Bitcoin XT - Revision history

Ysangkok: /* Bitcoin Cash support */ fix ref

2020-06-30T20:48:50Z

Bitcoin Cash support: fix ref

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:48, 30 June 2020
Line 35:		Line 35:
	==Bitcoin Cash support==		==Bitcoin Cash support==

	On August 25, 2017, Bitcoin XT published ''Release G'', which was a Bitcoin Cash client by default.<ref ~~name~~="releases"/> Subsequently, ''Release H'' was published, which supported the November 2017 Bitcoin Cash protocol upgrade, followed by ''Release I'', which supported the May 2018 Bitcoin Cash protocol upgrade.		On August 25, 2017, Bitcoin XT published ''Release G'', which was a Bitcoin Cash client by default.<ref>{{cite web\|url=https://github.com/bitcoinxt/bitcoinxt/releases\|title=Bitcoin XT Releases\|accessdate=17 June 2018}}</ref> Subsequently, ''Release H'' was published, which supported the November 2017 Bitcoin Cash protocol upgrade, followed by ''Release I'', which supported the May 2018 Bitcoin Cash protocol upgrade.

	==See Also==		==See Also==

Ysangkok: add more sections from deleted wikipedia article

2020-06-30T20:48:20Z

add more sections from deleted wikipedia article

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 |author=[[Gavin Andresen]]<br/>[[Mike Hearn]]
 |website=[https://bitcoinxt.software bitcoinxt.software]
-}}'''Bitcoin XT''' was a fork of [[Bitcoin Core]] created by [[Mike Hearn]] in 2014. Originally designed to introduce alternative P2P rules, it later gained significant notoriety and support after its adoption of [[BIP 0101|BIP 101]] without community support in 2015, giving it importance in the [[block size limit controversy]].<ref name="ooc">{{cite web|work=[[The Neighbourhood Pool Watch]]|author=[[organofcorti]]|title=BIP101 implementation flaws|date=27 August 2015|accessdate=27 August 2015|url=http://organofcorti.blogspot.com/2015/08/bip101-implementation-flaws.html}}</ref> After Andresen's resignation from the position of [[Bitcoin Core]] maintainer, he and [[Mike Hearn]] organized Bitcoin XT to address several controversial ideas lacking the consensus required to be implemented in Bitcoin Core.<ref>{{cite web|work=Medium|title=An XT FAQ|author=[[Mike Hearn|Hearn, Mike]]|date=27 August 2015|accessdate=27 August 2015|url=https://medium.com/@octskyward/an-xt-faq-38e78aa32ff0}}</ref>
+}}'''Bitcoin XT''' was a fork of [[Bitcoin Core]] created by [[Mike Hearn]] in 2014. Originally designed to introduce alternative P2P rules, it later gained significant notoriety and support after its adoption of [[BIP 0101|BIP 101]] without community support in 2015, giving it importance in the [[block size limit controversy]].<ref name="ooc">{{cite web|work=The Neighbourhood Pool Watch|author=organofcorti|title=BIP101 implementation flaws|date=27 August 2015|accessdate=27 August 2015|url=http://organofcorti.blogspot.com/2015/08/bip101-implementation-flaws.html}}</ref> After Andresen's resignation from the position of [[Bitcoin Core]] maintainer, he and [[Mike Hearn]] organized Bitcoin XT to address several controversial ideas lacking the consensus required to be implemented in Bitcoin Core.<ref>{{cite web|work=Medium|title=An XT FAQ|author=[[Mike Hearn|Hearn, Mike]]|date=27 August 2015|accessdate=27 August 2015|url=https://medium.com/@octskyward/an-xt-faq-38e78aa32ff0}}</ref>
 BIP 101 was implemented in Bitcoin XT on August 6, 2015<ref>[https://github.com/bitcoinxt/bitcoinxt/commit/946e3ba8c7806a66c2b834d3817ff0c986c0811b]</ref> and released on August 15.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://medium.com/@octskyward/why-is-bitcoin-forking-d647312d22c1|title=Why is Bitcoin forking? — Faith and future|author=Mike Hearn|work=Medium}}</ref> If 75% of the last 1000 blocks were observed to have particular version bits set, it would have ceased enforcing the 1 MB block size limit and also have added a few new rules. However, this threshold was never achieved and no new XT blocks are being created today.{{citation needed}}
@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 Later in January 2016, frustrated of his proposal being massively outvoted, Mike Hearn made a media stunt declaring on various US national and international press agencies that "Bitcoin has failed". Max Keiser quoted Bram Cohen <ref>Whiny Ragequitting https://medium.com/@bramcohen/whiny-ragequitting-cab164b1e88</ref> in describing Hearn's move as "whiny rage quitting" <ref>Mike Hearn's move from Bitcoin to Banks - Stacy Herbert, Max Keiser & Simon Dixon discuss https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ubqjei3Jd-U</ref>  and other members of the community pointed to an extensive account of manipulations http://gettopical.com/bitcoin/e289a9a5189008d994e80666e9038089 (unfortunately today many twitter screenshots are broken).
 ==See Also==

