Bitcoin Wiki - User contributions [en]

Merged mining specification

2015-08-08T12:31:19Z

Phelix: Clarifications

NOTE: This standard is used by [[Namecoin]], but new merged mining data should likely propose a new BIP to supercede it with something based on p2pool's merged mining.

== Terminology ==
;Auxiliary Proof-of-Work (POW): a.k.a "AuxPOW". This is the way that merged mining can exist; it is the relationship between two blockchains for one to trust the other's work as their own and accept AuxPOW blocks.
;Merged Mining: The act of using work done on one blockchain on more than one chain, using Auxiliary POW.
----
;Auxiliary Blockchain: The altcoin that is accepting work done on alternate chains as valid on its own chain. Client applications have to be modified to accept Auxiliary POW.
;Parent Blockchain: The blockchain where the actual mining work is taking place. This chain does not need to be aware of the Auxiliary POW logic, as AuxPOW blocks submitted to this chain are still valid blocks.
----
;Parent Block: Not to be confused with the "previous block". This is a block that is structured for the parent blockchain (i.e. the <tt>prev_block</tt> hash points to the prior block on the parent blockchain). The header of this block is part of the AuxPOW Block in the auxiliary blockchain.
;AuxPOW Block: This is a new type of block that is similar to a standard blockchain block, with two important differences. Firstly, the hash of the block header does NOT meet the difficulty level of the blockchain (so, if interpreted by a naive client, will be thrown out as not meeting the difficulty level). Secondly, it has additional data elements that show that the miner who created this block actually did mining activity (hashing) on the parent blockchain, and that work meets the difficulty level of the auxiliary blockchain, which is why this block should be accepted.

== Aux proof-of-work block ==
This is used to prove work on the auxiliary blockchain. In vinced's original implementation it's generated by calling the <tt>getworkaux</tt> RPC method on the parent blockchain client (<tt>bitcoind</tt>) and then the work is then submitted by passing it to the auxiliary chain client (<tt>namecoind</tt>) as the second parameter to <tt>getauxblock</tt>.

When receiving an Aux proof-of-work block in a [[Protocol specification#block|"<tt>block</tt>" network message]], the data received is similar to a standard block, but extra data is inserted between the <tt>nonce</tt> and <tt>txn_count</tt> elements. In the below table, the shaded rows are the same as the standard block definition:

{|class="wikitable"
! Field Size !! Description !! Data type !! Comments
|- style="background-color:#DDD; color:#999;"
| 4 || version || uint32_t ||
|- style="background-color:#DDD; color:#999;"
| 32 || prev_block || char[32] ||
|- style="background-color:#DDD; color:#999;"
| 32 || merkle_root || char[32] ||
|- style="background-color:#DDD; color:#999;"
| 4 || timestamp || uint32_t ||
|- style="background-color:#DDD; color:#999;"
| 4 || bits || uint32_t ||
|- style="background-color:#DDD; color:#999;"
| 4 || nonce || uint32_t ||
|-
| ? || coinbase_txn || [[Protocol specification#tx|txn]] || Coinbase transaction that is in the parent block, [[#Merged mining coinbase|linking]] the AuxPOW block to its parent block
|-
| 32 || block_hash || char[32] || Hash of the <tt>parent_block</tt> header
|-
| ? || coinbase_branch || [[#Merkle Branch|Merkle branch]] || The merkle branch linking the <tt>coinbase_txn</tt> to the parent block's <tt>merkle_root</tt>
|-
| ? || blockchain_branch || [[#Merkle Branch|Merkle branch]] || The merkle branch linking this auxiliary blockchain to the others, when used in a merged mining setup with multiple auxiliary chains
|-
| 80 || parent_block || [[Protocol specification#block|Block header]] || Parent block header
|- style="background-color:#DDD; color:#999;"
| ? || txn_count || var_int ||
|- style="background-color:#DDD; color:#999;"
| ? || txns || tx[] ||
|}

For the <tt>coinbase_branch</tt> merkle branch, because the coinbase transaction is the first transaction in the block (if using Bitcoin as a parent chain, i.e. hash #7 in the example given [[#Merkle Branch|below]]), the <tt>branch_side_mask</tt> is always going to be all zeroes, because the branch hashes will always be "on the right" of the working hash.

When only working on one auxiliary blockchain, the <tt>blockchain_branch</tt> link is not needed, and is nulled-out by being presented as 5 bytes of zeros (interpreted as a one-byte <tt>var_int</tt> indicating a <tt>branch_length</tt> of zero, and a 32-bit (4 byte) <tt>branch_side_mask</tt> of all zeroes).

Note that the <tt>block_hash</tt> element is not needed as you have the full <tt>parent_block</tt> header element and can calculate the hash from that. The current Namecoin client doesn't check this field for validity, and as such some AuxPOW blocks have it little-endian, and some have it big-endian.

== Merkle Branch ==
Say Alice created a Merkle tree, and it's root element is publicly available. For example:

<pre>
merkleRoot (0)
/ \
/ \
1 2
/ \ / \
/ \ / \
3 4 5 6
/ \ / \ / \ / \
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
</pre>

Now she wants to prove to Bob that a given hash (#10) was part of that tree, but Bob doesn't have the full tree (only the public root; hash #0). Alice can send Bob all the hashes she used to make the tree in the first place (hashes #7-#14, total of 7 extra hashes), so Bob can build the whole tree to verify the root is the same, but that's rather data-intensive. Instead, she could give Bob hashes #9, #3, and #2 (one from each level of the tree, working #10 back to the root). Without Bob knowing the structure of the tree, Alice also has to tell Bob what order to apply the hashes in (since <tt>hash(#9, #10) == #4</tt>, but <tt>hash(#10, #9) != #4</tt>). So Alice tells Bob "left, left, right" to indicate which operand #9, #3, and #2 are, respectively. That can be encoded as a bitmask and take up very little data to transmit. So, instead of transmitting 7 hashes to Bob, Alice transmits 3 hashes and a bitmask. The data savings get even more pronounced if the merkle tree gets even bigger.

