Bitcoin Wiki - User contributions [en]

Tor

2011-10-24T01:58:46Z

Tartarus: Add a section on pooled mining and Tor.

'''Tor''' is a distributed 'onion' network, that makes it more difficult for an adversary to track any one peer on the network. Tor also is very useful to access the 'uncensored' internet in countries such as China and Iran. Preserving privacy means not only hiding the content of messages, but also hiding who is talking to whom (traffic analysis). Tor provides anonymous connections that are strongly resistant to both eavesdropping and traffic analysis.

Bitcoin can run easily on the Tor network.

=Tor installation & use=
''todo explain: onion routing (how tor network helps to anonymize), encryption used, exit nodes, routers'' 

Please follow the instructions provided with installation files and read the [http://www.torproject.org/download/download.html.en#warning list of warnings]. ''Tor doesn't magically anonymize all your traffic just because you install it.'' 
Down the page you can find examples how to configure applications to use Tor to anonymize the origin of your traffic. 
[http://www.torproject.org/docs/tor-doc-windows.html.en This] is a detailed installation guide for Windows. Before you setup Bitcoin or mIRC to use Tor, please install Tor and start in. 
[[{{ns:file}}:20110109-tor-running.png]] On the taskbar of your compute you'll see a small green onion when Tor is running.
[[{{ns:file}}:20110109-bitcoin-mirc-vidalia.png]]

=GUI=
Once you have your Tor client up & running, you can configure your Bitcoin client to use it. 
Select in menu Settings -> Options 
[[{{ns:file}}:20110108-btc-options.png]] 

Check "Connect through socks 4 proxy" with the address 127.0.0.1 and port 9050 (the Tor default port number) 
[[{{ns:file}}:20110108-btc-client-tor-as-proxy.png]] 
Configuring an application to use Tor is also called to torify it.
(needs a brief howto here)

''the note about bitcoin-otc promote on a more appropriate place in this page? reference to trading and IRC''
Conducting business using [[bitcoin-otc]] can be done more anonymously when directly connected to a Freenode IRC hidden service.

=bitcoind=

Run bitcoind with -proxy=127.0.0.1:9050 (or whatever your SocksPort is).

=Hidden services=
These services are running within the tor network. You can connect to them for example using the -connect= parameter to bitcoind. Note that you do not need to use them - tor can also anonymize your normal internet traffic, including bitcoin connections. There are some technical reasons why hidden services may be beneficial, see the tor documentation if you're really interested.

Please add your service here if you run a stable bitcoin node under a tor hidden service.
* iy6ni3wkqazp4ytu.onion
* bxfna6fhddpzduck.onion

=Pooled Mining=

Some mining pools are available as a hidden service on the tor network. Any pool can be reached over tor. The general methodology here is to tell your mining client to use your local Tor proxy. This is client specific but there are some helpful hints.

==Linux / BSD==

Any client can have its traffic routed via Tor by using the torify command and invoking the miner with that. Another method is to set the http_proxy environment variable as some miners use libraries which support that.

==Windows / OS X==

It is possible to set the http_proxy environment variable as some miners use libraries which support that.

=mIRC=

mIRC is a popular IRC client. This is a guide how to connect to Freenode IRC using Tor + SASL + mIRC. 
==Register your nick with freenode nickserv ==
Freenode only allows SASL authenticated users to connect to the onion IRC server. SASL authentication works only with a registered nickname. 
Connect to Freenode IRC without using tor & execute 
/msg nickserv register <password> <email> 
 
You will see something like this 
-NickServ- An email containing nickname activation instructions has been sent to <email> 
-NickServ- If you do not complete registration within one day, your nickname will expire. 
 
To finish your nick registration go the provided email and copy/paste the command from e-mail to irc. 

==Add SASL support to your mIRC installation ==
Download the SASL.dll and sasl.mrc files and copy them to your mIRC installation directory 
Load sasl.mrc script (Alt + R to open script editor, Ctrl + L to load file, browse to sasl.mrc, press OK or "save & exit"). 
[[{{ns:file}}:20110109-sasl-script-loaded.png]] 
Type /dialog -m SASL.main SASL.main to open the SASL connection manager. 
[[{{ns:file}}:20110109-sasl-dialog.png]] 
Add Freenode entry. 
[[{{ns:file}}:20110109-sasl-manager.png]][[{{ns:file}}:20110109-sasl-manager-network.png]] 
Network is Freenode. 
Username and NS Password must match your nickserv reservation. 
Auth Type can be PLAIN 

==setup mIRC to use Tor ==
Add the entry for Freenode onion IRC server 
[[{{ns:file}}:20110109-onion-irc-add.png]] 
Configure mIRC to use a Proxy (your local Tor proxy) 
[[{{ns:file}}:20110109-mirc-proxy.png]] 
 
Now you should be able to connect. 
[http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2602 Bitcoin forum where this topic is discussed]

=How Tor works=
Unlike Freenet, I2P, etc., Tor's security is very well-defined. While weaknesses do exist (described below), they have been known since Tor was created, and new weaknesses of significance are not expected.

Tor sends TCP packets over 3 (normal) or 7 (hidden services) Tor relays. This is why it is so slow: your packet might have to go through 100 computers (counting Internet routers) before it reaches its destination. Tor uses multiple ''layers'' of encryption that are ''pulled away'' for each node. Hence the name '''T'''he '''O'''nion '''R'''outer, which is always capitalized as '''Tor''', and never TOR or t.o.r.

Say that I want to connect to bitcoin.org through Tor. I first select three Tor relays that I know about. Then, I send a message to my ISP that looks like this:
Send to this IP: <IP of Relay1>
<Encrypted data for Relay1>
When Relay1 receives this, he decrypts the payload using his private key. The payload contains this:
Send to this Tor node: <Relay2>
<Encrypted data for Relay2>
Relay2 decrypts his payload:
Send to this Tor node: <Relay3>
<Encrypted data for Relay3>
Relay3 receives the real TCP payload, which he sends to the destination:
Send to this IP: <IP of destination>
<Unencrypted payload>
The payload is not and can not be further encrypted by Tor. However, if the protocol itself uses encryption (HTTPS, SSH, etc.), the data will be encrypted. This means that the last node (the ''exit node'') can see everything you do on HTTP sites, and can steal your passwords if they are transmitted unencrypted. Many people become exit nodes just so they can view this information -- Tor is much more dangerous than open WiFi for snooping!

The encryption arrangement described above ensures that no single Tor node knows both the sender and the destination. Relay1 and your ISP know that you are using Tor and sending a packet at a certain time, but they don't know what you're sending or who you're sending to. Relay3 knows exactly what you're sending, but he can't determine who is sending it because Relay2 and Relay1 are blocking him. All three relays need to work together in order to conclusively connect the sender and the destination.

However, Tor is weak to a ''timing attack'' that allows only two participants in certain positions to determine the sender with high accuracy. Consider this Tor connection:
Sender <-> S-ISP <-> Relay1 <-> Relay2 <-> Relay3 <-> D-ISP <-> Destination
If the sender's ISP (S-ISP) and the destination are working together, they can record the size and times of packets sent and received. Over a large number of packets, they can determine with very high accuracy that the sender is, in fact, the person sending packets to the destination. This requires active surveillance or detailed logging by both sides. Relay1 can also perform the same role as S-ISP.

Additionally, more configurations are possible if the underlying connection is not encrypted (normal HTTP, for example):
*S-ISP & Relay3
*Relay1 & Relay3
*S-ISP & D-ISP
*Relay1 & D-ISP
This second set can always see that the sender is connected to the destination, but they can only see what the sender is doing on the site if the connection is not encrypted. (Pathnames are encrypted in HTTPS.)

Because the first relay (the ''entry node'') is a weak point in the connection, Tor takes certain defensive measures. When you first start Tor, it chooses three ''entry guards'' that don't change for the entire time that you run Tor. You will always use one of those three unless one goes down. If all of those nodes are safe and your ISP is safe, then you are OK.

These timing attacks are of special importance to Bitcoin because anyone can be the "destination" in a connection. Packets are broadcast to every peer in the Bitcoin network. This might allow your ISP alone to associate your transactions to you without much difficulty. However, a timing attack relies on receiving at least several dozen packets from the sender, so the "destination" might actually have to be one of your direct Bitcoin peers. It's not too difficult to flood the Bitcoin network with peers, though. Because of this attack, it is wise to use an [[EWallet]] instead of the Bitcoin client when using Tor.

To discover Tor relays, Tor uses a centralized directory server model. There are nine authoritative directory servers. To become a relay, you register with one of these. The directory servers share their data and produce a ''network status consensus'' document every so often containing all Tor nodes. Tor clients don't connect directly to the authoritative directory servers -- they connect to one of many ''directory mirrors'', which have a copy of the network status consensus. Since there is no peer-to-peer bootstrap mechanism in Tor, the entire network can be destroyed if half of the authoritative directory servers are destroyed, and the entire network can be subverted if half of the authoritative directory servers become evil.

Hidden services allow both the sender and destination to remain anonymous. A hidden service connection is made like this:
*The destination tells several Tor relays to act as ''introduction points'' for the hidden service. The destination stays connected to all of these introduction points through a regular three-node Tor circuit.
*The destination registers these introduction points on a Tor DHT. The introduction points are associated with the first 16 characters of an encoded SHA-1 hash of the destination's key. This is the information in .onion addresses. The use of SHA-1 is a possible weakness.
*The sender creates a four-node Tor circuit. The fourth node is called the ''rendezvous point''.
*The sender searches the DHT for the introduction points of the desired hidden service. The sender connects to one through a regular three-node Tor circuit and, through the introduction point, tells the destination about the rendezvous point he has chosen.
*The destination connects to the rendezvous point over a three-node Tor circuit. The sender and destination are now in contact over a seven-node connection.

For clients, hidden services are more secure than encrypted Tor HTTPS connections because:
*If the destination remains anonymous, they are less likely to become controlled by an evil party.
*The destination's ISP isn't involved as they are in the HTTPS case. Only these configurations are possible for a timing attack:
**S-ISP & Destination
**Relay1 & Destination

Running a hidden service is more dangerous, however. A simple intersection attack can be performed by the hidden service's ISP alone:
*Your Internet service is cut off.
*If the hidden service went down at that exact moment, you are unmasked.
The same sort of timing attacks as above are also possible.

See the [http://www.usenix.org/events/sec04/tech/full_papers/dingledine/dingledine_html/index.html Tor design paper] for more info.

=External Tor Hidden Services=

* [http://vms43o4cqysakvyb.onion Bitcoin 4 Cash] ([[Bitcoin 4 Cash|info]])
* [irc://p4fsi4ockecnea7l.onion Freenode hidden service]

=External links=

* [http://tor.eff.org/ Tor project]
* [http://www.torproject.org/docs/tor-doc-windows.html.en Tor installation guide - Windows]
* [https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/TheOnionRouter/TorFAQ Tor FAQ]
* [http://www.torproject.org/about/overview.html.en how Tor works - overview]
* [http://freenode.net/irc_servers.shtml#tor Freenode over Tor info]
* [http://wiki.honk-honk.org/wiki/SaslServ#mIRC howto enable SASL in mIRC]
* [http://honk-honk.org/SASL/SASL.dll SASL.dll library for mIRC]
* [http://honk-honk.org/SASL/sasl.mrc sasl script for mIRC]
* [http://freenode.net/sasl/ Freenode resources on SASL]

Mining hardware comparison

2011-06-28T03:05:26Z

Tartarus: Add my HIS H695FN2G2M measurements

Below are some statistics about the mining performance of various hardware used in a [[mining rig]].

