https://en.bitcoin.it/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&user=Mitay007&feedformat=atom
Bitcoin Wiki - User contributions [en]
2024-03-29T15:56:32Z
User contributions
MediaWiki 1.30.0
https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Mining_hardware_comparison&diff=8627
Mining hardware comparison
2011-05-20T18:04:08Z
<p>Mitay007: /* AMD */</p>
<hr />
<div>Below are some statistics about the mining performance of various hardware used in a [[mining rig]].<br />
<br />
The table shows (mostly) stock clock numbers. 10-20% performance improvement can be achieved via overclocking.<br />
<br />
'''Note:''' Clock refers to the Shader clock only with nVidia cards (not Core or Memory). With AMD card the shader clock is not separate, but is part of the GPU clock.<br />
<br />
==Graphics cards==<br />
<br />
===AMD===<br />
To get the maximum performance use the 2.1 release of the ATI Stream SDK. 2.2 wastes CPU time, and 2.3/2.4 drop mining performance by 5-10%.<br />
<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! W !! Clock !! SP !! SDK !! Slot !! Miner !! Notes<br />
|-<br />
| 3XXX || || || || || || || || OpenCL Not Supported<br />
|-<br />
| 42XX || || || || || || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || || OpenCL Not Supported (intergrated/mobile GPU)<br />
|-<br />
| 4350 || 6.93 || 0.346 || 20 || 575 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors <br />
|-<br />
| 4550 || 7.23 || 0.289 || 25 || 600 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors <br />
|- <br />
| 4650 || 31.33 || 0.653 || 48 || 650 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors <br />
|- <br />
| 4670 || 36.14 || 0.613 || 59 || 750 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors<br />
|-<br />
| 4670 || 40.11 || || 59 || 800 || 320 || || AGP x8 || poclbm/Ubuntu 10.10 w/ H == 0 mod || -w 32 -f 0, don't use vectors [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.msg85236#msg85236 source]<br />
|- <br />
| 4730 || 72.29 || 0.657 || 110 || 750 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 4770 || 72.29 || 0.904 || 80 || 750 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 4830 || 55.42 || 0.583 || 95 || 575 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|-<br />
| 4850 || 75.30 || 0.685 || 110 || 625 || 800 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 4850 || 101 || || || 817 || 500 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer || -f 0, core 817mhz(default 625)@1.123v , mem downclock to 500mhz (default 993) [http://www.smpake.com/?p=6 source] <br />
|- <br />
| 4860 || 67.47 || 0.519 || 130 || 700 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|-<br />
| 4870 || 90.36 || 0.602 || 150 || 750 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || clmine ||<br />
|-<br />
| 4870 || 78 || || || || || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/Vista 64bit || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source]<br />
|- <br />
| 4890 || 102.41 || 0.539 || 190 || 850 || 800 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 4890 || 108.3 || || 190 || 975 || 800 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 4850X2 || 150.60 || 0.602 || 250 || 625 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 4870X2 || 180.72 || 0.632 || 286 || 750 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 4870X2 || 180.6 || || 286 || 800 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 5450 || 11.99 || 0.631 || 19 || 650 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 5550 || 40.59 || 1.041 || 39 || 550 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 59.96 || 1.538 || 39 || 650 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 64 || 1.641 || 39 || 650 || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]<br />
|- <br />
| 5650 || 48 || 2.5-3.2 ? || 15-19 ? || || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source] [http://www.notebookcheck.net/ATI-Mobility-Radeon-HD-5650.23697.0.html source]<br />
|- <br />
| 5670 || 71.49 || 1.117 || 64 || 775 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EEFFEE;"| 5670 || 72 || 1.64 || 44 || 850 || || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm-mod (Win7-64) || Sapphire 100287VGAL card is low power<br />
|- <br />
| 5670 || 85 || || || 900 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128<br />
|- <br />
<br />
| 5750 || 116.24 || 1.352 || 86 || 700 || 720 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||<br />
|-<br />
| 5750 || 137 || || || 710 || || || PCI-E 1.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128 using stock memory and GPU clocks<br />
|-<br />
| 5750 || 154.56 || 1.45 || 106 || 830 || 720 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||-v -w128 -f20 underclocked memory clocks from 1150MHz to 300MHz<br />
|- <br />
| 5750 || 170 || || || 870 || || || PCI-E 1.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128 patched BIOS to underclock memory to 300MHz<br />
|-<br />
| 5770 || 156.83 || 1.452 || 108 || 850 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 180 || 1.406 || 128[*] || 950 || 800 || 2.4RC1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 30 (*Overclocked wattage calculated [http://bakkap.free.fr/Misc/wCalc.html here] )<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 205.58 || || || 935 || 300 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-04-28 || -v -w 256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFFF;"| 5830 || 206.64 || 1.181 || 175 || 800 || 1120 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFFFFF;"| 5830 || 241 || 1.377 || 175 || 1006 || || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-03-11 / Win7 64 ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 248 || 1.42 || 175 || 880 || 500 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.46 || -k poclbm VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 245 || 1.4 || 175 || 880 || 900 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm (guiminer) || -v -w 256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFFF;"| 5830 || 285 || || || 960 || || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.47 / poclbm / Win7 64 || VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFFF;"| 5830 || 290 || || || 996 || || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.4 / poclbm / Win7 64 || VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFFFFF;"| 5830 || 307 || || || 996 || || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 64 || VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 240.77 || 1.595 || 151 || 725 || 1440 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 250.26 || 1.657 || 151 || 725 || 1440 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || opencl client || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 252 || 1.575 || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-01-25 ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 255.3 || 1.593 || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-01-25 ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 264 || 1.748 || 151 || 725 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 1.0 x8 || guiminer-20110501 || -v -w128 <br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 280 || 1.75 || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.3 || with BFI_INT<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 292 || 1.825 || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-04-28 -v -f 1 ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 298 || 1.8620 || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-04-28 -v -f 1 -w 64 ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 300 || 1.5460 || 194 || 925 (OC) || 1440 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 314 || 1.8362 || 171 || 820 (OC) || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 1.0 x8 || poclbm || -v -w128 <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 344 || 1.8594 || 185 || 890 (OC) || 1440 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix || <br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 355 || 1.8684 || 190 || 915 (OC) || 1440 || || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || poclbm 2011-04-28 -v -f 20 -w128 || Running two in CFX for total of 695-725 MH/s<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 382 || 1.8454 || 207 || 995 (OC) || 1440 || || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || phoenix || OC 1.177v on core<br />
|-<br />
| 5870M || 116.5 || ? || ? || ? || ? || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || gui-miner (win-7) ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 313.65 || 1.668 || 188 || 850 || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 313 || 1.665 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo/Linux ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 343 || 1.824 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo/Linux ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 355 || 1.888 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/Linux ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 340 || 1.809 || 188 || 850 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 360 || 1.6822 || 214 || 970 || 700 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL w7-64 || -f 0 -v -w 128 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=6144.msg91959#msg91959 source]<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 408 || 1.8888 || 216 || 980 || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm/Win7x64 || -f 20 -v -w 128, BIT_ALIGN, BFI_INT<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 400 || 1.9047 || 210 || 950 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || Phoenix 1.3 || -k poclbm VECTORS AGGRESSION=7 FASTLOOP BFI_INT<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 421 || 1.9581 || 215 || 975 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.47 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 -k phatk <br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 440 || 2.0000 || 220 || 995 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 438 || 1.9819 || 221 || 1000 (OC) || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm/Linux || -v -w 64 -f 1 <br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 530 || 1.803 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.4.595.10 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/201103.beta3/Windows || -v -w128 -f60<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 535.06 || 1.820 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 560 || 1.905 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 565 || 1.922 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine2 ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 604 || 2.054 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 645 || 1.875|| 344 || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || -f1, Debian 6, fglrx-driver 10.9.3<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 740 || 2.1511 || 344 || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix/1.3 || AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT, memory clock @ 300MHz<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 755 || 2.2076 || 342 || 848 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 28-04-11 || -f 1 -w 256 -v, Ubuntu 10.10, fglrx 11.4, memory clock @ 300MHz<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 802 || 2.31 || 347 || 850 || 3200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix poclbm Ubuntu 11.04 || -q 6 -k AGGRESSION=19 WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT VECTORS, fglrx 11.4, mem clock @ 1000MHz<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5870x2 || 620 || || || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer || -v -w 128<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5870x2 || 826 || || || 950 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.4 w/ Phtak || AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT Memory @ 300MHz<br />
|- <br />
| 6310M || 9.821 || 0.545 || 18 || 500 || 80 || 2.4 || Integrated/APU || poclbm-gui -v -w128 || HP DM1z 18W TDP is shared with the CPU<br />
|- <br />
| 6490M || 16.289 || 0.708 || 23 || || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm-mod (Mac OS X 10.6.7) || MacBook Pro early 2011<br />
|- <br />
| 6850 || 171.59 || 1.351 || 127 || 775 || 960 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||<br />
|- <br />
| 6850 || 196 || || || 850 || 960 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 0<br />
|- <br />
| 6850 || 234.8 || || || 940 || 960 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.3 || AGGRESSION=8 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 220 || 1.236 || 178[*] || 1000 || 960 || 2.4RC1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 30 (*Overclocked wattage calculated [http://bakkap.free.fr/Misc/wCalc.html here] )<br />
|-<br />
| 6870 || 232.47 || 1.540 || 151 || 900 || 1120 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm -v -w 128 ||<br />
|- <br />
| 6870 || 277.47 || || || 940 || 1120 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.3 || AGGRESSION=8 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT<br />
|- <br />
| 6870 || 260.1 || 1.611 || 175 || 1001 || 1150 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm-gui windows7x86 cat 11.3 || -v -w 128 -f 1 <br />
|-<br />
| 6870 || 272 || 1.802 (?) || 151 (?) || 900 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha cat 11.4 sdk 2.4 || -G2 -D stock clocks, debian linux 64bit [http://img690.imageshack.us/img690/853/gpumine1.png source]<br />
|-<br />
| 6870 || 300.06 || 1.830 || 164 || 1020 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.4 cat 11.4 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=8 fastloop mem clock 344<br />
|- <br />
| 6870 || 302 || 1.726 (?) || 175 (?) || 1000 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha cat 11.4 sdk 2.4 || -G2 -D overclocked to 1000, debian linux 64bit [http://img814.imageshack.us/img814/6646/gpumine2.png source]<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 300 || 1.72 || 174 || 1038 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm windows7x86 cat 11.4 || -v -w128 -f1 mem clock 360, fan 100% temp 73C<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 322 || 1.882 || 170 || 1050 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.47 phatk 11.5 sdk 2.4 || BFI_INT VECTORS FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=256, mem clock @ 400MHz<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 295 || || 160 (?) || 810 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 325 || || 200 (?) || 885 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 360 || || 200 (?) || 970 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 360 || || (?) || 870 || 1375 || (?) || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm ||flashed with 6970 BIOS, -v -f30 -w128<br />
|-<br />
| 6970 || 323 || 1.468 || 220 || 880 || 1536 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -w 64, SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.<br />
|-<br />
| 6970 || 372 || || 220 (?) || 900 || || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix (svn trunk 05.14.2011) || clock 900/1375, VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128, fan 45% (auto) / temp 90C<br />
|- <br />
| 6990 || 708 || 2.05 || 346 || 830 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]. SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.<br />
|- <br />
| 6990 || 746 || 1.82 || 410 || 880 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]. SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.<br />
|- <br />
| 6990 || 771 || 1.8804 || 410 || 880 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx. Memory clock @ 1280Mhz.<br />
|- <br />
| 6990 || 772 || 1.8380 || 420 || 900 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix & Poclbm || OC switch ON + overclocked to 900 mhz, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128<br />
|- <br />
|FirePro V8700 || 84.8 || || || 750 || 800 || || || poclbm-mod.03.24.2011 || <br />
|-<br />
|FirePro M5800 || 61.4 || || || 650 || || || || poclbm-mod.03.24.2011 || Ubuntu || <br />
|- <br />
|}<br />
<br />
===Nvidia===<br />
<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! W !! Clock !! SP !! Comment<br />
|-<br />
| 8200 mGPU || 1.2 || || || 1200 || 16 || 128 MB shared memory, "poclbm -w 128 -f 0"<br />
|-<br />
| 8400 GS || 2.3 || || || || || "poclbm -w 128"<br />
|-<br />
| 8600M GT || 4.93 || || || || 32 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 8600GT || 5.66 || || || 1188 || 32 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 8600GT OC || 7.3 || || || 1602 || 32 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.0 poclbm] -w 128 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg72833#msg72833 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 8800GT || 25 || 0.24 || 105 || 1300 || ||<br />
|-<br />
| 8800GT || 24.5 || 0.23 || 105 || 1300 || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 8800GTS || 16.8 || 0.109 || 154 || || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source] [http://www.techspot.com/review/79-geforce-8800-gts-512/page11.html source]<br />
|-<br />
| 8800 GTS || 18.7 || 0.124 || 150 || 1200 || || poclbm -w 64 no vectors<br />
|-<br />
| 9300GE || 1.57 || || || 1300 || 8 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9300GS || 1.69 || || || 1400 || 8 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9300/nForce 730i || 2.15 || || || 1200 || 16 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9400GT || 3.37 || 0.067 || 50 || 1400 || 16 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9400M (MacBook) || 1.90 || 0.32 || 6 || 700 || || poclbm -f 8 no vectors<br />
|-<br />
| 9500GT || 6.75 || 0.135 || 50 || 1400 || 32 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9600GSO || 19.88 || 0.237 || 84 || 1375 || 96 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9600GSO512 || 11.75 || 0.131 || 90 || 1625 || 48 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9600GT || 15.66 || 0.165 || 95 || 1625 || 64 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9600GT Zotac || 15 || || || 1650 || 64 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9600GT OC || 18.8 || <0.198 || >95 || 1981 || 64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.0 poclbm] -w 128 -f 10 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg74610#msg74610 source] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg73353#msg73353 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 9800GT || 30.36 || 0.289 || 105 || 1800 || 112 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9800GTX || 32.54 || 0.232 || 140 || 1688 || 128 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9800GTX+ || 35.39 || 0.251 || 141 || 1836 || 128 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9800GTX+ || 37.23 || 0.266 || 140 || 1890 || 128 || win7x64 275.27 phoenix(1.48) -k poclbm AGGRESSION=3 WORKSIZE=64<br />