That is the overall premise, and specifically for the AuxPOW protocol, it's been termed a "merkle branch" (since it's one pathway of a merkle tree), and is transmitted thus:

{|class="wikitable"
! Field Size !! Description !! Data type !! Comments
|-
| ? || branch_length || [[Protocol_specification#Variable_length_integer|var_int]] || The number of hashes making up the branch
|-
| ? || branch_hash[] || char[32] || Individual hash in the branch; repeated <tt>branch_length</tt> number of times
|-
| 4 || branch_side_mask || int32_t || Bitmask of which side of the merkle hash function the <tt>branch_hash</tt> element should go on. Zero means it goes on the right, One means on the left. It is equal to the index of the starting hash within the widest level of the merkle tree for this merkle branch.
|}

The first <tt>branch_hash</tt> is used first, and the least-significant bit of the <tt>branch_side_mask</tt> determines its hash position. Then the second <tt>branch_hash</tt> is applied with the second-least-significant bit of the <tt>branch_side_mask</tt>, etc. So for Alice's example, <tt>branch_length</tt> would be 3, the hashes would be given in the order #9, #3, then #2, and the <tt>branch_side_mask</tt> would be <tt>0b011</tt> = 3 (equal to the index of #10 in the widest level of the merkle tree).

== Merged mining coinbase ==
Insert exactly one of these headers into the <tt>scriptSig</tt> of the coinbase transaction in the parent block.

{|class="wikitable"
! Field Size !! Description !! Data type !! Comments
|-
| 4 || magic || char[4] || <tt>0xfa</tt>, <tt>0xbe</tt>, 'm', 'm' '''(only required if over 20 bytes past the start of the script; optional otherwise)'''
|-
| 32 || block_hash || char[32] || Hash of the AuxPOW block header / root of the chain merkle branch
|-
| 4 || merkle_size || int32_t || Number of entries in aux work merkle tree. '''(Must be a power of 2)'''
|-
| 4 || merkle_nonce || int32_t || Nonce used to calculate indexes into aux work merkle tree; you may as well leave this at zero
|}

That string of 44 bytes being part of the coinbase script means that the miner constructed the AuxPOW Block before creating the coinbase.

==Aux work merkle tree==
If you're just mining a single auxiliary chain and using getauxblock, you don't have to worry about this - just set the merkle tree hash in the coinbase to the aux chain block's hash as given by getauxblock, the merkle size to 1, and the merkle nonce to 0. If you're mining more than one, this is a bit broken. It uses the following algorithm to convert the chain ID to a slot at the base of the merkle tree in which that chain's block hash must slot:

<pre>unsigned int rand = merkle_nonce;
rand = rand * 1103515245 + 12345;
rand += chain_id;
rand = rand * 1103515245 + 12345;
slot_num = rand % merkle_size</pre>

The idea is that you can increment merkle_nonce until the chains you're mining don't clash for the same slot. The trouble is that this doesn't work; because it just adds a number derived from the merkle_nonce to the chain_id, if two chains clash for one nonce they'll still clash for all possible nonces.<ref>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=51069.0</ref> New implementers: please pick your chain_id so that not clashing with existing chains requires as small a value of merkle_size as possible, or use a better algorithm to calculate the slot id for your chain.

Once you know where in the merkle tree the different chains go, ''reverse the bytes of each chain's block hash as given you by getauxblock'' (so the byte at the start moves to the end, etc) and insert into the appropriate slot, filling the unused ones with arbitrary data. Now build up the merkle tree as usual by taking each pair of values in the initial row and double SHA-256 hashing them to give a new row of hashes, repeating this until you only have a single hash. This last hash is the merkle root. You need to ''reverse the bytes of this again'' before inserting it into the coinbase. If you're not using getauxblock to get the block hash, you can skip the first reversal but still need to reverse the final merkle root when adding it to the coinbase.

The aux proof-of-work also needs a merkle branch, which is built as follows: find the location of the block's hash in the merkle tree, and add the other value that you hashed it with in building the merkle tree. Now add the value you hashed that result with. Keep doing this until you reach the root. The merkle root itself is ''never'' included in the merkle branch. If you just have a single aux chain, this can be left entirely empty. (It also appears you ''don't'' need to reverse these hashes.)

== Example ==
This is the AuxPOW block at [http://explorer.dot-bit.org/b/19200 height 19200] in the Namecoin chain (the first block that allowed AuxPOW authentication). It has a hash of <tt>d8a7c3e01e1e95bcee015e6fcc7583a2ca60b79e5a3aa0a171eddd344ada903d</tt>, and only has one Namecoin transaction (coinbase sending 50 NMC to the miner's address). The parent block that was used as Proof of Work has a hash less than the difficulty target of Namecoin at the time, but not the Bitcoin target:
<pre>
0000000000003d47277359fb969c43e3c7e7c0306a17f6444b8e91e19def03a9 -- parent block hash
000000000000b269000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 -- Namecoin difficulty target
00000000000009ee5d0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 -- Bitcoin difficulty target
</pre>

Hence, this AuxPOW block was valid in the Namecoin blockchain, but not in the Bitcoin blockchain (you will find no Bitcoin block with the hash starting <tt>3d47277359fb969c</tt>. If it were, it would be right after [https://blockchain.info/block-index/163650/00000000000004a59b7deb5c4e01b9786ea01ee8da000db77ce6035c2913be08 <tt>4a59b7deb5c4e01b</tt>], since that's the <tt>previous_block</tt> hash used)

<pre>
Block Header:
01 01 01 00 // Version
36 90 9a c0 7a 16 73 da f6 5f a7 d8 28 88 2e 66 c9 e8 9f 85 46 cd d5 0a 9f b1 00 00 00 00 00 00 // Previous block hash
0f 5c 65 49 bc d6 08 ab 7c 4e ac 59 3e 5b d5 a7 3b 2d 43 2e b6 35 18 70 8f 77 8f c7 dc df af 88 // Merkle root
8d 1a 90 4e // Timestamp
69 b2 00 1b // Bits
00 00 00 00 // Nonce

Parent Block Coinbase Transaction:
01 00 00 00 // Version
01 // TxIn Count

00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 // Previous Out
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ff ff ff ff