The table shows (mostly) stock clock numbers. 10-20% performance improvement can be achieved with [[GPU overclocking tools]].

'''Notes:'''
* Mhash/s = millions hashes per second (raw speed performance ; may not be very energy efficient with some models)
* Mhash/J = millions hashes per joule (energy efficiency ; 1 joule of energy is spent for 1 watt in 1 second)
* W = watt (maximum power consumption, i.e. energy per unit of time : 1 W = 1 J/s)
* Clock (in MHz) refers to the Shader clock only with nVidia cards (not Core or Memory). With AMD card the shader clock is not separate, but is part of the GPU clock.
* SP = Stream processors (Shader Units)

==Graphics cards==

===AMD (ATI)===
To get the maximum performance use the 2.1 release of the ATI Stream SDK. 2.2 wastes CPU time, and 2.3/2.4 drop mining performance by 5-10% unless using the Phoenix phatk kernel. ''Note: This statement is not entirely accurate. '''YMMV'''.''

{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! Mhash / $<ref name='amazon_20110625'/> !! Watts !! Clock !! SP !! SDK !! Slot !! Miner !! Notes

|-
| 3XXX || - || - || - || - || - || - || - || - || - || OpenCL Not Supported

|-
| 42XX || - || - || - || - || - || - || - || - || - || OpenCL Not Supported (integrated/mobile GPU)

|-
| 4350 || 6.93 || 0.346 ||0.16 || 20 || 575 || 80 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors
|-
| 4350 || 8.14 || -|| 0.19 || - || 730 || 80 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Diablo/Windows7 || -w 32. Model: Asus EAH4350 Silent. Memory at 400MHz. Runs at 60°C with ambient at 25°C.

|-
| 4550 || 7.23 || 0.289 ||0.13 || 25 || 600 || 80 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors

|-
| 4570M || 8.02 || 0.297 || ? || 27 || 680 || 80 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Diablo/Windows7 || -w 64, SDK 2.4, Cat 11.4. Model: Sony Vaio NW

|-
| 4570M || 9.6 || 0.300|| ? || 32 || 825(OC) || 80 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Diablo/Windows7 || -w 64, SDK 2.4, Cat 11.4. Model: Sony Vaio NW. OC core 680->825. U/C memory 800->500.

|-
| 4650 || 31.33 || 0.653|| 0.44 || 48 || 650 || 320 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors

|-
| 4670 || 36.14 || 0.613|| 0.34 || 59 || 750 || 320 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors
|-
| 4670 || 40.11 || 0.679|| 0.38 || 59 || 800 || 320 || - || AGP x8 || poclbm/Ubuntu 10.10 w/ H == 0 mod || -w 32 -f 0, don't use vectors [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.msg85236#msg85236 source]
|-
| 4670 || 50 || - || 0.47 || 60 || 800 || 320 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer || 2 miners set up i7 920 (130W), CPU: Ufasoft, GPU: OpenCL; the CPU is getting about 40 Mhash/s while the GPU goes from 10-20 Mhash/s

|-
| 4730 || 72.29 || 0.657|| ? || 110 || 750 || 640 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - ||

|-
| 4770 || 72.29 || 0.904|| 0.72 || 80 || 750 || 640 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - ||

|-
| 4830 || 55.42 || 0.583|| || 95 || 575 || 640 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - ||
|-
| 4830 || 66.12 || 0.503|| || 105 || 700 || 1005 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - ||

|-
| 4830 || 61.7 || - || || - || 700 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm-mod || Fedora 14 ||
|-
| 4830 || 64.9 || - || || - || 700 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm-mod || Fedora 14 ||

|-
| 4850 || 75.30 || 0.685 || || 110 || 625 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - ||
|-
| 4850 || 84.3 || 0.766|| || 110 || 725 || 300 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - || -w64 fan at 70% temp 73C, stock voltage -gui miner
|-
| 4850 || 90.1 || 0.819 || || 110 || 800 || 500 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer || -f 30; Tried phoenix and phatk, got same max
|-
| 4850 || 101 || 0.918 || || 110 || 817 || 500 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer || -f 0, core 817mhz(default 625)@1.123v , mem downclock to 500mhz (default 993) [http://www.smpake.com/?p=6 source]
|-
| 4850x2 || 150.60 || 0.602 || || 250 || 625 || 1600 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - ||

|-
| 4860 || 67.47 || 0.519|| || 130 || 700 || 640 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - ||

|-
|style="background:#F8F8FF;"| 4870 || 92.84 || 0.6189333(?)|| || 150(?) || 830(OC) || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 || -k poclbm AGGRESSION=5 (Windows 7 64-Bit, GPU OC 750->830MHz, VRAM UC 900->450MHz, BIOS modded)
|-
|style="background:#F8F8FF;"| 4870 || 104.6 || 0.872|| || 120 || 830(OC) || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 256 -f 1, Windows 7 64-Bit, GPU Core OC to 830 MHz, GPU Memory UC to 190 MHz (saves 30 watts at outlet)
|-
|style="background:#F8F8FF;"| 4870 || 90.36 || 0.602|| || 150 || 750 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || clmine ||
|-
|style="background:#F8F8FF;"| 4870 || 78 || 0.520|| || 150 || - || - || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/Vista 64bit || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source]
|-
|style="background:#F8F8FF;"| 4870x2 || 180.72|| 0.632|| || 286 || 750 || 1600 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - ||
|-
|style="background:#F8F8FF;"| 4870x2 || 180.6|| 0.632|| || 286 || 800 || 1600 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - ||

|-
| 4890 || 97.1 || 0.511|| || 190 || 870(OC) || 1050 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-01-21 Solo settings || Sapphire fab. No flags options helped. Close all browsers and do full restart of GUIMiner and then Bitcoin via GUIMiner server starter or the browsers GPU accl. will limit to 56~ ish Mhash/s - I can now start browser without slowdowns
|-
| 4890 || 102.41 || 0.539|| || 190 || 850 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - ||
|-
| 4890 || 108.3 || 0.57|| || 190 || 975 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - ||
|-
| 4890 || 121.5 || -|| || 190 || 1025 (OC) || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || no flags, Vcore 1.4 ||
|-
|style="background:#FFF8EF;"| 5450 || 11.99|| 0.631|| || 19 || 650 || 80 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - ||
|-
|style="background:#FFF8EF;"| 5450 || 13.74|| || - || - || 700 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/Linuxcoin v0.2 || -v -w128 tried several options, seems to work best.
|-
|style="background:#FFF8EF;"| 5450 || 14.12|| || - || - || 700 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix/Linuxcoin v0.2 || Flags: "DEVICE=0 VECTORS AGGRESSION=4 -v FASTLOOP BFI_INT WORKSIZE=64" Kernel: "phatk"
|-
|style="background:#FFF8EF;"| 5450 || 15.36|| || - || - || 700 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix || Flags: "DEVICE=0 VECTORS AGRESSION=8 FASTLOOP BFI_ING WORKSIZE=128" Kernel: "phatk" - MagicSata
|-
| 5550 || 40.59 || 1.041|| || 39 || 550 || 320 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - ||

|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 59.96 || 1.538|| || 39 || 650 || 400 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - ||
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 64 || 1.641|| || 39 || 650 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 62 || 1.59|| || 39 || 650 || 400 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 OpenCL/Linux x86_64 || -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS AGGRESSION=4 -v FASTLOOP BFI_INT WORKSIZE=64
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 73 || 1.872|| || 39 || 700 || 400 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 OpenCL/Linux x86_64 || -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS AGGRESSION=4 -v FASTLOOP BFI_INT WORKSIZE=64
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 102 || 1.46(+)|| || 75(-) || 950 || 400 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 OpenCL/Windows 7 x86 (no Aero) || -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS AGGRESSION=7 -v FASTLOOP BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 (Reference Sapphire card, 2 additional 120mm coolers, temperature is 79-82C)

|-
| 5650 || 48 || 1.37|| || 35(?) || - || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source] [http://www.notebookcheck.net/ATI-Mobility-Radeon-HD-5650.23697.0.html source] -- not TDP but load

|-
|style="background:#EEFFEE;"| 5670 || 71.49 || 1.117|| || 64 || 775 || 400 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - ||
|-
|style="background:#EEFFEE;"| 5670 || 72 || 1.64|| || 44 || 850 || - || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm-mod (Win7-64) || Sapphire 100287VGAL card is low power
|-
|style="background:#EEFFEE;"| 5670 || 85|| || - || - || 900 || 400 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128
|-
|style="background:#EEFFEE;"| 5670 || 91|| || - || - || 890 || 400 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer 2011-06-09 poclbm catalyst 11.2 win7 x86 || -v -f 0 -w 128

|-
| 5750 || 116.24 || 1.352|| || 86 || 700 || 720 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - ||
|-
| 5750 || 137 || ||- || - || 710 || - || - || PCI-E 1.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128 using stock memory and GPU clocks
|-
| 5750 || 146.4 || || - || - || 775 || - || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-21 || -v -w128, AMD Catalyst overclock (775MHz GPU / 1225 MHz Memory)
|-
| 5750 || 154.56 || 1.45|| || 106 || 830 || 720 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - || -v -w128 -f20 underclocked memory clocks from 1150MHz to 300MHz
|-
| 5750 || 170 || - || || - || 870 || - || - || PCI-E 1.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128 patched BIOS to underclock memory to 300MHz
|-
| 5750 || 173 || - || ||- || 875 || - || - || PCI-E 1.1 x16 || phoenix || 875/300 w/MSI Afterburner, BFI_INT VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 FASTLOOP=FALSE -k phatk

