https://en.bitcoin.it/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&user=Http&feedformat=atom
Bitcoin Wiki - User contributions [en]
2024-03-29T00:01:34Z
User contributions
MediaWiki 1.30.0
https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Mining_hardware_comparison&diff=36601
Mining hardware comparison
2013-04-02T20:16:09Z
<p>Http: /* ASIC */ Wolfram Alpha is not a reference and we can divide numbers</p>
<hr />
<div>Below are some statistics about the mining performance of various hardware used in a [[mining rig]].<br />
<br />
'''Notes:'''<br />
* Mhash/s = millions hashes per second (raw speed performance; may not be very energy efficient with some models)<br />
* Mhash/J = millions hashes per joule (energy efficiency; 1 joule of energy is 1 watt during 1 second: 1 J = 1 W*s)<br />
* W = watt (maximum power consumption, i.e. energy per unit of time: 1 W = 1 J/s)<br />
<br />
== FPGA ==<br />
<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align:center"<br />
|- <br />
! Product !! Hash rate<br />[Mhash/s] !! Efficiency<br />[Mhash/J] !! Efficiency<br />[Mhash/s/$] !! Power<br />[W] !! Price<br />[$]<br />
|-<br />
! Avnet Spartan-6 LX150T Development Kit<br />
| 100<ref>Fpgaminer (May 19, 2011). [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=9047.0 "Official Open Source FPGA Bitcoin Miner"]. Bitcointalk.org. Retrieved February 7, 2013.</ref> || || 0.10 || || 995<ref>[http://avnetexpress.avnet.com/store/em/EMController?action=products&catalogId=500201&storeId=500201&N=0&langId=-1&slnk=b&term=AES-S6DEV-LX150T-G&hrf=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.em.avnet.com%2Fen-us%2Fdesign%2Fdrc%2FPages%2FXilinx-Spartan-6-FPGA-LX150T-Development-Kit.aspx&intcmp=EMA-BUY-AES-S6DEV-LX150T-G "AES-S6DEV-LX150T-G Parts"]. Avnet Express. Retrieved February 7, 2013.</ref><br />
|-<br />
! Bitcoin Dominator X5000<br />
| 100<ref name="bd" /> || 14.7 || 0.22 || 6.8<ref name="bd" /> || 440<ref name="bd">NewMeat1 (August 18, 2011). [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=37904.0 "Custom FPGA Board for Sale!"]. Bitcointalk.org. Retrieved January 30, 2013.</ref><br />
|-<br />
! BitForce SHA256 Single<br />
| 832<ref name="single">[http://www.butterflylabs.com/product-details/ "BitForce SHA256 Single – Technical Specifications"]. Butterfly Labs. Retrieved January 30, 2013.</ref> || 10.4 || 1.38 || 80<ref name="single" /> || 599<ref name="single" /><br />
|-<br />
! Butterflylabs Mini Rig<br />
| 25,200<ref name="mini">[http://web.archive.org/web/20120514032732/http://www.butterflylabs.com/products "Products"]. Butterfly Labs. Archived from the original on May 14, 2012. Retrieved February 7, 2013.</ref> || 20.16 || 1.64 || 1,250<ref name="mini" /> || 15,295<ref name="mini2">[http://www.butterflylabs.com/order-form-bitforce-sha256-mini-rig/ "Order Form – BitForce SHA256 – Mini Rig"]. Butterfly Labs. Retrieved January 30, 2013.</ref><br />
|-<br />
! Digilent Nexys 2 500K<br />
| 5<ref>The Seven (June 3, 2011). [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=9047.msg164438#msg164438 "Re: Official Open Source FPGA Bitcoin Miner (Smaller Devices Now Supported!)"]. Bitcointalk.org. Retrieved February 7, 2013.</ref> || || 0.03 || || 149<ref name="dig">[http://www.digilentinc.com/Products/Detail.cfm?Prod=NEXYS2 "Nexys™2 Spartan-3E FPGA Board"]. Digilent. Retrieved January 30, 2013.</ref><br />
|-<br />
! Icarus<br />
| 380<ref name="ica">Nzghang (November 9, 2011). [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=51371.0 "FPGA development board 'Icarus' – DisContinued/ important announcement"]. Bitcointalk.org. Retrieved January 30, 2013.</ref> || 19.79 || 0.66 || 19.2<ref name="ica" /> || 569<ref name="ica" /><br />
|-<br />
! Lancelot<br />
| || || || || 500<ref name="lan">Nzghang (May 6, 2012). [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=79835.0 "FPGA development board "Lancelot" - accept bitsteam developer's orders."]. Bitcointalk.org. Retrieved January 30, 2013.</ref><br />
|-<br />
! ModMiner Quad <br />
| 800<ref name="mmq">[http://www.btcfpga.com/index.php?route=product/product&product_id=50 "ModMiner Quad"]. BTCFPGA. Retrieved January 30, 2013.</ref> || 20 || 0.75 || 40<ref name="mmq" /> || 1,069<ref name="mmq" /><br />
|-<br />
! Terasic DE2-115<br />
| 80<ref>Fpgaminer (May 4, 2011). [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5379.msg105544#msg105544 "Re: FPGA mining"]. Bitcointalk.org. Retrieved February 7, 2013.</ref> || || 0.13 || || 595<ref name="de2">[http://www.terasic.com.tw/cgi-bin/page/archive.pl?No=502 "Altera DE2-115 Development and Education Board"]. Terasic. Retrieved January 30, 2013.</ref><br />
|-<br />
! X6500 FPGA Miner <br />
| 400<ref name="x65" /> || 23.25 || 0.72 || 17.2<ref name="x65" /> || 550<ref name="x65">[http://store.fpgamining.com/ "FPGA Mining Store"]. FPGA Mining. Retrieved January 30, 2013.</ref><br />
|-<br />
! ZTEX USB-FPGA Module 1.15b<br />
| 90<ref name="miner" /> || || 0.27 || || 325<ref>http://shop.ztex.de/product_info.php?cPath=21&products_id=62</ref><br />
|-<br />
! ZTEX USB-FPGA Module 1.15x<br />
| 215<ref name="miner" /> || || 0.52 || || 406<ref>http://shop.ztex.de/product_info.php?cPath=21&products_id=66</ref><br />
|-<br />
! ZTEX USB-FPGA Module 1.15y<br />
| 860<ref name="miner">http://www.ztex.de/btcminer/</ref> || || 0.65 || || 1,304<ref name="1.15y">http://shop.ztex.de/product_info.php?cPath=21&products_id=74</ref><br />
|}<br />
<br />
== ASIC ==<br />
<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align:center"<br />
|- <br />
! Product !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! Mhash/s/$ !! Watts !! Price !! Shipping !! Comm ports<br />
|-<br />
! ASICMiner device(s)<br />
|| ? || ? || ? || ? || ? || {{No}} || ?<br />
|-<br />
! Avalon ASIC #1<br />
| 66,300<ref>http://garzikrants.blogspot.com/2013/02/avalon-miner-power-usage.html</ref> || 107 || 52.34 || 620W<ref>http://garzikrants.blogspot.com/2013/02/avalon-miner-power-usage.html</ref> || 1,299<ref name="avalon">[http://shop.avalon-asic.com/catalog/product/view/id/1 "Avalon ASIC"]. Avalon. Retrieved January 30, 2013.</ref> || {{Yes}} || Ethernet, Wifi<br />
|-<br />
! Avalon ASIC #2<br />
| 60,000<ref name="avalon" /> || 97 || 40.02 || 620W<ref>http://garzikrants.blogspot.com/2013/02/avalon-miner-power-usage.html</ref> || 1,499<ref name="avalon" /> || {{No}} || Ethernet, Wifi<br />
|-<br />
! Avalon ASIC #3<ref name="avalon" /><br />
| || || || || || {{No}} ||<br />
|-<br />
! BitForce Jalapeno<br />
| 4,500<ref name="jap">[http://www.butterflylabs.com/order-form-bitforce-sc-jalapeno "Pre Order Form – BitForce 'Jalapeno' "]. Butterfly Labs. Retrieved January 30, 2013.</ref> || ??? || 30.20 || ???<ref name="watts">http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1b8hvt/bfl_josh_updates_on_asic_status_full_transcript/</ref> || 149<ref name="jap" /> || {{No|Any day now}} || USB<br />
|-<br />
! BitForce Little Single<br />
| 30,000<ref name="ls" /> || || 46.22 || || 649<ref name="ls">[http://www.butterflylabs.com/pre-order-form-bitforce-little-single-sc/ "Pre Order Form – BitForce 'Little' Single SC"]. Butterfly Labs. Retrieved January 30, 2013.</ref> || {{Yes}} || USB<br />
|-<br />
! BitForce Single 'SC'<br />
| 60,000<ref name="sc">[http://www.butterflylabs.com/order-form-bitforce-sc-single "Pre Order Form – BitForce Single 'SC' "]. Butterfly Labs. Retrieved January 30, 2013.</ref> || ??? || 46.18 || ???<ref name="watts" /> || 1,299<ref name="sc" /> || {{No|Any day now}} || USB<br />
|-<br />
! BitForce Mini Rig 'SC'<br />
| 1,500,000<ref name="rig" /> || ??? || 50.16 || ???<ref name="watts" /> || 29,899<ref name="rig">[http://www.butterflylabs.com/order-form-bitforce-sc-mini-rig "Pre Order Form – BitForce Mini Rig 'SC' "]. Butterfly Labs. Retrieved January 30, 2013.</ref> || {{No|Any day now}} || ?<br />
|}<br />
<br />
==Graphics cards==<br />
=== Popular Mining Cards ===<br />
This information has been included to make choosing a card easier. The cards selected are generally readily available online. Once you have purchased a card or cards, use the tables below to compare different configurations and setups.<br />
=== genBTC's Card Comparison Spreadsheet ===<br />
The purpose of this chart is 1) Update used prices 2) To consolidate multiple sources of information into an at-a-glance format. 3) Provide 3 hashrate columns to make it easier to figure out performance before 4) You use this table to make informed decisions about purchasing a card for mining.<br><br />
Only edit Common MH/s. MH/s #1 and MH/s #2 were outsourced.<br><br />
I will continue to work on this chart, and it is a work in progress. <br><br />
Created February 25th 2013, Updated February 27th 2013 <br><br />
All the cards below are AMD (ATI) Radeon HD <br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! MH/s #1 !! MH/s #2 !! Common MH/s !! TDP(W) !! Shaders !! Stock Clock !! Ebay $ !! MSRP $ !! Cheapest $<br />
|----<br />
|5770||212.83||||200||108||800||850 MHz||$178?||$159||$ 50<br />
|----<br />
|5830||302||220||275||175||1120||800 MHz||$105||$239||$ 65<br />
|----<br />
|5850||346.16||270||330||151||1440||725 MHz||$101||$259||$ 90<br />
|----<br />
|5870||393||420||380||188||1600||850 MHz||$165||$379||$125<br />
|----<br />
|5970||704||700||750||294||3200||725 MHz||$248||$599||$269<br />
|----<br />
|6750||167.59||||170||86||720||725 MHz||$ 67||$109||<br />
|----<br />
|6770||196.67||||200||108||800||900 MHz||$ 84||$135||<br />
|----<br />
|6850||213.7||||250||127||960||775 MHz||$104||$179||<br />
|----<br />
|6870||278.31||||300||150||1120||900 MHz||$124||$239||<br />
|----<br />
|6950||369||350||350||200||1408||800 MHz||$171||$299||<br />
|----<br />
|6970||397||400||385||250||1536||880 MHz||$172||$369||<br />
|----<br />
|6990||772||700||750||375||3072||830 MHz||$372||$699||<br />
|----<br />
|7750||123||200||125||55||512||800 MHz||$ 93||$109||Newegg $89<br />
|----<br />
|7770||||250||200||80||640||1000 MHz||$ 98||$159||Newegg $119<br />
|----<br />
|7850||||375||300||130||1024||860 MHz||$177||$249||Newegg $169<br />
|----<br />
|7870||||||400||175||1280||1000 MHz||$227||$349||Newegg $229<br />
|----<br />
|7950||||450||500||200||1792||850 MHz||$307||$449||Newegg $299<br />
|----<br />
|7970||685||600||650||250||2048||925 MHz||$391||$549||Newegg $399<br />
|----<br />
|7990||||||1200||555||4096||925 MHz||$777||$999||Newegg $899<br />
|----<br />
|}<br />
MH/s #1 taken from Joseph Woodrell's chart directly below this one.<br><br />
MH/s #2 taken from https://bitclockers.com/calc <br><br />
TDP, Shaders, Stock Clock comes from http://www.hwcompare.com/ & www.AMD.com to Verify<br><br />
Ebay Price taken from http://cgi5.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?SellHub3 and questionable prices marked with a ? <br><br />
Cheapest $ = Used price. Sourced from All over the internet as if I had to buy the card today.<br><br />
Newegg Price means NEW & price was taken from the LOWEST priced card on 2/25/2013 @ 8 PM EST, any rebate disregarded<br><br />
<br />
=== Card Comparison Spreadsheet ===<br />
This spreadsheet performs several calculations and displays a visualization graph of a theoretical mining rig over time. It can be used to visualize any "what if" scenarios to better wrap your head around which card is the best choice under different conditions. Bright Yellow Boxes are editable, and affect the calculations. Dark Yellow Boxes are editable for notation, but don't affect the calculations. The Green highlighted card is the best under those conditions, the Blue highlight is second best, the Orange highlight is third best. Higher MHash/s performance can be obtained for each card through overclocking, but that drives up the wattage draw of the cards, and I did not have that complete dataset so I used the "average" MHash/s values listed here. <br /><br />
V1.5 - 1 Jan, 2012 - by. Joseph Woodrell <br />
[http://www.woodrell.com/joe/bitcoin/mining_sheet.zip Card Selection Spreadsheet]<br />
<br /><br />
==== Single Card Setups ====<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! Price <ref name=amazon>Price from http://ebay.com/ on 2012-02-10 using an average of completed items, minus the top and bottom 20% to avoid spikes and give a truer average.</ref> !! Availability !! Avg. Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! Mhash/s/$<br />
|----<br />
|5770<br />
|$136<br />
|Moderate<br />
|212.83<br />
|1.45<br />
|1.56 <br />
|----<br />
|5830<br />
|$92<br />
|Moderate<br />
|302<br />
|1.68<br />
|3.28<br />
|----<br />
|5850<br />
|$114.96<br />
|Limited<br />
|346.16<br />
|1.92<br />
|3.0<br />
|----<br />
|5870<br />
|$190.16<br />
|Limited<br />
|393<br />
|1.97<br />
|2.066 <br />
|----<br />
|5970<br />
|$421<br />
|Limited<br />
|704<br />
|2.2<br />
|1.67 <br />
|----<br />
|6750<br />
|$116<br />
|Easy<br />
|167.59<br />
|<br />
|1.44 <br />
|----<br />
|6770<br />
|$115<br />
|Easy<br />
|196.67<br />
|<br />
|1.71 <br />
|----<br />
|6850<br />
|$160<br />
|Easy<br />
|213.7<br />
|1.35<br />
|1.34 <br />
|----<br />
|6870<br />
|$190<br />
|Easy<br />
|278.31<br />
|1.73<br />
|1.46 <br />
|----<br />
|6930<br />
|$180<br />
|Limited<br />
|350<br />
|<br />
|1.94<br />
|----<br />
|6950<br />
|$230<br />
|Easy<br />
|369<br />
|1.94<br />
|1.6 <br />
|----<br />
|6970<br />
|$271.89<br />
|Easy<br />
|397<br />
|1.89<br />
|1.46 <br />
|----<br />
|6990<br />
|$622.99<br />
|Limited<br />
|772<br />
|1.93<br />
|1.23 <br />
|----<br />
|7750<br />
|$110<br />
|Easy<br />
|123<br />
|2.46<br />
|1.12 <br />
|----<br />
|7970<br />
|$420<br />
|Easy<br />
|685<br />
|<br />
|1.22 <br />
|----<br />
|}<br />
<br />
==== Multi-Card Setups ====<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! Price <ref name=amazon/> !! Availability !! Avg. Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! Mhash/s/$<br />
|----<br />
|5830x2<br />
|$360<br />
|Moderate<br />
|525<br />
|<br />
|1.46 <br />
|----<br />
|5850x4<br />
|$644<br />
|Limited<br />
|1360<br />
|1.94<br />
|2.11 <br />
|----<br />
|5850x6<br />
|$996<br />
|Limited<br />
|2130<br />
|<br />
| <br />
|----<br />
|5870x2<br />
|$700<br />
|Limited<br />
|787.5<br />
|0.84<br />
|1.13 <br />
|----<br />
|6770x2<br />
|$274<br />
|Easy<br />
|464<br />
|<br />
|1.69 <br />
|----<br />
|6950x4<br />
|$1,000<br />
|Easy<br />
|1316<br />
|1.51<br />
|1.32 <br />
|----<br />
|6970x2<br />
|$700<br />
|Easy<br />
|769<br />
|1.6<br />
|1.10 <br />
|----<br />
|6990x2<br />
|$1,540<br />
|Limited<br />
|1568<br />
|1.7<br />
|1.02 <br />
|----<br />
|6990x3<br />
|$2,310<br />
|Limited<br />
|2094<br />
|1.8<br />
|0.91 <br />
|----<br />
|7970x3<br />
|$1680<br />
|Easy<br />
|2050<br />
|2.41<br />
|1.16 <br />
|----<br />
|7970x2<br />
|$868<br />
|Easy<br />
|1060<br />
|<br />
| <br />
|----<br />
|}<br />
<br />
===AMD (ATI)===<br />
Stream SDK 2.5 seems to have resolved many of the problems with earlier versions. Everyone's setups will be unique so this should only be a guide or starting point, not an absolute. <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! Mhash/s/$<ref name='amazon_20110625'/> !! Watts !! Clock !! SP !! SDK !! Slot !! Miner !! Notes <br />
|-<br />
| 3410 || 0.89 || 0.074 || ? || 12(?) || 222 || 40 || 1.4 beta || PCI-E 1.1 x8 || A custom Brook+ miner || Using 16,384 length streams<br />
|-<br />
| 3XXX || || || || || || || || || || OpenCL Not Supported<br />
|-<br />
| 42XX || || || || || || || || || || OpenCL Not Supported (integrated/mobile GPU)<br />
|-<br />
| 4350 || 6.93 || 0.346 ||0.16 || 20 || 575 || 80 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors<br />
|-<br />
| 4350 || 7.2 || || || || 600 || || 1.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || cgminer/Linux || default settings<br />
|-<br />
| 4350 || 8.14 || -|| 0.19 || - || 730 || 80 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Diablo/Windows7 || -w 32. Model: Asus EAH4350 Silent. Memory at 400MHz. Runs at 60°C with ambient at 25°C.<br />
|-<br />
| 4350 || 10.7 || -|| - || - || 730 || - || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || CGMiner/Windows7 || -v -w 64 Voltage set at 0.900 core set at 800MHZ and memory set to 200MHZ<br />
|-<br />
| 4550 || 7.23 || 0.289 ||0.13 || 25 || 600 || 80 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors<br />
|-<br />
| 4550 || 7.8 || || || || || || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer /phoenix || worksize=64 VECTORS <br />
|-<br />
| 4570M || 8.02 || 0.297 || ? || 27 || 680 || 80 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Diablo/Windows7 || -w 64, SDK 2.4, Cat 11.4. Model: Sony Vaio NW<br />
|-<br />
| 4570M || 9.6 || 0.300|| ? || 32 || 825(OC) || 80 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Diablo/Windows7 || -w 64, SDK 2.4, Cat 11.4. Model: Sony Vaio NW. OC core 680->825. U/C memory 800->500.<br />
|-<br />
| 4650 || 31.33 || 0.653|| 0.44 || 48 || 650 || 320 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors<br />
|-<br />
| 4670 || 36.14 || 0.613|| 0.34 || 59 || 750 || 320 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors<br />
|-<br />
| 4670 || 40.11 || 0.679|| 0.38 || 59 || 800 || 320 || - || AGP x8 || poclbm/Ubuntu 10.10 w/ H == 0 mod || -w 32 -f 0, don't use vectors [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.msg85236#msg85236 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 4670 || 50 || - || 0.47 || 60 || 800 || 320 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer || 2 miners set up i7 920 (130W), CPU: Ufasoft, GPU: OpenCL; the CPU is getting about 40 Mhash/s while the GPU goes from 10-20 Mhash/s<br />
|-<br />
| 4730 || 72.29 || 0.657|| ? || 110 || 750 || 640 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
| 4770 || 72.29 || 0.904|| 0.72 || 80 || 750 || 640 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
| 4830 || 55.42 || 0.583|| || 95 || 575 || 640 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
| 4830 || 61.7 || - || || - || 700 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm-mod || Fedora 14<br />
|-<br />
| 4830 || 64.9 || - || - || - || 700 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm-mod || Fedora 14<br />
|-<br />
| 4830 || 66.12 || 0.503|| || 105 || 700 || 1005 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - ||<br />
|-<br />
| 4850 || 75.30 || 0.685 || || 110 || 625 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
| 4850 || 84.3 || 0.766 || || 110 || 725 || 300 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - || -w64 fan at 70% temp 73C, stock voltage -gui miner<br />
|-<br />
| 4850 || 87.4 || 0.79 || - || 110 || 785 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer || Phoenix; -k poclbm<br />
|-<br />
| 4850 || 90.1 || 0.819 || || 110 || 800 || 500 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer || -f 30; Tried phoenix and phatk, got same max<br />
|-<br />
| 4850 || 101 || 0.918 || || 110 || 817 || 500 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer || -f 0, core 817mhz(default 625)@1.123v , mem downclock to 500mhz (default 993) [http://www.smpake.com/?p=6 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 4850x2 || 150.60 || 0.602 || || 250 || 625 || 1600 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
| 4860 || 67.47 || 0.519|| || 130 || 700 || 640 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F8F8FF;"| 4870 || 78 || 0.520|| || 150 || - || - || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/Vista 64bit || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source]<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F8F8F8;"| 4870 || 88 || || || 140 || std || 800 || 12.3.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.50 / 64bit OS X pyopencl / poclbm || Standard Mac Pro 3,1 with Apple HD4870 upgrade. Flags: FASTLOOP WORKSIZE=64 AGGRESSION=5 (don't use vectors, and hash rate drops to 60-70 if browser windows are visible, speeds up to 88 if you hide them!<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F8F8FF;"| 4870 || 90.36 || 0.602|| || 150 || 750 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || clmine || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F8F8FF;"| 4870 || 92.84 || 0.6189333(?)|| || 150(?) || 830(OC) || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 || -k poclbm AGGRESSION=5 (Windows 7 64-Bit, GPU OC 750->830MHz, VRAM UC 900->450MHz, BIOS modded)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F8F8F8;"| 4870 || 96 || || || 140 || 750 || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Smartcoin r657s / phoenix 1.50 / Linuxcoin 0.2b final || Powercolor @ GPU 830 MHz/ MEM 200 Mhz @ 80% FAN @ 69 temp @ Flags: -k phatk bfi_int=false FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256 AGGRESSION=11 <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F8F8F8;"| 4870 || 104 || || || 140 || 750 || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Smartcoin r657s / DiabloMiner / Linuxcoin 0.2b final || Powercolor @ GPU 830 MHz/ MEM 200 Mhz @ 80% FAN @ 69 temp @ Flags: -v 1 -w 256 <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F8F8FF;"| 4870 || 104.2 || ?|| || ? || 830(OC) || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || Windows 7 64-Bit, GPU Core OC to 830 MHz, GPU Memory UC to 200 MHz By MSI AfterBurner. Card: Gainward Golden Sample. @70%Fan we have 55 GPU temp.<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F8F8FF;"| 4870 || 104.6 || 0.872|| || 120 || 830(OC) || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 256 -f 1, Windows 7 64-Bit, GPU Core OC to 830 MHz, GPU Memory UC to 190 MHz (saves 30 watts at outlet)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F8F8F8;"| 4870 || 112 || || || 140 || 750 || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || BAMT 0.5c / cgminer || Powercolor @ GPU 875 MHz/ MEM 300 Mhz/ 1,25VDC @ 100% FAN @ 65 temp @ Flags: -v 1 -w 256 <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F8F8FF;"| 4870x2 || 180.6|| 0.632|| || 286 || 800 || 1600 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F8F8FF;"| 4870x2 || 180.72|| 0.632|| || 286 || 750 || 1600 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
| 4870x2 || 203 || || || || 850(OC) || 1600 || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm-mod ver. 20 april 2011|| Gainward / Win7 x64 / -w 256 -f 1 / 850MHz GPU - 300MHz Mem - 1,262V - 100% fun : 72C<br />
|-<br />
| 4890 || 97.1 || 0.511|| || 190 || 870(OC) || 1050 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-01-21 Solo settings || Sapphire fab. No flags options helped. Close all browsers and do full restart of GUIMiner and then Bitcoin via GUIMiner server starter or the browsers GPU accl. will limit to 56~ ish Mhash/s - I can now start browser without slowdowns<br />
|-<br />
| 4890 || 102.41 || 0.539|| || 190 || 850 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
| 4890 || 108.3 || 0.57|| || 190 || 975 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
| 4890 || 121.5 || -|| || 190 || 1025 (OC) || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || no flags, Vcore 1.4 <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFF8EF;"| 5450 || 11.99|| 0.631|| || 19 || 650 || 80 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFF8EF;"| 5450 || 13.74|| || - || - || 700 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/Linuxcoin v0.2 || -v -w128 tried several options, seems to work best.<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFF8EF;"| 5450 || 14.12|| || - || - || 700 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix/Linuxcoin v0.2 || Flags: "DEVICE=0 VECTORS AGGRESSION=4 -v FASTLOOP BFI_INT WORKSIZE=64" Kernel: "phatk"<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFF8EF;"| 5450 || 15.36|| || - || - || 700 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix || Flags: "DEVICE=0 VECTORS AGRESSION=8 FASTLOOP BFI_ING WORKSIZE=128" Kernel: "phatk" - MagicSata<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFF8EF;"| 5450 || 18.10|| || - || - || 774 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 1 774.66MHz/300.37MHz<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFF8EF;"| 5470 || 17.10|| || - || - || - || - || - || - || poclbm || -v -w 128 MobileGPU<br />
|-<br />
| 5550 || 40.59 || 1.041|| || 39 || 550 || 320 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
| 5550 || 62.10 || - || - || - || 700 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix || 700MHz core 800MHz ram, phatk mod, Flags: "-k phatk worksize=128 vectors aggression=4 bfi_int"<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 59.96 || 1.538|| || 39 || 650 || 400 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 62 || 1.59|| || 39 || 650 || 400 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 OpenCL/Linux x86_64 || -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS AGGRESSION=4 -v FASTLOOP BFI_INT WORKSIZE=64<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 64 || 1.641|| || 39 || 650 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 73 || 1.872|| || 39 || 700 || 400 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 OpenCL/Linux x86_64 || -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS AGGRESSION=4 -v FASTLOOP BFI_INT WORKSIZE=64<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 86.3 || 2.397|| || 36 || 775 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.75 OpenCL/Windows 7 x64 (no Aero) ||-k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 -v WORKSIZE=256 Fan 100% 86C Undervolted @ 0.96v using Sapphire Trixx<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 94 || stock || || || 880 || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUI Miner 02-12/Windows 7 x86 || -v -w128 75C<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 102 || 1.46(+)|| || 75(-) || 950 || 400 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 OpenCL/Windows 7 x86 (no Aero) || -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS AGGRESSION=7 -v FASTLOOP BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 (Reference Sapphire card, 2 additional 120mm coolers, temperature is 79-82C)<br />
|-<br />
| 5650 || 48 || 1.37|| || 35(?) || - || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source] [http://www.notebookcheck.net/ATI-Mobility-Radeon-HD-5650.23697.0.html source] -- not TDP but load<br />
|-<br />
| 5650 || 61.2 || || || 35 || || || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.50 OpenCL/Windows 7 x64 || -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128 AGGRESSION=9<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EEFFEE;"| 5670 || 71.49 || 1.117|| || 64 || 775 || 400 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EEFFEE;"| 5670 || 72 || 1.64|| || 44 || 850 || - || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm-mod (Win7-64) || Sapphire 100287VGAL card is low power<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EEFFEE;"| 5670 || 85|| || - || - || 900 || 400 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EEFFEE;"| 5670 || 91|| || - || - || 890 || 400 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer 2011-06-09 poclbm catalyst 11.2 win7 x86 || -v -f 0 -w 128<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EEFFEE;"| 5670 || 100|| || - || - || 890 || 400 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || cgminer 1.5.6 || GPU/Mem 890/800 temp 72C<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EEFFEE;"| 5670 || 103 || -|| || - || 900/275 || 400 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x1 || phoenix-1.50 / phatk-mod / Ubuntu 11.04 || VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=256 / small fan, under 50 deg C, no voltage tweaks... catfish<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EEFFEE;"| 5670 || 127.8|| || - || - || 850 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Windows 7 (64bit) Phoenix 2.0 || Aggression=11 Worksize=128 Fastloop=False Opencl<br />
|-<br />
| 5750 || 105 || - || - || - || - || - || - || - || poclbm || Apple iMac 27inch (Mid 2010), Mac OSX 10.7 Lion <br />
|-<br />
| 5750 || 116.24 || 1.352|| || 86 || 700 || 720 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
| 5750 || 137 || ||- || - || 710 || 720 || - || PCI-E 1.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128 using stock memory and GPU clocks<br />
|-<br />
| 5750 || 146.4 || || - || - || 775 || 720 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-21 || -v -w128, AMD Catalyst overclock (775MHz GPU / 1225 MHz Memory)<br />
|-<br />
| 5750 || 154.56 || 1.45|| || 106 || 830 || 720 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - || -v -w128 -f20 underclocked memory clocks from 1150MHz to 300MHz<br />
|-<br />
| 5750 || 170 || - || || - || 870 || 720 || - || PCI-E 1.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128 patched BIOS to underclock memory to 300MHz<br />
|-<br />
| 5750 || 173 || - || ||- || 875 || 720 || - || PCI-E 1.1 x16 || phoenix || 875/300 w/MSI Afterburner, BFI_INT VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 FASTLOOP=FALSE -k phatk<br />
|-<br />
| 5750 || 177 || - || ||- || 910/575 || 720 || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || phoenix 1.5.6 || PowerColor GoGreen+fan, MSI Afterburner 2.2Beta, -k phatk VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 FASTLOOP=FALSE WORKSIZE=64<br />
|-<br />
| 5750 || 190 || - || ||- || 930/290 || - || atistream sdk || PCI-E 1.1 x16 || poclbm || 930gpu / 290mem (O.S. Ubuntu 10.10 x64, overclock gpu & underclock mem) with poclbm options -v -f 0 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
| 5750 Vapor-X || 195 || - || - || 125 || 975/300 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 1.1 x16 || cgminer 2.7.5 || (O.S. Ubuntu 12.01 AMD64 dedicated) cgminer options -Q 0 -I 9 -g 2 -w 256 --auto-fan --temp-target 65 --gpu-vddc 1.075 (Fan speed 60~65%)<br />
|-<br />
| 5750x2 CF || 356 || - || ||- || 870 || 720x2 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=28402.0 cgminer v1.5.1] (Win7 64bit) || 870MHz GPU / -I 8 / 2x [http://www.gigabyte.com/products/product-page.aspx?pid=3402#sp GIGABYTE GV-R575SL-1GI] cards + [http://www.gigabyte.com/products/product-page.aspx?pid=3258#sp GIGABYTE GA-790FXTA-UD5] MB + 1x [http://www.noctua.at/main.php?show=productview&products_id=9&lng=en 80mm], 1x [http://www.noctua.at/main.php?show=productview&products_id=16&lng=en 90mm] Noctua coolers<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 156.83 || 1.452|| || 108 || 850 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 171.12 || - || - || - || - || stock || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.7.3/debian gnu/linux 6 squeeze || -k phatk2 DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 180 || 1.406(*)|| || 128(*) || 950(OC) || 800 || 2.4RC1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 30 (*: Overclocked wattage calculated [http://bakkap.free.fr/Misc/wCalc.html here])<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 Hawk || 182 || ||- || - || 875 || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm/GUIMiner/Win7-64 || -v -w 128 (875MHz is stock for 5770 Hawk)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 185 || - || ||- || 850 || 1200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128 FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=7<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 205.58 || - || ||- || 935 || 300 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-04-28 || -v -w 256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 214.5 || 1.95(-)|| || 108(+) || 950 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.50/GUIMiner/Win7-64 || mem underclocked 300 mhz, 1.1vcore, 950mhz core, @69°C/57%FAN VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=12 -k phatk WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 214.7 || 1.95(-)|| || 108(+) || 950 || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / win7x86 || mem underclocked 309 mhz, -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 216.5 || -|| || - || 955 || || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.5 /phatk || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=23067.0 Modified phatk kernel] and stock voltage for Sapphire (1.125V) VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 -k phatk WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 218.35 || -|| || - || 1000 || 1401 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || DiabloMiner || -w 128 -v 2 (Overclocked to 1Ghz core with 1.2 voltage and Scythe Setsugen 2 cooling system)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 223 || 2.23(-)|| || 100(+) || 1050 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer || -v -w256 [http://www.smpake.com/?p=59 source]<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 227 || -|| || - || 1030 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || DiabloMiner || -w 256 -v 2 (Overclocked to 1030 core/300 mem with 1.2 voltage and Scythe Setsugen 2 cooling system)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 233 || 2.23(-)|| || 100(+) || 1050 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 || VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 -k phatk WORKSIZE=256 [http://www.smpake.com/?p=59 source]<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 236 || -|| || - || 1033/275 || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix-1.50 / phatk-mod / Ubuntu 10.04 || VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=256 / big fans, under 75 deg C, no voltage tweaks... catfish<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 240.61 || 2.3632(-)|| || 100(+) || 1080 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x1 || phoenix 1.48 || VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 -k phatk WORKSIZE=256 (OC'd and OV'd 1080/300 1.25v)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 241 || - || - || 100(+) || 1045 || 250 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.50 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 -k phatk WORKSIZE=256 (OC 1020/300) XFX@1.1 volts. +Kernel function improve 5%<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 244 || -|| || - || 1050 || 300 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.75 /phatk2 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=23067.0 Modified phatk kernel] and stock voltage for Sapphire (1.125V) VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=9, Temp 75C, FAN 100% (manual)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770x2 || 425 || - || - || 225(+) || 960 || 800x2 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm (guiminer) Win7x64 || -v -w128 (OC 960/1200)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830M || 120 || -|| || - || 570|| 120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.50 OpenCL/Win7 x64|| -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 244 || 1.36|| || 179 || 800 || 1000 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 OpenCL/Linux x86_64 || -k phatk DEVICE=1 VECTORS AGGRESSION=6 -v FASTLOOP WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 245 || 1.28|| || 192 || 880 || 900 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm (guiminer) || -v -w 256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 248 || 1.29|| || 192 || 880 || 500 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.46 || -k poclbm VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 256 || -|| || - || 900 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 || -k poclbm VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=7<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 267 || -|| || - || 875 || 1000 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x1 || Phoenix 1.48 OpenCL/Linux x86_64 || -k phatk DEVICE=1 VECTORS AGGRESSION=6 -v FASTLOOP WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 272 || 1.52|| || 179 || 875 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / LinuxCoin || 275Mhz Memory clock, 1.125 V (from 1.163), VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 275 || 1.5714|| || 175 || 900 || 500 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm (guiminer) Win7x64 || -v -w64 -f10, XFX stock w/ v2.4 SDK = 230Mh/s, v2.1 SDK = +10Mh/s, overclocking core clock by 100 = +30Mh/s, underclocking memory to 500 (ran cooler), and changing workload to -w64 = +5Mh/s.<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 285 || - ||1.58 || - || 960 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.47 / poclbm / Win7 64 || VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 290 || -|| || - || 930 || - || 2.2 || PCI-E x16/x4/x1 || GUIMiner / phoenix 1.5 / POCLBM / Win 7 64 || POCLBM VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 AGGRESSION=12 FASTLOOPS=false / Memory 300Mhz, VCore standard<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 290 || -|| || - || 996 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.4 / poclbm / Win7 64 || VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 295 || -|| || - || 980 || 1120 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIMiner / poclbm / Win XP 32 || Extra flags -v -w 128<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 297 || -|| || - || 970 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer / phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 64 || 300Mhz Memory clock, 44% fan-speed, -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=8 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 300 || -|| || - || 960|| 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIMiner / poclbm / Win 7 64 || Extra flags -v -w 256 (Sapphire Extreme 71 degrees @ 52% fan)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 300 || -|| || - || 970 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.47 / pheonix 1.48 / Win7 64 || (sapphire xtreme) VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 300 || -|| || - || 970 || 1120 || 2.1 || PCI-E x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 64 || 300Mhz memory clock BFI_INT AGGRESSION=12 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 305 || -|| || - || 984 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.4 / phatk / Win7 32 || 400Mhz Memory clock, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 307 || -|| || - || 996 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 64 || VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 307 || 2.25 || 2.55 || 125 || 965 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || cgminer 2.0.5 / Win7 64 || Mem @ 300/Stock voltage/Entire system 200W<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 308 || -|| || - || 990 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.50 / poclbm / Xubuntu 11.04 x64 || VECTORS AGGRESSION=11 BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 308 || -|| || - || 990 || 375 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 32 || @ stock voltage VECTORS AGGRESSION=11 -v FASTLOOP=false BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 black || 310 || ||- || - || 990 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x8 || LinuxCoin 0.2b, phoenix/phatk || (XFX Brand) -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 AGGRESSION=11 FASTLOOPS=false<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 311 || -|| || - || 1000 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.50 / phatk / Linux || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 315 || -|| || - || 970 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.6.1 / phatk2 / CrunchBang Linux || memory @ 300mhz VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=9 WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 316 || ||- || - || 1015 || 375 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 32 || @ stock voltage VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 -v FASTLOOP=false BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 319 || -|| 1.77 || - || 1030 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Xp 64 || 1.2v 355Mhz Memory, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 321 || -|| || - || 1000 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.50 / phatk-mod / Linux || 1000Mhz GPU, 350Mhz RAM, 1.15V, 90% fan, ~60c Temp, VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128; phatk kernel found [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=25135.0 here]<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 323 || || || || 900 (OC) || || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.5 Win7x64 || (500Mhz RAM), ~61c Temp, 57% fan, BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 -v WORKSIZE=64<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 (127$) || 325 || 1.98 || 2.57Mh/$ || 165W || 1040MHz || 200MHz || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || Guiminer/phatk-[http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=25135.0 mod] w7 64bit || -k phatk AGGRESSION=12 VECTORS2 WORKSIZE=128 stock volt, watercooled 53C<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 328 || - || - || - || 1040 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || LinuxCoin 0.2.1b / phoenix / phatk || 1.195 V, RAM @ 325 Mhz, fan @90%, no case, extra 10K RPM fan (62 deg.C in full-load); options: -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=256; brand: Sapphire Xtreme; bord is stable up to 1060 Mhz ~ 335 MHash, but produces some visual artefacts;<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 331 || - || 4.14 || - || 1010 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 1.0 x16 || WinXP 32 / Phoenix 1.7.5 / phatk2 || Stock Voltage, RAM 300, 64C, Fan 67%, -k phatk2 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=256 FASTLOOP=false (+6Mh w/ Phoenix 1.7.5 over 1.6.2)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 333 || - || - || - || 1040 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || LinuxCoin 0.2.1b / phoenix-1.50 / phatk-[http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=25135.0 mod] || + ~5 Mhash increase using the modified phatk from the user above. I am the same guy with 330 @ 1040 MHz Sapphire Xtreme, all other settings the same, board stable, no increase in rejected<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 334 || -|| || - || 1040 || - || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.75 / phatk 2.2 / Win7 64 || Stock voltage, 208Mhz Memory, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 334 || -|| || - || 1030 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.50 / phatk 2.0 / Win7 64 || Stock voltage, 385Mhz Memory, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=256 BFI_INT -- (upped from 330 achieved with diapolo mod [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=25135.0 here]), now using phatk 2.0 found [http://forum.bitcoin.org/?topic=7964.0 here]<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 342 || - || - || - || 1045 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk 2.2 / WinSvr 2008 R2 64 || Stock voltage, 385Mhz Memory, VECTORS VECTORS4 FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=14 BFI_INT -k phatk-2.2<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830x2 CF || 480 || -|| || - || 800 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Guiminer/ - / Win7 64bit |Guiminer || -v -f70 -w128<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830x2 || 570 || -|| || - || 950 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x8 || Guiminer/ - / Win7 64bit poclbm || poclbm -v -w256 -f10 MEMORYCLOCK 300MHZ GPUCLOCK 950MHZ FAN 52% 72°C <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830x2 || 608 || -|| || - || 990 || - || - || 2x PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 2.0/ phatk2 / Win7 32bit || Stock voltage, 300Mhz Memory, VECTORS GOFFSET AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=256 BFI_INT FAN 51% 69°C (Open ATX case) <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830x6 || 1967 || 1.62 || 1.97 || - || 1020/340 || 1120x6 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x1 || Phoenix 1.7.5/phatk2/BAMT Linux || 100% fan @65C / 1.162V / CCC 11.6 / BFI_INT VECTORS FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 240.77 || 1.595|| 1.49 || 151 || 725 || 1440 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 250.26 || 1.657|| || 151 || 725 || 1440 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || opencl client || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 252 || 1.575|| || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-01-25 || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 255.3 || 1.593|| || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-01-25 || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 264 || 1.748|| || 151 || 725 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 1.0 x8 || guiminer-20110501 || -v -w128<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 280 || 1.75|| || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.3 || with BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 280 || - || ||- || 725 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.50 / Fedora 14 || -v -k poclbm VECTORS AGGRESSION=8 WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT FASTLOOP=true<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 282.75 ||style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 3.06|| - || 92.25|| 666 (UC) || 1440|| 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix/WinXP || undervolted to 0.95V; phatk2 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=256; driver 10.12; [http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=9982.0 clocktweak] for setting values; [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=40056 thread]<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 292 || 1.825|| || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-04-28 -v -f 1 || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 298 || 1.8620|| || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-04-28 -v -f 1 -w 64 || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 300 || 1.5460|| || 194 || 925(OC) || 1440 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 304 || - || || - || 725 (stock) || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || cgminer.exe -v 2 -I 8 -w 256 --gpu-memclock 275 || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 314 || 1.8362|| || 171 || 820(OC) || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 1.0 x8 || poclbm || -v -w128<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 328 || - || || - || 875 @ Stock voltage || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix || 70C @42% fan, mem @ 500mhz; -v -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=8 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=128 <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 330 || - || ||- || 850 @ Stock voltage || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix || EAH5850, miner arguments: -k poclbm DEVICE=1 VECTORS AGGRESSION=8 WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 331 || - || ||- || 725 (Stock) || || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Diablo Win7 64bits|| Sapphire 5850 Xtreme, Arguments: -v 2 -w 192 (by Swapper 2011-07-05)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 335 || 1.8611|| || 180 || 890(OC) || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || poclbm || -v -w128, Memory downclocked to 300Mhz<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 344 || 1.8594|| || 185 || 890(OC) || 1440 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 347 || -|| || - || 876 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer / phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 64 || 300Mhz Memory clock, 50% fan-speed, -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 354 || -|| || - || 900(OC) || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || diablo -v 2 -w 128 || Ubuntu 11.04 64-bit [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=9239.0 Headless], catalyst 11.5, memory downclocked to 300mhz, stock voltage. flashed with atiflash [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9AxNmOy6_0 video]<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 355 || -|| || - || 900(OC) || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk || Ubuntu 11.04 64-bit, Memory downclocked to 200MHz, VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 355 || -|| || - || 900 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Ubuntu 11.04 x64 || 300Mhz Memory clock, 60% fan-speed, -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 356 || -|| || - || 870 (OC)|| 1440 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || cgminer 2.1.2 / Win 7 x64 || 302Mhz Memory clock, 85% fan-speed, Stock Voltage, -I 6 -v 2 -w 256 (2012-02 by Swapper)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 359 || -|| || - || 900 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.50 / phatk / Ubuntu 11.04 x64 || 300Mhz Memory clock, 66% fan-speed, -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 365 || -|| || - || 920 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 64 || 300Mhz memory clock VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 367.5 || -|| || - || 900(OC) || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 1.0 x16 || diablo with bitless's hack, -v 2 -w 128 || RHEL 5U5 x86_64, catalyst 11.5, Sapphire HD 5850 Xtreme, Memory downclocked to 300MHz, core voltage 1.145V, BIOS modded with RBE<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 369.4 || -|| || - || 930 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 1.0 x16 || guiminer / phoenix / phatk / Win7 32 || Catalyst 11.5, XFX HD5850, Memory downclocked to 322MHz, -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 372 || 1.68 || - || 220 @ Wall || 900 || 300 || 2.5 || PCI-E 1.1 x8 || cgminer 2.3.1 from source / Ubuntu 11.11 x86_64 || -I 8 -v 2 -w 256 --- hex-core opteron cpu w/ 12GB RAM and cgminer CPU bug in linux makes power usage a little high ~210w in windows 7 x86_64<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 375 || -|| || - || 940 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.50 / phatk / Ubuntu 10.04 || 300Mhz memory clock VECTORS AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=256 BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 381 || -|| || - || 940 || 1440 || 2.5 || PCI-E 1.0 x16 || phoenix / phatk / Win7 x64 / Catalyst 11.6 || MSI Afterburner 500MHz memory clock,-k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 AGGRESSION=13<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 382 || 1.8454|| || 207 || 995(OC) || 1440 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || phoenix || OC 1.177v on core<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 391 || - || - || 180 || 725 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Win 7 Ultimate x64 / DiabloMiner / Catalyst 12.2 || ASUS DirectCU @ GPU 960 MHz / MEM 300 Mhz @ Voltage 1.2 @ 70% FAN @ 69 temp @ Flags: -v 2,1 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 391 || -|| || - || 1000 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16(@x8) || phoenix 1.5 / phatk / Win7 64 || Mem @ 280, fan @ 100%, Temp @ 71, 1.163 V core, -v -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256, The name is Mautobu<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 392 || -||2.43 || - || 990 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix-svn (AUR) / phatk / Arch Linux || Memory: 180MHz, -v -q 1 -k phatk WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 397 || -|| || - || 950 || 1440 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.1 16x || phoenix 1.5 / phatk 2.2 / Win7 64, catalyst 11.6 || Mem speed 350Mhz, Fan 85%, 70C, 1.083 Vcore, -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=12 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 400 || -|| || - || 1000 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.5 Win7 x64 || Memory 600MHz, Vcore 1.225, 73C, -k phatk WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false, 3% phatk mod<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 404 || -|| || - || 965 || 1440 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.0 x16(@x8) || phoenixsvn / phatk2 / Ubuntu 11.04 / catalyst 11.8 || 5870 bios flash, Mem @322, fan@55%, Temp@83oC, 1.163Vcore, -k phatk2 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 408 || -|| - || - || 999/275 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.50 / phatk-mod / Ubuntu 10.04 || Fan 70%, temp < 60 deg C, Sapphire 5 heatpipe card, same flags as above/below (edit1- oops, no voltage tweaks... edit2- wow, phatk-mod makes a difference... catfish)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 412 || -|| || - || 1010 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 1x>16x || phoenix 1.5 / phatk 3% mod / Win7 64 11.5 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=12 -k phatk <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 414.8 || -|| || - || 1018 || 450 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 16x || GUIMiner / Win7 64 11.7 || I use Sapphire HD5850 Toxic 2GB and for OC TRIXX Sapphire Tweak Utility v4.0.2. 72 deg C, fan 100%, core 1018mhz, mem 450Mhz, stock voltage (1.163). proof: http://img23.imageshack.us/img23/2367/414upload.png GUIMiner parameters: -v -w256 -f1 <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 420 || -|| || - || 1055 || 300 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.0 1x>16x || phoenix 1.5 / phatk 3% mod / Win7 64 11.6 || Fan 80%, 66C, 1.250 Vcore, -k phatk PLATFORM=0 DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=8 And proof: http://i.imgur.com/s9hqs.png<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 431 || -|| || - || 1040 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 4x>16x || phoenix-svn / phatk kernel / Debian Wheezy AMD64 + fglrx 11.6 || fan 100%, vcore 1.1750 V, 72C, VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=15 FASTLOOP=false -k phatk, proof: http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/199/431u.png/<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 432.15 || -|| || - || 1040 || 500 || 2.5.793.1 || PCI-E 2.0 16x || phoenix 1.7.5 / phatk2 kernel / Win7 x64 SP1 || fan 100%, vcore 1.212 V, 69C, VECTORS4 BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=64 -k phatk2, proof: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/18704286/mining%205850.png/ ... Card is REF HIS 5850 ... i mining at this speed for stable but... max unstable (if i play video/flashvideo it will crash) is 436.48Mhash/sec with core 1051 mem 500 vcore 1.237 (same other settings) it's too hot in VRM that not sound good to me... i don't want to kill it for my fun mining ... - Nito Niwatori <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850x2 || 620 || - || || - || 800 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Guiminer ( cl miner ) v2012-02-19 Win7 x64 || MSI OC-Edition, -v -w 128 <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850x2 || 702 || - || - || - || 905 (OC)|| 1440 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 (x2) || phoenix 2.0.0 / Win 7 x32 || ASUS DirectCU: 304Mhz Memory clock, 66% fan-speed, Voltage Tweak, AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256 (https://www.dropbox.com/s/9u6f2jz3sz1poxb/5850.jpg)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850x2 || 720 || -|| || - || 875 (OC)|| 1440 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || cgminer 2.1.2 / Win 7 x64 || 302Mhz Memory clock, 85% fan-speed, Stock Voltage, -I 6 -v 2 -w 256 (2012-02 by Swapper)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850x3 || 1,010 || -|| || - || 850 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 (x3) || GUIMiner || -v -w128 | MSI Afterburner settings: 850MHz core clock and 500MHz memory clock <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850x4 || 1360 || 1.94|| || 700@wall || 900 || || || || poclbm|| <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850x6 || 2,135 || -|| || - || 900 || - || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.0 (6 total, 4 full length, 2 @ PCIE1x with risers || GUIMiner 24/8/2011 - poclbm || -v -f1 -w128 | Win 7 64Bit, Gigabyte GA-890FXA-UD5 motherboard, 4gb ram, AM3 cpu, Kingston SSD, Catalyst 11.8 drivers, guiminer switches: -v -f1 -w128, MSI Afterburner settings: 900MHz core clock and 1000MHz memory clock, cable risers required to fit all 6 cards, fans 100% Proof: http://i.imgur.com/6s7zv.jpg <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870M || 152.5 || -|| || - || 750(OC) || 1000 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || gui-miner (win-7) ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870M || 189.2 || -|| || - || 850(OC) || 1000 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Wins 7 64/gui-miner (win-7) || -v -w128 -f0 Graphics Overdrive setting 700->850 core clock & 900->1030memory clock . +35mhs over stock settings<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 313 || 1.665|| || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo/Linux || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 313.65 || 1.668||1.65 || 188 || 850 || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 340 || 1.809|| || 188 || 850 || 1600 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 343 || 1.824|| || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo/Linux || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 355 || 1.888|| || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/Linux || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 360 || 1.6822|| || 214 || 970 || 700 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL w7-64 || -f 0 -v -w 128 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=6144.msg91959#msg91959 source]<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 379 || 2.015|| || 188 || 850 || 1600 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha || -D -G2<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 397 || -|| || - || 930 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=10 WORKSIZE=128<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 400 || 1.9047|| || 210 || 950 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || Phoenix 1.3 || -k poclbm VECTORS AGGRESSION=7 FASTLOOP BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 408 || 1.8888|| || 216 || 980 || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm/Win7x64 || -f 20 -v -w 128, BIT_ALIGN, BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 414 || 1.9255|| || 215 || 975 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer/w7x64 || -k poclbm -v -w 256 -f 1 VECTORS BITALIGN BFI_INT -- Memory Clock 300<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 420 || 2.0000|| || 210 || 950 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=14 WORKSIZE=256 -- Memory Clock 300Mhz<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 421 || 1.9581|| || 215 || 975 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.47 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 -k phatk<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 421.5 || 2.007|| || 201 || 950 || 1600 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha || -D -G2 (GPU OC to 900, memory downclocked to 900)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 430 || || || || 980 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.48/Windows 7 64 || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=14 WORKSIZE=256 -- Memory Clock 300Mhz<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 432 || || || || 985 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.73/Windows 7 64 || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128 Memory Clock=900Mhz Asus 76C Fan=60% 65F ambient<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 435 || -|| || - || 990 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || LinuxCoin v0.2b phoenix/phatk || (Powercolor brand) -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 AGGRESSION=11 FASTLOOPS=false<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 437 || || 1.90|| || 960 || - || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x1 || phoenix 1.50 + phatk || Card is clocked with BIOS flash @ 960Mhz Core and 300Mhz Memory. More information and pictures: http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=7216.msg324521#msg324521 <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 438 || 1.9819|| || 221 || 1000(OC) || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm/Linux || -v -w 64 -f 1<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 440 || 2.0000|| || 220 || 995 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 445 || 2.28||2.34 || 195 || 1005 || 335 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x4 || Ubuntu 11.04 phoenix/phatk || (Asus brand, volts = 1'072) -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 AGGRESSION=12 FASTLOOPS=false -a 7 (-a 10)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 453 || || || || 980 || 1600 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.50/Windows 7 64 catalyst 11.6 phatk 2.2 || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=256 FASTLOOPS=false -- Memory Clock 350Mhz Vcore 1.163v<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 458 || -|| || - || 1040 || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm/Windows 7 64 || -v -w 256 -f 1 Crossfired, Water cooled, 916 Mhash/s total. Best dual gpu setup me thinks? The name is Mautobu.<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 460 || || || || 1050 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Guiminer || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=14 WORKSIZE=256 -- Memory Clock 300Mhz vcore @ 1225mV<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 460 || || || || 1020 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.50/Windows 7 64 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=256 -k phatk -- Memory Clock 300Mhz vcore @ 1225mV, 3% phatk mod<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 461 || || || || 1000 || 1600 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.75/Windows 7 64 || -k phatk2 (phatk 2.2) VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=9 WORKSIZE=128, Memory Clock=213, stock voltage<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 481 || || || || 1050 || 1600 || 2.5 || PCI-E 1x || phoenix 1.75/Windows 7 64 || -k phatk2 (phatk 2.2) VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=64 AGGRESSION=20 [MSI HD 5870 Ref Design vs Zalman VF3000A 1200mv Mem 600MHz]<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870x2 (CF) || 864 || -|| || - || 900 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer || -k phatk VECTORS FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=7 BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128 (Same flags per GPU)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870x2 (Ares) || 620 || -|| || - || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer || -v -w 128<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870x2 (Ares) || 826 || 0.751|| || 1100 || 950 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.4 w/ Phtak || AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT Memory @ 300MHz<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870x2 (Ares) || 826 || 1.18|| || 700 || 935 || 3200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 w/ Phatk || AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=256 VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false, memory @ 319 MHz, Windows 7 32-bit<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870x2 (Ares) || 878 || 0.585|| || 1500 || 1000 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.7 w/ Phtak || AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT Memory @ 300MHz<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870x4 || 1784 || || 1.29|| || 960 || - || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x1 || phoenix 1.50 + phatk + [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=7964.0 Version 2.2 Improvement] || Cards are clocked with BIOS flash @ 960Mhz Core and 300Mhz Memory. More information and pictures: http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=7216.msg324521#msg324521 <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870x6 || 2568 || -|| || 1200 || 970 || -|| 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/debian32bit || -v -w128, voltage default, Mem downclocked to 300 MHz, Fan 80-90% (+ 4x12cm fun 1900rpm), Temp 6x 70-75C. Whole computer comsumpts 1280Watt. Using PCI-E risers 16x-16x to use 6 GPU cards<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 530 || 1.803||0.53 ? || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.4.595.10 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/201103.beta3/Windows || -v -w128 -f60<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 535.06 || 1.820|| || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 560 || 1.905|| || 294 || 725 || 3200 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 565 || 1.922|| || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine2 || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 604 || 2.054|| || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 645 || 1.875|| || 344 || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || -f1, Debian 6, fglrx-driver 10.9.3<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 739 || || || || 795 || 3200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || cgminer 2.3.1 || -I 9 -k phatk -w 256 -v 2, memory clock @ 265MHz, Debian Squeeze, fglrx-driver 12.1.1, performance scales linearly with engine clock as long as memory clock is 1/3<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 740 || 2.1511|| || 344 || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix/1.3 || AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT, memory clock @ 300MHz<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 755 || 2.2076|| || 342 || 848 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 28-04-11 || -f 1 -w 256 -v, Ubuntu 10.10, fglrx 11.4, memory clock @ 300MHz<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 802 || 2.31|| || 347 || 850 || 3200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix poclbm Ubuntu 11.04 || -q 6 -k AGGRESSION=19 WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT VECTORS, fglrx 11.4, mem clock @ 1000MHz<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 820 || ??? || || ??? || 910 || 3200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x1 || Phoenix 1.5 Win7 || AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=256 BFI_INT VECTORS -k phatk, 11.5, Mem @ 300MHz, 1.110v, 3% phatk mod<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 822.2 || -|| || - || 950 || 3200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix win7 || -k phatk -q 6 AGGRESSION=20 WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT VECTORS, but with this increasing difficulty mining becomes pretty pointless<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 833 || -|| || - || 930 || 3200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.7.5, win7 x64, catalyst 11.7 || -k phatk AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=256 BFI_INT VECTORS fastloops=false. memory@300mhz, 1.125v, fan 100%, 73C core temp, 95c voltage controllers. it will clock higher but not stable without a voltage increase and i fear for the VRMs<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 863.4 || -|| || - || 955 || 3200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo - Debian || -v 2 -w 256 (XFX Radeon HD 5970 Black Edition)<br />
|-<br />
| 6310M || 9.821 || 0.545|| || 18 || 500 || 80 || 2.4 || Integrated/APU || poclbm-gui -v -w128 || HP DM1z 18W TDP is shared with the CPU<br />
|-<br />
| 6450 || 27.0 || 1.5 || - || 18 || 625 || 160 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 2011-06-14 || -v -w128 Sapphire HD6450 1gb ddr3 Ubuntu 11.04 64bit<br />
|-<br />
| 6450 || 32.6 || 1.918 || - || 17 || 725 || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer/Phoenix1.75 Windows 7 x64 (no Aero)|| -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 -v WORKSIZE=64 Dell OEM HD6450 1gb ddr3 passive cooling/no fan 81C<br />
|-<br />
| 6450 || 37.8 || ? || - || 17 || 850 || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix2.0.0 Windows 8 x64 || -k phatk2 VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 -v WORKSIZE=64 Sapphire HD6450 1GB DDR3 passive cooling/no fan 150MHz memory/1000mV VCore<br />
|-<br />
| 6470M || 24.1 || - || ||- || - || - || 2.1 || Integrated/APU || guiminer || <br />
|-<br />
| 6470M || 31.0 || - || ||- || - || - || 2.1 || Integrated/APU || phoenix 1.48 || <br />
|-<br />
| 6480G || 24.1 || - || ||- || - || - || 2.1 || Integrated/APU || phoenix 1.75 || <br />
|-<br />
| 6490M || 15.21 || - || ||- || - || - || - || - || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8994.0 DiabloMiner GUI] v2011-05-22 / Mac OS X 10.6.7 || Model: MacBookPro8,2 VRAM: 256MB<br />
|-<br />
| 6490M || 16.289 || 0.708|| || 23 || - || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm-mod (Mac OS X 10.6.7) || MacBook Pro early 2011<br />
|-<br />
| 6490M || 17.18 || - || ||- || - || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoneix 1.50 with poclbm, Mac OS X 10.6.7 || MacBook Pro 2,8 VRAM: 256MB. phoenix -k poclbm VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP<br />
|-<br />
| 6490M || 32.1 || - || ||- || - || - || - || - || guiminer 2011-07-01 with poclbm (Win7-x64) ||MacBookPro8,2 (WinX64) -v -w128 -f0<br />
|-<br />
| style="background:#FFDD00;"| 6520G || 33.8 || - || || - || 400 || 320 || - || Integrated/APU || guiminer 2011-07-01 with OpenCL (Win7-64bit) || -v -w128 on Toshiba L775D-S7222<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFDD00;"| 6530D || 40.5 || - || || - || 444 || 320 || 2.4 || FM-1 || cgminer 2.4.1 || Integrated/APU A6-3500; Linux; Catalyst 11.11; APP-SDK-v2.4 (595.10)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFDD00;"| 6550D(A8 Onboard) || 66.2 || -|| || - || - || - || 2.5 || FM-1 || guiminer 2011-07-01 with OpenCL (Win7-64bit) || -v -w128 -f60<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFDD00;"| 6550D || 67.6 || -|| || - || 600 || 400 || 2.5 || FM-1 || guiminer 2011-07-01 with OpenCL (Win7-64bit) || -v -w128 -f2<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFDD00;"| 6570 || 68.0 || 1.133|| || 60 || 650 || 480 || 2.4 || PCI-E x16 || guiminer 2011-05-21 with poclbm (Win7-32bit) || no extra option for miner . Sapphire 6570 gddr5 512mb<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFDD00;"| 6570 || 82.1 || 1.368|| || 60 || 650 || 480 || 2.4 || PCI-E x16 || guiminer 2011-05-21 with poclbm (Win7-32bit) || -v -w128 . Sapphire 6570 gddr5 512mb<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFDD00;"| 6570 || 86.0 || 1.95 || - || 44 || 650 || 480 || 2.4 || PCI-E x16 || guiminer/poclbm 2011-06-14 || -v -w128 Sapphire Ultimate HD6570 1gb ddr3 Ubuntu 11.04 64bit<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFDD00;"| 6570 || 112.0 || - || || - || 860 || 480 || 2.7 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer 2012-02-19/poclbm (Win7-64bit) || -v -w128 -f1 . Sapphire 6570 Low Profile gddr3 1024mb<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFDD00;"| 6570 || 114.0 || - || || - || 866 || 480 || 2.7 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer 2012-02-19/poclbm (Win7-64bit) || -v -f 0 -w128 -a 3 . XFX 6570 Full Profile gddr3 1024mb 64 bit<br />
|-<br />
| 6630M || 48.80 || -|| || - || - || - || - || - || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8994.0 DiabloMiner GUI] v2011-06-18 / Mac OS X 10.7 || Mac Mini 2011 MC816D/A<br />
|-<br />
| 6630M || 63.00 || -|| || - || 600 || 480 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || DiabloMiner Windows || Lenovo ThinkPad Edge E320 (card overclocked using Sapphire TRIXX)<br />
|-<br />
| 6670 || 102.20 || -|| || - || 800 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/Debian sid || -v -f 0 -w 128<br />
|-<br />
| 6670 || 104.00 || - || 1.0 || - || 820 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer(poclbm)/Win 7|| -v -a4 -f15 -d0 -w64<br />
|-<br />
| 6670 || 110.00 || - || 1.0 || - || 850 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer(poclbm)/Win 7|| -v -f 0 -w 128 -q 6<br />
|-<br />
| 6670 || 111.77 || 1.69 || - || 66 || 910 || 480 || 2.7 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.7.5 || -k phatk2 BFI_INT AGGRESSION=5 VECTORS WORKSIZE=128<br />
|-<br />
| 6670 || 120.1 || - || - || - || 900 || 480 || 2.7 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || cgminer 2.7.4 || kernel: diablo i:10 core: 900 mem: 750<br />
|-<br />
| 6670 || 124.0 || - || - || 66 || 940 || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix2.0.0 Windows 8 x64 || -k phatk2 VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 -v WORKSIZE=128 Sapphire HD6670 Ultimate 1GB DDR5 passive cooling/no fan 300MHz memory/1100mV VCore<br />
|-<br />
| 6750 || 142 || -|| || 150 || 700 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w128, Gigabyte SL (passive cooler), watts is TDP, card runs very hot (>90°C)<br />
|-<br />
| 6750 || 167.59 || -|| || - || 870 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer || -v -f30 -w128<br />
|-<br />
| 6750 || 172.00 || -|| || - || 860 || 600 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer 2012-02-19/poclbm (Win7-64bit) MSI Afterburner 2.2.3 || -v -w128 f-20 Sapphire 6570 GDDR3 1024Mb CCC ver. 11.12 OCL 2.5<br />
|-<br />
| 6750M || 41.48 || -|| || - || 870 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || diablominer ||<br />
|-<br />
| 6750M || 60 || -|| || - || - || - || - || - || diablominer OSX 10.7 WorkSize=128||<br />
|-<br />
| 6770 || 180 || -|| || - || 850 || 1200 || - || - || guiminer || -v -w128 , this was an XFX (OEM) model, GPU @ 850 MHz, mem @ 1200 MHz; I pushed it up to 190 Mhash/s briefly by overclocking, but it crashed the system above that<br />
|-<br />
| 6770 || 202 || -|| || - || 960 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x1,x4,x8,x16 || phoenix 1.48 || Sapphire 6770 (standard) -q2 -k poclbm DEVICE=0 AGGRESSION=10 VECTORS WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT FASTLOOP (The PCI-E speed does not affect the mining speed)<br />
|-<br />
| 6770 || 217 || -|| || - || 960 || 800 || - || PCI-E x16 || Guiminer with phoenix || Sapphire 6770 -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128 FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 with https://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=22965.0 modification<br />
|-<br />
| 6770 || 221 || -|| || - || 1010 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || Phoenix 1.50 || MSI 6770 -k phatk PLATFORM=0 DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=13 3% Stock voltage.<br />
|-<br />
| 6770 || 235 || -|| || - || 1010 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || Phoenix 1.50 || Sapphire 6770 -k phatk PLATFORM=0 DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=13 3% mod https://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=22965.0 and AS5 paste on core w/ external 12" fan 50C full load. Stock voltage.<br />
|-<br />
| 6770x2 || 470 || -|| || - || 1010 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || Phoenix 1.50 || Sapphire 6770 -k phatk PLATFORM=0 DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=13 3% mod https://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=22965.0 and AS5 paste on core w/ external 12" fan 50C full load. Stock voltage.<br />
|-<br />
| 6790 || 220 || 1.467|| || 150 || 800 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 || -k phatk BFI_INT FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=12 VECTORS OC'd to 1ghz, underclocked mem to 300, voltage at 1175<br />
|-<br />
| 6790 || 219 || 1.467|| || 150 || 960 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer || -v -f0 -w128 / GPU OC to 960MHz under Windows7 64bit<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 171.59 || 1.351||1.07 || 127 || 775 || 960 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 196 || -|| || - || 850 || 960 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 0<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 220 || 1.236(*)|| || 178(*) || 1000(OC) || 960 || 2.4RC1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 30 (*: Overclocked wattage calculated [http://bakkap.free.fr/Misc/wCalc.html here] )<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 234.8 || ||- || - || 940 || 960 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.3 || AGGRESSION=8 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 236.0 || ||- || - || 940 || 960 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.4 || -k phatk AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT, Core @ 900MHz, Memory @ 300MHz<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 244.2 || ||- || - || 960 || 960 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm june-2011 || -v -w 128<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 245.1 || ||- || 200 || 940 || 960 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer (Phoenix) || Sapphire 6850 (Memory @1000MHz); Win7 64bit; flags: -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=14 WORKSIZE=128 <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 250 || 1.612(*) ||- || 155(*) || 940 (OC) || 960 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || AOCLBF 1.74 (Phoenix 1.5**) @Win7/x64 || XFX 6850 (Memory @840MHz; Vdcc @1.148V; Fan @74%; Temp @70C; System @39C); flags: -k phatk BFI_INT FASTLOOP VECTORS AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128 (*: Overclocked wattage calculated [http://bakkap.free.fr/Misc/wCalc.html here] / **: [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=22965.0 Tainted Kernel])<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 256.2 || || - || 170 || 980 || 960 || 2.7 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.7.5 / Win7 32bit || -k phatk -VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=9, Sapphire VaporX 1GB, mem@250MHz, stock VDDC 1.150V <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 262.5 || || - || - || 965 || 525 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer / poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128 (HIS 6850 flashed to HIS 6870 BIOS)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 267.2 || ||1.67 || - || 1010(OC) || 960 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer / phoenix 1.50 || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 worksize=128 FASTLOOP=false<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 301.4 || ||1.67 || - || || || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer / poclbm || -v -f 2 -w 128 clock @ 985 mem @ 890<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 232.47 || 1.540||1.22 || 151 || 900 || 1120 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm -v -w 128 || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 245|| -|| || - || 900|| 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ph rising 1.45 phoenix 1.50 phatk 11.5 sdk 2.4 || HD5xxx+ Fastloop phatk AGGRESSION=10<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 264.5 || - || - || - || 980 || 1050 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-01 || Stays around 66*C if I keep the side panel off and the room well ventilated. Card is PowerColor branded. Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 with Classic theme. Fan is at 100%. -v -w128 <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 271 || 1.807|| || 150 || 940 || 1120|| 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm -v -w 128 || Debian 6.0.1 x86_64<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 277.47 || -|| || - || 940 || 1120 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.3 || AGGRESSION=8 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 279 || 1.847(?)|| || 151(?) || 900 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha cat 11.4 sdk 2.4 || -G2 -D stock clocks, debian linux 64bit<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 281.7 || 1.172 (stock)|| || - || 980 || 1120|| 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer-v2011-06-09 || xfx6870, flags: -v 19 -w 128, win7 32-bit<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 293.13 || || ||- || 945 || 1050|| 2.5 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.5 Phatk || xfx6870, Catalyst 11.6, 1.5 Phoenix flags: -k phatk FASTLOOP=false DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128; http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=25860.0 Kernel Patch; http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=6458.0 Cmd; http://developer.amd.com/tools/gDEBugger/Pages/default.aspx No Crossfire Required; runs faster without crossfire 1% + additional 3% from update<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 294 || || ||- || 980 || 1120|| 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix phatk || xfx6870, 340MHz memory clock, Catalyst 11.6, flags: BFI_INT VECTORS AGGRESSION=9 WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 294 || || ||- || 985 || 1100|| 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || Diablo || Powercolor branded card, Win 8 x64, -v 1 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 295 || 2.02||1.64 || 146 || 950 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || hashkill latest as of 7/6/11 (ubuntu 11.4) || hashkill-gpu -p bitcoin user:pass:server -D, mem clock 850, voltage @ 1.175, Fan @ 70%, Temp @ 71C.<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 297|| -|| || - || 1000|| 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ph rising 1.62 phoenix 1.50 phatk 11.5 sdk 2.4 || Vectors HD5xxx+ Fastloop phatk AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 300 || - || || - || 940 || 1120 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.6.2 phatk2 || xfx6870 Black Edition, 340MHz Memory Clock, Catalyst 11.6, VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128, Debian Linux 64-Bit, Fan @ 50%, Temp @ 75C<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 300 || 1.72 || - || 174 || 1038 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm windows7x86 cat 11.4 || -v -w128 -f1 mem clock 360, fan 100% temp 73C<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 300.06 || 1.830|| || 164 || 1020 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.4 cat 11.4 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=8 fastloop mem clock 344<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 302 || - || || - || 940 || 1120 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || cgminer 2.1.2 || xfx6870 Black Edition, 340MHz Memory Clock, Catalyst 11.6, -w 256 -I 9, Debian Linux 64-Bit, Fan @ 50%, Temp @ 75C<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 307 || 1.72 || - || 174 || 1001/\1001 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm windows7x86 cat11.8 || -v -w128 -f5,85°C<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 310 || - || - || - || 1035 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 phatk 11.5 sdk 2.4 || BFI_INT VECTORS FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=128, mem clock @ 300MHz, voltage @ 1.300<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 310 || -|| || - || 975 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix phatk linuxcoin || BFI_INT VECTORS FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128, mem clock @ 340MHz, core clock @ 970MHz, flashed bios, 72 degrees w/ fan @ 68%, GIGABYTE SOC<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 312 || -|| || - || 975 || 300|| 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.50 / phatk / Windows 7 x64 SP1 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256, mem clock @ 300MHz, voltage @ 1.300, Fan @ 45%, Temp @ 62C, MSI 6870 HAWK.<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 314 || -|| || - || 1030 || 1120|| 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.50 / phatk / Linux || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 316 || -|| || - || 1030 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer 2011-06-09 using phoenix (Win7-32bit) || -k phatk platform=0 device=0 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 worksize=128 FASTLOOP=false, mem clock @ 228MHz, voltage @ 1.25, Fan @ 40%, Temp @ 73C<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 320 || - || - || 160 || 950 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Win 7 Ultimate x64 / DiabloMiner / Catalyst 12.1 || Saphire @ GPU 1030 MHz / MEM 300 Mhz @ Voltage 1.25 @ 80% FAN @ 69 temp @ Flags: -v 2 -w 128<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 321|| -|| || - || 1050|| 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x8 ||aoclbf 1.7 phoenix 1.50 11.6|| Vectors HD5xxx+ phatk AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=256, Memory=325MHz, Volts=1.3V, Fan~55%, Temps~70C<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 322 || 1.882|| || 170 || 1050 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.47 phatk 11.5 sdk 2.4 || BFI_INT VECTORS FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=256, mem clock @ 400MHz<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 329 || -|| || - || 1075 || 1120|| 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 phatk 11.5 sdk 2.4 || BFI_INT VECTORS FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 332 || -||1.74 || - || 1050 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer 2011-06-14 using phoenix (Win7-32bit) || -k phatk platform=0 device=0 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 worksize=128 FASTLOOP=false, mem clock @ 228MHz, voltage @ 1.3, Fan @ 60%, Temp @ 74C, flash and browser hardware acceleration disabled, aero enabled.<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 339.25 || - || - || - || 1090 || 1120 || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.7.3 cat 12.1 || Mem @ 350Mhz Clock @ 1090 Voltage 1.337 fan @ 100 Temp @ 75 diapolo's modified phatk kernel -k phatk_dia platform=0 device=0 VECTORS2 AGGRESSION=11 worksize=64 FASTLOOP=false BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 375 || - || - || - || 1000 || 1120 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Win 7 Ultimate 32-bit / Guiminer v2011-07-01 / phoenix 1.5 / phatk2 / Catalyst 11.9 || XFX / GPU @ 1000 MHz / MEM @ 200 Mhz / Voltage @ 1.187 V / FAN @ 40% / Temp @ 72 C / Flags: -k phatk2 platform=0 device=0 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=6 worksize=128 FASTLOOP=false / Using 2 miners with equal settings on 1 GPU<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870x2 || 600 || - || - || - || 945 || 330 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Ubuntu 12.04 32-bit / Phoenix 2 / phatk2 / Catalyst 11.9 || XFX / GPU @ 945 MHz / MEM @ 330 Mhz / Voltage @ 1.175 / Config: phatk2 VECTORS4 BFI_INT AGGRESSION=12 worksize=128 FASTLOOP=false GOFFSET=True<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870x4 || 1150|| -|| 1.2 || - || 900|| 1050 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.7 (Win7-64bit) || -k phatk platform=0 device=0-3 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 worksize=128 FASTLOOP=false<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870x4 || 1180 || -|| - || 145 || 950 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/debian32bit || -v -w128, Gigabyte SOC. voltage 1.175 (default), GPU default 950 MHz, Mem downclocked to 300 MHz, Fan 4x100% (+ 2x12cm fun 1300rpm), Temp 4x75C (in summer).<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870x4 || 1200 || -|| - || 150 || 970 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/debian32bit || -v -w128, Gigabyte SOC. voltage 1.175 (default), GPU overclocked from 950 to 970 MHz, Mem downclocked to 300 MHz, Fan 4x100% (+ 2x12cm fun 1300rpm), Temp 4x75C (in summer). Unstable with GPU@975 MHz.<br />
|-<br />
| 6930 || 320|| -|| - || - || 960 || 1200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.75/phatk || stock voltage, BFI_INT FASTLOOP VECTORS AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=64. 70C, FAN 80% (HIS brand)<br />
|-<br />
| 6930 || 370|| -|| - || - || 980 || 855 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || cgminer-2.4.1 || stock voltage (1,160), -I9. 71C, FAN 85% (HIS brand)<br />
|-<br />
| 6930 || 372 || -||1.89(?) || - || 1000 || 900 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.75/poclbm || max stable @ 1200 mV, BFI_INT FASTLOOP VECTORS AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=64<br />
|-<br />
| style="background:#00FFFF;"|6930x2|| 700 ||- || - ||400~|| 940 || 2560 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Guiminer || max stable @ 1100mV mem 300, Fan 80-90%, temp 70-75, -v -w64 -f10<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 272 || -||0.90 || - || 900 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48/poclbm || max stable @ 1150 mV, AGGRESSION = 7, BFI_INT, MSI 6950<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 291 || -|| || - || 920 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48/poclbm || max stable @ 1200mV, AGGRESSION = 7, BFI_INT, MSI 6950<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 295 || -|| || - || 930 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48/poclbm || max stable @ 1275mV, AGGRESSION = 7, BFI_INT, MSI 6950<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 295 || 1.844(?)|| || 160(?) || 810 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 300 || -|| || - || 940 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48/poclbm || max stable @ 1300mV, AGGRESSION = 7, BFI_INT, MSI 6950<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 314 || -|| || - || 800 || 1408 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 05-01-11 || -v -f30 -w128 default mem 1250 Stock Sapphire 6950 1gb<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 325 || 1.635(?)|| || 200(?) || 885 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 332 || 1.95~ || 1.2~ || 170~ || 840 || 1408 || 2.5.684.212 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 2011-06-14 || -v -w 128 -f 0, WinXP x86, Cat11.6b, desktop on IGP, Sapphire 1GB w/ HW locked BIOS, +40MHz GPU OC, 160W ACP + 5% OC = 170W new estimated ACP<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 333 || 1.95~ || 1.2~ || 170~ || 840 || 1408 || 2.4.650.9 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 2011-06-14 || -v -w 128 -f 0, WinXP x86, Cat11.6, desktop on IGP, Sapphire 1GB w/ HW locked BIOS, +40MHz GPU OC, 160W ACP + 5% OC = 170W new estimated ACP<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 338 || 1.84~ || - || 184~ || 860 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.50/poclbm kernel || Sapphire 2GB card w/ HW locked BIOS; Cat 11.6, Win7 x64; core @ 860MHz & 1087mV (OC + undervolt), mem @ 860MHz; cmd line args: VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128; power and MH/J calculated using Power = C*f*v^2 w/ assumption of 175 W at stock settings w/ 100% GPU util. (not measured)<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 340 || - || ||- || 895 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 05-21-11 || -v -w 128, mem @ 500, 1200 mV, MSI 6950<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 340 || - || ||- || 800 || 1536 ||(?) || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 05-21-11 || -v -f30 -w128 default mem 1250,Sapphire 6950 1gb, unlocked shaders<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 343 || 2.14 || - || 160 || 840 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 06-27-11 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128 FASTLOOP=false, HIS H695FN2G2M 2GB, mem @ 720, Kill-a-Watt measured<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 344 || 2.02~ || 1.27~ || 170~ || 840 || 1408 || 2.5.684.212 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/20110709 || -v -w 128 -f 0, WinXP x86, Cat11.6b, desktop on IGP, Sapphire 1GB w/ HW locked BIOS, +40MHz GPU OC, 160W ACP + 5% OC = 170W new estimated ACP<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 344.4 || -|| || - || 800 || 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || Powercolor 6950 @ shadermod on original Bios 6950 / 1000mV 850/730, +20% powertune, Fan @ 60%, -v -w128 -f1.<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 349 || 1.745(?)|| || 200(?) || 800 || 1408 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 05-21-11 || -v -f30 -w128, xfx 6950 xxx 1gb, locked shaders, core 900, mem 650, 79° C<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 351 || 1.91~ || - || 184~ || 860 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIminer/poclbm v2011-07-01 || Sapphire 2GB card w/ HW locked BIOS; Cat 11.6, Win7 x64; core @ 860MHz & 1087mV (OC + undervolt), mem @ 860MHz; cmd line args: -v -w 128 -f 0; (same system as the 338 MH/s result above using Phoenix)<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 352.8 || -|| || - || 820 || 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || Powercolor 6950 @ shadermod on original Bios 6950 / 1000mV 850/730, +20% powertune, Fan @ 60%, -v -w128 -f1.<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 360 || 1.8(?)|| || 200(?) || 970 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 360 || -|| || - || 870 || 1375 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || flashed with 6970 BIOS, -v -f30 -w128<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 365 || -|| || - || 925 || 1408 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || stock bios, -v -f0 -w128, MSI twinfrozr III 2GB<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 366.4 || -|| || - || 850 || 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || Powercolor 6950 @ shadermod on original Bios 6950 / 1000mV 850/730, +20% powertune, Fan @ 60%, -v -w128 -f1.<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 381 || -|| || - || 850 || 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || cgminer/phatk || XFX 6950 2Gb reference @ shadermod on original Bios 6950 / 1100mV 850/1250, +10% powertune, I=5, Fan @ 54% ~3100RPM, temp 73C w128. Windows7x64, Catalyst 13.1 .<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 383 || -|| || - || 975 || 1408 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || stock bios, -v -f0 -w128, voltage 1.274 @72c MSI twinfrozr III 2GB<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 388.4 || -|| || - || 900 || 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || Powercolor 6950 @ shadermod on original Bios 6950 / 1000mV 850/730, +20% powertune, Fan @ 60%, -v -w128 -f1.<br />
|- <br />
| 6950 || 389.9 || -|| || - || 950 || 1408 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || cgminer 2.3.2/Diablo || stock bios, -I 9, VRAM @ 820Mhz, fan @ 100%, voltage 1.250v, temp @ 68c, HIS ICE-Q X 2GB, OCed using MSI Afterburner, Windows 7 Professional 64-bit SP 1<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 400~ || -|| || - || 895 || 320 || 1536|| PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIMiner 24th Aug 2011 || Sapphire HD6950 Shader unlock mod 1408>1536 / +20% Power control, Fan @ 55%, Flags:-v -f2 -w64 -r5.Note this keeps temps under 80oC which is needed for this to be stable.Moderate fan noise.Power use is ~200W.<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 403 || -|| || - || 939 || 685 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix-1.50/phatk || ASUS EAH6950 ([http://www.techpowerup.com/vgabios/90661/Asus.HD6970.2048.101124.html (Ref. 6950 Flashed -> 6970)]) / +10% overdrive volt., Fan @ 90%, VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128 AGGRESSION=13. Overclocked from 880 -> 939 with MSI Aferburner<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 408.8 || -|| || - || 925 || 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || cgminer 2.12 || GIGABYTE GV-R695D5-2GD-B @ shadermod on original Bios 6950, mem@625, V=1100mv Fan @ 60%. Windows 7x64, Catalyst 11.9<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 410.4 || -|| || - || 950 || 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || Powercolor 6950 @ shadermod on original Bios 6950 / 1000mV 850/730, +20% powertune, Fan @ 60%, -v -w128 -f1.<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 417 || 2.085(?)|| || 200(?) || 975 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || unlocked shaders, +20% overdrive, mem @ 1250, fan @ 77%, temp 64C, -v -w128, gpu core @ 1145mV<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 418.8 || -|| || - || 940|| 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || Gigabyte OC 1GB, shadermod, voltage locked 1.175, mem 450, -w128 -v -f0, ATI Tray Tool<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 425.3 || -|| || - || 950/850 || 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix-1.50/phatk2 (Ubuntu natty) || Asus 1GB DirectCU, shadermod on OEM BIOS, OEM 1.1v, AMDOverdriveCtrl for 950 core 850 mem, 20% overdrive, flags VECTORS2 BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 428 || 2.14(?)|| || 200(?) || 1000 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || unlocked shaders, +20% overdrive, mem @ 1250, fan @ 80%, temp 64C, -v -w128, gpu core @ 1160mV<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 432 || 2.16(?)||1.44 || 200(?) || 1000 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || unlocked shaders, +20% overdrive, mem @ 520, fan @ 80%, temp 76C, -v -w128 -f 2, gpu core @ 1275mV<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 432.4 || -|| || - || 1000 || 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || Powercolor 6950 @ shadermod on original Bios 6950 / 1000mV 850/730, +20% powertune, Fan @ 60%, -v -w128 -f1.<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 440 || || || || 990 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/phatk || unlocked shaders, mem @ 1375, VGPU 1.21v, Watercooled (MCW60), temp 54C, VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 -k phatk<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 454.4 || -|| || - || 1050 || 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || Powercolor 6950 @ shadermod on original Bios 6950 / 1000mV 850/730, +20% powertune, Fan @ 60%, -v -w128 -f1.<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFAFAF;"| 6950x2 CF || 720 || - || - || 400 ~|| 900 || 1408 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-07-01 || MSI Afterburner - gpu @ 900 (870 stock), mem @ 900 (1250 stock), temp 69-71C(bottom vga) fan@94% / 77-81C(top vga) fan@99% - 31C enviornment, -v -f 1 -w 128 BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFAFAF;"| 6950x2 CF || 731 || - || - || 400~ || 900 || 1408 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-07-01 || MSI Afterburner - gpu @ 900 (870 stock), mem @ 900 (1250 stock), temp 68C(bottom vga) fan@90% / 73C(top vga) fan@99% - 28C enviornment, -v -f 1 -w 128 BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13<br />
|-<br />
| 6950x3 || 1081 || -|| || - || 860 || 1408 || 2.4(?) || PCI-E 2.1 x8 || guiminer/poclbm 07-01 || Sapphire 2GB stock bios, stock voltage, locked shaders: +20% overdrive, mem@650, fan@95%, temp 94C, -v -f0 -w128, 93c<br />
|-<br />
| 6950x4 || 1316 || 1.513|| || 870 || 840 || 1408 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || locked shaders, default mem 1250, dual fan 75C typical<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 323 || 1.468||0.92 || 220 || 880 || 1536 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -w 64, SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 365 || 2.28|| || 160 || 880 || 1536 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/phoenix || VECTORS AGGRESSION=9 WORKSIZE=128, fan @ 45%, 61C, 1.0 Vcore, 150 MHz mem, TX650w (84%), reference card<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 370 || -|| || - || 880 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || -v -w128, fan @ 50%/temp 72C, stock card<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 372 || 1.691(?)|| || 220(?) || 900 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix (svn trunk 05.14.2011) || clock 900/1375, VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128, fan 45% (auto) / temp 90C<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 380 || -|| || - || - || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w128<br>export GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS=1 # to reduce poclbm CPU from 100% to 2%<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 385 || 1.964|| || 196 || 900 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || -v -w128, memory downclocked to 684Mhz, fan @ 70%/temp 81C<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 388 || -|| || - || 900 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || -v -w128, fan @ 50%/temp 72C, stock voltage of 1.175v<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 403 || -|| || - || MAX || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || clock Max/50%+stock, -v -w128, fan= 100%/temp 72C (Note: Overclocked using CCC utility under Windows 7, Clock set to Max value w/ 50% increase to memory and 5% increase to voltage)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 406 || -|| || - || 950 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.50/phatk || GPU Overclocked to Max (950MHz) using aticonfig, Memory Underclocked using AMDOverdriveCtrl (850MHz). Temp ~ 82C. VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 407 || -|| || - || 955 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w128, fan 75%/temp 75C, voltage +10%<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 414 || -|| || - || 960 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || -v -w128, fan @ 53%/temp 73C, stock voltage of 1.175v, high air flow case<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 420 || -|| || - || 975 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || -v -w128 -f0, clocks 975MHz/685MHz MSI Lightning<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 423 || -||1.20 || - || 995 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48/poclbm || ATI Tray Tools, Clocks=995/331.25, WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 VECTORS ,68C @ 65% Fan, HAF932 Case<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 431 || -|| - || - || 976 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.7/phatk2 || MSI AFTERBURNER, Clocks[976/1000], -k parameters[VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11], Temperatures{CARD}[86C@100% Fan]{ROOM}[27C/81F], <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 433 || -|| - || - || 975 || 1536 || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.6.2/phatk || MSI Afterburner 2.2Beta, -k phatk AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS, GPU 65C@100% Fan, Room 21C<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970x2 || 710 || -|| || - || 900/880 || 1536 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -w 256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970x2 || 828|| -|| || - || 940 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w128, fans 74%/82%, temp 74C/82C, powertune +20% (via CCC), memory underclock 825MHz (via MSI Afterburner), with 'Maj' fix<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970x3 || 1243|| -|| || 1000+ || 910 || 1536 || 2.5 || 2x16, 1x8 || phoenix 1.7.0 || fans 100%, temp 88C/84C/69C, GPU 920/ memory 795/ powertune 20%, ATI 11.11, -k phatk2 VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=128 AGGRESSION=13<br />
|-<br />
| 6990 || 670 || 1.94||0.89 || 346 || 830 || 3072 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || Catalyst 11.4 [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=2949.msg106238#msg106238 source].<br />
|-<br />
| 6990 || 704 || || || || 830 || 3072 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo Win7 64bits || Catalyst 11.4, Arguments: -v 2 -w 128 (by Swapper 2011-07-07)<br />
|-<br />
| 6990 || 708 || 2.05|| || 346 || 830 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || BIOS switch at "default" position 2, see [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 6990 || 744 || || || || 830 || 3072 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo Win7 64bits || Catalyst 11.6b, Arguments: -v 2 -w 128 (by Swapper 2011-07-14)<br />
|-<br />
| 6990 || 746 || 1.82|| || 410 || 880 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || BIOS switch at "overclocked" position 1, see [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 6990 || 758 || -|| || - || 880 || - || 2.4 || - || Phoenix with Poclbm || Catalyst 11.4, OC switch ON, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128 FASTLOOP=false<br />
|-<br />
| 6990 || 771 || 1.8804|| || 410 || 880 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx. Memory clock @ 1280Mhz.<br />
|-<br />
| 6990 || 772 || 1.8380|| || 420 || 900 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix & Poclbm || OC switch ON + overclocked to 900 mhz, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128<br />
|-<br />
| 6990 || 790 || -|| || - || 900 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || BIOS switch at "overclocked" position 1; with "aticonfig --odsc=900,1260" to further overclock the GPU to 900 MHz and mem to 1260 MHz, see [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 6990 || 795 || -|| || - || - || - || 2.4 || || Diablo's miner || BIOS switch at "overclocked" position 1; On Windows Vista, Clocks set at 955,1250. Power control at 20.<br />
Diablo's args: -w 128 -g 5 -v 2 -f 0<br />
|-<br />
| 6990 || 802 || -|| || - || 915 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || BIOS switch at "overclocked" position 1; with "aticonfig --odsc=915,1260" to further overclock the GPU to 915 MHz and mem to 1260 MHz, see [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 6990 || 835 || -||1.11 || - || 890/860 || 3072 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix || BIOS switch at "overclocked" position 1; with "aticonfig --adapter=1 --odsc=990,890 and aticonfig --adapter=0 --odsc=960,860" (GPU 0 runs hot). Currently, aticonfig can only underclock RAM to 100mhz below core speed. Command line: phoenix.py -k poclbm VECTORS AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
| 6990 || 852 || -|| || - || 955|| 3072 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || cgminer 2.1.2 || Memory: 830 Mhz, -v 2 -w 128 -I 9, Watercooled, stock voltage. (2012-02 by Swapper)<br />
|-<br />
| 6990 || 865 || -||1.11 || - || 890/860 || 3072 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || cgminer || BIOS switch at "overclocked" position 1; with core 0 at 990/890 engine/mem, core 1 at 960/860 (runs hot). Watercooled at 65-68C.<br />
|-<br />
| 6990x2 || 1436 || 1.848|| || 777 || 880 || 6144 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 x2 || guiminer 2011.05.11 || AUSUM switch set to 1 on both cards; Core left at 880MHz, memory left at 1250MHz; VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128<br />
|-<br />
| 6990x2 || 1640 || 1.416|| || 1200 || 1010 || 3072 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 x16 || phoenix 1.7.0 || GPU 910MHz, Memory 785MHz, Powertune 20%; VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128 FASTLOOP=false<br />