|-<br />
|style="background-color:#FFEFEF"| 9800GX2 || 57.83 || 0.294 || 197 || || 2x128 ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background-color:#FFEFEF"| 9800GX2 || 28 || 0.142 || 197 || || 2x128 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]<br />
|-<br />
| G210 || 3.38 || 0.111 || 30.5 || 1402 || 16 ||<br />
|-<br />
| G210 || 3.79 || 0.124 || 30.5 || 1402 || 16 || poclbm -f 1<br />
|-<br />
| GT220 || 9.83 || 0.170 || 58 || 1360 || 48 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GT240 || 19.37 || 0.281 || 69 || 1340 || 96 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GT240 || 21.24 || || || || 96 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4291.0 poclbm-mod] -f 0 -v [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg73383#msg73383 source]<br />
|-<br />
| GTS250 || 35.39 || 0.244 || 145 || 1836 || 128 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTS250 || 35.2 || 0.243 || 145 || 1836 || 128 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTS250 OC || 37 || 0.255 || 145 || 2047 || 128 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX260 || 35.91 || 0.178 || 202 || 1242 || 192 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX260 || 44 || 0.242 || 182 || 1242 || 216 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]<br />
|-<br />
| GTX260c216 || 40.40 || 0.236 || 171 || 1242 || 216 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX260c216 OC || 52.0 || || || 1461 || 216 || "poclbm -w 256 -f 1"<br />
|-<br />
| GTX275 || 50.75 || 0.232 || 219 || 1404 || 240 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX275 || 58 || || || 729/1458 || 240 || poclbm -f 0 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
| GTX280 || 46.84 || 0.198 || 236 || 1296 || 240 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX285 || 53.35 || 0.262 || 204 || 1476 || 240 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX295 || 89.78 || 0.311 || 289 || 1242 || 480 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GT 320M (MacBook Air) || 6.12 || || || 1212 || 48 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GT 330M (Sony Vaio Z) || 7.8 || 0.71 ( 0.3 total) || 11 (26w total) || 1045 || 48 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GT430 || 20.24 || 0.413 || 49 || 1400 || 96 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTS450 || 45.28 || 0.427 || 106 || 1566 || 192 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460SE || 56.39 || 0.376 || 150 || 1300 || 288 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 || 68.31 || 0.427 || 160 || 1350 || 336 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 (2 cards) || 102 || 0.319? || 320? || 1350 || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 (2 cards) OC || 127 || 0.374 || 340 || 1620 || 2x 336 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2444.0 rpcminer-cuda] -gpugrid=128 -gputhreads=128 ver.20110227<br />
|-<br />
| GTX465 || 64.41 || 0.322 || 200 || 1215 || 352 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX470 || 81.98 || 0.381 || 215 || 1215 || 448 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX470 || 94.7 || || || 1414 || ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX470 || 111.9 || || 215 || 1650 || 448 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX470 || 115 || || || 1616 || || phoenix 1.46 poclbm VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=6<br />
|-<br />
| GTX480 || 101.28 || 0.405 || 250 || 1401 || 480 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX560 Ti || 67.7 || 0.39 || 170 || 1700 || 384 || standard EVGA 560, no overclock<br />
|-<br />
| GTX560 Ti || 74.8 || 0.41 || 180 || 1700 || 384 || gigabyte 900Mhz clock; -w 512 -v<br />
|-<br />
| GTX560 OC || 86.7 || <0.51 || >170 || 1800 || 384 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2444.0 rpcminer-cuda] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg72816#msg72816 source]<br />
|-<br />
| GTX570 || 105.83 || 0.483 || 219 || 1464 || 480 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX580 || 140.05 || --- || 244 || 1544 || 512 ||<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro FX 580 || 5.7 || 0.14 || 40 || 1125 || 4 ||rpcminer-cuda, Win, -gpugrid=128 -gputhreads=512<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro FX 1600M || 6 || 0.12 || 50 || 625 || 32 ||rpcminer-cuda, Win<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro NVS 135M || 1.05 || 0.1 || 10 || 800 || 1 || <br />
|-<br />
| Quadro NVS 3100M || 3.6 || 0.257 || 14 || 600 || 16 || rpcminer-cuda, Win, CUDA 3.1.1<br />
|-<br />
| Tesla M2050 || 79.8 || || || || || DiabloMiner<br />
|-<br />
| Tesla M2050 || [http://glennfrancismurray.com/cost-defective-mining-with-gpu-clusters-amazo 100] || 0 || 0 || - || 512 || Amazon AWS [http://glennfrancismurray.com/cost-defective-mining-with-gpu-clusters-amazo CUDA RPC Miner & CUDA 2.0]<br />
|-<br />
|}<br />
<br />
==CPUs/APUs==<br />
<br />
A lot of nice data can be pulled from [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.0 this thread] to seed this section. Also from [https://www.bitcoin.org/wiki/doku.php?id=bitcoin_miners this page on the old wiki].<br />
<br />
Might you wish to throttle CPU load a bit, so it doesn't reach 100<sup>0</sup>C, it can be done with Battle Encoder Shirase to a margin, like, -15% of available CPU cycles.<br />
<br />
I found the best combination to be is to throttle CPU miner to -5% _AND_ set it to least of priority levels, so as not to choke GPU miner up.<br />
<br />
===AMD===<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! nprocs !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! TDP [W] !! CPU Clock !! Mhash/s CPU !! Mhash/s GPU !! GPU !! GPU Clock !! SP !! Software !! Notes<br />
|-<br />
| 4x Opteron 6174 || 48 || 115 || 0.36 || 320W || 2.2 GHz || 2.4<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| cpuminer v0.8.1 || --alg 4way --threads 48<br />
|-<br />
| 2x Opteron 6128 || 16 || 32.4 || 0.141 || 230W || 2 GHz || 32.4<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| 0.3.19 || -4way<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon XP 2000+ || 2 || 0.62 || 0.009 || 70W || 1.67 GHz || 0.62<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| 0.3.18/Ubuntu || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source] [http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm?articleid=914&page=4 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon 64 3500+ || 1 || 1.18 || 0.013 || 89W || 2.54 GHz || 1.18<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| ufasoft v0.4 || overclocked (originally 2.2 GHz)<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon 64 X2 3800+ || 2 || 1.73 || 0.03 || 65 W || 2.00 GHz || 1.73<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || -algo=4way<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon 64 X2 4000+ || 2 || 1.9 || 0.02 || 65W || 2.1 GHz || 1.9<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| rpc-miner<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon 64 X2 4400+ || || 2.09 || 0.032 || 65W || 2.3GHz || 2.09<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| 0.3.19/Win x64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon 64 X2 6000+ || 2 || 2.81 || 0.02 || 125W || 3 GHz || 2.81<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg22881#msg22881 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon 64 X2 6400+ Black Edition || 2 || 2.9 || 0.023 || 125W || 3.2 GHz || 2.9<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| 0.3.20.2 BETA/Win 7 x64 || -4way<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon II X2 240e || 2 || 2.71 || 0.06 || 45W || 2.81 GHz || 2.71<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon II X4 630 || 4 || 10.7 || 0.11 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 10.7<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| bitcoin-miner 0.4 || <br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 3.8 || 0.04 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 3.8<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| 0.3.1x/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 7.2 || 0.08 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 7.2<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| cpu-miner 0.2.1/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X4 955 || 4 || 11 || 0.09 || 125W || 3.2 GHz || 11<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| rpcminer-4way ||<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X4 965 || 4 || 12 || 0.09 || 140W || 3.4 GHz || 11<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| rpcminer-4way ||<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X6 1055T || 6 || 15.84 || 0.13 || 125W || 2.82 GHz || 15.84<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X6 1100T || 6 || 22 || 0.176 || 125W || 3.82 GHz || 22<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| bitcoin-miner || Aciid#bitcoin-dev<br />
|-<br />
| Zacate E-350 || 2 || 11 || 0.615 || 18W || 1.6 Ghz || 1.231 || 9.831 || HD6310M || 492 Mhz || 80 || poclbm -v -w128 + Ufasoft 0.7 || stock speeds<br />
|-<br />
| Zacate E-350 || 2 || 12<br />
|colspan=2|<br />
| 1.648 Ghz || 1.252 || 10.87 || HD6310M || 492 Mhz || 80 || poclbm -v -w 256 -f 1 || "autotune" speed with ASUS EFI BIOS<br />
|}<br />
<br />
===ARM===<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment<br />
|-<br />
| Cortex A8 || 1 || 0.125 || 0.36 || 0.35 W || 0.6 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || Nokia N900: 'cryptopp'<br />
|-<br />
| Cortex A8 || 1 || 0.2 || 0.57 || 0.35 W || 0.6 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || Nokia N900: 'c' algo<br />
|-<br />
| Tegra 250 (2xCortex-A9) || 2 || 0.57 || 1.14 || 0.5 W || 1.0 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-24) || Toshiba AC100, ubuntu, 'c' algo<br />
|-<br />
| ARM 11 || 1 || 0.11 || ? || ? || 0.528 GHz || cpuminer git || T-Mobile Pulse, inside Debian chroot, 'c' algo<br />
|}<br />
<br />
===Intel===<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium III mobile ? || 1 || 0.3 || 0.014 || 21W || 1.07 GHz || 0.3.1x/Win2K || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source] [http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=27380 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Old Xeon 512k (Dual) || 2x1/2 || 2.0 || ? || ? || 3.06GHz || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || HT disabled, algo=4way (twice as fast as the 2nd best algo)<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium 4 2.0A || 1 || 0.85 || || || 2.0 GHz || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft-0.4]/WinXP || -g no -t 2<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium Dual-Core E5400 || 2/2 || 2.27 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.7 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Celeron E330 || 2/2 || 2.2 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.5 GHz || 0.3.19/Ubuntu10.04 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Quad Q6600 || 4/4 || 11.0 || || 105W || 2.40 GHz || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || -a 60 -g no -t 4<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Quad Q9400 || 4/4 || 11 || 0.046 || 95W || 2.66 GHz || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || -a 60 -g no -t 4<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Quad Q9650 || 4/4 || 18.67 || || 95W || 4.00 GHz || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || -a 60 -g no -t 4<br />
|-<br />
| Core i3 530 || 2/4 || 8.31 || 0.10 || 80W || 3.66 GHz || Ufasoft 0.7 || -v -a5 -g no -t 4<br />
|-<br />
| Core i3 M350 || 2/4 || 1.48 || 0.04 || 35W || 2.27 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|- <br />
| Core i5 M450 || 2/4 || 1.8 || 0.05 || 35W || 1.2 GHz || 0.3.17/Win7-54 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source]<br />
|- <br />
| Core i5-650 || 2/4 || 5.1 || 0.04 ? || || 3.2 GHz || cpuminer-0.7 || -4way<br />
|-<br />
| Core i5 ? || 4/? || 6.5 || || || || client from svn || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37621#msg37621 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 4.5 || 0.05 || 95W || 3.1 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-01-22) || cryptopp_asm32<br />
|-<br />
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 14 || 0.15 || 95W || 3.1 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || sse2_64<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 920 || 4/8 || 19.2 || 0.10 || 195 || 4.0 GHz (x21) || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] || -a 5<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 950 || 4/8 || 5.88 || 0.039 || 150W || 3.83 GHz (x23) || bitcoin-0.3.20.2 Win7-64 ||<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 950 || 4/8 || 18.9 || 0.126 || 150W || 3.83 GHz (x23) || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] v0.4 ||<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 980x || 6/12 || 19.2 || 0.15 || 130 || 4.4 GHz (x33) || cpuminer/Win7-64 || <br />
|- <br />
| Core i7 980x || 6/12 || 8.7 || || || 3.9 GHz (x27) || 0.3.17/Win7-64 || <br />
|- <br />
| Core i7 620M || 2/4 || 6.3 || 0.18 || 35 || 2.66 GHz || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] v0.4 || <br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo E6550 || 1/2 || 2.45 || ? || ? || 2.33 GHz || cpuminer 0.7.1 (Linux) || --algo=sse2_64<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo E6850 || 2/2 || 6.75 || 0.10 || 65W || 3.0 Ghz || ufasoft-0.3 ||<br />
|- <br />
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 7.76 || 0.11 || 70W || 3.33 GHz (o/c?) || ufasoft-0.3 || miner optimized for Intel Core<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 2.52 || 0.04 || 65W || 2.66 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo E8400 || 2/2 || 6.9 || ? || ? || 3.0 GHz || ufasoft v0.10|| windows 7/64bit (-t 2)<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo T6400 || 2/2 || 4.2 || 0.12 || 35 W || 2.00 GHz || cpuminer git (Linux) || --algo=sse2_64<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon 3060 || 1/2 || 2.03 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.4GHz || cpuminer 0.8.1 (Linux) || --algo=cryptopp_asm32<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon Prestonia 2.4 (dual) || 2x1/2 || 2.16 || 0.017 || 130W || 2.4 GHz || ufasoft v0.4 || <br />
|-<br />
| Xeon X5355 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 10.13 || 0.16 || 120W || 2.66GHz || bitcoind || Roughly the same speed as the "c" algo in cpuminer<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon X5355 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 22.76 || 0.09 || 120W || 2.66GHz || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || -O2 -march=core2, algo=sse2_64<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5440 || 4/8 || 7.3 || ? || 80W || 2.66 GHz|| Kiv's poclbm-gui || FIXME: Either wrong model # or wrong threads/speed info<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5520 || 4/8 || 6.5 || 0.08 || 80W || 2.27 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5530 || 4/8 || 7.14 || 0.09 || 80W || 2.4 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5630 (dual) || 2x4/8 || 8 || 0.1 || 80W || 2.53 GHz || 0.3.17/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E6520 (dual) || 2x4/8 || 24.7 || ? || ? || 2.53 GHz || ufasoft v0.10 || windows 2008 R2 64bit (-t 16)<br />
|-<br />
| Atom N270 || 2 || 1.19 || 0.24 || 5W || 1.6 GHz || ufasoft v0.10 || <br />
|}<br />
<br />
===Other===<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment<br />
|-<br />
| Cell || 6 || 21 || 0.35 || 60W || 3.2 GHz || cellminer || Sony Playstation 3 (FAT): Needs custom firmware (no links to it, potential issues with Sony assholes.) [https://github.com/verement/cellminer source] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4704.20 source] Total power usage of PS3 fat is 120W but only the Cell cpu is active.<br />
|-<br />
| Cell || 6 || 21 || 0.7 || 35W || 3.2 GHz || cellminer || Sony Playstation 3 (SLIM): Total power usage of PS3 slim is 70W but only the Cell cpu is active.<br />
|}<br />
<br />
==See Also==<br />
<br />
* [[Mining rig]]<br />
* [[Generation Calculator]]<br />
* [[Power Calc]]<br />
* [[OpenCL miner]]<br />
* [http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=745 ATI Stream vs. NVIDIA CUDA - GPGPU computing battle royale]<br />
<br />
[[Category:Mining]]</div>
Mitay007
https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Mining_hardware_comparison&diff=8626
Mining hardware comparison
2011-05-20T18:01:18Z
<p>Mitay007: /* AMD */</p>
<hr />
<div>Below are some statistics about the mining performance of various hardware used in a [[mining rig]].<br />
<br />
The table shows (mostly) stock clock numbers. 10-20% performance improvement can be achieved via overclocking.<br />
<br />
'''Note:''' Clock refers to the Shader clock only with nVidia cards (not Core or Memory). With AMD card the shader clock is not separate, but is part of the GPU clock.<br />
<br />
==Graphics cards==<br />
<br />
===AMD===<br />
To get the maximum performance use the 2.1 release of the ATI Stream SDK. 2.2 wastes CPU time, and 2.3/2.4 drop mining performance by 5-10%.<br />
<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! W !! Clock !! SP !! SDK !! Slot !! Miner !! Notes<br />
|-<br />
| 3XXX || || || || || || || || OpenCL Not Supported<br />
|-<br />
| 42XX || || || || || || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || || OpenCL Not Supported (intergrated/mobile GPU)<br />
|-<br />
| 4350 || 6.93 || 0.346 || 20 || 575 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors <br />
|-<br />
| 4550 || 7.23 || 0.289 || 25 || 600 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors <br />
|- <br />
| 4650 || 31.33 || 0.653 || 48 || 650 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors <br />
|- <br />
| 4670 || 36.14 || 0.613 || 59 || 750 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors<br />
|-<br />
| 4670 || 40.11 || || 59 || 800 || 320 || || AGP x8 || poclbm/Ubuntu 10.10 w/ H == 0 mod || -w 32 -f 0, don't use vectors [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.msg85236#msg85236 source]<br />
|- <br />
| 4730 || 72.29 || 0.657 || 110 || 750 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 4770 || 72.29 || 0.904 || 80 || 750 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 4830 || 55.42 || 0.583 || 95 || 575 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|-<br />
| 4850 || 75.30 || 0.685 || 110 || 625 || 800 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 4850 || 101 || || || 817 || 500 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer || -f 0, core 817mhz(default 625)@1.123v , mem downclock to 500mhz (default 993) [http://www.smpake.com/?p=6 source] <br />
|- <br />
| 4860 || 67.47 || 0.519 || 130 || 700 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|-<br />
