Bitcoin Wiki - User contributions [en]

File:Male silhouette.gif

2011-06-23T22:52:08Z

Rallan: uploaded a new version of "File:Satoshi-nakamoto.gif": Why? :/

Comparison of mining pools

2011-06-15T19:24:44Z

Rallan:

Reward types & explanation:
* '''PPS''' - Pay Per Share. Each submitted share is worth certain amount of BTC. Since finding a block requires <current difficulty> shares ''on average'', a PPS method with 0% fee would be 50 BTC divided by <current difficulty>. It is risky for pool operators, hence the fee is highest.
* '''Prop.''' - Proportional. When block is found, the reward is distributed among all workers proportionally to how much shares each of them has found. This method is vulnerable to ''pool swapping'' cheat, where a worker would swap to another pool, if this one didn't find a block quickly. Then he would have extra profit on fast rounds, and normal profit on long rounds (because he would be mining on another pool by then). To mitigate this problem pools must introduce extra fees, and hide statistics, so that it is unknown when a block is found.
* '''Score''' - Score based system, the most advanced one. It is a proportional reward, but it is impossible to cheat as described above. Each submitted share is worth more in the function of time ''t'' since start of current round. For each share score is updated by: score += exp(t/C). This makes later shares worth more than earlier shares, thus swapping away to another pool on longer rounds makes the cheater's score to quickly diminish. Rewards are calculated proportionally to scores (and not to shares). Statistics can be shown "live" without fear. The score based method is perfect for 24/7 miners. (at slush's pool C=300 seconds, and every hour scores are normalized)

{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Name !! Location !! Hashrate (GHash/sec)<ref name="hashrate">Hashrate is given in gigahash/second.</ref><ref name="hashrate2">Note that pool hashrate is largely irrelevant but can be seen as a popularity measurement. Note however that it is a theoretical security issue if one pool gains above 50% of the total computational power of the network, thus consider joining a pool based on other metrics.</ref> !! Reward Type !! Transaction fees !! Fee PPS !! Fee Prop / Score !! Audits<ref name="auditing">Auditing can be accomplished by third-parties if the pool publishes proofs-of-work for every share.</ref> !! Protocol !! Launched !! Forum Thread !! Homepage
|-
| [[Bitclockers|BitClockers]] || Unknown || 75 || Prop. || kept by pool || - || 2% || ? || RPC (+LP) || 2011-05-27 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=10127.0 Link] || [http://bitclockers.com/ Link]
|-
| [[Bitcoin_Pool|Bitcoin Mining Pool]] || USA || 255 || Prop. || kept by pool || - || 0%<ref name="donations">Donations are possible</ref> || ? || RPC (+LP) || Unknown || [http://bitcoinpool.com/forum/ Link] || [http://www.bitcoinpool.com/ Link]
|-
| [[Bitcoin_Pooled_Mining|Bitcoin Pooled Mining (Slush)]] || London || 1491 || Score || kept by pool || - || 2% || ? || RPC || 2010-11-27 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=1976.0 Link] || [http://mining.bitcoin.cz/ Link]
|-
| [[Bitcoins.lc]] || EU || 225 || Prop. || kept by pool || - || 0% || ? || RPC (+LP) || 2011-05-27 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=10121.0 Link] || [http://www.bitcoins.lc/ Link]
|-
| [[BitLotto Pool]] || Los Angeles || 1 || Prop || kept by pool || - || - || ? || RPC (+LP) || 2011-06-08 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=13794.0 Link] || [http://www.bitlottopool.com/ Link]
|-
| [[BTC Guild]] || USA, EU || 1389 || Prop. || kept by pool || - || 0%<ref name="donationsf">Donations are possible to unlock features</ref>|| ? || RPC (+LP) || 2011-05-09 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=7760.0 Link] || [http://www.btcguild.com/ Link]
|-
| [[BTCMine]] || UK || 605 || Score || kept by pool || - || 2% || ? || RPC (+LP) || 2011-03-11 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=4251.0 Link] || [http://www.btcmine.com/ Link]
|-
| [[Continuum]] || Canada || 7 || PPS / Score || kept by pool || 5% || 0% || ? || RPC (+LP) || 2011-05-17 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8660.0 Link] || [http://www.continuumpool.com/ Link]
|-
| [[DeepBit]] || Germany || 2661 || PPS / Prop. || kept by pool || 10% || 3% || ? || RPC (+LP) || 2011-02-26 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=3889.0 Link] || [http://deepbit.net/ Link]
|-
| [[Eclipse]] || USA / Europe / AU / Asia || 25 || Prop / Score || kept by pool || 0% || 0% || ? || RPC (+LP) || 2011-06-14 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=16385.0 Link] || [https://eclipsemc.com Link]
|-
| [[Eligius]] || USA / Europe || 318 || MaxPPS / Prop. || kept by pool || ~0.0003%<ref name="donations">Donations are possible</ref> || ~0.0003%<ref name="donations">Donations are possible</ref> || Yes<ref name="auditnote">Access to Eligius proofs-of-work is available on request.</ref> || RPC (+LP) || 2011-04-27 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=6667.0 Link] || [http://eligius.st Link]
|-
| [[Mining Team Reddit]] || USA, EU || 125 || Prop || kept by pool || - || 0%<ref name="donations">Donations are possible</ref> || ? || RPC (+LP) || 2011-05-25 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=15929.0 Link] || [http://www.mtred.com/ Link]
|-
| [[Ozco.in]] || AUS || 25 || Prop || Kept in Pool || 0% || 0% || ? || RPC (+LP) || 2011-06-08 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=14085.0/ Link] || [http://www.ozco.in Link]
|-
| [[Simplecoin]] || Unknown || 0 || Prop|| kept by pool || - || 0% || ? || RPC (+LP) || 2011-06-02 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=11186.0 Link] || [http://simplecoin.us/ Link]
|-
| [[Swepool]] || Sweden || 51 || Prop || kept by pool || - || - || ? || RPC (+LP) || 2011-05-14 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8288.0 Link] || [http://swepool.net/ Link]
|-
| [[ZA Bitcoin]] || South Africa|| 0.4 || Prop || kept by pool || 0% || - || ? || RPC (+LP) || 2011-06-14 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/ Link] || [http://www.zabitcoin.co.za/ Link]
|}

<references/>

== See also ==
*[[Pooled mining]]
*[http://bcx.me/ Bitcoin Mining Pool Tracker]

[[Category:Mining]]

Talk:Mining hardware comparison

2011-06-15T19:22:35Z

Rallan:

Question about mega-hashes per Watt versus mega-hashes per Joule. Does anyone have an opinion? Most people know what a Watt is but I think seeing MHash/J could be confusing to some people. While perhaps being more accurate, using "/J" might go over some people's heads, especially since the edit was given with little to no explanation. [[User:Vast|Vast]] 06:45, 19 April 2011 (GMT)
: How about adding a note about what a Joule is somewhere people will see? --[[User:TiagoTiago|TiagoTiago]] 21:40, 9 May 2011 (GMT)
:: Hmmmmm... if only there was an online encyclopedia people could look it up in... [[User:Physics|Physics]] 06:52, 13 May 2011 (GMT)
::: In my opinion the MHash/s/W was more enlighting for non physicans, but hey, I don't really care. [[User:SmokeTooMuch|SmokeTooMuch]] 22:12, 30 May 2011 (GMT)

Is the note about the AMD Stream SDK valid anymore? Looking down the list it seems people are doing just as well and sometimes better on the 2.3 and 2.4 SDK as compared to the 2.1. [[User:Tybeet|Tybeet]] 23:04, 5 May 2011 (GMT)
: It depends on the mining application and the OpenCL kernel used I think. Phoenix with phatk mines faster on SDK 2.4 than on SDK 2.1 under 32-bit Windows 7. [[User:Icaci|Icaci]] 18:27, 29 May 2011 (GMT)

== Color Coding ==

What is the color coding indicative of?
: I think it is just a way to easily group cards of each type [[User:Fnord123|Fnord123]] 15:44, 23 May 2011 (GMT)

== Power Calculation ==

How do people calculate power? I took the [http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/2011-gaming-graphics-charts/2D-Power-Draw,2677.html idle power numbers from Tom's Hardware], then measured incremental power w/a Kill-A-Watt when hashing on my ATI 6970 (its the one w/1.96 Mhashes/W). [[User:Fnord123|Fnord123]] 15:42, 23 May 2011 (GMT)

== OS Listing ==

Think extracting out an OS column would be useful? Possibly OS version or architecture as well.

== Cheapest card per mhash/s ? ==
i'll pick ... the 5830 --[[User:Compn|Compn]] 16:51, 3 June 2011 (GMT)

== Point of reference or benchmark chart? ==

This page could use some serious cleaning up.

I think it needs to be decided if this page is a point of reference or a collection of benchmarks. If it's a point of reference, there should only be one entry per hardware type (video card model, cpu, etc.) with stock performance. Some video card entries have over six variations with different over clocking/settings.

:Identical (or near-identical) entries aren't that useful, but other than I find it helpful to see what variations worked, even for a given card, especially with so many variables in play. [[User:Mumpsimus|Mumpsimus]] 01:17, 15 June 2011 (GMT)

== Clarification of model number vs. number of cards. ==
[[User:Jthibo|Jthibo]] 18:10, 15 June 2011 (GMT)

I've noticed that people are putting in things like 6990x2 to indicate having 2, 6990 dual-gpu cards. The problem is that this is also how AMD numbers some of their card models to indicate the number of GPUs on the card. For example, I have a 4870 X2, which is the model number of the card (the X2 indicates dual-gpu, as opposed to the regular, single GPU 4870.) I see some people have put in entries for a 4870x2, but is this 2 (4870) cards, or 1 (4870 X2) card (or even 2 (4870 X2) cards?)

Perhaps we should have quantity number placed in parenthesis, so 2 4870 cards would be "4870 (x2)", and 1 4870 X2 card would be "4870 X2"? Or some variation on that. Perhaps even another column denoting the total number of GPUs for the entry?

: This is a comparison of hardware, 2 * 5770, for example, is no more than useful than a single 5770, yet a card with 2 GPUs on, is useful. Multi-GPU setups should be removed, imo. --[[User:Rallan|Rallan]] 19:22, 15 June 2011 (GMT)

Mining hardware comparison

2011-06-15T19:19:41Z

Rallan: Updated

Below are some statistics about the mining performance of various hardware used in a [[mining rig]].

The table shows (mostly) stock clock numbers. 10-20% performance improvement can be achieved via overclocking.

'''Notes:'''
* Whash/s = millions hashes per second (raw speed performance ; may not be very energy efficient with some models)
* Whash/J = millions hashes per joule (energy efficiency ; 1 joule of energy is spent for 1 watt in 1 second)
* W = watt (maximum power consumption, i.e. energy per unit of time : 1 W = 1 J/s)
* Clock (in MHz) refers to the Shader clock only with nVidia cards (not Core or Memory). With AMD card the shader clock is not separate, but is part of the GPU clock.
* SP = Stream processors (Shader Units)

==Graphics cards==

===AMD (ATI)===
To get the maximum performance use the 2.1 release of the ATI Stream SDK. 2.2 wastes CPU time, and 2.3/2.4 drop mining performance by 5-10% unless using the Phoenix phatk kernel. ''Note: This statement is not entirely accurate. '''YMMV'''.''

{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! Watts !! Clock !! SP !! SDK !! Slot !! Miner !! Notes

|-
| 3XXX || - || - || - || - || - || - || - || - || OpenCL Not Supported

|-
| 42XX || - || - || - || - || - || - || - || - || OpenCL Not Supported (integrated/mobile GPU)

|-
| 4350 || 6.93 || 0.346 || 20 || 575 || 80 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors
|-
| 4350 || 8.14 || - || - || 730 || 80 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Diablo/Windows7 || -w 32. Model: Asus EAH4350 Silent. Memory at 400MHz. Runs at 60°C with ambient at 25°C.

|-
| 4550 || 7.23 || 0.289 || 25 || 600 || 80 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors

|-
| 4570M || 8.02 || 0.297 || 27 || 680 || 80 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Diablo/Windows7 || -w 64, SDK 2.4, Cat 11.4. Model: Sony Vaio NW

|-
| 4570M || 9.6 || 0.300 || 32 || 825(OC) || 80 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Diablo/Windows7 || -w 64, SDK 2.4, Cat 11.4. Model: Sony Vaio NW. OC core 680->825. U/C memory 800->500.

|-
| 4650 || 31.33 || 0.653 || 48 || 650 || 320 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors

|-
| 4670 || 36.14 || 0.613 || 59 || 750 || 320 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors
|-
| 4670 || 40.11 || 0.679 || 59 || 800 || 320 || - || AGP x8 || poclbm/Ubuntu 10.10 w/ H == 0 mod || -w 32 -f 0, don't use vectors [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.msg85236#msg85236 source]

|-
| 4730 || 72.29 || 0.657 || 110 || 750 || 640 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - ||

|-
| 4770 || 72.29 || 0.904 || 80 || 750 || 640 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - ||

|-
| 4830 || 55.42 || 0.583 || 95 || 575 || 640 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - ||
|-
| 4830 || 66.12 || 0.503 || 105 || 700 || 1005 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - ||

|-
| 4850 || 75.30 || 0.685 || 110 || 625 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - ||
|-
| 4850 || 84.3 || 0.766 || 110 || 725 || 300 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - || -w64 fan at 70% temp 73C, stock voltage -gui miner
|-
| 4850 || 90.1 || 0.819 || 110 || 800 || 500 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer || -f 30; Tried phoenix and phatk, got same max
|-
| 4850 || 101 || 0.918 || 110 || 817 || 500 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer || -f 0, core 817mhz(default 625)@1.123v , mem downclock to 500mhz (default 993) [http://www.smpake.com/?p=6 source]
|-
| 4850x2 || 150.60 || 0.602 || 250 || 625 || 1600 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - ||

|-
| 4860 || 67.47 || 0.519 || 130 || 700 || 640 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - ||

|-
|style="background:#F8F8FF;"| 4870 || 92.84 || 0.6189333(?) || 150(?) || 830(OC) || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 || -k poclbm AGGRESSION=5 (Windows 7 64-Bit, GPU OC 750->830MHz, VRAM UC 900->450MHz, BIOS modded)
|-
|style="background:#F8F8FF;"| 4870 || 104.6 || 0.872 || 120 || 830(OC) || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 256 -f 1, Windows 7 64-Bit, GPU Core OC to 830 MHz, GPU Memory UC to 190 MHz (saves 30 watts at outlet)
|-
|style="background:#F8F8FF;"| 4870 || 90.36 || 0.602 || 150 || 750 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || clmine ||
|-
|style="background:#F8F8FF;"| 4870 || 78 || 0.520 || 150 || - || - || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/Vista 64bit || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source]
|-
|style="background:#F8F8FF;"| 4870x2 || 180.72 || 0.632 || 286 || 750 || 1600 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - ||
|-
|style="background:#F8F8FF;"| 4870x2 || 180.6 || 0.632 || 286 || 800 || 1600 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - ||

|-
| 4890 || 97.1 || 0.511 || 190 || 870(OC) || 1050 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-01-21 Solo settings || Sapphire fab. No flags options helped. Close all browsers and do full restart of GUIMiner and then Bitcoin via GUIMiner server starter or the browsers GPU accl. will limit to 56~ ish Mhash/s - I can now start browser without slowdowns
|-
| 4890 || 102.41 || 0.539 || 190 || 850 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - ||
|-
| 4890 || 108.3 || 0.57 || 190 || 975 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - ||

|-
|style="background:#FFF8EF;"| 5450 || 11.99 || 0.631 || 19 || 650 || 80 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - ||
|-
|style="background:#FFF8EF;"| 5450 || 13.74 || - || - || 700 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/Linuxcoin v0.2 || -v -w128 tried several options, seems to work best.
|-
|style="background:#FFF8EF;"| 5450 || 14.12 || - || - || 700 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix/Linuxcoin v0.2 || Flags: "DEVICE=0 VECTORS AGGRESSION=4 -v FASTLOOP BFI_INT WORKSIZE=64" Kernel: "phatk"

|-
| 5550 || 40.59 || 1.041 || 39 || 550 || 320 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - ||

|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 59.96 || 1.538 || 39 || 650 || 400 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - ||
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 64 || 1.641 || 39 || 650 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 62 || 1.59 || 39 || 650 || 400 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 OpenCL/Linux x86_64 || -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS AGGRESSION=4 -v FASTLOOP BFI_INT WORKSIZE=64
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 73 || 1.872 || 39 || 700 || 400 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 OpenCL/Linux x86_64 || -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS AGGRESSION=4 -v FASTLOOP BFI_INT WORKSIZE=64
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 102 || 1.46(+) || 75(-) || 950 || 400 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 OpenCL/Windows 7 x86 (no Aero) || -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS AGGRESSION=7 -v FASTLOOP BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 (Reference Sapphire card, 2 additional 120mm coolers, temperature is 79-82C)

|-
| 5650 || 48 || 1.37 || 35(?) || - || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source] [http://www.notebookcheck.net/ATI-Mobility-Radeon-HD-5650.23697.0.html source] -- not TDP but load

|-
|style="background:#EEFFEE;"| 5670 || 71.49 || 1.117 || 64 || 775 || 400 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - ||
|-
|style="background:#EEFFEE;"| 5670 || 72 || 1.64 || 44 || 850 || - || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm-mod (Win7-64) || Sapphire 100287VGAL card is low power
|-
|style="background:#EEFFEE;"| 5670 || 85 || - || - || 900 || 400 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128
|-
|style="background:#EEFFEE;"| 5670 || 91 || - || - || 890 || 400 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer 2011-06-09 poclbm catalyst 11.2 win7 x86 || -v -f 0 -w 128

|-
| 5750 || 116.24 || 1.352 || 86 || 700 || 720 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - ||
|-
| 5750 || 137 || - || - || 710 || - || - || PCI-E 1.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128 using stock memory and GPU clocks
|-
| 5750 || 146.4 || - || - || 775 || - || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-21 || -v -w128, AMD Catalyst overclock (775MHz GPU / 1225 MHz Memory)
|-
| 5750 || 154.56 || 1.45 || 106 || 830 || 720 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - || -v -w128 -f20 underclocked memory clocks from 1150MHz to 300MHz
|-
| 5750 || 170 || - || - || 870 || - || - || PCI-E 1.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128 patched BIOS to underclock memory to 300MHz
|-
| 5750 || 173 || - || - || 875 || - || - || PCI-E 1.1 x16 || phoenix || 875/300 w/MSI Afterburner, BFI_INT VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 FASTLOOP=FALSE -k phatk

|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 156.83 || 1.452 || 108 || 850 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 Hawk || 182 || - || - || 875 || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm/GUIMiner/Win7-64 || -v -w 128 (875MHz is stock for 5770 Hawk)
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 180 || 1.406(*) || 128(*) || 950(OC) || 800 || 2.4RC1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 30 (*: Overclocked wattage calculated [http://bakkap.free.fr/Misc/wCalc.html here])
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 185 || - || - || 850 || 1200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128 FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=7
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 205.58 || - || - || 935 || 300 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-04-28 || -v -w 256
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 210.7 || 1.95(-) || 108(+) || 950 || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / win7x86 || mem underclocked 309 mhz, -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 218.35 || - || - || 1000 || 1401 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || DiabloMiner || -w 128 -v 2 (Overclocked to 1Ghz core with 1.2 voltage and Scythe Setsugen 2 cooling system)
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 223 || 2.23(-) || 100(+) || 1050 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer || -v -w256 [http://www.smpake.com/?p=59 source]
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 233 || 2.23(-) || 100(+) || 1050 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 || VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 -k phatk WORKSIZE=256 [http://www.smpake.com/?p=59 source]
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 240.61 || 2.3632(-) || 100(+) || 1080 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x1 || phoenix 1.48 || VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 -k phatk WORKSIZE=256 (OC'd and OV'd 1080/300 1.25v)

|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 244 || 1.36 || 179 || 800 || 1000 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 OpenCL/Linux x86_64 || -k phatk DEVICE=1 VECTORS AGGRESSION=6 -v FASTLOOP WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 267 || - || - || 875 || 1000 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x1 || Phoenix 1.48 OpenCL/Linux x86_64 || -k phatk DEVICE=1 VECTORS AGGRESSION=6 -v FASTLOOP WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 245 || 1.28 || 192 || 880 || 900 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm (guiminer) || -v -w 256
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 248 || 1.29 || 192 || 880 || 500 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.46 || -k poclbm VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 256 || - || - || 900 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 || -k poclbm VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=7
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 272 || 1.52 || 179 || 875 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / LinuxCoin || 275Mhz Memory clock, 1.125 V (from 1.163), VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 275 || 1.5714 || 175 || 900 || 500 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm (guiminer) Win7x64 || -v -w64 -f10, XFX stock w/ v2.4 SDK = 230Mh/s, v2.1 SDK = +10Mh/s, overclocking core clock by 100 = +30Mh/s, underclocking memory to 500 (ran cooler), and changing workload to -w64 = +5Mh/s.
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 285 || - || - || 960 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.47 / poclbm / Win7 64 || VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 300 || - || - || 970 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.47 / pheonix 1.48 / Win7 64 || (sapphire xtreme) VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 290 || - || - || 996 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.4 / poclbm / Win7 64 || VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 300 || - || - || 970 || 1120 || 2.1 || PCI-E x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 64 || 300Mhz memory clock BFI_INT AGGRESSION=12 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 305 || - || - || 984 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.4 / phatk / Win7 32 || 400Mhz Memory clock, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 307 || - || - || 996 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 64 || VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 308 || - || - || 990 || 375 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 32 || @ stock voltage VECTORS AGGRESSION=11 -v FASTLOOP=false BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 310 || - || - || 1000 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Linux x86 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=12 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 black || 310 || - || - || 990 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x8 || LinuxCoin 0.2b, phoenix/phatk || (XFX Brand) -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 AGGRESSION=11 FASTLOOPS=false
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 316.35 || - || - || 1015 || 375 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 32 || @ stock voltage VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 -v FASTLOOP=false BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 318 || - || - || 1030 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 64 || 385Mhz Memory, VECTORS AGGRESSION=9 BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 319 || - || - || 1030 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Xp 64 || 1.2v 355Mhz Memory, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT

|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 240.77 || 1.595 || 151 || 725 || 1440 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 250.26 || 1.657 || 151 || 725 || 1440 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || opencl client || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 252 || 1.575 || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-01-25 ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 255.3 || 1.593 || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-01-25 ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 264 || 1.748 || 151 || 725 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 1.0 x8 || guiminer-20110501 || -v -w128
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 280 || 1.75 || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.3 || with BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 292 || 1.825 || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-04-28 -v -f 1 ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 298 || 1.8620 || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-04-28 -v -f 1 -w 64 ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 300 || 1.5460 || 194 || 925(OC) || 1440 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 314 || 1.8362 || 171 || 820(OC) || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 1.0 x8 || poclbm || -v -w128
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 330 || - || - || 850 @ Stock voltage || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix || EAH5850, miner arguments: -k poclbm DEVICE=1 VECTORS AGGRESSION=8 WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 335 || 1.8611 || 180 || 890(OC) || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || poclbm || -v -w128, Memory downclocked to 300Mhz
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 344 || 1.8594 || 185 || 890(OC) || 1440 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 347 || - || - || 876 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer / phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 64 || 300Mhz Memory clock, 50% fan-speed, -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 354 || - || - || 900(OC) || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || diablo -v 2 -w 128 || Ubuntu 11.04 64-bit [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=9239.0 Headless], catalyst 11.5, memory downclocked to 300mhz, stock voltage. flashed with atiflash [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9AxNmOy6_0 video]
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 355 || - || - || 900(OC) || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk || Ubuntu 11.04 64-bit, Memory downclocked to 200MHz, VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 355 || - || - || 900 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Ubuntu 11.04 x64 || 300Mhz Memory clock, 60% fan-speed, -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 365 || - || - || 920 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 64 || 300Mhz memory clock VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 382 || 1.8454 || 207 || 995(OC) || 1440 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || phoenix || OC 1.177v on core

|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870M || 152.5 || - || - || 750(OC) || 1000 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || gui-miner (win-7) ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 313.65 || 1.668 || 188 || 850 || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 313 || 1.665 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo/Linux ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 343 || 1.824 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo/Linux ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 355 || 1.888 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/Linux ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 340 || 1.809 || 188 || 850 || 1600 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 360 || 1.6822 || 214 || 970 || 700 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL w7-64 || -f 0 -v -w 128 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=6144.msg91959#msg91959 source]
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 377 || 2.008 || 188 || 850 || 1600 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha || -D -G2
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 397 || - || - || 930 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=10 WORKSIZE=128
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 408 || 1.8888 || 216 || 980 || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm/Win7x64 || -f 20 -v -w 128, BIT_ALIGN, BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 400 || 1.9047 || 210 || 950 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || Phoenix 1.3 || -k poclbm VECTORS AGGRESSION=7 FASTLOOP BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 398 || 1.980 || 201 || 900 || 1600 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha || -D -G2 (GPU OC to 900, memory downclocked to 900)
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 420 || 2.0000 || 210 || 950 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=14 WORKSIZE=256 -- Memory Clock 300Mhz
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 421 || 1.9581 || 215 || 975 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.47 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 -k phatk
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 440 || 2.0000 || 220 || 995 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 438 || 1.9819 || 221 || 1000(OC) || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm/Linux || -v -w 64 -f 1
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 445 || - || - || 1040 || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm/Windows 7 64 || -v -w 256 -f 1 Crossfired, Water cooled, 890 Mhash/s total, Both cards peak at 450 Mhash/s. Best dual gpu setup me thinks?
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 435 || - || - || 990 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || LinuxCoin v0.2b phoenix/phatk || (Powercolor brand) -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 AGGRESSION=11 FASTLOOPS=false
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 445 || 2.28 || 195 || 1005 || 335 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x4 || Ubuntu 11.04 phoenix/phatk || (Asus brand, volts = 1'072) -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 AGGRESSION=12 FASTLOOPS=false -a 7 (-a 10)
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870x2 (Ares) || 620 || - || - || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer || -v -w 128
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870x2 (Ares) || 826 || 0.751 || 1100 || 950 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.4 w/ Phtak || AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT Memory @ 300MHz
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870x2 (Ares) || 826 || 1.18 || 700 || 935 || 3200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 w/ Phatk || AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=256 VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false, memory @ 319 MHz, Windows 7 32-bit
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870x2 (Ares) || 878 || 0.585 || 1500 || 1000 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.7 w/ Phtak || AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT Memory @ 300MHz

|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 530 || 1.803 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.4.595.10 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/201103.beta3/Windows || -v -w128 -f60
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 535.06 || 1.820 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 560 || 1.905 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo ||
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 565 || 1.922 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine2 ||
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 604 || 2.054 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 645 || 1.875 || 344 || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || -f1, Debian 6, fglrx-driver 10.9.3
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 740 || 2.1511 || 344 || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix/1.3 || AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT, memory clock @ 300MHz
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 755 || 2.2076 || 342 || 848 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 28-04-11 || -f 1 -w 256 -v, Ubuntu 10.10, fglrx 11.4, memory clock @ 300MHz
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 802 || 2.31 || 347 || 850 || 3200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix poclbm Ubuntu 11.04 || -q 6 -k AGGRESSION=19 WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT VECTORS, fglrx 11.4, mem clock @ 1000MHz

|-
| 6310M || 9.821 || 0.545 || 18 || 500 || 80 || 2.4 || Integrated/APU || poclbm-gui -v -w128 || HP DM1z 18W TDP is shared with the CPU

|-
| 6470M || 24.1 || - || - || - || - || 2.1 || Integrated/APU || guiminer ||
|-
| 6470M || 31.0 || - || - || - || - || 2.1 || Integrated/APU || phoenix 1.48 ||

|-
| 6490M || 16.289 || 0.708 || 23 || - || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm-mod (Mac OS X 10.6.7) || MacBook Pro early 2011
|-
| 6490M || 15.21 || - || - || - || - || - || - || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8994.0 DiabloMiner GUI] v2011-05-22 / Mac OS X 10.6.7 || Model: MacBookPro8,2 VRAM: 256MB

|-
|style="background:#FFDD00;"| 6570 || 68.0 || 1.133 || 60 || 650 || 480 || 2.4 || PCI-E x16 || guiminer 2011-05-21 with poclbm (Win7-32bit) || no extra option for miner . Sapphire 6570 gddr5 512mb
|-
|style="background:#FFDD00;"| 6570 || 82.1 || 1.368 || 60 || 650 || 480 || 2.4 || PCI-E x16 || guiminer 2011-05-21 with poclbm (Win7-32bit) || -v -w128 . Sapphire 6570 gddr5 512mb

|-
| 6750 || 167.59 || - || - || 870 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer || -v -f30 -w128

|-
| 6770 || 180 || - || - || 850 || 1200 || - || - || guiminer || -v -w128 , this was an XFX (OEM) model, GPU @ 850 MHz, mem @ 1200 MHz; I pushed it up to 190 Mhash/s briefly by overclocking, but it crashed the system above that
|-
| 6770 || 202 || - || - || 960 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x1,x4,x8,x16 || phoenix 1.48 || Sapphire 6770 (standard) -q2 -k poclbm DEVICE=0 AGGRESSION=10 VECTORS WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT FASTLOOP (The PCI-E speed does not affect the mining speed)