35 // Script size
04 5d ee 09 1a 01 4d 52 2c fa be 6d 6d d8 a7 c3 e0 1e 1e 95 bc ee 01 5e 6f cc 75 83 a2 ca 60 b7 // Script
9e 5a 3a a0 a1 71 ed dd 34 4a da 90 3d 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00

ff ff ff ff // Sequence Number
01 // TxOut Count
60 a0 10 2a 01 00 00 00 // Amount

43 // Script Size
41 04 f8 bb e9 7e d2 ac bc 5b ba 11 c6 8f 6f 1a 03 13 f9 18 f3 d3 c0 e8 47 50 55 e3 51 e3 bf 44 // Script
2f 8c 8d ce e6 82 d2 45 7b dc 53 51 b7 0d d9 e3 40 26 76 6e ba 18 b0 6e ae e2 e1 02 ef d1 ab 63
46 67 ac

00 00 00 00 // Lock Time

Coinbase Link:
a9 03 ef 9d e1 91 8e 4b 44 f6 17 6a 30 c0 e7 c7 e3 43 9c 96 fb 59 73 27 47 3d 00 00 00 00 00 00 // Hash of parent block header
05 // Number of links in branch
05 0a c4 a1 a1 e1 bc e0 c4 8e 55 5b 1a 9f 93 52 81 96 8c 72 d6 37 9b 24 72 9c a0 42 5a 3f c3 cb // Hash #1
43 3c d3 48 b3 5e a2 28 06 cf 21 c7 b1 46 48 9a ef 69 89 55 1e b5 ad 23 73 ab 61 21 06 0f 30 34 // Hash #2
1d 64 87 57 c0 21 7d 43 e6 6c 57 ea ed 64 fc 18 20 ec 65 d1 57 f3 3b 74 19 65 18 3a 5e 0c 85 06 // Hash #3
ac 26 02 df e2 f5 47 01 2d 1c c7 50 04 d4 8f 97 ab a4 6b d9 93 0f f2 85 c9 f2 76 f5 bd 09 f3 56 // Hash #4
df 19 72 45 79 d6 5e c7 cb 62 bf 97 94 6d fc 6f b0 e3 b2 83 9b 7f da b3 7c db 60 e5 51 22 d3 5b // Hash #5
00 00 00 00 // Branch sides bitmask

Aux Blockchain Link:
00 // Number of links in branch
00 00 00 00 // Branch sides bitmask

Parent Block Header:
01 00 00 00 // Version
08 be 13 29 5c 03 e6 7c b7 0d 00 da e8 1e a0 6e 78 b9 01 4e 5c eb 7d 9b a5 04 00 00 00 00 00 00 // Previous block hash
e0 fd 42 db 8e f6 d7 83 f0 79 d1 26 be a1 2e 2d 10 c1 04 c0 92 7c d6 8f 95 4d 85 6f 9e 81 11 e5 // Merkle root
9a 23 90 4e // Timestamp
5d ee 09 1a // Bits
1c 65 50 86 // Nonce

Transactions:
01 // Tx Count
01 00 00 00 // Version
01 // TxIn Count

00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 // Previous Out
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ff ff ff ff

08 // Script size
04 69 b2 00 1b 01 01 52 // Script
ff ff ff ff // Sequence number
01 // TxOut Count
00 f2 05 2a 01 00 00 00 // Amount

43 // Script size
41 04 89 fe 91 e6 28 47 57 5c 98 de ea b0 20 f6 5f df f1 7a 3a 87 0e bb 05 82 0b 41 4f 3d 80 97 // Script
21 8e c9 a6 5f 1e 0a e0 ac 35 af 72 47 bd 79 ed 1f 2a 24 67 5f ff b5 aa 6f 96 20 e1 92 0a d4 bf
5a a6 ac

00 00 00 00 // Lock Time
</pre>

==Notes==
<references />

[[Category:Technical]]
[[Category:Developer]]

Namecoin

2014-09-22T13:37:58Z

Phelix: Remove broken link, Add link to list of cryptocurrencies

Namecoin is an alternative distributed Domain Name System (DNS) on the basis of Bitcoin software. It expands the software to support transactions for registering, updating, and transferring domains to serve.

Like Bitcoin, Namecoin is a peer-to-peer system, which, assuming an honest majority of participants, can not be controlled by a single state or a company. Changes to the namespace of the rightful owner of a domain with a public key signature are distributed to all peer-to-peer users. The inclusion in the block chain, as the everlasting logfile is used, verifies that the transactions are authentic. The block chain grows whenever new transactions are added by any of the participants. Through a fairly intense proof-of-work process, a matching result of a cryptographic hash function is found that may be verified by all other participants. Due to the computational effort, it is impractical for a counterfeit blockchain to be created.

Currently, the top-level domain .bit used in the official domain name system is not awarded. To resolve domain name you need either the current block chain or use a public name server that participates in the Namecoin system. Namecoin uses a separate block of Bitcoin chain. The software is open source and is hosted on GitHub.

==See Also==

* [[Dot-bit]]
* [[List of alternative cryptocurrencies]]
* [[Cryptocoin]]

==External Links==
* [http://namecoin.org Namecoin homepage]
* [https://github.com/namecoin/namecoin Namecoin on GitHub]
* [http://bit.namecoin.info New .bit homepage]
* [http://dot-bit.org dot-bit.org] project, focused on the domain registration aspect of Namecoin
* [http://liliontransfer.org/ Lilion Transfer] Exchange where you may exchange NameCoin to 20 currencies, 70 e-currencies, 20 e-wallets or 3 cryptocurrencies.
* [https://coinnext.com Coinnext] Cryptocurrency Exchange - Trade Namecoins
* [https://vircurex.com Vircurex] Buy, sell and trade your Namecoins
*[http://www.crypto.st Crypto Street - Advanced Trading Exchange for Namecoins]

==References==
<references />

[[Category:Open Source]]
[[Category:Digital currencies]]
[[Category:Alternative cryptocurrencies]]

Comparison of cryptocurrencies

2014-09-22T13:34:31Z

Phelix: Update Namecoin

This article aims to list relevant cryptocurrencies. To be listed here, a currency must have '''one''' of the following qualities:
*The currency must have a market cap of one million US dollars.
*The currency must be the first to introduce an innovative protocol.
*The currency must have at one point had significant notoriety.
*The currency must have been an infamous fraud.
These coins are currently ordered according to launch date.