|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 156.83 || 1.452|| || 108 || 850 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 Hawk || 182 || ||- || - || 875 || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm/GUIMiner/Win7-64 || -v -w 128 (875MHz is stock for 5770 Hawk)
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 180 || 1.406(*)|| || 128(*) || 950(OC) || 800 || 2.4RC1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 30 (*: Overclocked wattage calculated [http://bakkap.free.fr/Misc/wCalc.html here])
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 185 || - || ||- || 850 || 1200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128 FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=7
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 205.58 || - || ||- || 935 || 300 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-04-28 || -v -w 256
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 210.7 || 1.95(-)|| || 108(+) || 950 || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / win7x86 || mem underclocked 309 mhz, -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 218.35 || -|| || - || 1000 || 1401 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || DiabloMiner || -w 128 -v 2 (Overclocked to 1Ghz core with 1.2 voltage and Scythe Setsugen 2 cooling system)
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 223 || 2.23(-)|| || 100(+) || 1050 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer || -v -w256 [http://www.smpake.com/?p=59 source]
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 226 || - || - || 100(+) || 1025 || 300 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.50 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=14 -k phatk WORKSIZE=128 (OC 1020/300) XFX@1.1 volts
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 227 || -|| || - || 1030 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || DiabloMiner || -w 256 -v 2 (Overclocked to 1030 core/300 mem with 1.2 voltage and Scythe Setsugen 2 cooling system)
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 233 || 2.23(-)|| || 100(+) || 1050 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 || VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 -k phatk WORKSIZE=256 [http://www.smpake.com/?p=59 source]
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 240.61 || 2.3632(-)|| || 100(+) || 1080 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x1 || phoenix 1.48 || VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 -k phatk WORKSIZE=256 (OC'd and OV'd 1080/300 1.25v)
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 244 || 1.36|| || 179 || 800 || 1000 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 OpenCL/Linux x86_64 || -k phatk DEVICE=1 VECTORS AGGRESSION=6 -v FASTLOOP WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 267 || -|| || - || 875 || 1000 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x1 || Phoenix 1.48 OpenCL/Linux x86_64 || -k phatk DEVICE=1 VECTORS AGGRESSION=6 -v FASTLOOP WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 245 || 1.28|| || 192 || 880 || 900 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm (guiminer) || -v -w 256
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 248 || 1.29|| || 192 || 880 || 500 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.46 || -k poclbm VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 256 || -|| || - || 900 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 || -k poclbm VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=7
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 272 || 1.52|| || 179 || 875 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / LinuxCoin || 275Mhz Memory clock, 1.125 V (from 1.163), VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 275 || 1.5714|| || 175 || 900 || 500 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm (guiminer) Win7x64 || -v -w64 -f10, XFX stock w/ v2.4 SDK = 230Mh/s, v2.1 SDK = +10Mh/s, overclocking core clock by 100 = +30Mh/s, underclocking memory to 500 (ran cooler), and changing workload to -w64 = +5Mh/s.
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 285 || - ||1.58 || - || 960 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.47 / poclbm / Win7 64 || VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 287 || -|| || - || 935 || - || 2.2 || PCI-E x16 || GUIMiner / phoenix 1.5 / phatk / Win 7 64 || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 AGGRESSION=12 FASTLOOPS=false / Memory 300Mhz, VCore standard
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 290 || -|| || - || 996 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.4 / poclbm / Win7 64 || VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 295 || -|| || - || 980 || 1120 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIMiner / poclbm / Win XP 32 || Extra flags -v -w 128
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 297 || -|| || - || 970 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer / phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 64 || 300Mhz Memory clock, 44% fan-speed, -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=8 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 300 || -|| || - || 970 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.47 / pheonix 1.48 / Win7 64 || (sapphire xtreme) VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 300 || -|| || - || 970 || 1120 || 2.1 || PCI-E x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 64 || 300Mhz memory clock BFI_INT AGGRESSION=12 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 305 || -|| || - || 984 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.4 / phatk / Win7 32 || 400Mhz Memory clock, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 307 || -|| || - || 996 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 64 || VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 308 || -|| || - || 990 || 375 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 32 || @ stock voltage VECTORS AGGRESSION=11 -v FASTLOOP=false BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 black || 310 || ||- || - || 990 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x8 || LinuxCoin 0.2b, phoenix/phatk || (XFX Brand) -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 AGGRESSION=11 FASTLOOPS=false
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 311 || -|| || - || 1000 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.50 / phatk / Linux || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 316.35 || ||- || - || 1015 || 375 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 32 || @ stock voltage VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 -v FASTLOOP=false BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 318 || -|| || - || 1030 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 64 || 385Mhz Memory, VECTORS AGGRESSION=9 BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 319 || -|| 1.77 || - || 1030 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Xp 64 || 1.2v 355Mhz Memory, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830x2 CF || 480 || -|| || - || 800 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Guiminer/ - / Win7 64bit |Guiminer -v -f70 -w128||
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830x2 || 570 || -|| || - || 950 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x8 || Guiminer/ - / Win7 64bit poclbm || poclbm -v -w256 -f10 MEMORYCLOCK 300MHZ GPUCLOCK 950MHZ FAN 52% 72°C||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 240.77 || 1.595|| 1.49 || 151 || 725 || 1440 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 250.26 || 1.657|| || 151 || 725 || 1440 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || opencl client || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 252 || 1.575|| || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-01-25 ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850x4 || 1360 || 1.94|| || 700@wall || 900 || || || || poclbm||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 255.3 || 1.593|| || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-01-25 ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 264 || 1.748|| || 151 || 725 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 1.0 x8 || guiminer-20110501 || -v -w128
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 280 || 1.75|| || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.3 || with BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 280 || - || ||- || 725 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.50 / Fedora 14 || -v -k poclbm VECTORS AGGRESSION=8 WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT FASTLOOP=true
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 292 || 1.825|| || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-04-28 -v -f 1 ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 298 || 1.8620|| || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-04-28 -v -f 1 -w 64 ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 300 || 1.5460|| || 194 || 925(OC) || 1440 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 314 || 1.8362|| || 171 || 820(OC) || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 1.0 x8 || poclbm || -v -w128
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 330 || - || ||- || 850 @ Stock voltage || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix || EAH5850, miner arguments: -k poclbm DEVICE=1 VECTORS AGGRESSION=8 WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 335 || 1.8611|| || 180 || 890(OC) || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || poclbm || -v -w128, Memory downclocked to 300Mhz
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 344 || 1.8594|| || 185 || 890(OC) || 1440 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 347 || -|| || - || 876 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer / phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 64 || 300Mhz Memory clock, 50% fan-speed, -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 354 || -|| || - || 900(OC) || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || diablo -v 2 -w 128 || Ubuntu 11.04 64-bit [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=9239.0 Headless], catalyst 11.5, memory downclocked to 300mhz, stock voltage. flashed with atiflash [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9AxNmOy6_0 video]
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 355 || -|| || - || 900(OC) || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk || Ubuntu 11.04 64-bit, Memory downclocked to 200MHz, VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 355 || -|| || - || 900 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Ubuntu 11.04 x64 || 300Mhz Memory clock, 60% fan-speed, -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 359 || -|| || - || 900 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.50 / phatk / Ubuntu 11.04 x64 || 300Mhz Memory clock, 66% fan-speed, -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 365 || -|| || - || 920 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 64 || 300Mhz memory clock VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 375 || -|| || - || 940 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.50 / phatk / Ubuntu 10.04 || 300Mhz memory clock VECTORS AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=256 BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 382 || 1.8454|| || 207 || 995(OC) || 1440 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || phoenix || OC 1.177v on core
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 386 || -|| || - || 970 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16(@x8) || guiminer / phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 64 || 5870 bios flash, Mem @300, fan@58%, Temp@80oC, 1.163Vcore, -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256 (two concurrent miners, each miner with diff CPU affinity)
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 391 || -|| || - || 1000 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16(@x8) || phoenix 1.5 / phatk / Win7 64 || Mem @ 280, fan @ 100%, Temp @ 71, 1.163 V core, -v -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256, The name is Mautobu
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 392 || -||2.43 || - || 990 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix-svn (AUR) / phatk / Arch Linux || Memory: 180MHz, -v -q 1 -k phatk WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870M || 152.5 || -|| || - || 750(OC) || 1000 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || gui-miner (win-7) ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 313.65 || 1.668||1.65 || 188 || 850 || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 313 || 1.665|| || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo/Linux ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 343 || 1.824|| || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo/Linux ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 355 || 1.888|| || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/Linux ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 340 || 1.809|| || 188 || 850 || 1600 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 360 || 1.6822|| || 214 || 970 || 700 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL w7-64 || -f 0 -v -w 128 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=6144.msg91959#msg91959 source]
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 377 || 2.008|| || 188 || 850 || 1600 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha || -D -G2
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 397 || -|| || - || 930 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=10 WORKSIZE=128
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 408 || 1.8888|| || 216 || 980 || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm/Win7x64 || -f 20 -v -w 128, BIT_ALIGN, BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 400 || 1.9047|| || 210 || 950 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || Phoenix 1.3 || -k poclbm VECTORS AGGRESSION=7 FASTLOOP BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 398 || 1.980|| || 201 || 900 || 1600 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha || -D -G2 (GPU OC to 900, memory downclocked to 900)
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 414 || 1.9255|| || 215 || 975 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer/w7x64 || -k poclbm -v -w 256 -f 1 VECTORS BITALIGN BFI_INT -- Memory Clock 300
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 420 || 2.0000|| || 210 || 950 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=14 WORKSIZE=256 -- Memory Clock 300Mhz
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 421 || 1.9581|| || 215 || 975 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.47 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 -k phatk
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 440 || 2.0000|| || 220 || 995 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 438 || 1.9819|| || 221 || 1000(OC) || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm/Linux || -v -w 64 -f 1
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 458 || -|| || - || 1040 || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm/Windows 7 64 || -v -w 256 -f 1 Crossfired, Water cooled, 916 Mhash/s total. Best dual gpu setup me thinks? The name is Mautobu.
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 435 || -|| || - || 990 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || LinuxCoin v0.2b phoenix/phatk || (Powercolor brand) -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 AGGRESSION=11 FASTLOOPS=false
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 445 || 2.28||2.34 || 195 || 1005 || 335 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x4 || Ubuntu 11.04 phoenix/phatk || (Asus brand, volts = 1'072) -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 AGGRESSION=12 FASTLOOPS=false -a 7 (-a 10)
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870x2 (Ares) || 620 || -|| || - || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer || -v -w 128
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870x2 (Ares) || 826 || 0.751|| || 1100 || 950 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.4 w/ Phtak || AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT Memory @ 300MHz
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870x2 (Ares) || 826 || 1.18|| || 700 || 935 || 3200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 w/ Phatk || AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=256 VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false, memory @ 319 MHz, Windows 7 32-bit
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870x2 (Ares) || 878 || 0.585|| || 1500 || 1000 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.7 w/ Phtak || AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT Memory @ 300MHz

|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 530 || 1.803||0.53 ? || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.4.595.10 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/201103.beta3/Windows || -v -w128 -f60
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 535.06 || 1.820|| || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 560 || 1.905|| || 294 || 725 || 3200 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo ||
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 565 || 1.922|| || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine2 ||
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 604 || 2.054|| || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 645 || 1.875|| || 344 || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || -f1, Debian 6, fglrx-driver 10.9.3
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 740 || 2.1511|| || 344 || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix/1.3 || AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT, memory clock @ 300MHz
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 755 || 2.2076|| || 342 || 848 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 28-04-11 || -f 1 -w 256 -v, Ubuntu 10.10, fglrx 11.4, memory clock @ 300MHz
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 802 || 2.31|| || 347 || 850 || 3200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix poclbm Ubuntu 11.04 || -q 6 -k AGGRESSION=19 WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT VECTORS, fglrx 11.4, mem clock @ 1000MHz
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 822.2 || -|| || - || 950 || 3200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix win7 || -k phatk -q 6 AGGRESSION=20 WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT VECTORS, but with this increasing difficulty mining becomes pretty pointless

|-
| 6310M || 9.821 || 0.545|| || 18 || 500 || 80 || 2.4 || Integrated/APU || poclbm-gui -v -w128 || HP DM1z 18W TDP is shared with the CPU