|-
| 6790 || 220 || 1.467 || 150 || 800 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 || -k phatk BFI_INT FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=12 VECTORS OC'd to 1ghz, underclocked mem to 300, voltage at 1175

|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 171.59 || 1.351 || 127 || 775 || 960 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 196 || - || - || 850 || 960 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 0
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 220 || 1.236(*) || 178(*) || 1000(OC) || 960 || 2.4RC1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 30 (*: Overclocked wattage calculated [http://bakkap.free.fr/Misc/wCalc.html here] )
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 234.8 || - || - || 940 || 960 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.3 || AGGRESSION=8 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 244.2 || - || - || 960 || 960 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm june-2011 || -v -w 128

|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 232.47 || 1.540 || 151 || 900 || 1120 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm -v -w 128 ||
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 277.47 || - || - || 940 || 1120 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.3 || AGGRESSION=8 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 271 || 1.807 || 150 || 940 || 1100 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm -v -w 128 || Debian 6.0.1 x86_64
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 260.1 || 1.611 || 175 || 1001 || 1150 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm-gui windows7x86 cat 11.3 || -v -w 128 -f 1
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 276 || 1.828(?) || 151(?) || 900 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha cat 11.4 sdk 2.4 || -G2 -D stock clocks, debian linux 64bit
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 300.06 || 1.830 || 164 || 1020 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.4 cat 11.4 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=8 fastloop mem clock 344
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 306 || 1.748(?) || 175(?) || 1000 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha cat 11.4 sdk 2.4 || -G2 -D overclocked to 1000, debian linux 64bit
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 300 || 1.72 || 174 || 1038 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm windows7x86 cat 11.4 || -v -w128 -f1 mem clock 360, fan 100% temp 73C
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 310 || - || - || 1035 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 phatk 11.5 sdk 2.4 || BFI_INT VECTORS FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=128, mem clock @ 300MHz, voltage @ 1.300
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 316 || - || - || 1030 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer 2011-06-09 using phoenix (Win7-32bit) || -k phatk platform=0 device=0 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 worksize=128 FASTLOOP=false, mem clock @ 228MHz, voltage @ 1.25, Fan @ 40%, Temp @ 73C
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 322 || 1.882 || 170 || 1050 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.47 phatk 11.5 sdk 2.4 || BFI_INT VECTORS FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=256, mem clock @ 400MHz
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 329 || - || - || 1075 || 372 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 phatk 11.5 sdk 2.4 || BFI_INT VECTORS FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=256

|-
| 6950 || 272 || - || - || 900 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48/poclbm || max stable @ 1150 mV, AGGRESSION = 7, BFI_INT, MSI 6950
|-
| 6950 || 291 || - || - || 920 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48/poclbm || max stable @ 1200mV, AGGRESSION = 7, BFI_INT, MSI 6950
|-
| 6950 || 295 || - || - || 930 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48/poclbm || max stable @ 1275mV, AGGRESSION = 7, BFI_INT, MSI 6950
|-
| 6950 || 300 || - || - || 940 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48/poclbm || max stable @ 1300mV, AGGRESSION = 7, BFI_INT, MSI 6950
|-
| 6950 || 295 || 1.844(?) || 160(?) || 810 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250
|-
| 6950 || 314 || - || - || 800 || 1408 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 05-01-11 || -v -f30 -w128 default mem 1250 Stock Sapphire 6950 1gb
|-
| 6950 || 325 || 1.635(?) || 200(?) || 885 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250
|-
| 6950 || 340 || - || - || 895 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 05-21-11 || -v -w 128, mem @ 500, 1200 mV, MSI 6950
|-
| 6950 || 340 || - || - || 800 || 1536 ||(?) || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 05-21-11 || -v -f30 -w128 default mem 1250,Sapphire 6950 1gb, unlocked shaders
|-
| 6950 || 349 || 1.745(?) || 200(?) || 800 || 1408 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 05-21-11 || -v -f30 -w128, xfx 6950 xxx 1gb, locked shaders, core 900, mem 650, 79° C
|-
| 6950 || 360 || 1.8(?) || 200(?) || 970 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250
|-
| 6950 || 360 || - || - || 870 || 1375 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || flashed with 6970 BIOS, -v -f30 -w128
|-
| 6950 || 365 || - || - || 925 || 1408 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || stock bios, -v -f0 -w128, MSI twinfrozr III 2GB
|-
| 6950 || 417 || 2.085(?) || 200(?) || 975 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || unlocked shaders, +20% overdrive, mem @ 1250, fan @ 77%, temp 64C, -v -w128, gpu core @ 1145mV
|-
| 6950 || 428 || 2.14(?) || 200(?) || 1000 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || unlocked shaders, +20% overdrive, mem @ 1250, fan @ 80%, temp 64C, -v -w128, gpu core @ 1160mV
|-
| 6950 || 432 || 2.16(?) || 200(?) || 1000 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || unlocked shaders, +20% overdrive, mem @ 520, fan @ 80%, temp 76C, -v -w128 -f 2, gpu core @ 1275mV
|-
| 6950x4 || 1316 || 1.513 || 870 || 840 || 1408 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || locked shaders, default mem 1250, dual fan 75C typical
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 323 || 1.468 || 220 || 880 || 1536 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -w 64, SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 370 || - || - || 880 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || -v -w128, fan @ 50%/temp 72C, stock card
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 372 || 1.691(?) || 220(?) || 900 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix (svn trunk 05.14.2011) || clock 900/1375, VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128, fan 45% (auto) / temp 90C
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 388 || - || - || 900 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || -v -w128, fan @ 50%/temp 72C, stock voltage of 1.175v
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 385 || 1.964 || 196 || 900 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || -v -w128, memory downclocked to 684Mhz, fan @ 70%/temp 81C
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 380 || - || - || - || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w128<br>export GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS=1 # to reduce poclbm CPU from 100% to 2%
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 403 || - || - || MAX || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || clock Max/50%+stock, -v -w128, fan= 100%/temp 72C (Note: Overclocked using CCC utility under Windows 7, Clock set to Max value w/ 50% increase to memory and 5% increase to voltage)
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 407 || - || - || 955 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || -v -w128, fan @ 75%/temp 75C, voltage +10%
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 414 || - || - || 960 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || -v -w128, fan @ 53%/temp 73C, stock voltage of 1.175v, high air flow case
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 420 || - || - || 975 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || -v -w128 -f0, clocks 975MHz/685MHz MSI Lightning
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 423 || - || - || 995 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48/poclbm || ATI Tray Tools, Clocks=995/331.25, WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 VECTORS ,68C @ 65% Fan, HAF932 Case
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970x2 || 710 || - || - || 900/880 || 1536 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -w 256

|-
| 6990 || 670 || 1.94 || 346 || 830 || 3072 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || Catalyst 11.4 [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=2949.msg106238#msg106238 source].
|-
| 6990 || 708 || 2.05 || 346 || 830 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || BIOS switch at "default" position 2, see [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]
|-
| 6990 || 746 || 1.82 || 410 || 880 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || BIOS switch at "overclocked" position 1, see [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]
|-
| 6990 || 758 || - || - || 880 || - || 2.4 || - || Phoenix with Poclbm || Catalyst 11.4, OC switch ON, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128 FASTLOOP=false
|-
| 6990 || 771 || 1.8804 || 410 || 880 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx. Memory clock @ 1280Mhz.
|-
| 6990 || 772 || 1.8380 || 420 || 900 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix & Poclbm || OC switch ON + overclocked to 900 mhz, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128
|-
| 6990 || 790 || - || - || 900 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || BIOS switch at "overclocked" position 1; with "aticonfig --odsc=900,1260" to further overclock the GPU to 900 MHz and mem to 1260 MHz, see [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]
|-
| 6990 || 802 || - || - || 915 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || BIOS switch at "overclocked" position 1; with "aticonfig --odsc=915,1260" to further overclock the GPU to 915 MHz and mem to 1260 MHz, see [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]
|-
| 6990 || 835 || - || - || 890/860 || 3072 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix || BIOS switch at "overclocked" position 1; with "aticonfig --adapter=1 --odsc=990,890 and aticonfig --adapter=0 --odsc=960,860" (GPU 0 runs hot). Currently, aticonfig can only underclock RAM to 100mhz below core speed. Command line: phoenix.py -k poclbm VECTORS AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT
|-
| 6990x2 || 1436 || 1.848 || 777 || 880 || 6144 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 x2 || guiminer 2011.05.11 || AUSUM switch set to 1 on both cards; Core left at 880MHz, memory left at 1250MHz; VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128
|-
| 6990x3 || 2094 || - || - || 900 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 x8 x4 || poclbm || GPU 900MHz, Memory 1250MHz; poclbm.py -f 0 -w 256

|-
| FirePro V4800 || 79.7 || - || - || 775 || 400 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-01 ||
|-
| FirePro V8700 || 84.8 || - || - || 750 || 800 || - || - || poclbm-mod.03.24.2011 ||

|-
| FirePro M5800 || 61.4 || - || - || 650 || - || - || - || poclbm-mod.03.24.2011 || Ubuntu
|-
| FirePro V5800 || 119 || - || - || 690 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-01 || Windows 7 32bit
|-
| FirePro V5800 || 144 || - || - || 690 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-01 || -v -w128 (Windows 7 32bit)
|-
| FirePro V5800 || 161 || - || - || 780 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-01 || -v -w128 (Windows 7 32bit)
|-
| FirePro V7750 || 35.7 || - || - || - || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-21 || Windows 7 64bit
|-
| FirePro V7800 || 254.85 || - || - || - || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 with poclbm || Debian Squeeze

|-
| FirePro M7820 || 150.0 || - || - || 700 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-06-09 / poclbm || Memory downclocked to 500 from 1000MHz, 169MH/s@800MHz, 181MH/s@860Mhz (max.), only SDK2.1 works, Windows 7 x86

|}

===Nvidia===

{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! Watts !! Clock !! SP !! Comment
|-
| ION || 1.8 || || 27 || || 16 || poclbm; power consumption incl. CPU
|-
| 8200 mGPU || 1.2 || || || 1200 || 16 || 128 MB shared memory, "poclbm -w 128 -f 0"
|-
| 8400 GS || 2.3 || || || || || "poclbm -w 128"
|-
| 8400 GS || 1.6 || || 128 || 1238 || || DiabloMiner -w 128 -f 1 [https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/User:Knightmb source]
|-
| 8400M GS || 2.0 || || || || ||
|-
| 8600M GT || 4.93 || || || || 32 ||
|-
| 8600GT || 5.66 || || || 1188 || 32 ||
|-
| 8600GT OC || 7.3 || || || 1602 || 32 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.0 poclbm] -w 128 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg72833#msg72833 source]
|-
| 8800GT || 25 || 0.24 || 105 || 1300 || ||
|-
| 8800GT || 24.5 || 0.23 || 105 || 1300 || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]
|-
| 8800GT || 31.1 || || 105 || 1855 || || Overclocked 715 GPU / 1030 Memory / 1855 Shader; GuiMiner v2011-05-21
|-
| 8800GT || 31.8 || || 105 || 1836 || 112 || 713 gpu, 1026 memory. win7x86, phoenix 1.48, -k poclbm WORKSIZE=64 AGGRESSION=5
|-
| 8800GTS || 16.8 || 0.109 || 154 || || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source] [http://www.techspot.com/review/79-geforce-8800-gts-512/page11.html source]
|-
| 8800 GTS || 18.7 || 0.124 || 150 || 1200 || || poclbm -w 64 no vectors
|-
| 8800 GTX || 27.5 || || || 1404 || || phoenix 1.48, poclbm, no vectors, 83C with 50C ambient
|-
| 8800m GTX || 16.3 || || || || || rpcminer-cuda Win7-64
|-
| 9300GE || 1.57 || || || 1300 || 8 ||
|-
| 9300GS || 1.69 || || || 1400 || 8 ||
|-
| 9300/nForce 730i || 2.15 || || || 1200 || 16 ||
|-
| 9400GT || 3.37 || 0.067 || 50 || 1400 || 16 ||
|-
| 9400M (MacBook) || 1.90 || 0.32 || 6 || 700 || || poclbm -f 8 no vectors
|-
| 9500GT || 6.75 || 0.135 || 50 || 1400 || 32 ||
|-
| 9600GSO || 19.88 || 0.237 || 84 || 1375 || 96 ||
|-
| 9600GSO512 || 11.75 || 0.131 || 90 || 1625 || 48 ||
|-
| 9600GT || 15.66 || 0.165 || 95 || 1625 || 64 ||
|-
| 9600GT Zotac || 15 || || || 1650 || 64 ||
|-
| 9600GT OC || 18.8 || <0.198 || >95 || 1981 || 64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.0 poclbm] -w 128 -f 10 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg74610#msg74610 source] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg73353#msg73353 source]
|-
| 9800GT || 30.36 || 0.289 || 105 || 1800 || 112 ||
|-
| 9800GT EE || 19.7 || || 75 || 1375 || 112 || rpcminer-cuda
|-
| 9800GT OC || 29.5 || 0.283 || 105 || 1836 || 112 || poclbm.py, no options. Memory underclocked to 850Mhz, GPU overclocked to 733Mhz
|-
| 9800GTX || 32.54 || 0.232 || 140 || 1688 || 128 ||
|-
| 9800GTX+ || 35.39 || 0.251 || 141 || 1836 || 128 ||
|-
| 9800GTX+ || 37.23 || 0.266 || 140 || 1890 || 128 || win7x64 275.27 phoenix(1.48) -k poclbm AGGRESSION=3 WORKSIZE=64
|-
| 9800GTX+ || 40.20 || || 140 || 835 || 128 || lowered memory clock higher core, unstable if going higher
|-
|style="background-color:#FFEFEF"| 9800GX2 || 57.83 || 0.294 || 197 || || 2x128 ||
|-
|style="background-color:#FFEFEF"| 9800GX2 || 28 || 0.142 || 197 || || 2x128 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]
|-
| G210 || 3.38 || 0.111 || 30.5 || 1402 || 16 ||
|-
| G210 || 3.79 || 0.124 || 30.5 || 1402 || 16 || poclbm -f 1
|-
| GT220 || 10.8 || || 128 || 1360 || || DiabloMiner -w 128 -f 1000 [https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/User:Knightmb source]
|-
| GT240 || 19.37 || 0.281 || 69 || 1340 || 96 ||
|-
| GT240 || 21.24 || || || || 96 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4291.0 poclbm-mod] -f 0 -v [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg73383#msg73383 source]
|-
| GTS250 || 35.39 || 0.244 || 145 || 1836 || 128 ||
|-
| GTS250 || 35.2 || 0.243 || 145 || 1836 || 128 ||
|-
| GTS250 OC || 37 || 0.255 || 145 || 2047 || 128 ||
|-
| GTX260M || 22.5 || || || 500 || 112 || poclbm 4/28/2011 Asus G71GX runs ~90c without cooling pad
|-
| GTX260 || 35.91 || 0.178 || 202 || 1242 || 192 ||
|-
| GTX260 || 44 || 0.242 || 182 || 1242 || 216 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|-
| GTX260c216 || 40.40 || 0.236 || 171 || 1242 || 216 ||
|-
| GTX260c216 || 47.4 || || 182 || 1348 || 216 || poclbm -w 256
|-
| GTX260c216 || 50.00 || || || 1050 || 216 || m0mchil GPU client, Windows 7 64-bit, x6 @ 3.5ghz
|-
| GTX260c216 OC || 52.0 || || || 1461 || 216 || "poclbm -w 256 -f 1"
|-
| GTX260c216 OC || 58.9 || || || 756/400 || 216 || Core overclocked, Memory underclocked, Ubuntu 11.04 Classic Session(No Effects) "poclbm -w 256 -f 1"
|-
| GTX260c216 OC || 60.1 || || || 1706 || 216 || Core: 364 MHz, Shaders: 1706 MHz, Memory: 594 MHz, VDDC: 1.1800V. "poclbm-mod -w 256 -f 1"
|-
| GTX275 || 50.75 || 0.232 || 219 || 1404 || 240 ||
|-
| GTX275 || 58 || || || 729/1458 || 240 || poclbm -f 0 -w 256
|-
| GTX280 || 46.84 || 0.198 || 236 || 1296 || 240 ||
|-
| GTX280 || 64.34 || 0.289 || 245 || 1296 || 240 || phoenix.exe -k poclbm AGGRESSION=6 WORKSIZE=128 (61*C with Accelero XTREME GTX280)
|-
| GTX285 || 64.8 || || || 1607 || 240 || GuiMiner - Not sure about wattage yet. Still testing. Card runs around 74 C
|-
|-
| GTX285 || 53.35 || 0.262 || 204 || 1476 || 240 ||
|-
| GTX295 || 89.78 || 0.311 || 289 || 1242 || 480 ||
|-
| GTX295 || 120.70 || || 289 || 1242 || 480 || GUIMiner no oc.
|-
| GTX295 || 117.30 || || 289 || 1476 || 490 ||
|-
| GT 320M (MacBook Air) || 6.12 || || || 1212 || 48 ||
|-
| 320M (Mac mini 2010) || 7.0 || 0.35 || 20 || 450 || 32 || poclbm no extra options, windows 7 x64
|-
| GT 330M || 7.97 || || || || || Model: MacBookPro6,2 VRAM: 512MB Software: [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8994.0 DiabloMiner GUI] v2011-05-22 / Mac OS X 10.6.7
|-
| GT 330M (Sony Vaio Z) || 7.8 || 0.71 ( 0.3 total) || 11 (26w total) || 1045 || 48 ||
|-
| GTS 350M (Toshiba A665-3DV) || 17.0 || || 14 || 1080 || || DiabloMiner-Windows.exe
|-
| GTS 360M || 25.0 || || || || || [toshiba qosmio laptop, ~150-165*F stock fans]
|-
| GTS 360M (ASUS G60jx) || 20.0 || || || || || everythins is stock, it cannot sustain. it reaches 90 degrees and freezes.
|-
| GT430 || 20.24 || 0.413 || 49 || 1400 || 96 ||
|-
| GTS450 || 45.28 || 0.427 || 106 || 1566 || 192 ||
|-
| GTX460SE || 56.39 || 0.376 || 150 || 1300 || 288 ||
|-
| GTX460 || 66.32 || || || 814 || 336 || rpcminer-cuda 20110605, Graphics Clock @ 814MHz, Memory @ 1555MHz
|-
| GTX460 || 68.31 || 0.427 || 160 || 1350 || 336 ||
|-
| GTX460 768MB || 57.8 || || ? || 1350 || 336 || rpcminer-cuda -gputhreads=320 -gpugrid=336
|-
| GTX460 768MB (MSI Cyclone 768D5/OC) || 75.1 || || ? || 930 || 336 || rpcminer-cuda on Win7 x64 with ForceWare 275.33. [http://event.msi.com/vga/afterburner/download.htm MSI Afterburner] set to core: 930MHz, shader: 1850MHz, core voltage: 1.087V, memory: 1600MHz. Runs at 58°C with fan at 75% (ambient 25°C).
|-
| GTX460 1GB DirectCU || 72.3 || ? || ? || 1672 || 336 || rpcminer-cuda -gputhreads=320 -gpugrid=336
|-
| GTX460 (2 cards) || 102 || 0.319? || 320? || 1350 || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]
|-
| GTX460 (2 cards) OC || 127 || 0.374 || 340 || 1620 || 2x 336 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2444.0 rpcminer-cuda] -gpugrid=128 -gputhreads=128 ver.20110227
|-
| GTX465 || 64.41 || 0.322 || 200 || 1215 || 352 ||
|-
| GTX470 || 81.98 || 0.381 || 215 || 1215 || 448 ||
|-
| GTX470 || 94.7 || || || 1414 || ||
|-
| GTX470 || 111.9 || || 215 || 1650 || 448 ||
|-
| GTX470 || 115 || || || 1616 || || phoenix 1.46 poclbm VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=6
|-
| GTX480 || 101.28 || 0.405 || 250 || 1401 || 480 ||
|-
| GTX480 || 140.43 || || || 1700 || 480 || rpcminer-cuda -gpugrid=512 -gputhreads=480
|-
| GTX560 Ti || 67.7 || 0.39 || 170 || 1700 || 384 || standard EVGA 560, no overclock
|-
| GTX560 Ti || 74.8 || 0.41 || 180 || 1700 || 384 || gigabyte 900Mhz clock; -w 512 -v
|-
| GTX560 OC || 86.7 || <0.51 || >170 || 1800 || 384 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2444.0 rpcminer-cuda] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg72816#msg72816 source]
|-
| GTX570 || 105.83 || 0.483 || 219 || 1464 || 480 ||
|-
| GTX570 || 125 || --- || 219 || 750 || 480 || rpcminer-cuda.exe -aggression=11 -gpugrid=480 -gputhreads=512
|-
| GTX580 || 140.05 || --- || 244 || 1544 || 512 ||
|-
| GTX590 || 193.1 || --- || --- || 1215 || 2x 512 || poclbm -v -w 256, Win
|-
| Quadro FX 580 || 5.7 || 0.14 || 40 || 1125 || 4 ||rpcminer-cuda, Win, -gpugrid=128 -gputhreads=512
|-
| Quadro FX 770M || 5.75 || || || 500 || 32 || DiabloMiner-Windows.exe BFI_INT FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=6, Win
|-
|Quadro FX 770M || 6.39 || || || 500 || 32 || DiabloMiner-Windows.exe BFI_INT FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=6 w 64, Win 7x64
|-
|Quadro FX 880M || 9.6 || || || || || poclbm/guiminer
|-
| Quadro FX 1600M || 6 || 0.12 || 50 || 625 || 32 ||rpcminer-cuda, Win
|-
| Quadro FX 2000M || 23 || || 58 || || || phoenix 1.48, -k poclbm, VECTORS, AGGRESION=6, Lenovo W520 platform
|-
| Quadro FX 2800M || 22 || ? || 75 || 600 || 96 ||DiabloMiner, win
|-
| Quadro FX 3600M || 36 || -- || 70 || 500 || 96 ||
|-
| Quadro NVS 135M || 1.05 || 0.1 || 10 || 800 || 1 ||
|-
| Quadro NVS 295 || 1.7 || 0.07 || 23 || 567 || 8 || phoenix
|-
| Quadro NVS 3100M || 3.6 || 0.257 || 14 || 600 || 16 || rpcminer-cuda, Win, CUDA 3.1.1
|-
| Quadro 5000 || 62 || --- || 152 || 513 || ? || rpcminer-cuda.exe -aggression=10 gpugrid=256 gputhreads=512; if anyone can provide info about the number of shader processors of this card, this would be the value of choice for gpugrid << This card has 352 cores. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Nvidia_graphics_processing_units#Quadro source]
|-
| Tesla C1060 || 52.5 || || || 1296 || 240 || poclbm, Win7x64
|-
| Tesla M2050 || 79.8 || || || 1550 || 448 || DiabloMiner
|-
| Tesla M2050 || [http://glennfrancismurray.com/cost-defective-mining-with-gpu-clusters-amazo 100] || 0 || 0 || - || 512 || Amazon AWS [http://glennfrancismurray.com/cost-defective-mining-with-gpu-clusters-amazo CUDA RPC Miner & CUDA 2.0]
|-
| Tesla S1070 || 155.2 || || || || || rpcminer-cuda, Linux, CUDA 3.2, 4 instances (-gpu=0 through -gpu=3)
|-
| GTX280x2 || 102.7 || || || || ||
|-
|}

==CPUs/APUs==

A lot of nice data can be pulled from [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.0 this thread] to seed this section.

Might you wish to throttle CPU load a bit, so it doesn't reach 100°C, it can be done with Battle Encoder Shirase to a margin, like, -15% of available CPU cycles.

Often, the best combination to be is to throttle CPU miner to -5% '''AND''' set it to least of priority levels, so as not to choke GPU miner up.

===AMD===
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! nprocs !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! TDP [W] !! CPU Clock !! Mhash/s CPU !! Mhash/s GPU !! GPU !! GPU Clock !! SP !! Software !! Notes
|-
| 4x Opteron 6174 || 48 || 115 || 0.36 || 320W || 2.2 GHz || 2.4
|colspan=4|
| cpuminer v0.8.1 || --alg 4way --threads 48
|-
| 2x Opteron 6128 || 16 || 32.4 || 0.141 || 230W || 2 GHz || 32.4
|colspan=4|
| 0.3.19 || -4way
|-
| Athlon XP 2000+ || 2 || 0.62 || 0.009 || 70W || 1.67 GHz || 0.62
|colspan=4|
| 0.3.18/Ubuntu || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source] [http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm?articleid=914&page=4 source]
|-
| Athlon 64 3500+ || 1 || 1.18 || 0.013 || 89W || 2.54 GHz || 1.18
|colspan=4|
| ufasoft v0.4 || overclocked (originally 2.2 GHz)
|-
| Athlon 64 X2 3800+ || 2 || 1.73 || 0.03 || 65 W || 2.00 GHz || 1.73
|colspan=4|
| cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || -algo=4way
|-
| Athlon 64 X2 4000+ || 2 || 1.9 || 0.02 || 65W || 2.1 GHz || 1.9
|colspan=4|
| rpc-miner ||
|-
| Athlon 64 X2 4400+ || || 2.09 || 0.032 || 65W || 2.3GHz || 2.09
|colspan=4|
| 0.3.19/Win x64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]
|-
| Athlon 64 X2 6000+ || 2 || 2.81 || 0.02 || 125W || 3 GHz || 2.81
|colspan=4|
| || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg22881#msg22881 source]
|-
| Athlon 64 X2 6400+ Black Edition || 2 || 2.9 || 0.023 || 125W || 3.2 GHz || 2.9
|colspan=4|
| 0.3.20.2 BETA/Win 7 x64 || -4way
|-
| Athlon II X2 240e || 2 || 2.71 || 0.06 || 45W || 2.81 GHz || 2.71
|colspan=4|
| bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Athlon II X2 250 || 2 || 5.6 || 0.09 || 65W || 3.01GHz || 5.6
|colspan=4|
| bitcoin-miner 0.11 ||
|-
| Athlon II X4 630 || 4 || 10.7 || 0.11 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 10.7
|colspan=4|
| bitcoin-miner 0.4 ||
|-
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 3.8 || 0.04 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 3.8
|colspan=4|
| 0.3.1x/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|-
| Phenom X4 9950 BE || 4 || 9.3 || 0.07 || 126W || 2.6 GHz || 2.32
|colspan=4|
| bitcoin-miner 0.13/WinXP || No GPU
|-
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 7.2 || 0.08 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 7.2
|colspan=4|
| cpu-miner 0.2.1/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|-
| Phenom II X4 810 || 4 || 5.0 || || 95W || 2.8 GHz ||
|colspan=4|
| rpcminer-cpu ||
|-
| Phenom II X4 810 || 4 || 9.5 || || 95W || 2.8 GHz ||
|colspan=4|
| rpcminer-4way ||
|-
| Phenom II X4 810 || 4 || 10.5 || || 95W || 2.8 GHz ||
|colspan=4|
| ufasoft v0.10 ||
|-
| Phenom II X4 955 || 4 || 11 || 0.09 || 125W || 3.2 GHz || 11
|colspan=4|
| rpcminer-4way ||
|-
| Phenom II X4 965 || 4 || 12 || 0.09 || 140W || 3.4 GHz || 11
|colspan=4|
| rpcminer-4way ||
|-
| Phenom II X6 1055T || 6 || 15.84 || 0.13 || 125W || 2.82 GHz || 15.84
|colspan=4|
| bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Phenom II X6 1075T || 6 || 21.3 || || 125W|| ||
|colspan=4|
| minerd || Ubuntu 11.04 amd64 runlevel=1 -algo=4way -threads=6
|-
| Phenom II X6 1090T || 6 || 18|| || 141W|| 3.50 GHz || 3
|colspan=4|
| minerd ||
|-
| Phenom II X6 1100T || 6 || 22 || 0.176 || 125W || 3.82 GHz || 22
|colspan=4|
| bitcoin-miner || Aciid#bitcoin-dev
|-
| Zacate E-350 || 2 || 11 || 0.615 || 18W || 1.6 Ghz || 1.231 || 9.831 || HD6310M || 492 Mhz || 80 || poclbm -v -w128 + Ufasoft 0.7 || stock speeds
|-
| Zacate E-350 || 2 || 12
|colspan=2|
| 1.648 Ghz || 1.252 || 10.87 || HD6310M || 492 Mhz || 80 || poclbm -v -w 256 -f 1 || "autotune" speed with ASUS EFI BIOS
|}

===ARM===
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment
|-
| ARM1136EJ-S || 1 || 0.11 || ? || ? || 0.528 GHz || cpuminer git || T-Mobile Pulse, inside Debian chroot, 'c' algo
|-
| Cortex-A8 || 1 || 0.125 || 0.36 || 0.35 W || 0.6 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || Nokia N900: 'cryptopp'
|-
| Cortex-A8 || 1 || 0.2 || 0.57 || 0.35 W || 0.6 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || Nokia N900: 'c' algo
|-
| 2x Cortex-A9 || 2 || 0.57 || 1.14 || 0.5 W || 1.0 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-24) || Toshiba AC100, ubuntu, 'c' algo
|}

