Bitcoin Wiki - User contributions [en]

Talk:Comparison of VPS providers

2015-05-03T20:19:06Z

RockHoster: /* Request for deletion */

==Reorganizing the list==
The fight to be on top of the list on this page is disappointing. I think the page is already in need of reorganization; perhaps we can sort it by actual popularity. Suggestions? --[[User:Taras|Taras]] ([[User talk:Taras|talk]]) 00:58, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

: just keep it alphabetized and ban anyone who tries to jump the line :) [[User:Nanotube|Nanotube]] ([[User talk:Nanotube|talk]]) 20:34, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

== Adding IPv6 ==
Support for IPv6 is a very important transition, both for TOR, and for general internet connectivity.
* In Oct 2012, support for TOR clients connecting to relays as well as relays publishing IPv6 addresses and accepting clients connecting over IPv6 had been implemented.
* By Jan 2013, support for exiting to IPv6 destinations had been implemented.

Please see the [[https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/org/roadmaps/Tor/IPv6 TOR on IPv6 roadmap]] for additional details regarding TOR and IPv6.

Using [http://ipv6-test.com IPv6-test.com], I've tested for accessibility to each provider's homepage via IPv6. The following is proposed for satisfying a '''yes''' listing critera:
* [http://ipv6-test.com/validate.php IPv6-test.com] must report a valid AAAA record for provider's homepage.
* [http://ipv6-test.com/validate.php IPv6-test.com] must be able to load the provider's homepage via IPv6.
[[User:Erth64net|Erth64net]] ([[User talk:Erth64net|talk]]) 20:31, 16 July 2013 (GMT)

== Request for deletion ==
I nominate this page for deletion. Reason: Nobody is willing to frequently update it. It's completely useless and misleading. {{unsigned|Chmod755}}
:Agreed, though my reason is more that this isn't directly Bitcoin-related. At best it's a list of VPS providers that accept Bitcoin - in which case, would we also be listing every flower store, restaurant, etc. that accepts Bitcoin? I feel that other sites are more suitable for that purpose (including e.g. OpenStreetMaps' data) [[User:TheRealSteve|TheRealSteve]] ([[User talk:TheRealSteve|talk]]) 15:11, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
::Also agreed... This page was more useful when it was first created, but nowadays it is somewhat difficult to find a VPS that ''doesn't'' accept bitcoin. It's become an annoying advertising convention since then. I guess we'll wait a few days to see if there are any objections. [[User:Taras|Taras]] ([[User talk:Taras|talk]]) 22:48, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
:::I understand the reasons mentioned above, but I'm not sure removing this page is the best option. For me this wiki is an important source of clientele. I think removing this page is not good for the completeness of the wiki and the trade section. Visitors of this site now are able to see for example VPN providers, but not VPS providers. I'm willing to help moderate the page to prevent people from ignoring the alphabet ;-). [[User:Bitcoincloud|Bitcoincloud]] 2015-04-09 15:28 GMT +1
:::: I agree with BitCloud. This wiki is a very good source of clients who wish to pay with BTC. Removing this page is not a good idea. Banning or suspending members who don't wish to co-operate will be helpful. But removing this page is not at all a good idea and I can also help in moderating page being neutral. Thanks [[User:RockHoster|RockHoster]] ([[User talk:RockHoster|talk]]) 20:13, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

User talk:Taras

2015-05-01T15:36:05Z

RockHoster: /* Comparison of VPS providers list */

{{archive}}__TOC__
== Bitcoin Fog ==
Could you remove bitcoin fog advertisment from bitcoin wiki, because it scammed a lot of people? {{unsigned|Pampa|20:20, 5 March 2015 (UTC)‎}}
:See [[Talk:Bitcoin Fog]] --[[User:Taras|Taras]] ([[User talk:Taras|talk]]) 21:36, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
== Can you at least consult with me ==

...before editing "every" thing I write. Isn't that the point of this being a community wiki and not a centralized wiki?

Why did you rename the PS Coin page (see how I'm consulting first before just undo-ing)?

Additionally, I changed the "planned" template you edited back to "soon" which I originally had made - there is a very literal distinction between those words. Planned would imply uncertainty. We've already tackled the sufficient regulatory hurdles necessary, minus one additional step which we're in the process of completing now.

{{unsigned|Bliljerk101|23:41, 8 February 2015 (UTC)}}

:Is [[PS Coin]] really called "PS Coin - incentivized exchange"? They write that down as their name all the time? If it is, go ahead and put it back.

:: I just feel the distinction would help in this case, since it's radically different than other exchanges (no other exchanges have an incentivized algorithm like PS Coin - it really should be in a category of its own) [[User:Bliljerk101|Bliljerk101]] ([[User talk:Bliljerk101|talk]]) 18:29, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

:Also, "Planned" does not imply uncertainty. It is only used when implementation is imminent. [[User:Taras|Taras]] ([[User talk:Taras|talk]]) 14:37, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

:: "Planned" implies the inherent uncertainty of any future event. Until it happens, it is always uncertain. --[[User:Luke-jr|Luke-jr]] ([[User talk:Luke-jr|talk]]) 06:09, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

::: Do you think we should keep the "soon" template or otherwise distinguish scheduled implementations from dry internal speculation? [[User:Taras|Taras]] ([[User talk:Taras|talk]]) 14:26, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

:::: [[User:Luke-jr|Luke-jr]], Thanks for your input here. [[User:Taras|Taras]], I think there is no reason to not keep both templates. However, in the case of [[PS Coin]] the "Soon" template should be used. Other exchanges may appropriately need to use a "planned" template instead. [[User:Bliljerk101|Bliljerk101]] ([[User talk:Bliljerk101|talk]]) 18:29, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

== Dokuwiki revisions ==

One thing that might cause trouble: Mark started bitcoin.it and tried to get everyone to move to it, but there was a period of time when it was uncertain whether the community would want to switch from the old wiki to this one, so the two wikis competed for a time (perhaps as long as a month or two). Therefore, there might be some edit conflicts that can't be easily resolved. Then again, both wikis had very low activity at the time, so maybe there won't be any conflicts. [[User:Theymos|theymos]] ([[User talk:Theymos|talk]]) 06:41, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
:I've trimmed any revisions that occurred after Mark started bitcoin.it, leaving the ones that were present in the text that you imported in 2010. I'm pretty sure everything will be alright. [[User:Taras|Taras]] ([[User talk:Taras|talk]]) 15:52, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

== Comparison of VPS providers list ==

I see the list of hosting providers providing VPS is disappeared because there is no body to take care. If it is possible, Can I take the charge of that page ?<br>
I promise that I will not be biassed and I will be neutral to the list.

If it is possible, Can I also get the last list prepared to make a new list ?

User talk:Taras

2015-05-01T15:34:46Z

RockHoster: /* Comparison of VPS providers list */ new section

File:Ablazehost.png

2014-10-04T12:09:36Z

RockHoster:

== Licensing ==
{{Copyrighted free use}}

File:Rockhoster.png

2014-08-07T18:29:46Z

RockHoster: Img

== Summary ==
Img
== Licensing ==
{{subst:nld}}