https://en.bitcoin.it/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&user=2Fast2BCn&feedformat=atom
Bitcoin Wiki - User contributions [en]
2024-03-28T23:40:36Z
User contributions
MediaWiki 1.30.0
https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Comparison_of_mining_pools&diff=9956
Comparison of mining pools
2011-06-07T14:07:25Z
<p>2Fast2BCn: </p>
<hr />
<div>{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Name !! Location !! Hashrate<ref name="hashrate">Hashrate is given in gigahash/second.</ref><ref name="hashrate2">Note that pool hashrate is largely irrelevant but can be seen as a popularity measurement. Note however that it is a theoretical security issue if one pool gains above 50% of the total computational power of the network, thus consider joining a pool based on other metrics.</ref> !! Reward Type !! Transaction fees !! Fee PPS !! Fee Prop / Score !! Audits<ref name="auditing">Auditing can be accomplished by third-parties if the pool publishes proofs-of-work for every share.</ref> !! Protocol !! Launched !! Forum Thread !! Homepage<br />
|-<br />
| [[Bitclockers|BitClockers]] || Unknown || 15 || Prop. || kept by pool || - || 2% || ? || RPC (+LP) || 2011-05-27 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=10127.0 Link] || [http://bitclockers.com/ Link]<br />
|-<br />
| [[Bitcoin_Pool|Bitcoin Mining Pool]] || USA || 118 || Prop. || kept by pool || - || 0%<ref name="donations">Donations are possible</ref> || ? || RPC (+LP) || Unknown || [http://bitcoinpool.com/forum/ Link] || [http://www.bitcoinpool.com/ Link]<br />
|-<br />
| [[Bitcoin_Pooled_Mining|Bitcoin Pooled Mining (Slush)]] || Unknown || 808 || Score || kept by pool || - || 2% || ? || RPC (+LP) || 2010-11-27 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=1976.0 Link] || [http://mining.bitcoin.cz/ Link]<br />
|-<br />
| [[Bitcoins.lc]] || Unknown || 28 || Prop. || kept by pool || - || 0% || ? || RPC (+LP) || 2011-05-27 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=10121.0 Link] || [http://www.bitcoins.lc/ Link]<br />
|-<br />
| [[BTC Guild]] || USA || 650 || Prop. || kept by pool || - || 0%<ref name="donationsf">Donations are possible to unlock features</ref>|| ? || RPC (+LP) || 2011-05-09 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=7760.0 Link] || [http://www.btcguild.com/ Link]<br />
|-<br />
| [[Continuum]] || Unknown || 7 || PPS / Score || kept by pool || 5% || 0% || ? || RPC (+LP) || 2011-05-17 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8660.0 Link] || [http://www.continuumpool.com/ Link]<br />
|-<br />
| [[DeepBit]] || Unknown || 2000 || PPS / Prop. || kept by pool || 10% || 3% || ? || RPC (+LP) || 2011-02-26 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=3889.0 Link] || [http://deepbit.net/ Link]<br />
|-<br />
| [[Eligius]] || USA / Europe || 112 / 19 || Prop. || kept by pool || - || ~0.0003% || Yes<ref name="auditnote">Access to Eligius proofs-of-work is available on request.</ref> || RPC (+LP) || 2011-04-27 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=6667.0 Link] || [http://eligius.st Link]<br />
|-<br />
| [[Swepool.net]] || Sweden || 56 || PPS || kept by pool || 8% || - || ? || RPC (+LP) || 2011-05-14 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8288.0 Link] || [http://swepool.net/ Link]<br />
|-<br />
| [[Simplecoin.us]] || Unknown || 35 || Prop|| kept by pool || - || 0% || ? || RPC (+LP) || 2011-06-02 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=11186.0 Link] || [http://simplecoin.us/ Link]<br />
|-<br />
| [[mtred.com]] || USA / Europe || 21 || Prop || kept by pool || - || 0% || ? || RPC (+LP) || 2011-05-25 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=9911.0 Link] || [http://www.mtred.com/ Link]<br />
|-<br />
| [[btcmine.com]] || Unknown || 370 || Prop || kept by pool || - || 2% || ? || RPC (+LP) || 2011-03-11 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=4251.0 Link] || [http://www.btcmine.com/ Link]<br />
|}<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<references/><br />
<br />
== See also ==<br />
*[[Pooled mining]]<br />
*[http://bcx.me/ Bitcoin Mining Pool Tracker]<br />
<br />
[[Category:Mining]]</div>
2Fast2BCn
https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Comparison_of_mining_pools&diff=9935
Comparison of mining pools
2011-06-07T07:39:12Z
<p>2Fast2BCn: </p>
<hr />
<div>{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Name !! Location !! Hashrate<ref name="hashrate">Hashrate is given in gigahash/second.</ref><ref name="hashrate2">Note that pool hashrate is largely irrelevant but can be seen as a popularity measurement. Note however that it is a theoretical security issue if one pool gains above 50% of the total computational power of the network, thus consider joining a pool based on other metrics.</ref> !! Reward Type !! Transaction fees !! Fee PPS !! Fee Prop / Score !! Audits<ref name="auditing">Auditing can be accomplished by third-parties if the pool publishes proofs-of-work for every share.</ref> !! Protocol !! Launched !! Forum Thread !! Homepage<br />
|-<br />
| [[Bitclockers|BitClockers]] || Unknown || 15 || Prop. || kept by pool || - || 2% || ? || RPC (+LP) || 2011-05-27 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=10127.0 Link] || [http://bitclockers.com/ Link]<br />
|-<br />
| [[Bitcoin_Pool|Bitcoin Mining Pool]] || USA || 118 || Prop. || kept by pool || - || 0%<ref name="donations">Donations are possible</ref> || ? || RPC (+LP) || Unknown || [http://bitcoinpool.com/forum/ Link] || [http://www.bitcoinpool.com/ Link]<br />
|-<br />
| [[Bitcoin_Pooled_Mining|Bitcoin Pooled Mining (Slush)]] || Unknown || 808 || Score || kept by pool || - || 2% || ? || RPC (+LP) || 2010-11-27 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=1976.0 Link] || [http://mining.bitcoin.cz/ Link]<br />
|-<br />
| [[Bitcoins.lc]] || Unknown || 28 || Prop. || kept by pool || - || 0% || ? || RPC (+LP) || 2011-05-27 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=10121.0 Link] || [http://www.bitcoins.lc/ Link]<br />