===Intel===
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment
|-
| Pentium III mobile ? || 1 || 0.3 || 0.014 || 21W || 1.07 GHz || 0.3.1x/Win2K || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source] [http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=27380 source]
|-
| Pentium M 1.6ghz || 1 || .4 || || || 1.6 GHZ || minerd (jgarzik's 1.0) || cryppto, Windows 7
|-
| Pentium M 1.73ghz || 1 || .5 || || || 1.73 GHZ || minerd (jgarzik's 1.0) || cryppto, Windows 7
|-
| Old Xeon 512k (Dual) || 2x1/2 || 2.0 || ? || ? || 3.06GHz || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || HT disabled, algo=4way (twice as fast as the 2nd best algo)
|-
| Pentium 4 2.0A || 1 || 0.85 || || || 2.0 GHz || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft-0.4]/WinXP || -g no -t 2
|-
| Pentium Dual-Core E2180 || 2/2 || 1.75 || || || 2.0 GHz || rpcminer-cpu || Win7-64
|-
| Pentium Dual-Core E2180 || 2/2 || 4.1 || || || 2.0 GHz || cpuminer || sse2_64
|-
| Pentium Dual-Core E2180 || 2/2 || 4.5 || || || 2.0 GHz || ufasoft v0.11 || Win7-64
|-
| Pentium Dual-Core E5400 || 2/2 || 2.27 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.7 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Celeron E330 || 2/2 || 2.2 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.5 GHz || 0.3.19/Ubuntu10.04 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]
|-
| Core 2 Quad Q6600 || 4/4 || 11.0 || || 105W || 2.40 GHz || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || -a 60 -g no -t 4
|-
| Core 2 Quad Q9400 || 4/4 || 11 || 0.046 || 95W || 2.66 GHz || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || -a 60 -g no -t 4
|-
| Core 2 Quad Q9650 || 4/4 || 18.67 || || 95W || 4.00 GHz || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || -a 60 -g no -t 4
|-
| Core i3 530 || 2/4 || 8.31 || 0.10 || 80W || 3.66 GHz || Ufasoft 0.7 || -v -a5 -g no -t 4
|-
| Core i3 M350 || 2/4 || 1.48 || 0.04 || 35W || 2.27 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Core i5 M450 || 2/4 || 1.8 || 0.05 || 35W || 1.2 GHz || 0.3.17/Win7-54 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source]
|-
| Core i5-650 || 2/4 || 5.1 || 0.04 ? || || 3.2 GHz || cpuminer-0.7 || -4way
|-
| Core i5-750 || 4/4 || 14 || || || 3.2 GHz || bitcoin-miner 0.11 || -a 5 -g no -t 4
|-
| Core i5 ? || 4/? || 6.5 || || || || client from svn || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37621#msg37621 source]
|-
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 4.5 || 0.05 || 95W || 3.1 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-01-22) || cryptopp_asm32
|-
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 14 || 0.15 || 95W || 3.1 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || sse2_64
|-
| Core i5 2500K || 4/4 || 20.6 || || || 4.2GHz || bitcoin-miner || -g no
|-
| Core i7 620M || 2/4 || 1.888 || || || 2.66 GHz || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8994.0 RPCMiner GUI] v2011-05-22 / Mac OS X 10.6.7 || Model: MacBookPro6,2 RAM: 4GB
|-
| Core i7 720QM || 4/8 || 7.9 || ? || 45 || 1.6 GHz > 2.8 GHz || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] || Dell Precision M6500, Win7-64, 8GB DDR3
|-
| Core i7 820 || 4/8 || 13.8 || || || 2.8 Ghz || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] || -t 8
|-
| Core i7 920 || 4/8 || 19.2 || 0.10 || 195 || 4.0 GHz (x21) || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] || -a 5
|-
| Core i7 950 || 4/8 || 5.88 || 0.039 || 150W || 3.83 GHz (x23) || bitcoin-0.3.20.2 Win7-64 ||
|-
| Core i7 950 || 4/8 || 18.9 || 0.126 || 150W || 3.83 GHz (x23) || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] v0.4 ||
|-
| Core i7 980x || 6/12 || 19.2 || 0.15 || 130 || 4.4 GHz (x33) || cpuminer/Win7-64 ||
|-
| Core i7 980x || 6/12 || 8.7 || || || 3.9 GHz (x27) || 0.3.17/Win7-64 ||
|-
| Core i7 2635QM || 4/8 || 2.93 || || || 2.00 GHz || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8994.0 RPCMiner GUI] v2011-05-22 / Mac OS X 10.6.7 || Model: MacBookPro8,2 RAM: 4GB
|-
| Core i7 620M || 2/4 || 6.3 || 0.18 || 35 || 2.66 GHz || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] v0.4 ||
|-
| Core i7 2600k || 4/4 || 6.7 || || || 4.00 GHz || phoenix 0.48 ||
|-
| Core 2 Duo U7600 || 1 || 1.1 || || || 1.2 GHZ || minerd (jgarzik's 1.0) || cryppto, Windows 7
|-
| Core 2 Duo E5200 || 2/2 || 6.2 || 0.086 || 72W || 2.76 Ghz || Ufasoft/Win7-64 || TDP is 65W + 7W overclock
|-
| Core 2 Duo E6550 || 1/2 || 2.45 || ? || ? || 2.33 GHz || cpuminer 0.7.1 (Linux) || --algo=sse2_64
|-
| Core 2 Duo E6850 || 2/2 || 6.75 || 0.10 || 65W || 3.0 Ghz || ufasoft-0.3 ||
|-
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 7.76 || 0.11 || 70W || 3.33 GHz (o/c?) || ufasoft-0.3 || miner optimized for Intel Core
|-
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 2.52 || 0.04 || 65W || 2.66 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Core 2 Duo E8200 || 2/2 || 2.3 || 0.035 || 65W|| 2.66GHz || rpcminer-cpu ||
|-
| Core 2 Duo E8400 || 2/2 || 6.9 || 0.106 || 65W || 3.0 GHz || ufasoft v0.10|| windows 7/64bit (-t 2)
|-
| Core 2 Duo T6400 || 2/2 || 4.2 || 0.12 || 35 W || 2.00 GHz || cpuminer git (Linux) || --algo=sse2_64
|-
| Core 2 Duo T7250 || 2/2 || 4.5 || 0.13 || 35 W || 2.00 GHz || bitcoin-miner 0.13/WinXP || No GPU
|-
| Core 2 Extreme X9000 || 2/2 || 2.37 || || || 2.8 GHz || rpcminer-cpu || Win7-64
|-
| Core 2 Extreme X9000 || 2/2 || 6.2 || || || 2.8 GHz || ufasoft v0.11 || Win7-64
|-
| Core 2 Extreme X9000 || 2/2 || 7.2 || || || 3.2 GHz || ufasoft v0.11 || Win7-64 Overclocked from 2.8 GHz to 3.2 GHz
|-
| Xeon 2.8 || 2/2 || 0.8 || || || 2.8 GHz || cpuminer || cryptopp_asm32
|-
| Xeon 3060 || 1/2 || 2.03 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.4GHz || cpuminer 0.8.1 (Linux) || --algo=cryptopp_asm32
|-
| Xeon Prestonia 2.4 (dual) || 2x1/2 || 2.16 || 0.017 || 130W || 2.4 GHz || ufasoft v0.4 ||
|-
| Xeon X5355 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 10.13 || 0.16 || 120W || 2.66GHz || bitcoind || Roughly the same speed as the "c" algo in cpuminer
|-
| Xeon X5355 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 22.76 || 0.09 || 120W || 2.66GHz || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || -O2 -march=core2, algo=sse2_64
|-
| Xeon E5335 || 4/4 || 9.35 || 0.12 || 80W || 2.00 GHz || ufasoft v0.11 || Vista-32
|-
| Xeon E5440 || 4/8 || 7.3 || ? || 80W || 2.66 GHz|| Kiv's poclbm-gui || FIXME: Either wrong model # or wrong threads/speed info
|-
| Xeon E5520 || 4/8 || 6.5 || 0.08 || 80W || 2.27 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Xeon E5530 || 4/8 || 7.14 || 0.09 || 80W || 2.4 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Xeon E5630 (dual) || 2x4/8 || 8 || 0.1 || 80W || 2.53 GHz || 0.3.17/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]
|-
| Xeon E6520 (dual) || 2x4/8 || 24.7 || ? || ? || 2.53 GHz || ufasoft v0.10 || windows 2008 R2 64bit (-t 16)
|-
| Xeon E7450 (quad) || 4x6/24 || 22 || ? || ? || 2.40 GHz || rpcminer-cpu || rpcminer-cpu -t=24
|-
| Xeon E7520 (dual) || 2x4/16 || 18 || ? || 95W || 1.87 GHz || ufasoft v0.10 || windows 2008 R2 64bit (-t 16)
|-
| Xeon W3680 || 6/12 || 18 || ? || 130W || 3.33 GHz || cpuminer v1.0.2 --algo=4way || Ubuntu 11.04 64bit
|-
| Atom N230 || 1/2 || 0.375 || || 4W || 1.6 GHz || rpcminer-cpu ||
|-
| Atom N230 || 1/2 || 0.245 || || 4W || 1.6 GHz || rpcminer-4way ||
|-
| Atom N230 || 1/2 || 0.97 || || 4W || 1.6 GHz || ufasoft v0.10 ||
|-
| Atom N270 || 1/2 || 1.19 || 0.24 || 5W || 1.6 GHz || ufasoft v0.10 ||
|}

===Other===
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment
|-
| Cell || 6 || 21 || 0.35 || 60W || 3.2 GHz || cellminer || Sony Playstation 3 (FAT): Needs custom firmware (no links to it, potential issues with Sony assholes.) [https://github.com/verement/cellminer source] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4704.20 source] Total power usage of PS3 fat is 120W but only the Cell cpu is active.
|-
| Cell || 6 || 21 || 0.7 || 35W || 3.2 GHz || cellminer || Sony Playstation 3 (SLIM): Total power usage of PS3 slim is 70W but only the Cell cpu is active.
|-
| MIPS || 1 || 0.026 || ? || ? || 200 MHz || cpuminer || ASUS WL-500G Deluxe router running [http://openwrt.org/ OpenWrt]
|-
| VIA Eden || 1 || 1.3 || 0.17 || 8W || 1600 MHz || cpuminer || VIA Eden w/ Padlock
|-
| PowerPC 7447A || 1 || 0.53 || || || 1420 MHz || cpuminer ||
|}

==See Also==

* [[Mining rig]]
* [[Generation Calculator]]
* [[Power Calc]]
* [[OpenCL miner]]
* [http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=745 ATI Stream vs. NVIDIA CUDA - GPGPU computing battle royale]
* [http://bitminer.info/ Bitminer.info]

[[Category:Mining]]

Mining hardware comparison

2011-06-13T20:41:42Z

Rallan:

Below are some statistics about the mining performance of various hardware used in a [[mining rig]].

The table shows (mostly) stock clock numbers. 10-20% performance improvement can be achieved via overclocking.

'''Notes:'''
* Whash/s = millions hashes per second (raw speed performance ; may not be very energy efficient with some models)
* Whash/J = millions hashes per joule (energy efficiency ; 1 joule of energy is spent for 1 watt in 1 second)
* W = watt (maximum power consumption, i.e. energy per unit of time : 1 W = 1 J/s)
* Clock (in MHz) refers to the Shader clock only with nVidia cards (not Core or Memory). With AMD card the shader clock is not separate, but is part of the GPU clock.
* SP = Stream processors (Shader Units)

==Graphics cards==

===AMD (ATI)===
To get the maximum performance use the 2.1 release of the ATI Stream SDK. 2.2 wastes CPU time, and 2.3/2.4 drop mining performance by 5-10% unless using the Phoenix phatk kernel. ''Note: This statement is not entirely accurate. '''YMMV'''.''

{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! W !! Clock !! SP !! SDK !! Slot !! Miner !! Notes

|-
| 3XXX || - || - || - || - || - || - || - || - || OpenCL Not Supported

|-
| 42XX || - || - || - || - || - || - || - || - || OpenCL Not Supported (integrated/mobile GPU)

|-
| 4350 || 6.93 || 0.346 || 20 || 575 || 80 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors
|-
| 4350 || 8.14 || - || - || 730 || 80 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Diablo/Windows7 || -w 32. Model: Asus EAH4350 Silent. Memory at 400MHz. Runs at 60°C with ambient at 25°C.

|-
| 4550 || 7.23 || 0.289 || 25 || 600 || 80 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors

|-
| 4570M || 8.02 || 0.297 || 27 || 680 || 80 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Diablo/Windows7 || -w 64, SDK 2.4, Cat 11.4. Model: Sony Vaio NW

|-
| 4570M || 9.6 || 0.300 || 32 || 825(OC) || 80 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Diablo/Windows7 || -w 64, SDK 2.4, Cat 11.4. Model: Sony Vaio NW. OC core 680->825. U/C memory 800->500.

|-
| 4650 || 31.33 || 0.653 || 48 || 650 || 320 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors

|-
| 4670 || 36.14 || 0.613 || 59 || 750 || 320 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors
|-
| 4670 || 40.11 || 0.679 || 59 || 800 || 320 || - || AGP x8 || poclbm/Ubuntu 10.10 w/ H == 0 mod || -w 32 -f 0, don't use vectors [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.msg85236#msg85236 source]

|-
| 4730 || 72.29 || 0.657 || 110 || 750 || 640 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - ||

|-
| 4770 || 72.29 || 0.904 || 80 || 750 || 640 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - ||

|-
| 4830 || 55.42 || 0.583 || 95 || 575 || 640 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - ||
|-
| 4830 || 66.12 || 0.503 || 105 || 700 || 1005 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - ||

|-
| 4850 || 75.30 || 0.685 || 110 || 625 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - ||
|-
| 4850 || 84.3 || 0.766 || 110 || 725 || 300 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - || -w64 fan at 70% temp 73C, stock voltage -gui miner
|-
| 4850 || 90.1 || 0.819 || 110 || 800 || 500 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer || -f 30; Tried phoenix and phatk, got same max
|-
| 4850 || 101 || 0.918 || 110 || 817 || 500 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer || -f 0, core 817mhz(default 625)@1.123v , mem downclock to 500mhz (default 993) [http://www.smpake.com/?p=6 source]
|-
| 4850x2 || 150.60 || 0.602 || 250 || 625 || 1600 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - ||

|-
| 4860 || 67.47 || 0.519 || 130 || 700 || 640 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - ||

|-
|style="background:#F8F8FF;"| 4870 || 92.84 || 0.6189333(?) || 150(?) || 830(OC) || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 || -k poclbm AGGRESSION=5 (Windows 7 64-Bit, GPU OC 750->830MHz, VRAM UC 900->450MHz, BIOS modded)
|-
|style="background:#F8F8FF;"| 4870 || 104.6 || 0.872 || 120 || 830(OC) || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 256 -f 1, Windows 7 64-Bit, GPU Core OC to 830 MHz, GPU Memory UC to 190 MHz (saves 30 watts at outlet)
|-
|style="background:#F8F8FF;"| 4870 || 90.36 || 0.602 || 150 || 750 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || clmine ||
|-
|style="background:#F8F8FF;"| 4870 || 78 || 0.520 || 150 || - || - || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/Vista 64bit || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source]
|-
|style="background:#F8F8FF;"| 4870x2 || 180.72 || 0.632 || 286 || 750 || 1600 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - ||
|-
|style="background:#F8F8FF;"| 4870x2 || 180.6 || 0.632 || 286 || 800 || 1600 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - ||

|-
| 4890 || 97.1 || 0.511 || 190 || 870(OC) || 1050 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-01-21 Solo settings || Sapphire fab. No flags options helped. Close all browsers and do full restart of GUIMiner and then Bitcoin via GUIMiner server starter or the browsers GPU accl. will limit to 56~ ish Mhash/s - I can now start browser without slowdowns
|-
| 4890 || 102.41 || 0.539 || 190 || 850 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - ||
|-
| 4890 || 108.3 || 0.57 || 190 || 975 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - ||

|-
|style="background:#FFF8EF;"| 5450 || 11.99 || 0.631 || 19 || 650 || 80 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - ||
|-
|style="background:#FFF8EF;"| 5450 || 13.74 || - || - || 700 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/Linuxcoin v0.2 || -v -w128 tried several options, seems to work best.
|-
|style="background:#FFF8EF;"| 5450 || 14.12 || - || - || 700 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix/Linuxcoin v0.2 || Flags: "DEVICE=0 VECTORS AGGRESSION=4 -v FASTLOOP BFI_INT WORKSIZE=64" Kernel: "phatk"

|-
| 5550 || 40.59 || 1.041 || 39 || 550 || 320 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - ||

|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 59.96 || 1.538 || 39 || 650 || 400 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - ||
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 64 || 1.641 || 39 || 650 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 62 || 1.59 || 39 || 650 || 400 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 OpenCL/Linux x86_64 || -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS AGGRESSION=4 -v FASTLOOP BFI_INT WORKSIZE=64
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 73 || 1.872 || 39 || 700 || 400 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 OpenCL/Linux x86_64 || -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS AGGRESSION=4 -v FASTLOOP BFI_INT WORKSIZE=64
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 102 || 1.46(+) || 75(-) || 950 || 400 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 OpenCL/Windows 7 x86 (no Aero) || -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS AGGRESSION=7 -v FASTLOOP BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 (Reference Sapphire card, 2 additional 120mm coolers, temperature is 79-82C)

|-
| 5650 || 48 || 1.37 || 35(?) || - || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source] [http://www.notebookcheck.net/ATI-Mobility-Radeon-HD-5650.23697.0.html source] -- not TDP but load

|-
|style="background:#EEFFEE;"| 5670 || 71.49 || 1.117 || 64 || 775 || 400 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - ||
|-
|style="background:#EEFFEE;"| 5670 || 72 || 1.64 || 44 || 850 || - || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm-mod (Win7-64) || Sapphire 100287VGAL card is low power
|-
|style="background:#EEFFEE;"| 5670 || 85 || - || - || 900 || 400 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128

|-
| 5750 || 116.24 || 1.352 || 86 || 700 || 720 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - ||
|-
| 5750 || 137 || - || - || 710 || - || - || PCI-E 1.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128 using stock memory and GPU clocks
|-
| 5750 || 146.4 || - || - || 775 || - || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-21 || -v -w128, AMD Catalyst overclock (775MHz GPU / 1225 MHz Memory)
|-
| 5750 || 154.56 || 1.45 || 106 || 830 || 720 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - || -v -w128 -f20 underclocked memory clocks from 1150MHz to 300MHz
|-
| 5750 || 170 || - || - || 870 || - || - || PCI-E 1.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128 patched BIOS to underclock memory to 300MHz
|-
| 5750 || 173 || - || - || 875 || - || - || PCI-E 1.1 x16 || phoenix || 875/300 w/MSI Afterburner, BFI_INT VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 FASTLOOP=FALSE -k phatk

|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 156.83 || 1.452 || 108 || 850 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 180 || 1.406(*) || 128(*) || 950(OC) || 800 || 2.4RC1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 30 (*: Overclocked wattage calculated [http://bakkap.free.fr/Misc/wCalc.html here])
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 185 || - || - || 850 || 1200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128 FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=7
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 205.58 || - || - || 935 || 300 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-04-28 || -v -w 256
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 210.7 || 1.95(-) || 108(+) || 950 || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / win7x86 || mem underclocked 309 mhz, -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 218.35 || - || - || 1000 || 1401 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || DiabloMiner || -w 128 -v 2 (Overclocked to 1Ghz core with 1.2 voltage and Scythe Setsugen 2 cooling system)
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 223 || 2.23(-) || 100(+) || 1050 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer || -v -w256 [http://www.smpake.com/?p=59 source]
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 233 || 2.23(-) || 100(+) || 1050 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 || VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 -k phatk WORKSIZE=256 [http://www.smpake.com/?p=59 source]
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 236.32 || 2.3632(-) || 100(+) || 1080 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x1 || phoenix 1.48 || VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 -k phatk WORKSIZE=256 (OC'd and OV'd 1068/300 1.237v)

|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 244 || 1.36 || 179 || 800 || 1000 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 OpenCL/Linux x86_64 || -k phatk DEVICE=1 VECTORS AGGRESSION=6 -v FASTLOOP WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 267 || - || - || 875 || 1000 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x1 || Phoenix 1.48 OpenCL/Linux x86_64 || -k phatk DEVICE=1 VECTORS AGGRESSION=6 -v FASTLOOP WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 245 || 1.28 || 192 || 880 || 900 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm (guiminer) || -v -w 256
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 248 || 1.29 || 192 || 880 || 500 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.46 || -k poclbm VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 256 || - || - || 900 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 || -k poclbm VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=7
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 272 || 1.52 || 179 || 875 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / LinuxCoin || 275Mhz Memory clock, 1.125 V (from 1.163), VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 275 || 1.5714 || 175 || 900 || 500 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm (guiminer) Win7x64 || -v -w64 -f10, XFX stock w/ v2.4 SDK = 230Mh/s, v2.1 SDK = +10Mh/s, overclocking core clock by 100 = +30Mh/s, underclocking memory to 500 (ran cooler), and changing workload to -w64 = +5Mh/s.
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 285 || - || - || 960 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.47 / poclbm / Win7 64 || VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 290 || - || - || 996 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.4 / poclbm / Win7 64 || VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 300 || - || - || 970 || 1120 || 2.1 || PCI-E x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 64 || 300Mhz memory clock BFI_INT AGGRESSION=12 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 305 || - || - || 984 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.4 / phatk / Win7 32 || 400Mhz Memory clock, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 307 || - || - || 996 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 64 || VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 308 || - || - || 990 || 375 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 32 || @ stock voltage VECTORS AGGRESSION=11 -v FASTLOOP=false BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 310 || - || - || 1000 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Linux x86 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=12 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 black || 310 || - || - || 990 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x8 || LinuxCoin 0.2b, phoenix/phatk || (XFX Brand) -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 AGGRESSION=11 FASTLOOPS=false
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 316.35 || - || - || 1015 || 375 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 32 || @ stock voltage VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 -v FASTLOOP=false BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 318 || - || - || 1030 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 64 || 385Mhz Memory, VECTORS AGGRESSION=9 BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 319 || - || - || 1030 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Xp 64 || 1.2v 355Mhz Memory, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT

|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 240.77 || 1.595 || 151 || 725 || 1440 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 250.26 || 1.657 || 151 || 725 || 1440 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || opencl client || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 252 || 1.575 || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-01-25 ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 255.3 || 1.593 || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-01-25 ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 264 || 1.748 || 151 || 725 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 1.0 x8 || guiminer-20110501 || -v -w128
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 280 || 1.75 || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.3 || with BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 292 || 1.825 || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-04-28 -v -f 1 ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 298 || 1.8620 || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-04-28 -v -f 1 -w 64 ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 300 || 1.5460 || 194 || 925(OC) || 1440 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 314 || 1.8362 || 171 || 820(OC) || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 1.0 x8 || poclbm || -v -w128
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 330 || - || - || 850 @ Stock voltage || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix || EAH5850, miner arguments: -k poclbm DEVICE=1 VECTORS AGGRESSION=8 WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 335 || 1.8611 || 180 || 890(OC) || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || poclbm || -v -w128, Memory downclocked to 300Mhz
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 344 || 1.8594 || 185 || 890(OC) || 1440 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 354 || - || - || 900(OC) || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || diablo -v 2 -w 128 || Ubuntu 11.04 64-bit [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=9239.0 Headless], catalyst 11.5, memory downclocked to 300mhz, stock voltage. flashed with atiflash [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9AxNmOy6_0 video]
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 355 || - || - || 900(OC) || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.48 || Ubuntu 11.04 64-bit, Memory downclocked to 200MHz, VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 365 || - || - || 920 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 64 || 300Mhz memory clock VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 382 || 1.8454 || 207 || 995(OC) || 1440 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || phoenix || OC 1.177v on core

|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870M || 152.5 || - || - || 750(OC) || 1000 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || gui-miner (win-7) ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 313.65 || 1.668 || 188 || 850 || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 313 || 1.665 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo/Linux ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 343 || 1.824 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo/Linux ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 355 || 1.888 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/Linux ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 340 || 1.809 || 188 || 850 || 1600 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 360 || 1.6822 || 214 || 970 || 700 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL w7-64 || -f 0 -v -w 128 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=6144.msg91959#msg91959 source]
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 377 || 2.008 || 188 || 850 || 1600 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha || -D -G2
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 397 || - || - || 930 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=10 WORKSIZE=128
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 408 || 1.8888 || 216 || 980 || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm/Win7x64 || -f 20 -v -w 128, BIT_ALIGN, BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 400 || 1.9047 || 210 || 950 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || Phoenix 1.3 || -k poclbm VECTORS AGGRESSION=7 FASTLOOP BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 398 || 1.980 || 201 || 900 || 1600 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha || -D -G2 (GPU OC to 900, memory downclocked to 900)
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 420 || 2.0000 || 210 || 950 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=14 WORKSIZE=256 -- Memory Clock 300Mhz
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 421 || 1.9581 || 215 || 975 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.47 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 -k phatk
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 440 || 2.0000 || 220 || 995 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 438 || 1.9819 || 221 || 1000(OC) || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm/Linux || -v -w 64 -f 1
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 445 || - || - || 1040 || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm/Windows 7 64 || -v -w 128 -f 1 Crossfired, Water cooled, 890 Mhash/s total, Both cards peak at 450 Mhash/s. Best dual gpu setup me thinks?
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 435 || - || - || 990 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || LinuxCoin v0.2b phoenix/phatk || (Powercolor brand) -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 AGGRESSION=11 FASTLOOPS=false
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870x2 (Ares) || 620 || - || - || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer || -v -w 128
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870x2 (Ares) || 826 || 0.751 || 1100 || 950 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.4 w/ Phtak || AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT Memory @ 300MHz
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870x2 (Ares) || 826 || 1.18 || 700 || 935 || 3200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 w/ Phatk || AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=256 VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false, memory @ 319 MHz, Windows 7 32-bit
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870x2 (Ares) || 878 || 0.585 || 1500 || 1000 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.7 w/ Phtak || AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT Memory @ 300MHz

|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 530 || 1.803 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.4.595.10 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/201103.beta3/Windows || -v -w128 -f60
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 535.06 || 1.820 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 560 || 1.905 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo ||
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 565 || 1.922 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine2 ||
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 604 || 2.054 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 645 || 1.875 || 344 || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || -f1, Debian 6, fglrx-driver 10.9.3
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 740 || 2.1511 || 344 || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix/1.3 || AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT, memory clock @ 300MHz
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 755 || 2.2076 || 342 || 848 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 28-04-11 || -f 1 -w 256 -v, Ubuntu 10.10, fglrx 11.4, memory clock @ 300MHz
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 802 || 2.31 || 347 || 850 || 3200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix poclbm Ubuntu 11.04 || -q 6 -k AGGRESSION=19 WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT VECTORS, fglrx 11.4, mem clock @ 1000MHz

|-
| 6310M || 9.821 || 0.545 || 18 || 500 || 80 || 2.4 || Integrated/APU || poclbm-gui -v -w128 || HP DM1z 18W TDP is shared with the CPU

|-
| 6470M || 24.1 || - || - || - || - || 2.1 || Integrated/APU || guiminer ||
|-
| 6470M || 31.0 || - || - || - || - || 2.1 || Integrated/APU || phoenix 1.48 ||

|-
| 6490M || 16.289 || 0.708 || 23 || - || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm-mod (Mac OS X 10.6.7) || MacBook Pro early 2011
|-
| 6490M || 15.21 || - || - || - || - || - || - || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8994.0 DiabloMiner GUI] v2011-05-22 / Mac OS X 10.6.7 || Model: MacBookPro8,2 VRAM: 256MB

|-
|style="background:#FFDD00;"| 6570 || 68.0 || 1.133 || 60 || 650 || 480 || 2.4 || PCI-E x16 || guiminer 2011-05-21 with poclbm (Win7-32bit) || no extra option for miner . Sapphire 6570 gddr5 512mb
|-
|style="background:#FFDD00;"| 6570 || 82.1 || 1.368 || 60 || 650 || 480 || 2.4 || PCI-E x16 || guiminer 2011-05-21 with poclbm (Win7-32bit) || -v -w128 . Sapphire 6570 gddr5 512mb

|-
| 6750 || 167.59 || - || - || 870 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer || -v -f30 -w128

|-
| 6770 || 180 || - || - || 850 || 1200 || - || - || guiminer || -v -w128 , this was an XFX (OEM) model, GPU @ 850 MHz, mem @ 1200 MHz; I pushed it up to 190 Mhash/s briefly by overclocking, but it crashed the system above that
|-
| 6770 || 202 || - || - || 960 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x1,x4,x8,x16 || phoenix 1.48 || Sapphire 6770 (standard) -q2 -k poclbm DEVICE=0 AGGRESSION=10 VECTORS WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT FASTLOOP (The PCI-E speed does not affect the mining speed)