|-<br />
| 6990x2 || 1700 || 1.416|| || 1200 || 1010 || 3072 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 x16 || guiminer 2011.06.14 || GPU 1010MHz, Memory 900MHz; -k phatk2 VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=128 AGGRESSION=13<br />
|-<br />
| 6990x2 || 1740 || 2.11 || || 825 || 940 || 3072 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 x16 || cgminer 2.0.8 || GPU0+3 930MHz core/805MHz memory, GPU1+2 940MHz core/815MHz memory; BIOS switch factory setting; Cooled with 7C air from outside; -g4 -I9 -k phatk<br />
|-<br />
| 6990x3 || 2094 || -|| || - || 900 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 x8 x4 || poclbm || GPU 900MHz, Memory 1250MHz; poclbm.py -f 0 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
| 7750 || 104.15 || || || || 800 || || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix || worksize=128 VECTORS FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=10 WORKSIZE=128<br />
|-<br />
| 7750 || 117.15 || || || || 900 || || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix || worksize=128 VECTORS FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=10 WORKSIZE=128<br />
|-<br />
| 7750 || 125.5 || - || - || - || 830 || 512 || 2.6 (10.0.898.1) || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || DiabloMiner || GPU: 830MHz, Memory: 1125MHz; -v 1 -w 256 [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=64241.msg816946#msg816946 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 7750 || 133 || 2.66 || 1.21 || 50 || 880 || 512 || 2.6 (?) || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || cgminer || factory-overclocked to 880 MHz; power draw measured with a Kill-a-Watt<br />
|-<br />
| 7750 || 136.1 || - || - || - || 900 || 512 || 2.6 (10.0.898.1) || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || DiabloMiner || GPU: 900MHz (CCC locked @ 900), Memory: 800MHz; -v 1 -w 256 [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=64241.msg816946#msg816946 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 7770 || 182 || - || - || 83 || 1020 || 640 || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || Ubuntu 10.04 LTS amd64, GPU: 1020MHz<br />
|-<br />
| 7770 || 213 || - || - || - || 1150 || 640 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || Win7 32bit, Core2Duo, poclbm guiminer<br />
|-<br />
| 7850 || 287 || 1,91 || 1,1 || 150 || 950 || 1024 || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || cgminer || GPU:950 MEM:800, Linux 64bit, Intensive 14, GPU temp = 60°C, Room temp = 25°C, Fan = 60%<br />
|-<br />
| 7850 || 329 || - || - || 150 || 1100 || 1024 || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || cgminer 2.6.4 || Linux 64bit GTK+3, GPU temp = 60°C, Room temp = 25°C, Fan = 60%, -v 1 -k poclbm -I 6 --gpu-engine 1100 --gpu-memclock 950<br />
|-<br />
| 7850 || 363 || - || - || - || 1241 || 1024 || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Guiminer || GPU:1241 MEM:4840 <br />
|-<br />
| 7870 || 405 || - || - || - || 1100 || 1280 || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Guiminer || Sapphire 7870 OC , GPU: 1100MHz, Mem: 950 Mhz, GPU temp: 65°C, Fan 36% (1377 RPM).<br />
|-<br />
| 7870 || 406 || - || - || - || 1100 || 1280 || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || cgminer || Gigabyte GV-R787OC-2GD, GPU: 1200MHz, [cgminer -I 7]<br />
|-<br />
| 7870 || 422 || - || - || - || 1165 || 1280 || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || cgminer || Sapphire 7870 1ghz edition, GPU: 1165MHz, [cgminer.exe -d 0 -l 1 -T -I 8]<br />
|-<br />
| 7870 || 460 || - || - || - || 1250 || 1280 || 2.7? || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Guiminer || MSI R7870 TFIII/oc, Catalyst 12.11 beta4, 455-460 mhash/s @1250 core, 750 mem, 0% Power limit, 1.218v, Zalman VF3000N = 42C, VRMS = 57C, ambient approx. 17-19C, -v -w128 -f10<br />
|-<br />
| 7870 XT || 485 || 3.09 || 1.8726 || 157 || 1200 || 1280 || 2.8 || PCI-E 3.0 x16 2.0 || cgminer ||7870XT clock/mem - 1200/1600<br />
|-<br />
| 7870xt || 520 || - || - || - || 1200 || 1536 || 2.7? lol || PCI-E 2.0 x4 || Guiminer || Sapphire HD7870xt, Catalyst 12.11 beta 4, 515-520 mhash/s @1200/core 750/mem, 0%PL, 1.17v/stock, Zalman vf3000a @60-62C even though its sandwiched between a 7870 and 5850. xD<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#00FFFF;"| 7950 || 510 || - || - || - || 985 || 1792 || 2.6 || PCI-E 3.0 x16 || Diablo || Windows 8 x64, Asus P8Z77 WS, i7 3rd Gen, Card is XFX brand, Clock 985Mhz, Mem 1100Mhz, -v 1 -w 256<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#00FFFF;"| 7950 || 512 || - || - || - || 1000 || 1792 || 2.6 || PCI-E 3.0 x8 || poclbm || GPU: 1000MHz, Memory: 850MHz<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#00FFFF;"| 7950 || 550 || - || - || - || 1060 || 1792 || 2.8 || PCI-E 3.0 x16 || Diablo || Core 1060, Mem 800, -v 1 -w 256 Intesity 7<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#00FFFF;"| 7950 || 605 || - || - || - || 1150 || 1792 || 2.6 (10.0.898.1) || PCI-E 3.0 x16 || DiabloMiner || GPU: 1150MHz, Memory: 1375MHz; -v 1 -w 256<br />
<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FF0000;"| 7970 || 555 || - || - || - || 925 || 2048 || 2.6 (10.0.898.1) || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || DiabloMiner || GPU: 925MHz, Memory: 1375MHz; -v 1 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FF0000;"| 7970 || 640 || -|| || - || 1070 core/1000 mem || 2048 || 2.6 || PCI-E 3.0 x16 || cgminer 2.6.5 || MSI R7970 Lightning Win7 х64, Catalyst 12.8, GPU 1070 MHz, Memory 1000 MHz, GPU temp = 72°C, Room temp = 28°C, Fan = 57%, cgminer -k diablo -v 1 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FF0000;"| 7970 || 650 || -|| || - || 1100 || 2048 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 x8 x4 || Diablo|| GPU 1100MHz, Memory 600MHz;<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FF0000;"| 7970 || 650 || -|| || - || 1100 || 2048 || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x1 || cgminer 2.4.1 || Win7 х86, Catalyst 12.3, GPU 1100 MHz, Memory 950 MHz, GPU temp = 68°C, Room temp = 25°C, Fan = 58%, -k poclbm -v 1 -w 128<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FF0000;"| 7970 || 674 || -|| || - || 1130 core/1000 mem || 2048 || 2.6 || PCI-E 3.0 x16 || cgminer 2.6.5 || MSI R7970 Lightning Win7 х64, Catalyst 12.8, GPU 1130 MHz, Memory 1000 MHz, GPU temp = 72°C, Room temp = 28°C, Fan = 57%, cgminer -k diablo -v 1 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FF0000;"| 7970 || 685 || -|| || - || 1150 core/1000 mem || 2048 || 2.6 || PCI-E 3.0 x16 || cgminer 2.6.5 || MSI R7970 Lightning Win7 х64, Catalyst 12.8, GPU 1150 MHz, Memory 1000 MHz, GPU temp = 72°C, Room temp = 28°C, Fan = 58%, cgminer -k diablo -v 1 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FF0000;"| 7970 || 685 || -|| || - || 1177 || 2048 || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || cgminer 2.3.1 || Win7, Catalyst 12.3, driver: 2.95, E: 1177, M:685, -k diakgcn -v 2 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FF0000;"| 7970 || 690 || - || - || - || 1150 || 2048 || 2.6 (10.0.898.1) || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || DiabloMiner || GPU: 1150MHz, Memory: 1375MHz; -v 1 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FF0000;"| 7970 || 695 || - || - || - || 1160(core)/1050(mem) || 2048 || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || DiabloMiner (options: -v 1 -w 256) || Asus HD7970-DC2T-3GD5 @ 1.17V; Linux Ubuntu 11.10 64 bit; AMD SDK 2.6; Catalyst 12.3 <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FF0000;"| 7970 || 710 || -|| || - || 1200 || 2048 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || DiabloMiner|| GPU 1200MHz, Memory 600MHz; -v 1 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FF0000;"| 7970 || 714~ || -|| || - || 1210 || 2048 || 2.7 || PCI-E 1.1 x16 || cgminer 2.7.4 || MSI HD7970 R7970-2PMD3GD5/OC, core clock - 1210Mhz, memory clock - 685, core voltage (1.149V - MSI Afterburner, ~1.043V - GPU-Z), memory voltage 1.5V, temperature - 75C at mid-day and 65C w/ AC on at 20C, Catalyst 12.8, Windows 8 Release Preview 32-bit, kernel - poclbm, vector - 1, worksize - 64, intensity - 14, fan - 100% <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FF0000;"| 7970 || 825 || -|| || 214 || 1290 || 2048 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Bitminter|| Bitminter beta 1.1.1; GPU 1290MHz, Memory <br />
1375MHz (Trixx = 600); work size 256, "BFI_INT," Device-accessible CPU memory; full watercooled block; power stats from GPU-Z; Driver 11.12<br />
|-<br />
| 7970x3 || 1950 || 2.6 || 1.72 || 750 || 1100 || 2048x3 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || cgminer 2.7.5 || Win8, Catalyst 12.8, driver: 8.982.0.0, E: 1100, M:750, kernel: poclbm, worksize: 256, intensity: 9, gpu-threads: 4, refitted Diamond 7970 HSF with new VRM pads to lower VRM temps ~15C. Undervolted each card until crash under load, then raised about 0.015v for stability. Settings using afterburner 2.2.1 with OC unlocked. Visiontek 7970: $370, Sapphire 7970: $360, Diamond 7970: $400<br />
|-<br />
| 7970x3 || 2050 || 2.41 || 1.22 || 850 || 1150 || 6144 || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || cgminer 2.3.1 || Win7, Catalyst 12.3, driver: 2.95, E: 1150, M:685, -k diakgcn -v 2 -w 256, 850W power consumption measured at the wall<br />
|-<br />
| FirePro V3800 || 69.0 || -|| || - || || || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || BitMinter Client || <br />
|-<br />
| FirePro V4800 || 79.7 || -|| || - || 775 || 400 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-01 || <br />
|-<br />
| FirePro V8700 || 84.8 || -|| || - || 750 || 800 || - || - || poclbm-mod.03.24.2011 || <br />
<br />
|-<br />
| FirePro M5800 || 61.4 || -|| || - || 650 || - || - || - || poclbm-mod.03.24.2011 || Ubuntu<br />
|-<br />
| FirePro M5800 || 69.3 || -|| || - || 650 || 400 || 2.1 || - || GUIMiner v2011-04-26 || -v -w128, Windows 7 32bit<br />
|-<br />
| FirePro M5950 || 96.7 || -|| || - || 725 || 900 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -v -w128 (Windows 7 64 bit)<br />
|-<br />
| FirePro V5800 || 119 || -|| || - || 690 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-01 || Windows 7 32bit<br />
|-<br />
| FirePro V5800 || 144 || -|| || - || 690 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-01 || -v -w128 (Windows 7 32bit)<br />
|-<br />
| FirePro V5800 || 161 || -|| || - || 780 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-01 || -v -w128 (Windows 7 32bit)<br />
|-<br />
| FirePro V7750 || 35.7 || -|| || - || - || 320 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-21 || Windows 7 64bit<br />
|-<br />
| FirePro V7800 || 254.85 || -|| || - || - || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 with poclbm || Debian Squeeze<br />
|-<br />
| FirePro M7740 (M97 GL) [DELL] || 63.0 || -|| || - || 650 || - || 2.1 || PCIe v2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-06-14 || Windows 7 64bit / only SDK2.1 works<br />
|-<br />
| FirePro M7820 || 150.0 || -|| || - || 700 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-06-09 / poclbm || Memory downclocked to 500 from 1000MHz, 169MH/s@800MHz, 181MH/s@860Mhz (max.), only SDK2.1 works, Windows 7 x86<br />
|}<br />
<br />
<references><br />
<ref name='amazon_20110625'>$ Prices from http://www.amazon.com on 2011-06-25</ref><br />
</references><br />
<br />
===Nvidia===<br />
<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! Watts !! Clock !! SP !! Comment<br />
|-<br />
| ION || 1.8 || 0.067 || 27 || || 16 || poclbm; power consumption incl. CPU<br />
|-<br />
| 8200 mGPU || 1.2 || || || 1200 || 16 || 128 MB shared memory, "poclbm -w 128 -f 0"<br />
|-<br />
| 8400 GS || 2.3 || || || || || "poclbm -w 128"<br />
|-<br />
| 8400 GS || 1.6 || 0.013 || 128 || 1238 || || DiabloMiner -w 128 -f 1 [https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/User:Knightmb source]<br />
|-<br />
| 8400M GS || 2.0 || || || || ||<br />
|-<br />
| 8500GT || 2.4 || || || 918 || 16 || poclbm under GUIMiner<br />
|-<br />
| 8600M GT || 4.93 || || || || 32 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 8600M GT || 3.8 || || || || || Macbook Pro running Diablo<br />
|-<br />
| 8600GT || 5.66 || || || 1188 || 32 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 8600GT OC || 7.3 || || || 1602 || 32 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.0 poclbm] -w 128 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg72833#msg72833 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 8800GT || 25 || 0.24 || 105 || 1300 || ||<br />
|-<br />
| 8800GT || 24.5 || 0.23 || 105 || 1300 || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 8800GT || 31.1 || 0.296 || 105 || 1855 || || Overclocked 715 GPU / 1030 Memory / 1855 Shader; GuiMiner v2011-05-21<br />
|-<br />
| 8800GT || 31.8 || 0.303 || 105 || 1836 || 112 || 713 gpu, 1026 memory. win7x86, phoenix 1.48, -k poclbm WORKSIZE=64 AGGRESSION=5<br />
|-<br />
| 8800GT || 34.0 || || 105 || 1998 || || gpu 756M, mem 1123M, shader 1998M, temp 65C. winXP, phoenix 1.50, -k poclbm WORKSIZE=64 AGGRESSION=6 -- same settings get 32.7 MH/s with aggression 2<br />
|-<br />
| 8800GTS || 16.8 || 0.109 || 154 || || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source] [http://www.techspot.com/review/79-geforce-8800-gts-512/page11.html source]<br />
|-<br />
| 8800 GTS || 18.7 || 0.124 || 150 || 1200 || || poclbm -w 64 no vectors<br />
|-<br />
| 8800 GTS || 33.5 || || 150 || OC || || CUDA mining via GUIminer. Win7 64bit. poclbm -v -w128 -f0. OC'd Core@799MHz, Mem@1080MHz, Shader@1905MHz. Fan 70%, GPU temp @ 66C in comfortable room temp.<br />
|-<br />
| 8800 GTX || 27.5 || || || 1404 || || phoenix 1.48, poclbm, no vectors, 83C with 50C ambient <br />
|-<br />
| 8800m GTX || 16.3 || || || || || rpcminer-cuda Win7-64<br />
|-<br />
| 9300GE || 1.57 || || || 1300 || 8 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9300GS || 1.69 || || || 1400 || 8 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9300/nForce 730i || 2.15 || || || 1200 || 16 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9400GT || 3.37 || 0.067 || 50 || 1400 || 16 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9400M (MacBook) || 1.90 || 0.32 || 6 || 700 || || poclbm -f 8 no vectors<br />
|-<br />
| 9500M GS || 3.2 || || || 950 || 32 || rpcminer-cuda<br />
|-<br />
| 9500GT || 6.75 || 0.135 || 50 || 1400 || 32 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9500GT || 7.30 || 0.135 || 50 || 1400 || 32|| rpcminer-cuda, Overclocked 730 GPU/ 500 Memory / fan 100% 70C solid<br />
|-<br />
| 9500GT || 7.10 || 0.135 || 50 || 1767 || 32 || rpcminer-cuda, Overclocked 707 GPU / 500 Memory / fan 100% 73C steady<br />
|-<br />
| 9600GSO || 19.88 || 0.237 || 84 || 1375 || 96 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9600GSO512 || 11.75 || 0.131 || 90 || 1625 || 48 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9600GT || 15.66 || 0.165 || 95 || 1625 || 64 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9600GT Zotac || 15 || || || 1650 || 64 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9600GT OC || 18.8 || <0.198 || >95 || 1981 || 64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.0 poclbm] -w 128 -f 10 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg74610#msg74610 source] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg73353#msg73353 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 9600M GS || 4.0 || || || 1075 || 32 || rpcminer-cuda<br />
|-<br />
| 9800GT || 30.36 || 0.289 || 105 || 1800 || 112 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9800GT EE || 19.7 || 0.263 || 75 || 1375 || 112 || rpcminer-cuda<br />
|-<br />
| 9800GT OC || 29.5 || 0.283 || 105 || 1836 || 112 || poclbm.py, no options. Memory underclocked to 850Mhz, GPU overclocked to 733Mhz<br />
|-<br />
| 9800GTX || 32.54 || 0.232 || 140 || 1688 || 128 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9800GTX+ || 32.6 || 0.232 || 140 || 1688 || 128 || win7x64 275.33 Overclocked to 756/1890/1102 using a CUDA-specific miner (instead of phoenix, yay for ZERO stales!)<br />
|-<br />
| 9800GTX+ || 35.39 || 0.251 || 141 || 1836 || 128 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9800GTX+ || 36 || || || || || factory OC ubuntu polclbm.py -w 128 -f 10 -a 10 (DO NOT USE -v)<br />
|-<br />
| 9800GTX+ || 37.23 || 0.266 || 140 || 1890 || 128 || win7x64 275.27 phoenix(1.48) -k poclbm AGGRESSION=3 WORKSIZE=64 (may cause 75%+ stale count, in which case use a CUDA-specific miner instead)<br />
|-<br />
| 9800GTX+ || 40.20 || 0.287 || 140 || 835 || 128 || lowered memory clock higher core, unstable if going higher<br />
|-<br />
|style="background-color:#FFEFEF"| 9800GX2 || 57.83 || 0.294 || 197 || || 2x128 ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background-color:#FFEFEF"| 9800GX2 || 28 || 0.142 || 197 || || 2x128 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]<br />
|-<br />
| G210 || 3.38 || 0.111 || 30.5 || 1402 || 16 ||<br />
|-<br />
| G210 || 3.79 || 0.124 || 30.5 || 1402 || 16 || poclbm -f 1<br />
|-<br />
| GT220 || 10.8 || 0.084 || 128 || 1360 || || DiabloMiner -w 128 -f 1000 [https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/User:Knightmb source]<br />
|-<br />
| GT230 || 15.5 || 0.161 || 96 || 650 || 64 || (9600GT rebranded one from in a medion pc)<br />
|-<br />
| GT240 || 19.37 || 0.281 || 69 || 1340 || 96 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GT240 || 21.24 || || || || 96 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4291.0 poclbm-mod] -f 0 -v [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg73383#msg73383 source]<br />
|-<br />
| GT240 || 28.1 || || || || 96 || poclbm -f0 -v (Gainward GT240 1024DDR5 OC core@670/stockmem@1700/shader@1700 - stable; max.temp=73)<br />
|-<br />
| GT240M || 9.8 || 0.426 || 23 || 550 || 48 || poclbm -f 0 -w 256 <br />
|-<br />
| GT240 OC || 25.6 || 0.365 || 70 || 1765 || 96 || poclbm<br />
|-<br />
| GTS250 || 35.39 || 0.244 || 145 || 1836 || 128 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTS250 || 35.2 || 0.243 || 145 || 1836 || 128 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTS250 OC || 37 || 0.255 || 145 || 2047 || 128 || 37.2 with the following OC: Core: 775MHz, Shader: 1900MHz, Memory: 1200MHz<br />
|-<br />
| GTX260M || 22.5 || || || 500 || 112 || poclbm 4/28/2011 Asus G71GX runs ~90c without cooling pad <br />
|-<br />
| GTX260 || 35.91 || 0.178 || 202 || 1242 || 192 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX260 || 44 || 0.242 || 182 || 1242 || 216 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]<br />
|-<br />
| GTX260c216 || 40.40 || 0.236 || 171 || 1242 || 216 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX260c216 || 47.4 || 0.260 || 182 || 1348 || 216 || poclbm -w 256<br />
|-<br />
| GTX260c216 || 50.00 || || || 1050 || 216 || m0mchil GPU client, Windows 7 64-bit, x6 @ 3.5ghz<br />
|-<br />
| GTX260c216 OC || 52.0 || || || 1461 || 216 || "poclbm -w 256 -f 1"<br />
|-<br />
| GTX260c216 OC || 58.9 || || || 756/400 || 216 || Core overclocked, Memory underclocked, Ubuntu 11.04 Classic Session(No Effects) "poclbm -w 256 -f 1"<br />
|-<br />
| GTX260c216 OC || 60.1 || || || 1706 || 216 || Core: 364 MHz, Shaders: 1706 MHz, Memory: 594 MHz, VDDC: 1.1800V. "poclbm-mod -w 256 -f 1"<br />
|-<br />
| GTX275 || 50.75 || 0.232 || 219 || 1404 || 240 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX275 || 58 || || || 729/1458 || 240 || poclbm -f 0 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
| GTX280 || 46.84 || 0.198 || 236 || 1296 || 240 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX280 || 64.34 || 0.289 || 245 || 1296 || 240 || phoenix.exe -k poclbm AGGRESSION=6 WORKSIZE=128 (61*C with Accelero XTREME GTX280)<br />
|-<br />
| GTX285 || 64.8 || || || 1607 || 240 || GuiMiner - Not sure about wattage yet. Still testing. Card runs around 74 C<br />
|-<br />
|-<br />
| GTX285 || 53.35 || 0.262 || 204 || 1476 || 240 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX295 || 89.78 || 0.311 || 289 || 1242 || 480 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX295 || 120.70 || 0.418 || 289 || 1242 || 480 || GUIMiner no oc.<br />
|-<br />
| GTX295 || 117.30 || 0.406 || 289 || 1476 || 490 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GT 320M (MacBook Air) || 6.12 || || || 1212 || 48 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 320M (Mac mini 2010) || 7.0 || 0.35 || 20 || 450 || 32 || poclbm no extra options, windows 7 x64<br />
|-<br />
| GT 325M || 7.5 || || || 990 || 48 || rpcminer-cuda<br />
|-<br />
| GT 325M || 10.5 || || || 325/650(mem)/1300(shaders) || || rpcminer-cuda, 71 degrees<br />
|-<br />
| GT 325M || 7.99 || || || || || poclbm -f 0 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
| GT330 || 21.65 || || || || || poclbm -f 0 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
| GT 330M || 7.97 || || || ||48|| Model: MacBookPro6,2 VRAM: 512MB Software: [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8994.0 DiabloMiner GUI] v2011-05-22 / Mac OS X 10.6.7<br />
|-<br />
| GT 330M || 10.8 || || ||650MHZ core||48|| Model: MacBookPro6,2 VRAM: 512MB Software: GUIMiner running in Bootcamp v2011-08-24 / Mac OS X 10.6.8.The GPU was OC'd to 650MHZ core clock,mem clock was the lowest it would go in MSI Afterburner.The Bootcamp OS was Windows 7 x64.MBP Mid 2010.<br />
|-<br />
| GT 330M (Sony Vaio Z) || 7.8 || 0.71 ( 0.3 total) || 11 (26w total) || 1045 || 48 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GT 330M (Samsung R480) || 9.1 || || || 575(GPU)/1265(shader) || ||VRAM 1024MB. pocblm -vectors --verbose. Windows 7 Ultimate x86<br />
|-<br />
| GTS 350M (Toshiba A665-3DV) || 17.0 || 1.214 || 14 || 1080 || || DiabloMiner-Windows.exe<br />
|-<br />
| GTS 350M (Toshiba A665-3DV5) || 20.8 || || || 1350 || || DiabloMiner-Windows.exe, OC'd 550/850/1350 73C stable<br />
|-<br />
| GTS 360M || 25.0 || || || || || [toshiba qosmio laptop, ~150-165*F stock fans]<br />
|-<br />
| GTS 360M (ASUS G60jx) || 20.0 || || || || || everythins is stock, it cannot sustain. it reaches 90 degrees and freezes.<br />
|-<br />
| GTS 360M (ASUS G60jx) || 27.2 || || || Shader @ 1720, Memory @ 900 || || stock hardware (clean exhaust fan), Afterburner, 72 deg C Stable <br />
|-<br />
| GT430 || 20.24 || 0.413 || 49 || 1400 || 96 ||<br />
|- <br />
| GT440 || 20.4 || || || 1645 || 96 || rpcminer-cuda -aggression=8; winxp x64 driver 275.33<br />
|-<br />
| GT530 || 17.9 || 0.358 || 50 || 1400 || || BitMinter v1.1.2<br />
|-<br />
| GT520M || 8.9 || || || || || rpcminer-cuda, got up 2 10.2MH/s OC'ed<br />
|-<br />
| GT525M || 14.6 || || || || || rpcminer-cuda<br />
|-<br />
| GT540M || 16.0 || || || || || rpcminer-cuda<br />
|-<br />
| GT550M || 17.08 || || || || || rpcminer-cuda -aggression=8<br />
|-<br />
| GT610M (ASUS K45V) || 9.371 || || || 738 MHz || || 2GB RAM.<br />
|-<br />
| GT650M (rMBP) || 17.8 || || || 900 || 16 || cgminer 2.5.0 on OSX 10.7.4<br />
|-<br />
| GT650M OC || 27.4 || || || || || GUIMiner <br />
|-<br />
| GTS450 || 45.28 || 0.427 || 106 || 1566 || 192 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTS450 (Sparkle One) || 40.0 || || || || || poclbcm git Oct 2012<br />
|- <br />
| GTS450 || 45.28 || 0.427 || 106 || 1566 || 192 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460SE || 56.39 || 0.376 || 150 || 1300 || 288 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 || 66.32 || || || 814 || 336 || rpcminer-cuda 20110605, Graphics Clock @ 814MHz, Memory @ 1555MHz<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 || 68.31 || 0.427 || 160 || 1350 || 336 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 768MB || 57.8 || || ? || 1350 || 336 || rpcminer-cuda -gputhreads=320 -gpugrid=336<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 768MB (MSI Cyclone 768D5/OC) || 75.1 || || ? || 930 || 336 || rpcminer-cuda on Win7 x64 with ForceWare 275.33. [http://event.msi.com/vga/afterburner/download.htm MSI Afterburner] set to core: 930MHz, shader: 1850MHz, core voltage: 1.087V, memory: 1600MHz. Runs at 58°C with fan at 75% (ambient 25°C). <br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 1GB DirectCU || 72.3 || ? || ? || 1672 || 336 || rpcminer-cuda -gputhreads=320 -gpugrid=336<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 1GB DirectCU || 89.5 || ? || ? || 1000 || 336 || guiminer GPU:1000mhz MEM:900<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 1GB ( evga FPB ) || 71.4 || -- || -- || 870/1744/1800 || 336 || guiminer-cuda v2012-02-19 FW290.53 Win7x64<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 1GB ( evga ) || 83.1 || 0.519 || 160 || 925/1850/900@0.960v || 336 || guiminer (phoenix1.75) -k poclbm AGGRESSION=8 FASTLOOP BFI_INT -v WORKSIZE=256 ForceWare 301.42 Win7x64 Runs at 70°C with fan at 100%<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 (2 cards) || 102 || 0.319? || 320? || 1350 || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 (2 cards) OC || 127 || 0.374 || 340 || 1620 || 2x 336 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2444.0 rpcminer-cuda] -gpugrid=128 -gputhreads=128 ver.20110227<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 1GB OC (2x MsiHawksSLI) || 158 || 0.658 || 240w(used kill a watt) || core/shader/ram@vcore 930/1860/1150@1.087v (only vcore raised) || 2x 336 || rpcminer-cuda ver.20110227 -gpugrid=320 -gputhreads=320 -aggression=7 Watercooled stable @ 110°F/43° !!!USE ASUS GPU Tweak with GPU-Z (afterburner v2.2.3 wont OC with NVIDIA driver 306.97) I would need gpu bios mod to get more oc/volt. Setting faster ram did increase Mhash/s versus setting ram=core clock.<br />
|-<br />
| GTX465 || 64.41 || 0.322 || 200 || 1215 || 352 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX470 || 81.98 || 0.381 || 215 || 1215 || 448 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX470 || 94.7 || || || 1414 || ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX470 || 103.7 || || || 1520 || || memory @ 418MHz, stable @ 72 deg fan @ 90%, puddinpop rpcminer-cuda -gpugrid=96 -gputhread=128 AGGRESSION=14 GIGABYTE brand card BIOS 70.00.21.00.03 <br />
|-<br />
| GTX470 || 111.9 || 0.520 || 215 || 1650 || 448 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX470 || 115 || || || 1616 || || phoenix 1.46 poclbm VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=6<br />
|-<br />
| GTX470x2 || 121 ea. (130 burst ea.) || || || 1700 ||448|| PuddinPop rpcminer-cuda -gpugrid=96 -gputhreads=128 AGGRESSION=14 (memory 856 Max Temp. 71 deg. F on Water 1.085v+, Stable on Beast 2.0>3 days, no i7 CPU OC, driver 280.26, bios 70.00.21.00.03)<br />
|-<br />
| GTX480 || 101.28 || 0.405 || 250 || 1401 || 480 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX480 || 140.43 || || || 1700 || 480 || rpcminer-cuda -gpugrid=512 -gputhreads=480<br />
|-<br />
| GTX480 AMP!Zotac|| 140.1 || || || 1700|| 480 || rpcminer-cuda -gpugrid=480 -gputhreads=480 (vCore-1050,Core Clock-851, Shader Clock-1702, Memory Clock-2033, t-79°c, Water 43°c, stable temperature and work)<br />
|-<br />
| GTX550 Ti || 45.0 || ? || ? || ? || ? || EVGA 1GB, WinXP rpcminer, no overclock<br />
|-<br />
| GTX560 Ti || 67.7 || 0.39 || 170 || 1700 || 384 || standard EVGA 560, no overclock<br />
|-<br />
| GTX560 Ti || 74 || 0.41 || 170 || 822 || 384 || MSI 560Ti HAWK; core 822 Mhz clock (no overclock); rpcminer-cuda.exe -aggression=4 -gpugrid=64 -gputhreads=384; temp - 71°C; Win 7 x64<br />
|-<br />
| GTX560 Ti || 74.8 || 0.41 || 180 || 1700 || 384 || gigabyte 900Mhz clock; -w 512 -v<br />
|-<br />
| GTX560 Ti || 81 || 0.45 || 180 || 835 || 384 || Gainward GTX560TI Phantom, default clock, rpcminer-cuda<br />
|-<br />
| GTX560 Ti || 85.1 || - || - || - || - || cgminer 2.5.0, linux 32bit, nvidia 295.41, Intensity: 14<br />
|-<br />
| GTX560 Ti || 100 || 0.5 || 200 || 1000 || 384 || GFX - MSI 560Ti HAWK; rpcminer-cuda.exe -aggression=8 -gpugrid=64 -gputhreads=384; GPU temp - 68°C; OS - Windows 8 x64 .<br />
|-<br />
| GTX 560M || 39.3 || 0.38 || 75 W || 775|| 192 || [http://www.examiner.com/computers-in-denver/toshiba-qosmio-x775-q7380-review-review source1] [http://www.notebookcheck.net/NVIDIA-GeForce-GTX-560M.48313.0.html source2] Note: Uses the 295.51 Beta Drivers<br />
|-<br />
| GTX560 OC || 86.7 || <0.51 || >170 || 1800 || 384 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2444.0 rpcminer-cuda] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg72816#msg72816 source]<br />
|-<br />
| GTX570 || 105.83 || 0.483 || 219 || 1464 || 480 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX570 || 140 || 0.639 || 219 || 750 || 480 || rpcminer-cuda.exe -aggression=10 -gpugrid=480 -gputhreads=960; display driver stops working with aggression=11 under win7 x64 driver 270.61<br />
|-<br />
| GTX570 || 157 || 0.717 || 219 || 850 || 480 || rpcminer-cuda.exe -aggression=11 -gpugrid=120 -gputhreads=960<br />
|-<br />
| GTX570 || 165 || || || 925 || 480 || rpcminer-cuda.exe -gpugrid=120 -gputhreads=960; vcore 1.1v; Win7 x64 304.79 Beta; -aggression=11 adds strong lag with minimal increase in hashrate.<br />
|-<br />
| GTX570 || 160 || || || 925 || 480 || rpcminer-cuda.exe -gpugrid=104 -gputhreads=832; No desktop lag, very minimal loss in hashrate compared to much laggier settings<br />
|-<br />
| GTX580 || 156.6 || 0.642 || 244 || 1544 || 512 || cgminer 2.11.3 on Win 8-64 with I=6, driver nVidia 314.22<br />
|-<br />
| GTX580x2 || 2x 146 || 0.598 || 244 || 1544 || 512 || rpcminer-cuda.exe -gpugrid=128 -gputhreads=1024 <br />
(aggression levels above the default of 6 not recommended; only a gain of ~3MH/s per card, and '''heavy''' lag, GUIMiner v2011-08-24, win7 64bit nVidia 290.36 beta driver)<br />
|-<br />
| GTX590 || 193.1 || --- || --- || 1215 || 2x 512 || poclbm -v -w 256, Win<br />
|-<br />
| GTX590 || 2x 121.48 || --- || --- || 750 || 2x 512 || <br />
|-<br />
| GTX670 || 112.00 || 1.1 || 100 || 1275 || 1344 || EVGA GTX670FTW 2GB / GPU Clock offset +75Mhz with EVGA Precision X / GUIMiner -f 60 / Windows 7 64-Bit. (09-13-2012)<br />
|-<br />
| GTX680 || 127.3 || || || 1280 || 1536 || Asus GTX 680 2GB DirectCU II: Windows 7 64 bit: Nvidia 310.90 driver: Offset of 186: Runs at a constant 52C<br />
|-<br />
| GTX680 || 110.00 || || || 1110 || 1536 || RPCMiner with OpenCL or others. Might crash once mining stops. No Flags and Stock Settings (GPU Boost @ 1110mhz Core) with EVGA GTX 680, latest version of GUIMiner (2012-2-19) and Windows 7 x64.<br />
|-<br />
| GTX680 || 120.00 || 1.2 || 100 || 1272 || 1536 || Ufasoft Galaxy 4GB (GPU Clock offset +70Mhz with EVGA Precision X) (2012-7-28) and Windows 7 64-Bit.<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro FX 580 || 5.7 || 0.14 || 40 || 1125 || 4 ||rpcminer-cuda, Win, -gpugrid=128 -gputhreads=512<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro FX 770M || 5.75 || || || 500 || 32 || DiabloMiner-Windows.exe BFI_INT FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=6, Win<br />
|-<br />
|Quadro FX 770M || 6.39 || || || 500 || 32 || DiabloMiner-Windows.exe BFI_INT FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=6 w 64, Win 7x64<br />
|-<br />
|Quadro FX 880M || 9.6 || || || || || poclbm/guiminer<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro FX 1600M || 6 || 0.12 || 50 || 625 || 32 ||rpcminer-cuda, Win<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro FX 1800 || 13.6 || - || - || - || - || cgminer 2.5.0, linux 32bit, nvidia 256.44 Intensity: 4<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro FX 2000M || 23 || 0.397 || 58 || || || phoenix 1.48, -k poclbm, VECTORS, AGGRESION=6, Lenovo W520 platform<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro FX 2800M || 22 || 0.293 || 75 || 600 || 96 ||DiabloMiner, win<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro FX 3000M || 28.6 || - || - || - || - || cgminer 2.5.0, linux 32bit, nvidia 295.41 Intensity: 3<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro FX 3600M || 36 || 0.514 || 70 || 500 || 96 ||<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro FX 3800 || 33.3 || || || || || poclbm/guiminer -f0 -w128<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro NVS 135M || 1.05 || 0.1 || 10 || 800 || 1 || <br />
|-<br />
| Quadro NVS 295 || 1.7 || 0.07 || 23 || 567 || 8 || phoenix<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro NVS 3100M || 3.6 || 0.257 || 14 || 600 || 16 || rpcminer-cuda, Win, CUDA 3.1.1<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro NVS 4200M || 10.0 || || || 810 || || guiminer, Win7-64<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro 5000 || 67.7 || 0.445 || 152 || 513 || 352 || rpcminer-cuda.exe -aggression=7 gpugrid=352 gputhreads=704;<br />
|-<br />
| Tesla C1060 || 52.5 || || || 1296 || 240 || poclbm, Win7x64<br />
|-<br />
| Tesla K20 || 134.8 || || || 706 || 2496 || poclbm, Linux<br />
|-<br />
| Tesla M2050 || 79.8 || || || 1550 || 448 || DiabloMiner<br />
|-<br />
| Tesla M2050 || 94.5 || || || 1550 || || poclbm<br />
|-<br />
| Tesla S1070 || 155.2 || || 800 <ref name='nvidia_S1070'/> || 1440 (GT200b)<ref name='nvidia_S1070'/> || 960<ref name='nvidia_S1070'/> || rpcminer-cuda, Linux, CUDA 3.2, 4 instances (-gpu=0 through -gpu=3)<br />
|-<br />
| Tesla S2070 || 749.23 || || || 1150<ref name='nvidia_S2070'/> || 1792<ref name='nvidia_S2070'/> || rpcminer-cuda, Linux, CUDA 4.0, 8 instances (-gpu=0 through -gpu=7) <br />
|-<br />
| GTX280x2 || 102.7 || || || || ||<br />
|-<br />
|}<br />
<references><br />
<ref name='nvidia_S1070'>The S1070 is a dedicated supercomputing platform that features four Tesla units (GT200). Technical data taken from [http://www.nvidia.de/object/tesla_s1070_de.html NVIDIA]</ref><br />
<ref name='nvidia_S2070'>The S2070 is a dedicated supercomputing platform that features four Fermi units (C2070). Technical data taken from [http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nvidia_Tesla Wikipedia] (Documentation from NVIDIA webpage is confusing)</ref><br />
</references><br />
<br />
==CPUs/APUs==<br />
<br />
A lot of nice data can be pulled from [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.0 this thread] to seed this section. <br />
<br />
Might you wish to throttle CPU load a bit, so it doesn't reach 100°C, it can be done with Battle Encoder Shirase to a margin, like, -15% of available CPU cycles.<br />
<br />
Often, the best combination to be is to throttle CPU miner to -5% '''AND''' set it to least of priority levels, so as not to choke GPU miner up.<br />
<br />
===AMD===<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! nprocs !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! TDP [W] !! CPU Clock !! Mhash/s CPU !! Mhash/s GPU !! GPU !! GPU Clock !! SP !! Software !! Notes<br />
|-<br />
| 4x Opteron 6174 || 48 || 115 || 0.36 || 320W || 2.2 GHz || 2.4<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| cpuminer v0.8.1 || --alg 4way --threads 48<br />
|-<br />
| 2x Opteron 6172 || 24 || 55 || 0.24 || 230W || 2.1 GHz || 2.3<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| cgminer v2.7.6 || --algo 4way -t 24<br />
|-<br />
| 2x Opteron 6128 || 16 || 32.4 || 0.141 || 230W || 2 GHz || 32.4<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| 0.3.19 || -4way<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon XP 2000+ || 2 || 0.62 || 0.009 || 70W || 1.67 GHz || 0.62<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| 0.3.18/Ubuntu || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source] [http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm?articleid=914&page=4 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon 64 3500+ || 1 || 1.18 || 0.013 || 89W || 2.54 GHz || 1.18<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| ufasoft v0.4 || overclocked (originally 2.2 GHz)<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon 64 X2 3800+ || 2 || 1.73 || 0.03 || 65 W || 2.00 GHz || 1.73<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || -algo=4way<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon 64 X2 4000+ || 2 || 1.9 || 0.02 || 65W || 2.1 GHz || 1.9<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| rpc-miner ||<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon 64 X2 4400+ || || 2.09 || 0.032 || 65W || 2.3GHz || 2.09<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| 0.3.19/Win x64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon 64 X2 6000+ || 2 || 2.81 || 0.02 || 125W || 3 GHz || 2.81<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg22881#msg22881 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon 64 X2 6400+ Black Edition || 2 || 2.9 || 0.023 || 125W || 3.2 GHz || 2.9<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| 0.3.20.2 BETA/Win 7 x64 || -4way<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon II X2 240e || 2 || 2.71 || 0.06 || 45W || 2.81 GHz || 2.71<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon II X2 250 || 2 || 5.6 || 0.09 || 65W || 3.01GHz || 5.6<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| bitcoin-miner 0.11 ||<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon II X4 630 || 4 || 10.7 || 0.11 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 10.7<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| bitcoin-miner 0.4 || <br />
|-<br />
| Opteron 8220 x16 || 16 || 25 || || || 2.8Ghz || 1.5 <br />
|colspan=4| <br />
| ufasoft / OpenSuse 64bit || running default, but had to copy 32bit binaries over to get curl and ufasoft running. might be better when using native 32bit system w/o other users on the machine ||<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 3.8 || 0.04 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 3.8<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| 0.3.1x/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom X4 9950 BE || 4 || 9.3 || 0.07 || 126W || 2.6 GHz || 2.32<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| bitcoin-miner 0.13/WinXP || No GPU<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 7.2 || 0.08 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 7.2<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| cpu-miner 0.2.1/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X4 810 || 4 || 5.0 || || 95W || 2.8 GHz ||<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| rpcminer-cpu ||<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X4 810 || 4 || 9.5 || || 95W || 2.8 GHz ||<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| rpcminer-4way ||<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X4 810 || 4 || 10.5 || || 95W || 2.8 GHz ||<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| ufasoft v0.10 ||<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X4 810 || 4 || 11.5 || || 95W || 2.8 GHz ||<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| cgminer 1.5.3 || "cgminer 1.5.3 --algo 4way" on Ubuntu 11.10 alpha 2 (64 bit), built by GCC 4.6.1 with "-O3 -Wall -march=native" <br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X4 955 || 4 || 11 || 0.09 || 125W || 3.2 GHz || 11<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| rpcminer-4way ||<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X4 965 || 4 || 12 || 0.09 || 140W || 3.4 GHz || 11<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| rpcminer-4way ||<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X6 1055T || 6 || 15.84 || 0.13 || 125W || 2.82 GHz || 15.84 <br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X6 1055T || 6 || 23.6 || || 95W || 3.50 GHz || 23.6 <br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| [http://github.com/pooler/cpuminer pooler's cpuminer] 2.2.2 || --algo=sha256d<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X6 1075T || 6 || 21.3 || || 125W|| ||<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| minerd || Ubuntu 11.04 amd64 runlevel=1 -algo=4way -threads=6<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X6 1090T || 6 || 18|| || 141W|| 3.50 GHz || 3<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| minerd || <br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X6 1100T || 6 || 22 || 0.176 || 125W || 3.82 GHz || 22<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| bitcoin-miner || Aciid#bitcoin-dev<br />
|-<br />
| Sempron 3000+ || 2 || 0.8 || || 62W || 1.6 GHz || 0.8<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| cpuminer || --alg 4way<br />
|-<br />
| Turion X2 RM-70 || 2 || 1.9 || || 65W || 2.1 GHz || 1.9<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| cpuminer || --alg 4way<br />
|-<br />
| Zacate E-350 || 2 || 11 || 0.615 || 18W || 1.6 Ghz || 1.231 || 9.831 || HD6310M || 492 Mhz || 80 || poclbm -v -w128 + Ufasoft 0.7 || stock speeds<br />
|-<br />
| Zacate E-350 || 2 || 12<br />
|colspan=2|<br />
| 1.648 Ghz || 1.252 || 10.87 || HD6310M || 492 Mhz || 80 || poclbm -v -w 256 -f 1 || "autotune" speed with ASUS EFI BIOS<br />
|-<br />
| Ontario C-50 || 2 || 6.2 || 0.68 || 9W || 1.0 Ghz || 1.200 || 6.2 || HD6250M || 277 Mhz || 80 || poclbm -v -w128 -f5 -r5 || <br />
|-<br />
| A4-3400 || 2 || 23.2 || || || 75W || 2.4 Ghz || || 23.2 || 6350 || stock || || GUIminer || ||<br />
|-<br />
| A8-3850 || 4 || 60 || || 100W || Stock || || 60 || HD6550D || Stock || 400 || poclbm.exe, Win7-32, 4GB RAM || All running at stock speeds, and set to auto in BIOS.<br />
|<br />
|-<br />
| A8-3870K || 4 || 95 || || 100W (@stock) || 3.3 Ghz || || 95 || HD6550D || 900MHz || 400 || phoenix.exe -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=4 WORKSIZE=128, Win7-64, 8GB RAM 1667MHz || M/B ASUS F1 A75-M Pro, CPU/GPU BIOS overclocked<br />
|-<br />
| A10-5800K || 4 || 105 || || 100W || 3.8 Ghz || || 105 || HD7660D || 800MHz || 384 || cgminer Intensity=7 || Linux 64bit (Ubuntu 12.10), AMD-APP-SDK-v2.7-RC-lnx64, stock speeds *not* overclocked<br />
|}<br />
<br />
===ARM===<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! Mhash/s/$ /€ !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment<br />
|-<br />
| ARM926EJ-S || 1 || 0.187 || ? || ? || ? || 1.2 GHz || cpuminer || Seagate Dockstar [http://archlinuxarm.org/platforms/armv5/seagate-dockstar ArchLinux]<br />
|-<br />
| Marvel Feroceon (88FR131) || 1 || 0.195 || 0.224 ||<0.01|| 0.87 W || 1.2 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-06-15) || Marvell SheevaPlug, Debian, 'c' algo<br />
|-<br />
| ARM1136EJ-S || 1 || 0.11 || ? || ? || ? || 0.528 GHz || cpuminer git || T-Mobile Pulse, inside Debian chroot, 'c' algo<br />
|-<br />
| ARM1176JZ(F)-S || 1 || 0.119 || ? || ? || ? || 0.412 GHz || [http://github.com/pooler/cpuminer pooler's cpuminer] 2.2 || iPhone 3G, 'sha256d' algo<br />
|-<br />
| ARM1176JZ(F)-S || 1 || 0.2 || ? || ? || 3.75W || 800 Mhz || cgminer 2.5.0 || RaspberryPi Model B, SoC BCM2835, Debian Squezee 19-04-2012, Overclocked Cpu 800mhz<br />
|-<br />
| Cortex-A8 || 1 || 0.125 || 0.36 || <0.01 || 0.35 W || 0.6 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || Nokia N900: 'cryptopp'<br />
|-<br />
| Cortex-A8 || 1 || 0.2 || 0.57 || <0.01 || 0.35 W || 0.6 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || Nokia N900: 'c' algo<br />
|-<br />
| Cortex-A8 || 1 || 0.365 || ? || ? || ? || 0.6 GHz || [http://github.com/pooler/cpuminer pooler's cpuminer] || BeagleBoard: 'sha256d' algo<br />
|-<br />
| Cortex-A8 || 1 || 0.435 || ? || ? || ? || 0.8 GHz || [http://github.com/pooler/cpuminer pooler's cpuminer] 2.2 || 'sha256d' algo<br />
|-<br />
| Cortex-A8 || 1 || 0.44 || ? || ? || ? || 0.8 GHz || cpuminer 2.2.3 (-mfpu=neon) || EfikaMX (iMX.51), CRUX ARMHF, cpuminer -a sha256d<br />
|-<br />
| AllWinner A10(A8) || 1 || 0.568 || ? || ? || <2.5W || 1.0 GHz || [http://github.com/pooler/cpuminer pooler's cpuminer] 2.2 || -a sha256d #Native Lubuntu armhf build <br />
|-<br />
| Cortex-A9 || 2 || 0.57|| 1.14 ||<0.01 || 0.5 W || 1.0 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-24) || Toshiba AC100, ubuntu, 'c' algo<br />
|-<br />
| Cortex-A9 || 2 || 1.3 || ? || ? || ? || 1.2 GHz || [http://github.com/pooler/cpuminer pooler's cpuminer] 2.2.3 || Samsung Galaxy S II - CFLAGS="-O3 -mfpu=neon"<br />
|}<br />
<br />
===Intel===<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! Mhash / $<ref name='amazon_20110625'/>/€<ref name='geizhals_20110625'/> !! ACP [W] !! Clock [GHz] !! Version !! Comment<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium III (Coppermine) || 2 || 0.39 || 0.008 |||| TDP 2× 26.1 W || 1 || Ufasoft 0.32 (compiled from source), Debian Squeeze || [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_Pentium_III_microprocessors#.22Coppermine.22_.28180_nm.29 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium III mobile ? || 1 || 0.3 || 0.014 |||| 21 || 1.07 || 0.3.1x/Win2K || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source] [http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=27380 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium M 1.6ghz || 1 || 0.4 || || || || 1.6 || minerd (jgarzik's 1.0) || cryppto, Windows 7<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium M 1.6ghz || 1 || 0.62 || || || || 1.6 || Ufasoft 0.20 || Windows XP Professional<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium M 1.6ghz || 1 || 0.71 || || || || 1.6 || [http://github.com/pooler/cpuminer pooler's cpuminer] 2.2 || Gentoo Linux<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium M 1.73ghz || 1 || 0.5 || || || || 1.73 || minerd (jgarzik's 1.0) || cryppto, Windows 7<br />
|-<br />
| Old Xeon 512k (Dual) || 2x1/2 || 2.0 || || || || 3.0 || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || HT disabled, algo=4way (twice as fast as the 2nd best algo)<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium 4 2.0A || 1 || 0.85 || || || || 2.0 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft-0.4]/WinXP || -g no -t 2<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium 4 630 || 1/2 || 1.29 || || || || 3.0 || ufasoft 0.23 || Windows XP<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium Dual-Core E2180 || 2/2 || 1.75 || || || || 2.0 || rpcminer-cpu || Win7-64<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium Dual-Core E2180 || 2/2 || 4.1 || || || || 2.0 || cpuminer || sse2_64<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium Dual-Core E2180 || 2/2 || 4.5 || || || || 2.0 || ufasoft v0.11 || Win7-64<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium Dual-Core E5400 || 2/2 || 2.27 || 0.03 || || 65 || 2.7 || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Celeron E330 || 2/2 || 2.2 || 0.03 || || 65 || 2.5 || 0.3.19/Ubuntu10.04 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]<br />
|-<br />
|-<br />
| Celeron E3400 || 2/2 || 5.9 || - || - || - || 2.6 || Ufasoft v0.13 / GUIMiner v2011-06-14 || WinXP 32 bit, SSE2, Flags "-g no" <br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Quad Q6600 || 4/4 || 11.0 || || 0.02/0.06 || 105 || 2.40 || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || -a 60 -g no -t 4<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Quad Q8200 || 4/4 || 10.9 || || 0.06/0.10 || || 2.33 || Ufasoft 0.14 || -g no -l yes -t 4<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Quad Q9400 || 4/4 || 11 || 0.046 || 0.06/0.07 || 95 || 2.66 || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || -a 60 -g no -t 4<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Quad Q9650 || 4/4 || 18.67 || || 0.05/0.06 || 95 || 4.00 || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || -a 60 -g no -t 4<br />
|-<br />
| Core i3 530 || 2/4 || 8.31 || 0.10 || 0.06/0.10 || 80 || 3.66 || Ufasoft 0.7 || -v -a5 -g no -t 4<br />
|-<br />
| Core i3 M350 || 2/4 || 1.48 || 0.04 || || 35 || 2.27 || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Core i3-2100 || 2/4 || 8.28 || || || || 3.1 || ufasoft v0.20 || <br />
|-<br />
| Core i5 M450 || 2/4 || 1.8 || 0.05 || || 35 || 1.2 || 0.3.17/Win7-54 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source]<br />
|- <br />
| Core i5-650 || 2/4 || 5.1 || 0.04 ? || 0.02/0.03 || || 3.2 || cpuminer-0.7 || -4way<br />
|-<br />
| Core i5-750 || 4/4 || 14 || || 0.06/0.10 || || 3.2 || bitcoin-miner 0.11 || -a 5 -g no -t 4<br />
|-<br />
| Core i5 ? || 4/? || 6.5 || || || || || client from svn || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37621#msg37621 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 4.5 || 0.05 || 0.02/0.03 || 95 || 3.1 || cpuminer git (2011-01-22) || cryptopp_asm32<br />
|-<br />
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 14 || 0.15 || 0.07/0.09 || 95 || 3.1 || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || sse2_64<br />
|-<br />
| Core i5-2400S || 4/4 || 16.6 || || || 65 || 2.5 || [http://github.com/pooler/cpuminer pooler's cpuminer] 2.2.3 || Linux Mint 13<br />
|-<br />
| Core i5 2500K || 4/4 || 20.6 || ||0.10/0.12 || || 4.2 || bitcoin-miner || -g no<br />
|-<br />
| Core i5 2600K || 4/8 || 17.3 || || || 75 || 3.4 || bitcoin-miner || -g no. 75W for the whole System without monitor (MSI Board). CPU underclocked to 3,4Ghz and undervolted to 1,012Vcore. Passive Cooling! 3.6ghz results in 18,4 Mhash/s<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 2600K || 4/8 || 18.6 || || || 95 W max. || 3.4 || Ufasoft bitcoin-miner 0.20 || -g no -t 8 CPU @ 3.511Ghz 1.176V<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 2600 || 4/8 || 23.9 || || || || 3.4 || [http://github.com/pooler/cpuminer pooler's cpuminer] 2.2 || Ubuntu Linux 11.10<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 620M || 2/4 || 1.888 || || || || 2.66 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8994.0 RPCMiner GUI] v2011-05-22 / Mac OS X 10.6.7 || Model: MacBookPro6,2 RAM: 4GB<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 620M || 2/4 || 6.5 || || || || 3.33 || This is achieved by running RPC 4 way miner in VMware Fusion 4 (running win 7 in the VM) while in Mac OSX / Mac OS X 10.6.8 || Model: MacBookPro6,2 RAM: 8GB.The CPU appears to turbo boost to 3.33GHz in this way from 2.67GHz when running it in this way.The MBP gets very hot and uses a lot of energy though so watch those temps.It'll throttle after a while unless you keep the air vents clear underneath (ie don't put int in your lap,etc).<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 720QM || 4/8 || 7.9 || ?|| || 45 || 2.8 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] || stream processors overclocked from 1.6 GHz; Dell Precision M6500, Win7-64, 8GB DDR3<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 820 || 4/8 || 13.8 || || || || 2.8 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] || -t 8<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 920 || 4/8 || 19.2 || 0.10 || || 195 || 4.0 (x21) || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] || -a 5<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 950 || 4/8 || 5.88 || 0.039 || || 150 || 3.83 (x23) || bitcoin-0.3.20.2 Win7-64 ||<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 950 || 4/8 || 18.9 || 0.126 || || 150 || 3.83 (x23) || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] v0.4 ||<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 980x || 6/12 || 19.2 || 0.15 || || 130 || 4.4 (x33) || cpuminer/Win7-64 || <br />
|- <br />
| Core i7 980x || 6/12 || 8.7 || || || || 3.9 (x27) || 0.3.17/Win7-64 || <br />
|- <br />
| Core i7 990x || 6/12 || 33.3 || || || || 4.5 (x32) || ufasoft/Win2008 R2-64 || Ram - 12Gb, Rampage III BlackEdition, Water cooling<br />
|- <br />
| Core i7 2635QM || 4/8 || 2.93 || || || || 2.00 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8994.0 RPCMiner GUI] v2011-05-22 / Mac OS X 10.6.7 || Model: MacBookPro8,2 RAM: 4GB<br />
|- <br />
| Core i7 620M || 2/4 || 6.3 || 0.18 || || 35 || 2.66 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] v0.4 || <br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 2600k || 4/4 || 6.7 || || || || 4.00 || phoenix 0.48 ||<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 3770k || 4/8 || 5.2 || || || || 4.4 || Guiminer v2012-12-03 || Windows 7 x64 : -v argument increased Mhash/s from 5.0 to 5.2<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 3930k || 6/12 || 66.6 || || || || 4.625 (125 x 37) || Ufasoft bitcoin-miner v0.28 || Windows 7 x64, uses ~190watts : -v argument increased Mhash/s from 36.0 to 66.6<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo U7600 || 1 || 1.1 || || || || 1.2 || minerd (jgarzik's 1.0) || cryppto, Windows 7<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo E5200 || 2/2 || 6.2 || 0.086 || || 72 || 2.76 || Ufasoft/Win7-64 || TDP is 65W + 7W overclock<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo E6550 || 1/2 || 2.45 || || || || 2.33 || cpuminer 0.7.1 (Linux) || --algo=sse2_64<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo E6850 || 2/2 || 6.75 || 0.10 || || 65 || 3.0 || ufasoft-0.3 ||<br />
|- <br />
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 7.76 || 0.11 || || 70 || 3.33 || ufasoft-0.3 || uncertain of overclock; miner optimized for Intel Core<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 2.52 || 0.04 || || 65 || 2.66 || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo E8200 || 2/2 || 2.3 || 0.035 || || 65 || 2.66 || rpcminer-cpu ||<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo E8400 || 2/2 || 6.9 || 0.106 || || 65 || 3.0 || ufasoft v0.10 || windows 7/64bit (-t 2)<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo E8500 || 1/2 || 3.6 || || || || 3.16 || guiminer v2011-06-14 || windows vista 32bit<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo E8500 || 2/2 || 7.2 || || || || 3.16 || guiminer v2011-06-14 || windows vista 32bit<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo P8700 || 2/2 || 5.9 || || || || 2.53 || ufasoft v0.21 || windows 7/64bit <br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo T5450 || 2/2 || 2.5 || 0.07 || || 35 || 1.63 || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || Ubuntu 11.04<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo T5500 || 2/2 || 4.3 || || || || 1.66 || [http://github.com/pooler/cpuminer pooler's cpuminer] 2.2 || Gentoo Linux (amd64)<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo T6400 || 2/2 || 4.2 || 0.12 || || 35 || 2.00 || cpuminer git (Linux) || --algo=sse2_64<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo T7250 || 2/2 || 4.5 || 0.13 || || 35 || 2.00 || bitcoin-miner 0.13/WinXP || No GPU<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo T7450 || 2/2 || 3.7 || 0.10 || || 35 || 2.13 || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || Ubuntu 11.04<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo T9400 || 2/2 || 4.2 || || || || 2.53 || ufasoft v0.13 || Win7-64<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Extreme X9000 || 2/2 || 2.37 || || || || 2.8 || rpcminer-cpu || Win7-64<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Extreme X9000 || 2/2 || 6.2 || || || || 2.8 || ufasoft v0.11 || Win7-64<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Extreme X9000 || 2/2 || 7.2 || || || || 3.2 || ufasoft v0.11 || Win7-64 Overclocked from 2.8 GHz to 3.2 GHz<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon 2.8 || 2/2 || 0.8 || || || || 2.8 || cpuminer || cryptopp_asm32 <br />
|-<br />
| Xeon 3060 || 1/2 || 2.03 || 0.03 || || 65 || 2. || cpuminer 0.8.1 (Linux) || --algo=cryptopp_asm32<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon Prestonia 2.4 (dual) || 2x1/2 || 2.16 || 0.017 || || 130 || 2.4 || ufasoft v0.4 || <br />
|-<br />
| Xeon X5355 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 10.13 || 0.16 || || 120 || 2.6 || bitcoind || Roughly the same speed as the "c" algo in cpuminer<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E3-1230 V2 (quad) || 4/8 || 19.7 || ? || ? || ? || 3.70 || cgminer 2.8.3 || -O2 -march=core-avx-i algo=sse2_64<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon X5355 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 22.76 || 0.09 || || 120 || 2.6 || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || -O2 -march=core2, algo=sse2_64<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon X5365 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 26.00 || ? || || ? || 3.0 || cpuminer git (2011-06-15) || algo=sse2_64<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon X5650 || 2x6/24 || 28.6 || ? || ? || ? || 2.67 || cpuminer 1.0.2 || --algo 4way<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon x5680 (dual) || 2x6/24 || 48 || ? || ? || ? || 3.33GHz || Ufasoft 0.29 || CentOS 6.2 x86_64<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon x5690 (dual) || 2x6/24 || 52 || ? || ? || ? || 3.46GHz || Ufasoft 0.29 || CentOS 6.2 x86_64<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5-2690 (dual) || 2x8/32 || 66 || ? || ? || 2x135W || 2.9GHz || Ufasoft 64-bit 0.31 || Windows Server 2008R2 x64<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5335 || 4/4 || 9.35 || 0.12 || || 80 || 2.00 || ufasoft v0.11 || Vista-32<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5410 || 4/4 || 9.8 || ? || || 80 || 2.33|| ufasoft v0.10 || CentOS 5.5 x64 <br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5440 || 4/8 || 7.3 || ? || || 80 || 2.66|| Kiv's poclbm-gui || FIXME: Either wrong model # or wrong threads/speed info<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5506 || 4/4 || 9.6 || ? || || 80 || 2.13|| ufasoft v0.10 || CentOS 5.5 x64 <br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5520 || 4/8 || 6.5 || 0.08 || || 80 || 2.27 || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5530 || 4/8 || 7.14 || 0.09 || || 80 || 2.4 || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5620 || 4/8 || 11.2 || ? || || 80 || 2.4 || ufasoft v0.10 -t 4 || CentOS 5.5 x64 Hyper-Threading is off<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5630 (dual) || 2x4/8 || 8 || 0.1 || || 80 || 2.53 || 0.3.17/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E6520 (dual) || 2x4/8 || 24.7 || || || || 2.53 || ufasoft v0.10 || windows 2008 R2 64bit (-t 16)<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E7220 || 2/2 || 6.3 || ? || || 80 || 2.93|| ufasoft v0.10 || CentOS 5.5 x64 <br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E7320 (dual) || 2x2 || 1.5 || || || || 2.8 || cgminer v1.2.8 || 2x2.8ghz dual core running Ubuntu 11.04 x86 (individual cores get 0.4 MH/s)<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E7450 (quad) || 4x6/24 || 60 || || || || 2.40 || ufasoft v0.13 || -t 24<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E7520 (dual) || 2x4/16 || 18 || || || 95 || 1.87 || ufasoft v0.10 || windows 2008 R2 64bit (-t 16)<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon W3680 || 6/12 || 18 || || || 130 || 3.33 || cpuminer v1.0.2 --algo=4way || Ubuntu 11.04 64bit<br />
|-<br />
| Atom Z520 || 1/2 || 1.20 || || || 2 || 1.7 || ufasoft 1.18 || Asus Eee 1101HA with overclocking capabilities<br />
|-<br />
| Atom N230 || 1/2 || 0.375 || || || 4 || 1.6 || rpcminer-cpu || <br />
|-<br />
| Atom N230 || 1/2 || 0.245 || || || 4 || 1.6 || rpcminer-4way || <br />
|-<br />
| Atom N230 || 1/2 || 0.97 || || || 4 || 1.6 || ufasoft v0.10 || <br />
|-<br />
| Atom N270 || 1/2 || 1.19 || 0.24 || || 5 || 1.6 || ufasoft v0.10 || <br />
|-<br />
| Atom N450 || 1/2 || 1.60 || 0.31 || || 6.5 || 2.06 || ufasoft v0.10 || <br />
|-<br />
| Atom N550 || 2/4 || 1.97 || || || || 1.5 || ufasoft v0.21 || Windows 7/64 bit<br />
|-<br />
| Atom 330 || 2/4 || 1.80 || || || 8 || 1.6 || ufasoft v0.13 || -t 4<br />
|-<br />
| Atom D510 || 2/4 || 1.00 || || || || 1.6 || cpuminer w cryptopp_asm32 || debian linux 6.0, headless system, 2 GB RAM, running from usb-flash<br />
|-<br />
| Atom D510 || 4/4 || 2.3 || 0.07 || || 30 || 1.6 || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || Ubuntu 11.04 Server<br />
|}<br />
<br />
<references><br />
<ref name='amazon_20110625'>$ Prices from http://www.amazon.com on 2011-06-25</ref><br />
<ref name='geizhals_20110625'>€ Prices from http://geizhals.at/eu on 2011-06-25</ref><br />
</references><br />
<br />
===Other===<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! Mhash/s/$ !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment<br />
|-<br />
| Cell || 6 || 21 || 0.35 || 0.07 || 60W || 3.2 GHz || Cellminer || Sony Playstation 3 (FAT): Needs custom firmware. [https://github.com/verement/cellminer source] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4704.20 source] Total power usage of PS3 fat is 120W but only the Cell cpu is active.<br />
|-<br />
| Cell || 7 || 26.6 || ? || ? || 60W || 3.2 GHz || Cellminer || Sony Playstation 3 (FAT): Needs custom firmware. [https://github.com/verement/cellminer source] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4704.20 source] Running with 7th spu enabled and both ppe cores.<br />
|-<br />
| Cell || 6 || 21 || 0.7 || 0.07 || 35W || 3.2 GHz || cellminer || Sony Playstation 3 (SLIM): Total power usage of PS3 slim is 70W but only the Cell cpu is active.<br />
|-<br />
| MIPS || 1 || 0.026 || ? || ? || ? || 200 MHz || cpuminer || ASUS WL-500G Deluxe Router Running [http://openwrt.org/ OpenWrt]<br />
|-<br />
| VIA Eden || 1 || 1.3 || 0.17 || || 8W || 1600 MHz || cpuminer || VIA Eden w/ padlock<br />
|-<br />
| PowerPC 7447A || 1 || 0.53 || || || || 1420 MHz || cpuminer ||<br />
|-<br />
| PowerPC 7450 (G4e) || 1 || 1.29 || || || || 1670 MHz || cgminer 2.0.7 || PowerBook5,6; Mac OS X 10.5.8; Altivec<br />
|-<br />
| PowerPC 750 (G3) || 1 || 0.140 || || || || 600 MHz || cpuminer || iBook G3 600 w/ Cryptopp<br />
|-<br />
| IBM POWER4+ 2/way || 2/1 || 0.58 || || || || 1450 MHz || cpuminer 2.2.3 || CRUX PPC (64bit), cpuminer -a sha256d -t 1<br />
|-<br />
| IBM Power7 (PowerPC) || || 7.6 || || || || 3.5 Ghz || cgminer || IBM Power7 770, SuSE Linux 11.1, 4 cores, OpenCL, YASM, Altivec<br />
|-<br />
| Google App Engine || 1 || 0.144 || || || 0W || || pyminer || Modified version of [https://github.com/jgarzik/pyminer pyminer] for GAE.<br />
|-<br />
| Open Shift || 1 || 0.059 || || || 0W || || pyminer || <br />
|}<br />
<br />
<references></references><br />
<br />
==See Also==<br />
* [[TP's Bitcoin Calculator]]<br />
* [[Mining rig]]<br />
* [[ZTEX FPGA Boards for Bitcoin Mining]]<br />
* [[Generation Calculator]]<br />
* [[Power Calc]]<br />
* [[OpenCL miner]]<br />
* [http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=745 ATI Stream vs. NVIDIA CUDA - GPGPU computing battle royale] <br />
* [http://bitminer.info/ Bitminer.info] <br />
* [http://www.pcper.com/reviews/Graphics-Cards/Bitcoin-Currency-and-GPU-Mining-Performance-Comparison Bitcoin Mining Performance Compared]<br />
** [http://www.pcper.com/reviews/Graphics-Cards/Bitcoin-Mining-Update-Power-Usage-Costs-Across-United-States Bitcoin Mining Power Costs Compared]<br />
<br />
[[Category:Mining]]</div>
Http
https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Mining_hardware_comparison&diff=36600
Mining hardware comparison
2013-04-02T20:13:32Z
<p>Http: /* FPGA */ Wolfram Alpha is not a reference and we can divide numbers</p>
<hr />
<div>Below are some statistics about the mining performance of various hardware used in a [[mining rig]].<br />
<br />
'''Notes:'''<br />
* Mhash/s = millions hashes per second (raw speed performance; may not be very energy efficient with some models)<br />
* Mhash/J = millions hashes per joule (energy efficiency; 1 joule of energy is 1 watt during 1 second: 1 J = 1 W*s)<br />
* W = watt (maximum power consumption, i.e. energy per unit of time: 1 W = 1 J/s)<br />
<br />
== FPGA ==<br />
<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align:center"<br />
|- <br />
! Product !! Hash rate<br />[Mhash/s] !! Efficiency<br />[Mhash/J] !! Efficiency<br />[Mhash/s/$] !! Power<br />[W] !! Price<br />[$]<br />
|-<br />
! Avnet Spartan-6 LX150T Development Kit<br />
| 100<ref>Fpgaminer (May 19, 2011). [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=9047.0 "Official Open Source FPGA Bitcoin Miner"]. Bitcointalk.org. Retrieved February 7, 2013.</ref> || || 0.10 || || 995<ref>[http://avnetexpress.avnet.com/store/em/EMController?action=products&catalogId=500201&storeId=500201&N=0&langId=-1&slnk=b&term=AES-S6DEV-LX150T-G&hrf=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.em.avnet.com%2Fen-us%2Fdesign%2Fdrc%2FPages%2FXilinx-Spartan-6-FPGA-LX150T-Development-Kit.aspx&intcmp=EMA-BUY-AES-S6DEV-LX150T-G "AES-S6DEV-LX150T-G Parts"]. Avnet Express. Retrieved February 7, 2013.</ref><br />
|-<br />
! Bitcoin Dominator X5000<br />
| 100<ref name="bd" /> || 14.7 || 0.22 || 6.8<ref name="bd" /> || 440<ref name="bd">NewMeat1 (August 18, 2011). [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=37904.0 "Custom FPGA Board for Sale!"]. Bitcointalk.org. Retrieved January 30, 2013.</ref><br />
|-<br />
! BitForce SHA256 Single<br />
| 832<ref name="single">[http://www.butterflylabs.com/product-details/ "BitForce SHA256 Single – Technical Specifications"]. Butterfly Labs. Retrieved January 30, 2013.</ref> || 10.4 || 1.38 || 80<ref name="single" /> || 599<ref name="single" /><br />
|-<br />
! Butterflylabs Mini Rig<br />
| 25,200<ref name="mini">[http://web.archive.org/web/20120514032732/http://www.butterflylabs.com/products "Products"]. Butterfly Labs. Archived from the original on May 14, 2012. Retrieved February 7, 2013.</ref> || 20.16 || 1.64 || 1,250<ref name="mini" /> || 15,295<ref name="mini2">[http://www.butterflylabs.com/order-form-bitforce-sha256-mini-rig/ "Order Form – BitForce SHA256 – Mini Rig"]. Butterfly Labs. Retrieved January 30, 2013.</ref><br />
|-<br />
! Digilent Nexys 2 500K<br />
| 5<ref>The Seven (June 3, 2011). [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=9047.msg164438#msg164438 "Re: Official Open Source FPGA Bitcoin Miner (Smaller Devices Now Supported!)"]. Bitcointalk.org. Retrieved February 7, 2013.</ref> || || 0.03 || || 149<ref name="dig">[http://www.digilentinc.com/Products/Detail.cfm?Prod=NEXYS2 "Nexys™2 Spartan-3E FPGA Board"]. Digilent. Retrieved January 30, 2013.</ref><br />
|-<br />
! Icarus<br />
| 380<ref name="ica">Nzghang (November 9, 2011). [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=51371.0 "FPGA development board 'Icarus' – DisContinued/ important announcement"]. Bitcointalk.org. Retrieved January 30, 2013.</ref> || 19.79 || 0.66 || 19.2<ref name="ica" /> || 569<ref name="ica" /><br />
|-<br />
! Lancelot<br />
| || || || || 500<ref name="lan">Nzghang (May 6, 2012). [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=79835.0 "FPGA development board "Lancelot" - accept bitsteam developer's orders."]. Bitcointalk.org. Retrieved January 30, 2013.</ref><br />
|-<br />
! ModMiner Quad <br />
| 800<ref name="mmq">[http://www.btcfpga.com/index.php?route=product/product&product_id=50 "ModMiner Quad"]. BTCFPGA. Retrieved January 30, 2013.</ref> || 20 || 0.75 || 40<ref name="mmq" /> || 1,069<ref name="mmq" /><br />
|-<br />
! Terasic DE2-115<br />
| 80<ref>Fpgaminer (May 4, 2011). [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5379.msg105544#msg105544 "Re: FPGA mining"]. Bitcointalk.org. Retrieved February 7, 2013.</ref> || || 0.13 || || 595<ref name="de2">[http://www.terasic.com.tw/cgi-bin/page/archive.pl?No=502 "Altera DE2-115 Development and Education Board"]. Terasic. Retrieved January 30, 2013.</ref><br />
|-<br />
! X6500 FPGA Miner <br />
| 400<ref name="x65" /> || 23.25 || 0.72 || 17.2<ref name="x65" /> || 550<ref name="x65">[http://store.fpgamining.com/ "FPGA Mining Store"]. FPGA Mining. Retrieved January 30, 2013.</ref><br />
|-<br />
! ZTEX USB-FPGA Module 1.15b<br />
| 90<ref name="miner" /> || || 0.27 || || 325<ref>http://shop.ztex.de/product_info.php?cPath=21&products_id=62</ref><br />
|-<br />
! ZTEX USB-FPGA Module 1.15x<br />
| 215<ref name="miner" /> || || 0.52 || || 406<ref>http://shop.ztex.de/product_info.php?cPath=21&products_id=66</ref><br />
|-<br />
! ZTEX USB-FPGA Module 1.15y<br />
| 860<ref name="miner">http://www.ztex.de/btcminer/</ref> || || 0.65 || || 1,304<ref name="1.15y">http://shop.ztex.de/product_info.php?cPath=21&products_id=74</ref><br />
|}<br />
<br />
== ASIC ==<br />
<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align:center"<br />
|- <br />
! Product !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! Mhash/s/$ !! Watts !! Price !! Shipping !! Comm ports<br />
|-<br />
! ASICMiner device(s)<br />
|| ? || ? || ? || ? || ? || {{No}} || ?<br />
|-<br />
! Avalon ASIC #1<br />
| 66,300<ref>http://garzikrants.blogspot.com/2013/02/avalon-miner-power-usage.html</ref> || 107 || 52.34<ref>http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=68000%2F1299</ref> || 620W<ref>http://garzikrants.blogspot.com/2013/02/avalon-miner-power-usage.html</ref> || 1,299<ref name="avalon">[http://shop.avalon-asic.com/catalog/product/view/id/1 "Avalon ASIC"]. Avalon. Retrieved January 30, 2013.</ref> || {{Yes}} || Ethernet, Wifi<br />
|-<br />
! Avalon ASIC #2<br />
| 60,000<ref name="avalon" /> || 97 || 40.02<ref>http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=60000%2F1499</ref> || 620W<ref>http://garzikrants.blogspot.com/2013/02/avalon-miner-power-usage.html</ref> || 1,499<ref name="avalon" /> || {{No}} || Ethernet, Wifi<br />
|-<br />
! Avalon ASIC #3<ref name="avalon" /><br />
| || || || || || {{No}} ||<br />
|-<br />
! BitForce Jalapeno<br />
| 4,500<ref name="jap">[http://www.butterflylabs.com/order-form-bitforce-sc-jalapeno "Pre Order Form – BitForce 'Jalapeno' "]. Butterfly Labs. Retrieved January 30, 2013.</ref> || ??? || 30.20<ref>http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=4500%2F149</ref> || ???<ref name="watts">http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1b8hvt/bfl_josh_updates_on_asic_status_full_transcript/</ref> || 149<ref name="jap" /> || {{No|Any day now}} || USB<br />
|-<br />
! BitForce Little Single<br />
| 30,000<ref name="ls" /> || || 46.22<ref>http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=30000%2F649</ref> || || 649<ref name="ls">[http://www.butterflylabs.com/pre-order-form-bitforce-little-single-sc/ "Pre Order Form – BitForce 'Little' Single SC"]. Butterfly Labs. Retrieved January 30, 2013.</ref> || {{Yes}} || USB<br />
|-<br />
! BitForce Single 'SC'<br />
| 60,000<ref name="sc">[http://www.butterflylabs.com/order-form-bitforce-sc-single "Pre Order Form – BitForce Single 'SC' "]. Butterfly Labs. Retrieved January 30, 2013.</ref> || ??? || 46.18<ref>http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=60000%2F1299</ref> || ???<ref name="watts" /> || 1,299<ref name="sc" /> || {{No|Any day now}} || USB<br />
|-<br />
! BitForce Mini Rig 'SC'<br />
| 1,500,000<ref name="rig" /> || ??? || 50.16<ref>http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=1500000%2F29899</ref> || ???<ref name="watts" /> || 29,899<ref name="rig">[http://www.butterflylabs.com/order-form-bitforce-sc-mini-rig "Pre Order Form – BitForce Mini Rig 'SC' "]. Butterfly Labs. Retrieved January 30, 2013.</ref> || {{No|Any day now}} || ?<br />
|}<br />
<br />
==Graphics cards==<br />
=== Popular Mining Cards ===<br />
This information has been included to make choosing a card easier. The cards selected are generally readily available online. Once you have purchased a card or cards, use the tables below to compare different configurations and setups.<br />
=== genBTC's Card Comparison Spreadsheet ===<br />
The purpose of this chart is 1) Update used prices 2) To consolidate multiple sources of information into an at-a-glance format. 3) Provide 3 hashrate columns to make it easier to figure out performance before 4) You use this table to make informed decisions about purchasing a card for mining.<br><br />
Only edit Common MH/s. MH/s #1 and MH/s #2 were outsourced.<br><br />
I will continue to work on this chart, and it is a work in progress. <br><br />
Created February 25th 2013, Updated February 27th 2013 <br><br />
All the cards below are AMD (ATI) Radeon HD <br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! MH/s #1 !! MH/s #2 !! Common MH/s !! TDP(W) !! Shaders !! Stock Clock !! Ebay $ !! MSRP $ !! Cheapest $<br />
|----<br />
|5770||212.83||||200||108||800||850 MHz||$178?||$159||$ 50<br />
|----<br />
|5830||302||220||275||175||1120||800 MHz||$105||$239||$ 65<br />
|----<br />
|5850||346.16||270||330||151||1440||725 MHz||$101||$259||$ 90<br />
|----<br />
|5870||393||420||380||188||1600||850 MHz||$165||$379||$125<br />
|----<br />
|5970||704||700||750||294||3200||725 MHz||$248||$599||$269<br />
|----<br />
|6750||167.59||||170||86||720||725 MHz||$ 67||$109||<br />
|----<br />
|6770||196.67||||200||108||800||900 MHz||$ 84||$135||<br />
|----<br />
|6850||213.7||||250||127||960||775 MHz||$104||$179||<br />
|----<br />
|6870||278.31||||300||150||1120||900 MHz||$124||$239||<br />
|----<br />
|6950||369||350||350||200||1408||800 MHz||$171||$299||<br />
|----<br />
|6970||397||400||385||250||1536||880 MHz||$172||$369||<br />
|----<br />
|6990||772||700||750||375||3072||830 MHz||$372||$699||<br />
|----<br />
|7750||123||200||125||55||512||800 MHz||$ 93||$109||Newegg $89<br />
|----<br />
|7770||||250||200||80||640||1000 MHz||$ 98||$159||Newegg $119<br />
|----<br />
|7850||||375||300||130||1024||860 MHz||$177||$249||Newegg $169<br />
|----<br />
|7870||||||400||175||1280||1000 MHz||$227||$349||Newegg $229<br />
|----<br />
|7950||||450||500||200||1792||850 MHz||$307||$449||Newegg $299<br />
|----<br />
|7970||685||600||650||250||2048||925 MHz||$391||$549||Newegg $399<br />
|----<br />
|7990||||||1200||555||4096||925 MHz||$777||$999||Newegg $899<br />
|----<br />
|}<br />
MH/s #1 taken from Joseph Woodrell's chart directly below this one.<br><br />
MH/s #2 taken from https://bitclockers.com/calc <br><br />
TDP, Shaders, Stock Clock comes from http://www.hwcompare.com/ & www.AMD.com to Verify<br><br />
Ebay Price taken from http://cgi5.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?SellHub3 and questionable prices marked with a ? <br><br />
Cheapest $ = Used price. Sourced from All over the internet as if I had to buy the card today.<br><br />
Newegg Price means NEW & price was taken from the LOWEST priced card on 2/25/2013 @ 8 PM EST, any rebate disregarded<br><br />
<br />
=== Card Comparison Spreadsheet ===<br />
This spreadsheet performs several calculations and displays a visualization graph of a theoretical mining rig over time. It can be used to visualize any "what if" scenarios to better wrap your head around which card is the best choice under different conditions. Bright Yellow Boxes are editable, and affect the calculations. Dark Yellow Boxes are editable for notation, but don't affect the calculations. The Green highlighted card is the best under those conditions, the Blue highlight is second best, the Orange highlight is third best. Higher MHash/s performance can be obtained for each card through overclocking, but that drives up the wattage draw of the cards, and I did not have that complete dataset so I used the "average" MHash/s values listed here. <br /><br />
V1.5 - 1 Jan, 2012 - by. Joseph Woodrell <br />
[http://www.woodrell.com/joe/bitcoin/mining_sheet.zip Card Selection Spreadsheet]<br />
<br /><br />
==== Single Card Setups ====<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! Price <ref name=amazon>Price from http://ebay.com/ on 2012-02-10 using an average of completed items, minus the top and bottom 20% to avoid spikes and give a truer average.</ref> !! Availability !! Avg. Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! Mhash/s/$<br />
|----<br />
|5770<br />
|$136<br />
|Moderate<br />
|212.83<br />
|1.45<br />
|1.56 <br />
|----<br />
|5830<br />
|$92<br />
|Moderate<br />
|302<br />
|1.68<br />
|3.28<br />
|----<br />
|5850<br />
|$114.96<br />
|Limited<br />
|346.16<br />
|1.92<br />
|3.0<br />
|----<br />
|5870<br />
|$190.16<br />
|Limited<br />
|393<br />
|1.97<br />
|2.066 <br />
|----<br />
|5970<br />
|$421<br />
|Limited<br />
|704<br />
|2.2<br />
|1.67 <br />
|----<br />
|6750<br />
|$116<br />
|Easy<br />
|167.59<br />
|<br />
|1.44 <br />
|----<br />
|6770<br />
|$115<br />
|Easy<br />
|196.67<br />
|<br />
|1.71 <br />
|----<br />
|6850<br />
|$160<br />
|Easy<br />
|213.7<br />
|1.35<br />
|1.34 <br />
|----<br />
|6870<br />
|$190<br />
|Easy<br />
|278.31<br />
|1.73<br />
|1.46 <br />
|----<br />
|6930<br />
|$180<br />
|Limited<br />
|350<br />
|<br />
|1.94<br />
|----<br />
|6950<br />
|$230<br />
|Easy<br />
|369<br />
|1.94<br />
|1.6 <br />
|----<br />
|6970<br />
|$271.89<br />
|Easy<br />
|397<br />
|1.89<br />
|1.46 <br />
|----<br />
|6990<br />
|$622.99<br />
|Limited<br />
|772<br />
|1.93<br />
|1.23 <br />
|----<br />
|7750<br />
|$110<br />
|Easy<br />
|123<br />
|2.46<br />
|1.12 <br />
|----<br />
|7970<br />
|$420<br />
|Easy<br />
|685<br />
|<br />
|1.22 <br />
|----<br />
|}<br />
<br />
==== Multi-Card Setups ====<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! Price <ref name=amazon/> !! Availability !! Avg. Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! Mhash/s/$<br />
|----<br />
|5830x2<br />
|$360<br />
|Moderate<br />
|525<br />
|<br />
|1.46 <br />
|----<br />
|5850x4<br />
|$644<br />
|Limited<br />
|1360<br />
|1.94<br />
|2.11 <br />
|----<br />
|5850x6<br />
|$996<br />
|Limited<br />
|2130<br />
|<br />
| <br />
|----<br />
|5870x2<br />
|$700<br />
|Limited<br />
|787.5<br />
|0.84<br />
|1.13 <br />
|----<br />
|6770x2<br />
|$274<br />
|Easy<br />
|464<br />
|<br />
|1.69 <br />
|----<br />
|6950x4<br />
|$1,000<br />
|Easy<br />
|1316<br />
|1.51<br />
|1.32 <br />
|----<br />
|6970x2<br />
|$700<br />
|Easy<br />
|769<br />
|1.6<br />
|1.10 <br />
|----<br />
|6990x2<br />
|$1,540<br />
|Limited<br />
|1568<br />
|1.7<br />
|1.02 <br />
|----<br />
|6990x3<br />
|$2,310<br />
|Limited<br />
|2094<br />
|1.8<br />
|0.91 <br />
|----<br />
|7970x3<br />
|$1680<br />
|Easy<br />
|2050<br />
|2.41<br />
|1.16 <br />
|----<br />
|7970x2<br />
|$868<br />
|Easy<br />
|1060<br />
|<br />
| <br />
|----<br />
|}<br />
<br />
===AMD (ATI)===<br />
Stream SDK 2.5 seems to have resolved many of the problems with earlier versions. Everyone's setups will be unique so this should only be a guide or starting point, not an absolute. <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! Mhash/s/$<ref name='amazon_20110625'/> !! Watts !! Clock !! SP !! SDK !! Slot !! Miner !! Notes <br />
|-<br />
| 3410 || 0.89 || 0.074 || ? || 12(?) || 222 || 40 || 1.4 beta || PCI-E 1.1 x8 || A custom Brook+ miner || Using 16,384 length streams<br />
|-<br />
| 3XXX || || || || || || || || || || OpenCL Not Supported<br />
|-<br />
| 42XX || || || || || || || || || || OpenCL Not Supported (integrated/mobile GPU)<br />
|-<br />
| 4350 || 6.93 || 0.346 ||0.16 || 20 || 575 || 80 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors<br />
|-<br />
| 4350 || 7.2 || || || || 600 || || 1.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || cgminer/Linux || default settings<br />
|-<br />
| 4350 || 8.14 || -|| 0.19 || - || 730 || 80 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Diablo/Windows7 || -w 32. Model: Asus EAH4350 Silent. Memory at 400MHz. Runs at 60°C with ambient at 25°C.<br />
|-<br />
| 4350 || 10.7 || -|| - || - || 730 || - || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || CGMiner/Windows7 || -v -w 64 Voltage set at 0.900 core set at 800MHZ and memory set to 200MHZ<br />
|-<br />
| 4550 || 7.23 || 0.289 ||0.13 || 25 || 600 || 80 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors<br />
|-<br />
| 4550 || 7.8 || || || || || || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer /phoenix || worksize=64 VECTORS <br />
|-<br />
| 4570M || 8.02 || 0.297 || ? || 27 || 680 || 80 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Diablo/Windows7 || -w 64, SDK 2.4, Cat 11.4. Model: Sony Vaio NW<br />
|-<br />
| 4570M || 9.6 || 0.300|| ? || 32 || 825(OC) || 80 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Diablo/Windows7 || -w 64, SDK 2.4, Cat 11.4. Model: Sony Vaio NW. OC core 680->825. U/C memory 800->500.<br />
|-<br />
| 4650 || 31.33 || 0.653|| 0.44 || 48 || 650 || 320 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors<br />
|-<br />
| 4670 || 36.14 || 0.613|| 0.34 || 59 || 750 || 320 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors<br />
|-<br />
| 4670 || 40.11 || 0.679|| 0.38 || 59 || 800 || 320 || - || AGP x8 || poclbm/Ubuntu 10.10 w/ H == 0 mod || -w 32 -f 0, don't use vectors [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.msg85236#msg85236 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 4670 || 50 || - || 0.47 || 60 || 800 || 320 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer || 2 miners set up i7 920 (130W), CPU: Ufasoft, GPU: OpenCL; the CPU is getting about 40 Mhash/s while the GPU goes from 10-20 Mhash/s<br />
|-<br />
| 4730 || 72.29 || 0.657|| ? || 110 || 750 || 640 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
| 4770 || 72.29 || 0.904|| 0.72 || 80 || 750 || 640 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
| 4830 || 55.42 || 0.583|| || 95 || 575 || 640 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
| 4830 || 61.7 || - || || - || 700 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm-mod || Fedora 14<br />
|-<br />
| 4830 || 64.9 || - || - || - || 700 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm-mod || Fedora 14<br />
|-<br />
| 4830 || 66.12 || 0.503|| || 105 || 700 || 1005 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - ||<br />
|-<br />
| 4850 || 75.30 || 0.685 || || 110 || 625 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
| 4850 || 84.3 || 0.766 || || 110 || 725 || 300 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - || -w64 fan at 70% temp 73C, stock voltage -gui miner<br />
|-<br />
| 4850 || 87.4 || 0.79 || - || 110 || 785 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer || Phoenix; -k poclbm<br />
|-<br />
| 4850 || 90.1 || 0.819 || || 110 || 800 || 500 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer || -f 30; Tried phoenix and phatk, got same max<br />
|-<br />
| 4850 || 101 || 0.918 || || 110 || 817 || 500 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer || -f 0, core 817mhz(default 625)@1.123v , mem downclock to 500mhz (default 993) [http://www.smpake.com/?p=6 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 4850x2 || 150.60 || 0.602 || || 250 || 625 || 1600 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
| 4860 || 67.47 || 0.519|| || 130 || 700 || 640 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F8F8FF;"| 4870 || 78 || 0.520|| || 150 || - || - || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/Vista 64bit || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source]<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F8F8F8;"| 4870 || 88 || || || 140 || std || 800 || 12.3.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.50 / 64bit OS X pyopencl / poclbm || Standard Mac Pro 3,1 with Apple HD4870 upgrade. Flags: FASTLOOP WORKSIZE=64 AGGRESSION=5 (don't use vectors, and hash rate drops to 60-70 if browser windows are visible, speeds up to 88 if you hide them!<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F8F8FF;"| 4870 || 90.36 || 0.602|| || 150 || 750 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || clmine || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F8F8FF;"| 4870 || 92.84 || 0.6189333(?)|| || 150(?) || 830(OC) || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 || -k poclbm AGGRESSION=5 (Windows 7 64-Bit, GPU OC 750->830MHz, VRAM UC 900->450MHz, BIOS modded)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F8F8F8;"| 4870 || 96 || || || 140 || 750 || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Smartcoin r657s / phoenix 1.50 / Linuxcoin 0.2b final || Powercolor @ GPU 830 MHz/ MEM 200 Mhz @ 80% FAN @ 69 temp @ Flags: -k phatk bfi_int=false FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256 AGGRESSION=11 <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F8F8F8;"| 4870 || 104 || || || 140 || 750 || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Smartcoin r657s / DiabloMiner / Linuxcoin 0.2b final || Powercolor @ GPU 830 MHz/ MEM 200 Mhz @ 80% FAN @ 69 temp @ Flags: -v 1 -w 256 <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F8F8FF;"| 4870 || 104.2 || ?|| || ? || 830(OC) || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || Windows 7 64-Bit, GPU Core OC to 830 MHz, GPU Memory UC to 200 MHz By MSI AfterBurner. Card: Gainward Golden Sample. @70%Fan we have 55 GPU temp.<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F8F8FF;"| 4870 || 104.6 || 0.872|| || 120 || 830(OC) || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 256 -f 1, Windows 7 64-Bit, GPU Core OC to 830 MHz, GPU Memory UC to 190 MHz (saves 30 watts at outlet)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F8F8F8;"| 4870 || 112 || || || 140 || 750 || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || BAMT 0.5c / cgminer || Powercolor @ GPU 875 MHz/ MEM 300 Mhz/ 1,25VDC @ 100% FAN @ 65 temp @ Flags: -v 1 -w 256 <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F8F8FF;"| 4870x2 || 180.6|| 0.632|| || 286 || 800 || 1600 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F8F8FF;"| 4870x2 || 180.72|| 0.632|| || 286 || 750 || 1600 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
| 4870x2 || 203 || || || || 850(OC) || 1600 || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm-mod ver. 20 april 2011|| Gainward / Win7 x64 / -w 256 -f 1 / 850MHz GPU - 300MHz Mem - 1,262V - 100% fun : 72C<br />
|-<br />
| 4890 || 97.1 || 0.511|| || 190 || 870(OC) || 1050 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-01-21 Solo settings || Sapphire fab. No flags options helped. Close all browsers and do full restart of GUIMiner and then Bitcoin via GUIMiner server starter or the browsers GPU accl. will limit to 56~ ish Mhash/s - I can now start browser without slowdowns<br />
|-<br />
| 4890 || 102.41 || 0.539|| || 190 || 850 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
| 4890 || 108.3 || 0.57|| || 190 || 975 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
| 4890 || 121.5 || -|| || 190 || 1025 (OC) || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || no flags, Vcore 1.4 <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFF8EF;"| 5450 || 11.99|| 0.631|| || 19 || 650 || 80 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFF8EF;"| 5450 || 13.74|| || - || - || 700 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/Linuxcoin v0.2 || -v -w128 tried several options, seems to work best.<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFF8EF;"| 5450 || 14.12|| || - || - || 700 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix/Linuxcoin v0.2 || Flags: "DEVICE=0 VECTORS AGGRESSION=4 -v FASTLOOP BFI_INT WORKSIZE=64" Kernel: "phatk"<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFF8EF;"| 5450 || 15.36|| || - || - || 700 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix || Flags: "DEVICE=0 VECTORS AGRESSION=8 FASTLOOP BFI_ING WORKSIZE=128" Kernel: "phatk" - MagicSata<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFF8EF;"| 5450 || 18.10|| || - || - || 774 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 1 774.66MHz/300.37MHz<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFF8EF;"| 5470 || 17.10|| || - || - || - || - || - || - || poclbm || -v -w 128 MobileGPU<br />
|-<br />
| 5550 || 40.59 || 1.041|| || 39 || 550 || 320 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
| 5550 || 62.10 || - || - || - || 700 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix || 700MHz core 800MHz ram, phatk mod, Flags: "-k phatk worksize=128 vectors aggression=4 bfi_int"<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 59.96 || 1.538|| || 39 || 650 || 400 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 62 || 1.59|| || 39 || 650 || 400 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 OpenCL/Linux x86_64 || -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS AGGRESSION=4 -v FASTLOOP BFI_INT WORKSIZE=64<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 64 || 1.641|| || 39 || 650 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 73 || 1.872|| || 39 || 700 || 400 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 OpenCL/Linux x86_64 || -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS AGGRESSION=4 -v FASTLOOP BFI_INT WORKSIZE=64<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 86.3 || 2.397|| || 36 || 775 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.75 OpenCL/Windows 7 x64 (no Aero) ||-k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 -v WORKSIZE=256 Fan 100% 86C Undervolted @ 0.96v using Sapphire Trixx<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 94 || stock || || || 880 || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUI Miner 02-12/Windows 7 x86 || -v -w128 75C<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 102 || 1.46(+)|| || 75(-) || 950 || 400 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 OpenCL/Windows 7 x86 (no Aero) || -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS AGGRESSION=7 -v FASTLOOP BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 (Reference Sapphire card, 2 additional 120mm coolers, temperature is 79-82C)<br />
|-<br />
| 5650 || 48 || 1.37|| || 35(?) || - || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source] [http://www.notebookcheck.net/ATI-Mobility-Radeon-HD-5650.23697.0.html source] -- not TDP but load<br />
|-<br />
| 5650 || 61.2 || || || 35 || || || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.50 OpenCL/Windows 7 x64 || -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128 AGGRESSION=9<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EEFFEE;"| 5670 || 71.49 || 1.117|| || 64 || 775 || 400 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EEFFEE;"| 5670 || 72 || 1.64|| || 44 || 850 || - || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm-mod (Win7-64) || Sapphire 100287VGAL card is low power<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EEFFEE;"| 5670 || 85|| || - || - || 900 || 400 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EEFFEE;"| 5670 || 91|| || - || - || 890 || 400 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer 2011-06-09 poclbm catalyst 11.2 win7 x86 || -v -f 0 -w 128<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EEFFEE;"| 5670 || 100|| || - || - || 890 || 400 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || cgminer 1.5.6 || GPU/Mem 890/800 temp 72C<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EEFFEE;"| 5670 || 103 || -|| || - || 900/275 || 400 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x1 || phoenix-1.50 / phatk-mod / Ubuntu 11.04 || VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=256 / small fan, under 50 deg C, no voltage tweaks... catfish<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EEFFEE;"| 5670 || 127.8|| || - || - || 850 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Windows 7 (64bit) Phoenix 2.0 || Aggression=11 Worksize=128 Fastloop=False Opencl<br />
|-<br />
| 5750 || 105 || - || - || - || - || - || - || - || poclbm || Apple iMac 27inch (Mid 2010), Mac OSX 10.7 Lion <br />
|-<br />
| 5750 || 116.24 || 1.352|| || 86 || 700 || 720 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
| 5750 || 137 || ||- || - || 710 || 720 || - || PCI-E 1.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128 using stock memory and GPU clocks<br />
|-<br />
| 5750 || 146.4 || || - || - || 775 || 720 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-21 || -v -w128, AMD Catalyst overclock (775MHz GPU / 1225 MHz Memory)<br />
|-<br />
| 5750 || 154.56 || 1.45|| || 106 || 830 || 720 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - || -v -w128 -f20 underclocked memory clocks from 1150MHz to 300MHz<br />
|-<br />
| 5750 || 170 || - || || - || 870 || 720 || - || PCI-E 1.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128 patched BIOS to underclock memory to 300MHz<br />
|-<br />
| 5750 || 173 || - || ||- || 875 || 720 || - || PCI-E 1.1 x16 || phoenix || 875/300 w/MSI Afterburner, BFI_INT VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 FASTLOOP=FALSE -k phatk<br />
|-<br />
| 5750 || 177 || - || ||- || 910/575 || 720 || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || phoenix 1.5.6 || PowerColor GoGreen+fan, MSI Afterburner 2.2Beta, -k phatk VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 FASTLOOP=FALSE WORKSIZE=64<br />
|-<br />
| 5750 || 190 || - || ||- || 930/290 || - || atistream sdk || PCI-E 1.1 x16 || poclbm || 930gpu / 290mem (O.S. Ubuntu 10.10 x64, overclock gpu & underclock mem) with poclbm options -v -f 0 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
| 5750 Vapor-X || 195 || - || - || 125 || 975/300 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 1.1 x16 || cgminer 2.7.5 || (O.S. Ubuntu 12.01 AMD64 dedicated) cgminer options -Q 0 -I 9 -g 2 -w 256 --auto-fan --temp-target 65 --gpu-vddc 1.075 (Fan speed 60~65%)<br />
|-<br />