|-<br />
| [[BTC Guild]] || USA || 650 || Prop. || kept by pool || - || 0%<ref name="donationsf">Donations are possible to unlock features</ref>|| ? || RPC (+LP) || 2011-05-09 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=7760.0 Link] || [http://www.btcguild.com/ Link]<br />
|-<br />
| [[Continuum]] || Unknown || 7 || PPS / Score || kept by pool || 5% || 0% || ? || RPC (+LP) || 2011-05-17 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8660.0 Link] || [http://www.continuumpool.com/ Link]<br />
|-<br />
| [[DeepBit]] || Unknown || 2000 || PPS / Prop. || kept by pool || 10% || 3% || ? || RPC (+LP) || 2011-02-26 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=3889.0 Link] || [http://deepbit.net/ Link]<br />
|-<br />
| [[Eligius]] || USA / Europe || 112 / 19 || Prop. || kept by pool || - || ~0.0003% || Yes<ref name="auditnote">Access to Eligius proofs-of-work is available on request.</ref> || RPC (+LP) || 2011-04-27 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=6667.0 Link] || [http://eligius.st Link]<br />
|-<br />
| [[Swepool.net]] || Sweden || 56 || PPS || kept by pool || 8% || - || ? || RPC (+LP) || 2011-05-14 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8288.0 Link] || [http://swepool.net/ Link]<br />
|-<br />
| [[Simplecoin.us]] || Unknown || 35 || Prop|| kept by pool || - || 0% || ? || RPC (+LP) || 2011-06-02 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=11186.0 Link] || [http://simplecoin.us/ Link]<br />
|-<br />
| [[mtred.com]] || USA / Europe || 21 || Prop || kept by pool || - || 0% || ? || RPC (+LP) || 2011-05-25 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=9911.0 Link] || [http://www.mtred.com/ Link]<br />
|}<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<references/><br />
<br />
== See also ==<br />
*[[Pooled mining]]<br />
*[http://bcx.me/ Bitcoin Mining Pool Tracker]<br />
<br />
[[Category:Mining]]</div>
2Fast2BCn
https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Mining_hardware_comparison&diff=6495
Mining hardware comparison
2011-04-01T09:17:41Z
<p>2Fast2BCn: /* Nvidia */</p>
<hr />
<div>Below are some statistics about the mining performance of various hardware used in a [[mining rig]].<br />
<br />
The table shows stock clock numbers. 10-20% performance improvement can be achieved via overclocking.<br />
<br />
==Graphics cards==<br />
<br />
===AMD===<br />
To get the maximum performance use the 2.1 or 2.2 release of the ATI Stream SDK. 2.3 performance drops by 5-10%.<br />
<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! W !! Clock !! SP !! SDK !! Slot !! Miner !! Notes<br />
|-<br />
| 3XXX || || || || || || || || OpenCL Not Supported<br />
|-<br />
| 42XX || || || || || || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || || OpenCL Not Supported (intergrated/mobile GPU)<br />
|-<br />
| 4350 || 6.93 || 0.346 || 20 || 575 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors <br />
|-<br />
| 4550 || 7.23 || 0.289 || 25 || 600 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors <br />
|- <br />
| 4650 || 31.33 || 0.653 || 48 || 650 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors <br />
|- <br />
| 4670 || 36.14 || 0.613 || 59 || 750 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors <br />
|- <br />
| 4730 || 72.29 || 0.657 || 110 || 750 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 4770 || 72.29 || 0.904 || 80 || 750 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 4830 || 55.42 || 0.583 || 95 || 575 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|-<br />
| 4850 || 75.30 || 0.685 || 110 || 625 || 800 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 4860 || 67.47 || 0.519 || 130 || 700 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|-<br />
| 4870 || 90.36 || 0.602 || 150 || 750 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || clmine ||<br />
|-<br />
| 4870 || 78 || || || || || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/Vista 64bit || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source]<br />
|- <br />
| 4890 || 102.41 || 0.539 || 190 || 850 || 800 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 4850X2 || 150.60 || 0.602 || 250 || 625 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 4870X2 || 180.72 || 0.632 || 286 || 750 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 5450 || 11.99 || 0.631 || 19 || 650 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 5550 || 40.59 || 1.041 || 39 || 550 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 59.96 || 1.538 || 39 || 650 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 64 || 1.641 || 39 || 650 || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]<br />
|- <br />
| 5650 || 48 || 2.5-3.2 ? || 15-19 ? || || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source] [http://www.notebookcheck.net/ATI-Mobility-Radeon-HD-5650.23697.0.html source]<br />
|- <br />
| 5670 || 71.49 || 1.117 || 64 || 775 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 5670 || 85 || || || 900 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128<br />
|- <br />
<br />