JonathanCross: /* Controversy */ Adding ref for Max Keiser quote and removing episode number (was incorrect)

2019-03-03T22:10:43Z

Controversy: Adding ref for Max Keiser quote and removing episode number (was incorrect)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:10, 3 March 2019
Line 19:		Line 19:
	==Controversy==		==Controversy==

	Later in January 2016, frustrated of his proposal being massively outvoted, Mike Hearn made a media stunt declaring on various US national and international press agencies that "Bitcoin has failed". Max Keiser ~~defined this episode a~~ "~~whining ragequit~~" ~~(beginning of E855 on RT)~~ and other members of the community pointed to an extensive account of manipulations http://gettopical.com/bitcoin/e289a9a5189008d994e80666e9038089 (unfortunately today many twitter screenshots are broken).		Later in January 2016, frustrated of his proposal being massively outvoted, Mike Hearn made a media stunt declaring on various US national and international press agencies that "Bitcoin has failed". Max Keiser quoted Bram Cohen <ref>Whiny Ragequitting https://medium.com/@bramcohen/whiny-ragequitting-cab164b1e88</ref> in describing Hearn's move as "whiny rage quitting" <ref>Mike Hearn's move from Bitcoin to Banks - Stacy Herbert, Max Keiser & Simon Dixon discuss https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ubqjei3Jd-U</ref> and other members of the community pointed to an extensive account of manipulations http://gettopical.com/bitcoin/e289a9a5189008d994e80666e9038089 (unfortunately today many twitter screenshots are broken).

