:Bitcoin Firsts - Revision history

Taras: Unsigned comments

2014-08-15T00:18:00Z

Unsigned comments

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:18, 15 August 2014
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Like maybe going to v0.6 release is enough to make it into the History, but not something that would go into firsts.		Like maybe going to v0.6 release is enough to make it into the History, but not something that would go into firsts.
	At the same time, the first food truck to start using bitcoin might be something suitable for the Firsts page but would be extraneous in the Bitcoin History page.		At the same time, the first food truck to start using bitcoin might be something suitable for the Firsts page but would be extraneous in the Bitcoin History page. {{unsigned\|Sgornick\|08:31, 30 March 2012}}

	== Adult entertainers video ==		== Adult entertainers video ==

	Video has been removed from Youtube due to TOS violation. I change the link to the original subreddit where it all began and entertainers in general started accepting Bitcoin.		Video has been removed from Youtube due to TOS violation. I change the link to the original subreddit where it all began and entertainers in general started accepting Bitcoin. {{unsigned\|JulianTosh\|20:05, 5 April 2012‎}}

	== Many, if not most things missing ==		== Many, if not most things missing ==

Aceat64 at 07:04, 15 April 2013

2013-04-15T07:04:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:04, 15 April 2013
Line 36:		Line 36:
	Some "Firsts" are actually no "Firsts". I suggest to reword all to "First …" and remove those that fail to fit into this. "First trading day of blablabla exchange" is not a Bitcoin first for example. If the exchange is the most relevant one, there is definitely room for some "first exchange to trad $XXX in one day/week/month".		Some "Firsts" are actually no "Firsts". I suggest to reword all to "First …" and remove those that fail to fit into this. "First trading day of blablabla exchange" is not a Bitcoin first for example. If the exchange is the most relevant one, there is definitely room for some "first exchange to trad $XXX in one day/week/month".
	--[[User:Giszmo\|Giszmo]] ([[User talk:Giszmo\|talk]]) 05:27, 16 November 2012 (GMT)		--[[User:Giszmo\|Giszmo]] ([[User talk:Giszmo\|talk]]) 05:27, 16 November 2012 (GMT)

			== First firearm for sale? ==
			Yes, this is my own forum post, but I think it may be the [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=492.msg4421 first firearm (legally) offered for sale via bitcoin].
			--[[User:Aceat64\|Aceat64]] ([[User talk:Aceat64\|talk]]) 07:04, 15 April 2013 (GMT)

Giszmo: /* Format */ new section

2012-11-16T05:27:54Z

Format: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:27, 16 November 2012
Line 31:		Line 31:
	<references />		<references />
	--[[User:Giszmo\|Giszmo]] ([[User talk:Giszmo\|talk]]) 15:16, 27 August 2012 (GMT)		--[[User:Giszmo\|Giszmo]] ([[User talk:Giszmo\|talk]]) 15:16, 27 August 2012 (GMT)

			== Format ==

			Some "Firsts" are actually no "Firsts". I suggest to reword all to "First …" and remove those that fail to fit into this. "First trading day of blablabla exchange" is not a Bitcoin first for example. If the exchange is the most relevant one, there is definitely room for some "first exchange to trad $XXX in one day/week/month".
			--[[User:Giszmo\|Giszmo]] ([[User talk:Giszmo\|talk]]) 05:27, 16 November 2012 (GMT)

Giszmo: Suggested to add many more things. Please discuss.

2012-08-27T15:16:48Z

Suggested to add many more things. Please discuss.

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:16, 27 August 2012
Line 9:		Line 9:

	Video has been removed from Youtube due to TOS violation. I change the link to the original subreddit where it all began and entertainers in general started accepting Bitcoin.		Video has been removed from Youtube due to TOS violation. I change the link to the original subreddit where it all began and entertainers in general started accepting Bitcoin.

			== Many, if not most things missing ==
			Many ideas and actions deserve being mentioned and the first to do it deserves to be mentioned here I think. There would be room for mentioning others as super tiny references like <ref>alternative 1</ref><ref>alternative 2</ref><ref>alternative 3</ref>. 5 minutes of brain storming:
			* first implementation of an exchange (otc?)
			* first floating exchange (MtGox?)
			* first free bitcoins site (faucet?)
			* first facebook wallet
			* first margin trading
			* first betting site
			* first auction site
			* first firstbits site
			* first live monitor of an exchange
			* first day with more than x transactions
			* first day with trade volume > x USD
			* first mobile wallet
			* first iPhone/android/blackberry/... wallet
			* first hosted wallet
			* first hosted wallet without registration (instawallet?)
			* first brain wallet site
			* …
			<references />
			--[[User:Giszmo\|Giszmo]] ([[User talk:Giszmo\|talk]]) 15:16, 27 August 2012 (GMT)

JulianTosh: /* Adult entertainers video */ new section

2012-04-05T20:05:03Z

Adult entertainers video: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:05, 5 April 2012
Line 5:		Line 5:
	Like maybe going to v0.6 release is enough to make it into the History, but not something that would go into firsts.		Like maybe going to v0.6 release is enough to make it into the History, but not something that would go into firsts.
	At the same time, the first food truck to start using bitcoin might be something suitable for the Firsts page but would be extraneous in the Bitcoin History page.		At the same time, the first food truck to start using bitcoin might be something suitable for the Firsts page but would be extraneous in the Bitcoin History page.

			== Adult entertainers video ==

			Video has been removed from Youtube due to TOS violation. I change the link to the original subreddit where it all began and entertainers in general started accepting Bitcoin.

Sgornick: Fix formatting.

2012-03-30T08:31:54Z

Fix formatting.

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:31, 30 March 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~[quote author=nanotube link=topic=74552.msg826799#msg826799 date=1333075584]~~		Any reason the 'bitcoin first' page is separate from the older History page?
	~~sgornick: any~~ reason the 'bitcoin first' page is separate from the older History page?
	~~[/quote]~~

	Ya, probably so that the History page was more specific to bitcoin, but firsts was for trivia and only true firsts.		Ya, probably so that the History page was more specific to bitcoin, but firsts was for trivia and only true firsts.

Sgornick: Add mention as to why fits here versus History.

2012-03-30T08:31:19Z

Add mention as to why fits here versus History.

New page

[quote author=nanotube link=topic=74552.msg826799#msg826799 date=1333075584]
sgornick: any reason the 'bitcoin first' page is separate from the older History page?
[/quote]

Ya, probably so that the History page was more specific to bitcoin, but firsts was for trivia and only true firsts.

Like maybe going to v0.6 release is enough to make it into the History, but not something that would go into firsts.
At the same time, the first food truck to start using bitcoin might be something suitable for the Firsts page but would be extraneous in the Bitcoin History page.