| 5750 || 116.24 || 1.352 || 86 || 700 || 720 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 5770 || 156.83 || 1.452 || 108 || 850 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFFFFF;"| 5830 || 206.64 || 1.181 || 175 || 800 || 1120 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFFFFF;"| 5830 || 241 || 1.377 || 175 || 1006 || || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-02-22 ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 240.77 || 1.595 || 151 || 725 || 1440 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 252 || 1.669 || 151 || 765 || || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-01-25 ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 255.3 || 1.690 || 151 || 765 || || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-01-25 ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 300 || 1.987 || 151 || 925 (OC) || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 250.26 || 1.657 || 151 || || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || opencl client || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 313.65 || 1.668 || 188 || 850 || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 313 || 1.665 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo/Linux ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 343 || 1.824 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo/Linux ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 355 || 1.888 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/Linux ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 340 || 1.809 || 188 || 850 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 535.06 || 1.820 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 560 || 1.905 || 294 || 725 || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 565 || 1.922 || 294 || || || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine2 ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 604 || 2.054 || 294 || || || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 645 || || || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || -f1, Debian 6, fglrx-driver 10.9.3<br />
|- <br />
| 6850 || 171.59 || 1.351 || 127 || 775 || 960 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||<br />
|- <br />
| 6850 || 196 || || || 850 || 960 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 0<br />
|- <br />
| 6870 || 232.47 || 1.540 || 151 || 900 || 1120 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 6870 || 282.23 || 1.611 || 175 || 1047 || 1120 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm windows cat 11.2 || -v -w 128 -f 0 mem clock 300<br />
|- <br />
| 6950 || 295 || || 160 (?) || 810 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 325 || || 200 (?) || 885 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250<br />
|-<br />
| 6970 || 323 || 1.468 || 220 || 880 || 1536 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -w 64, SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.<br />
|- <br />
| 6990 || || || || || || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || || SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.<br />
|- <br />
|FirePro V8700 || 84.8 || || || 750 || 800 || || || poclbm-mod.03.24.2011 || <br />
|- <br />
|}<br />
<br />
===Nvidia===<br />
<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! W !! Clock !! SP !! Comment<br />
|-<br />
| 8200 mGPU || 1.2 || || || 1200 || 16 || 128 MB shared memory, "poclbm -w 128 -f 0"<br />
|-<br />
| 8600M GT || 4.93 || || || || 32 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 8600GT || 5.66 || || || 1188 || 32 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 8600GT OC || 7.3 || || || 1602 || 32 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.0 poclbm] -w 128 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg72833#msg72833 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 8800GT || 25 || 0.24 || 105 || 1300 || ||<br />
|-<br />
| 8800GT || 24.5 || 0.23 || 105 || 1300 || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 8800GTS || 16.8 || 0.109 || 154 || || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source] [http://www.techspot.com/review/79-geforce-8800-gts-512/page11.html source]<br />
|-<br />
| 8800 GTS || 18.7 || 0.124 || 150 || 1200 || || poclbm -w 64 no vectors<br />
|-<br />
| 9300GE || 1.57 || || || 1300 || 8 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9300GS || 1.69 || || || 1400 || 8 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9400GT || 3.37 || 0.067 || 50 || 1400 || 16 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9500GT || 6.75 || 0.135 || 50 || 1400 || 32 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9600GSO || 19.88 || 0.237 || 84 || 1375 || 96 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9600GSO512 || 11.75 || 0.131 || 90 || 1625 || 48 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9600GT || 15.66 || 0.165 || 95 || 1625 || 64 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9600GT OC || 18.8 || <0.198 || >95 || 1981 || 64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.0 poclbm] -w 128 -f 10 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg74610#msg74610 source] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg73353#msg73353 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 9800GT || 30.36 || 0.289 || 105 || 1800 || 112 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9800GTX || 32.54 || 0.232 || 140 || 1688 || 128 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9800GTX+ || 35.39 || 0.251 || 141 || 1836 || 128 ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background-color:#FFEFEF"| 9800GX2 || 57.83 || 0.294 || 197 || || 2x128 ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background-color:#FFEFEF"| 9800GX2 || 28 || 0.142 || 197 || || 2x128 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]<br />
|-<br />
| G210 || 3.38 || 0.111 || 30.5 || 1402 || 16 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GT220 || 9.83 || 0.170 || 58 || 1360 || 48 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GT240 || 19.37 || 0.281 || 69 || 1340 || 96 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GT240 || 21.24 || || || || 96 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4291.0 poclbm-mod] -f 0 -v [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg73383#msg73383 source]<br />
|-<br />
| GTS250 || 35.39 || 0.244 || 145 || 1836 || 128 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX260 || 35.91 || 0.178 || 202 || 1242 || 192 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX260 || 44 || 0.242 || 182 || 1242 || 216 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]<br />
|-<br />