	==See Also==		==See Also==

Luke-jr: Corrections

2019-02-24T22:13:19Z

Corrections

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:13, 24 February 2019
Line 3:		Line 3:
	\|author=[[Gavin Andresen]]<br/>[[Mike Hearn]]		\|author=[[Gavin Andresen]]<br/>[[Mike Hearn]]
	\|website=[https://bitcoinxt.software bitcoinxt.software]		\|website=[https://bitcoinxt.software bitcoinxt.software]
	}}'''Bitcoin XT''' was a fork of [[Bitcoin Core]] created by [[~~Gavin Andresen~~]] in ~~2012~~. Originally designed to introduce alternative P2P rules,~~{{citation needed}}~~ it later gained significant notoriety and support after its ~~early~~ adoption of [[BIP 0101\|BIP 101]] in 2015, giving it importance in the [[block size limit controversy]].<ref name="ooc">{{cite web\|work=[[The Neighbourhood Pool Watch]]\|author=[[organofcorti]]\|title=BIP101 implementation flaws\|date=27 August 2015\|accessdate=27 August 2015\|url=http://organofcorti.blogspot.com/2015/08/bip101-implementation-flaws.html}}</ref> After Andresen's resignation from the position of [[Bitcoin Core]] maintainer, he and [[Mike Hearn]] organized Bitcoin XT to address several controversial ideas lacking the consensus required to be implemented in Bitcoin Core.<ref>{{cite web\|work=Medium\|title=An XT FAQ\|author=[[Mike Hearn\|Hearn, Mike]]\|date=27 August 2015\|accessdate=27 August 2015\|url=https://medium.com/@octskyward/an-xt-faq-38e78aa32ff0}}</ref>		}}'''Bitcoin XT''' was a fork of [[Bitcoin Core]] created by [[Mike Hearn]] in 2014. Originally designed to introduce alternative P2P rules, it later gained significant notoriety and support after its adoption of [[BIP 0101\|BIP 101]] without community support in 2015, giving it importance in the [[block size limit controversy]].<ref name="ooc">{{cite web\|work=[[The Neighbourhood Pool Watch]]\|author=[[organofcorti]]\|title=BIP101 implementation flaws\|date=27 August 2015\|accessdate=27 August 2015\|url=http://organofcorti.blogspot.com/2015/08/bip101-implementation-flaws.html}}</ref> After Andresen's resignation from the position of [[Bitcoin Core]] maintainer, he and [[Mike Hearn]] organized Bitcoin XT to address several controversial ideas lacking the consensus required to be implemented in Bitcoin Core.<ref>{{cite web\|work=Medium\|title=An XT FAQ\|author=[[Mike Hearn\|Hearn, Mike]]\|date=27 August 2015\|accessdate=27 August 2015\|url=https://medium.com/@octskyward/an-xt-faq-38e78aa32ff0}}</ref>

	BIP 101 was implemented in Bitcoin XT on August 6, 2015<ref>[https://github.com/bitcoinxt/bitcoinxt/commit/946e3ba8c7806a66c2b834d3817ff0c986c0811b]</ref> and released on August 15.<ref>{{cite web\|url=https://medium.com/@octskyward/why-is-bitcoin-forking-d647312d22c1\|title=Why is Bitcoin forking? — Faith and future\|author=Mike Hearn\|work=Medium}}</ref> If 75% of the last 1000 blocks were observed to have particular version bits set, it would have ceased enforcing the 1 MB block size limit and also have added a few new rules. However, this threshold was never achieved and no new XT blocks are being created today.{{citation needed}}		BIP 101 was implemented in Bitcoin XT on August 6, 2015<ref>[https://github.com/bitcoinxt/bitcoinxt/commit/946e3ba8c7806a66c2b834d3817ff0c986c0811b]</ref> and released on August 15.<ref>{{cite web\|url=https://medium.com/@octskyward/why-is-bitcoin-forking-d647312d22c1\|title=Why is Bitcoin forking? — Faith and future\|author=Mike Hearn\|work=Medium}}</ref> If 75% of the last 1000 blocks were observed to have particular version bits set, it would have ceased enforcing the 1 MB block size limit and also have added a few new rules. However, this threshold was never achieved and no new XT blocks are being created today.{{citation needed}}

Taras at 23:17, 4 December 2017

2017-12-04T23:17:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:17, 4 December 2017
Line 3:		Line 3:
	\|author=[[Gavin Andresen]]<br/>[[Mike Hearn]]		\|author=[[Gavin Andresen]]<br/>[[Mike Hearn]]
	\|website=[https://bitcoinxt.software bitcoinxt.software]		\|website=[https://bitcoinxt.software bitcoinxt.software]
	}}'''Bitcoin XT''' is a fork of [[Bitcoin Core]] ~~that aims~~ to ~~make transactions reliable~~, ~~inexpensive, and accessible. It achieved~~ significant notoriety and support after ~~prematurely adopting~~ [[BIP 0101\|BIP 101]], giving it importance in the [[block size limit controversy]].<ref name="ooc">{{cite web\|work=[[The Neighbourhood Pool Watch]]\|author=[[organofcorti]]\|title=BIP101 implementation flaws\|date=27 August 2015\|accessdate=27 August 2015\|url=http://organofcorti.blogspot.com/2015/08/bip101-implementation-flaws.html}}</ref>		}}'''Bitcoin XT''' was a fork of [[Bitcoin Core]] created by [[Gavin Andresen]] in 2012. Originally designed to introduce alternative P2P rules,{{citation needed}} it later gained significant notoriety and support after its early adoption of [[BIP 0101\|BIP 101]] in 2015, giving it importance in the [[block size limit controversy]].<ref name="ooc">{{cite web\|work=[[The Neighbourhood Pool Watch]]\|author=[[organofcorti]]\|title=BIP101 implementation flaws\|date=27 August 2015\|accessdate=27 August 2015\|url=http://organofcorti.blogspot.com/2015/08/bip101-implementation-flaws.html}}</ref> After Andresen's resignation from the position of [[Bitcoin Core]] maintainer, he and [[Mike Hearn]] organized Bitcoin XT to address several controversial ideas lacking the consensus required to be implemented in Bitcoin Core.<ref>{{cite web\|work=Medium\|title=An XT FAQ\|author=[[Mike Hearn\|Hearn, Mike]]\|date=27 August 2015\|accessdate=27 August 2015\|url=https://medium.com/@octskyward/an-xt-faq-38e78aa32ff0}}</ref>