| 5750x2 CF || 356 || - || ||- || 870 || 720x2 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=28402.0 cgminer v1.5.1] (Win7 64bit) || 870MHz GPU / -I 8 / 2x [http://www.gigabyte.com/products/product-page.aspx?pid=3402#sp GIGABYTE GV-R575SL-1GI] cards + [http://www.gigabyte.com/products/product-page.aspx?pid=3258#sp GIGABYTE GA-790FXTA-UD5] MB + 1x [http://www.noctua.at/main.php?show=productview&products_id=9&lng=en 80mm], 1x [http://www.noctua.at/main.php?show=productview&products_id=16&lng=en 90mm] Noctua coolers<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 156.83 || 1.452|| || 108 || 850 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 171.12 || - || - || - || - || stock || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.7.3/debian gnu/linux 6 squeeze || -k phatk2 DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 180 || 1.406(*)|| || 128(*) || 950(OC) || 800 || 2.4RC1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 30 (*: Overclocked wattage calculated [http://bakkap.free.fr/Misc/wCalc.html here])<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 Hawk || 182 || ||- || - || 875 || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm/GUIMiner/Win7-64 || -v -w 128 (875MHz is stock for 5770 Hawk)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 185 || - || ||- || 850 || 1200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128 FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=7<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 205.58 || - || ||- || 935 || 300 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-04-28 || -v -w 256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 214.5 || 1.95(-)|| || 108(+) || 950 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.50/GUIMiner/Win7-64 || mem underclocked 300 mhz, 1.1vcore, 950mhz core, @69°C/57%FAN VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=12 -k phatk WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 214.7 || 1.95(-)|| || 108(+) || 950 || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / win7x86 || mem underclocked 309 mhz, -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 216.5 || -|| || - || 955 || || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.5 /phatk || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=23067.0 Modified phatk kernel] and stock voltage for Sapphire (1.125V) VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 -k phatk WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 218.35 || -|| || - || 1000 || 1401 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || DiabloMiner || -w 128 -v 2 (Overclocked to 1Ghz core with 1.2 voltage and Scythe Setsugen 2 cooling system)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 223 || 2.23(-)|| || 100(+) || 1050 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer || -v -w256 [http://www.smpake.com/?p=59 source]<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 227 || -|| || - || 1030 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || DiabloMiner || -w 256 -v 2 (Overclocked to 1030 core/300 mem with 1.2 voltage and Scythe Setsugen 2 cooling system)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 233 || 2.23(-)|| || 100(+) || 1050 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 || VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 -k phatk WORKSIZE=256 [http://www.smpake.com/?p=59 source]<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 236 || -|| || - || 1033/275 || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix-1.50 / phatk-mod / Ubuntu 10.04 || VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=256 / big fans, under 75 deg C, no voltage tweaks... catfish<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 240.61 || 2.3632(-)|| || 100(+) || 1080 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x1 || phoenix 1.48 || VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 -k phatk WORKSIZE=256 (OC'd and OV'd 1080/300 1.25v)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 241 || - || - || 100(+) || 1045 || 250 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.50 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 -k phatk WORKSIZE=256 (OC 1020/300) XFX@1.1 volts. +Kernel function improve 5%<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 244 || -|| || - || 1050 || 300 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.75 /phatk2 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=23067.0 Modified phatk kernel] and stock voltage for Sapphire (1.125V) VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=9, Temp 75C, FAN 100% (manual)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770x2 || 425 || - || - || 225(+) || 960 || 800x2 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm (guiminer) Win7x64 || -v -w128 (OC 960/1200)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830M || 120 || -|| || - || 570|| 120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.50 OpenCL/Win7 x64|| -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 244 || 1.36|| || 179 || 800 || 1000 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 OpenCL/Linux x86_64 || -k phatk DEVICE=1 VECTORS AGGRESSION=6 -v FASTLOOP WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 245 || 1.28|| || 192 || 880 || 900 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm (guiminer) || -v -w 256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 248 || 1.29|| || 192 || 880 || 500 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.46 || -k poclbm VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 256 || -|| || - || 900 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 || -k poclbm VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=7<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 267 || -|| || - || 875 || 1000 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x1 || Phoenix 1.48 OpenCL/Linux x86_64 || -k phatk DEVICE=1 VECTORS AGGRESSION=6 -v FASTLOOP WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 272 || 1.52|| || 179 || 875 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / LinuxCoin || 275Mhz Memory clock, 1.125 V (from 1.163), VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 275 || 1.5714|| || 175 || 900 || 500 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm (guiminer) Win7x64 || -v -w64 -f10, XFX stock w/ v2.4 SDK = 230Mh/s, v2.1 SDK = +10Mh/s, overclocking core clock by 100 = +30Mh/s, underclocking memory to 500 (ran cooler), and changing workload to -w64 = +5Mh/s.<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 285 || - ||1.58 || - || 960 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.47 / poclbm / Win7 64 || VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 290 || -|| || - || 930 || - || 2.2 || PCI-E x16/x4/x1 || GUIMiner / phoenix 1.5 / POCLBM / Win 7 64 || POCLBM VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 AGGRESSION=12 FASTLOOPS=false / Memory 300Mhz, VCore standard<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 290 || -|| || - || 996 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.4 / poclbm / Win7 64 || VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 295 || -|| || - || 980 || 1120 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIMiner / poclbm / Win XP 32 || Extra flags -v -w 128<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 297 || -|| || - || 970 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer / phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 64 || 300Mhz Memory clock, 44% fan-speed, -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=8 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 300 || -|| || - || 960|| 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIMiner / poclbm / Win 7 64 || Extra flags -v -w 256 (Sapphire Extreme 71 degrees @ 52% fan)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 300 || -|| || - || 970 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.47 / pheonix 1.48 / Win7 64 || (sapphire xtreme) VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 300 || -|| || - || 970 || 1120 || 2.1 || PCI-E x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 64 || 300Mhz memory clock BFI_INT AGGRESSION=12 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 305 || -|| || - || 984 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.4 / phatk / Win7 32 || 400Mhz Memory clock, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 307 || -|| || - || 996 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 64 || VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 307 || 2.25 || 2.55 || 125 || 965 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || cgminer 2.0.5 / Win7 64 || Mem @ 300/Stock voltage/Entire system 200W<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 308 || -|| || - || 990 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.50 / poclbm / Xubuntu 11.04 x64 || VECTORS AGGRESSION=11 BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 308 || -|| || - || 990 || 375 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 32 || @ stock voltage VECTORS AGGRESSION=11 -v FASTLOOP=false BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 black || 310 || ||- || - || 990 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x8 || LinuxCoin 0.2b, phoenix/phatk || (XFX Brand) -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 AGGRESSION=11 FASTLOOPS=false<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 311 || -|| || - || 1000 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.50 / phatk / Linux || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 315 || -|| || - || 970 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.6.1 / phatk2 / CrunchBang Linux || memory @ 300mhz VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=9 WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 316 || ||- || - || 1015 || 375 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 32 || @ stock voltage VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 -v FASTLOOP=false BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 319 || -|| 1.77 || - || 1030 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Xp 64 || 1.2v 355Mhz Memory, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 321 || -|| || - || 1000 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.50 / phatk-mod / Linux || 1000Mhz GPU, 350Mhz RAM, 1.15V, 90% fan, ~60c Temp, VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128; phatk kernel found [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=25135.0 here]<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 323 || || || || 900 (OC) || || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.5 Win7x64 || (500Mhz RAM), ~61c Temp, 57% fan, BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 -v WORKSIZE=64<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 (127$) || 325 || 1.98 || 2.57Mh/$ || 165W || 1040MHz || 200MHz || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || Guiminer/phatk-[http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=25135.0 mod] w7 64bit || -k phatk AGGRESSION=12 VECTORS2 WORKSIZE=128 stock volt, watercooled 53C<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 328 || - || - || - || 1040 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || LinuxCoin 0.2.1b / phoenix / phatk || 1.195 V, RAM @ 325 Mhz, fan @90%, no case, extra 10K RPM fan (62 deg.C in full-load); options: -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=256; brand: Sapphire Xtreme; bord is stable up to 1060 Mhz ~ 335 MHash, but produces some visual artefacts;<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 331 || - || 4.14 || - || 1010 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 1.0 x16 || WinXP 32 / Phoenix 1.7.5 / phatk2 || Stock Voltage, RAM 300, 64C, Fan 67%, -k phatk2 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=256 FASTLOOP=false (+6Mh w/ Phoenix 1.7.5 over 1.6.2)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 333 || - || - || - || 1040 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || LinuxCoin 0.2.1b / phoenix-1.50 / phatk-[http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=25135.0 mod] || + ~5 Mhash increase using the modified phatk from the user above. I am the same guy with 330 @ 1040 MHz Sapphire Xtreme, all other settings the same, board stable, no increase in rejected<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 334 || -|| || - || 1040 || - || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.75 / phatk 2.2 / Win7 64 || Stock voltage, 208Mhz Memory, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 334 || -|| || - || 1030 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.50 / phatk 2.0 / Win7 64 || Stock voltage, 385Mhz Memory, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=256 BFI_INT -- (upped from 330 achieved with diapolo mod [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=25135.0 here]), now using phatk 2.0 found [http://forum.bitcoin.org/?topic=7964.0 here]<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 342 || - || - || - || 1045 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk 2.2 / WinSvr 2008 R2 64 || Stock voltage, 385Mhz Memory, VECTORS VECTORS4 FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=14 BFI_INT -k phatk-2.2<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830x2 CF || 480 || -|| || - || 800 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Guiminer/ - / Win7 64bit |Guiminer || -v -f70 -w128<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830x2 || 570 || -|| || - || 950 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x8 || Guiminer/ - / Win7 64bit poclbm || poclbm -v -w256 -f10 MEMORYCLOCK 300MHZ GPUCLOCK 950MHZ FAN 52% 72°C <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830x2 || 608 || -|| || - || 990 || - || - || 2x PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 2.0/ phatk2 / Win7 32bit || Stock voltage, 300Mhz Memory, VECTORS GOFFSET AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=256 BFI_INT FAN 51% 69°C (Open ATX case) <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830x6 || 1967 || 1.62 || 1.97 || - || 1020/340 || 1120x6 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x1 || Phoenix 1.7.5/phatk2/BAMT Linux || 100% fan @65C / 1.162V / CCC 11.6 / BFI_INT VECTORS FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 240.77 || 1.595|| 1.49 || 151 || 725 || 1440 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 250.26 || 1.657|| || 151 || 725 || 1440 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || opencl client || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 252 || 1.575|| || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-01-25 || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 255.3 || 1.593|| || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-01-25 || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 264 || 1.748|| || 151 || 725 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 1.0 x8 || guiminer-20110501 || -v -w128<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 280 || 1.75|| || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.3 || with BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 280 || - || ||- || 725 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.50 / Fedora 14 || -v -k poclbm VECTORS AGGRESSION=8 WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT FASTLOOP=true<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 282.75 ||style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 3.06|| - || 92.25|| 666 (UC) || 1440|| 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix/WinXP || undervolted to 0.95V; phatk2 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=256; driver 10.12; [http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=9982.0 clocktweak] for setting values; [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=40056 thread]<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 292 || 1.825|| || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-04-28 -v -f 1 || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 298 || 1.8620|| || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-04-28 -v -f 1 -w 64 || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 300 || 1.5460|| || 194 || 925(OC) || 1440 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 304 || - || || - || 725 (stock) || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || cgminer.exe -v 2 -I 8 -w 256 --gpu-memclock 275 || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 314 || 1.8362|| || 171 || 820(OC) || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 1.0 x8 || poclbm || -v -w128<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 328 || - || || - || 875 @ Stock voltage || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix || 70C @42% fan, mem @ 500mhz; -v -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=8 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=128 <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 330 || - || ||- || 850 @ Stock voltage || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix || EAH5850, miner arguments: -k poclbm DEVICE=1 VECTORS AGGRESSION=8 WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 331 || - || ||- || 725 (Stock) || || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Diablo Win7 64bits|| Sapphire 5850 Xtreme, Arguments: -v 2 -w 192 (by Swapper 2011-07-05)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 335 || 1.8611|| || 180 || 890(OC) || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || poclbm || -v -w128, Memory downclocked to 300Mhz<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 344 || 1.8594|| || 185 || 890(OC) || 1440 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 347 || -|| || - || 876 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer / phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 64 || 300Mhz Memory clock, 50% fan-speed, -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 354 || -|| || - || 900(OC) || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || diablo -v 2 -w 128 || Ubuntu 11.04 64-bit [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=9239.0 Headless], catalyst 11.5, memory downclocked to 300mhz, stock voltage. flashed with atiflash [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9AxNmOy6_0 video]<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 355 || -|| || - || 900(OC) || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk || Ubuntu 11.04 64-bit, Memory downclocked to 200MHz, VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 355 || -|| || - || 900 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Ubuntu 11.04 x64 || 300Mhz Memory clock, 60% fan-speed, -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 356 || -|| || - || 870 (OC)|| 1440 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || cgminer 2.1.2 / Win 7 x64 || 302Mhz Memory clock, 85% fan-speed, Stock Voltage, -I 6 -v 2 -w 256 (2012-02 by Swapper)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 359 || -|| || - || 900 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.50 / phatk / Ubuntu 11.04 x64 || 300Mhz Memory clock, 66% fan-speed, -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 365 || -|| || - || 920 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 64 || 300Mhz memory clock VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 367.5 || -|| || - || 900(OC) || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 1.0 x16 || diablo with bitless's hack, -v 2 -w 128 || RHEL 5U5 x86_64, catalyst 11.5, Sapphire HD 5850 Xtreme, Memory downclocked to 300MHz, core voltage 1.145V, BIOS modded with RBE<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 369.4 || -|| || - || 930 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 1.0 x16 || guiminer / phoenix / phatk / Win7 32 || Catalyst 11.5, XFX HD5850, Memory downclocked to 322MHz, -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 372 || 1.68 || - || 220 @ Wall || 900 || 300 || 2.5 || PCI-E 1.1 x8 || cgminer 2.3.1 from source / Ubuntu 11.11 x86_64 || -I 8 -v 2 -w 256 --- hex-core opteron cpu w/ 12GB RAM and cgminer CPU bug in linux makes power usage a little high ~210w in windows 7 x86_64<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 375 || -|| || - || 940 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.50 / phatk / Ubuntu 10.04 || 300Mhz memory clock VECTORS AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=256 BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 381 || -|| || - || 940 || 1440 || 2.5 || PCI-E 1.0 x16 || phoenix / phatk / Win7 x64 / Catalyst 11.6 || MSI Afterburner 500MHz memory clock,-k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 AGGRESSION=13<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 382 || 1.8454|| || 207 || 995(OC) || 1440 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || phoenix || OC 1.177v on core<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 391 || - || - || 180 || 725 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Win 7 Ultimate x64 / DiabloMiner / Catalyst 12.2 || ASUS DirectCU @ GPU 960 MHz / MEM 300 Mhz @ Voltage 1.2 @ 70% FAN @ 69 temp @ Flags: -v 2,1 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 391 || -|| || - || 1000 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16(@x8) || phoenix 1.5 / phatk / Win7 64 || Mem @ 280, fan @ 100%, Temp @ 71, 1.163 V core, -v -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256, The name is Mautobu<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 392 || -||2.43 || - || 990 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix-svn (AUR) / phatk / Arch Linux || Memory: 180MHz, -v -q 1 -k phatk WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 397 || -|| || - || 950 || 1440 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.1 16x || phoenix 1.5 / phatk 2.2 / Win7 64, catalyst 11.6 || Mem speed 350Mhz, Fan 85%, 70C, 1.083 Vcore, -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=12 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 400 || -|| || - || 1000 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.5 Win7 x64 || Memory 600MHz, Vcore 1.225, 73C, -k phatk WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false, 3% phatk mod<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 404 || -|| || - || 965 || 1440 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.0 x16(@x8) || phoenixsvn / phatk2 / Ubuntu 11.04 / catalyst 11.8 || 5870 bios flash, Mem @322, fan@55%, Temp@83oC, 1.163Vcore, -k phatk2 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 408 || -|| - || - || 999/275 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.50 / phatk-mod / Ubuntu 10.04 || Fan 70%, temp < 60 deg C, Sapphire 5 heatpipe card, same flags as above/below (edit1- oops, no voltage tweaks... edit2- wow, phatk-mod makes a difference... catfish)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 412 || -|| || - || 1010 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 1x>16x || phoenix 1.5 / phatk 3% mod / Win7 64 11.5 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=12 -k phatk <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 414.8 || -|| || - || 1018 || 450 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 16x || GUIMiner / Win7 64 11.7 || I use Sapphire HD5850 Toxic 2GB and for OC TRIXX Sapphire Tweak Utility v4.0.2. 72 deg C, fan 100%, core 1018mhz, mem 450Mhz, stock voltage (1.163). proof: http://img23.imageshack.us/img23/2367/414upload.png GUIMiner parameters: -v -w256 -f1 <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 420 || -|| || - || 1055 || 300 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.0 1x>16x || phoenix 1.5 / phatk 3% mod / Win7 64 11.6 || Fan 80%, 66C, 1.250 Vcore, -k phatk PLATFORM=0 DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=8 And proof: http://i.imgur.com/s9hqs.png<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 431 || -|| || - || 1040 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 4x>16x || phoenix-svn / phatk kernel / Debian Wheezy AMD64 + fglrx 11.6 || fan 100%, vcore 1.1750 V, 72C, VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=15 FASTLOOP=false -k phatk, proof: http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/199/431u.png/<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 432.15 || -|| || - || 1040 || 500 || 2.5.793.1 || PCI-E 2.0 16x || phoenix 1.7.5 / phatk2 kernel / Win7 x64 SP1 || fan 100%, vcore 1.212 V, 69C, VECTORS4 BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=64 -k phatk2, proof: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/18704286/mining%205850.png/ ... Card is REF HIS 5850 ... i mining at this speed for stable but... max unstable (if i play video/flashvideo it will crash) is 436.48Mhash/sec with core 1051 mem 500 vcore 1.237 (same other settings) it's too hot in VRM that not sound good to me... i don't want to kill it for my fun mining ... - Nito Niwatori <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850x2 || 620 || - || || - || 800 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Guiminer ( cl miner ) v2012-02-19 Win7 x64 || MSI OC-Edition, -v -w 128 <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850x2 || 702 || - || - || - || 905 (OC)|| 1440 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 (x2) || phoenix 2.0.0 / Win 7 x32 || ASUS DirectCU: 304Mhz Memory clock, 66% fan-speed, Voltage Tweak, AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256 (https://www.dropbox.com/s/9u6f2jz3sz1poxb/5850.jpg)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850x2 || 720 || -|| || - || 875 (OC)|| 1440 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || cgminer 2.1.2 / Win 7 x64 || 302Mhz Memory clock, 85% fan-speed, Stock Voltage, -I 6 -v 2 -w 256 (2012-02 by Swapper)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850x3 || 1,010 || -|| || - || 850 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 (x3) || GUIMiner || -v -w128 | MSI Afterburner settings: 850MHz core clock and 500MHz memory clock <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850x4 || 1360 || 1.94|| || 700@wall || 900 || || || || poclbm|| <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850x6 || 2,135 || -|| || - || 900 || - || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.0 (6 total, 4 full length, 2 @ PCIE1x with risers || GUIMiner 24/8/2011 - poclbm || -v -f1 -w128 | Win 7 64Bit, Gigabyte GA-890FXA-UD5 motherboard, 4gb ram, AM3 cpu, Kingston SSD, Catalyst 11.8 drivers, guiminer switches: -v -f1 -w128, MSI Afterburner settings: 900MHz core clock and 1000MHz memory clock, cable risers required to fit all 6 cards, fans 100% Proof: http://i.imgur.com/6s7zv.jpg <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870M || 152.5 || -|| || - || 750(OC) || 1000 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || gui-miner (win-7) ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870M || 189.2 || -|| || - || 850(OC) || 1000 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Wins 7 64/gui-miner (win-7) || -v -w128 -f0 Graphics Overdrive setting 700->850 core clock & 900->1030memory clock . +35mhs over stock settings<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 313 || 1.665|| || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo/Linux || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 313.65 || 1.668||1.65 || 188 || 850 || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 340 || 1.809|| || 188 || 850 || 1600 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 343 || 1.824|| || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo/Linux || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 355 || 1.888|| || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/Linux || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 360 || 1.6822|| || 214 || 970 || 700 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL w7-64 || -f 0 -v -w 128 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=6144.msg91959#msg91959 source]<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 379 || 2.015|| || 188 || 850 || 1600 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha || -D -G2<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 397 || -|| || - || 930 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=10 WORKSIZE=128<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 400 || 1.9047|| || 210 || 950 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || Phoenix 1.3 || -k poclbm VECTORS AGGRESSION=7 FASTLOOP BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 408 || 1.8888|| || 216 || 980 || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm/Win7x64 || -f 20 -v -w 128, BIT_ALIGN, BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 414 || 1.9255|| || 215 || 975 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer/w7x64 || -k poclbm -v -w 256 -f 1 VECTORS BITALIGN BFI_INT -- Memory Clock 300<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 420 || 2.0000|| || 210 || 950 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=14 WORKSIZE=256 -- Memory Clock 300Mhz<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 421 || 1.9581|| || 215 || 975 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.47 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 -k phatk<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 421.5 || 2.007|| || 201 || 950 || 1600 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha || -D -G2 (GPU OC to 900, memory downclocked to 900)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 430 || || || || 980 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.48/Windows 7 64 || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=14 WORKSIZE=256 -- Memory Clock 300Mhz<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 432 || || || || 985 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.73/Windows 7 64 || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128 Memory Clock=900Mhz Asus 76C Fan=60% 65F ambient<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 435 || -|| || - || 990 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || LinuxCoin v0.2b phoenix/phatk || (Powercolor brand) -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 AGGRESSION=11 FASTLOOPS=false<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 437 || || 1.90|| || 960 || - || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x1 || phoenix 1.50 + phatk || Card is clocked with BIOS flash @ 960Mhz Core and 300Mhz Memory. More information and pictures: http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=7216.msg324521#msg324521 <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 438 || 1.9819|| || 221 || 1000(OC) || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm/Linux || -v -w 64 -f 1<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 440 || 2.0000|| || 220 || 995 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 445 || 2.28||2.34 || 195 || 1005 || 335 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x4 || Ubuntu 11.04 phoenix/phatk || (Asus brand, volts = 1'072) -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 AGGRESSION=12 FASTLOOPS=false -a 7 (-a 10)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 453 || || || || 980 || 1600 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.50/Windows 7 64 catalyst 11.6 phatk 2.2 || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=256 FASTLOOPS=false -- Memory Clock 350Mhz Vcore 1.163v<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 458 || -|| || - || 1040 || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm/Windows 7 64 || -v -w 256 -f 1 Crossfired, Water cooled, 916 Mhash/s total. Best dual gpu setup me thinks? The name is Mautobu.<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 460 || || || || 1050 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Guiminer || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=14 WORKSIZE=256 -- Memory Clock 300Mhz vcore @ 1225mV<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 460 || || || || 1020 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.50/Windows 7 64 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=256 -k phatk -- Memory Clock 300Mhz vcore @ 1225mV, 3% phatk mod<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 461 || || || || 1000 || 1600 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.75/Windows 7 64 || -k phatk2 (phatk 2.2) VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=9 WORKSIZE=128, Memory Clock=213, stock voltage<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 481 || || || || 1050 || 1600 || 2.5 || PCI-E 1x || phoenix 1.75/Windows 7 64 || -k phatk2 (phatk 2.2) VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=64 AGGRESSION=20 [MSI HD 5870 Ref Design vs Zalman VF3000A 1200mv Mem 600MHz]<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870x2 (CF) || 864 || -|| || - || 900 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer || -k phatk VECTORS FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=7 BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128 (Same flags per GPU)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870x2 (Ares) || 620 || -|| || - || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer || -v -w 128<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870x2 (Ares) || 826 || 0.751|| || 1100 || 950 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.4 w/ Phtak || AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT Memory @ 300MHz<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870x2 (Ares) || 826 || 1.18|| || 700 || 935 || 3200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 w/ Phatk || AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=256 VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false, memory @ 319 MHz, Windows 7 32-bit<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870x2 (Ares) || 878 || 0.585|| || 1500 || 1000 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.7 w/ Phtak || AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT Memory @ 300MHz<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870x4 || 1784 || || 1.29|| || 960 || - || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x1 || phoenix 1.50 + phatk + [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=7964.0 Version 2.2 Improvement] || Cards are clocked with BIOS flash @ 960Mhz Core and 300Mhz Memory. More information and pictures: http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=7216.msg324521#msg324521 <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870x6 || 2568 || -|| || 1200 || 970 || -|| 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/debian32bit || -v -w128, voltage default, Mem downclocked to 300 MHz, Fan 80-90% (+ 4x12cm fun 1900rpm), Temp 6x 70-75C. Whole computer comsumpts 1280Watt. Using PCI-E risers 16x-16x to use 6 GPU cards<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 530 || 1.803||0.53 ? || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.4.595.10 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/201103.beta3/Windows || -v -w128 -f60<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 535.06 || 1.820|| || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 560 || 1.905|| || 294 || 725 || 3200 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 565 || 1.922|| || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine2 || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 604 || 2.054|| || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 645 || 1.875|| || 344 || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || -f1, Debian 6, fglrx-driver 10.9.3<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 739 || || || || 795 || 3200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || cgminer 2.3.1 || -I 9 -k phatk -w 256 -v 2, memory clock @ 265MHz, Debian Squeeze, fglrx-driver 12.1.1, performance scales linearly with engine clock as long as memory clock is 1/3<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 740 || 2.1511|| || 344 || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix/1.3 || AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT, memory clock @ 300MHz<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 755 || 2.2076|| || 342 || 848 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 28-04-11 || -f 1 -w 256 -v, Ubuntu 10.10, fglrx 11.4, memory clock @ 300MHz<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 802 || 2.31|| || 347 || 850 || 3200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix poclbm Ubuntu 11.04 || -q 6 -k AGGRESSION=19 WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT VECTORS, fglrx 11.4, mem clock @ 1000MHz<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 820 || ??? || || ??? || 910 || 3200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x1 || Phoenix 1.5 Win7 || AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=256 BFI_INT VECTORS -k phatk, 11.5, Mem @ 300MHz, 1.110v, 3% phatk mod<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 822.2 || -|| || - || 950 || 3200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix win7 || -k phatk -q 6 AGGRESSION=20 WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT VECTORS, but with this increasing difficulty mining becomes pretty pointless<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 833 || -|| || - || 930 || 3200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.7.5, win7 x64, catalyst 11.7 || -k phatk AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=256 BFI_INT VECTORS fastloops=false. memory@300mhz, 1.125v, fan 100%, 73C core temp, 95c voltage controllers. it will clock higher but not stable without a voltage increase and i fear for the VRMs<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 863.4 || -|| || - || 955 || 3200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo - Debian || -v 2 -w 256 (XFX Radeon HD 5970 Black Edition)<br />
|-<br />
| 6310M || 9.821 || 0.545|| || 18 || 500 || 80 || 2.4 || Integrated/APU || poclbm-gui -v -w128 || HP DM1z 18W TDP is shared with the CPU<br />
|-<br />
| 6450 || 27.0 || 1.5 || - || 18 || 625 || 160 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 2011-06-14 || -v -w128 Sapphire HD6450 1gb ddr3 Ubuntu 11.04 64bit<br />
|-<br />
| 6450 || 32.6 || 1.918 || - || 17 || 725 || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer/Phoenix1.75 Windows 7 x64 (no Aero)|| -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 -v WORKSIZE=64 Dell OEM HD6450 1gb ddr3 passive cooling/no fan 81C<br />
|-<br />
| 6450 || 37.8 || ? || - || 17 || 850 || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix2.0.0 Windows 8 x64 || -k phatk2 VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 -v WORKSIZE=64 Sapphire HD6450 1GB DDR3 passive cooling/no fan 150MHz memory/1000mV VCore<br />
|-<br />
| 6470M || 24.1 || - || ||- || - || - || 2.1 || Integrated/APU || guiminer || <br />
|-<br />
| 6470M || 31.0 || - || ||- || - || - || 2.1 || Integrated/APU || phoenix 1.48 || <br />
|-<br />
| 6480G || 24.1 || - || ||- || - || - || 2.1 || Integrated/APU || phoenix 1.75 || <br />
|-<br />
| 6490M || 15.21 || - || ||- || - || - || - || - || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8994.0 DiabloMiner GUI] v2011-05-22 / Mac OS X 10.6.7 || Model: MacBookPro8,2 VRAM: 256MB<br />
|-<br />
| 6490M || 16.289 || 0.708|| || 23 || - || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm-mod (Mac OS X 10.6.7) || MacBook Pro early 2011<br />
|-<br />
| 6490M || 17.18 || - || ||- || - || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoneix 1.50 with poclbm, Mac OS X 10.6.7 || MacBook Pro 2,8 VRAM: 256MB. phoenix -k poclbm VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP<br />
|-<br />
| 6490M || 32.1 || - || ||- || - || - || - || - || guiminer 2011-07-01 with poclbm (Win7-x64) ||MacBookPro8,2 (WinX64) -v -w128 -f0<br />
|-<br />
| style="background:#FFDD00;"| 6520G || 33.8 || - || || - || 400 || 320 || - || Integrated/APU || guiminer 2011-07-01 with OpenCL (Win7-64bit) || -v -w128 on Toshiba L775D-S7222<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFDD00;"| 6530D || 40.5 || - || || - || 444 || 320 || 2.4 || FM-1 || cgminer 2.4.1 || Integrated/APU A6-3500; Linux; Catalyst 11.11; APP-SDK-v2.4 (595.10)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFDD00;"| 6550D(A8 Onboard) || 66.2 || -|| || - || - || - || 2.5 || FM-1 || guiminer 2011-07-01 with OpenCL (Win7-64bit) || -v -w128 -f60<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFDD00;"| 6550D || 67.6 || -|| || - || 600 || 400 || 2.5 || FM-1 || guiminer 2011-07-01 with OpenCL (Win7-64bit) || -v -w128 -f2<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFDD00;"| 6570 || 68.0 || 1.133|| || 60 || 650 || 480 || 2.4 || PCI-E x16 || guiminer 2011-05-21 with poclbm (Win7-32bit) || no extra option for miner . Sapphire 6570 gddr5 512mb<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFDD00;"| 6570 || 82.1 || 1.368|| || 60 || 650 || 480 || 2.4 || PCI-E x16 || guiminer 2011-05-21 with poclbm (Win7-32bit) || -v -w128 . Sapphire 6570 gddr5 512mb<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFDD00;"| 6570 || 86.0 || 1.95 || - || 44 || 650 || 480 || 2.4 || PCI-E x16 || guiminer/poclbm 2011-06-14 || -v -w128 Sapphire Ultimate HD6570 1gb ddr3 Ubuntu 11.04 64bit<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFDD00;"| 6570 || 112.0 || - || || - || 860 || 480 || 2.7 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer 2012-02-19/poclbm (Win7-64bit) || -v -w128 -f1 . Sapphire 6570 Low Profile gddr3 1024mb<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFDD00;"| 6570 || 114.0 || - || || - || 866 || 480 || 2.7 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer 2012-02-19/poclbm (Win7-64bit) || -v -f 0 -w128 -a 3 . XFX 6570 Full Profile gddr3 1024mb 64 bit<br />
|-<br />
| 6630M || 48.80 || -|| || - || - || - || - || - || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8994.0 DiabloMiner GUI] v2011-06-18 / Mac OS X 10.7 || Mac Mini 2011 MC816D/A<br />
|-<br />
| 6630M || 63.00 || -|| || - || 600 || 480 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || DiabloMiner Windows || Lenovo ThinkPad Edge E320 (card overclocked using Sapphire TRIXX)<br />
|-<br />
| 6670 || 102.20 || -|| || - || 800 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/Debian sid || -v -f 0 -w 128<br />
|-<br />
| 6670 || 104.00 || - || 1.0 || - || 820 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer(poclbm)/Win 7|| -v -a4 -f15 -d0 -w64<br />
|-<br />
| 6670 || 110.00 || - || 1.0 || - || 850 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer(poclbm)/Win 7|| -v -f 0 -w 128 -q 6<br />
|-<br />
| 6670 || 111.77 || 1.69 || - || 66 || 910 || 480 || 2.7 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.7.5 || -k phatk2 BFI_INT AGGRESSION=5 VECTORS WORKSIZE=128<br />
|-<br />
| 6670 || 120.1 || - || - || - || 900 || 480 || 2.7 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || cgminer 2.7.4 || kernel: diablo i:10 core: 900 mem: 750<br />
|-<br />
| 6670 || 124.0 || - || - || 66 || 940 || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix2.0.0 Windows 8 x64 || -k phatk2 VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 -v WORKSIZE=128 Sapphire HD6670 Ultimate 1GB DDR5 passive cooling/no fan 300MHz memory/1100mV VCore<br />
|-<br />
| 6750 || 142 || -|| || 150 || 700 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w128, Gigabyte SL (passive cooler), watts is TDP, card runs very hot (>90°C)<br />
|-<br />
| 6750 || 167.59 || -|| || - || 870 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer || -v -f30 -w128<br />
|-<br />
| 6750 || 172.00 || -|| || - || 860 || 600 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer 2012-02-19/poclbm (Win7-64bit) MSI Afterburner 2.2.3 || -v -w128 f-20 Sapphire 6570 GDDR3 1024Mb CCC ver. 11.12 OCL 2.5<br />
|-<br />
| 6750M || 41.48 || -|| || - || 870 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || diablominer ||<br />
|-<br />
| 6750M || 60 || -|| || - || - || - || - || - || diablominer OSX 10.7 WorkSize=128||<br />
|-<br />
| 6770 || 180 || -|| || - || 850 || 1200 || - || - || guiminer || -v -w128 , this was an XFX (OEM) model, GPU @ 850 MHz, mem @ 1200 MHz; I pushed it up to 190 Mhash/s briefly by overclocking, but it crashed the system above that<br />
|-<br />
| 6770 || 202 || -|| || - || 960 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x1,x4,x8,x16 || phoenix 1.48 || Sapphire 6770 (standard) -q2 -k poclbm DEVICE=0 AGGRESSION=10 VECTORS WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT FASTLOOP (The PCI-E speed does not affect the mining speed)<br />
|-<br />
| 6770 || 217 || -|| || - || 960 || 800 || - || PCI-E x16 || Guiminer with phoenix || Sapphire 6770 -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128 FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 with https://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=22965.0 modification<br />
|-<br />
| 6770 || 221 || -|| || - || 1010 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || Phoenix 1.50 || MSI 6770 -k phatk PLATFORM=0 DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=13 3% Stock voltage.<br />
|-<br />
| 6770 || 235 || -|| || - || 1010 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || Phoenix 1.50 || Sapphire 6770 -k phatk PLATFORM=0 DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=13 3% mod https://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=22965.0 and AS5 paste on core w/ external 12" fan 50C full load. Stock voltage.<br />
|-<br />
| 6770x2 || 470 || -|| || - || 1010 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || Phoenix 1.50 || Sapphire 6770 -k phatk PLATFORM=0 DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=13 3% mod https://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=22965.0 and AS5 paste on core w/ external 12" fan 50C full load. Stock voltage.<br />
|-<br />
| 6790 || 220 || 1.467|| || 150 || 800 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 || -k phatk BFI_INT FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=12 VECTORS OC'd to 1ghz, underclocked mem to 300, voltage at 1175<br />
|-<br />
| 6790 || 219 || 1.467|| || 150 || 960 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer || -v -f0 -w128 / GPU OC to 960MHz under Windows7 64bit<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 171.59 || 1.351||1.07 || 127 || 775 || 960 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 196 || -|| || - || 850 || 960 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 0<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 220 || 1.236(*)|| || 178(*) || 1000(OC) || 960 || 2.4RC1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 30 (*: Overclocked wattage calculated [http://bakkap.free.fr/Misc/wCalc.html here] )<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 234.8 || ||- || - || 940 || 960 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.3 || AGGRESSION=8 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 236.0 || ||- || - || 940 || 960 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.4 || -k phatk AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT, Core @ 900MHz, Memory @ 300MHz<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 244.2 || ||- || - || 960 || 960 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm june-2011 || -v -w 128<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 245.1 || ||- || 200 || 940 || 960 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer (Phoenix) || Sapphire 6850 (Memory @1000MHz); Win7 64bit; flags: -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=14 WORKSIZE=128 <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 250 || 1.612(*) ||- || 155(*) || 940 (OC) || 960 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || AOCLBF 1.74 (Phoenix 1.5**) @Win7/x64 || XFX 6850 (Memory @840MHz; Vdcc @1.148V; Fan @74%; Temp @70C; System @39C); flags: -k phatk BFI_INT FASTLOOP VECTORS AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128 (*: Overclocked wattage calculated [http://bakkap.free.fr/Misc/wCalc.html here] / **: [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=22965.0 Tainted Kernel])<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 256.2 || || - || 170 || 980 || 960 || 2.7 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.7.5 / Win7 32bit || -k phatk -VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=9, Sapphire VaporX 1GB, mem@250MHz, stock VDDC 1.150V <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 262.5 || || - || - || 965 || 525 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer / poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128 (HIS 6850 flashed to HIS 6870 BIOS)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 267.2 || ||1.67 || - || 1010(OC) || 960 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer / phoenix 1.50 || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 worksize=128 FASTLOOP=false<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 301.4 || ||1.67 || - || || || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer / poclbm || -v -f 2 -w 128 clock @ 985 mem @ 890<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 232.47 || 1.540||1.22 || 151 || 900 || 1120 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm -v -w 128 || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 245|| -|| || - || 900|| 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ph rising 1.45 phoenix 1.50 phatk 11.5 sdk 2.4 || HD5xxx+ Fastloop phatk AGGRESSION=10<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 264.5 || - || - || - || 980 || 1050 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-01 || Stays around 66*C if I keep the side panel off and the room well ventilated. Card is PowerColor branded. Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 with Classic theme. Fan is at 100%. -v -w128 <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 271 || 1.807|| || 150 || 940 || 1120|| 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm -v -w 128 || Debian 6.0.1 x86_64<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 277.47 || -|| || - || 940 || 1120 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.3 || AGGRESSION=8 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 279 || 1.847(?)|| || 151(?) || 900 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha cat 11.4 sdk 2.4 || -G2 -D stock clocks, debian linux 64bit<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 281.7 || 1.172 (stock)|| || - || 980 || 1120|| 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer-v2011-06-09 || xfx6870, flags: -v 19 -w 128, win7 32-bit<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 293.13 || || ||- || 945 || 1050|| 2.5 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.5 Phatk || xfx6870, Catalyst 11.6, 1.5 Phoenix flags: -k phatk FASTLOOP=false DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128; http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=25860.0 Kernel Patch; http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=6458.0 Cmd; http://developer.amd.com/tools/gDEBugger/Pages/default.aspx No Crossfire Required; runs faster without crossfire 1% + additional 3% from update<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 294 || || ||- || 980 || 1120|| 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix phatk || xfx6870, 340MHz memory clock, Catalyst 11.6, flags: BFI_INT VECTORS AGGRESSION=9 WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 294 || || ||- || 985 || 1100|| 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || Diablo || Powercolor branded card, Win 8 x64, -v 1 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 295 || 2.02||1.64 || 146 || 950 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || hashkill latest as of 7/6/11 (ubuntu 11.4) || hashkill-gpu -p bitcoin user:pass:server -D, mem clock 850, voltage @ 1.175, Fan @ 70%, Temp @ 71C.<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 297|| -|| || - || 1000|| 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ph rising 1.62 phoenix 1.50 phatk 11.5 sdk 2.4 || Vectors HD5xxx+ Fastloop phatk AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 300 || - || || - || 940 || 1120 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.6.2 phatk2 || xfx6870 Black Edition, 340MHz Memory Clock, Catalyst 11.6, VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128, Debian Linux 64-Bit, Fan @ 50%, Temp @ 75C<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 300 || 1.72 || - || 174 || 1038 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm windows7x86 cat 11.4 || -v -w128 -f1 mem clock 360, fan 100% temp 73C<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 300.06 || 1.830|| || 164 || 1020 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.4 cat 11.4 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=8 fastloop mem clock 344<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 302 || - || || - || 940 || 1120 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || cgminer 2.1.2 || xfx6870 Black Edition, 340MHz Memory Clock, Catalyst 11.6, -w 256 -I 9, Debian Linux 64-Bit, Fan @ 50%, Temp @ 75C<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 307 || 1.72 || - || 174 || 1001/\1001 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm windows7x86 cat11.8 || -v -w128 -f5,85°C<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 310 || - || - || - || 1035 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 phatk 11.5 sdk 2.4 || BFI_INT VECTORS FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=128, mem clock @ 300MHz, voltage @ 1.300<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 310 || -|| || - || 975 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix phatk linuxcoin || BFI_INT VECTORS FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128, mem clock @ 340MHz, core clock @ 970MHz, flashed bios, 72 degrees w/ fan @ 68%, GIGABYTE SOC<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 312 || -|| || - || 975 || 300|| 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.50 / phatk / Windows 7 x64 SP1 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256, mem clock @ 300MHz, voltage @ 1.300, Fan @ 45%, Temp @ 62C, MSI 6870 HAWK.<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 314 || -|| || - || 1030 || 1120|| 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.50 / phatk / Linux || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 316 || -|| || - || 1030 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer 2011-06-09 using phoenix (Win7-32bit) || -k phatk platform=0 device=0 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 worksize=128 FASTLOOP=false, mem clock @ 228MHz, voltage @ 1.25, Fan @ 40%, Temp @ 73C<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 320 || - || - || 160 || 950 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Win 7 Ultimate x64 / DiabloMiner / Catalyst 12.1 || Saphire @ GPU 1030 MHz / MEM 300 Mhz @ Voltage 1.25 @ 80% FAN @ 69 temp @ Flags: -v 2 -w 128<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 321|| -|| || - || 1050|| 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x8 ||aoclbf 1.7 phoenix 1.50 11.6|| Vectors HD5xxx+ phatk AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=256, Memory=325MHz, Volts=1.3V, Fan~55%, Temps~70C<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 322 || 1.882|| || 170 || 1050 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.47 phatk 11.5 sdk 2.4 || BFI_INT VECTORS FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=256, mem clock @ 400MHz<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 329 || -|| || - || 1075 || 1120|| 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 phatk 11.5 sdk 2.4 || BFI_INT VECTORS FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 332 || -||1.74 || - || 1050 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer 2011-06-14 using phoenix (Win7-32bit) || -k phatk platform=0 device=0 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 worksize=128 FASTLOOP=false, mem clock @ 228MHz, voltage @ 1.3, Fan @ 60%, Temp @ 74C, flash and browser hardware acceleration disabled, aero enabled.<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 339.25 || - || - || - || 1090 || 1120 || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.7.3 cat 12.1 || Mem @ 350Mhz Clock @ 1090 Voltage 1.337 fan @ 100 Temp @ 75 diapolo's modified phatk kernel -k phatk_dia platform=0 device=0 VECTORS2 AGGRESSION=11 worksize=64 FASTLOOP=false BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 375 || - || - || - || 1000 || 1120 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Win 7 Ultimate 32-bit / Guiminer v2011-07-01 / phoenix 1.5 / phatk2 / Catalyst 11.9 || XFX / GPU @ 1000 MHz / MEM @ 200 Mhz / Voltage @ 1.187 V / FAN @ 40% / Temp @ 72 C / Flags: -k phatk2 platform=0 device=0 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=6 worksize=128 FASTLOOP=false / Using 2 miners with equal settings on 1 GPU<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870x2 || 600 || - || - || - || 945 || 330 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Ubuntu 12.04 32-bit / Phoenix 2 / phatk2 / Catalyst 11.9 || XFX / GPU @ 945 MHz / MEM @ 330 Mhz / Voltage @ 1.175 / Config: phatk2 VECTORS4 BFI_INT AGGRESSION=12 worksize=128 FASTLOOP=false GOFFSET=True<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870x4 || 1150|| -|| 1.2 || - || 900|| 1050 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.7 (Win7-64bit) || -k phatk platform=0 device=0-3 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 worksize=128 FASTLOOP=false<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870x4 || 1180 || -|| - || 145 || 950 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/debian32bit || -v -w128, Gigabyte SOC. voltage 1.175 (default), GPU default 950 MHz, Mem downclocked to 300 MHz, Fan 4x100% (+ 2x12cm fun 1300rpm), Temp 4x75C (in summer).<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870x4 || 1200 || -|| - || 150 || 970 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/debian32bit || -v -w128, Gigabyte SOC. voltage 1.175 (default), GPU overclocked from 950 to 970 MHz, Mem downclocked to 300 MHz, Fan 4x100% (+ 2x12cm fun 1300rpm), Temp 4x75C (in summer). Unstable with GPU@975 MHz.<br />
|-<br />
| 6930 || 320|| -|| - || - || 960 || 1200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.75/phatk || stock voltage, BFI_INT FASTLOOP VECTORS AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=64. 70C, FAN 80% (HIS brand)<br />
|-<br />
| 6930 || 370|| -|| - || - || 980 || 855 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || cgminer-2.4.1 || stock voltage (1,160), -I9. 71C, FAN 85% (HIS brand)<br />
|-<br />
| 6930 || 372 || -||1.89(?) || - || 1000 || 900 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.75/poclbm || max stable @ 1200 mV, BFI_INT FASTLOOP VECTORS AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=64<br />
|-<br />
| style="background:#00FFFF;"|6930x2|| 700 ||- || - ||400~|| 940 || 2560 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Guiminer || max stable @ 1100mV mem 300, Fan 80-90%, temp 70-75, -v -w64 -f10<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 272 || -||0.90 || - || 900 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48/poclbm || max stable @ 1150 mV, AGGRESSION = 7, BFI_INT, MSI 6950<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 291 || -|| || - || 920 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48/poclbm || max stable @ 1200mV, AGGRESSION = 7, BFI_INT, MSI 6950<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 295 || -|| || - || 930 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48/poclbm || max stable @ 1275mV, AGGRESSION = 7, BFI_INT, MSI 6950<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 295 || 1.844(?)|| || 160(?) || 810 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 300 || -|| || - || 940 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48/poclbm || max stable @ 1300mV, AGGRESSION = 7, BFI_INT, MSI 6950<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 314 || -|| || - || 800 || 1408 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 05-01-11 || -v -f30 -w128 default mem 1250 Stock Sapphire 6950 1gb<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 325 || 1.635(?)|| || 200(?) || 885 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 332 || 1.95~ || 1.2~ || 170~ || 840 || 1408 || 2.5.684.212 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 2011-06-14 || -v -w 128 -f 0, WinXP x86, Cat11.6b, desktop on IGP, Sapphire 1GB w/ HW locked BIOS, +40MHz GPU OC, 160W ACP + 5% OC = 170W new estimated ACP<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 333 || 1.95~ || 1.2~ || 170~ || 840 || 1408 || 2.4.650.9 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 2011-06-14 || -v -w 128 -f 0, WinXP x86, Cat11.6, desktop on IGP, Sapphire 1GB w/ HW locked BIOS, +40MHz GPU OC, 160W ACP + 5% OC = 170W new estimated ACP<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 338 || 1.84~ || - || 184~ || 860 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.50/poclbm kernel || Sapphire 2GB card w/ HW locked BIOS; Cat 11.6, Win7 x64; core @ 860MHz & 1087mV (OC + undervolt), mem @ 860MHz; cmd line args: VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128; power and MH/J calculated using Power = C*f*v^2 w/ assumption of 175 W at stock settings w/ 100% GPU util. (not measured)<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 340 || - || ||- || 895 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 05-21-11 || -v -w 128, mem @ 500, 1200 mV, MSI 6950<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 340 || - || ||- || 800 || 1536 ||(?) || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 05-21-11 || -v -f30 -w128 default mem 1250,Sapphire 6950 1gb, unlocked shaders<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 343 || 2.14 || - || 160 || 840 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 06-27-11 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128 FASTLOOP=false, HIS H695FN2G2M 2GB, mem @ 720, Kill-a-Watt measured<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 344 || 2.02~ || 1.27~ || 170~ || 840 || 1408 || 2.5.684.212 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/20110709 || -v -w 128 -f 0, WinXP x86, Cat11.6b, desktop on IGP, Sapphire 1GB w/ HW locked BIOS, +40MHz GPU OC, 160W ACP + 5% OC = 170W new estimated ACP<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 344.4 || -|| || - || 800 || 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || Powercolor 6950 @ shadermod on original Bios 6950 / 1000mV 850/730, +20% powertune, Fan @ 60%, -v -w128 -f1.<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 349 || 1.745(?)|| || 200(?) || 800 || 1408 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 05-21-11 || -v -f30 -w128, xfx 6950 xxx 1gb, locked shaders, core 900, mem 650, 79° C<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 351 || 1.91~ || - || 184~ || 860 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIminer/poclbm v2011-07-01 || Sapphire 2GB card w/ HW locked BIOS; Cat 11.6, Win7 x64; core @ 860MHz & 1087mV (OC + undervolt), mem @ 860MHz; cmd line args: -v -w 128 -f 0; (same system as the 338 MH/s result above using Phoenix)<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 352.8 || -|| || - || 820 || 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || Powercolor 6950 @ shadermod on original Bios 6950 / 1000mV 850/730, +20% powertune, Fan @ 60%, -v -w128 -f1.<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 360 || 1.8(?)|| || 200(?) || 970 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 360 || -|| || - || 870 || 1375 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || flashed with 6970 BIOS, -v -f30 -w128<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 365 || -|| || - || 925 || 1408 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || stock bios, -v -f0 -w128, MSI twinfrozr III 2GB<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 366.4 || -|| || - || 850 || 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || Powercolor 6950 @ shadermod on original Bios 6950 / 1000mV 850/730, +20% powertune, Fan @ 60%, -v -w128 -f1.<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 381 || -|| || - || 850 || 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || cgminer/phatk || XFX 6950 2Gb reference @ shadermod on original Bios 6950 / 1100mV 850/1250, +10% powertune, I=5, Fan @ 54% ~3100RPM, temp 73C w128. Windows7x64, Catalyst 13.1 .<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 383 || -|| || - || 975 || 1408 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || stock bios, -v -f0 -w128, voltage 1.274 @72c MSI twinfrozr III 2GB<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 388.4 || -|| || - || 900 || 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || Powercolor 6950 @ shadermod on original Bios 6950 / 1000mV 850/730, +20% powertune, Fan @ 60%, -v -w128 -f1.<br />
|- <br />
| 6950 || 389.9 || -|| || - || 950 || 1408 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || cgminer 2.3.2/Diablo || stock bios, -I 9, VRAM @ 820Mhz, fan @ 100%, voltage 1.250v, temp @ 68c, HIS ICE-Q X 2GB, OCed using MSI Afterburner, Windows 7 Professional 64-bit SP 1<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 400~ || -|| || - || 895 || 320 || 1536|| PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIMiner 24th Aug 2011 || Sapphire HD6950 Shader unlock mod 1408>1536 / +20% Power control, Fan @ 55%, Flags:-v -f2 -w64 -r5.Note this keeps temps under 80oC which is needed for this to be stable.Moderate fan noise.Power use is ~200W.<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 403 || -|| || - || 939 || 685 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix-1.50/phatk || ASUS EAH6950 ([http://www.techpowerup.com/vgabios/90661/Asus.HD6970.2048.101124.html (Ref. 6950 Flashed -> 6970)]) / +10% overdrive volt., Fan @ 90%, VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128 AGGRESSION=13. Overclocked from 880 -> 939 with MSI Aferburner<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 408.8 || -|| || - || 925 || 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || cgminer 2.12 || GIGABYTE GV-R695D5-2GD-B @ shadermod on original Bios 6950, mem@625, V=1100mv Fan @ 60%. Windows 7x64, Catalyst 11.9<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 410.4 || -|| || - || 950 || 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || Powercolor 6950 @ shadermod on original Bios 6950 / 1000mV 850/730, +20% powertune, Fan @ 60%, -v -w128 -f1.<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 417 || 2.085(?)|| || 200(?) || 975 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || unlocked shaders, +20% overdrive, mem @ 1250, fan @ 77%, temp 64C, -v -w128, gpu core @ 1145mV<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 418.8 || -|| || - || 940|| 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || Gigabyte OC 1GB, shadermod, voltage locked 1.175, mem 450, -w128 -v -f0, ATI Tray Tool<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 425.3 || -|| || - || 950/850 || 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix-1.50/phatk2 (Ubuntu natty) || Asus 1GB DirectCU, shadermod on OEM BIOS, OEM 1.1v, AMDOverdriveCtrl for 950 core 850 mem, 20% overdrive, flags VECTORS2 BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 428 || 2.14(?)|| || 200(?) || 1000 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || unlocked shaders, +20% overdrive, mem @ 1250, fan @ 80%, temp 64C, -v -w128, gpu core @ 1160mV<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 432 || 2.16(?)||1.44 || 200(?) || 1000 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || unlocked shaders, +20% overdrive, mem @ 520, fan @ 80%, temp 76C, -v -w128 -f 2, gpu core @ 1275mV<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 432.4 || -|| || - || 1000 || 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || Powercolor 6950 @ shadermod on original Bios 6950 / 1000mV 850/730, +20% powertune, Fan @ 60%, -v -w128 -f1.<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 440 || || || || 990 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/phatk || unlocked shaders, mem @ 1375, VGPU 1.21v, Watercooled (MCW60), temp 54C, VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 -k phatk<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 454.4 || -|| || - || 1050 || 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || Powercolor 6950 @ shadermod on original Bios 6950 / 1000mV 850/730, +20% powertune, Fan @ 60%, -v -w128 -f1.<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFAFAF;"| 6950x2 CF || 720 || - || - || 400 ~|| 900 || 1408 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-07-01 || MSI Afterburner - gpu @ 900 (870 stock), mem @ 900 (1250 stock), temp 69-71C(bottom vga) fan@94% / 77-81C(top vga) fan@99% - 31C enviornment, -v -f 1 -w 128 BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFAFAF;"| 6950x2 CF || 731 || - || - || 400~ || 900 || 1408 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-07-01 || MSI Afterburner - gpu @ 900 (870 stock), mem @ 900 (1250 stock), temp 68C(bottom vga) fan@90% / 73C(top vga) fan@99% - 28C enviornment, -v -f 1 -w 128 BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13<br />
|-<br />
| 6950x3 || 1081 || -|| || - || 860 || 1408 || 2.4(?) || PCI-E 2.1 x8 || guiminer/poclbm 07-01 || Sapphire 2GB stock bios, stock voltage, locked shaders: +20% overdrive, mem@650, fan@95%, temp 94C, -v -f0 -w128, 93c<br />
|-<br />
| 6950x4 || 1316 || 1.513|| || 870 || 840 || 1408 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || locked shaders, default mem 1250, dual fan 75C typical<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 323 || 1.468||0.92 || 220 || 880 || 1536 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -w 64, SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 365 || 2.28|| || 160 || 880 || 1536 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/phoenix || VECTORS AGGRESSION=9 WORKSIZE=128, fan @ 45%, 61C, 1.0 Vcore, 150 MHz mem, TX650w (84%), reference card<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 370 || -|| || - || 880 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || -v -w128, fan @ 50%/temp 72C, stock card<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 372 || 1.691(?)|| || 220(?) || 900 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix (svn trunk 05.14.2011) || clock 900/1375, VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128, fan 45% (auto) / temp 90C<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 380 || -|| || - || - || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w128<br>export GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS=1 # to reduce poclbm CPU from 100% to 2%<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 385 || 1.964|| || 196 || 900 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || -v -w128, memory downclocked to 684Mhz, fan @ 70%/temp 81C<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 388 || -|| || - || 900 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || -v -w128, fan @ 50%/temp 72C, stock voltage of 1.175v<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 403 || -|| || - || MAX || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || clock Max/50%+stock, -v -w128, fan= 100%/temp 72C (Note: Overclocked using CCC utility under Windows 7, Clock set to Max value w/ 50% increase to memory and 5% increase to voltage)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 406 || -|| || - || 950 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.50/phatk || GPU Overclocked to Max (950MHz) using aticonfig, Memory Underclocked using AMDOverdriveCtrl (850MHz). Temp ~ 82C. VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 407 || -|| || - || 955 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w128, fan 75%/temp 75C, voltage +10%<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 414 || -|| || - || 960 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || -v -w128, fan @ 53%/temp 73C, stock voltage of 1.175v, high air flow case<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 420 || -|| || - || 975 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || -v -w128 -f0, clocks 975MHz/685MHz MSI Lightning<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 423 || -||1.20 || - || 995 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48/poclbm || ATI Tray Tools, Clocks=995/331.25, WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 VECTORS ,68C @ 65% Fan, HAF932 Case<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 431 || -|| - || - || 976 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.7/phatk2 || MSI AFTERBURNER, Clocks[976/1000], -k parameters[VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11], Temperatures{CARD}[86C@100% Fan]{ROOM}[27C/81F], <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 433 || -|| - || - || 975 || 1536 || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.6.2/phatk || MSI Afterburner 2.2Beta, -k phatk AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS, GPU 65C@100% Fan, Room 21C<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970x2 || 710 || -|| || - || 900/880 || 1536 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -w 256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970x2 || 828|| -|| || - || 940 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w128, fans 74%/82%, temp 74C/82C, powertune +20% (via CCC), memory underclock 825MHz (via MSI Afterburner), with 'Maj' fix<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970x3 || 1243|| -|| || 1000+ || 910 || 1536 || 2.5 || 2x16, 1x8 || phoenix 1.7.0 || fans 100%, temp 88C/84C/69C, GPU 920/ memory 795/ powertune 20%, ATI 11.11, -k phatk2 VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=128 AGGRESSION=13<br />
|-<br />
| 6990 || 670 || 1.94||0.89 || 346 || 830 || 3072 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || Catalyst 11.4 [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=2949.msg106238#msg106238 source].<br />
|-<br />
| 6990 || 704 || || || || 830 || 3072 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo Win7 64bits || Catalyst 11.4, Arguments: -v 2 -w 128 (by Swapper 2011-07-07)<br />
|-<br />
| 6990 || 708 || 2.05|| || 346 || 830 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || BIOS switch at "default" position 2, see [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 6990 || 744 || || || || 830 || 3072 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo Win7 64bits || Catalyst 11.6b, Arguments: -v 2 -w 128 (by Swapper 2011-07-14)<br />
|-<br />
| 6990 || 746 || 1.82|| || 410 || 880 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || BIOS switch at "overclocked" position 1, see [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 6990 || 758 || -|| || - || 880 || - || 2.4 || - || Phoenix with Poclbm || Catalyst 11.4, OC switch ON, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128 FASTLOOP=false<br />
|-<br />
| 6990 || 771 || 1.8804|| || 410 || 880 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx. Memory clock @ 1280Mhz.<br />
|-<br />
| 6990 || 772 || 1.8380|| || 420 || 900 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix & Poclbm || OC switch ON + overclocked to 900 mhz, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128<br />
|-<br />
| 6990 || 790 || -|| || - || 900 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || BIOS switch at "overclocked" position 1; with "aticonfig --odsc=900,1260" to further overclock the GPU to 900 MHz and mem to 1260 MHz, see [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 6990 || 795 || -|| || - || - || - || 2.4 || || Diablo's miner || BIOS switch at "overclocked" position 1; On Windows Vista, Clocks set at 955,1250. Power control at 20.<br />
Diablo's args: -w 128 -g 5 -v 2 -f 0<br />
|-<br />
| 6990 || 802 || -|| || - || 915 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || BIOS switch at "overclocked" position 1; with "aticonfig --odsc=915,1260" to further overclock the GPU to 915 MHz and mem to 1260 MHz, see [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 6990 || 835 || -||1.11 || - || 890/860 || 3072 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix || BIOS switch at "overclocked" position 1; with "aticonfig --adapter=1 --odsc=990,890 and aticonfig --adapter=0 --odsc=960,860" (GPU 0 runs hot). Currently, aticonfig can only underclock RAM to 100mhz below core speed. Command line: phoenix.py -k poclbm VECTORS AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
| 6990 || 852 || -|| || - || 955|| 3072 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || cgminer 2.1.2 || Memory: 830 Mhz, -v 2 -w 128 -I 9, Watercooled, stock voltage. (2012-02 by Swapper)<br />
|-<br />
| 6990 || 865 || -||1.11 || - || 890/860 || 3072 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || cgminer || BIOS switch at "overclocked" position 1; with core 0 at 990/890 engine/mem, core 1 at 960/860 (runs hot). Watercooled at 65-68C.<br />
|-<br />
| 6990x2 || 1436 || 1.848|| || 777 || 880 || 6144 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 x2 || guiminer 2011.05.11 || AUSUM switch set to 1 on both cards; Core left at 880MHz, memory left at 1250MHz; VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128<br />
|-<br />
| 6990x2 || 1640 || 1.416|| || 1200 || 1010 || 3072 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 x16 || phoenix 1.7.0 || GPU 910MHz, Memory 785MHz, Powertune 20%; VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128 FASTLOOP=false<br />
|-<br />
| 6990x2 || 1700 || 1.416|| || 1200 || 1010 || 3072 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 x16 || guiminer 2011.06.14 || GPU 1010MHz, Memory 900MHz; -k phatk2 VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=128 AGGRESSION=13<br />
|-<br />
| 6990x2 || 1740 || 2.11 || || 825 || 940 || 3072 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 x16 || cgminer 2.0.8 || GPU0+3 930MHz core/805MHz memory, GPU1+2 940MHz core/815MHz memory; BIOS switch factory setting; Cooled with 7C air from outside; -g4 -I9 -k phatk<br />
|-<br />
| 6990x3 || 2094 || -|| || - || 900 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 x8 x4 || poclbm || GPU 900MHz, Memory 1250MHz; poclbm.py -f 0 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
| 7750 || 104.15 || || || || 800 || || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix || worksize=128 VECTORS FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=10 WORKSIZE=128<br />
|-<br />
| 7750 || 117.15 || || || || 900 || || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix || worksize=128 VECTORS FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=10 WORKSIZE=128<br />
|-<br />
| 7750 || 125.5 || - || - || - || 830 || 512 || 2.6 (10.0.898.1) || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || DiabloMiner || GPU: 830MHz, Memory: 1125MHz; -v 1 -w 256 [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=64241.msg816946#msg816946 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 7750 || 133 || 2.66 || 1.21 || 50 || 880 || 512 || 2.6 (?) || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || cgminer || factory-overclocked to 880 MHz; power draw measured with a Kill-a-Watt<br />
|-<br />
| 7750 || 136.1 || - || - || - || 900 || 512 || 2.6 (10.0.898.1) || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || DiabloMiner || GPU: 900MHz (CCC locked @ 900), Memory: 800MHz; -v 1 -w 256 [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=64241.msg816946#msg816946 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 7770 || 182 || - || - || 83 || 1020 || 640 || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || Ubuntu 10.04 LTS amd64, GPU: 1020MHz<br />
|-<br />
| 7770 || 213 || - || - || - || 1150 || 640 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || Win7 32bit, Core2Duo, poclbm guiminer<br />
|-<br />
| 7850 || 287 || 1,91 || 1,1 || 150 || 950 || 1024 || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || cgminer || GPU:950 MEM:800, Linux 64bit, Intensive 14, GPU temp = 60°C, Room temp = 25°C, Fan = 60%<br />
|-<br />
| 7850 || 329 || - || - || 150 || 1100 || 1024 || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || cgminer 2.6.4 || Linux 64bit GTK+3, GPU temp = 60°C, Room temp = 25°C, Fan = 60%, -v 1 -k poclbm -I 6 --gpu-engine 1100 --gpu-memclock 950<br />
|-<br />
| 7850 || 363 || - || - || - || 1241 || 1024 || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Guiminer || GPU:1241 MEM:4840 <br />
|-<br />
| 7870 || 405 || - || - || - || 1100 || 1280 || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Guiminer || Sapphire 7870 OC , GPU: 1100MHz, Mem: 950 Mhz, GPU temp: 65°C, Fan 36% (1377 RPM).<br />
|-<br />
| 7870 || 406 || - || - || - || 1100 || 1280 || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || cgminer || Gigabyte GV-R787OC-2GD, GPU: 1200MHz, [cgminer -I 7]<br />
|-<br />
| 7870 || 422 || - || - || - || 1165 || 1280 || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || cgminer || Sapphire 7870 1ghz edition, GPU: 1165MHz, [cgminer.exe -d 0 -l 1 -T -I 8]<br />
|-<br />
| 7870 || 460 || - || - || - || 1250 || 1280 || 2.7? || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Guiminer || MSI R7870 TFIII/oc, Catalyst 12.11 beta4, 455-460 mhash/s @1250 core, 750 mem, 0% Power limit, 1.218v, Zalman VF3000N = 42C, VRMS = 57C, ambient approx. 17-19C, -v -w128 -f10<br />
|-<br />
| 7870 XT || 485 || 3.09 || 1.8726 || 157 || 1200 || 1280 || 2.8 || PCI-E 3.0 x16 2.0 || cgminer ||7870XT clock/mem - 1200/1600<br />
|-<br />
| 7870xt || 520 || - || - || - || 1200 || 1536 || 2.7? lol || PCI-E 2.0 x4 || Guiminer || Sapphire HD7870xt, Catalyst 12.11 beta 4, 515-520 mhash/s @1200/core 750/mem, 0%PL, 1.17v/stock, Zalman vf3000a @60-62C even though its sandwiched between a 7870 and 5850. xD<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#00FFFF;"| 7950 || 510 || - || - || - || 985 || 1792 || 2.6 || PCI-E 3.0 x16 || Diablo || Windows 8 x64, Asus P8Z77 WS, i7 3rd Gen, Card is XFX brand, Clock 985Mhz, Mem 1100Mhz, -v 1 -w 256<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#00FFFF;"| 7950 || 512 || - || - || - || 1000 || 1792 || 2.6 || PCI-E 3.0 x8 || poclbm || GPU: 1000MHz, Memory: 850MHz<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#00FFFF;"| 7950 || 550 || - || - || - || 1060 || 1792 || 2.8 || PCI-E 3.0 x16 || Diablo || Core 1060, Mem 800, -v 1 -w 256 Intesity 7<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#00FFFF;"| 7950 || 605 || - || - || - || 1150 || 1792 || 2.6 (10.0.898.1) || PCI-E 3.0 x16 || DiabloMiner || GPU: 1150MHz, Memory: 1375MHz; -v 1 -w 256<br />
<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FF0000;"| 7970 || 555 || - || - || - || 925 || 2048 || 2.6 (10.0.898.1) || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || DiabloMiner || GPU: 925MHz, Memory: 1375MHz; -v 1 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FF0000;"| 7970 || 640 || -|| || - || 1070 core/1000 mem || 2048 || 2.6 || PCI-E 3.0 x16 || cgminer 2.6.5 || MSI R7970 Lightning Win7 х64, Catalyst 12.8, GPU 1070 MHz, Memory 1000 MHz, GPU temp = 72°C, Room temp = 28°C, Fan = 57%, cgminer -k diablo -v 1 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FF0000;"| 7970 || 650 || -|| || - || 1100 || 2048 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 x8 x4 || Diablo|| GPU 1100MHz, Memory 600MHz;<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FF0000;"| 7970 || 650 || -|| || - || 1100 || 2048 || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x1 || cgminer 2.4.1 || Win7 х86, Catalyst 12.3, GPU 1100 MHz, Memory 950 MHz, GPU temp = 68°C, Room temp = 25°C, Fan = 58%, -k poclbm -v 1 -w 128<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FF0000;"| 7970 || 674 || -|| || - || 1130 core/1000 mem || 2048 || 2.6 || PCI-E 3.0 x16 || cgminer 2.6.5 || MSI R7970 Lightning Win7 х64, Catalyst 12.8, GPU 1130 MHz, Memory 1000 MHz, GPU temp = 72°C, Room temp = 28°C, Fan = 57%, cgminer -k diablo -v 1 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FF0000;"| 7970 || 685 || -|| || - || 1150 core/1000 mem || 2048 || 2.6 || PCI-E 3.0 x16 || cgminer 2.6.5 || MSI R7970 Lightning Win7 х64, Catalyst 12.8, GPU 1150 MHz, Memory 1000 MHz, GPU temp = 72°C, Room temp = 28°C, Fan = 58%, cgminer -k diablo -v 1 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FF0000;"| 7970 || 685 || -|| || - || 1177 || 2048 || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || cgminer 2.3.1 || Win7, Catalyst 12.3, driver: 2.95, E: 1177, M:685, -k diakgcn -v 2 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FF0000;"| 7970 || 690 || - || - || - || 1150 || 2048 || 2.6 (10.0.898.1) || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || DiabloMiner || GPU: 1150MHz, Memory: 1375MHz; -v 1 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FF0000;"| 7970 || 695 || - || - || - || 1160(core)/1050(mem) || 2048 || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || DiabloMiner (options: -v 1 -w 256) || Asus HD7970-DC2T-3GD5 @ 1.17V; Linux Ubuntu 11.10 64 bit; AMD SDK 2.6; Catalyst 12.3 <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FF0000;"| 7970 || 710 || -|| || - || 1200 || 2048 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || DiabloMiner|| GPU 1200MHz, Memory 600MHz; -v 1 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FF0000;"| 7970 || 714~ || -|| || - || 1210 || 2048 || 2.7 || PCI-E 1.1 x16 || cgminer 2.7.4 || MSI HD7970 R7970-2PMD3GD5/OC, core clock - 1210Mhz, memory clock - 685, core voltage (1.149V - MSI Afterburner, ~1.043V - GPU-Z), memory voltage 1.5V, temperature - 75C at mid-day and 65C w/ AC on at 20C, Catalyst 12.8, Windows 8 Release Preview 32-bit, kernel - poclbm, vector - 1, worksize - 64, intensity - 14, fan - 100% <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FF0000;"| 7970 || 825 || -|| || 214 || 1290 || 2048 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Bitminter|| Bitminter beta 1.1.1; GPU 1290MHz, Memory <br />
1375MHz (Trixx = 600); work size 256, "BFI_INT," Device-accessible CPU memory; full watercooled block; power stats from GPU-Z; Driver 11.12<br />
|-<br />
| 7970x3 || 1950 || 2.6 || 1.72 || 750 || 1100 || 2048x3 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || cgminer 2.7.5 || Win8, Catalyst 12.8, driver: 8.982.0.0, E: 1100, M:750, kernel: poclbm, worksize: 256, intensity: 9, gpu-threads: 4, refitted Diamond 7970 HSF with new VRM pads to lower VRM temps ~15C. Undervolted each card until crash under load, then raised about 0.015v for stability. Settings using afterburner 2.2.1 with OC unlocked. Visiontek 7970: $370, Sapphire 7970: $360, Diamond 7970: $400<br />
|-<br />
| 7970x3 || 2050 || 2.41 || 1.22 || 850 || 1150 || 6144 || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || cgminer 2.3.1 || Win7, Catalyst 12.3, driver: 2.95, E: 1150, M:685, -k diakgcn -v 2 -w 256, 850W power consumption measured at the wall<br />
|-<br />
| FirePro V3800 || 69.0 || -|| || - || || || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || BitMinter Client || <br />
|-<br />
| FirePro V4800 || 79.7 || -|| || - || 775 || 400 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-01 || <br />
|-<br />
| FirePro V8700 || 84.8 || -|| || - || 750 || 800 || - || - || poclbm-mod.03.24.2011 || <br />
<br />
|-<br />
| FirePro M5800 || 61.4 || -|| || - || 650 || - || - || - || poclbm-mod.03.24.2011 || Ubuntu<br />
|-<br />
| FirePro M5800 || 69.3 || -|| || - || 650 || 400 || 2.1 || - || GUIMiner v2011-04-26 || -v -w128, Windows 7 32bit<br />
|-<br />
| FirePro M5950 || 96.7 || -|| || - || 725 || 900 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -v -w128 (Windows 7 64 bit)<br />
|-<br />
| FirePro V5800 || 119 || -|| || - || 690 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-01 || Windows 7 32bit<br />
|-<br />
| FirePro V5800 || 144 || -|| || - || 690 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-01 || -v -w128 (Windows 7 32bit)<br />
|-<br />
| FirePro V5800 || 161 || -|| || - || 780 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-01 || -v -w128 (Windows 7 32bit)<br />
|-<br />
| FirePro V7750 || 35.7 || -|| || - || - || 320 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-21 || Windows 7 64bit<br />
|-<br />
| FirePro V7800 || 254.85 || -|| || - || - || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 with poclbm || Debian Squeeze<br />
|-<br />
| FirePro M7740 (M97 GL) [DELL] || 63.0 || -|| || - || 650 || - || 2.1 || PCIe v2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-06-14 || Windows 7 64bit / only SDK2.1 works<br />
|-<br />
| FirePro M7820 || 150.0 || -|| || - || 700 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-06-09 / poclbm || Memory downclocked to 500 from 1000MHz, 169MH/s@800MHz, 181MH/s@860Mhz (max.), only SDK2.1 works, Windows 7 x86<br />
|}<br />
<br />
<references><br />
<ref name='amazon_20110625'>$ Prices from http://www.amazon.com on 2011-06-25</ref><br />
</references><br />
<br />
===Nvidia===<br />
<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! Watts !! Clock !! SP !! Comment<br />
|-<br />
| ION || 1.8 || 0.067 || 27 || || 16 || poclbm; power consumption incl. CPU<br />
|-<br />
| 8200 mGPU || 1.2 || || || 1200 || 16 || 128 MB shared memory, "poclbm -w 128 -f 0"<br />
|-<br />
| 8400 GS || 2.3 || || || || || "poclbm -w 128"<br />
|-<br />
| 8400 GS || 1.6 || 0.013 || 128 || 1238 || || DiabloMiner -w 128 -f 1 [https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/User:Knightmb source]<br />
|-<br />
| 8400M GS || 2.0 || || || || ||<br />
|-<br />
| 8500GT || 2.4 || || || 918 || 16 || poclbm under GUIMiner<br />
|-<br />
| 8600M GT || 4.93 || || || || 32 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 8600M GT || 3.8 || || || || || Macbook Pro running Diablo<br />
|-<br />
| 8600GT || 5.66 || || || 1188 || 32 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 8600GT OC || 7.3 || || || 1602 || 32 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.0 poclbm] -w 128 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg72833#msg72833 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 8800GT || 25 || 0.24 || 105 || 1300 || ||<br />
|-<br />
| 8800GT || 24.5 || 0.23 || 105 || 1300 || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 8800GT || 31.1 || 0.296 || 105 || 1855 || || Overclocked 715 GPU / 1030 Memory / 1855 Shader; GuiMiner v2011-05-21<br />
|-<br />
| 8800GT || 31.8 || 0.303 || 105 || 1836 || 112 || 713 gpu, 1026 memory. win7x86, phoenix 1.48, -k poclbm WORKSIZE=64 AGGRESSION=5<br />
|-<br />
| 8800GT || 34.0 || || 105 || 1998 || || gpu 756M, mem 1123M, shader 1998M, temp 65C. winXP, phoenix 1.50, -k poclbm WORKSIZE=64 AGGRESSION=6 -- same settings get 32.7 MH/s with aggression 2<br />
|-<br />
| 8800GTS || 16.8 || 0.109 || 154 || || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source] [http://www.techspot.com/review/79-geforce-8800-gts-512/page11.html source]<br />
|-<br />
| 8800 GTS || 18.7 || 0.124 || 150 || 1200 || || poclbm -w 64 no vectors<br />
|-<br />
| 8800 GTS || 33.5 || || 150 || OC || || CUDA mining via GUIminer. Win7 64bit. poclbm -v -w128 -f0. OC'd Core@799MHz, Mem@1080MHz, Shader@1905MHz. Fan 70%, GPU temp @ 66C in comfortable room temp.<br />
|-<br />
| 8800 GTX || 27.5 || || || 1404 || || phoenix 1.48, poclbm, no vectors, 83C with 50C ambient <br />
|-<br />
| 8800m GTX || 16.3 || || || || || rpcminer-cuda Win7-64<br />
|-<br />
| 9300GE || 1.57 || || || 1300 || 8 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9300GS || 1.69 || || || 1400 || 8 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9300/nForce 730i || 2.15 || || || 1200 || 16 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9400GT || 3.37 || 0.067 || 50 || 1400 || 16 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9400M (MacBook) || 1.90 || 0.32 || 6 || 700 || || poclbm -f 8 no vectors<br />
|-<br />
| 9500M GS || 3.2 || || || 950 || 32 || rpcminer-cuda<br />
|-<br />
| 9500GT || 6.75 || 0.135 || 50 || 1400 || 32 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9500GT || 7.30 || 0.135 || 50 || 1400 || 32|| rpcminer-cuda, Overclocked 730 GPU/ 500 Memory / fan 100% 70C solid<br />
|-<br />
| 9500GT || 7.10 || 0.135 || 50 || 1767 || 32 || rpcminer-cuda, Overclocked 707 GPU / 500 Memory / fan 100% 73C steady<br />
|-<br />
| 9600GSO || 19.88 || 0.237 || 84 || 1375 || 96 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9600GSO512 || 11.75 || 0.131 || 90 || 1625 || 48 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9600GT || 15.66 || 0.165 || 95 || 1625 || 64 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9600GT Zotac || 15 || || || 1650 || 64 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9600GT OC || 18.8 || <0.198 || >95 || 1981 || 64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.0 poclbm] -w 128 -f 10 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg74610#msg74610 source] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg73353#msg73353 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 9600M GS || 4.0 || || || 1075 || 32 || rpcminer-cuda<br />
|-<br />
| 9800GT || 30.36 || 0.289 || 105 || 1800 || 112 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9800GT EE || 19.7 || 0.263 || 75 || 1375 || 112 || rpcminer-cuda<br />
|-<br />
| 9800GT OC || 29.5 || 0.283 || 105 || 1836 || 112 || poclbm.py, no options. Memory underclocked to 850Mhz, GPU overclocked to 733Mhz<br />
|-<br />
| 9800GTX || 32.54 || 0.232 || 140 || 1688 || 128 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9800GTX+ || 32.6 || 0.232 || 140 || 1688 || 128 || win7x64 275.33 Overclocked to 756/1890/1102 using a CUDA-specific miner (instead of phoenix, yay for ZERO stales!)<br />
|-<br />
| 9800GTX+ || 35.39 || 0.251 || 141 || 1836 || 128 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9800GTX+ || 36 || || || || || factory OC ubuntu polclbm.py -w 128 -f 10 -a 10 (DO NOT USE -v)<br />
|-<br />
| 9800GTX+ || 37.23 || 0.266 || 140 || 1890 || 128 || win7x64 275.27 phoenix(1.48) -k poclbm AGGRESSION=3 WORKSIZE=64 (may cause 75%+ stale count, in which case use a CUDA-specific miner instead)<br />
|-<br />
| 9800GTX+ || 40.20 || 0.287 || 140 || 835 || 128 || lowered memory clock higher core, unstable if going higher<br />
|-<br />
|style="background-color:#FFEFEF"| 9800GX2 || 57.83 || 0.294 || 197 || || 2x128 ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background-color:#FFEFEF"| 9800GX2 || 28 || 0.142 || 197 || || 2x128 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]<br />
|-<br />
| G210 || 3.38 || 0.111 || 30.5 || 1402 || 16 ||<br />
|-<br />
| G210 || 3.79 || 0.124 || 30.5 || 1402 || 16 || poclbm -f 1<br />
|-<br />
| GT220 || 10.8 || 0.084 || 128 || 1360 || || DiabloMiner -w 128 -f 1000 [https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/User:Knightmb source]<br />
|-<br />
| GT230 || 15.5 || 0.161 || 96 || 650 || 64 || (9600GT rebranded one from in a medion pc)<br />
|-<br />
| GT240 || 19.37 || 0.281 || 69 || 1340 || 96 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GT240 || 21.24 || || || || 96 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4291.0 poclbm-mod] -f 0 -v [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg73383#msg73383 source]<br />
|-<br />
| GT240 || 28.1 || || || || 96 || poclbm -f0 -v (Gainward GT240 1024DDR5 OC core@670/stockmem@1700/shader@1700 - stable; max.temp=73)<br />
|-<br />
| GT240M || 9.8 || 0.426 || 23 || 550 || 48 || poclbm -f 0 -w 256 <br />
|-<br />
| GT240 OC || 25.6 || 0.365 || 70 || 1765 || 96 || poclbm<br />
|-<br />
| GTS250 || 35.39 || 0.244 || 145 || 1836 || 128 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTS250 || 35.2 || 0.243 || 145 || 1836 || 128 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTS250 OC || 37 || 0.255 || 145 || 2047 || 128 || 37.2 with the following OC: Core: 775MHz, Shader: 1900MHz, Memory: 1200MHz<br />
|-<br />
| GTX260M || 22.5 || || || 500 || 112 || poclbm 4/28/2011 Asus G71GX runs ~90c without cooling pad <br />
|-<br />
| GTX260 || 35.91 || 0.178 || 202 || 1242 || 192 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX260 || 44 || 0.242 || 182 || 1242 || 216 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]<br />
|-<br />
| GTX260c216 || 40.40 || 0.236 || 171 || 1242 || 216 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX260c216 || 47.4 || 0.260 || 182 || 1348 || 216 || poclbm -w 256<br />
|-<br />
| GTX260c216 || 50.00 || || || 1050 || 216 || m0mchil GPU client, Windows 7 64-bit, x6 @ 3.5ghz<br />
|-<br />
| GTX260c216 OC || 52.0 || || || 1461 || 216 || "poclbm -w 256 -f 1"<br />
|-<br />
| GTX260c216 OC || 58.9 || || || 756/400 || 216 || Core overclocked, Memory underclocked, Ubuntu 11.04 Classic Session(No Effects) "poclbm -w 256 -f 1"<br />
|-<br />
| GTX260c216 OC || 60.1 || || || 1706 || 216 || Core: 364 MHz, Shaders: 1706 MHz, Memory: 594 MHz, VDDC: 1.1800V. "poclbm-mod -w 256 -f 1"<br />
|-<br />
| GTX275 || 50.75 || 0.232 || 219 || 1404 || 240 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX275 || 58 || || || 729/1458 || 240 || poclbm -f 0 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
| GTX280 || 46.84 || 0.198 || 236 || 1296 || 240 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX280 || 64.34 || 0.289 || 245 || 1296 || 240 || phoenix.exe -k poclbm AGGRESSION=6 WORKSIZE=128 (61*C with Accelero XTREME GTX280)<br />
|-<br />
| GTX285 || 64.8 || || || 1607 || 240 || GuiMiner - Not sure about wattage yet. Still testing. Card runs around 74 C<br />
|-<br />
|-<br />
| GTX285 || 53.35 || 0.262 || 204 || 1476 || 240 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX295 || 89.78 || 0.311 || 289 || 1242 || 480 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX295 || 120.70 || 0.418 || 289 || 1242 || 480 || GUIMiner no oc.<br />
|-<br />
| GTX295 || 117.30 || 0.406 || 289 || 1476 || 490 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GT 320M (MacBook Air) || 6.12 || || || 1212 || 48 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 320M (Mac mini 2010) || 7.0 || 0.35 || 20 || 450 || 32 || poclbm no extra options, windows 7 x64<br />
|-<br />
| GT 325M || 7.5 || || || 990 || 48 || rpcminer-cuda<br />
|-<br />
| GT 325M || 10.5 || || || 325/650(mem)/1300(shaders) || || rpcminer-cuda, 71 degrees<br />
|-<br />
| GT 325M || 7.99 || || || || || poclbm -f 0 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
| GT330 || 21.65 || || || || || poclbm -f 0 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
| GT 330M || 7.97 || || || ||48|| Model: MacBookPro6,2 VRAM: 512MB Software: [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8994.0 DiabloMiner GUI] v2011-05-22 / Mac OS X 10.6.7<br />
|-<br />
| GT 330M || 10.8 || || ||650MHZ core||48|| Model: MacBookPro6,2 VRAM: 512MB Software: GUIMiner running in Bootcamp v2011-08-24 / Mac OS X 10.6.8.The GPU was OC'd to 650MHZ core clock,mem clock was the lowest it would go in MSI Afterburner.The Bootcamp OS was Windows 7 x64.MBP Mid 2010.<br />
|-<br />
| GT 330M (Sony Vaio Z) || 7.8 || 0.71 ( 0.3 total) || 11 (26w total) || 1045 || 48 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GT 330M (Samsung R480) || 9.1 || || || 575(GPU)/1265(shader) || ||VRAM 1024MB. pocblm -vectors --verbose. Windows 7 Ultimate x86<br />
|-<br />
| GTS 350M (Toshiba A665-3DV) || 17.0 || 1.214 || 14 || 1080 || || DiabloMiner-Windows.exe<br />
|-<br />
| GTS 350M (Toshiba A665-3DV5) || 20.8 || || || 1350 || || DiabloMiner-Windows.exe, OC'd 550/850/1350 73C stable<br />
|-<br />
| GTS 360M || 25.0 || || || || || [toshiba qosmio laptop, ~150-165*F stock fans]<br />
|-<br />
| GTS 360M (ASUS G60jx) || 20.0 || || || || || everythins is stock, it cannot sustain. it reaches 90 degrees and freezes.<br />
|-<br />
| GTS 360M (ASUS G60jx) || 27.2 || || || Shader @ 1720, Memory @ 900 || || stock hardware (clean exhaust fan), Afterburner, 72 deg C Stable <br />
|-<br />
| GT430 || 20.24 || 0.413 || 49 || 1400 || 96 ||<br />
|- <br />
| GT440 || 20.4 || || || 1645 || 96 || rpcminer-cuda -aggression=8; winxp x64 driver 275.33<br />
|-<br />
| GT530 || 17.9 || 0.358 || 50 || 1400 || || BitMinter v1.1.2<br />
|-<br />
| GT520M || 8.9 || || || || || rpcminer-cuda, got up 2 10.2MH/s OC'ed<br />
|-<br />
| GT525M || 14.6 || || || || || rpcminer-cuda<br />
|-<br />
| GT540M || 16.0 || || || || || rpcminer-cuda<br />
|-<br />
| GT550M || 17.08 || || || || || rpcminer-cuda -aggression=8<br />
|-<br />
| GT610M (ASUS K45V) || 9.371 || || || 738 MHz || || 2GB RAM.<br />
|-<br />
| GT650M (rMBP) || 17.8 || || || 900 || 16 || cgminer 2.5.0 on OSX 10.7.4<br />
|-<br />
| GT650M OC || 27.4 || || || || || GUIMiner <br />
|-<br />
| GTS450 || 45.28 || 0.427 || 106 || 1566 || 192 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTS450 (Sparkle One) || 40.0 || || || || || poclbcm git Oct 2012<br />
|- <br />
| GTS450 || 45.28 || 0.427 || 106 || 1566 || 192 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460SE || 56.39 || 0.376 || 150 || 1300 || 288 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 || 66.32 || || || 814 || 336 || rpcminer-cuda 20110605, Graphics Clock @ 814MHz, Memory @ 1555MHz<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 || 68.31 || 0.427 || 160 || 1350 || 336 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 768MB || 57.8 || || ? || 1350 || 336 || rpcminer-cuda -gputhreads=320 -gpugrid=336<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 768MB (MSI Cyclone 768D5/OC) || 75.1 || || ? || 930 || 336 || rpcminer-cuda on Win7 x64 with ForceWare 275.33. [http://event.msi.com/vga/afterburner/download.htm MSI Afterburner] set to core: 930MHz, shader: 1850MHz, core voltage: 1.087V, memory: 1600MHz. Runs at 58°C with fan at 75% (ambient 25°C). <br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 1GB DirectCU || 72.3 || ? || ? || 1672 || 336 || rpcminer-cuda -gputhreads=320 -gpugrid=336<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 1GB DirectCU || 89.5 || ? || ? || 1000 || 336 || guiminer GPU:1000mhz MEM:900<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 1GB ( evga FPB ) || 71.4 || -- || -- || 870/1744/1800 || 336 || guiminer-cuda v2012-02-19 FW290.53 Win7x64<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 1GB ( evga ) || 83.1 || 0.519 || 160 || 925/1850/900@0.960v || 336 || guiminer (phoenix1.75) -k poclbm AGGRESSION=8 FASTLOOP BFI_INT -v WORKSIZE=256 ForceWare 301.42 Win7x64 Runs at 70°C with fan at 100%<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 (2 cards) || 102 || 0.319? || 320? || 1350 || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 (2 cards) OC || 127 || 0.374 || 340 || 1620 || 2x 336 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2444.0 rpcminer-cuda] -gpugrid=128 -gputhreads=128 ver.20110227<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 1GB OC (2x MsiHawksSLI) || 158 || 0.658 || 240w(used kill a watt) || core/shader/ram@vcore 930/1860/1150@1.087v (only vcore raised) || 2x 336 || rpcminer-cuda ver.20110227 -gpugrid=320 -gputhreads=320 -aggression=7 Watercooled stable @ 110°F/43° !!!USE ASUS GPU Tweak with GPU-Z (afterburner v2.2.3 wont OC with NVIDIA driver 306.97) I would need gpu bios mod to get more oc/volt. Setting faster ram did increase Mhash/s versus setting ram=core clock.<br />
|-<br />
| GTX465 || 64.41 || 0.322 || 200 || 1215 || 352 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX470 || 81.98 || 0.381 || 215 || 1215 || 448 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX470 || 94.7 || || || 1414 || ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX470 || 103.7 || || || 1520 || || memory @ 418MHz, stable @ 72 deg fan @ 90%, puddinpop rpcminer-cuda -gpugrid=96 -gputhread=128 AGGRESSION=14 GIGABYTE brand card BIOS 70.00.21.00.03 <br />
|-<br />
| GTX470 || 111.9 || 0.520 || 215 || 1650 || 448 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX470 || 115 || || || 1616 || || phoenix 1.46 poclbm VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=6<br />
|-<br />
| GTX470x2 || 121 ea. (130 burst ea.) || || || 1700 ||448|| PuddinPop rpcminer-cuda -gpugrid=96 -gputhreads=128 AGGRESSION=14 (memory 856 Max Temp. 71 deg. F on Water 1.085v+, Stable on Beast 2.0>3 days, no i7 CPU OC, driver 280.26, bios 70.00.21.00.03)<br />
|-<br />
| GTX480 || 101.28 || 0.405 || 250 || 1401 || 480 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX480 || 140.43 || || || 1700 || 480 || rpcminer-cuda -gpugrid=512 -gputhreads=480<br />
|-<br />
| GTX480 AMP!Zotac|| 140.1 || || || 1700|| 480 || rpcminer-cuda -gpugrid=480 -gputhreads=480 (vCore-1050,Core Clock-851, Shader Clock-1702, Memory Clock-2033, t-79°c, Water 43°c, stable temperature and work)<br />
|-<br />
| GTX550 Ti || 45.0 || ? || ? || ? || ? || EVGA 1GB, WinXP rpcminer, no overclock<br />
|-<br />
| GTX560 Ti || 67.7 || 0.39 || 170 || 1700 || 384 || standard EVGA 560, no overclock<br />
|-<br />
| GTX560 Ti || 74 || 0.41 || 170 || 822 || 384 || MSI 560Ti HAWK; core 822 Mhz clock (no overclock); rpcminer-cuda.exe -aggression=4 -gpugrid=64 -gputhreads=384; temp - 71°C; Win 7 x64<br />
|-<br />
| GTX560 Ti || 74.8 || 0.41 || 180 || 1700 || 384 || gigabyte 900Mhz clock; -w 512 -v<br />
|-<br />
| GTX560 Ti || 81 || 0.45 || 180 || 835 || 384 || Gainward GTX560TI Phantom, default clock, rpcminer-cuda<br />
|-<br />
| GTX560 Ti || 85.1 || - || - || - || - || cgminer 2.5.0, linux 32bit, nvidia 295.41, Intensity: 14<br />
|-<br />
| GTX560 Ti || 100 || 0.5 || 200 || 1000 || 384 || GFX - MSI 560Ti HAWK; rpcminer-cuda.exe -aggression=8 -gpugrid=64 -gputhreads=384; GPU temp - 68°C; OS - Windows 8 x64 .<br />
|-<br />
| GTX 560M || 39.3 || 0.38 || 75 W || 775|| 192 || [http://www.examiner.com/computers-in-denver/toshiba-qosmio-x775-q7380-review-review source1] [http://www.notebookcheck.net/NVIDIA-GeForce-GTX-560M.48313.0.html source2] Note: Uses the 295.51 Beta Drivers<br />
|-<br />
| GTX560 OC || 86.7 || <0.51 || >170 || 1800 || 384 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2444.0 rpcminer-cuda] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg72816#msg72816 source]<br />
|-<br />
| GTX570 || 105.83 || 0.483 || 219 || 1464 || 480 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX570 || 140 || 0.639 || 219 || 750 || 480 || rpcminer-cuda.exe -aggression=10 -gpugrid=480 -gputhreads=960; display driver stops working with aggression=11 under win7 x64 driver 270.61<br />
|-<br />
| GTX570 || 157 || 0.717 || 219 || 850 || 480 || rpcminer-cuda.exe -aggression=11 -gpugrid=120 -gputhreads=960<br />
|-<br />
| GTX570 || 165 || || || 925 || 480 || rpcminer-cuda.exe -gpugrid=120 -gputhreads=960; vcore 1.1v; Win7 x64 304.79 Beta; -aggression=11 adds strong lag with minimal increase in hashrate.<br />
|-<br />
| GTX570 || 160 || || || 925 || 480 || rpcminer-cuda.exe -gpugrid=104 -gputhreads=832; No desktop lag, very minimal loss in hashrate compared to much laggier settings<br />
|-<br />
| GTX580 || 156.6 || 0.642 || 244 || 1544 || 512 || cgminer 2.11.3 on Win 8-64 with I=6, driver nVidia 314.22<br />
|-<br />
| GTX580x2 || 2x 146 || 0.598 || 244 || 1544 || 512 || rpcminer-cuda.exe -gpugrid=128 -gputhreads=1024 <br />
(aggression levels above the default of 6 not recommended; only a gain of ~3MH/s per card, and '''heavy''' lag, GUIMiner v2011-08-24, win7 64bit nVidia 290.36 beta driver)<br />
|-<br />
| GTX590 || 193.1 || --- || --- || 1215 || 2x 512 || poclbm -v -w 256, Win<br />
|-<br />
| GTX590 || 2x 121.48 || --- || --- || 750 || 2x 512 || <br />
|-<br />
| GTX670 || 112.00 || 1.1 || 100 || 1275 || 1344 || EVGA GTX670FTW 2GB / GPU Clock offset +75Mhz with EVGA Precision X / GUIMiner -f 60 / Windows 7 64-Bit. (09-13-2012)<br />
|-<br />
| GTX680 || 127.3 || || || 1280 || 1536 || Asus GTX 680 2GB DirectCU II: Windows 7 64 bit: Nvidia 310.90 driver: Offset of 186: Runs at a constant 52C<br />
|-<br />
| GTX680 || 110.00 || || || 1110 || 1536 || RPCMiner with OpenCL or others. Might crash once mining stops. No Flags and Stock Settings (GPU Boost @ 1110mhz Core) with EVGA GTX 680, latest version of GUIMiner (2012-2-19) and Windows 7 x64.<br />
|-<br />
| GTX680 || 120.00 || 1.2 || 100 || 1272 || 1536 || Ufasoft Galaxy 4GB (GPU Clock offset +70Mhz with EVGA Precision X) (2012-7-28) and Windows 7 64-Bit.<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro FX 580 || 5.7 || 0.14 || 40 || 1125 || 4 ||rpcminer-cuda, Win, -gpugrid=128 -gputhreads=512<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro FX 770M || 5.75 || || || 500 || 32 || DiabloMiner-Windows.exe BFI_INT FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=6, Win<br />
|-<br />
|Quadro FX 770M || 6.39 || || || 500 || 32 || DiabloMiner-Windows.exe BFI_INT FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=6 w 64, Win 7x64<br />
|-<br />
|Quadro FX 880M || 9.6 || || || || || poclbm/guiminer<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro FX 1600M || 6 || 0.12 || 50 || 625 || 32 ||rpcminer-cuda, Win<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro FX 1800 || 13.6 || - || - || - || - || cgminer 2.5.0, linux 32bit, nvidia 256.44 Intensity: 4<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro FX 2000M || 23 || 0.397 || 58 || || || phoenix 1.48, -k poclbm, VECTORS, AGGRESION=6, Lenovo W520 platform<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro FX 2800M || 22 || 0.293 || 75 || 600 || 96 ||DiabloMiner, win<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro FX 3000M || 28.6 || - || - || - || - || cgminer 2.5.0, linux 32bit, nvidia 295.41 Intensity: 3<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro FX 3600M || 36 || 0.514 || 70 || 500 || 96 ||<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro FX 3800 || 33.3 || || || || || poclbm/guiminer -f0 -w128<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro NVS 135M || 1.05 || 0.1 || 10 || 800 || 1 || <br />
|-<br />
| Quadro NVS 295 || 1.7 || 0.07 || 23 || 567 || 8 || phoenix<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro NVS 3100M || 3.6 || 0.257 || 14 || 600 || 16 || rpcminer-cuda, Win, CUDA 3.1.1<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro NVS 4200M || 10.0 || || || 810 || || guiminer, Win7-64<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro 5000 || 67.7 || 0.445 || 152 || 513 || 352 || rpcminer-cuda.exe -aggression=7 gpugrid=352 gputhreads=704;<br />
|-<br />
| Tesla C1060 || 52.5 || || || 1296 || 240 || poclbm, Win7x64<br />
|-<br />
| Tesla K20 || 134.8 || || || 706 || 2496 || poclbm, Linux<br />
|-<br />
| Tesla M2050 || 79.8 || || || 1550 || 448 || DiabloMiner<br />
|-<br />
| Tesla M2050 || 94.5 || || || 1550 || || poclbm<br />
|-<br />
| Tesla S1070 || 155.2 || || 800 <ref name='nvidia_S1070'/> || 1440 (GT200b)<ref name='nvidia_S1070'/> || 960<ref name='nvidia_S1070'/> || rpcminer-cuda, Linux, CUDA 3.2, 4 instances (-gpu=0 through -gpu=3)<br />
|-<br />
| Tesla S2070 || 749.23 || || || 1150<ref name='nvidia_S2070'/> || 1792<ref name='nvidia_S2070'/> || rpcminer-cuda, Linux, CUDA 4.0, 8 instances (-gpu=0 through -gpu=7) <br />
|-<br />
| GTX280x2 || 102.7 || || || || ||<br />
|-<br />
|}<br />
<references><br />
<ref name='nvidia_S1070'>The S1070 is a dedicated supercomputing platform that features four Tesla units (GT200). Technical data taken from [http://www.nvidia.de/object/tesla_s1070_de.html NVIDIA]</ref><br />
<ref name='nvidia_S2070'>The S2070 is a dedicated supercomputing platform that features four Fermi units (C2070). Technical data taken from [http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nvidia_Tesla Wikipedia] (Documentation from NVIDIA webpage is confusing)</ref><br />
</references><br />
<br />
==CPUs/APUs==<br />
<br />
A lot of nice data can be pulled from [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.0 this thread] to seed this section. <br />
<br />
Might you wish to throttle CPU load a bit, so it doesn't reach 100°C, it can be done with Battle Encoder Shirase to a margin, like, -15% of available CPU cycles.<br />
<br />
Often, the best combination to be is to throttle CPU miner to -5% '''AND''' set it to least of priority levels, so as not to choke GPU miner up.<br />
<br />
===AMD===<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! nprocs !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! TDP [W] !! CPU Clock !! Mhash/s CPU !! Mhash/s GPU !! GPU !! GPU Clock !! SP !! Software !! Notes<br />
|-<br />
| 4x Opteron 6174 || 48 || 115 || 0.36 || 320W || 2.2 GHz || 2.4<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| cpuminer v0.8.1 || --alg 4way --threads 48<br />
|-<br />
| 2x Opteron 6172 || 24 || 55 || 0.24 || 230W || 2.1 GHz || 2.3<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| cgminer v2.7.6 || --algo 4way -t 24<br />
|-<br />
| 2x Opteron 6128 || 16 || 32.4 || 0.141 || 230W || 2 GHz || 32.4<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| 0.3.19 || -4way<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon XP 2000+ || 2 || 0.62 || 0.009 || 70W || 1.67 GHz || 0.62<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| 0.3.18/Ubuntu || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source] [http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm?articleid=914&page=4 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon 64 3500+ || 1 || 1.18 || 0.013 || 89W || 2.54 GHz || 1.18<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| ufasoft v0.4 || overclocked (originally 2.2 GHz)<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon 64 X2 3800+ || 2 || 1.73 || 0.03 || 65 W || 2.00 GHz || 1.73<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || -algo=4way<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon 64 X2 4000+ || 2 || 1.9 || 0.02 || 65W || 2.1 GHz || 1.9<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| rpc-miner ||<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon 64 X2 4400+ || || 2.09 || 0.032 || 65W || 2.3GHz || 2.09<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| 0.3.19/Win x64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon 64 X2 6000+ || 2 || 2.81 || 0.02 || 125W || 3 GHz || 2.81<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg22881#msg22881 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon 64 X2 6400+ Black Edition || 2 || 2.9 || 0.023 || 125W || 3.2 GHz || 2.9<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| 0.3.20.2 BETA/Win 7 x64 || -4way<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon II X2 240e || 2 || 2.71 || 0.06 || 45W || 2.81 GHz || 2.71<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon II X2 250 || 2 || 5.6 || 0.09 || 65W || 3.01GHz || 5.6<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| bitcoin-miner 0.11 ||<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon II X4 630 || 4 || 10.7 || 0.11 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 10.7<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| bitcoin-miner 0.4 || <br />
|-<br />
| Opteron 8220 x16 || 16 || 25 || || || 2.8Ghz || 1.5 <br />
|colspan=4| <br />
| ufasoft / OpenSuse 64bit || running default, but had to copy 32bit binaries over to get curl and ufasoft running. might be better when using native 32bit system w/o other users on the machine ||<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 3.8 || 0.04 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 3.8<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| 0.3.1x/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom X4 9950 BE || 4 || 9.3 || 0.07 || 126W || 2.6 GHz || 2.32<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| bitcoin-miner 0.13/WinXP || No GPU<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 7.2 || 0.08 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 7.2<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| cpu-miner 0.2.1/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X4 810 || 4 || 5.0 || || 95W || 2.8 GHz ||<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| rpcminer-cpu ||<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X4 810 || 4 || 9.5 || || 95W || 2.8 GHz ||<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| rpcminer-4way ||<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X4 810 || 4 || 10.5 || || 95W || 2.8 GHz ||<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| ufasoft v0.10 ||<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X4 810 || 4 || 11.5 || || 95W || 2.8 GHz ||<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| cgminer 1.5.3 || "cgminer 1.5.3 --algo 4way" on Ubuntu 11.10 alpha 2 (64 bit), built by GCC 4.6.1 with "-O3 -Wall -march=native" <br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X4 955 || 4 || 11 || 0.09 || 125W || 3.2 GHz || 11<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| rpcminer-4way ||<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X4 965 || 4 || 12 || 0.09 || 140W || 3.4 GHz || 11<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| rpcminer-4way ||<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X6 1055T || 6 || 15.84 || 0.13 || 125W || 2.82 GHz || 15.84 <br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X6 1055T || 6 || 23.6 || || 95W || 3.50 GHz || 23.6 <br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| [http://github.com/pooler/cpuminer pooler's cpuminer] 2.2.2 || --algo=sha256d<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X6 1075T || 6 || 21.3 || || 125W|| ||<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| minerd || Ubuntu 11.04 amd64 runlevel=1 -algo=4way -threads=6<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X6 1090T || 6 || 18|| || 141W|| 3.50 GHz || 3<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| minerd || <br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X6 1100T || 6 || 22 || 0.176 || 125W || 3.82 GHz || 22<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| bitcoin-miner || Aciid#bitcoin-dev<br />
|-<br />
| Sempron 3000+ || 2 || 0.8 || || 62W || 1.6 GHz || 0.8<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| cpuminer || --alg 4way<br />
|-<br />
| Turion X2 RM-70 || 2 || 1.9 || || 65W || 2.1 GHz || 1.9<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| cpuminer || --alg 4way<br />
|-<br />
| Zacate E-350 || 2 || 11 || 0.615 || 18W || 1.6 Ghz || 1.231 || 9.831 || HD6310M || 492 Mhz || 80 || poclbm -v -w128 + Ufasoft 0.7 || stock speeds<br />
|-<br />
| Zacate E-350 || 2 || 12<br />
|colspan=2|<br />
| 1.648 Ghz || 1.252 || 10.87 || HD6310M || 492 Mhz || 80 || poclbm -v -w 256 -f 1 || "autotune" speed with ASUS EFI BIOS<br />
|-<br />
| Ontario C-50 || 2 || 6.2 || 0.68 || 9W || 1.0 Ghz || 1.200 || 6.2 || HD6250M || 277 Mhz || 80 || poclbm -v -w128 -f5 -r5 || <br />
|-<br />
| A4-3400 || 2 || 23.2 || || || 75W || 2.4 Ghz || || 23.2 || 6350 || stock || || GUIminer || ||<br />
|-<br />
| A8-3850 || 4 || 60 || || 100W || Stock || || 60 || HD6550D || Stock || 400 || poclbm.exe, Win7-32, 4GB RAM || All running at stock speeds, and set to auto in BIOS.<br />
|<br />
|-<br />
| A8-3870K || 4 || 95 || || 100W (@stock) || 3.3 Ghz || || 95 || HD6550D || 900MHz || 400 || phoenix.exe -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=4 WORKSIZE=128, Win7-64, 8GB RAM 1667MHz || M/B ASUS F1 A75-M Pro, CPU/GPU BIOS overclocked<br />
|-<br />
| A10-5800K || 4 || 105 || || 100W || 3.8 Ghz || || 105 || HD7660D || 800MHz || 384 || cgminer Intensity=7 || Linux 64bit (Ubuntu 12.10), AMD-APP-SDK-v2.7-RC-lnx64, stock speeds *not* overclocked<br />
|}<br />
<br />
===ARM===<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! Mhash/s/$ /€ !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment<br />
|-<br />
| ARM926EJ-S || 1 || 0.187 || ? || ? || ? || 1.2 GHz || cpuminer || Seagate Dockstar [http://archlinuxarm.org/platforms/armv5/seagate-dockstar ArchLinux]<br />
|-<br />
| Marvel Feroceon (88FR131) || 1 || 0.195 || 0.224 ||<0.01|| 0.87 W || 1.2 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-06-15) || Marvell SheevaPlug, Debian, 'c' algo<br />
|-<br />
| ARM1136EJ-S || 1 || 0.11 || ? || ? || ? || 0.528 GHz || cpuminer git || T-Mobile Pulse, inside Debian chroot, 'c' algo<br />
|-<br />
| ARM1176JZ(F)-S || 1 || 0.119 || ? || ? || ? || 0.412 GHz || [http://github.com/pooler/cpuminer pooler's cpuminer] 2.2 || iPhone 3G, 'sha256d' algo<br />
|-<br />
| ARM1176JZ(F)-S || 1 || 0.2 || ? || ? || 3.75W || 800 Mhz || cgminer 2.5.0 || RaspberryPi Model B, SoC BCM2835, Debian Squezee 19-04-2012, Overclocked Cpu 800mhz<br />
|-<br />
| Cortex-A8 || 1 || 0.125 || 0.36 || <0.01 || 0.35 W || 0.6 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || Nokia N900: 'cryptopp'<br />
|-<br />
| Cortex-A8 || 1 || 0.2 || 0.57 || <0.01 || 0.35 W || 0.6 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || Nokia N900: 'c' algo<br />
|-<br />
| Cortex-A8 || 1 || 0.365 || ? || ? || ? || 0.6 GHz || [http://github.com/pooler/cpuminer pooler's cpuminer] || BeagleBoard: 'sha256d' algo<br />
|-<br />
| Cortex-A8 || 1 || 0.435 || ? || ? || ? || 0.8 GHz || [http://github.com/pooler/cpuminer pooler's cpuminer] 2.2 || 'sha256d' algo<br />
|-<br />
| Cortex-A8 || 1 || 0.44 || ? || ? || ? || 0.8 GHz || cpuminer 2.2.3 (-mfpu=neon) || EfikaMX (iMX.51), CRUX ARMHF, cpuminer -a sha256d<br />
|-<br />
| AllWinner A10(A8) || 1 || 0.568 || ? || ? || <2.5W || 1.0 GHz || [http://github.com/pooler/cpuminer pooler's cpuminer] 2.2 || -a sha256d #Native Lubuntu armhf build <br />
|-<br />
| Cortex-A9 || 2 || 0.57|| 1.14 ||<0.01 || 0.5 W || 1.0 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-24) || Toshiba AC100, ubuntu, 'c' algo<br />
|-<br />
| Cortex-A9 || 2 || 1.3 || ? || ? || ? || 1.2 GHz || [http://github.com/pooler/cpuminer pooler's cpuminer] 2.2.3 || Samsung Galaxy S II - CFLAGS="-O3 -mfpu=neon"<br />
|}<br />
<br />