| GTX260c216 || 40.40 || 0.236 || 171 || 1242 || 216 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX260c216 OC || 52.0 || || || 1461 || 216 || "poclbm -w 256 -f 1"<br />
|-<br />
| GTX275 || 50.75 || 0.232 || 219 || 1404 || 240 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX275 || 58 || || || 729/1458 || 240 || poclbm -f 0 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
| GTX280 || 46.84 || 0.198 || 236 || 1296 || 240 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX285 || 53.35 || 0.262 || 204 || 1476 || 240 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX295 || 89.78 || 0.311 || 289 || 1242 || 480 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GT 320M (MacBook Air) || 6.12 || || || 1212 || 48 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GT 330M (Sony Vaio Z) || 7.8 || 0.71 ( 0.3 total) || 11 (26w total) || 1045 || 48 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GT430 || 20.24 || 0.413 || 49 || 1400 || 96 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTS450 || 45.28 || 0.427 || 106 || 1566 || 192 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460SE || 56.39 || 0.376 || 150 || 1300 || 288 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 || 68.31 || 0.427 || 160 || 1350 || 336 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 (2 cards) || 102 || 0.319? || 320? || 1350 || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 (2 cards) OC || 127 || 0.374 || 340 || 1620 || 2x 336 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2444.0 rpcminer-cuda] -gpugrid=128 -gputhreads=128 ver.20110227<br />
|-<br />
| GTX465 || 64.41 || 0.322 || 200 || 1215 || 352 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX470 || 81.98 || 0.381 || 215 || 1215 || 448 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX470 || 94.7 || || || 1414 || ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX480 || 101.28 || 0.405 || 250 || 1401 || 480 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX560 Ti || 67.7 || 0.39 || 170 || 1700 || 384 || standard EVGA 560, no overclock<br />
|-<br />
| GTX560 OC || 86.7 || <0.51 || >170 || 1800 || 384 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2444.0 rpcminer-cuda] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg72816#msg72816 source]<br />
|-<br />
| GTX570 || 105.83 || 0.483 || 219 || 1464 || 480 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX580 || 119.06 || 0.488 || 244 || 1544 || 512 ||<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro FX 580 || 5.7 || 0.14 || 40 || 1125 || 4 ||<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro NVS 135M || 1.05 || 0.1 || 10 || 800 || 1 || <br />
|-<br />
| Quadro NVS 3100M || 3.6 || 0.257 || 14 || 600 || 16 || rpcminer-cuda, Win, CUDA 3.1.1<br />
|-<br />
|}<br />
<br />
==CPUs==<br />
<br />
A lot of nice data can be pulled from [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.0 this thread] to seed this section. Also from [https://www.bitcoin.org/wiki/doku.php?id=bitcoin_miners this page on the old wiki].<br />
<br />
===AMD===<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! nprocs !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment<br />
|-<br />
| 2x Opteron 6128 || 16 || 32.4 || 0.203 || 160W || 2 GHz || 0.3.19 || -4way<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon X2 3800+ || 2 || 1.73 || 0.03 || 65 W || 2.00 GHz || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || -algo=4way<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon X2 4000+ || 2 || 1.9 || 0.02 || 65W || 2.1 GHz || rpc-miner || <br />
|-<br />
| Athlon X2 4400+ || || 2.09 || 0.32 || 65W || 2.3GHz || 0.3.19/Win x64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon X2 6000+ || 2 || 2.81 || 0.02 || 125W || 3 GHz || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg22881#msg22881 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon X2 6400+ Black Edition || 2 || 2.9 || 0.023 || 125W || 3.2 GHz || 0.3.20.2 BETA/Win 7 x64 || -4way<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon XP 2000+ || 2 || 0.62 || 0.009 || 70W || 1.67 GHz || 0.3.18/Ubuntu || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source] [http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm?articleid=914&page=4 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon II X2 240e || 2 || 2.71 || 0.06 || 45W || 2.81 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon II X4 630 || 4 || 10.7 || 0.11 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || bitcoin-miner 0.4 || <br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X6 1055T || 6 || 15.84 || 0.13 || 125W || 2.82 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X6 1100T || 6 || 22 || 0.176 || 125W || 3.82 GHz || bitcoin-miner || Aciid#bitcoin-dev<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 3.8 || 0.04 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 0.3.1x/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 7.2 || 0.08 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || cpu-miner 0.2.1/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II x4 955 || 4 || 11 || 0.09 || 125W || 3.2 GHz || rpcminer-4way ||<br />
|}<br />
<br />
===ARM===<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment<br />
|-<br />
| Cortex A8 || 1 || 0.125 || || || 0.6 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || Nokia N900: 'cryptopp'<br />
|-<br />
| Cortex A8 || 1 || 0.2 || || || 0.6 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || Nokia N900: 'c' algo<br />
|}<br />
<br />