|-
| 6790 || 220 || 1.467 || 150 || 800 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 || -k phatk BFI_INT FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=12 VECTORS OC'd to 1ghz, underclocked mem to 300, voltage at 1175

|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 171.59 || 1.351 || 127 || 775 || 960 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 196 || - || - || 850 || 960 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 0
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 220 || 1.236(*) || 178(*) || 1000(OC) || 960 || 2.4RC1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 30 (*: Overclocked wattage calculated [http://bakkap.free.fr/Misc/wCalc.html here] )
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 234.8 || - || - || 940 || 960 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.3 || AGGRESSION=8 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 244.2 || - || - || 960 || 960 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm june-2011 || -v -w 128

|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 232.47 || 1.540 || 151 || 900 || 1120 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm -v -w 128 ||
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 277.47 || - || - || 940 || 1120 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.3 || AGGRESSION=8 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 271 || 1.807 || 150 || 940 || 1100 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm -v -w 128 || Debian 6.0.1 x86_64
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 260.1 || 1.611 || 175 || 1001 || 1150 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm-gui windows7x86 cat 11.3 || -v -w 128 -f 1
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 276 || 1.828(?) || 151(?) || 900 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha cat 11.4 sdk 2.4 || -G2 -D stock clocks, debian linux 64bit
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 300.06 || 1.830 || 164 || 1020 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.4 cat 11.4 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=8 fastloop mem clock 344
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 306 || 1.748(?) || 175(?) || 1000 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha cat 11.4 sdk 2.4 || -G2 -D overclocked to 1000, debian linux 64bit
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 300 || 1.72 || 174 || 1038 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm windows7x86 cat 11.4 || -v -w128 -f1 mem clock 360, fan 100% temp 73C
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 310 || - || - || 1035 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 phatk 11.5 sdk 2.4 || BFI_INT VECTORS FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=128, mem clock @ 300MHz, voltage @ 1.300
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 316 || - || - || 1030 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer 2011-06-09 using phoenix (Win7-32bit) || -k phatk platform=0 device=0 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 worksize=128 FASTLOOP=false, mem clock @ 228MHz, voltage @ 1.25, Fan @ 40%, Temp @ 73C
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 322 || 1.882 || 170 || 1050 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.47 phatk 11.5 sdk 2.4 || BFI_INT VECTORS FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=256, mem clock @ 400MHz
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 329 || - || - || 1075 || 372 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 phatk 11.5 sdk 2.4 || BFI_INT VECTORS FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=256

|-
| 6950 || 272 || - || - || 900 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48/poclbm || max stable @ 1150 mV, AGGRESSION = 7, BFI_INT, MSI 6950
|-
| 6950 || 291 || - || - || 920 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48/poclbm || max stable @ 1200mV, AGGRESSION = 7, BFI_INT, MSI 6950
|-
| 6950 || 295 || - || - || 930 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48/poclbm || max stable @ 1275mV, AGGRESSION = 7, BFI_INT, MSI 6950
|-
| 6950 || 300 || - || - || 940 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48/poclbm || max stable @ 1300mV, AGGRESSION = 7, BFI_INT, MSI 6950
|-
| 6950 || 295 || 1.844(?) || 160(?) || 810 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250
|-
| 6950 || 314 || - || - || 800 || 1408 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 05-01-11 || -v -f30 -w128 default mem 1250 Stock Sapphire 6950 1gb
|-
| 6950 || 325 || 1.635(?) || 200(?) || 885 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250
|-
| 6950 || 340 || - || - || 895 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 05-21-11 || -v -w 128, mem @ 500, 1200 mV, MSI 6950
|-
| 6950 || 340 || - || - || 800 || 1536 ||(?) || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 05-21-11 || -v -f30 -w128 default mem 1250,Sapphire 6950 1gb, unlocked shaders
|-
| 6950 || 349 || 1.745(?) || 200(?) || 800 || 1408 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 05-21-11 || -v -f30 -w128, xfx 6950 xxx 1gb, locked shaders, core 900, mem 650, 79° C
|-
| 6950 || 360 || 1.8(?) || 200(?) || 970 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250
|-
| 6950 || 360 || - || - || 870 || 1375 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || flashed with 6970 BIOS, -v -f30 -w128
|-
| 6950 || 417 || 2.085(?) || 200(?) || 975 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || unlocked shaders, +20% overdrive, mem @ 1250, fan @ 77%, temp 64C, -v -w128, gpu core @ 1145mV
|-
| 6950 || 428 || 2.14(?) || 200(?) || 1000 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || unlocked shaders, +20% overdrive, mem @ 1250, fan @ 80%, temp 64C, -v -w128, gpu core @ 1160mV
|-
| 6950 || 432 || 2.16(?) || 200(?) || 1000 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || unlocked shaders, +20% overdrive, mem @ 520, fan @ 80%, temp 76C, -v -w128 -f 2, gpu core @ 1275mV
|-
| 6950x4 || 1316 || 1.513 || 870 || 840 || 1408 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || locked shaders, default mem 1250, dual fan 75C typical

|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 323 || 1.468 || 220 || 880 || 1536 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -w 64, SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 372 || 1.691(?) || 220(?) || 900 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix (svn trunk 05.14.2011) || clock 900/1375, VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128, fan 45% (auto) / temp 90C
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 385 || 1.964 || 196 || 900 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || -v -w128, memory downclocked to 684Mhz, fan @ 70%/temp 81C
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 380 || - || - || - || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w128<br>export GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS=1 # to reduce poclbm CPU from 100% to 2%
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 402 || - || - || - || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || -v -w128, fan 75%/75C, voltage +10% (via CCC), clocks 940MHz/600MHz (via TriXX)
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 403 || - || - || MAX || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || clock Max/50%+stock, -v -w128, fan= 100%/temp 72C (Note: Overclocked using CCC utility under Windows 7, Clock set to Max value w/ 50% increase to memory and 5% increase to voltage)
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 423 || - || - || 995 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48/poclbm || ATI Tray Tools, Clocks=995/331.25, WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 VECTORS ,68C @ 65% Fan, HAF932 Case
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970x2 || 710 || - || - || 900/880 || 1536 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -w 256

|-
| 6990 || 670 || 1.94 || 346 || 830 || 3072 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || Catalyst 11.4 [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=2949.msg106238#msg106238 source].
|-
| 6990 || 708 || 2.05 || 346 || 830 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || BIOS switch at "default" position 2, see [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]
|-
| 6990 || 746 || 1.82 || 410 || 880 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || BIOS switch at "overclocked" position 1, see [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]
|-
| 6990 || 758 || - || - || 880 || - || 2.4 || - || Phoenix with Poclbm || Catalyst 11.4, OC switch ON, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128 FASTLOOP=false
|-
| 6990 || 771 || 1.8804 || 410 || 880 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx. Memory clock @ 1280Mhz.
|-
| 6990 || 772 || 1.8380 || 420 || 900 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix & Poclbm || OC switch ON + overclocked to 900 mhz, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128
|-
| 6990 || 790 || - || - || 900 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || BIOS switch at "overclocked" position 1; with "aticonfig --odsc=900,1260" to further overclock the GPU to 900 MHz and mem to 1260 MHz, see [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]
|-
| 6990 || 802 || - || - || 915 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || BIOS switch at "overclocked" position 1; with "aticonfig --odsc=915,1260" to further overclock the GPU to 915 MHz and mem to 1260 MHz, see [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]
|-
| 6990 || 835 || - || - || 890/860 || 3072 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix || BIOS switch at "overclocked" position 1; with "aticonfig --adapter=1 --odsc=990,890 and aticonfig --adapter=0 --odsc=960,860" (GPU 0 runs hot). Currently, aticonfig can only underclock RAM to 100mhz below core speed. Command line: phoenix.py -k poclbm VECTORS AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT
|-
| 6990x2 || 1436 || 1.848 || 777 || 880 || 6144 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 x2 || guiminer 2011.05.11 || AUSUM switch set to 1 on both cards; Core left at 880MHz, memory left at 1250MHz; VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128
|-
| 6990x3 || 2094 || - || - || 900 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 x8 x4 || poclbm || GPU 900MHz, Memory 1250MHz; poclbm.py -f 0 -w 256

|-
| FirePro V4800 || 79.7 || - || - || 775 || 400 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-01 ||
|-
| FirePro V8700 || 84.8 || - || - || 750 || 800 || - || - || poclbm-mod.03.24.2011 ||

|-
| FirePro M5800 || 61.4 || - || - || 650 || - || - || - || poclbm-mod.03.24.2011 || Ubuntu
|-
| FirePro V5800 || 119 || - || - || 690 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-01 || Windows 7 32bit
|-
| FirePro V5800 || 144 || - || - || 690 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-01 || -v -w128 (Windows 7 32bit)
|-
| FirePro V5800 || 161 || - || - || 780 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-01 || -v -w128 (Windows 7 32bit)
|-
| FirePro V7750 || 35.7 || - || - || - || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-21 || Windows 7 64bit
|-
| FirePro V7800 || 254.85 || - || - || - || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 with poclbm || Debian Squeeze

|-
| FirePro M7820 || 150.0 || - || - || 700 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-06-09 || Memory downclocked to 500 from 1000MHz, 169MH/s@800MHz, 181MH/s@860Mhz (max.), only SDK2.1 works, Windows 7 x86

|}

===Nvidia===

{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! W !! Clock !! SP !! Comment
|-
| ION || 1.8 || || 27 || || 16 || poclbm; power consumption incl. CPU
|-
| 8200 mGPU || 1.2 || || || 1200 || 16 || 128 MB shared memory, "poclbm -w 128 -f 0"
|-
| 8400 GS || 2.3 || || || || || "poclbm -w 128"
|-
| 8400 GS || 1.6 || || 128 || 1238 || || DiabloMiner -w 128 -f 1 [https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/User:Knightmb source]
|-
| 8400M GS || 2.0 || || || || ||
|-
| 8600M GT || 4.93 || || || || 32 ||
|-
| 8600GT || 5.66 || || || 1188 || 32 ||
|-
| 8600GT OC || 7.3 || || || 1602 || 32 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.0 poclbm] -w 128 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg72833#msg72833 source]
|-
| 8800GT || 25 || 0.24 || 105 || 1300 || ||
|-
| 8800GT || 24.5 || 0.23 || 105 || 1300 || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]
|-
| 8800GT || 31.1 || || 105 || 1855 || || Overclocked 715 GPU / 1030 Memory / 1855 Shader; GuiMiner v2011-05-21
|-
| 8800GT || 31.8 || || 105 || 1836 || 112 || 713 gpu, 1026 memory. win7x86, phoenix 1.48, -k poclbm WORKSIZE=64 AGGRESSION=5
|-
| 8800GTS || 16.8 || 0.109 || 154 || || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source] [http://www.techspot.com/review/79-geforce-8800-gts-512/page11.html source]
|-
| 8800 GTS || 18.7 || 0.124 || 150 || 1200 || || poclbm -w 64 no vectors
|-
| 8800 GTX || 27.5 || || || 1404 || || phoenix 1.48, poclbm, no vectors, 83C with 50C ambient
|-
| 8800m GTX || 16.3 || || || || || rpcminer-cuda Win7-64
|-
| 9300GE || 1.57 || || || 1300 || 8 ||
|-
| 9300GS || 1.69 || || || 1400 || 8 ||
|-
| 9300/nForce 730i || 2.15 || || || 1200 || 16 ||
|-
| 9400GT || 3.37 || 0.067 || 50 || 1400 || 16 ||
|-
| 9400M (MacBook) || 1.90 || 0.32 || 6 || 700 || || poclbm -f 8 no vectors
|-
| 9500GT || 6.75 || 0.135 || 50 || 1400 || 32 ||
|-
| 9600GSO || 19.88 || 0.237 || 84 || 1375 || 96 ||
|-
| 9600GSO512 || 11.75 || 0.131 || 90 || 1625 || 48 ||
|-
| 9600GT || 15.66 || 0.165 || 95 || 1625 || 64 ||
|-
| 9600GT Zotac || 15 || || || 1650 || 64 ||
|-
| 9600GT OC || 18.8 || <0.198 || >95 || 1981 || 64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.0 poclbm] -w 128 -f 10 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg74610#msg74610 source] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg73353#msg73353 source]
|-
| 9800GT || 30.36 || 0.289 || 105 || 1800 || 112 ||
|-
| 9800GT EE || 19.7 || || 75 || 1375 || 112 || rpcminer-cuda
|-
| 9800GT OC || 29.5 || 0.283 || 105 || 1836 || 112 || poclbm.py, no options. Memory underclocked to 850Mhz, GPU overclocked to 733Mhz
|-
| 9800GTX || 32.54 || 0.232 || 140 || 1688 || 128 ||
|-
| 9800GTX+ || 35.39 || 0.251 || 141 || 1836 || 128 ||
|-
| 9800GTX+ || 37.23 || 0.266 || 140 || 1890 || 128 || win7x64 275.27 phoenix(1.48) -k poclbm AGGRESSION=3 WORKSIZE=64
|-
| 9800GTX+ || 40.20 || || 140 || 835 || 128 || lowered memory clock higher core, unstable if going higher
|-
|style="background-color:#FFEFEF"| 9800GX2 || 57.83 || 0.294 || 197 || || 2x128 ||
|-
|style="background-color:#FFEFEF"| 9800GX2 || 28 || 0.142 || 197 || || 2x128 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]
|-
| G210 || 3.38 || 0.111 || 30.5 || 1402 || 16 ||
|-
| G210 || 3.79 || 0.124 || 30.5 || 1402 || 16 || poclbm -f 1
|-
| GT220 || 10.8 || || 128 || 1360 || || DiabloMiner -w 128 -f 1000 [https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/User:Knightmb source]
|-
| GT240 || 19.37 || 0.281 || 69 || 1340 || 96 ||
|-
| GT240 || 21.24 || || || || 96 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4291.0 poclbm-mod] -f 0 -v [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg73383#msg73383 source]
|-
| GTS250 || 35.39 || 0.244 || 145 || 1836 || 128 ||
|-
| GTS250 || 35.2 || 0.243 || 145 || 1836 || 128 ||
|-
| GTS250 OC || 37 || 0.255 || 145 || 2047 || 128 ||
|-
| GTX260M || 22.5 || || || 500 || 112 || poclbm 4/28/2011 Asus G71GX runs ~90c without cooling pad
|-
| GTX260 || 35.91 || 0.178 || 202 || 1242 || 192 ||
|-
| GTX260 || 44 || 0.242 || 182 || 1242 || 216 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|-
| GTX260c216 || 40.40 || 0.236 || 171 || 1242 || 216 ||
|-
| GTX260c216 || 47.4 || || 182 || 1348 || 216 || poclbm -w 256
|-
| GTX260c216 || 50.00 || || || 1050 || 216 || m0mchil GPU client, Windows 7 64-bit, x6 @ 3.5ghz
|-
| GTX260c216 OC || 52.0 || || || 1461 || 216 || "poclbm -w 256 -f 1"
|-
| GTX260c216 OC || 58.9 || || || 756/400 || 216 || Core overclocked, Memory underclocked, Ubuntu 11.04 Classic Session(No Effects) "poclbm -w 256 -f 1"
|-
| GTX260c216 OC || 60.1 || || || 1706 || 216 || Core: 364 MHz, Shaders: 1706 MHz, Memory: 594 MHz, VDDC: 1.1800V. "poclbm-mod -w 256 -f 1"
|-
| GTX275 || 50.75 || 0.232 || 219 || 1404 || 240 ||
|-
| GTX275 || 58 || || || 729/1458 || 240 || poclbm -f 0 -w 256
|-
| GTX280 || 46.84 || 0.198 || 236 || 1296 || 240 ||
|-
| GTX280 || 64.34 || 0.289 || 245 || 1296 || 240 || phoenix.exe -k poclbm AGGRESSION=6 WORKSIZE=128 (61*C with Accelero XTREME GTX280)
|-
| GTX285 || 64.8 || || || 1607 || 240 || GuiMiner - Not sure about wattage yet. Still testing. Card runs around 74 C
|-
|-
| GTX285 || 53.35 || 0.262 || 204 || 1476 || 240 ||
|-
| GTX295 || 89.78 || 0.311 || 289 || 1242 || 480 ||
|-
| GTX295 || 120.70 || || 289 || 1242 || 480 || GUIMiner no oc.
|-
| GTX295 || 117.30 || || 289 || 1476 || 490 ||
|-
| GT 320M (MacBook Air) || 6.12 || || || 1212 || 48 ||
|-
| 320M (Mac mini 2010) || 7.0 || 0.35 || 20 || 450 || 32 || poclbm no extra options, windows 7 x64
|-
| GT 330M || 7.97 || || || || || Model: MacBookPro6,2 VRAM: 512MB Software: [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8994.0 DiabloMiner GUI] v2011-05-22 / Mac OS X 10.6.7
|-
| GT 330M (Sony Vaio Z) || 7.8 || 0.71 ( 0.3 total) || 11 (26w total) || 1045 || 48 ||
|-
| GTS 350M (Toshiba A665-3DV) || 17.0 || || 14 || 1080 || || DiabloMiner-Windows.exe
|-
| GTS 360M || 25.0 || || || || || [toshiba qosmio laptop, ~150-165*F stock fans]
|-
| GTS 360M (ASUS G60jx) || 20.0 || || || || || everythins is stock, it cannot sustain. it reaches 90 degrees and freezes.
|-
| GT430 || 20.24 || 0.413 || 49 || 1400 || 96 ||
|-
| GTS450 || 45.28 || 0.427 || 106 || 1566 || 192 ||
|-
| GTX460SE || 56.39 || 0.376 || 150 || 1300 || 288 ||
|-
| GTX460 || 66.32 || || || 814 || 336 || rpcminer-cuda 20110605, Graphics Clock @ 814MHz, Memory @ 1555MHz
|-
| GTX460 || 68.31 || 0.427 || 160 || 1350 || 336 ||
|-
| GTX460 768MB || 57.8 || || ? || 1350 || 336 || rpcminer-cuda -gputhreads=320 -gpugrid=336
|-
| GTX460 768MB (MSI Cyclone 768D5/OC) || 75.1 || || ? || 930 || 336 || rpcminer-cuda on Win7 x64 with ForceWare 275.33. [http://event.msi.com/vga/afterburner/download.htm MSI Afterburner] set to core: 930MHz, shader: 1850MHz, core voltage: 1.087V, memory: 1600MHz. Runs at 58°C with fan at 75% (ambient 25°C).
|-
| GTX460 1GB DirectCU || 72.3 || ? || ? || 1672 || 336 || rpcminer-cuda -gputhreads=320 -gpugrid=336
|-
| GTX460 (2 cards) || 102 || 0.319? || 320? || 1350 || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]
|-
| GTX460 (2 cards) OC || 127 || 0.374 || 340 || 1620 || 2x 336 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2444.0 rpcminer-cuda] -gpugrid=128 -gputhreads=128 ver.20110227
|-
| GTX465 || 64.41 || 0.322 || 200 || 1215 || 352 ||
|-
| GTX470 || 81.98 || 0.381 || 215 || 1215 || 448 ||
|-
| GTX470 || 94.7 || || || 1414 || ||
|-
| GTX470 || 111.9 || || 215 || 1650 || 448 ||
|-
| GTX470 || 115 || || || 1616 || || phoenix 1.46 poclbm VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=6
|-
| GTX480 || 101.28 || 0.405 || 250 || 1401 || 480 ||
|-
| GTX560 Ti || 67.7 || 0.39 || 170 || 1700 || 384 || standard EVGA 560, no overclock
|-
| GTX560 Ti || 74.8 || 0.41 || 180 || 1700 || 384 || gigabyte 900Mhz clock; -w 512 -v
|-
| GTX560 OC || 86.7 || <0.51 || >170 || 1800 || 384 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2444.0 rpcminer-cuda] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg72816#msg72816 source]
|-
| GTX570 || 105.83 || 0.483 || 219 || 1464 || 480 ||
|-
| GTX570 || 125 || --- || 219 || 750 || 480 || rpcminer-cuda.exe -aggression=11 -gpugrid=480 -gputhreads=512
|-
| GTX580 || 140.05 || --- || 244 || 1544 || 512 ||
|-
| GTX590 || 193.1 || --- || --- || 1215 || 2x 512 || poclbm -v -w 256, Win
|-
| Quadro FX 580 || 5.7 || 0.14 || 40 || 1125 || 4 ||rpcminer-cuda, Win, -gpugrid=128 -gputhreads=512
|-
| Quadro FX 770M || 5.75 || || || 500 || 32 || DiabloMiner-Windows.exe BFI_INT FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=6, Win
|-
|Quadro FX 770M || 6.39 || || || 500 || 32 || DiabloMiner-Windows.exe BFI_INT FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=6 w 64, Win 7x64
|-
|Quadro FX 880M || 9.6 || || || || || poclbm/guiminer
|-
| Quadro FX 1600M || 6 || 0.12 || 50 || 625 || 32 ||rpcminer-cuda, Win
|-
| Quadro FX 2000M || 23 || || 58 || || || phoenix 1.48, -k poclbm, VECTORS, AGGRESION=6, Lenovo W520 platform
|-
| Quadro FX 3600M || 36 || -- || 70 || 500 || 96 ||DiabloMiner, win
|-
| Quadro NVS 135M || 1.05 || 0.1 || 10 || 800 || 1 ||
|-
| Quadro NVS 295 || 1.7 || 0.07 || 23 || 567 || 8 || phoenix
|-
| Quadro NVS 3100M || 3.6 || 0.257 || 14 || 600 || 16 || rpcminer-cuda, Win, CUDA 3.1.1
|-
| Quadro 5000 || 62 || --- || 152 || 513 || ? || rpcminer-cuda.exe -aggression=10 gpugrid=256 gputhreads=512; if anyone can provide info about the number of shader processors of this card, this would be the value of choice for gpugrid << This card has 352 cores. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Nvidia_graphics_processing_units#Quadro source]
|-
| Tesla C1060 || 52.5 || || || 1296 || 240 || poclbm, Win7x64
|-
| Tesla M2050 || 79.8 || || || 1550 || 448 || DiabloMiner
|-
| Tesla M2050 || [http://glennfrancismurray.com/cost-defective-mining-with-gpu-clusters-amazo 100] || 0 || 0 || - || 512 || Amazon AWS [http://glennfrancismurray.com/cost-defective-mining-with-gpu-clusters-amazo CUDA RPC Miner & CUDA 2.0]
|-
| Tesla S1070 || 155.2 || || || || || rpcminer-cuda, Linux, CUDA 3.2, 4 instances (-gpu=0 through -gpu=3)
|-
| GTX280x2 || 102.7 || || || || ||
|-
|}

==CPUs/APUs==

A lot of nice data can be pulled from [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.0 this thread] to seed this section.

Might you wish to throttle CPU load a bit, so it doesn't reach 100°C, it can be done with Battle Encoder Shirase to a margin, like, -15% of available CPU cycles.

Often, the best combination to be is to throttle CPU miner to -5% '''AND''' set it to least of priority levels, so as not to choke GPU miner up.

===AMD===
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! nprocs !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! TDP [W] !! CPU Clock !! Mhash/s CPU !! Mhash/s GPU !! GPU !! GPU Clock !! SP !! Software !! Notes
|-
| 4x Opteron 6174 || 48 || 115 || 0.36 || 320W || 2.2 GHz || 2.4
|colspan=4|
| cpuminer v0.8.1 || --alg 4way --threads 48
|-
| 2x Opteron 6128 || 16 || 32.4 || 0.141 || 230W || 2 GHz || 32.4
|colspan=4|
| 0.3.19 || -4way
|-
| Athlon XP 2000+ || 2 || 0.62 || 0.009 || 70W || 1.67 GHz || 0.62
|colspan=4|
| 0.3.18/Ubuntu || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source] [http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm?articleid=914&page=4 source]
|-
| Athlon 64 3500+ || 1 || 1.18 || 0.013 || 89W || 2.54 GHz || 1.18
|colspan=4|
| ufasoft v0.4 || overclocked (originally 2.2 GHz)
|-
| Athlon 64 X2 3800+ || 2 || 1.73 || 0.03 || 65 W || 2.00 GHz || 1.73
|colspan=4|
| cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || -algo=4way
|-
| Athlon 64 X2 4000+ || 2 || 1.9 || 0.02 || 65W || 2.1 GHz || 1.9
|colspan=4|
| rpc-miner ||
|-
| Athlon 64 X2 4400+ || || 2.09 || 0.032 || 65W || 2.3GHz || 2.09
|colspan=4|
| 0.3.19/Win x64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]
|-
| Athlon 64 X2 6000+ || 2 || 2.81 || 0.02 || 125W || 3 GHz || 2.81
|colspan=4|
| || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg22881#msg22881 source]
|-
| Athlon 64 X2 6400+ Black Edition || 2 || 2.9 || 0.023 || 125W || 3.2 GHz || 2.9
|colspan=4|
| 0.3.20.2 BETA/Win 7 x64 || -4way
|-
| Athlon II X2 240e || 2 || 2.71 || 0.06 || 45W || 2.81 GHz || 2.71
|colspan=4|
| bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Athlon II X2 250 || 2 || 5.6 || 0.09 || 65W || 3.01GHz || 5.6
|colspan=4|
| bitcoin-miner 0.11 ||
|-
| Athlon II X4 630 || 4 || 10.7 || 0.11 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 10.7
|colspan=4|
| bitcoin-miner 0.4 ||
|-
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 3.8 || 0.04 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 3.8
|colspan=4|
| 0.3.1x/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|-
| Phenom X4 9950 BE || 4 || 9.3 || 0.07 || 126W || 2.6 GHz || 2.32
|colspan=4|
| bitcoin-miner 0.13/WinXP || No GPU
|-
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 7.2 || 0.08 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 7.2
|colspan=4|
| cpu-miner 0.2.1/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|-
| Phenom II X4 810 || 4 || 5.0 || || 95W || 2.8 GHz ||
|colspan=4|
| rpcminer-cpu ||
|-
| Phenom II X4 810 || 4 || 9.5 || || 95W || 2.8 GHz ||
|colspan=4|
| rpcminer-4way ||
|-
| Phenom II X4 810 || 4 || 10.5 || || 95W || 2.8 GHz ||
|colspan=4|
| ufasoft v0.10 ||
|-
| Phenom II X4 955 || 4 || 11 || 0.09 || 125W || 3.2 GHz || 11
|colspan=4|
| rpcminer-4way ||
|-
| Phenom II X4 965 || 4 || 12 || 0.09 || 140W || 3.4 GHz || 11
|colspan=4|
| rpcminer-4way ||
|-
| Phenom II X6 1055T || 6 || 15.84 || 0.13 || 125W || 2.82 GHz || 15.84
|colspan=4|
| bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Phenom II X6 1090T || 6 || 18|| || 141W|| 3.50 GHz || 3
|colspan=4|
| minerd ||
|-
| Phenom II X6 1100T || 6 || 22 || 0.176 || 125W || 3.82 GHz || 22
|colspan=4|
| bitcoin-miner || Aciid#bitcoin-dev
|-
| Zacate E-350 || 2 || 11 || 0.615 || 18W || 1.6 Ghz || 1.231 || 9.831 || HD6310M || 492 Mhz || 80 || poclbm -v -w128 + Ufasoft 0.7 || stock speeds
|-
| Zacate E-350 || 2 || 12
|colspan=2|
| 1.648 Ghz || 1.252 || 10.87 || HD6310M || 492 Mhz || 80 || poclbm -v -w 256 -f 1 || "autotune" speed with ASUS EFI BIOS
|}

===ARM===
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment
|-
| ARM1136EJ-S || 1 || 0.11 || ? || ? || 0.528 GHz || cpuminer git || T-Mobile Pulse, inside Debian chroot, 'c' algo
|-
| Cortex-A8 || 1 || 0.125 || 0.36 || 0.35 W || 0.6 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || Nokia N900: 'cryptopp'
|-
| Cortex-A8 || 1 || 0.2 || 0.57 || 0.35 W || 0.6 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || Nokia N900: 'c' algo
|-
| 2x Cortex-A9 || 2 || 0.57 || 1.14 || 0.5 W || 1.0 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-24) || Toshiba AC100, ubuntu, 'c' algo
|}