{| class="wikitable sortable" style="width: 100%; text-align: center; font-size: smaller; "
! style="width: 1;" | Coin
! style="width: 1;" | Ticker
! style="width: 1;" | Launched
! style="width: 99;" | Protocol
! style="width: 1;" | Distribution
! style="width: 1;" | Market cap
! style="width: 1;" | Unit cap
! style="width: 1;" | Status
! Notes
|-
| style="text-align: left;" | [[File:Bitcoin.png|16px|link=]] [[Bitcoin]]
| BTC
| 3 Jan 2009
| SHA256d
| rowspan=2 | Proof-of-work (fixed, halving)
| rowspan=2 | $6.34 billion
| 20,999,999.9769
| {{yes|Active}}
| First blockchain
|-
| style="text-align: left;" | [[File:Bitcoin.png|16px|link=]] [[Tonal Bitcoin]]
| TBC
| 2 Jan 2011
| SHA256d
| 7,750,54.00
| {{yes|Active}}
| First on-chain alternative
|-
| style="text-align: left;" | Ripple
| XRP
| 1 Mar 2011
| Ripple
| Central
| $139 million
| 28,989,252,282
| {{yes|Active}}
|
|-
| style="text-align: left;" | [[File:Namecoin.png|16px|link=]] [[Namecoin]]
| NMC
| 18 Apr 2011
| SHA256d
| Proof-of-work (fixed, halving)
| $11.14 million
| 20,999,999.9769
| {{yes|Active}}
| First alternative chain, bitDNS
|-
| style="text-align: left;" | Tenebrix
| TBX
| 25 Sep 2011
| [[scrypt]]
| Central, Proof-of-work (fixed, halving)
| ''None''
| 10,499,999.9769
| {{no|Dead}}
| First [[scrypt]] coin
|-
| style="text-align: left;" | [[File:Litecoin.png|16px|link=]] Litecoin
| LTC
| 7 Oct 2011
| [[scrypt]]
| Proof-of-work (fixed, halving)
| $154 million
| 83,999,949.9076
| {{yes|Active}}
| TBX clone
|-
| style="text-align: left;" | Bytecoin
| BCN
| 4 Jul 2012
| [[CryptoNight]]
| Proof-of-work (random, smooth)
| $2.73 million
| 184.46 billion
| {{yes|Active}}
| First CryptoNote coin
|-
| style="text-align: left;" | [[File:Peercoin.png|16px|link=]] Peercoin
| PPC
| 19 Aug 2012
| SHA256d
| Proof-of-work/stake
| $15.5 million
| Unlimited
| {{yes|Active}}
|
|-
| style="text-align: left;" | Freicoin
| FRC
| 21 Dec 2012
| SHA256d
| Proof-of-work
| $84 thousand
|?
| {{Yes|Active}}
| First demurrage cryptocurrency
|-
| style="text-align: left;" | Feathercoin
| FTC
| 16 Apr 2013
| [[scrypt]]
| Proof-of-work (fixed, halving)
| $1.15 million
|?
| {{yes|Active}}
| LTC hardfork
|-
| style="text-align: left;" | Primecoin
| XPM
| 7 Jul 2013
| [[Cunningham]]
| Proof-of-work
| $1.2 million
|?
| {{Yes|Active}}
| First "useful proof-of-work" altcoin
|-
| style="text-align: left;" | [[File:Btsx.png|16px|link=]] BitSharesX
| BTSX
| 29 Sep 2013
| BitSharesX
|?
| $66.5 million
| 1,999,992,536
| {{yes|Active}}
|
|-
| style="text-align: left;" | [[File:Nxt.png|16px|link=]] Nxt
| NXT
| 29 Sep 2013
| Nxt
| Central
| $29.0 million
| 999,997,096
| {{yes|Active}}
|
|-
| style="text-align: left;" | [[File:Dogecoin.png|16px|link=]] Dogecoin
| DOGE
| 6 Dec 2013
| [[scrypt]]
| Proof-of-work (random)
| $12.7 million
| Unlimited
| {{yes|Active}}
| Was joke, became huge
|-
| style="text-align: left;" | [[File:Darkcoin.png|16px|link=]] Darkcoin
| DRK
| 19 Jan 2014
| [[Combo11]]
| Proof-of-work (fixed, curve)
| $12.5 million
| 18.4 million (estimate)
| {{yes|Active}}
|
|-
| style="text-align: left;" | HunterCoin
| HUC
| 1 Feb 2014
| SHA256d and/or [[scrypt]]
| Game rewards, Proof-of-work
| $47 thousand
| 42,000,000
| {{yes|Active}}
| First blockchain-based game
|-
| style="text-align: left;" | [[File:Monero.png|16px|link=]] Monero
| XMR
| 18 Apr 2014
| [[CryptoNight]]
| Proof-of-work (random, smooth)
| $6.27 million
| 18,446,744,073,709,551,615
| {{yes|Active}}
|
|-
| style="text-align: left;" | [[File:Maid.png|16px|link=]] MaidSafeCoin
| MAID
| 22 Apr 2014
| Mastercoin
| Central
| $8.54 million
| 452,552,412
| {{yes|Active}}
|
|}

==See Also==
* [http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=134179.0 List of alternative chains]
==References==
<references/>
[[Category:Alternative cryptocurrencies]]

BitDNS

2014-09-22T13:30:32Z

Phelix: /* External Links */

A project with the goal is to spread [[namecoin]] domains by providing resources and tools for the developers and the community.

==See Also==

* [[Namecoin]]

==External Links==
* [http://bit.namecoin.info New .bit homepage]
* [http://dot-bit.org Dot-bit.org] old project website

Namecoin

2014-09-22T13:29:51Z

Phelix: Update Links

Namecoin is an alternative distributed Domain Name System (DNS) on the basis of Bitcoin software. It expands the software to support transactions for registering, updating, and transferring domains to serve.