| 4870 || 90.36 || 0.602 || 150 || 750 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || clmine ||<br />
|-<br />
| 4870 || 78 || || || || || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/Vista 64bit || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source]<br />
|- <br />
| 4890 || 102.41 || 0.539 || 190 || 850 || 800 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 4890 || 108.3 || || 190 || 975 || 800 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 4850X2 || 150.60 || 0.602 || 250 || 625 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 4870X2 || 180.72 || 0.632 || 286 || 750 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 4870X2 || 180.6 || || 286 || 800 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 5450 || 11.99 || 0.631 || 19 || 650 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 5550 || 40.59 || 1.041 || 39 || 550 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 59.96 || 1.538 || 39 || 650 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 64 || 1.641 || 39 || 650 || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]<br />
|- <br />
| 5650 || 48 || 2.5-3.2 ? || 15-19 ? || || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source] [http://www.notebookcheck.net/ATI-Mobility-Radeon-HD-5650.23697.0.html source]<br />
|- <br />
| 5670 || 71.49 || 1.117 || 64 || 775 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EEFFEE;"| 5670 || 72 || 1.64 || 44 || 850 || || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm-mod (Win7-64) || Sapphire 100287VGAL card is low power<br />
|- <br />
| 5670 || 85 || || || 900 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128<br />
|- <br />
<br />
| 5750 || 116.24 || 1.352 || 86 || 700 || 720 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||<br />
|-<br />
| 5750 || 137 || || || 710 || || || PCI-E 1.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128 using stock memory and GPU clocks<br />
|-<br />
| 5750 || 154.56 || 1.45 || 106 || 830 || 720 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||-v -w128 -f20 underclocked memory clocks from 1150MHz to 300MHz<br />
|- <br />
| 5750 || 170 || || || 870 || || || PCI-E 1.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128 patched BIOS to underclock memory to 300MHz<br />
|-<br />
| 5770 || 156.83 || 1.452 || 108 || 850 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 180 || 1.406 || 128[*] || 950 || 800 || 2.4RC1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 30 (*Overclocked wattage calculated [http://bakkap.free.fr/Misc/wCalc.html here] )<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 205.58 || || || 935 || 300 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-04-28 || -v -w 256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFFF;"| 5830 || 206.64 || 1.181 || 175 || 800 || 1120 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFFFFF;"| 5830 || 241 || 1.377 || 175 || 1006 || || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-03-11 / Win7 64 ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 248 || 1.42 || 175 || 880 || 500 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.46 || -k poclbm VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 245 || 1.4 || 175 || 880 || 900 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm (guiminer) || -v -w 256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFFF;"| 5830 || 285 || || || 960 || || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.47 / poclbm / Win7 64 || VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFFF;"| 5830 || 290 || || || 996 || || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.4 / poclbm / Win7 64 || VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFFFFF;"| 5830 || 307 || || || 996 || || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 64 || VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 240.77 || 1.595 || 151 || 725 || 1440 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 250.26 || 1.657 || 151 || 725 || 1440 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || opencl client || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 252 || 1.575 || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-01-25 ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 255.3 || 1.593 || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-01-25 ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 264 || 1.748 || 151 || 725 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 1.0 x8 || guiminer-20110501 || -v -w128 <br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 280 || 1.75 || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.3 || with BFI_INT<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 292 || 1.825 || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-04-28 -v -f 1 ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 298 || 1.862|| 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-04-28 -v -f 1 -w 64 ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 300 || 1.546 || 194 || 925 (OC) || 1440 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 314 || ? || ? || 820 (OC) || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 1.0 x8 || poclbm || -v -w128 <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 344 || 1.8594 || 185 || 890 (OC) || 1440 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix || <br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 355 || 1.8684 || 190 || 915 || 1440 || || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || poclbm 2011-04-28 -v -f 20 -w128 || Running two in CFX for total of 695-725 MH/s<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 382 || 1.8454 || 207 || 995 || 1440 || || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || phoenix || OC 1.177v on core<br />
|-<br />
| 5870M || 116.5 || ? || ? || ? || ? || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || gui-miner (win-7) ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 313.65 || 1.668 || 188 || 850 || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 313 || 1.665 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo/Linux ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 343 || 1.824 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo/Linux ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 355 || 1.888 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/Linux ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 340 || 1.809 || 188 || 850 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 360 || 1.6822 || 214 || 970 || 700 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL w7-64 || -f 0 -v -w 128 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=6144.msg91959#msg91959 source]<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 408 || 1.8888 || 216 || 980 || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm/Win7x64 || -f 20 -v -w 128, BIT_ALIGN, BFI_INT<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 400 || 1.9047 || 210 || 950 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || Phoenix 1.3 || -k poclbm VECTORS AGGRESSION=7 FASTLOOP BFI_INT<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 421 || 1.9581 || 215 || 975 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.47 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 -k phatk <br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 440 || 2.0000 || 220 || 995 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 438 || 1.9819 || 221 || 1000 (OC) || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm/Linux || -v -w 64 -f 1 <br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 530 || 1.803 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.4.595.10 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/201103.beta3/Windows || -v -w128 -f60<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 535.06 || 1.820 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 560 || 1.905 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 565 || 1.922 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine2 ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 604 || 2.054 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 645 || 1.875|| 344 || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || -f1, Debian 6, fglrx-driver 10.9.3<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 740 || 2.1511 || 344 || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix/1.3 || AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT, memory clock @ 300MHz<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 755 || 2.2076 || 342 || 848 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 28-04-11 || -f 1 -w 256 -v, Ubuntu 10.10, fglrx 11.4, memory clock @ 300MHz<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 802 || 2.31 || 347 || 850 || 3200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix poclbm Ubuntu 11.04 || -q 6 -k AGGRESSION=19 WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT VECTORS, fglrx 11.4, mem clock @ 1000MHz<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5870x2 || 620 || || || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer || -v -w 128<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5870x2 || 826 || || || 950 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.4 w/ Phtak || AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT Memory @ 300MHz<br />
|- <br />
| 6310M || 9.821 || 0.545 || 18 || 500 || 80 || 2.4 || Integrated/APU || poclbm-gui -v -w128 || HP DM1z 18W TDP is shared with the CPU<br />
|- <br />
| 6490M || 16.289 || 0.708 || 23 || || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm-mod (Mac OS X 10.6.7) || MacBook Pro early 2011<br />
|- <br />
| 6850 || 171.59 || 1.351 || 127 || 775 || 960 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||<br />
|- <br />
| 6850 || 196 || || || 850 || 960 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 0<br />
|- <br />
| 6850 || 234.8 || || || 940 || 960 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.3 || AGGRESSION=8 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 220 || 1.236 || 178[*] || 1000 || 960 || 2.4RC1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 30 (*Overclocked wattage calculated [http://bakkap.free.fr/Misc/wCalc.html here] )<br />
|-<br />
| 6870 || 232.47 || 1.540 || 151 || 900 || 1120 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm -v -w 128 ||<br />
|- <br />
| 6870 || 277.47 || || || 940 || 1120 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.3 || AGGRESSION=8 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT<br />
|- <br />
| 6870 || 260.1 || 1.611 || 175 || 1001 || 1150 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm-gui windows7x86 cat 11.3 || -v -w 128 -f 1 <br />
|-<br />
| 6870 || 272 || 1.802 (?) || 151 (?) || 900 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha cat 11.4 sdk 2.4 || -G2 -D stock clocks, debian linux 64bit [http://img690.imageshack.us/img690/853/gpumine1.png source]<br />
|-<br />
| 6870 || 300.06 || 1.830 || 164 || 1020 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.4 cat 11.4 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=8 fastloop mem clock 344<br />
|- <br />
| 6870 || 302 || 1.726 (?) || 175 (?) || 1000 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha cat 11.4 sdk 2.4 || -G2 -D overclocked to 1000, debian linux 64bit [http://img814.imageshack.us/img814/6646/gpumine2.png source]<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 300 || 1.72 || 174 || 1038 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm windows7x86 cat 11.4 || -v -w128 -f1 mem clock 360, fan 100% temp 73C<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 322 || 1.882 || 170 || 1050 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.47 phatk 11.5 sdk 2.4 || BFI_INT VECTORS FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=256, mem clock @ 400MHz<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 295 || || 160 (?) || 810 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 325 || || 200 (?) || 885 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 360 || || 200 (?) || 970 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 360 || || (?) || 870 || 1375 || (?) || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm ||flashed with 6970 BIOS, -v -f30 -w128<br />
|-<br />
| 6970 || 323 || 1.468 || 220 || 880 || 1536 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -w 64, SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.<br />
|-<br />
| 6970 || 372 || || 220 (?) || 900 || || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix (svn trunk 05.14.2011) || clock 900/1375, VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128, fan 45% (auto) / temp 90C<br />
|- <br />
| 6990 || 708 || 2.05 || 346 || 830 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]. SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.<br />
|- <br />
| 6990 || 746 || 1.82 || 410 || 880 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]. SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.<br />
|- <br />
| 6990 || 771 || 1.8804 || 410 || 880 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx. Memory clock @ 1280Mhz.<br />
|- <br />
| 6990 || 772 || 1.8380 || 420 || 900 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix & Poclbm || OC switch ON + overclocked to 900 mhz, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128<br />
|- <br />
|FirePro V8700 || 84.8 || || || 750 || 800 || || || poclbm-mod.03.24.2011 || <br />
|-<br />
|FirePro M5800 || 61.4 || || || 650 || || || || poclbm-mod.03.24.2011 || Ubuntu || <br />
|- <br />
|}<br />
<br />
===Nvidia===<br />
<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! W !! Clock !! SP !! Comment<br />
|-<br />
| 8200 mGPU || 1.2 || || || 1200 || 16 || 128 MB shared memory, "poclbm -w 128 -f 0"<br />
|-<br />
| 8400 GS || 2.3 || || || || || "poclbm -w 128"<br />
|-<br />
| 8600M GT || 4.93 || || || || 32 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 8600GT || 5.66 || || || 1188 || 32 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 8600GT OC || 7.3 || || || 1602 || 32 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.0 poclbm] -w 128 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg72833#msg72833 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 8800GT || 25 || 0.24 || 105 || 1300 || ||<br />
|-<br />
| 8800GT || 24.5 || 0.23 || 105 || 1300 || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 8800GTS || 16.8 || 0.109 || 154 || || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source] [http://www.techspot.com/review/79-geforce-8800-gts-512/page11.html source]<br />
|-<br />
| 8800 GTS || 18.7 || 0.124 || 150 || 1200 || || poclbm -w 64 no vectors<br />
|-<br />
| 9300GE || 1.57 || || || 1300 || 8 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9300GS || 1.69 || || || 1400 || 8 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9300/nForce 730i || 2.15 || || || 1200 || 16 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9400GT || 3.37 || 0.067 || 50 || 1400 || 16 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9400M (MacBook) || 1.90 || 0.32 || 6 || 700 || || poclbm -f 8 no vectors<br />
|-<br />
| 9500GT || 6.75 || 0.135 || 50 || 1400 || 32 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9600GSO || 19.88 || 0.237 || 84 || 1375 || 96 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9600GSO512 || 11.75 || 0.131 || 90 || 1625 || 48 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9600GT || 15.66 || 0.165 || 95 || 1625 || 64 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9600GT Zotac || 15 || || || 1650 || 64 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9600GT OC || 18.8 || <0.198 || >95 || 1981 || 64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.0 poclbm] -w 128 -f 10 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg74610#msg74610 source] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg73353#msg73353 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 9800GT || 30.36 || 0.289 || 105 || 1800 || 112 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9800GTX || 32.54 || 0.232 || 140 || 1688 || 128 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9800GTX+ || 35.39 || 0.251 || 141 || 1836 || 128 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9800GTX+ || 37.23 || 0.266 || 140 || 1890 || 128 || win7x64 275.27 phoenix(1.48) -k poclbm AGGRESSION=3 WORKSIZE=64<br />
|-<br />
|style="background-color:#FFEFEF"| 9800GX2 || 57.83 || 0.294 || 197 || || 2x128 ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background-color:#FFEFEF"| 9800GX2 || 28 || 0.142 || 197 || || 2x128 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]<br />
|-<br />
| G210 || 3.38 || 0.111 || 30.5 || 1402 || 16 ||<br />
|-<br />
| G210 || 3.79 || 0.124 || 30.5 || 1402 || 16 || poclbm -f 1<br />
|-<br />
| GT220 || 9.83 || 0.170 || 58 || 1360 || 48 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GT240 || 19.37 || 0.281 || 69 || 1340 || 96 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GT240 || 21.24 || || || || 96 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4291.0 poclbm-mod] -f 0 -v [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg73383#msg73383 source]<br />
|-<br />
| GTS250 || 35.39 || 0.244 || 145 || 1836 || 128 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTS250 || 35.2 || 0.243 || 145 || 1836 || 128 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTS250 OC || 37 || 0.255 || 145 || 2047 || 128 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX260 || 35.91 || 0.178 || 202 || 1242 || 192 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX260 || 44 || 0.242 || 182 || 1242 || 216 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]<br />
|-<br />
| GTX260c216 || 40.40 || 0.236 || 171 || 1242 || 216 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX260c216 OC || 52.0 || || || 1461 || 216 || "poclbm -w 256 -f 1"<br />
|-<br />
| GTX275 || 50.75 || 0.232 || 219 || 1404 || 240 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX275 || 58 || || || 729/1458 || 240 || poclbm -f 0 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
| GTX280 || 46.84 || 0.198 || 236 || 1296 || 240 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX285 || 53.35 || 0.262 || 204 || 1476 || 240 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX295 || 89.78 || 0.311 || 289 || 1242 || 480 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GT 320M (MacBook Air) || 6.12 || || || 1212 || 48 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GT 330M (Sony Vaio Z) || 7.8 || 0.71 ( 0.3 total) || 11 (26w total) || 1045 || 48 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GT430 || 20.24 || 0.413 || 49 || 1400 || 96 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTS450 || 45.28 || 0.427 || 106 || 1566 || 192 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460SE || 56.39 || 0.376 || 150 || 1300 || 288 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 || 68.31 || 0.427 || 160 || 1350 || 336 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 (2 cards) || 102 || 0.319? || 320? || 1350 || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 (2 cards) OC || 127 || 0.374 || 340 || 1620 || 2x 336 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2444.0 rpcminer-cuda] -gpugrid=128 -gputhreads=128 ver.20110227<br />