===Intel===
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment
|-
| Pentium III mobile ? || 1 || 0.3 || 0.014 || 21W || 1.07 GHz || 0.3.1x/Win2K || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source] [http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=27380 source]
|-
| Pentium M 1.6ghz || 1 || .4 || || || 1.6 GHZ || minerd (jgarzik's 1.0) || cryppto, Windows 7
|-
| Pentium M 1.73ghz || 1 || .5 || || || 1.73 GHZ || minerd (jgarzik's 1.0) || cryppto, Windows 7
|-
| Old Xeon 512k (Dual) || 2x1/2 || 2.0 || ? || ? || 3.06GHz || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || HT disabled, algo=4way (twice as fast as the 2nd best algo)
|-
| Pentium 4 2.0A || 1 || 0.85 || || || 2.0 GHz || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft-0.4]/WinXP || -g no -t 2
|-
| Pentium Dual-Core E2180 || 2/2 || 1.75 || || || 2.0 GHz || rpcminer-cpu || Win7-64
|-
| Pentium Dual-Core E2180 || 2/2 || 4.1 || || || 2.0 GHz || cpuminer || sse2_64
|-
| Pentium Dual-Core E2180 || 2/2 || 4.5 || || || 2.0 GHz || ufasoft v0.11 || Win7-64
|-
| Pentium Dual-Core E5400 || 2/2 || 2.27 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.7 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Celeron E330 || 2/2 || 2.2 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.5 GHz || 0.3.19/Ubuntu10.04 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]
|-
| Core 2 Quad Q6600 || 4/4 || 11.0 || || 105W || 2.40 GHz || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || -a 60 -g no -t 4
|-
| Core 2 Quad Q9400 || 4/4 || 11 || 0.046 || 95W || 2.66 GHz || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || -a 60 -g no -t 4
|-
| Core 2 Quad Q9650 || 4/4 || 18.67 || || 95W || 4.00 GHz || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || -a 60 -g no -t 4
|-
| Core i3 530 || 2/4 || 8.31 || 0.10 || 80W || 3.66 GHz || Ufasoft 0.7 || -v -a5 -g no -t 4
|-
| Core i3 M350 || 2/4 || 1.48 || 0.04 || 35W || 2.27 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Core i5 M450 || 2/4 || 1.8 || 0.05 || 35W || 1.2 GHz || 0.3.17/Win7-54 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source]
|-
| Core i5-650 || 2/4 || 5.1 || 0.04 ? || || 3.2 GHz || cpuminer-0.7 || -4way
|-
| Core i5-750 || 4/4 || 14 || || || 3.2 GHz || bitcoin-miner 0.11 || -a 5 -g no -t 4
|-
| Core i5 ? || 4/? || 6.5 || || || || client from svn || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37621#msg37621 source]
|-
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 4.5 || 0.05 || 95W || 3.1 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-01-22) || cryptopp_asm32
|-
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 14 || 0.15 || 95W || 3.1 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || sse2_64
|-
| Core i5 2500K || 4/4 || 20.6 || || || 4.2GHz || bitcoin-miner || -g no
|-
| Core i7 620M || 2/4 || 1.888 || || || 2.66 GHz || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8994.0 RPCMiner GUI] v2011-05-22 / Mac OS X 10.6.7 || Model: MacBookPro6,2 RAM: 4GB
|-
| Core i7 920 || 4/8 || 19.2 || 0.10 || 195 || 4.0 GHz (x21) || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] || -a 5
|-
| Core i7 950 || 4/8 || 5.88 || 0.039 || 150W || 3.83 GHz (x23) || bitcoin-0.3.20.2 Win7-64 ||
|-
| Core i7 950 || 4/8 || 18.9 || 0.126 || 150W || 3.83 GHz (x23) || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] v0.4 ||
|-
| Core i7 980x || 6/12 || 19.2 || 0.15 || 130 || 4.4 GHz (x33) || cpuminer/Win7-64 ||
|-
| Core i7 980x || 6/12 || 8.7 || || || 3.9 GHz (x27) || 0.3.17/Win7-64 ||
|-
| Core i7 2635QM || 4/8 || 2.93 || || || 2.00 GHz || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8994.0 RPCMiner GUI] v2011-05-22 / Mac OS X 10.6.7 || Model: MacBookPro8,2 RAM: 4GB
|-
| Core i7 620M || 2/4 || 6.3 || 0.18 || 35 || 2.66 GHz || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] v0.4 ||
|-
| Core i7 2600k || 4/4 || 6.7 || || || 4.00 GHz || phoenix 0.48 ||
|-
| Core 2 Duo U7600 || 1 || 1.1 || || || 1.2 GHZ || minerd (jgarzik's 1.0) || cryppto, Windows 7
|-
| Core 2 Duo E5200 || 2/2 || 6.2 || 0.086 || 72W || 2.76 Ghz || Ufasoft/Win7-64 || TDP is 65W + 7W overclock
|-
| Core 2 Duo E6550 || 1/2 || 2.45 || ? || ? || 2.33 GHz || cpuminer 0.7.1 (Linux) || --algo=sse2_64
|-
| Core 2 Duo E6850 || 2/2 || 6.75 || 0.10 || 65W || 3.0 Ghz || ufasoft-0.3 ||
|-
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 7.76 || 0.11 || 70W || 3.33 GHz (o/c?) || ufasoft-0.3 || miner optimized for Intel Core
|-
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 2.52 || 0.04 || 65W || 2.66 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Core 2 Duo E8200 || 2/2 || 2.3 || 0.035 || 65W|| 2.66GHz || rpcminer-cpu ||
|-
| Core 2 Duo E8400 || 2/2 || 6.9 || 0.106 || 65W || 3.0 GHz || ufasoft v0.10|| windows 7/64bit (-t 2)
|-
| Core 2 Duo T6400 || 2/2 || 4.2 || 0.12 || 35 W || 2.00 GHz || cpuminer git (Linux) || --algo=sse2_64
|-
| Core 2 Duo T7250 || 2/2 || 4.5 || 0.13 || 35 W || 2.00 GHz || bitcoin-miner 0.13/WinXP || No GPU
|-
| Core 2 Extreme X9000 || 2/2 || 2.37 || || || 2.8 GHz || rpcminer-cpu || Win7-64
|-
| Core 2 Extreme X9000 || 2/2 || 6.2 || || || 2.8 GHz || ufasoft v0.11 || Win7-64
|-
| Core 2 Extreme X9000 || 2/2 || 7.2 || || || 3.2 GHz || ufasoft v0.11 || Win7-64 Overclocked from 2.8 GHz to 3.2 GHz
|-
| Xeon 2.8 || 2/2 || 0.8 || || || 2.8 GHz || cpuminer || cryptopp_asm32
|-
| Xeon 3060 || 1/2 || 2.03 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.4GHz || cpuminer 0.8.1 (Linux) || --algo=cryptopp_asm32
|-
| Xeon Prestonia 2.4 (dual) || 2x1/2 || 2.16 || 0.017 || 130W || 2.4 GHz || ufasoft v0.4 ||
|-
| Xeon X5355 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 10.13 || 0.16 || 120W || 2.66GHz || bitcoind || Roughly the same speed as the "c" algo in cpuminer
|-
| Xeon X5355 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 22.76 || 0.09 || 120W || 2.66GHz || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || -O2 -march=core2, algo=sse2_64
|-
| Xeon E5335 || 4/4 || 9.35 || 0.12 || 80W || 2.00 GHz || ufasoft v0.11 || Vista-32
|-
| Xeon E5440 || 4/8 || 7.3 || ? || 80W || 2.66 GHz|| Kiv's poclbm-gui || FIXME: Either wrong model # or wrong threads/speed info
|-
| Xeon E5520 || 4/8 || 6.5 || 0.08 || 80W || 2.27 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Xeon E5530 || 4/8 || 7.14 || 0.09 || 80W || 2.4 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Xeon E5630 (dual) || 2x4/8 || 8 || 0.1 || 80W || 2.53 GHz || 0.3.17/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]
|-
| Xeon E6520 (dual) || 2x4/8 || 24.7 || ? || ? || 2.53 GHz || ufasoft v0.10 || windows 2008 R2 64bit (-t 16)
|-
| Xeon E7520 (dual) || 2x4/16 || 18 || ? || 95W || 1.87 GHz || ufasoft v0.10 || windows 2008 R2 64bit (-t 16)
|-
| Atom N230 || 1/2 || 0.375 || || 4W || 1.6 GHz || rpcminer-cpu ||
|-
| Atom N230 || 1/2 || 0.245 || || 4W || 1.6 GHz || rpcminer-4way ||
|-
| Atom N230 || 1/2 || 0.97 || || 4W || 1.6 GHz || ufasoft v0.10 ||
|-
| Atom N270 || 1/2 || 1.19 || 0.24 || 5W || 1.6 GHz || ufasoft v0.10 ||
|}

===Other===
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment
|-
| Cell || 6 || 21 || 0.35 || 60W || 3.2 GHz || cellminer || Sony Playstation 3 (FAT): Needs custom firmware (no links to it, potential issues with Sony assholes.) [https://github.com/verement/cellminer source] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4704.20 source] Total power usage of PS3 fat is 120W but only the Cell cpu is active.
|-
| Cell || 6 || 21 || 0.7 || 35W || 3.2 GHz || cellminer || Sony Playstation 3 (SLIM): Total power usage of PS3 slim is 70W but only the Cell cpu is active.
|-
| MIPS || 1 || 0.026 || ? || ? || 200 MHz || cpuminer || ASUS WL-500G Deluxe router running [http://openwrt.org/ OpenWrt]
|-
| VIA Eden || 1 || 1.3 || 0.17 || 8W || 1600 MHz || cpuminer || VIA Eden w/ Padlock
|-
| PowerPC 7447A || 1 || 0.53 || || || 1420 MHz || cpuminer ||
|}

==See Also==

* [[Mining rig]]
* [[Generation Calculator]]
* [[Power Calc]]
* [[OpenCL miner]]
* [http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=745 ATI Stream vs. NVIDIA CUDA - GPGPU computing battle royale]
* [http://bitminer.info/ Bitminer.info]

[[Category:Mining]]

Mining hardware comparison

2011-06-12T14:43:04Z

Rallan: (except that was!)

Below are some statistics about the mining performance of various hardware used in a [[mining rig]].

The table shows (mostly) stock clock numbers. 10-20% performance improvement can be achieved via overclocking.

'''Note:''' Clock refers to the Shader clock only with nVidia cards (not Core or Memory). With AMD card the shader clock is not separate, but is part of the GPU clock.

W = Watt (maximum power consumption)

SP = Stream processors (Shader Units)

==Graphics cards==

===AMD (ATI)===
To get the maximum performance use the 2.1 release of the ATI Stream SDK. 2.2 wastes CPU time, and 2.3/2.4 drop mining performance by 5-10% unless using the Phoenix phatk kernel.

{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! W !! Clock !! SP !! SDK !! Slot !! Miner !! Notes
|-
| 3XXX || || || || || || || || || OpenCL Not Supported
|-
| 42XX || || || || || || || || || OpenCL Not Supported (intergrated/mobile GPU)
|-
| 4350 || 6.93 || 0.346 || 20 || 575 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors
|-
| 4550 || 7.23 || 0.289 || 25 || 600 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors
|-
| 4570M || 8.02 || 0.297 || 27 || 680 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Diablo/Windows7 || -w 64, SDK 2.4, Cat 11.4. Model: Sony Vaio NW
|-
| 4570M || 9.6 || 0.300 || 32 || 825 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Diablo/Windows7 || -w 64, SDK 2.4, Cat 11.4. Model: Sony Vaio NW. O/C core 680->825. U/C memory 800->500.
|-
| 4650 || 31.33 || 0.653 || 48 || 650 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors
|-
| 4670 || 36.14 || 0.613 || 59 || 750 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors
|-
| 4670 || 40.11 || 0.679 || 59 || 800 || 320 || || AGP x8 || poclbm/Ubuntu 10.10 w/ H == 0 mod || -w 32 -f 0, don't use vectors [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.msg85236#msg85236 source]
|-
| 4730 || 72.29 || 0.657 || 110 || 750 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||
|-
| 4770 || 72.29 || 0.904 || 80 || 750 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||
|-
| 4830 || 55.42 || 0.583 || 95 || 575 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||
|-
| 4830 || 66.12 || 0.503 || 105 || 700 || 1005 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||
|-
| 4850 || 75.30 || 0.685 || 110 || 625 || 800 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||
|-
| 4850 || 84.3 || 0.766 || 110 || 725 || 300 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || || -w64 fan at 70% temp 73C, stock voltage -gui miner
|-
| 4850 || 90.1 || 0.819 || 110 || 800 || 500 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer || -f 30; Tried phoenix and phatk, got same max
|-
| 4850 || 101 ||0.918 || 110 || 817 || 500 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer || -f 0, core 817mhz(default 625)@1.123v , mem downclock to 500mhz (default 993) [http://www.smpake.com/?p=6 source]
|-
| 4860 || 67.47 || 0.519 || 130 || 700 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||
|-
| 4870 || 92.84 || 0.6189333... (?) || 150 (?) || 830 || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 || -k poclbm AGGRESSION=5 (Windows 7 64-Bit, GPU OC 750->830MHz, VRAM UC 900->450MHz, BIOS modded)
|-
| 4870 || 104.6 || 0.872 || 120 || 830 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 256 -f 1, Windows 7 64-Bit, GPU Core OC to 830 MHz, GPU Memory UC to 190 MHz (saves 30 Watt at outlet)
|-
| 4870 || 90.36 || 0.602 || 150 || 750 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || clmine ||
|-
| 4870 || 78 || 0.520 || 150 || || || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/Vista 64bit || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source]
|-
| 4890 Sapphire fab. OC || 97.1 || 0.511 || 190 || 870 || 1050 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-01-21 Solo settings || No flags options helped. Close all browsers and do full restart of GUIMiner and then Bitcoin via GUIMiner server starter or the browsers GPU accl. will limit to 56~ ish Mhash/s - I can now start browser without slowdowns
|-
| 4890 || 102.41 || 0.539 || 190 || 850 || 800 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||
|-
| 4890 || 108.3 || || 190 || 975 || 800 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||
|-
| 4850X2 || 150.60 || 0.602 || 250 || 625 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||
|-
| 4870X2 || 180.72 || 0.632 || 286 || 750 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||
|-
| 4870X2 || 180.6 || 0.632 || 286 || 800 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||
|-
| 5450 || 11.99 || 0.631 || 19 || 650 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||
|-
| 5450 || 13.74 || - || - || 700 || - || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/Linuxcoin v0.2 ||-v -w128 tried several options, seems to work best.
|-
| 5450 || 14.12 || - || - || 700 || - || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix/Linuxcoin v0.2 ||Flags: "DEVICE=0 VECTORS AGGRESSION=4 -v FASTLOOP BFI_INT WORKSIZE=64" Kernel: "phatk"
|-
| 5550 || 40.59 || 1.041 || 39 || 550 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 59.96 || 1.538 || 39 || 650 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 64 || 1.641 || 39 || 650 || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 62 || 1.59 || 39 || 650 || 400 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 OpenCL/Linux x86_64 || -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS AGGRESSION=4 -v FASTLOOP BFI_INT WORKSIZE=64
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 73 || 1.872 || 39 || 700 || 400 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 OpenCL/Linux x86_64 || -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS AGGRESSION=4 -v FASTLOOP BFI_INT WORKSIZE=64
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 102 || || <75 || 950 || 400 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 OpenCL/Windows 7 x86 (no Aero) || -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS AGGRESSION=7 -v FASTLOOP BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 (Reference Sapphire card, 2 additional 120mm coolers, temperature is 79-82C)
|-
| 5650 || 48 || 1.37 || 35 ? || || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source] [http://www.notebookcheck.net/ATI-Mobility-Radeon-HD-5650.23697.0.html source] -- not TDP but load
|-
| 5670 || 71.49 || 1.117 || 64 || 775 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||
|-
|style="background:#EEFFEE;"| 5670 || 72 || 1.64 || 44 || 850 || || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm-mod (Win7-64) || Sapphire 100287VGAL card is low power
|-
| 5670 || 85 || || || 900 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128
|-
| 5750 || 116.24 || 1.352 || 86 || 700 || 720 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||
|-
| 5750 || 137 || || || 710 || || || PCI-E 1.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128 using stock memory and GPU clocks
|-
| 5750 || 146.4 || || || 775 || || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-21 || -v -w128, AMD Catalyst overclock (775MHz GPU / 1225 MHz Memory)
|-
| 5750 || 154.56 || 1.45 || 106 || 830 || 720 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||-v -w128 -f20 underclocked memory clocks from 1150MHz to 300MHz
|-
| 5750 || 170 || || || 870 || || || PCI-E 1.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128 patched BIOS to underclock memory to 300MHz
|-
| 5750 || 173 || || || 875 || || || PCI-E 1.1 x16 || phoenix || 875/300 w/MSI Afterburner, BFI_INT VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 FASTLOOP=FALSE -k phatk
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 156.83 || 1.452 || 108 || 850 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 180 || 1.406 || 128[*] || 950 || 800 || 2.4RC1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 30 (*Overclocked wattage calculated [http://bakkap.free.fr/Misc/wCalc.html here] )
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 205.58 || || || 935 || 300 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-04-28 || -v -w 256
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 210.7 || || 108+ || 950 || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / win7x86 || mem underclocked 309 mhz, -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 218.35 || || || 1000 || 1401 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || DiabloMiner || -w 128 -v 2 (Overclocked to 1Ghz core with 1.2 voltage and Scythe Setsugen 2 cooling system)
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 223 || || 100+ || 1050 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer || -v -w256 [http://www.smpake.com/?p=59 source]
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 233 || || 100+ || 1050 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 || VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 -k phatk WORKSIZE=256 [http://www.smpake.com/?p=59 source]
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 236.32 || || 100+ || 1050 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x1 || phoenix 1.48 || VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 -k phatk WORKSIZE=256 (OC'd and OV'd 1068/300 1.237v)
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 244 || 1.52 || 179 || 800 || 1000 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 OpenCL/Linux x86_64 || -k phatk DEVICE=1 VECTORS AGGRESSION=6 -v FASTLOOP WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 267 || || || 875 || 1000 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x1 || Phoenix 1.48 OpenCL/Linux x86_64 || -k phatk DEVICE=1 VECTORS AGGRESSION=6 -v FASTLOOP WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 245 || 1.28 || 192 || 880 || 900 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm (guiminer) || -v -w 256
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 248 || 1.29 || 192 || 880 || 500 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.46 || -k poclbm VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 256 || || || 900 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 || -k poclbm VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=7
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 272 || 1.52 || 179 || 875 || || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / LinuxCoin || 275Mhz Memory clock, 1.125 V (from 1.163), VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 275 || || 175 || 900 || 500 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm (guiminer) Win7x64 || -v -w64 -f10, XFX stock w/ v2.4 SDK = 230Mh/s, v2.1 SDK = +10Mh/s, overclocking core clock by 100 = +30Mh/s, underclocking memory to 500 (ran cooler), and changing workload to -w64 = +5Mh/s.
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 285 || || || 960 || || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.47 / poclbm / Win7 64 || VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 290 || || || 996 || || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.4 / poclbm / Win7 64 || VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 300 || || || 970 || 1120 || 2.1 || PCI-E x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 64 || 300Mhz memory clock BFI_INT AGGRESSION=12 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 305 || || || 984 || || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.4 / phatk / Win7 32 || 400Mhz Memory clock, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 307 || || || 996 || || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 64 || VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 308 || || || 990 || 375 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 32 ||@ stock voltage VECTORS AGGRESSION=11 -v FASTLOOP=false BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 310 || || || 1000 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Linux x86 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=12 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 316.35 || || || 1015 || 375 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 32 ||@ stock voltage VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 -v FASTLOOP=false BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 318 || || || 1030 || || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 64 || 385Mhz Memory, VECTORS AGGRESSION=9 BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 319 || || || 1030 || || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Xp 64 || 1.2v 355Mhz Memory, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 black || 310 || || || 990 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x8 || LinuxCoin 0.2b, phoenix/phatk || (XFX Brand) -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 AGGRESSION=11 FASTLOOPS=false
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 240.77 || 1.595 || 151 || 725 || 1440 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 250.26 || 1.657 || 151 || 725 || 1440 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || opencl client || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 252 || 1.575 || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-01-25 ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 255.3 || 1.593 || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-01-25 ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 264 || 1.748 || 151 || 725 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 1.0 x8 || guiminer-20110501 || -v -w128
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 280 || 1.75 || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.3 || with BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 292 || 1.825 || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-04-28 -v -f 1 ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 298 || 1.8620 || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-04-28 -v -f 1 -w 64 ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 300 || 1.5460 || 194 || 925 (OC) || 1440 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 314 || 1.8362 || 171 || 820 (OC) || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 1.0 x8 || poclbm || -v -w128
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 330 || || || 850 @ Stock voltage || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix || EAH5850, miner arguments: -k poclbm DEVICE=1 VECTORS AGGRESSION=8 WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 335 || 1.8611 || 180 || 890 (OC) || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || poclbm || -v -w128, Memory downclocked to 300Mhz
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 344 || 1.8594 || 185 || 890 (OC) || 1440 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 354 || || || 900 (OC) || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || diablo -v 2 -w 128 || Ubuntu 11.04 64-bit [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=9239.0 Headless], catalyst 11.5, memory downclocked to 300mhz, stock voltage. flashed with atiflash [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9AxNmOy6_0 video]
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 355 || || || 900 (OC) || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.48 || Ubuntu 11.04 64-bit, Memory downclocked to 200MHz, VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 365 || || || 920 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 64 || 300Mhz memory clock VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 382 || 1.8454 || 207 || 995 (OC) || 1440 || || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || phoenix || OC 1.177v on core
|-
| 5870M || 152.5 || || || 750 (OC) || 1000 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || gui-miner (win-7) ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 313.65 || 1.668 || 188 || 850 || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 313 || 1.665 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo/Linux ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 343 || 1.824 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo/Linux ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 355 || 1.888 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/Linux ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 340 || 1.809 || 188 || 850 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 360 || 1.6822 || 214 || 970 || 700 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL w7-64 || -f 0 -v -w 128 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=6144.msg91959#msg91959 source]
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 377 || 2.008 || 188 || 850 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha || -D -G2
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 397|| |||| 930|| 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=10 WORKSIZE=128
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 408 || 1.8888 || 216 || 980 || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm/Win7x64 || -f 20 -v -w 128, BIT_ALIGN, BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 400 || 1.9047 || 210 || 950 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || Phoenix 1.3 || -k poclbm VECTORS AGGRESSION=7 FASTLOOP BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 398 || 1.980 || 201 || 900 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha || -D -G2 (GPU OC to 900, memory downclocked to 900)
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 420 || 2.0000 || 210 || 950 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=14 WORKSIZE=256 -- Memory Clock 300Mhz
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 421 || 1.9581 || 215 || 975 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.47 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 -k phatk
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 440 || 2.0000 || 220 || 995 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 438 || 1.9819 || 221 || 1000 (OC) || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm/Linux || -v -w 64 -f 1
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 445 || || || 1040 || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm/Windows 7 64 || -v -w 128 -f 1 Crossfired, Water cooled, 890 Mhash/s total, Both cards peak at 450 Mhash/s. Best dual gpu setup me thinks?
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 435 || || || 990 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || LinuxCoin v0.2b phoenix/phatk || (Powercolor brand) -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 AGGRESSION=11 FASTLOOPS=false
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 530 || 1.803 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.4.595.10 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/201103.beta3/Windows || -v -w128 -f60
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 535.06 || 1.820 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 560 || 1.905 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo ||
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 565 || 1.922 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine2 ||
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 604 || 2.054 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 645 || 1.875|| 344 || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || -f1, Debian 6, fglrx-driver 10.9.3
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 740 || 2.1511 || 344 || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix/1.3 || AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT, memory clock @ 300MHz
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 755 || 2.2076 || 342 || 848 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 28-04-11 || -f 1 -w 256 -v, Ubuntu 10.10, fglrx 11.4, memory clock @ 300MHz
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 802 || 2.31 || 347 || 850 || 3200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix poclbm Ubuntu 11.04 || -q 6 -k AGGRESSION=19 WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT VECTORS, fglrx 11.4, mem clock @ 1000MHz
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870x2 (Ares) || 620 || || || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer || -v -w 128
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870x2 (Ares) || 826 || 0.751 || 1100 || 950 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.4 w/ Phtak || AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT Memory @ 300MHz
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870x2 (Ares) || 826 || 1.18 || 700 || 935 || 3200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 w/ Phatk || AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=256 VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false, memory @ 319 MHz, Windows 7 32-bit
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870x2 (Ares) || 878 || 0.585 || 1500 || 1000 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.7 w/ Phtak || AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT Memory @ 300MHz
|-
| 6310M || 9.821 || 0.545 || 18 || 500 || 80 || 2.4 || Integrated/APU || poclbm-gui -v -w128 || HP DM1z 18W TDP is shared with the CPU
|-
| 6470M || 24.1 || || || || || 2.1 || Integrated/APU || guiminer ||
|-
| 6470M || 31.0 || || || || || 2.1 || Integrated/APU || phoenix 1.48 ||
|-
| 6490M || 16.289 || 0.708 || 23 || || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm-mod (Mac OS X 10.6.7) || MacBook Pro early 2011
|-
| 6490M || 15.21 || || || || || || || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8994.0 DiabloMiner GUI] v2011-05-22 / Mac OS X 10.6.7|| Model: MacBookPro8,2 VRAM: 256MB
|-
|style="background:#FFDD00;"| 6570 || 68.0 || 1.133 || 60 || 650 || 480 || 2.4 || PCI-E x16 || guiminer 2011-05-21 with poclbm (Win7-32bit)|| no extra option for miner . Sapphire 6570 gddr5 512mb
|-
|style="background:#FFDD00;"| 6570 || 82.1 || 1.368 || 60 || 650 || 480 || 2.4 || PCI-E x16 || guiminer 2011-05-21 with poclbm (Win7-32bit)|| -v -w128 . Sapphire 6570 gddr5 512mb
|-
| 6750 || 167.59 || || || 870 || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer || -v -f30 -w128
|-
| 6770 || 180 || || || 850 || 1200 || || || guiminer || -v -w128 , this was an XFX (OEM) model, GPU @ 850 MHz, mem @ 1200 MHz; I pushed it up to 190 Mhash/s briefly by overclocking, but it crashed the system above that
|-
| 6770 || 202 || || || 960 || 800 || || PCI-E 2.1 x1,x4,x8,x16 || phoenix 1.48 || Sapphire 6770 (standard) -q2 -k poclbm DEVICE=0 AGGRESSION=10 VECTORS WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT FASTLOOP (The PCI-E speed does not affect the mining speed)
|-
| 6790 || 220 || || 150 || 800 || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 || -k phatk BFI_INT FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=12 VECTORS OC'd to 1ghz, underclocked mem to 300, voltage at 1175
|-
| 6850 || 171.59 || 1.351 || 127 || 775 || 960 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||
|-
| 6850 || 196 || || || 850 || 960 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 0
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 220 || 1.236 || 178[*] || 1000 || 960 || 2.4RC1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 30 (*Overclocked wattage calculated [http://bakkap.free.fr/Misc/wCalc.html here] )
|-
| 6850 || 234.8 || || || 940 || 960 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.3 || AGGRESSION=8 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT
|-
| 6850 || 244.2 || || || 960 || 960 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm june-2011 || -v -w 128
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 232.47 || 1.540 || 151 || 900 || 1120 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm -v -w 128 ||
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 277.47 || || || 940 || 1120 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.3 || AGGRESSION=8 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 271 || || 150 || 940 || 1100 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm -v -w 128 || Debian 6.0.1 x86_64
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 260.1 || 1.611 || 175 || 1001 || 1150 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm-gui windows7x86 cat 11.3 || -v -w 128 -f 1
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 276 || 1.828 (?) || 151 (?) || 900 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha cat 11.4 sdk 2.4 || -G2 -D stock clocks, debian linux 64bit
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 300.06 || 1.830 || 164 || 1020 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.4 cat 11.4 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=8 fastloop mem clock 344
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 306 || 1.748 (?) || 175 (?) || 1000 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha cat 11.4 sdk 2.4 || -G2 -D overclocked to 1000, debian linux 64bit
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 300 || 1.72 || 174 || 1038 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm windows7x86 cat 11.4 || -v -w128 -f1 mem clock 360, fan 100% temp 73C
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 310 || || || 1035 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 phatk 11.5 sdk 2.4 || BFI_INT VECTORS FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=128, mem clock @ 300MHz, voltage @ 1.300
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 316 || || || 1030 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer 2011-06-09 using phoenix (Win7-32bit) || -k phatk platform=0 device=0 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 worksize=128 FASTLOOP=false, mem clock @ 228MHz, voltage @ 1.25, Fan @ 40%, Temp @ 73C
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 322 || 1.882 || 170 || 1050 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.47 phatk 11.5 sdk 2.4 || BFI_INT VECTORS FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=256, mem clock @ 400MHz
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 329 || || || 1075 || 372 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 phatk 11.5 sdk 2.4 || BFI_INT VECTORS FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=256
|-
| 6950 || 272 || || || 900 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48/poclbm || max stable @ 1150 mV, AGGRESSION = 7, BFI_INT
|-
| 6950 || 291 || || || 920 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48/poclbm || max stable @ 1200mV, AGGRESSION = 7, BFI_INT
|-
| 6950 || 295 || || || 930 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48/poclbm || max stable @ 1275mV, AGGRESSION = 7, BFI_INT
|-
| 6950 || 300 || || || 940 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48/poclbm || max stable @ 1300mV, AGGRESSION = 7, BFI_INT
|-
| 6950 || 295 || || 160 (?) || 810 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250
|-
| 6950 || 314 || || (?) || 800 || 1408 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 05-01-11 || -v -f30 -w128 default mem 1250 Stock Sapphire 6950 1gb
|-
| 6950 || 325 || || 200 (?) || 885 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250
|-
| 6950 || 340 || || (?) || 800 || 1536 || (?) || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 05-21-11 ||-v -f30 -w128 default mem 1250,Sapphire 6950 1gb, unlocked shaders
|-
| 6950 || 349 || || ~200 || 800 || 1408 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 05-21-11 ||-v -f30 -w128, xfx 6950 xxx 1gb, locked shaders, core 900, mem 650, 79° C
|-
| 6950 || 360 || || 200 (?) || 970 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250
|-
| 6950 || 360 || || (?) || 870 || 1375 || (?) || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm ||flashed with 6970 BIOS, -v -f30 -w128
|-
| 6950x4 || 1316 || 1.513 || 870 || 840 || 1408 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || locked shaders, default mem 1250, dual fan 75C typical
|-
| 6950 || 417 || || +200? || 975 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || unlocked shaders, +20% overdrive, mem @ 1250, fan @ 77%, temp 64C, -v -w128, gpu core @ 1145mV
|-
| 6950 || 428 || || +200? || 1000 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || unlocked shaders, +20% overdrive, mem @ 1250, fan @ 80%, temp 64C, -v -w128, gpu core @ 1160mV
|-
| 6950 || 432 || || +200? || 1000 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || unlocked shaders, +20% overdrive, mem @ 520, fan @ 80%, temp 76C, -v -w128 -f 2, gpu core @ 1275mV
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 323 || 1.468 || 220 || 880 || 1536 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -w 64, SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 372 || || 220 (?) || 900 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix (svn trunk 05.14.2011) || clock 900/1375, VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128, fan 45% (auto) / temp 90C
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 385 || 1.964 || 196 || 900 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || -v -w128, memory downclocked to 684Mhz, fan @ 70%/temp 81C
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 380 || || || || || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w128<br>export GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS=1 # to reduce poclbm CPU from 100% to 2%
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 402 || || || || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || -v -w128, fan 75%/75C, voltage +10% (via CCC), clocks 940MHz/600MHz (via TriXX)
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 403 || || (?) || MAX || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || clock Max/50%+stock, -v -w128, fan= 100%/temp 72C (Note: Overclocked using CCC utility under Windows 7, Clock set to Max value w/ 50% increase to memory and 5% increase to voltage)
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 423 || || || 995 || || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48/poclbm || ATI Tray Tools, Clocks=995/331.25, WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 VECTORS ,68C @ 65% Fan, HAF932 Case
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970x2 || 710 || || || 900/880 || 1536 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -w 256
|-
| 6990 || 670 || 1.94 || 346 || 830 || 3072 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || Catalyst 11.4 [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=2949.msg106238#msg106238 source].
|-
| 6990 || 708 || 2.05 || 346 || 830 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || BIOS switch at "default" position 2, see [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]
|-
| 6990 || 746 || 1.82 || 410 || 880 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || BIOS switch at "overclocked" position 1, see [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]
|-
| 6990 || 758 || || || 880 || || 2.4 || || Phoenix with Poclbm || Catalyst 11.4, OC switch ON, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128 FASTLOOP=false
|-
| 6990 || 771 || 1.8804 || 410 || 880 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx. Memory clock @ 1280Mhz.
|-
| 6990 || 772 || 1.8380 || 420 || 900 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix & Poclbm || OC switch ON + overclocked to 900 mhz, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128
|-
| 6990 || 790 || || || 900 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || BIOS switch at "overclocked" position 1; with "aticonfig --odsc=900,1260" to further overclock the GPU to 900 MHz and mem to 1260 MHz, see [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]
|-
| 6990 || 802 || || || 915 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || BIOS switch at "overclocked" position 1; with "aticonfig --odsc=915,1260" to further overclock the GPU to 915 MHz and mem to 1260 MHz, see [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]
|-
| 6990 || 835 || || || 890/860 || 3072 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix || BIOS switch at "overclocked" position 1; with "aticonfig --adapter=1 --odsc=990,890 and aticonfig --adapter=0 --odsc=960,860" (GPU 0 runs hot). Currently, aticonfig can only underclock RAM to 100mhz below core speed. Command line: phoenix.py -k poclbm VECTORS AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT
|-
| 6990x2 || 1436 || 1.848 || 777 || 880 || 6144 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 x2 || guiminer 2011.05.11 || AUSUM switch set to 1 on both cards; Core left at 880MHz, memory left at 1250MHz; VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128
|-
| 6990x3 || 2094 || || || 900 || || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 x8 x4 || poclbm || GPU 900MHz, Memory 1250MHz; poclbm.py -f 0 -w 256
|-
|FirePro V4800 || 79.7 || || || 775 || 400 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-01 ||
|-
|FirePro V8700 || 84.8 || || || 750 || 800 || || || poclbm-mod.03.24.2011 ||
|-
|FirePro M5800 || 61.4 || || || 650 || || || || poclbm-mod.03.24.2011 || Ubuntu
|-
|FirePro V5800 || 119 || || || || 800 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-01 || Windows 7 32bit
|-
|FirePro V5800 || 144 || || || || 800 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-01 || -v -w128 (Windows 7 32bit)
|-
|FirePro V7750 || 35.7 || || || || || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-21 || Windows 7 64bit
|-
|FirePro M7820 || 150.0 || || || 700 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-06-09 || Memory downclocked to 500 from 1000MHz, 169MH/s@800MHz, 181MH/s@860Mhz (max.), only SDK2.1 works, Windows 7 x86
|-
|}