Like Bitcoin, Namecoin is a peer-to-peer system, which, assuming an honest majority of participants, can not be controlled by a single state or a company. Changes to the namespace of the rightful owner of a domain with a public key signature are distributed to all peer-to-peer users. The inclusion in the block chain, as the everlasting logfile is used, verifies that the transactions are authentic. The block chain grows whenever new transactions are added by any of the participants. Through a fairly intense proof-of-work process, a matching result of a cryptographic hash function is found that may be verified by all other participants. Due to the computational effort, it is impractical for a counterfeit blockchain to be created.

Currently, the top-level domain .bit used in the official domain name system is not awarded. To resolve domain name you need either the current block chain or use a public name server that participates in the Namecoin system. Namecoin uses a separate block of Bitcoin chain. The software is open source and is hosted on GitHub.

==See Also==

* [[Dot-bit]]
* [[NamecoinUs]]
* [[Cryptocoin]]

==External Links==
* [http://namecoin.org Namecoin homepage]
* [https://github.com/namecoin/namecoin Namecoin on GitHub]
* [http://bit.namecoin.info New .bit homepage]
* [http://dot-bit.org dot-bit.org] project, focused on the domain registration aspect of Namecoin
* [http://liliontransfer.org/ Lilion Transfer] Exchange where you may exchange NameCoin to 20 currencies, 70 e-currencies, 20 e-wallets or 3 cryptocurrencies.
* [https://coinnext.com Coinnext] Cryptocurrency Exchange - Trade Namecoins
* [https://vircurex.com Vircurex] Buy, sell and trade your Namecoins
*[http://www.crypto.st Crypto Street - Advanced Trading Exchange for Namecoins]

==References==
<references />

[[Category:Open Source]]
[[Category:Digital currencies]]
[[Category:Alternative cryptocurrencies]]

Profitability Calculator

2013-01-02T09:56:47Z

Phelix: added blockchained.com calc

Aids in estimating mining profits at current network and market conditions.

The current [[difficulty]] is obtained from [[Bitcoin Block Explorer]] and the USD exchange rate is taken from the highest bid on the [[Currency Exchange]] [[MtGox]].

== See also ==
* [[Generation Calculator]]
* [[Power Calc]]

==External Links==
* [[TP's Bitcoin Calculator]][http://tpbitcalc.appspot.com/](useful for pool mining)
* [http://bitcoinX.com/profit/ BitcoinX.com Mining Profitability Calculator] - since 2011-04-14
* [http://0x10.org/sandbox/bitcalc/ Mining Break Even Calculator] (also useful for pool mining)
* [http://bitcoin.web-share.nl/ Easy BitCoin Mining Calculator] (also useful for pool mining)
* [http://btcsec.com/calculator/ Online Bitcoin Profitability Mining Calculator] (Russian)
* [http://blockchained.com/profit/ Blockchained.com Bitcoin Mining Profitability Calculator] - (with decline factor)
[[Category:Mining]]
[[Category:Calculators]]

Talk:BIP 0015

2012-03-15T11:31:45Z

Phelix:

== Thoughts ==
I think anything outside the blockchain is an additional security vulnerability.

=== My concept ===

Send 0.005 BTCs to 10 consecutive coinbase addresses in one trasaction (concept copied from http://vermorel.com/process/CreateJournalEntryComment?moduleId=5042156&entryId=14193327&finalize=true ). Coins sent from address you want to use and include in script hex encoded address in any format - e.g. MyName or me@company.com then a OP_DROP in the script (as per "bob" in (98*256*256+111*256*256+98=6451042) http://blockexplorer.com/testnet/tx/9b8cf14991f5b401d4356bbf2e11f5f3bb5221bbd947b8be4cf600f5492f974d ).
This would be called an "Address Initiation" transaction.

==== Initially ====
Clients would when they see an Address Initiation transaction store name/address pair locally. Could then translate names into addresses to send BTCs. Ordered nature of blockchain would ensure you can check your address is valid before telling anyone to use it.

==== Once large scale and implemented network wide ====
Clients send directly to nice addresses and network can lookup real address to receive when trying to spend.

==== Advantages ====
* There is a cost of creating an address so less spam addresses.
* Cost is paid to miners who secure the network.
* Does not require blockchain fork.
* Any address format possible.
* Now people can speculate on Addresses too! (or is that a disadvantage?).
* As secure as Bitcoin.

==== Disadvantages ====
* A number of client changes needed to make user friendly.
* Does not seem elegant.
* Storage bloat (although would not be a problem for a long time).
* More prone to typos (phelix)
[[User:Nibor|Nibor]] 00:11 27 December 2011

== Namecoin aliases ==
http://dot-bit.org/Namespace:Aliases

Talk:BIP 0015

2012-03-15T11:30:47Z

Phelix: typos, namecoin

== Thoughts ==
I think anything outside the blockchain is an additional security vulnerability.

=== My concept ===

Send 0.005 BTCs to 10 consecutive coinbase addresses in one trasaction (concept copied from http://vermorel.com/process/CreateJournalEntryComment?moduleId=5042156&entryId=14193327&finalize=true ). Coins sent from address you want to use and include in script hex encoded address in any format - e.g. MyName or me@company.com then a OP_DROP in the script (as per "bob" in (98*256*256+111*256*256+98=6451042) http://blockexplorer.com/testnet/tx/9b8cf14991f5b401d4356bbf2e11f5f3bb5221bbd947b8be4cf600f5492f974d ).
This would be called an "Address Initiation" transaction.

==== Initially ====
Clients would when they see an Address Initiation transaction store name/address pair locally. Could then translate names into addresses to send BTCs. Ordered nature of blockchain would ensure you can check your address is valid before telling anyone to use it.

==== Once large scale and implemented network wide ====
Clients send directly to nice addresses and network can lookup real address to receive when trying to spend.

==== Advantages ====
* There is a cost of creating an address so less spam addresses.
* Cost is paid to miners who secure the network.
* Does not require blockchain fork.
* Any address format possible.
* Now people can speculate on Addresses too! (or is that a disadvantage?).
* As secure as Bitcoin.