|-<br />
| GTX465 || 64.41 || 0.322 || 200 || 1215 || 352 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX470 || 81.98 || 0.381 || 215 || 1215 || 448 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX470 || 94.7 || || || 1414 || ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX470 || 111.9 || || 215 || 1650 || 448 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX470 || 115 || || || 1616 || || phoenix 1.46 poclbm VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=6<br />
|-<br />
| GTX480 || 101.28 || 0.405 || 250 || 1401 || 480 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX560 Ti || 67.7 || 0.39 || 170 || 1700 || 384 || standard EVGA 560, no overclock<br />
|-<br />
| GTX560 Ti || 74.8 || 0.41 || 180 || 1700 || 384 || gigabyte 900Mhz clock; -w 512 -v<br />
|-<br />
| GTX560 OC || 86.7 || <0.51 || >170 || 1800 || 384 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2444.0 rpcminer-cuda] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg72816#msg72816 source]<br />
|-<br />
| GTX570 || 105.83 || 0.483 || 219 || 1464 || 480 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX580 || 140.05 || --- || 244 || 1544 || 512 ||<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro FX 580 || 5.7 || 0.14 || 40 || 1125 || 4 ||rpcminer-cuda, Win, -gpugrid=128 -gputhreads=512<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro FX 1600M || 6 || 0.12 || 50 || 625 || 32 ||rpcminer-cuda, Win<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro NVS 135M || 1.05 || 0.1 || 10 || 800 || 1 || <br />
|-<br />
| Quadro NVS 3100M || 3.6 || 0.257 || 14 || 600 || 16 || rpcminer-cuda, Win, CUDA 3.1.1<br />
|-<br />
| Tesla M2050 || 79.8 || || || || || DiabloMiner<br />
|-<br />
| Tesla M2050 || [http://glennfrancismurray.com/cost-defective-mining-with-gpu-clusters-amazo 100] || 0 || 0 || - || 512 || Amazon AWS [http://glennfrancismurray.com/cost-defective-mining-with-gpu-clusters-amazo CUDA RPC Miner & CUDA 2.0]<br />
|-<br />
|}<br />
<br />
==CPUs/APUs==<br />
<br />
A lot of nice data can be pulled from [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.0 this thread] to seed this section. Also from [https://www.bitcoin.org/wiki/doku.php?id=bitcoin_miners this page on the old wiki].<br />
<br />
Might you wish to throttle CPU load a bit, so it doesn't reach 100<sup>0</sup>C, it can be done with Battle Encoder Shirase to a margin, like, -15% of available CPU cycles.<br />
<br />
I found the best combination to be is to throttle CPU miner to -5% _AND_ set it to least of priority levels, so as not to choke GPU miner up.<br />
<br />
===AMD===<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! nprocs !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! TDP [W] !! CPU Clock !! Mhash/s CPU !! Mhash/s GPU !! GPU !! GPU Clock !! SP !! Software !! Notes<br />
|-<br />
| 4x Opteron 6174 || 48 || 115 || 0.36 || 320W || 2.2 GHz || 2.4<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| cpuminer v0.8.1 || --alg 4way --threads 48<br />
|-<br />
| 2x Opteron 6128 || 16 || 32.4 || 0.141 || 230W || 2 GHz || 32.4<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| 0.3.19 || -4way<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon XP 2000+ || 2 || 0.62 || 0.009 || 70W || 1.67 GHz || 0.62<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| 0.3.18/Ubuntu || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source] [http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm?articleid=914&page=4 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon 64 3500+ || 1 || 1.18 || 0.013 || 89W || 2.54 GHz || 1.18<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| ufasoft v0.4 || overclocked (originally 2.2 GHz)<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon 64 X2 3800+ || 2 || 1.73 || 0.03 || 65 W || 2.00 GHz || 1.73<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || -algo=4way<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon 64 X2 4000+ || 2 || 1.9 || 0.02 || 65W || 2.1 GHz || 1.9<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| rpc-miner<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon 64 X2 4400+ || || 2.09 || 0.032 || 65W || 2.3GHz || 2.09<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| 0.3.19/Win x64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon 64 X2 6000+ || 2 || 2.81 || 0.02 || 125W || 3 GHz || 2.81<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg22881#msg22881 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon 64 X2 6400+ Black Edition || 2 || 2.9 || 0.023 || 125W || 3.2 GHz || 2.9<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| 0.3.20.2 BETA/Win 7 x64 || -4way<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon II X2 240e || 2 || 2.71 || 0.06 || 45W || 2.81 GHz || 2.71<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon II X4 630 || 4 || 10.7 || 0.11 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 10.7<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| bitcoin-miner 0.4 || <br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 3.8 || 0.04 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 3.8<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| 0.3.1x/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 7.2 || 0.08 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 7.2<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| cpu-miner 0.2.1/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X4 955 || 4 || 11 || 0.09 || 125W || 3.2 GHz || 11<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| rpcminer-4way ||<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X4 965 || 4 || 12 || 0.09 || 140W || 3.4 GHz || 11<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| rpcminer-4way ||<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X6 1055T || 6 || 15.84 || 0.13 || 125W || 2.82 GHz || 15.84<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X6 1100T || 6 || 22 || 0.176 || 125W || 3.82 GHz || 22<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| bitcoin-miner || Aciid#bitcoin-dev<br />
|-<br />
| Zacate E-350 || 2 || 11 || 0.615 || 18W || 1.6 Ghz || 1.231 || 9.831 || HD6310M || 492 Mhz || 80 || poclbm -v -w128 + Ufasoft 0.7 || stock speeds<br />
|-<br />
| Zacate E-350 || 2 || 12<br />
|colspan=2|<br />
| 1.648 Ghz || 1.252 || 10.87 || HD6310M || 492 Mhz || 80 || poclbm -v -w 256 -f 1 || "autotune" speed with ASUS EFI BIOS<br />
|}<br />
<br />
===ARM===<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment<br />
|-<br />
| Cortex A8 || 1 || 0.125 || 0.36 || 0.35 W || 0.6 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || Nokia N900: 'cryptopp'<br />
|-<br />
| Cortex A8 || 1 || 0.2 || 0.57 || 0.35 W || 0.6 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || Nokia N900: 'c' algo<br />
|-<br />
| Tegra 250 (2xCortex-A9) || 2 || 0.57 || 1.14 || 0.5 W || 1.0 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-24) || Toshiba AC100, ubuntu, 'c' algo<br />
|-<br />
| ARM 11 || 1 || 0.11 || ? || ? || 0.528 GHz || cpuminer git || T-Mobile Pulse, inside Debian chroot, 'c' algo<br />
|}<br />
<br />
===Intel===<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium III mobile ? || 1 || 0.3 || 0.014 || 21W || 1.07 GHz || 0.3.1x/Win2K || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source] [http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=27380 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Old Xeon 512k (Dual) || 2x1/2 || 2.0 || ? || ? || 3.06GHz || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || HT disabled, algo=4way (twice as fast as the 2nd best algo)<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium 4 2.0A || 1 || 0.85 || || || 2.0 GHz || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft-0.4]/WinXP || -g no -t 2<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium Dual-Core E5400 || 2/2 || 2.27 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.7 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Celeron E330 || 2/2 || 2.2 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.5 GHz || 0.3.19/Ubuntu10.04 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Quad Q6600 || 4/4 || 11.0 || || 105W || 2.40 GHz || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || -a 60 -g no -t 4<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Quad Q9400 || 4/4 || 11 || 0.046 || 95W || 2.66 GHz || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || -a 60 -g no -t 4<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Quad Q9650 || 4/4 || 18.67 || || 95W || 4.00 GHz || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || -a 60 -g no -t 4<br />
|-<br />
| Core i3 530 || 2/4 || 8.31 || 0.10 || 80W || 3.66 GHz || Ufasoft 0.7 || -v -a5 -g no -t 4<br />
|-<br />
| Core i3 M350 || 2/4 || 1.48 || 0.04 || 35W || 2.27 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|- <br />
| Core i5 M450 || 2/4 || 1.8 || 0.05 || 35W || 1.2 GHz || 0.3.17/Win7-54 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source]<br />
|- <br />
| Core i5-650 || 2/4 || 5.1 || 0.04 ? || || 3.2 GHz || cpuminer-0.7 || -4way<br />
|-<br />
| Core i5 ? || 4/? || 6.5 || || || || client from svn || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37621#msg37621 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 4.5 || 0.05 || 95W || 3.1 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-01-22) || cryptopp_asm32<br />
|-<br />
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 14 || 0.15 || 95W || 3.1 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || sse2_64<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 920 || 4/8 || 19.2 || 0.10 || 195 || 4.0 GHz (x21) || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] || -a 5<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 950 || 4/8 || 5.88 || 0.039 || 150W || 3.83 GHz (x23) || bitcoin-0.3.20.2 Win7-64 ||<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 950 || 4/8 || 18.9 || 0.126 || 150W || 3.83 GHz (x23) || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] v0.4 ||<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 980x || 6/12 || 19.2 || 0.15 || 130 || 4.4 GHz (x33) || cpuminer/Win7-64 || <br />
|- <br />
| Core i7 980x || 6/12 || 8.7 || || || 3.9 GHz (x27) || 0.3.17/Win7-64 || <br />
|- <br />
| Core i7 620M || 2/4 || 6.3 || 0.18 || 35 || 2.66 GHz || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] v0.4 || <br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo E6550 || 1/2 || 2.45 || ? || ? || 2.33 GHz || cpuminer 0.7.1 (Linux) || --algo=sse2_64<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo E6850 || 2/2 || 6.75 || 0.10 || 65W || 3.0 Ghz || ufasoft-0.3 ||<br />
|- <br />
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 7.76 || 0.11 || 70W || 3.33 GHz (o/c?) || ufasoft-0.3 || miner optimized for Intel Core<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 2.52 || 0.04 || 65W || 2.66 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo E8400 || 2/2 || 6.9 || ? || ? || 3.0 GHz || ufasoft v0.10|| windows 7/64bit (-t 2)<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo T6400 || 2/2 || 4.2 || 0.12 || 35 W || 2.00 GHz || cpuminer git (Linux) || --algo=sse2_64<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon 3060 || 1/2 || 2.03 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.4GHz || cpuminer 0.8.1 (Linux) || --algo=cryptopp_asm32<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon Prestonia 2.4 (dual) || 2x1/2 || 2.16 || 0.017 || 130W || 2.4 GHz || ufasoft v0.4 || <br />
|-<br />
| Xeon X5355 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 10.13 || 0.16 || 120W || 2.66GHz || bitcoind || Roughly the same speed as the "c" algo in cpuminer<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon X5355 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 22.76 || 0.09 || 120W || 2.66GHz || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || -O2 -march=core2, algo=sse2_64<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5440 || 4/8 || 7.3 || ? || 80W || 2.66 GHz|| Kiv's poclbm-gui || FIXME: Either wrong model # or wrong threads/speed info<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5520 || 4/8 || 6.5 || 0.08 || 80W || 2.27 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5530 || 4/8 || 7.14 || 0.09 || 80W || 2.4 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5630 (dual) || 2x4/8 || 8 || 0.1 || 80W || 2.53 GHz || 0.3.17/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E6520 (dual) || 2x4/8 || 24.7 || ? || ? || 2.53 GHz || ufasoft v0.10 || windows 2008 R2 64bit (-t 16)<br />
|-<br />
| Atom N270 || 2 || 1.19 || 0.24 || 5W || 1.6 GHz || ufasoft v0.10 || <br />
|}<br />
<br />
===Other===<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment<br />
|-<br />
| Cell || 6 || 21 || 0.35 || 60W || 3.2 GHz || cellminer || Sony Playstation 3 (FAT): Needs custom firmware (no links to it, potential issues with Sony assholes.) [https://github.com/verement/cellminer source] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4704.20 source] Total power usage of PS3 fat is 120W but only the Cell cpu is active.<br />
|-<br />
| Cell || 6 || 21 || 0.7 || 35W || 3.2 GHz || cellminer || Sony Playstation 3 (SLIM): Total power usage of PS3 slim is 70W but only the Cell cpu is active.<br />
|}<br />
<br />
==See Also==<br />
<br />
* [[Mining rig]]<br />
* [[Generation Calculator]]<br />
* [[Power Calc]]<br />
* [[OpenCL miner]]<br />
* [http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=745 ATI Stream vs. NVIDIA CUDA - GPGPU computing battle royale]<br />
<br />
[[Category:Mining]]</div>
Mitay007
https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Mining_hardware_comparison&diff=8082
Mining hardware comparison
2011-05-06T11:14:08Z
<p>Mitay007: /* AMD */</p>
<hr />
<div>Below are some statistics about the mining performance of various hardware used in a [[mining rig]].<br />
<br />
The table shows (mostly) stock clock numbers. 10-20% performance improvement can be achieved via overclocking.<br />
<br />
'''Note:''' Clock refers to the Shader clock only (not Core or Memory).<br />
<br />
==Graphics cards==<br />
<br />
===AMD===<br />
To get the maximum performance use the 2.1 release of the ATI Stream SDK. 2.2 wastes CPU time, and 2.3/2.4 drop mining performance by 5-10%.<br />
<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! W !! Clock !! SP !! SDK !! Slot !! Miner !! Notes<br />
|-<br />
| 3XXX || || || || || || || || OpenCL Not Supported<br />
|-<br />
| 42XX || || || || || || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || || OpenCL Not Supported (intergrated/mobile GPU)<br />
|-<br />
| 4350 || 6.93 || 0.346 || 20 || 575 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors <br />
|-<br />
| 4550 || 7.23 || 0.289 || 25 || 600 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors <br />
|- <br />
| 4650 || 31.33 || 0.653 || 48 || 650 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors <br />
|- <br />
| 4670 || 36.14 || 0.613 || 59 || 750 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors<br />
|-<br />
| 4670 || 40.11 || || 59 || 800 || 320 || || AGP x8 || poclbm/Ubuntu 10.10 w/ H == 0 mod [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.msg85236#msg85236 source] || -w 32 -f 0, don't use vectors<br />
|- <br />
| 4730 || 72.29 || 0.657 || 110 || 750 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 4770 || 72.29 || 0.904 || 80 || 750 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 4830 || 55.42 || 0.583 || 95 || 575 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|-<br />
| 4850 || 75.30 || 0.685 || 110 || 625 || 800 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 4860 || 67.47 || 0.519 || 130 || 700 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|-<br />
| 4870 || 90.36 || 0.602 || 150 || 750 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || clmine ||<br />
|-<br />
| 4870 || 78 || || || || || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/Vista 64bit || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source]<br />
|- <br />
| 4890 || 102.41 || 0.539 || 190 || 850 || 800 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 4890 || 108.3 || || 190 || 975 || 800 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 4850X2 || 150.60 || 0.602 || 250 || 625 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 4870X2 || 180.72 || 0.632 || 286 || 750 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 4870X2 || 180.6 || || 286 || 800 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 5450 || 11.99 || 0.631 || 19 || 650 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 5550 || 40.59 || 1.041 || 39 || 550 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 59.96 || 1.538 || 39 || 650 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 64 || 1.641 || 39 || 650 || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]<br />
|- <br />
| 5650 || 48 || 2.5-3.2 ? || 15-19 ? || || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source] [http://www.notebookcheck.net/ATI-Mobility-Radeon-HD-5650.23697.0.html source]<br />
|- <br />
| 5670 || 71.49 || 1.117 || 64 || 775 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EEFFEE;"| 5670 || 72 || 1.64 || 44 || 850 || || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm-mod (Win7-64) || Sapphire 100287VGAL card is low power<br />
|- <br />
| 5670 || 85 || || || 900 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128<br />
|- <br />
<br />
| 5750 || 116.24 || 1.352 || 86 || 700 || 720 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 5750 || 154.56 || 1.45 || 106 || 830 || 720 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||-v -w128 -f20 underclocked memory clocks from 1150MHz to 300MHz<br />
|- <br />
| 5770 || 156.83 || 1.452 || 108 || 850 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 180 || 1.406 || 128[*] || 950 || 800 || 2.4RC1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 30 (*Overclocked wattage calculated [http://bakkap.free.fr/Misc/wCalc.html here] )<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFFF;"| 5830 || 206.64 || 1.181 || 175 || 800 || 1120 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFFFFF;"| 5830 || 241 || 1.377 || 175 || 1006 || || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-03-11 / Win7 64 ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFFF;"| 5830 || 280 || || || 993 || || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.4 / poclbm / Win7 64 || vector aggr 12, BFI_INT<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 240.77 || 1.595 || 151 || 725 || 1440 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 250.26 || 1.657 || 151 || 725 || 1440 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || opencl client || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 252 || 1.575 || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-01-25 ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 255.3 || 1.593 || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-01-25 ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 264 || 1.748 || 151 || 725 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 1.0 x8 || guiminer-20110501 || -v -w128 <br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 280 || 1.75 || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.3 || with BFI_INT<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 292 || 1.825 || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-04-28 -v -f 1 ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 298 || 1.862|| 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-04-28 -v -f 1 -w 64 ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 300 || 1.546 || 194 || 925 (OC) || 1440 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 344 || 1.8594 || 185 || 890 (OC) || 1440 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix || <br />