===Nvidia===

{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! W !! Clock !! SP !! Comment
|-
| ION || 1.8 || || 27 || || 16 || poclbm; power consumption incl. CPU
|-
| 8200 mGPU || 1.2 || || || 1200 || 16 || 128 MB shared memory, "poclbm -w 128 -f 0"
|-
| 8400 GS || 2.3 || || || || || "poclbm -w 128"
|-
| 8400 GS || 1.6 || || 128 || 1238 || || DiabloMiner -w 128 -f 1 [https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/User:Knightmb source]
|-
| 8400M GS || 2.0 || || || || ||
|-
| 8600M GT || 4.93 || || || || 32 ||
|-
| 8600GT || 5.66 || || || 1188 || 32 ||
|-
| 8600GT OC || 7.3 || || || 1602 || 32 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.0 poclbm] -w 128 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg72833#msg72833 source]
|-
| 8800GT || 25 || 0.24 || 105 || 1300 || ||
|-
| 8800GT || 24.5 || 0.23 || 105 || 1300 || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]
|-
| 8800GT || 31.1 || || 105 || 1855 || || Overclocked 715 GPU / 1030 Memory / 1855 Shader; GuiMiner v2011-05-21
|-
| 8800GT || 31.8 || || 105 || 1836 || 112 || 713 gpu, 1026 memory. win7x86, phoenix 1.48, -k poclbm WORKSIZE=64 AGGRESSION=5
|-
| 8800GTS || 16.8 || 0.109 || 154 || || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source] [http://www.techspot.com/review/79-geforce-8800-gts-512/page11.html source]
|-
| 8800 GTS || 18.7 || 0.124 || 150 || 1200 || || poclbm -w 64 no vectors
|-
| 8800 GTX || 27.5 || || || 1404 || || phoenix 1.48, poclbm, no vectors, 83C with 50C ambient
|-
| 8800m GTX || 16.3 || || || || || rpcminer-cuda Win7-64
|-
| 9300GE || 1.57 || || || 1300 || 8 ||
|-
| 9300GS || 1.69 || || || 1400 || 8 ||
|-
| 9300/nForce 730i || 2.15 || || || 1200 || 16 ||
|-
| 9400GT || 3.37 || 0.067 || 50 || 1400 || 16 ||
|-
| 9400M (MacBook) || 1.90 || 0.32 || 6 || 700 || || poclbm -f 8 no vectors
|-
| 9500GT || 6.75 || 0.135 || 50 || 1400 || 32 ||
|-
| 9600GSO || 19.88 || 0.237 || 84 || 1375 || 96 ||
|-
| 9600GSO512 || 11.75 || 0.131 || 90 || 1625 || 48 ||
|-
| 9600GT || 15.66 || 0.165 || 95 || 1625 || 64 ||
|-
| 9600GT Zotac || 15 || || || 1650 || 64 ||
|-
| 9600GT OC || 18.8 || <0.198 || >95 || 1981 || 64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.0 poclbm] -w 128 -f 10 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg74610#msg74610 source] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg73353#msg73353 source]
|-
| 9800GT || 30.36 || 0.289 || 105 || 1800 || 112 ||
|-
| 9800GT EE || 19.7 || || 75 || 1375 || 112 || rpcminer-cuda
|-
| 9800GT OC || 29.5 || 0.283 || 105 || 1836 || 112 || poclbm.py, no options. Memory underclocked to 850Mhz, GPU overclocked to 733Mhz
|-
| 9800GTX || 32.54 || 0.232 || 140 || 1688 || 128 ||
|-
| 9800GTX+ || 35.39 || 0.251 || 141 || 1836 || 128 ||
|-
| 9800GTX+ || 37.23 || 0.266 || 140 || 1890 || 128 || win7x64 275.27 phoenix(1.48) -k poclbm AGGRESSION=3 WORKSIZE=64
|-
| 9800GTX+ || 40.20 || || 140 || 835 || 128 || lowered memory clock higher core, unstable if going higher
|-
|style="background-color:#FFEFEF"| 9800GX2 || 57.83 || 0.294 || 197 || || 2x128 ||
|-
|style="background-color:#FFEFEF"| 9800GX2 || 28 || 0.142 || 197 || || 2x128 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]
|-
| G210 || 3.38 || 0.111 || 30.5 || 1402 || 16 ||
|-
| G210 || 3.79 || 0.124 || 30.5 || 1402 || 16 || poclbm -f 1
|-
| GT220 || 10.8 || || 128 || 1360 || || DiabloMiner -w 128 -f 1000 [https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/User:Knightmb source]
|-
| GT240 || 19.37 || 0.281 || 69 || 1340 || 96 ||
|-
| GT240 || 21.24 || || || || 96 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4291.0 poclbm-mod] -f 0 -v [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg73383#msg73383 source]
|-
| GTS250 || 35.39 || 0.244 || 145 || 1836 || 128 ||
|-
| GTS250 || 35.2 || 0.243 || 145 || 1836 || 128 ||
|-
| GTS250 OC || 37 || 0.255 || 145 || 2047 || 128 ||
|-
| GTX260M || 22.5 || || || 500 || 112 || poclbm 4/28/2011 Asus G71GX runs ~90c without cooling pad
|-
| GTX260 || 35.91 || 0.178 || 202 || 1242 || 192 ||
|-
| GTX260 || 44 || 0.242 || 182 || 1242 || 216 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|-
| GTX260c216 || 40.40 || 0.236 || 171 || 1242 || 216 ||
|-
| GTX260c216 || 47.4 || || 182 || 1348 || 216 || poclbm -w 256
|-
| GTX260c216 || 50.00 || || || 1050 || 216 || m0mchil GPU client, Windows 7 64-bit, x6 @ 3.5ghz
|-
| GTX260c216 OC || 52.0 || || || 1461 || 216 || "poclbm -w 256 -f 1"
|-
| GTX260c216 OC || 58.9 || || || 756/400 || 216 || Core overclocked, Memory underclocked, Ubuntu 11.04 Classic Session(No Effects) "poclbm -w 256 -f 1"
|-
| GTX275 || 50.75 || 0.232 || 219 || 1404 || 240 ||
|-
| GTX275 || 58 || || || 729/1458 || 240 || poclbm -f 0 -w 256
|-
| GTX280 || 46.84 || 0.198 || 236 || 1296 || 240 ||
|-
| GTX280 || 64.34 || 0.289 || 245 || 1296 || 240 || phoenix.exe -k poclbm AGGRESSION=6 WORKSIZE=128 (61*C with Accelero XTREME GTX280)
|-
| GTX285 || 64.8 || || || 1607 || 240 || GuiMiner - Not sure about wattage yet. Still testing. Card runs around 74 C
|-
|-
| GTX285 || 53.35 || 0.262 || 204 || 1476 || 240 ||
|-
| GTX295 || 89.78 || 0.311 || 289 || 1242 || 480 ||
|-
| GTX295 || 113.60 || || 289 || 1242 || 480 || GUIMiner no oc.
|-
| GTX295 || 117.30 || || 289 || 1476 || 490 ||
|-
| GT 320M (MacBook Air) || 6.12 || || || 1212 || 48 ||
|-
| 320M (Mac mini 2010) || 7.0 || 0.35 || 20 || 450 || 32 || poclbm no extra options, windows 7 x64
|-
| GT 330M || 7.97 || || || || || Model: MacBookPro6,2 VRAM: 512MB Software: [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8994.0 DiabloMiner GUI] v2011-05-22 / Mac OS X 10.6.7
|-
| GT 330M (Sony Vaio Z) || 7.8 || 0.71 ( 0.3 total) || 11 (26w total) || 1045 || 48 ||
|-
| GTS 350M (Toshiba A665-3DV) || 17.0 || || 14 || 1080 || || DiabloMiner-Windows.exe
|-
| GTS 360M || 25.0 || || || || || [toshiba qosmio laptop, ~150-165*F stock fans]
|-
| GTS 360M (ASUS G60jx) || 20.0 || || || || || everythins is stock, it cannot sustain. it reaches 90 degrees and freezes.
|-
| GT430 || 20.24 || 0.413 || 49 || 1400 || 96 ||
|-
| GTS450 || 45.28 || 0.427 || 106 || 1566 || 192 ||
|-
| GTX460SE || 56.39 || 0.376 || 150 || 1300 || 288 ||
|-
| GTX460 || 66.32 || || || 814 || 336 || rpcminer-cuda 20110605, Graphics Clock @ 814MHz, Memory @ 1555MHz
|-
| GTX460 || 68.31 || 0.427 || 160 || 1350 || 336 ||
|-
| GTX460 768MB || 57.8 || || ? || 1350 || 336 || rpcminer-cuda -gputhreads=320 -gpugrid=336
|-
| GTX460 (2 cards) || 102 || 0.319? || 320? || 1350 || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]
|-
| GTX460 (2 cards) OC || 127 || 0.374 || 340 || 1620 || 2x 336 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2444.0 rpcminer-cuda] -gpugrid=128 -gputhreads=128 ver.20110227
|-
| GTX465 || 64.41 || 0.322 || 200 || 1215 || 352 ||
|-
| GTX470 || 81.98 || 0.381 || 215 || 1215 || 448 ||
|-
| GTX470 || 94.7 || || || 1414 || ||
|-
| GTX470 || 111.9 || || 215 || 1650 || 448 ||
|-
| GTX470 || 115 || || || 1616 || || phoenix 1.46 poclbm VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=6
|-
| GTX480 || 101.28 || 0.405 || 250 || 1401 || 480 ||
|-
| GTX560 Ti || 67.7 || 0.39 || 170 || 1700 || 384 || standard EVGA 560, no overclock
|-
| GTX560 Ti || 74.8 || 0.41 || 180 || 1700 || 384 || gigabyte 900Mhz clock; -w 512 -v
|-
| GTX560 OC || 86.7 || <0.51 || >170 || 1800 || 384 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2444.0 rpcminer-cuda] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg72816#msg72816 source]
|-
| GTX570 || 105.83 || 0.483 || 219 || 1464 || 480 ||
|-
| GTX570 || 125 || --- || 219 || 750 || 480 || rpcminer-cuda.exe -aggression=11 -gpugrid=480 -gputhreads=512
|-
| GTX580 || 140.05 || --- || 244 || 1544 || 512 ||
|-
| GTX590 || 193.1 || --- || --- || 1215 || 2x 512 || poclbm -v -w 256, Win
|-
| Quadro FX 580 || 5.7 || 0.14 || 40 || 1125 || 4 ||rpcminer-cuda, Win, -gpugrid=128 -gputhreads=512
|-
| Quadro FX 770M || 5.75 || || || 500 || 32 || DiabloMiner-Windows.exe BFI_INT FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=6, Win
|-
|Quadro FX 770M || 6.39 || || || 500 || 32 || DiabloMiner-Windows.exe BFI_INT FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=6 w 64, Win 7x64
|-
|Quadro FX 880M || 9.6 || || || || || poclbm/guiminer
|-
| Quadro FX 1600M || 6 || 0.12 || 50 || 625 || 32 ||rpcminer-cuda, Win
|-
| Quadro FX 2000M || 23 || || 58 || || || phoenix 1.48, -k poclbm, VECTORS, AGGRESION=6, Lenovo W520 platform
|-
| Quadro FX 3600M || 36 || -- || 70 || 500 || 96 ||DiabloMiner, win
|-
| Quadro NVS 135M || 1.05 || 0.1 || 10 || 800 || 1 ||
|-
| Quadro NVS 295 || 1.7 || 0.07 || 23 || 567 || 8 || phoenix
|-
| Quadro NVS 3100M || 3.6 || 0.257 || 14 || 600 || 16 || rpcminer-cuda, Win, CUDA 3.1.1
|-
| Quadro 5000 || 62 || --- || 152 || 513 || ? || rpcminer-cuda.exe -aggression=10 gpugrid=256 gputhreads=512; if anyone can provide info about the number of shader processors of this card, this would be the value of choice for gpugrid
|-
| Tesla C1060 || 52.5 || || || 1296 || 240 || poclbm, Win7x64
|-
| Tesla M2050 || 79.8 || || || 1550 || 448 || DiabloMiner
|-
| Tesla M2050 || [http://glennfrancismurray.com/cost-defective-mining-with-gpu-clusters-amazo 100] || 0 || 0 || - || 512 || Amazon AWS [http://glennfrancismurray.com/cost-defective-mining-with-gpu-clusters-amazo CUDA RPC Miner & CUDA 2.0]
|-
| Tesla S1070 || 155.2 || || || || || rpcminer-cuda, Linux, CUDA 3.2, 4 instances (-gpu=0 through -gpu=3)
|-
| GTX280x2 || 102.7 || || || || ||
|-
|}

==CPUs/APUs==

A lot of nice data can be pulled from [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.0 this thread] to seed this section.

Might you wish to throttle CPU load a bit, so it doesn't reach 100°C, it can be done with Battle Encoder Shirase to a margin, like, -15% of available CPU cycles.

Often, the best combination to be is to throttle CPU miner to -5% '''AND''' set it to least of priority levels, so as not to choke GPU miner up.

===AMD===
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! nprocs !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! TDP [W] !! CPU Clock !! Mhash/s CPU !! Mhash/s GPU !! GPU !! GPU Clock !! SP !! Software !! Notes
|-
| 4x Opteron 6174 || 48 || 115 || 0.36 || 320W || 2.2 GHz || 2.4
|colspan=4|
| cpuminer v0.8.1 || --alg 4way --threads 48
|-
| 2x Opteron 6128 || 16 || 32.4 || 0.141 || 230W || 2 GHz || 32.4
|colspan=4|
| 0.3.19 || -4way
|-
| Athlon XP 2000+ || 2 || 0.62 || 0.009 || 70W || 1.67 GHz || 0.62
|colspan=4|
| 0.3.18/Ubuntu || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source] [http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm?articleid=914&page=4 source]
|-
| Athlon 64 3500+ || 1 || 1.18 || 0.013 || 89W || 2.54 GHz || 1.18
|colspan=4|
| ufasoft v0.4 || overclocked (originally 2.2 GHz)
|-
| Athlon 64 X2 3800+ || 2 || 1.73 || 0.03 || 65 W || 2.00 GHz || 1.73
|colspan=4|
| cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || -algo=4way
|-
| Athlon 64 X2 4000+ || 2 || 1.9 || 0.02 || 65W || 2.1 GHz || 1.9
|colspan=4|
| rpc-miner ||
|-
| Athlon 64 X2 4400+ || || 2.09 || 0.032 || 65W || 2.3GHz || 2.09
|colspan=4|
| 0.3.19/Win x64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]
|-
| Athlon 64 X2 6000+ || 2 || 2.81 || 0.02 || 125W || 3 GHz || 2.81
|colspan=4|
| || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg22881#msg22881 source]
|-
| Athlon 64 X2 6400+ Black Edition || 2 || 2.9 || 0.023 || 125W || 3.2 GHz || 2.9
|colspan=4|
| 0.3.20.2 BETA/Win 7 x64 || -4way
|-
| Athlon II X2 240e || 2 || 2.71 || 0.06 || 45W || 2.81 GHz || 2.71
|colspan=4|
| bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Athlon II X2 250 || 2 || 5.6 || 0.09 || 65W || 3.01GHz || 5.6
|colspan=4|
| bitcoin-miner 0.11 ||
|-
| Athlon II X4 630 || 4 || 10.7 || 0.11 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 10.7
|colspan=4|
| bitcoin-miner 0.4 ||
|-
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 3.8 || 0.04 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 3.8
|colspan=4|
| 0.3.1x/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|-
| Phenom X4 9950 BE || 4 || 9.3 || 0.07 || 126W || 2.6 GHz || 2.32
|colspan=4|
| bitcoin-miner 0.13/WinXP || No GPU
|-
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 7.2 || 0.08 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 7.2
|colspan=4|
| cpu-miner 0.2.1/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|-
| Phenom II X4 810 || 4 || 5.0 || || 95W || 2.8 GHz ||
|colspan=4|
| rpcminer-cpu ||
|-
| Phenom II X4 810 || 4 || 9.5 || || 95W || 2.8 GHz ||
|colspan=4|
| rpcminer-4way ||
|-
| Phenom II X4 810 || 4 || 10.5 || || 95W || 2.8 GHz ||
|colspan=4|
| ufasoft v0.10 ||
|-
| Phenom II X4 955 || 4 || 11 || 0.09 || 125W || 3.2 GHz || 11
|colspan=4|
| rpcminer-4way ||
|-
| Phenom II X4 965 || 4 || 12 || 0.09 || 140W || 3.4 GHz || 11
|colspan=4|
| rpcminer-4way ||
|-
| Phenom II X6 1055T || 6 || 15.84 || 0.13 || 125W || 2.82 GHz || 15.84
|colspan=4|
| bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Phenom II X6 1090T || 6 || 18|| || 141W|| 3.50 GHz || 3
|colspan=4|
| minerd ||
|-
| Phenom II X6 1100T || 6 || 22 || 0.176 || 125W || 3.82 GHz || 22
|colspan=4|
| bitcoin-miner || Aciid#bitcoin-dev
|-
| Zacate E-350 || 2 || 11 || 0.615 || 18W || 1.6 Ghz || 1.231 || 9.831 || HD6310M || 492 Mhz || 80 || poclbm -v -w128 + Ufasoft 0.7 || stock speeds
|-
| Zacate E-350 || 2 || 12
|colspan=2|
| 1.648 Ghz || 1.252 || 10.87 || HD6310M || 492 Mhz || 80 || poclbm -v -w 256 -f 1 || "autotune" speed with ASUS EFI BIOS
|}

===ARM===
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment
|-
| ARM1136EJ-S || 1 || 0.11 || ? || ? || 0.528 GHz || cpuminer git || T-Mobile Pulse, inside Debian chroot, 'c' algo
|-
| Cortex-A8 || 1 || 0.125 || 0.36 || 0.35 W || 0.6 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || Nokia N900: 'cryptopp'
|-
| Cortex-A8 || 1 || 0.2 || 0.57 || 0.35 W || 0.6 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || Nokia N900: 'c' algo
|-
| 2x Cortex-A9 || 2 || 0.57 || 1.14 || 0.5 W || 1.0 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-24) || Toshiba AC100, ubuntu, 'c' algo
|}

===Intel===
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment
|-
| Pentium III mobile ? || 1 || 0.3 || 0.014 || 21W || 1.07 GHz || 0.3.1x/Win2K || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source] [http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=27380 source]
|-
| Pentium M 1.6ghz || 1 || .4 || || || 1.6 GHZ || minerd (jgarzik's 1.0) || cryppto, Windows 7
|-
| Pentium M 1.73ghz || 1 || .5 || || || 1.73 GHZ || minerd (jgarzik's 1.0) || cryppto, Windows 7
|-
| Old Xeon 512k (Dual) || 2x1/2 || 2.0 || ? || ? || 3.06GHz || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || HT disabled, algo=4way (twice as fast as the 2nd best algo)
|-
| Pentium 4 2.0A || 1 || 0.85 || || || 2.0 GHz || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft-0.4]/WinXP || -g no -t 2
|-
| Pentium Dual-Core E2180 || 2/2 || 1.75 || || || 2.0 GHz || rpcminer-cpu || Win7-64
|-
| Pentium Dual-Core E2180 || 2/2 || 4.1 || || || 2.0 GHz || cpuminer || sse2_64
|-
| Pentium Dual-Core E2180 || 2/2 || 4.5 || || || 2.0 GHz || ufasoft v0.11 || Win7-64
|-
| Pentium Dual-Core E5400 || 2/2 || 2.27 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.7 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Celeron E330 || 2/2 || 2.2 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.5 GHz || 0.3.19/Ubuntu10.04 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]
|-
| Core 2 Quad Q6600 || 4/4 || 11.0 || || 105W || 2.40 GHz || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || -a 60 -g no -t 4
|-
| Core 2 Quad Q9400 || 4/4 || 11 || 0.046 || 95W || 2.66 GHz || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || -a 60 -g no -t 4
|-
| Core 2 Quad Q9650 || 4/4 || 18.67 || || 95W || 4.00 GHz || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || -a 60 -g no -t 4
|-
| Core i3 530 || 2/4 || 8.31 || 0.10 || 80W || 3.66 GHz || Ufasoft 0.7 || -v -a5 -g no -t 4
|-
| Core i3 M350 || 2/4 || 1.48 || 0.04 || 35W || 2.27 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Core i5 M450 || 2/4 || 1.8 || 0.05 || 35W || 1.2 GHz || 0.3.17/Win7-54 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source]
|-
| Core i5-650 || 2/4 || 5.1 || 0.04 ? || || 3.2 GHz || cpuminer-0.7 || -4way
|-
| Core i5-750 || 4/4 || 14 || || || 3.2 GHz || bitcoin-miner 0.11 || -a 5 -g no -t 4
|-
| Core i5 ? || 4/? || 6.5 || || || || client from svn || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37621#msg37621 source]
|-
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 4.5 || 0.05 || 95W || 3.1 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-01-22) || cryptopp_asm32
|-
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 14 || 0.15 || 95W || 3.1 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || sse2_64
|-
| Core i7 620M || 2/4 || 1.888 || || || 2.66 GHz || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8994.0 RPCMiner GUI] v2011-05-22 / Mac OS X 10.6.7 || Model: MacBookPro6,2 RAM: 4GB
|-
| Core i7 920 || 4/8 || 19.2 || 0.10 || 195 || 4.0 GHz (x21) || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] || -a 5
|-
| Core i7 950 || 4/8 || 5.88 || 0.039 || 150W || 3.83 GHz (x23) || bitcoin-0.3.20.2 Win7-64 ||
|-
| Core i7 950 || 4/8 || 18.9 || 0.126 || 150W || 3.83 GHz (x23) || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] v0.4 ||
|-
| Core i7 980x || 6/12 || 19.2 || 0.15 || 130 || 4.4 GHz (x33) || cpuminer/Win7-64 ||
|-
| Core i7 980x || 6/12 || 8.7 || || || 3.9 GHz (x27) || 0.3.17/Win7-64 ||
|-
| Core i7 2635QM || 4/8 || 2.93 || || || 2.00 GHz || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8994.0 RPCMiner GUI] v2011-05-22 / Mac OS X 10.6.7 || Model: MacBookPro8,2 RAM: 4GB
|-
| Core i7 620M || 2/4 || 6.3 || 0.18 || 35 || 2.66 GHz || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] v0.4 ||
|-
| Core i7 2600k || 4/4 || 6.7 || || || 4.00 GHz || phoenix 0.48 ||
|-
| Core 2 Duo U7600 || 1 || 1.1 || || || 1.2 GHZ || minerd (jgarzik's 1.0) || cryppto, Windows 7
|-
| Core 2 Duo E5200 || 2/2 || 6.2 || 0.086 || 72W || 2.76 Ghz || Ufasoft/Win7-64 || TDP is 65W + 7W overclock
|-
| Core 2 Duo E6550 || 1/2 || 2.45 || ? || ? || 2.33 GHz || cpuminer 0.7.1 (Linux) || --algo=sse2_64
|-
| Core 2 Duo E6850 || 2/2 || 6.75 || 0.10 || 65W || 3.0 Ghz || ufasoft-0.3 ||
|-
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 7.76 || 0.11 || 70W || 3.33 GHz (o/c?) || ufasoft-0.3 || miner optimized for Intel Core
|-
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 2.52 || 0.04 || 65W || 2.66 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Core 2 Duo E8200 || 2/2 || 2.3 || 0.035 || 65W|| 2.66GHz || rpcminer-cpu || ||
|-
| Core 2 Duo E8400 || 2/2 || 6.9 || 0.106 || 65W || 3.0 GHz || ufasoft v0.10|| windows 7/64bit (-t 2)
|-
| Core 2 Duo T6400 || 2/2 || 4.2 || 0.12 || 35 W || 2.00 GHz || cpuminer git (Linux) || --algo=sse2_64
|-
| Core 2 Duo T7250 || 2/2 || 4.5 || 0.13 || 35 W || 2.00 GHz || bitcoin-miner 0.13/WinXP || No GPU
|-
| Core 2 Extreme X9000 || 2/2 || 2.37 || || || 2.8 GHz || rpcminer-cpu || Win7-64
|-
| Core 2 Extreme X9000 || 2/2 || 6.2 || || || 2.8 GHz || ufasoft v0.11 || Win7-64
|-
| Core 2 Extreme X9000 || 2/2 || 7.2 || || || 3.2 GHz || ufasoft v0.11 || Win7-64 Overclocked from 2.8 GHz to 3.2 GHz
|-
| Xeon 2.8 || 2/2 || 0.8 || || || 2.8 GHz || cpuminer || cryptopp_asm32
|-
| Xeon 3060 || 1/2 || 2.03 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.4GHz || cpuminer 0.8.1 (Linux) || --algo=cryptopp_asm32
|-
| Xeon Prestonia 2.4 (dual) || 2x1/2 || 2.16 || 0.017 || 130W || 2.4 GHz || ufasoft v0.4 ||
|-
| Xeon X5355 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 10.13 || 0.16 || 120W || 2.66GHz || bitcoind || Roughly the same speed as the "c" algo in cpuminer
|-
| Xeon X5355 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 22.76 || 0.09 || 120W || 2.66GHz || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || -O2 -march=core2, algo=sse2_64
|-
| Xeon E5335 || 4/4 || 9.35 || 0.12 || 80W || 2.00 GHz || ufasoft v0.11 || Vista-32
|-
| Xeon E5440 || 4/8 || 7.3 || ? || 80W || 2.66 GHz|| Kiv's poclbm-gui || FIXME: Either wrong model # or wrong threads/speed info
|-
| Xeon E5520 || 4/8 || 6.5 || 0.08 || 80W || 2.27 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Xeon E5530 || 4/8 || 7.14 || 0.09 || 80W || 2.4 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Xeon E5630 (dual) || 2x4/8 || 8 || 0.1 || 80W || 2.53 GHz || 0.3.17/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]
|-
| Xeon E6520 (dual) || 2x4/8 || 24.7 || ? || ? || 2.53 GHz || ufasoft v0.10 || windows 2008 R2 64bit (-t 16)
|-
| Xeon E7520 (dual) || 2x4/16 || 18 || ? || 95W || 1.87 GHz || ufasoft v0.10 || windows 2008 R2 64bit (-t 16)
|-
| Atom N230 || 1/2 || 0.375 || || 4W || 1.6 GHz || rpcminer-cpu ||
|-
| Atom N230 || 1/2 || 0.245 || || 4W || 1.6 GHz || rpcminer-4way ||
|-
| Atom N230 || 1/2 || 0.97 || || 4W || 1.6 GHz || ufasoft v0.10 ||
|-
| Atom N270 || 1/2 || 1.19 || 0.24 || 5W || 1.6 GHz || ufasoft v0.10 ||
|}

