CryptoNote - Revision history

Luke-jr: Altcoins are off-topic, no need to list them

2014-12-24T21:37:30Z

Altcoins are off-topic, no need to list them

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:37, 24 December 2014
Line 44:		Line 44:
	Little is known about CryptoNote's origins. The official website uses supposedly fake names for the team members, while the white paper's author is Nicolas van Saberhagen, which is also likely to be a pseudonym. The white paper "CryptoNote v 2.0" is dated back to October 2013.<ref>https://cryptonote.org/whitepaper.pdf</ref> There are claims that this date isn't correct: bitcointalk.org user rethink-your-strategy discovered copies of CryptoNote whitepapers with XPM properties set to 2014 on cryptonote.org site<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=740112.0</ref> while nearly same documents with 2013 and 2012 years in XPM properties were available on bytecoin.org site.<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=740112.msg8409063#msg8409063</ref>		Little is known about CryptoNote's origins. The official website uses supposedly fake names for the team members, while the white paper's author is Nicolas van Saberhagen, which is also likely to be a pseudonym. The white paper "CryptoNote v 2.0" is dated back to October 2013.<ref>https://cryptonote.org/whitepaper.pdf</ref> There are claims that this date isn't correct: bitcointalk.org user rethink-your-strategy discovered copies of CryptoNote whitepapers with XPM properties set to 2014 on cryptonote.org site<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=740112.0</ref> while nearly same documents with 2013 and 2012 years in XPM properties were available on bytecoin.org site.<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=740112.msg8409063#msg8409063</ref>

	It was also mentioned that the team developing CryptoNote had experienced a schism and went separate ways~~: Bytecoin, DarkNote, Monero and Boolberry seems to be lead by different developers~~.		It was also mentioned that the team developing CryptoNote had experienced a schism and went separate ways.

	== Philosophy ==		== Philosophy ==

Nordo: /* Smooth emission */ + alternative emission logic in CryptoNote forks

2014-12-24T17:46:56Z

Smooth emission: + alternative emission logic in CryptoNote forks

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:46, 24 December 2014
Line 27:		Line 27:
	BaseReward = (MSupply - A) >> 18		BaseReward = (MSupply - A) >> 18
	MSupply = 2^64 - 1 (atomic units)		MSupply = 2^64 - 1 (atomic units)

			CryptoNote forks DarkNote and MonetaVerde implement alternative emission logic: in DarkNote emission halves each month and in MonetaVerde block reward increases with difficulty.

	=== Egalitarian proof of work ===		=== Egalitarian proof of work ===

Nordo: /* Origins */

2014-12-24T17:33:34Z

Origins

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:33, 24 December 2014
Line 40:		Line 40:
	The first version of CN – CryptoNote v.1 (December 12 2012) was published in Tor http://ol346fucnsjru223.onion/whitepaper.pdf		The first version of CN – CryptoNote v.1 (December 12 2012) was published in Tor http://ol346fucnsjru223.onion/whitepaper.pdf

	Little is known about CryptoNote's origins. The official website uses supposedly fake names for the team members, while the white paper's author is Nicolas van Saberhagen, which is also likely to be a pseudonym. The white paper "CryptoNote v 2.0" is dated back to October 2013.<ref>https://cryptonote.org/whitepaper.pdf</ref> There are claims that this date isn't correct: bitcointalk.org user rethink-your-strategy discovered copies of CryptoNote whitepapers with XPM properties set to 2014 on cryptonote.org site<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=740112.0</ref> while nearly same documents with 2013 and 2012 years in XPM properties were available on bytecoin.org site.<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=740112.msg8409063#msg8409063</ref> It was also mentioned that the team developing CryptoNote had experienced a schism and went separate ways: Bytecoin, DarkNote, Monero and Boolberry seems to be lead by different developers.		Little is known about CryptoNote's origins. The official website uses supposedly fake names for the team members, while the white paper's author is Nicolas van Saberhagen, which is also likely to be a pseudonym. The white paper "CryptoNote v 2.0" is dated back to October 2013.<ref>https://cryptonote.org/whitepaper.pdf</ref> There are claims that this date isn't correct: bitcointalk.org user rethink-your-strategy discovered copies of CryptoNote whitepapers with XPM properties set to 2014 on cryptonote.org site<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=740112.0</ref> while nearly same documents with 2013 and 2012 years in XPM properties were available on bytecoin.org site.<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=740112.msg8409063#msg8409063</ref>

			It was also mentioned that the team developing CryptoNote had experienced a schism and went separate ways: Bytecoin, DarkNote, Monero and Boolberry seems to be lead by different developers.