|-<br />
| 5870M || 116.5 || ? || ? || ? || ? || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || gui-miner (win-7) ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 313.65 || 1.668 || 188 || 850 || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 313 || 1.665 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo/Linux ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 343 || 1.824 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo/Linux ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 355 || 1.888 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/Linux ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 340 || 1.809 || 188 || 850 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 360 || || || 970 || 700 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL w7-64 || -f 0 -v -w 128 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=6144.msg91959#msg91959 source]<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 385 || || || 980 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm-mod/Win7-64 || -f 0 -v -w 128<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 400 || || || 950 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || Phoenix 1.3 || -k poclbm VECTORS AGGRESSION=7 FASTLOOP BFI_INT<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 530 || 1.803 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.4.595.10 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/201103.beta3/Windows || -v -w128 -f60<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 535.06 || 1.820 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 560 || 1.905 || 294 || 725 || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 565 || 1.922 || 294 || || || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine2 ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 604 || 2.054 || 294 || || || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 645 || 1.875|| 344 || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || -f1, Debian 6, fglrx-driver 10.9.3<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 740 || 2.1511 || 344 || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix/1.3 || AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT, memory clock @ 300MHz<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 755 || 2.2076 || 342 || 848 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 28-04-11 || -f 1 -w 256 -v, Ubuntu 10.10, fglrx 11.4, memory clock @ 300MHz<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 802 || 2.31 || 347 || 850 || 3200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix || -q 6 -k poclbm AGGRESSION=19 WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT VECTORS, Ubuntu 11.04, fglrx 11.4, memory clock @ 1000MHz<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5870x2 || 620 || || || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer || -v -w 128<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5870x2 || 820 || || || 975 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix/1.3 || AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT Memory @ 300MHz<br />
|- <br />
| 6310M || 9.821 || 0.545 || 18 || 500 || 80 || 2.4 || Integrated/APU || poclbm-gui -v -w128 || HP DM1z 18W TDP is shared with the CPU<br />
|- <br />
| 6490M || 16.289 || 0.708 || 23 || || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm-mod (Mac OS X 10.6.7) || MacBook Pro early 2011<br />
|- <br />
| 6850 || 171.59 || 1.351 || 127 || 775 || 960 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||<br />
|- <br />
| 6850 || 196 || || || 850 || 960 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 0<br />
|- <br />
| 6850 || 234.8 || || || 940 || 960 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.3 AGGRESSION=8 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 220 || 1.236 || 178[*] || 1000 || 960 || 2.4RC1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 30 (*Overclocked wattage calculated [http://bakkap.free.fr/Misc/wCalc.html here] )<br />
|-<br />
| 6870 || 232.47 || 1.540 || 151 || 900 || 1120 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm -v -w 128 ||<br />
|- <br />
| 6870 || 277.47 || || || 940 || 1120 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.3 AGGRESSION=8 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT || <br />
|- <br />
| 6870 || 260.1 || 1.611 || 175 || 1001 || 1150 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm-gui windows7x86 cat 11.3 || -v -w 128 -f 1 <br />
|-<br />
| 6870 || 267 || 1.768 (?) || 151 (?) || 900 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha cat 11.4 sdk 2.4 || stock clocks, debian linux 64bit [http://www.bitcoinpool.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=59&start=10 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 6870 || 282.23 || 1.611 || 175 || 1047 || 1120 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm windows cat 11.2 || -v -w 128 -f 0 mem clock 300<br />
|- <br />
| 6870 || 296 || 1.691 (?) || 175 (?) || 1000 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha cat 11.4 sdk 2.4 || OC to 1000, debian linux 64bit [http://www.bitcoinpool.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=59&start=10 source]<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 300 || 1.72 || 174 || 1038 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm windows7x86 cat 11.4 || -v -w128 -f1 mem clock 360, fan 100% temp 73C<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 295 || || 160 (?) || 810 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 325 || || 200 (?) || 885 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 360 || || 200 (?) || 970 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250<br />
|-<br />
| 6970 || 323 || 1.468 || 220 || 880 || 1536 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -w 64, SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.<br />
|- <br />
| 6990 || 708 || 1.97 || 346 || 830 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]. SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.<br />
|- <br />
| 6990 || 746 || 1.82 || 410 || 880 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]. SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.<br />
|- <br />
| 6990 || 771 || 1.8804 || 410 || 880 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx. Memory clock @ 1280Mhz.<br />
|- <br />
| 6990 || 772 || 1.8380 || 420 || 900 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix || Overclock switch ON + overclocked to 900 mhz, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128<br />
|- <br />
|FirePro V8700 || 84.8 || || || 750 || 800 || || || poclbm-mod.03.24.2011 || <br />
|-<br />
|FirePro M5800 || 61.4 || || || 650 || || || || poclbm-mod.03.24.2011 || Ubuntu || <br />
|- <br />
|}<br />
<br />
===Nvidia===<br />
<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! W !! Clock !! SP !! Comment<br />
|-<br />
| 8200 mGPU || 1.2 || || || 1200 || 16 || 128 MB shared memory, "poclbm -w 128 -f 0"<br />
|-<br />
| 8400 GS || 2.3 || || || || || "poclbm -w 128"<br />
|-<br />
| 8600M GT || 4.93 || || || || 32 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 8600GT || 5.66 || || || 1188 || 32 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 8600GT OC || 7.3 || || || 1602 || 32 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.0 poclbm] -w 128 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg72833#msg72833 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 8800GT || 25 || 0.24 || 105 || 1300 || ||<br />
|-<br />
| 8800GT || 24.5 || 0.23 || 105 || 1300 || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 8800GTS || 16.8 || 0.109 || 154 || || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source] [http://www.techspot.com/review/79-geforce-8800-gts-512/page11.html source]<br />
|-<br />
| 8800 GTS || 18.7 || 0.124 || 150 || 1200 || || poclbm -w 64 no vectors<br />
|-<br />
| 9300GE || 1.57 || || || 1300 || 8 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9300GS || 1.69 || || || 1400 || 8 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9400GT || 3.37 || 0.067 || 50 || 1400 || 16 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9400M (MacBook) || 1.90 || 0.32 || 6 || 700 || || poclbm -f 8 no vectors<br />
|-<br />
| 9500GT || 6.75 || 0.135 || 50 || 1400 || 32 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9600GSO || 19.88 || 0.237 || 84 || 1375 || 96 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9600GSO512 || 11.75 || 0.131 || 90 || 1625 || 48 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9600GT || 15.66 || 0.165 || 95 || 1625 || 64 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9600GT OC || 18.8 || <0.198 || >95 || 1981 || 64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.0 poclbm] -w 128 -f 10 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg74610#msg74610 source] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg73353#msg73353 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 9800GT || 30.36 || 0.289 || 105 || 1800 || 112 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9800GTX || 32.54 || 0.232 || 140 || 1688 || 128 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9800GTX+ || 35.39 || 0.251 || 141 || 1836 || 128 ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background-color:#FFEFEF"| 9800GX2 || 57.83 || 0.294 || 197 || || 2x128 ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background-color:#FFEFEF"| 9800GX2 || 28 || 0.142 || 197 || || 2x128 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]<br />
|-<br />
| G210 || 3.38 || 0.111 || 30.5 || 1402 || 16 ||<br />
|-<br />
| G210 || 3.79 || 0.124 || 30.5 || 1402 || 16 || poclbm -f 1<br />
|-<br />
| GT220 || 9.83 || 0.170 || 58 || 1360 || 48 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GT240 || 19.37 || 0.281 || 69 || 1340 || 96 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GT240 || 21.24 || || || || 96 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4291.0 poclbm-mod] -f 0 -v [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg73383#msg73383 source]<br />
|-<br />
| GTS250 || 35.39 || 0.244 || 145 || 1836 || 128 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTS250 || 35.2 || 0.243 || 145 || 1836 || 128 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTS250 OC || 37 || 0.255 || 145 || 2047 || 128 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX260 || 35.91 || 0.178 || 202 || 1242 || 192 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX260 || 44 || 0.242 || 182 || 1242 || 216 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]<br />
|-<br />
| GTX260c216 || 40.40 || 0.236 || 171 || 1242 || 216 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX260c216 OC || 52.0 || || || 1461 || 216 || "poclbm -w 256 -f 1"<br />
|-<br />
| GTX275 || 50.75 || 0.232 || 219 || 1404 || 240 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX275 || 58 || || || 729/1458 || 240 || poclbm -f 0 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
| GTX280 || 46.84 || 0.198 || 236 || 1296 || 240 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX285 || 53.35 || 0.262 || 204 || 1476 || 240 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX295 || 89.78 || 0.311 || 289 || 1242 || 480 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GT 320M (MacBook Air) || 6.12 || || || 1212 || 48 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GT 330M (Sony Vaio Z) || 7.8 || 0.71 ( 0.3 total) || 11 (26w total) || 1045 || 48 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GT430 || 20.24 || 0.413 || 49 || 1400 || 96 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTS450 || 45.28 || 0.427 || 106 || 1566 || 192 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460SE || 56.39 || 0.376 || 150 || 1300 || 288 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 || 68.31 || 0.427 || 160 || 1350 || 336 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 (2 cards) || 102 || 0.319? || 320? || 1350 || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 (2 cards) OC || 127 || 0.374 || 340 || 1620 || 2x 336 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2444.0 rpcminer-cuda] -gpugrid=128 -gputhreads=128 ver.20110227<br />
|-<br />
| GTX465 || 64.41 || 0.322 || 200 || 1215 || 352 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX470 || 81.98 || 0.381 || 215 || 1215 || 448 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX470 || 94.7 || || || 1414 || ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX470 || 111.9 || || 215 || 1650 || 448 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX480 || 101.28 || 0.405 || 250 || 1401 || 480 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX560 Ti || 67.7 || 0.39 || 170 || 1700 || 384 || standard EVGA 560, no overclock<br />
|-<br />
| GTX560 OC || 86.7 || <0.51 || >170 || 1800 || 384 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2444.0 rpcminer-cuda] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg72816#msg72816 source]<br />
|-<br />
| GTX570 || 105.83 || 0.483 || 219 || 1464 || 480 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX580 || 140.05 || --- || 244 || 1544 || 512 ||<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro FX 580 || 5.7 || 0.14 || 40 || 1125 || 4 ||rpcminer-cuda, Win, -gpugrid=128 -gputhreads=512<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro FX 1600M || 6 || 0.12 || 50 || 625 || 32 ||rpcminer-cuda, Win<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro NVS 135M || 1.05 || 0.1 || 10 || 800 || 1 || <br />
|-<br />
| Quadro NVS 3100M || 3.6 || 0.257 || 14 || 600 || 16 || rpcminer-cuda, Win, CUDA 3.1.1<br />
|-<br />
| Tesla M2050 || 79.8 || || || || || DiabloMiner<br />
|-<br />
|}<br />
<br />
==CPUs/APUs==<br />
<br />
A lot of nice data can be pulled from [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.0 this thread] to seed this section. Also from [https://www.bitcoin.org/wiki/doku.php?id=bitcoin_miners this page on the old wiki].<br />
<br />
===AMD===<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! nprocs !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! TDP [W] !! CPU Clock !! Mhash/s CPU !! Mhash/s GPU !! GPU !! GPU Clock !! SP !! Software !! Notes<br />
|-<br />
| 4x Opteron 6174 || 48 || 115 || 0.36 || 320W || 2.2 GHz || 2.4<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| cpuminer v0.8.1 || --alg 4way --threads 48<br />
|-<br />
| 2x Opteron 6128 || 16 || 32.4 || 0.141 || 230W || 2 GHz || 32.4<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| 0.3.19 || -4way<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon XP 2000+ || 2 || 0.62 || 0.009 || 70W || 1.67 GHz || 0.62<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| 0.3.18/Ubuntu || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source] [http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm?articleid=914&page=4 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon 64 3500+ || 1 || 1.18 || 0.013 || 89W || 2.54 GHz || 1.18<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| ufasoft v0.4 || overclocked (originally 2.2 GHz)<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon 64 X2 3800+ || 2 || 1.73 || 0.03 || 65 W || 2.00 GHz || 1.73<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || -algo=4way<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon 64 X2 4000+ || 2 || 1.9 || 0.02 || 65W || 2.1 GHz || 1.9<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| rpc-miner<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon 64 X2 4400+ || || 2.09 || 0.032 || 65W || 2.3GHz || 2.09<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| 0.3.19/Win x64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon 64 X2 6000+ || 2 || 2.81 || 0.02 || 125W || 3 GHz || 2.81<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg22881#msg22881 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon 64 X2 6400+ Black Edition || 2 || 2.9 || 0.023 || 125W || 3.2 GHz || 2.9<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| 0.3.20.2 BETA/Win 7 x64 || -4way<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon II X2 240e || 2 || 2.71 || 0.06 || 45W || 2.81 GHz || 2.71<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon II X4 630 || 4 || 10.7 || 0.11 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 10.7<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| bitcoin-miner 0.4 || <br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 3.8 || 0.04 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 3.8<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| 0.3.1x/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 7.2 || 0.08 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 7.2<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| cpu-miner 0.2.1/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X4 955 || 4 || 11 || 0.09 || 125W || 3.2 GHz || 11<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| rpcminer-4way ||<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X6 1055T || 6 || 15.84 || 0.13 || 125W || 2.82 GHz || 15.84<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X6 1100T || 6 || 22 || 0.176 || 125W || 3.82 GHz || 22<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| bitcoin-miner || Aciid#bitcoin-dev<br />
|-<br />
| Zacate E-350 || 2 || 11 || 0.615 || 18W || 1.6 Ghz || 1.231 || 9.831 || HD6310M || 492 Mhz || 80 || poclbm -v -w128 + Ufasoft 0.7 || stock speeds<br />
|-<br />
| Zacate E-350 || 2 || 12<br />
|colspan=2|<br />
| 1.648 Ghz || 1.252 || 10.87 || HD6310M || 492 Mhz || 80 || poclbm -v -w 256 -f 1 || "autotune" speed with ASUS EFI BIOS<br />
|}<br />
<br />