==== Disadvantages ====
* A number of client changes needed to make user friendly.
* Does not seem elegant.
* Storage bloat (although would not be a problem for a long time).
* More prone to typos
[[User:Nibor|Nibor]] 00:11 27 December 2011

==== Namecoin aliases ====
http://dot-bit.org/Namespace:Aliases

Original Bitcoin client/API calls list

2012-01-29T17:48:09Z

Phelix: getreceivedbyaddress works only locally

Bitcoin API call list (as of version 0.4.0)

== Common operations ==

=== Listing my bitcoin addresses ===

Listing the bitcoin [[address|addresses]] in your wallet is easily done via ''listreceivedbyaddress''. It normally lists only addresses which already have received transactions, however you can list all the addresses by setting the first argument to 0, and the second one to true.

[[accounts explained|Accounts]] are used to organize addresses.

== Full list ==

Required arguments are denoted inside < and > Optional arguments are inside [ and ].

{|class="wikitable"
! Command !! Parameters !! Description !! Requires unlocked wallet? (v0.4.0+)
|-
| backupwallet || <destination> || Safely copies wallet.dat to destination, which can be a directory or a path with filename. || N
|-
| encryptwallet || <passphrase> || Encrypts the wallet with <passphrase>. || N
|-
| getaccount || <bitcoinaddress> || Returns the account associated with the given address. || N
|-
| getaccountaddress || <account> || Returns the current bitcoin address for receiving payments to this account. || N
|-
| getaddressesbyaccount || <account> || Returns the list of addresses for the given account. || N
|-
| getbalance || [account] [minconf=1] || If [account] is not specified, returns the server's total available balance. If [account] is specified, returns the balance in the account. || N
|-
| getblockbycount || height || Dumps the block existing at specified height. '''Note: this is not available in the official release'''
|-
| getblockcount || || Returns the number of blocks in the longest block chain. || N
|-
| getblocknumber || || Returns the block number of the latest block in the longest block chain. || N
|-
| getconnectioncount || || Returns the number of connections to other nodes. || N
|-
| getdifficulty || || Returns the proof-of-work difficulty as a multiple of the minimum difficulty. || N
|-
| getgenerate || || Returns true or false whether bitcoind is currently generating hashes || N
|-
| gethashespersec || || Returns a recent hashes per second performance measurement while generating. || N
|-
| getinfo || || Returns an object containing various state info. || N
|-
| getnewaddress || [account] || Returns a new bitcoin address for receiving payments. If [account] is specified (recommended), it is added to the address book so payments received with the address will be credited to [account]. || N
|-
| getreceivedbyaccount || [account] [minconf=1] || Returns the total amount received by addresses with [account] in transactions with at least [minconf] confirmations. If [account] not provided return will include all transactions to all accounts. (version 0.3.24-beta) || N
|-
| getreceivedbyaddress || <bitcoinaddress> [minconf=1] || Returns the total amount received by <bitcoinaddress> in transactions with at least [minconf] confirmations. While some might consider this obvious, value reported by this only considers *receiving* transactions. It does not check payments that have been made *from* this address. In other words, this is not "getaddressbalance". Works only for addresses in the local wallet, external addresses will always show 0. || N
|-
| gettransaction || <txid> || Returns an object about the given transaction containing:
* "amount" : total amount of the transaction
* "confirmations" : number of confirmations of the transaction
* "txid" : the transaction ID
* "time" : time the transaction occurred
* "details" - An array of objects containing:
** "account"
** "address"
** "category"
** "amount"
|| N
|-
| [[getwork]] || [data] || If [data] is not specified, returns formatted hash data to work on:
* "midstate" : precomputed hash state after hashing the first half of the data
* "data" : block data
* "hash1" : formatted hash buffer for second hash
* "target" : little endian hash target
If [data] is specified, tries to solve the block and returns true if it was successful.
|| N
|-
| help || [command] || List commands, or get help for a command. || N
|-
| keypoolrefill || || Fills the keypool, requires wallet passphrase to be set. || Y
|-
| listaccounts || [minconf=1] || Returns Object that has account names as keys, account balances as values. || N
|-
| listreceivedbyaccount || [minconf=1] [includeempty=false] || Returns an array of objects containing:
* "account" : the account of the receiving addresses
* "amount" : total amount received by addresses with this account
* "confirmations" : number of confirmations of the most recent transaction included
|| N
|-
| listreceivedbyaddress || [minconf=1] [includeempty=false] || Returns an array of objects containing:
* "address" : receiving address
* "account" : the account of the receiving address
* "amount" : total amount received by the address
* "confirmations" : number of confirmations of the most recent transaction included
To get a list of accounts on the system, execute bitcoind listreceivedbyaddress 0 true
|| N
|-
| listtransactions || [account] [count=10] [from=0] || Returns up to [count] most recent transactions skipping the first [from] transactions for account [account]. If [account] not provided will return recent transaction from all accounts.
|| N
|-
| move || <fromaccount> <toaccount> <amount> [minconf=1] [comment] || Move from one account in your wallet to another || N
|-
| sendfrom || <fromaccount> <tobitcoinaddress> <amount> [minconf=1] [comment] [comment-to] || <amount> is a real and is rounded to 8 decimal places. Will send the given amount to the given address, ensuring the account has a valid balance using [minconf] confirmations. Returns the transaction ID if successful (not in JSON object). || Y
|-
| sendmany || <fromaccount> {address:amount,...} [minconf=1] [comment] || amounts are double-precision floating point numbers || Y
|-
| sendtoaddress || <bitcoinaddress> <amount> [comment] [comment-to] || <amount> is a real and is rounded to 8 decimal places. Returns the transaction ID <txid> if successful. || Y
|-
| setaccount || <bitcoinaddress> <account> || Sets the account associated with the given address. Assigning address that is already assigned to the same account will create a new address associated with that account. || N
|-
| setgenerate || <generate> [genproclimit] || <generate> is true or false to turn generation on or off. Generation is limited to [genproclimit] processors, -1 is unlimited. || N
|-
| settxfee || <amount> || <amount> is a real and is rounded to the nearest 0.00000001 || N
|-
| stop || || Stop bitcoin server. || N
|-
| validateaddress || <bitcoinaddress> || Return information about <bitcoinaddress>. || N
|-
| walletlock || || Removes the wallet encryption key from memory, locking the wallet. After calling this method, you will need to call walletpassphrase again before being able to call any methods which require the wallet to be unlocked. || N
|-
| walletpassphrase || <passphrase> <timeout> || Stores the wallet decryption key in memory for <timeout> seconds. || N
|-
| walletpassphrasechange || <oldpassphrase> <newpassphrase> || Changes the wallet passphrase from <oldpassphrase> to <newpassphrase>. || N

|}

==See Also==

* [[Original Bitcoin client]]
* [[API reference (JSON-RPC)]]
* [[Lazy_API]]
* [[Elis-API]] - A more detailed version of this page - for developers!
* [http://code.gogulski.com/bitcoin-php/class_bitcoin_client.html PHP BitcoinClient Class Reference]