===Intel===<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium III mobile ? || 1 || 0.3 || 0.014 || 21W || 1.07 GHz || 0.3.1x/Win2K || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source] [http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=27380 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Old Xeon 512k (Dual) || 2x1/2 || 2.0 || ? || ? || 3.06GHz || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || HT disabled, algo=4way (twice as fast as the 2nd best algo)<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium 4 2.0A || 1 || 0.85 || || || 2.0 GHz || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft-0.4]/WinXP || -g no -t 2<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium Dual-Core E5400 || 2/2 || 2.27 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.7 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Celeron E330 || 2/2 || 2.2 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.5 GHz || 0.3.19/Ubuntu10.04 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Core i3 M350 || 2/4 || 1.48 || 0.04 || 35W || 2.27 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|- <br />
| Core i5 M450 || 2/4 || 1.8 || 0.05 || 35W || 1.2 GHz || 0.3.17/Win7-54 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source]<br />
|- <br />
| Core i5-650 || 2/4 || 5.1 || 0.04 ? || || 3.2 GHz || cpuminer-0.7 || -4way<br />
|-<br />
| Core i5 ? || 4/? || 6.5 || || || || client from svn || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37621#msg37621 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 4.5 || 0.05 || 95W || 3.1 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-01-22) || cryptopp_asm32<br />
|-<br />
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 14 || 0.15 || 95W || 3.1 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || sse2_64<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 920 || 4/8 || 19.2 || 0.10 || 195 || 4.0 GHz (x21) || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] || -a 5<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 950 || 4/8 || 5.88 || 0.039 || 150W || 3.83 GHz (x23) || bitcoin-0.3.20.2 Win7-64 ||<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 950 || 4/8 || 18.9 || 0.126 || 150W || 3.83 GHz (x23) || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] v0.4 ||<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 980x || 6/12 || 19.2 || 0.15 || 130 || 4.4 GHz (x33) || cpuminer/Win7-64 || <br />
|- <br />
| Core i7 980x || 6/12 || 8.7 || || || 3.9 GHz (x27) || 0.3.17/Win7-64 || <br />
|- <br />
| Core i7 620M || 2/4 || 6.3 || 0.18 || 35 || 2.66 GHz || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] v0.4 || <br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo E6550 || 1/2 || 2.45 || ? || ? || 2.33 GHz || cpuminer 0.7.1 (Linux) || --algo=sse2_64<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo E6850 || 2/2 || 6.75 || 0.10 || 65W || 3.0 Ghz || ufasoft-0.3 ||<br />
|- <br />
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 7.76 || 0.11 || 70W || 3.33 GHz (o/c?) || ufasoft-0.3 || miner optimized for Intel Core<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 2.52 || 0.04 || 65W || 2.66 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon X5355 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 10.13 || 0.16 || 120W || 2.66GHz || bitcoind || Roughly the same speed as the "c" algo in cpuminer<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon X5355 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 22.76 || 0.09 || 120W || 2.66GHz || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || -O2 -march=core2, algo=sse2_64<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5440 || 4/8 || 7.3 || ? || 80W || 2.66 GHz|| Kiv's poclbm-gui || FIXME: Either wrong model # or wrong threads/speed info<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5520 || 4/8 || 6.5 || 0.08 || 80W || 2.27 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5530 || 4/8 || 7.14 || 0.09 || 80W || 2.4 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5630 (dual) || 2x4/8 || 8 || 0.1 || 80W || 2.53 GHz || 0.3.17/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Atom N270 || 1 || 0.42 || '''0.17''' || 2.5W || 1.6 GHz || 0.3.1x/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]<br />
|}<br />
<br />
==See Also==<br />
<br />
* [[Mining rig]]<br />
* [[OpenCL miner]]<br />
* [http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=745 ATI Stream vs. NVIDIA CUDA - GPGPU computing battle royale]<br />
<br />
[[Category:Mining]]</div>
2Fast2BCn
https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Mining_hardware_comparison&diff=6492
Mining hardware comparison
2011-04-01T07:18:09Z
<p>2Fast2BCn: </p>
<hr />
<div>Below are some statistics about the mining performance of various hardware used in a [[mining rig]].<br />
<br />
The table shows stock clock numbers. 10-20% performance improvement can be achieved via overclocking.<br />
<br />
==Graphics cards==<br />
<br />
===AMD===<br />
To get the maximum performance use the 2.1 or 2.2 release of the ATI Stream SDK. 2.3 performance drops by 5-10%.<br />
<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! W !! Clock !! SP !! SDK !! Slot !! Miner !! Notes<br />
|-<br />
| 3XXX || || || || || || || || OpenCL Not Supported<br />
|-<br />
| 42XX || || || || || || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || || OpenCL Not Supported (intergrated/mobile GPU)<br />
|-<br />
| 4350 || 6.93 || 0.346 || 20 || 575 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors <br />
|-<br />
| 4550 || 7.23 || 0.289 || 25 || 600 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors <br />
|- <br />
| 4650 || 31.33 || 0.653 || 48 || 650 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors <br />
|- <br />
| 4670 || 36.14 || 0.613 || 59 || 750 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors <br />
|- <br />
| 4730 || 72.29 || 0.657 || 110 || 750 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 4770 || 72.29 || 0.904 || 80 || 750 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 4830 || 55.42 || 0.583 || 95 || 575 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|-<br />
| 4850 || 75.30 || 0.685 || 110 || 625 || 800 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 4860 || 67.47 || 0.519 || 130 || 700 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|-<br />
| 4870 || 90.36 || 0.602 || 150 || 750 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || clmine ||<br />
|-<br />