|-
| 6470M || 24.1 || - || ||- || - || - || 2.1 || Integrated/APU || guiminer ||
|-
| 6470M || 31.0 || - || ||- || - || - || 2.1 || Integrated/APU || phoenix 1.48 ||
|-
| 6490M || 17.18 || - || ||- || - || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoneix 1.50 with poclbm, Mac OS X 10.6.7 || MacBook Pro 2,8 VRAM: 256MB. phoenix -k poclbm VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP
|-
| 6490M || 16.289 || 0.708|| || 23 || - || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm-mod (Mac OS X 10.6.7) || MacBook Pro early 2011
|-
| 6490M || 15.21 || - || ||- || - || - || - || - || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8994.0 DiabloMiner GUI] v2011-05-22 / Mac OS X 10.6.7 || Model: MacBookPro8,2 VRAM: 256MB

|-
|style="background:#FFDD00;"| 6570 || 68.0 || 1.133|| || 60 || 650 || 480 || 2.4 || PCI-E x16 || guiminer 2011-05-21 with poclbm (Win7-32bit) || no extra option for miner . Sapphire 6570 gddr5 512mb
|-
|style="background:#FFDD00;"| 6570 || 82.1 || 1.368|| || 60 || 650 || 480 || 2.4 || PCI-E x16 || guiminer 2011-05-21 with poclbm (Win7-32bit) || -v -w128 . Sapphire 6570 gddr5 512mb
|-
| 6670 || 102.20 || -|| || - || 800 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/Debian sid || -v -f 0 -w 128
|-
| 6750 || 167.59 || -|| || - || 870 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer || -v -f30 -w128

|-
| 6770 || 180 || -|| || - || 850 || 1200 || - || - || guiminer || -v -w128 , this was an XFX (OEM) model, GPU @ 850 MHz, mem @ 1200 MHz; I pushed it up to 190 Mhash/s briefly by overclocking, but it crashed the system above that
|-
| 6770 || 202 || -|| || - || 960 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x1,x4,x8,x16 || phoenix 1.48 || Sapphire 6770 (standard) -q2 -k poclbm DEVICE=0 AGGRESSION=10 VECTORS WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT FASTLOOP (The PCI-E speed does not affect the mining speed)

|-
| 6770 || 217 || -|| || - || 960 || 800 || - || PCI-E x16 || Guiminer with phoenix || Sapphire 6770 -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128 FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 with https://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=22965.0 modification
|-
| 6790 || 220 || 1.467|| || 150 || 800 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 || -k phatk BFI_INT FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=12 VECTORS OC'd to 1ghz, underclocked mem to 300, voltage at 1175

|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 171.59 || 1.351||1.07 || 127 || 775 || 960 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 196 || -|| || - || 850 || 960 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 0
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 220 || 1.236(*)|| || 178(*) || 1000(OC) || 960 || 2.4RC1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 30 (*: Overclocked wattage calculated [http://bakkap.free.fr/Misc/wCalc.html here] )
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 234.8 || ||- || - || 940 || 960 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.3 || AGGRESSION=8 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 236.0 || ||- || - || 940 || 960 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.4 || -k phatk AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT, Core @ 900MHz, Memory @ 300MHz
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 244.2 || ||- || - || 960 || 960 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm june-2011 || -v -w 128
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 245.1 || ||- || 200 || 940 || 940 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer (Phoenix) || Sapphire 6850 (Memory @1000MHz); Win7 64bit; flags: -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=14 WORKSIZE=128
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 267.2 || ||1.67 || - || 1010(OC) || 960 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer / phoenix 1.50 || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 worksize=128 FASTLOOP=false
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 232.47 || 1.540||1.22 || 151 || 900 || 1120 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm -v -w 128 ||
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 277.47 || -|| || - || 940 || 1120 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.3 || AGGRESSION=8 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 271 || 1.807|| || 150 || 940 || 1120|| 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm -v -w 128 || Debian 6.0.1 x86_64
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 260.1 || 1.611|| || 175 || 1001 || 1120|| 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm-gui windows7x86 cat 11.3 || -v -w 128 -f 1
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 276 || 1.828(?)|| || 151(?) || 900 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha cat 11.4 sdk 2.4 || -G2 -D stock clocks, debian linux 64bit
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 281.7 || 1.172 (stock)|| || - || 980 || 1120|| 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer-v2011-06-09 || xfx6870, flags: -v 19 -w 128, win7 32-bit
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 294 || || ||- || 980 || 1120|| 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix phatk || xfx6870, 340MHz memory clock, Catalyst 11.6, flags: BFI_INT VECTORS AGGRESSION=9 WORKSIZE=256
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 300.06 || 1.830|| || 164 || 1020 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.4 cat 11.4 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=8 fastloop mem clock 344
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 306 || 1.748(?)|| || 175(?) || 1000 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha cat 11.4 sdk 2.4 || -G2 -D overclocked to 1000, debian linux 64bit
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 300 || 1.72|| || 174 || 1038 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm windows7x86 cat 11.4 || -v -w128 -f1 mem clock 360, fan 100% temp 73C
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 310 || -|| || - || 1035 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 phatk 11.5 sdk 2.4 || BFI_INT VECTORS FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=128, mem clock @ 300MHz, voltage @ 1.300
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 314 || -|| || - || 1030 || 1120|| 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.50 / phatk / Linux || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 316 || -|| || - || 1030 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer 2011-06-09 using phoenix (Win7-32bit) || -k phatk platform=0 device=0 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 worksize=128 FASTLOOP=false, mem clock @ 228MHz, voltage @ 1.25, Fan @ 40%, Temp @ 73C
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 322 || 1.882|| || 170 || 1050 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.47 phatk 11.5 sdk 2.4 || BFI_INT VECTORS FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=256, mem clock @ 400MHz
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 329 || -|| || - || 1075 || 1120|| 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 phatk 11.5 sdk 2.4 || BFI_INT VECTORS FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=256
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 245|| -|| || - || 900|| 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ph rising 1.45 phoenix 1.50 phatk 11.5 sdk 2.4 || HD5xxx+ Fastloop phatk AGGRESSION=10
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 297|| -|| || - || 1000|| 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ph rising 1.62 phoenix 1.50 phatk 11.5 sdk 2.4 || Vectors HD5xxx+ Fastloop phatk AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 321|| -|| || - || 1050|| 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x8 ||aoclbf 1.7 phoenix 1.50 11.6|| Vectors HD5xxx+ phatk AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=256, Memory=325MHz, Volts=1.3V, Fan~55%, Temps~70C
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 332 || -||1.74 || - || 1050 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer 2011-06-14 using phoenix (Win7-32bit) || -k phatk platform=0 device=0 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 worksize=128 FASTLOOP=false, mem clock @ 228MHz, voltage @ 1.3, Fan @ 60%, Temp @ 74C, flash and browser hardware acceleration disabled, aero enabled.
|-
| 6950 || 272 || -||0.90 || - || 900 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48/poclbm || max stable @ 1150 mV, AGGRESSION = 7, BFI_INT, MSI 6950
|-
| 6950 || 291 || -|| || - || 920 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48/poclbm || max stable @ 1200mV, AGGRESSION = 7, BFI_INT, MSI 6950
|-
| 6950 || 295 || -|| || - || 930 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48/poclbm || max stable @ 1275mV, AGGRESSION = 7, BFI_INT, MSI 6950
|-
| 6950 || 300 || -|| || - || 940 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48/poclbm || max stable @ 1300mV, AGGRESSION = 7, BFI_INT, MSI 6950
|-
| 6950 || 295 || 1.844(?)|| || 160(?) || 810 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250
|-
| 6950 || 314 || -|| || - || 800 || 1408 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 05-01-11 || -v -f30 -w128 default mem 1250 Stock Sapphire 6950 1gb
|-
| 6950 || 325 || 1.635(?)|| || 200(?) || 885 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250
|-
| 6950 || 328 || ~1.95 || ~1.2 || ~170 || 840 || 1408 || 2.4.650.9 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 2011-06-14 || -v -w 128, Cat11.6, Sapphire 1GB w/ HW locked BIOS, +40MHz GPU OC, 160W ACP + 5% OC = 170W new estimated ACP
|-
| 6950 || 339 || ~1.80 || 1.13 || ~188 || 860 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.50/poclbm kernel || non-ref card w/ shaders locked in hardware; core @ 860 MHz & 1100mV, mem @ 1250 MHz; cmd line args: VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128; power and MH/J calculated using Power = C*f*v^2 w/ assumption of 175 W at stock settings w/ 100% GPU util. (true values may differ)
|-
| 6950 || 340 || - || ||- || 895 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 05-21-11 || -v -w 128, mem @ 500, 1200 mV, MSI 6950
|-
| 6950 || 340 || - || ||- || 800 || 1536 ||(?) || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 05-21-11 || -v -f30 -w128 default mem 1250,Sapphire 6950 1gb, unlocked shaders
|-
| 6950 || 343 || 2.14 || - || 160 || 840 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 06-27-11 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128 FASTLOOP=false, HIS H695FN2G2M 2GB, mem @ 720, Kill-a-Watt measured
|-
| 6950 || 349 || 1.745(?)|| || 200(?) || 800 || 1408 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 05-21-11 || -v -f30 -w128, xfx 6950 xxx 1gb, locked shaders, core 900, mem 650, 79° C
|-
| 6950 || 360 || 1.8(?)|| || 200(?) || 970 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250
|-
| 6950 || 360 || -|| || - || 870 || 1375 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || flashed with 6970 BIOS, -v -f30 -w128
|-
| 6950 || 365 || -|| || - || 925 || 1408 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || stock bios, -v -f0 -w128, MSI twinfrozr III 2GB
|-
| 6950 || 344.4 || -|| || - || 800 || 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || Powercolor 6950 @ shadermod on original Bios 6950 / 1000mV 850/730, +20% powertune, Fan @ 60%, -v -w128 -f1.
|-
| 6950 || 352.8 || -|| || - || 820 || 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || Powercolor 6950 @ shadermod on original Bios 6950 / 1000mV 850/730, +20% powertune, Fan @ 60%, -v -w128 -f1.
|-
| 6950 || 366.4 || -|| || - || 850 || 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || Powercolor 6950 @ shadermod on original Bios 6950 / 1000mV 850/730, +20% powertune, Fan @ 60%, -v -w128 -f1.
|-
| 6950 || 388.4 || -|| || - || 900 || 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || Powercolor 6950 @ shadermod on original Bios 6950 / 1000mV 850/730, +20% powertune, Fan @ 60%, -v -w128 -f1.
|-
| 6950 || 403 || -|| || - || 939 || 685 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix-1.50/phatk || ASUS EAH6950 ([http://www.techpowerup.com/vgabios/90661/Asus.HD6970.2048.101124.html (Ref. 6950 Flashed -> 6970)]) / +10% overdrive volt., Fan @ 90%, VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128 AGGRESSION=13. Overclocked from 880 -> 939 with MSI Aferburner
|-
| 6950 || 410.4 || -|| || - || 950 || 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || Powercolor 6950 @ shadermod on original Bios 6950 / 1000mV 850/730, +20% powertune, Fan @ 60%, -v -w128 -f1.
|-
| 6950 || 432.4 || -|| || - || 1000 || 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || Powercolor 6950 @ shadermod on original Bios 6950 / 1000mV 850/730, +20% powertune, Fan @ 60%, -v -w128 -f1.
|-
| 6950 || 454.4 || -|| || - || 1050 || 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || Powercolor 6950 @ shadermod on original Bios 6950 / 1000mV 850/730, +20% powertune, Fan @ 60%, -v -w128 -f1.
|-
| 6950 || 417 || 2.085(?)|| || 200(?) || 975 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || unlocked shaders, +20% overdrive, mem @ 1250, fan @ 77%, temp 64C, -v -w128, gpu core @ 1145mV
|-
| 6950 || 428 || 2.14(?)|| || 200(?) || 1000 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || unlocked shaders, +20% overdrive, mem @ 1250, fan @ 80%, temp 64C, -v -w128, gpu core @ 1160mV
|-
| 6950 || 432 || 2.16(?)||1.44 || 200(?) || 1000 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || unlocked shaders, +20% overdrive, mem @ 520, fan @ 80%, temp 76C, -v -w128 -f 2, gpu core @ 1275mV
|-
| 6950x4 || 1316 || 1.513|| || 870 || 840 || 1408 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || locked shaders, default mem 1250, dual fan 75C typical
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 323 || 1.468||0.92 || 220 || 880 || 1536 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -w 64, SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 370 || -|| || - || 880 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || -v -w128, fan @ 50%/temp 72C, stock card
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 372 || 1.691(?)|| || 220(?) || 900 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix (svn trunk 05.14.2011) || clock 900/1375, VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128, fan 45% (auto) / temp 90C
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 388 || -|| || - || 900 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || -v -w128, fan @ 50%/temp 72C, stock voltage of 1.175v
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 385 || 1.964|| || 196 || 900 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || -v -w128, memory downclocked to 684Mhz, fan @ 70%/temp 81C
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 380 || -|| || - || - || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w128 export GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS=1 # to reduce poclbm CPU from 100% to 2%
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 403 || -|| || - || MAX || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || clock Max/50%+stock, -v -w128, fan= 100%/temp 72C (Note: Overclocked using CCC utility under Windows 7, Clock set to Max value w/ 50% increase to memory and 5% increase to voltage)
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 407 || -|| || - || 955 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w128, fan 75%/temp 75C, voltage +10%
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 414 || -|| || - || 960 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || -v -w128, fan @ 53%/temp 73C, stock voltage of 1.175v, high air flow case
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 420 || -|| || - || 975 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || -v -w128 -f0, clocks 975MHz/685MHz MSI Lightning
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 423 || -||1.20 || - || 995 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48/poclbm || ATI Tray Tools, Clocks=995/331.25, WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 VECTORS ,68C @ 65% Fan, HAF932 Case
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970x2 || 710 || -|| || - || 900/880 || 1536 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -w 256
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970x2 || 828|| -|| || - || 940 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w128, fans 74%/82%, temp 74C/82C, powertune +20% (via CCC), memory underclock 825MHz (via MSI Afterburner), with 'Maj' fix
|-
| 6990 || 670 || 1.94||0.89 || 346 || 830 || 3072 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || Catalyst 11.4 [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=2949.msg106238#msg106238 source].
|-
| 6990 || 708 || 2.05|| || 346 || 830 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || BIOS switch at "default" position 2, see [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]
|-
| 6990 || 746 || 1.82|| || 410 || 880 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || BIOS switch at "overclocked" position 1, see [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]
|-
| 6990 || 758 || -|| || - || 880 || - || 2.4 || - || Phoenix with Poclbm || Catalyst 11.4, OC switch ON, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128 FASTLOOP=false
|-
| 6990 || 771 || 1.8804|| || 410 || 880 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx. Memory clock @ 1280Mhz.
|-
| 6990 || 772 || 1.8380|| || 420 || 900 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix & Poclbm || OC switch ON + overclocked to 900 mhz, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128
|-
| 6990 || 790 || -|| || - || 900 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || BIOS switch at "overclocked" position 1; with "aticonfig --odsc=900,1260" to further overclock the GPU to 900 MHz and mem to 1260 MHz, see [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]
|-
| 6990 || 802 || -|| || - || 915 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || BIOS switch at "overclocked" position 1; with "aticonfig --odsc=915,1260" to further overclock the GPU to 915 MHz and mem to 1260 MHz, see [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]
|-
| 6990 || 835 || -||1.11 || - || 890/860 || 3072 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix || BIOS switch at "overclocked" position 1; with "aticonfig --adapter=1 --odsc=990,890 and aticonfig --adapter=0 --odsc=960,860" (GPU 0 runs hot). Currently, aticonfig can only underclock RAM to 100mhz below core speed. Command line: phoenix.py -k poclbm VECTORS AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT
|-
| 6990x2 || 1436 || 1.848|| || 777 || 880 || 6144 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 x2 || guiminer 2011.05.11 || AUSUM switch set to 1 on both cards; Core left at 880MHz, memory left at 1250MHz; VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128
|-
| 6990x2 || 1700 || 1.416|| || 1200 || 1010 || 3072 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 x16 || guiminer 2011.06.14 || GPU 1010MHz, Memory 900MHz; VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128 FASTLOOP=false
|-
| 6990x3 || 2094 || -|| || - || 900 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 x8 x4 || poclbm || GPU 900MHz, Memory 1250MHz; poclbm.py -f 0 -w 256