===Intel===<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! Mhash / $<ref name='amazon_20110625'/>/€<ref name='geizhals_20110625'/> !! ACP [W] !! Clock [GHz] !! Version !! Comment<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium III (Coppermine) || 2 || 0.39 || 0.008 |||| TDP 2× 26.1 W || 1 || Ufasoft 0.32 (compiled from source), Debian Squeeze || [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_Pentium_III_microprocessors#.22Coppermine.22_.28180_nm.29 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium III mobile ? || 1 || 0.3 || 0.014 |||| 21 || 1.07 || 0.3.1x/Win2K || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source] [http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=27380 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium M 1.6ghz || 1 || 0.4 || || || || 1.6 || minerd (jgarzik's 1.0) || cryppto, Windows 7<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium M 1.6ghz || 1 || 0.62 || || || || 1.6 || Ufasoft 0.20 || Windows XP Professional<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium M 1.6ghz || 1 || 0.71 || || || || 1.6 || [http://github.com/pooler/cpuminer pooler's cpuminer] 2.2 || Gentoo Linux<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium M 1.73ghz || 1 || 0.5 || || || || 1.73 || minerd (jgarzik's 1.0) || cryppto, Windows 7<br />
|-<br />
| Old Xeon 512k (Dual) || 2x1/2 || 2.0 || || || || 3.0 || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || HT disabled, algo=4way (twice as fast as the 2nd best algo)<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium 4 2.0A || 1 || 0.85 || || || || 2.0 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft-0.4]/WinXP || -g no -t 2<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium 4 630 || 1/2 || 1.29 || || || || 3.0 || ufasoft 0.23 || Windows XP<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium Dual-Core E2180 || 2/2 || 1.75 || || || || 2.0 || rpcminer-cpu || Win7-64<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium Dual-Core E2180 || 2/2 || 4.1 || || || || 2.0 || cpuminer || sse2_64<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium Dual-Core E2180 || 2/2 || 4.5 || || || || 2.0 || ufasoft v0.11 || Win7-64<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium Dual-Core E5400 || 2/2 || 2.27 || 0.03 || || 65 || 2.7 || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Celeron E330 || 2/2 || 2.2 || 0.03 || || 65 || 2.5 || 0.3.19/Ubuntu10.04 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]<br />
|-<br />
|-<br />
| Celeron E3400 || 2/2 || 5.9 || - || - || - || 2.6 || Ufasoft v0.13 / GUIMiner v2011-06-14 || WinXP 32 bit, SSE2, Flags "-g no" <br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Quad Q6600 || 4/4 || 11.0 || || 0.02/0.06 || 105 || 2.40 || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || -a 60 -g no -t 4<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Quad Q8200 || 4/4 || 10.9 || || 0.06/0.10 || || 2.33 || Ufasoft 0.14 || -g no -l yes -t 4<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Quad Q9400 || 4/4 || 11 || 0.046 || 0.06/0.07 || 95 || 2.66 || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || -a 60 -g no -t 4<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Quad Q9650 || 4/4 || 18.67 || || 0.05/0.06 || 95 || 4.00 || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || -a 60 -g no -t 4<br />
|-<br />
| Core i3 530 || 2/4 || 8.31 || 0.10 || 0.06/0.10 || 80 || 3.66 || Ufasoft 0.7 || -v -a5 -g no -t 4<br />
|-<br />
| Core i3 M350 || 2/4 || 1.48 || 0.04 || || 35 || 2.27 || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Core i3-2100 || 2/4 || 8.28 || || || || 3.1 || ufasoft v0.20 || <br />
|-<br />
| Core i5 M450 || 2/4 || 1.8 || 0.05 || || 35 || 1.2 || 0.3.17/Win7-54 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source]<br />
|- <br />
| Core i5-650 || 2/4 || 5.1 || 0.04 ? || 0.02/0.03 || || 3.2 || cpuminer-0.7 || -4way<br />
|-<br />
| Core i5-750 || 4/4 || 14 || || 0.06/0.10 || || 3.2 || bitcoin-miner 0.11 || -a 5 -g no -t 4<br />
|-<br />
| Core i5 ? || 4/? || 6.5 || || || || || client from svn || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37621#msg37621 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 4.5 || 0.05 || 0.02/0.03 || 95 || 3.1 || cpuminer git (2011-01-22) || cryptopp_asm32<br />
|-<br />
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 14 || 0.15 || 0.07/0.09 || 95 || 3.1 || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || sse2_64<br />
|-<br />
| Core i5-2400S || 4/4 || 16.6 || || || 65 || 2.5 || [http://github.com/pooler/cpuminer pooler's cpuminer] 2.2.3 || Linux Mint 13<br />
|-<br />
| Core i5 2500K || 4/4 || 20.6 || ||0.10/0.12 || || 4.2 || bitcoin-miner || -g no<br />
|-<br />
| Core i5 2600K || 4/8 || 17.3 || || || 75 || 3.4 || bitcoin-miner || -g no. 75W for the whole System without monitor (MSI Board). CPU underclocked to 3,4Ghz and undervolted to 1,012Vcore. Passive Cooling! 3.6ghz results in 18,4 Mhash/s<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 2600K || 4/8 || 18.6 || || || 95 W max. || 3.4 || Ufasoft bitcoin-miner 0.20 || -g no -t 8 CPU @ 3.511Ghz 1.176V<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 2600 || 4/8 || 23.9 || || || || 3.4 || [http://github.com/pooler/cpuminer pooler's cpuminer] 2.2 || Ubuntu Linux 11.10<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 620M || 2/4 || 1.888 || || || || 2.66 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8994.0 RPCMiner GUI] v2011-05-22 / Mac OS X 10.6.7 || Model: MacBookPro6,2 RAM: 4GB<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 620M || 2/4 || 6.5 || || || || 3.33 || This is achieved by running RPC 4 way miner in VMware Fusion 4 (running win 7 in the VM) while in Mac OSX / Mac OS X 10.6.8 || Model: MacBookPro6,2 RAM: 8GB.The CPU appears to turbo boost to 3.33GHz in this way from 2.67GHz when running it in this way.The MBP gets very hot and uses a lot of energy though so watch those temps.It'll throttle after a while unless you keep the air vents clear underneath (ie don't put int in your lap,etc).<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 720QM || 4/8 || 7.9 || ?|| || 45 || 2.8 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] || stream processors overclocked from 1.6 GHz; Dell Precision M6500, Win7-64, 8GB DDR3<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 820 || 4/8 || 13.8 || || || || 2.8 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] || -t 8<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 920 || 4/8 || 19.2 || 0.10 || || 195 || 4.0 (x21) || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] || -a 5<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 950 || 4/8 || 5.88 || 0.039 || || 150 || 3.83 (x23) || bitcoin-0.3.20.2 Win7-64 ||<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 950 || 4/8 || 18.9 || 0.126 || || 150 || 3.83 (x23) || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] v0.4 ||<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 980x || 6/12 || 19.2 || 0.15 || || 130 || 4.4 (x33) || cpuminer/Win7-64 || <br />
|- <br />
| Core i7 980x || 6/12 || 8.7 || || || || 3.9 (x27) || 0.3.17/Win7-64 || <br />
|- <br />
| Core i7 990x || 6/12 || 33.3 || || || || 4.5 (x32) || ufasoft/Win2008 R2-64 || Ram - 12Gb, Rampage III BlackEdition, Water cooling<br />
|- <br />
| Core i7 2635QM || 4/8 || 2.93 || || || || 2.00 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8994.0 RPCMiner GUI] v2011-05-22 / Mac OS X 10.6.7 || Model: MacBookPro8,2 RAM: 4GB<br />
|- <br />
| Core i7 620M || 2/4 || 6.3 || 0.18 || || 35 || 2.66 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] v0.4 || <br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 2600k || 4/4 || 6.7 || || || || 4.00 || phoenix 0.48 ||<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 3770k || 4/8 || 5.2 || || || || 4.4 || Guiminer v2012-12-03 || Windows 7 x64 : -v argument increased Mhash/s from 5.0 to 5.2<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 3930k || 6/12 || 66.6 || || || || 4.625 (125 x 37) || Ufasoft bitcoin-miner v0.28 || Windows 7 x64, uses ~190watts : -v argument increased Mhash/s from 36.0 to 66.6<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo U7600 || 1 || 1.1 || || || || 1.2 || minerd (jgarzik's 1.0) || cryppto, Windows 7<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo E5200 || 2/2 || 6.2 || 0.086 || || 72 || 2.76 || Ufasoft/Win7-64 || TDP is 65W + 7W overclock<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo E6550 || 1/2 || 2.45 || || || || 2.33 || cpuminer 0.7.1 (Linux) || --algo=sse2_64<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo E6850 || 2/2 || 6.75 || 0.10 || || 65 || 3.0 || ufasoft-0.3 ||<br />
|- <br />
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 7.76 || 0.11 || || 70 || 3.33 || ufasoft-0.3 || uncertain of overclock; miner optimized for Intel Core<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 2.52 || 0.04 || || 65 || 2.66 || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo E8200 || 2/2 || 2.3 || 0.035 || || 65 || 2.66 || rpcminer-cpu ||<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo E8400 || 2/2 || 6.9 || 0.106 || || 65 || 3.0 || ufasoft v0.10 || windows 7/64bit (-t 2)<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo E8500 || 1/2 || 3.6 || || || || 3.16 || guiminer v2011-06-14 || windows vista 32bit<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo E8500 || 2/2 || 7.2 || || || || 3.16 || guiminer v2011-06-14 || windows vista 32bit<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo P8700 || 2/2 || 5.9 || || || || 2.53 || ufasoft v0.21 || windows 7/64bit <br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo T5450 || 2/2 || 2.5 || 0.07 || || 35 || 1.63 || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || Ubuntu 11.04<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo T5500 || 2/2 || 4.3 || || || || 1.66 || [http://github.com/pooler/cpuminer pooler's cpuminer] 2.2 || Gentoo Linux (amd64)<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo T6400 || 2/2 || 4.2 || 0.12 || || 35 || 2.00 || cpuminer git (Linux) || --algo=sse2_64<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo T7250 || 2/2 || 4.5 || 0.13 || || 35 || 2.00 || bitcoin-miner 0.13/WinXP || No GPU<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo T7450 || 2/2 || 3.7 || 0.10 || || 35 || 2.13 || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || Ubuntu 11.04<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo T9400 || 2/2 || 4.2 || || || || 2.53 || ufasoft v0.13 || Win7-64<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Extreme X9000 || 2/2 || 2.37 || || || || 2.8 || rpcminer-cpu || Win7-64<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Extreme X9000 || 2/2 || 6.2 || || || || 2.8 || ufasoft v0.11 || Win7-64<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Extreme X9000 || 2/2 || 7.2 || || || || 3.2 || ufasoft v0.11 || Win7-64 Overclocked from 2.8 GHz to 3.2 GHz<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon 2.8 || 2/2 || 0.8 || || || || 2.8 || cpuminer || cryptopp_asm32 <br />
|-<br />
| Xeon 3060 || 1/2 || 2.03 || 0.03 || || 65 || 2. || cpuminer 0.8.1 (Linux) || --algo=cryptopp_asm32<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon Prestonia 2.4 (dual) || 2x1/2 || 2.16 || 0.017 || || 130 || 2.4 || ufasoft v0.4 || <br />
|-<br />
| Xeon X5355 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 10.13 || 0.16 || || 120 || 2.6 || bitcoind || Roughly the same speed as the "c" algo in cpuminer<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E3-1230 V2 (quad) || 4/8 || 19.7 || ? || ? || ? || 3.70 || cgminer 2.8.3 || -O2 -march=core-avx-i algo=sse2_64<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon X5355 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 22.76 || 0.09 || || 120 || 2.6 || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || -O2 -march=core2, algo=sse2_64<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon X5365 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 26.00 || ? || || ? || 3.0 || cpuminer git (2011-06-15) || algo=sse2_64<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon X5650 || 2x6/24 || 28.6 || ? || ? || ? || 2.67 || cpuminer 1.0.2 || --algo 4way<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon x5680 (dual) || 2x6/24 || 48 || ? || ? || ? || 3.33GHz || Ufasoft 0.29 || CentOS 6.2 x86_64<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon x5690 (dual) || 2x6/24 || 52 || ? || ? || ? || 3.46GHz || Ufasoft 0.29 || CentOS 6.2 x86_64<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5-2690 (dual) || 2x8/32 || 66 || ? || ? || 2x135W || 2.9GHz || Ufasoft 64-bit 0.31 || Windows Server 2008R2 x64<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5335 || 4/4 || 9.35 || 0.12 || || 80 || 2.00 || ufasoft v0.11 || Vista-32<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5410 || 4/4 || 9.8 || ? || || 80 || 2.33|| ufasoft v0.10 || CentOS 5.5 x64 <br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5440 || 4/8 || 7.3 || ? || || 80 || 2.66|| Kiv's poclbm-gui || FIXME: Either wrong model # or wrong threads/speed info<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5506 || 4/4 || 9.6 || ? || || 80 || 2.13|| ufasoft v0.10 || CentOS 5.5 x64 <br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5520 || 4/8 || 6.5 || 0.08 || || 80 || 2.27 || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5530 || 4/8 || 7.14 || 0.09 || || 80 || 2.4 || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5620 || 4/8 || 11.2 || ? || || 80 || 2.4 || ufasoft v0.10 -t 4 || CentOS 5.5 x64 Hyper-Threading is off<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5630 (dual) || 2x4/8 || 8 || 0.1 || || 80 || 2.53 || 0.3.17/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E6520 (dual) || 2x4/8 || 24.7 || || || || 2.53 || ufasoft v0.10 || windows 2008 R2 64bit (-t 16)<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E7220 || 2/2 || 6.3 || ? || || 80 || 2.93|| ufasoft v0.10 || CentOS 5.5 x64 <br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E7320 (dual) || 2x2 || 1.5 || || || || 2.8 || cgminer v1.2.8 || 2x2.8ghz dual core running Ubuntu 11.04 x86 (individual cores get 0.4 MH/s)<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E7450 (quad) || 4x6/24 || 60 || || || || 2.40 || ufasoft v0.13 || -t 24<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E7520 (dual) || 2x4/16 || 18 || || || 95 || 1.87 || ufasoft v0.10 || windows 2008 R2 64bit (-t 16)<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon W3680 || 6/12 || 18 || || || 130 || 3.33 || cpuminer v1.0.2 --algo=4way || Ubuntu 11.04 64bit<br />
|-<br />
| Atom Z520 || 1/2 || 1.20 || || || 2 || 1.7 || ufasoft 1.18 || Asus Eee 1101HA with overclocking capabilities<br />
|-<br />
| Atom N230 || 1/2 || 0.375 || || || 4 || 1.6 || rpcminer-cpu || <br />
|-<br />
| Atom N230 || 1/2 || 0.245 || || || 4 || 1.6 || rpcminer-4way || <br />
|-<br />
| Atom N230 || 1/2 || 0.97 || || || 4 || 1.6 || ufasoft v0.10 || <br />
|-<br />
| Atom N270 || 1/2 || 1.19 || 0.24 || || 5 || 1.6 || ufasoft v0.10 || <br />
|-<br />
| Atom N450 || 1/2 || 1.60 || 0.31 || || 6.5 || 2.06 || ufasoft v0.10 || <br />
|-<br />
| Atom N550 || 2/4 || 1.97 || || || || 1.5 || ufasoft v0.21 || Windows 7/64 bit<br />
|-<br />
| Atom 330 || 2/4 || 1.80 || || || 8 || 1.6 || ufasoft v0.13 || -t 4<br />
|-<br />
| Atom D510 || 2/4 || 1.00 || || || || 1.6 || cpuminer w cryptopp_asm32 || debian linux 6.0, headless system, 2 GB RAM, running from usb-flash<br />
|-<br />
| Atom D510 || 4/4 || 2.3 || 0.07 || || 30 || 1.6 || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || Ubuntu 11.04 Server<br />
|}<br />
<br />
<references><br />
<ref name='amazon_20110625'>$ Prices from http://www.amazon.com on 2011-06-25</ref><br />
<ref name='geizhals_20110625'>€ Prices from http://geizhals.at/eu on 2011-06-25</ref><br />
</references><br />
<br />
===Other===<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! Mhash/s/$ !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment<br />
|-<br />
| Cell || 6 || 21 || 0.35 || 0.07 || 60W || 3.2 GHz || Cellminer || Sony Playstation 3 (FAT): Needs custom firmware. [https://github.com/verement/cellminer source] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4704.20 source] Total power usage of PS3 fat is 120W but only the Cell cpu is active.<br />
|-<br />
| Cell || 7 || 26.6 || ? || ? || 60W || 3.2 GHz || Cellminer || Sony Playstation 3 (FAT): Needs custom firmware. [https://github.com/verement/cellminer source] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4704.20 source] Running with 7th spu enabled and both ppe cores.<br />
|-<br />
| Cell || 6 || 21 || 0.7 || 0.07 || 35W || 3.2 GHz || cellminer || Sony Playstation 3 (SLIM): Total power usage of PS3 slim is 70W but only the Cell cpu is active.<br />
|-<br />
| MIPS || 1 || 0.026 || ? || ? || ? || 200 MHz || cpuminer || ASUS WL-500G Deluxe Router Running [http://openwrt.org/ OpenWrt]<br />
|-<br />
| VIA Eden || 1 || 1.3 || 0.17 || || 8W || 1600 MHz || cpuminer || VIA Eden w/ padlock<br />
|-<br />
| PowerPC 7447A || 1 || 0.53 || || || || 1420 MHz || cpuminer ||<br />
|-<br />
| PowerPC 7450 (G4e) || 1 || 1.29 || || || || 1670 MHz || cgminer 2.0.7 || PowerBook5,6; Mac OS X 10.5.8; Altivec<br />
|-<br />
| PowerPC 750 (G3) || 1 || 0.140 || || || || 600 MHz || cpuminer || iBook G3 600 w/ Cryptopp<br />
|-<br />
| IBM POWER4+ 2/way || 2/1 || 0.58 || || || || 1450 MHz || cpuminer 2.2.3 || CRUX PPC (64bit), cpuminer -a sha256d -t 1<br />
|-<br />
| IBM Power7 (PowerPC) || || 7.6 || || || || 3.5 Ghz || cgminer || IBM Power7 770, SuSE Linux 11.1, 4 cores, OpenCL, YASM, Altivec<br />
|-<br />
| Google App Engine || 1 || 0.144 || || || 0W || || pyminer || Modified version of [https://github.com/jgarzik/pyminer pyminer] for GAE.<br />
|-<br />
| Open Shift || 1 || 0.059 || || || 0W || || pyminer || <br />
|}<br />
<br />
<references></references><br />
<br />
==See Also==<br />
* [[TP's Bitcoin Calculator]]<br />
* [[Mining rig]]<br />
* [[ZTEX FPGA Boards for Bitcoin Mining]]<br />
* [[Generation Calculator]]<br />
* [[Power Calc]]<br />
* [[OpenCL miner]]<br />
* [http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=745 ATI Stream vs. NVIDIA CUDA - GPGPU computing battle royale] <br />
* [http://bitminer.info/ Bitminer.info] <br />
* [http://www.pcper.com/reviews/Graphics-Cards/Bitcoin-Currency-and-GPU-Mining-Performance-Comparison Bitcoin Mining Performance Compared]<br />
** [http://www.pcper.com/reviews/Graphics-Cards/Bitcoin-Mining-Update-Power-Usage-Costs-Across-United-States Bitcoin Mining Power Costs Compared]<br />
<br />
[[Category:Mining]]</div>
Http
https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Mining_hardware_comparison&diff=36563
Mining hardware comparison
2013-04-01T15:54:07Z
<p>Http: /* FPGA */ units in square brackets (common notation in physics)</p>
<hr />
<div>Below are some statistics about the mining performance of various hardware used in a [[mining rig]].<br />
<br />
'''Notes:'''<br />
* Mhash/s = millions hashes per second (raw speed performance; may not be very energy efficient with some models)<br />
* Mhash/J = millions hashes per joule (energy efficiency; 1 joule of energy is 1 watt during 1 second: 1 J = 1 W*s)<br />
* W = watt (maximum power consumption, i.e. energy per unit of time: 1 W = 1 J/s)<br />
<br />
== FPGA ==<br />
<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align:center"<br />
|- <br />
! Product !! Hash rate<br />[Mhash/s] !! Efficiency<br />[Mhash/J] !! Efficiency<br />[Mhash/s/$] !! Power<br />[W] !! Price<br />[$]<br />
|-<br />
! Avnet Spartan-6 LX150T Development Kit<br />
| 100<ref>Fpgaminer (May 19, 2011). [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=9047.0 "Official Open Source FPGA Bitcoin Miner"]. Bitcointalk.org. Retrieved February 7, 2013.</ref> || || 0.10<ref>[http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=100%2F995 "100/995"]. Wolfram Alpha. Retrieved February 7, 2013.</ref> || || 995<ref>[http://avnetexpress.avnet.com/store/em/EMController?action=products&catalogId=500201&storeId=500201&N=0&langId=-1&slnk=b&term=AES-S6DEV-LX150T-G&hrf=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.em.avnet.com%2Fen-us%2Fdesign%2Fdrc%2FPages%2FXilinx-Spartan-6-FPGA-LX150T-Development-Kit.aspx&intcmp=EMA-BUY-AES-S6DEV-LX150T-G "AES-S6DEV-LX150T-G Parts"]. Avnet Express. Retrieved February 7, 2013.</ref><br />
|-<br />
! Bitcoin Dominator X5000<br />
| 100<ref name="bd" /> || 14.7<ref>[http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=100%2F6.8 "100/6.8"]. Wolfram Alpha. Retrieved February 7, 2013.</ref> || 0.22<ref>[http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=100%2F440 "100/440"]. Wolfram Alpha. Retrieved February 7, 2013.</ref> || 6.8<ref name="bd" /> || 440<ref name="bd">NewMeat1 (August 18, 2011). [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=37904.0 "Custom FPGA Board for Sale!"]. Bitcointalk.org. Retrieved January 30, 2013.</ref><br />
|-<br />
! BitForce SHA256 Single<br />
| 832<ref name="single">[http://www.butterflylabs.com/product-details/ "BitForce SHA256 Single – Technical Specifications"]. Butterfly Labs. Retrieved January 30, 2013.</ref> || 10.4<ref>[http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=832%2F80 "832/80"]. Wolfram Alpha. Retrieved February 7, 2013.</ref> || 1.38<ref>[http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=832%2F599 "832/599"]. Retrieved February 7, 2013.</ref> || 80<ref name="single" /> || 599<ref name="single" /><br />
|-<br />
! Butterflylabs Mini Rig<br />
| 25,200<ref name="mini">[http://web.archive.org/web/20120514032732/http://www.butterflylabs.com/products "Products"]. Butterfly Labs. Archived from the original on May 14, 2012. Retrieved February 7, 2013.</ref> || 20.16<ref>[http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=25200%2F1250 "25200/1250"]. Wolfram Alpha. Retrieved February 7, 2013.</ref> || 1.64<ref>[http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=25200%2F15295 "25200/15295"]. Wolfram Alpha. Retrieved February 7, 2013.</ref> || 1,250<ref name="mini" /> || 15,295<ref name="mini2">[http://www.butterflylabs.com/order-form-bitforce-sha256-mini-rig/ "Order Form – BitForce SHA256 – Mini Rig"]. Butterfly Labs. Retrieved January 30, 2013.</ref><br />
|-<br />
! Digilent Nexys 2 500K<br />
| 5<ref>The Seven (June 3, 2011). [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=9047.msg164438#msg164438 "Re: Official Open Source FPGA Bitcoin Miner (Smaller Devices Now Supported!)"]. Bitcointalk.org. Retrieved February 7, 2013.</ref> || || 0.03<ref>[http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=5%2F149 "5/149"]. Wolfram Alpha. Retrieved February 7, 2013.</ref> || || 149<ref name="dig">[http://www.digilentinc.com/Products/Detail.cfm?Prod=NEXYS2 "Nexys™2 Spartan-3E FPGA Board"]. Digilent. Retrieved January 30, 2013.</ref><br />
|-<br />
! Icarus<br />
| 380<ref name="ica">Nzghang (November 9, 2011). [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=51371.0 "FPGA development board 'Icarus' – DisContinued/ important announcement"]. Bitcointalk.org. Retrieved January 30, 2013.</ref> || 19.79<ref>[http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=380%2F19.2 "380/19.2"]. Wolfram Alpha. Retrieved February 7, 2013.</ref> || 0.66<ref>[http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=380%2F569 "380/569"]. Retrieved February 7, 2013.</ref> || 19.2<ref name="ica" /> || 569<ref name="ica" /><br />
|-<br />
! Lancelot<br />
| || || || || 500<ref name="lan">Nzghang (May 6, 2012). [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=79835.0 "FPGA development board "Lancelot" - accept bitsteam developer's orders."]. Bitcointalk.org. Retrieved January 30, 2013.</ref><br />
|-<br />
! ModMiner Quad <br />
| 800<ref name="mmq">[http://www.btcfpga.com/index.php?route=product/product&product_id=50 "ModMiner Quad"]. BTCFPGA. Retrieved January 30, 2013.</ref> || 20<ref>http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=800%2F40</ref> || 0.75<ref>http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=800%2F1069</ref> || 40<ref name="mmq" /> || 1,069<ref name="mmq" /><br />
|-<br />
! Terasic DE2-115<br />
| 80<ref>Fpgaminer (May 4, 2011). [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5379.msg105544#msg105544 "Re: FPGA mining"]. Bitcointalk.org. Retrieved February 7, 2013.</ref> || || 0.13<ref>[http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=80%2F595 "80/595"]. Retrieved February 7, 2013.</ref> || || 595<ref name="de2">[http://www.terasic.com.tw/cgi-bin/page/archive.pl?No=502 "Altera DE2-115 Development and Education Board"]. Terasic. Retrieved January 30, 2013.</ref><br />
|-<br />
! X6500 FPGA Miner <br />
| 400<ref name="x65" /> || 23.25<ref>http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=400%2F17.2</ref> || 0.72<ref>http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=400%2F550</ref> || 17.2<ref name="x65" /> || 550<ref name="x65">[http://store.fpgamining.com/ "FPGA Mining Store"]. FPGA Mining. Retrieved January 30, 2013.</ref><br />
|-<br />
! ZTEX USB-FPGA Module 1.15b<br />
| 90<ref name="miner" /> || || 0.27<ref>http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=90%2F325</ref> || || 325<ref>http://shop.ztex.de/product_info.php?cPath=21&products_id=62</ref><br />
|-<br />
! ZTEX USB-FPGA Module 1.15x<br />
| 215<ref name="miner" /> || || 0.52<ref>http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=215%2F406</ref> || || 406<ref>http://shop.ztex.de/product_info.php?cPath=21&products_id=66</ref><br />
|-<br />
! ZTEX USB-FPGA Module 1.15y<br />
| 860<ref name="miner">http://www.ztex.de/btcminer/</ref> || || 0.65<ref>http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=860%2F1304</ref> || || 1,304<ref name="1.15y">http://shop.ztex.de/product_info.php?cPath=21&products_id=74</ref><br />
|}<br />
<br />
== ASIC ==<br />
<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align:center"<br />
|- <br />
! Product !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! Mhash/s/$ !! Watts !! Price !! Shipping !! Comm ports<br />
|-<br />
! ASICMiner device(s)<br />
|| ? || ? || ? || ? || ? || {{No}} || ?<br />
|-<br />
! Avalon ASIC #1<br />
| 66,300<ref>http://garzikrants.blogspot.com/2013/02/avalon-miner-power-usage.html</ref> || 107 || 52.34<ref>http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=68000%2F1299</ref> || 620W<ref>http://garzikrants.blogspot.com/2013/02/avalon-miner-power-usage.html</ref> || 1,299<ref name="avalon">[http://shop.avalon-asic.com/catalog/product/view/id/1 "Avalon ASIC"]. Avalon. Retrieved January 30, 2013.</ref> || {{Yes}} || Ethernet, Wifi<br />
|-<br />
! Avalon ASIC #2<br />
| 60,000<ref name="avalon" /> || 97 || 40.02<ref>http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=60000%2F1499</ref> || 620W<ref>http://garzikrants.blogspot.com/2013/02/avalon-miner-power-usage.html</ref> || 1,499<ref name="avalon" /> || {{No}} || Ethernet, Wifi<br />
|-<br />
! Avalon ASIC #3<ref name="avalon" /><br />
| || || || || || {{No}} ||<br />
|-<br />
! BitForce Jalapeno<br />
| 4,500<ref name="jap">[http://www.butterflylabs.com/order-form-bitforce-sc-jalapeno "Pre Order Form – BitForce 'Jalapeno' "]. Butterfly Labs. Retrieved January 30, 2013.</ref> || ??? || 30.20<ref>http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=4500%2F149</ref> || ???<ref name="watts">http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1b8hvt/bfl_josh_updates_on_asic_status_full_transcript/</ref> || 149<ref name="jap" /> || {{No|Any day now}} || USB<br />
|-<br />
! BitForce Little Single<br />
| 30,000<ref name="ls" /> || || 46.22<ref>http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=30000%2F649</ref> || || 649<ref name="ls">[http://www.butterflylabs.com/pre-order-form-bitforce-little-single-sc/ "Pre Order Form – BitForce 'Little' Single SC"]. Butterfly Labs. Retrieved January 30, 2013.</ref> || {{Yes}} || USB<br />
|-<br />
! BitForce Single 'SC'<br />
| 60,000<ref name="sc">[http://www.butterflylabs.com/order-form-bitforce-sc-single "Pre Order Form – BitForce Single 'SC' "]. Butterfly Labs. Retrieved January 30, 2013.</ref> || ??? || 46.18<ref>http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=60000%2F1299</ref> || ???<ref name="watts" /> || 1,299<ref name="sc" /> || {{No|Any day now}} || USB<br />
|-<br />
! BitForce Mini Rig 'SC'<br />
| 1,500,000<ref name="rig" /> || ??? || 50.16<ref>http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=1500000%2F29899</ref> || ???<ref name="watts" /> || 29,899<ref name="rig">[http://www.butterflylabs.com/order-form-bitforce-sc-mini-rig "Pre Order Form – BitForce Mini Rig 'SC' "]. Butterfly Labs. Retrieved January 30, 2013.</ref> || {{No|Any day now}} || ?<br />
|}<br />
<br />
==Graphics cards==<br />
=== Popular Mining Cards ===<br />
This information has been included to make choosing a card easier. The cards selected are generally readily available online. Once you have purchased a card or cards, use the tables below to compare different configurations and setups.<br />
=== genBTC's Card Comparison Spreadsheet ===<br />
The purpose of this chart is 1) Update used prices 2) To consolidate multiple sources of information into an at-a-glance format. 3) Provide 3 hashrate columns to make it easier to figure out performance before 4) You use this table to make informed decisions about purchasing a card for mining.<br><br />
Only edit Common MH/s. MH/s #1 and MH/s #2 were outsourced.<br><br />
I will continue to work on this chart, and it is a work in progress. <br><br />
Created February 25th 2013, Updated February 27th 2013 <br><br />
All the cards below are AMD (ATI) Radeon HD <br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! MH/s #1 !! MH/s #2 !! Common MH/s !! TDP(W) !! Shaders !! Stock Clock !! Ebay $ !! MSRP $ !! Cheapest $<br />
|----<br />
|5770||212.83||||200||108||800||850 MHz||$178?||$159||$ 50<br />
|----<br />
|5830||302||220||275||175||1120||800 MHz||$105||$239||$ 65<br />
|----<br />
|5850||346.16||270||330||151||1440||725 MHz||$101||$259||$ 90<br />
|----<br />
|5870||393||420||380||188||1600||850 MHz||$165||$379||$125<br />
|----<br />
|5970||704||700||750||294||3200||725 MHz||$248||$599||$269<br />
|----<br />
|6750||167.59||||170||86||720||725 MHz||$ 67||$109||<br />
|----<br />
|6770||196.67||||200||108||800||900 MHz||$ 84||$135||<br />
|----<br />
|6850||213.7||||250||127||960||775 MHz||$104||$179||<br />
|----<br />
|6870||278.31||||300||150||1120||900 MHz||$124||$239||<br />
|----<br />
|6950||369||350||350||200||1408||800 MHz||$171||$299||<br />
|----<br />
|6970||397||400||385||250||1536||880 MHz||$172||$369||<br />
|----<br />
|6990||772||700||750||375||3072||830 MHz||$372||$699||<br />
|----<br />
|7750||123||200||125||55||512||800 MHz||$ 93||$109||Newegg $89<br />
|----<br />
|7770||||250||200||80||640||1000 MHz||$ 98||$159||Newegg $119<br />
|----<br />
|7850||||375||300||130||1024||860 MHz||$177||$249||Newegg $169<br />
|----<br />
|7870||||||400||175||1280||1000 MHz||$227||$349||Newegg $229<br />
|----<br />
|7950||||450||500||200||1792||850 MHz||$307||$449||Newegg $299<br />
|----<br />
|7970||685||600||650||250||2048||925 MHz||$391||$549||Newegg $399<br />
|----<br />
|7990||||||1200||555||4096||925 MHz||$777||$999||Newegg $899<br />
|----<br />
|}<br />
MH/s #1 taken from Joseph Woodrell's chart directly below this one.<br><br />
MH/s #2 taken from https://bitclockers.com/calc <br><br />
TDP, Shaders, Stock Clock comes from http://www.hwcompare.com/ & www.AMD.com to Verify<br><br />
Ebay Price taken from http://cgi5.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?SellHub3 and questionable prices marked with a ? <br><br />
Cheapest $ = Used price. Sourced from All over the internet as if I had to buy the card today.<br><br />
Newegg Price means NEW & price was taken from the LOWEST priced card on 2/25/2013 @ 8 PM EST, any rebate disregarded<br><br />
<br />
=== Card Comparison Spreadsheet ===<br />
This spreadsheet performs several calculations and displays a visualization graph of a theoretical mining rig over time. It can be used to visualize any "what if" scenarios to better wrap your head around which card is the best choice under different conditions. Bright Yellow Boxes are editable, and affect the calculations. Dark Yellow Boxes are editable for notation, but don't affect the calculations. The Green highlighted card is the best under those conditions, the Blue highlight is second best, the Orange highlight is third best. Higher MHash/s performance can be obtained for each card through overclocking, but that drives up the wattage draw of the cards, and I did not have that complete dataset so I used the "average" MHash/s values listed here. <br /><br />
V1.5 - 1 Jan, 2012 - by. Joseph Woodrell <br />
[http://www.woodrell.com/joe/bitcoin/mining_sheet.zip Card Selection Spreadsheet]<br />
<br /><br />
==== Single Card Setups ====<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! Price <ref name=amazon>Price from http://ebay.com/ on 2012-02-10 using an average of completed items, minus the top and bottom 20% to avoid spikes and give a truer average.</ref> !! Availability !! Avg. Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! Mhash/s/$<br />
|----<br />
|5770<br />
|$136<br />
|Moderate<br />
|212.83<br />
|1.45<br />
|1.56 <br />
|----<br />
|5830<br />
|$92<br />
|Moderate<br />
|302<br />
|1.68<br />
|3.28<br />
|----<br />
|5850<br />
|$114.96<br />
|Limited<br />
|346.16<br />
|1.92<br />
|3.0<br />
|----<br />
|5870<br />
|$190.16<br />
|Limited<br />
|393<br />
|1.97<br />
|2.066 <br />
|----<br />
|5970<br />
|$421<br />
|Limited<br />
|704<br />
|2.2<br />
|1.67 <br />
|----<br />
|6750<br />
|$116<br />
|Easy<br />
|167.59<br />
|<br />
|1.44 <br />
|----<br />
|6770<br />
|$115<br />
|Easy<br />
|196.67<br />
|<br />
|1.71 <br />
|----<br />
|6850<br />
|$160<br />
|Easy<br />
|213.7<br />
|1.35<br />
|1.34 <br />
|----<br />
|6870<br />
|$190<br />
|Easy<br />
|278.31<br />
|1.73<br />
|1.46 <br />
|----<br />
|6930<br />
|$180<br />
|Limited<br />
|350<br />
|<br />
|1.94<br />
|----<br />
|6950<br />
|$230<br />
|Easy<br />
|369<br />
|1.94<br />
|1.6 <br />
|----<br />
|6970<br />
|$271.89<br />
|Easy<br />
|397<br />
|1.89<br />
|1.46 <br />
|----<br />
|6990<br />
|$622.99<br />
|Limited<br />
|772<br />
|1.93<br />
|1.23 <br />
|----<br />
|7750<br />
|$110<br />
|Easy<br />
|123<br />
|2.46<br />
|1.12 <br />
|----<br />
|7970<br />
|$420<br />
|Easy<br />
|685<br />
|<br />
|1.22 <br />
|----<br />
|}<br />
<br />
==== Multi-Card Setups ====<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! Price <ref name=amazon/> !! Availability !! Avg. Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! Mhash/s/$<br />
|----<br />
|5830x2<br />
|$360<br />
|Moderate<br />
|525<br />
|<br />
|1.46 <br />
|----<br />
|5850x4<br />
|$644<br />
|Limited<br />
|1360<br />
|1.94<br />
|2.11 <br />
|----<br />
|5850x6<br />
|$996<br />
|Limited<br />
|2130<br />
|<br />
| <br />
|----<br />
|5870x2<br />
|$700<br />
|Limited<br />
|787.5<br />
|0.84<br />
|1.13 <br />
|----<br />
|6770x2<br />
|$274<br />
|Easy<br />
|464<br />
|<br />
|1.69 <br />
|----<br />
|6950x4<br />
|$1,000<br />
|Easy<br />
|1316<br />
|1.51<br />
|1.32 <br />
|----<br />
|6970x2<br />
|$700<br />
|Easy<br />
|769<br />
|1.6<br />
|1.10 <br />
|----<br />
|6990x2<br />
|$1,540<br />
|Limited<br />
|1568<br />
|1.7<br />
|1.02 <br />
|----<br />
|6990x3<br />
|$2,310<br />
|Limited<br />
|2094<br />
|1.8<br />
|0.91 <br />
|----<br />
|7970x3<br />
|$1680<br />
|Easy<br />
|2050<br />
|2.41<br />
|1.16 <br />
|----<br />
|7970x2<br />
|$868<br />
|Easy<br />
|1060<br />
|<br />
| <br />
|----<br />
|}<br />
<br />
===AMD (ATI)===<br />
Stream SDK 2.5 seems to have resolved many of the problems with earlier versions. Everyone's setups will be unique so this should only be a guide or starting point, not an absolute. <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! Mhash/s/$<ref name='amazon_20110625'/> !! Watts !! Clock !! SP !! SDK !! Slot !! Miner !! Notes <br />
|-<br />
| 3410 || 0.89 || 0.074 || ? || 12(?) || 222 || 40 || 1.4 beta || PCI-E 1.1 x8 || A custom Brook+ miner || Using 16,384 length streams<br />
|-<br />
| 3XXX || || || || || || || || || || OpenCL Not Supported<br />
|-<br />
| 42XX || || || || || || || || || || OpenCL Not Supported (integrated/mobile GPU)<br />
|-<br />
| 4350 || 6.93 || 0.346 ||0.16 || 20 || 575 || 80 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors<br />
|-<br />
| 4350 || 7.2 || || || || 600 || || 1.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || cgminer/Linux || default settings<br />
|-<br />
| 4350 || 8.14 || -|| 0.19 || - || 730 || 80 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Diablo/Windows7 || -w 32. Model: Asus EAH4350 Silent. Memory at 400MHz. Runs at 60°C with ambient at 25°C.<br />
|-<br />
| 4350 || 10.7 || -|| - || - || 730 || - || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || CGMiner/Windows7 || -v -w 64 Voltage set at 0.900 core set at 800MHZ and memory set to 200MHZ<br />
|-<br />
| 4550 || 7.23 || 0.289 ||0.13 || 25 || 600 || 80 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors<br />
|-<br />
| 4550 || 7.8 || || || || || || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer /phoenix || worksize=64 VECTORS <br />
|-<br />
| 4570M || 8.02 || 0.297 || ? || 27 || 680 || 80 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Diablo/Windows7 || -w 64, SDK 2.4, Cat 11.4. Model: Sony Vaio NW<br />
|-<br />
| 4570M || 9.6 || 0.300|| ? || 32 || 825(OC) || 80 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Diablo/Windows7 || -w 64, SDK 2.4, Cat 11.4. Model: Sony Vaio NW. OC core 680->825. U/C memory 800->500.<br />
|-<br />
| 4650 || 31.33 || 0.653|| 0.44 || 48 || 650 || 320 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors<br />
|-<br />
| 4670 || 36.14 || 0.613|| 0.34 || 59 || 750 || 320 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors<br />
|-<br />
| 4670 || 40.11 || 0.679|| 0.38 || 59 || 800 || 320 || - || AGP x8 || poclbm/Ubuntu 10.10 w/ H == 0 mod || -w 32 -f 0, don't use vectors [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.msg85236#msg85236 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 4670 || 50 || - || 0.47 || 60 || 800 || 320 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer || 2 miners set up i7 920 (130W), CPU: Ufasoft, GPU: OpenCL; the CPU is getting about 40 Mhash/s while the GPU goes from 10-20 Mhash/s<br />
|-<br />
| 4730 || 72.29 || 0.657|| ? || 110 || 750 || 640 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
| 4770 || 72.29 || 0.904|| 0.72 || 80 || 750 || 640 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
| 4830 || 55.42 || 0.583|| || 95 || 575 || 640 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
| 4830 || 61.7 || - || || - || 700 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm-mod || Fedora 14<br />
|-<br />
| 4830 || 64.9 || - || - || - || 700 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm-mod || Fedora 14<br />
|-<br />
| 4830 || 66.12 || 0.503|| || 105 || 700 || 1005 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - ||<br />
|-<br />
| 4850 || 75.30 || 0.685 || || 110 || 625 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
| 4850 || 84.3 || 0.766 || || 110 || 725 || 300 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - || -w64 fan at 70% temp 73C, stock voltage -gui miner<br />
|-<br />
| 4850 || 87.4 || 0.79 || - || 110 || 785 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer || Phoenix; -k poclbm<br />
|-<br />
| 4850 || 90.1 || 0.819 || || 110 || 800 || 500 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer || -f 30; Tried phoenix and phatk, got same max<br />
|-<br />
| 4850 || 101 || 0.918 || || 110 || 817 || 500 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer || -f 0, core 817mhz(default 625)@1.123v , mem downclock to 500mhz (default 993) [http://www.smpake.com/?p=6 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 4850x2 || 150.60 || 0.602 || || 250 || 625 || 1600 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
| 4860 || 67.47 || 0.519|| || 130 || 700 || 640 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F8F8FF;"| 4870 || 78 || 0.520|| || 150 || - || - || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/Vista 64bit || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source]<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F8F8F8;"| 4870 || 88 || || || 140 || std || 800 || 12.3.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.50 / 64bit OS X pyopencl / poclbm || Standard Mac Pro 3,1 with Apple HD4870 upgrade. Flags: FASTLOOP WORKSIZE=64 AGGRESSION=5 (don't use vectors, and hash rate drops to 60-70 if browser windows are visible, speeds up to 88 if you hide them!<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F8F8FF;"| 4870 || 90.36 || 0.602|| || 150 || 750 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || clmine || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F8F8FF;"| 4870 || 92.84 || 0.6189333(?)|| || 150(?) || 830(OC) || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 || -k poclbm AGGRESSION=5 (Windows 7 64-Bit, GPU OC 750->830MHz, VRAM UC 900->450MHz, BIOS modded)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F8F8F8;"| 4870 || 96 || || || 140 || 750 || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Smartcoin r657s / phoenix 1.50 / Linuxcoin 0.2b final || Powercolor @ GPU 830 MHz/ MEM 200 Mhz @ 80% FAN @ 69 temp @ Flags: -k phatk bfi_int=false FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256 AGGRESSION=11 <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F8F8F8;"| 4870 || 104 || || || 140 || 750 || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Smartcoin r657s / DiabloMiner / Linuxcoin 0.2b final || Powercolor @ GPU 830 MHz/ MEM 200 Mhz @ 80% FAN @ 69 temp @ Flags: -v 1 -w 256 <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F8F8FF;"| 4870 || 104.2 || ?|| || ? || 830(OC) || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || Windows 7 64-Bit, GPU Core OC to 830 MHz, GPU Memory UC to 200 MHz By MSI AfterBurner. Card: Gainward Golden Sample. @70%Fan we have 55 GPU temp.<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F8F8FF;"| 4870 || 104.6 || 0.872|| || 120 || 830(OC) || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 256 -f 1, Windows 7 64-Bit, GPU Core OC to 830 MHz, GPU Memory UC to 190 MHz (saves 30 watts at outlet)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F8F8F8;"| 4870 || 112 || || || 140 || 750 || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || BAMT 0.5c / cgminer || Powercolor @ GPU 875 MHz/ MEM 300 Mhz/ 1,25VDC @ 100% FAN @ 65 temp @ Flags: -v 1 -w 256 <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F8F8FF;"| 4870x2 || 180.6|| 0.632|| || 286 || 800 || 1600 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F8F8FF;"| 4870x2 || 180.72|| 0.632|| || 286 || 750 || 1600 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
| 4870x2 || 203 || || || || 850(OC) || 1600 || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm-mod ver. 20 april 2011|| Gainward / Win7 x64 / -w 256 -f 1 / 850MHz GPU - 300MHz Mem - 1,262V - 100% fun : 72C<br />
|-<br />
| 4890 || 97.1 || 0.511|| || 190 || 870(OC) || 1050 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-01-21 Solo settings || Sapphire fab. No flags options helped. Close all browsers and do full restart of GUIMiner and then Bitcoin via GUIMiner server starter or the browsers GPU accl. will limit to 56~ ish Mhash/s - I can now start browser without slowdowns<br />
|-<br />
| 4890 || 102.41 || 0.539|| || 190 || 850 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
| 4890 || 108.3 || 0.57|| || 190 || 975 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
| 4890 || 121.5 || -|| || 190 || 1025 (OC) || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || no flags, Vcore 1.4 <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFF8EF;"| 5450 || 11.99|| 0.631|| || 19 || 650 || 80 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFF8EF;"| 5450 || 13.74|| || - || - || 700 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/Linuxcoin v0.2 || -v -w128 tried several options, seems to work best.<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFF8EF;"| 5450 || 14.12|| || - || - || 700 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix/Linuxcoin v0.2 || Flags: "DEVICE=0 VECTORS AGGRESSION=4 -v FASTLOOP BFI_INT WORKSIZE=64" Kernel: "phatk"<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFF8EF;"| 5450 || 15.36|| || - || - || 700 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix || Flags: "DEVICE=0 VECTORS AGRESSION=8 FASTLOOP BFI_ING WORKSIZE=128" Kernel: "phatk" - MagicSata<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFF8EF;"| 5450 || 18.10|| || - || - || 774 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 1 774.66MHz/300.37MHz<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFF8EF;"| 5470 || 17.10|| || - || - || - || - || - || - || poclbm || -v -w 128 MobileGPU<br />
|-<br />
| 5550 || 40.59 || 1.041|| || 39 || 550 || 320 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
| 5550 || 62.10 || - || - || - || 700 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix || 700MHz core 800MHz ram, phatk mod, Flags: "-k phatk worksize=128 vectors aggression=4 bfi_int"<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 59.96 || 1.538|| || 39 || 650 || 400 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 62 || 1.59|| || 39 || 650 || 400 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 OpenCL/Linux x86_64 || -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS AGGRESSION=4 -v FASTLOOP BFI_INT WORKSIZE=64<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 64 || 1.641|| || 39 || 650 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 73 || 1.872|| || 39 || 700 || 400 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 OpenCL/Linux x86_64 || -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS AGGRESSION=4 -v FASTLOOP BFI_INT WORKSIZE=64<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 86.3 || 2.397|| || 36 || 775 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.75 OpenCL/Windows 7 x64 (no Aero) ||-k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 -v WORKSIZE=256 Fan 100% 86C Undervolted @ 0.96v using Sapphire Trixx<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 94 || stock || || || 880 || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUI Miner 02-12/Windows 7 x86 || -v -w128 75C<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 102 || 1.46(+)|| || 75(-) || 950 || 400 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 OpenCL/Windows 7 x86 (no Aero) || -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS AGGRESSION=7 -v FASTLOOP BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 (Reference Sapphire card, 2 additional 120mm coolers, temperature is 79-82C)<br />
|-<br />
| 5650 || 48 || 1.37|| || 35(?) || - || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source] [http://www.notebookcheck.net/ATI-Mobility-Radeon-HD-5650.23697.0.html source] -- not TDP but load<br />
|-<br />
| 5650 || 61.2 || || || 35 || || || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.50 OpenCL/Windows 7 x64 || -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128 AGGRESSION=9<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EEFFEE;"| 5670 || 71.49 || 1.117|| || 64 || 775 || 400 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EEFFEE;"| 5670 || 72 || 1.64|| || 44 || 850 || - || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm-mod (Win7-64) || Sapphire 100287VGAL card is low power<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EEFFEE;"| 5670 || 85|| || - || - || 900 || 400 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EEFFEE;"| 5670 || 91|| || - || - || 890 || 400 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer 2011-06-09 poclbm catalyst 11.2 win7 x86 || -v -f 0 -w 128<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EEFFEE;"| 5670 || 100|| || - || - || 890 || 400 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || cgminer 1.5.6 || GPU/Mem 890/800 temp 72C<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EEFFEE;"| 5670 || 103 || -|| || - || 900/275 || 400 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x1 || phoenix-1.50 / phatk-mod / Ubuntu 11.04 || VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=256 / small fan, under 50 deg C, no voltage tweaks... catfish<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EEFFEE;"| 5670 || 127.8|| || - || - || 850 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Windows 7 (64bit) Phoenix 2.0 || Aggression=11 Worksize=128 Fastloop=False Opencl<br />
|-<br />
| 5750 || 105 || - || - || - || - || - || - || - || poclbm || Apple iMac 27inch (Mid 2010), Mac OSX 10.7 Lion <br />
|-<br />
| 5750 || 116.24 || 1.352|| || 86 || 700 || 720 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
| 5750 || 137 || ||- || - || 710 || 720 || - || PCI-E 1.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128 using stock memory and GPU clocks<br />
|-<br />
| 5750 || 146.4 || || - || - || 775 || 720 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-21 || -v -w128, AMD Catalyst overclock (775MHz GPU / 1225 MHz Memory)<br />
|-<br />
| 5750 || 154.56 || 1.45|| || 106 || 830 || 720 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - || -v -w128 -f20 underclocked memory clocks from 1150MHz to 300MHz<br />
|-<br />
| 5750 || 170 || - || || - || 870 || 720 || - || PCI-E 1.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128 patched BIOS to underclock memory to 300MHz<br />
|-<br />
| 5750 || 173 || - || ||- || 875 || 720 || - || PCI-E 1.1 x16 || phoenix || 875/300 w/MSI Afterburner, BFI_INT VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 FASTLOOP=FALSE -k phatk<br />
|-<br />
| 5750 || 177 || - || ||- || 910/575 || 720 || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || phoenix 1.5.6 || PowerColor GoGreen+fan, MSI Afterburner 2.2Beta, -k phatk VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 FASTLOOP=FALSE WORKSIZE=64<br />
|-<br />
| 5750 || 190 || - || ||- || 930/290 || - || atistream sdk || PCI-E 1.1 x16 || poclbm || 930gpu / 290mem (O.S. Ubuntu 10.10 x64, overclock gpu & underclock mem) with poclbm options -v -f 0 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
| 5750 Vapor-X || 195 || - || - || 125 || 975/300 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 1.1 x16 || cgminer 2.7.5 || (O.S. Ubuntu 12.01 AMD64 dedicated) cgminer options -Q 0 -I 9 -g 2 -w 256 --auto-fan --temp-target 65 --gpu-vddc 1.075 (Fan speed 60~65%)<br />
|-<br />
| 5750x2 CF || 356 || - || ||- || 870 || 720x2 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=28402.0 cgminer v1.5.1] (Win7 64bit) || 870MHz GPU / -I 8 / 2x [http://www.gigabyte.com/products/product-page.aspx?pid=3402#sp GIGABYTE GV-R575SL-1GI] cards + [http://www.gigabyte.com/products/product-page.aspx?pid=3258#sp GIGABYTE GA-790FXTA-UD5] MB + 1x [http://www.noctua.at/main.php?show=productview&products_id=9&lng=en 80mm], 1x [http://www.noctua.at/main.php?show=productview&products_id=16&lng=en 90mm] Noctua coolers<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 156.83 || 1.452|| || 108 || 850 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 171.12 || - || - || - || - || stock || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.7.3/debian gnu/linux 6 squeeze || -k phatk2 DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 180 || 1.406(*)|| || 128(*) || 950(OC) || 800 || 2.4RC1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 30 (*: Overclocked wattage calculated [http://bakkap.free.fr/Misc/wCalc.html here])<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 Hawk || 182 || ||- || - || 875 || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm/GUIMiner/Win7-64 || -v -w 128 (875MHz is stock for 5770 Hawk)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 185 || - || ||- || 850 || 1200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128 FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=7<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 205.58 || - || ||- || 935 || 300 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-04-28 || -v -w 256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 214.5 || 1.95(-)|| || 108(+) || 950 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.50/GUIMiner/Win7-64 || mem underclocked 300 mhz, 1.1vcore, 950mhz core, @69°C/57%FAN VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=12 -k phatk WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 214.7 || 1.95(-)|| || 108(+) || 950 || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / win7x86 || mem underclocked 309 mhz, -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 216.5 || -|| || - || 955 || || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.5 /phatk || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=23067.0 Modified phatk kernel] and stock voltage for Sapphire (1.125V) VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 -k phatk WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 218.35 || -|| || - || 1000 || 1401 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || DiabloMiner || -w 128 -v 2 (Overclocked to 1Ghz core with 1.2 voltage and Scythe Setsugen 2 cooling system)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 223 || 2.23(-)|| || 100(+) || 1050 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer || -v -w256 [http://www.smpake.com/?p=59 source]<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 227 || -|| || - || 1030 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || DiabloMiner || -w 256 -v 2 (Overclocked to 1030 core/300 mem with 1.2 voltage and Scythe Setsugen 2 cooling system)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 233 || 2.23(-)|| || 100(+) || 1050 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 || VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 -k phatk WORKSIZE=256 [http://www.smpake.com/?p=59 source]<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 236 || -|| || - || 1033/275 || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix-1.50 / phatk-mod / Ubuntu 10.04 || VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=256 / big fans, under 75 deg C, no voltage tweaks... catfish<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 240.61 || 2.3632(-)|| || 100(+) || 1080 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x1 || phoenix 1.48 || VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 -k phatk WORKSIZE=256 (OC'd and OV'd 1080/300 1.25v)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 241 || - || - || 100(+) || 1045 || 250 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.50 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 -k phatk WORKSIZE=256 (OC 1020/300) XFX@1.1 volts. +Kernel function improve 5%<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 244 || -|| || - || 1050 || 300 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.75 /phatk2 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=23067.0 Modified phatk kernel] and stock voltage for Sapphire (1.125V) VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=9, Temp 75C, FAN 100% (manual)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770x2 || 425 || - || - || 225(+) || 960 || 800x2 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm (guiminer) Win7x64 || -v -w128 (OC 960/1200)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830M || 120 || -|| || - || 570|| 120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.50 OpenCL/Win7 x64|| -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 244 || 1.36|| || 179 || 800 || 1000 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 OpenCL/Linux x86_64 || -k phatk DEVICE=1 VECTORS AGGRESSION=6 -v FASTLOOP WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 245 || 1.28|| || 192 || 880 || 900 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm (guiminer) || -v -w 256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 248 || 1.29|| || 192 || 880 || 500 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.46 || -k poclbm VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 256 || -|| || - || 900 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 || -k poclbm VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=7<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 267 || -|| || - || 875 || 1000 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x1 || Phoenix 1.48 OpenCL/Linux x86_64 || -k phatk DEVICE=1 VECTORS AGGRESSION=6 -v FASTLOOP WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 272 || 1.52|| || 179 || 875 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / LinuxCoin || 275Mhz Memory clock, 1.125 V (from 1.163), VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 275 || 1.5714|| || 175 || 900 || 500 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm (guiminer) Win7x64 || -v -w64 -f10, XFX stock w/ v2.4 SDK = 230Mh/s, v2.1 SDK = +10Mh/s, overclocking core clock by 100 = +30Mh/s, underclocking memory to 500 (ran cooler), and changing workload to -w64 = +5Mh/s.<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 285 || - ||1.58 || - || 960 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.47 / poclbm / Win7 64 || VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 290 || -|| || - || 930 || - || 2.2 || PCI-E x16/x4/x1 || GUIMiner / phoenix 1.5 / POCLBM / Win 7 64 || POCLBM VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 AGGRESSION=12 FASTLOOPS=false / Memory 300Mhz, VCore standard<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 290 || -|| || - || 996 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.4 / poclbm / Win7 64 || VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 295 || -|| || - || 980 || 1120 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIMiner / poclbm / Win XP 32 || Extra flags -v -w 128<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 297 || -|| || - || 970 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer / phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 64 || 300Mhz Memory clock, 44% fan-speed, -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=8 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 300 || -|| || - || 960|| 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIMiner / poclbm / Win 7 64 || Extra flags -v -w 256 (Sapphire Extreme 71 degrees @ 52% fan)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 300 || -|| || - || 970 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.47 / pheonix 1.48 / Win7 64 || (sapphire xtreme) VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 300 || -|| || - || 970 || 1120 || 2.1 || PCI-E x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 64 || 300Mhz memory clock BFI_INT AGGRESSION=12 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 305 || -|| || - || 984 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.4 / phatk / Win7 32 || 400Mhz Memory clock, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 307 || -|| || - || 996 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 64 || VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 307 || 2.25 || 2.55 || 125 || 965 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || cgminer 2.0.5 / Win7 64 || Mem @ 300/Stock voltage/Entire system 200W<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 308 || -|| || - || 990 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.50 / poclbm / Xubuntu 11.04 x64 || VECTORS AGGRESSION=11 BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 308 || -|| || - || 990 || 375 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 32 || @ stock voltage VECTORS AGGRESSION=11 -v FASTLOOP=false BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 black || 310 || ||- || - || 990 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x8 || LinuxCoin 0.2b, phoenix/phatk || (XFX Brand) -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 AGGRESSION=11 FASTLOOPS=false<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 311 || -|| || - || 1000 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.50 / phatk / Linux || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 315 || -|| || - || 970 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.6.1 / phatk2 / CrunchBang Linux || memory @ 300mhz VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=9 WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 316 || ||- || - || 1015 || 375 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 32 || @ stock voltage VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 -v FASTLOOP=false BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 319 || -|| 1.77 || - || 1030 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Xp 64 || 1.2v 355Mhz Memory, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 321 || -|| || - || 1000 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.50 / phatk-mod / Linux || 1000Mhz GPU, 350Mhz RAM, 1.15V, 90% fan, ~60c Temp, VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128; phatk kernel found [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=25135.0 here]<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 323 || || || || 900 (OC) || || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.5 Win7x64 || (500Mhz RAM), ~61c Temp, 57% fan, BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 -v WORKSIZE=64<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 (127$) || 325 || 1.98 || 2.57Mh/$ || 165W || 1040MHz || 200MHz || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || Guiminer/phatk-[http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=25135.0 mod] w7 64bit || -k phatk AGGRESSION=12 VECTORS2 WORKSIZE=128 stock volt, watercooled 53C<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 328 || - || - || - || 1040 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || LinuxCoin 0.2.1b / phoenix / phatk || 1.195 V, RAM @ 325 Mhz, fan @90%, no case, extra 10K RPM fan (62 deg.C in full-load); options: -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=256; brand: Sapphire Xtreme; bord is stable up to 1060 Mhz ~ 335 MHash, but produces some visual artefacts;<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 331 || - || 4.14 || - || 1010 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 1.0 x16 || WinXP 32 / Phoenix 1.7.5 / phatk2 || Stock Voltage, RAM 300, 64C, Fan 67%, -k phatk2 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=256 FASTLOOP=false (+6Mh w/ Phoenix 1.7.5 over 1.6.2)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 333 || - || - || - || 1040 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || LinuxCoin 0.2.1b / phoenix-1.50 / phatk-[http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=25135.0 mod] || + ~5 Mhash increase using the modified phatk from the user above. I am the same guy with 330 @ 1040 MHz Sapphire Xtreme, all other settings the same, board stable, no increase in rejected<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 334 || -|| || - || 1040 || - || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.75 / phatk 2.2 / Win7 64 || Stock voltage, 208Mhz Memory, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 334 || -|| || - || 1030 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.50 / phatk 2.0 / Win7 64 || Stock voltage, 385Mhz Memory, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=256 BFI_INT -- (upped from 330 achieved with diapolo mod [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=25135.0 here]), now using phatk 2.0 found [http://forum.bitcoin.org/?topic=7964.0 here]<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 342 || - || - || - || 1045 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk 2.2 / WinSvr 2008 R2 64 || Stock voltage, 385Mhz Memory, VECTORS VECTORS4 FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=14 BFI_INT -k phatk-2.2<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830x2 CF || 480 || -|| || - || 800 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Guiminer/ - / Win7 64bit |Guiminer || -v -f70 -w128<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830x2 || 570 || -|| || - || 950 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x8 || Guiminer/ - / Win7 64bit poclbm || poclbm -v -w256 -f10 MEMORYCLOCK 300MHZ GPUCLOCK 950MHZ FAN 52% 72°C <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830x2 || 608 || -|| || - || 990 || - || - || 2x PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 2.0/ phatk2 / Win7 32bit || Stock voltage, 300Mhz Memory, VECTORS GOFFSET AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=256 BFI_INT FAN 51% 69°C (Open ATX case) <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830x6 || 1967 || 1.62 || 1.97 || - || 1020/340 || 1120x6 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x1 || Phoenix 1.7.5/phatk2/BAMT Linux || 100% fan @65C / 1.162V / CCC 11.6 / BFI_INT VECTORS FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 240.77 || 1.595|| 1.49 || 151 || 725 || 1440 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 250.26 || 1.657|| || 151 || 725 || 1440 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || opencl client || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 252 || 1.575|| || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-01-25 || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 255.3 || 1.593|| || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-01-25 || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 264 || 1.748|| || 151 || 725 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 1.0 x8 || guiminer-20110501 || -v -w128<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 280 || 1.75|| || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.3 || with BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 280 || - || ||- || 725 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.50 / Fedora 14 || -v -k poclbm VECTORS AGGRESSION=8 WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT FASTLOOP=true<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 282.75 ||style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 3.06|| - || 92.25|| 666 (UC) || 1440|| 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix/WinXP || undervolted to 0.95V; phatk2 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=256; driver 10.12; [http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=9982.0 clocktweak] for setting values; [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=40056 thread]<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 292 || 1.825|| || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-04-28 -v -f 1 || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 298 || 1.8620|| || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-04-28 -v -f 1 -w 64 || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 300 || 1.5460|| || 194 || 925(OC) || 1440 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 304 || - || || - || 725 (stock) || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || cgminer.exe -v 2 -I 8 -w 256 --gpu-memclock 275 || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 314 || 1.8362|| || 171 || 820(OC) || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 1.0 x8 || poclbm || -v -w128<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 328 || - || || - || 875 @ Stock voltage || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix || 70C @42% fan, mem @ 500mhz; -v -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=8 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=128 <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 330 || - || ||- || 850 @ Stock voltage || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix || EAH5850, miner arguments: -k poclbm DEVICE=1 VECTORS AGGRESSION=8 WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 331 || - || ||- || 725 (Stock) || || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Diablo Win7 64bits|| Sapphire 5850 Xtreme, Arguments: -v 2 -w 192 (by Swapper 2011-07-05)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 335 || 1.8611|| || 180 || 890(OC) || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || poclbm || -v -w128, Memory downclocked to 300Mhz<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 344 || 1.8594|| || 185 || 890(OC) || 1440 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 347 || -|| || - || 876 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer / phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 64 || 300Mhz Memory clock, 50% fan-speed, -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 354 || -|| || - || 900(OC) || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || diablo -v 2 -w 128 || Ubuntu 11.04 64-bit [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=9239.0 Headless], catalyst 11.5, memory downclocked to 300mhz, stock voltage. flashed with atiflash [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9AxNmOy6_0 video]<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 355 || -|| || - || 900(OC) || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk || Ubuntu 11.04 64-bit, Memory downclocked to 200MHz, VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 355 || -|| || - || 900 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Ubuntu 11.04 x64 || 300Mhz Memory clock, 60% fan-speed, -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 356 || -|| || - || 870 (OC)|| 1440 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || cgminer 2.1.2 / Win 7 x64 || 302Mhz Memory clock, 85% fan-speed, Stock Voltage, -I 6 -v 2 -w 256 (2012-02 by Swapper)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 359 || -|| || - || 900 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.50 / phatk / Ubuntu 11.04 x64 || 300Mhz Memory clock, 66% fan-speed, -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 365 || -|| || - || 920 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 64 || 300Mhz memory clock VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 367.5 || -|| || - || 900(OC) || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 1.0 x16 || diablo with bitless's hack, -v 2 -w 128 || RHEL 5U5 x86_64, catalyst 11.5, Sapphire HD 5850 Xtreme, Memory downclocked to 300MHz, core voltage 1.145V, BIOS modded with RBE<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 369.4 || -|| || - || 930 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 1.0 x16 || guiminer / phoenix / phatk / Win7 32 || Catalyst 11.5, XFX HD5850, Memory downclocked to 322MHz, -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 372 || 1.68 || - || 220 @ Wall || 900 || 300 || 2.5 || PCI-E 1.1 x8 || cgminer 2.3.1 from source / Ubuntu 11.11 x86_64 || -I 8 -v 2 -w 256 --- hex-core opteron cpu w/ 12GB RAM and cgminer CPU bug in linux makes power usage a little high ~210w in windows 7 x86_64<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 375 || -|| || - || 940 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.50 / phatk / Ubuntu 10.04 || 300Mhz memory clock VECTORS AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=256 BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 381 || -|| || - || 940 || 1440 || 2.5 || PCI-E 1.0 x16 || phoenix / phatk / Win7 x64 / Catalyst 11.6 || MSI Afterburner 500MHz memory clock,-k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 AGGRESSION=13<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 382 || 1.8454|| || 207 || 995(OC) || 1440 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || phoenix || OC 1.177v on core<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 391 || - || - || 180 || 725 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Win 7 Ultimate x64 / DiabloMiner / Catalyst 12.2 || ASUS DirectCU @ GPU 960 MHz / MEM 300 Mhz @ Voltage 1.2 @ 70% FAN @ 69 temp @ Flags: -v 2,1 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 391 || -|| || - || 1000 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16(@x8) || phoenix 1.5 / phatk / Win7 64 || Mem @ 280, fan @ 100%, Temp @ 71, 1.163 V core, -v -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256, The name is Mautobu<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 392 || -||2.43 || - || 990 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix-svn (AUR) / phatk / Arch Linux || Memory: 180MHz, -v -q 1 -k phatk WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 397 || -|| || - || 950 || 1440 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.1 16x || phoenix 1.5 / phatk 2.2 / Win7 64, catalyst 11.6 || Mem speed 350Mhz, Fan 85%, 70C, 1.083 Vcore, -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=12 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 400 || -|| || - || 1000 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.5 Win7 x64 || Memory 600MHz, Vcore 1.225, 73C, -k phatk WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false, 3% phatk mod<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 404 || -|| || - || 965 || 1440 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.0 x16(@x8) || phoenixsvn / phatk2 / Ubuntu 11.04 / catalyst 11.8 || 5870 bios flash, Mem @322, fan@55%, Temp@83oC, 1.163Vcore, -k phatk2 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 408 || -|| - || - || 999/275 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.50 / phatk-mod / Ubuntu 10.04 || Fan 70%, temp < 60 deg C, Sapphire 5 heatpipe card, same flags as above/below (edit1- oops, no voltage tweaks... edit2- wow, phatk-mod makes a difference... catfish)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 412 || -|| || - || 1010 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 1x>16x || phoenix 1.5 / phatk 3% mod / Win7 64 11.5 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=12 -k phatk <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 414.8 || -|| || - || 1018 || 450 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 16x || GUIMiner / Win7 64 11.7 || I use Sapphire HD5850 Toxic 2GB and for OC TRIXX Sapphire Tweak Utility v4.0.2. 72 deg C, fan 100%, core 1018mhz, mem 450Mhz, stock voltage (1.163). proof: http://img23.imageshack.us/img23/2367/414upload.png GUIMiner parameters: -v -w256 -f1 <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 420 || -|| || - || 1055 || 300 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.0 1x>16x || phoenix 1.5 / phatk 3% mod / Win7 64 11.6 || Fan 80%, 66C, 1.250 Vcore, -k phatk PLATFORM=0 DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=8 And proof: http://i.imgur.com/s9hqs.png<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 431 || -|| || - || 1040 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 4x>16x || phoenix-svn / phatk kernel / Debian Wheezy AMD64 + fglrx 11.6 || fan 100%, vcore 1.1750 V, 72C, VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=15 FASTLOOP=false -k phatk, proof: http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/199/431u.png/<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 432.15 || -|| || - || 1040 || 500 || 2.5.793.1 || PCI-E 2.0 16x || phoenix 1.7.5 / phatk2 kernel / Win7 x64 SP1 || fan 100%, vcore 1.212 V, 69C, VECTORS4 BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=64 -k phatk2, proof: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/18704286/mining%205850.png/ ... Card is REF HIS 5850 ... i mining at this speed for stable but... max unstable (if i play video/flashvideo it will crash) is 436.48Mhash/sec with core 1051 mem 500 vcore 1.237 (same other settings) it's too hot in VRM that not sound good to me... i don't want to kill it for my fun mining ... - Nito Niwatori <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850x2 || 620 || - || || - || 800 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Guiminer ( cl miner ) v2012-02-19 Win7 x64 || MSI OC-Edition, -v -w 128 <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850x2 || 702 || - || - || - || 905 (OC)|| 1440 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 (x2) || phoenix 2.0.0 / Win 7 x32 || ASUS DirectCU: 304Mhz Memory clock, 66% fan-speed, Voltage Tweak, AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256 (https://www.dropbox.com/s/9u6f2jz3sz1poxb/5850.jpg)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850x2 || 720 || -|| || - || 875 (OC)|| 1440 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || cgminer 2.1.2 / Win 7 x64 || 302Mhz Memory clock, 85% fan-speed, Stock Voltage, -I 6 -v 2 -w 256 (2012-02 by Swapper)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850x3 || 1,010 || -|| || - || 850 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 (x3) || GUIMiner || -v -w128 | MSI Afterburner settings: 850MHz core clock and 500MHz memory clock <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850x4 || 1360 || 1.94|| || 700@wall || 900 || || || || poclbm|| <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850x6 || 2,135 || -|| || - || 900 || - || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.0 (6 total, 4 full length, 2 @ PCIE1x with risers || GUIMiner 24/8/2011 - poclbm || -v -f1 -w128 | Win 7 64Bit, Gigabyte GA-890FXA-UD5 motherboard, 4gb ram, AM3 cpu, Kingston SSD, Catalyst 11.8 drivers, guiminer switches: -v -f1 -w128, MSI Afterburner settings: 900MHz core clock and 1000MHz memory clock, cable risers required to fit all 6 cards, fans 100% Proof: http://i.imgur.com/6s7zv.jpg <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870M || 152.5 || -|| || - || 750(OC) || 1000 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || gui-miner (win-7) ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870M || 189.2 || -|| || - || 850(OC) || 1000 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Wins 7 64/gui-miner (win-7) || -v -w128 -f0 Graphics Overdrive setting 700->850 core clock & 900->1030memory clock . +35mhs over stock settings<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 313 || 1.665|| || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo/Linux || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 313.65 || 1.668||1.65 || 188 || 850 || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 340 || 1.809|| || 188 || 850 || 1600 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 343 || 1.824|| || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo/Linux || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 355 || 1.888|| || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/Linux || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 360 || 1.6822|| || 214 || 970 || 700 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL w7-64 || -f 0 -v -w 128 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=6144.msg91959#msg91959 source]<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 379 || 2.015|| || 188 || 850 || 1600 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha || -D -G2<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 397 || -|| || - || 930 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=10 WORKSIZE=128<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 400 || 1.9047|| || 210 || 950 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || Phoenix 1.3 || -k poclbm VECTORS AGGRESSION=7 FASTLOOP BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 408 || 1.8888|| || 216 || 980 || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm/Win7x64 || -f 20 -v -w 128, BIT_ALIGN, BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 414 || 1.9255|| || 215 || 975 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer/w7x64 || -k poclbm -v -w 256 -f 1 VECTORS BITALIGN BFI_INT -- Memory Clock 300<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 420 || 2.0000|| || 210 || 950 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=14 WORKSIZE=256 -- Memory Clock 300Mhz<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 421 || 1.9581|| || 215 || 975 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.47 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 -k phatk<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 421.5 || 2.007|| || 201 || 950 || 1600 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha || -D -G2 (GPU OC to 900, memory downclocked to 900)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 430 || || || || 980 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.48/Windows 7 64 || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=14 WORKSIZE=256 -- Memory Clock 300Mhz<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 432 || || || || 985 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.73/Windows 7 64 || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128 Memory Clock=900Mhz Asus 76C Fan=60% 65F ambient<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 435 || -|| || - || 990 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || LinuxCoin v0.2b phoenix/phatk || (Powercolor brand) -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 AGGRESSION=11 FASTLOOPS=false<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 437 || || 1.90|| || 960 || - || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x1 || phoenix 1.50 + phatk || Card is clocked with BIOS flash @ 960Mhz Core and 300Mhz Memory. More information and pictures: http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=7216.msg324521#msg324521 <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 438 || 1.9819|| || 221 || 1000(OC) || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm/Linux || -v -w 64 -f 1<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 440 || 2.0000|| || 220 || 995 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 445 || 2.28||2.34 || 195 || 1005 || 335 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x4 || Ubuntu 11.04 phoenix/phatk || (Asus brand, volts = 1'072) -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 AGGRESSION=12 FASTLOOPS=false -a 7 (-a 10)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 453 || || || || 980 || 1600 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.50/Windows 7 64 catalyst 11.6 phatk 2.2 || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=256 FASTLOOPS=false -- Memory Clock 350Mhz Vcore 1.163v<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 458 || -|| || - || 1040 || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm/Windows 7 64 || -v -w 256 -f 1 Crossfired, Water cooled, 916 Mhash/s total. Best dual gpu setup me thinks? The name is Mautobu.<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 460 || || || || 1050 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Guiminer || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=14 WORKSIZE=256 -- Memory Clock 300Mhz vcore @ 1225mV<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 460 || || || || 1020 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.50/Windows 7 64 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=256 -k phatk -- Memory Clock 300Mhz vcore @ 1225mV, 3% phatk mod<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 461 || || || || 1000 || 1600 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.75/Windows 7 64 || -k phatk2 (phatk 2.2) VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=9 WORKSIZE=128, Memory Clock=213, stock voltage<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 481 || || || || 1050 || 1600 || 2.5 || PCI-E 1x || phoenix 1.75/Windows 7 64 || -k phatk2 (phatk 2.2) VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=64 AGGRESSION=20 [MSI HD 5870 Ref Design vs Zalman VF3000A 1200mv Mem 600MHz]<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870x2 (CF) || 864 || -|| || - || 900 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer || -k phatk VECTORS FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=7 BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128 (Same flags per GPU)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870x2 (Ares) || 620 || -|| || - || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer || -v -w 128<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870x2 (Ares) || 826 || 0.751|| || 1100 || 950 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.4 w/ Phtak || AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT Memory @ 300MHz<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870x2 (Ares) || 826 || 1.18|| || 700 || 935 || 3200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 w/ Phatk || AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=256 VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false, memory @ 319 MHz, Windows 7 32-bit<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870x2 (Ares) || 878 || 0.585|| || 1500 || 1000 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.7 w/ Phtak || AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT Memory @ 300MHz<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870x4 || 1784 || || 1.29|| || 960 || - || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x1 || phoenix 1.50 + phatk + [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=7964.0 Version 2.2 Improvement] || Cards are clocked with BIOS flash @ 960Mhz Core and 300Mhz Memory. More information and pictures: http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=7216.msg324521#msg324521 <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870x6 || 2568 || -|| || 1200 || 970 || -|| 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/debian32bit || -v -w128, voltage default, Mem downclocked to 300 MHz, Fan 80-90% (+ 4x12cm fun 1900rpm), Temp 6x 70-75C. Whole computer comsumpts 1280Watt. Using PCI-E risers 16x-16x to use 6 GPU cards<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 530 || 1.803||0.53 ? || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.4.595.10 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/201103.beta3/Windows || -v -w128 -f60<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 535.06 || 1.820|| || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 560 || 1.905|| || 294 || 725 || 3200 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 565 || 1.922|| || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine2 || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 604 || 2.054|| || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 645 || 1.875|| || 344 || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || -f1, Debian 6, fglrx-driver 10.9.3<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 739 || || || || 795 || 3200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || cgminer 2.3.1 || -I 9 -k phatk -w 256 -v 2, memory clock @ 265MHz, Debian Squeeze, fglrx-driver 12.1.1, performance scales linearly with engine clock as long as memory clock is 1/3<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 740 || 2.1511|| || 344 || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix/1.3 || AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT, memory clock @ 300MHz<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 755 || 2.2076|| || 342 || 848 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 28-04-11 || -f 1 -w 256 -v, Ubuntu 10.10, fglrx 11.4, memory clock @ 300MHz<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 802 || 2.31|| || 347 || 850 || 3200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix poclbm Ubuntu 11.04 || -q 6 -k AGGRESSION=19 WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT VECTORS, fglrx 11.4, mem clock @ 1000MHz<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 820 || ??? || || ??? || 910 || 3200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x1 || Phoenix 1.5 Win7 || AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=256 BFI_INT VECTORS -k phatk, 11.5, Mem @ 300MHz, 1.110v, 3% phatk mod<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 822.2 || -|| || - || 950 || 3200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix win7 || -k phatk -q 6 AGGRESSION=20 WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT VECTORS, but with this increasing difficulty mining becomes pretty pointless<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 833 || -|| || - || 930 || 3200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.7.5, win7 x64, catalyst 11.7 || -k phatk AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=256 BFI_INT VECTORS fastloops=false. memory@300mhz, 1.125v, fan 100%, 73C core temp, 95c voltage controllers. it will clock higher but not stable without a voltage increase and i fear for the VRMs<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 863.4 || -|| || - || 955 || 3200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo - Debian || -v 2 -w 256 (XFX Radeon HD 5970 Black Edition)<br />
|-<br />
| 6310M || 9.821 || 0.545|| || 18 || 500 || 80 || 2.4 || Integrated/APU || poclbm-gui -v -w128 || HP DM1z 18W TDP is shared with the CPU<br />
|-<br />
| 6450 || 27.0 || 1.5 || - || 18 || 625 || 160 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 2011-06-14 || -v -w128 Sapphire HD6450 1gb ddr3 Ubuntu 11.04 64bit<br />
|-<br />
| 6450 || 32.6 || 1.918 || - || 17 || 725 || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer/Phoenix1.75 Windows 7 x64 (no Aero)|| -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 -v WORKSIZE=64 Dell OEM HD6450 1gb ddr3 passive cooling/no fan 81C<br />
|-<br />
| 6450 || 37.8 || ? || - || 17 || 850 || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix2.0.0 Windows 8 x64 || -k phatk2 VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 -v WORKSIZE=64 Sapphire HD6450 1GB DDR3 passive cooling/no fan 150MHz memory/1000mV VCore<br />
|-<br />
| 6470M || 24.1 || - || ||- || - || - || 2.1 || Integrated/APU || guiminer || <br />
|-<br />
| 6470M || 31.0 || - || ||- || - || - || 2.1 || Integrated/APU || phoenix 1.48 || <br />
|-<br />
| 6480G || 24.1 || - || ||- || - || - || 2.1 || Integrated/APU || phoenix 1.75 || <br />
|-<br />
| 6490M || 15.21 || - || ||- || - || - || - || - || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8994.0 DiabloMiner GUI] v2011-05-22 / Mac OS X 10.6.7 || Model: MacBookPro8,2 VRAM: 256MB<br />
|-<br />
| 6490M || 16.289 || 0.708|| || 23 || - || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm-mod (Mac OS X 10.6.7) || MacBook Pro early 2011<br />
|-<br />
| 6490M || 17.18 || - || ||- || - || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoneix 1.50 with poclbm, Mac OS X 10.6.7 || MacBook Pro 2,8 VRAM: 256MB. phoenix -k poclbm VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP<br />
|-<br />
| 6490M || 32.1 || - || ||- || - || - || - || - || guiminer 2011-07-01 with poclbm (Win7-x64) ||MacBookPro8,2 (WinX64) -v -w128 -f0<br />
|-<br />
| style="background:#FFDD00;"| 6520G || 33.8 || - || || - || 400 || 320 || - || Integrated/APU || guiminer 2011-07-01 with OpenCL (Win7-64bit) || -v -w128 on Toshiba L775D-S7222<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFDD00;"| 6530D || 40.5 || - || || - || 444 || 320 || 2.4 || FM-1 || cgminer 2.4.1 || Integrated/APU A6-3500; Linux; Catalyst 11.11; APP-SDK-v2.4 (595.10)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFDD00;"| 6550D(A8 Onboard) || 66.2 || -|| || - || - || - || 2.5 || FM-1 || guiminer 2011-07-01 with OpenCL (Win7-64bit) || -v -w128 -f60<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFDD00;"| 6550D || 67.6 || -|| || - || 600 || 400 || 2.5 || FM-1 || guiminer 2011-07-01 with OpenCL (Win7-64bit) || -v -w128 -f2<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFDD00;"| 6570 || 68.0 || 1.133|| || 60 || 650 || 480 || 2.4 || PCI-E x16 || guiminer 2011-05-21 with poclbm (Win7-32bit) || no extra option for miner . Sapphire 6570 gddr5 512mb<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFDD00;"| 6570 || 82.1 || 1.368|| || 60 || 650 || 480 || 2.4 || PCI-E x16 || guiminer 2011-05-21 with poclbm (Win7-32bit) || -v -w128 . Sapphire 6570 gddr5 512mb<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFDD00;"| 6570 || 86.0 || 1.95 || - || 44 || 650 || 480 || 2.4 || PCI-E x16 || guiminer/poclbm 2011-06-14 || -v -w128 Sapphire Ultimate HD6570 1gb ddr3 Ubuntu 11.04 64bit<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFDD00;"| 6570 || 112.0 || - || || - || 860 || 480 || 2.7 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer 2012-02-19/poclbm (Win7-64bit) || -v -w128 -f1 . Sapphire 6570 Low Profile gddr3 1024mb<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFDD00;"| 6570 || 114.0 || - || || - || 866 || 480 || 2.7 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer 2012-02-19/poclbm (Win7-64bit) || -v -f 0 -w128 -a 3 . XFX 6570 Full Profile gddr3 1024mb 64 bit<br />
|-<br />
| 6630M || 48.80 || -|| || - || - || - || - || - || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8994.0 DiabloMiner GUI] v2011-06-18 / Mac OS X 10.7 || Mac Mini 2011 MC816D/A<br />
|-<br />
| 6630M || 63.00 || -|| || - || 600 || 480 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || DiabloMiner Windows || Lenovo ThinkPad Edge E320 (card overclocked using Sapphire TRIXX)<br />
|-<br />
| 6670 || 102.20 || -|| || - || 800 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/Debian sid || -v -f 0 -w 128<br />
|-<br />
| 6670 || 104.00 || - || 1.0 || - || 820 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer(poclbm)/Win 7|| -v -a4 -f15 -d0 -w64<br />
|-<br />
| 6670 || 110.00 || - || 1.0 || - || 850 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer(poclbm)/Win 7|| -v -f 0 -w 128 -q 6<br />
|-<br />
| 6670 || 111.77 || 1.69 || - || 66 || 910 || 480 || 2.7 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.7.5 || -k phatk2 BFI_INT AGGRESSION=5 VECTORS WORKSIZE=128<br />
|-<br />
| 6670 || 120.1 || - || - || - || 900 || 480 || 2.7 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || cgminer 2.7.4 || kernel: diablo i:10 core: 900 mem: 750<br />
|-<br />
| 6670 || 124.0 || - || - || 66 || 940 || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix2.0.0 Windows 8 x64 || -k phatk2 VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 -v WORKSIZE=128 Sapphire HD6670 Ultimate 1GB DDR5 passive cooling/no fan 300MHz memory/1100mV VCore<br />
|-<br />
| 6750 || 142 || -|| || 150 || 700 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w128, Gigabyte SL (passive cooler), watts is TDP, card runs very hot (>90°C)<br />
|-<br />
| 6750 || 167.59 || -|| || - || 870 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer || -v -f30 -w128<br />
|-<br />
| 6750 || 172.00 || -|| || - || 860 || 600 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer 2012-02-19/poclbm (Win7-64bit) MSI Afterburner 2.2.3 || -v -w128 f-20 Sapphire 6570 GDDR3 1024Mb CCC ver. 11.12 OCL 2.5<br />
|-<br />
| 6750M || 41.48 || -|| || - || 870 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || diablominer ||<br />
|-<br />
| 6750M || 60 || -|| || - || - || - || - || - || diablominer OSX 10.7 WorkSize=128||<br />
|-<br />
| 6770 || 180 || -|| || - || 850 || 1200 || - || - || guiminer || -v -w128 , this was an XFX (OEM) model, GPU @ 850 MHz, mem @ 1200 MHz; I pushed it up to 190 Mhash/s briefly by overclocking, but it crashed the system above that<br />
|-<br />
| 6770 || 202 || -|| || - || 960 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x1,x4,x8,x16 || phoenix 1.48 || Sapphire 6770 (standard) -q2 -k poclbm DEVICE=0 AGGRESSION=10 VECTORS WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT FASTLOOP (The PCI-E speed does not affect the mining speed)<br />
|-<br />
| 6770 || 217 || -|| || - || 960 || 800 || - || PCI-E x16 || Guiminer with phoenix || Sapphire 6770 -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128 FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 with https://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=22965.0 modification<br />
|-<br />
| 6770 || 221 || -|| || - || 1010 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || Phoenix 1.50 || MSI 6770 -k phatk PLATFORM=0 DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=13 3% Stock voltage.<br />
|-<br />
| 6770 || 235 || -|| || - || 1010 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || Phoenix 1.50 || Sapphire 6770 -k phatk PLATFORM=0 DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=13 3% mod https://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=22965.0 and AS5 paste on core w/ external 12" fan 50C full load. Stock voltage.<br />
|-<br />
| 6770x2 || 470 || -|| || - || 1010 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || Phoenix 1.50 || Sapphire 6770 -k phatk PLATFORM=0 DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=13 3% mod https://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=22965.0 and AS5 paste on core w/ external 12" fan 50C full load. Stock voltage.<br />
|-<br />
| 6790 || 220 || 1.467|| || 150 || 800 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 || -k phatk BFI_INT FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=12 VECTORS OC'd to 1ghz, underclocked mem to 300, voltage at 1175<br />
|-<br />
| 6790 || 219 || 1.467|| || 150 || 960 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer || -v -f0 -w128 / GPU OC to 960MHz under Windows7 64bit<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 171.59 || 1.351||1.07 || 127 || 775 || 960 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 196 || -|| || - || 850 || 960 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 0<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 220 || 1.236(*)|| || 178(*) || 1000(OC) || 960 || 2.4RC1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 30 (*: Overclocked wattage calculated [http://bakkap.free.fr/Misc/wCalc.html here] )<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 234.8 || ||- || - || 940 || 960 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.3 || AGGRESSION=8 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 236.0 || ||- || - || 940 || 960 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.4 || -k phatk AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT, Core @ 900MHz, Memory @ 300MHz<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 244.2 || ||- || - || 960 || 960 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm june-2011 || -v -w 128<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 245.1 || ||- || 200 || 940 || 960 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer (Phoenix) || Sapphire 6850 (Memory @1000MHz); Win7 64bit; flags: -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=14 WORKSIZE=128 <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 250 || 1.612(*) ||- || 155(*) || 940 (OC) || 960 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || AOCLBF 1.74 (Phoenix 1.5**) @Win7/x64 || XFX 6850 (Memory @840MHz; Vdcc @1.148V; Fan @74%; Temp @70C; System @39C); flags: -k phatk BFI_INT FASTLOOP VECTORS AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128 (*: Overclocked wattage calculated [http://bakkap.free.fr/Misc/wCalc.html here] / **: [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=22965.0 Tainted Kernel])<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 256.2 || || - || 170 || 980 || 960 || 2.7 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.7.5 / Win7 32bit || -k phatk -VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=9, Sapphire VaporX 1GB, mem@250MHz, stock VDDC 1.150V <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 262.5 || || - || - || 965 || 525 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer / poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128 (HIS 6850 flashed to HIS 6870 BIOS)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 267.2 || ||1.67 || - || 1010(OC) || 960 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer / phoenix 1.50 || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 worksize=128 FASTLOOP=false<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 301.4 || ||1.67 || - || || || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer / poclbm || -v -f 2 -w 128 clock @ 985 mem @ 890<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 232.47 || 1.540||1.22 || 151 || 900 || 1120 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm -v -w 128 || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 245|| -|| || - || 900|| 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ph rising 1.45 phoenix 1.50 phatk 11.5 sdk 2.4 || HD5xxx+ Fastloop phatk AGGRESSION=10<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 264.5 || - || - || - || 980 || 1050 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-01 || Stays around 66*C if I keep the side panel off and the room well ventilated. Card is PowerColor branded. Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 with Classic theme. Fan is at 100%. -v -w128 <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 271 || 1.807|| || 150 || 940 || 1120|| 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm -v -w 128 || Debian 6.0.1 x86_64<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 277.47 || -|| || - || 940 || 1120 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.3 || AGGRESSION=8 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 279 || 1.847(?)|| || 151(?) || 900 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha cat 11.4 sdk 2.4 || -G2 -D stock clocks, debian linux 64bit<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 281.7 || 1.172 (stock)|| || - || 980 || 1120|| 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer-v2011-06-09 || xfx6870, flags: -v 19 -w 128, win7 32-bit<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 293.13 || || ||- || 945 || 1050|| 2.5 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.5 Phatk || xfx6870, Catalyst 11.6, 1.5 Phoenix flags: -k phatk FASTLOOP=false DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128; http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=25860.0 Kernel Patch; http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=6458.0 Cmd; http://developer.amd.com/tools/gDEBugger/Pages/default.aspx No Crossfire Required; runs faster without crossfire 1% + additional 3% from update<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 294 || || ||- || 980 || 1120|| 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix phatk || xfx6870, 340MHz memory clock, Catalyst 11.6, flags: BFI_INT VECTORS AGGRESSION=9 WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 294 || || ||- || 985 || 1100|| 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || Diablo || Powercolor branded card, Win 8 x64, -v 1 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 295 || 2.02||1.64 || 146 || 950 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || hashkill latest as of 7/6/11 (ubuntu 11.4) || hashkill-gpu -p bitcoin user:pass:server -D, mem clock 850, voltage @ 1.175, Fan @ 70%, Temp @ 71C.<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 297|| -|| || - || 1000|| 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ph rising 1.62 phoenix 1.50 phatk 11.5 sdk 2.4 || Vectors HD5xxx+ Fastloop phatk AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 300 || - || || - || 940 || 1120 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.6.2 phatk2 || xfx6870 Black Edition, 340MHz Memory Clock, Catalyst 11.6, VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128, Debian Linux 64-Bit, Fan @ 50%, Temp @ 75C<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 300 || 1.72 || - || 174 || 1038 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm windows7x86 cat 11.4 || -v -w128 -f1 mem clock 360, fan 100% temp 73C<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 300.06 || 1.830|| || 164 || 1020 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.4 cat 11.4 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=8 fastloop mem clock 344<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 302 || - || || - || 940 || 1120 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || cgminer 2.1.2 || xfx6870 Black Edition, 340MHz Memory Clock, Catalyst 11.6, -w 256 -I 9, Debian Linux 64-Bit, Fan @ 50%, Temp @ 75C<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 307 || 1.72 || - || 174 || 1001/\1001 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm windows7x86 cat11.8 || -v -w128 -f5,85°C<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 310 || - || - || - || 1035 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 phatk 11.5 sdk 2.4 || BFI_INT VECTORS FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=128, mem clock @ 300MHz, voltage @ 1.300<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 310 || -|| || - || 975 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix phatk linuxcoin || BFI_INT VECTORS FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128, mem clock @ 340MHz, core clock @ 970MHz, flashed bios, 72 degrees w/ fan @ 68%, GIGABYTE SOC<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 312 || -|| || - || 975 || 300|| 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.50 / phatk / Windows 7 x64 SP1 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256, mem clock @ 300MHz, voltage @ 1.300, Fan @ 45%, Temp @ 62C, MSI 6870 HAWK.<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 314 || -|| || - || 1030 || 1120|| 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.50 / phatk / Linux || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 316 || -|| || - || 1030 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer 2011-06-09 using phoenix (Win7-32bit) || -k phatk platform=0 device=0 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 worksize=128 FASTLOOP=false, mem clock @ 228MHz, voltage @ 1.25, Fan @ 40%, Temp @ 73C<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 320 || - || - || 160 || 950 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Win 7 Ultimate x64 / DiabloMiner / Catalyst 12.1 || Saphire @ GPU 1030 MHz / MEM 300 Mhz @ Voltage 1.25 @ 80% FAN @ 69 temp @ Flags: -v 2 -w 128<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 321|| -|| || - || 1050|| 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x8 ||aoclbf 1.7 phoenix 1.50 11.6|| Vectors HD5xxx+ phatk AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=256, Memory=325MHz, Volts=1.3V, Fan~55%, Temps~70C<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 322 || 1.882|| || 170 || 1050 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.47 phatk 11.5 sdk 2.4 || BFI_INT VECTORS FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=256, mem clock @ 400MHz<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 329 || -|| || - || 1075 || 1120|| 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 phatk 11.5 sdk 2.4 || BFI_INT VECTORS FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 332 || -||1.74 || - || 1050 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer 2011-06-14 using phoenix (Win7-32bit) || -k phatk platform=0 device=0 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 worksize=128 FASTLOOP=false, mem clock @ 228MHz, voltage @ 1.3, Fan @ 60%, Temp @ 74C, flash and browser hardware acceleration disabled, aero enabled.<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 339.25 || - || - || - || 1090 || 1120 || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.7.3 cat 12.1 || Mem @ 350Mhz Clock @ 1090 Voltage 1.337 fan @ 100 Temp @ 75 diapolo's modified phatk kernel -k phatk_dia platform=0 device=0 VECTORS2 AGGRESSION=11 worksize=64 FASTLOOP=false BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 375 || - || - || - || 1000 || 1120 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Win 7 Ultimate 32-bit / Guiminer v2011-07-01 / phoenix 1.5 / phatk2 / Catalyst 11.9 || XFX / GPU @ 1000 MHz / MEM @ 200 Mhz / Voltage @ 1.187 V / FAN @ 40% / Temp @ 72 C / Flags: -k phatk2 platform=0 device=0 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=6 worksize=128 FASTLOOP=false / Using 2 miners with equal settings on 1 GPU<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870x2 || 600 || - || - || - || 945 || 330 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Ubuntu 12.04 32-bit / Phoenix 2 / phatk2 / Catalyst 11.9 || XFX / GPU @ 945 MHz / MEM @ 330 Mhz / Voltage @ 1.175 / Config: phatk2 VECTORS4 BFI_INT AGGRESSION=12 worksize=128 FASTLOOP=false GOFFSET=True<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870x4 || 1150|| -|| 1.2 || - || 900|| 1050 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.7 (Win7-64bit) || -k phatk platform=0 device=0-3 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 worksize=128 FASTLOOP=false<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870x4 || 1180 || -|| - || 145 || 950 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/debian32bit || -v -w128, Gigabyte SOC. voltage 1.175 (default), GPU default 950 MHz, Mem downclocked to 300 MHz, Fan 4x100% (+ 2x12cm fun 1300rpm), Temp 4x75C (in summer).<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870x4 || 1200 || -|| - || 150 || 970 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/debian32bit || -v -w128, Gigabyte SOC. voltage 1.175 (default), GPU overclocked from 950 to 970 MHz, Mem downclocked to 300 MHz, Fan 4x100% (+ 2x12cm fun 1300rpm), Temp 4x75C (in summer). Unstable with GPU@975 MHz.<br />