===Other===
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment
|-
| Cell || 6 || 21 || 0.35 || 60W || 3.2 GHz || cellminer || Sony Playstation 3 (FAT): Needs custom firmware (no links to it, potential issues with Sony assholes.) [https://github.com/verement/cellminer source] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4704.20 source] Total power usage of PS3 fat is 120W but only the Cell cpu is active.
|-
| Cell || 6 || 21 || 0.7 || 35W || 3.2 GHz || cellminer || Sony Playstation 3 (SLIM): Total power usage of PS3 slim is 70W but only the Cell cpu is active.
|-
| MIPS || 1 || 0.026 || ? || ? || 200 MHz || cpuminer || ASUS WL-500G Deluxe router running [http://openwrt.org/ OpenWrt]
|-
| VIA Eden || 1 || 1.3 || 0.17 || 8W || 1600 MHz || cpuminer || VIA Eden w/ Padlock
|-
| PowerPC 7447A || 1 || 0.53 || || || 1420 MHz || cpuminer ||
|}

==See Also==

* [[Mining rig]]
* [[Generation Calculator]]
* [[Power Calc]]
* [[OpenCL miner]]
* [http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=745 ATI Stream vs. NVIDIA CUDA - GPGPU computing battle royale]
* [http://bitminer.info/ Bitminer.info] ('''WARNING''': Runs Java miner... May cause reduced computer performance)

[[Category:Mining]]

Mining hardware comparison

2011-06-12T14:42:02Z

Rallan: x1 =/= typo.

Below are some statistics about the mining performance of various hardware used in a [[mining rig]].

The table shows (mostly) stock clock numbers. 10-20% performance improvement can be achieved via overclocking.

'''Note:''' Clock refers to the Shader clock only with nVidia cards (not Core or Memory). With AMD card the shader clock is not separate, but is part of the GPU clock.

W = Watt (maximum power consumption)

SP = Stream processors (Shader Units)

==Graphics cards==

===AMD (ATI)===
To get the maximum performance use the 2.1 release of the ATI Stream SDK. 2.2 wastes CPU time, and 2.3/2.4 drop mining performance by 5-10% unless using the Phoenix phatk kernel.

{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! W !! Clock !! SP !! SDK !! Slot !! Miner !! Notes
|-
| 3XXX || || || || || || || || || OpenCL Not Supported
|-
| 42XX || || || || || || || || || OpenCL Not Supported (intergrated/mobile GPU)
|-
| 4350 || 6.93 || 0.346 || 20 || 575 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors
|-
| 4550 || 7.23 || 0.289 || 25 || 600 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors
|-
| 4570M || 8.02 || 0.297 || 27 || 680 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Diablo/Windows7 || -w 64, SDK 2.4, Cat 11.4. Model: Sony Vaio NW
|-
| 4570M || 9.6 || 0.300 || 32 || 825 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Diablo/Windows7 || -w 64, SDK 2.4, Cat 11.4. Model: Sony Vaio NW. O/C core 680->825. U/C memory 800->500.
|-
| 4650 || 31.33 || 0.653 || 48 || 650 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors
|-
| 4670 || 36.14 || 0.613 || 59 || 750 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors
|-
| 4670 || 40.11 || 0.679 || 59 || 800 || 320 || || AGP x8 || poclbm/Ubuntu 10.10 w/ H == 0 mod || -w 32 -f 0, don't use vectors [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.msg85236#msg85236 source]
|-
| 4730 || 72.29 || 0.657 || 110 || 750 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||
|-
| 4770 || 72.29 || 0.904 || 80 || 750 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||
|-
| 4830 || 55.42 || 0.583 || 95 || 575 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||
|-
| 4830 || 66.12 || 0.503 || 105 || 700 || 1005 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||
|-
| 4850 || 75.30 || 0.685 || 110 || 625 || 800 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||
|-
| 4850 || 84.3 || 0.766 || 110 || 725 || 300 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || || -w64 fan at 70% temp 73C, stock voltage -gui miner
|-
| 4850 || 90.1 || 0.819 || 110 || 800 || 500 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer || -f 30; Tried phoenix and phatk, got same max
|-
| 4850 || 101 ||0.918 || 110 || 817 || 500 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer || -f 0, core 817mhz(default 625)@1.123v , mem downclock to 500mhz (default 993) [http://www.smpake.com/?p=6 source]
|-
| 4860 || 67.47 || 0.519 || 130 || 700 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||
|-
| 4870 || 92.84 || 0.6189333... (?) || 150 (?) || 830 || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 || -k poclbm AGGRESSION=5 (Windows 7 64-Bit, GPU OC 750->830MHz, VRAM UC 900->450MHz, BIOS modded)
|-
| 4870 || 104.6 || 0.872 || 120 || 830 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 256 -f 1, Windows 7 64-Bit, GPU Core OC to 830 MHz, GPU Memory UC to 190 MHz (saves 30 Watt at outlet)
|-
| 4870 || 90.36 || 0.602 || 150 || 750 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || clmine ||
|-
| 4870 || 78 || 0.520 || 150 || || || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/Vista 64bit || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source]
|-
| 4890 Sapphire fab. OC || 97.1 || 0.511 || 190 || 870 || 1050 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-01-21 Solo settings || No flags options helped. Close all browsers and do full restart of GUIMiner and then Bitcoin via GUIMiner server starter or the browsers GPU accl. will limit to 56~ ish Mhash/s - I can now start browser without slowdowns
|-
| 4890 || 102.41 || 0.539 || 190 || 850 || 800 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||
|-
| 4890 || 108.3 || || 190 || 975 || 800 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||
|-
| 4850X2 || 150.60 || 0.602 || 250 || 625 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||
|-
| 4870X2 || 180.72 || 0.632 || 286 || 750 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||
|-
| 4870X2 || 180.6 || 0.632 || 286 || 800 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||
|-
| 5450 || 11.99 || 0.631 || 19 || 650 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||
|-
| 5450 || 13.74 || - || - || 700 || - || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/Linuxcoin v0.2 ||-v -w128 tried several options, seems to work best.
|-
| 5450 || 14.12 || - || - || 700 || - || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix/Linuxcoin v0.2 ||Flags: "DEVICE=0 VECTORS AGGRESSION=4 -v FASTLOOP BFI_INT WORKSIZE=64" Kernel: "phatk"
|-
| 5550 || 40.59 || 1.041 || 39 || 550 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 59.96 || 1.538 || 39 || 650 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 64 || 1.641 || 39 || 650 || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 62 || 1.59 || 39 || 650 || 400 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 OpenCL/Linux x86_64 || -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS AGGRESSION=4 -v FASTLOOP BFI_INT WORKSIZE=64
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 73 || 1.872 || 39 || 700 || 400 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 OpenCL/Linux x86_64 || -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS AGGRESSION=4 -v FASTLOOP BFI_INT WORKSIZE=64
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 102 || || <75 || 950 || 400 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 OpenCL/Windows 7 x86 (no Aero) || -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS AGGRESSION=7 -v FASTLOOP BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 (Reference Sapphire card, 2 additional 120mm coolers, temperature is 79-82C)
|-
| 5650 || 48 || 1.37 || 35 ? || || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source] [http://www.notebookcheck.net/ATI-Mobility-Radeon-HD-5650.23697.0.html source] -- not TDP but load
|-
| 5670 || 71.49 || 1.117 || 64 || 775 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||
|-
|style="background:#EEFFEE;"| 5670 || 72 || 1.64 || 44 || 850 || || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm-mod (Win7-64) || Sapphire 100287VGAL card is low power
|-
| 5670 || 85 || || || 900 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128
|-
| 5750 || 116.24 || 1.352 || 86 || 700 || 720 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||
|-
| 5750 || 137 || || || 710 || || || PCI-E 1.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128 using stock memory and GPU clocks
|-
| 5750 || 146.4 || || || 775 || || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-21 || -v -w128, AMD Catalyst overclock (775MHz GPU / 1225 MHz Memory)
|-
| 5750 || 154.56 || 1.45 || 106 || 830 || 720 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||-v -w128 -f20 underclocked memory clocks from 1150MHz to 300MHz
|-
| 5750 || 170 || || || 870 || || || PCI-E 1.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128 patched BIOS to underclock memory to 300MHz
|-
| 5750 || 173 || || || 875 || || || PCI-E 1.1 x16 || phoenix || 875/300 w/MSI Afterburner, BFI_INT VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 FASTLOOP=FALSE -k phatk
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 156.83 || 1.452 || 108 || 850 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 180 || 1.406 || 128[*] || 950 || 800 || 2.4RC1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 30 (*Overclocked wattage calculated [http://bakkap.free.fr/Misc/wCalc.html here] )
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 205.58 || || || 935 || 300 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-04-28 || -v -w 256
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 210.7 || || 108+ || 950 || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / win7x86 || mem underclocked 309 mhz, -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 218.35 || || || 1000 || 1401 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || DiabloMiner || -w 128 -v 2 (Overclocked to 1Ghz core with 1.2 voltage and Scythe Setsugen 2 cooling system)
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 223 || || 100+ || 1050 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer || -v -w256 [http://www.smpake.com/?p=59 source]
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 233 || || 100+ || 1050 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 || VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 -k phatk WORKSIZE=256 [http://www.smpake.com/?p=59 source]
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 236.32 || || 100+ || 1050 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 || VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 -k phatk WORKSIZE=256 OC'd and OV'd 1068/300 1.237v
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 244 || 1.52 || 179 || 800 || 1000 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 OpenCL/Linux x86_64 || -k phatk DEVICE=1 VECTORS AGGRESSION=6 -v FASTLOOP WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 267 || || || 875 || 1000 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x1 || Phoenix 1.48 OpenCL/Linux x86_64 || -k phatk DEVICE=1 VECTORS AGGRESSION=6 -v FASTLOOP WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 245 || 1.28 || 192 || 880 || 900 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm (guiminer) || -v -w 256
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 248 || 1.29 || 192 || 880 || 500 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.46 || -k poclbm VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 256 || || || 900 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 || -k poclbm VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=7
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 272 || 1.52 || 179 || 875 || || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / LinuxCoin || 275Mhz Memory clock, 1.125 V (from 1.163), VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 275 || || 175 || 900 || 500 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm (guiminer) Win7x64 || -v -w64 -f10, XFX stock w/ v2.4 SDK = 230Mh/s, v2.1 SDK = +10Mh/s, overclocking core clock by 100 = +30Mh/s, underclocking memory to 500 (ran cooler), and changing workload to -w64 = +5Mh/s.
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 285 || || || 960 || || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.47 / poclbm / Win7 64 || VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 290 || || || 996 || || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.4 / poclbm / Win7 64 || VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 300 || || || 970 || 1120 || 2.1 || PCI-E x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 64 || 300Mhz memory clock BFI_INT AGGRESSION=12 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 305 || || || 984 || || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.4 / phatk / Win7 32 || 400Mhz Memory clock, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 307 || || || 996 || || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 64 || VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 308 || || || 990 || 375 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 32 ||@ stock voltage VECTORS AGGRESSION=11 -v FASTLOOP=false BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 310 || || || 1000 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Linux x86 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=12 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 316.35 || || || 1015 || 375 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 32 ||@ stock voltage VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 -v FASTLOOP=false BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 318 || || || 1030 || || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 64 || 385Mhz Memory, VECTORS AGGRESSION=9 BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 319 || || || 1030 || || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Xp 64 || 1.2v 355Mhz Memory, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 black || 310 || || || 990 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x8 || LinuxCoin 0.2b, phoenix/phatk || (XFX Brand) -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 AGGRESSION=11 FASTLOOPS=false
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 240.77 || 1.595 || 151 || 725 || 1440 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 250.26 || 1.657 || 151 || 725 || 1440 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || opencl client || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 252 || 1.575 || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-01-25 ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 255.3 || 1.593 || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-01-25 ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 264 || 1.748 || 151 || 725 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 1.0 x8 || guiminer-20110501 || -v -w128
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 280 || 1.75 || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.3 || with BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 292 || 1.825 || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-04-28 -v -f 1 ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 298 || 1.8620 || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-04-28 -v -f 1 -w 64 ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 300 || 1.5460 || 194 || 925 (OC) || 1440 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 314 || 1.8362 || 171 || 820 (OC) || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 1.0 x8 || poclbm || -v -w128
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 330 || || || 850 @ Stock voltage || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix || EAH5850, miner arguments: -k poclbm DEVICE=1 VECTORS AGGRESSION=8 WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 335 || 1.8611 || 180 || 890 (OC) || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || poclbm || -v -w128, Memory downclocked to 300Mhz
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 344 || 1.8594 || 185 || 890 (OC) || 1440 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 354 || || || 900 (OC) || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || diablo -v 2 -w 128 || Ubuntu 11.04 64-bit [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=9239.0 Headless], catalyst 11.5, memory downclocked to 300mhz, stock voltage. flashed with atiflash [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9AxNmOy6_0 video]
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 355 || || || 900 (OC) || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.48 || Ubuntu 11.04 64-bit, Memory downclocked to 200MHz, VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 365 || || || 920 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 64 || 300Mhz memory clock VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 382 || 1.8454 || 207 || 995 (OC) || 1440 || || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || phoenix || OC 1.177v on core
|-
| 5870M || 152.5 || || || 750 (OC) || 1000 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || gui-miner (win-7) ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 313.65 || 1.668 || 188 || 850 || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 313 || 1.665 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo/Linux ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 343 || 1.824 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo/Linux ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 355 || 1.888 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/Linux ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 340 || 1.809 || 188 || 850 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 360 || 1.6822 || 214 || 970 || 700 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL w7-64 || -f 0 -v -w 128 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=6144.msg91959#msg91959 source]
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 377 || 2.008 || 188 || 850 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha || -D -G2
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 397|| |||| 930|| 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=10 WORKSIZE=128
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 408 || 1.8888 || 216 || 980 || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm/Win7x64 || -f 20 -v -w 128, BIT_ALIGN, BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 400 || 1.9047 || 210 || 950 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || Phoenix 1.3 || -k poclbm VECTORS AGGRESSION=7 FASTLOOP BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 398 || 1.980 || 201 || 900 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha || -D -G2 (GPU OC to 900, memory downclocked to 900)
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 420 || 2.0000 || 210 || 950 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=14 WORKSIZE=256 -- Memory Clock 300Mhz
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 421 || 1.9581 || 215 || 975 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.47 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 -k phatk
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 440 || 2.0000 || 220 || 995 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 438 || 1.9819 || 221 || 1000 (OC) || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm/Linux || -v -w 64 -f 1
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 445 || || || 1040 || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm/Windows 7 64 || -v -w 128 -f 1 Crossfired, Water cooled, 890 Mhash/s total, Both cards peak at 450 Mhash/s. Best dual gpu setup me thinks?
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 435 || || || 990 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || LinuxCoin v0.2b phoenix/phatk || (Powercolor brand) -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 AGGRESSION=11 FASTLOOPS=false
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 530 || 1.803 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.4.595.10 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/201103.beta3/Windows || -v -w128 -f60
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 535.06 || 1.820 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 560 || 1.905 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo ||
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 565 || 1.922 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine2 ||
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 604 || 2.054 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 645 || 1.875|| 344 || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || -f1, Debian 6, fglrx-driver 10.9.3
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 740 || 2.1511 || 344 || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix/1.3 || AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT, memory clock @ 300MHz
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 755 || 2.2076 || 342 || 848 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 28-04-11 || -f 1 -w 256 -v, Ubuntu 10.10, fglrx 11.4, memory clock @ 300MHz
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 802 || 2.31 || 347 || 850 || 3200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix poclbm Ubuntu 11.04 || -q 6 -k AGGRESSION=19 WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT VECTORS, fglrx 11.4, mem clock @ 1000MHz
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870x2 (Ares) || 620 || || || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer || -v -w 128
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870x2 (Ares) || 826 || 0.751 || 1100 || 950 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.4 w/ Phtak || AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT Memory @ 300MHz
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870x2 (Ares) || 826 || 1.18 || 700 || 935 || 3200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 w/ Phatk || AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=256 VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false, memory @ 319 MHz, Windows 7 32-bit
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870x2 (Ares) || 878 || 0.585 || 1500 || 1000 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.7 w/ Phtak || AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT Memory @ 300MHz
|-
| 6310M || 9.821 || 0.545 || 18 || 500 || 80 || 2.4 || Integrated/APU || poclbm-gui -v -w128 || HP DM1z 18W TDP is shared with the CPU
|-
| 6470M || 24.1 || || || || || 2.1 || Integrated/APU || guiminer ||
|-
| 6470M || 31.0 || || || || || 2.1 || Integrated/APU || phoenix 1.48 ||
|-
| 6490M || 16.289 || 0.708 || 23 || || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm-mod (Mac OS X 10.6.7) || MacBook Pro early 2011
|-
| 6490M || 15.21 || || || || || || || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8994.0 DiabloMiner GUI] v2011-05-22 / Mac OS X 10.6.7|| Model: MacBookPro8,2 VRAM: 256MB
|-
|style="background:#FFDD00;"| 6570 || 68.0 || 1.133 || 60 || 650 || 480 || 2.4 || PCI-E x16 || guiminer 2011-05-21 with poclbm (Win7-32bit)|| no extra option for miner . Sapphire 6570 gddr5 512mb
|-
|style="background:#FFDD00;"| 6570 || 82.1 || 1.368 || 60 || 650 || 480 || 2.4 || PCI-E x16 || guiminer 2011-05-21 with poclbm (Win7-32bit)|| -v -w128 . Sapphire 6570 gddr5 512mb
|-
| 6750 || 167.59 || || || 870 || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer || -v -f30 -w128
|-
| 6770 || 180 || || || 850 || 1200 || || || guiminer || -v -w128 , this was an XFX (OEM) model, GPU @ 850 MHz, mem @ 1200 MHz; I pushed it up to 190 Mhash/s briefly by overclocking, but it crashed the system above that
|-
| 6770 || 202 || || || 960 || 800 || || PCI-E 2.1 x1,x4,x8,x16 || phoenix 1.48 || Sapphire 6770 (standard) -q2 -k poclbm DEVICE=0 AGGRESSION=10 VECTORS WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT FASTLOOP (The PCI-E speed does not affect the mining speed)
|-
| 6790 || 220 || || 150 || 800 || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 || -k phatk BFI_INT FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=12 VECTORS OC'd to 1ghz, underclocked mem to 300, voltage at 1175
|-
| 6850 || 171.59 || 1.351 || 127 || 775 || 960 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||
|-
| 6850 || 196 || || || 850 || 960 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 0
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 220 || 1.236 || 178[*] || 1000 || 960 || 2.4RC1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 30 (*Overclocked wattage calculated [http://bakkap.free.fr/Misc/wCalc.html here] )
|-
| 6850 || 234.8 || || || 940 || 960 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.3 || AGGRESSION=8 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT
|-
| 6850 || 244.2 || || || 960 || 960 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm june-2011 || -v -w 128
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 232.47 || 1.540 || 151 || 900 || 1120 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm -v -w 128 ||
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 277.47 || || || 940 || 1120 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.3 || AGGRESSION=8 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 271 || || 150 || 940 || 1100 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm -v -w 128 || Debian 6.0.1 x86_64
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 260.1 || 1.611 || 175 || 1001 || 1150 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm-gui windows7x86 cat 11.3 || -v -w 128 -f 1
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 276 || 1.828 (?) || 151 (?) || 900 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha cat 11.4 sdk 2.4 || -G2 -D stock clocks, debian linux 64bit
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 300.06 || 1.830 || 164 || 1020 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.4 cat 11.4 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=8 fastloop mem clock 344
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 306 || 1.748 (?) || 175 (?) || 1000 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha cat 11.4 sdk 2.4 || -G2 -D overclocked to 1000, debian linux 64bit
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 300 || 1.72 || 174 || 1038 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm windows7x86 cat 11.4 || -v -w128 -f1 mem clock 360, fan 100% temp 73C
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 310 || || || 1035 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 phatk 11.5 sdk 2.4 || BFI_INT VECTORS FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=128, mem clock @ 300MHz, voltage @ 1.300
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 316 || || || 1030 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer 2011-06-09 using phoenix (Win7-32bit) || -k phatk platform=0 device=0 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 worksize=128 FASTLOOP=false, mem clock @ 228MHz, voltage @ 1.25, Fan @ 40%, Temp @ 73C
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 322 || 1.882 || 170 || 1050 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.47 phatk 11.5 sdk 2.4 || BFI_INT VECTORS FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=256, mem clock @ 400MHz
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 329 || || || 1075 || 372 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 phatk 11.5 sdk 2.4 || BFI_INT VECTORS FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=256
|-
| 6950 || 272 || || || 900 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48/poclbm || max stable @ 1150 mV, AGGRESSION = 7, BFI_INT
|-
| 6950 || 291 || || || 920 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48/poclbm || max stable @ 1200mV, AGGRESSION = 7, BFI_INT
|-
| 6950 || 295 || || || 930 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48/poclbm || max stable @ 1275mV, AGGRESSION = 7, BFI_INT
|-
| 6950 || 300 || || || 940 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48/poclbm || max stable @ 1300mV, AGGRESSION = 7, BFI_INT
|-
| 6950 || 295 || || 160 (?) || 810 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250
|-
| 6950 || 314 || || (?) || 800 || 1408 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 05-01-11 || -v -f30 -w128 default mem 1250 Stock Sapphire 6950 1gb
|-
| 6950 || 325 || || 200 (?) || 885 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250
|-
| 6950 || 340 || || (?) || 800 || 1536 || (?) || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 05-21-11 ||-v -f30 -w128 default mem 1250,Sapphire 6950 1gb, unlocked shaders
|-
| 6950 || 349 || || ~200 || 800 || 1408 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 05-21-11 ||-v -f30 -w128, xfx 6950 xxx 1gb, locked shaders, core 900, mem 650, 79° C
|-
| 6950 || 360 || || 200 (?) || 970 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250
|-
| 6950 || 360 || || (?) || 870 || 1375 || (?) || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm ||flashed with 6970 BIOS, -v -f30 -w128
|-
| 6950x4 || 1316 || 1.513 || 870 || 840 || 1408 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || locked shaders, default mem 1250, dual fan 75C typical
|-
| 6950 || 417 || || +200? || 975 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || unlocked shaders, +20% overdrive, mem @ 1250, fan @ 77%, temp 64C, -v -w128, gpu core @ 1145mV
|-
| 6950 || 428 || || +200? || 1000 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || unlocked shaders, +20% overdrive, mem @ 1250, fan @ 80%, temp 64C, -v -w128, gpu core @ 1160mV
|-
| 6950 || 432 || || +200? || 1000 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || unlocked shaders, +20% overdrive, mem @ 520, fan @ 80%, temp 76C, -v -w128 -f 2, gpu core @ 1275mV
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 323 || 1.468 || 220 || 880 || 1536 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -w 64, SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 372 || || 220 (?) || 900 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix (svn trunk 05.14.2011) || clock 900/1375, VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128, fan 45% (auto) / temp 90C
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 385 || 1.964 || 196 || 900 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || -v -w128, memory downclocked to 684Mhz, fan @ 70%/temp 81C
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 380 || || || || || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w128<br>export GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS=1 # to reduce poclbm CPU from 100% to 2%
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 402 || || || || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || -v -w128, fan 75%/75C, voltage +10% (via CCC), clocks 940MHz/600MHz (via TriXX)
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 403 || || (?) || MAX || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || clock Max/50%+stock, -v -w128, fan= 100%/temp 72C (Note: Overclocked using CCC utility under Windows 7, Clock set to Max value w/ 50% increase to memory and 5% increase to voltage)
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 423 || || || 995 || || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48/poclbm || ATI Tray Tools, Clocks=995/331.25, WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 VECTORS ,68C @ 65% Fan, HAF932 Case
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970x2 || 710 || || || 900/880 || 1536 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -w 256
|-
| 6990 || 670 || 1.94 || 346 || 830 || 3072 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || Catalyst 11.4 [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=2949.msg106238#msg106238 source].
|-
| 6990 || 708 || 2.05 || 346 || 830 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || BIOS switch at "default" position 2, see [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]
|-
| 6990 || 746 || 1.82 || 410 || 880 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || BIOS switch at "overclocked" position 1, see [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]
|-
| 6990 || 758 || || || 880 || || 2.4 || || Phoenix with Poclbm || Catalyst 11.4, OC switch ON, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128 FASTLOOP=false
|-
| 6990 || 771 || 1.8804 || 410 || 880 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx. Memory clock @ 1280Mhz.
|-
| 6990 || 772 || 1.8380 || 420 || 900 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix & Poclbm || OC switch ON + overclocked to 900 mhz, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128
|-
| 6990 || 790 || || || 900 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || BIOS switch at "overclocked" position 1; with "aticonfig --odsc=900,1260" to further overclock the GPU to 900 MHz and mem to 1260 MHz, see [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]
|-
| 6990 || 802 || || || 915 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || BIOS switch at "overclocked" position 1; with "aticonfig --odsc=915,1260" to further overclock the GPU to 915 MHz and mem to 1260 MHz, see [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]
|-
| 6990 || 835 || || || 890/860 || 3072 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix || BIOS switch at "overclocked" position 1; with "aticonfig --adapter=1 --odsc=990,890 and aticonfig --adapter=0 --odsc=960,860" (GPU 0 runs hot). Currently, aticonfig can only underclock RAM to 100mhz below core speed. Command line: phoenix.py -k poclbm VECTORS AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT
|-
| 6990x2 || 1436 || 1.848 || 777 || 880 || 6144 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 x2 || guiminer 2011.05.11 || AUSUM switch set to 1 on both cards; Core left at 880MHz, memory left at 1250MHz; VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128
|-
| 6990x3 || 2094 || || || 900 || || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 x8 x4 || poclbm || GPU 900MHz, Memory 1250MHz; poclbm.py -f 0 -w 256
|-
|FirePro V4800 || 79.7 || || || 775 || 400 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-01 ||
|-
|FirePro V8700 || 84.8 || || || 750 || 800 || || || poclbm-mod.03.24.2011 ||
|-
|FirePro M5800 || 61.4 || || || 650 || || || || poclbm-mod.03.24.2011 || Ubuntu
|-
|FirePro V5800 || 119 || || || || 800 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-01 || Windows 7 32bit
|-
|FirePro V5800 || 144 || || || || 800 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-01 || -v -w128 (Windows 7 32bit)
|-
|FirePro V7750 || 35.7 || || || || || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-21 || Windows 7 64bit
|-
|FirePro M7820 || 150.0 || || || 700 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-06-09 || Memory downclocked to 500 from 1000MHz, 169MH/s@800MHz, 181MH/s@860Mhz (max.), only SDK2.1 works, Windows 7 x86
|-
|}