[[Category:Technical]]
[[Category:Developer]]

Talk:BIP 0020

2012-01-22T10:19:54Z

Phelix: After Buy URL

Has anybody thought about including network addresses (IPv4/IPv6) of the receiving client into the URL? This way, a payment transaction could be sent directly (in addition to
sending P2P of course). --[[User:Goonie|Goonie]] 11:21, 23 July 2011 (GMT)

== Fallback URI ==
On Android an app can register to open with a normal web URI. This has the advantage of acting as a fallback URI in case there is no app that supports '''bitcoin:'''. For example we could propose '''<nowiki>https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Send/<address>[?][amount=<size>][&][label=<label>][&][message=<message>]</nowiki>'''. If the user had a mobile app that supported bitcoin it would have registered '''<nowiki>https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Send/</nowiki>''' and be launched. If the user did not have such an app their browser would launch and be directed to '''https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Send/'''. This page could then inform the user about various apps that support bitcoin transfers and possibly have a link to [[MyBitcoin]] as well. Maybe '''https://bitcoin.org/Send/''' would be more appropriate, though that one might not be updated often enough.
* iPhone support
There is even a way to have this work on iOS devices. Have the web page redirect to the standard '''bitcoin:''' scheme. If an app is present to support this the app will launch, if not the browser the will stay open at the explanation page.
* Upshot
This fallback proposal will make bitcoin QR codes meaningful regardless of if the user has a bitcoin app installed.--[[User:BitMark|BitMark]] 16:05, 2 April 2011 (GMT)

== Use-cases - buy this link ==
On the buy-this link, perhaps we should also incorporate an optional transaction id or something which would be passed along to the bitcoin client. Not really transaction but some sort of arbitrary data, only meaningful to the merchant. Something an online merchant can use to verify which transaction it has received is relevant to a purchase. [[User:Dantman|Dantman]] 20:45, 18 April 2011 (GMT)

== Incorrect Syntax ==
The proposed syntax doesn't seem to capture the intent of the design. Here's how it reads on the wiki page:

bitcoin:<address>[?][amount=<size>][&][label=<label>][&][message=<message>]

The above syntax describes the question mark and ampersands as optional, but really they should be mandatory as a separator if multiple parameters are included. According to the proposed specification, above, the following would be an acceptable URI, which I don't believe is a good thing (note the absence of the optional question mark and ampersands):

bitcoin:1NS17iag9jJgTHD1VXjvLCEnZuQ3rJED9Lamount=50X8label=Luke-Jrmessage=Donation%20for%20project%20xyz

Perhaps a more exact/correct way to describe the proposed syntax would be:

bitcoin:<address>[?<parameters-list>]
where <parameters-list> is one or more of the following, separated by ampersand
[amount=<size>]
[label=<label>]
[message=<message>]

The BNF gets close to describing this, but also has issues. The most glaring to me is this line:

messageparam = "label=" *uchar

(Seems to me that messageparam should have the literal "message=", as opposed to "label=".)

In addition, the BNF includes a parameter named "version" (which is not in the earlier specification), and also doesn't state that parameters are separated by ampersands.

[[User:Jerfelix|Jerfelix]] 04:09, 13 June 2011 (GMT)

== Why all the crazy representation stuff? ==

Amounthex, amountdec, exponents.. wtf? Why not settle on one normalized representation, this complicates parsing (and testing of parsers) for no good reason --[[User:Witchspace|Witchspace]] 05:14, 4 August 2011 (GMT)

* An earlier draft used a simple Satoshi count for amount, but some community members thought it needed to use more high-level units so we ended up with a combination of both. Parsing is not very complicated, and doing it this way allows people writing URIs to easily specify the value they want in any existing [[Units|unit]]. The spec also has examples which can be used for testing. --[[User:Luke-jr|Luke-jr]] 14:04, 10 August 2011 (GMT)

== After Buy URL ==
It might be interesting to include an URL the user is directed to after payment.

Use case: buy digital goods for mobile devices.

Example: I want to buy a digital newspaper or app via QR code: I scan the code, pay the amount and am then redirected to a refreshing "waiting for payment" page that will show me the content when it considers the transaction valid.

[[User:Phelix|Phelix]] 10:19, 22 January 2012 (GMT)

Talk:BIP 0020

2012-01-22T10:16:47Z

Phelix:

Profitability Calculator

2011-12-11T18:47:45Z

Phelix:

Aids in estimating mining profits at current network and market conditions.

The current [[difficulty]] is obtained from [[Bitcoin Block Explorer]] and the USD exchange rate is taken from the highest bid on the [[Currency Exchange]] [[MtGox]].

==External Links==
* [http://bitcoinX.com/profit/ BitcoinX.com Mining Profitability Calculator] - since 2011-04-14
* [http://tpbitcalc.appspot.com/ TP's Bitcoin Calculator] website (useful for pool mining)
* [http://0x10.org/sandbox/bitcalc/ Mining Break Even Calculator] website (also useful for pool mining)
* [http://bitcoin.web-share.nl/ Easy BitCoin Mining Calculator] website (also useful for pool mining)
[[Category:Mining]]

Template:MainPage Topics

2011-10-16T12:25:03Z

Phelix:

{|cellpadding="2" style="background-color: inherit;"
|-
| scope="col" style="width: 200px;" |
* [[Introduction]]
* [[Getting started]]
* [[Myths]]
* [[Securing your wallet]]
| scope="col" style="width: 200px;" |
* [[PHP developer intro]]
* [[API reference (JSON-RPC)]]
* [[Protocol specification]]
* [[Secure Trading|Best practices for traders]]
* [[Bitcoin Improvement Proposals]]
|}