| 4870 || 78 || || || || || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/Vista 64bit || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source]<br />
|- <br />
| 4890 || 102.41 || 0.539 || 190 || 850 || 800 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 4850X2 || 150.60 || 0.602 || 250 || 625 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 4870X2 || 180.72 || 0.632 || 286 || 750 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 5450 || 11.99 || 0.631 || 19 || 650 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 5550 || 40.59 || 1.041 || 39 || 550 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 59.96 || 1.538 || 39 || 650 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 64 || 1.641 || 39 || 650 || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]<br />
|- <br />
| 5650 || 48 || 2.5-3.2 ? || 15-19 ? || || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source] [http://www.notebookcheck.net/ATI-Mobility-Radeon-HD-5650.23697.0.html source]<br />
|- <br />
| 5670 || 71.49 || 1.117 || 64 || 775 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 5670 || 85 || || || 900 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128<br />
|- <br />
<br />
| 5750 || 116.24 || 1.352 || 86 || 700 || 720 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 5770 || 156.83 || 1.452 || 108 || 850 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFFFFF;"| 5830 || 206.64 || 1.181 || 175 || 800 || 1120 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFFFFF;"| 5830 || 241 || 1.377 || 175 || 1006 || || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-02-22 ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 240.77 || 1.595 || 151 || 725 || 1440 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 252 || 1.669 || 151 || 765 || || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-01-25 ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 255.3 || 1.690 || 151 || 765 || || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-01-25 ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 300 || 1.987 || 151 || 925 (OC) || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 250.26 || 1.657 || 151 || || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || opencl client || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 313.65 || 1.668 || 188 || 850 || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 313 || 1.665 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo/Linux ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 343 || 1.824 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo/Linux ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 355 || 1.888 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/Linux ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 340 || 1.809 || 188 || 850 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 535.06 || 1.820 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 560 || 1.905 || 294 || 725 || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 565 || 1.922 || 294 || || || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine2 ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 604 || 2.054 || 294 || || || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||<br />
|- <br />
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 645 || || || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || -f1, Debian 6, fglrx-driver 10.9.3<br />
|- <br />
| 6850 || 171.59 || 1.351 || 127 || 775 || 960 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||<br />
|- <br />
| 6850 || 196 || || || 850 || 960 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 0<br />
|- <br />
| 6870 || 232.47 || 1.540 || 151 || 900 || 1120 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||<br />
|- <br />
| 6870 || 282.23 || 1.611 || 175 || 1047 || 1120 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm windows cat 11.2 || -v -w 128 -f 0 mem clock 300<br />
|- <br />
| 6950 || 295 || || 160 (?) || 810 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250<br />
|-<br />
| 6950 || 325 || || 200 (?) || 885 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250<br />
|-<br />
| 6970 || 323 || 1.468 || 220 || 880 || 1536 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -w 64, SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.<br />
|- <br />
| 6990 || || || || || || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || || SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.<br />
|- <br />
|FirePro V8700 || 84.8 || || || 750 || 800 || || || poclbm-mod.03.24.2011 || <br />
|- <br />
|}<br />
<br />
===Nvidia===<br />
<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! W !! Clock !! SP !! Comment<br />
|-<br />
| 8200 mGPU || 1.2 || || || 1200 || 16 || 128 MB shared memory, "poclbm -w 128 -f 0"<br />
|-<br />
| 8600M GT || 4.93 || || || || 32 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 8600GT || 5.66 || || || 1188 || 32 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 8600GT OC || 7.3 || || || 1602 || 32 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.0 poclbm] -w 128 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg72833#msg72833 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 8800GT || 25 || 0.24 || 105 || 1300 || ||<br />
|-<br />
| 8800GT || 24.5 || 0.23 || 105 || 1300 || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 8800GTS || 16.8 || 0.109 || 154 || || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source] [http://www.techspot.com/review/79-geforce-8800-gts-512/page11.html source]<br />
|-<br />
| 8800 GTS || 18.7 || 0.124 || 150 || 1200 || || poclbm -w 64 no vectors<br />
|-<br />