|-
| FirePro V4800 || 79.7 || -|| || - || 775 || 400 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-01 ||
|-
| FirePro V8700 || 84.8 || -|| || - || 750 || 800 || - || - || poclbm-mod.03.24.2011 ||

|-
| FirePro M5800 || 61.4 || -|| || - || 650 || - || - || - || poclbm-mod.03.24.2011 || Ubuntu
|-
| FirePro M5800 || 69.3 || -|| || - || 650 || 400 || 2.1 || - || GUIMiner v2011-04-26 || -v -w128, Windows 7 32bit
|-
| FirePro V5800 || 119 || -|| || - || 690 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-01 || Windows 7 32bit
|-
| FirePro V5800 || 144 || -|| || - || 690 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-01 || -v -w128 (Windows 7 32bit)
|-
| FirePro V5800 || 161 || -|| || - || 780 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-01 || -v -w128 (Windows 7 32bit)
|-
| FirePro V7750 || 35.7 || -|| || - || - || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-21 || Windows 7 64bit
|-
| FirePro V7800 || 254.85 || -|| || - || - || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 with poclbm || Debian Squeeze
|-
| FirePro M7820 || 150.0 || -|| || - || 700 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-06-09 / poclbm || Memory downclocked to 500 from 1000MHz, 169MH/s@800MHz, 181MH/s@860Mhz (max.), only SDK2.1 works, Windows 7 x86
|}

<references>
<ref name='amazon_20110625'>$ Prices from http://www.amazon.com on 2011-06-25</ref>
</references>