|-<br />
| 6930 || 320|| -|| - || - || 960 || 1200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.75/phatk || stock voltage, BFI_INT FASTLOOP VECTORS AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=64. 70C, FAN 80% (HIS brand)<br />
|-<br />
| 6930 || 370|| -|| - || - || 980 || 855 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || cgminer-2.4.1 || stock voltage (1,160), -I9. 71C, FAN 85% (HIS brand)<br />
|-<br />
| 6930 || 372 || -||1.89(?) || - || 1000 || 900 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.75/poclbm || max stable @ 1200 mV, BFI_INT FASTLOOP VECTORS AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=64<br />
|-<br />
| style="background:#00FFFF;"|6930x2|| 700 ||- || - ||400~|| 940 || 2560 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Guiminer || max stable @ 1100mV mem 300, Fan 80-90%, temp 70-75, -v -w64 -f10<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 272 || -||0.90 || - || 900 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48/poclbm || max stable @ 1150 mV, AGGRESSION = 7, BFI_INT, MSI 6950<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 291 || -|| || - || 920 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48/poclbm || max stable @ 1200mV, AGGRESSION = 7, BFI_INT, MSI 6950<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 295 || -|| || - || 930 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48/poclbm || max stable @ 1275mV, AGGRESSION = 7, BFI_INT, MSI 6950<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 295 || 1.844(?)|| || 160(?) || 810 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 300 || -|| || - || 940 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48/poclbm || max stable @ 1300mV, AGGRESSION = 7, BFI_INT, MSI 6950<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 314 || -|| || - || 800 || 1408 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 05-01-11 || -v -f30 -w128 default mem 1250 Stock Sapphire 6950 1gb<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 325 || 1.635(?)|| || 200(?) || 885 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 332 || 1.95~ || 1.2~ || 170~ || 840 || 1408 || 2.5.684.212 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 2011-06-14 || -v -w 128 -f 0, WinXP x86, Cat11.6b, desktop on IGP, Sapphire 1GB w/ HW locked BIOS, +40MHz GPU OC, 160W ACP + 5% OC = 170W new estimated ACP<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 333 || 1.95~ || 1.2~ || 170~ || 840 || 1408 || 2.4.650.9 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 2011-06-14 || -v -w 128 -f 0, WinXP x86, Cat11.6, desktop on IGP, Sapphire 1GB w/ HW locked BIOS, +40MHz GPU OC, 160W ACP + 5% OC = 170W new estimated ACP<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 338 || 1.84~ || - || 184~ || 860 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.50/poclbm kernel || Sapphire 2GB card w/ HW locked BIOS; Cat 11.6, Win7 x64; core @ 860MHz & 1087mV (OC + undervolt), mem @ 860MHz; cmd line args: VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128; power and MH/J calculated using Power = C*f*v^2 w/ assumption of 175 W at stock settings w/ 100% GPU util. (not measured)<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 340 || - || ||- || 895 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 05-21-11 || -v -w 128, mem @ 500, 1200 mV, MSI 6950<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 340 || - || ||- || 800 || 1536 ||(?) || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 05-21-11 || -v -f30 -w128 default mem 1250,Sapphire 6950 1gb, unlocked shaders<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 343 || 2.14 || - || 160 || 840 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 06-27-11 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128 FASTLOOP=false, HIS H695FN2G2M 2GB, mem @ 720, Kill-a-Watt measured<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 344 || 2.02~ || 1.27~ || 170~ || 840 || 1408 || 2.5.684.212 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/20110709 || -v -w 128 -f 0, WinXP x86, Cat11.6b, desktop on IGP, Sapphire 1GB w/ HW locked BIOS, +40MHz GPU OC, 160W ACP + 5% OC = 170W new estimated ACP<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 344.4 || -|| || - || 800 || 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || Powercolor 6950 @ shadermod on original Bios 6950 / 1000mV 850/730, +20% powertune, Fan @ 60%, -v -w128 -f1.<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 349 || 1.745(?)|| || 200(?) || 800 || 1408 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 05-21-11 || -v -f30 -w128, xfx 6950 xxx 1gb, locked shaders, core 900, mem 650, 79° C<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 351 || 1.91~ || - || 184~ || 860 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIminer/poclbm v2011-07-01 || Sapphire 2GB card w/ HW locked BIOS; Cat 11.6, Win7 x64; core @ 860MHz & 1087mV (OC + undervolt), mem @ 860MHz; cmd line args: -v -w 128 -f 0; (same system as the 338 MH/s result above using Phoenix)<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 352.8 || -|| || - || 820 || 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || Powercolor 6950 @ shadermod on original Bios 6950 / 1000mV 850/730, +20% powertune, Fan @ 60%, -v -w128 -f1.<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 360 || 1.8(?)|| || 200(?) || 970 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 360 || -|| || - || 870 || 1375 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || flashed with 6970 BIOS, -v -f30 -w128<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 365 || -|| || - || 925 || 1408 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || stock bios, -v -f0 -w128, MSI twinfrozr III 2GB<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 366.4 || -|| || - || 850 || 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || Powercolor 6950 @ shadermod on original Bios 6950 / 1000mV 850/730, +20% powertune, Fan @ 60%, -v -w128 -f1.<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 381 || -|| || - || 850 || 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || cgminer/phatk || XFX 6950 2Gb reference @ shadermod on original Bios 6950 / 1100mV 850/1250, +10% powertune, I=5, Fan @ 54% ~3100RPM, temp 73C w128. Windows7x64, Catalyst 13.1 .<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 383 || -|| || - || 975 || 1408 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || stock bios, -v -f0 -w128, voltage 1.274 @72c MSI twinfrozr III 2GB<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 388.4 || -|| || - || 900 || 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || Powercolor 6950 @ shadermod on original Bios 6950 / 1000mV 850/730, +20% powertune, Fan @ 60%, -v -w128 -f1.<br />
|- <br />
| 6950 || 389.9 || -|| || - || 950 || 1408 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || cgminer 2.3.2/Diablo || stock bios, -I 9, VRAM @ 820Mhz, fan @ 100%, voltage 1.250v, temp @ 68c, HIS ICE-Q X 2GB, OCed using MSI Afterburner, Windows 7 Professional 64-bit SP 1<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 400~ || -|| || - || 895 || 320 || 1536|| PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIMiner 24th Aug 2011 || Sapphire HD6950 Shader unlock mod 1408>1536 / +20% Power control, Fan @ 55%, Flags:-v -f2 -w64 -r5.Note this keeps temps under 80oC which is needed for this to be stable.Moderate fan noise.Power use is ~200W.<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 403 || -|| || - || 939 || 685 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix-1.50/phatk || ASUS EAH6950 ([http://www.techpowerup.com/vgabios/90661/Asus.HD6970.2048.101124.html (Ref. 6950 Flashed -> 6970)]) / +10% overdrive volt., Fan @ 90%, VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128 AGGRESSION=13. Overclocked from 880 -> 939 with MSI Aferburner<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 408.8 || -|| || - || 925 || 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || cgminer 2.12 || GIGABYTE GV-R695D5-2GD-B @ shadermod on original Bios 6950, mem@625, V=1100mv Fan @ 60%. Windows 7x64, Catalyst 11.9<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 410.4 || -|| || - || 950 || 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || Powercolor 6950 @ shadermod on original Bios 6950 / 1000mV 850/730, +20% powertune, Fan @ 60%, -v -w128 -f1.<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 417 || 2.085(?)|| || 200(?) || 975 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || unlocked shaders, +20% overdrive, mem @ 1250, fan @ 77%, temp 64C, -v -w128, gpu core @ 1145mV<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 418.8 || -|| || - || 940|| 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || Gigabyte OC 1GB, shadermod, voltage locked 1.175, mem 450, -w128 -v -f0, ATI Tray Tool<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 425.3 || -|| || - || 950/850 || 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix-1.50/phatk2 (Ubuntu natty) || Asus 1GB DirectCU, shadermod on OEM BIOS, OEM 1.1v, AMDOverdriveCtrl for 950 core 850 mem, 20% overdrive, flags VECTORS2 BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 428 || 2.14(?)|| || 200(?) || 1000 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || unlocked shaders, +20% overdrive, mem @ 1250, fan @ 80%, temp 64C, -v -w128, gpu core @ 1160mV<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 432 || 2.16(?)||1.44 || 200(?) || 1000 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || unlocked shaders, +20% overdrive, mem @ 520, fan @ 80%, temp 76C, -v -w128 -f 2, gpu core @ 1275mV<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 432.4 || -|| || - || 1000 || 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || Powercolor 6950 @ shadermod on original Bios 6950 / 1000mV 850/730, +20% powertune, Fan @ 60%, -v -w128 -f1.<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 440 || || || || 990 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/phatk || unlocked shaders, mem @ 1375, VGPU 1.21v, Watercooled (MCW60), temp 54C, VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 -k phatk<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 454.4 || -|| || - || 1050 || 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || Powercolor 6950 @ shadermod on original Bios 6950 / 1000mV 850/730, +20% powertune, Fan @ 60%, -v -w128 -f1.<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFAFAF;"| 6950x2 CF || 720 || - || - || 400 ~|| 900 || 1408 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-07-01 || MSI Afterburner - gpu @ 900 (870 stock), mem @ 900 (1250 stock), temp 69-71C(bottom vga) fan@94% / 77-81C(top vga) fan@99% - 31C enviornment, -v -f 1 -w 128 BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFAFAF;"| 6950x2 CF || 731 || - || - || 400~ || 900 || 1408 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-07-01 || MSI Afterburner - gpu @ 900 (870 stock), mem @ 900 (1250 stock), temp 68C(bottom vga) fan@90% / 73C(top vga) fan@99% - 28C enviornment, -v -f 1 -w 128 BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13<br />
|-<br />
| 6950x3 || 1081 || -|| || - || 860 || 1408 || 2.4(?) || PCI-E 2.1 x8 || guiminer/poclbm 07-01 || Sapphire 2GB stock bios, stock voltage, locked shaders: +20% overdrive, mem@650, fan@95%, temp 94C, -v -f0 -w128, 93c<br />
|-<br />
| 6950x4 || 1316 || 1.513|| || 870 || 840 || 1408 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || locked shaders, default mem 1250, dual fan 75C typical<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 323 || 1.468||0.92 || 220 || 880 || 1536 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -w 64, SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 365 || 2.28|| || 160 || 880 || 1536 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/phoenix || VECTORS AGGRESSION=9 WORKSIZE=128, fan @ 45%, 61C, 1.0 Vcore, 150 MHz mem, TX650w (84%), reference card<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 370 || -|| || - || 880 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || -v -w128, fan @ 50%/temp 72C, stock card<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 372 || 1.691(?)|| || 220(?) || 900 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix (svn trunk 05.14.2011) || clock 900/1375, VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128, fan 45% (auto) / temp 90C<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 380 || -|| || - || - || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w128<br>export GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS=1 # to reduce poclbm CPU from 100% to 2%<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 385 || 1.964|| || 196 || 900 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || -v -w128, memory downclocked to 684Mhz, fan @ 70%/temp 81C<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 388 || -|| || - || 900 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || -v -w128, fan @ 50%/temp 72C, stock voltage of 1.175v<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 403 || -|| || - || MAX || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || clock Max/50%+stock, -v -w128, fan= 100%/temp 72C (Note: Overclocked using CCC utility under Windows 7, Clock set to Max value w/ 50% increase to memory and 5% increase to voltage)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 406 || -|| || - || 950 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.50/phatk || GPU Overclocked to Max (950MHz) using aticonfig, Memory Underclocked using AMDOverdriveCtrl (850MHz). Temp ~ 82C. VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 407 || -|| || - || 955 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w128, fan 75%/temp 75C, voltage +10%<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 414 || -|| || - || 960 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || -v -w128, fan @ 53%/temp 73C, stock voltage of 1.175v, high air flow case<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 420 || -|| || - || 975 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || -v -w128 -f0, clocks 975MHz/685MHz MSI Lightning<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 423 || -||1.20 || - || 995 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48/poclbm || ATI Tray Tools, Clocks=995/331.25, WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 VECTORS ,68C @ 65% Fan, HAF932 Case<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 431 || -|| - || - || 976 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.7/phatk2 || MSI AFTERBURNER, Clocks[976/1000], -k parameters[VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11], Temperatures{CARD}[86C@100% Fan]{ROOM}[27C/81F], <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 433 || -|| - || - || 975 || 1536 || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.6.2/phatk || MSI Afterburner 2.2Beta, -k phatk AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS, GPU 65C@100% Fan, Room 21C<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970x2 || 710 || -|| || - || 900/880 || 1536 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -w 256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970x2 || 828|| -|| || - || 940 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w128, fans 74%/82%, temp 74C/82C, powertune +20% (via CCC), memory underclock 825MHz (via MSI Afterburner), with 'Maj' fix<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970x3 || 1243|| -|| || 1000+ || 910 || 1536 || 2.5 || 2x16, 1x8 || phoenix 1.7.0 || fans 100%, temp 88C/84C/69C, GPU 920/ memory 795/ powertune 20%, ATI 11.11, -k phatk2 VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=128 AGGRESSION=13<br />
|-<br />
| 6990 || 670 || 1.94||0.89 || 346 || 830 || 3072 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || Catalyst 11.4 [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=2949.msg106238#msg106238 source].<br />
|-<br />
| 6990 || 704 || || || || 830 || 3072 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo Win7 64bits || Catalyst 11.4, Arguments: -v 2 -w 128 (by Swapper 2011-07-07)<br />
|-<br />
| 6990 || 708 || 2.05|| || 346 || 830 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || BIOS switch at "default" position 2, see [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 6990 || 744 || || || || 830 || 3072 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo Win7 64bits || Catalyst 11.6b, Arguments: -v 2 -w 128 (by Swapper 2011-07-14)<br />
|-<br />
| 6990 || 746 || 1.82|| || 410 || 880 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || BIOS switch at "overclocked" position 1, see [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 6990 || 758 || -|| || - || 880 || - || 2.4 || - || Phoenix with Poclbm || Catalyst 11.4, OC switch ON, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128 FASTLOOP=false<br />
|-<br />
| 6990 || 771 || 1.8804|| || 410 || 880 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx. Memory clock @ 1280Mhz.<br />
|-<br />
| 6990 || 772 || 1.8380|| || 420 || 900 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix & Poclbm || OC switch ON + overclocked to 900 mhz, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128<br />
|-<br />
| 6990 || 790 || -|| || - || 900 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || BIOS switch at "overclocked" position 1; with "aticonfig --odsc=900,1260" to further overclock the GPU to 900 MHz and mem to 1260 MHz, see [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 6990 || 795 || -|| || - || - || - || 2.4 || || Diablo's miner || BIOS switch at "overclocked" position 1; On Windows Vista, Clocks set at 955,1250. Power control at 20.<br />
Diablo's args: -w 128 -g 5 -v 2 -f 0<br />
|-<br />
| 6990 || 802 || -|| || - || 915 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || BIOS switch at "overclocked" position 1; with "aticonfig --odsc=915,1260" to further overclock the GPU to 915 MHz and mem to 1260 MHz, see [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 6990 || 835 || -||1.11 || - || 890/860 || 3072 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix || BIOS switch at "overclocked" position 1; with "aticonfig --adapter=1 --odsc=990,890 and aticonfig --adapter=0 --odsc=960,860" (GPU 0 runs hot). Currently, aticonfig can only underclock RAM to 100mhz below core speed. Command line: phoenix.py -k poclbm VECTORS AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
| 6990 || 852 || -|| || - || 955|| 3072 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || cgminer 2.1.2 || Memory: 830 Mhz, -v 2 -w 128 -I 9, Watercooled, stock voltage. (2012-02 by Swapper)<br />
|-<br />
| 6990 || 865 || -||1.11 || - || 890/860 || 3072 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || cgminer || BIOS switch at "overclocked" position 1; with core 0 at 990/890 engine/mem, core 1 at 960/860 (runs hot). Watercooled at 65-68C.<br />
|-<br />
| 6990x2 || 1436 || 1.848|| || 777 || 880 || 6144 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 x2 || guiminer 2011.05.11 || AUSUM switch set to 1 on both cards; Core left at 880MHz, memory left at 1250MHz; VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128<br />
|-<br />
| 6990x2 || 1640 || 1.416|| || 1200 || 1010 || 3072 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 x16 || phoenix 1.7.0 || GPU 910MHz, Memory 785MHz, Powertune 20%; VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128 FASTLOOP=false<br />
|-<br />
| 6990x2 || 1700 || 1.416|| || 1200 || 1010 || 3072 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 x16 || guiminer 2011.06.14 || GPU 1010MHz, Memory 900MHz; -k phatk2 VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=128 AGGRESSION=13<br />
|-<br />
| 6990x2 || 1740 || 2.11 || || 825 || 940 || 3072 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 x16 || cgminer 2.0.8 || GPU0+3 930MHz core/805MHz memory, GPU1+2 940MHz core/815MHz memory; BIOS switch factory setting; Cooled with 7C air from outside; -g4 -I9 -k phatk<br />
|-<br />
| 6990x3 || 2094 || -|| || - || 900 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 x8 x4 || poclbm || GPU 900MHz, Memory 1250MHz; poclbm.py -f 0 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
| 7750 || 104.15 || || || || 800 || || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix || worksize=128 VECTORS FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=10 WORKSIZE=128<br />
|-<br />
| 7750 || 117.15 || || || || 900 || || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix || worksize=128 VECTORS FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=10 WORKSIZE=128<br />
|-<br />
| 7750 || 125.5 || - || - || - || 830 || 512 || 2.6 (10.0.898.1) || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || DiabloMiner || GPU: 830MHz, Memory: 1125MHz; -v 1 -w 256 [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=64241.msg816946#msg816946 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 7750 || 133 || 2.66 || 1.21 || 50 || 880 || 512 || 2.6 (?) || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || cgminer || factory-overclocked to 880 MHz; power draw measured with a Kill-a-Watt<br />
|-<br />
| 7750 || 136.1 || - || - || - || 900 || 512 || 2.6 (10.0.898.1) || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || DiabloMiner || GPU: 900MHz (CCC locked @ 900), Memory: 800MHz; -v 1 -w 256 [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=64241.msg816946#msg816946 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 7770 || 182 || - || - || 83 || 1020 || 640 || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || Ubuntu 10.04 LTS amd64, GPU: 1020MHz<br />
|-<br />
| 7770 || 213 || - || - || - || 1150 || 640 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || Win7 32bit, Core2Duo, poclbm guiminer<br />
|-<br />
| 7850 || 287 || 1,91 || 1,1 || 150 || 950 || 1024 || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || cgminer || GPU:950 MEM:800, Linux 64bit, Intensive 14, GPU temp = 60°C, Room temp = 25°C, Fan = 60%<br />
|-<br />
| 7850 || 329 || - || - || 150 || 1100 || 1024 || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || cgminer 2.6.4 || Linux 64bit GTK+3, GPU temp = 60°C, Room temp = 25°C, Fan = 60%, -v 1 -k poclbm -I 6 --gpu-engine 1100 --gpu-memclock 950<br />
|-<br />
| 7850 || 363 || - || - || - || 1241 || 1024 || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Guiminer || GPU:1241 MEM:4840 <br />
|-<br />
| 7870 || 405 || - || - || - || 1100 || 1280 || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Guiminer || Sapphire 7870 OC , GPU: 1100MHz, Mem: 950 Mhz, GPU temp: 65°C, Fan 36% (1377 RPM).<br />
|-<br />
| 7870 || 406 || - || - || - || 1100 || 1280 || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || cgminer || Gigabyte GV-R787OC-2GD, GPU: 1200MHz, [cgminer -I 7]<br />
|-<br />
| 7870 || 422 || - || - || - || 1165 || 1280 || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || cgminer || Sapphire 7870 1ghz edition, GPU: 1165MHz, [cgminer.exe -d 0 -l 1 -T -I 8]<br />
|-<br />
| 7870 || 460 || - || - || - || 1250 || 1280 || 2.7? || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Guiminer || MSI R7870 TFIII/oc, Catalyst 12.11 beta4, 455-460 mhash/s @1250 core, 750 mem, 0% Power limit, 1.218v, Zalman VF3000N = 42C, VRMS = 57C, ambient approx. 17-19C, -v -w128 -f10<br />
|-<br />
| 7870 XT || 485 || 3.09 || 1.8726 || 157 || 1200 || 1280 || 2.8 || PCI-E 3.0 x16 2.0 || cgminer ||7870XT clock/mem - 1200/1600<br />
|-<br />
| 7870xt || 520 || - || - || - || 1200 || 1536 || 2.7? lol || PCI-E 2.0 x4 || Guiminer || Sapphire HD7870xt, Catalyst 12.11 beta 4, 515-520 mhash/s @1200/core 750/mem, 0%PL, 1.17v/stock, Zalman vf3000a @60-62C even though its sandwiched between a 7870 and 5850. xD<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#00FFFF;"| 7950 || 510 || - || - || - || 985 || 1792 || 2.6 || PCI-E 3.0 x16 || Diablo || Windows 8 x64, Asus P8Z77 WS, i7 3rd Gen, Card is XFX brand, Clock 985Mhz, Mem 1100Mhz, -v 1 -w 256<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#00FFFF;"| 7950 || 512 || - || - || - || 1000 || 1792 || 2.6 || PCI-E 3.0 x8 || poclbm || GPU: 1000MHz, Memory: 850MHz<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#00FFFF;"| 7950 || 550 || - || - || - || 1060 || 1792 || 2.8 || PCI-E 3.0 x16 || Diablo || Core 1060, Mem 800, -v 1 -w 256 Intesity 7<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#00FFFF;"| 7950 || 605 || - || - || - || 1150 || 1792 || 2.6 (10.0.898.1) || PCI-E 3.0 x16 || DiabloMiner || GPU: 1150MHz, Memory: 1375MHz; -v 1 -w 256<br />
<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FF0000;"| 7970 || 555 || - || - || - || 925 || 2048 || 2.6 (10.0.898.1) || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || DiabloMiner || GPU: 925MHz, Memory: 1375MHz; -v 1 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FF0000;"| 7970 || 640 || -|| || - || 1070 core/1000 mem || 2048 || 2.6 || PCI-E 3.0 x16 || cgminer 2.6.5 || MSI R7970 Lightning Win7 х64, Catalyst 12.8, GPU 1070 MHz, Memory 1000 MHz, GPU temp = 72°C, Room temp = 28°C, Fan = 57%, cgminer -k diablo -v 1 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FF0000;"| 7970 || 650 || -|| || - || 1100 || 2048 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 x8 x4 || Diablo|| GPU 1100MHz, Memory 600MHz;<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FF0000;"| 7970 || 650 || -|| || - || 1100 || 2048 || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x1 || cgminer 2.4.1 || Win7 х86, Catalyst 12.3, GPU 1100 MHz, Memory 950 MHz, GPU temp = 68°C, Room temp = 25°C, Fan = 58%, -k poclbm -v 1 -w 128<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FF0000;"| 7970 || 674 || -|| || - || 1130 core/1000 mem || 2048 || 2.6 || PCI-E 3.0 x16 || cgminer 2.6.5 || MSI R7970 Lightning Win7 х64, Catalyst 12.8, GPU 1130 MHz, Memory 1000 MHz, GPU temp = 72°C, Room temp = 28°C, Fan = 57%, cgminer -k diablo -v 1 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FF0000;"| 7970 || 685 || -|| || - || 1150 core/1000 mem || 2048 || 2.6 || PCI-E 3.0 x16 || cgminer 2.6.5 || MSI R7970 Lightning Win7 х64, Catalyst 12.8, GPU 1150 MHz, Memory 1000 MHz, GPU temp = 72°C, Room temp = 28°C, Fan = 58%, cgminer -k diablo -v 1 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FF0000;"| 7970 || 685 || -|| || - || 1177 || 2048 || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || cgminer 2.3.1 || Win7, Catalyst 12.3, driver: 2.95, E: 1177, M:685, -k diakgcn -v 2 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FF0000;"| 7970 || 690 || - || - || - || 1150 || 2048 || 2.6 (10.0.898.1) || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || DiabloMiner || GPU: 1150MHz, Memory: 1375MHz; -v 1 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FF0000;"| 7970 || 695 || - || - || - || 1160(core)/1050(mem) || 2048 || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || DiabloMiner (options: -v 1 -w 256) || Asus HD7970-DC2T-3GD5 @ 1.17V; Linux Ubuntu 11.10 64 bit; AMD SDK 2.6; Catalyst 12.3 <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FF0000;"| 7970 || 710 || -|| || - || 1200 || 2048 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || DiabloMiner|| GPU 1200MHz, Memory 600MHz; -v 1 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FF0000;"| 7970 || 714~ || -|| || - || 1210 || 2048 || 2.7 || PCI-E 1.1 x16 || cgminer 2.7.4 || MSI HD7970 R7970-2PMD3GD5/OC, core clock - 1210Mhz, memory clock - 685, core voltage (1.149V - MSI Afterburner, ~1.043V - GPU-Z), memory voltage 1.5V, temperature - 75C at mid-day and 65C w/ AC on at 20C, Catalyst 12.8, Windows 8 Release Preview 32-bit, kernel - poclbm, vector - 1, worksize - 64, intensity - 14, fan - 100% <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FF0000;"| 7970 || 825 || -|| || 214 || 1290 || 2048 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Bitminter|| Bitminter beta 1.1.1; GPU 1290MHz, Memory <br />
1375MHz (Trixx = 600); work size 256, "BFI_INT," Device-accessible CPU memory; full watercooled block; power stats from GPU-Z; Driver 11.12<br />
|-<br />
| 7970x3 || 1950 || 2.6 || 1.72 || 750 || 1100 || 2048x3 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || cgminer 2.7.5 || Win8, Catalyst 12.8, driver: 8.982.0.0, E: 1100, M:750, kernel: poclbm, worksize: 256, intensity: 9, gpu-threads: 4, refitted Diamond 7970 HSF with new VRM pads to lower VRM temps ~15C. Undervolted each card until crash under load, then raised about 0.015v for stability. Settings using afterburner 2.2.1 with OC unlocked. Visiontek 7970: $370, Sapphire 7970: $360, Diamond 7970: $400<br />
|-<br />
| 7970x3 || 2050 || 2.41 || 1.22 || 850 || 1150 || 6144 || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || cgminer 2.3.1 || Win7, Catalyst 12.3, driver: 2.95, E: 1150, M:685, -k diakgcn -v 2 -w 256, 850W power consumption measured at the wall<br />
|-<br />
| FirePro V3800 || 69.0 || -|| || - || || || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || BitMinter Client || <br />
|-<br />
| FirePro V4800 || 79.7 || -|| || - || 775 || 400 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-01 || <br />
|-<br />
| FirePro V8700 || 84.8 || -|| || - || 750 || 800 || - || - || poclbm-mod.03.24.2011 || <br />
<br />
|-<br />
| FirePro M5800 || 61.4 || -|| || - || 650 || - || - || - || poclbm-mod.03.24.2011 || Ubuntu<br />
|-<br />
| FirePro M5800 || 69.3 || -|| || - || 650 || 400 || 2.1 || - || GUIMiner v2011-04-26 || -v -w128, Windows 7 32bit<br />
|-<br />
| FirePro M5950 || 96.7 || -|| || - || 725 || 900 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -v -w128 (Windows 7 64 bit)<br />
|-<br />
| FirePro V5800 || 119 || -|| || - || 690 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-01 || Windows 7 32bit<br />
|-<br />
| FirePro V5800 || 144 || -|| || - || 690 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-01 || -v -w128 (Windows 7 32bit)<br />
|-<br />
| FirePro V5800 || 161 || -|| || - || 780 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-01 || -v -w128 (Windows 7 32bit)<br />
|-<br />
| FirePro V7750 || 35.7 || -|| || - || - || 320 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-21 || Windows 7 64bit<br />
|-<br />
| FirePro V7800 || 254.85 || -|| || - || - || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 with poclbm || Debian Squeeze<br />
|-<br />
| FirePro M7740 (M97 GL) [DELL] || 63.0 || -|| || - || 650 || - || 2.1 || PCIe v2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-06-14 || Windows 7 64bit / only SDK2.1 works<br />
|-<br />
| FirePro M7820 || 150.0 || -|| || - || 700 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-06-09 / poclbm || Memory downclocked to 500 from 1000MHz, 169MH/s@800MHz, 181MH/s@860Mhz (max.), only SDK2.1 works, Windows 7 x86<br />
|}<br />
<br />
<references><br />
<ref name='amazon_20110625'>$ Prices from http://www.amazon.com on 2011-06-25</ref><br />
</references><br />
<br />
===Nvidia===<br />
<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! Watts !! Clock !! SP !! Comment<br />
|-<br />
| ION || 1.8 || 0.067 || 27 || || 16 || poclbm; power consumption incl. CPU<br />
|-<br />
| 8200 mGPU || 1.2 || || || 1200 || 16 || 128 MB shared memory, "poclbm -w 128 -f 0"<br />
|-<br />
| 8400 GS || 2.3 || || || || || "poclbm -w 128"<br />
|-<br />
| 8400 GS || 1.6 || 0.013 || 128 || 1238 || || DiabloMiner -w 128 -f 1 [https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/User:Knightmb source]<br />
|-<br />
| 8400M GS || 2.0 || || || || ||<br />
|-<br />
| 8500GT || 2.4 || || || 918 || 16 || poclbm under GUIMiner<br />
|-<br />
| 8600M GT || 4.93 || || || || 32 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 8600M GT || 3.8 || || || || || Macbook Pro running Diablo<br />
|-<br />
| 8600GT || 5.66 || || || 1188 || 32 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 8600GT OC || 7.3 || || || 1602 || 32 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.0 poclbm] -w 128 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg72833#msg72833 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 8800GT || 25 || 0.24 || 105 || 1300 || ||<br />
|-<br />
| 8800GT || 24.5 || 0.23 || 105 || 1300 || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 8800GT || 31.1 || 0.296 || 105 || 1855 || || Overclocked 715 GPU / 1030 Memory / 1855 Shader; GuiMiner v2011-05-21<br />
|-<br />
| 8800GT || 31.8 || 0.303 || 105 || 1836 || 112 || 713 gpu, 1026 memory. win7x86, phoenix 1.48, -k poclbm WORKSIZE=64 AGGRESSION=5<br />
|-<br />
| 8800GT || 34.0 || || 105 || 1998 || || gpu 756M, mem 1123M, shader 1998M, temp 65C. winXP, phoenix 1.50, -k poclbm WORKSIZE=64 AGGRESSION=6 -- same settings get 32.7 MH/s with aggression 2<br />
|-<br />
| 8800GTS || 16.8 || 0.109 || 154 || || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source] [http://www.techspot.com/review/79-geforce-8800-gts-512/page11.html source]<br />
|-<br />
| 8800 GTS || 18.7 || 0.124 || 150 || 1200 || || poclbm -w 64 no vectors<br />
|-<br />
| 8800 GTS || 33.5 || || 150 || OC || || CUDA mining via GUIminer. Win7 64bit. poclbm -v -w128 -f0. OC'd Core@799MHz, Mem@1080MHz, Shader@1905MHz. Fan 70%, GPU temp @ 66C in comfortable room temp.<br />
|-<br />
| 8800 GTX || 27.5 || || || 1404 || || phoenix 1.48, poclbm, no vectors, 83C with 50C ambient <br />
|-<br />
| 8800m GTX || 16.3 || || || || || rpcminer-cuda Win7-64<br />
|-<br />
| 9300GE || 1.57 || || || 1300 || 8 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9300GS || 1.69 || || || 1400 || 8 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9300/nForce 730i || 2.15 || || || 1200 || 16 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9400GT || 3.37 || 0.067 || 50 || 1400 || 16 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9400M (MacBook) || 1.90 || 0.32 || 6 || 700 || || poclbm -f 8 no vectors<br />
|-<br />
| 9500M GS || 3.2 || || || 950 || 32 || rpcminer-cuda<br />
|-<br />
| 9500GT || 6.75 || 0.135 || 50 || 1400 || 32 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9500GT || 7.30 || 0.135 || 50 || 1400 || 32|| rpcminer-cuda, Overclocked 730 GPU/ 500 Memory / fan 100% 70C solid<br />
|-<br />
| 9500GT || 7.10 || 0.135 || 50 || 1767 || 32 || rpcminer-cuda, Overclocked 707 GPU / 500 Memory / fan 100% 73C steady<br />
|-<br />
| 9600GSO || 19.88 || 0.237 || 84 || 1375 || 96 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9600GSO512 || 11.75 || 0.131 || 90 || 1625 || 48 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9600GT || 15.66 || 0.165 || 95 || 1625 || 64 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9600GT Zotac || 15 || || || 1650 || 64 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9600GT OC || 18.8 || <0.198 || >95 || 1981 || 64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.0 poclbm] -w 128 -f 10 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg74610#msg74610 source] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg73353#msg73353 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 9600M GS || 4.0 || || || 1075 || 32 || rpcminer-cuda<br />
|-<br />
| 9800GT || 30.36 || 0.289 || 105 || 1800 || 112 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9800GT EE || 19.7 || 0.263 || 75 || 1375 || 112 || rpcminer-cuda<br />
|-<br />
| 9800GT OC || 29.5 || 0.283 || 105 || 1836 || 112 || poclbm.py, no options. Memory underclocked to 850Mhz, GPU overclocked to 733Mhz<br />
|-<br />
| 9800GTX || 32.54 || 0.232 || 140 || 1688 || 128 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9800GTX+ || 32.6 || 0.232 || 140 || 1688 || 128 || win7x64 275.33 Overclocked to 756/1890/1102 using a CUDA-specific miner (instead of phoenix, yay for ZERO stales!)<br />
|-<br />
| 9800GTX+ || 35.39 || 0.251 || 141 || 1836 || 128 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9800GTX+ || 36 || || || || || factory OC ubuntu polclbm.py -w 128 -f 10 -a 10 (DO NOT USE -v)<br />
|-<br />
| 9800GTX+ || 37.23 || 0.266 || 140 || 1890 || 128 || win7x64 275.27 phoenix(1.48) -k poclbm AGGRESSION=3 WORKSIZE=64 (may cause 75%+ stale count, in which case use a CUDA-specific miner instead)<br />
|-<br />
| 9800GTX+ || 40.20 || 0.287 || 140 || 835 || 128 || lowered memory clock higher core, unstable if going higher<br />
|-<br />
|style="background-color:#FFEFEF"| 9800GX2 || 57.83 || 0.294 || 197 || || 2x128 ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background-color:#FFEFEF"| 9800GX2 || 28 || 0.142 || 197 || || 2x128 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]<br />
|-<br />
| G210 || 3.38 || 0.111 || 30.5 || 1402 || 16 ||<br />
|-<br />
| G210 || 3.79 || 0.124 || 30.5 || 1402 || 16 || poclbm -f 1<br />
|-<br />
| GT220 || 10.8 || 0.084 || 128 || 1360 || || DiabloMiner -w 128 -f 1000 [https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/User:Knightmb source]<br />
|-<br />
| GT230 || 15.5 || 0.161 || 96 || 650 || 64 || (9600GT rebranded one from in a medion pc)<br />
|-<br />
| GT240 || 19.37 || 0.281 || 69 || 1340 || 96 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GT240 || 21.24 || || || || 96 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4291.0 poclbm-mod] -f 0 -v [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg73383#msg73383 source]<br />
|-<br />
| GT240 || 28.1 || || || || 96 || poclbm -f0 -v (Gainward GT240 1024DDR5 OC core@670/stockmem@1700/shader@1700 - stable; max.temp=73)<br />
|-<br />
| GT240M || 9.8 || 0.426 || 23 || 550 || 48 || poclbm -f 0 -w 256 <br />
|-<br />
| GT240 OC || 25.6 || 0.365 || 70 || 1765 || 96 || poclbm<br />
|-<br />
| GTS250 || 35.39 || 0.244 || 145 || 1836 || 128 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTS250 || 35.2 || 0.243 || 145 || 1836 || 128 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTS250 OC || 37 || 0.255 || 145 || 2047 || 128 || 37.2 with the following OC: Core: 775MHz, Shader: 1900MHz, Memory: 1200MHz<br />
|-<br />
| GTX260M || 22.5 || || || 500 || 112 || poclbm 4/28/2011 Asus G71GX runs ~90c without cooling pad <br />
|-<br />
| GTX260 || 35.91 || 0.178 || 202 || 1242 || 192 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX260 || 44 || 0.242 || 182 || 1242 || 216 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]<br />
|-<br />
| GTX260c216 || 40.40 || 0.236 || 171 || 1242 || 216 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX260c216 || 47.4 || 0.260 || 182 || 1348 || 216 || poclbm -w 256<br />
|-<br />
| GTX260c216 || 50.00 || || || 1050 || 216 || m0mchil GPU client, Windows 7 64-bit, x6 @ 3.5ghz<br />
|-<br />
| GTX260c216 OC || 52.0 || || || 1461 || 216 || "poclbm -w 256 -f 1"<br />
|-<br />
| GTX260c216 OC || 58.9 || || || 756/400 || 216 || Core overclocked, Memory underclocked, Ubuntu 11.04 Classic Session(No Effects) "poclbm -w 256 -f 1"<br />
|-<br />
| GTX260c216 OC || 60.1 || || || 1706 || 216 || Core: 364 MHz, Shaders: 1706 MHz, Memory: 594 MHz, VDDC: 1.1800V. "poclbm-mod -w 256 -f 1"<br />
|-<br />
| GTX275 || 50.75 || 0.232 || 219 || 1404 || 240 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX275 || 58 || || || 729/1458 || 240 || poclbm -f 0 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
| GTX280 || 46.84 || 0.198 || 236 || 1296 || 240 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX280 || 64.34 || 0.289 || 245 || 1296 || 240 || phoenix.exe -k poclbm AGGRESSION=6 WORKSIZE=128 (61*C with Accelero XTREME GTX280)<br />
|-<br />
| GTX285 || 64.8 || || || 1607 || 240 || GuiMiner - Not sure about wattage yet. Still testing. Card runs around 74 C<br />
|-<br />
|-<br />
| GTX285 || 53.35 || 0.262 || 204 || 1476 || 240 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX295 || 89.78 || 0.311 || 289 || 1242 || 480 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX295 || 120.70 || 0.418 || 289 || 1242 || 480 || GUIMiner no oc.<br />
|-<br />
| GTX295 || 117.30 || 0.406 || 289 || 1476 || 490 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GT 320M (MacBook Air) || 6.12 || || || 1212 || 48 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 320M (Mac mini 2010) || 7.0 || 0.35 || 20 || 450 || 32 || poclbm no extra options, windows 7 x64<br />
|-<br />
| GT 325M || 7.5 || || || 990 || 48 || rpcminer-cuda<br />
|-<br />
| GT 325M || 10.5 || || || 325/650(mem)/1300(shaders) || || rpcminer-cuda, 71 degrees<br />
|-<br />
| GT 325M || 7.99 || || || || || poclbm -f 0 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
| GT330 || 21.65 || || || || || poclbm -f 0 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
| GT 330M || 7.97 || || || ||48|| Model: MacBookPro6,2 VRAM: 512MB Software: [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8994.0 DiabloMiner GUI] v2011-05-22 / Mac OS X 10.6.7<br />
|-<br />
| GT 330M || 10.8 || || ||650MHZ core||48|| Model: MacBookPro6,2 VRAM: 512MB Software: GUIMiner running in Bootcamp v2011-08-24 / Mac OS X 10.6.8.The GPU was OC'd to 650MHZ core clock,mem clock was the lowest it would go in MSI Afterburner.The Bootcamp OS was Windows 7 x64.MBP Mid 2010.<br />
|-<br />
| GT 330M (Sony Vaio Z) || 7.8 || 0.71 ( 0.3 total) || 11 (26w total) || 1045 || 48 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GT 330M (Samsung R480) || 9.1 || || || 575(GPU)/1265(shader) || ||VRAM 1024MB. pocblm -vectors --verbose. Windows 7 Ultimate x86<br />
|-<br />
| GTS 350M (Toshiba A665-3DV) || 17.0 || 1.214 || 14 || 1080 || || DiabloMiner-Windows.exe<br />
|-<br />
| GTS 350M (Toshiba A665-3DV5) || 20.8 || || || 1350 || || DiabloMiner-Windows.exe, OC'd 550/850/1350 73C stable<br />
|-<br />
| GTS 360M || 25.0 || || || || || [toshiba qosmio laptop, ~150-165*F stock fans]<br />
|-<br />
| GTS 360M (ASUS G60jx) || 20.0 || || || || || everythins is stock, it cannot sustain. it reaches 90 degrees and freezes.<br />
|-<br />
| GTS 360M (ASUS G60jx) || 27.2 || || || Shader @ 1720, Memory @ 900 || || stock hardware (clean exhaust fan), Afterburner, 72 deg C Stable <br />
|-<br />
| GT430 || 20.24 || 0.413 || 49 || 1400 || 96 ||<br />
|- <br />
| GT440 || 20.4 || || || 1645 || 96 || rpcminer-cuda -aggression=8; winxp x64 driver 275.33<br />
|-<br />
| GT530 || 17.9 || 0.358 || 50 || 1400 || || BitMinter v1.1.2<br />
|-<br />
| GT520M || 8.9 || || || || || rpcminer-cuda, got up 2 10.2MH/s OC'ed<br />
|-<br />
| GT525M || 14.6 || || || || || rpcminer-cuda<br />
|-<br />
| GT540M || 16.0 || || || || || rpcminer-cuda<br />
|-<br />
| GT550M || 17.08 || || || || || rpcminer-cuda -aggression=8<br />
|-<br />
| GT610M (ASUS K45V) || 9.371 || || || 738 MHz || || 2GB RAM.<br />
|-<br />
| GT650M (rMBP) || 17.8 || || || 900 || 16 || cgminer 2.5.0 on OSX 10.7.4<br />
|-<br />
| GT650M OC || 27.4 || || || || || GUIMiner <br />
|-<br />
| GTS450 || 45.28 || 0.427 || 106 || 1566 || 192 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTS450 (Sparkle One) || 40.0 || || || || || poclbcm git Oct 2012<br />
|- <br />
| GTS450 || 45.28 || 0.427 || 106 || 1566 || 192 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460SE || 56.39 || 0.376 || 150 || 1300 || 288 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 || 66.32 || || || 814 || 336 || rpcminer-cuda 20110605, Graphics Clock @ 814MHz, Memory @ 1555MHz<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 || 68.31 || 0.427 || 160 || 1350 || 336 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 768MB || 57.8 || || ? || 1350 || 336 || rpcminer-cuda -gputhreads=320 -gpugrid=336<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 768MB (MSI Cyclone 768D5/OC) || 75.1 || || ? || 930 || 336 || rpcminer-cuda on Win7 x64 with ForceWare 275.33. [http://event.msi.com/vga/afterburner/download.htm MSI Afterburner] set to core: 930MHz, shader: 1850MHz, core voltage: 1.087V, memory: 1600MHz. Runs at 58°C with fan at 75% (ambient 25°C). <br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 1GB DirectCU || 72.3 || ? || ? || 1672 || 336 || rpcminer-cuda -gputhreads=320 -gpugrid=336<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 1GB DirectCU || 89.5 || ? || ? || 1000 || 336 || guiminer GPU:1000mhz MEM:900<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 1GB ( evga FPB ) || 71.4 || -- || -- || 870/1744/1800 || 336 || guiminer-cuda v2012-02-19 FW290.53 Win7x64<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 1GB ( evga ) || 83.1 || 0.519 || 160 || 925/1850/900@0.960v || 336 || guiminer (phoenix1.75) -k poclbm AGGRESSION=8 FASTLOOP BFI_INT -v WORKSIZE=256 ForceWare 301.42 Win7x64 Runs at 70°C with fan at 100%<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 (2 cards) || 102 || 0.319? || 320? || 1350 || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 (2 cards) OC || 127 || 0.374 || 340 || 1620 || 2x 336 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2444.0 rpcminer-cuda] -gpugrid=128 -gputhreads=128 ver.20110227<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 1GB OC (2x MsiHawksSLI) || 158 || 0.658 || 240w(used kill a watt) || core/shader/ram@vcore 930/1860/1150@1.087v (only vcore raised) || 2x 336 || rpcminer-cuda ver.20110227 -gpugrid=320 -gputhreads=320 -aggression=7 Watercooled stable @ 110°F/43° !!!USE ASUS GPU Tweak with GPU-Z (afterburner v2.2.3 wont OC with NVIDIA driver 306.97) I would need gpu bios mod to get more oc/volt. Setting faster ram did increase Mhash/s versus setting ram=core clock.<br />
|-<br />
| GTX465 || 64.41 || 0.322 || 200 || 1215 || 352 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX470 || 81.98 || 0.381 || 215 || 1215 || 448 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX470 || 94.7 || || || 1414 || ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX470 || 103.7 || || || 1520 || || memory @ 418MHz, stable @ 72 deg fan @ 90%, puddinpop rpcminer-cuda -gpugrid=96 -gputhread=128 AGGRESSION=14 GIGABYTE brand card BIOS 70.00.21.00.03 <br />
|-<br />
| GTX470 || 111.9 || 0.520 || 215 || 1650 || 448 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX470 || 115 || || || 1616 || || phoenix 1.46 poclbm VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=6<br />
|-<br />
| GTX470x2 || 121 ea. (130 burst ea.) || || || 1700 ||448|| PuddinPop rpcminer-cuda -gpugrid=96 -gputhreads=128 AGGRESSION=14 (memory 856 Max Temp. 71 deg. F on Water 1.085v+, Stable on Beast 2.0>3 days, no i7 CPU OC, driver 280.26, bios 70.00.21.00.03)<br />
|-<br />
| GTX480 || 101.28 || 0.405 || 250 || 1401 || 480 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX480 || 140.43 || || || 1700 || 480 || rpcminer-cuda -gpugrid=512 -gputhreads=480<br />
|-<br />
| GTX480 AMP!Zotac|| 140.1 || || || 1700|| 480 || rpcminer-cuda -gpugrid=480 -gputhreads=480 (vCore-1050,Core Clock-851, Shader Clock-1702, Memory Clock-2033, t-79°c, Water 43°c, stable temperature and work)<br />
|-<br />
| GTX550 Ti || 45.0 || ? || ? || ? || ? || EVGA 1GB, WinXP rpcminer, no overclock<br />
|-<br />
| GTX560 Ti || 67.7 || 0.39 || 170 || 1700 || 384 || standard EVGA 560, no overclock<br />
|-<br />
| GTX560 Ti || 74 || 0.41 || 170 || 822 || 384 || MSI 560Ti HAWK; core 822 Mhz clock (no overclock); rpcminer-cuda.exe -aggression=4 -gpugrid=64 -gputhreads=384; temp - 71°C; Win 7 x64<br />
|-<br />
| GTX560 Ti || 74.8 || 0.41 || 180 || 1700 || 384 || gigabyte 900Mhz clock; -w 512 -v<br />
|-<br />
| GTX560 Ti || 81 || 0.45 || 180 || 835 || 384 || Gainward GTX560TI Phantom, default clock, rpcminer-cuda<br />
|-<br />
| GTX560 Ti || 85.1 || - || - || - || - || cgminer 2.5.0, linux 32bit, nvidia 295.41, Intensity: 14<br />
|-<br />
| GTX560 Ti || 100 || 0.5 || 200 || 1000 || 384 || GFX - MSI 560Ti HAWK; rpcminer-cuda.exe -aggression=8 -gpugrid=64 -gputhreads=384; GPU temp - 68°C; OS - Windows 8 x64 .<br />
|-<br />
| GTX 560M || 39.3 || 0.38 || 75 W || 775|| 192 || [http://www.examiner.com/computers-in-denver/toshiba-qosmio-x775-q7380-review-review source1] [http://www.notebookcheck.net/NVIDIA-GeForce-GTX-560M.48313.0.html source2] Note: Uses the 295.51 Beta Drivers<br />
|-<br />
| GTX560 OC || 86.7 || <0.51 || >170 || 1800 || 384 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2444.0 rpcminer-cuda] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg72816#msg72816 source]<br />
|-<br />
| GTX570 || 105.83 || 0.483 || 219 || 1464 || 480 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX570 || 140 || 0.639 || 219 || 750 || 480 || rpcminer-cuda.exe -aggression=10 -gpugrid=480 -gputhreads=960; display driver stops working with aggression=11 under win7 x64 driver 270.61<br />
|-<br />
| GTX570 || 157 || 0.717 || 219 || 850 || 480 || rpcminer-cuda.exe -aggression=11 -gpugrid=120 -gputhreads=960<br />
|-<br />
| GTX570 || 165 || || || 925 || 480 || rpcminer-cuda.exe -gpugrid=120 -gputhreads=960; vcore 1.1v; Win7 x64 304.79 Beta; -aggression=11 adds strong lag with minimal increase in hashrate.<br />
|-<br />
| GTX570 || 160 || || || 925 || 480 || rpcminer-cuda.exe -gpugrid=104 -gputhreads=832; No desktop lag, very minimal loss in hashrate compared to much laggier settings<br />
|-<br />
| GTX580 || 156.6 || 0.642 || 244 || 1544 || 512 || cgminer 2.11.3 on Win 8-64 with I=6, driver nVidia 314.22<br />
|-<br />
| GTX580x2 || 2x 146 || 0.598 || 244 || 1544 || 512 || rpcminer-cuda.exe -gpugrid=128 -gputhreads=1024 <br />
(aggression levels above the default of 6 not recommended; only a gain of ~3MH/s per card, and '''heavy''' lag, GUIMiner v2011-08-24, win7 64bit nVidia 290.36 beta driver)<br />
|-<br />
| GTX590 || 193.1 || --- || --- || 1215 || 2x 512 || poclbm -v -w 256, Win<br />
|-<br />
| GTX590 || 2x 121.48 || --- || --- || 750 || 2x 512 || <br />
|-<br />
| GTX670 || 112.00 || 1.1 || 100 || 1275 || 1344 || EVGA GTX670FTW 2GB / GPU Clock offset +75Mhz with EVGA Precision X / GUIMiner -f 60 / Windows 7 64-Bit. (09-13-2012)<br />
|-<br />
| GTX680 || 127.3 || || || 1280 || 1536 || Asus GTX 680 2GB DirectCU II: Windows 7 64 bit: Nvidia 310.90 driver: Offset of 186: Runs at a constant 52C<br />
|-<br />
| GTX680 || 110.00 || || || 1110 || 1536 || RPCMiner with OpenCL or others. Might crash once mining stops. No Flags and Stock Settings (GPU Boost @ 1110mhz Core) with EVGA GTX 680, latest version of GUIMiner (2012-2-19) and Windows 7 x64.<br />
|-<br />
| GTX680 || 120.00 || 1.2 || 100 || 1272 || 1536 || Ufasoft Galaxy 4GB (GPU Clock offset +70Mhz with EVGA Precision X) (2012-7-28) and Windows 7 64-Bit.<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro FX 580 || 5.7 || 0.14 || 40 || 1125 || 4 ||rpcminer-cuda, Win, -gpugrid=128 -gputhreads=512<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro FX 770M || 5.75 || || || 500 || 32 || DiabloMiner-Windows.exe BFI_INT FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=6, Win<br />
|-<br />
|Quadro FX 770M || 6.39 || || || 500 || 32 || DiabloMiner-Windows.exe BFI_INT FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=6 w 64, Win 7x64<br />
|-<br />
|Quadro FX 880M || 9.6 || || || || || poclbm/guiminer<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro FX 1600M || 6 || 0.12 || 50 || 625 || 32 ||rpcminer-cuda, Win<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro FX 1800 || 13.6 || - || - || - || - || cgminer 2.5.0, linux 32bit, nvidia 256.44 Intensity: 4<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro FX 2000M || 23 || 0.397 || 58 || || || phoenix 1.48, -k poclbm, VECTORS, AGGRESION=6, Lenovo W520 platform<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro FX 2800M || 22 || 0.293 || 75 || 600 || 96 ||DiabloMiner, win<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro FX 3000M || 28.6 || - || - || - || - || cgminer 2.5.0, linux 32bit, nvidia 295.41 Intensity: 3<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro FX 3600M || 36 || 0.514 || 70 || 500 || 96 ||<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro FX 3800 || 33.3 || || || || || poclbm/guiminer -f0 -w128<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro NVS 135M || 1.05 || 0.1 || 10 || 800 || 1 || <br />
|-<br />
| Quadro NVS 295 || 1.7 || 0.07 || 23 || 567 || 8 || phoenix<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro NVS 3100M || 3.6 || 0.257 || 14 || 600 || 16 || rpcminer-cuda, Win, CUDA 3.1.1<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro NVS 4200M || 10.0 || || || 810 || || guiminer, Win7-64<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro 5000 || 67.7 || 0.445 || 152 || 513 || 352 || rpcminer-cuda.exe -aggression=7 gpugrid=352 gputhreads=704;<br />
|-<br />
| Tesla C1060 || 52.5 || || || 1296 || 240 || poclbm, Win7x64<br />
|-<br />
| Tesla K20 || 134.8 || || || 706 || 2496 || poclbm, Linux<br />
|-<br />
| Tesla M2050 || 79.8 || || || 1550 || 448 || DiabloMiner<br />
|-<br />
| Tesla M2050 || 94.5 || || || 1550 || || poclbm<br />
|-<br />
| Tesla S1070 || 155.2 || || 800 <ref name='nvidia_S1070'/> || 1440 (GT200b)<ref name='nvidia_S1070'/> || 960<ref name='nvidia_S1070'/> || rpcminer-cuda, Linux, CUDA 3.2, 4 instances (-gpu=0 through -gpu=3)<br />
|-<br />
| Tesla S2070 || 749.23 || || || 1150<ref name='nvidia_S2070'/> || 1792<ref name='nvidia_S2070'/> || rpcminer-cuda, Linux, CUDA 4.0, 8 instances (-gpu=0 through -gpu=7) <br />
|-<br />
| GTX280x2 || 102.7 || || || || ||<br />
|-<br />
|}<br />
<references><br />
<ref name='nvidia_S1070'>The S1070 is a dedicated supercomputing platform that features four Tesla units (GT200). Technical data taken from [http://www.nvidia.de/object/tesla_s1070_de.html NVIDIA]</ref><br />
<ref name='nvidia_S2070'>The S2070 is a dedicated supercomputing platform that features four Fermi units (C2070). Technical data taken from [http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nvidia_Tesla Wikipedia] (Documentation from NVIDIA webpage is confusing)</ref><br />
</references><br />
<br />
==CPUs/APUs==<br />
<br />
A lot of nice data can be pulled from [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.0 this thread] to seed this section. <br />
<br />
Might you wish to throttle CPU load a bit, so it doesn't reach 100°C, it can be done with Battle Encoder Shirase to a margin, like, -15% of available CPU cycles.<br />
<br />
Often, the best combination to be is to throttle CPU miner to -5% '''AND''' set it to least of priority levels, so as not to choke GPU miner up.<br />
<br />
===AMD===<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! nprocs !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! TDP [W] !! CPU Clock !! Mhash/s CPU !! Mhash/s GPU !! GPU !! GPU Clock !! SP !! Software !! Notes<br />
|-<br />
| 4x Opteron 6174 || 48 || 115 || 0.36 || 320W || 2.2 GHz || 2.4<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| cpuminer v0.8.1 || --alg 4way --threads 48<br />
|-<br />
| 2x Opteron 6172 || 24 || 55 || 0.24 || 230W || 2.1 GHz || 2.3<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| cgminer v2.7.6 || --algo 4way -t 24<br />
|-<br />
| 2x Opteron 6128 || 16 || 32.4 || 0.141 || 230W || 2 GHz || 32.4<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| 0.3.19 || -4way<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon XP 2000+ || 2 || 0.62 || 0.009 || 70W || 1.67 GHz || 0.62<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| 0.3.18/Ubuntu || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source] [http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm?articleid=914&page=4 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon 64 3500+ || 1 || 1.18 || 0.013 || 89W || 2.54 GHz || 1.18<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| ufasoft v0.4 || overclocked (originally 2.2 GHz)<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon 64 X2 3800+ || 2 || 1.73 || 0.03 || 65 W || 2.00 GHz || 1.73<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || -algo=4way<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon 64 X2 4000+ || 2 || 1.9 || 0.02 || 65W || 2.1 GHz || 1.9<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| rpc-miner ||<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon 64 X2 4400+ || || 2.09 || 0.032 || 65W || 2.3GHz || 2.09<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| 0.3.19/Win x64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon 64 X2 6000+ || 2 || 2.81 || 0.02 || 125W || 3 GHz || 2.81<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg22881#msg22881 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon 64 X2 6400+ Black Edition || 2 || 2.9 || 0.023 || 125W || 3.2 GHz || 2.9<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| 0.3.20.2 BETA/Win 7 x64 || -4way<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon II X2 240e || 2 || 2.71 || 0.06 || 45W || 2.81 GHz || 2.71<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon II X2 250 || 2 || 5.6 || 0.09 || 65W || 3.01GHz || 5.6<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| bitcoin-miner 0.11 ||<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon II X4 630 || 4 || 10.7 || 0.11 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 10.7<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| bitcoin-miner 0.4 || <br />
|-<br />
| Opteron 8220 x16 || 16 || 25 || || || 2.8Ghz || 1.5 <br />
|colspan=4| <br />
| ufasoft / OpenSuse 64bit || running default, but had to copy 32bit binaries over to get curl and ufasoft running. might be better when using native 32bit system w/o other users on the machine ||<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 3.8 || 0.04 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 3.8<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| 0.3.1x/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom X4 9950 BE || 4 || 9.3 || 0.07 || 126W || 2.6 GHz || 2.32<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| bitcoin-miner 0.13/WinXP || No GPU<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 7.2 || 0.08 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 7.2<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| cpu-miner 0.2.1/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X4 810 || 4 || 5.0 || || 95W || 2.8 GHz ||<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| rpcminer-cpu ||<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X4 810 || 4 || 9.5 || || 95W || 2.8 GHz ||<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| rpcminer-4way ||<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X4 810 || 4 || 10.5 || || 95W || 2.8 GHz ||<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| ufasoft v0.10 ||<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X4 810 || 4 || 11.5 || || 95W || 2.8 GHz ||<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| cgminer 1.5.3 || "cgminer 1.5.3 --algo 4way" on Ubuntu 11.10 alpha 2 (64 bit), built by GCC 4.6.1 with "-O3 -Wall -march=native" <br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X4 955 || 4 || 11 || 0.09 || 125W || 3.2 GHz || 11<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| rpcminer-4way ||<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X4 965 || 4 || 12 || 0.09 || 140W || 3.4 GHz || 11<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| rpcminer-4way ||<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X6 1055T || 6 || 15.84 || 0.13 || 125W || 2.82 GHz || 15.84 <br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X6 1055T || 6 || 23.6 || || 95W || 3.50 GHz || 23.6 <br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| [http://github.com/pooler/cpuminer pooler's cpuminer] 2.2.2 || --algo=sha256d<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X6 1075T || 6 || 21.3 || || 125W|| ||<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| minerd || Ubuntu 11.04 amd64 runlevel=1 -algo=4way -threads=6<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X6 1090T || 6 || 18|| || 141W|| 3.50 GHz || 3<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| minerd || <br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X6 1100T || 6 || 22 || 0.176 || 125W || 3.82 GHz || 22<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| bitcoin-miner || Aciid#bitcoin-dev<br />
|-<br />
| Sempron 3000+ || 2 || 0.8 || || 62W || 1.6 GHz || 0.8<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| cpuminer || --alg 4way<br />
|-<br />
| Turion X2 RM-70 || 2 || 1.9 || || 65W || 2.1 GHz || 1.9<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| cpuminer || --alg 4way<br />
|-<br />
| Zacate E-350 || 2 || 11 || 0.615 || 18W || 1.6 Ghz || 1.231 || 9.831 || HD6310M || 492 Mhz || 80 || poclbm -v -w128 + Ufasoft 0.7 || stock speeds<br />
|-<br />
| Zacate E-350 || 2 || 12<br />
|colspan=2|<br />
| 1.648 Ghz || 1.252 || 10.87 || HD6310M || 492 Mhz || 80 || poclbm -v -w 256 -f 1 || "autotune" speed with ASUS EFI BIOS<br />
|-<br />
| Ontario C-50 || 2 || 6.2 || 0.68 || 9W || 1.0 Ghz || 1.200 || 6.2 || HD6250M || 277 Mhz || 80 || poclbm -v -w128 -f5 -r5 || <br />
|-<br />
| A4-3400 || 2 || 23.2 || || || 75W || 2.4 Ghz || || 23.2 || 6350 || stock || || GUIminer || ||<br />
|-<br />
| A8-3850 || 4 || 60 || || 100W || Stock || || 60 || HD6550D || Stock || 400 || poclbm.exe, Win7-32, 4GB RAM || All running at stock speeds, and set to auto in BIOS.<br />
|<br />
|-<br />
| A8-3870K || 4 || 95 || || 100W (@stock) || 3.3 Ghz || || 95 || HD6550D || 900MHz || 400 || phoenix.exe -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=4 WORKSIZE=128, Win7-64, 8GB RAM 1667MHz || M/B ASUS F1 A75-M Pro, CPU/GPU BIOS overclocked<br />
|-<br />
| A10-5800K || 4 || 105 || || 100W || 3.8 Ghz || || 105 || HD7660D || 800MHz || 384 || cgminer Intensity=7 || Linux 64bit (Ubuntu 12.10), AMD-APP-SDK-v2.7-RC-lnx64, stock speeds *not* overclocked<br />
|}<br />
<br />
===ARM===<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! Mhash/s/$ /€ !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment<br />
|-<br />
| ARM926EJ-S || 1 || 0.187 || ? || ? || ? || 1.2 GHz || cpuminer || Seagate Dockstar [http://archlinuxarm.org/platforms/armv5/seagate-dockstar ArchLinux]<br />
|-<br />
| Marvel Feroceon (88FR131) || 1 || 0.195 || 0.224 ||<0.01|| 0.87 W || 1.2 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-06-15) || Marvell SheevaPlug, Debian, 'c' algo<br />
|-<br />
| ARM1136EJ-S || 1 || 0.11 || ? || ? || ? || 0.528 GHz || cpuminer git || T-Mobile Pulse, inside Debian chroot, 'c' algo<br />
|-<br />
| ARM1176JZ(F)-S || 1 || 0.119 || ? || ? || ? || 0.412 GHz || [http://github.com/pooler/cpuminer pooler's cpuminer] 2.2 || iPhone 3G, 'sha256d' algo<br />
|-<br />
| ARM1176JZ(F)-S || 1 || 0.2 || ? || ? || 3.75W || 800 Mhz || cgminer 2.5.0 || RaspberryPi Model B, SoC BCM2835, Debian Squezee 19-04-2012, Overclocked Cpu 800mhz<br />
|-<br />
| Cortex-A8 || 1 || 0.125 || 0.36 || <0.01 || 0.35 W || 0.6 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || Nokia N900: 'cryptopp'<br />
|-<br />
| Cortex-A8 || 1 || 0.2 || 0.57 || <0.01 || 0.35 W || 0.6 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || Nokia N900: 'c' algo<br />
|-<br />
| Cortex-A8 || 1 || 0.365 || ? || ? || ? || 0.6 GHz || [http://github.com/pooler/cpuminer pooler's cpuminer] || BeagleBoard: 'sha256d' algo<br />
|-<br />
| Cortex-A8 || 1 || 0.435 || ? || ? || ? || 0.8 GHz || [http://github.com/pooler/cpuminer pooler's cpuminer] 2.2 || 'sha256d' algo<br />
|-<br />
| Cortex-A8 || 1 || 0.44 || ? || ? || ? || 0.8 GHz || cpuminer 2.2.3 (-mfpu=neon) || EfikaMX (iMX.51), CRUX ARMHF, cpuminer -a sha256d<br />
|-<br />
| AllWinner A10(A8) || 1 || 0.568 || ? || ? || <2.5W || 1.0 GHz || [http://github.com/pooler/cpuminer pooler's cpuminer] 2.2 || -a sha256d #Native Lubuntu armhf build <br />
|-<br />
| Cortex-A9 || 2 || 0.57|| 1.14 ||<0.01 || 0.5 W || 1.0 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-24) || Toshiba AC100, ubuntu, 'c' algo<br />
|-<br />
| Cortex-A9 || 2 || 1.3 || ? || ? || ? || 1.2 GHz || [http://github.com/pooler/cpuminer pooler's cpuminer] 2.2.3 || Samsung Galaxy S II - CFLAGS="-O3 -mfpu=neon"<br />
|}<br />
<br />
===Intel===<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! Mhash / $<ref name='amazon_20110625'/>/€<ref name='geizhals_20110625'/> !! ACP [W] !! Clock [GHz] !! Version !! Comment<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium III (Coppermine) || 2 || 0.39 || 0.008 |||| TDP 2× 26.1 W || 1 || Ufasoft 0.32 (compiled from source), Debian Squeeze || [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_Pentium_III_microprocessors#.22Coppermine.22_.28180_nm.29 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium III mobile ? || 1 || 0.3 || 0.014 |||| 21 || 1.07 || 0.3.1x/Win2K || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source] [http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=27380 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium M 1.6ghz || 1 || 0.4 || || || || 1.6 || minerd (jgarzik's 1.0) || cryppto, Windows 7<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium M 1.6ghz || 1 || 0.62 || || || || 1.6 || Ufasoft 0.20 || Windows XP Professional<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium M 1.6ghz || 1 || 0.71 || || || || 1.6 || [http://github.com/pooler/cpuminer pooler's cpuminer] 2.2 || Gentoo Linux<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium M 1.73ghz || 1 || 0.5 || || || || 1.73 || minerd (jgarzik's 1.0) || cryppto, Windows 7<br />
|-<br />
| Old Xeon 512k (Dual) || 2x1/2 || 2.0 || || || || 3.0 || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || HT disabled, algo=4way (twice as fast as the 2nd best algo)<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium 4 2.0A || 1 || 0.85 || || || || 2.0 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft-0.4]/WinXP || -g no -t 2<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium 4 630 || 1/2 || 1.29 || || || || 3.0 || ufasoft 0.23 || Windows XP<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium Dual-Core E2180 || 2/2 || 1.75 || || || || 2.0 || rpcminer-cpu || Win7-64<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium Dual-Core E2180 || 2/2 || 4.1 || || || || 2.0 || cpuminer || sse2_64<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium Dual-Core E2180 || 2/2 || 4.5 || || || || 2.0 || ufasoft v0.11 || Win7-64<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium Dual-Core E5400 || 2/2 || 2.27 || 0.03 || || 65 || 2.7 || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Celeron E330 || 2/2 || 2.2 || 0.03 || || 65 || 2.5 || 0.3.19/Ubuntu10.04 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]<br />
|-<br />
|-<br />
| Celeron E3400 || 2/2 || 5.9 || - || - || - || 2.6 || Ufasoft v0.13 / GUIMiner v2011-06-14 || WinXP 32 bit, SSE2, Flags "-g no" <br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Quad Q6600 || 4/4 || 11.0 || || 0.02/0.06 || 105 || 2.40 || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || -a 60 -g no -t 4<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Quad Q8200 || 4/4 || 10.9 || || 0.06/0.10 || || 2.33 || Ufasoft 0.14 || -g no -l yes -t 4<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Quad Q9400 || 4/4 || 11 || 0.046 || 0.06/0.07 || 95 || 2.66 || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || -a 60 -g no -t 4<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Quad Q9650 || 4/4 || 18.67 || || 0.05/0.06 || 95 || 4.00 || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || -a 60 -g no -t 4<br />
|-<br />
| Core i3 530 || 2/4 || 8.31 || 0.10 || 0.06/0.10 || 80 || 3.66 || Ufasoft 0.7 || -v -a5 -g no -t 4<br />
|-<br />
| Core i3 M350 || 2/4 || 1.48 || 0.04 || || 35 || 2.27 || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Core i3-2100 || 2/4 || 8.28 || || || || 3.1 || ufasoft v0.20 || <br />
|-<br />
| Core i5 M450 || 2/4 || 1.8 || 0.05 || || 35 || 1.2 || 0.3.17/Win7-54 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source]<br />
|- <br />
| Core i5-650 || 2/4 || 5.1 || 0.04 ? || 0.02/0.03 || || 3.2 || cpuminer-0.7 || -4way<br />
|-<br />
| Core i5-750 || 4/4 || 14 || || 0.06/0.10 || || 3.2 || bitcoin-miner 0.11 || -a 5 -g no -t 4<br />
|-<br />
| Core i5 ? || 4/? || 6.5 || || || || || client from svn || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37621#msg37621 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 4.5 || 0.05 || 0.02/0.03 || 95 || 3.1 || cpuminer git (2011-01-22) || cryptopp_asm32<br />
|-<br />
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 14 || 0.15 || 0.07/0.09 || 95 || 3.1 || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || sse2_64<br />
|-<br />
| Core i5-2400S || 4/4 || 16.6 || || || 65 || 2.5 || [http://github.com/pooler/cpuminer pooler's cpuminer] 2.2.3 || Linux Mint 13<br />
|-<br />
| Core i5 2500K || 4/4 || 20.6 || ||0.10/0.12 || || 4.2 || bitcoin-miner || -g no<br />
|-<br />
| Core i5 2600K || 4/8 || 17.3 || || || 75 || 3.4 || bitcoin-miner || -g no. 75W for the whole System without monitor (MSI Board). CPU underclocked to 3,4Ghz and undervolted to 1,012Vcore. Passive Cooling! 3.6ghz results in 18,4 Mhash/s<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 2600K || 4/8 || 18.6 || || || 95 W max. || 3.4 || Ufasoft bitcoin-miner 0.20 || -g no -t 8 CPU @ 3.511Ghz 1.176V<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 2600 || 4/8 || 23.9 || || || || 3.4 || [http://github.com/pooler/cpuminer pooler's cpuminer] 2.2 || Ubuntu Linux 11.10<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 620M || 2/4 || 1.888 || || || || 2.66 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8994.0 RPCMiner GUI] v2011-05-22 / Mac OS X 10.6.7 || Model: MacBookPro6,2 RAM: 4GB<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 620M || 2/4 || 6.5 || || || || 3.33 || This is achieved by running RPC 4 way miner in VMware Fusion 4 (running win 7 in the VM) while in Mac OSX / Mac OS X 10.6.8 || Model: MacBookPro6,2 RAM: 8GB.The CPU appears to turbo boost to 3.33GHz in this way from 2.67GHz when running it in this way.The MBP gets very hot and uses a lot of energy though so watch those temps.It'll throttle after a while unless you keep the air vents clear underneath (ie don't put int in your lap,etc).<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 720QM || 4/8 || 7.9 || ?|| || 45 || 2.8 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] || stream processors overclocked from 1.6 GHz; Dell Precision M6500, Win7-64, 8GB DDR3<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 820 || 4/8 || 13.8 || || || || 2.8 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] || -t 8<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 920 || 4/8 || 19.2 || 0.10 || || 195 || 4.0 (x21) || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] || -a 5<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 950 || 4/8 || 5.88 || 0.039 || || 150 || 3.83 (x23) || bitcoin-0.3.20.2 Win7-64 ||<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 950 || 4/8 || 18.9 || 0.126 || || 150 || 3.83 (x23) || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] v0.4 ||<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 980x || 6/12 || 19.2 || 0.15 || || 130 || 4.4 (x33) || cpuminer/Win7-64 || <br />
|- <br />
| Core i7 980x || 6/12 || 8.7 || || || || 3.9 (x27) || 0.3.17/Win7-64 || <br />
|- <br />
| Core i7 990x || 6/12 || 33.3 || || || || 4.5 (x32) || ufasoft/Win2008 R2-64 || Ram - 12Gb, Rampage III BlackEdition, Water cooling<br />
|- <br />
| Core i7 2635QM || 4/8 || 2.93 || || || || 2.00 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8994.0 RPCMiner GUI] v2011-05-22 / Mac OS X 10.6.7 || Model: MacBookPro8,2 RAM: 4GB<br />
|- <br />
| Core i7 620M || 2/4 || 6.3 || 0.18 || || 35 || 2.66 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] v0.4 || <br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 2600k || 4/4 || 6.7 || || || || 4.00 || phoenix 0.48 ||<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 3770k || 4/8 || 5.2 || || || || 4.4 || Guiminer v2012-12-03 || Windows 7 x64 : -v argument increased Mhash/s from 5.0 to 5.2<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 3930k || 6/12 || 66.6 || || || || 4.625 (125 x 37) || Ufasoft bitcoin-miner v0.28 || Windows 7 x64, uses ~190watts : -v argument increased Mhash/s from 36.0 to 66.6<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo U7600 || 1 || 1.1 || || || || 1.2 || minerd (jgarzik's 1.0) || cryppto, Windows 7<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo E5200 || 2/2 || 6.2 || 0.086 || || 72 || 2.76 || Ufasoft/Win7-64 || TDP is 65W + 7W overclock<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo E6550 || 1/2 || 2.45 || || || || 2.33 || cpuminer 0.7.1 (Linux) || --algo=sse2_64<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo E6850 || 2/2 || 6.75 || 0.10 || || 65 || 3.0 || ufasoft-0.3 ||<br />
|- <br />
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 7.76 || 0.11 || || 70 || 3.33 || ufasoft-0.3 || uncertain of overclock; miner optimized for Intel Core<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 2.52 || 0.04 || || 65 || 2.66 || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo E8200 || 2/2 || 2.3 || 0.035 || || 65 || 2.66 || rpcminer-cpu ||<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo E8400 || 2/2 || 6.9 || 0.106 || || 65 || 3.0 || ufasoft v0.10 || windows 7/64bit (-t 2)<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo E8500 || 1/2 || 3.6 || || || || 3.16 || guiminer v2011-06-14 || windows vista 32bit<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo E8500 || 2/2 || 7.2 || || || || 3.16 || guiminer v2011-06-14 || windows vista 32bit<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo P8700 || 2/2 || 5.9 || || || || 2.53 || ufasoft v0.21 || windows 7/64bit <br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo T5450 || 2/2 || 2.5 || 0.07 || || 35 || 1.63 || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || Ubuntu 11.04<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo T5500 || 2/2 || 4.3 || || || || 1.66 || [http://github.com/pooler/cpuminer pooler's cpuminer] 2.2 || Gentoo Linux (amd64)<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo T6400 || 2/2 || 4.2 || 0.12 || || 35 || 2.00 || cpuminer git (Linux) || --algo=sse2_64<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo T7250 || 2/2 || 4.5 || 0.13 || || 35 || 2.00 || bitcoin-miner 0.13/WinXP || No GPU<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo T7450 || 2/2 || 3.7 || 0.10 || || 35 || 2.13 || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || Ubuntu 11.04<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo T9400 || 2/2 || 4.2 || || || || 2.53 || ufasoft v0.13 || Win7-64<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Extreme X9000 || 2/2 || 2.37 || || || || 2.8 || rpcminer-cpu || Win7-64<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Extreme X9000 || 2/2 || 6.2 || || || || 2.8 || ufasoft v0.11 || Win7-64<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Extreme X9000 || 2/2 || 7.2 || || || || 3.2 || ufasoft v0.11 || Win7-64 Overclocked from 2.8 GHz to 3.2 GHz<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon 2.8 || 2/2 || 0.8 || || || || 2.8 || cpuminer || cryptopp_asm32 <br />
|-<br />
| Xeon 3060 || 1/2 || 2.03 || 0.03 || || 65 || 2. || cpuminer 0.8.1 (Linux) || --algo=cryptopp_asm32<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon Prestonia 2.4 (dual) || 2x1/2 || 2.16 || 0.017 || || 130 || 2.4 || ufasoft v0.4 || <br />
|-<br />
| Xeon X5355 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 10.13 || 0.16 || || 120 || 2.6 || bitcoind || Roughly the same speed as the "c" algo in cpuminer<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E3-1230 V2 (quad) || 4/8 || 19.7 || ? || ? || ? || 3.70 || cgminer 2.8.3 || -O2 -march=core-avx-i algo=sse2_64<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon X5355 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 22.76 || 0.09 || || 120 || 2.6 || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || -O2 -march=core2, algo=sse2_64<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon X5365 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 26.00 || ? || || ? || 3.0 || cpuminer git (2011-06-15) || algo=sse2_64<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon X5650 || 2x6/24 || 28.6 || ? || ? || ? || 2.67 || cpuminer 1.0.2 || --algo 4way<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon x5680 (dual) || 2x6/24 || 48 || ? || ? || ? || 3.33GHz || Ufasoft 0.29 || CentOS 6.2 x86_64<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon x5690 (dual) || 2x6/24 || 52 || ? || ? || ? || 3.46GHz || Ufasoft 0.29 || CentOS 6.2 x86_64<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5-2690 (dual) || 2x8/32 || 66 || ? || ? || 2x135W || 2.9GHz || Ufasoft 64-bit 0.31 || Windows Server 2008R2 x64<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5335 || 4/4 || 9.35 || 0.12 || || 80 || 2.00 || ufasoft v0.11 || Vista-32<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5410 || 4/4 || 9.8 || ? || || 80 || 2.33|| ufasoft v0.10 || CentOS 5.5 x64 <br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5440 || 4/8 || 7.3 || ? || || 80 || 2.66|| Kiv's poclbm-gui || FIXME: Either wrong model # or wrong threads/speed info<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5506 || 4/4 || 9.6 || ? || || 80 || 2.13|| ufasoft v0.10 || CentOS 5.5 x64 <br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5520 || 4/8 || 6.5 || 0.08 || || 80 || 2.27 || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5530 || 4/8 || 7.14 || 0.09 || || 80 || 2.4 || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5620 || 4/8 || 11.2 || ? || || 80 || 2.4 || ufasoft v0.10 -t 4 || CentOS 5.5 x64 Hyper-Threading is off<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5630 (dual) || 2x4/8 || 8 || 0.1 || || 80 || 2.53 || 0.3.17/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E6520 (dual) || 2x4/8 || 24.7 || || || || 2.53 || ufasoft v0.10 || windows 2008 R2 64bit (-t 16)<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E7220 || 2/2 || 6.3 || ? || || 80 || 2.93|| ufasoft v0.10 || CentOS 5.5 x64 <br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E7320 (dual) || 2x2 || 1.5 || || || || 2.8 || cgminer v1.2.8 || 2x2.8ghz dual core running Ubuntu 11.04 x86 (individual cores get 0.4 MH/s)<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E7450 (quad) || 4x6/24 || 60 || || || || 2.40 || ufasoft v0.13 || -t 24<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E7520 (dual) || 2x4/16 || 18 || || || 95 || 1.87 || ufasoft v0.10 || windows 2008 R2 64bit (-t 16)<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon W3680 || 6/12 || 18 || || || 130 || 3.33 || cpuminer v1.0.2 --algo=4way || Ubuntu 11.04 64bit<br />
|-<br />
| Atom Z520 || 1/2 || 1.20 || || || 2 || 1.7 || ufasoft 1.18 || Asus Eee 1101HA with overclocking capabilities<br />
|-<br />
| Atom N230 || 1/2 || 0.375 || || || 4 || 1.6 || rpcminer-cpu || <br />
|-<br />
| Atom N230 || 1/2 || 0.245 || || || 4 || 1.6 || rpcminer-4way || <br />
|-<br />
| Atom N230 || 1/2 || 0.97 || || || 4 || 1.6 || ufasoft v0.10 || <br />
|-<br />
| Atom N270 || 1/2 || 1.19 || 0.24 || || 5 || 1.6 || ufasoft v0.10 || <br />
|-<br />
| Atom N450 || 1/2 || 1.60 || 0.31 || || 6.5 || 2.06 || ufasoft v0.10 || <br />
|-<br />
| Atom N550 || 2/4 || 1.97 || || || || 1.5 || ufasoft v0.21 || Windows 7/64 bit<br />
|-<br />
| Atom 330 || 2/4 || 1.80 || || || 8 || 1.6 || ufasoft v0.13 || -t 4<br />
|-<br />
| Atom D510 || 2/4 || 1.00 || || || || 1.6 || cpuminer w cryptopp_asm32 || debian linux 6.0, headless system, 2 GB RAM, running from usb-flash<br />
|-<br />
| Atom D510 || 4/4 || 2.3 || 0.07 || || 30 || 1.6 || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || Ubuntu 11.04 Server<br />
|}<br />
<br />
<references><br />
<ref name='amazon_20110625'>$ Prices from http://www.amazon.com on 2011-06-25</ref><br />
<ref name='geizhals_20110625'>€ Prices from http://geizhals.at/eu on 2011-06-25</ref><br />
</references><br />
<br />
===Other===<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! Mhash/s/$ !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment<br />
|-<br />
| Cell || 6 || 21 || 0.35 || 0.07 || 60W || 3.2 GHz || Cellminer || Sony Playstation 3 (FAT): Needs custom firmware. [https://github.com/verement/cellminer source] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4704.20 source] Total power usage of PS3 fat is 120W but only the Cell cpu is active.<br />
|-<br />
| Cell || 7 || 26.6 || ? || ? || 60W || 3.2 GHz || Cellminer || Sony Playstation 3 (FAT): Needs custom firmware. [https://github.com/verement/cellminer source] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4704.20 source] Running with 7th spu enabled and both ppe cores.<br />
|-<br />
| Cell || 6 || 21 || 0.7 || 0.07 || 35W || 3.2 GHz || cellminer || Sony Playstation 3 (SLIM): Total power usage of PS3 slim is 70W but only the Cell cpu is active.<br />
|-<br />
| MIPS || 1 || 0.026 || ? || ? || ? || 200 MHz || cpuminer || ASUS WL-500G Deluxe Router Running [http://openwrt.org/ OpenWrt]<br />
|-<br />
| VIA Eden || 1 || 1.3 || 0.17 || || 8W || 1600 MHz || cpuminer || VIA Eden w/ padlock<br />
|-<br />
| PowerPC 7447A || 1 || 0.53 || || || || 1420 MHz || cpuminer ||<br />
|-<br />
| PowerPC 7450 (G4e) || 1 || 1.29 || || || || 1670 MHz || cgminer 2.0.7 || PowerBook5,6; Mac OS X 10.5.8; Altivec<br />
|-<br />
| PowerPC 750 (G3) || 1 || 0.140 || || || || 600 MHz || cpuminer || iBook G3 600 w/ Cryptopp<br />
|-<br />
| IBM POWER4+ 2/way || 2/1 || 0.58 || || || || 1450 MHz || cpuminer 2.2.3 || CRUX PPC (64bit), cpuminer -a sha256d -t 1<br />
|-<br />
| IBM Power7 (PowerPC) || || 7.6 || || || || 3.5 Ghz || cgminer || IBM Power7 770, SuSE Linux 11.1, 4 cores, OpenCL, YASM, Altivec<br />
|-<br />
| Google App Engine || 1 || 0.144 || || || 0W || || pyminer || Modified version of [https://github.com/jgarzik/pyminer pyminer] for GAE.<br />
|-<br />
| Open Shift || 1 || 0.059 || || || 0W || || pyminer || <br />
|}<br />
<br />
<references></references><br />
<br />
==See Also==<br />
* [[TP's Bitcoin Calculator]]<br />
* [[Mining rig]]<br />
* [[ZTEX FPGA Boards for Bitcoin Mining]]<br />
* [[Generation Calculator]]<br />
* [[Power Calc]]<br />
* [[OpenCL miner]]<br />
* [http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=745 ATI Stream vs. NVIDIA CUDA - GPGPU computing battle royale] <br />
* [http://bitminer.info/ Bitminer.info] <br />
* [http://www.pcper.com/reviews/Graphics-Cards/Bitcoin-Currency-and-GPU-Mining-Performance-Comparison Bitcoin Mining Performance Compared]<br />
** [http://www.pcper.com/reviews/Graphics-Cards/Bitcoin-Mining-Update-Power-Usage-Costs-Across-United-States Bitcoin Mining Power Costs Compared]<br />
<br />
[[Category:Mining]]</div>
Http
https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Help:FAQ&diff=36561
Help:FAQ
2013-04-01T15:38:22Z
<p>Http: /* I'd like to learn more. Where can I get help? */ fix links</p>
<hr />
<div>Here you will find answers to the most commonly asked questions.<br />
<br />
== General ==<br />
=== What are bitcoins? ===<br />
Bitcoins are the unit of currency of the Bitcoin system. A commonly used shorthand for this is “BTC” to refer to a price or amount (eg: “100 BTC”).<br />
There are such things as [[physical bitcoins]], but ultimately, a bitcoin is just a number associated with a [[Address|Bitcoin Address]]. A physical bitcoin is simply an object, such as a coin, with the number carefully embedded inside. See also an [[Introduction|easy intro]] to bitcoin.<br />
<br />
=== How can I get bitcoins? ===<br />
<br />
There are a variety of ways to acquire bitcoins:<br />
<br />
* Accept bitcoins as payment for goods or services.<br />
* The most common way to buy bitcoins are the [[Buying bitcoins|Bitcoin Exchanges]]<br />
* There are several services where you can [[Buying_Bitcoins_(the_noob_version)|trade them]] for traditional currency.<br />
* Find someone to trade cash for bitcoins in-person through a [https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Category:Directories local directory].<br />
* Participate in a [[Pooled mining|mining pool]].<br />
* If you have a lot of mining hardware, you can solo mine and attempt to create a new [[block]] (currently yields 25 bitcoins plus transaction fees).<br />
<br />
===Does Bitcoin guarantee an influx of free money?===<br />
<br />
Since Bitcoin is a new technology, what it is and how it works may be initially unclear. Bitcoin is sometimes presented as being one of three things:<br />
<ol style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;"><br />
<li>Some sort of online 'get-rich-quick' scam.</li><br />
<li>A loophole in the market economy, the installation of which guarantees a steady influx of cash.</li><br />
<li>A sure investment that will almost certainly yield a profit.</li><br />
</ol><br />
In fact, none of the above are true. Let's look at them independently.<br />
<br />
;Is Bitcoin a 'get-rich-quick' scheme?<br />
:If you've spent much time on the Internet, you've probably seen ads for many 'get-rich-quick' schemes. These ads usually promise huge profits for a small amounts of easy work. Such schemes are usually pyramid/matrix-style schemes that make money from their own employees and offer nothing of any real value. Most convince one to buy packages that will make them earn hundreds a day, which in fact have the buyer distribute more such ads, and make minute profits.<br />
<br />
:Bitcoin is in no way similar to these schemes. Bitcoin doesn't promise windfall profits. There is no way for the developers to make money from your involvement or to take money from you. That bitcoins are nearly impossible to acquire without the owner's consent represents one of its greatest strengths. Bitcoin is an experimental, virtual currency that may succeed or may fail. None of its developers expect to get rich off of it. <br />
<br />
:A more detailed answer to this question can be found [http://bitcointalk.org/?topic=7815.0 here].<br />
<br />
;Will I make money by installing the client?<br />
:Most people who use Bitcoin don't earn anything by doing so, and the default client has no built-in way to earn Bitcoins. A small minority of people with dedicated, high-performance hardware do earn some Bitcoins by "''mining''" (generating new bitcoins, see [[#What is mining?|What is mining?]]) with special software, but joining Bitcoin shouldn't be construed as being the road to riches. Most Bitcoin users get involved because they find the project conceptually interesting and don't earn anything by doing so. This is also why you won't find much speculation about the political or economic repercussions of Bitcoin anywhere on this site: Bitcoin developers owe their dedication to the project's intellectual yieldings more than to those of a monetary nature. Bitcoin is still taking its first baby steps; it may go on to do great things but right now it only has something to offer those chasing conceptually interesting projects or bleeding edge technology.<br />
<br />
;As an investment, is Bitcoin a sure thing?<br />
:Bitcoin is a new and interesting electronic currency, the value of which is not backed by any single government or organization. Like other currencies, it is worth something partly because people are willing to trade it for goods and services. Its exchange rate fluctuates continuously, and sometimes wildly. It lacks wide acceptance and is vulnerable to manipulation by parties with modest funding. Security incidents such as website and account compromise may trigger major sell-offs. Other fluctuations can build into positive feedback loops and cause much larger exchange rate fluctuations. Anyone who puts money into Bitcoin should understand the risk they are taking and consider it a high-risk currency. Later, as Bitcoin becomes better known and more widely accepted, it may stabilize, but for the time being it is unpredictable. Any investment in Bitcoin should be done carefully and with a clear plan to manage the risk.<br />
<br />
=== Can I buy bitcoins with Paypal? ===<br />
<br />
It is possible to buy [[physical bitcoins]] with PayPal but it is otherwise difficult and/or expensive to do so for non-physical bitcoins, because of significant risk to the seller. <br />
<br />
While it is possible to find an individual who wishes to sell Bitcoin to you via Paypal, (perhaps via [http://www.bitcoin-otc.com/ #bitcoin-otc] ) most exchanges do not allow funding through PayPal. This is due to repeated cases where someone pays for bitcoins with Paypal, receives their bitcoins, and then fraudulently complains to Paypal that they never received their purchase. PayPal often sides with the fraudulent buyer in this case, which means any seller needs to cover that risk with higher fees or refuse to accept PayPal altogether.<br />
<br />
Buying Bitcoins from individuals this way is still possible, but requires the seller to have some trust that the buyer will not file a claim with PayPal to reverse the payment.<br />
<br />
=== Where can I find a forum to discuss Bitcoin? ===<br />
<br />
Please visit the [[Bitcoin:Community_portal#Bitcoin_Community_Forums_on_various_platforms|Community Portal]] for links to Bitcoin-related forums.<br />
<br />
=== How are new bitcoins created? ===<br />
<br />
[[File:total_bitcoins_over_time_graph.png|thumb|Number of bitcoins over time, assuming a perfect 10-minute interval.]]<br />
New bitcoins are generated by the network through the process of "[[#What is mining?|''mining'']]". In a process that is similar to a continuous raffle draw, mining nodes on the network are awarded bitcoins each time they find the solution to a certain mathematical problem (and thereby create a new [[block]]). Creating a block is a [[proof of work]] with a difficulty that varies with the overall strength of the network. The reward for solving a block is [[Controlled Currency Supply|automatically adjusted]] so that roughly every four years of operation of the Bitcoin network, half the amount of bitcoins created in the prior 4 years are created. {{formatnum:10500000}} bitcoins were created in the first 4 (approx.) years from January 2009 to November 2012. Every four years thereafter this amount halves, so it will be {{formatnum:5250000}} over years 4-8, {{formatnum:2625000}} over years 8-12, and so on. Thus the total number of bitcoins in existence will never exceed {{formatnum:21000000}}. See [[Controlled Currency Supply]].<br />
<br />
Blocks are [[Mining|mined]] every 10 minutes, on average and for the first four years ({{formatnum:210000}} blocks) each block included 50 new bitcoins. As the amount of processing power directed at mining changes, the difficulty of creating new bitcoins changes. This difficulty factor is calculated every 2016 blocks and is based upon the time taken to generate the previous 2016 blocks. See [[Mining]].<br />
<br />
=== What's the current total number of bitcoins in existence? ===<br />
<br />
[http://blockexplorer.com/q/totalbc Current count]. Also see [https://blockchain.info/charts/total-bitcoins Total bitcoins in circulation chart]<br />
<br />
The number of blocks times the coin value of a block is the number of coins in existence. The coin value of a block is 50 BTC for each of the first {{formatnum:210000}} blocks, 25 BTC for the next {{formatnum:210000}} blocks, then 12.5 BTC, 6.25 BTC and so on.<br />
<br />
=== How divisible are bitcoins? ===<br />
<br />
A bitcoin can be divided down to 8 decimal places. Therefore, 0.00000001 BTC is the smallest amount that can be handled in a transaction. If necessary, the protocol and related software can be modified to handle even smaller amounts.<br />
<br />
=== What do I call the various denominations of bitcoin? ===<br />
<br />
There is a lot of discussion about the naming of these fractions of bitcoins. The leading candidates are:<br />
<br />
* 1 BTC = 1 bitcoin<br />
* 0.01 BTC = 1 cBTC = 1 centibitcoin (also referred to as bitcent)<br />
* 0.001 BTC = 1 mBTC = 1 millibitcoin (also referred to as mbit (pronounced em-bit) or millibit or even bitmill)<br />
* 0.000 001 BTC = 1 μBTC = 1 microbitcoin (also referred to as ubit (pronounced yu-bit) or microbit)<br />
<br />
The above follows the accepted international SI prefixes for hundredths, thousandths, and millionths. There are many arguments against the special case of 0.01 BTC since it is unlikely to represent anything meaningful as the Bitcoin economy grows (it certainly won't be the equivalent of 0.01 USD, GBP or EUR). Equally, the inclusion of existing national currency denominations such as "cent", "nickel", "dime", "pence", "pound", "kopek" and so on are to be discouraged; this is a worldwide currency.<br />
<br />
One exception is the "satoshi" which is smallest denomination currently possible <br />
<br />
* 0.000 000 01 BTC = 1 satoshi (pronounced sa-toh-shee)<br />
which is so named in honour of Satoshi Nakamoto, the pseudonym of the inventor of Bitcoin.<br />
<br />
For an overview of all defined units of Bitcoin (including less common and niche units), see [[Units]].<br />
<br />
Further discussion on this topic can be found on the forums here:<br />
<br />
* [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=14438.msg195287#msg195287 We need names]<br />
* [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=8282.0 What to call 0.001 BTC]<br />
<br />
=== How does the halving work when the number gets really small? ===<br />
<br />
Eventually the reward will go from 0.00000001 BTC to zero and no more bitcoins will be created. <br />
<br />
The block reward calculation is done as a right bitwise shift of a 64-bit signed integer, which means it is divided by two and rounded down. The integer is equal to the value in BTC * 100,000,000 since internally in the reference client software, all Bitcoin balances and values are stored as unsigned integers.<br />
<br />
With an initial block reward of 50 BTC, it will take many 4-year periods for the block reward to reach zero.<br />
<br />
=== How long will it take to generate all the coins? ===<br />
<br />
The last block that will generate coins will be block #6,929,999 which should be generated at or near the year 2140. The total number of coins in circulation will then remain static at 20,999,999.9769 BTC.<br />
<br />
Even if the allowed precision is expanded from the current 8 decimals, the total BTC in circulation will always be slightly below 21 million (assuming everything else stays the same). For example, with 16 decimals of precision, the end total would be 20,999,999.999999999496 BTC.<br />
<br />
=== If no more coins are going to be generated, will more blocks be created? ===<br />
<br />
Absolutely! Even before the creation of coins ends, the use of [[transaction fee|transaction fees]] will likely make creating new blocks more valuable from the fees than the new coins being created. When coin generation ends, these fees will sustain the ability to use bitcoins and the Bitcoin network. There is no practical limit on the number of blocks that will be mined in the future.<br />
<br />
=== But if no more coins are generated, what happens when Bitcoins are lost? Won't that be a problem? ===<br />
<br />
Because of the law of supply and demand, when fewer bitcoins are available the ones that are left will be in higher demand, and therefore will have a higher value. So, as Bitcoins are lost, the remaining bitcoins will eventually increase in value to compensate. As the value of a bitcoin increases, the number of bitcoins required to purchase an item '''de'''creases. This is a [[Deflationary spiral|deflationary economic model]]. As the average transaction size reduces, transactions will probably be denominated in sub-units of a bitcoin such as millibitcoins ("Millies") or microbitcoins ("Mikes").<br />
<br />
The Bitcoin protocol uses a base unit of one hundred-millionth of a Bitcoin ("a Satoshi"), but unused bits are available in the protocol fields that could be used to denote even smaller subdivisions.<br />
<br />
=== If every transaction is broadcast via the network, does Bitcoin scale? ===<br />
The Bitcoin protocol allows lightweight clients that can use Bitcoin without downloading the entire transaction history. As traffic grows and this becomes more critical, implementations of the concept will be developed. Full network nodes will at some point become a more specialized service.<br />
<br />
With some modifications to the software, full Bitcoin nodes could easily keep up with both VISA and MasterCard combined, using only fairly modest hardware (a single high end server by todays standards). It is worth noting that the MasterCard network is structured somewhat like Bitcoin itself - as a peer to peer broadcast network.<br />
<br />
Learn more about [[Scalability]].<br />
<br />
==Economy==<br />
=== Where does the value of Bitcoin stem from? What backs up Bitcoin? ===<br />
Bitcoins have value because they are useful and because they are [[Controlled Currency Supply|scarce]]. As they are accepted by more merchants, their value will [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sticky_%28economics%29 stabilize]. See the [[Trade|list of Bitcoin-accepting sites]].<br />
<br />
When we say that a currency is backed up by gold, we mean that there's a promise in place that you can exchange the currency for gold. Bitcoins, like dollars and euros, are not backed up by anything except the variety of merchants that accept them.<br />
<br />
It's a common misconception that Bitcoins gain their value from the cost of electricity required to generate them. Cost doesn't equal value – hiring 1,000 men to shovel a big hole in the ground may be costly, but not valuable. Also, even though scarcity is a critical requirement for a useful currency, it alone doesn't make anything valuable. For example, your fingerprints are scarce, but that doesn't mean they have any exchange value.<br />
<br />
Alternatively it needs to be added that while the law of supply and demand applies it does not guarantee value of Bitcoins in the future. If confidence in Bitcoins is lost then it will not matter that the supply can no longer be increased, the demand will fall off with all holders trying to get rid of their coins. An example of this can be seen in cases of state currencies, in cases when the state in question dissolves and so no new supply of the currency is available (the central authority managing the supply is gone), however the demand for the currency falls sharply because confidence in its purchasing power disappears. Of-course Bitcoins do not have such central authority managing the supply of the coins, but it does not prevent confidence from eroding due to other situations that are not necessarily predictable.<br />
<br />
=== Is Bitcoin a bubble? ===<br />
Yes, in the same way as the euro and dollar are. They only have value in exchange and have no inherent value. If everyone suddenly stopped accepting your dollars, euros or bitcoins, the "bubble" would burst and their value would drop to zero. But that is unlikely to happen: even in Somalia, where the government collapsed 20 years ago, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Somali_shilling Somali shillings] are still accepted as payment.<br />
<br />
=== Is Bitcoin a Ponzi scheme? ===<br />
In a Ponzi Scheme, the founders persuade investors that they’ll profit. Bitcoin does not make such a guarantee. There is no central entity, just individuals building an economy.<br />
<br />
A ponzi scheme is a zero sum game. Early adopters can only profit at the expense of late adopters. Bitcoin has possible win-win outcomes. Early adopters profit from the rise in value. Late adopters, and indeed, society as a whole, benefit from the usefulness of a stable, fast, inexpensive, and widely accepted p2p currency.<br />
<br />
The fact that early adopters benefit more doesn't alone make anything a Ponzi scheme. All good investments in successful companies have this quality.<br />
<br />
=== Doesn't Bitcoin unfairly benefit early adopters? ===<br />
Early adopters have a large number of bitcoins now because they took a risk and invested resources in an unproven technology. By so doing, they have helped Bitcoin become what it is now and what it will be in the future (hopefully, a ubiquitous decentralized digital currency). It is only fair they will reap the benefits of their successful investment.<br />
<br />
In any case, any bitcoin generated will probably change hands dozens of time as a medium of exchange, so the profit made from the initial distribution will be insignificant compared to the total commerce enabled by Bitcoin.<br />
<br />
Since the pricing of Bitcoins has fallen greatly from its June 2011 peak, prices today are much more similar to those enjoyed by many early adopters. Those who are buying Bitcoins today likely believe that Bitcoin will grow significantly in the future. Setting aside the brief opportunity to have sold Bitcoins at the June 2011 peak enjoyed by few, the early-adopter window is arguably still open.<br />
<br />
===Won't loss of wallets and the finite amount of Bitcoins create excessive deflation, destroying Bitcoin? ===<br />
Worries about Bitcoin being destroyed by deflation are not entirely unfounded. Unlike most currencies, which experience inflation as their founding institutions create more and more units, Bitcoin will likely experience gradual deflation with the passage of time. Bitcoin is unique in that only a small amount of units will ever be produced (twenty-one million to be exact), this number has been known since the project's inception, and the units are created at a predictable rate.<br />
<br />
Also, Bitcoin users are faced with a danger that doesn't threaten users of any other currency: if a Bitcoin user loses his wallet, his money is gone forever, unless he finds it again. And not just to him; it's gone completely out of circulation, rendered utterly inaccessible to anyone. As people will lose their wallets, the total number of Bitcoins will slowly decrease.<br />
<br />
Therefore, Bitcoin seems to be faced with a unique problem. Whereas most currencies inflate over time, Bitcoin will mostly likely do just the opposite. Time will see the irretrievable loss of an ever-increasing number of Bitcoins. An already small number will be permanently whittled down further and further. And as there become fewer and fewer Bitcoins, the laws of supply and demand suggest that their value will probably continually rise.<br />
<br />
Thus Bitcoin is bound to once again stray into mysterious territory, because no one exactly knows what happens to a currency that grows continually more valuable. Many economists claim that a low level of inflation is a good thing for a currency, but nobody is quite sure about what might happens to one that continually deflates. Although deflation could hardly be called a rare phenomenon, steady, constant deflation is unheard of. There may be a lot of speculation, no one has any hard data to back up their claims.<br />
<br />
That being said, there is a mechanism in place to combat the obvious consequences. Extreme deflation would render most currencies highly impractical: if a single Canadian dollar could suddenly buy the holder a car, how would one go about buying bread or candy? Even pennies would fetch more than a person could carry. Bitcoin, however, offers a simple and stylish solution: infinite divisibility. Bitcoins can be divided up and trade into as small of pieces as one wants, so no matter how valuable Bitcoins become, one can trade them in practical quantities. <br />
<br />
In fact, infinite divisibility should allow Bitcoins to function in cases of extreme wallet loss. Even if, in the far future, so many people have lost their wallets that only a single Bitcoin, or a fraction of one, remains, Bitcoin should continue to function just fine. No one can claim to be sure what is going to happen, but deflation may prove to present a smaller threat than many expect.<br />
<br />
For more information, see the [[Deflationary spiral]] page.<br />
<br />
=== What if someone bought up all the existing Bitcoins? ===<br />
Bitcoin markets are competitive -- meaning the price of a bitcoin will rise or fall depending on supply and demand at certain price levels. Only a fraction of bitcoins issued to date are found on the exchange markets for sale. So even though technically a buyer with lots of money could buy all the bitcoins offered for sale, unless those holding the rest of the bitcoins offer them for sale as well, even the wealthiest, most determined buyer can't get at them.<br />
<br />
Additionally, new currency continues to be issued daily and will continue to do so for decades though over time the rate at which they are issued declines to insignificant levels. Those who are mining aren't obligated to sell their bitcoins so not all bitcoins will make it to the markets even.<br />
<br />
This situation doesn't suggest, however, that the markets aren't vulnerable to price manipulation. It doesn't take significant amounts of money to move the market price up or down and thus Bitcoin remains a volatile asset.<br />
<br />
===What if someone creates a new block chain, or a new digital currency that renders Bitcoin obsolete?===<br />
<br />
That the block chain cannot be easily forked represents one of the central security mechanisms of Bitcoin. Given the choice between two block chains, a Bitcoin miner always chooses the longer one - that is to say, the one with the more complex hash. Thusly, it ensures that each user can only spend their bitcoins once, and that no user gets ripped off.<br />
<br />
As a consequence of the block chain structure, there may at any time be many different sub-branches, and the possibility always exists of a transaction being over-written by the longest branch, if it has been recorded in a shorter one. The older a transaction is though, the lower its chances of being over-written, and the higher of becoming permanent. Although the block chain prevents one from spending more Bitcoins than one has, it means that transactions can be accidentally nullified. <br />
<br />
A new block chain would leave the network vulnerable to [[double-spending|double-spend]] attacks. However, the creation of a viable new chain presents considerable difficulty, and the possibility does not present much of a risk.<br />
<br />
Bitcoin will always choose the longer Block Chain and determines the relative length of two branches by the complexities of their hashes. Since the hash of each new block is made from that of the block preceding it, to create a block with a more complex hash, one must be prepared to do more computation than has been done by the entire Bitcoin network from the fork point up to the newest of the blocks one is trying to supersede. Needless to say, such an undertaking would require a very large amount of processing power and since Bitcoin is continually growing and expanding, it will likely only require more with the passage of time.<br />