	== Philosophy ==		== Philosophy ==

Nordo: /* Origins */ rewrite

2014-12-24T17:28:14Z

Origins: rewrite

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:28, 24 December 2014
Line 40:		Line 40:
	The first version of CN – CryptoNote v.1 (December 12 2012) was published in Tor http://ol346fucnsjru223.onion/whitepaper.pdf		The first version of CN – CryptoNote v.1 (December 12 2012) was published in Tor http://ol346fucnsjru223.onion/whitepaper.pdf

	Little is known about CryptoNote's origins. The official website uses supposedly fake names for the team members, while the white paper's author is Nicolas van Saberhagen, which is also likely to be a pseudonym. The white paper "CryptoNote v 2.0" is dated back to October 2013<ref>https://cryptonote.org/whitepaper.pdf</ref>~~, [~~https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=740112.0 ~~but this date appears to have been faked]~~.		Little is known about CryptoNote's origins. The official website uses supposedly fake names for the team members, while the white paper's author is Nicolas van Saberhagen, which is also likely to be a pseudonym. The white paper "CryptoNote v 2.0" is dated back to October 2013.<ref>https://cryptonote.org/whitepaper.pdf</ref> There are claims that this date isn't correct: bitcointalk.org user rethink-your-strategy discovered copies of CryptoNote whitepapers with XPM properties set to 2014 on cryptonote.org site<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=740112.0</ref> while nearly same documents with 2013 and 2012 years in XPM properties were available on bytecoin.org site.<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=740112.msg8409063#msg8409063</ref> It was also mentioned that the team developing CryptoNote had experienced a schism and went separate ways: Bytecoin, DarkNote, Monero and Boolberry seems to be lead by different developers.
	It was also mentioned that the team developing CryptoNote had experienced a schism and went separate ways.

	== Philosophy ==		== Philosophy ==

Luke-jr: restore schism note (dead links don't mean content should be removed)

2014-09-25T02:30:20Z

restore schism note (dead links don't mean content should be removed)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:30, 25 September 2014
Line 40:		Line 40:
	The first version of CN – CryptoNote v.1 (December 12 2012) was published in Tor http://ol346fucnsjru223.onion/whitepaper.pdf		The first version of CN – CryptoNote v.1 (December 12 2012) was published in Tor http://ol346fucnsjru223.onion/whitepaper.pdf

	Little is known about CryptoNote's origins. The official website uses supposedly fake names for the team members, while the white paper's author is Nicolas van Saberhagen, which is also likely to be a pseudonym. The white paper "CryptoNote v 2.0" is dated back to October 2013<ref>https://cryptonote.org/whitepaper.pdf</ref>, [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=740112.0 but ~~some believe~~ this date to have been faked]..		Little is known about CryptoNote's origins. The official website uses supposedly fake names for the team members, while the white paper's author is Nicolas van Saberhagen, which is also likely to be a pseudonym. The white paper "CryptoNote v 2.0" is dated back to October 2013<ref>https://cryptonote.org/whitepaper.pdf</ref>, [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=740112.0 but this date appears to have been faked].
			It was also mentioned that the team developing CryptoNote had experienced a schism and went separate ways.

	== Philosophy ==		== Philosophy ==

Luke-jr: Improve accuracy, don't just remove information

2014-09-25T02:28:15Z

Improve accuracy, don't just remove information

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:28, 25 September 2014
Line 40:		Line 40:
	The first version of CN – CryptoNote v.1 (December 12 2012) was published in Tor http://ol346fucnsjru223.onion/whitepaper.pdf		The first version of CN – CryptoNote v.1 (December 12 2012) was published in Tor http://ol346fucnsjru223.onion/whitepaper.pdf

	Little is known about CryptoNote's origins. The official website uses supposedly fake names for the team members, while the white paper's author is Nicolas van Saberhagen, which is also likely to be a pseudonym. The white paper "CryptoNote v 2.0" is dated back to October 2013<ref>https://cryptonote.org/whitepaper.pdf</ref>.		Little is known about CryptoNote's origins. The official website uses supposedly fake names for the team members, while the white paper's author is Nicolas van Saberhagen, which is also likely to be a pseudonym. The white paper "CryptoNote v 2.0" is dated back to October 2013<ref>https://cryptonote.org/whitepaper.pdf</ref>, [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=740112.0 but some believe this date to have been faked]..

	== Philosophy ==		== Philosophy ==

Volka: The situation is ambiguous and it seems like an individual's point of view. Here are the links that justify the changes made in the article: http://goo.gl/rlGijz, http://goo.gl/8jVfkF, http://goo.gl/byy7Hw

2014-09-24T14:47:06Z

The situation is ambiguous and it seems like an individual's point of view. Here are the links that justify the changes made in the article: http://goo.gl/rlGijz, http://goo.gl/8jVfkF, http://goo.gl/byy7Hw

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:47, 24 September 2014
Line 40:		Line 40:
	The first version of CN – CryptoNote v.1 (December 12 2012) was published in Tor http://ol346fucnsjru223.onion/whitepaper.pdf		The first version of CN – CryptoNote v.1 (December 12 2012) was published in Tor http://ol346fucnsjru223.onion/whitepaper.pdf