===Intel===<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium III mobile ? || 1 || 0.3 || 0.014 || 21W || 1.07 GHz || 0.3.1x/Win2K || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source] [http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=27380 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Old Xeon 512k (Dual) || 2x1/2 || 2.0 || ? || ? || 3.06GHz || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || HT disabled, algo=4way (twice as fast as the 2nd best algo)<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium 4 2.0A || 1 || 0.85 || || || 2.0 GHz || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft-0.4]/WinXP || -g no -t 2<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium Dual-Core E5400 || 2/2 || 2.27 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.7 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Celeron E330 || 2/2 || 2.2 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.5 GHz || 0.3.19/Ubuntu10.04 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Core i3 530 || 2/4 || 8.31 || 0.10 || 80W || 3.66 GHz || Ufasoft 0.7 || -v -a5 -g no -t 4<br />
|-<br />
| Core i3 M350 || 2/4 || 1.48 || 0.04 || 35W || 2.27 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|- <br />
| Core i5 M450 || 2/4 || 1.8 || 0.05 || 35W || 1.2 GHz || 0.3.17/Win7-54 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source]<br />
|- <br />
| Core i5-650 || 2/4 || 5.1 || 0.04 ? || || 3.2 GHz || cpuminer-0.7 || -4way<br />
|-<br />
| Core i5 ? || 4/? || 6.5 || || || || client from svn || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37621#msg37621 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 4.5 || 0.05 || 95W || 3.1 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-01-22) || cryptopp_asm32<br />
|-<br />
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 14 || 0.15 || 95W || 3.1 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || sse2_64<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 920 || 4/8 || 19.2 || 0.10 || 195 || 4.0 GHz (x21) || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] || -a 5<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 950 || 4/8 || 5.88 || 0.039 || 150W || 3.83 GHz (x23) || bitcoin-0.3.20.2 Win7-64 ||<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 950 || 4/8 || 18.9 || 0.126 || 150W || 3.83 GHz (x23) || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] v0.4 ||<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 980x || 6/12 || 19.2 || 0.15 || 130 || 4.4 GHz (x33) || cpuminer/Win7-64 || <br />
|- <br />
| Core i7 980x || 6/12 || 8.7 || || || 3.9 GHz (x27) || 0.3.17/Win7-64 || <br />
|- <br />
| Core i7 620M || 2/4 || 6.3 || 0.18 || 35 || 2.66 GHz || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] v0.4 || <br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo E6550 || 1/2 || 2.45 || ? || ? || 2.33 GHz || cpuminer 0.7.1 (Linux) || --algo=sse2_64<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo E6850 || 2/2 || 6.75 || 0.10 || 65W || 3.0 Ghz || ufasoft-0.3 ||<br />
|- <br />
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 7.76 || 0.11 || 70W || 3.33 GHz (o/c?) || ufasoft-0.3 || miner optimized for Intel Core<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 2.52 || 0.04 || 65W || 2.66 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon 3060 || 1/2 || 2.03 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.4GHz || cpuminer 0.8.1 (Linux) || --algo=cryptopp_asm32<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon Prestonia 2.4 (dual) || 2x1/2 || 2.16 || 0.017 || 130W || 2.4 GHz || ufasoft v0.4 || <br />
|-<br />
| Xeon X5355 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 10.13 || 0.16 || 120W || 2.66GHz || bitcoind || Roughly the same speed as the "c" algo in cpuminer<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon X5355 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 22.76 || 0.09 || 120W || 2.66GHz || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || -O2 -march=core2, algo=sse2_64<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5440 || 4/8 || 7.3 || ? || 80W || 2.66 GHz|| Kiv's poclbm-gui || FIXME: Either wrong model # or wrong threads/speed info<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5520 || 4/8 || 6.5 || 0.08 || 80W || 2.27 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5530 || 4/8 || 7.14 || 0.09 || 80W || 2.4 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5630 (dual) || 2x4/8 || 8 || 0.1 || 80W || 2.53 GHz || 0.3.17/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Atom N270 || 1 || 0.42 || '''0.17''' || 2.5W || 1.6 GHz || 0.3.1x/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]<br />
|}<br />
<br />
==Other Devices==<br />
<br />
===Consoles===<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Device !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment<br />
|-<br />
| Sony Playstation 3 (FAT) || 6 || 21 || 0.35 || 60W || 3.2 GHz || cellminer || Needs custom firmware (no links to it, potential issues with Sony assholes.) [https://github.com/verement/cellminer source] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4704.20 source] Total power usage of PS3 fat is 120W but only the Cell cpu is active.<br />
|-<br />
| Sony Playstation 3 (SLIM) || 6 || 21 || 0.7 || 35W || 3.2 GHz || cellminer || Total power usage of PS3 slim is 70W but only the Cell cpu is active.<br />
|}<br />
<br />
===ARM devices===<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment<br />
|-<br />
| Cortex A8 || 1 || 0.125 || 0.36 || 0.35 W || 0.6 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || Nokia N900: 'cryptopp'<br />
|-<br />
| Cortex A8 || 1 || 0.2 || 0.57 || 0.35 W || 0.6 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || Nokia N900: 'c' algo<br />
|-<br />
| Tegra 250 (2xCortex-A9) || 2 || 0.57 || 1.14 || 0.5 W || 1.0 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-24) || Toshiba AC100, ubuntu, 'c' algo<br />
|}<br />
<br />
<br />
==See Also==<br />
<br />
* [[Mining rig]]<br />
* [[Generation Calculator]]<br />
* [[Power Calc]]<br />
* [[OpenCL miner]]<br />
* [http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=745 ATI Stream vs. NVIDIA CUDA - GPGPU computing battle royale]<br />
<br />
[[Category:Mining]]</div>
Mitay007
https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Mining_hardware_comparison&diff=7927
Mining hardware comparison
2011-05-02T20:08:49Z
<p>Mitay007: /* AMD */</p>
<hr />
<div>Below are some statistics about the mining performance of various hardware used in a [[mining rig]].<br />
<br />
The table shows (mostly) stock clock numbers. 10-20% performance improvement can be achieved via overclocking.<br />
<br />
==Graphics cards==<br />
<br />
===AMD===<br />
To get the maximum performance use the 2.1 release of the ATI Stream SDK. 2.2 wastes CPU time, and 2.3/2.4 drop mining performance by 5-10%.<br />
<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! W !! Clock !! SP !! SDK !! Slot !! Miner !! Notes<br />
|-<br />
| 3XXX || || || || || || || || OpenCL Not Supported<br />
|-<br />
| 42XX || || || || || || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || || OpenCL Not Supported (intergrated/mobile GPU)<br />
|-<br />
| 4350 || 6.93 || 0.346 || 20 || 575 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors <br />
|-<br />
| 4550 || 7.23 || 0.289 || 25 || 600 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors <br />
|- <br />
| 4650 || 31.33 || 0.653 || 48 || 650 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors <br />
|- <br />
| 4670 || 36.14 || 0.613 || 59 || 750 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors<br />
|-<br />
| 4670 || 40.11 || || 59 || 800 || 320 || || AGP x8 || poclbm/Ubuntu 10.10 w/ H == 0 mod [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.msg85236#msg85236 source] || -w 32 -f 0, don't use vectors<br />
|- <br />
| 4730 || 72.29 || 0.657 || 110 || 750 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 4770 || 72.29 || 0.904 || 80 || 750 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 4830 || 55.42 || 0.583 || 95 || 575 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|-<br />
| 4850 || 75.30 || 0.685 || 110 || 625 || 800 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 4860 || 67.47 || 0.519 || 130 || 700 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|-<br />
| 4870 || 90.36 || 0.602 || 150 || 750 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || clmine ||<br />
|-<br />
| 4870 || 78 || || || || || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/Vista 64bit || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source]<br />
|- <br />
| 4890 || 102.41 || 0.539 || 190 || 850 || 800 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 4890 || 108.3 || || 190 || 975 || 800 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 4850X2 || 150.60 || 0.602 || 250 || 625 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 4870X2 || 180.72 || 0.632 || 286 || 750 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 4870X2 || 180.6 || || 286 || 800 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 5450 || 11.99 || 0.631 || 19 || 650 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 5550 || 40.59 || 1.041 || 39 || 550 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 59.96 || 1.538 || 39 || 650 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 64 || 1.641 || 39 || 650 || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]<br />
|- <br />
| 5650 || 48 || 2.5-3.2 ? || 15-19 ? || || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source] [http://www.notebookcheck.net/ATI-Mobility-Radeon-HD-5650.23697.0.html source]<br />
|- <br />
| 5670 || 71.49 || 1.117 || 64 || 775 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EEFFEE;"| 5670 || 72 || 1.64 || 44 || 850 || || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm-mod (Win7-64) || Sapphire 100287VGAL card is low power<br />
|- <br />
| 5670 || 85 || || || 900 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128<br />
|- <br />
<br />
| 5750 || 116.24 || 1.352 || 86 || 700 || 720 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 5770 || 156.83 || 1.452 || 108 || 850 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 180 || 1.406 || 128[*] || 950 || 800 || 2.4RC1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 30 (*Overclocked wattage calculated [http://bakkap.free.fr/Misc/wCalc.html here] )<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFFF;"| 5830 || 206.64 || 1.181 || 175 || 800 || 1120 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFFFFF;"| 5830 || 241 || 1.377 || 175 || 1006 || || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-03-11 / Win7 64 ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 240.77 || 1.595 || 151 || 725 || 1440 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 250.26 || 1.657 || 151 || || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || opencl client || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 252 || 1.669 || 151 || 765 || || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-01-25 ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 255.3 || 1.690 || 151 || 765 || || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-01-25 ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 280 || 1.69 || 151 || 765 || || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.3 || with BFI_INT<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 292 || 1.934 || 151 || 765 || || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-04-28 -v -f 1 ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 298 || 1.974 || 151 || 765 || || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-04-28 -v -f 1 -w 64 ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 300 || 1.987 || 151 || 925 (OC) || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]<br />
|- <br />
| 5870M || 116.5 || ? || ? || ? || ? || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || gui-miner (win-7) ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 313.65 || 1.668 || 188 || 850 || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 313 || 1.665 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo/Linux ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 343 || 1.824 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo/Linux ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 355 || 1.888 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/Linux ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 340 || 1.809 || 188 || 850 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 360 || || || 970 || 700 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL w7-64 || -f 0 -v -w 128 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=6144.msg91959#msg91959 source]<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 385 || || || 980 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm-mod/Win7-64 || -f 0 -v -w 128<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 400 || || || 950 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || Phoenix 1.3 || -k poclbm VECTORS AGGRESSION=7 FASTLOOP BFI_INT<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 530 || 1.803 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.4.595.10 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/201103.beta3/Windows || -v -w128 -f60<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 535.06 || 1.820 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 560 || 1.905 || 294 || 725 || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 565 || 1.922 || 294 || || || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine2 ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 604 || 2.054 || 294 || || || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 645 || 1.875|| 344 || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || -f1, Debian 6, fglrx-driver 10.9.3<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 740 || 2.1511 || 344 || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix/1.3 || AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT, memory clock @ 300MHz<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 755 || 2.2076 || 342 || 848 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 28-04-11 || -f 1 -w 256 -v, Ubuntu 10.10, fglrx 11.4, memory clock @ 300MHz<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5870x2 || 620 || || || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer || -v -w 128<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5870x2 || 820 || || || 975 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix/1.3 || AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT Memory @ 300MHz<br />
|- <br />
| 6310M || 9.821 || 0.545 || 18 || 500 || 80 || 2.4 || Integrated/APU || poclbm-gui -v -w128 || HP DM1z 18W TDP is shared with the CPU<br />
|- <br />
| 6490M || 16.289 || 0.708 || 23 || || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm-mod (Mac OS X 10.6.7) || MacBook Pro early 2011<br />
|- <br />
| 6850 || 171.59 || 1.351 || 127 || 775 || 960 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||<br />
|- <br />
| 6850 || 196 || || || 850 || 960 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 0<br />
|- <br />
| 6850 || 234.8 || || || 940 || 960 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.3 AGGRESSION=8 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 220 || 1.236 || 178[*] || 1000 || 960 || 2.4RC1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 30 (*Overclocked wattage calculated [http://bakkap.free.fr/Misc/wCalc.html here] )<br />
|-<br />
| 6870 || 232.47 || 1.540 || 151 || 900 || 1120 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm -v -w 128 ||<br />
|- <br />
| 6870 || 277.47 || || || 940 || 1120 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.3 AGGRESSION=8 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT || <br />
|- <br />
| 6870 || 260.1 || 1.611 || 175 || 1001 || 1150 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm-gui windows7x86 cat 11.3 || -v -w 128 -f 1 <br />
|-<br />
| 6870 || 267 || 1.768 (?) || 151 (?) || 900 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha cat 11.4 sdk 2.4 || stock clocks, debian linux 64bit [http://www.bitcoinpool.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=59&start=10 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 6870 || 282.23 || 1.611 || 175 || 1047 || 1120 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm windows cat 11.2 || -v -w 128 -f 0 mem clock 300<br />
|- <br />
| 6870 || 296 || 1.691 (?) || 175 (?) || 1000 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha cat 11.4 sdk 2.4 || OC to 1000, debian linux 64bit [http://www.bitcoinpool.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=59&start=10 source]<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 300 || 1.72 || 174 || 1038 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm windows7x86 cat 11.4 || -v -w128 -f1 mem clock 360, fan 100% temp 73C<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 295 || || 160 (?) || 810 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 325 || || 200 (?) || 885 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 360 || || 200 (?) || 970 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250<br />
|-<br />
| 6970 || 323 || 1.468 || 220 || 880 || 1536 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -w 64, SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.<br />
|- <br />
| 6990 || 708 || 1.97 || 346 || 830 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]. SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.<br />
|- <br />
| 6990 || 746 || 1.82 || 410 || 880 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]. SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.<br />
|- <br />
| 6990 || 771 || 1.8804 || 410 || 880 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx. Memory clock @ 1280Mhz.<br />
|- <br />
| 6990 || 772 || 1.8380 || 420 || 900 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix || Overclock switch ON + overclocked to 900 mhz, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128<br />
|- <br />
|FirePro V8700 || 84.8 || || || 750 || 800 || || || poclbm-mod.03.24.2011 || <br />
|-<br />
|FirePro M5800 || 61.4 || || || 650 || || || || poclbm-mod.03.24.2011 || Ubuntu || <br />
|- <br />
|}<br />
<br />
===Nvidia===<br />
<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! W !! Clock !! SP !! Comment<br />
|-<br />
| 8200 mGPU || 1.2 || || || 1200 || 16 || 128 MB shared memory, "poclbm -w 128 -f 0"<br />
|-<br />
| 8400 GS || 2.3 || || || || || "poclbm -w 128"<br />
|-<br />
| 8600M GT || 4.93 || || || || 32 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 8600GT || 5.66 || || || 1188 || 32 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 8600GT OC || 7.3 || || || 1602 || 32 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.0 poclbm] -w 128 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg72833#msg72833 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 8800GT || 25 || 0.24 || 105 || 1300 || ||<br />
|-<br />
| 8800GT || 24.5 || 0.23 || 105 || 1300 || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 8800GTS || 16.8 || 0.109 || 154 || || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source] [http://www.techspot.com/review/79-geforce-8800-gts-512/page11.html source]<br />
|-<br />
| 8800 GTS || 18.7 || 0.124 || 150 || 1200 || || poclbm -w 64 no vectors<br />
|-<br />