| 9300GE || 1.57 || || || 1300 || 8 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9300GS || 1.69 || || || 1400 || 8 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9400GT || 3.37 || 0.067 || 50 || 1400 || 16 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9500GT || 6.75 || 0.135 || 50 || 1400 || 32 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9600GSO || 19.88 || 0.237 || 84 || 1375 || 96 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9600GSO512 || 11.75 || 0.131 || 90 || 1625 || 48 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9600GT || 15.66 || 0.165 || 95 || 1625 || 64 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9600GT OC || 18.8 || <0.198 || >95 || 1981 || 64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.0 poclbm] -w 128 -f 10 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg74610#msg74610 source] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg73353#msg73353 source]<br />
|-<br />
| 9800GT || 30.36 || 0.289 || 105 || 1800 || 112 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9800GTX || 32.54 || 0.232 || 140 || 1688 || 128 ||<br />
|-<br />
| 9800GTX+ || 35.39 || 0.251 || 141 || 1836 || 128 ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background-color:#FFEFEF"| 9800GX2 || 57.83 || 0.294 || 197 || || 2x128 ||<br />
|-<br />
|style="background-color:#FFEFEF"| 9800GX2 || 28 || 0.142 || 197 || || 2x128 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]<br />
|-<br />
| G210 || 3.38 || 0.111 || 30.5 || 1402 || 16 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GT220 || 9.83 || 0.170 || 58 || 1360 || 48 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GT240 || 19.37 || 0.281 || 69 || 1340 || 96 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GT240 || 21.24 || || || || 96 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4291.0 poclbm-mod] -f 0 -v [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg73383#msg73383 source]<br />
|-<br />
| GTS250 || 35.39 || 0.244 || 145 || 1836 || 128 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX260 || 35.91 || 0.178 || 202 || 1242 || 192 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX260 || 44 || 0.242 || 182 || 1242 || 216 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]<br />
|-<br />
| GTX260c216 || 40.40 || 0.236 || 171 || 1242 || 216 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX260c216 OC || 52.0 || || || 1461 || 216 || "poclbm -w 256 -f 1"<br />
|-<br />
| GTX275 || 50.75 || 0.232 || 219 || 1404 || 240 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX275 || 58 || || || 729/1458 || 240 || poclbm -f 0 -w 256<br />
|-<br />
| GTX280 || 46.84 || 0.198 || 236 || 1296 || 240 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX285 || 53.35 || 0.262 || 204 || 1476 || 240 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX295 || 89.78 || 0.311 || 289 || 1242 || 480 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GT 320M (MacBook Air) || 6.12 || || || 1212 || 48 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GT 330M (Sony Vaio Z) || 7.8 || 0.71 ( 0.3 total) || 11 (26w total) || 1045 || 48 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GT430 || 20.24 || 0.413 || 49 || 1400 || 96 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTS450 || 45.28 || 0.427 || 106 || 1566 || 192 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460SE || 56.39 || 0.376 || 150 || 1300 || 288 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 || 68.31 || 0.427 || 160 || 1350 || 336 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 (2 cards) || 102 || 0.319? || 320? || 1350 || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]<br />
|-<br />
| GTX460 (2 cards) OC || 127 || 0.374 || 340 || 1620 || 2x 336 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2444.0 rpcminer-cuda] -gpugrid=128 -gputhreads=128 ver.20110227<br />
|-<br />
| GTX465 || 64.41 || 0.322 || 200 || 1215 || 352 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX470 || 81.98 || 0.381 || 215 || 1215 || 448 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX480 || 101.28 || 0.405 || 250 || 1401 || 480 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX560 Ti || 67.7 || 0.39 || 170 || 1700 || 384 || standard EVGA 560, no overclock<br />
|-<br />
| GTX560 OC || 86.7 || <0.51 || >170 || 1800 || 384 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2444.0 rpcminer-cuda] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg72816#msg72816 source]<br />
|-<br />
| GTX570 || 105.83 || 0.483 || 219 || 1464 || 480 ||<br />
|-<br />
| GTX580 || 119.06 || 0.488 || 244 || 1544 || 512 ||<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro FX 580 || 5.7 || 0.14 || 40 || 1125 || 4 ||<br />
|-<br />
| Quadro NVS 135M || 1.05 || 0.1 || 10 || 800 || 1 || <br />
|-<br />
| Quadro NVS 3100M || 3.6 || 0.257 || 14 || 600 || 16 || rpcminer-cuda, Win, CUDA 3.1.1<br />
|-<br />
|}<br />
<br />
==CPUs==<br />
<br />
A lot of nice data can be pulled from [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.0 this thread] to seed this section. Also from [https://www.bitcoin.org/wiki/doku.php?id=bitcoin_miners this page on the old wiki].<br />
<br />
===AMD===<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! nprocs !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment<br />
|-<br />
| 2x Opteron 6128 || 16 || 32.4 || 0.203 || 160W || 2 GHz || 0.3.19 || -4way<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon X2 3800+ || 2 || 1.73 || 0.03 || 65 W || 2.00 GHz || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || -algo=4way<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon X2 4000+ || 2 || 1.9 || 0.02 || 65W || 2.1 GHz || rpc-miner || <br />
|-<br />