	Little is known about CryptoNote's origins. The official website uses supposedly fake names for the team members, while the white paper's author is Nicolas van Saberhagen, which is also likely to be a pseudonym. The white paper "CryptoNote v 2.0" is dated back to October 2013<ref>https://cryptonote.org/whitepaper.pdf</ref>~~, [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=740112.0 but this date appears to have been faked]~~.		Little is known about CryptoNote's origins. The official website uses supposedly fake names for the team members, while the white paper's author is Nicolas van Saberhagen, which is also likely to be a pseudonym. The white paper "CryptoNote v 2.0" is dated back to October 2013<ref>https://cryptonote.org/whitepaper.pdf</ref>.

	== Philosophy ==		== Philosophy ==

Volka: Link doesn't work, you get an error.

2014-09-24T14:09:14Z

Link doesn't work, you get an error.

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:09, 24 September 2014
Line 40:		Line 40:
	The first version of CN – CryptoNote v.1 (December 12 2012) was published in Tor http://ol346fucnsjru223.onion/whitepaper.pdf		The first version of CN – CryptoNote v.1 (December 12 2012) was published in Tor http://ol346fucnsjru223.onion/whitepaper.pdf

	Little is known about CryptoNote's origins. The official website uses supposedly fake names for the team members, while the white paper's author is Nicolas van Saberhagen, which is also likely to be a pseudonym. The white paper "CryptoNote v 2.0" is dated back to October 2013<ref>https://cryptonote.org/whitepaper.pdf</ref>, [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=740112.0 but this date appears to have been faked]~~. It was also mentioned that the team developing CryptoNote had experience a schism and went separate ways<ref>https://forum.cryptonote.org/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=21#p73</ref>~~.		Little is known about CryptoNote's origins. The official website uses supposedly fake names for the team members, while the white paper's author is Nicolas van Saberhagen, which is also likely to be a pseudonym. The white paper "CryptoNote v 2.0" is dated back to October 2013<ref>https://cryptonote.org/whitepaper.pdf</ref>, [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=740112.0 but this date appears to have been faked].

	== Philosophy ==		== Philosophy ==

Luke-jr: Reverted edits by Volka (talk) to last revision by Lunokhod

2014-09-24T02:16:12Z

Reverted edits by Volka (talk) to last revision by Lunokhod

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:16, 24 September 2014
Line 40:		Line 40:
	The first version of CN – CryptoNote v.1 (December 12 2012) was published in Tor http://ol346fucnsjru223.onion/whitepaper.pdf		The first version of CN – CryptoNote v.1 (December 12 2012) was published in Tor http://ol346fucnsjru223.onion/whitepaper.pdf

	Little is known about CryptoNote's origins. The official website uses supposedly fake names for the team members, while the white paper's author is Nicolas van Saberhagen, which is also likely to be a pseudonym. The white paper "CryptoNote v 2.0" is dated back to October 2013<ref>https://cryptonote.org/whitepaper.pdf</ref>.		Little is known about CryptoNote's origins. The official website uses supposedly fake names for the team members, while the white paper's author is Nicolas van Saberhagen, which is also likely to be a pseudonym. The white paper "CryptoNote v 2.0" is dated back to October 2013<ref>https://cryptonote.org/whitepaper.pdf</ref>, [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=740112.0 but this date appears to have been faked]. It was also mentioned that the team developing CryptoNote had experience a schism and went separate ways<ref>https://forum.cryptonote.org/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=21#p73</ref>.

	== Philosophy ==		== Philosophy ==

Volka at 17:53, 23 September 2014

2014-09-23T17:53:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:53, 23 September 2014
Line 40:		Line 40:
	The first version of CN – CryptoNote v.1 (December 12 2012) was published in Tor http://ol346fucnsjru223.onion/whitepaper.pdf		The first version of CN – CryptoNote v.1 (December 12 2012) was published in Tor http://ol346fucnsjru223.onion/whitepaper.pdf

	Little is known about CryptoNote's origins. The official website uses supposedly fake names for the team members, while the white paper's author is Nicolas van Saberhagen, which is also likely to be a pseudonym. The white paper "CryptoNote v 2.0" is dated back to October 2013<ref>https://cryptonote.org/whitepaper.pdf</ref>, [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=740112.0 but this date appears to have been faked]. It was also mentioned that the team developing CryptoNote had experience a schism and went separate ways<ref>https://forum.cryptonote.org/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=21#p73</ref>.		Little is known about CryptoNote's origins. The official website uses supposedly fake names for the team members, while the white paper's author is Nicolas van Saberhagen, which is also likely to be a pseudonym. The white paper "CryptoNote v 2.0" is dated back to October 2013<ref>https://cryptonote.org/whitepaper.pdf</ref>.

	== Philosophy ==		== Philosophy ==