===Nvidia===

{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! Watts !! Clock !! SP !! Comment
|-
| ION || 1.8 || 0.067 || 27 || || 16 || poclbm; power consumption incl. CPU
|-
| 8200 mGPU || 1.2 || || || 1200 || 16 || 128 MB shared memory, "poclbm -w 128 -f 0"
|-
| 8400 GS || 2.3 || || || || || "poclbm -w 128"
|-
| 8400 GS || 1.6 || 0.013 || 128 || 1238 || || DiabloMiner -w 128 -f 1 [https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/User:Knightmb source]
|-
| 8400M GS || 2.0 || || || || ||
|-
| 8500GT || 2.4 || || || 918 || 16 || poclbm under GUIMiner
|-
| 8600M GT || 4.93 || || || || 32 ||
|-
| 8600M GT || 3.8 || || || || || Macbook Pro running Diablo
|-
| 8600GT || 5.66 || || || 1188 || 32 ||
|-
| 8600GT OC || 7.3 || || || 1602 || 32 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.0 poclbm] -w 128 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg72833#msg72833 source]
|-
| 8800GT || 25 || 0.24 || 105 || 1300 || ||
|-
| 8800GT || 24.5 || 0.23 || 105 || 1300 || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]
|-
| 8800GT || 31.1 || 0.296 || 105 || 1855 || || Overclocked 715 GPU / 1030 Memory / 1855 Shader; GuiMiner v2011-05-21
|-
| 8800GT || 31.8 || 0.303 || 105 || 1836 || 112 || 713 gpu, 1026 memory. win7x86, phoenix 1.48, -k poclbm WORKSIZE=64 AGGRESSION=5
|-
| 8800GTS || 16.8 || 0.109 || 154 || || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source] [http://www.techspot.com/review/79-geforce-8800-gts-512/page11.html source]
|-
| 8800 GTS || 18.7 || 0.124 || 150 || 1200 || || poclbm -w 64 no vectors
|-
| 8800 GTX || 27.5 || || || 1404 || || phoenix 1.48, poclbm, no vectors, 83C with 50C ambient
|-
| 8800m GTX || 16.3 || || || || || rpcminer-cuda Win7-64
|-
| 9300GE || 1.57 || || || 1300 || 8 ||
|-
| 9300GS || 1.69 || || || 1400 || 8 ||
|-
| 9300/nForce 730i || 2.15 || || || 1200 || 16 ||
|-
| 9400GT || 3.37 || 0.067 || 50 || 1400 || 16 ||
|-
| 9400M (MacBook) || 1.90 || 0.32 || 6 || 700 || || poclbm -f 8 no vectors
|-
| 9500GT || 6.75 || 0.135 || 50 || 1400 || 32 ||
|-
| 9500GT || 7.10 || 0.135 || 50 || 1767 || 32 || rpcminer-cuda, Overclocked 707 GPU / 500 Memory / fan 100% 73C steady
|-
| 9600GSO || 19.88 || 0.237 || 84 || 1375 || 96 ||
|-
| 9600GSO512 || 11.75 || 0.131 || 90 || 1625 || 48 ||
|-
| 9600GT || 15.66 || 0.165 || 95 || 1625 || 64 ||
|-
| 9600GT Zotac || 15 || || || 1650 || 64 ||
|-
| 9600GT OC || 18.8 || <0.198 || >95 || 1981 || 64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.0 poclbm] -w 128 -f 10 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg74610#msg74610 source] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg73353#msg73353 source]
|-
| 9600M GS || 4.0 || || || 1075 || 32 || rpcminer-cuda
|-
| 9800GT || 30.36 || 0.289 || 105 || 1800 || 112 ||
|-
| 9800GT EE || 19.7 || 0.263 || 75 || 1375 || 112 || rpcminer-cuda
|-
| 9800GT OC || 29.5 || 0.283 || 105 || 1836 || 112 || poclbm.py, no options. Memory underclocked to 850Mhz, GPU overclocked to 733Mhz
|-
| 9800GTX || 32.54 || 0.232 || 140 || 1688 || 128 ||
|-
| 9800GTX+ || 35.39 || 0.251 || 141 || 1836 || 128 ||
|-
| 9800GTX+ || 36 || || || || || factory OC ubuntu polclbm.py -w 128 -f 10 -a 10 (DO NOT USE -v)
|-
| 9800GTX+ || 37.23 || 0.266 || 140 || 1890 || 128 || win7x64 275.27 phoenix(1.48) -k poclbm AGGRESSION=3 WORKSIZE=64
|-
| 9800GTX+ || 40.20 || 0.287 || 140 || 835 || 128 || lowered memory clock higher core, unstable if going higher
|-
|style="background-color:#FFEFEF"| 9800GX2 || 57.83 || 0.294 || 197 || || 2x128 ||
|-
|style="background-color:#FFEFEF"| 9800GX2 || 28 || 0.142 || 197 || || 2x128 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]
|-
| G210 || 3.38 || 0.111 || 30.5 || 1402 || 16 ||
|-
| G210 || 3.79 || 0.124 || 30.5 || 1402 || 16 || poclbm -f 1
|-
| GT220 || 10.8 || 0.084 || 128 || 1360 || || DiabloMiner -w 128 -f 1000 [https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/User:Knightmb source]
|-
| GT230 || 15.5 || 0.161 || 96 || 650 || 64 || (9600GT rebranded one from in a medion pc)
|-
| GT240 || 19.37 || 0.281 || 69 || 1340 || 96 ||
|-
| GT240 || 21.24 || || || || 96 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4291.0 poclbm-mod] -f 0 -v [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg73383#msg73383 source]
|-
| GT240 || 28.1 || || || || 96 || poclbm -f0 -v (Gainward GT240 1024DDR5 OC core@670/stockmem@1700/shader@1700 - stable; max.temp=73)
|-
| GT240M || 9.8 || 0.426 || 23 || 550 || 48 || poclbm -f 0 -w 256
|-
| GT330 || 21.65 || || || || || poclbm -f 0 -w 256
|-
| GTS250 || 35.39 || 0.244 || 145 || 1836 || 128 ||
|-
| GTS250 || 35.2 || 0.243 || 145 || 1836 || 128 ||
|-
| GTS250 OC || 37 || 0.255 || 145 || 2047 || 128 ||
|-
| GTX260M || 22.5 || || || 500 || 112 || poclbm 4/28/2011 Asus G71GX runs ~90c without cooling pad
|-
| GTX260 || 35.91 || 0.178 || 202 || 1242 || 192 ||
|-
| GTX260 || 44 || 0.242 || 182 || 1242 || 216 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|-
| GTX260c216 || 40.40 || 0.236 || 171 || 1242 || 216 ||
|-
| GTX260c216 || 47.4 || 0.260 || 182 || 1348 || 216 || poclbm -w 256
|-
| GTX260c216 || 50.00 || || || 1050 || 216 || m0mchil GPU client, Windows 7 64-bit, x6 @ 3.5ghz
|-
| GTX260c216 OC || 52.0 || || || 1461 || 216 || "poclbm -w 256 -f 1"
|-
| GTX260c216 OC || 58.9 || || || 756/400 || 216 || Core overclocked, Memory underclocked, Ubuntu 11.04 Classic Session(No Effects) "poclbm -w 256 -f 1"
|-
| GTX260c216 OC || 60.1 || || || 1706 || 216 || Core: 364 MHz, Shaders: 1706 MHz, Memory: 594 MHz, VDDC: 1.1800V. "poclbm-mod -w 256 -f 1"
|-
| GTX275 || 50.75 || 0.232 || 219 || 1404 || 240 ||
|-
| GTX275 || 58 || || || 729/1458 || 240 || poclbm -f 0 -w 256
|-
| GTX280 || 46.84 || 0.198 || 236 || 1296 || 240 ||
|-
| GTX280 || 64.34 || 0.289 || 245 || 1296 || 240 || phoenix.exe -k poclbm AGGRESSION=6 WORKSIZE=128 (61*C with Accelero XTREME GTX280)
|-
| GTX285 || 64.8 || || || 1607 || 240 || GuiMiner - Not sure about wattage yet. Still testing. Card runs around 74 C
|-
|-
| GTX285 || 53.35 || 0.262 || 204 || 1476 || 240 ||
|-
| GTX295 || 89.78 || 0.311 || 289 || 1242 || 480 ||
|-
| GTX295 || 120.70 || 0.418 || 289 || 1242 || 480 || GUIMiner no oc.
|-
| GTX295 || 117.30 || 0.406 || 289 || 1476 || 490 ||
|-
| GT 320M (MacBook Air) || 6.12 || || || 1212 || 48 ||
|-
| 320M (Mac mini 2010) || 7.0 || 0.35 || 20 || 450 || 32 || poclbm no extra options, windows 7 x64
|-
| GT 325M || 7.5 || || || 990 || 48 || rpcminer-cuda
|-
| GT 330M || 7.97 || || || || || Model: MacBookPro6,2 VRAM: 512MB Software: [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8994.0 DiabloMiner GUI] v2011-05-22 / Mac OS X 10.6.7
|-
| GT 330M (Sony Vaio Z) || 7.8 || 0.71 ( 0.3 total) || 11 (26w total) || 1045 || 48 ||
|-
| GTS 350M (Toshiba A665-3DV) || 17.0 || 1.214 || 14 || 1080 || || DiabloMiner-Windows.exe
|-
| GTS 360M || 25.0 || || || || || [toshiba qosmio laptop, ~150-165*F stock fans]
|-
| GTS 360M (ASUS G60jx) || 20.0 || || || || || everythins is stock, it cannot sustain. it reaches 90 degrees and freezes.
|-
| GT430 || 20.24 || 0.413 || 49 || 1400 || 96 ||
|-
| GT540M || 16.0 || || || || || rpcminer-cuda
|-
| GTS450 || 45.28 || 0.427 || 106 || 1566 || 192 ||
|-
| GTX460SE || 56.39 || 0.376 || 150 || 1300 || 288 ||
|-
| GTX460 || 66.32 || || || 814 || 336 || rpcminer-cuda 20110605, Graphics Clock @ 814MHz, Memory @ 1555MHz
|-
| GTX460 || 68.31 || 0.427 || 160 || 1350 || 336 ||
|-
| GTX460 768MB || 57.8 || || ? || 1350 || 336 || rpcminer-cuda -gputhreads=320 -gpugrid=336
|-
| GTX460 768MB (MSI Cyclone 768D5/OC) || 75.1 || || ? || 930 || 336 || rpcminer-cuda on Win7 x64 with ForceWare 275.33. [http://event.msi.com/vga/afterburner/download.htm MSI Afterburner] set to core: 930MHz, shader: 1850MHz, core voltage: 1.087V, memory: 1600MHz. Runs at 58°C with fan at 75% (ambient 25°C).
|-
| GTX460 1GB DirectCU || 72.3 || ? || ? || 1672 || 336 || rpcminer-cuda -gputhreads=320 -gpugrid=336
|-
| GTX460 (2 cards) || 102 || 0.319? || 320? || 1350 || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]
|-
| GTX460 (2 cards) OC || 127 || 0.374 || 340 || 1620 || 2x 336 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2444.0 rpcminer-cuda] -gpugrid=128 -gputhreads=128 ver.20110227
|-
| GTX465 || 64.41 || 0.322 || 200 || 1215 || 352 ||
|-
| GTX470 || 81.98 || 0.381 || 215 || 1215 || 448 ||
|-
| GTX470 || 94.7 || || || 1414 || ||
|-
| GTX470 || 111.9 || 0.520 || 215 || 1650 || 448 ||
|-
| GTX470 || 115 || || || 1616 || || phoenix 1.46 poclbm VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=6
|-
| GTX480 || 101.28 || 0.405 || 250 || 1401 || 480 ||
|-
| GTX480 || 140.43 || || || 1700 || 480 || rpcminer-cuda -gpugrid=512 -gputhreads=480
|-
| GTX560 Ti || 67.7 || 0.39 || 170 || 1700 || 384 || standard EVGA 560, no overclock
|-
| GTX560 Ti || 74.8 || 0.41 || 180 || 1700 || 384 || gigabyte 900Mhz clock; -w 512 -v
|-
| GTX560 OC || 86.7 || <0.51 || >170 || 1800 || 384 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2444.0 rpcminer-cuda] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg72816#msg72816 source]
|-
| GTX570 || 105.83 || 0.483 || 219 || 1464 || 480 ||
|-
| GTX570 || 140 || 0.639 || 219 || 750 || 480 || rpcminer-cuda.exe -aggression=10 -gpugrid=480 -gputhreads=960; display driver stops working with aggression=11 under win7 x64 driver 270.61
|-
| GTX570 || 157 || 0.717 || 219 || 850 || 480 || rpcminer-cuda.exe -aggression=11 -gpugrid=120 -gputhreads=960
|-
| GTX580 || 140.05 || 0.574 || 244 || 1544 || 512 ||
|-
| GTX590 || 193.1 || --- || --- || 1215 || 2x 512 || poclbm -v -w 256, Win
|-
| Quadro FX 580 || 5.7 || 0.14 || 40 || 1125 || 4 ||rpcminer-cuda, Win, -gpugrid=128 -gputhreads=512
|-
| Quadro FX 770M || 5.75 || || || 500 || 32 || DiabloMiner-Windows.exe BFI_INT FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=6, Win
|-
|Quadro FX 770M || 6.39 || || || 500 || 32 || DiabloMiner-Windows.exe BFI_INT FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=6 w 64, Win 7x64
|-
|Quadro FX 880M || 9.6 || || || || || poclbm/guiminer
|-
| Quadro FX 1600M || 6 || 0.12 || 50 || 625 || 32 ||rpcminer-cuda, Win
|-
| Quadro FX 2000M || 23 || 0.397 || 58 || || || phoenix 1.48, -k poclbm, VECTORS, AGGRESION=6, Lenovo W520 platform
|-
| Quadro FX 2800M || 22 || 0.293 || 75 || 600 || 96 ||DiabloMiner, win
|-
| Quadro FX 3600M || 36 || 0.514 || 70 || 500 || 96 ||
|-
| Quadro NVS 135M || 1.05 || 0.1 || 10 || 800 || 1 ||
|-
| Quadro NVS 295 || 1.7 || 0.07 || 23 || 567 || 8 || phoenix
|-
| Quadro NVS 3100M || 3.6 || 0.257 || 14 || 600 || 16 || rpcminer-cuda, Win, CUDA 3.1.1
|-
| Quadro 5000 || 67.7 || 0.445 || 152 || 513 || 352 || rpcminer-cuda.exe -aggression=7 gpugrid=352 gputhreads=704;
|-
| Tesla C1060 || 52.5 || || || 1296 || 240 || poclbm, Win7x64
|-
| Tesla M2050 || 79.8 || || || 1550 || 448 || DiabloMiner
|-
| Tesla S1070 || 155.2 || || || || || rpcminer-cuda, Linux, CUDA 3.2, 4 instances (-gpu=0 through -gpu=3)
|-
| GTX280x2 || 102.7 || || || || ||
|-
|}

==CPUs/APUs==

A lot of nice data can be pulled from [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.0 this thread] to seed this section.

Might you wish to throttle CPU load a bit, so it doesn't reach 100°C, it can be done with Battle Encoder Shirase to a margin, like, -15% of available CPU cycles.

Often, the best combination to be is to throttle CPU miner to -5% '''AND''' set it to least of priority levels, so as not to choke GPU miner up.