<br />
A much more distinct and real threat to the Bitcoin use is the development of other, superior virtual currencies, which could supplant Bitcoin and render it obsolete and valueless.<br />
<br />
A great deal of careful thought and ingenuity has gone into the development of Bitcoin, but it is the first of its breed, a prototype, and vulnerable to more highly-evolved competitors. At present, any threatening rivals have yet to rear their heads; Bitcoin remains the first and foremost private virtual currency, but we can offer no guarantees that it will retain that position. It would certainly be in keeping with internet history for a similar system built from the same principles to supersede and cast Bitcoin into obsolescence, after time had revealed its major shortcomings. Friendster and Myspace suffered similar fates at the hand of Facebook, Napster was ousted by Limeware, Bearshare and torrent applications, and Skype has all but crushed the last few disciples of the Microsoft Messenger army. <br />
<br />
This may sound rather foreboding, so bear in mind that the introduction of new and possibly better virtual currencies will not necessarily herald Bitcoin's demise. If Bitcoin establishes itself sufficiently firmly before the inception of the next generation of private, online currencies so as to gain widespread acceptance and general stability, future currencies may pose little threat even if they can claim superior design. This is known as the network effect.<br />
<br />
=== Is Bitcoin open to value manipulation? ===<br />
<br />
The current low market cap of Bitcoin means that any investor with deep enough pockets can significantly change/manipulate the rate. Is this a problem?<br />
<br />
This is only a problem if you are investing in Bitcoin for short period of time. A manipulator can't change the fundamentals, and over a period of 5-10 years they will win over any short term manipulations.<br />
<br />
==Sending and Receiving Payments==<br />
<br />
=== Why do I have to wait 10 minutes before I can spend money I received? ===<br />
<br />
10 minutes is the average time taken to find a block. It can be significantly more or less time than that depending on luck; 10 minutes is simply the average case. <br />
<br />
You can see how long all other recent transactions have taken here: [http://bitcoinstats.org/ BitcoinStats.org]. <br />
<br />
[[Blocks]] (shown as "confirmations" in the GUI) are how the Bitcoin achieves consensus on who owns what. Once a block is found everyone agrees that you now own those coins, so you can spend them again. Until then it's possible that some network nodes believe otherwise, if somebody is attempting to defraud the system by reversing a transaction. The more confirmations a transaction has, the less risk there is of a reversal. Only 6 blocks or 1 hour is enough to make reversal computationally impractical. This is dramatically better than credit cards which can see chargebacks occur up to three months after the original transaction!<br />
<br />
Ten minutes was specifically chosen by [[Satoshi]] as a tradeoff between propagation time of new blocks in large networks and the amount of work wasted due to chain splits. For a more technical explanation, see Satoshi's [http://www.bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf original technical paper].<br />
<br />
[[File:TransactionConfirmationTimesExample.PNG]]<br />
<br />
=== Do you have to wait until my transactions are confirmed in order to buy or sell things with Bitcoin? ===<br />
<br />
YES, you do, IF the transaction is non-recourse. The Bitcoin reference software does not display transactions as confirmed until six blocks have passed (confirmations). As transactions are burred in the chain they become increasingly non-reversible but are very reversible before the first confirmation. Two to six confirmations are recommended for non-recourse situations depending on the value of the transactions involved.<br />
<br />
When people ask this question they are usually thinking about applications like supermarkets. This generally is a recourse situation: if somebody tries to double-spend on a face-to-face transaction it might work a few times, but probabalistically speaking eventually one of the double-spends will get noticed, and the penalty for shoplifting charges in most localities is calibrated to be several times worse than the proceeds of a single shoplifting event.<br />
<br />
Double-spends might be a concern for something like a snack machine in a low-traffic area with no nearby security cameras. Such a machine shouldn't honor 0-confirmation payments, and should instead use some other mechanism of clearing Bitcoin or validating transactions against reversal, see the wiki article [[Myths#Point_of_sale_with_bitcoins_isn.27t_possible_because_of_the_10_minute_wait_for_confirmation|here]] for alternatives.<br />
<br />
Applications that require immediate payment processing, like supermarkets or snack machines, need to manage the risks. Here is one way to reverse an unconfirmed payment:<br />
<br />
A [[Double-spending#Finney_attack|Finney attack]], in which an attacker mines a block containing a movement of some coins back to themselves. Once they find a block solution, they quickly go to a merchant and make a purchase, then broadcast the block, thus taking back the coins. This attack is a risk primarily for goods that are dispatched immediately, like song downloads or currency trades. Because the attacker can't choose the time of the attack, it isn't a risk for merchants such as supermarkets where you can't choose exactly when to pay (due to queues, etc). The attack can fail if somebody else finds a block containing the purchasing transaction before you release your own block, therefore, merchants can reduce but not eliminate the risk by making purchasers wait some length of time that's less than a confirm.<br />
<br />
Because pulling off this attack is not trivial, merchants who need to sell things automatically and instantly are most likely to just price the cost of reversal fraud in, or use insurance.<br />
<br />
=== I was sent some bitcoins and they haven't arrived yet! Where are they? ===<br />
<br />
Don't panic! There are a number of reasons why your bitcoins might not show up yet, and a number of ways to diagnose them. <br />
<br />
The latest version of the Bitcoin-Qt client tells you how far it has yet to go in downloading the blockchain. Hover over the icon in the bottom right corner of the client to learn your client's status.<br />
<br />
If it has not caught up then it's possible that your transaction hasn't been included in a block yet. <br />
<br />
You can check pending transactions in the network by going [http://blockchain.info here] and then searching for your address. If the transaction is listed here then it's a matter of waiting until it gets included in a block before it will show in your client. <br />
<br />
If the transaction is based on a coin that was in a recent transaction then it could be considered a low priority transaction. Transfers can take longer if the transaction fee paid was not high enough. If there is no fee at all the transfer can get a very low priority and take hours or even days to be included in a block.<br />
<br />
=== Why does my Bitcoin address keep changing? ===<br />
<br />
Whenever the address listed in "Your address" receives a transaction, Bitcoin replaces it with a new address. This is meant to encourage you to use a new address for every transaction, which enhances [[anonymity]]. All of your old addresses are still usable: you can see them in ''Settings -> Your Receiving Addresses''.<br />
<br />
===How much will the transaction fee be?===<br />
<br />
Some transactions might require a [[transaction fee]] for them to get confirmed in a timely manner. The transaction fee is processed by and received by the bitcoin miner. The most recent version of the Bitcoin client will estimate an appropriate fee when a fee might be required.<br />
<br />
The fee is added to the payment amount. For example, if you are sending a 1.234 BTC payment and the client requires a 0.0005 BTC fee, then 1.2345 BTC will be subtracted from the wallet balance for the entire transaction and the address for where the payment was sent will receive a payment of 1.234 BTC.<br />
<br />
A fee might be imposed because your transaction looks like a denial of service attack to the Bitcoin system. For example, it might be burdensome to transmit or it might recycle Bitcoins you recently received. The wallet software attempts to avoid generating burdensome transactions, but it isn't always able to do so: The funds in your wallet might be new or composed of many tiny payments. <br />
<br />
Because the fee is related to the amount of data that makes up the transaction and not to the amount of Bitcoins being sent, the fee may seem extremely low (0.0005 BTC for a 1,000 BTC transfer) or unfairly high (0.004 BTC for a 0.02 BTC payment, or about 20%). If you are receiving tiny amounts (''e.g.'' as small payments from a mining pool) then fees when sending will be higher than if your activity follows the pattern of conventional consumer or business transactions. <br />
<br />
As of Bitcoin 0.5.3 the required fee will not be higher than 0.05 BTC. For most users there is usually no required fee at all. If a fee is required it will most commonly be 0.0005 BTC.<br />
<br />
=== What happens when someone sends me a bitcoin but my computer is powered off? ===<br />
<br />
Bitcoins are not actually "sent" to your wallet; the software only uses that term so that we can use the currency without having to learn new concepts. Your wallet is only needed when you wish to spend coins that you've received.<br />
<br />
If you are sent coins when your wallet client program is not running, and you later launch the wallet client program, the coins will eventually appear as if they were just received in the wallet. That is to say, when the client program is started it must download blocks and catch up with any transactions it did not already know about.<br />
<br />
=== How long does "synchronizing" take when the Bitcoin client is first installed? What's it doing? ===<br />
<br />
The popular Bitcoin client software from bitcoin.org implements a "full" Bitcoin node: It can carry out all the duties of the Bitcoin P2P system, it isn't simply a "client". One of the principles behind the operation of full Bitcoin nodes is that they don't assume that the other participants have followed the rules of the Bitcoin system. During synchronization, the software is processing historical Bitcoin transactions and making sure for itself that all of the rules of the system have been correctly followed.<br />
<br />
In normal operation, after synchronizing, the software should use a hardly noticeable amount of your computer's resources.<br />
<br />
When the wallet client program is first installed, its initial validation requires a lot of work from your computer's hard disk, so the amount of time to synchronize depends on your disk speed and, to a lesser extent, your CPU speed. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or so. On a slow computer it could take more than 40 hours of continuous synchronization, so check your computer's power-saving settings to ensure that it does not turn its hard disk off when unattended for a few hours. You can use the Bitcoin software during synchronization, but you may not see recent payments to you until the client program has caught up to the point where those transactions happened.<br />
<br />
If you feel that this process takes too long, you can download a pre-synchronized blockchain from [http://eu2.bitcoincharts.com/blockchain/ http://eu2.bitcoincharts.com/blockchain/]. Alternatively, you can try an alternative "lite" client such as Multibit or a super-light client like electrum, though these clients have somewhat weaker security, are less mature, and don't contribute to the health of the P2P network.<br />
<br />
==Networking==<br />
=== Do I need to configure my firewall to run Bitcoin? ===<br />
<br />
Bitcoin will connect to other nodes, usually on TCP port 8333. You will need to allow outgoing TCP connections to port 8333 if you want to allow your Bitcoin client to connect to many nodes. [[Testnet]] uses TCP port 18333 instead of 8333.<br />
<br />
If you want to restrict your firewall rules to a few IPs, you can find stable nodes in the [[Fallback Nodes|fallback nodes list]].<br />
<br />
=== How does the peer finding mechanism work? ===<br />
<br />
Bitcoin finds peers primarily by forwarding peer announcements within its own network and each node saves a database of peers that it's aware of, for future use. In order to bootstrap this process Bitcoin needs a list of initial peers, these can be provided manually but normally it obtains them by querying a set of DNS domain names which have automatically updated lists, if that doesn't work it falls back to a built-in list which is updated from time to time in new versions of the software. There is also an IRC based mechanism but it is disabled by default.<br />
<br />
==Mining==<br />
===What is mining?===<br />
[[Mining]] is the process of spending computation power to secure Bitcoin transactions against reversal and introducing new Bitcoins to the system.<br />
<br />
Technically speaking, mining is the calculation of a [[hash]] of the a block header, which includes among other things a reference to the previous block, a hash of a set of transactions and a [[nonce]]. If the hash value is found to be less than the current [[target]] (which is inversely proportional to the [[difficulty]]), a new block is formed and the miner gets the newly generated Bitcoins (25 per block at current levels). If the hash is not less than the current target, a new nonce is tried, and a new hash is calculated. This is done millions of times per second by each miner.<br />
<br />
===Is mining used for some useful computation?===<br />
The computations done when mining are internal to Bitcoin and not related to any other distributed computing projects. They serve the purpose of securing the Bitcoin network, which is useful.<br />
<br />
===Is it not a waste of energy?===<br />
Spending energy on creating and securing a free monetary system is hardly a waste. Also, services necessary for the operation of currently widespread monetary systems, such as banks and credit card companies, also spend energy, arguably more than Bitcoin would.<br />
<br />
===Why don't we use calculations that are also useful for some other purpose?===<br />
To provide security for the Bitcoin network, the calculations involved need to have some [http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/5617/why-are-bitcoin-calculation-useless/5618#5618 very specific features]. These features are incompatible with leveraging the computation for other purposes.<br />
<br />
===How can we stop miners from creating zero transaction blocks?===<br />
The incentive for miners to include transactions is in the fees that come along with them. If we were to implement some minimum number of transactions per block it would be trivial for a miner to create and include transactions merely to surpass that threshold. As the network matures, the block reward drops, and miners become more dependent on transactions fees to pay their costs, the problem of zero transaction blocks should diminish over time.<br />
<br />
===How does the proof-of-work system help secure Bitcoin?===<br />
To give a general idea of the mining process, imagine this setup:<br />
<br />
payload = <some data related to things happening on the Bitcoin network><br />
nonce = 1<br />
hash = [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SHA2 SHA2]( [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SHA2 SHA2]( payload + nonce ) )<br />
<br />
The work performed by a miner consists of repeatedly increasing "nonce" until<br />
the hash function yields a value, that has the rare property of being below a certain<br />
target threshold. (In other words: The hash "starts with a certain number of zeroes",<br />
if you display it in the fixed-length representation, that is typically used.)<br />
<br />
As can be seen, the mining process doesn't compute anything special. It merely<br />
tries to find a number (also referred to as nonce) which - in combination with the payload -<br />
results in a hash with special properties.<br />
<br />
The advantage of using such a mechanism consists of the fact, that it is very easy to check a result: Given the payload and a specific nonce, only a single call of the hashing function is needed to verify that the hash has the required properties. Since there is no known way to find these hashes other than brute force, this can be used as a "proof of work" that someone invested a lot of computing power to find the correct nonce for this payload.<br />
<br />
This feature is then used in the Bitcoin network to secure various aspects. An attacker<br />
that wants to introduce malicious payload data into the network, will need to do the<br />
required proof of work before it will be accepted. And as long as honest miners have more<br />
computing power, they can always outpace an attacker.<br />
<br />
Also see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hashcash Hashcash] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof-of-work_system Proof-of-work system] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SHA2 SHA2] and on Wikipedia.<br />
<br />
===Why was the "Generate coin" option of the client software removed?===<br />
<br />
In the early days of Bitcoin, it was easy for anyone to find new blocks using standard CPUs. As more and more people started mining, the [[difficulty]] of finding new blocks has greatly increased to the point where the average time for a CPU to find a single block can be many years. The only cost-effective method of [[Mining|mining]] is using a high-end graphics card with special software (see also [[Why a GPU mines faster than a CPU]]) and/or joining a [[Bitcoin Pool|mining pool]]. Since solo CPU mining is essentially useless, it was removed from the GUI of the Bitcoin software.<br />
<br />
==Security==<br />
<br />
===Could miners collude to give themselves money or to fundamentally change the nature of Bitcoin?===<br />
<br />
There are two questions in here. Let's look at them separately.<br />
<br />
;Could miners gang up and give themselves money?<br />
<br />
Mining itself is the process of creating new blocks in the block chain. Each block contains a list of all the transactions that have taken place across the entire Bitcoin network since the last block was created, as well as a hash of the previous block. New blocks are 'mined', or rather, generated, by Bitcoin clients correctly guessing sequences of characters in codes called 'hashes,' which are created using information from previous blocks. Bitcoin users may download specialized 'mining' software, which allows them to dedicate some amount of their processing power – however large or small – to guessing at strings within the hash of the previous block. Whoever makes the right guess first, thus creating a new block, receives a reward in Bitcoins.<br />
<br />
The block chain is one of the two structures that makes Bitcoin secure, the other being the public-key encryption system on which Bitcoin trade is based. The block chain assures that not only is every single transaction that ever takes place recorded, but that every single transaction is recorded on the computer of anyone who chooses to store the relevant information. Many, many users have complete records of every transaction in Bitcoins history readily available to them at any point, and anyone who wants in the information can obtain it with ease. These things make Bitcoin very hard to fool.<br />
<br />
The Bitcoin network takes considerable processing power to run, and since those with the most processing power can make the most guesses, those who put the most power toward to sustaining the network earn the most currency. Each correct guess yields, at present, twenty-five Bitcoins, and as Bitcoins are presently worth something (although the value still fluctuates) every miner who earns any number of Bitcoins makes money. Some miners pull in Bitcoins on their own; and some also join or form pools wherein all who contribute earn a share of the profits. <br />
<br />
Therefore, first answer is a vehement “yes” – no only can miners collude to get more money, Bitcoin is designed to encourage them to do so. Bitcoin pools are communal affairs, and there is nothing dishonest or underhanded about them.<br />
<br />
Of course, the real question is:<br />
<br />
;Can they do so in ways not sanction by Bitcoin developers? Is there any way to rip off the network and make loads of money dishonestly?<br />
<br />
Bitcoin isn't infallible. It can be cheated, but doing so is extremely difficult. Bitcoin was designed to evade some of the central problems with modern currencies – namely, that their trustworthiness hinges upon that of people who might not have users' best interests in mind. Every currency in the world (other than Bitcoin) is controlled by large institutions who keep track of what's done with it, and who can manipulate its value. And every other currency has value because people trust the institutions that control them.<br />
<br />
Bitcoin doesn't ask that its users trust any institution. Its security is based on the cryptography that is an integral part of its structure, and that is readily available for any and all to see. Instead of one entity keeping track of transactions, the entire network does, so Bitcoins are astoundingly difficult to steal, or double-spend. Bitcoins are created in a regular and predictable fashion, and by many different users, so no one can decide to make a whole lot more and lessen their value. In short, Bitcoin is designed to be inflation-proof, double-spend-proof and completely distributed.<br />
<br />
Nonetheless, there are a few ways that one can acquire Bitcoins dishonestly. Firstly, one can steal private keys. Key theft isn't something that Bitcoin security has been designed to prevent: it's up to users to keep theirs safe. But the cryptography is designed so that it is completely impossible to deduce someone's private key from their public one. As long as you keep your private key to yourself, you don't have much to worry about. Furthermore, one could theoretically create a new block chain, but due to the way in which the block chain is constructed, this would be extremely difficult and require massive amounts of processing power. A full explanation of the difficulties involved can be found in the [[block chain]] article.<br />
<br />
Bitcoin can be ripped off – but doing so would be extremely hard and require considerable expertise and a staggering amount of processing power. And it's only going to get harder with time. Bitcoin isn't impenetrable, but it's close enough to put any real worries in the peripherals.<br />
<br />
;Could miners fundamentally change the nature of Bitcoin?<br />
<br />
Once again, almost certainly not.<br />
<br />
Bitcoin is a distributed network, so any changes implemented to the system must be accepted by all users. Someone trying to change the way Bitcoins are generated would have to convince every user to download and use their software – so the only changes that would go through are those that would be equally benefit all users. <br />
<br />
And thus, it is more or less impossible for anyone to change the function of Bitcoin to their advantage. If users don't like the changes, they won't adopt them, whereas if users do like them, then these will help everyone equally. Of course, one can conceive of a situation where someone manages to get a change pushed through that provides them with an advantage that no one notices, but given that Bitcoin is structurally relatively simple, it is unlikely that any major changes will go through without someone noticing first.<br />
<br />
The fact that such changes are so difficult to make testifies to the fully distributed nature of Bitcoin. Any centrally controlled currency can be modified by its central agency without the consent of its adherents. Bitcoin has no central authority, so it changes only at the behest of the whole community. Bitcoins development represents a kind of collective evolution; the first of its kind among currencies.<br />
<br />
==Help==<br />
===I'd like to learn more. Where can I get help?===<br />
<br />
* Read the [[Introduction|introduction to bitcoin]] <br />
* See the videos, podcasts, and blog posts from the [[Press]]<br />
* Read and post on the [[:Bitcoin:Community_portal#Bitcoin_Community_Forums|forums]]<br />
* Chat on one of the [[:Bitcoin:Community_portal#IRC_Chat|Bitcoin IRC]] channels<br />
* Listen to [http://omegataupodcast.net/2011/03/59-bitcoin-a-digital-decentralized-currency/ this podcast], which goes into the details of how bitcoin works<br />
* Ask questions on the [http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com Bitcoin Stack Exchange]<br />
<br />
==See Also==<br />
<br />
* [[Man page]]<br />
* [[Introduction]]<br />
<br />
[[de:FAQ]]<br />
[[zh-cn:FAQ]]<br />
[[fr:FAQ]]<br />
[[ru:FAQ]]<br />
<br />
[[Category:Technical]]<br />
[[Category:Vocabulary]]</div>
Http
https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Talk:Block_chain&diff=36560
Talk:Block chain
2013-04-01T15:33:30Z
<p>Http: Orphan chains</p>
<hr />
<div>''"More serious forks have occurred after fixing bugs that required backward-incompatible changes."'' Any more infos on this? What kind of forks respective bugs were this?<br />
<br />
Describing the main orphan chains and their reason would also be useful. --[[User:Http|Http]] ([[User talk:Http|talk]]) 15:33, 1 April 2013 (GMT)</div>
Http
https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Help:FAQ&diff=36558
Help:FAQ
2013-04-01T14:53:24Z
<p>Http: /* Won't loss of wallets and the finite amount of Bitcoins create excessive deflation, destroying Bitcoin? */ grammar fix and remove some unnecessary spaces</p>
<hr />
<div>Here you will find answers to the most commonly asked questions.<br />
<br />
== General ==<br />
=== What are bitcoins? ===<br />
Bitcoins are the unit of currency of the Bitcoin system. A commonly used shorthand for this is “BTC” to refer to a price or amount (eg: “100 BTC”).<br />
There are such things as [[physical bitcoins]], but ultimately, a bitcoin is just a number associated with a [[Address|Bitcoin Address]]. A physical bitcoin is simply an object, such as a coin, with the number carefully embedded inside. See also an [[Introduction|easy intro]] to bitcoin.<br />
<br />
=== How can I get bitcoins? ===<br />
<br />
There are a variety of ways to acquire bitcoins:<br />
<br />
* Accept bitcoins as payment for goods or services.<br />
* The most common way to buy bitcoins are the [[Buying bitcoins|Bitcoin Exchanges]]<br />
* There are several services where you can [[Buying_Bitcoins_(the_noob_version)|trade them]] for traditional currency.<br />
* Find someone to trade cash for bitcoins in-person through a [https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Category:Directories local directory].<br />
* Participate in a [[Pooled mining|mining pool]].<br />
* If you have a lot of mining hardware, you can solo mine and attempt to create a new [[block]] (currently yields 25 bitcoins plus transaction fees).<br />
<br />
===Does Bitcoin guarantee an influx of free money?===<br />
<br />
Since Bitcoin is a new technology, what it is and how it works may be initially unclear. Bitcoin is sometimes presented as being one of three things:<br />
<ol style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;"><br />
<li>Some sort of online 'get-rich-quick' scam.</li><br />
<li>A loophole in the market economy, the installation of which guarantees a steady influx of cash.</li><br />
<li>A sure investment that will almost certainly yield a profit.</li><br />
</ol><br />
In fact, none of the above are true. Let's look at them independently.<br />
<br />
;Is Bitcoin a 'get-rich-quick' scheme?<br />
:If you've spent much time on the Internet, you've probably seen ads for many 'get-rich-quick' schemes. These ads usually promise huge profits for a small amounts of easy work. Such schemes are usually pyramid/matrix-style schemes that make money from their own employees and offer nothing of any real value. Most convince one to buy packages that will make them earn hundreds a day, which in fact have the buyer distribute more such ads, and make minute profits.<br />
<br />
:Bitcoin is in no way similar to these schemes. Bitcoin doesn't promise windfall profits. There is no way for the developers to make money from your involvement or to take money from you. That bitcoins are nearly impossible to acquire without the owner's consent represents one of its greatest strengths. Bitcoin is an experimental, virtual currency that may succeed or may fail. None of its developers expect to get rich off of it. <br />
<br />
:A more detailed answer to this question can be found [http://bitcointalk.org/?topic=7815.0 here].<br />
<br />
;Will I make money by installing the client?<br />
:Most people who use Bitcoin don't earn anything by doing so, and the default client has no built-in way to earn Bitcoins. A small minority of people with dedicated, high-performance hardware do earn some Bitcoins by "''mining''" (generating new bitcoins, see [[#What is mining?|What is mining?]]) with special software, but joining Bitcoin shouldn't be construed as being the road to riches. Most Bitcoin users get involved because they find the project conceptually interesting and don't earn anything by doing so. This is also why you won't find much speculation about the political or economic repercussions of Bitcoin anywhere on this site: Bitcoin developers owe their dedication to the project's intellectual yieldings more than to those of a monetary nature. Bitcoin is still taking its first baby steps; it may go on to do great things but right now it only has something to offer those chasing conceptually interesting projects or bleeding edge technology.<br />
<br />
;As an investment, is Bitcoin a sure thing?<br />
:Bitcoin is a new and interesting electronic currency, the value of which is not backed by any single government or organization. Like other currencies, it is worth something partly because people are willing to trade it for goods and services. Its exchange rate fluctuates continuously, and sometimes wildly. It lacks wide acceptance and is vulnerable to manipulation by parties with modest funding. Security incidents such as website and account compromise may trigger major sell-offs. Other fluctuations can build into positive feedback loops and cause much larger exchange rate fluctuations. Anyone who puts money into Bitcoin should understand the risk they are taking and consider it a high-risk currency. Later, as Bitcoin becomes better known and more widely accepted, it may stabilize, but for the time being it is unpredictable. Any investment in Bitcoin should be done carefully and with a clear plan to manage the risk.<br />
<br />
=== Can I buy bitcoins with Paypal? ===<br />
<br />
It is possible to buy [[physical bitcoins]] with PayPal but it is otherwise difficult and/or expensive to do so for non-physical bitcoins, because of significant risk to the seller. <br />
<br />
While it is possible to find an individual who wishes to sell Bitcoin to you via Paypal, (perhaps via [http://www.bitcoin-otc.com/ #bitcoin-otc] ) most exchanges do not allow funding through PayPal. This is due to repeated cases where someone pays for bitcoins with Paypal, receives their bitcoins, and then fraudulently complains to Paypal that they never received their purchase. PayPal often sides with the fraudulent buyer in this case, which means any seller needs to cover that risk with higher fees or refuse to accept PayPal altogether.<br />
<br />
Buying Bitcoins from individuals this way is still possible, but requires the seller to have some trust that the buyer will not file a claim with PayPal to reverse the payment.<br />
<br />
=== Where can I find a forum to discuss Bitcoin? ===<br />
<br />
Please visit the [[Bitcoin:Community_portal#Bitcoin_Community_Forums_on_various_platforms|Community Portal]] for links to Bitcoin-related forums.<br />
<br />
=== How are new bitcoins created? ===<br />
<br />
[[File:total_bitcoins_over_time_graph.png|thumb|Number of bitcoins over time, assuming a perfect 10-minute interval.]]<br />
New bitcoins are generated by the network through the process of "[[#What is mining?|''mining'']]". In a process that is similar to a continuous raffle draw, mining nodes on the network are awarded bitcoins each time they find the solution to a certain mathematical problem (and thereby create a new [[block]]). Creating a block is a [[proof of work]] with a difficulty that varies with the overall strength of the network. The reward for solving a block is [[Controlled Currency Supply|automatically adjusted]] so that roughly every four years of operation of the Bitcoin network, half the amount of bitcoins created in the prior 4 years are created. {{formatnum:10500000}} bitcoins were created in the first 4 (approx.) years from January 2009 to November 2012. Every four years thereafter this amount halves, so it will be {{formatnum:5250000}} over years 4-8, {{formatnum:2625000}} over years 8-12, and so on. Thus the total number of bitcoins in existence will never exceed {{formatnum:21000000}}. See [[Controlled Currency Supply]].<br />
<br />
Blocks are [[Mining|mined]] every 10 minutes, on average and for the first four years ({{formatnum:210000}} blocks) each block included 50 new bitcoins. As the amount of processing power directed at mining changes, the difficulty of creating new bitcoins changes. This difficulty factor is calculated every 2016 blocks and is based upon the time taken to generate the previous 2016 blocks. See [[Mining]].<br />
<br />
=== What's the current total number of bitcoins in existence? ===<br />
<br />
[http://blockexplorer.com/q/totalbc Current count]. Also see [https://blockchain.info/charts/total-bitcoins Total bitcoins in circulation chart]<br />
<br />
The number of blocks times the coin value of a block is the number of coins in existence. The coin value of a block is 50 BTC for each of the first {{formatnum:210000}} blocks, 25 BTC for the next {{formatnum:210000}} blocks, then 12.5 BTC, 6.25 BTC and so on.<br />
<br />
=== How divisible are bitcoins? ===<br />
<br />
A bitcoin can be divided down to 8 decimal places. Therefore, 0.00000001 BTC is the smallest amount that can be handled in a transaction. If necessary, the protocol and related software can be modified to handle even smaller amounts.<br />
<br />
=== What do I call the various denominations of bitcoin? ===<br />
<br />
There is a lot of discussion about the naming of these fractions of bitcoins. The leading candidates are:<br />
<br />
* 1 BTC = 1 bitcoin<br />
* 0.01 BTC = 1 cBTC = 1 centibitcoin (also referred to as bitcent)<br />
* 0.001 BTC = 1 mBTC = 1 millibitcoin (also referred to as mbit (pronounced em-bit) or millibit or even bitmill)<br />
* 0.000 001 BTC = 1 μBTC = 1 microbitcoin (also referred to as ubit (pronounced yu-bit) or microbit)<br />
<br />
The above follows the accepted international SI prefixes for hundredths, thousandths, and millionths. There are many arguments against the special case of 0.01 BTC since it is unlikely to represent anything meaningful as the Bitcoin economy grows (it certainly won't be the equivalent of 0.01 USD, GBP or EUR). Equally, the inclusion of existing national currency denominations such as "cent", "nickel", "dime", "pence", "pound", "kopek" and so on are to be discouraged; this is a worldwide currency.<br />
<br />
One exception is the "satoshi" which is smallest denomination currently possible <br />
<br />
* 0.000 000 01 BTC = 1 satoshi (pronounced sa-toh-shee)<br />
which is so named in honour of Satoshi Nakamoto, the pseudonym of the inventor of Bitcoin.<br />
<br />
For an overview of all defined units of Bitcoin (including less common and niche units), see [[Units]].<br />
<br />
Further discussion on this topic can be found on the forums here:<br />
<br />
* [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=14438.msg195287#msg195287 We need names]<br />
* [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=8282.0 What to call 0.001 BTC]<br />
<br />
=== How does the halving work when the number gets really small? ===<br />
<br />
Eventually the reward will go from 0.00000001 BTC to zero and no more bitcoins will be created. <br />
<br />
The block reward calculation is done as a right bitwise shift of a 64-bit signed integer, which means it is divided by two and rounded down. The integer is equal to the value in BTC * 100,000,000 since internally in the reference client software, all Bitcoin balances and values are stored as unsigned integers.<br />
<br />
With an initial block reward of 50 BTC, it will take many 4-year periods for the block reward to reach zero.<br />
<br />
=== How long will it take to generate all the coins? ===<br />
<br />
The last block that will generate coins will be block #6,929,999 which should be generated at or near the year 2140. The total number of coins in circulation will then remain static at 20,999,999.9769 BTC.<br />
<br />
Even if the allowed precision is expanded from the current 8 decimals, the total BTC in circulation will always be slightly below 21 million (assuming everything else stays the same). For example, with 16 decimals of precision, the end total would be 20,999,999.999999999496 BTC.<br />
<br />
=== If no more coins are going to be generated, will more blocks be created? ===<br />
<br />
Absolutely! Even before the creation of coins ends, the use of [[transaction fee|transaction fees]] will likely make creating new blocks more valuable from the fees than the new coins being created. When coin generation ends, these fees will sustain the ability to use bitcoins and the Bitcoin network. There is no practical limit on the number of blocks that will be mined in the future.<br />
<br />
=== But if no more coins are generated, what happens when Bitcoins are lost? Won't that be a problem? ===<br />
<br />
Because of the law of supply and demand, when fewer bitcoins are available the ones that are left will be in higher demand, and therefore will have a higher value. So, as Bitcoins are lost, the remaining bitcoins will eventually increase in value to compensate. As the value of a bitcoin increases, the number of bitcoins required to purchase an item '''de'''creases. This is a [[Deflationary spiral|deflationary economic model]]. As the average transaction size reduces, transactions will probably be denominated in sub-units of a bitcoin such as millibitcoins ("Millies") or microbitcoins ("Mikes").<br />
<br />
The Bitcoin protocol uses a base unit of one hundred-millionth of a Bitcoin ("a Satoshi"), but unused bits are available in the protocol fields that could be used to denote even smaller subdivisions.<br />
<br />
=== If every transaction is broadcast via the network, does Bitcoin scale? ===<br />
The Bitcoin protocol allows lightweight clients that can use Bitcoin without downloading the entire transaction history. As traffic grows and this becomes more critical, implementations of the concept will be developed. Full network nodes will at some point become a more specialized service.<br />
<br />
With some modifications to the software, full Bitcoin nodes could easily keep up with both VISA and MasterCard combined, using only fairly modest hardware (a single high end server by todays standards). It is worth noting that the MasterCard network is structured somewhat like Bitcoin itself - as a peer to peer broadcast network.<br />
<br />
Learn more about [[Scalability]].<br />
<br />
==Economy==<br />
=== Where does the value of Bitcoin stem from? What backs up Bitcoin? ===<br />
Bitcoins have value because they are useful and because they are [[Controlled Currency Supply|scarce]]. As they are accepted by more merchants, their value will [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sticky_%28economics%29 stabilize]. See the [[Trade|list of Bitcoin-accepting sites]].<br />
<br />
When we say that a currency is backed up by gold, we mean that there's a promise in place that you can exchange the currency for gold. Bitcoins, like dollars and euros, are not backed up by anything except the variety of merchants that accept them.<br />
<br />
It's a common misconception that Bitcoins gain their value from the cost of electricity required to generate them. Cost doesn't equal value – hiring 1,000 men to shovel a big hole in the ground may be costly, but not valuable. Also, even though scarcity is a critical requirement for a useful currency, it alone doesn't make anything valuable. For example, your fingerprints are scarce, but that doesn't mean they have any exchange value.<br />
<br />
Alternatively it needs to be added that while the law of supply and demand applies it does not guarantee value of Bitcoins in the future. If confidence in Bitcoins is lost then it will not matter that the supply can no longer be increased, the demand will fall off with all holders trying to get rid of their coins. An example of this can be seen in cases of state currencies, in cases when the state in question dissolves and so no new supply of the currency is available (the central authority managing the supply is gone), however the demand for the currency falls sharply because confidence in its purchasing power disappears. Of-course Bitcoins do not have such central authority managing the supply of the coins, but it does not prevent confidence from eroding due to other situations that are not necessarily predictable.<br />
<br />
=== Is Bitcoin a bubble? ===<br />
Yes, in the same way as the euro and dollar are. They only have value in exchange and have no inherent value. If everyone suddenly stopped accepting your dollars, euros or bitcoins, the "bubble" would burst and their value would drop to zero. But that is unlikely to happen: even in Somalia, where the government collapsed 20 years ago, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Somali_shilling Somali shillings] are still accepted as payment.<br />
<br />
=== Is Bitcoin a Ponzi scheme? ===<br />
In a Ponzi Scheme, the founders persuade investors that they’ll profit. Bitcoin does not make such a guarantee. There is no central entity, just individuals building an economy.<br />
<br />
A ponzi scheme is a zero sum game. Early adopters can only profit at the expense of late adopters. Bitcoin has possible win-win outcomes. Early adopters profit from the rise in value. Late adopters, and indeed, society as a whole, benefit from the usefulness of a stable, fast, inexpensive, and widely accepted p2p currency.<br />
<br />
The fact that early adopters benefit more doesn't alone make anything a Ponzi scheme. All good investments in successful companies have this quality.<br />
<br />
=== Doesn't Bitcoin unfairly benefit early adopters? ===<br />
Early adopters have a large number of bitcoins now because they took a risk and invested resources in an unproven technology. By so doing, they have helped Bitcoin become what it is now and what it will be in the future (hopefully, a ubiquitous decentralized digital currency). It is only fair they will reap the benefits of their successful investment.<br />
<br />
In any case, any bitcoin generated will probably change hands dozens of time as a medium of exchange, so the profit made from the initial distribution will be insignificant compared to the total commerce enabled by Bitcoin.<br />
<br />
Since the pricing of Bitcoins has fallen greatly from its June 2011 peak, prices today are much more similar to those enjoyed by many early adopters. Those who are buying Bitcoins today likely believe that Bitcoin will grow significantly in the future. Setting aside the brief opportunity to have sold Bitcoins at the June 2011 peak enjoyed by few, the early-adopter window is arguably still open.<br />
<br />
===Won't loss of wallets and the finite amount of Bitcoins create excessive deflation, destroying Bitcoin? ===<br />
Worries about Bitcoin being destroyed by deflation are not entirely unfounded. Unlike most currencies, which experience inflation as their founding institutions create more and more units, Bitcoin will likely experience gradual deflation with the passage of time. Bitcoin is unique in that only a small amount of units will ever be produced (twenty-one million to be exact), this number has been known since the project's inception, and the units are created at a predictable rate.<br />
<br />
Also, Bitcoin users are faced with a danger that doesn't threaten users of any other currency: if a Bitcoin user loses his wallet, his money is gone forever, unless he finds it again. And not just to him; it's gone completely out of circulation, rendered utterly inaccessible to anyone. As people will lose their wallets, the total number of Bitcoins will slowly decrease.<br />
<br />
Therefore, Bitcoin seems to be faced with a unique problem. Whereas most currencies inflate over time, Bitcoin will mostly likely do just the opposite. Time will see the irretrievable loss of an ever-increasing number of Bitcoins. An already small number will be permanently whittled down further and further. And as there become fewer and fewer Bitcoins, the laws of supply and demand suggest that their value will probably continually rise.<br />
<br />
Thus Bitcoin is bound to once again stray into mysterious territory, because no one exactly knows what happens to a currency that grows continually more valuable. Many economists claim that a low level of inflation is a good thing for a currency, but nobody is quite sure about what might happens to one that continually deflates. Although deflation could hardly be called a rare phenomenon, steady, constant deflation is unheard of. There may be a lot of speculation, no one has any hard data to back up their claims.<br />
<br />
That being said, there is a mechanism in place to combat the obvious consequences. Extreme deflation would render most currencies highly impractical: if a single Canadian dollar could suddenly buy the holder a car, how would one go about buying bread or candy? Even pennies would fetch more than a person could carry. Bitcoin, however, offers a simple and stylish solution: infinite divisibility. Bitcoins can be divided up and trade into as small of pieces as one wants, so no matter how valuable Bitcoins become, one can trade them in practical quantities. <br />
<br />
In fact, infinite divisibility should allow Bitcoins to function in cases of extreme wallet loss. Even if, in the far future, so many people have lost their wallets that only a single Bitcoin, or a fraction of one, remains, Bitcoin should continue to function just fine. No one can claim to be sure what is going to happen, but deflation may prove to present a smaller threat than many expect.<br />
<br />
For more information, see the [[Deflationary spiral]] page.<br />
<br />
=== What if someone bought up all the existing Bitcoins? ===<br />
Bitcoin markets are competitive -- meaning the price of a bitcoin will rise or fall depending on supply and demand at certain price levels. Only a fraction of bitcoins issued to date are found on the exchange markets for sale. So even though technically a buyer with lots of money could buy all the bitcoins offered for sale, unless those holding the rest of the bitcoins offer them for sale as well, even the wealthiest, most determined buyer can't get at them.<br />
<br />
Additionally, new currency continues to be issued daily and will continue to do so for decades though over time the rate at which they are issued declines to insignificant levels. Those who are mining aren't obligated to sell their bitcoins so not all bitcoins will make it to the markets even.<br />
<br />
This situation doesn't suggest, however, that the markets aren't vulnerable to price manipulation. It doesn't take significant amounts of money to move the market price up or down and thus Bitcoin remains a volatile asset.<br />
<br />
===What if someone creates a new block chain, or a new digital currency that renders Bitcoin obsolete?===<br />
<br />
That the block chain cannot be easily forked represents one of the central security mechanisms of Bitcoin. Given the choice between two block chains, a Bitcoin miner always chooses the longer one - that is to say, the one with the more complex hash. Thusly, it ensures that each user can only spend their bitcoins once, and that no user gets ripped off.<br />
<br />
As a consequence of the block chain structure, there may at any time be many different sub-branches, and the possibility always exists of a transaction being over-written by the longest branch, if it has been recorded in a shorter one. The older a transaction is though, the lower its chances of being over-written, and the higher of becoming permanent. Although the block chain prevents one from spending more Bitcoins than one has, it means that transactions can be accidentally nullified. <br />
<br />
A new block chain would leave the network vulnerable to [[double-spending|double-spend]] attacks. However, the creation of a viable new chain presents considerable difficulty, and the possibility does not present much of a risk.<br />
<br />
Bitcoin will always choose the longer Block Chain and determines the relative length of two branches by the complexities of their hashes. Since the hash of each new block is made from that of the block preceding it, to create a block with a more complex hash, one must be prepared to do more computation than has been done by the entire Bitcoin network from the fork point up to the newest of the blocks one is trying to supersede. Needless to say, such an undertaking would require a very large amount of processing power and since Bitcoin is continually growing and expanding, it will likely only require more with the passage of time.<br />
<br />
A much more distinct and real threat to the Bitcoin use is the development of other, superior virtual currencies, which could supplant Bitcoin and render it obsolete and valueless.<br />
<br />
A great deal of careful thought and ingenuity has gone into the development of Bitcoin, but it is the first of its breed, a prototype, and vulnerable to more highly-evolved competitors. At present, any threatening rivals have yet to rear their heads; Bitcoin remains the first and foremost private virtual currency, but we can offer no guarantees that it will retain that position. It would certainly be in keeping with internet history for a similar system built from the same principles to supersede and cast Bitcoin into obsolescence, after time had revealed its major shortcomings. Friendster and Myspace suffered similar fates at the hand of Facebook, Napster was ousted by Limeware, Bearshare and torrent applications, and Skype has all but crushed the last few disciples of the Microsoft Messenger army. <br />
<br />
This may sound rather foreboding, so bear in mind that the introduction of new and possibly better virtual currencies will not necessarily herald Bitcoin's demise. If Bitcoin establishes itself sufficiently firmly before the inception of the next generation of private, online currencies so as to gain widespread acceptance and general stability, future currencies may pose little threat even if they can claim superior design. This is known as the network effect.<br />
<br />
=== Is Bitcoin open to value manipulation? ===<br />
<br />
The current low market cap of Bitcoin means that any investor with deep enough pockets can significantly change/manipulate the rate. Is this a problem?<br />
<br />
This is only a problem if you are investing in Bitcoin for short period of time. A manipulator can't change the fundamentals, and over a period of 5-10 years they will win over any short term manipulations.<br />
<br />
==Sending and Receiving Payments==<br />
<br />
=== Why do I have to wait 10 minutes before I can spend money I received? ===<br />
<br />
10 minutes is the average time taken to find a block. It can be significantly more or less time than that depending on luck; 10 minutes is simply the average case. <br />
<br />
You can see how long all other recent transactions have taken here: [http://bitcoinstats.org/ BitcoinStats.org]. <br />
<br />
[[Blocks]] (shown as "confirmations" in the GUI) are how the Bitcoin achieves consensus on who owns what. Once a block is found everyone agrees that you now own those coins, so you can spend them again. Until then it's possible that some network nodes believe otherwise, if somebody is attempting to defraud the system by reversing a transaction. The more confirmations a transaction has, the less risk there is of a reversal. Only 6 blocks or 1 hour is enough to make reversal computationally impractical. This is dramatically better than credit cards which can see chargebacks occur up to three months after the original transaction!<br />
<br />
Ten minutes was specifically chosen by [[Satoshi]] as a tradeoff between propagation time of new blocks in large networks and the amount of work wasted due to chain splits. For a more technical explanation, see Satoshi's [http://www.bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf original technical paper].<br />
<br />
[[File:TransactionConfirmationTimesExample.PNG]]<br />
<br />
=== Do you have to wait until my transactions are confirmed in order to buy or sell things with Bitcoin? ===<br />
<br />
YES, you do, IF the transaction is non-recourse. The Bitcoin reference software does not display transactions as confirmed until six blocks have passed (confirmations). As transactions are burred in the chain they become increasingly non-reversible but are very reversible before the first confirmation. Two to six confirmations are recommended for non-recourse situations depending on the value of the transactions involved.<br />
<br />
When people ask this question they are usually thinking about applications like supermarkets. This generally is a recourse situation: if somebody tries to double-spend on a face-to-face transaction it might work a few times, but probabalistically speaking eventually one of the double-spends will get noticed, and the penalty for shoplifting charges in most localities is calibrated to be several times worse than the proceeds of a single shoplifting event.<br />
<br />
Double-spends might be a concern for something like a snack machine in a low-traffic area with no nearby security cameras. Such a machine shouldn't honor 0-confirmation payments, and should instead use some other mechanism of clearing Bitcoin or validating transactions against reversal, see the wiki article [[Myths#Point_of_sale_with_bitcoins_isn.27t_possible_because_of_the_10_minute_wait_for_confirmation|here]] for alternatives.<br />
<br />
Applications that require immediate payment processing, like supermarkets or snack machines, need to manage the risks. Here is one way to reverse an unconfirmed payment:<br />
<br />
A [[Double-spending#Finney_attack|Finney attack]], in which an attacker mines a block containing a movement of some coins back to themselves. Once they find a block solution, they quickly go to a merchant and make a purchase, then broadcast the block, thus taking back the coins. This attack is a risk primarily for goods that are dispatched immediately, like song downloads or currency trades. Because the attacker can't choose the time of the attack, it isn't a risk for merchants such as supermarkets where you can't choose exactly when to pay (due to queues, etc). The attack can fail if somebody else finds a block containing the purchasing transaction before you release your own block, therefore, merchants can reduce but not eliminate the risk by making purchasers wait some length of time that's less than a confirm.<br />
<br />
Because pulling off this attack is not trivial, merchants who need to sell things automatically and instantly are most likely to just price the cost of reversal fraud in, or use insurance.<br />
<br />
=== I was sent some bitcoins and they haven't arrived yet! Where are they? ===<br />
<br />
Don't panic! There are a number of reasons why your bitcoins might not show up yet, and a number of ways to diagnose them. <br />
<br />
The latest version of the Bitcoin-Qt client tells you how far it has yet to go in downloading the blockchain. Hover over the icon in the bottom right corner of the client to learn your client's status.<br />
<br />
If it has not caught up then it's possible that your transaction hasn't been included in a block yet. <br />
<br />
You can check pending transactions in the network by going [http://blockchain.info here] and then searching for your address. If the transaction is listed here then it's a matter of waiting until it gets included in a block before it will show in your client. <br />
<br />
If the transaction is based on a coin that was in a recent transaction then it could be considered a low priority transaction. Transfers can take longer if the transaction fee paid was not high enough. If there is no fee at all the transfer can get a very low priority and take hours or even days to be included in a block.<br />
<br />
=== Why does my Bitcoin address keep changing? ===<br />
<br />
Whenever the address listed in "Your address" receives a transaction, Bitcoin replaces it with a new address. This is meant to encourage you to use a new address for every transaction, which enhances [[anonymity]]. All of your old addresses are still usable: you can see them in ''Settings -> Your Receiving Addresses''.<br />
<br />
===How much will the transaction fee be?===<br />
<br />
Some transactions might require a [[transaction fee]] for them to get confirmed in a timely manner. The transaction fee is processed by and received by the bitcoin miner. The most recent version of the Bitcoin client will estimate an appropriate fee when a fee might be required.<br />
<br />
The fee is added to the payment amount. For example, if you are sending a 1.234 BTC payment and the client requires a 0.0005 BTC fee, then 1.2345 BTC will be subtracted from the wallet balance for the entire transaction and the address for where the payment was sent will receive a payment of 1.234 BTC.<br />
<br />
A fee might be imposed because your transaction looks like a denial of service attack to the Bitcoin system. For example, it might be burdensome to transmit or it might recycle Bitcoins you recently received. The wallet software attempts to avoid generating burdensome transactions, but it isn't always able to do so: The funds in your wallet might be new or composed of many tiny payments. <br />
<br />
Because the fee is related to the amount of data that makes up the transaction and not to the amount of Bitcoins being sent, the fee may seem extremely low (0.0005 BTC for a 1,000 BTC transfer) or unfairly high (0.004 BTC for a 0.02 BTC payment, or about 20%). If you are receiving tiny amounts (''e.g.'' as small payments from a mining pool) then fees when sending will be higher than if your activity follows the pattern of conventional consumer or business transactions. <br />
<br />
As of Bitcoin 0.5.3 the required fee will not be higher than 0.05 BTC. For most users there is usually no required fee at all. If a fee is required it will most commonly be 0.0005 BTC.<br />
<br />
=== What happens when someone sends me a bitcoin but my computer is powered off? ===<br />
<br />
Bitcoins are not actually "sent" to your wallet; the software only uses that term so that we can use the currency without having to learn new concepts. Your wallet is only needed when you wish to spend coins that you've received.<br />
<br />
If you are sent coins when your wallet client program is not running, and you later launch the wallet client program, the coins will eventually appear as if they were just received in the wallet. That is to say, when the client program is started it must download blocks and catch up with any transactions it did not already know about.<br />
<br />
=== How long does "synchronizing" take when the Bitcoin client is first installed? What's it doing? ===<br />
<br />
The popular Bitcoin client software from bitcoin.org implements a "full" Bitcoin node: It can carry out all the duties of the Bitcoin P2P system, it isn't simply a "client". One of the principles behind the operation of full Bitcoin nodes is that they don't assume that the other participants have followed the rules of the Bitcoin system. During synchronization, the software is processing historical Bitcoin transactions and making sure for itself that all of the rules of the system have been correctly followed.<br />
<br />
In normal operation, after synchronizing, the software should use a hardly noticeable amount of your computer's resources.<br />
<br />
When the wallet client program is first installed, its initial validation requires a lot of work from your computer's hard disk, so the amount of time to synchronize depends on your disk speed and, to a lesser extent, your CPU speed. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or so. On a slow computer it could take more than 40 hours of continuous synchronization, so check your computer's power-saving settings to ensure that it does not turn its hard disk off when unattended for a few hours. You can use the Bitcoin software during synchronization, but you may not see recent payments to you until the client program has caught up to the point where those transactions happened.<br />
<br />
If you feel that this process takes too long, you can download a pre-synchronized blockchain from [http://eu2.bitcoincharts.com/blockchain/ http://eu2.bitcoincharts.com/blockchain/]. Alternatively, you can try an alternative "lite" client such as Multibit or a super-light client like electrum, though these clients have somewhat weaker security, are less mature, and don't contribute to the health of the P2P network.<br />
<br />
==Networking==<br />
=== Do I need to configure my firewall to run Bitcoin? ===<br />
<br />
Bitcoin will connect to other nodes, usually on TCP port 8333. You will need to allow outgoing TCP connections to port 8333 if you want to allow your Bitcoin client to connect to many nodes. [[Testnet]] uses TCP port 18333 instead of 8333.<br />
<br />
If you want to restrict your firewall rules to a few IPs, you can find stable nodes in the [[Fallback Nodes|fallback nodes list]].<br />
<br />
=== How does the peer finding mechanism work? ===<br />
<br />
Bitcoin finds peers primarily by forwarding peer announcements within its own network and each node saves a database of peers that it's aware of, for future use. In order to bootstrap this process Bitcoin needs a list of initial peers, these can be provided manually but normally it obtains them by querying a set of DNS domain names which have automatically updated lists, if that doesn't work it falls back to a built-in list which is updated from time to time in new versions of the software. There is also an IRC based mechanism but it is disabled by default.<br />
<br />
==Mining==<br />
===What is mining?===<br />
[[Mining]] is the process of spending computation power to secure Bitcoin transactions against reversal and introducing new Bitcoins to the system.<br />
<br />
Technically speaking, mining is the calculation of a [[hash]] of the a block header, which includes among other things a reference to the previous block, a hash of a set of transactions and a [[nonce]]. If the hash value is found to be less than the current [[target]] (which is inversely proportional to the [[difficulty]]), a new block is formed and the miner gets the newly generated Bitcoins (25 per block at current levels). If the hash is not less than the current target, a new nonce is tried, and a new hash is calculated. This is done millions of times per second by each miner.<br />
<br />
===Is mining used for some useful computation?===<br />
The computations done when mining are internal to Bitcoin and not related to any other distributed computing projects. They serve the purpose of securing the Bitcoin network, which is useful.<br />
<br />
===Is it not a waste of energy?===<br />
Spending energy on creating and securing a free monetary system is hardly a waste. Also, services necessary for the operation of currently widespread monetary systems, such as banks and credit card companies, also spend energy, arguably more than Bitcoin would.<br />
<br />
===Why don't we use calculations that are also useful for some other purpose?===<br />
To provide security for the Bitcoin network, the calculations involved need to have some [http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/5617/why-are-bitcoin-calculation-useless/5618#5618 very specific features]. These features are incompatible with leveraging the computation for other purposes.<br />
<br />
===How can we stop miners from creating zero transaction blocks?===<br />
The incentive for miners to include transactions is in the fees that come along with them. If we were to implement some minimum number of transactions per block it would be trivial for a miner to create and include transactions merely to surpass that threshold. As the network matures, the block reward drops, and miners become more dependent on transactions fees to pay their costs, the problem of zero transaction blocks should diminish over time.<br />
<br />
===How does the proof-of-work system help secure Bitcoin?===<br />
To give a general idea of the mining process, imagine this setup:<br />
<br />
payload = <some data related to things happening on the Bitcoin network><br />
nonce = 1<br />
hash = [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SHA2 SHA2]( [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SHA2 SHA2]( payload + nonce ) )<br />
<br />
The work performed by a miner consists of repeatedly increasing "nonce" until<br />
the hash function yields a value, that has the rare property of being below a certain<br />
target threshold. (In other words: The hash "starts with a certain number of zeroes",<br />
if you display it in the fixed-length representation, that is typically used.)<br />
<br />
As can be seen, the mining process doesn't compute anything special. It merely<br />
tries to find a number (also referred to as nonce) which - in combination with the payload -<br />
results in a hash with special properties.<br />
<br />
The advantage of using such a mechanism consists of the fact, that it is very easy to check a result: Given the payload and a specific nonce, only a single call of the hashing function is needed to verify that the hash has the required properties. Since there is no known way to find these hashes other than brute force, this can be used as a "proof of work" that someone invested a lot of computing power to find the correct nonce for this payload.<br />
<br />
This feature is then used in the Bitcoin network to secure various aspects. An attacker<br />
that wants to introduce malicious payload data into the network, will need to do the<br />
required proof of work before it will be accepted. And as long as honest miners have more<br />
computing power, they can always outpace an attacker.<br />
<br />
Also see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hashcash Hashcash] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof-of-work_system Proof-of-work system] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SHA2 SHA2] and on Wikipedia.<br />
<br />
===Why was the "Generate coin" option of the client software removed?===<br />
<br />
In the early days of Bitcoin, it was easy for anyone to find new blocks using standard CPUs. As more and more people started mining, the [[difficulty]] of finding new blocks has greatly increased to the point where the average time for a CPU to find a single block can be many years. The only cost-effective method of [[Mining|mining]] is using a high-end graphics card with special software (see also [[Why a GPU mines faster than a CPU]]) and/or joining a [[Bitcoin Pool|mining pool]]. Since solo CPU mining is essentially useless, it was removed from the GUI of the Bitcoin software.<br />
<br />
==Security==<br />
<br />
===Could miners collude to give themselves money or to fundamentally change the nature of Bitcoin?===<br />
<br />
There are two questions in here. Let's look at them separately.<br />
<br />
;Could miners gang up and give themselves money?<br />
<br />
Mining itself is the process of creating new blocks in the block chain. Each block contains a list of all the transactions that have taken place across the entire Bitcoin network since the last block was created, as well as a hash of the previous block. New blocks are 'mined', or rather, generated, by Bitcoin clients correctly guessing sequences of characters in codes called 'hashes,' which are created using information from previous blocks. Bitcoin users may download specialized 'mining' software, which allows them to dedicate some amount of their processing power – however large or small – to guessing at strings within the hash of the previous block. Whoever makes the right guess first, thus creating a new block, receives a reward in Bitcoins.<br />
<br />
The block chain is one of the two structures that makes Bitcoin secure, the other being the public-key encryption system on which Bitcoin trade is based. The block chain assures that not only is every single transaction that ever takes place recorded, but that every single transaction is recorded on the computer of anyone who chooses to store the relevant information. Many, many users have complete records of every transaction in Bitcoins history readily available to them at any point, and anyone who wants in the information can obtain it with ease. These things make Bitcoin very hard to fool.<br />
<br />
The Bitcoin network takes considerable processing power to run, and since those with the most processing power can make the most guesses, those who put the most power toward to sustaining the network earn the most currency. Each correct guess yields, at present, twenty-five Bitcoins, and as Bitcoins are presently worth something (although the value still fluctuates) every miner who earns any number of Bitcoins makes money. Some miners pull in Bitcoins on their own; and some also join or form pools wherein all who contribute earn a share of the profits. <br />
<br />
Therefore, first answer is a vehement “yes” – no only can miners collude to get more money, Bitcoin is designed to encourage them to do so. Bitcoin pools are communal affairs, and there is nothing dishonest or underhanded about them.<br />
<br />
Of course, the real question is:<br />
<br />
;Can they do so in ways not sanction by Bitcoin developers? Is there any way to rip off the network and make loads of money dishonestly?<br />
<br />
Bitcoin isn't infallible. It can be cheated, but doing so is extremely difficult. Bitcoin was designed to evade some of the central problems with modern currencies – namely, that their trustworthiness hinges upon that of people who might not have users' best interests in mind. Every currency in the world (other than Bitcoin) is controlled by large institutions who keep track of what's done with it, and who can manipulate its value. And every other currency has value because people trust the institutions that control them.<br />
<br />
Bitcoin doesn't ask that its users trust any institution. Its security is based on the cryptography that is an integral part of its structure, and that is readily available for any and all to see. Instead of one entity keeping track of transactions, the entire network does, so Bitcoins are astoundingly difficult to steal, or double-spend. Bitcoins are created in a regular and predictable fashion, and by many different users, so no one can decide to make a whole lot more and lessen their value. In short, Bitcoin is designed to be inflation-proof, double-spend-proof and completely distributed.<br />
<br />
Nonetheless, there are a few ways that one can acquire Bitcoins dishonestly. Firstly, one can steal private keys. Key theft isn't something that Bitcoin security has been designed to prevent: it's up to users to keep theirs safe. But the cryptography is designed so that it is completely impossible to deduce someone's private key from their public one. As long as you keep your private key to yourself, you don't have much to worry about. Furthermore, one could theoretically create a new block chain, but due to the way in which the block chain is constructed, this would be extremely difficult and require massive amounts of processing power. A full explanation of the difficulties involved can be found in the [[block chain]] article.<br />
<br />
Bitcoin can be ripped off – but doing so would be extremely hard and require considerable expertise and a staggering amount of processing power. And it's only going to get harder with time. Bitcoin isn't impenetrable, but it's close enough to put any real worries in the peripherals.<br />
<br />
;Could miners fundamentally change the nature of Bitcoin?<br />
<br />
Once again, almost certainly not.<br />
<br />
Bitcoin is a distributed network, so any changes implemented to the system must be accepted by all users. Someone trying to change the way Bitcoins are generated would have to convince every user to download and use their software – so the only changes that would go through are those that would be equally benefit all users. <br />
<br />
And thus, it is more or less impossible for anyone to change the function of Bitcoin to their advantage. If users don't like the changes, they won't adopt them, whereas if users do like them, then these will help everyone equally. Of course, one can conceive of a situation where someone manages to get a change pushed through that provides them with an advantage that no one notices, but given that Bitcoin is structurally relatively simple, it is unlikely that any major changes will go through without someone noticing first.<br />
<br />
The fact that such changes are so difficult to make testifies to the fully distributed nature of Bitcoin. Any centrally controlled currency can be modified by its central agency without the consent of its adherents. Bitcoin has no central authority, so it changes only at the behest of the whole community. Bitcoins development represents a kind of collective evolution; the first of its kind among currencies.<br />
<br />
==Help==<br />
===I'd like to learn more. Where can I get help?===<br />
<br />
* Read the [[Introduction|introduction to bitcoin]] <br />
* See the videos, podcasts, and blog posts from the [[Press]]<br />
* Read and post on the [[Bitcoin:Community_portal#Bitcoin_Community_Forums|forums]]<br />
* Chat on one of the [[Bitcoin:Community_portal#IRC_Chat|Bitcoin IRC]] channels<br />
* Listen to [http://omegataupodcast.net/2011/03/59-bitcoin-a-digital-decentralized-currency/ this podcast], which goes into the details of how bitcoin works<br />
* Ask questions on the [http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com Bitcoin Stack Exchange]<br />
<br />
==See Also==<br />
<br />
* [[Man page]]<br />
* [[Introduction]]<br />
<br />
[[de:FAQ]]<br />
[[zh-cn:FAQ]]<br />
[[fr:FAQ]]<br />
[[ru:FAQ]]<br />
<br />
[[Category:Technical]]<br />
[[Category:Vocabulary]]</div>
Http
https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Help:FAQ&diff=36557
Help:FAQ
2013-04-01T14:49:15Z
<p>Http: /* Won't loss of wallets and the finite amount of Bitcoins create excessive deflation, destroying Bitcoin? */ typo</p>
<hr />
<div>Here you will find answers to the most commonly asked questions.<br />
<br />
== General ==<br />
=== What are bitcoins? ===<br />
Bitcoins are the unit of currency of the Bitcoin system. A commonly used shorthand for this is “BTC” to refer to a price or amount (eg: “100 BTC”).<br />
There are such things as [[physical bitcoins]], but ultimately, a bitcoin is just a number associated with a [[Address|Bitcoin Address]]. A physical bitcoin is simply an object, such as a coin, with the number carefully embedded inside. See also an [[Introduction|easy intro]] to bitcoin.<br />
<br />
=== How can I get bitcoins? ===<br />
<br />
There are a variety of ways to acquire bitcoins:<br />
<br />
* Accept bitcoins as payment for goods or services.<br />
* The most common way to buy bitcoins are the [[Buying bitcoins|Bitcoin Exchanges]]<br />
* There are several services where you can [[Buying_Bitcoins_(the_noob_version)|trade them]] for traditional currency.<br />
* Find someone to trade cash for bitcoins in-person through a [https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Category:Directories local directory].<br />
* Participate in a [[Pooled mining|mining pool]].<br />
* If you have a lot of mining hardware, you can solo mine and attempt to create a new [[block]] (currently yields 25 bitcoins plus transaction fees).<br />
<br />
===Does Bitcoin guarantee an influx of free money?===<br />
<br />
Since Bitcoin is a new technology, what it is and how it works may be initially unclear. Bitcoin is sometimes presented as being one of three things:<br />
<ol style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;"><br />
<li>Some sort of online 'get-rich-quick' scam.</li><br />
<li>A loophole in the market economy, the installation of which guarantees a steady influx of cash.</li><br />
<li>A sure investment that will almost certainly yield a profit.</li><br />
</ol><br />
In fact, none of the above are true. Let's look at them independently.<br />
<br />
;Is Bitcoin a 'get-rich-quick' scheme?<br />
:If you've spent much time on the Internet, you've probably seen ads for many 'get-rich-quick' schemes. These ads usually promise huge profits for a small amounts of easy work. Such schemes are usually pyramid/matrix-style schemes that make money from their own employees and offer nothing of any real value. Most convince one to buy packages that will make them earn hundreds a day, which in fact have the buyer distribute more such ads, and make minute profits.<br />
<br />
:Bitcoin is in no way similar to these schemes. Bitcoin doesn't promise windfall profits. There is no way for the developers to make money from your involvement or to take money from you. That bitcoins are nearly impossible to acquire without the owner's consent represents one of its greatest strengths. Bitcoin is an experimental, virtual currency that may succeed or may fail. None of its developers expect to get rich off of it. <br />
<br />
:A more detailed answer to this question can be found [http://bitcointalk.org/?topic=7815.0 here].<br />
<br />
;Will I make money by installing the client?<br />
:Most people who use Bitcoin don't earn anything by doing so, and the default client has no built-in way to earn Bitcoins. A small minority of people with dedicated, high-performance hardware do earn some Bitcoins by "''mining''" (generating new bitcoins, see [[#What is mining?|What is mining?]]) with special software, but joining Bitcoin shouldn't be construed as being the road to riches. Most Bitcoin users get involved because they find the project conceptually interesting and don't earn anything by doing so. This is also why you won't find much speculation about the political or economic repercussions of Bitcoin anywhere on this site: Bitcoin developers owe their dedication to the project's intellectual yieldings more than to those of a monetary nature. Bitcoin is still taking its first baby steps; it may go on to do great things but right now it only has something to offer those chasing conceptually interesting projects or bleeding edge technology.<br />
<br />
;As an investment, is Bitcoin a sure thing?<br />
:Bitcoin is a new and interesting electronic currency, the value of which is not backed by any single government or organization. Like other currencies, it is worth something partly because people are willing to trade it for goods and services. Its exchange rate fluctuates continuously, and sometimes wildly. It lacks wide acceptance and is vulnerable to manipulation by parties with modest funding. Security incidents such as website and account compromise may trigger major sell-offs. Other fluctuations can build into positive feedback loops and cause much larger exchange rate fluctuations. Anyone who puts money into Bitcoin should understand the risk they are taking and consider it a high-risk currency. Later, as Bitcoin becomes better known and more widely accepted, it may stabilize, but for the time being it is unpredictable. Any investment in Bitcoin should be done carefully and with a clear plan to manage the risk.<br />
<br />
=== Can I buy bitcoins with Paypal? ===<br />
<br />
It is possible to buy [[physical bitcoins]] with PayPal but it is otherwise difficult and/or expensive to do so for non-physical bitcoins, because of significant risk to the seller. <br />
<br />
While it is possible to find an individual who wishes to sell Bitcoin to you via Paypal, (perhaps via [http://www.bitcoin-otc.com/ #bitcoin-otc] ) most exchanges do not allow funding through PayPal. This is due to repeated cases where someone pays for bitcoins with Paypal, receives their bitcoins, and then fraudulently complains to Paypal that they never received their purchase. PayPal often sides with the fraudulent buyer in this case, which means any seller needs to cover that risk with higher fees or refuse to accept PayPal altogether.<br />
<br />
Buying Bitcoins from individuals this way is still possible, but requires the seller to have some trust that the buyer will not file a claim with PayPal to reverse the payment.<br />
<br />
=== Where can I find a forum to discuss Bitcoin? ===<br />
<br />
Please visit the [[Bitcoin:Community_portal#Bitcoin_Community_Forums_on_various_platforms|Community Portal]] for links to Bitcoin-related forums.<br />
<br />
=== How are new bitcoins created? ===<br />
<br />
[[File:total_bitcoins_over_time_graph.png|thumb|Number of bitcoins over time, assuming a perfect 10-minute interval.]]<br />
New bitcoins are generated by the network through the process of "[[#What is mining?|''mining'']]". In a process that is similar to a continuous raffle draw, mining nodes on the network are awarded bitcoins each time they find the solution to a certain mathematical problem (and thereby create a new [[block]]). Creating a block is a [[proof of work]] with a difficulty that varies with the overall strength of the network. The reward for solving a block is [[Controlled Currency Supply|automatically adjusted]] so that roughly every four years of operation of the Bitcoin network, half the amount of bitcoins created in the prior 4 years are created. {{formatnum:10500000}} bitcoins were created in the first 4 (approx.) years from January 2009 to November 2012. Every four years thereafter this amount halves, so it will be {{formatnum:5250000}} over years 4-8, {{formatnum:2625000}} over years 8-12, and so on. Thus the total number of bitcoins in existence will never exceed {{formatnum:21000000}}. See [[Controlled Currency Supply]].<br />
<br />
Blocks are [[Mining|mined]] every 10 minutes, on average and for the first four years ({{formatnum:210000}} blocks) each block included 50 new bitcoins. As the amount of processing power directed at mining changes, the difficulty of creating new bitcoins changes. This difficulty factor is calculated every 2016 blocks and is based upon the time taken to generate the previous 2016 blocks. See [[Mining]].<br />
<br />
=== What's the current total number of bitcoins in existence? ===<br />
<br />
[http://blockexplorer.com/q/totalbc Current count]. Also see [https://blockchain.info/charts/total-bitcoins Total bitcoins in circulation chart]<br />
<br />
The number of blocks times the coin value of a block is the number of coins in existence. The coin value of a block is 50 BTC for each of the first {{formatnum:210000}} blocks, 25 BTC for the next {{formatnum:210000}} blocks, then 12.5 BTC, 6.25 BTC and so on.<br />
<br />
=== How divisible are bitcoins? ===<br />
<br />
A bitcoin can be divided down to 8 decimal places. Therefore, 0.00000001 BTC is the smallest amount that can be handled in a transaction. If necessary, the protocol and related software can be modified to handle even smaller amounts.<br />
<br />
=== What do I call the various denominations of bitcoin? ===<br />
<br />
There is a lot of discussion about the naming of these fractions of bitcoins. The leading candidates are:<br />
<br />
* 1 BTC = 1 bitcoin<br />
* 0.01 BTC = 1 cBTC = 1 centibitcoin (also referred to as bitcent)<br />
* 0.001 BTC = 1 mBTC = 1 millibitcoin (also referred to as mbit (pronounced em-bit) or millibit or even bitmill)<br />
* 0.000 001 BTC = 1 μBTC = 1 microbitcoin (also referred to as ubit (pronounced yu-bit) or microbit)<br />
<br />
The above follows the accepted international SI prefixes for hundredths, thousandths, and millionths. There are many arguments against the special case of 0.01 BTC since it is unlikely to represent anything meaningful as the Bitcoin economy grows (it certainly won't be the equivalent of 0.01 USD, GBP or EUR). Equally, the inclusion of existing national currency denominations such as "cent", "nickel", "dime", "pence", "pound", "kopek" and so on are to be discouraged; this is a worldwide currency.<br />
<br />
One exception is the "satoshi" which is smallest denomination currently possible <br />
<br />
* 0.000 000 01 BTC = 1 satoshi (pronounced sa-toh-shee)<br />
which is so named in honour of Satoshi Nakamoto, the pseudonym of the inventor of Bitcoin.<br />
<br />
For an overview of all defined units of Bitcoin (including less common and niche units), see [[Units]].<br />
<br />
Further discussion on this topic can be found on the forums here:<br />
<br />
* [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=14438.msg195287#msg195287 We need names]<br />
* [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=8282.0 What to call 0.001 BTC]<br />
<br />
=== How does the halving work when the number gets really small? ===<br />
<br />
Eventually the reward will go from 0.00000001 BTC to zero and no more bitcoins will be created. <br />
<br />
The block reward calculation is done as a right bitwise shift of a 64-bit signed integer, which means it is divided by two and rounded down. The integer is equal to the value in BTC * 100,000,000 since internally in the reference client software, all Bitcoin balances and values are stored as unsigned integers.<br />
<br />
With an initial block reward of 50 BTC, it will take many 4-year periods for the block reward to reach zero.<br />
<br />
=== How long will it take to generate all the coins? ===<br />
<br />
The last block that will generate coins will be block #6,929,999 which should be generated at or near the year 2140. The total number of coins in circulation will then remain static at 20,999,999.9769 BTC.<br />
<br />
Even if the allowed precision is expanded from the current 8 decimals, the total BTC in circulation will always be slightly below 21 million (assuming everything else stays the same). For example, with 16 decimals of precision, the end total would be 20,999,999.999999999496 BTC.<br />
<br />
=== If no more coins are going to be generated, will more blocks be created? ===<br />
<br />
Absolutely! Even before the creation of coins ends, the use of [[transaction fee|transaction fees]] will likely make creating new blocks more valuable from the fees than the new coins being created. When coin generation ends, these fees will sustain the ability to use bitcoins and the Bitcoin network. There is no practical limit on the number of blocks that will be mined in the future.<br />
<br />
=== But if no more coins are generated, what happens when Bitcoins are lost? Won't that be a problem? ===<br />
<br />
Because of the law of supply and demand, when fewer bitcoins are available the ones that are left will be in higher demand, and therefore will have a higher value. So, as Bitcoins are lost, the remaining bitcoins will eventually increase in value to compensate. As the value of a bitcoin increases, the number of bitcoins required to purchase an item '''de'''creases. This is a [[Deflationary spiral|deflationary economic model]]. As the average transaction size reduces, transactions will probably be denominated in sub-units of a bitcoin such as millibitcoins ("Millies") or microbitcoins ("Mikes").<br />
<br />
The Bitcoin protocol uses a base unit of one hundred-millionth of a Bitcoin ("a Satoshi"), but unused bits are available in the protocol fields that could be used to denote even smaller subdivisions.<br />
<br />
=== If every transaction is broadcast via the network, does Bitcoin scale? ===<br />
The Bitcoin protocol allows lightweight clients that can use Bitcoin without downloading the entire transaction history. As traffic grows and this becomes more critical, implementations of the concept will be developed. Full network nodes will at some point become a more specialized service.<br />
<br />
With some modifications to the software, full Bitcoin nodes could easily keep up with both VISA and MasterCard combined, using only fairly modest hardware (a single high end server by todays standards). It is worth noting that the MasterCard network is structured somewhat like Bitcoin itself - as a peer to peer broadcast network.<br />
<br />
Learn more about [[Scalability]].<br />
<br />
==Economy==<br />
=== Where does the value of Bitcoin stem from? What backs up Bitcoin? ===<br />
Bitcoins have value because they are useful and because they are [[Controlled Currency Supply|scarce]]. As they are accepted by more merchants, their value will [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sticky_%28economics%29 stabilize]. See the [[Trade|list of Bitcoin-accepting sites]].<br />
<br />
When we say that a currency is backed up by gold, we mean that there's a promise in place that you can exchange the currency for gold. Bitcoins, like dollars and euros, are not backed up by anything except the variety of merchants that accept them.<br />
<br />
It's a common misconception that Bitcoins gain their value from the cost of electricity required to generate them. Cost doesn't equal value – hiring 1,000 men to shovel a big hole in the ground may be costly, but not valuable. Also, even though scarcity is a critical requirement for a useful currency, it alone doesn't make anything valuable. For example, your fingerprints are scarce, but that doesn't mean they have any exchange value.<br />
<br />
Alternatively it needs to be added that while the law of supply and demand applies it does not guarantee value of Bitcoins in the future. If confidence in Bitcoins is lost then it will not matter that the supply can no longer be increased, the demand will fall off with all holders trying to get rid of their coins. An example of this can be seen in cases of state currencies, in cases when the state in question dissolves and so no new supply of the currency is available (the central authority managing the supply is gone), however the demand for the currency falls sharply because confidence in its purchasing power disappears. Of-course Bitcoins do not have such central authority managing the supply of the coins, but it does not prevent confidence from eroding due to other situations that are not necessarily predictable.<br />
<br />
=== Is Bitcoin a bubble? ===<br />
Yes, in the same way as the euro and dollar are. They only have value in exchange and have no inherent value. If everyone suddenly stopped accepting your dollars, euros or bitcoins, the "bubble" would burst and their value would drop to zero. But that is unlikely to happen: even in Somalia, where the government collapsed 20 years ago, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Somali_shilling Somali shillings] are still accepted as payment.<br />
<br />
=== Is Bitcoin a Ponzi scheme? ===<br />
In a Ponzi Scheme, the founders persuade investors that they’ll profit. Bitcoin does not make such a guarantee. There is no central entity, just individuals building an economy.<br />
<br />
A ponzi scheme is a zero sum game. Early adopters can only profit at the expense of late adopters. Bitcoin has possible win-win outcomes. Early adopters profit from the rise in value. Late adopters, and indeed, society as a whole, benefit from the usefulness of a stable, fast, inexpensive, and widely accepted p2p currency.<br />
<br />
The fact that early adopters benefit more doesn't alone make anything a Ponzi scheme. All good investments in successful companies have this quality.<br />
<br />
=== Doesn't Bitcoin unfairly benefit early adopters? ===<br />
Early adopters have a large number of bitcoins now because they took a risk and invested resources in an unproven technology. By so doing, they have helped Bitcoin become what it is now and what it will be in the future (hopefully, a ubiquitous decentralized digital currency). It is only fair they will reap the benefits of their successful investment.<br />
<br />
In any case, any bitcoin generated will probably change hands dozens of time as a medium of exchange, so the profit made from the initial distribution will be insignificant compared to the total commerce enabled by Bitcoin.<br />
<br />
Since the pricing of Bitcoins has fallen greatly from its June 2011 peak, prices today are much more similar to those enjoyed by many early adopters. Those who are buying Bitcoins today likely believe that Bitcoin will grow significantly in the future. Setting aside the brief opportunity to have sold Bitcoins at the June 2011 peak enjoyed by few, the early-adopter window is arguably still open.<br />
<br />
===Won't loss of wallets and the finite amount of Bitcoins create excessive deflation, destroying Bitcoin? ===<br />
Worries about Bitcoin being destroyed by deflation are not entirely unfounded. Unlike most currencies, which experience inflation as their founding institutions create more and more units, Bitcoin will likely experience gradual deflation with the passage of time. Bitcoin is unique in that only a small amount of units will ever be produced (twenty-one million to be exact), this number has been known since the project's inception, and the units are created at a predictable rate.<br />
<br />
Also, Bitcoin users are faced with a danger that doesn't threaten users of any other currency: if a Bitcoin user loses his wallet, his money is gone forever, unless he finds it again. And not just to him; it's gone completely out of circulation, rendered utterly inaccessible to anyone. As people will lose their wallets, the total number of Bitcoins will slowly decrease.<br />
<br />
Therefore, Bitcoin seems to be faced with a unique problem. Whereas most currencies inflate over time, Bitcoin will mostly likely do the just the opposite. Time will see the irretrievable loss of an ever-increasing number of Bitcoins. An already small number will be permanently whittled down further and further. And as there become fewer and fewer Bitcoins, the laws of supply and demand suggest that their value will probably continually rise.<br />
<br />
Thus Bitcoin is bound to once again stray into mysterious territory, because no one exactly knows what happens to a currency that grows continually more valuable. Many economists claim that a low level of inflation is a good thing for a currency, but nobody is quite sure about what might happens to one that continually deflates. Although deflation could hardly be called a rare phenomenon, steady, constant deflation is unheard of. There may be a lot of speculation, no one has any hard data to back up their claims.<br />
<br />
That being said, there is a mechanism in place to combat the obvious consequences. Extreme deflation would render most currencies highly impractical: if a single Canadian dollar could suddenly buy the holder a car, how would one go about buying bread or candy? Even pennies would fetch more than a person could carry. Bitcoin, however, offers a simple and stylish solution: infinite divisibility. Bitcoins can be divided up and trade into as small of pieces as one wants, so no matter how valuable Bitcoins become, one can trade them in practical quantities. <br />
<br />
In fact, infinite divisibility should allow Bitcoins to function in cases of extreme wallet loss. Even if, in the far future, so many people have lost their wallets that only a single Bitcoin, or a fraction of one, remains, Bitcoin should continue to function just fine. No one can claim to be sure what is going to happen, but deflation may prove to present a smaller threat than many expect.<br />
<br />
For more information, see the [[Deflationary spiral]] page.<br />
<br />
=== What if someone bought up all the existing Bitcoins? ===<br />
Bitcoin markets are competitive -- meaning the price of a bitcoin will rise or fall depending on supply and demand at certain price levels. Only a fraction of bitcoins issued to date are found on the exchange markets for sale. So even though technically a buyer with lots of money could buy all the bitcoins offered for sale, unless those holding the rest of the bitcoins offer them for sale as well, even the wealthiest, most determined buyer can't get at them.<br />
<br />
Additionally, new currency continues to be issued daily and will continue to do so for decades though over time the rate at which they are issued declines to insignificant levels. Those who are mining aren't obligated to sell their bitcoins so not all bitcoins will make it to the markets even.<br />
<br />
This situation doesn't suggest, however, that the markets aren't vulnerable to price manipulation. It doesn't take significant amounts of money to move the market price up or down and thus Bitcoin remains a volatile asset.<br />
<br />
===What if someone creates a new block chain, or a new digital currency that renders Bitcoin obsolete?===<br />
<br />
That the block chain cannot be easily forked represents one of the central security mechanisms of Bitcoin. Given the choice between two block chains, a Bitcoin miner always chooses the longer one - that is to say, the one with the more complex hash. Thusly, it ensures that each user can only spend their bitcoins once, and that no user gets ripped off.<br />
<br />
As a consequence of the block chain structure, there may at any time be many different sub-branches, and the possibility always exists of a transaction being over-written by the longest branch, if it has been recorded in a shorter one. The older a transaction is though, the lower its chances of being over-written, and the higher of becoming permanent. Although the block chain prevents one from spending more Bitcoins than one has, it means that transactions can be accidentally nullified. <br />
<br />
A new block chain would leave the network vulnerable to [[double-spending|double-spend]] attacks. However, the creation of a viable new chain presents considerable difficulty, and the possibility does not present much of a risk.<br />
<br />
Bitcoin will always choose the longer Block Chain and determines the relative length of two branches by the complexities of their hashes. Since the hash of each new block is made from that of the block preceding it, to create a block with a more complex hash, one must be prepared to do more computation than has been done by the entire Bitcoin network from the fork point up to the newest of the blocks one is trying to supersede. Needless to say, such an undertaking would require a very large amount of processing power and since Bitcoin is continually growing and expanding, it will likely only require more with the passage of time.<br />
<br />
A much more distinct and real threat to the Bitcoin use is the development of other, superior virtual currencies, which could supplant Bitcoin and render it obsolete and valueless.<br />
<br />
A great deal of careful thought and ingenuity has gone into the development of Bitcoin, but it is the first of its breed, a prototype, and vulnerable to more highly-evolved competitors. At present, any threatening rivals have yet to rear their heads; Bitcoin remains the first and foremost private virtual currency, but we can offer no guarantees that it will retain that position. It would certainly be in keeping with internet history for a similar system built from the same principles to supersede and cast Bitcoin into obsolescence, after time had revealed its major shortcomings. Friendster and Myspace suffered similar fates at the hand of Facebook, Napster was ousted by Limeware, Bearshare and torrent applications, and Skype has all but crushed the last few disciples of the Microsoft Messenger army. <br />
<br />
This may sound rather foreboding, so bear in mind that the introduction of new and possibly better virtual currencies will not necessarily herald Bitcoin's demise. If Bitcoin establishes itself sufficiently firmly before the inception of the next generation of private, online currencies so as to gain widespread acceptance and general stability, future currencies may pose little threat even if they can claim superior design. This is known as the network effect.<br />
<br />
=== Is Bitcoin open to value manipulation? ===<br />
<br />
The current low market cap of Bitcoin means that any investor with deep enough pockets can significantly change/manipulate the rate. Is this a problem?<br />
<br />
This is only a problem if you are investing in Bitcoin for short period of time. A manipulator can't change the fundamentals, and over a period of 5-10 years they will win over any short term manipulations.<br />
<br />
==Sending and Receiving Payments==<br />
<br />
=== Why do I have to wait 10 minutes before I can spend money I received? ===<br />
<br />
10 minutes is the average time taken to find a block. It can be significantly more or less time than that depending on luck; 10 minutes is simply the average case. <br />
<br />
You can see how long all other recent transactions have taken here: [http://bitcoinstats.org/ BitcoinStats.org]. <br />
<br />
[[Blocks]] (shown as "confirmations" in the GUI) are how the Bitcoin achieves consensus on who owns what. Once a block is found everyone agrees that you now own those coins, so you can spend them again. Until then it's possible that some network nodes believe otherwise, if somebody is attempting to defraud the system by reversing a transaction. The more confirmations a transaction has, the less risk there is of a reversal. Only 6 blocks or 1 hour is enough to make reversal computationally impractical. This is dramatically better than credit cards which can see chargebacks occur up to three months after the original transaction!<br />
<br />
Ten minutes was specifically chosen by [[Satoshi]] as a tradeoff between propagation time of new blocks in large networks and the amount of work wasted due to chain splits. For a more technical explanation, see Satoshi's [http://www.bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf original technical paper].<br />
<br />
[[File:TransactionConfirmationTimesExample.PNG]]<br />
<br />
=== Do you have to wait until my transactions are confirmed in order to buy or sell things with Bitcoin? ===<br />
<br />
YES, you do, IF the transaction is non-recourse. The Bitcoin reference software does not display transactions as confirmed until six blocks have passed (confirmations). As transactions are burred in the chain they become increasingly non-reversible but are very reversible before the first confirmation. Two to six confirmations are recommended for non-recourse situations depending on the value of the transactions involved.<br />
<br />
When people ask this question they are usually thinking about applications like supermarkets. This generally is a recourse situation: if somebody tries to double-spend on a face-to-face transaction it might work a few times, but probabalistically speaking eventually one of the double-spends will get noticed, and the penalty for shoplifting charges in most localities is calibrated to be several times worse than the proceeds of a single shoplifting event.<br />
<br />
Double-spends might be a concern for something like a snack machine in a low-traffic area with no nearby security cameras. Such a machine shouldn't honor 0-confirmation payments, and should instead use some other mechanism of clearing Bitcoin or validating transactions against reversal, see the wiki article [[Myths#Point_of_sale_with_bitcoins_isn.27t_possible_because_of_the_10_minute_wait_for_confirmation|here]] for alternatives.<br />
<br />
Applications that require immediate payment processing, like supermarkets or snack machines, need to manage the risks. Here is one way to reverse an unconfirmed payment:<br />
<br />
A [[Double-spending#Finney_attack|Finney attack]], in which an attacker mines a block containing a movement of some coins back to themselves. Once they find a block solution, they quickly go to a merchant and make a purchase, then broadcast the block, thus taking back the coins. This attack is a risk primarily for goods that are dispatched immediately, like song downloads or currency trades. Because the attacker can't choose the time of the attack, it isn't a risk for merchants such as supermarkets where you can't choose exactly when to pay (due to queues, etc). The attack can fail if somebody else finds a block containing the purchasing transaction before you release your own block, therefore, merchants can reduce but not eliminate the risk by making purchasers wait some length of time that's less than a confirm.<br />
<br />
Because pulling off this attack is not trivial, merchants who need to sell things automatically and instantly are most likely to just price the cost of reversal fraud in, or use insurance.<br />
<br />
=== I was sent some bitcoins and they haven't arrived yet! Where are they? ===<br />
<br />
Don't panic! There are a number of reasons why your bitcoins might not show up yet, and a number of ways to diagnose them. <br />
<br />
The latest version of the Bitcoin-Qt client tells you how far it has yet to go in downloading the blockchain. Hover over the icon in the bottom right corner of the client to learn your client's status.<br />
<br />
If it has not caught up then it's possible that your transaction hasn't been included in a block yet. <br />
<br />
You can check pending transactions in the network by going [http://blockchain.info here] and then searching for your address. If the transaction is listed here then it's a matter of waiting until it gets included in a block before it will show in your client. <br />
<br />