	~~After [[Gavin Andresen]]'s resignation from the position of [[~~Bitcoin ~~Core]] maintainer~~, ~~he and~~ [~~[Mike Hearn~~]~~] organized{{when}} Bitcoin XT to address controversial ideas lacking the consensus required to be implemented in Bitcoin Core~~.<ref>{{cite web~~\|work=Medium\|title=An XT FAQ\|author=[[Mike Hearn\|Hearn, Mike]]\|date=27 August 2015\|accessdate=27 August 2015~~\|url=https://medium.com/@octskyward/an-xt-~~faq~~-~~38e78aa32ff0~~}}</ref>		BIP 101 was implemented in Bitcoin XT on August 6, 2015<ref>[https://github.com/bitcoinxt/bitcoinxt/commit/946e3ba8c7806a66c2b834d3817ff0c986c0811b]</ref> and released on August 15.<ref>{{cite web\|url=https://medium.com/@octskyward/why-is-bitcoin-forking-d647312d22c1\|title=Why is Bitcoin forking? — Faith and future\|author=Mike Hearn\|work=Medium}}</ref> If 75% of the last 1000 blocks were observed to have particular version bits set, it would have ceased enforcing the 1 MB block size limit and also have added a few new rules. However, this threshold was never achieved and no new XT blocks are being created today.{{citation needed}}

	~~Due to implementing~~ BIP ~~0101 in version 0.11.0A, it is now incompatible with the~~ Bitcoin ~~consensus protocol,~~ and ~~when 75% of~~ the ~~last 1000 blocks are observed to have particular version bits set, it ceases enforcing the 1 MB~~ block size ~~limit and also adds a few new rules.~~		In January 2016, BIP 101 was removed from Bitcoin XT and replaced with the one-time block size increase to 2 MB present in [[Bitcoin Classic]].<ref>https://github.com/bitcoinxt/bitcoinxt/pull/117</ref> In the year following this change, adoption of Bitcoin XT decreased dramatically, with fewer than 30 nodes remaining by January 2017.<ref name="cdns">{{cite web \|url=https://coin.dance/nodes/xt \|title=Bitcoin XT Nodes Summary \|work=coin.dance \|accessdate=7 January 2017 }}</ref> Later attempts by other codebases to increase the block size to 2 MB including Bitcoin Classic and [[SegWit2x]] have also failed.<ref name="cd">{{cite web\|url=https://www.coindesk.com/no-fork-no-fire-segwit2x-nodes-stall-running-abandoned-bitcoin-code/\|title=No Fork, No Fire: Segwit2x Nodes Stall Running Abandoned Bitcoin Code\|work=[[CoinDesk]]\|author=Higgins, Stan\|date=November 17, 2017\|accessdate=November 29, 2017}}</ref>
	~~Since it is incompatible with the Bitcoin protocol, it is technically an [[altcoin]], however, if it were~~ to ~~obtain~~ [[~~Economic_majority\|economic acceptance~~]] ~~it would become a "new Bitcoin" some day~~.