| 9300GE || 1.57 || || || 1300 || 8 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9300GS || 1.69 || || || 1400 || 8 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9400GT || 3.37 || 0.067 || 50 || 1400 || 16 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9400M (MacBook) || 1.90 || 0.32 || 6 || 700 || || poclbm -f 8 no vectors<br />
|-<br />
| 9500GT || 6.75 || 0.135 || 50 || 1400 || 32 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9600GSO || 19.88 || 0.237 || 84 || 1375 || 96 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9600GSO512 || 11.75 || 0.131 || 90 || 1625 || 48 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9600GT || 15.66 || 0.165 || 95 || 1625 || 64 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9600GT OC || 18.8 || <0.198 || >95 || 1981 || 64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.0 poclbm] -w 128 -f 10 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg74610#msg74610 source] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg73353#msg73353 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 9800GT || 30.36 || 0.289 || 105 || 1800 || 112 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9800GTX || 32.54 || 0.232 || 140 || 1688 || 128 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9800GTX+ || 35.39 || 0.251 || 141 || 1836 || 128 ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background-color:#FFEFEF"| 9800GX2 || 57.83 || 0.294 || 197 || || 2x128 ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background-color:#FFEFEF"| 9800GX2 || 28 || 0.142 || 197 || || 2x128 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]<br />
|-<br />
| G210 || 3.38 || 0.111 || 30.5 || 1402 || 16 ||<br />
|-<br />
| G210 || 3.79 || 0.124 || 30.5 || 1402 || 16 || poclbm -f 1<br />
|-<br />
| GT220 || 9.83 || 0.170 || 58 || 1360 || 48 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GT240 || 19.37 || 0.281 || 69 || 1340 || 96 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GT240 || 21.24 || || || || 96 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4291.0 poclbm-mod] -f 0 -v [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg73383#msg73383 source]<br />
|-<br />
| GTS250 || 35.39 || 0.244 || 145 || 1836 || 128 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX260 || 35.91 || 0.178 || 202 || 1242 || 192 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX260 || 44 || 0.242 || 182 || 1242 || 216 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]<br />
|-<br />
| GTX260c216 || 40.40 || 0.236 || 171 || 1242 || 216 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX260c216 OC || 52.0 || || || 1461 || 216 || "poclbm -w 256 -f 1"<br />
|-<br />
| GTX275 || 50.75 || 0.232 || 219 || 1404 || 240 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX275 || 58 || || || 729/1458 || 240 || poclbm -f 0 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
| GTX280 || 46.84 || 0.198 || 236 || 1296 || 240 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX285 || 53.35 || 0.262 || 204 || 1476 || 240 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX295 || 89.78 || 0.311 || 289 || 1242 || 480 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GT 320M (MacBook Air) || 6.12 || || || 1212 || 48 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GT 330M (Sony Vaio Z) || 7.8 || 0.71 ( 0.3 total) || 11 (26w total) || 1045 || 48 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GT430 || 20.24 || 0.413 || 49 || 1400 || 96 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTS450 || 45.28 || 0.427 || 106 || 1566 || 192 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460SE || 56.39 || 0.376 || 150 || 1300 || 288 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 || 68.31 || 0.427 || 160 || 1350 || 336 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 (2 cards) || 102 || 0.319? || 320? || 1350 || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 (2 cards) OC || 127 || 0.374 || 340 || 1620 || 2x 336 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2444.0 rpcminer-cuda] -gpugrid=128 -gputhreads=128 ver.20110227<br />
|-<br />
| GTX465 || 64.41 || 0.322 || 200 || 1215 || 352 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX470 || 81.98 || 0.381 || 215 || 1215 || 448 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX470 || 94.7 || || || 1414 || ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX470 || 111.9 || || 215 || 1650 || 448 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX480 || 101.28 || 0.405 || 250 || 1401 || 480 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX560 Ti || 67.7 || 0.39 || 170 || 1700 || 384 || standard EVGA 560, no overclock<br />
|-<br />
| GTX560 OC || 86.7 || <0.51 || >170 || 1800 || 384 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2444.0 rpcminer-cuda] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg72816#msg72816 source]<br />
|-<br />
| GTX570 || 105.83 || 0.483 || 219 || 1464 || 480 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX580 || 140.05 || --- || 244 || 1544 || 512 ||<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro FX 580 || 5.7 || 0.14 || 40 || 1125 || 4 ||rpcminer-cuda, Win, -gpugrid=128 -gputhreads=512<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro FX 1600M || 6 || 0.12 || 50 || 625 || 32 ||rpcminer-cuda, Win<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro NVS 135M || 1.05 || 0.1 || 10 || 800 || 1 || <br />
|-<br />
| Quadro NVS 3100M || 3.6 || 0.257 || 14 || 600 || 16 || rpcminer-cuda, Win, CUDA 3.1.1<br />
|-<br />
| Tesla M2050 || 79.8 || || || || || DiabloMiner<br />
|-<br />
|}<br />
<br />
==CPUs/APUs==<br />
<br />
A lot of nice data can be pulled from [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.0 this thread] to seed this section. Also from [https://www.bitcoin.org/wiki/doku.php?id=bitcoin_miners this page on the old wiki].<br />
<br />
===AMD===<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! nprocs !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! TDP [W] !! CPU Clock !! Mhash/s CPU !! Mhash/s GPU !! GPU !! GPU Clock !! SP !! Software !! Notes<br />
|-<br />
| 4x Opteron 6174 || 48 || 115 || 0.36 || 320W || 2.2 GHz || 2.4<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| cpuminer v0.8.1 || --alg 4way --threads 48<br />
|-<br />
| 2x Opteron 6128 || 16 || 32.4 || 0.141 || 230W || 2 GHz || 32.4<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| 0.3.19 || -4way<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon XP 2000+ || 2 || 0.62 || 0.009 || 70W || 1.67 GHz || 0.62<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| 0.3.18/Ubuntu || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source] [http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm?articleid=914&page=4 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon 64 3500+ || 1 || 1.18 || 0.013 || 89W || 2.54 GHz || 1.18<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| ufasoft v0.4 || overclocked (originally 2.2 GHz)<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon 64 X2 3800+ || 2 || 1.73 || 0.03 || 65 W || 2.00 GHz || 1.73<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || -algo=4way<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon 64 X2 4000+ || 2 || 1.9 || 0.02 || 65W || 2.1 GHz || 1.9<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| rpc-miner<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon 64 X2 4400+ || || 2.09 || 0.032 || 65W || 2.3GHz || 2.09<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| 0.3.19/Win x64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon 64 X2 6000+ || 2 || 2.81 || 0.02 || 125W || 3 GHz || 2.81<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg22881#msg22881 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon 64 X2 6400+ Black Edition || 2 || 2.9 || 0.023 || 125W || 3.2 GHz || 2.9<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| 0.3.20.2 BETA/Win 7 x64 || -4way<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon II X2 240e || 2 || 2.71 || 0.06 || 45W || 2.81 GHz || 2.71<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon II X4 630 || 4 || 10.7 || 0.11 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 10.7<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| bitcoin-miner 0.4 || <br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 3.8 || 0.04 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 3.8<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| 0.3.1x/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 7.2 || 0.08 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 7.2<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| cpu-miner 0.2.1/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X4 955 || 4 || 11 || 0.09 || 125W || 3.2 GHz || 11<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| rpcminer-4way ||<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X6 1055T || 6 || 15.84 || 0.13 || 125W || 2.82 GHz || 15.84<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X6 1100T || 6 || 22 || 0.176 || 125W || 3.82 GHz || 22<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| bitcoin-miner || Aciid#bitcoin-dev<br />
|-<br />
| Zacate E-350 || 2 || 11 || 0.615 || 18W || 1.6 Ghz || 1.231 || 9.831 || HD6310M || 492 Mhz || 80 || poclbm -v -w128 + Ufasoft 0.7 || stock speeds<br />
|-<br />
| Zacate E-350 || 2 || 12<br />
|colspan=2|<br />
| 1.648 Ghz || 1.252 || 10.87 || HD6310M || 492 Mhz || 80 || poclbm -v -w 256 -f 1 || "autotune" speed with ASUS EFI BIOS<br />
|}<br />
<br />
===Intel===<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium III mobile ? || 1 || 0.3 || 0.014 || 21W || 1.07 GHz || 0.3.1x/Win2K || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source] [http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=27380 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Old Xeon 512k (Dual) || 2x1/2 || 2.0 || ? || ? || 3.06GHz || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || HT disabled, algo=4way (twice as fast as the 2nd best algo)<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium 4 2.0A || 1 || 0.85 || || || 2.0 GHz || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft-0.4]/WinXP || -g no -t 2<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium Dual-Core E5400 || 2/2 || 2.27 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.7 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Celeron E330 || 2/2 || 2.2 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.5 GHz || 0.3.19/Ubuntu10.04 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Core i3 530 || 2/4 || 8.31 || 0.10 || 80W || 3.66 GHz || Ufasoft 0.7 || -v -a5 -g no -t 4<br />
|-<br />
| Core i3 M350 || 2/4 || 1.48 || 0.04 || 35W || 2.27 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|- <br />
| Core i5 M450 || 2/4 || 1.8 || 0.05 || 35W || 1.2 GHz || 0.3.17/Win7-54 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source]<br />
|- <br />
| Core i5-650 || 2/4 || 5.1 || 0.04 ? || || 3.2 GHz || cpuminer-0.7 || -4way<br />
|-<br />
| Core i5 ? || 4/? || 6.5 || || || || client from svn || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37621#msg37621 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 4.5 || 0.05 || 95W || 3.1 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-01-22) || cryptopp_asm32<br />
|-<br />
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 14 || 0.15 || 95W || 3.1 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || sse2_64<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 920 || 4/8 || 19.2 || 0.10 || 195 || 4.0 GHz (x21) || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] || -a 5<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 950 || 4/8 || 5.88 || 0.039 || 150W || 3.83 GHz (x23) || bitcoin-0.3.20.2 Win7-64 ||<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 950 || 4/8 || 18.9 || 0.126 || 150W || 3.83 GHz (x23) || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] v0.4 ||<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 980x || 6/12 || 19.2 || 0.15 || 130 || 4.4 GHz (x33) || cpuminer/Win7-64 || <br />
|- <br />
| Core i7 980x || 6/12 || 8.7 || || || 3.9 GHz (x27) || 0.3.17/Win7-64 || <br />
|- <br />
| Core i7 620M || 2/4 || 6.3 || 0.18 || 35 || 2.66 GHz || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] v0.4 || <br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo E6550 || 1/2 || 2.45 || ? || ? || 2.33 GHz || cpuminer 0.7.1 (Linux) || --algo=sse2_64<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo E6850 || 2/2 || 6.75 || 0.10 || 65W || 3.0 Ghz || ufasoft-0.3 ||<br />
|- <br />
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 7.76 || 0.11 || 70W || 3.33 GHz (o/c?) || ufasoft-0.3 || miner optimized for Intel Core<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 2.52 || 0.04 || 65W || 2.66 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon 3060 || 1/2 || 2.03 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.4GHz || cpuminer 0.8.1 (Linux) || --algo=cryptopp_asm32<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon Prestonia 2.4 (dual) || 2x1/2 || 2.16 || 0.017 || 130W || 2.4 GHz || ufasoft v0.4 || <br />
|-<br />
| Xeon X5355 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 10.13 || 0.16 || 120W || 2.66GHz || bitcoind || Roughly the same speed as the "c" algo in cpuminer<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon X5355 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 22.76 || 0.09 || 120W || 2.66GHz || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || -O2 -march=core2, algo=sse2_64<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5440 || 4/8 || 7.3 || ? || 80W || 2.66 GHz|| Kiv's poclbm-gui || FIXME: Either wrong model # or wrong threads/speed info<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5520 || 4/8 || 6.5 || 0.08 || 80W || 2.27 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5530 || 4/8 || 7.14 || 0.09 || 80W || 2.4 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5630 (dual) || 2x4/8 || 8 || 0.1 || 80W || 2.53 GHz || 0.3.17/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Atom N270 || 1 || 0.42 || '''0.17''' || 2.5W || 1.6 GHz || 0.3.1x/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]<br />
|}<br />
<br />
==Other Devices==<br />
<br />
===Consoles===<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Device !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment<br />
|-<br />
| Sony Playstation 3 (FAT) || 6 || 21 || 0.35 || 60W || 3.2 GHz || cellminer || Needs custom firmware (no links to it, potential issues with Sony assholes.) [https://github.com/verement/cellminer source] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4704.20 source] Total power usage of PS3 fat is 120W but only the Cell cpu is active.<br />
|-<br />
| Sony Playstation 3 (SLIM) || 6 || 21 || 0.7 || 35W || 3.2 GHz || cellminer || Total power usage of PS3 slim is 70W but only the Cell cpu is active.<br />
|}<br />
<br />
===ARM devices===<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment<br />
|-<br />
| Cortex A8 || 1 || 0.125 || 0.36 || 0.35 W || 0.6 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || Nokia N900: 'cryptopp'<br />
|-<br />
| Cortex A8 || 1 || 0.2 || 0.57 || 0.35 W || 0.6 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || Nokia N900: 'c' algo<br />
|-<br />
| Tegra 250 (2xCortex-A9) || 2 || 0.57 || 1.14 || 0.5 W || 1.0 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-24) || Toshiba AC100, ubuntu, 'c' algo<br />
|}<br />
<br />
<br />
==See Also==<br />
<br />
* [[Mining rig]]<br />
* [[Generation Calculator]]<br />
* [[Power Calc]]<br />
* [[OpenCL miner]]<br />
* [http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=745 ATI Stream vs. NVIDIA CUDA - GPGPU computing battle royale]<br />
<br />
[[Category:Mining]]</div>
Mitay007
https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Mining_hardware_comparison&diff=7535
Mining hardware comparison
2011-04-21T14:18:13Z
<p>Mitay007: /* Nvidia */</p>
<hr />
<div>Below are some statistics about the mining performance of various hardware used in a [[mining rig]].<br />
<br />
The table shows (mostly) stock clock numbers. 10-20% performance improvement can be achieved via overclocking.<br />
<br />
==Graphics cards==<br />
<br />
===AMD===<br />
To get the maximum performance use the 2.1 or 2.2 release of the ATI Stream SDK. 2.3 performance drops by 5-10%.<br />
<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! W !! Clock !! SP !! SDK !! Slot !! Miner !! Notes<br />
|-<br />
| 3XXX || || || || || || || || OpenCL Not Supported<br />
|-<br />
| 42XX || || || || || || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || || OpenCL Not Supported (intergrated/mobile GPU)<br />
|-<br />
| 4350 || 6.93 || 0.346 || 20 || 575 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors <br />
|-<br />
| 4550 || 7.23 || 0.289 || 25 || 600 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors <br />
|- <br />
| 4650 || 31.33 || 0.653 || 48 || 650 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors <br />
|- <br />
| 4670 || 36.14 || 0.613 || 59 || 750 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors <br />
|- <br />
| 4730 || 72.29 || 0.657 || 110 || 750 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 4770 || 72.29 || 0.904 || 80 || 750 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 4830 || 55.42 || 0.583 || 95 || 575 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|-<br />
| 4850 || 75.30 || 0.685 || 110 || 625 || 800 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 4860 || 67.47 || 0.519 || 130 || 700 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|-<br />
| 4870 || 90.36 || 0.602 || 150 || 750 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || clmine ||<br />
|-<br />
| 4870 || 78 || || || || || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/Vista 64bit || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source]<br />
|- <br />
| 4890 || 102.41 || 0.539 || 190 || 850 || 800 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 4850X2 || 150.60 || 0.602 || 250 || 625 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 4870X2 || 180.72 || 0.632 || 286 || 750 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 5450 || 11.99 || 0.631 || 19 || 650 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 5550 || 40.59 || 1.041 || 39 || 550 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 59.96 || 1.538 || 39 || 650 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 64 || 1.641 || 39 || 650 || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]<br />
|- <br />
| 5650 || 48 || 2.5-3.2 ? || 15-19 ? || || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source] [http://www.notebookcheck.net/ATI-Mobility-Radeon-HD-5650.23697.0.html source]<br />
|- <br />
| 5670 || 71.49 || 1.117 || 64 || 775 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EEFFEE;"| 5670 || 72 || 1.64 || 44 || 850 || || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm-mod (Win7-64) || Sapphire 100287VGAL card is low power<br />
|- <br />
| 5670 || 85 || || || 900 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128<br />
|- <br />
<br />