If the transaction is based on a coin that was in a recent transaction then it could be considered a low priority transaction. Transfers can take longer if the transaction fee paid was not high enough. If there is no fee at all the transfer can get a very low priority and take hours or even days to be included in a block.<br />
<br />
=== Why does my Bitcoin address keep changing? ===<br />
<br />
Whenever the address listed in "Your address" receives a transaction, Bitcoin replaces it with a new address. This is meant to encourage you to use a new address for every transaction, which enhances [[anonymity]]. All of your old addresses are still usable: you can see them in ''Settings -> Your Receiving Addresses''.<br />
<br />
===How much will the transaction fee be?===<br />
<br />
Some transactions might require a [[transaction fee]] for them to get confirmed in a timely manner. The transaction fee is processed by and received by the bitcoin miner. The most recent version of the Bitcoin client will estimate an appropriate fee when a fee might be required.<br />
<br />
The fee is added to the payment amount. For example, if you are sending a 1.234 BTC payment and the client requires a 0.0005 BTC fee, then 1.2345 BTC will be subtracted from the wallet balance for the entire transaction and the address for where the payment was sent will receive a payment of 1.234 BTC.<br />
<br />
A fee might be imposed because your transaction looks like a denial of service attack to the Bitcoin system. For example, it might be burdensome to transmit or it might recycle Bitcoins you recently received. The wallet software attempts to avoid generating burdensome transactions, but it isn't always able to do so: The funds in your wallet might be new or composed of many tiny payments. <br />
<br />
Because the fee is related to the amount of data that makes up the transaction and not to the amount of Bitcoins being sent, the fee may seem extremely low (0.0005 BTC for a 1,000 BTC transfer) or unfairly high (0.004 BTC for a 0.02 BTC payment, or about 20%). If you are receiving tiny amounts (''e.g.'' as small payments from a mining pool) then fees when sending will be higher than if your activity follows the pattern of conventional consumer or business transactions. <br />
<br />
As of Bitcoin 0.5.3 the required fee will not be higher than 0.05 BTC. For most users there is usually no required fee at all. If a fee is required it will most commonly be 0.0005 BTC.<br />
<br />
=== What happens when someone sends me a bitcoin but my computer is powered off? ===<br />
<br />
Bitcoins are not actually "sent" to your wallet; the software only uses that term so that we can use the currency without having to learn new concepts. Your wallet is only needed when you wish to spend coins that you've received.<br />
<br />
If you are sent coins when your wallet client program is not running, and you later launch the wallet client program, the coins will eventually appear as if they were just received in the wallet. That is to say, when the client program is started it must download blocks and catch up with any transactions it did not already know about.<br />
<br />
=== How long does "synchronizing" take when the Bitcoin client is first installed? What's it doing? ===<br />
<br />
The popular Bitcoin client software from bitcoin.org implements a "full" Bitcoin node: It can carry out all the duties of the Bitcoin P2P system, it isn't simply a "client". One of the principles behind the operation of full Bitcoin nodes is that they don't assume that the other participants have followed the rules of the Bitcoin system. During synchronization, the software is processing historical Bitcoin transactions and making sure for itself that all of the rules of the system have been correctly followed.<br />
<br />
In normal operation, after synchronizing, the software should use a hardly noticeable amount of your computer's resources.<br />
<br />
When the wallet client program is first installed, its initial validation requires a lot of work from your computer's hard disk, so the amount of time to synchronize depends on your disk speed and, to a lesser extent, your CPU speed. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or so. On a slow computer it could take more than 40 hours of continuous synchronization, so check your computer's power-saving settings to ensure that it does not turn its hard disk off when unattended for a few hours. You can use the Bitcoin software during synchronization, but you may not see recent payments to you until the client program has caught up to the point where those transactions happened.<br />
<br />
If you feel that this process takes too long, you can download a pre-synchronized blockchain from [http://eu2.bitcoincharts.com/blockchain/ http://eu2.bitcoincharts.com/blockchain/]. Alternatively, you can try an alternative "lite" client such as Multibit or a super-light client like electrum, though these clients have somewhat weaker security, are less mature, and don't contribute to the health of the P2P network.<br />
<br />
==Networking==<br />
=== Do I need to configure my firewall to run Bitcoin? ===<br />
<br />
Bitcoin will connect to other nodes, usually on TCP port 8333. You will need to allow outgoing TCP connections to port 8333 if you want to allow your Bitcoin client to connect to many nodes. [[Testnet]] uses TCP port 18333 instead of 8333.<br />
<br />
If you want to restrict your firewall rules to a few IPs, you can find stable nodes in the [[Fallback Nodes|fallback nodes list]].<br />
<br />
=== How does the peer finding mechanism work? ===<br />
<br />
Bitcoin finds peers primarily by forwarding peer announcements within its own network and each node saves a database of peers that it's aware of, for future use. In order to bootstrap this process Bitcoin needs a list of initial peers, these can be provided manually but normally it obtains them by querying a set of DNS domain names which have automatically updated lists, if that doesn't work it falls back to a built-in list which is updated from time to time in new versions of the software. There is also an IRC based mechanism but it is disabled by default.<br />
<br />
==Mining==<br />
===What is mining?===<br />
[[Mining]] is the process of spending computation power to secure Bitcoin transactions against reversal and introducing new Bitcoins to the system.<br />
<br />
Technically speaking, mining is the calculation of a [[hash]] of the a block header, which includes among other things a reference to the previous block, a hash of a set of transactions and a [[nonce]]. If the hash value is found to be less than the current [[target]] (which is inversely proportional to the [[difficulty]]), a new block is formed and the miner gets the newly generated Bitcoins (25 per block at current levels). If the hash is not less than the current target, a new nonce is tried, and a new hash is calculated. This is done millions of times per second by each miner.<br />
<br />
===Is mining used for some useful computation?===<br />
The computations done when mining are internal to Bitcoin and not related to any other distributed computing projects. They serve the purpose of securing the Bitcoin network, which is useful.<br />
<br />
===Is it not a waste of energy?===<br />
Spending energy on creating and securing a free monetary system is hardly a waste. Also, services necessary for the operation of currently widespread monetary systems, such as banks and credit card companies, also spend energy, arguably more than Bitcoin would.<br />
<br />
===Why don't we use calculations that are also useful for some other purpose?===<br />
To provide security for the Bitcoin network, the calculations involved need to have some [http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/5617/why-are-bitcoin-calculation-useless/5618#5618 very specific features]. These features are incompatible with leveraging the computation for other purposes.<br />
<br />
===How can we stop miners from creating zero transaction blocks?===<br />
The incentive for miners to include transactions is in the fees that come along with them. If we were to implement some minimum number of transactions per block it would be trivial for a miner to create and include transactions merely to surpass that threshold. As the network matures, the block reward drops, and miners become more dependent on transactions fees to pay their costs, the problem of zero transaction blocks should diminish over time.<br />
<br />
===How does the proof-of-work system help secure Bitcoin?===<br />
To give a general idea of the mining process, imagine this setup:<br />
<br />
payload = <some data related to things happening on the Bitcoin network><br />
nonce = 1<br />
hash = [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SHA2 SHA2]( [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SHA2 SHA2]( payload + nonce ) )<br />
<br />
The work performed by a miner consists of repeatedly increasing "nonce" until<br />
the hash function yields a value, that has the rare property of being below a certain<br />
target threshold. (In other words: The hash "starts with a certain number of zeroes",<br />
if you display it in the fixed-length representation, that is typically used.)<br />
<br />
As can be seen, the mining process doesn't compute anything special. It merely<br />
tries to find a number (also referred to as nonce) which - in combination with the payload -<br />
results in a hash with special properties.<br />
<br />
The advantage of using such a mechanism consists of the fact, that it is very easy to check a result: Given the payload and a specific nonce, only a single call of the hashing function is needed to verify that the hash has the required properties. Since there is no known way to find these hashes other than brute force, this can be used as a "proof of work" that someone invested a lot of computing power to find the correct nonce for this payload.<br />
<br />
This feature is then used in the Bitcoin network to secure various aspects. An attacker<br />
that wants to introduce malicious payload data into the network, will need to do the<br />
required proof of work before it will be accepted. And as long as honest miners have more<br />
computing power, they can always outpace an attacker.<br />
<br />
Also see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hashcash Hashcash] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof-of-work_system Proof-of-work system] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SHA2 SHA2] and on Wikipedia.<br />
<br />
===Why was the "Generate coin" option of the client software removed?===<br />
<br />
In the early days of Bitcoin, it was easy for anyone to find new blocks using standard CPUs. As more and more people started mining, the [[difficulty]] of finding new blocks has greatly increased to the point where the average time for a CPU to find a single block can be many years. The only cost-effective method of [[Mining|mining]] is using a high-end graphics card with special software (see also [[Why a GPU mines faster than a CPU]]) and/or joining a [[Bitcoin Pool|mining pool]]. Since solo CPU mining is essentially useless, it was removed from the GUI of the Bitcoin software.<br />
<br />
==Security==<br />
<br />
===Could miners collude to give themselves money or to fundamentally change the nature of Bitcoin?===<br />
<br />
There are two questions in here. Let's look at them separately.<br />
<br />
;Could miners gang up and give themselves money?<br />
<br />
Mining itself is the process of creating new blocks in the block chain. Each block contains a list of all the transactions that have taken place across the entire Bitcoin network since the last block was created, as well as a hash of the previous block. New blocks are 'mined', or rather, generated, by Bitcoin clients correctly guessing sequences of characters in codes called 'hashes,' which are created using information from previous blocks. Bitcoin users may download specialized 'mining' software, which allows them to dedicate some amount of their processing power – however large or small – to guessing at strings within the hash of the previous block. Whoever makes the right guess first, thus creating a new block, receives a reward in Bitcoins.<br />
<br />
The block chain is one of the two structures that makes Bitcoin secure, the other being the public-key encryption system on which Bitcoin trade is based. The block chain assures that not only is every single transaction that ever takes place recorded, but that every single transaction is recorded on the computer of anyone who chooses to store the relevant information. Many, many users have complete records of every transaction in Bitcoins history readily available to them at any point, and anyone who wants in the information can obtain it with ease. These things make Bitcoin very hard to fool.<br />
<br />
The Bitcoin network takes considerable processing power to run, and since those with the most processing power can make the most guesses, those who put the most power toward to sustaining the network earn the most currency. Each correct guess yields, at present, twenty-five Bitcoins, and as Bitcoins are presently worth something (although the value still fluctuates) every miner who earns any number of Bitcoins makes money. Some miners pull in Bitcoins on their own; and some also join or form pools wherein all who contribute earn a share of the profits. <br />
<br />
Therefore, first answer is a vehement “yes” – no only can miners collude to get more money, Bitcoin is designed to encourage them to do so. Bitcoin pools are communal affairs, and there is nothing dishonest or underhanded about them.<br />
<br />
Of course, the real question is:<br />
<br />
;Can they do so in ways not sanction by Bitcoin developers? Is there any way to rip off the network and make loads of money dishonestly?<br />
<br />
Bitcoin isn't infallible. It can be cheated, but doing so is extremely difficult. Bitcoin was designed to evade some of the central problems with modern currencies – namely, that their trustworthiness hinges upon that of people who might not have users' best interests in mind. Every currency in the world (other than Bitcoin) is controlled by large institutions who keep track of what's done with it, and who can manipulate its value. And every other currency has value because people trust the institutions that control them.<br />
<br />
Bitcoin doesn't ask that its users trust any institution. Its security is based on the cryptography that is an integral part of its structure, and that is readily available for any and all to see. Instead of one entity keeping track of transactions, the entire network does, so Bitcoins are astoundingly difficult to steal, or double-spend. Bitcoins are created in a regular and predictable fashion, and by many different users, so no one can decide to make a whole lot more and lessen their value. In short, Bitcoin is designed to be inflation-proof, double-spend-proof and completely distributed.<br />
<br />
Nonetheless, there are a few ways that one can acquire Bitcoins dishonestly. Firstly, one can steal private keys. Key theft isn't something that Bitcoin security has been designed to prevent: it's up to users to keep theirs safe. But the cryptography is designed so that it is completely impossible to deduce someone's private key from their public one. As long as you keep your private key to yourself, you don't have much to worry about. Furthermore, one could theoretically create a new block chain, but due to the way in which the block chain is constructed, this would be extremely difficult and require massive amounts of processing power. A full explanation of the difficulties involved can be found in the [[block chain]] article.<br />
<br />
Bitcoin can be ripped off – but doing so would be extremely hard and require considerable expertise and a staggering amount of processing power. And it's only going to get harder with time. Bitcoin isn't impenetrable, but it's close enough to put any real worries in the peripherals.<br />
<br />
;Could miners fundamentally change the nature of Bitcoin?<br />
<br />
Once again, almost certainly not.<br />
<br />
Bitcoin is a distributed network, so any changes implemented to the system must be accepted by all users. Someone trying to change the way Bitcoins are generated would have to convince every user to download and use their software – so the only changes that would go through are those that would be equally benefit all users. <br />
<br />
And thus, it is more or less impossible for anyone to change the function of Bitcoin to their advantage. If users don't like the changes, they won't adopt them, whereas if users do like them, then these will help everyone equally. Of course, one can conceive of a situation where someone manages to get a change pushed through that provides them with an advantage that no one notices, but given that Bitcoin is structurally relatively simple, it is unlikely that any major changes will go through without someone noticing first.<br />
<br />
The fact that such changes are so difficult to make testifies to the fully distributed nature of Bitcoin. Any centrally controlled currency can be modified by its central agency without the consent of its adherents. Bitcoin has no central authority, so it changes only at the behest of the whole community. Bitcoins development represents a kind of collective evolution; the first of its kind among currencies.<br />
<br />
==Help==<br />
===I'd like to learn more. Where can I get help?===<br />
<br />
* Read the [[Introduction|introduction to bitcoin]] <br />
* See the videos, podcasts, and blog posts from the [[Press]]<br />
* Read and post on the [[Bitcoin:Community_portal#Bitcoin_Community_Forums|forums]]<br />
* Chat on one of the [[Bitcoin:Community_portal#IRC_Chat|Bitcoin IRC]] channels<br />
* Listen to [http://omegataupodcast.net/2011/03/59-bitcoin-a-digital-decentralized-currency/ this podcast], which goes into the details of how bitcoin works<br />
* Ask questions on the [http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com Bitcoin Stack Exchange]<br />
<br />
==See Also==<br />
<br />
* [[Man page]]<br />
* [[Introduction]]<br />
<br />
[[de:FAQ]]<br />
[[zh-cn:FAQ]]<br />
[[fr:FAQ]]<br />
[[ru:FAQ]]<br />
<br />
[[Category:Technical]]<br />
[[Category:Vocabulary]]</div>
Http
https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Talk:Trade&diff=36553
Talk:Trade
2013-04-01T12:52:47Z
<p>Http: /* Pharmacy */ new section</p>
<hr />
<div>==Proposed Listing Standards==<br />
I propose the following standards be required for listing on the [Trade]. The listed site must<br />
# Be currently functional (downtime of less than 48 hours is acceptable)<br />
# Be currently accepting bitcoins<br />
# Have clear instructions for paying with bitcoins from the link given<br />
# Prices must be sane within an order of magnitude (non-sane prices indicate that the website has not been updated to match bitcoin deflation)<br />
The standards will help keep the list manageable and easy to use.<br />
<br />
<br />
This is a talk page, so please sign your contributions. I mostly agree, but the "sane prices" criterion seems a bit subjective ; there is a risk that we exclude goodwilling merchants, who would otherwise be willing to update their prices when contacted. [[User:ThomasV|ThomasV]] 10:43, 12 February 2011 (GMT)<br />
<br />
:Here is an example [http://bitcoin2cash.com/]. When I say "sane", I mean reasonable within an order of magnitude. I moved your other comment to a separate section for clarity [[User:Ptd|Ptd]] 12:59, 13 February 2011 (GMT)<br />
<br />
Sounds reasonable. --[[User:Sirius|Sirius]] 07:09, 23 February 2011 (GMT)<br />
Reasonable. What about defining a practice for ordering the list of sites? I've got one to add, so I'll just tack it at the bottom, but it's going to be an ugly list after awhile. Alphabetical? Chronologically ordered by add date?<br />
[[User:JulianTosh|JulianTosh]] 00:19, 10 May 2011 (GMT)<br />
<br />
I'd say somewhat unreasonable regarding the clear instructions. A lot of my customers are the types who would get confused if I listed my native currency and Bitcoin side by side. I want to offer Bitcoin for Bitcoin users, but not at the risk of confusing other potential customers and potentially losing sales as a result. As such, I make it possible for customers to switch to using Bitcoin during the checkout process. [[User:Orbixx|Orbixx]] 18:39, 02 June 2011 (GMT)<br />
<br />
Every link that does not go to a page that CLEARLY states they are accepting bitcoins should be removed. Try to go to the website Orbixx has added again, there is simply no way to check they accept bitcoins, and I believe they don't actually. I couldn't figure it out. So I think the rules should be that if the link does NOT arrive at a page that says the site is accepting bitcoins, it should be removed. Orbixx, companies can just create a separate page for it, and you link to that page, not simply to your homepage if you think it would be too confusing on the home page.<br />
[[User:Berend|Berend]] 21:21, 2 June 2011 (GMT)<br />
<br />
On Exoware.net payment methods are not stated at all until the checkout process; this is incredibly common. It should be evident that we accept Bitcoin because we are listed on this page and there should be no need to plaster it all over some landing page or on the site. As for your belief that "they don't actually [accept bitcoins]", you're welcome to try us - we do. The mere fact that you nonchalantly removed our listing in the first place for apparently not accepting Bitcoin without even getting in contact with us in the first place is ridiculous. Then to come on here after I email you with screenshots showing the page where you can change your currency to BTC and say that somehow you still maintain that we do not accept Bitcoin is preposterous. Do not remove any listings without first solidly verifying your inadequate assumptions. [[User:Orbixx|Orbixx]] 04:01, 03 June 2011 (GMT)<br />
<br />
It's not unreasonable to expect a merchant to have a bitcoin logo among the mastercard, visa, paypal, google checkout, etc. buttons that clutter a corner of nearly every website that takes money. If they accept bitcoin, they should add a bitcoin logo there. if they take money, they should have a section that fits the description. it's that simple. no reason not to be able to tell at a glance. [[User:aarcane|aarcane]] 04:54, 03 June 2011 (UTC)<br />
<br />
I suggest we vote on this. Vendors who have hidden the fact they accept bitcoin extremely well (try finding it on Orbixx's site) do not deserve to be listed here. We could create a separate page for them (i.e. unverifiable entries). [[User:Berend|Berend]] 22:24, 11 August 2011 (GMT)<br />
<br />
I agree that a site that accepts bitcoin must Clearly Say So on any page that mentions payment options, and their front/landing page. Any site that does not say so Up Front, should not be listed as Accepting Bitcoin. How do you verify that they accept bitcoin until you've already selected a product/service, and gone to the checkout page, and Finally see an option for using Bitcoin? This is a ridiculous thing to do. If I only have a Mastercard, and I'm on a site that only accepts Visa, I'd be pretty upset to not find that out until I'm already at the checkout page!! Every site I have EVER used to purchase Anything online says, Up Front, what kinds of payment methods they accept. No confusion. [[User:Krepta3000|Krepta3000]] 17:47, 25 August 2011 (MST) <br />
<br />
==Should we put addresses on the wiki?==<br />
We just had some bitcoin address spam. perhaps it would not have happened if we did not put bitcoin addresses on the wiki ? [[User:ThomasV|ThomasV]] 23:50, 12 February 2011 (GMT)<br />
: Page is now semi-protected. [[User:MagicalTux|MagicalTux]] 08:28, 16 February 2011 (GMT)<br />
<br />
Yea i suggest not to put the bitcoin addresses of donation-accepting orgs on the wiki. this opens it up to vandalism in hopes of getting misdirected bitcoins. just link to the relevant webpage of the donation-accepting organization, and that's all. that way also we don't have to worry about the addresses changing.--[[User:Nanotube|Nanotube]] 04:41, 24 February 2011 (GMT)<br />
<br />
==Hide Contents of Adult?==<br />
Should the contents of Adult be displayed by default, or might it be reasonable to expect that to be a hidden that requires an action for the contents of the category to be rendered? - [[User:sgornick]] 06:22, 23 February 2011 (GMT)<br />
<br />
Should be hidden or moved to another page. --[[User:Sirius|Sirius]] 07:05, 23 February 2011 (GMT)<br />
<br />
I'm all for censoring it as much as the community will tolerate. --[[User:Luke-jr|Luke-jr]] 13:27, 23 February 2011 (GMT)<br />
<br />
Why hide adult section? They are just links to sites, and section is clearly labeled "Adult". What's the big idea on the censorship? --[[User:Nanotube|Nanotube]] 04:39, 24 February 2011 (GMT)<br />
<br />
I suggest do not censor or hide. Consider for example genjix's calm reference to drugs in his presentation. Should he have been afraid and contemplative of censoring or preventing from communicating such things? Such is a kind of debate generally influenced by religi*** motivations. See [[Trade_R]] for adult content [[User:Mizerydearia|Mizerydearia]] 15:04, 27 April 2011 (GMT)<br />
<br />
Against censorship of site links. They should simply be labeled as adult oriented and the vagues possible genre references.<br />
[[User:JulianTosh|JulianTosh]] 00:21, 10 May 2011 (GMT)<br />
<br />
The problem with listing every site together with adults sites is that automatic scanning software might label your business in the same group. You don't want that to happen, else your legitimate businesses will very quickly disappear from this page<br />
[[User:Berend|Berend]] 21:18, 2 June 2011 (GMT)<br />
<br />
The header for the page claims 'Products or services illegal in US or Japan are not fit to be listed here - such links will be removed immediately. Any attempt to get those links up again will result in the account being blocked. This includes pornography and many mind-altering drugs'. As pornography is not actually illegal in Japan or in the US, it should be clarified whether the restriction is the result of an editor attempting to enforce their ideology, a requirement that all porn comply with Japanese censorship regulations (i.e. mosaic over certain body parts - which I suspect fairly few bitcoin-accepting sites actually comply with), or an administrative decision whose force stems from private property rights rather than from .us/.jp law. [[User:Deekoo|Deekoo]] 05:54, 15 August 2011 (GMT)<br />
<br />
== Drugs Section Empty ==<br />
<br />
The "psychoactives" section appears to consist entirely of dead links. [[User:Ironwolf|Ironwolf]] 03:54, 28 March 2011 (GMT)<br />
<br />
I deleted the Drugs section, since Bitcoin is still far too vulnerable to government actions against it -- there are many single points of failure. The most glaring to me is the DNS system -- the bitcoin.org domain could be taken down if the US government wishes to.<br />
<br />
:This is a terrible decision. My company was removed because of this decision, and it disgusts me. Not all drugs are illegal. My company operates a physical storefront in the US. We ONLY sell drugs that you can buy at the supermarket down the road. Just because it is a "drug" or "psychoactive" doesn't mean that the government is trying to shut it down. Nicotine is a drug, aspirin is a drug, alcohol is a drug. Lotus petals are psychoactive, and so is chamomile and kava - but you can go into Walmart or Walgreens/CVS and buy them. These are the only drugs for sale. Stop freaking out about it. People have swept our business off this list twice because of this ridiculous mindset. We're a hippy art store - not a head shop or drug market. --[[User:Metagnosis|Metagnosis]] 17:59, 22 June 2011 (GMT)<br />
<br />
I apologize to those merchants who may not get as many customers now, but really, it's probably better this way. Anyone who needs to can get a connection by asking around, I'm sure. My goal is only to reduce the "criminal" perception of Bitcoin. [[User:AaronM|AaronM]] 01:18, 27 April 2011 (GMT)<br />
<br />
We want a payment medium that resists the authority of the state. That is going to be "criminal". The real fix is providing adequate fallbacks and replacements for single points of failure [[User:STH|STH]] 01:04, 20 November 2011 (GMT)<br />
<br />
== What is a Notable Website ==<br />
<br />
I started accepting bitcoin at http://la.indymedia.org and a couple other sites on the slaptech.net site. What's the standard for adding this to the list of sites? [[User:Johnk|Johnk]] 16:30, 17 April 2011 (GMT)<br />
:Just go for it. Even MezeGrill has no verifiable info on their business accepting BTC. We need some level of organisation to sort things out and it is good practice to give all necessary information that makes it easy for others to verify your information but for now if you have an actual business that's better than the worst of those listed here already.<br />
:--[[User:Giszmo|Giszmo]] 13:24, 28 September 2011 (GMT)<br />
<br />
== New section for services that are not considered "Professional services"? ==<br />
<br />
I'm wondering whether it might be advisable to add a section for services that are not really "professional services" as that term is ordinarily used in vernacular English. <br />
<br />
For example, I just added a dump-truck haulage service to ''Professional services/Other''; but dump truck haulage is not generally considered a professional service. Ought we to consider adding a new section to the page? [[User:1ECVX6EAk53VER2NH5NKharUUGpfw8iUP6|1ECVX6EAk53VER2NH5NKharUUGpfw8iUP6]] 01:49, 4 May 2011 (GMT)<br />
<br />
:i'm a massage therapist wanting to trade bitcoin for massage. what section do i put my services in?<br />
:[[User:zenbunny|zenbunny]] 20:52, 25 May 2011 (GMT)<br />
<br />
== donation accepting organizations ==<br />
<br />
perhaps a separate page should be created for them ?<br />
I guess donations do not belong to "trade".<br />
[[User:ThomasV|ThomasV]] 23:17, 5 May 2011 (GMT)<br />
<br />
:Definitely. It's a bit sad that there is no place to list all Bitcoin-accepted organizations, particularly smaller non-profit ones since they don't sell anything and the organizations page has a notability requirement. I'll create one if no one objects and/or does it before me. [[User:Blues|Blues]] 20:36, 25 May 2011 (GMT)<br />
<br />
I've added RYT (Roll Your Tasks) under 'Productivity' again (has been deleted by user Luke-jr, probably because there is no force to pay for this service). Donations are accepted, but I'm not an organization of any kind. Moreover RYT is an app for enhancing productivity without political or similar intent, beside that I want to give others the opportunity to use it. I think it's good to also give non- or part-commercial efforts a chance to be listed here. If someone wants to have some specific (RYT) improvements, feel free to suggest a deal...<br />
<br />
Listing criteria above are fullfilled:<br />
Be currently functional (downtime of less than 48 hours is acceptable) -> fullfilled.<br />
Be currently accepting bitcoins -> Yes.<br />
Have clear instructions for paying with bitcoins from the link given -> Yes (bitcoin address).<br />
Prices must be sane within an order of magnitude (non-sane prices indicate that the website has not been updated to match bitcoin deflation) -> Very sane (free, if you don't want to donate).<br />
[[User:Hartrock|Hartrock]] 03:57, 25 September 2011 (GMT)<br />
<br />
== Alternative listings for bitcoin-related directory and merchant sites ==<br />
<br />
Because this wiki is censored and not allowing of certain contents or sites, I have set up http://bitcoinsites.witcoin.com/ to allow for all bitcoin-related sites to be posted. Feel free to also use this medium for commenting and reviewing sites as well. [[User:Mizerydearia|Mizerydearia]] 05:28, 25 May 2011 (GMT)<br />
<br />
* Since witcoin.com is subject to US and/or Canada law, I would expect it to be censored as well eventually. But perhaps not a bad idea to make an alternative site for the ratings/reviews idea anyway... I won't use it if it's based on witcoin though, since they require paying to comment/rate... --[[User:Luke-jr|Luke-jr]] 18:27, 25 May 2011 (GMT)<br />
<br />
Witcoin still down [[User:STH|STH]] 00:58, 20 November 2011 (GMT)<br />
<br />
[http://payco.in payco.in : bitcoin currency directory] - I've started a links list of my own (I admit I wanted to get my own site, [http://lorna-morgan.com Lorna Morgan], listed somewhere I wouldn't be removed!) I didn't like the design of witcoin ... and Bitcookies seems to be down at the moment. --[[User:Lorna Morgan|Lorna Morgan]] 05:36, 28 July 2011 (GMT)<br />
<br />
payco.in still up [[User:STH|STH]] 00:58, 20 November 2011 (GMT)<br />
<br />
<br />
[http://bitcookies.com Bitcookies] - A community resource to list businesses, events, and classifieds that are related to Bitcoin. The server is privately owned and therefore not subject to any controlling interests. The site does not, nor will it ever have censorship in terms of the types of businesses/traders/websites listed. The site is free to all community members and was developed with funds from my mining operations. [[User:Miner249er|Miner24934]] 16:25, 27 May 2011 (GMT)<br />
<br />
Bitcookies still down [[User:STH|STH]] 00:56, 20 November 2011 (GMT)<br />
<br />
== Bloomberg Esque Data Suite: Compiling Transaction info from merchants to measure demand ==<br />
<br />
I am included on the list of many who are very interested in seeing bitcoin succeed and want to be a part of that success, but there is one serious uncertainity that is keeping me from getting in: are people actually using their coins for more than just buying drugs and slim jims, and is all of the buying concentrated in one website or product and one consumer demographic? Demand for the coins is necessary for their success. This can be determined by consumption rates and habits. I have perused the website listing, but still feel that information is lacking. <br />
<br />
It would be nice to see an economic indicator that acquires data from merchants (and compensates them in bitcoin for their effort) on the dollar value (and perhaps sector) of the bitcoin transactions. We could then weigh a derivative of total dollar amount and number of transactions against the number of bitcoins mined to get a better understanding of the economic health of the currency.<br />
<br />
== Require description of changes ==<br />
<br />
It's impossible to read this pages's history, because most people seem to forget to:<br />
- use the "description" line when committing a change<br />
- use the "preview" button, and do several changes in a row just because they forgot the label on a link<br />
<br />
The first point is the most important, because of changes like [https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Trade&diff=prev&oldid=11246 that one], that suppresses and adds random links without even explaining why. Such changes should be immediately reverted, by policy. On the technical side, one small improvement could be to require the "description" field to be non-empty. People could still write random characters, but that would still be a different action. --[[User:Davux|Davux]] 23:15, 22 June 2011 (GMT)<br />
<br />
== Huge chunk of deletions reverted ==<br />
<br />
Hi,<br />
<br />
I've tracked down a huge set of deletions wich was probably done in error, [https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Trade&diff=next&oldid=11252 see link]. I've reverted each deletion individually because otherwise, new entries would have been deleted.<br />
<br />
It's probably necessary to watch out for that. --[[User:Joise|Joise]] 18:55, 29 June 2011 (GMT)<br />
<br />
== Vetting ==<br />
<br />
I realise this is probably a difficult issue &mdash; we don't realistically have the time or work to vet all listed sites &mdash; but should ones which are clearly scams be removed from the wiki page, or should each be discussed first before deletion (perhaps, by moderator staff)?<br />
<br />
For example: <blockquote>[https://sites.google.com/site/wwjdtd/ Time Warp interactive], is a fiction/nonfiction mmorpg that is in alpha and is selling the game only through bitcoins</blockquote>This, to me, is clearly a scam. Going through their Google Sites website (which is the new GeoCities), it becomes clear very quickly that this is not a product that it pretends to be, and is instead just some fly by night website setup by a couple of teenagers in hopes of some free cash from unsuspecting visitors.<br />
<br />
I doubt anybody would actually send any BTC their way anyway, but in my opinion having hoaxes like this damages the credibility and trustworthy of Bitcoin accepting merchants as a whole.<br />
<br />
Could we come up with some way of pruning false merchants like this?<br />
<br />
::I think that links which are very clearly scam should not be promoted. However I see two difficulties:<br />
::# It might be hard to see whether something is simply a low budget project or not serious. <br />
::# What is reputable and what not certainly will vary widely. If you want to promote a bank, I'd likely want another neighborhood than if you just try to sell psychodelically designed pizza containing extremely high concentrations of capsain.<br />
::# The more profound issue is that the not-to-reputable looking enterprises might be exactly the ones which bring the stongest kicks to innovation. I am thinking in the term "garage firm". And obviously grandparents will tell the kids some day that the whole bitcoin economy started with alpaca socks, online poker and fancy glass beads.<br />
<br />
::My proposal: Create a playground / dockland / bitcoinpunk section which can collect the fringe of the fringe. And let largely visitors decide what they are going to trust. --[[User:Joise|Joise]] 19:21, 4 July 2011 (GMT)<br />
<br />
== proposal ==<br />
<br />
Separated pages for trading, bitcoin accepting online stores, games, free coins etc.<br />
<br />
== Major clean-up ==<br />
Mediawiki has a perfect way to deal with collections. That's '''categories'''. It also has great tools to get a consistent look. That's '''templates'''.<br />
This cluttered list of non-verifiable (every child here knows [http://www.mezegrill.com/ meze grill] accepts bitcoins but there is no word indicating this is true if you follow the link), outdated (o-crep is on this list but the [http://o-crepes.com/bitcoin/# link] leads you to a one time offer) or even scam. Often there is not even a link to brick and mortar businesses but only a street address.<br />
<br />
I suggest everybody who wants to promote his business here makes a small [[myBitcoinBusiness site]] for it and makes strong use of categories and templates.<br />
--[[User:Giszmo|Giszmo]] 13:24, 28 September 2011 (GMT)<br />
:I'd like to bump this suggestion. Are there any objections to creating a separate page for every Business and put it into all relevant categories? --[[User:Giszmo|Giszmo]] ([[User talk:Giszmo|talk]]) 05:21, 26 August 2012 (GMT)<br />
<br />
== Please add us www.fnib.co ==<br />
<br />
First National Innovation Brokers has been accepting btc to fund forex and gold trading accounts since June, 2011.<br />
www.fnib.co Please add us on the Trade list and help get the word out.<br />
:It's a wiki. Add yourself. Wikipedia rules of no articles about yourself don't apply here. If you take yourself for relevant and others disagree, after an edit-war you might give up or become relevant ;) --[[User:Giszmo|Giszmo]] ([[User talk:Giszmo|talk]]) 05:22, 26 August 2012 (GMT)<br />
<br />
== Is bittit.info appropriate? ==<br />
<br />
bittit.info is a place for users to sell their photos. It's free to use (no fees) and it also has a NSFW section. I wonder if that last thing makes it inappropriate for this wiki. It's not a porn site, almost all the pictures are in the SFW section but I hesitate to add it here. If someone could advice me on that matter I would be grateful. --[[User:Tritonio|Tritonio]] 20:25, 6 November 2011 (GMT)<br />
<br />
== Geographical ==<br />
<br />
Perhaps as a start there should be something to deal with location. <br />
We could have a separate non-geographical section for things like online services and places that post globally. <br />
<br />
A plumber accepting BTC in USA probably isn't much interest to someone in Japan.<br />
<br />
== Duplication ==<br />
<br />
Pages [[Buying bitcoins]] and [[Selling bitcoins]] list exchanges as well. Perhaps separating this information is a good idea (into a page named like "List of Exchanges") to avoid duplication and "overcluttering" of Trade page?<br />
<br />
== Referral Links ==<br />
<br />
I am constantly finding referral links on this page and others. Whenever I see them, I change them back to regular links without the referral code.<br />
<br />
Is there some action we should be taking to block those users who keep adding their referral codes to links?<br />
: Admins can/should block their accounts. We could create a bot to detect these easy to detect links and revert them automatically. I never made a bot but saw many in action. Also I believe the pages should make clear that referral spam will not be tolerated and patrol the referrers and black list certain origins like this wiki for example and exclude those spammers for future referrals. --[[User:Giszmo|Giszmo]] ([[User talk:Giszmo|talk]]) 14:17, 22 July 2012 (GMT)<br />
<br />
== DailyBtc.com ==<br />
<br />
Daily bitcoin lottery paid out every day<br />
<br />
== Wikileaks ==<br />
<br />
Why isn't WikiLeaks listed? Under Political Activism?<br />
<br />
== Coinster Search Engine (no censorship) ==<br />
<br />
[http://coinster.info Coinster.info] has very open listing guidelines.<br />
<br />
== Pharmacy ==<br />
<br />
The listed sites are the same sites that probably send you your daily spam. The India one is listed twice (with different domains) and the Swiss one has no pharmacy license according to their homepage. Listing such sites here is kind of an endorsement and I would prefer not to list those sites here. I don't like censorship, but I don't see any reason to promote them either. --[[User:Http|Http]] ([[User talk:Http|talk]]) 12:52, 1 April 2013 (GMT)</div>
Http
https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Mining_hardware_comparison&diff=36552
Mining hardware comparison
2013-04-01T11:29:27Z
<p>Http: /* Nvidia */ fixed wrong number for GTX580x1 (I assume x2 is also wrong)</p>
<hr />
<div>Below are some statistics about the mining performance of various hardware used in a [[mining rig]].<br />
<br />
'''Notes:'''<br />
* Mhash/s = millions hashes per second (raw speed performance; may not be very energy efficient with some models)<br />
* Mhash/J = millions hashes per joule (energy efficiency; 1 joule of energy is 1 watt during 1 second: 1 J = 1 W*s)<br />
* W = watt (maximum power consumption, i.e. energy per unit of time: 1 W = 1 J/s)<br />
<br />
== FPGA ==<br />
<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align:center"<br />
|- <br />
! Product !! Hash rate<br />(Mhash/s) !! Efficiency<br />(Mhash/J) !! Efficiency<br />(Mhash/s/$) !! Power<br />(W) !! Price<br />($)<br />
|-<br />
! Avnet Spartan-6 LX150T Development Kit<br />
| 100<ref>Fpgaminer (May 19, 2011). [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=9047.0 "Official Open Source FPGA Bitcoin Miner"]. Bitcointalk.org. Retrieved February 7, 2013.</ref> || || 0.10<ref>[http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=100%2F995 "100/995"]. Wolfram Alpha. Retrieved February 7, 2013.</ref> || || 995<ref>[http://avnetexpress.avnet.com/store/em/EMController?action=products&catalogId=500201&storeId=500201&N=0&langId=-1&slnk=b&term=AES-S6DEV-LX150T-G&hrf=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.em.avnet.com%2Fen-us%2Fdesign%2Fdrc%2FPages%2FXilinx-Spartan-6-FPGA-LX150T-Development-Kit.aspx&intcmp=EMA-BUY-AES-S6DEV-LX150T-G "AES-S6DEV-LX150T-G Parts"]. Avnet Express. Retrieved February 7, 2013.</ref><br />
|-<br />
! Bitcoin Dominator X5000<br />
| 100<ref name="bd" /> || 14.7<ref>[http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=100%2F6.8 "100/6.8"]. Wolfram Alpha. Retrieved February 7, 2013.</ref> || 0.22<ref>[http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=100%2F440 "100/440"]. Wolfram Alpha. Retrieved February 7, 2013.</ref> || 6.8<ref name="bd" /> || 440<ref name="bd">NewMeat1 (August 18, 2011). [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=37904.0 "Custom FPGA Board for Sale!"]. Bitcointalk.org. Retrieved January 30, 2013.</ref><br />
|-<br />
! BitForce SHA256 Single<br />
| 832<ref name="single">[http://www.butterflylabs.com/product-details/ "BitForce SHA256 Single – Technical Specifications"]. Butterfly Labs. Retrieved January 30, 2013.</ref> || 10.4<ref>[http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=832%2F80 "832/80"]. Wolfram Alpha. Retrieved February 7, 2013.</ref> || 1.38<ref>[http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=832%2F599 "832/599"]. Retrieved February 7, 2013.</ref> || 80<ref name="single" /> || 599<ref name="single" /><br />
|-<br />
! Butterflylabs Mini Rig<br />
| 25,200<ref name="mini">[http://web.archive.org/web/20120514032732/http://www.butterflylabs.com/products "Products"]. Butterfly Labs. Archived from the original on May 14, 2012. Retrieved February 7, 2013.</ref> || 20.16<ref>[http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=25200%2F1250 "25200/1250"]. Wolfram Alpha. Retrieved February 7, 2013.</ref> || 1.64<ref>[http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=25200%2F15295 "25200/15295"]. Wolfram Alpha. Retrieved February 7, 2013.</ref> || 1,250<ref name="mini" /> || 15,295<ref name="mini2">[http://www.butterflylabs.com/order-form-bitforce-sha256-mini-rig/ "Order Form – BitForce SHA256 – Mini Rig"]. Butterfly Labs. Retrieved January 30, 2013.</ref><br />
|-<br />
! Digilent Nexys 2 500K<br />
| 5<ref>The Seven (June 3, 2011). [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=9047.msg164438#msg164438 "Re: Official Open Source FPGA Bitcoin Miner (Smaller Devices Now Supported!)"]. Bitcointalk.org. Retrieved February 7, 2013.</ref> || || 0.03<ref>[http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=5%2F149 "5/149"]. Wolfram Alpha. Retrieved February 7, 2013.</ref> || || 149<ref name="dig">[http://www.digilentinc.com/Products/Detail.cfm?Prod=NEXYS2 "Nexys™2 Spartan-3E FPGA Board"]. Digilent. Retrieved January 30, 2013.</ref><br />
|-<br />
! Icarus<br />
| 380<ref name="ica">Nzghang (November 9, 2011). [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=51371.0 "FPGA development board 'Icarus' – DisContinued/ important announcement"]. Bitcointalk.org. Retrieved January 30, 2013.</ref> || 19.79<ref>[http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=380%2F19.2 "380/19.2"]. Wolfram Alpha. Retrieved February 7, 2013.</ref> || 0.66<ref>[http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=380%2F569 "380/569"]. Retrieved February 7, 2013.</ref> || 19.2<ref name="ica" /> || 569<ref name="ica" /><br />
|-<br />
! Lancelot<br />
| || || || || 500<ref name="lan">Nzghang (May 6, 2012). [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=79835.0 "FPGA development board "Lancelot" - accept bitsteam developer's orders."]. Bitcointalk.org. Retrieved January 30, 2013.</ref><br />
|-<br />
! ModMiner Quad <br />
| 800<ref name="mmq">[http://www.btcfpga.com/index.php?route=product/product&product_id=50 "ModMiner Quad"]. BTCFPGA. Retrieved January 30, 2013.</ref> || 20<ref>http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=800%2F40</ref> || 0.75<ref>http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=800%2F1069</ref> || 40<ref name="mmq" /> || 1,069<ref name="mmq" /><br />
|-<br />
! Terasic DE2-115<br />
| 80<ref>Fpgaminer (May 4, 2011). [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5379.msg105544#msg105544 "Re: FPGA mining"]. Bitcointalk.org. Retrieved February 7, 2013.</ref> || || 0.13<ref>[http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=80%2F595 "80/595"]. Retrieved February 7, 2013.</ref> || || 595<ref name="de2">[http://www.terasic.com.tw/cgi-bin/page/archive.pl?No=502 "Altera DE2-115 Development and Education Board"]. Terasic. Retrieved January 30, 2013.</ref><br />
|-<br />
! X6500 FPGA Miner <br />
| 400<ref name="x65" /> || 23.25<ref>http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=400%2F17.2</ref> || 0.72<ref>http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=400%2F550</ref> || 17.2<ref name="x65" /> || 550<ref name="x65">[http://store.fpgamining.com/ "FPGA Mining Store"]. FPGA Mining. Retrieved January 30, 2013.</ref><br />
|-<br />
! ZTEX USB-FPGA Module 1.15b<br />
| 90<ref name="miner" /> || || 0.27<ref>http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=90%2F325</ref> || || 325<ref>http://shop.ztex.de/product_info.php?cPath=21&products_id=62</ref><br />
|-<br />
! ZTEX USB-FPGA Module 1.15x<br />
| 215<ref name="miner" /> || || 0.52<ref>http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=215%2F406</ref> || || 406<ref>http://shop.ztex.de/product_info.php?cPath=21&products_id=66</ref><br />
|-<br />
! ZTEX USB-FPGA Module 1.15y<br />
| 860<ref name="miner">http://www.ztex.de/btcminer/</ref> || || 0.65<ref>http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=860%2F1304</ref> || || 1,304<ref name="1.15y">http://shop.ztex.de/product_info.php?cPath=21&products_id=74</ref><br />
|}<br />
<br />
== ASIC ==<br />
<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align:center"<br />
|- <br />
! Product !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! Mhash/s/$ !! Watts !! Price !! Shipping !! Comm ports<br />
|-<br />
! ASICMiner device(s)<br />
|| ? || ? || ? || ? || ? || {{No}} || ?<br />
|-<br />
! Avalon ASIC #1<br />
| 66,300<ref>http://garzikrants.blogspot.com/2013/02/avalon-miner-power-usage.html</ref> || 107 || 52.34<ref>http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=68000%2F1299</ref> || 620W<ref>http://garzikrants.blogspot.com/2013/02/avalon-miner-power-usage.html</ref> || 1,299<ref name="avalon">[http://shop.avalon-asic.com/catalog/product/view/id/1 "Avalon ASIC"]. Avalon. Retrieved January 30, 2013.</ref> || {{Yes}} || Ethernet, Wifi<br />
|-<br />
! Avalon ASIC #2<br />
| 60,000<ref name="avalon" /> || 97 || 40.02<ref>http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=60000%2F1499</ref> || 620W<ref>http://garzikrants.blogspot.com/2013/02/avalon-miner-power-usage.html</ref> || 1,499<ref name="avalon" /> || {{No}} || Ethernet, Wifi<br />
|-<br />
! Avalon ASIC #3<ref name="avalon" /><br />
| || || || || || {{No}} ||<br />
|-<br />
! BitForce Jalapeno<br />
| 4,500<ref name="jap">[http://www.butterflylabs.com/order-form-bitforce-sc-jalapeno "Pre Order Form – BitForce 'Jalapeno' "]. Butterfly Labs. Retrieved January 30, 2013.</ref> || ??? || 30.20<ref>http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=4500%2F149</ref> || ???<ref name="watts">http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1b8hvt/bfl_josh_updates_on_asic_status_full_transcript/</ref> || 149<ref name="jap" /> || {{No|Any day now}} || USB<br />
|-<br />
! BitForce Little Single<br />
| 30,000<ref name="ls" /> || || 46.22<ref>http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=30000%2F649</ref> || || 649<ref name="ls">[http://www.butterflylabs.com/pre-order-form-bitforce-little-single-sc/ "Pre Order Form – BitForce 'Little' Single SC"]. Butterfly Labs. Retrieved January 30, 2013.</ref> || {{Yes}} || USB<br />
|-<br />
! BitForce Single 'SC'<br />
| 60,000<ref name="sc">[http://www.butterflylabs.com/order-form-bitforce-sc-single "Pre Order Form – BitForce Single 'SC' "]. Butterfly Labs. Retrieved January 30, 2013.</ref> || ??? || 46.18<ref>http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=60000%2F1299</ref> || ???<ref name="watts" /> || 1,299<ref name="sc" /> || {{No|Any day now}} || USB<br />
|-<br />
! BitForce Mini Rig 'SC'<br />
| 1,500,000<ref name="rig" /> || ??? || 50.16<ref>http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=1500000%2F29899</ref> || ???<ref name="watts" /> || 29,899<ref name="rig">[http://www.butterflylabs.com/order-form-bitforce-sc-mini-rig "Pre Order Form – BitForce Mini Rig 'SC' "]. Butterfly Labs. Retrieved January 30, 2013.</ref> || {{No|Any day now}} || ?<br />
|}<br />
<br />
==Graphics cards==<br />
=== Popular Mining Cards ===<br />
This information has been included to make choosing a card easier. The cards selected are generally readily available online. Once you have purchased a card or cards, use the tables below to compare different configurations and setups.<br />
=== genBTC's Card Comparison Spreadsheet ===<br />
The purpose of this chart is 1) Update used prices 2) To consolidate multiple sources of information into an at-a-glance format. 3) Provide 3 hashrate columns to make it easier to figure out performance before 4) You use this table to make informed decisions about purchasing a card for mining.<br><br />
Only edit Common MH/s. MH/s #1 and MH/s #2 were outsourced.<br><br />
I will continue to work on this chart, and it is a work in progress. <br><br />
Created February 25th 2013, Updated February 27th 2013 <br><br />
All the cards below are AMD (ATI) Radeon HD <br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! MH/s #1 !! MH/s #2 !! Common MH/s !! TDP(W) !! Shaders !! Stock Clock !! Ebay $ !! MSRP $ !! Cheapest $<br />
|----<br />
|5770||212.83||||200||108||800||850 MHz||$178?||$159||$ 50<br />
|----<br />
|5830||302||220||275||175||1120||800 MHz||$105||$239||$ 65<br />
|----<br />
|5850||346.16||270||330||151||1440||725 MHz||$101||$259||$ 90<br />
|----<br />
|5870||393||420||380||188||1600||850 MHz||$165||$379||$125<br />
|----<br />
|5970||704||700||750||294||3200||725 MHz||$248||$599||$269<br />
|----<br />
|6750||167.59||||170||86||720||725 MHz||$ 67||$109||<br />
|----<br />
|6770||196.67||||200||108||800||900 MHz||$ 84||$135||<br />
|----<br />
|6850||213.7||||250||127||960||775 MHz||$104||$179||<br />
|----<br />
|6870||278.31||||300||150||1120||900 MHz||$124||$239||<br />
|----<br />
|6950||369||350||350||200||1408||800 MHz||$171||$299||<br />
|----<br />
|6970||397||400||385||250||1536||880 MHz||$172||$369||<br />
|----<br />
|6990||772||700||750||375||3072||830 MHz||$372||$699||<br />
|----<br />
|7750||123||200||125||55||512||800 MHz||$ 93||$109||Newegg $89<br />
|----<br />
|7770||||250||200||80||640||1000 MHz||$ 98||$159||Newegg $119<br />
|----<br />
|7850||||375||300||130||1024||860 MHz||$177||$249||Newegg $169<br />
|----<br />
|7870||||||400||175||1280||1000 MHz||$227||$349||Newegg $229<br />
|----<br />
|7950||||450||500||200||1792||850 MHz||$307||$449||Newegg $299<br />
|----<br />
|7970||685||600||650||250||2048||925 MHz||$391||$549||Newegg $399<br />
|----<br />
|7990||||||1200||555||4096||925 MHz||$777||$999||Newegg $899<br />
|----<br />
|}<br />
MH/s #1 taken from Joseph Woodrell's chart directly below this one.<br><br />
MH/s #2 taken from https://bitclockers.com/calc <br><br />
TDP, Shaders, Stock Clock comes from http://www.hwcompare.com/ & www.AMD.com to Verify<br><br />
Ebay Price taken from http://cgi5.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?SellHub3 and questionable prices marked with a ? <br><br />
Cheapest $ = Used price. Sourced from All over the internet as if I had to buy the card today.<br><br />
Newegg Price means NEW & price was taken from the LOWEST priced card on 2/25/2013 @ 8 PM EST, any rebate disregarded<br><br />
<br />
=== Card Comparison Spreadsheet ===<br />
This spreadsheet performs several calculations and displays a visualization graph of a theoretical mining rig over time. It can be used to visualize any "what if" scenarios to better wrap your head around which card is the best choice under different conditions. Bright Yellow Boxes are editable, and affect the calculations. Dark Yellow Boxes are editable for notation, but don't affect the calculations. The Green highlighted card is the best under those conditions, the Blue highlight is second best, the Orange highlight is third best. Higher MHash/s performance can be obtained for each card through overclocking, but that drives up the wattage draw of the cards, and I did not have that complete dataset so I used the "average" MHash/s values listed here. <br /><br />
V1.5 - 1 Jan, 2012 - by. Joseph Woodrell <br />
[http://www.woodrell.com/joe/bitcoin/mining_sheet.zip Card Selection Spreadsheet]<br />
<br /><br />
==== Single Card Setups ====<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! Price <ref name=amazon>Price from http://ebay.com/ on 2012-02-10 using an average of completed items, minus the top and bottom 20% to avoid spikes and give a truer average.</ref> !! Availability !! Avg. Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! Mhash/s/$<br />
|----<br />
|5770<br />
|$136<br />
|Moderate<br />
|212.83<br />
|1.45<br />
|1.56 <br />
|----<br />
|5830<br />
|$92<br />
|Moderate<br />
|302<br />
|1.68<br />
|3.28<br />
|----<br />
|5850<br />
|$114.96<br />
|Limited<br />
|346.16<br />
|1.92<br />
|3.0<br />
|----<br />
|5870<br />
|$190.16<br />
|Limited<br />
|393<br />
|1.97<br />
|2.066 <br />
|----<br />
|5970<br />
|$421<br />
|Limited<br />
|704<br />
|2.2<br />
|1.67 <br />
|----<br />
|6750<br />
|$116<br />
|Easy<br />
|167.59<br />
|<br />
|1.44 <br />
|----<br />
|6770<br />
|$115<br />
|Easy<br />
|196.67<br />
|<br />
|1.71 <br />
|----<br />
|6850<br />
|$160<br />
|Easy<br />
|213.7<br />
|1.35<br />
|1.34 <br />
|----<br />
|6870<br />
|$190<br />
|Easy<br />
|278.31<br />
|1.73<br />
|1.46 <br />
|----<br />
|6930<br />
|$180<br />
|Limited<br />
|350<br />
|<br />
|1.94<br />
|----<br />
|6950<br />
|$230<br />
|Easy<br />
|369<br />
|1.94<br />
|1.6 <br />
|----<br />
|6970<br />
|$271.89<br />
|Easy<br />
|397<br />
|1.89<br />
|1.46 <br />
|----<br />
|6990<br />
|$622.99<br />
|Limited<br />
|772<br />
|1.93<br />
|1.23 <br />
|----<br />
|7750<br />
|$110<br />
|Easy<br />
|123<br />
|2.46<br />
|1.12 <br />
|----<br />
|7970<br />
|$420<br />
|Easy<br />
|685<br />
|<br />
|1.22 <br />
|----<br />
|}<br />
<br />
==== Multi-Card Setups ====<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! Price <ref name=amazon/> !! Availability !! Avg. Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! Mhash/s/$<br />
|----<br />
|5830x2<br />
|$360<br />
|Moderate<br />
|525<br />
|<br />
|1.46 <br />
|----<br />
|5850x4<br />
|$644<br />
|Limited<br />
|1360<br />
|1.94<br />
|2.11 <br />
|----<br />
|5850x6<br />
|$996<br />
|Limited<br />
|2130<br />
|<br />
| <br />
|----<br />
|5870x2<br />
|$700<br />
|Limited<br />
|787.5<br />
|0.84<br />
|1.13 <br />
|----<br />
|6770x2<br />
|$274<br />
|Easy<br />
|464<br />
|<br />
|1.69 <br />
|----<br />
|6950x4<br />
|$1,000<br />
|Easy<br />
|1316<br />
|1.51<br />
|1.32 <br />
|----<br />
|6970x2<br />
|$700<br />
|Easy<br />
|769<br />
|1.6<br />
|1.10 <br />
|----<br />
|6990x2<br />
|$1,540<br />
|Limited<br />
|1568<br />
|1.7<br />
|1.02 <br />
|----<br />
|6990x3<br />
|$2,310<br />
|Limited<br />
|2094<br />
|1.8<br />
|0.91 <br />
|----<br />
|7970x3<br />
|$1680<br />
|Easy<br />
|2050<br />
|2.41<br />
|1.16 <br />
|----<br />
|7970x2<br />
|$868<br />
|Easy<br />
|1060<br />
|<br />
| <br />
|----<br />
|}<br />
<br />
===AMD (ATI)===<br />
Stream SDK 2.5 seems to have resolved many of the problems with earlier versions. Everyone's setups will be unique so this should only be a guide or starting point, not an absolute. <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! Mhash/s/$<ref name='amazon_20110625'/> !! Watts !! Clock !! SP !! SDK !! Slot !! Miner !! Notes <br />
|-<br />
| 3410 || 0.89 || 0.074 || ? || 12(?) || 222 || 40 || 1.4 beta || PCI-E 1.1 x8 || A custom Brook+ miner || Using 16,384 length streams<br />
|-<br />
| 3XXX || || || || || || || || || || OpenCL Not Supported<br />
|-<br />
| 42XX || || || || || || || || || || OpenCL Not Supported (integrated/mobile GPU)<br />
|-<br />
| 4350 || 6.93 || 0.346 ||0.16 || 20 || 575 || 80 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors<br />
|-<br />
| 4350 || 7.2 || || || || 600 || || 1.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || cgminer/Linux || default settings<br />
|-<br />
| 4350 || 8.14 || -|| 0.19 || - || 730 || 80 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Diablo/Windows7 || -w 32. Model: Asus EAH4350 Silent. Memory at 400MHz. Runs at 60°C with ambient at 25°C.<br />
|-<br />
| 4350 || 10.7 || -|| - || - || 730 || - || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || CGMiner/Windows7 || -v -w 64 Voltage set at 0.900 core set at 800MHZ and memory set to 200MHZ<br />
|-<br />
| 4550 || 7.23 || 0.289 ||0.13 || 25 || 600 || 80 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors<br />
|-<br />
| 4550 || 7.8 || || || || || || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer /phoenix || worksize=64 VECTORS <br />
|-<br />
| 4570M || 8.02 || 0.297 || ? || 27 || 680 || 80 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Diablo/Windows7 || -w 64, SDK 2.4, Cat 11.4. Model: Sony Vaio NW<br />
|-<br />
| 4570M || 9.6 || 0.300|| ? || 32 || 825(OC) || 80 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Diablo/Windows7 || -w 64, SDK 2.4, Cat 11.4. Model: Sony Vaio NW. OC core 680->825. U/C memory 800->500.<br />
|-<br />
| 4650 || 31.33 || 0.653|| 0.44 || 48 || 650 || 320 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors<br />
|-<br />
| 4670 || 36.14 || 0.613|| 0.34 || 59 || 750 || 320 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors<br />
|-<br />
| 4670 || 40.11 || 0.679|| 0.38 || 59 || 800 || 320 || - || AGP x8 || poclbm/Ubuntu 10.10 w/ H == 0 mod || -w 32 -f 0, don't use vectors [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.msg85236#msg85236 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 4670 || 50 || - || 0.47 || 60 || 800 || 320 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer || 2 miners set up i7 920 (130W), CPU: Ufasoft, GPU: OpenCL; the CPU is getting about 40 Mhash/s while the GPU goes from 10-20 Mhash/s<br />
|-<br />
| 4730 || 72.29 || 0.657|| ? || 110 || 750 || 640 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
| 4770 || 72.29 || 0.904|| 0.72 || 80 || 750 || 640 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
| 4830 || 55.42 || 0.583|| || 95 || 575 || 640 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
| 4830 || 61.7 || - || || - || 700 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm-mod || Fedora 14<br />
|-<br />
| 4830 || 64.9 || - || - || - || 700 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm-mod || Fedora 14<br />
|-<br />
| 4830 || 66.12 || 0.503|| || 105 || 700 || 1005 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - ||<br />
|-<br />
| 4850 || 75.30 || 0.685 || || 110 || 625 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
| 4850 || 84.3 || 0.766 || || 110 || 725 || 300 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - || -w64 fan at 70% temp 73C, stock voltage -gui miner<br />
|-<br />
| 4850 || 87.4 || 0.79 || - || 110 || 785 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer || Phoenix; -k poclbm<br />
|-<br />
| 4850 || 90.1 || 0.819 || || 110 || 800 || 500 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer || -f 30; Tried phoenix and phatk, got same max<br />
|-<br />
| 4850 || 101 || 0.918 || || 110 || 817 || 500 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer || -f 0, core 817mhz(default 625)@1.123v , mem downclock to 500mhz (default 993) [http://www.smpake.com/?p=6 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 4850x2 || 150.60 || 0.602 || || 250 || 625 || 1600 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
| 4860 || 67.47 || 0.519|| || 130 || 700 || 640 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F8F8FF;"| 4870 || 78 || 0.520|| || 150 || - || - || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/Vista 64bit || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source]<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F8F8F8;"| 4870 || 88 || || || 140 || std || 800 || 12.3.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.50 / 64bit OS X pyopencl / poclbm || Standard Mac Pro 3,1 with Apple HD4870 upgrade. Flags: FASTLOOP WORKSIZE=64 AGGRESSION=5 (don't use vectors, and hash rate drops to 60-70 if browser windows are visible, speeds up to 88 if you hide them!<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F8F8FF;"| 4870 || 90.36 || 0.602|| || 150 || 750 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || clmine || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F8F8FF;"| 4870 || 92.84 || 0.6189333(?)|| || 150(?) || 830(OC) || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 || -k poclbm AGGRESSION=5 (Windows 7 64-Bit, GPU OC 750->830MHz, VRAM UC 900->450MHz, BIOS modded)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F8F8F8;"| 4870 || 96 || || || 140 || 750 || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Smartcoin r657s / phoenix 1.50 / Linuxcoin 0.2b final || Powercolor @ GPU 830 MHz/ MEM 200 Mhz @ 80% FAN @ 69 temp @ Flags: -k phatk bfi_int=false FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256 AGGRESSION=11 <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F8F8F8;"| 4870 || 104 || || || 140 || 750 || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Smartcoin r657s / DiabloMiner / Linuxcoin 0.2b final || Powercolor @ GPU 830 MHz/ MEM 200 Mhz @ 80% FAN @ 69 temp @ Flags: -v 1 -w 256 <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F8F8FF;"| 4870 || 104.2 || ?|| || ? || 830(OC) || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || Windows 7 64-Bit, GPU Core OC to 830 MHz, GPU Memory UC to 200 MHz By MSI AfterBurner. Card: Gainward Golden Sample. @70%Fan we have 55 GPU temp.<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F8F8FF;"| 4870 || 104.6 || 0.872|| || 120 || 830(OC) || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 256 -f 1, Windows 7 64-Bit, GPU Core OC to 830 MHz, GPU Memory UC to 190 MHz (saves 30 watts at outlet)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F8F8F8;"| 4870 || 112 || || || 140 || 750 || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || BAMT 0.5c / cgminer || Powercolor @ GPU 875 MHz/ MEM 300 Mhz/ 1,25VDC @ 100% FAN @ 65 temp @ Flags: -v 1 -w 256 <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F8F8FF;"| 4870x2 || 180.6|| 0.632|| || 286 || 800 || 1600 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F8F8FF;"| 4870x2 || 180.72|| 0.632|| || 286 || 750 || 1600 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
| 4870x2 || 203 || || || || 850(OC) || 1600 || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm-mod ver. 20 april 2011|| Gainward / Win7 x64 / -w 256 -f 1 / 850MHz GPU - 300MHz Mem - 1,262V - 100% fun : 72C<br />
|-<br />
| 4890 || 97.1 || 0.511|| || 190 || 870(OC) || 1050 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-01-21 Solo settings || Sapphire fab. No flags options helped. Close all browsers and do full restart of GUIMiner and then Bitcoin via GUIMiner server starter or the browsers GPU accl. will limit to 56~ ish Mhash/s - I can now start browser without slowdowns<br />
|-<br />
| 4890 || 102.41 || 0.539|| || 190 || 850 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
| 4890 || 108.3 || 0.57|| || 190 || 975 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
| 4890 || 121.5 || -|| || 190 || 1025 (OC) || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || no flags, Vcore 1.4 <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFF8EF;"| 5450 || 11.99|| 0.631|| || 19 || 650 || 80 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFF8EF;"| 5450 || 13.74|| || - || - || 700 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/Linuxcoin v0.2 || -v -w128 tried several options, seems to work best.<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFF8EF;"| 5450 || 14.12|| || - || - || 700 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix/Linuxcoin v0.2 || Flags: "DEVICE=0 VECTORS AGGRESSION=4 -v FASTLOOP BFI_INT WORKSIZE=64" Kernel: "phatk"<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFF8EF;"| 5450 || 15.36|| || - || - || 700 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix || Flags: "DEVICE=0 VECTORS AGRESSION=8 FASTLOOP BFI_ING WORKSIZE=128" Kernel: "phatk" - MagicSata<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFF8EF;"| 5450 || 18.10|| || - || - || 774 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 1 774.66MHz/300.37MHz<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFF8EF;"| 5470 || 17.10|| || - || - || - || - || - || - || poclbm || -v -w 128 MobileGPU<br />
|-<br />
| 5550 || 40.59 || 1.041|| || 39 || 550 || 320 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
| 5550 || 62.10 || - || - || - || 700 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix || 700MHz core 800MHz ram, phatk mod, Flags: "-k phatk worksize=128 vectors aggression=4 bfi_int"<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 59.96 || 1.538|| || 39 || 650 || 400 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 62 || 1.59|| || 39 || 650 || 400 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 OpenCL/Linux x86_64 || -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS AGGRESSION=4 -v FASTLOOP BFI_INT WORKSIZE=64<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 64 || 1.641|| || 39 || 650 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 73 || 1.872|| || 39 || 700 || 400 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 OpenCL/Linux x86_64 || -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS AGGRESSION=4 -v FASTLOOP BFI_INT WORKSIZE=64<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 86.3 || 2.397|| || 36 || 775 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.75 OpenCL/Windows 7 x64 (no Aero) ||-k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 -v WORKSIZE=256 Fan 100% 86C Undervolted @ 0.96v using Sapphire Trixx<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 94 || stock || || || 880 || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUI Miner 02-12/Windows 7 x86 || -v -w128 75C<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 102 || 1.46(+)|| || 75(-) || 950 || 400 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 OpenCL/Windows 7 x86 (no Aero) || -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS AGGRESSION=7 -v FASTLOOP BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 (Reference Sapphire card, 2 additional 120mm coolers, temperature is 79-82C)<br />
|-<br />
| 5650 || 48 || 1.37|| || 35(?) || - || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source] [http://www.notebookcheck.net/ATI-Mobility-Radeon-HD-5650.23697.0.html source] -- not TDP but load<br />
|-<br />
| 5650 || 61.2 || || || 35 || || || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.50 OpenCL/Windows 7 x64 || -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128 AGGRESSION=9<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EEFFEE;"| 5670 || 71.49 || 1.117|| || 64 || 775 || 400 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EEFFEE;"| 5670 || 72 || 1.64|| || 44 || 850 || - || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm-mod (Win7-64) || Sapphire 100287VGAL card is low power<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EEFFEE;"| 5670 || 85|| || - || - || 900 || 400 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EEFFEE;"| 5670 || 91|| || - || - || 890 || 400 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer 2011-06-09 poclbm catalyst 11.2 win7 x86 || -v -f 0 -w 128<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EEFFEE;"| 5670 || 100|| || - || - || 890 || 400 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || cgminer 1.5.6 || GPU/Mem 890/800 temp 72C<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EEFFEE;"| 5670 || 103 || -|| || - || 900/275 || 400 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x1 || phoenix-1.50 / phatk-mod / Ubuntu 11.04 || VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=256 / small fan, under 50 deg C, no voltage tweaks... catfish<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EEFFEE;"| 5670 || 127.8|| || - || - || 850 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Windows 7 (64bit) Phoenix 2.0 || Aggression=11 Worksize=128 Fastloop=False Opencl<br />
|-<br />
| 5750 || 105 || - || - || - || - || - || - || - || poclbm || Apple iMac 27inch (Mid 2010), Mac OSX 10.7 Lion <br />
|-<br />
| 5750 || 116.24 || 1.352|| || 86 || 700 || 720 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
| 5750 || 137 || ||- || - || 710 || 720 || - || PCI-E 1.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128 using stock memory and GPU clocks<br />
|-<br />
| 5750 || 146.4 || || - || - || 775 || 720 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-21 || -v -w128, AMD Catalyst overclock (775MHz GPU / 1225 MHz Memory)<br />
|-<br />
| 5750 || 154.56 || 1.45|| || 106 || 830 || 720 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - || -v -w128 -f20 underclocked memory clocks from 1150MHz to 300MHz<br />
|-<br />
| 5750 || 170 || - || || - || 870 || 720 || - || PCI-E 1.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128 patched BIOS to underclock memory to 300MHz<br />
|-<br />
| 5750 || 173 || - || ||- || 875 || 720 || - || PCI-E 1.1 x16 || phoenix || 875/300 w/MSI Afterburner, BFI_INT VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 FASTLOOP=FALSE -k phatk<br />
|-<br />
| 5750 || 177 || - || ||- || 910/575 || 720 || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || phoenix 1.5.6 || PowerColor GoGreen+fan, MSI Afterburner 2.2Beta, -k phatk VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 FASTLOOP=FALSE WORKSIZE=64<br />
|-<br />
| 5750 || 190 || - || ||- || 930/290 || - || atistream sdk || PCI-E 1.1 x16 || poclbm || 930gpu / 290mem (O.S. Ubuntu 10.10 x64, overclock gpu & underclock mem) with poclbm options -v -f 0 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
| 5750 Vapor-X || 195 || - || - || 125 || 975/300 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 1.1 x16 || cgminer 2.7.5 || (O.S. Ubuntu 12.01 AMD64 dedicated) cgminer options -Q 0 -I 9 -g 2 -w 256 --auto-fan --temp-target 65 --gpu-vddc 1.075 (Fan speed 60~65%)<br />
|-<br />
| 5750x2 CF || 356 || - || ||- || 870 || 720x2 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=28402.0 cgminer v1.5.1] (Win7 64bit) || 870MHz GPU / -I 8 / 2x [http://www.gigabyte.com/products/product-page.aspx?pid=3402#sp GIGABYTE GV-R575SL-1GI] cards + [http://www.gigabyte.com/products/product-page.aspx?pid=3258#sp GIGABYTE GA-790FXTA-UD5] MB + 1x [http://www.noctua.at/main.php?show=productview&products_id=9&lng=en 80mm], 1x [http://www.noctua.at/main.php?show=productview&products_id=16&lng=en 90mm] Noctua coolers<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 156.83 || 1.452|| || 108 || 850 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 171.12 || - || - || - || - || stock || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.7.3/debian gnu/linux 6 squeeze || -k phatk2 DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 180 || 1.406(*)|| || 128(*) || 950(OC) || 800 || 2.4RC1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 30 (*: Overclocked wattage calculated [http://bakkap.free.fr/Misc/wCalc.html here])<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 Hawk || 182 || ||- || - || 875 || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm/GUIMiner/Win7-64 || -v -w 128 (875MHz is stock for 5770 Hawk)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 185 || - || ||- || 850 || 1200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128 FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=7<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 205.58 || - || ||- || 935 || 300 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-04-28 || -v -w 256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 214.5 || 1.95(-)|| || 108(+) || 950 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.50/GUIMiner/Win7-64 || mem underclocked 300 mhz, 1.1vcore, 950mhz core, @69°C/57%FAN VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=12 -k phatk WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 214.7 || 1.95(-)|| || 108(+) || 950 || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / win7x86 || mem underclocked 309 mhz, -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 216.5 || -|| || - || 955 || || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.5 /phatk || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=23067.0 Modified phatk kernel] and stock voltage for Sapphire (1.125V) VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 -k phatk WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 218.35 || -|| || - || 1000 || 1401 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || DiabloMiner || -w 128 -v 2 (Overclocked to 1Ghz core with 1.2 voltage and Scythe Setsugen 2 cooling system)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 223 || 2.23(-)|| || 100(+) || 1050 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer || -v -w256 [http://www.smpake.com/?p=59 source]<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 227 || -|| || - || 1030 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || DiabloMiner || -w 256 -v 2 (Overclocked to 1030 core/300 mem with 1.2 voltage and Scythe Setsugen 2 cooling system)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 233 || 2.23(-)|| || 100(+) || 1050 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 || VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 -k phatk WORKSIZE=256 [http://www.smpake.com/?p=59 source]<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 236 || -|| || - || 1033/275 || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix-1.50 / phatk-mod / Ubuntu 10.04 || VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=256 / big fans, under 75 deg C, no voltage tweaks... catfish<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 240.61 || 2.3632(-)|| || 100(+) || 1080 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x1 || phoenix 1.48 || VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 -k phatk WORKSIZE=256 (OC'd and OV'd 1080/300 1.25v)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 241 || - || - || 100(+) || 1045 || 250 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.50 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 -k phatk WORKSIZE=256 (OC 1020/300) XFX@1.1 volts. +Kernel function improve 5%<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 244 || -|| || - || 1050 || 300 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.75 /phatk2 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=23067.0 Modified phatk kernel] and stock voltage for Sapphire (1.125V) VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=9, Temp 75C, FAN 100% (manual)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770x2 || 425 || - || - || 225(+) || 960 || 800x2 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm (guiminer) Win7x64 || -v -w128 (OC 960/1200)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830M || 120 || -|| || - || 570|| 120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.50 OpenCL/Win7 x64|| -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 244 || 1.36|| || 179 || 800 || 1000 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 OpenCL/Linux x86_64 || -k phatk DEVICE=1 VECTORS AGGRESSION=6 -v FASTLOOP WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 245 || 1.28|| || 192 || 880 || 900 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm (guiminer) || -v -w 256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 248 || 1.29|| || 192 || 880 || 500 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.46 || -k poclbm VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 256 || -|| || - || 900 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 || -k poclbm VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=7<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 267 || -|| || - || 875 || 1000 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x1 || Phoenix 1.48 OpenCL/Linux x86_64 || -k phatk DEVICE=1 VECTORS AGGRESSION=6 -v FASTLOOP WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 272 || 1.52|| || 179 || 875 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / LinuxCoin || 275Mhz Memory clock, 1.125 V (from 1.163), VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 275 || 1.5714|| || 175 || 900 || 500 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm (guiminer) Win7x64 || -v -w64 -f10, XFX stock w/ v2.4 SDK = 230Mh/s, v2.1 SDK = +10Mh/s, overclocking core clock by 100 = +30Mh/s, underclocking memory to 500 (ran cooler), and changing workload to -w64 = +5Mh/s.<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 285 || - ||1.58 || - || 960 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.47 / poclbm / Win7 64 || VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 290 || -|| || - || 930 || - || 2.2 || PCI-E x16/x4/x1 || GUIMiner / phoenix 1.5 / POCLBM / Win 7 64 || POCLBM VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 AGGRESSION=12 FASTLOOPS=false / Memory 300Mhz, VCore standard<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 290 || -|| || - || 996 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.4 / poclbm / Win7 64 || VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 295 || -|| || - || 980 || 1120 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIMiner / poclbm / Win XP 32 || Extra flags -v -w 128<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 297 || -|| || - || 970 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer / phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 64 || 300Mhz Memory clock, 44% fan-speed, -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=8 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 300 || -|| || - || 960|| 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIMiner / poclbm / Win 7 64 || Extra flags -v -w 256 (Sapphire Extreme 71 degrees @ 52% fan)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 300 || -|| || - || 970 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.47 / pheonix 1.48 / Win7 64 || (sapphire xtreme) VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 300 || -|| || - || 970 || 1120 || 2.1 || PCI-E x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 64 || 300Mhz memory clock BFI_INT AGGRESSION=12 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 305 || -|| || - || 984 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.4 / phatk / Win7 32 || 400Mhz Memory clock, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 307 || -|| || - || 996 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 64 || VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 307 || 2.25 || 2.55 || 125 || 965 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || cgminer 2.0.5 / Win7 64 || Mem @ 300/Stock voltage/Entire system 200W<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 308 || -|| || - || 990 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.50 / poclbm / Xubuntu 11.04 x64 || VECTORS AGGRESSION=11 BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 308 || -|| || - || 990 || 375 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 32 || @ stock voltage VECTORS AGGRESSION=11 -v FASTLOOP=false BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 black || 310 || ||- || - || 990 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x8 || LinuxCoin 0.2b, phoenix/phatk || (XFX Brand) -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 AGGRESSION=11 FASTLOOPS=false<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 311 || -|| || - || 1000 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.50 / phatk / Linux || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 315 || -|| || - || 970 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.6.1 / phatk2 / CrunchBang Linux || memory @ 300mhz VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=9 WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 316 || ||- || - || 1015 || 375 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 32 || @ stock voltage VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 -v FASTLOOP=false BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 319 || -|| 1.77 || - || 1030 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Xp 64 || 1.2v 355Mhz Memory, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 321 || -|| || - || 1000 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.50 / phatk-mod / Linux || 1000Mhz GPU, 350Mhz RAM, 1.15V, 90% fan, ~60c Temp, VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128; phatk kernel found [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=25135.0 here]<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 323 || || || || 900 (OC) || || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.5 Win7x64 || (500Mhz RAM), ~61c Temp, 57% fan, BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 -v WORKSIZE=64<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 (127$) || 325 || 1.98 || 2.57Mh/$ || 165W || 1040MHz || 200MHz || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || Guiminer/phatk-[http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=25135.0 mod] w7 64bit || -k phatk AGGRESSION=12 VECTORS2 WORKSIZE=128 stock volt, watercooled 53C<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 328 || - || - || - || 1040 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || LinuxCoin 0.2.1b / phoenix / phatk || 1.195 V, RAM @ 325 Mhz, fan @90%, no case, extra 10K RPM fan (62 deg.C in full-load); options: -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=256; brand: Sapphire Xtreme; bord is stable up to 1060 Mhz ~ 335 MHash, but produces some visual artefacts;<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 331 || - || 4.14 || - || 1010 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 1.0 x16 || WinXP 32 / Phoenix 1.7.5 / phatk2 || Stock Voltage, RAM 300, 64C, Fan 67%, -k phatk2 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=256 FASTLOOP=false (+6Mh w/ Phoenix 1.7.5 over 1.6.2)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 333 || - || - || - || 1040 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || LinuxCoin 0.2.1b / phoenix-1.50 / phatk-[http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=25135.0 mod] || + ~5 Mhash increase using the modified phatk from the user above. I am the same guy with 330 @ 1040 MHz Sapphire Xtreme, all other settings the same, board stable, no increase in rejected<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 334 || -|| || - || 1040 || - || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.75 / phatk 2.2 / Win7 64 || Stock voltage, 208Mhz Memory, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 334 || -|| || - || 1030 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.50 / phatk 2.0 / Win7 64 || Stock voltage, 385Mhz Memory, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=256 BFI_INT -- (upped from 330 achieved with diapolo mod [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=25135.0 here]), now using phatk 2.0 found [http://forum.bitcoin.org/?topic=7964.0 here]<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 342 || - || - || - || 1045 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk 2.2 / WinSvr 2008 R2 64 || Stock voltage, 385Mhz Memory, VECTORS VECTORS4 FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=14 BFI_INT -k phatk-2.2<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830x2 CF || 480 || -|| || - || 800 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Guiminer/ - / Win7 64bit |Guiminer || -v -f70 -w128<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830x2 || 570 || -|| || - || 950 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x8 || Guiminer/ - / Win7 64bit poclbm || poclbm -v -w256 -f10 MEMORYCLOCK 300MHZ GPUCLOCK 950MHZ FAN 52% 72°C <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830x2 || 608 || -|| || - || 990 || - || - || 2x PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 2.0/ phatk2 / Win7 32bit || Stock voltage, 300Mhz Memory, VECTORS GOFFSET AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=256 BFI_INT FAN 51% 69°C (Open ATX case) <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830x6 || 1967 || 1.62 || 1.97 || - || 1020/340 || 1120x6 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x1 || Phoenix 1.7.5/phatk2/BAMT Linux || 100% fan @65C / 1.162V / CCC 11.6 / BFI_INT VECTORS FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 240.77 || 1.595|| 1.49 || 151 || 725 || 1440 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 250.26 || 1.657|| || 151 || 725 || 1440 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || opencl client || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 252 || 1.575|| || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-01-25 || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 255.3 || 1.593|| || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-01-25 || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 264 || 1.748|| || 151 || 725 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 1.0 x8 || guiminer-20110501 || -v -w128<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 280 || 1.75|| || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.3 || with BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 280 || - || ||- || 725 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.50 / Fedora 14 || -v -k poclbm VECTORS AGGRESSION=8 WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT FASTLOOP=true<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 282.75 ||style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 3.06|| - || 92.25|| 666 (UC) || 1440|| 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix/WinXP || undervolted to 0.95V; phatk2 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=256; driver 10.12; [http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=9982.0 clocktweak] for setting values; [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=40056 thread]<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 292 || 1.825|| || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-04-28 -v -f 1 || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 298 || 1.8620|| || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-04-28 -v -f 1 -w 64 || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 300 || 1.5460|| || 194 || 925(OC) || 1440 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 304 || - || || - || 725 (stock) || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || cgminer.exe -v 2 -I 8 -w 256 --gpu-memclock 275 || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 314 || 1.8362|| || 171 || 820(OC) || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 1.0 x8 || poclbm || -v -w128<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 328 || - || || - || 875 @ Stock voltage || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix || 70C @42% fan, mem @ 500mhz; -v -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=8 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=128 <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 330 || - || ||- || 850 @ Stock voltage || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix || EAH5850, miner arguments: -k poclbm DEVICE=1 VECTORS AGGRESSION=8 WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 331 || - || ||- || 725 (Stock) || || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Diablo Win7 64bits|| Sapphire 5850 Xtreme, Arguments: -v 2 -w 192 (by Swapper 2011-07-05)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 335 || 1.8611|| || 180 || 890(OC) || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || poclbm || -v -w128, Memory downclocked to 300Mhz<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 344 || 1.8594|| || 185 || 890(OC) || 1440 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 347 || -|| || - || 876 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer / phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 64 || 300Mhz Memory clock, 50% fan-speed, -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 354 || -|| || - || 900(OC) || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || diablo -v 2 -w 128 || Ubuntu 11.04 64-bit [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=9239.0 Headless], catalyst 11.5, memory downclocked to 300mhz, stock voltage. flashed with atiflash [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9AxNmOy6_0 video]<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 355 || -|| || - || 900(OC) || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk || Ubuntu 11.04 64-bit, Memory downclocked to 200MHz, VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 355 || -|| || - || 900 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Ubuntu 11.04 x64 || 300Mhz Memory clock, 60% fan-speed, -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 356 || -|| || - || 870 (OC)|| 1440 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || cgminer 2.1.2 / Win 7 x64 || 302Mhz Memory clock, 85% fan-speed, Stock Voltage, -I 6 -v 2 -w 256 (2012-02 by Swapper)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 359 || -|| || - || 900 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.50 / phatk / Ubuntu 11.04 x64 || 300Mhz Memory clock, 66% fan-speed, -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 365 || -|| || - || 920 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 64 || 300Mhz memory clock VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 367.5 || -|| || - || 900(OC) || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 1.0 x16 || diablo with bitless's hack, -v 2 -w 128 || RHEL 5U5 x86_64, catalyst 11.5, Sapphire HD 5850 Xtreme, Memory downclocked to 300MHz, core voltage 1.145V, BIOS modded with RBE<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 369.4 || -|| || - || 930 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 1.0 x16 || guiminer / phoenix / phatk / Win7 32 || Catalyst 11.5, XFX HD5850, Memory downclocked to 322MHz, -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 372 || 1.68 || - || 220 @ Wall || 900 || 300 || 2.5 || PCI-E 1.1 x8 || cgminer 2.3.1 from source / Ubuntu 11.11 x86_64 || -I 8 -v 2 -w 256 --- hex-core opteron cpu w/ 12GB RAM and cgminer CPU bug in linux makes power usage a little high ~210w in windows 7 x86_64<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 375 || -|| || - || 940 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.50 / phatk / Ubuntu 10.04 || 300Mhz memory clock VECTORS AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=256 BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 381 || -|| || - || 940 || 1440 || 2.5 || PCI-E 1.0 x16 || phoenix / phatk / Win7 x64 / Catalyst 11.6 || MSI Afterburner 500MHz memory clock,-k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 AGGRESSION=13<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 382 || 1.8454|| || 207 || 995(OC) || 1440 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || phoenix || OC 1.177v on core<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 391 || - || - || 180 || 725 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Win 7 Ultimate x64 / DiabloMiner / Catalyst 12.2 || ASUS DirectCU @ GPU 960 MHz / MEM 300 Mhz @ Voltage 1.2 @ 70% FAN @ 69 temp @ Flags: -v 2,1 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 391 || -|| || - || 1000 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16(@x8) || phoenix 1.5 / phatk / Win7 64 || Mem @ 280, fan @ 100%, Temp @ 71, 1.163 V core, -v -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256, The name is Mautobu<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 392 || -||2.43 || - || 990 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix-svn (AUR) / phatk / Arch Linux || Memory: 180MHz, -v -q 1 -k phatk WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 397 || -|| || - || 950 || 1440 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.1 16x || phoenix 1.5 / phatk 2.2 / Win7 64, catalyst 11.6 || Mem speed 350Mhz, Fan 85%, 70C, 1.083 Vcore, -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=12 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 400 || -|| || - || 1000 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.5 Win7 x64 || Memory 600MHz, Vcore 1.225, 73C, -k phatk WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false, 3% phatk mod<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 404 || -|| || - || 965 || 1440 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.0 x16(@x8) || phoenixsvn / phatk2 / Ubuntu 11.04 / catalyst 11.8 || 5870 bios flash, Mem @322, fan@55%, Temp@83oC, 1.163Vcore, -k phatk2 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 408 || -|| - || - || 999/275 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.50 / phatk-mod / Ubuntu 10.04 || Fan 70%, temp < 60 deg C, Sapphire 5 heatpipe card, same flags as above/below (edit1- oops, no voltage tweaks... edit2- wow, phatk-mod makes a difference... catfish)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 412 || -|| || - || 1010 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 1x>16x || phoenix 1.5 / phatk 3% mod / Win7 64 11.5 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=12 -k phatk <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 414.8 || -|| || - || 1018 || 450 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 16x || GUIMiner / Win7 64 11.7 || I use Sapphire HD5850 Toxic 2GB and for OC TRIXX Sapphire Tweak Utility v4.0.2. 72 deg C, fan 100%, core 1018mhz, mem 450Mhz, stock voltage (1.163). proof: http://img23.imageshack.us/img23/2367/414upload.png GUIMiner parameters: -v -w256 -f1 <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 420 || -|| || - || 1055 || 300 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.0 1x>16x || phoenix 1.5 / phatk 3% mod / Win7 64 11.6 || Fan 80%, 66C, 1.250 Vcore, -k phatk PLATFORM=0 DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=8 And proof: http://i.imgur.com/s9hqs.png<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 431 || -|| || - || 1040 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 4x>16x || phoenix-svn / phatk kernel / Debian Wheezy AMD64 + fglrx 11.6 || fan 100%, vcore 1.1750 V, 72C, VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=15 FASTLOOP=false -k phatk, proof: http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/199/431u.png/<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 432.15 || -|| || - || 1040 || 500 || 2.5.793.1 || PCI-E 2.0 16x || phoenix 1.7.5 / phatk2 kernel / Win7 x64 SP1 || fan 100%, vcore 1.212 V, 69C, VECTORS4 BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=64 -k phatk2, proof: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/18704286/mining%205850.png/ ... Card is REF HIS 5850 ... i mining at this speed for stable but... max unstable (if i play video/flashvideo it will crash) is 436.48Mhash/sec with core 1051 mem 500 vcore 1.237 (same other settings) it's too hot in VRM that not sound good to me... i don't want to kill it for my fun mining ... - Nito Niwatori <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850x2 || 620 || - || || - || 800 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Guiminer ( cl miner ) v2012-02-19 Win7 x64 || MSI OC-Edition, -v -w 128 <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850x2 || 702 || - || - || - || 905 (OC)|| 1440 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 (x2) || phoenix 2.0.0 / Win 7 x32 || ASUS DirectCU: 304Mhz Memory clock, 66% fan-speed, Voltage Tweak, AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256 (https://www.dropbox.com/s/9u6f2jz3sz1poxb/5850.jpg)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850x2 || 720 || -|| || - || 875 (OC)|| 1440 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || cgminer 2.1.2 / Win 7 x64 || 302Mhz Memory clock, 85% fan-speed, Stock Voltage, -I 6 -v 2 -w 256 (2012-02 by Swapper)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850x3 || 1,010 || -|| || - || 850 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 (x3) || GUIMiner || -v -w128 | MSI Afterburner settings: 850MHz core clock and 500MHz memory clock <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850x4 || 1360 || 1.94|| || 700@wall || 900 || || || || poclbm|| <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850x6 || 2,135 || -|| || - || 900 || - || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.0 (6 total, 4 full length, 2 @ PCIE1x with risers || GUIMiner 24/8/2011 - poclbm || -v -f1 -w128 | Win 7 64Bit, Gigabyte GA-890FXA-UD5 motherboard, 4gb ram, AM3 cpu, Kingston SSD, Catalyst 11.8 drivers, guiminer switches: -v -f1 -w128, MSI Afterburner settings: 900MHz core clock and 1000MHz memory clock, cable risers required to fit all 6 cards, fans 100% Proof: http://i.imgur.com/6s7zv.jpg <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870M || 152.5 || -|| || - || 750(OC) || 1000 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || gui-miner (win-7) ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870M || 189.2 || -|| || - || 850(OC) || 1000 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Wins 7 64/gui-miner (win-7) || -v -w128 -f0 Graphics Overdrive setting 700->850 core clock & 900->1030memory clock . +35mhs over stock settings<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 313 || 1.665|| || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo/Linux || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 313.65 || 1.668||1.65 || 188 || 850 || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 340 || 1.809|| || 188 || 850 || 1600 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 343 || 1.824|| || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo/Linux || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 355 || 1.888|| || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/Linux || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 360 || 1.6822|| || 214 || 970 || 700 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL w7-64 || -f 0 -v -w 128 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=6144.msg91959#msg91959 source]<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 379 || 2.015|| || 188 || 850 || 1600 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha || -D -G2<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 397 || -|| || - || 930 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=10 WORKSIZE=128<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 400 || 1.9047|| || 210 || 950 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || Phoenix 1.3 || -k poclbm VECTORS AGGRESSION=7 FASTLOOP BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 408 || 1.8888|| || 216 || 980 || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm/Win7x64 || -f 20 -v -w 128, BIT_ALIGN, BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 414 || 1.9255|| || 215 || 975 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer/w7x64 || -k poclbm -v -w 256 -f 1 VECTORS BITALIGN BFI_INT -- Memory Clock 300<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 420 || 2.0000|| || 210 || 950 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=14 WORKSIZE=256 -- Memory Clock 300Mhz<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 421 || 1.9581|| || 215 || 975 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.47 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 -k phatk<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 421.5 || 2.007|| || 201 || 950 || 1600 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha || -D -G2 (GPU OC to 900, memory downclocked to 900)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 430 || || || || 980 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.48/Windows 7 64 || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=14 WORKSIZE=256 -- Memory Clock 300Mhz<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 432 || || || || 985 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.73/Windows 7 64 || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128 Memory Clock=900Mhz Asus 76C Fan=60% 65F ambient<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 435 || -|| || - || 990 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || LinuxCoin v0.2b phoenix/phatk || (Powercolor brand) -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 AGGRESSION=11 FASTLOOPS=false<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 437 || || 1.90|| || 960 || - || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x1 || phoenix 1.50 + phatk || Card is clocked with BIOS flash @ 960Mhz Core and 300Mhz Memory. More information and pictures: http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=7216.msg324521#msg324521 <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 438 || 1.9819|| || 221 || 1000(OC) || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm/Linux || -v -w 64 -f 1<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 440 || 2.0000|| || 220 || 995 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 445 || 2.28||2.34 || 195 || 1005 || 335 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x4 || Ubuntu 11.04 phoenix/phatk || (Asus brand, volts = 1'072) -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 AGGRESSION=12 FASTLOOPS=false -a 7 (-a 10)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 453 || || || || 980 || 1600 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.50/Windows 7 64 catalyst 11.6 phatk 2.2 || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=256 FASTLOOPS=false -- Memory Clock 350Mhz Vcore 1.163v<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 458 || -|| || - || 1040 || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm/Windows 7 64 || -v -w 256 -f 1 Crossfired, Water cooled, 916 Mhash/s total. Best dual gpu setup me thinks? The name is Mautobu.<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 460 || || || || 1050 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Guiminer || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=14 WORKSIZE=256 -- Memory Clock 300Mhz vcore @ 1225mV<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 460 || || || || 1020 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.50/Windows 7 64 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=256 -k phatk -- Memory Clock 300Mhz vcore @ 1225mV, 3% phatk mod<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 461 || || || || 1000 || 1600 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.75/Windows 7 64 || -k phatk2 (phatk 2.2) VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=9 WORKSIZE=128, Memory Clock=213, stock voltage<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 481 || || || || 1050 || 1600 || 2.5 || PCI-E 1x || phoenix 1.75/Windows 7 64 || -k phatk2 (phatk 2.2) VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=64 AGGRESSION=20 [MSI HD 5870 Ref Design vs Zalman VF3000A 1200mv Mem 600MHz]<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870x2 (CF) || 864 || -|| || - || 900 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer || -k phatk VECTORS FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=7 BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128 (Same flags per GPU)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870x2 (Ares) || 620 || -|| || - || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer || -v -w 128<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870x2 (Ares) || 826 || 0.751|| || 1100 || 950 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.4 w/ Phtak || AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT Memory @ 300MHz<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870x2 (Ares) || 826 || 1.18|| || 700 || 935 || 3200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 w/ Phatk || AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=256 VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false, memory @ 319 MHz, Windows 7 32-bit<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870x2 (Ares) || 878 || 0.585|| || 1500 || 1000 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.7 w/ Phtak || AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT Memory @ 300MHz<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870x4 || 1784 || || 1.29|| || 960 || - || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x1 || phoenix 1.50 + phatk + [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=7964.0 Version 2.2 Improvement] || Cards are clocked with BIOS flash @ 960Mhz Core and 300Mhz Memory. More information and pictures: http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=7216.msg324521#msg324521 <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870x6 || 2568 || -|| || 1200 || 970 || -|| 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/debian32bit || -v -w128, voltage default, Mem downclocked to 300 MHz, Fan 80-90% (+ 4x12cm fun 1900rpm), Temp 6x 70-75C. Whole computer comsumpts 1280Watt. Using PCI-E risers 16x-16x to use 6 GPU cards<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 530 || 1.803||0.53 ? || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.4.595.10 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/201103.beta3/Windows || -v -w128 -f60<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 535.06 || 1.820|| || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 560 || 1.905|| || 294 || 725 || 3200 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 565 || 1.922|| || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine2 || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 604 || 2.054|| || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 645 || 1.875|| || 344 || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || -f1, Debian 6, fglrx-driver 10.9.3<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 739 || || || || 795 || 3200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || cgminer 2.3.1 || -I 9 -k phatk -w 256 -v 2, memory clock @ 265MHz, Debian Squeeze, fglrx-driver 12.1.1, performance scales linearly with engine clock as long as memory clock is 1/3<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 740 || 2.1511|| || 344 || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix/1.3 || AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT, memory clock @ 300MHz<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 755 || 2.2076|| || 342 || 848 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 28-04-11 || -f 1 -w 256 -v, Ubuntu 10.10, fglrx 11.4, memory clock @ 300MHz<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 802 || 2.31|| || 347 || 850 || 3200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix poclbm Ubuntu 11.04 || -q 6 -k AGGRESSION=19 WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT VECTORS, fglrx 11.4, mem clock @ 1000MHz<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 820 || ??? || || ??? || 910 || 3200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x1 || Phoenix 1.5 Win7 || AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=256 BFI_INT VECTORS -k phatk, 11.5, Mem @ 300MHz, 1.110v, 3% phatk mod<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 822.2 || -|| || - || 950 || 3200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix win7 || -k phatk -q 6 AGGRESSION=20 WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT VECTORS, but with this increasing difficulty mining becomes pretty pointless<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 833 || -|| || - || 930 || 3200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.7.5, win7 x64, catalyst 11.7 || -k phatk AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=256 BFI_INT VECTORS fastloops=false. memory@300mhz, 1.125v, fan 100%, 73C core temp, 95c voltage controllers. it will clock higher but not stable without a voltage increase and i fear for the VRMs<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 863.4 || -|| || - || 955 || 3200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo - Debian || -v 2 -w 256 (XFX Radeon HD 5970 Black Edition)<br />