===AMD===
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! nprocs !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! TDP [W] !! CPU Clock !! Mhash/s CPU !! Mhash/s GPU !! GPU !! GPU Clock !! SP !! Software !! Notes
|-
| 4x Opteron 6174 || 48 || 115 || 0.36 || 320W || 2.2 GHz || 2.4
|colspan=4|
| cpuminer v0.8.1 || --alg 4way --threads 48
|-
| 2x Opteron 6128 || 16 || 32.4 || 0.141 || 230W || 2 GHz || 32.4
|colspan=4|
| 0.3.19 || -4way
|-
| Athlon XP 2000+ || 2 || 0.62 || 0.009 || 70W || 1.67 GHz || 0.62
|colspan=4|
| 0.3.18/Ubuntu || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source] [http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm?articleid=914&page=4 source]
|-
| Athlon 64 3500+ || 1 || 1.18 || 0.013 || 89W || 2.54 GHz || 1.18
|colspan=4|
| ufasoft v0.4 || overclocked (originally 2.2 GHz)
|-
| Athlon 64 X2 3800+ || 2 || 1.73 || 0.03 || 65 W || 2.00 GHz || 1.73
|colspan=4|
| cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || -algo=4way
|-
| Athlon 64 X2 4000+ || 2 || 1.9 || 0.02 || 65W || 2.1 GHz || 1.9
|colspan=4|
| rpc-miner ||
|-
| Athlon 64 X2 4400+ || || 2.09 || 0.032 || 65W || 2.3GHz || 2.09
|colspan=4|
| 0.3.19/Win x64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]
|-
| Athlon 64 X2 6000+ || 2 || 2.81 || 0.02 || 125W || 3 GHz || 2.81
|colspan=4|
| || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg22881#msg22881 source]
|-
| Athlon 64 X2 6400+ Black Edition || 2 || 2.9 || 0.023 || 125W || 3.2 GHz || 2.9
|colspan=4|
| 0.3.20.2 BETA/Win 7 x64 || -4way
|-
| Athlon II X2 240e || 2 || 2.71 || 0.06 || 45W || 2.81 GHz || 2.71
|colspan=4|
| bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Athlon II X2 250 || 2 || 5.6 || 0.09 || 65W || 3.01GHz || 5.6
|colspan=4|
| bitcoin-miner 0.11 ||
|-
| Athlon II X4 630 || 4 || 10.7 || 0.11 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 10.7
|colspan=4|
| bitcoin-miner 0.4 ||
|-
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 3.8 || 0.04 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 3.8
|colspan=4|
| 0.3.1x/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|-
| Phenom X4 9950 BE || 4 || 9.3 || 0.07 || 126W || 2.6 GHz || 2.32
|colspan=4|
| bitcoin-miner 0.13/WinXP || No GPU
|-
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 7.2 || 0.08 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 7.2
|colspan=4|
| cpu-miner 0.2.1/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|-
| Phenom II X4 810 || 4 || 5.0 || || 95W || 2.8 GHz ||
|colspan=4|
| rpcminer-cpu ||
|-
| Phenom II X4 810 || 4 || 9.5 || || 95W || 2.8 GHz ||
|colspan=4|
| rpcminer-4way ||
|-
| Phenom II X4 810 || 4 || 10.5 || || 95W || 2.8 GHz ||
|colspan=4|
| ufasoft v0.10 ||
|-
| Phenom II X4 955 || 4 || 11 || 0.09 || 125W || 3.2 GHz || 11
|colspan=4|
| rpcminer-4way ||
|-
| Phenom II X4 965 || 4 || 12 || 0.09 || 140W || 3.4 GHz || 11
|colspan=4|
| rpcminer-4way ||
|-
| Phenom II X6 1055T || 6 || 15.84 || 0.13 || 125W || 2.82 GHz || 15.84
|colspan=4|
| bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Phenom II X6 1075T || 6 || 21.3 || || 125W|| ||
|colspan=4|
| minerd || Ubuntu 11.04 amd64 runlevel=1 -algo=4way -threads=6
|-
| Phenom II X6 1090T || 6 || 18|| || 141W|| 3.50 GHz || 3
|colspan=4|
| minerd ||
|-
| Phenom II X6 1100T || 6 || 22 || 0.176 || 125W || 3.82 GHz || 22
|colspan=4|
| bitcoin-miner || Aciid#bitcoin-dev
|-
| Zacate E-350 || 2 || 11 || 0.615 || 18W || 1.6 Ghz || 1.231 || 9.831 || HD6310M || 492 Mhz || 80 || poclbm -v -w128 + Ufasoft 0.7 || stock speeds
|-
| Zacate E-350 || 2 || 12
|colspan=2|
| 1.648 Ghz || 1.252 || 10.87 || HD6310M || 492 Mhz || 80 || poclbm -v -w 256 -f 1 || "autotune" speed with ASUS EFI BIOS
|}

===ARM===
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! Mhash/$ /€ !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment
|-
| ARM1136EJ-S || 1 || 0.11 || ? || ? || ? || 0.528 GHz || cpuminer git || T-Mobile Pulse, inside Debian chroot, 'c' algo
|-
| Cortex-A8 || 1 || 0.125 || 0.36 || <0.01 || 0.35 W || 0.6 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || Nokia N900: 'cryptopp'
|-
| Cortex-A8 || 1 || 0.2 || 0.57 || <0.01 || 0.35 W || 0.6 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || Nokia N900: 'c' algo
|-
| 2x Cortex-A9 || 2 || 0.57|| 1.14 ||<0.01 || 0.5 W || 1.0 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-24) || Toshiba AC100, ubuntu, 'c' algo
|-
| Marvel Feroceon (88FR131) || 1 || 0.195 || 0.224 ||<0.01|| 0.87 W || 1.2 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-06-15) || Marvell SheevaPlug, Debian, 'c' algo
|}