	~~==Mission statement==~~
	<~~!--this needs to be summarized or removed--~~>
	~~The XT mission statement defines what the project believes is important~~: ~~commitment to these principles are what differentiates it from Bitcoin Core~~.

	* '''Scaling the ~~network up to handle user demand and spam is important'''~~, ~~even if that means the network becomes centralised along the way. The idea~~ of ~~a global system used by ordinary people is what motivated many people to support this.~~
	* XT ~~proponents believe '''unconfirmed transactions are important'''. Many merchants want or need to accept payments within seconds rather~~ than ~~minutes or hours~~. ~~XT accepts this fact and does what it can to minimise the risk, then "helps" sellers judge what remains. It is committed to support only~~ "~~first seen~~" ~~policies, and will not adopt changes that make unconfirmed transactions riskier.~~
	<!-- This doesn't seem different from Core: ** '''Lightweight wallets are important'''. Most users cannot or will not run a fully verifying node. Most of the world population does not even own a computer: they will experience the internet exclusively via smartphones. These users must sacrifice some security in order to participate, so XT supports whatever technical tradeoffs wallet developers wish to explore. -->
	* '''Decision making is quick and clear'''. Decisions are made according to a leadership hierarchy. The XT software encodes decisions that follow the above principles: people who disagree are welcome to use different software, or patch ours. We do not consider writing principled software to be centralising and do not refuse to select reasonable defaults.
	<!-- Also no difference: * The Bitcoin XT community is friendly, pragmatic, cares about app developers and considers the user experience in everything we do. We value professionalism in technical approach and communication. We run a moderated mailing list and do not tolerate troublemakers. -->

	~~You can [~~https://~~bitcoinxt~~.~~software~~/~~patches.html read more about the code changes in~~ Bitcoin XT].

	=~~=Block size hard fork==~~
	~~In 2010, a~~ block size ~~limit was introduced into~~ Bitcoin by [[~~Satoshi Nakamoto~~]]. ~~He added it as a safety measure to prevent miners from spamming large blocks and meant for it to be removed once secure lightweight wallets were developed;~~
	~~however, the spam problem has only gotten worse, and secure lightweight wallets never implemented.~~

	~~There has been much community [[Block size limit controversy~~\|~~debate]] on this topic. You can read analysis and explanations for why we think raising the block size limit is important here:~~

	* [http://~~gavinandresen~~.~~ninja/ A series of essays] by [[Gavin Andresen]]~~
	* [https://medium.com/~~@octskyward/crash~~-~~landing~~-~~f5cc19908e32 Why the block size limit must be raised] and [https://medium.com/@octskyward/the~~-~~capacity~~-~~cliff~~-~~586d1bf7715e why the proposed alternative schemes will not~~ work~~], by~~ [[~~Mike Hearn~~]].

	==Miners==		==Miners==
Line 52:		Line 30:
	[[Category:Block size limit controversy]]		[[Category:Block size limit controversy]]
	[[Category:Direct code forks of Bitcoin Core]]		[[Category:Direct code forks of Bitcoin Core]]
			[[Category:Failed hardforks]]
			[[Category:Contentious hardforks]]

	[[Category:User Interfaces]]		[[Category:User Interfaces]]
	[[Category:Frontends]]		[[Category:Frontends]]
	[[Category:Free Software]]		[[Category:Free Software]]
	[[Category:Open Source]]		[[Category:Open Source]]

Jaromil: added section on controversy

2016-01-26T00:33:43Z

added section on controversy

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:33, 26 January 2016
Line 38:		Line 38:
	==Users and merchants==		==Users and merchants==
	If insufficient mining hash power runs XT to reach supermajority then nothing will happen. If enough does, XT users will follow a new blockchain and cease to be using and trading bitcoins.		If insufficient mining hash power runs XT to reach supermajority then nothing will happen. If enough does, XT users will follow a new blockchain and cease to be using and trading bitcoins.