===Nvidia===

{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! W !! Clock !! SP !! Comment
|-
| ION || 1.8 || || 27 || || 16 || poclbm; power consumption incl. CPU
|-
| 8200 mGPU || 1.2 || || || 1200 || 16 || 128 MB shared memory, "poclbm -w 128 -f 0"
|-
| 8400 GS || 2.3 || || || || || "poclbm -w 128"
|-
| 8400 GS || 1.6 || || 128 || 1238 || || DiabloMiner -w 128 -f 1 [https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/User:Knightmb source]
|-
| 8400M GS || 2.0 || || || || ||
|-
| 8600M GT || 4.93 || || || || 32 ||
|-
| 8600GT || 5.66 || || || 1188 || 32 ||
|-
| 8600GT OC || 7.3 || || || 1602 || 32 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.0 poclbm] -w 128 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg72833#msg72833 source]
|-
| 8800GT || 25 || 0.24 || 105 || 1300 || ||
|-
| 8800GT || 24.5 || 0.23 || 105 || 1300 || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]
|-
| 8800GT || 31.1 || || 105 || 1855 || || Overclocked 715 GPU / 1030 Memory / 1855 Shader; GuiMiner v2011-05-21
|-
| 8800GT || 31.8 || || 105 || 1836 || 112 || 713 gpu, 1026 memory. win7x86, phoenix 1.48, -k poclbm WORKSIZE=64 AGGRESSION=5
|-
| 8800GTS || 16.8 || 0.109 || 154 || || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source] [http://www.techspot.com/review/79-geforce-8800-gts-512/page11.html source]
|-
| 8800 GTS || 18.7 || 0.124 || 150 || 1200 || || poclbm -w 64 no vectors
|-
| 8800 GTX || 27.5 || || || 1404 || || phoenix 1.48, poclbm, no vectors, 83C with 50C ambient
|-
| 8800m GTX || 16.3 || || || || || rpcminer-cuda Win7-64
|-
| 9300GE || 1.57 || || || 1300 || 8 ||
|-
| 9300GS || 1.69 || || || 1400 || 8 ||
|-
| 9300/nForce 730i || 2.15 || || || 1200 || 16 ||
|-
| 9400GT || 3.37 || 0.067 || 50 || 1400 || 16 ||
|-
| 9400M (MacBook) || 1.90 || 0.32 || 6 || 700 || || poclbm -f 8 no vectors
|-
| 9500GT || 6.75 || 0.135 || 50 || 1400 || 32 ||
|-
| 9600GSO || 19.88 || 0.237 || 84 || 1375 || 96 ||
|-
| 9600GSO512 || 11.75 || 0.131 || 90 || 1625 || 48 ||
|-
| 9600GT || 15.66 || 0.165 || 95 || 1625 || 64 ||
|-
| 9600GT Zotac || 15 || || || 1650 || 64 ||
|-
| 9600GT OC || 18.8 || <0.198 || >95 || 1981 || 64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.0 poclbm] -w 128 -f 10 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg74610#msg74610 source] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg73353#msg73353 source]
|-
| 9800GT || 30.36 || 0.289 || 105 || 1800 || 112 ||
|-
| 9800GT EE || 19.7 || || 75 || 1375 || 112 || rpcminer-cuda
|-
| 9800GT OC || 29.5 || 0.283 || 105 || 1836 || 112 || poclbm.py, no options. Memory underclocked to 850Mhz, GPU overclocked to 733Mhz
|-
| 9800GTX || 32.54 || 0.232 || 140 || 1688 || 128 ||
|-
| 9800GTX+ || 35.39 || 0.251 || 141 || 1836 || 128 ||
|-
| 9800GTX+ || 37.23 || 0.266 || 140 || 1890 || 128 || win7x64 275.27 phoenix(1.48) -k poclbm AGGRESSION=3 WORKSIZE=64
|-
| 9800GTX+ || 40.20 || || 140 || 835 || 128 || lowered memory clock higher core, unstable if going higher
|-
|style="background-color:#FFEFEF"| 9800GX2 || 57.83 || 0.294 || 197 || || 2x128 ||
|-
|style="background-color:#FFEFEF"| 9800GX2 || 28 || 0.142 || 197 || || 2x128 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]
|-
| G210 || 3.38 || 0.111 || 30.5 || 1402 || 16 ||
|-
| G210 || 3.79 || 0.124 || 30.5 || 1402 || 16 || poclbm -f 1
|-
| GT220 || 10.8 || || 128 || 1360 || || DiabloMiner -w 128 -f 1000 [https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/User:Knightmb source]
|-
| GT240 || 19.37 || 0.281 || 69 || 1340 || 96 ||
|-
| GT240 || 21.24 || || || || 96 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4291.0 poclbm-mod] -f 0 -v [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg73383#msg73383 source]
|-
| GTS250 || 35.39 || 0.244 || 145 || 1836 || 128 ||
|-
| GTS250 || 35.2 || 0.243 || 145 || 1836 || 128 ||
|-
| GTS250 OC || 37 || 0.255 || 145 || 2047 || 128 ||
|-
| GTX260M || 22.5 || || || 500 || 112 || poclbm 4/28/2011 Asus G71GX runs ~90c without cooling pad
|-
| GTX260 || 35.91 || 0.178 || 202 || 1242 || 192 ||
|-
| GTX260 || 44 || 0.242 || 182 || 1242 || 216 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|-
| GTX260c216 || 40.40 || 0.236 || 171 || 1242 || 216 ||
|-
| GTX260c216 || 47.4 || || 182 || 1348 || 216 || poclbm -w 256
|-
| GTX260c216 || 50.00 || || || 1050 || 216 || m0mchil GPU client, Windows 7 64-bit, x6 @ 3.5ghz
|-
| GTX260c216 OC || 52.0 || || || 1461 || 216 || "poclbm -w 256 -f 1"
|-
| GTX260c216 OC || 58.9 || || || 756/400 || 216 || Core overclocked, Memory underclocked, Ubuntu 11.04 Classic Session(No Effects) "poclbm -w 256 -f 1"
|-
| GTX275 || 50.75 || 0.232 || 219 || 1404 || 240 ||
|-
| GTX275 || 58 || || || 729/1458 || 240 || poclbm -f 0 -w 256
|-
| GTX280 || 46.84 || 0.198 || 236 || 1296 || 240 ||
|-
| GTX280 || 64.34 || 0.289 || 245 || 1296 || 240 || phoenix.exe -k poclbm AGGRESSION=6 WORKSIZE=128 (61*C with Accelero XTREME GTX280)
|-
| GTX285 || 64.8 || || || 1607 || 240 || GuiMiner - Not sure about wattage yet. Still testing. Card runs around 74 C
|-
|-
| GTX285 || 53.35 || 0.262 || 204 || 1476 || 240 ||
|-
| GTX295 || 89.78 || 0.311 || 289 || 1242 || 480 ||
|-
| GTX295 || 113.60 || || 289 || 1242 || 480 || GUIMiner no oc.
|-
| GTX295 || 117.30 || || 289 || 1476 || 490 ||
|-
| GT 320M (MacBook Air) || 6.12 || || || 1212 || 48 ||
|-
| 320M (Mac mini 2010) || 7.0 || 0.35 || 20 || 450 || 32 || poclbm no extra options, windows 7 x64
|-
| GT 330M || 7.97 || || || || || Model: MacBookPro6,2 VRAM: 512MB Software: [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8994.0 DiabloMiner GUI] v2011-05-22 / Mac OS X 10.6.7
|-
| GT 330M (Sony Vaio Z) || 7.8 || 0.71 ( 0.3 total) || 11 (26w total) || 1045 || 48 ||
|-
| GTS 350M (Toshiba A665-3DV) || 17.0 || || 14 || 1080 || || DiabloMiner-Windows.exe
|-
| GTS 360M || 25.0 || || || || || [toshiba qosmio laptop, ~150-165*F stock fans]
|-
| GTS 360M (ASUS G60jx) || 20.0 || || || || || everythins is stock, it cannot sustain. it reaches 90 degrees and freezes.
|-
| GT430 || 20.24 || 0.413 || 49 || 1400 || 96 ||
|-
| GTS450 || 45.28 || 0.427 || 106 || 1566 || 192 ||
|-
| GTX460SE || 56.39 || 0.376 || 150 || 1300 || 288 ||
|-
| GTX460 || 66.32 || || || 814 || 336 || rpcminer-cuda 20110605, Graphics Clock @ 814MHz, Memory @ 1555MHz
|-
| GTX460 || 68.31 || 0.427 || 160 || 1350 || 336 ||
|-
| GTX460 768MB || 57.8 || || ? || 1350 || 336 || rpcminer-cuda -gputhreads=320 -gpugrid=336
|-
| GTX460 (2 cards) || 102 || 0.319? || 320? || 1350 || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]
|-
| GTX460 (2 cards) OC || 127 || 0.374 || 340 || 1620 || 2x 336 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2444.0 rpcminer-cuda] -gpugrid=128 -gputhreads=128 ver.20110227
|-
| GTX465 || 64.41 || 0.322 || 200 || 1215 || 352 ||
|-
| GTX470 || 81.98 || 0.381 || 215 || 1215 || 448 ||
|-
| GTX470 || 94.7 || || || 1414 || ||
|-
| GTX470 || 111.9 || || 215 || 1650 || 448 ||
|-
| GTX470 || 115 || || || 1616 || || phoenix 1.46 poclbm VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=6
|-
| GTX480 || 101.28 || 0.405 || 250 || 1401 || 480 ||
|-
| GTX560 Ti || 67.7 || 0.39 || 170 || 1700 || 384 || standard EVGA 560, no overclock
|-
| GTX560 Ti || 74.8 || 0.41 || 180 || 1700 || 384 || gigabyte 900Mhz clock; -w 512 -v
|-
| GTX560 OC || 86.7 || <0.51 || >170 || 1800 || 384 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2444.0 rpcminer-cuda] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg72816#msg72816 source]
|-
| GTX570 || 105.83 || 0.483 || 219 || 1464 || 480 ||
|-
| GTX570 || 125 || --- || 219 || 750 || 480 || rpcminer-cuda.exe -aggression=11 -gpugrid=480 -gputhreads=512
|-
| GTX580 || 140.05 || --- || 244 || 1544 || 512 ||
|-
| GTX590 || 193.1 || --- || --- || 1215 || 2x 512 || poclbm -v -w 256, Win
|-
| Quadro FX 580 || 5.7 || 0.14 || 40 || 1125 || 4 ||rpcminer-cuda, Win, -gpugrid=128 -gputhreads=512
|-
| Quadro FX 770M || 5.75 || || || 500 || 32 || DiabloMiner-Windows.exe BFI_INT FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=6, Win
|-
|Quadro FX 770M || 6.39 || || || 500 || 32 || DiabloMiner-Windows.exe BFI_INT FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=6 w 64, Win 7x64
|-
|Quadro FX 880M || 9.6 || || || || || poclbm/guiminer
|-
| Quadro FX 1600M || 6 || 0.12 || 50 || 625 || 32 ||rpcminer-cuda, Win
|-
| Quadro FX 2000M || 23 || || 58 || || || phoenix 1.48, -k poclbm, VECTORS, AGGRESION=6, Lenovo W520 platform
|-
| Quadro FX 3600M || 36 || -- || 70 || 500 || 96 ||DiabloMiner, win
|-
| Quadro NVS 135M || 1.05 || 0.1 || 10 || 800 || 1 ||
|-
| Quadro NVS 295 || 1.7 || 0.07 || 23 || 567 || 8 || phoenix
|-
| Quadro NVS 3100M || 3.6 || 0.257 || 14 || 600 || 16 || rpcminer-cuda, Win, CUDA 3.1.1
|-
| Quadro 5000 || 62 || --- || 152 || 513 || ? || rpcminer-cuda.exe -aggression=10 gpugrid=256 gputhreads=512; if anyone can provide info about the number of shader processors of this card, this would be the value of choice for gpugrid
|-
| Tesla C1060 || 52.5 || || || 1296 || 240 || poclbm, Win7x64
|-
| Tesla M2050 || 79.8 || || || 1550 || 448 || DiabloMiner
|-
| Tesla M2050 || [http://glennfrancismurray.com/cost-defective-mining-with-gpu-clusters-amazo 100] || 0 || 0 || - || 512 || Amazon AWS [http://glennfrancismurray.com/cost-defective-mining-with-gpu-clusters-amazo CUDA RPC Miner & CUDA 2.0]
|-
| Tesla S1070 || 155.2 || || || || || rpcminer-cuda, Linux, CUDA 3.2, 4 instances (-gpu=0 through -gpu=3)
|-
| GTX280x2 || 102.7 || || || || ||
|-
|}

==CPUs/APUs==

A lot of nice data can be pulled from [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.0 this thread] to seed this section.

Might you wish to throttle CPU load a bit, so it doesn't reach 100°C, it can be done with Battle Encoder Shirase to a margin, like, -15% of available CPU cycles.

Often, the best combination to be is to throttle CPU miner to -5% '''AND''' set it to least of priority levels, so as not to choke GPU miner up.

===AMD===
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! nprocs !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! TDP [W] !! CPU Clock !! Mhash/s CPU !! Mhash/s GPU !! GPU !! GPU Clock !! SP !! Software !! Notes
|-
| 4x Opteron 6174 || 48 || 115 || 0.36 || 320W || 2.2 GHz || 2.4
|colspan=4|
| cpuminer v0.8.1 || --alg 4way --threads 48
|-
| 2x Opteron 6128 || 16 || 32.4 || 0.141 || 230W || 2 GHz || 32.4
|colspan=4|
| 0.3.19 || -4way
|-
| Athlon XP 2000+ || 2 || 0.62 || 0.009 || 70W || 1.67 GHz || 0.62
|colspan=4|
| 0.3.18/Ubuntu || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source] [http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm?articleid=914&page=4 source]
|-
| Athlon 64 3500+ || 1 || 1.18 || 0.013 || 89W || 2.54 GHz || 1.18
|colspan=4|
| ufasoft v0.4 || overclocked (originally 2.2 GHz)
|-
| Athlon 64 X2 3800+ || 2 || 1.73 || 0.03 || 65 W || 2.00 GHz || 1.73
|colspan=4|
| cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || -algo=4way
|-
| Athlon 64 X2 4000+ || 2 || 1.9 || 0.02 || 65W || 2.1 GHz || 1.9
|colspan=4|
| rpc-miner ||
|-
| Athlon 64 X2 4400+ || || 2.09 || 0.032 || 65W || 2.3GHz || 2.09
|colspan=4|
| 0.3.19/Win x64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]
|-
| Athlon 64 X2 6000+ || 2 || 2.81 || 0.02 || 125W || 3 GHz || 2.81
|colspan=4|
| || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg22881#msg22881 source]
|-
| Athlon 64 X2 6400+ Black Edition || 2 || 2.9 || 0.023 || 125W || 3.2 GHz || 2.9
|colspan=4|
| 0.3.20.2 BETA/Win 7 x64 || -4way
|-
| Athlon II X2 240e || 2 || 2.71 || 0.06 || 45W || 2.81 GHz || 2.71
|colspan=4|
| bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Athlon II X2 250 || 2 || 5.6 || 0.09 || 65W || 3.01GHz || 5.6
|colspan=4|
| bitcoin-miner 0.11 ||
|-
| Athlon II X4 630 || 4 || 10.7 || 0.11 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 10.7
|colspan=4|
| bitcoin-miner 0.4 ||
|-
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 3.8 || 0.04 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 3.8
|colspan=4|
| 0.3.1x/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|-
| Phenom X4 9950 BE || 4 || 9.3 || 0.07 || 126W || 2.6 GHz || 2.32
|colspan=4|
| bitcoin-miner 0.13/WinXP || No GPU
|-
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 7.2 || 0.08 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 7.2
|colspan=4|
| cpu-miner 0.2.1/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|-
| Phenom II X4 810 || 4 || 5.0 || || 95W || 2.8 GHz ||
|colspan=4|
| rpcminer-cpu ||
|-
| Phenom II X4 810 || 4 || 9.5 || || 95W || 2.8 GHz ||
|colspan=4|
| rpcminer-4way ||
|-
| Phenom II X4 810 || 4 || 10.5 || || 95W || 2.8 GHz ||
|colspan=4|
| ufasoft v0.10 ||
|-
| Phenom II X4 955 || 4 || 11 || 0.09 || 125W || 3.2 GHz || 11
|colspan=4|
| rpcminer-4way ||
|-
| Phenom II X4 965 || 4 || 12 || 0.09 || 140W || 3.4 GHz || 11
|colspan=4|
| rpcminer-4way ||
|-
| Phenom II X6 1055T || 6 || 15.84 || 0.13 || 125W || 2.82 GHz || 15.84
|colspan=4|
| bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Phenom II X6 1090T || 6 || 18|| || 141W|| 3.50 GHz || 3
|colspan=4|
| minerd ||
|-
| Phenom II X6 1100T || 6 || 22 || 0.176 || 125W || 3.82 GHz || 22
|colspan=4|
| bitcoin-miner || Aciid#bitcoin-dev
|-
| Zacate E-350 || 2 || 11 || 0.615 || 18W || 1.6 Ghz || 1.231 || 9.831 || HD6310M || 492 Mhz || 80 || poclbm -v -w128 + Ufasoft 0.7 || stock speeds
|-
| Zacate E-350 || 2 || 12
|colspan=2|
| 1.648 Ghz || 1.252 || 10.87 || HD6310M || 492 Mhz || 80 || poclbm -v -w 256 -f 1 || "autotune" speed with ASUS EFI BIOS
|}

===ARM===
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment
|-
| ARM1136EJ-S || 1 || 0.11 || ? || ? || 0.528 GHz || cpuminer git || T-Mobile Pulse, inside Debian chroot, 'c' algo
|-
| Cortex-A8 || 1 || 0.125 || 0.36 || 0.35 W || 0.6 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || Nokia N900: 'cryptopp'
|-
| Cortex-A8 || 1 || 0.2 || 0.57 || 0.35 W || 0.6 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || Nokia N900: 'c' algo
|-
| 2x Cortex-A9 || 2 || 0.57 || 1.14 || 0.5 W || 1.0 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-24) || Toshiba AC100, ubuntu, 'c' algo
|}

===Intel===
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment
|-
| Pentium III mobile ? || 1 || 0.3 || 0.014 || 21W || 1.07 GHz || 0.3.1x/Win2K || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source] [http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=27380 source]
|-
| Pentium M 1.6ghz || 1 || .4 || || || 1.6 GHZ || minerd (jgarzik's 1.0) || cryppto, Windows 7
|-
| Pentium M 1.73ghz || 1 || .5 || || || 1.73 GHZ || minerd (jgarzik's 1.0) || cryppto, Windows 7
|-
| Old Xeon 512k (Dual) || 2x1/2 || 2.0 || ? || ? || 3.06GHz || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || HT disabled, algo=4way (twice as fast as the 2nd best algo)
|-
| Pentium 4 2.0A || 1 || 0.85 || || || 2.0 GHz || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft-0.4]/WinXP || -g no -t 2
|-
| Pentium Dual-Core E2180 || 2/2 || 1.75 || || || 2.0 GHz || rpcminer-cpu || Win7-64
|-
| Pentium Dual-Core E2180 || 2/2 || 4.1 || || || 2.0 GHz || cpuminer || sse2_64
|-
| Pentium Dual-Core E2180 || 2/2 || 4.5 || || || 2.0 GHz || ufasoft v0.11 || Win7-64
|-
| Pentium Dual-Core E5400 || 2/2 || 2.27 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.7 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Celeron E330 || 2/2 || 2.2 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.5 GHz || 0.3.19/Ubuntu10.04 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]
|-
| Core 2 Quad Q6600 || 4/4 || 11.0 || || 105W || 2.40 GHz || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || -a 60 -g no -t 4
|-
| Core 2 Quad Q9400 || 4/4 || 11 || 0.046 || 95W || 2.66 GHz || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || -a 60 -g no -t 4
|-
| Core 2 Quad Q9650 || 4/4 || 18.67 || || 95W || 4.00 GHz || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || -a 60 -g no -t 4
|-
| Core i3 530 || 2/4 || 8.31 || 0.10 || 80W || 3.66 GHz || Ufasoft 0.7 || -v -a5 -g no -t 4
|-
| Core i3 M350 || 2/4 || 1.48 || 0.04 || 35W || 2.27 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Core i5 M450 || 2/4 || 1.8 || 0.05 || 35W || 1.2 GHz || 0.3.17/Win7-54 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source]
|-
| Core i5-650 || 2/4 || 5.1 || 0.04 ? || || 3.2 GHz || cpuminer-0.7 || -4way
|-
| Core i5-750 || 4/4 || 14 || || || 3.2 GHz || bitcoin-miner 0.11 || -a 5 -g no -t 4
|-
| Core i5 ? || 4/? || 6.5 || || || || client from svn || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37621#msg37621 source]
|-
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 4.5 || 0.05 || 95W || 3.1 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-01-22) || cryptopp_asm32
|-
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 14 || 0.15 || 95W || 3.1 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || sse2_64
|-
| Core i7 620M || 2/4 || 1.888 || || || 2.66 GHz || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8994.0 RPCMiner GUI] v2011-05-22 / Mac OS X 10.6.7 || Model: MacBookPro6,2 RAM: 4GB
|-
| Core i7 920 || 4/8 || 19.2 || 0.10 || 195 || 4.0 GHz (x21) || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] || -a 5
|-
| Core i7 950 || 4/8 || 5.88 || 0.039 || 150W || 3.83 GHz (x23) || bitcoin-0.3.20.2 Win7-64 ||
|-
| Core i7 950 || 4/8 || 18.9 || 0.126 || 150W || 3.83 GHz (x23) || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] v0.4 ||
|-
| Core i7 980x || 6/12 || 19.2 || 0.15 || 130 || 4.4 GHz (x33) || cpuminer/Win7-64 ||
|-
| Core i7 980x || 6/12 || 8.7 || || || 3.9 GHz (x27) || 0.3.17/Win7-64 ||
|-
| Core i7 2635QM || 4/8 || 2.93 || || || 2.00 GHz || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8994.0 RPCMiner GUI] v2011-05-22 / Mac OS X 10.6.7 || Model: MacBookPro8,2 RAM: 4GB
|-
| Core i7 620M || 2/4 || 6.3 || 0.18 || 35 || 2.66 GHz || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] v0.4 ||
|-
| Core i7 2600k || 4/4 || 6.7 || || || 4.00 GHz || phoenix 0.48 ||
|-
| Core 2 Duo U7600 || 1 || 1.1 || || || 1.2 GHZ || minerd (jgarzik's 1.0) || cryppto, Windows 7
|-
| Core 2 Duo E5200 || 2/2 || 6.2 || 0.086 || 72W || 2.76 Ghz || Ufasoft/Win7-64 || TDP is 65W + 7W overclock
|-
| Core 2 Duo E6550 || 1/2 || 2.45 || ? || ? || 2.33 GHz || cpuminer 0.7.1 (Linux) || --algo=sse2_64
|-
| Core 2 Duo E6850 || 2/2 || 6.75 || 0.10 || 65W || 3.0 Ghz || ufasoft-0.3 ||
|-
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 7.76 || 0.11 || 70W || 3.33 GHz (o/c?) || ufasoft-0.3 || miner optimized for Intel Core
|-
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 2.52 || 0.04 || 65W || 2.66 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Core 2 Duo E8200 || 2/2 || 2.3 || 0.035 || 65W|| 2.66GHz || rpcminer-cpu || ||
|-
| Core 2 Duo E8400 || 2/2 || 6.9 || 0.106 || 65W || 3.0 GHz || ufasoft v0.10|| windows 7/64bit (-t 2)
|-
| Core 2 Duo T6400 || 2/2 || 4.2 || 0.12 || 35 W || 2.00 GHz || cpuminer git (Linux) || --algo=sse2_64
|-
| Core 2 Duo T7250 || 2/2 || 4.5 || 0.13 || 35 W || 2.00 GHz || bitcoin-miner 0.13/WinXP || No GPU
|-
| Core 2 Extreme X9000 || 2/2 || 2.37 || || || 2.8 GHz || rpcminer-cpu || Win7-64
|-
| Core 2 Extreme X9000 || 2/2 || 6.2 || || || 2.8 GHz || ufasoft v0.11 || Win7-64
|-
| Core 2 Extreme X9000 || 2/2 || 7.2 || || || 3.2 GHz || ufasoft v0.11 || Win7-64 Overclocked from 2.8 GHz to 3.2 GHz
|-
| Xeon 2.8 || 2/2 || 0.8 || || || 2.8 GHz || cpuminer || cryptopp_asm32
|-
| Xeon 3060 || 1/2 || 2.03 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.4GHz || cpuminer 0.8.1 (Linux) || --algo=cryptopp_asm32
|-
| Xeon Prestonia 2.4 (dual) || 2x1/2 || 2.16 || 0.017 || 130W || 2.4 GHz || ufasoft v0.4 ||
|-
| Xeon X5355 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 10.13 || 0.16 || 120W || 2.66GHz || bitcoind || Roughly the same speed as the "c" algo in cpuminer
|-
| Xeon X5355 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 22.76 || 0.09 || 120W || 2.66GHz || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || -O2 -march=core2, algo=sse2_64
|-
| Xeon E5335 || 4/4 || 9.35 || 0.12 || 80W || 2.00 GHz || ufasoft v0.11 || Vista-32
|-
| Xeon E5440 || 4/8 || 7.3 || ? || 80W || 2.66 GHz|| Kiv's poclbm-gui || FIXME: Either wrong model # or wrong threads/speed info
|-
| Xeon E5520 || 4/8 || 6.5 || 0.08 || 80W || 2.27 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Xeon E5530 || 4/8 || 7.14 || 0.09 || 80W || 2.4 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Xeon E5630 (dual) || 2x4/8 || 8 || 0.1 || 80W || 2.53 GHz || 0.3.17/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]
|-
| Xeon E6520 (dual) || 2x4/8 || 24.7 || ? || ? || 2.53 GHz || ufasoft v0.10 || windows 2008 R2 64bit (-t 16)
|-
| Xeon E7520 (dual) || 2x4/16 || 18 || ? || 95W || 1.87 GHz || ufasoft v0.10 || windows 2008 R2 64bit (-t 16)
|-
| Atom N230 || 1/2 || 0.375 || || 4W || 1.6 GHz || rpcminer-cpu ||
|-
| Atom N230 || 1/2 || 0.245 || || 4W || 1.6 GHz || rpcminer-4way ||
|-
| Atom N230 || 1/2 || 0.97 || || 4W || 1.6 GHz || ufasoft v0.10 ||
|-
| Atom N270 || 1/2 || 1.19 || 0.24 || 5W || 1.6 GHz || ufasoft v0.10 ||
|}

===Other===
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment
|-
| Cell || 6 || 21 || 0.35 || 60W || 3.2 GHz || cellminer || Sony Playstation 3 (FAT): Needs custom firmware (no links to it, potential issues with Sony assholes.) [https://github.com/verement/cellminer source] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4704.20 source] Total power usage of PS3 fat is 120W but only the Cell cpu is active.
|-
| Cell || 6 || 21 || 0.7 || 35W || 3.2 GHz || cellminer || Sony Playstation 3 (SLIM): Total power usage of PS3 slim is 70W but only the Cell cpu is active.
|-
| MIPS || 1 || 0.026 || ? || ? || 200 MHz || cpuminer || ASUS WL-500G Deluxe router running [http://openwrt.org/ OpenWrt]
|-
| VIA Eden || 1 || 1.3 || 0.17 || 8W || 1600 MHz || cpuminer || VIA Eden w/ Padlock
|-
| PowerPC 7447A || 1 || 0.53 || || || 1420 MHz || cpuminer ||
|}

==See Also==

* [[Mining rig]]
* [[Generation Calculator]]
* [[Power Calc]]
* [[OpenCL miner]]
* [http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=745 ATI Stream vs. NVIDIA CUDA - GPGPU computing battle royale]
* [http://bitminer.info/ Bitminer.info] ('''WARNING''': Runs Java miner... May cause reduced computer performance)

[[Category:Mining]]