===Intel===
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! Mhash / $<ref name='amazon_20110625'/>/€<ref name='geizhals_20110625'/> !! ACP [W] !! Clock [GHz] !! Version !! Comment
|-
| Pentium III mobile ? || 1 || 0.3 || 0.014 |||| 21 || 1.07 || 0.3.1x/Win2K || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source] [http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=27380 source]
|-
| Pentium M 1.6ghz || 1 || .4 || || || || 1.6 || minerd (jgarzik's 1.0) || cryppto, Windows 7
|-
| Pentium M 1.73ghz || 1 || .5 || || || || 1.73 || minerd (jgarzik's 1.0) || cryppto, Windows 7
|-
| Old Xeon 512k (Dual) || 2x1/2 || 2.0 || || || || 3.0 || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || HT disabled, algo=4way (twice as fast as the 2nd best algo)
|-
| Pentium 4 2.0A || 1 || 0.85 || || || || 2.0 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft-0.4]/WinXP || -g no -t 2
|-
| Pentium Dual-Core E2180 || 2/2 || 1.75 || || || || 2.0 || rpcminer-cpu || Win7-64
|-
| Pentium Dual-Core E2180 || 2/2 || 4.1 || || || || 2.0 || cpuminer || sse2_64
|-
| Pentium Dual-Core E2180 || 2/2 || 4.5 || || || || 2.0 || ufasoft v0.11 || Win7-64
|-
| Pentium Dual-Core E5400 || 2/2 || 2.27 || 0.03 || || 65 || 2.7 || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Celeron E330 || 2/2 || 2.2 || 0.03 || || 65 || 2.5 || 0.3.19/Ubuntu10.04 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]
|-
| Core 2 Quad Q6600 || 4/4 || 11.0 || || 0.02/0.06 || 105 || 2.40 || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || -a 60 -g no -t 4
|-
| Core 2 Quad Q8200 || 4/4 || 10.9 || || 0.06/0.10 || || 2.33 || Ufasoft 0.14 || -g no -l yes -t 4
|-
| Core 2 Quad Q9400 || 4/4 || 11 || 0.046 || 0.06/0.07 || 95 || 2.66 || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || -a 60 -g no -t 4
|-
| Core 2 Quad Q9650 || 4/4 || 18.67 || || 0.05/0.06 || 95 || 4.00 || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || -a 60 -g no -t 4
|-
| Core i3 530 || 2/4 || 8.31 || 0.10 || 0.06/0.10 || 80 || 3.66 || Ufasoft 0.7 || -v -a5 -g no -t 4
|-
| Core i3 M350 || 2/4 || 1.48 || 0.04 || || 35 || 2.27 || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Core i5 M450 || 2/4 || 1.8 || 0.05 || || 35 || 1.2 || 0.3.17/Win7-54 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source]
|-
| Core i5-650 || 2/4 || 5.1 || 0.04 ? || 0.02/0.03 || || 3.2 || cpuminer-0.7 || -4way
|-
| Core i5-750 || 4/4 || 14 || || 0.06/0.10 || || 3.2 || bitcoin-miner 0.11 || -a 5 -g no -t 4
|-
| Core i5 ? || 4/? || 6.5 || || || || || client from svn || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37621#msg37621 source]
|-
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 4.5 || 0.05 || 0.02/0.03 || 95 || 3.1 || cpuminer git (2011-01-22) || cryptopp_asm32
|-
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 14 || 0.15 || 0.07/0.09 || 95 || 3.1 || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || sse2_64
|-
| Core i5 2500K || 4/4 || 20.6 || ||0.10/0.12 || || 4.2 || bitcoin-miner || -g no
|-
| Core i5 2600K || 4/8 || 17.3 || || || 75 || 3.4 || bitcoin-miner || -g no. 75W for the whole System without monitor (MSI Board). CPU underclocked to 3,4Ghz and undervolted to 1,012Vcore. Passive Cooling! 3.6ghz results in 18,4 Mhash/s
|-
| Core i7 620M || 2/4 || 1.888 || || || || 2.66 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8994.0 RPCMiner GUI] v2011-05-22 / Mac OS X 10.6.7 || Model: MacBookPro6,2 RAM: 4GB
|-
| Core i7 720QM || 4/8 || 7.9 || ?|| || 45 || 2.8 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] || stream processors overclocked from 1.6 GHz; Dell Precision M6500, Win7-64, 8GB DDR3
|-
| Core i7 820 || 4/8 || 13.8 || || || || 2.8 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] || -t 8
|-
| Core i7 920 || 4/8 || 19.2 || 0.10 || || 195 || 4.0 (x21) || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] || -a 5
|-
| Core i7 950 || 4/8 || 5.88 || 0.039 || || 150 || 3.83 (x23) || bitcoin-0.3.20.2 Win7-64 ||
|-
| Core i7 950 || 4/8 || 18.9 || 0.126 || || 150 || 3.83 (x23) || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] v0.4 ||
|-
| Core i7 980x || 6/12 || 19.2 || 0.15 || || 130 || 4.4 (x33) || cpuminer/Win7-64 ||
|-
| Core i7 980x || 6/12 || 8.7 || || || || 3.9 (x27) || 0.3.17/Win7-64 ||
|-
| Core i7 2635QM || 4/8 || 2.93 || || || || 2.00 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8994.0 RPCMiner GUI] v2011-05-22 / Mac OS X 10.6.7 || Model: MacBookPro8,2 RAM: 4GB
|-
| Core i7 620M || 2/4 || 6.3 || 0.18 || || 35 || 2.66 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] v0.4 ||
|-
| Core i7 2600k || 4/4 || 6.7 || || || || 4.00 || phoenix 0.48 ||
|-
| Core 2 Duo U7600 || 1 || 1.1 || || || || 1.2 || minerd (jgarzik's 1.0) || cryppto, Windows 7
|-
| Core 2 Duo E5200 || 2/2 || 6.2 || 0.086 || || 72 || 2.76 || Ufasoft/Win7-64 || TDP is 65W + 7W overclock
|-
| Core 2 Duo E6550 || 1/2 || 2.45 || || || || 2.33 || cpuminer 0.7.1 (Linux) || --algo=sse2_64
|-
| Core 2 Duo E6850 || 2/2 || 6.75 || 0.10 || || 65 || 3.0 || ufasoft-0.3 ||
|-
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 7.76 || 0.11 || || 70 || 3.33 || ufasoft-0.3 || uncertain of overclock; miner optimized for Intel Core
|-
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 2.52 || 0.04 || || 65 || 2.66 || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Core 2 Duo E8200 || 2/2 || 2.3 || 0.035 || || 65 || 2.66 || rpcminer-cpu ||
|-
| Core 2 Duo E8400 || 2/2 || 6.9 || 0.106 || || 65 || 3.0 || ufasoft v0.10 || windows 7/64bit (-t 2)
|-
| Core 2 Duo E8500 || 1/2 || 3.6 || || || || 3.16 || guiminer v2011-06-14 || windows vista 32bit
|-
| Core 2 Duo E8500 || 2/2 || 7.2 || || || || 3.16 || guiminer v2011-06-14 || windows vista 32bit
|-
| Core 2 Duo T5450 || 2/2 || 2.5 || 0.07 || || 35 || 1.63 || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || Ubuntu 11.04
|-
| Core 2 Duo T6400 || 2/2 || 4.2 || 0.12 || || 35 || 2.00 || cpuminer git (Linux) || --algo=sse2_64
|-
| Core 2 Duo T7250 || 2/2 || 4.5 || 0.13 || || 35 || 2.00 || bitcoin-miner 0.13/WinXP || No GPU
|-
| Core 2 Duo T7450 || 2/2 || 3.7 || 0.10 || || 35 || 2.13 || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || Ubuntu 11.04
|-
| Core 2 Duo T9400 || 2/2 || 4.2 || || || || 2.53 || ufasoft v0.13 || Win7-64
|-
| Core 2 Extreme X9000 || 2/2 || 2.37 || || || || 2.8 || rpcminer-cpu || Win7-64
|-
| Core 2 Extreme X9000 || 2/2 || 6.2 || || || || 2.8 || ufasoft v0.11 || Win7-64
|-
| Core 2 Extreme X9000 || 2/2 || 7.2 || || || || 3.2 || ufasoft v0.11 || Win7-64 Overclocked from 2.8 GHz to 3.2 GHz
|-
| Xeon 2.8 || 2/2 || 0.8 || || || || 2.8 || cpuminer || cryptopp_asm32
|-
| Xeon 3060 || 1/2 || 2.03 || 0.03 || || 65 || 2. || cpuminer 0.8.1 (Linux) || --algo=cryptopp_asm32
|-
| Xeon Prestonia 2.4 (dual) || 2x1/2 || 2.16 || 0.017 || || 130 || 2.4 || ufasoft v0.4 ||
|-
| Xeon X5355 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 10.13 || 0.16 || || 120 || 2.6 || bitcoind || Roughly the same speed as the "c" algo in cpuminer
|-
| Xeon X5355 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 22.76 || 0.09 || || 120 || 2.6 || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || -O2 -march=core2, algo=sse2_64
|-
| Xeon X5365 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 26.00 || ? || || ? || 3.0 || cpuminer git (2011-06-15) || algo=sse2_64
|-
| Xeon E5335 || 4/4 || 9.35 || 0.12 || || 80 || 2.00 || ufasoft v0.11 || Vista-32
|-
| Xeon E5410 || 4/8 || 4.6 || ? || || 80 || 2.33|| cpuminer v1.0.2 --algo=4way || CentOS 5.5 x64
|-
| Xeon E5440 || 4/8 || 7.3 || ? || || 80 || 2.66|| Kiv's poclbm-gui || FIXME: Either wrong model # or wrong threads/speed info
|-
| Xeon E5520 || 4/8 || 6.5 || 0.08 || || 80 || 2.27 || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Xeon E5530 || 4/8 || 7.14 || 0.09 || || 80 || 2.4 || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Xeon E5630 (dual) || 2x4/8 || 8 || 0.1 || || 80 || 2.53 || 0.3.17/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]
|-
| Xeon E6520 (dual) || 2x4/8 || 24.7 || || || || 2.53 || ufasoft v0.10 || windows 2008 R2 64bit (-t 16)
|-
| Xeon E7450 (quad) || 4x6/24 || 60 || || || || 2.40 || ufasoft v0.13 || -t 24
|-
| Xeon E7520 (dual) || 2x4/16 || 18 || || || 95 || 1.87 || ufasoft v0.10 || windows 2008 R2 64bit (-t 16)
|-
| Xeon W3680 || 6/12 || 18 || || || 130 || 3.33 || cpuminer v1.0.2 --algo=4way || Ubuntu 11.04 64bit
|-
| Atom N230 || 1/2 || 0.375 || || || 4 || 1.6 || rpcminer-cpu ||
|-
| Atom N230 || 1/2 || 0.245 || || || 4 || 1.6 || rpcminer-4way ||
|-
| Atom N230 || 1/2 || 0.97 || || || 4 || 1.6 || ufasoft v0.10 ||
|-
| Atom N270 || 1/2 || 1.19 || 0.24 || || 5 || 1.6 || ufasoft v0.10 ||
|-
| Atom D510 || 2/4 || 1.00 || || || || 1.6 || cpuminer w cryptopp_asm32 || debian linux 6.0, headless system, 2 GB RAM, running from usb-flash
|-
| Atom D510 || 4/4 || 2.3 || 0.07 || || 30 || 1.6 || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || Ubuntu 11.04 Server
|}

<references>
<ref name='amazon_20110625'>$ Prices from http://www.amazon.com on 2011-06-25</ref>
<ref name='geizhals_20110625'>€ Prices from http://geizhals.at/eu on 2011-06-25</ref>
</references>

===Other===
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! Mhash/$ !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment
|-
| Cell || 6 || 21 || 0.35 || 0.07 || 60W || 3.2 GHz || cellminer || Sony Playstation 3 (FAT): Needs custom firmware. [https://github.com/verement/cellminer source] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4704.20 source] Total power usage of PS3 fat is 120W but only the Cell cpu is active.
|-
| Cell || 6 || 21 || 0.7 || 0.07 || 35W || 3.2 GHz || cellminer || Sony Playstation 3 (SLIM): Total power usage of PS3 slim is 70W but only the Cell cpu is active.
|-
| MIPS || 1 || 0.026 || ? || || ? || 200 MHz || cpuminer || ASUS WL-500G Deluxe router running [http://openwrt.org/ OpenWrt]
|-
| VIA Eden || 1 || 1.3 || 0.17 || || 8W || 1600 MHz || cpuminer || VIA Eden w/ Padlock
|-
| PowerPC 7447A || 1 || 0.53 || || || || 1420 MHz || cpuminer ||
|}

===FPGA Devices===

{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! FPGA Model !! Cores !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! Mhash/$ !! Power [W] !! Board price !! Clock !! Version !! Board !! Comment
|-
| Altera EP4CE115C7 || 1 || 80 || 18.18 || 0.13 || 4.4 || $595 ($299 academic) <ref>Price from http://www.terasic.com.tw/cgi-bin/page/archive.pl?No=502 on 2011-06-26</ref> || 80 MHz || fpgaminer 0.03 || Terasic DE2-115 || Unoptimized Pipelined version
|-
| Altera EP4CE115C7 || 1 || 109 || || 0.18 || || $595 ($299 academic) <ref>Price from http://www.terasic.com.tw/cgi-bin/page/archive.pl?No=502 on 2011-06-26</ref> || 109 MHz || fpgaminer 0.03-makomk || Terasic DE2-115 || makomk's improvements
|-
| Xilinx XC5VLX110T-1FF1136 || 1 || 120 || || 0.06 || || $1999 ($750 academic) <ref>Price from http://www.digilentinc.com/Products/Detail.cfm?NavPath=2,400,795&Prod=XUPV5 on 2011-06-26</ref> || 120 MHz || fpgaminer virtex5 || XUPV5-LX110T || Original non-configurable fully-unrolled Xilinx VHDL design
|-
| Xilinx XC3S500E-FG320-5 || 1 || 3.125 || 4.0 || 0.02 || 0.78 || $149 ($99 academic) <ref>Price from http://www.digilentinc.com/Products/Detail.cfm?Prod=NEXYS2 on 2011-06-26</ref> || 100 MHz || fpgaminer Verilog Xilinx port || Digilent Nexys 2 500K ||
|}

<references>
</references>

==See Also==

* [[Mining rig]]
* [[Generation Calculator]]
* [[Power Calc]]
* [[OpenCL miner]]
* [http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=745 ATI Stream vs. NVIDIA CUDA - GPGPU computing battle royale]
* [http://bitminer.info/ Bitminer.info]

[[Category:Mining]]

User:Tartarus

2011-06-25T15:44:50Z

Tartarus:

Just here to correct some minor problems as I find them. 
Contributors Award participant: 1KjoJihf7GWHWeQFhDmaw4g7xorkmD13u

User:Tartarus

2011-06-25T15:44:19Z

Tartarus:

Just here to correct some minor problems as I find them.
Contributors Award participant: 1KjoJihf7GWHWeQFhDmaw4g7xorkmD13u�

User:Tartarus

2011-06-25T15:43:11Z

Tartarus: Created page with "Just here to correct some minor problems as I find them."

Just here to correct some minor problems as I find them.

RPCminer.app

2011-06-19T20:35:41Z

Tartarus: Note that RPCminer link is a 64bit app

A application-packaged frontend for [[RPC Miner]] that can be run on Mac OS 10.6 or higher.

Double-click on the icon to start mining. Yields 1100–1400 khash/s on a recent MacBook Air and Mac Mini (2011 models).

Features integration with Mac OS APIs and systems such as user defaults for storing configuration, LaunchAgents, and more.

The project was announced on May 19, 2011<ref>[http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8994.0 ‘GUI’ miners for Mac (Diablo GPU and RPCminer CPU)]</ref> The project’s goal is to provide a self-contained binary download in a standard Mac packaging that is ready for use by the end-user.

==Download==
* [http://ul.to/kxr9ydrj DiaboloMiner.app] (MD5 SUM: 98bdbbbcec9c094769c308cbd146e65e)
* [http://ul.to/49dw65r3 RPCminer.app (64bit binary)] (MD5 SUM: eb7bdf83dcbf18c5b3fe7c6853ce6293)

==See Also==

* [http://github.com/codykrieger/gfxCardStatus gfxCardStatus] utility

==External Links==

* [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8994.0 Official forum thread] with links to download files
* [http://maccoinminer.wordpress.com/2011/05/20/rpcminer-for-mac/ Walk-through] for setting up [[pooled mining]]

==References==
<references />

[[Category:Miners]]
[[Category:Open Source]]