			==Controversy==

			Later in January 2016, frustrated of his proposal being massively outvoted, Mike Hearn made a media stunt declaring on various US national and international press agencies that "Bitcoin has failed". Max Keiser defined this episode a "whining ragequit" (beginning of E855 on RT) and other members of the community pointed to an extensive account of manipulations http://gettopical.com/bitcoin/e289a9a5189008d994e80666e9038089 (unfortunately today many twitter screenshots are broken).

	==See Also==		==See Also==

Lapp0: "unusually" doesn't make sense in this context

2016-01-20T05:35:27Z

"unusually" doesn't make sense in this context

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:35, 20 January 2016
Line 8:		Line 8:

	Due to implementing BIP 0101 in version 0.11.0A, it is now incompatible with the Bitcoin consensus protocol, and when 75% of the last 1000 blocks are observed to have particular version bits set, it ceases enforcing the 1 MB block size limit and also adds a few new rules.		Due to implementing BIP 0101 in version 0.11.0A, it is now incompatible with the Bitcoin consensus protocol, and when 75% of the last 1000 blocks are observed to have particular version bits set, it ceases enforcing the 1 MB block size limit and also adds a few new rules.
	Since it is incompatible with the Bitcoin protocol, it is technically an [[altcoin]], ~~but due~~ to ~~an unusually large~~ [[Economic_majority\|economic acceptance]] it ~~may potentially~~ become a "new Bitcoin" some day.		Since it is incompatible with the Bitcoin protocol, it is technically an [[altcoin]], however, if it were to obtain [[Economic_majority\|economic acceptance]] it would become a "new Bitcoin" some day.

	==Mission statement==		==Mission statement==

Nomnom: link economic acceptance to Economic_majority

2016-01-09T16:30:09Z

link economic acceptance to Economic_majority

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:30, 9 January 2016
Line 8:		Line 8:

	Due to implementing BIP 0101 in version 0.11.0A, it is now incompatible with the Bitcoin consensus protocol, and when 75% of the last 1000 blocks are observed to have particular version bits set, it ceases enforcing the 1 MB block size limit and also adds a few new rules.		Due to implementing BIP 0101 in version 0.11.0A, it is now incompatible with the Bitcoin consensus protocol, and when 75% of the last 1000 blocks are observed to have particular version bits set, it ceases enforcing the 1 MB block size limit and also adds a few new rules.
	Since it is incompatible with the Bitcoin protocol, it is technically an [[altcoin]], but due to an unusually large economic acceptance it may potentially become a "new Bitcoin" some day.		Since it is incompatible with the Bitcoin protocol, it is technically an [[altcoin]], but due to an unusually large [[Economic_majority\|economic acceptance]] it may potentially become a "new Bitcoin" some day.

	==Mission statement==		==Mission statement==

Lapp0: Reverted incorrect statements

2016-01-07T00:59:45Z

Reverted incorrect statements

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:59, 7 January 2016
Line 37:		Line 37:

	==Users and merchants==		==Users and merchants==
	If insufficient mining hash power runs XT to reach supermajority then nothing will happen. If enough does, XT blockchain ~~will become Bitcoin because it will be the economic majority, bitcoin-legacy chain with low hashrate will most likely~~ be ~~abandoned~~.		If insufficient mining hash power runs XT to reach supermajority then nothing will happen. If enough does, XT users will follow a new blockchain and cease to be using and trading bitcoins.

	==See Also==		==See Also==

Nomnom: fix typo

2016-01-01T19:12:04Z

fix typo

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:12, 1 January 2016
Line 37:		Line 37:

	==Users and merchants==		==Users and merchants==
	If insufficient mining hash power runs XT to reach supermajority then nothing will happen. If enough does, XT blockchain ~~which~~ will become Bitcoin because it will be the economic majority, bitcoin-legacy chain with low hashrate will most likely be abandoned.		If insufficient mining hash power runs XT to reach supermajority then nothing will happen. If enough does, XT blockchain will become Bitcoin because it will be the economic majority, bitcoin-legacy chain with low hashrate will most likely be abandoned.

	==See Also==		==See Also==