| 5750 || 116.24 || 1.352 || 86 || 700 || 720 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 5770 || 156.83 || 1.452 || 108 || 850 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 180 || 1.406 || 128[*] || 950 || 800 || 2.4RC1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 30 (*Overclocked wattage calculated [http://bakkap.free.fr/Misc/wCalc.html here] )<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFFF;"| 5830 || 206.64 || 1.181 || 175 || 800 || 1120 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFFFFF;"| 5830 || 241 || 1.377 || 175 || 1006 || || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-03-11 / Win7 64 ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 240.77 || 1.595 || 151 || 725 || 1440 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 252 || 1.669 || 151 || 765 || || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-01-25 ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 255.3 || 1.690 || 151 || 765 || || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-01-25 ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 300 || 1.987 || 151 || 925 (OC) || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 250.26 || 1.657 || 151 || || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || opencl client || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 313.65 || 1.668 || 188 || 850 || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 313 || 1.665 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo/Linux ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 343 || 1.824 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo/Linux ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 355 || 1.888 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/Linux ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 340 || 1.809 || 188 || 850 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 530 || 1.803 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.4.595.10 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/201103.beta3/Windows || -v -w128 -f60<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 535.06 || 1.820 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 560 || 1.905 || 294 || 725 || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 565 || 1.922 || 294 || || || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine2 ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 604 || 2.054 || 294 || || || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 645 || || || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || -f1, Debian 6, fglrx-driver 10.9.3<br />
|- <br />
| 6490M || 16.289 || 0.708 || 23 || || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm-mod (Mac OS X 10.6.7) || MacBook Pro early 2011<br />
|- <br />
| 6850 || 171.59 || 1.351 || 127 || 775 || 960 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||<br />
|- <br />
| 6850 || 196 || || || 850 || 960 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 0<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 220 || 1.236 || 178[*] || 1000 || 960 || 2.4RC1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 30 (*Overclocked wattage calculated [http://bakkap.free.fr/Misc/wCalc.html here] )<br />
|-<br />
| 6870 || 232.47 || 1.540 || 151 || 900 || 1120 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 6870 || 260.1 || 1.611 || 175 || 1001 || 1150 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm-gui windows7x86 cat 11.3 || -v -w 128 -f 1 <br />
|-<br />
| 6870 || 282.23 || 1.611 || 175 || 1047 || 1120 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm windows cat 11.2 || -v -w 128 -f 0 mem clock 300<br />
|- <br />
| 6950 || 295 || || 160 (?) || 810 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 325 || || 200 (?) || 885 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 360 || || 200 (?) || 970 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250<br />
|-<br />
| 6970 || 323 || 1.468 || 220 || 880 || 1536 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -w 64, SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.<br />
|- <br />
| 6990 || 683 || 1.97 || 346 || 830 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=5444.msg83507#msg83507 source]. SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.<br />
|- <br />
| 6990 || 746 || 1.82 || 410 || 880 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=5444.msg83507#msg83507 source]. SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.<br />
|- <br />
|FirePro V8700 || 84.8 || || || 750 || 800 || || || poclbm-mod.03.24.2011 || <br />
|-<br />
|FirePro M5800 || 61.4 || || || 650 || || || || poclbm-mod.03.24.2011 || Ubuntu || <br />
|- <br />
|}<br />
<br />
===Nvidia===<br />
<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! W !! Clock !! SP !! Comment<br />
|-<br />
| 8200 mGPU || 1.2 || || || 1200 || 16 || 128 MB shared memory, "poclbm -w 128 -f 0"<br />
|-<br />
| 8600M GT || 4.93 || || || || 32 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 8600GT || 5.66 || || || 1188 || 32 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 8600GT OC || 7.3 || || || 1602 || 32 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.0 poclbm] -w 128 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg72833#msg72833 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 8800GT || 25 || 0.24 || 105 || 1300 || ||<br />
|-<br />
| 8800GT || 24.5 || 0.23 || 105 || 1300 || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 8800GTS || 16.8 || 0.109 || 154 || || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source] [http://www.techspot.com/review/79-geforce-8800-gts-512/page11.html source]<br />
|-<br />
| 8800 GTS || 18.7 || 0.124 || 150 || 1200 || || poclbm -w 64 no vectors<br />
|-<br />
| 9300GE || 1.57 || || || 1300 || 8 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9300GS || 1.69 || || || 1400 || 8 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9400GT || 3.37 || 0.067 || 50 || 1400 || 16 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9400M (MacBook) || 1.90 || 0.32 || 6 || 700 || || poclbm -f 8 no vectors<br />
|-<br />
| 9500GT || 6.75 || 0.135 || 50 || 1400 || 32 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9600GSO || 19.88 || 0.237 || 84 || 1375 || 96 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9600GSO512 || 11.75 || 0.131 || 90 || 1625 || 48 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9600GT || 15.66 || 0.165 || 95 || 1625 || 64 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9600GT OC || 18.8 || <0.198 || >95 || 1981 || 64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.0 poclbm] -w 128 -f 10 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg74610#msg74610 source] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg73353#msg73353 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 9800GT || 30.36 || 0.289 || 105 || 1800 || 112 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9800GTX || 32.54 || 0.232 || 140 || 1688 || 128 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9800GTX+ || 35.39 || 0.251 || 141 || 1836 || 128 ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background-color:#FFEFEF"| 9800GX2 || 57.83 || 0.294 || 197 || || 2x128 ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background-color:#FFEFEF"| 9800GX2 || 28 || 0.142 || 197 || || 2x128 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]<br />
|-<br />
| G210 || 3.38 || 0.111 || 30.5 || 1402 || 16 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GT220 || 9.83 || 0.170 || 58 || 1360 || 48 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GT240 || 19.37 || 0.281 || 69 || 1340 || 96 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GT240 || 21.24 || || || || 96 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4291.0 poclbm-mod] -f 0 -v [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg73383#msg73383 source]<br />
|-<br />
| GTS250 || 35.39 || 0.244 || 145 || 1836 || 128 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX260 || 35.91 || 0.178 || 202 || 1242 || 192 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX260 || 44 || 0.242 || 182 || 1242 || 216 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]<br />
|-<br />
| GTX260c216 || 40.40 || 0.236 || 171 || 1242 || 216 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX260c216 OC || 52.0 || || || 1461 || 216 || "poclbm -w 256 -f 1"<br />
|-<br />
| GTX275 || 50.75 || 0.232 || 219 || 1404 || 240 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX275 || 58 || || || 729/1458 || 240 || poclbm -f 0 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
| GTX280 || 46.84 || 0.198 || 236 || 1296 || 240 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX285 || 53.35 || 0.262 || 204 || 1476 || 240 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX295 || 89.78 || 0.311 || 289 || 1242 || 480 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GT 320M (MacBook Air) || 6.12 || || || 1212 || 48 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GT 330M (Sony Vaio Z) || 7.8 || 0.71 ( 0.3 total) || 11 (26w total) || 1045 || 48 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GT430 || 20.24 || 0.413 || 49 || 1400 || 96 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTS450 || 45.28 || 0.427 || 106 || 1566 || 192 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460SE || 56.39 || 0.376 || 150 || 1300 || 288 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 || 68.31 || 0.427 || 160 || 1350 || 336 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 (2 cards) || 102 || 0.319? || 320? || 1350 || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 (2 cards) OC || 127 || 0.374 || 340 || 1620 || 2x 336 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2444.0 rpcminer-cuda] -gpugrid=128 -gputhreads=128 ver.20110227<br />
|-<br />
| GTX465 || 64.41 || 0.322 || 200 || 1215 || 352 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX470 || 81.98 || 0.381 || 215 || 1215 || 448 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX470 || 94.7 || || || 1414 || ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX480 || 101.28 || 0.405 || 250 || 1401 || 480 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX560 Ti || 67.7 || 0.39 || 170 || 1700 || 384 || standard EVGA 560, no overclock<br />
|-<br />
| GTX560 OC || 86.7 || <0.51 || >170 || 1800 || 384 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2444.0 rpcminer-cuda] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg72816#msg72816 source]<br />
|-<br />
| GTX570 || 105.83 || 0.483 || 219 || 1464 || 480 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX580 || 119.06 || 0.488 || 244 || 1544 || 512 ||<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro FX 580 || 5.7 || 0.14 || 40 || 1125 || 4 ||<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro FX 1600M || 6 || 0.12 || 50 || 625 || 32 ||rpcminer-cuda, Win<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro NVS 135M || 1.05 || 0.1 || 10 || 800 || 1 || <br />
|-<br />
| Quadro NVS 3100M || 3.6 || 0.257 || 14 || 600 || 16 || rpcminer-cuda, Win, CUDA 3.1.1<br />
|-<br />
| Tesla M2050 || 79.8 || || || || || DiabloMiner<br />
|-<br />
|}<br />
<br />
==CPUs==<br />
<br />
A lot of nice data can be pulled from [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.0 this thread] to seed this section. Also from [https://www.bitcoin.org/wiki/doku.php?id=bitcoin_miners this page on the old wiki].<br />
<br />
===AMD===<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! nprocs !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment<br />
|-<br />
| 2x Opteron 6128 || 16 || 32.4 || 0.203 || 160W || 2 GHz || 0.3.19 || -4way<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon 64 3500+ || 1 || 1.18 || 0.018 || 65 W || 2.54 GHz || ufasoft v0.4 || overclocked (originally 2.2 GHz)<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon X2 3800+ || 2 || 1.73 || 0.03 || 65 W || 2.00 GHz || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || -algo=4way<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon X2 4000+ || 2 || 1.9 || 0.02 || 65W || 2.1 GHz || rpc-miner || <br />
|-<br />
| Athlon X2 4400+ || || 2.09 || 0.032 || 65W || 2.3GHz || 0.3.19/Win x64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon X2 6000+ || 2 || 2.81 || 0.02 || 125W || 3 GHz || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg22881#msg22881 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon X2 6400+ Black Edition || 2 || 2.9 || 0.023 || 125W || 3.2 GHz || 0.3.20.2 BETA/Win 7 x64 || -4way<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon XP 2000+ || 2 || 0.62 || 0.009 || 70W || 1.67 GHz || 0.3.18/Ubuntu || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source] [http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm?articleid=914&page=4 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon II X2 240e || 2 || 2.71 || 0.06 || 45W || 2.81 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon II X4 630 || 4 || 10.7 || 0.11 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || bitcoin-miner 0.4 || <br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X6 1055T || 6 || 15.84 || 0.13 || 125W || 2.82 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X6 1100T || 6 || 22 || 0.176 || 125W || 3.82 GHz || bitcoin-miner || Aciid#bitcoin-dev<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 3.8 || 0.04 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 0.3.1x/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 7.2 || 0.08 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || cpu-miner 0.2.1/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II x4 955 || 4 || 11 || 0.09 || 125W || 3.2 GHz || rpcminer-4way ||<br />
|}<br />
<br />
===ARM===<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment<br />
|-<br />
| Cortex A8 || 1 || 0.125 || 0.36 || 0.35 W || 0.6 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || Nokia N900: 'cryptopp'<br />
|-<br />
| Cortex A8 || 1 || 0.2 || 0.57 || 0.35 W || 0.6 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || Nokia N900: 'c' algo<br />
|-<br />
| Tegra 250 (2xCortex-A9) || 2 || 0.57 || 1.14 || 0.5 W || 1.0 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-24) || Toshiba AC100, ubuntu, 'c' algo<br />
|}<br />
<br />
===Intel===<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium III mobile ? || 1 || 0.3 || 0.014 || 21W || 1.07 GHz || 0.3.1x/Win2K || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source] [http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=27380 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Old Xeon 512k (Dual) || 2x1/2 || 2.0 || ? || ? || 3.06GHz || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || HT disabled, algo=4way (twice as fast as the 2nd best algo)<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium 4 2.0A || 1 || 0.85 || || || 2.0 GHz || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft-0.4]/WinXP || -g no -t 2<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium Dual-Core E5400 || 2/2 || 2.27 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.7 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Celeron E330 || 2/2 || 2.2 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.5 GHz || 0.3.19/Ubuntu10.04 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Core i3 M350 || 2/4 || 1.48 || 0.04 || 35W || 2.27 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|- <br />
| Core i5 M450 || 2/4 || 1.8 || 0.05 || 35W || 1.2 GHz || 0.3.17/Win7-54 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source]<br />
|- <br />
| Core i5-650 || 2/4 || 5.1 || 0.04 ? || || 3.2 GHz || cpuminer-0.7 || -4way<br />
|-<br />
| Core i5 ? || 4/? || 6.5 || || || || client from svn || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37621#msg37621 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 4.5 || 0.05 || 95W || 3.1 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-01-22) || cryptopp_asm32<br />
|-<br />
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 14 || 0.15 || 95W || 3.1 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || sse2_64<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 920 || 4/8 || 19.2 || 0.10 || 195 || 4.0 GHz (x21) || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] || -a 5<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 950 || 4/8 || 5.88 || 0.039 || 150W || 3.83 GHz (x23) || bitcoin-0.3.20.2 Win7-64 ||<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 950 || 4/8 || 18.9 || 0.126 || 150W || 3.83 GHz (x23) || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] v0.4 ||<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 980x || 6/12 || 19.2 || 0.15 || 130 || 4.4 GHz (x33) || cpuminer/Win7-64 || <br />
|- <br />
| Core i7 980x || 6/12 || 8.7 || || || 3.9 GHz (x27) || 0.3.17/Win7-64 || <br />
|- <br />
| Core i7 620M || 2/4 || 6.3 || 0.18 || 35 || 2.66 GHz || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] v0.4 || <br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo E6550 || 1/2 || 2.45 || ? || ? || 2.33 GHz || cpuminer 0.7.1 (Linux) || --algo=sse2_64<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo E6850 || 2/2 || 6.75 || 0.10 || 65W || 3.0 Ghz || ufasoft-0.3 ||<br />
|- <br />
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 7.76 || 0.11 || 70W || 3.33 GHz (o/c?) || ufasoft-0.3 || miner optimized for Intel Core<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 2.52 || 0.04 || 65W || 2.66 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon 3060 || 1/2 || 2.03 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.4GHz || cpuminer 0.8.1 (Linux) || --algo=cryptopp_asm32<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon Prestonia 2.4 (dual) || 2x1/2 || 2.16 || 0.017 || 130W || 2.4 GHz || ufasoft v0.4 || <br />
|-<br />
| Xeon X5355 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 10.13 || 0.16 || 120W || 2.66GHz || bitcoind || Roughly the same speed as the "c" algo in cpuminer<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon X5355 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 22.76 || 0.09 || 120W || 2.66GHz || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || -O2 -march=core2, algo=sse2_64<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5440 || 4/8 || 7.3 || ? || 80W || 2.66 GHz|| Kiv's poclbm-gui || FIXME: Either wrong model # or wrong threads/speed info<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5520 || 4/8 || 6.5 || 0.08 || 80W || 2.27 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5530 || 4/8 || 7.14 || 0.09 || 80W || 2.4 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5630 (dual) || 2x4/8 || 8 || 0.1 || 80W || 2.53 GHz || 0.3.17/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Atom N270 || 1 || 0.42 || '''0.17''' || 2.5W || 1.6 GHz || 0.3.1x/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]<br />
|}<br />
<br />
==See Also==<br />
<br />
* [[Mining rig]]<br />
* [[Generation Calculator]]<br />
* [[Power Calc]]<br />
* [[OpenCL miner]]<br />
* [http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=745 ATI Stream vs. NVIDIA CUDA - GPGPU computing battle royale]<br />
<br />
[[Category:Mining]]</div>
Mitay007