|-<br />
| 6310M || 9.821 || 0.545|| || 18 || 500 || 80 || 2.4 || Integrated/APU || poclbm-gui -v -w128 || HP DM1z 18W TDP is shared with the CPU<br />
|-<br />
| 6450 || 27.0 || 1.5 || - || 18 || 625 || 160 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 2011-06-14 || -v -w128 Sapphire HD6450 1gb ddr3 Ubuntu 11.04 64bit<br />
|-<br />
| 6450 || 32.6 || 1.918 || - || 17 || 725 || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer/Phoenix1.75 Windows 7 x64 (no Aero)|| -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 -v WORKSIZE=64 Dell OEM HD6450 1gb ddr3 passive cooling/no fan 81C<br />
|-<br />
| 6450 || 37.8 || ? || - || 17 || 850 || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix2.0.0 Windows 8 x64 || -k phatk2 VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 -v WORKSIZE=64 Sapphire HD6450 1GB DDR3 passive cooling/no fan 150MHz memory/1000mV VCore<br />
|-<br />
| 6470M || 24.1 || - || ||- || - || - || 2.1 || Integrated/APU || guiminer || <br />
|-<br />
| 6470M || 31.0 || - || ||- || - || - || 2.1 || Integrated/APU || phoenix 1.48 || <br />
|-<br />
| 6480G || 24.1 || - || ||- || - || - || 2.1 || Integrated/APU || phoenix 1.75 || <br />
|-<br />
| 6490M || 15.21 || - || ||- || - || - || - || - || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8994.0 DiabloMiner GUI] v2011-05-22 / Mac OS X 10.6.7 || Model: MacBookPro8,2 VRAM: 256MB<br />
|-<br />
| 6490M || 16.289 || 0.708|| || 23 || - || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm-mod (Mac OS X 10.6.7) || MacBook Pro early 2011<br />
|-<br />
| 6490M || 17.18 || - || ||- || - || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoneix 1.50 with poclbm, Mac OS X 10.6.7 || MacBook Pro 2,8 VRAM: 256MB. phoenix -k poclbm VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP<br />
|-<br />
| 6490M || 32.1 || - || ||- || - || - || - || - || guiminer 2011-07-01 with poclbm (Win7-x64) ||MacBookPro8,2 (WinX64) -v -w128 -f0<br />
|-<br />
| style="background:#FFDD00;"| 6520G || 33.8 || - || || - || 400 || 320 || - || Integrated/APU || guiminer 2011-07-01 with OpenCL (Win7-64bit) || -v -w128 on Toshiba L775D-S7222<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFDD00;"| 6530D || 40.5 || - || || - || 444 || 320 || 2.4 || FM-1 || cgminer 2.4.1 || Integrated/APU A6-3500; Linux; Catalyst 11.11; APP-SDK-v2.4 (595.10)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFDD00;"| 6550D(A8 Onboard) || 66.2 || -|| || - || - || - || 2.5 || FM-1 || guiminer 2011-07-01 with OpenCL (Win7-64bit) || -v -w128 -f60<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFDD00;"| 6550D || 67.6 || -|| || - || 600 || 400 || 2.5 || FM-1 || guiminer 2011-07-01 with OpenCL (Win7-64bit) || -v -w128 -f2<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFDD00;"| 6570 || 68.0 || 1.133|| || 60 || 650 || 480 || 2.4 || PCI-E x16 || guiminer 2011-05-21 with poclbm (Win7-32bit) || no extra option for miner . Sapphire 6570 gddr5 512mb<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFDD00;"| 6570 || 82.1 || 1.368|| || 60 || 650 || 480 || 2.4 || PCI-E x16 || guiminer 2011-05-21 with poclbm (Win7-32bit) || -v -w128 . Sapphire 6570 gddr5 512mb<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFDD00;"| 6570 || 86.0 || 1.95 || - || 44 || 650 || 480 || 2.4 || PCI-E x16 || guiminer/poclbm 2011-06-14 || -v -w128 Sapphire Ultimate HD6570 1gb ddr3 Ubuntu 11.04 64bit<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFDD00;"| 6570 || 112.0 || - || || - || 860 || 480 || 2.7 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer 2012-02-19/poclbm (Win7-64bit) || -v -w128 -f1 . Sapphire 6570 Low Profile gddr3 1024mb<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFDD00;"| 6570 || 114.0 || - || || - || 866 || 480 || 2.7 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer 2012-02-19/poclbm (Win7-64bit) || -v -f 0 -w128 -a 3 . XFX 6570 Full Profile gddr3 1024mb 64 bit<br />
|-<br />
| 6630M || 48.80 || -|| || - || - || - || - || - || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8994.0 DiabloMiner GUI] v2011-06-18 / Mac OS X 10.7 || Mac Mini 2011 MC816D/A<br />
|-<br />
| 6630M || 63.00 || -|| || - || 600 || 480 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || DiabloMiner Windows || Lenovo ThinkPad Edge E320 (card overclocked using Sapphire TRIXX)<br />
|-<br />
| 6670 || 102.20 || -|| || - || 800 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/Debian sid || -v -f 0 -w 128<br />
|-<br />
| 6670 || 104.00 || - || 1.0 || - || 820 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer(poclbm)/Win 7|| -v -a4 -f15 -d0 -w64<br />
|-<br />
| 6670 || 110.00 || - || 1.0 || - || 850 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer(poclbm)/Win 7|| -v -f 0 -w 128 -q 6<br />
|-<br />
| 6670 || 111.77 || 1.69 || - || 66 || 910 || 480 || 2.7 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.7.5 || -k phatk2 BFI_INT AGGRESSION=5 VECTORS WORKSIZE=128<br />
|-<br />
| 6670 || 120.1 || - || - || - || 900 || 480 || 2.7 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || cgminer 2.7.4 || kernel: diablo i:10 core: 900 mem: 750<br />
|-<br />
| 6670 || 124.0 || - || - || 66 || 940 || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix2.0.0 Windows 8 x64 || -k phatk2 VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 -v WORKSIZE=128 Sapphire HD6670 Ultimate 1GB DDR5 passive cooling/no fan 300MHz memory/1100mV VCore<br />
|-<br />
| 6750 || 142 || -|| || 150 || 700 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w128, Gigabyte SL (passive cooler), watts is TDP, card runs very hot (>90°C)<br />
|-<br />
| 6750 || 167.59 || -|| || - || 870 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer || -v -f30 -w128<br />
|-<br />
| 6750 || 172.00 || -|| || - || 860 || 600 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer 2012-02-19/poclbm (Win7-64bit) MSI Afterburner 2.2.3 || -v -w128 f-20 Sapphire 6570 GDDR3 1024Mb CCC ver. 11.12 OCL 2.5<br />
|-<br />
| 6750M || 41.48 || -|| || - || 870 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || diablominer ||<br />
|-<br />
| 6750M || 60 || -|| || - || - || - || - || - || diablominer OSX 10.7 WorkSize=128||<br />
|-<br />
| 6770 || 180 || -|| || - || 850 || 1200 || - || - || guiminer || -v -w128 , this was an XFX (OEM) model, GPU @ 850 MHz, mem @ 1200 MHz; I pushed it up to 190 Mhash/s briefly by overclocking, but it crashed the system above that<br />
|-<br />
| 6770 || 202 || -|| || - || 960 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x1,x4,x8,x16 || phoenix 1.48 || Sapphire 6770 (standard) -q2 -k poclbm DEVICE=0 AGGRESSION=10 VECTORS WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT FASTLOOP (The PCI-E speed does not affect the mining speed)<br />
|-<br />
| 6770 || 217 || -|| || - || 960 || 800 || - || PCI-E x16 || Guiminer with phoenix || Sapphire 6770 -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128 FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 with https://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=22965.0 modification<br />
|-<br />
| 6770 || 221 || -|| || - || 1010 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || Phoenix 1.50 || MSI 6770 -k phatk PLATFORM=0 DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=13 3% Stock voltage.<br />
|-<br />
| 6770 || 235 || -|| || - || 1010 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || Phoenix 1.50 || Sapphire 6770 -k phatk PLATFORM=0 DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=13 3% mod https://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=22965.0 and AS5 paste on core w/ external 12" fan 50C full load. Stock voltage.<br />
|-<br />
| 6770x2 || 470 || -|| || - || 1010 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || Phoenix 1.50 || Sapphire 6770 -k phatk PLATFORM=0 DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=13 3% mod https://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=22965.0 and AS5 paste on core w/ external 12" fan 50C full load. Stock voltage.<br />
|-<br />
| 6790 || 220 || 1.467|| || 150 || 800 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 || -k phatk BFI_INT FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=12 VECTORS OC'd to 1ghz, underclocked mem to 300, voltage at 1175<br />
|-<br />
| 6790 || 219 || 1.467|| || 150 || 960 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer || -v -f0 -w128 / GPU OC to 960MHz under Windows7 64bit<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 171.59 || 1.351||1.07 || 127 || 775 || 960 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 196 || -|| || - || 850 || 960 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 0<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 220 || 1.236(*)|| || 178(*) || 1000(OC) || 960 || 2.4RC1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 30 (*: Overclocked wattage calculated [http://bakkap.free.fr/Misc/wCalc.html here] )<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 234.8 || ||- || - || 940 || 960 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.3 || AGGRESSION=8 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 236.0 || ||- || - || 940 || 960 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.4 || -k phatk AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT, Core @ 900MHz, Memory @ 300MHz<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 244.2 || ||- || - || 960 || 960 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm june-2011 || -v -w 128<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 245.1 || ||- || 200 || 940 || 960 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer (Phoenix) || Sapphire 6850 (Memory @1000MHz); Win7 64bit; flags: -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=14 WORKSIZE=128 <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 250 || 1.612(*) ||- || 155(*) || 940 (OC) || 960 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || AOCLBF 1.74 (Phoenix 1.5**) @Win7/x64 || XFX 6850 (Memory @840MHz; Vdcc @1.148V; Fan @74%; Temp @70C; System @39C); flags: -k phatk BFI_INT FASTLOOP VECTORS AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128 (*: Overclocked wattage calculated [http://bakkap.free.fr/Misc/wCalc.html here] / **: [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=22965.0 Tainted Kernel])<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 256.2 || || - || 170 || 980 || 960 || 2.7 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.7.5 / Win7 32bit || -k phatk -VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=9, Sapphire VaporX 1GB, mem@250MHz, stock VDDC 1.150V <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 262.5 || || - || - || 965 || 525 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer / poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128 (HIS 6850 flashed to HIS 6870 BIOS)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 267.2 || ||1.67 || - || 1010(OC) || 960 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer / phoenix 1.50 || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 worksize=128 FASTLOOP=false<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 301.4 || ||1.67 || - || || || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer / poclbm || -v -f 2 -w 128 clock @ 985 mem @ 890<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 232.47 || 1.540||1.22 || 151 || 900 || 1120 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm -v -w 128 || <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 245|| -|| || - || 900|| 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ph rising 1.45 phoenix 1.50 phatk 11.5 sdk 2.4 || HD5xxx+ Fastloop phatk AGGRESSION=10<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 264.5 || - || - || - || 980 || 1050 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-01 || Stays around 66*C if I keep the side panel off and the room well ventilated. Card is PowerColor branded. Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 with Classic theme. Fan is at 100%. -v -w128 <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 271 || 1.807|| || 150 || 940 || 1120|| 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm -v -w 128 || Debian 6.0.1 x86_64<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 277.47 || -|| || - || 940 || 1120 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.3 || AGGRESSION=8 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 279 || 1.847(?)|| || 151(?) || 900 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha cat 11.4 sdk 2.4 || -G2 -D stock clocks, debian linux 64bit<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 281.7 || 1.172 (stock)|| || - || 980 || 1120|| 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer-v2011-06-09 || xfx6870, flags: -v 19 -w 128, win7 32-bit<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 293.13 || || ||- || 945 || 1050|| 2.5 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.5 Phatk || xfx6870, Catalyst 11.6, 1.5 Phoenix flags: -k phatk FASTLOOP=false DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128; http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=25860.0 Kernel Patch; http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=6458.0 Cmd; http://developer.amd.com/tools/gDEBugger/Pages/default.aspx No Crossfire Required; runs faster without crossfire 1% + additional 3% from update<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 294 || || ||- || 980 || 1120|| 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix phatk || xfx6870, 340MHz memory clock, Catalyst 11.6, flags: BFI_INT VECTORS AGGRESSION=9 WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 294 || || ||- || 985 || 1100|| 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || Diablo || Powercolor branded card, Win 8 x64, -v 1 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 295 || 2.02||1.64 || 146 || 950 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || hashkill latest as of 7/6/11 (ubuntu 11.4) || hashkill-gpu -p bitcoin user:pass:server -D, mem clock 850, voltage @ 1.175, Fan @ 70%, Temp @ 71C.<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 297|| -|| || - || 1000|| 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ph rising 1.62 phoenix 1.50 phatk 11.5 sdk 2.4 || Vectors HD5xxx+ Fastloop phatk AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 300 || - || || - || 940 || 1120 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.6.2 phatk2 || xfx6870 Black Edition, 340MHz Memory Clock, Catalyst 11.6, VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128, Debian Linux 64-Bit, Fan @ 50%, Temp @ 75C<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 300 || 1.72 || - || 174 || 1038 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm windows7x86 cat 11.4 || -v -w128 -f1 mem clock 360, fan 100% temp 73C<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 300.06 || 1.830|| || 164 || 1020 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.4 cat 11.4 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=8 fastloop mem clock 344<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 302 || - || || - || 940 || 1120 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || cgminer 2.1.2 || xfx6870 Black Edition, 340MHz Memory Clock, Catalyst 11.6, -w 256 -I 9, Debian Linux 64-Bit, Fan @ 50%, Temp @ 75C<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 307 || 1.72 || - || 174 || 1001/\1001 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm windows7x86 cat11.8 || -v -w128 -f5,85°C<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 310 || - || - || - || 1035 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 phatk 11.5 sdk 2.4 || BFI_INT VECTORS FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=128, mem clock @ 300MHz, voltage @ 1.300<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 310 || -|| || - || 975 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix phatk linuxcoin || BFI_INT VECTORS FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128, mem clock @ 340MHz, core clock @ 970MHz, flashed bios, 72 degrees w/ fan @ 68%, GIGABYTE SOC<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 312 || -|| || - || 975 || 300|| 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.50 / phatk / Windows 7 x64 SP1 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256, mem clock @ 300MHz, voltage @ 1.300, Fan @ 45%, Temp @ 62C, MSI 6870 HAWK.<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 314 || -|| || - || 1030 || 1120|| 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.50 / phatk / Linux || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 316 || -|| || - || 1030 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer 2011-06-09 using phoenix (Win7-32bit) || -k phatk platform=0 device=0 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 worksize=128 FASTLOOP=false, mem clock @ 228MHz, voltage @ 1.25, Fan @ 40%, Temp @ 73C<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 320 || - || - || 160 || 950 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Win 7 Ultimate x64 / DiabloMiner / Catalyst 12.1 || Saphire @ GPU 1030 MHz / MEM 300 Mhz @ Voltage 1.25 @ 80% FAN @ 69 temp @ Flags: -v 2 -w 128<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 321|| -|| || - || 1050|| 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x8 ||aoclbf 1.7 phoenix 1.50 11.6|| Vectors HD5xxx+ phatk AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=256, Memory=325MHz, Volts=1.3V, Fan~55%, Temps~70C<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 322 || 1.882|| || 170 || 1050 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.47 phatk 11.5 sdk 2.4 || BFI_INT VECTORS FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=256, mem clock @ 400MHz<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 329 || -|| || - || 1075 || 1120|| 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 phatk 11.5 sdk 2.4 || BFI_INT VECTORS FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 332 || -||1.74 || - || 1050 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer 2011-06-14 using phoenix (Win7-32bit) || -k phatk platform=0 device=0 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 worksize=128 FASTLOOP=false, mem clock @ 228MHz, voltage @ 1.3, Fan @ 60%, Temp @ 74C, flash and browser hardware acceleration disabled, aero enabled.<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 339.25 || - || - || - || 1090 || 1120 || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.7.3 cat 12.1 || Mem @ 350Mhz Clock @ 1090 Voltage 1.337 fan @ 100 Temp @ 75 diapolo's modified phatk kernel -k phatk_dia platform=0 device=0 VECTORS2 AGGRESSION=11 worksize=64 FASTLOOP=false BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 375 || - || - || - || 1000 || 1120 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Win 7 Ultimate 32-bit / Guiminer v2011-07-01 / phoenix 1.5 / phatk2 / Catalyst 11.9 || XFX / GPU @ 1000 MHz / MEM @ 200 Mhz / Voltage @ 1.187 V / FAN @ 40% / Temp @ 72 C / Flags: -k phatk2 platform=0 device=0 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=6 worksize=128 FASTLOOP=false / Using 2 miners with equal settings on 1 GPU<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870x2 || 600 || - || - || - || 945 || 330 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Ubuntu 12.04 32-bit / Phoenix 2 / phatk2 / Catalyst 11.9 || XFX / GPU @ 945 MHz / MEM @ 330 Mhz / Voltage @ 1.175 / Config: phatk2 VECTORS4 BFI_INT AGGRESSION=12 worksize=128 FASTLOOP=false GOFFSET=True<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870x4 || 1150|| -|| 1.2 || - || 900|| 1050 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.7 (Win7-64bit) || -k phatk platform=0 device=0-3 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 worksize=128 FASTLOOP=false<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870x4 || 1180 || -|| - || 145 || 950 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/debian32bit || -v -w128, Gigabyte SOC. voltage 1.175 (default), GPU default 950 MHz, Mem downclocked to 300 MHz, Fan 4x100% (+ 2x12cm fun 1300rpm), Temp 4x75C (in summer).<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870x4 || 1200 || -|| - || 150 || 970 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/debian32bit || -v -w128, Gigabyte SOC. voltage 1.175 (default), GPU overclocked from 950 to 970 MHz, Mem downclocked to 300 MHz, Fan 4x100% (+ 2x12cm fun 1300rpm), Temp 4x75C (in summer). Unstable with GPU@975 MHz.<br />
|-<br />
| 6930 || 320|| -|| - || - || 960 || 1200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.75/phatk || stock voltage, BFI_INT FASTLOOP VECTORS AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=64. 70C, FAN 80% (HIS brand)<br />
|-<br />
| 6930 || 370|| -|| - || - || 980 || 855 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || cgminer-2.4.1 || stock voltage (1,160), -I9. 71C, FAN 85% (HIS brand)<br />
|-<br />
| 6930 || 372 || -||1.89(?) || - || 1000 || 900 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.75/poclbm || max stable @ 1200 mV, BFI_INT FASTLOOP VECTORS AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=64<br />
|-<br />
| style="background:#00FFFF;"|6930x2|| 700 ||- || - ||400~|| 940 || 2560 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Guiminer || max stable @ 1100mV mem 300, Fan 80-90%, temp 70-75, -v -w64 -f10<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 272 || -||0.90 || - || 900 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48/poclbm || max stable @ 1150 mV, AGGRESSION = 7, BFI_INT, MSI 6950<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 291 || -|| || - || 920 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48/poclbm || max stable @ 1200mV, AGGRESSION = 7, BFI_INT, MSI 6950<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 295 || -|| || - || 930 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48/poclbm || max stable @ 1275mV, AGGRESSION = 7, BFI_INT, MSI 6950<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 295 || 1.844(?)|| || 160(?) || 810 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 300 || -|| || - || 940 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48/poclbm || max stable @ 1300mV, AGGRESSION = 7, BFI_INT, MSI 6950<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 314 || -|| || - || 800 || 1408 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 05-01-11 || -v -f30 -w128 default mem 1250 Stock Sapphire 6950 1gb<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 325 || 1.635(?)|| || 200(?) || 885 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 332 || 1.95~ || 1.2~ || 170~ || 840 || 1408 || 2.5.684.212 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 2011-06-14 || -v -w 128 -f 0, WinXP x86, Cat11.6b, desktop on IGP, Sapphire 1GB w/ HW locked BIOS, +40MHz GPU OC, 160W ACP + 5% OC = 170W new estimated ACP<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 333 || 1.95~ || 1.2~ || 170~ || 840 || 1408 || 2.4.650.9 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 2011-06-14 || -v -w 128 -f 0, WinXP x86, Cat11.6, desktop on IGP, Sapphire 1GB w/ HW locked BIOS, +40MHz GPU OC, 160W ACP + 5% OC = 170W new estimated ACP<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 338 || 1.84~ || - || 184~ || 860 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.50/poclbm kernel || Sapphire 2GB card w/ HW locked BIOS; Cat 11.6, Win7 x64; core @ 860MHz & 1087mV (OC + undervolt), mem @ 860MHz; cmd line args: VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128; power and MH/J calculated using Power = C*f*v^2 w/ assumption of 175 W at stock settings w/ 100% GPU util. (not measured)<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 340 || - || ||- || 895 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 05-21-11 || -v -w 128, mem @ 500, 1200 mV, MSI 6950<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 340 || - || ||- || 800 || 1536 ||(?) || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 05-21-11 || -v -f30 -w128 default mem 1250,Sapphire 6950 1gb, unlocked shaders<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 343 || 2.14 || - || 160 || 840 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 06-27-11 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128 FASTLOOP=false, HIS H695FN2G2M 2GB, mem @ 720, Kill-a-Watt measured<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 344 || 2.02~ || 1.27~ || 170~ || 840 || 1408 || 2.5.684.212 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/20110709 || -v -w 128 -f 0, WinXP x86, Cat11.6b, desktop on IGP, Sapphire 1GB w/ HW locked BIOS, +40MHz GPU OC, 160W ACP + 5% OC = 170W new estimated ACP<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 344.4 || -|| || - || 800 || 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || Powercolor 6950 @ shadermod on original Bios 6950 / 1000mV 850/730, +20% powertune, Fan @ 60%, -v -w128 -f1.<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 349 || 1.745(?)|| || 200(?) || 800 || 1408 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 05-21-11 || -v -f30 -w128, xfx 6950 xxx 1gb, locked shaders, core 900, mem 650, 79° C<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 351 || 1.91~ || - || 184~ || 860 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIminer/poclbm v2011-07-01 || Sapphire 2GB card w/ HW locked BIOS; Cat 11.6, Win7 x64; core @ 860MHz & 1087mV (OC + undervolt), mem @ 860MHz; cmd line args: -v -w 128 -f 0; (same system as the 338 MH/s result above using Phoenix)<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 352.8 || -|| || - || 820 || 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || Powercolor 6950 @ shadermod on original Bios 6950 / 1000mV 850/730, +20% powertune, Fan @ 60%, -v -w128 -f1.<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 360 || 1.8(?)|| || 200(?) || 970 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 360 || -|| || - || 870 || 1375 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || flashed with 6970 BIOS, -v -f30 -w128<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 365 || -|| || - || 925 || 1408 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || stock bios, -v -f0 -w128, MSI twinfrozr III 2GB<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 366.4 || -|| || - || 850 || 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || Powercolor 6950 @ shadermod on original Bios 6950 / 1000mV 850/730, +20% powertune, Fan @ 60%, -v -w128 -f1.<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 381 || -|| || - || 850 || 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || cgminer/phatk || XFX 6950 2Gb reference @ shadermod on original Bios 6950 / 1100mV 850/1250, +10% powertune, I=5, Fan @ 54% ~3100RPM, temp 73C w128. Windows7x64, Catalyst 13.1 .<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 383 || -|| || - || 975 || 1408 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || stock bios, -v -f0 -w128, voltage 1.274 @72c MSI twinfrozr III 2GB<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 388.4 || -|| || - || 900 || 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || Powercolor 6950 @ shadermod on original Bios 6950 / 1000mV 850/730, +20% powertune, Fan @ 60%, -v -w128 -f1.<br />
|- <br />
| 6950 || 389.9 || -|| || - || 950 || 1408 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || cgminer 2.3.2/Diablo || stock bios, -I 9, VRAM @ 820Mhz, fan @ 100%, voltage 1.250v, temp @ 68c, HIS ICE-Q X 2GB, OCed using MSI Afterburner, Windows 7 Professional 64-bit SP 1<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 400~ || -|| || - || 895 || 320 || 1536|| PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIMiner 24th Aug 2011 || Sapphire HD6950 Shader unlock mod 1408>1536 / +20% Power control, Fan @ 55%, Flags:-v -f2 -w64 -r5.Note this keeps temps under 80oC which is needed for this to be stable.Moderate fan noise.Power use is ~200W.<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 403 || -|| || - || 939 || 685 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix-1.50/phatk || ASUS EAH6950 ([http://www.techpowerup.com/vgabios/90661/Asus.HD6970.2048.101124.html (Ref. 6950 Flashed -> 6970)]) / +10% overdrive volt., Fan @ 90%, VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128 AGGRESSION=13. Overclocked from 880 -> 939 with MSI Aferburner<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 408.8 || -|| || - || 925 || 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || cgminer 2.12 || GIGABYTE GV-R695D5-2GD-B @ shadermod on original Bios 6950, mem@625, V=1100mv Fan @ 60%. Windows 7x64, Catalyst 11.9<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 410.4 || -|| || - || 950 || 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || Powercolor 6950 @ shadermod on original Bios 6950 / 1000mV 850/730, +20% powertune, Fan @ 60%, -v -w128 -f1.<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 417 || 2.085(?)|| || 200(?) || 975 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || unlocked shaders, +20% overdrive, mem @ 1250, fan @ 77%, temp 64C, -v -w128, gpu core @ 1145mV<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 418.8 || -|| || - || 940|| 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || Gigabyte OC 1GB, shadermod, voltage locked 1.175, mem 450, -w128 -v -f0, ATI Tray Tool<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 425.3 || -|| || - || 950/850 || 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix-1.50/phatk2 (Ubuntu natty) || Asus 1GB DirectCU, shadermod on OEM BIOS, OEM 1.1v, AMDOverdriveCtrl for 950 core 850 mem, 20% overdrive, flags VECTORS2 BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 428 || 2.14(?)|| || 200(?) || 1000 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || unlocked shaders, +20% overdrive, mem @ 1250, fan @ 80%, temp 64C, -v -w128, gpu core @ 1160mV<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 432 || 2.16(?)||1.44 || 200(?) || 1000 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || unlocked shaders, +20% overdrive, mem @ 520, fan @ 80%, temp 76C, -v -w128 -f 2, gpu core @ 1275mV<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 432.4 || -|| || - || 1000 || 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || Powercolor 6950 @ shadermod on original Bios 6950 / 1000mV 850/730, +20% powertune, Fan @ 60%, -v -w128 -f1.<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 440 || || || || 990 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/phatk || unlocked shaders, mem @ 1375, VGPU 1.21v, Watercooled (MCW60), temp 54C, VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 -k phatk<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 454.4 || -|| || - || 1050 || 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || Powercolor 6950 @ shadermod on original Bios 6950 / 1000mV 850/730, +20% powertune, Fan @ 60%, -v -w128 -f1.<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFAFAF;"| 6950x2 CF || 720 || - || - || 400 ~|| 900 || 1408 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-07-01 || MSI Afterburner - gpu @ 900 (870 stock), mem @ 900 (1250 stock), temp 69-71C(bottom vga) fan@94% / 77-81C(top vga) fan@99% - 31C enviornment, -v -f 1 -w 128 BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFAFAF;"| 6950x2 CF || 731 || - || - || 400~ || 900 || 1408 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-07-01 || MSI Afterburner - gpu @ 900 (870 stock), mem @ 900 (1250 stock), temp 68C(bottom vga) fan@90% / 73C(top vga) fan@99% - 28C enviornment, -v -f 1 -w 128 BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13<br />
|-<br />
| 6950x3 || 1081 || -|| || - || 860 || 1408 || 2.4(?) || PCI-E 2.1 x8 || guiminer/poclbm 07-01 || Sapphire 2GB stock bios, stock voltage, locked shaders: +20% overdrive, mem@650, fan@95%, temp 94C, -v -f0 -w128, 93c<br />
|-<br />
| 6950x4 || 1316 || 1.513|| || 870 || 840 || 1408 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || locked shaders, default mem 1250, dual fan 75C typical<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 323 || 1.468||0.92 || 220 || 880 || 1536 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -w 64, SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 365 || 2.28|| || 160 || 880 || 1536 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/phoenix || VECTORS AGGRESSION=9 WORKSIZE=128, fan @ 45%, 61C, 1.0 Vcore, 150 MHz mem, TX650w (84%), reference card<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 370 || -|| || - || 880 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || -v -w128, fan @ 50%/temp 72C, stock card<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 372 || 1.691(?)|| || 220(?) || 900 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix (svn trunk 05.14.2011) || clock 900/1375, VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128, fan 45% (auto) / temp 90C<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 380 || -|| || - || - || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w128<br>export GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS=1 # to reduce poclbm CPU from 100% to 2%<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 385 || 1.964|| || 196 || 900 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || -v -w128, memory downclocked to 684Mhz, fan @ 70%/temp 81C<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 388 || -|| || - || 900 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || -v -w128, fan @ 50%/temp 72C, stock voltage of 1.175v<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 403 || -|| || - || MAX || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || clock Max/50%+stock, -v -w128, fan= 100%/temp 72C (Note: Overclocked using CCC utility under Windows 7, Clock set to Max value w/ 50% increase to memory and 5% increase to voltage)<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 406 || -|| || - || 950 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.50/phatk || GPU Overclocked to Max (950MHz) using aticonfig, Memory Underclocked using AMDOverdriveCtrl (850MHz). Temp ~ 82C. VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 407 || -|| || - || 955 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w128, fan 75%/temp 75C, voltage +10%<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 414 || -|| || - || 960 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || -v -w128, fan @ 53%/temp 73C, stock voltage of 1.175v, high air flow case<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 420 || -|| || - || 975 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || -v -w128 -f0, clocks 975MHz/685MHz MSI Lightning<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 423 || -||1.20 || - || 995 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48/poclbm || ATI Tray Tools, Clocks=995/331.25, WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 VECTORS ,68C @ 65% Fan, HAF932 Case<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 431 || -|| - || - || 976 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.7/phatk2 || MSI AFTERBURNER, Clocks[976/1000], -k parameters[VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11], Temperatures{CARD}[86C@100% Fan]{ROOM}[27C/81F], <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 433 || -|| - || - || 975 || 1536 || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.6.2/phatk || MSI Afterburner 2.2Beta, -k phatk AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS, GPU 65C@100% Fan, Room 21C<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970x2 || 710 || -|| || - || 900/880 || 1536 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -w 256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970x2 || 828|| -|| || - || 940 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w128, fans 74%/82%, temp 74C/82C, powertune +20% (via CCC), memory underclock 825MHz (via MSI Afterburner), with 'Maj' fix<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970x3 || 1243|| -|| || 1000+ || 910 || 1536 || 2.5 || 2x16, 1x8 || phoenix 1.7.0 || fans 100%, temp 88C/84C/69C, GPU 920/ memory 795/ powertune 20%, ATI 11.11, -k phatk2 VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=128 AGGRESSION=13<br />
|-<br />
| 6990 || 670 || 1.94||0.89 || 346 || 830 || 3072 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || Catalyst 11.4 [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=2949.msg106238#msg106238 source].<br />
|-<br />
| 6990 || 704 || || || || 830 || 3072 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo Win7 64bits || Catalyst 11.4, Arguments: -v 2 -w 128 (by Swapper 2011-07-07)<br />
|-<br />
| 6990 || 708 || 2.05|| || 346 || 830 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || BIOS switch at "default" position 2, see [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 6990 || 744 || || || || 830 || 3072 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo Win7 64bits || Catalyst 11.6b, Arguments: -v 2 -w 128 (by Swapper 2011-07-14)<br />
|-<br />
| 6990 || 746 || 1.82|| || 410 || 880 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || BIOS switch at "overclocked" position 1, see [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 6990 || 758 || -|| || - || 880 || - || 2.4 || - || Phoenix with Poclbm || Catalyst 11.4, OC switch ON, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128 FASTLOOP=false<br />
|-<br />
| 6990 || 771 || 1.8804|| || 410 || 880 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx. Memory clock @ 1280Mhz.<br />
|-<br />
| 6990 || 772 || 1.8380|| || 420 || 900 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix & Poclbm || OC switch ON + overclocked to 900 mhz, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128<br />
|-<br />
| 6990 || 790 || -|| || - || 900 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || BIOS switch at "overclocked" position 1; with "aticonfig --odsc=900,1260" to further overclock the GPU to 900 MHz and mem to 1260 MHz, see [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 6990 || 795 || -|| || - || - || - || 2.4 || || Diablo's miner || BIOS switch at "overclocked" position 1; On Windows Vista, Clocks set at 955,1250. Power control at 20.<br />
Diablo's args: -w 128 -g 5 -v 2 -f 0<br />
|-<br />
| 6990 || 802 || -|| || - || 915 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || BIOS switch at "overclocked" position 1; with "aticonfig --odsc=915,1260" to further overclock the GPU to 915 MHz and mem to 1260 MHz, see [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 6990 || 835 || -||1.11 || - || 890/860 || 3072 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix || BIOS switch at "overclocked" position 1; with "aticonfig --adapter=1 --odsc=990,890 and aticonfig --adapter=0 --odsc=960,860" (GPU 0 runs hot). Currently, aticonfig can only underclock RAM to 100mhz below core speed. Command line: phoenix.py -k poclbm VECTORS AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT<br />
|-<br />
| 6990 || 852 || -|| || - || 955|| 3072 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || cgminer 2.1.2 || Memory: 830 Mhz, -v 2 -w 128 -I 9, Watercooled, stock voltage. (2012-02 by Swapper)<br />
|-<br />
| 6990 || 865 || -||1.11 || - || 890/860 || 3072 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || cgminer || BIOS switch at "overclocked" position 1; with core 0 at 990/890 engine/mem, core 1 at 960/860 (runs hot). Watercooled at 65-68C.<br />
|-<br />
| 6990x2 || 1436 || 1.848|| || 777 || 880 || 6144 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 x2 || guiminer 2011.05.11 || AUSUM switch set to 1 on both cards; Core left at 880MHz, memory left at 1250MHz; VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128<br />
|-<br />
| 6990x2 || 1640 || 1.416|| || 1200 || 1010 || 3072 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 x16 || phoenix 1.7.0 || GPU 910MHz, Memory 785MHz, Powertune 20%; VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128 FASTLOOP=false<br />
|-<br />
| 6990x2 || 1700 || 1.416|| || 1200 || 1010 || 3072 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 x16 || guiminer 2011.06.14 || GPU 1010MHz, Memory 900MHz; -k phatk2 VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=128 AGGRESSION=13<br />
|-<br />
| 6990x2 || 1740 || 2.11 || || 825 || 940 || 3072 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 x16 || cgminer 2.0.8 || GPU0+3 930MHz core/805MHz memory, GPU1+2 940MHz core/815MHz memory; BIOS switch factory setting; Cooled with 7C air from outside; -g4 -I9 -k phatk<br />
|-<br />
| 6990x3 || 2094 || -|| || - || 900 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 x8 x4 || poclbm || GPU 900MHz, Memory 1250MHz; poclbm.py -f 0 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
| 7750 || 104.15 || || || || 800 || || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix || worksize=128 VECTORS FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=10 WORKSIZE=128<br />
|-<br />
| 7750 || 117.15 || || || || 900 || || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix || worksize=128 VECTORS FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=10 WORKSIZE=128<br />
|-<br />
| 7750 || 125.5 || - || - || - || 830 || 512 || 2.6 (10.0.898.1) || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || DiabloMiner || GPU: 830MHz, Memory: 1125MHz; -v 1 -w 256 [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=64241.msg816946#msg816946 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 7750 || 133 || 2.66 || 1.21 || 50 || 880 || 512 || 2.6 (?) || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || cgminer || factory-overclocked to 880 MHz; power draw measured with a Kill-a-Watt<br />
|-<br />
| 7750 || 136.1 || - || - || - || 900 || 512 || 2.6 (10.0.898.1) || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || DiabloMiner || GPU: 900MHz (CCC locked @ 900), Memory: 800MHz; -v 1 -w 256 [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=64241.msg816946#msg816946 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 7770 || 182 || - || - || 83 || 1020 || 640 || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || Ubuntu 10.04 LTS amd64, GPU: 1020MHz<br />
|-<br />
| 7770 || 213 || - || - || - || 1150 || 640 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || Win7 32bit, Core2Duo, poclbm guiminer<br />
|-<br />
| 7850 || 287 || 1,91 || 1,1 || 150 || 950 || 1024 || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || cgminer || GPU:950 MEM:800, Linux 64bit, Intensive 14, GPU temp = 60°C, Room temp = 25°C, Fan = 60%<br />
|-<br />
| 7850 || 329 || - || - || 150 || 1100 || 1024 || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || cgminer 2.6.4 || Linux 64bit GTK+3, GPU temp = 60°C, Room temp = 25°C, Fan = 60%, -v 1 -k poclbm -I 6 --gpu-engine 1100 --gpu-memclock 950<br />
|-<br />
| 7850 || 363 || - || - || - || 1241 || 1024 || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Guiminer || GPU:1241 MEM:4840 <br />
|-<br />
| 7870 || 405 || - || - || - || 1100 || 1280 || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Guiminer || Sapphire 7870 OC , GPU: 1100MHz, Mem: 950 Mhz, GPU temp: 65°C, Fan 36% (1377 RPM).<br />
|-<br />
| 7870 || 406 || - || - || - || 1100 || 1280 || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || cgminer || Gigabyte GV-R787OC-2GD, GPU: 1200MHz, [cgminer -I 7]<br />
|-<br />
| 7870 || 422 || - || - || - || 1165 || 1280 || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || cgminer || Sapphire 7870 1ghz edition, GPU: 1165MHz, [cgminer.exe -d 0 -l 1 -T -I 8]<br />
|-<br />
| 7870 || 460 || - || - || - || 1250 || 1280 || 2.7? || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Guiminer || MSI R7870 TFIII/oc, Catalyst 12.11 beta4, 455-460 mhash/s @1250 core, 750 mem, 0% Power limit, 1.218v, GPU + Zalman VF3000N = 42C, VRMS = 57C, ambient approx. 17-19C, -v -w128 -f10<br />
|-<br />
| 7870 XT || 485 || 3.09 || 1.8726 || 157 || 1200 || 1280 || 2.8 || PCI-E 3.0 x16 2.0 || cgminer ||7870XT clock/mem - 1200/1600<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#00FFFF;"| 7950 || 510 || - || - || - || 985 || 1792 || 2.6 || PCI-E 3.0 x16 || Diablo || Windows 8 x64, Asus P8Z77 WS, i7 3rd Gen, Card is XFX brand, Clock 985Mhz, Mem 1100Mhz, -v 1 -w 256<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#00FFFF;"| 7950 || 512 || - || - || - || 1000 || 1792 || 2.6 || PCI-E 3.0 x8 || poclbm || GPU: 1000MHz, Memory: 850MHz<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#00FFFF;"| 7950 || 550 || - || - || - || 1060 || 1792 || 2.8 || PCI-E 3.0 x16 || Diablo || Core 1060, Mem 800, -v 1 -w 256 Intesity 7<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#00FFFF;"| 7950 || 605 || - || - || - || 1150 || 1792 || 2.6 (10.0.898.1) || PCI-E 3.0 x16 || DiabloMiner || GPU: 1150MHz, Memory: 1375MHz; -v 1 -w 256<br />
<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FF0000;"| 7970 || 555 || - || - || - || 925 || 2048 || 2.6 (10.0.898.1) || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || DiabloMiner || GPU: 925MHz, Memory: 1375MHz; -v 1 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FF0000;"| 7970 || 640 || -|| || - || 1070 core/1000 mem || 2048 || 2.6 || PCI-E 3.0 x16 || cgminer 2.6.5 || MSI R7970 Lightning Win7 х64, Catalyst 12.8, GPU 1070 MHz, Memory 1000 MHz, GPU temp = 72°C, Room temp = 28°C, Fan = 57%, cgminer -k diablo -v 1 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FF0000;"| 7970 || 650 || -|| || - || 1100 || 2048 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 x8 x4 || Diablo|| GPU 1100MHz, Memory 600MHz;<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FF0000;"| 7970 || 650 || -|| || - || 1100 || 2048 || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x1 || cgminer 2.4.1 || Win7 х86, Catalyst 12.3, GPU 1100 MHz, Memory 950 MHz, GPU temp = 68°C, Room temp = 25°C, Fan = 58%, -k poclbm -v 1 -w 128<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FF0000;"| 7970 || 674 || -|| || - || 1130 core/1000 mem || 2048 || 2.6 || PCI-E 3.0 x16 || cgminer 2.6.5 || MSI R7970 Lightning Win7 х64, Catalyst 12.8, GPU 1130 MHz, Memory 1000 MHz, GPU temp = 72°C, Room temp = 28°C, Fan = 57%, cgminer -k diablo -v 1 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FF0000;"| 7970 || 685 || -|| || - || 1150 core/1000 mem || 2048 || 2.6 || PCI-E 3.0 x16 || cgminer 2.6.5 || MSI R7970 Lightning Win7 х64, Catalyst 12.8, GPU 1150 MHz, Memory 1000 MHz, GPU temp = 72°C, Room temp = 28°C, Fan = 58%, cgminer -k diablo -v 1 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FF0000;"| 7970 || 685 || -|| || - || 1177 || 2048 || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || cgminer 2.3.1 || Win7, Catalyst 12.3, driver: 2.95, E: 1177, M:685, -k diakgcn -v 2 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FF0000;"| 7970 || 690 || - || - || - || 1150 || 2048 || 2.6 (10.0.898.1) || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || DiabloMiner || GPU: 1150MHz, Memory: 1375MHz; -v 1 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FF0000;"| 7970 || 695 || - || - || - || 1160(core)/1050(mem) || 2048 || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || DiabloMiner (options: -v 1 -w 256) || Asus HD7970-DC2T-3GD5 @ 1.17V; Linux Ubuntu 11.10 64 bit; AMD SDK 2.6; Catalyst 12.3 <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FF0000;"| 7970 || 710 || -|| || - || 1200 || 2048 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || DiabloMiner|| GPU 1200MHz, Memory 600MHz; -v 1 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FF0000;"| 7970 || 714~ || -|| || - || 1210 || 2048 || 2.7 || PCI-E 1.1 x16 || cgminer 2.7.4 || MSI HD7970 R7970-2PMD3GD5/OC, core clock - 1210Mhz, memory clock - 685, core voltage (1.149V - MSI Afterburner, ~1.043V - GPU-Z), memory voltage 1.5V, temperature - 75C at mid-day and 65C w/ AC on at 20C, Catalyst 12.8, Windows 8 Release Preview 32-bit, kernel - poclbm, vector - 1, worksize - 64, intensity - 14, fan - 100% <br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FF0000;"| 7970 || 825 || -|| || 214 || 1290 || 2048 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Bitminter|| Bitminter beta 1.1.1; GPU 1290MHz, Memory <br />
1375MHz (Trixx = 600); work size 256, "BFI_INT," Device-accessible CPU memory; full watercooled block; power stats from GPU-Z; Driver 11.12<br />
|-<br />
| 7970x3 || 1950 || 2.6 || 1.72 || 750 || 1100 || 2048x3 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || cgminer 2.7.5 || Win8, Catalyst 12.8, driver: 8.982.0.0, E: 1100, M:750, kernel: poclbm, worksize: 256, intensity: 9, gpu-threads: 4, refitted Diamond 7970 HSF with new VRM pads to lower VRM temps ~15C. Undervolted each card until crash under load, then raised about 0.015v for stability. Settings using afterburner 2.2.1 with OC unlocked. Visiontek 7970: $370, Sapphire 7970: $360, Diamond 7970: $400<br />
|-<br />
| 7970x3 || 2050 || 2.41 || 1.22 || 850 || 1150 || 6144 || 2.6 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || cgminer 2.3.1 || Win7, Catalyst 12.3, driver: 2.95, E: 1150, M:685, -k diakgcn -v 2 -w 256, 850W power consumption measured at the wall<br />
|-<br />
| FirePro V3800 || 69.0 || -|| || - || || || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || BitMinter Client || <br />
|-<br />
| FirePro V4800 || 79.7 || -|| || - || 775 || 400 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-01 || <br />
|-<br />
| FirePro V8700 || 84.8 || -|| || - || 750 || 800 || - || - || poclbm-mod.03.24.2011 || <br />
<br />
|-<br />
| FirePro M5800 || 61.4 || -|| || - || 650 || - || - || - || poclbm-mod.03.24.2011 || Ubuntu<br />
|-<br />
| FirePro M5800 || 69.3 || -|| || - || 650 || 400 || 2.1 || - || GUIMiner v2011-04-26 || -v -w128, Windows 7 32bit<br />
|-<br />
| FirePro M5950 || 96.7 || -|| || - || 725 || 900 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -v -w128 (Windows 7 64 bit)<br />
|-<br />
| FirePro V5800 || 119 || -|| || - || 690 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-01 || Windows 7 32bit<br />
|-<br />
| FirePro V5800 || 144 || -|| || - || 690 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-01 || -v -w128 (Windows 7 32bit)<br />
|-<br />
| FirePro V5800 || 161 || -|| || - || 780 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-01 || -v -w128 (Windows 7 32bit)<br />
|-<br />
| FirePro V7750 || 35.7 || -|| || - || - || 320 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-21 || Windows 7 64bit<br />
|-<br />
| FirePro V7800 || 254.85 || -|| || - || - || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 with poclbm || Debian Squeeze<br />
|-<br />
| FirePro M7740 (M97 GL) [DELL] || 63.0 || -|| || - || 650 || - || 2.1 || PCIe v2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-06-14 || Windows 7 64bit / only SDK2.1 works<br />
|-<br />
| FirePro M7820 || 150.0 || -|| || - || 700 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-06-09 / poclbm || Memory downclocked to 500 from 1000MHz, 169MH/s@800MHz, 181MH/s@860Mhz (max.), only SDK2.1 works, Windows 7 x86<br />
|}<br />
<br />
<references><br />
<ref name='amazon_20110625'>$ Prices from http://www.amazon.com on 2011-06-25</ref><br />
</references><br />
<br />
===Nvidia===<br />
<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! Watts !! Clock !! SP !! Comment<br />
|-<br />
| ION || 1.8 || 0.067 || 27 || || 16 || poclbm; power consumption incl. CPU<br />
|-<br />
| 8200 mGPU || 1.2 || || || 1200 || 16 || 128 MB shared memory, "poclbm -w 128 -f 0"<br />
|-<br />
| 8400 GS || 2.3 || || || || || "poclbm -w 128"<br />
|-<br />
| 8400 GS || 1.6 || 0.013 || 128 || 1238 || || DiabloMiner -w 128 -f 1 [https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/User:Knightmb source]<br />
|-<br />
| 8400M GS || 2.0 || || || || ||<br />
|-<br />
| 8500GT || 2.4 || || || 918 || 16 || poclbm under GUIMiner<br />
|-<br />
| 8600M GT || 4.93 || || || || 32 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 8600M GT || 3.8 || || || || || Macbook Pro running Diablo<br />
|-<br />
| 8600GT || 5.66 || || || 1188 || 32 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 8600GT OC || 7.3 || || || 1602 || 32 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.0 poclbm] -w 128 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg72833#msg72833 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 8800GT || 25 || 0.24 || 105 || 1300 || ||<br />
|-<br />
| 8800GT || 24.5 || 0.23 || 105 || 1300 || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 8800GT || 31.1 || 0.296 || 105 || 1855 || || Overclocked 715 GPU / 1030 Memory / 1855 Shader; GuiMiner v2011-05-21<br />
|-<br />
| 8800GT || 31.8 || 0.303 || 105 || 1836 || 112 || 713 gpu, 1026 memory. win7x86, phoenix 1.48, -k poclbm WORKSIZE=64 AGGRESSION=5<br />
|-<br />
| 8800GT || 34.0 || || 105 || 1998 || || gpu 756M, mem 1123M, shader 1998M, temp 65C. winXP, phoenix 1.50, -k poclbm WORKSIZE=64 AGGRESSION=6 -- same settings get 32.7 MH/s with aggression 2<br />
|-<br />
| 8800GTS || 16.8 || 0.109 || 154 || || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source] [http://www.techspot.com/review/79-geforce-8800-gts-512/page11.html source]<br />
|-<br />
| 8800 GTS || 18.7 || 0.124 || 150 || 1200 || || poclbm -w 64 no vectors<br />
|-<br />
| 8800 GTS || 33.5 || || 150 || OC || || CUDA mining via GUIminer. Win7 64bit. poclbm -v -w128 -f0. OC'd Core@799MHz, Mem@1080MHz, Shader@1905MHz. Fan 70%, GPU temp @ 66C in comfortable room temp.<br />
|-<br />
| 8800 GTX || 27.5 || || || 1404 || || phoenix 1.48, poclbm, no vectors, 83C with 50C ambient <br />
|-<br />
| 8800m GTX || 16.3 || || || || || rpcminer-cuda Win7-64<br />
|-<br />
| 9300GE || 1.57 || || || 1300 || 8 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9300GS || 1.69 || || || 1400 || 8 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9300/nForce 730i || 2.15 || || || 1200 || 16 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9400GT || 3.37 || 0.067 || 50 || 1400 || 16 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9400M (MacBook) || 1.90 || 0.32 || 6 || 700 || || poclbm -f 8 no vectors<br />
|-<br />
| 9500M GS || 3.2 || || || 950 || 32 || rpcminer-cuda<br />
|-<br />
| 9500GT || 6.75 || 0.135 || 50 || 1400 || 32 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9500GT || 7.30 || 0.135 || 50 || 1400 || 32|| rpcminer-cuda, Overclocked 730 GPU/ 500 Memory / fan 100% 70C solid<br />
|-<br />
| 9500GT || 7.10 || 0.135 || 50 || 1767 || 32 || rpcminer-cuda, Overclocked 707 GPU / 500 Memory / fan 100% 73C steady<br />
|-<br />
| 9600GSO || 19.88 || 0.237 || 84 || 1375 || 96 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9600GSO512 || 11.75 || 0.131 || 90 || 1625 || 48 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9600GT || 15.66 || 0.165 || 95 || 1625 || 64 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9600GT Zotac || 15 || || || 1650 || 64 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9600GT OC || 18.8 || <0.198 || >95 || 1981 || 64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.0 poclbm] -w 128 -f 10 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg74610#msg74610 source] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg73353#msg73353 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 9600M GS || 4.0 || || || 1075 || 32 || rpcminer-cuda<br />
|-<br />
| 9800GT || 30.36 || 0.289 || 105 || 1800 || 112 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9800GT EE || 19.7 || 0.263 || 75 || 1375 || 112 || rpcminer-cuda<br />
|-<br />
| 9800GT OC || 29.5 || 0.283 || 105 || 1836 || 112 || poclbm.py, no options. Memory underclocked to 850Mhz, GPU overclocked to 733Mhz<br />
|-<br />
| 9800GTX || 32.54 || 0.232 || 140 || 1688 || 128 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9800GTX+ || 32.6 || 0.232 || 140 || 1688 || 128 || win7x64 275.33 Overclocked to 756/1890/1102 using a CUDA-specific miner (instead of phoenix, yay for ZERO stales!)<br />
|-<br />
| 9800GTX+ || 35.39 || 0.251 || 141 || 1836 || 128 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9800GTX+ || 36 || || || || || factory OC ubuntu polclbm.py -w 128 -f 10 -a 10 (DO NOT USE -v)<br />
|-<br />
| 9800GTX+ || 37.23 || 0.266 || 140 || 1890 || 128 || win7x64 275.27 phoenix(1.48) -k poclbm AGGRESSION=3 WORKSIZE=64 (may cause 75%+ stale count, in which case use a CUDA-specific miner instead)<br />
|-<br />
| 9800GTX+ || 40.20 || 0.287 || 140 || 835 || 128 || lowered memory clock higher core, unstable if going higher<br />
|-<br />
|style="background-color:#FFEFEF"| 9800GX2 || 57.83 || 0.294 || 197 || || 2x128 ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background-color:#FFEFEF"| 9800GX2 || 28 || 0.142 || 197 || || 2x128 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]<br />
|-<br />
| G210 || 3.38 || 0.111 || 30.5 || 1402 || 16 ||<br />
|-<br />
| G210 || 3.79 || 0.124 || 30.5 || 1402 || 16 || poclbm -f 1<br />
|-<br />
| GT220 || 10.8 || 0.084 || 128 || 1360 || || DiabloMiner -w 128 -f 1000 [https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/User:Knightmb source]<br />
|-<br />
| GT230 || 15.5 || 0.161 || 96 || 650 || 64 || (9600GT rebranded one from in a medion pc)<br />
|-<br />
| GT240 || 19.37 || 0.281 || 69 || 1340 || 96 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GT240 || 21.24 || || || || 96 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4291.0 poclbm-mod] -f 0 -v [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg73383#msg73383 source]<br />
|-<br />
| GT240 || 28.1 || || || || 96 || poclbm -f0 -v (Gainward GT240 1024DDR5 OC core@670/stockmem@1700/shader@1700 - stable; max.temp=73)<br />
|-<br />
| GT240M || 9.8 || 0.426 || 23 || 550 || 48 || poclbm -f 0 -w 256 <br />
|-<br />
| GT240 OC || 25.6 || 0.365 || 70 || 1765 || 96 || poclbm<br />
|-<br />
| GTS250 || 35.39 || 0.244 || 145 || 1836 || 128 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTS250 || 35.2 || 0.243 || 145 || 1836 || 128 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTS250 OC || 37 || 0.255 || 145 || 2047 || 128 || 37.2 with the following OC: Core: 775MHz, Shader: 1900MHz, Memory: 1200MHz<br />
|-<br />
| GTX260M || 22.5 || || || 500 || 112 || poclbm 4/28/2011 Asus G71GX runs ~90c without cooling pad <br />
|-<br />
| GTX260 || 35.91 || 0.178 || 202 || 1242 || 192 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX260 || 44 || 0.242 || 182 || 1242 || 216 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]<br />
|-<br />
| GTX260c216 || 40.40 || 0.236 || 171 || 1242 || 216 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX260c216 || 47.4 || 0.260 || 182 || 1348 || 216 || poclbm -w 256<br />
|-<br />
| GTX260c216 || 50.00 || || || 1050 || 216 || m0mchil GPU client, Windows 7 64-bit, x6 @ 3.5ghz<br />
|-<br />
| GTX260c216 OC || 52.0 || || || 1461 || 216 || "poclbm -w 256 -f 1"<br />
|-<br />
| GTX260c216 OC || 58.9 || || || 756/400 || 216 || Core overclocked, Memory underclocked, Ubuntu 11.04 Classic Session(No Effects) "poclbm -w 256 -f 1"<br />
|-<br />
| GTX260c216 OC || 60.1 || || || 1706 || 216 || Core: 364 MHz, Shaders: 1706 MHz, Memory: 594 MHz, VDDC: 1.1800V. "poclbm-mod -w 256 -f 1"<br />
|-<br />
| GTX275 || 50.75 || 0.232 || 219 || 1404 || 240 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX275 || 58 || || || 729/1458 || 240 || poclbm -f 0 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
| GTX280 || 46.84 || 0.198 || 236 || 1296 || 240 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX280 || 64.34 || 0.289 || 245 || 1296 || 240 || phoenix.exe -k poclbm AGGRESSION=6 WORKSIZE=128 (61*C with Accelero XTREME GTX280)<br />
|-<br />
| GTX285 || 64.8 || || || 1607 || 240 || GuiMiner - Not sure about wattage yet. Still testing. Card runs around 74 C<br />
|-<br />
|-<br />
| GTX285 || 53.35 || 0.262 || 204 || 1476 || 240 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX295 || 89.78 || 0.311 || 289 || 1242 || 480 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX295 || 120.70 || 0.418 || 289 || 1242 || 480 || GUIMiner no oc.<br />
|-<br />
| GTX295 || 117.30 || 0.406 || 289 || 1476 || 490 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GT 320M (MacBook Air) || 6.12 || || || 1212 || 48 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 320M (Mac mini 2010) || 7.0 || 0.35 || 20 || 450 || 32 || poclbm no extra options, windows 7 x64<br />
|-<br />
| GT 325M || 7.5 || || || 990 || 48 || rpcminer-cuda<br />
|-<br />
| GT 325M || 10.5 || || || 325/650(mem)/1300(shaders) || || rpcminer-cuda, 71 degrees<br />
|-<br />
| GT 325M || 7.99 || || || || || poclbm -f 0 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
| GT330 || 21.65 || || || || || poclbm -f 0 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
| GT 330M || 7.97 || || || ||48|| Model: MacBookPro6,2 VRAM: 512MB Software: [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8994.0 DiabloMiner GUI] v2011-05-22 / Mac OS X 10.6.7<br />
|-<br />
| GT 330M || 10.8 || || ||650MHZ core||48|| Model: MacBookPro6,2 VRAM: 512MB Software: GUIMiner running in Bootcamp v2011-08-24 / Mac OS X 10.6.8.The GPU was OC'd to 650MHZ core clock,mem clock was the lowest it would go in MSI Afterburner.The Bootcamp OS was Windows 7 x64.MBP Mid 2010.<br />
|-<br />
| GT 330M (Sony Vaio Z) || 7.8 || 0.71 ( 0.3 total) || 11 (26w total) || 1045 || 48 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GT 330M (Samsung R480) || 9.1 || || || 575(GPU)/1265(shader) || ||VRAM 1024MB. pocblm -vectors --verbose. Windows 7 Ultimate x86<br />
|-<br />
| GTS 350M (Toshiba A665-3DV) || 17.0 || 1.214 || 14 || 1080 || || DiabloMiner-Windows.exe<br />
|-<br />
| GTS 350M (Toshiba A665-3DV5) || 20.8 || || || 1350 || || DiabloMiner-Windows.exe, OC'd 550/850/1350 73C stable<br />
|-<br />
| GTS 360M || 25.0 || || || || || [toshiba qosmio laptop, ~150-165*F stock fans]<br />
|-<br />
| GTS 360M (ASUS G60jx) || 20.0 || || || || || everythins is stock, it cannot sustain. it reaches 90 degrees and freezes.<br />
|-<br />
| GTS 360M (ASUS G60jx) || 27.2 || || || Shader @ 1720, Memory @ 900 || || stock hardware (clean exhaust fan), Afterburner, 72 deg C Stable <br />
|-<br />
| GT430 || 20.24 || 0.413 || 49 || 1400 || 96 ||<br />
|- <br />
| GT440 || 20.4 || || || 1645 || 96 || rpcminer-cuda -aggression=8; winxp x64 driver 275.33<br />
|-<br />
| GT530 || 17.9 || 0.358 || 50 || 1400 || || BitMinter v1.1.2<br />
|-<br />
| GT520M || 8.9 || || || || || rpcminer-cuda, got up 2 10.2MH/s OC'ed<br />
|-<br />
| GT525M || 14.6 || || || || || rpcminer-cuda<br />
|-<br />
| GT540M || 16.0 || || || || || rpcminer-cuda<br />
|-<br />
| GT550M || 17.08 || || || || || rpcminer-cuda -aggression=8<br />
|-<br />
| GT610M (ASUS K45V) || 9.371 || || || 738 MHz || || 2GB RAM.<br />
|-<br />
| GT650M (rMBP) || 17.8 || || || 900 || 16 || cgminer 2.5.0 on OSX 10.7.4<br />
|-<br />
| GT650M OC || 27.4 || || || || || GUIMiner <br />
|-<br />
| GTS450 || 45.28 || 0.427 || 106 || 1566 || 192 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTS450 (Sparkle One) || 40.0 || || || || || poclbcm git Oct 2012<br />
|- <br />
| GTS450 || 45.28 || 0.427 || 106 || 1566 || 192 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460SE || 56.39 || 0.376 || 150 || 1300 || 288 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 || 66.32 || || || 814 || 336 || rpcminer-cuda 20110605, Graphics Clock @ 814MHz, Memory @ 1555MHz<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 || 68.31 || 0.427 || 160 || 1350 || 336 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 768MB || 57.8 || || ? || 1350 || 336 || rpcminer-cuda -gputhreads=320 -gpugrid=336<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 768MB (MSI Cyclone 768D5/OC) || 75.1 || || ? || 930 || 336 || rpcminer-cuda on Win7 x64 with ForceWare 275.33. [http://event.msi.com/vga/afterburner/download.htm MSI Afterburner] set to core: 930MHz, shader: 1850MHz, core voltage: 1.087V, memory: 1600MHz. Runs at 58°C with fan at 75% (ambient 25°C). <br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 1GB DirectCU || 72.3 || ? || ? || 1672 || 336 || rpcminer-cuda -gputhreads=320 -gpugrid=336<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 1GB DirectCU || 89.5 || ? || ? || 1000 || 336 || guiminer GPU:1000mhz MEM:900<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 1GB ( evga FPB ) || 71.4 || -- || -- || 870/1744/1800 || 336 || guiminer-cuda v2012-02-19 FW290.53 Win7x64<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 1GB ( evga ) || 83.1 || 0.519 || 160 || 925/1850/900@0.960v || 336 || guiminer (phoenix1.75) -k poclbm AGGRESSION=8 FASTLOOP BFI_INT -v WORKSIZE=256 ForceWare 301.42 Win7x64 Runs at 70°C with fan at 100%<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 (2 cards) || 102 || 0.319? || 320? || 1350 || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 (2 cards) OC || 127 || 0.374 || 340 || 1620 || 2x 336 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2444.0 rpcminer-cuda] -gpugrid=128 -gputhreads=128 ver.20110227<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 1GB OC (2x MsiHawksSLI) || 158 || 0.658 || 240w(used kill a watt) || core/shader/ram@vcore 930/1860/1150@1.087v (only vcore raised) || 2x 336 || rpcminer-cuda ver.20110227 -gpugrid=320 -gputhreads=320 -aggression=7 Watercooled stable @ 110°F/43° !!!USE ASUS GPU Tweak with GPU-Z (afterburner v2.2.3 wont OC with NVIDIA driver 306.97) I would need gpu bios mod to get more oc/volt. Setting faster ram did increase Mhash/s versus setting ram=core clock.<br />
|-<br />
| GTX465 || 64.41 || 0.322 || 200 || 1215 || 352 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX470 || 81.98 || 0.381 || 215 || 1215 || 448 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX470 || 94.7 || || || 1414 || ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX470 || 103.7 || || || 1520 || || memory @ 418MHz, stable @ 72 deg fan @ 90%, puddinpop rpcminer-cuda -gpugrid=96 -gputhread=128 AGGRESSION=14 GIGABYTE brand card BIOS 70.00.21.00.03 <br />
|-<br />
| GTX470 || 111.9 || 0.520 || 215 || 1650 || 448 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX470 || 115 || || || 1616 || || phoenix 1.46 poclbm VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=6<br />
|-<br />
| GTX470x2 || 121 ea. (130 burst ea.) || || || 1700 ||448|| PuddinPop rpcminer-cuda -gpugrid=96 -gputhreads=128 AGGRESSION=14 (memory 856 Max Temp. 71 deg. F on Water 1.085v+, Stable on Beast 2.0>3 days, no i7 CPU OC, driver 280.26, bios 70.00.21.00.03)<br />
|-<br />
| GTX480 || 101.28 || 0.405 || 250 || 1401 || 480 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX480 || 140.43 || || || 1700 || 480 || rpcminer-cuda -gpugrid=512 -gputhreads=480<br />
|-<br />
| GTX480 AMP!Zotac|| 140.1 || || || 1700|| 480 || rpcminer-cuda -gpugrid=480 -gputhreads=480 (vCore-1050,Core Clock-851, Shader Clock-1702, Memory Clock-2033, t-79°c, Water 43°c, stable temperature and work)<br />
|-<br />
| GTX550 Ti || 45.0 || ? || ? || ? || ? || EVGA 1GB, WinXP rpcminer, no overclock<br />
|-<br />
| GTX560 Ti || 67.7 || 0.39 || 170 || 1700 || 384 || standard EVGA 560, no overclock<br />
|-<br />
| GTX560 Ti || 74 || 0.41 || 170 || 822 || 384 || MSI 560Ti HAWK; core 822 Mhz clock (no overclock); rpcminer-cuda.exe -aggression=4 -gpugrid=64 -gputhreads=384; temp - 71°C; Win 7 x64<br />
|-<br />
| GTX560 Ti || 74.8 || 0.41 || 180 || 1700 || 384 || gigabyte 900Mhz clock; -w 512 -v<br />
|-<br />
| GTX560 Ti || 81 || 0.45 || 180 || 835 || 384 || Gainward GTX560TI Phantom, default clock, rpcminer-cuda<br />
|-<br />
| GTX560 Ti || 85.1 || - || - || - || - || cgminer 2.5.0, linux 32bit, nvidia 295.41, Intensity: 14<br />
|-<br />
| GTX560 Ti || 100 || 0.5 || 200 || 1000 || 384 || GFX - MSI 560Ti HAWK; rpcminer-cuda.exe -aggression=8 -gpugrid=64 -gputhreads=384; GPU temp - 68°C; OS - Windows 8 x64 .<br />
|-<br />
| GTX 560M || 39.3 || 0.38 || 75 W || 775|| 192 || [http://www.examiner.com/computers-in-denver/toshiba-qosmio-x775-q7380-review-review source1] [http://www.notebookcheck.net/NVIDIA-GeForce-GTX-560M.48313.0.html source2] Note: Uses the 295.51 Beta Drivers<br />
|-<br />
| GTX560 OC || 86.7 || <0.51 || >170 || 1800 || 384 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2444.0 rpcminer-cuda] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg72816#msg72816 source]<br />
|-<br />
| GTX570 || 105.83 || 0.483 || 219 || 1464 || 480 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX570 || 140 || 0.639 || 219 || 750 || 480 || rpcminer-cuda.exe -aggression=10 -gpugrid=480 -gputhreads=960; display driver stops working with aggression=11 under win7 x64 driver 270.61<br />
|-<br />
| GTX570 || 157 || 0.717 || 219 || 850 || 480 || rpcminer-cuda.exe -aggression=11 -gpugrid=120 -gputhreads=960<br />
|-<br />
| GTX570 || 165 || || || 925 || 480 || rpcminer-cuda.exe -gpugrid=120 -gputhreads=960; vcore 1.1v; Win7 x64 304.79 Beta; -aggression=11 adds strong lag with minimal increase in hashrate.<br />
|-<br />
| GTX570 || 160 || || || 925 || 480 || rpcminer-cuda.exe -gpugrid=104 -gputhreads=832; No desktop lag, very minimal loss in hashrate compared to much laggier settings<br />
|-<br />
| GTX580 || 156.6 || 0.642 || 244 || 1544 || 512 || cgminer 2.11.3 on Win 8-64 with I=6, driver nVidia 314.22<br />
|-<br />
| GTX580x2 || 2x 146 || 0.598 || 244 || 1544 || 512 || rpcminer-cuda.exe -gpugrid=128 -gputhreads=1024 <br />
(aggression levels above the default of 6 not recommended; only a gain of ~3MH/s per card, and '''heavy''' lag, GUIMiner v2011-08-24, win7 64bit nVidia 290.36 beta driver)<br />
|-<br />
| GTX590 || 193.1 || --- || --- || 1215 || 2x 512 || poclbm -v -w 256, Win<br />
|-<br />
| GTX590 || 2x 121.48 || --- || --- || 750 || 2x 512 || <br />
|-<br />
| GTX670 || 112.00 || 1.1 || 100 || 1275 || 1344 || EVGA GTX670FTW 2GB / GPU Clock offset +75Mhz with EVGA Precision X / GUIMiner -f 60 / Windows 7 64-Bit. (09-13-2012)<br />
|-<br />
| GTX680 || 127.3 || || || 1280 || 1536 || Asus GTX 680 2GB DirectCU II: Windows 7 64 bit: Nvidia 310.90 driver: Offset of 186: Runs at a constant 52C<br />
|-<br />
| GTX680 || 110.00 || || || 1110 || 1536 || RPCMiner with OpenCL or others. Might crash once mining stops. No Flags and Stock Settings (GPU Boost @ 1110mhz Core) with EVGA GTX 680, latest version of GUIMiner (2012-2-19) and Windows 7 x64.<br />
|-<br />
| GTX680 || 120.00 || 1.2 || 100 || 1272 || 1536 || Ufasoft Galaxy 4GB (GPU Clock offset +70Mhz with EVGA Precision X) (2012-7-28) and Windows 7 64-Bit.<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro FX 580 || 5.7 || 0.14 || 40 || 1125 || 4 ||rpcminer-cuda, Win, -gpugrid=128 -gputhreads=512<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro FX 770M || 5.75 || || || 500 || 32 || DiabloMiner-Windows.exe BFI_INT FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=6, Win<br />
|-<br />
|Quadro FX 770M || 6.39 || || || 500 || 32 || DiabloMiner-Windows.exe BFI_INT FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=6 w 64, Win 7x64<br />
|-<br />
|Quadro FX 880M || 9.6 || || || || || poclbm/guiminer<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro FX 1600M || 6 || 0.12 || 50 || 625 || 32 ||rpcminer-cuda, Win<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro FX 1800 || 13.6 || - || - || - || - || cgminer 2.5.0, linux 32bit, nvidia 256.44 Intensity: 4<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro FX 2000M || 23 || 0.397 || 58 || || || phoenix 1.48, -k poclbm, VECTORS, AGGRESION=6, Lenovo W520 platform<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro FX 2800M || 22 || 0.293 || 75 || 600 || 96 ||DiabloMiner, win<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro FX 3000M || 28.6 || - || - || - || - || cgminer 2.5.0, linux 32bit, nvidia 295.41 Intensity: 3<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro FX 3600M || 36 || 0.514 || 70 || 500 || 96 ||<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro FX 3800 || 33.3 || || || || || poclbm/guiminer -f0 -w128<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro NVS 135M || 1.05 || 0.1 || 10 || 800 || 1 || <br />
|-<br />
| Quadro NVS 295 || 1.7 || 0.07 || 23 || 567 || 8 || phoenix<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro NVS 3100M || 3.6 || 0.257 || 14 || 600 || 16 || rpcminer-cuda, Win, CUDA 3.1.1<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro NVS 4200M || 10.0 || || || 810 || || guiminer, Win7-64<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro 5000 || 67.7 || 0.445 || 152 || 513 || 352 || rpcminer-cuda.exe -aggression=7 gpugrid=352 gputhreads=704;<br />
|-<br />
| Tesla C1060 || 52.5 || || || 1296 || 240 || poclbm, Win7x64<br />
|-<br />
| Tesla K20 || 134.8 || || || 706 || 2496 || poclbm, Linux<br />
|-<br />
| Tesla M2050 || 79.8 || || || 1550 || 448 || DiabloMiner<br />
|-<br />
| Tesla M2050 || 94.5 || || || 1550 || || poclbm<br />
|-<br />
| Tesla S1070 || 155.2 || || 800 <ref name='nvidia_S1070'/> || 1440 (GT200b)<ref name='nvidia_S1070'/> || 960<ref name='nvidia_S1070'/> || rpcminer-cuda, Linux, CUDA 3.2, 4 instances (-gpu=0 through -gpu=3)<br />
|-<br />
| Tesla S2070 || 749.23 || || || 1150<ref name='nvidia_S2070'/> || 1792<ref name='nvidia_S2070'/> || rpcminer-cuda, Linux, CUDA 4.0, 8 instances (-gpu=0 through -gpu=7) <br />
|-<br />
| GTX280x2 || 102.7 || || || || ||<br />
|-<br />
|}<br />
<references><br />
<ref name='nvidia_S1070'>The S1070 is a dedicated supercomputing platform that features four Tesla units (GT200). Technical data taken from [http://www.nvidia.de/object/tesla_s1070_de.html NVIDIA]</ref><br />
<ref name='nvidia_S2070'>The S2070 is a dedicated supercomputing platform that features four Fermi units (C2070). Technical data taken from [http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nvidia_Tesla Wikipedia] (Documentation from NVIDIA webpage is confusing)</ref><br />
</references><br />
<br />
==CPUs/APUs==<br />
<br />
A lot of nice data can be pulled from [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.0 this thread] to seed this section. <br />
<br />
Might you wish to throttle CPU load a bit, so it doesn't reach 100°C, it can be done with Battle Encoder Shirase to a margin, like, -15% of available CPU cycles.<br />
<br />
Often, the best combination to be is to throttle CPU miner to -5% '''AND''' set it to least of priority levels, so as not to choke GPU miner up.<br />
<br />
===AMD===<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! nprocs !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! TDP [W] !! CPU Clock !! Mhash/s CPU !! Mhash/s GPU !! GPU !! GPU Clock !! SP !! Software !! Notes<br />
|-<br />
| 4x Opteron 6174 || 48 || 115 || 0.36 || 320W || 2.2 GHz || 2.4<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| cpuminer v0.8.1 || --alg 4way --threads 48<br />
|-<br />
| 2x Opteron 6172 || 24 || 55 || 0.24 || 230W || 2.1 GHz || 2.3<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| cgminer v2.7.6 || --algo 4way -t 24<br />
|-<br />
| 2x Opteron 6128 || 16 || 32.4 || 0.141 || 230W || 2 GHz || 32.4<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| 0.3.19 || -4way<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon XP 2000+ || 2 || 0.62 || 0.009 || 70W || 1.67 GHz || 0.62<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| 0.3.18/Ubuntu || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source] [http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm?articleid=914&page=4 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon 64 3500+ || 1 || 1.18 || 0.013 || 89W || 2.54 GHz || 1.18<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| ufasoft v0.4 || overclocked (originally 2.2 GHz)<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon 64 X2 3800+ || 2 || 1.73 || 0.03 || 65 W || 2.00 GHz || 1.73<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || -algo=4way<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon 64 X2 4000+ || 2 || 1.9 || 0.02 || 65W || 2.1 GHz || 1.9<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| rpc-miner ||<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon 64 X2 4400+ || || 2.09 || 0.032 || 65W || 2.3GHz || 2.09<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| 0.3.19/Win x64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon 64 X2 6000+ || 2 || 2.81 || 0.02 || 125W || 3 GHz || 2.81<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg22881#msg22881 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon 64 X2 6400+ Black Edition || 2 || 2.9 || 0.023 || 125W || 3.2 GHz || 2.9<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| 0.3.20.2 BETA/Win 7 x64 || -4way<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon II X2 240e || 2 || 2.71 || 0.06 || 45W || 2.81 GHz || 2.71<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon II X2 250 || 2 || 5.6 || 0.09 || 65W || 3.01GHz || 5.6<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| bitcoin-miner 0.11 ||<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon II X4 630 || 4 || 10.7 || 0.11 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 10.7<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| bitcoin-miner 0.4 || <br />
|-<br />
| Opteron 8220 x16 || 16 || 25 || || || 2.8Ghz || 1.5 <br />
|colspan=4| <br />
| ufasoft / OpenSuse 64bit || running default, but had to copy 32bit binaries over to get curl and ufasoft running. might be better when using native 32bit system w/o other users on the machine ||<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 3.8 || 0.04 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 3.8<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| 0.3.1x/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom X4 9950 BE || 4 || 9.3 || 0.07 || 126W || 2.6 GHz || 2.32<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| bitcoin-miner 0.13/WinXP || No GPU<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 7.2 || 0.08 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 7.2<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| cpu-miner 0.2.1/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X4 810 || 4 || 5.0 || || 95W || 2.8 GHz ||<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| rpcminer-cpu ||<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X4 810 || 4 || 9.5 || || 95W || 2.8 GHz ||<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| rpcminer-4way ||<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X4 810 || 4 || 10.5 || || 95W || 2.8 GHz ||<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| ufasoft v0.10 ||<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X4 810 || 4 || 11.5 || || 95W || 2.8 GHz ||<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| cgminer 1.5.3 || "cgminer 1.5.3 --algo 4way" on Ubuntu 11.10 alpha 2 (64 bit), built by GCC 4.6.1 with "-O3 -Wall -march=native" <br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X4 955 || 4 || 11 || 0.09 || 125W || 3.2 GHz || 11<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| rpcminer-4way ||<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X4 965 || 4 || 12 || 0.09 || 140W || 3.4 GHz || 11<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| rpcminer-4way ||<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X6 1055T || 6 || 15.84 || 0.13 || 125W || 2.82 GHz || 15.84 <br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X6 1055T || 6 || 23.6 || || 95W || 3.50 GHz || 23.6 <br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| [http://github.com/pooler/cpuminer pooler's cpuminer] 2.2.2 || --algo=sha256d<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X6 1075T || 6 || 21.3 || || 125W|| ||<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| minerd || Ubuntu 11.04 amd64 runlevel=1 -algo=4way -threads=6<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X6 1090T || 6 || 18|| || 141W|| 3.50 GHz || 3<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| minerd || <br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X6 1100T || 6 || 22 || 0.176 || 125W || 3.82 GHz || 22<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| bitcoin-miner || Aciid#bitcoin-dev<br />
|-<br />
| Sempron 3000+ || 2 || 0.8 || || 62W || 1.6 GHz || 0.8<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| cpuminer || --alg 4way<br />
|-<br />
| Turion X2 RM-70 || 2 || 1.9 || || 65W || 2.1 GHz || 1.9<br />
|colspan=4|<br />
| cpuminer || --alg 4way<br />
|-<br />
| Zacate E-350 || 2 || 11 || 0.615 || 18W || 1.6 Ghz || 1.231 || 9.831 || HD6310M || 492 Mhz || 80 || poclbm -v -w128 + Ufasoft 0.7 || stock speeds<br />
|-<br />
| Zacate E-350 || 2 || 12<br />
|colspan=2|<br />
| 1.648 Ghz || 1.252 || 10.87 || HD6310M || 492 Mhz || 80 || poclbm -v -w 256 -f 1 || "autotune" speed with ASUS EFI BIOS<br />
|-<br />
| Ontario C-50 || 2 || 6.2 || 0.68 || 9W || 1.0 Ghz || 1.200 || 6.2 || HD6250M || 277 Mhz || 80 || poclbm -v -w128 -f5 -r5 || <br />
|-<br />
| A4-3400 || 2 || 23.2 || || || 75W || 2.4 Ghz || || 23.2 || 6350 || stock || || GUIminer || ||<br />
|-<br />
| A8-3850 || 4 || 60 || || 100W || Stock || || 60 || HD6550D || Stock || 400 || poclbm.exe, Win7-32, 4GB RAM || All running at stock speeds, and set to auto in BIOS.<br />
|<br />
|-<br />
| A8-3870K || 4 || 95 || || 100W (@stock) || 3.3 Ghz || || 95 || HD6550D || 900MHz || 400 || phoenix.exe -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=4 WORKSIZE=128, Win7-64, 8GB RAM 1667MHz || M/B ASUS F1 A75-M Pro, CPU/GPU BIOS overclocked<br />
|-<br />
| A10-5800K || 4 || 105 || || 100W || 3.8 Ghz || || 105 || HD7660D || 800MHz || 384 || cgminer Intensity=7 || Linux 64bit (Ubuntu 12.10), AMD-APP-SDK-v2.7-RC-lnx64, stock speeds *not* overclocked<br />
|}<br />
<br />
===ARM===<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! Mhash/s/$ /€ !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment<br />
|-<br />
| ARM926EJ-S || 1 || 0.187 || ? || ? || ? || 1.2 GHz || cpuminer || Seagate Dockstar [http://archlinuxarm.org/platforms/armv5/seagate-dockstar ArchLinux]<br />
|-<br />
| Marvel Feroceon (88FR131) || 1 || 0.195 || 0.224 ||<0.01|| 0.87 W || 1.2 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-06-15) || Marvell SheevaPlug, Debian, 'c' algo<br />
|-<br />
| ARM1136EJ-S || 1 || 0.11 || ? || ? || ? || 0.528 GHz || cpuminer git || T-Mobile Pulse, inside Debian chroot, 'c' algo<br />
|-<br />
| ARM1176JZ(F)-S || 1 || 0.119 || ? || ? || ? || 0.412 GHz || [http://github.com/pooler/cpuminer pooler's cpuminer] 2.2 || iPhone 3G, 'sha256d' algo<br />
|-<br />
| ARM1176JZ(F)-S || 1 || 0.2 || ? || ? || 3.75W || 800 Mhz || cgminer 2.5.0 || RaspberryPi Model B, SoC BCM2835, Debian Squezee 19-04-2012, Overclocked Cpu 800mhz<br />
|-<br />
| Cortex-A8 || 1 || 0.125 || 0.36 || <0.01 || 0.35 W || 0.6 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || Nokia N900: 'cryptopp'<br />
|-<br />
| Cortex-A8 || 1 || 0.2 || 0.57 || <0.01 || 0.35 W || 0.6 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || Nokia N900: 'c' algo<br />
|-<br />
| Cortex-A8 || 1 || 0.365 || ? || ? || ? || 0.6 GHz || [http://github.com/pooler/cpuminer pooler's cpuminer] || BeagleBoard: 'sha256d' algo<br />
|-<br />
| Cortex-A8 || 1 || 0.435 || ? || ? || ? || 0.8 GHz || [http://github.com/pooler/cpuminer pooler's cpuminer] 2.2 || 'sha256d' algo<br />
|-<br />
| Cortex-A8 || 1 || 0.44 || ? || ? || ? || 0.8 GHz || cpuminer 2.2.3 (-mfpu=neon) || EfikaMX (iMX.51), CRUX ARMHF, cpuminer -a sha256d<br />
|-<br />
| AllWinner A10(A8) || 1 || 0.568 || ? || ? || <2.5W || 1.0 GHz || [http://github.com/pooler/cpuminer pooler's cpuminer] 2.2 || -a sha256d #Native Lubuntu armhf build <br />
|-<br />
| Cortex-A9 || 2 || 0.57|| 1.14 ||<0.01 || 0.5 W || 1.0 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-24) || Toshiba AC100, ubuntu, 'c' algo<br />
|-<br />
| Cortex-A9 || 2 || 1.3 || ? || ? || ? || 1.2 GHz || [http://github.com/pooler/cpuminer pooler's cpuminer] 2.2.3 || Samsung Galaxy S II - CFLAGS="-O3 -mfpu=neon"<br />
|}<br />
<br />
===Intel===<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! Mhash / $<ref name='amazon_20110625'/>/€<ref name='geizhals_20110625'/> !! ACP [W] !! Clock [GHz] !! Version !! Comment<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium III (Coppermine) || 2 || 0.39 || 0.008 |||| TDP 2× 26.1 W || 1 || Ufasoft 0.32 (compiled from source), Debian Squeeze || [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_Pentium_III_microprocessors#.22Coppermine.22_.28180_nm.29 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium III mobile ? || 1 || 0.3 || 0.014 |||| 21 || 1.07 || 0.3.1x/Win2K || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source] [http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=27380 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium M 1.6ghz || 1 || 0.4 || || || || 1.6 || minerd (jgarzik's 1.0) || cryppto, Windows 7<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium M 1.6ghz || 1 || 0.62 || || || || 1.6 || Ufasoft 0.20 || Windows XP Professional<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium M 1.6ghz || 1 || 0.71 || || || || 1.6 || [http://github.com/pooler/cpuminer pooler's cpuminer] 2.2 || Gentoo Linux<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium M 1.73ghz || 1 || 0.5 || || || || 1.73 || minerd (jgarzik's 1.0) || cryppto, Windows 7<br />
|-<br />
| Old Xeon 512k (Dual) || 2x1/2 || 2.0 || || || || 3.0 || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || HT disabled, algo=4way (twice as fast as the 2nd best algo)<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium 4 2.0A || 1 || 0.85 || || || || 2.0 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft-0.4]/WinXP || -g no -t 2<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium 4 630 || 1/2 || 1.29 || || || || 3.0 || ufasoft 0.23 || Windows XP<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium Dual-Core E2180 || 2/2 || 1.75 || || || || 2.0 || rpcminer-cpu || Win7-64<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium Dual-Core E2180 || 2/2 || 4.1 || || || || 2.0 || cpuminer || sse2_64<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium Dual-Core E2180 || 2/2 || 4.5 || || || || 2.0 || ufasoft v0.11 || Win7-64<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium Dual-Core E5400 || 2/2 || 2.27 || 0.03 || || 65 || 2.7 || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Celeron E330 || 2/2 || 2.2 || 0.03 || || 65 || 2.5 || 0.3.19/Ubuntu10.04 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]<br />
|-<br />
|-<br />
| Celeron E3400 || 2/2 || 5.9 || - || - || - || 2.6 || Ufasoft v0.13 / GUIMiner v2011-06-14 || WinXP 32 bit, SSE2, Flags "-g no" <br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Quad Q6600 || 4/4 || 11.0 || || 0.02/0.06 || 105 || 2.40 || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || -a 60 -g no -t 4<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Quad Q8200 || 4/4 || 10.9 || || 0.06/0.10 || || 2.33 || Ufasoft 0.14 || -g no -l yes -t 4<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Quad Q9400 || 4/4 || 11 || 0.046 || 0.06/0.07 || 95 || 2.66 || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || -a 60 -g no -t 4<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Quad Q9650 || 4/4 || 18.67 || || 0.05/0.06 || 95 || 4.00 || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || -a 60 -g no -t 4<br />
|-<br />
| Core i3 530 || 2/4 || 8.31 || 0.10 || 0.06/0.10 || 80 || 3.66 || Ufasoft 0.7 || -v -a5 -g no -t 4<br />
|-<br />
| Core i3 M350 || 2/4 || 1.48 || 0.04 || || 35 || 2.27 || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Core i3-2100 || 2/4 || 8.28 || || || || 3.1 || ufasoft v0.20 || <br />
|-<br />
| Core i5 M450 || 2/4 || 1.8 || 0.05 || || 35 || 1.2 || 0.3.17/Win7-54 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source]<br />
|- <br />
| Core i5-650 || 2/4 || 5.1 || 0.04 ? || 0.02/0.03 || || 3.2 || cpuminer-0.7 || -4way<br />
|-<br />
| Core i5-750 || 4/4 || 14 || || 0.06/0.10 || || 3.2 || bitcoin-miner 0.11 || -a 5 -g no -t 4<br />
|-<br />
| Core i5 ? || 4/? || 6.5 || || || || || client from svn || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37621#msg37621 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 4.5 || 0.05 || 0.02/0.03 || 95 || 3.1 || cpuminer git (2011-01-22) || cryptopp_asm32<br />
|-<br />
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 14 || 0.15 || 0.07/0.09 || 95 || 3.1 || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || sse2_64<br />
|-<br />
| Core i5-2400S || 4/4 || 16.6 || || || 65 || 2.5 || [http://github.com/pooler/cpuminer pooler's cpuminer] 2.2.3 || Linux Mint 13<br />
|-<br />
| Core i5 2500K || 4/4 || 20.6 || ||0.10/0.12 || || 4.2 || bitcoin-miner || -g no<br />
|-<br />
| Core i5 2600K || 4/8 || 17.3 || || || 75 || 3.4 || bitcoin-miner || -g no. 75W for the whole System without monitor (MSI Board). CPU underclocked to 3,4Ghz and undervolted to 1,012Vcore. Passive Cooling! 3.6ghz results in 18,4 Mhash/s<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 2600K || 4/8 || 18.6 || || || 95 W max. || 3.4 || Ufasoft bitcoin-miner 0.20 || -g no -t 8 CPU @ 3.511Ghz 1.176V<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 2600 || 4/8 || 23.9 || || || || 3.4 || [http://github.com/pooler/cpuminer pooler's cpuminer] 2.2 || Ubuntu Linux 11.10<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 620M || 2/4 || 1.888 || || || || 2.66 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8994.0 RPCMiner GUI] v2011-05-22 / Mac OS X 10.6.7 || Model: MacBookPro6,2 RAM: 4GB<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 620M || 2/4 || 6.5 || || || || 3.33 || This is achieved by running RPC 4 way miner in VMware Fusion 4 (running win 7 in the VM) while in Mac OSX / Mac OS X 10.6.8 || Model: MacBookPro6,2 RAM: 8GB.The CPU appears to turbo boost to 3.33GHz in this way from 2.67GHz when running it in this way.The MBP gets very hot and uses a lot of energy though so watch those temps.It'll throttle after a while unless you keep the air vents clear underneath (ie don't put int in your lap,etc).<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 720QM || 4/8 || 7.9 || ?|| || 45 || 2.8 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] || stream processors overclocked from 1.6 GHz; Dell Precision M6500, Win7-64, 8GB DDR3<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 820 || 4/8 || 13.8 || || || || 2.8 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] || -t 8<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 920 || 4/8 || 19.2 || 0.10 || || 195 || 4.0 (x21) || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] || -a 5<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 950 || 4/8 || 5.88 || 0.039 || || 150 || 3.83 (x23) || bitcoin-0.3.20.2 Win7-64 ||<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 950 || 4/8 || 18.9 || 0.126 || || 150 || 3.83 (x23) || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] v0.4 ||<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 980x || 6/12 || 19.2 || 0.15 || || 130 || 4.4 (x33) || cpuminer/Win7-64 || <br />
|- <br />
| Core i7 980x || 6/12 || 8.7 || || || || 3.9 (x27) || 0.3.17/Win7-64 || <br />
|- <br />
| Core i7 990x || 6/12 || 33.3 || || || || 4.5 (x32) || ufasoft/Win2008 R2-64 || Ram - 12Gb, Rampage III BlackEdition, Water cooling<br />
|- <br />
| Core i7 2635QM || 4/8 || 2.93 || || || || 2.00 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8994.0 RPCMiner GUI] v2011-05-22 / Mac OS X 10.6.7 || Model: MacBookPro8,2 RAM: 4GB<br />
|- <br />
| Core i7 620M || 2/4 || 6.3 || 0.18 || || 35 || 2.66 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] v0.4 || <br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 2600k || 4/4 || 6.7 || || || || 4.00 || phoenix 0.48 ||<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 3770k || 4/8 || 5.2 || || || || 4.4 || Guiminer v2012-12-03 || Windows 7 x64 : -v argument increased Mhash/s from 5.0 to 5.2<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 3930k || 6/12 || 66.6 || || || || 4.625 (125 x 37) || Ufasoft bitcoin-miner v0.28 || Windows 7 x64, uses ~190watts : -v argument increased Mhash/s from 36.0 to 66.6<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo U7600 || 1 || 1.1 || || || || 1.2 || minerd (jgarzik's 1.0) || cryppto, Windows 7<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo E5200 || 2/2 || 6.2 || 0.086 || || 72 || 2.76 || Ufasoft/Win7-64 || TDP is 65W + 7W overclock<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo E6550 || 1/2 || 2.45 || || || || 2.33 || cpuminer 0.7.1 (Linux) || --algo=sse2_64<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo E6850 || 2/2 || 6.75 || 0.10 || || 65 || 3.0 || ufasoft-0.3 ||<br />
|- <br />
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 7.76 || 0.11 || || 70 || 3.33 || ufasoft-0.3 || uncertain of overclock; miner optimized for Intel Core<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 2.52 || 0.04 || || 65 || 2.66 || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo E8200 || 2/2 || 2.3 || 0.035 || || 65 || 2.66 || rpcminer-cpu ||<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo E8400 || 2/2 || 6.9 || 0.106 || || 65 || 3.0 || ufasoft v0.10 || windows 7/64bit (-t 2)<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo E8500 || 1/2 || 3.6 || || || || 3.16 || guiminer v2011-06-14 || windows vista 32bit<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo E8500 || 2/2 || 7.2 || || || || 3.16 || guiminer v2011-06-14 || windows vista 32bit<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo P8700 || 2/2 || 5.9 || || || || 2.53 || ufasoft v0.21 || windows 7/64bit <br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo T5450 || 2/2 || 2.5 || 0.07 || || 35 || 1.63 || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || Ubuntu 11.04<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo T5500 || 2/2 || 4.3 || || || || 1.66 || [http://github.com/pooler/cpuminer pooler's cpuminer] 2.2 || Gentoo Linux (amd64)<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo T6400 || 2/2 || 4.2 || 0.12 || || 35 || 2.00 || cpuminer git (Linux) || --algo=sse2_64<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo T7250 || 2/2 || 4.5 || 0.13 || || 35 || 2.00 || bitcoin-miner 0.13/WinXP || No GPU<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo T7450 || 2/2 || 3.7 || 0.10 || || 35 || 2.13 || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || Ubuntu 11.04<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo T9400 || 2/2 || 4.2 || || || || 2.53 || ufasoft v0.13 || Win7-64<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Extreme X9000 || 2/2 || 2.37 || || || || 2.8 || rpcminer-cpu || Win7-64<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Extreme X9000 || 2/2 || 6.2 || || || || 2.8 || ufasoft v0.11 || Win7-64<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Extreme X9000 || 2/2 || 7.2 || || || || 3.2 || ufasoft v0.11 || Win7-64 Overclocked from 2.8 GHz to 3.2 GHz<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon 2.8 || 2/2 || 0.8 || || || || 2.8 || cpuminer || cryptopp_asm32 <br />
|-<br />
| Xeon 3060 || 1/2 || 2.03 || 0.03 || || 65 || 2. || cpuminer 0.8.1 (Linux) || --algo=cryptopp_asm32<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon Prestonia 2.4 (dual) || 2x1/2 || 2.16 || 0.017 || || 130 || 2.4 || ufasoft v0.4 || <br />
|-<br />
| Xeon X5355 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 10.13 || 0.16 || || 120 || 2.6 || bitcoind || Roughly the same speed as the "c" algo in cpuminer<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E3-1230 V2 (quad) || 4/8 || 19.7 || ? || ? || ? || 3.70 || cgminer 2.8.3 || -O2 -march=core-avx-i algo=sse2_64<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon X5355 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 22.76 || 0.09 || || 120 || 2.6 || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || -O2 -march=core2, algo=sse2_64<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon X5365 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 26.00 || ? || || ? || 3.0 || cpuminer git (2011-06-15) || algo=sse2_64<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon X5650 || 2x6/24 || 28.6 || ? || ? || ? || 2.67 || cpuminer 1.0.2 || --algo 4way<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon x5680 (dual) || 2x6/24 || 48 || ? || ? || ? || 3.33GHz || Ufasoft 0.29 || CentOS 6.2 x86_64<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon x5690 (dual) || 2x6/24 || 52 || ? || ? || ? || 3.46GHz || Ufasoft 0.29 || CentOS 6.2 x86_64<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5-2690 (dual) || 2x8/32 || 66 || ? || ? || 2x135W || 2.9GHz || Ufasoft 64-bit 0.31 || Windows Server 2008R2 x64<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5335 || 4/4 || 9.35 || 0.12 || || 80 || 2.00 || ufasoft v0.11 || Vista-32<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5410 || 4/4 || 9.8 || ? || || 80 || 2.33|| ufasoft v0.10 || CentOS 5.5 x64 <br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5440 || 4/8 || 7.3 || ? || || 80 || 2.66|| Kiv's poclbm-gui || FIXME: Either wrong model # or wrong threads/speed info<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5506 || 4/4 || 9.6 || ? || || 80 || 2.13|| ufasoft v0.10 || CentOS 5.5 x64 <br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5520 || 4/8 || 6.5 || 0.08 || || 80 || 2.27 || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5530 || 4/8 || 7.14 || 0.09 || || 80 || 2.4 || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5620 || 4/8 || 11.2 || ? || || 80 || 2.4 || ufasoft v0.10 -t 4 || CentOS 5.5 x64 Hyper-Threading is off<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5630 (dual) || 2x4/8 || 8 || 0.1 || || 80 || 2.53 || 0.3.17/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E6520 (dual) || 2x4/8 || 24.7 || || || || 2.53 || ufasoft v0.10 || windows 2008 R2 64bit (-t 16)<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E7220 || 2/2 || 6.3 || ? || || 80 || 2.93|| ufasoft v0.10 || CentOS 5.5 x64 <br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E7320 (dual) || 2x2 || 1.5 || || || || 2.8 || cgminer v1.2.8 || 2x2.8ghz dual core running Ubuntu 11.04 x86 (individual cores get 0.4 MH/s)<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E7450 (quad) || 4x6/24 || 60 || || || || 2.40 || ufasoft v0.13 || -t 24<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E7520 (dual) || 2x4/16 || 18 || || || 95 || 1.87 || ufasoft v0.10 || windows 2008 R2 64bit (-t 16)<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon W3680 || 6/12 || 18 || || || 130 || 3.33 || cpuminer v1.0.2 --algo=4way || Ubuntu 11.04 64bit<br />
|-<br />
| Atom Z520 || 1/2 || 1.20 || || || 2 || 1.7 || ufasoft 1.18 || Asus Eee 1101HA with overclocking capabilities<br />
|-<br />
| Atom N230 || 1/2 || 0.375 || || || 4 || 1.6 || rpcminer-cpu || <br />
|-<br />
| Atom N230 || 1/2 || 0.245 || || || 4 || 1.6 || rpcminer-4way || <br />
|-<br />
| Atom N230 || 1/2 || 0.97 || || || 4 || 1.6 || ufasoft v0.10 || <br />
|-<br />
| Atom N270 || 1/2 || 1.19 || 0.24 || || 5 || 1.6 || ufasoft v0.10 || <br />
|-<br />
| Atom N450 || 1/2 || 1.60 || 0.31 || || 6.5 || 2.06 || ufasoft v0.10 || <br />
|-<br />
| Atom N550 || 2/4 || 1.97 || || || || 1.5 || ufasoft v0.21 || Windows 7/64 bit<br />
|-<br />
| Atom 330 || 2/4 || 1.80 || || || 8 || 1.6 || ufasoft v0.13 || -t 4<br />
|-<br />
| Atom D510 || 2/4 || 1.00 || || || || 1.6 || cpuminer w cryptopp_asm32 || debian linux 6.0, headless system, 2 GB RAM, running from usb-flash<br />
|-<br />
| Atom D510 || 4/4 || 2.3 || 0.07 || || 30 || 1.6 || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || Ubuntu 11.04 Server<br />
|}<br />
<br />
<references><br />
<ref name='amazon_20110625'>$ Prices from http://www.amazon.com on 2011-06-25</ref><br />
<ref name='geizhals_20110625'>€ Prices from http://geizhals.at/eu on 2011-06-25</ref><br />
</references><br />
<br />
===Other===<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! Mhash/s/$ !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment<br />
|-<br />
| Cell || 6 || 21 || 0.35 || 0.07 || 60W || 3.2 GHz || Cellminer || Sony Playstation 3 (FAT): Needs custom firmware. [https://github.com/verement/cellminer source] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4704.20 source] Total power usage of PS3 fat is 120W but only the Cell cpu is active.<br />
|-<br />
| Cell || 7 || 26.6 || ? || ? || 60W || 3.2 GHz || Cellminer || Sony Playstation 3 (FAT): Needs custom firmware. [https://github.com/verement/cellminer source] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4704.20 source] Running with 7th spu enabled and both ppe cores.<br />
|-<br />
| Cell || 6 || 21 || 0.7 || 0.07 || 35W || 3.2 GHz || cellminer || Sony Playstation 3 (SLIM): Total power usage of PS3 slim is 70W but only the Cell cpu is active.<br />
|-<br />
| MIPS || 1 || 0.026 || ? || ? || ? || 200 MHz || cpuminer || ASUS WL-500G Deluxe Router Running [http://openwrt.org/ OpenWrt]<br />
|-<br />
| VIA Eden || 1 || 1.3 || 0.17 || || 8W || 1600 MHz || cpuminer || VIA Eden w/ padlock<br />
|-<br />
| PowerPC 7447A || 1 || 0.53 || || || || 1420 MHz || cpuminer ||<br />
|-<br />
| PowerPC 7450 (G4e) || 1 || 1.29 || || || || 1670 MHz || cgminer 2.0.7 || PowerBook5,6; Mac OS X 10.5.8; Altivec<br />
|-<br />
| PowerPC 750 (G3) || 1 || 0.140 || || || || 600 MHz || cpuminer || iBook G3 600 w/ Cryptopp<br />
|-<br />
| IBM POWER4+ 2/way || 2/1 || 0.58 || || || || 1450 MHz || cpuminer 2.2.3 || CRUX PPC (64bit), cpuminer -a sha256d -t 1<br />
|-<br />
| IBM Power7 (PowerPC) || || 7.6 || || || || 3.5 Ghz || cgminer || IBM Power7 770, SuSE Linux 11.1, 4 cores, OpenCL, YASM, Altivec<br />
|-<br />
| Google App Engine || 1 || 0.144 || || || 0W || || pyminer || Modified version of [https://github.com/jgarzik/pyminer pyminer] for GAE.<br />
|-<br />
| Open Shift || 1 || 0.059 || || || 0W || || pyminer || <br />
|}<br />
<br />
<references></references><br />
<br />
==See Also==<br />
* [[TP's Bitcoin Calculator]]<br />
* [[Mining rig]]<br />
* [[ZTEX FPGA Boards for Bitcoin Mining]]<br />
* [[Generation Calculator]]<br />
* [[Power Calc]]<br />
* [[OpenCL miner]]<br />
* [http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=745 ATI Stream vs. NVIDIA CUDA - GPGPU computing battle royale] <br />
* [http://bitminer.info/ Bitminer.info] <br />
* [http://www.pcper.com/reviews/Graphics-Cards/Bitcoin-Currency-and-GPU-Mining-Performance-Comparison Bitcoin Mining Performance Compared]<br />
** [http://www.pcper.com/reviews/Graphics-Cards/Bitcoin-Mining-Update-Power-Usage-Costs-Across-United-States Bitcoin Mining Power Costs Compared]<br />
<br />
[[Category:Mining]]</div>
Http