| Athlon X2 4400+ || || 2.09 || 0.32 || 65W || 2.3GHz || 0.3.19/Win x64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon X2 6000+ || 2 || 2.81 || 0.02 || 125W || 3 GHz || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg22881#msg22881 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon X2 6400+ Black Edition || 2 || 2.9 || 0.023 || 125W || 3.2 GHz || 0.3.20.2 BETA/Win 7 x64 || -4way<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon XP 2000+ || 2 || 0.62 || 0.009 || 70W || 1.67 GHz || 0.3.18/Ubuntu || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source] [http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm?articleid=914&page=4 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon II X2 240e || 2 || 2.71 || 0.06 || 45W || 2.81 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Athlon II X4 630 || 4 || 10.7 || 0.11 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || bitcoin-miner 0.4 || <br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X6 1055T || 6 || 15.84 || 0.13 || 125W || 2.82 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X6 1100T || 6 || 22 || 0.176 || 125W || 3.82 GHz || bitcoin-miner || Aciid#bitcoin-dev<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 3.8 || 0.04 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 0.3.1x/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 7.2 || 0.08 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || cpu-miner 0.2.1/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Phenom II x4 955 || 4 || 11 || 0.09 || 125W || 3.2 GHz || rpcminer-4way ||<br />
|}<br />
<br />
===ARM===<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment<br />
|-<br />
| Cortex A8 || 1 || 0.125 || || || 0.6 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || Nokia N900: 'cryptopp'<br />
|-<br />
| Cortex A8 || 1 || 0.2 || || || 0.6 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || Nokia N900: 'c' algo<br />
|}<br />
<br />
===Intel===<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable"<br />
|-<br />
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium III mobile ? || 1 || 0.3 || 0.014 || 21W || 1.07 GHz || 0.3.1x/Win2K || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source] [http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=27380 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Old Xeon 512k (Dual) || 2x1/2 || 2.0 || ? || ? || 3.06GHz || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || HT disabled, algo=4way (twice as fast as the 2nd best algo)<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium 4 2.0A || 1 || 0.85 || || || 2.0 GHz || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft-0.4]/WinXP || -g no -t 2<br />
|-<br />
| Pentium Dual-Core E5400 || 2/2 || 2.27 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.7 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Celeron E330 || 2/2 || 2.2 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.5 GHz || 0.3.19/Ubuntu10.04 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Core i3 M350 || 2/4 || 1.48 || 0.04 || 35W || 2.27 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|- <br />
| Core i5 M450 || 2/4 || 1.8 || 0.05 || 35W || 1.2 GHz || 0.3.17/Win7-54 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source]<br />
|- <br />
| Core i5-650 || 2/4 || 5.1 || 0.04 ? || || 3.2 GHz || cpuminer-0.7 || -4way<br />
|-<br />
| Core i5 ? || 4/? || 6.5 || || || || client from svn || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37621#msg37621 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 4.5 || 0.05 || 95W || 3.1 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-01-22) || cryptopp_asm32<br />
|-<br />
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 14 || 0.15 || 95W || 3.1 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || sse2_64<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 920 || 4/8 || 19.2 || 0.10 || 195 || 4.0 GHz (x21) || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] || -a 5<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 950 || 4/8 || 5.88 || 0.039 || 150W || 3.83 GHz (x23) || bitcoin-0.3.20.2 Win7-64 ||<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 950 || 4/8 || 18.9 || 0.126 || 150W || 3.83 GHz (x23) || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] v0.4 ||<br />
|-<br />
| Core i7 980x || 6/12 || 19.2 || 0.15 || 130 || 4.4 GHz (x33) || cpuminer/Win7-64 || <br />
|- <br />
| Core i7 980x || 6/12 || 8.7 || || || 3.9 GHz (x27) || 0.3.17/Win7-64 || <br />
|- <br />
| Core i7 620M || 2/4 || 6.3 || 0.18 || 35 || 2.66 GHz || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] v0.4 || <br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo E6550 || 1/2 || 2.45 || ? || ? || 2.33 GHz || cpuminer 0.7.1 (Linux) || --algo=sse2_64<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo E6850 || 2/2 || 6.75 || 0.10 || 65W || 3.0 Ghz || ufasoft-0.3 ||<br />
|- <br />
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 7.76 || 0.11 || 70W || 3.33 GHz (o/c?) || ufasoft-0.3 || miner optimized for Intel Core<br />
|-<br />
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 2.52 || 0.04 || 65W || 2.66 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon X5355 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 10.13 || 0.16 || 120W || 2.66GHz || bitcoind || Roughly the same speed as the "c" algo in cpuminer<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon X5355 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 22.76 || 0.09 || 120W || 2.66GHz || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || -O2 -march=core2, algo=sse2_64<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5440 || 4/8 || 7.3 || ? || 80W || 2.66 GHz|| Kiv's poclbm-gui || FIXME: Either wrong model # or wrong threads/speed info<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5520 || 4/8 || 6.5 || 0.08 || 80W || 2.27 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5530 || 4/8 || 7.14 || 0.09 || 80W || 2.4 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Xeon E5630 (dual) || 2x4/8 || 8 || 0.1 || 80W || 2.53 GHz || 0.3.17/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]<br />
|-<br />
| Atom N270 || 1 || 0.42 || '''0.17''' || 2.5W || 1.6 GHz || 0.3.1x/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]<br />
|}<br />
<br />
==See Also==<br />
<br />
* [[Mining rig]]<br />
* [[OpenCL miner]]<br />
* [http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=745 ATI Stream vs. NVIDIA CUDA - GPGPU computing battle royale]<br />
<br />
[[Category:Mining]]</div>
2Fast2BCn