{|cellpadding="2" style="background-color: inherit;"
|-
! scope="col" style="width: 200px;" |
! scope="col" style="width: 200px;" |
|-
|
* [[Software]]
* [[:Category:Mining|Mining]]
* [[:Category:Exchanges|Exchanges]]
* [[:Category:Directories|Local Directories]]
* [[Press|Press coverage]]
* [[:Category:Marketing|Marketing resources]]
* [[People]]
|
* [[:Category:Technical|Technical articles]]
* [[:Category:Clients|Clients]] / [[:Category:Frontends|Frontends]]
* [[:Category:Economics|Economics]]
* [[Trade|Businesses (Trade)]]
* [[Real world shops|Real world merchants map]]
* [[Donation-accepting_organizations_and_projects|Donation-accepting sites]]
* [[Meetups]]
|}

<div style="text-align: right;" class="noprint">[{{fullurl:Template:MainPage_Topics|action=edit}} '''Edit'''] – '''[[Special:Categories|See More]]'''</div>

Talk:Main Page

2011-10-16T12:20:07Z

Phelix:

The description of bitcoin is similiar to wikipedia article.--[[User:Kiba|Kiba]] 19:53, 16 December 2010 (GMT)
: It seems that the beginning of the introduction was made by Grondilu (french guy who sometimes comes on irc and auctions gold on the forum), see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bitcoin&diff=402269158&oldid=402260422]. Since most of the bitcoin article on wikipedia was put together by the bitcoin community, it shouldn't be too difficult to have them accept publication here. In the meantime I see no harm keeping this for a few days, until we either get explicit authorization, or rewrite it into something more personnal. [[User:MagicalTux|MagicalTux]] 21:47, 16 December 2010 (GMT)
:: In the meantime I have added a "wikipedia" source, thru adhering with the wikipedia CC by-sa license. [[User:MagicalTux|MagicalTux]] 21:49, 16 December 2010 (GMT)
:::Authorisation isn't needed. We're complying with the Wikipedia license by sourcing their work. Shouldn't matter. [[User:Genjix|Genjix]] 03:31, 19 December 2010 (GMT)

I don't like "the idea of using digital files as money" -- maybe "the idea of using digital information as money" ? 'files' has too specific a meaning in the computer context. Then again, most dollars and euros and other conventional currency are nothing but accounting entries in various databases.--[[User:Gavinandresen|Gavin Andresen]] 16:20, 22 December 2010 (GMT)
: Maybe using with "bits of data"? (it's BITcoin after all). Anyway "files" doesn't seem appropriate... [[User:MagicalTux|MagicalTux]] 12:25, 23 December 2010 (GMT)
::"bits of data" sounds equally weird. I changed it to information. However, is it really information? Information is supposed to be human-readable quantitative data, whereas data is the raw stream... It doesn't fit data or information as it's a solution to a mathematical operation. We could write "the idea of using computed solutions to mathematical problems as money". [[User:Genjix|Genjix]] 16:38, 23 December 2010 (GMT)
:::Ok, on second thought, I changed it. [[User:Genjix|Genjix]] 16:39, 23 December 2010 (GMT)

== Header capitalisation ==

Please refrain from using Initial Caps in your titles. Use One initial cap; it's the style in current usage.
For names such as Bitcoin Market, capitalise each letter of the word only for that name
e.g "How to use Bitcoin Market".[[User:Genjix|Genjix]] 07:23, 30 December 2010 (GMT)
:Lets stick to the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_(capitalization) Wikipedia style guide]. [[User:Genjix|Genjix]] 21:07, 9 January 2011 (GMT)

== Fonts for source code ==

MT, can you make the fonts bigger? I can hardly see the fonts for the <source> snippets. Thanks. [[User:Genjix|Genjix]] 07:23, 30 December 2010 (GMT)
: For the source snippets, this can be done by editing [[MediaWiki:Geshi.css]] I guess, use the discussion page there [[User:MagicalTux|MagicalTux]] 14:59, 31 December 2010 (GMT)
::Thanks. I didn't know about that- well you've sorted it now anyway ;) [[User:Genjix|Genjix]] 21:09, 9 January 2011 (GMT)

== Myths about Bitcoin page ==

[[Myths]] needs more love! Not sure what to add there, but lets work on this and put it on the front-page. [[User:Genjix|Genjix]] 21:15, 9 January 2011 (GMT)

==Further Languages==

There now are wiki URLs here for two languages in addition to English. How do bitcoin wikis for additional languages get started? For example, there are a number of bitcoin users whose primary language is spanish. Bitcoin has a number of German language readers too ... for example [http://www.go-bitcoin.com Go-Bitcoin]]. [[User:sgornick]] 18:01, 8 February 2011 (GMT)
: Those informations are available on the [[Bitcoin.it Wiki]] page. [[User:MagicalTux|MagicalTux]] 08:30, 16 February 2011 (GMT)

== Recent Changes showing New Users ==

Would an administrator please remove new users from the recent changes? It generally clogs it up and isn't helpful for editors. Thanks! --[[User:Firestorm|<tt><big>'''Firestorm'''</big></tt>]] 05:10, 26 May 2011 (GMT)

== Please remove text about Fractional Reserve banking! ==

This needs to be removed immediately from the front page: "Be safe from instability caused by fractional reserve banking and central banks. The limited inflation of the Bitcoin system's money supply is distributed evenly (by CPU power) throughout the network, not monopolized by banks."

Nothing about Bitcoin has anything to do with Fractional Reserve Banking. Fractional reserve banking will exist with bitcoin. Also, inflation is not limited by any bitcoin algorithm- only the currency supply which are two different things. [[Controlled_Currency_Supply|Please read this article!]]

Even if you change "limited '''inflation''' of the Bitcoin system's money supply" to "limited '''increase''' of the Bitcoin system's money supply", it would still be wrong because money supply includes demand deposits which are not limited by Bitcoin. The only thing limited by Bitcoin is the currency supply.

== Contents of "Topic central" ==
I suggest adding "services". [[User:Phelix|Phelix]] 12:30, 15 September 2011 (GMT)

This link should be displayed more prominently. Maybe something like: "spend coins". Also "trade" is very misleading because it is easy to think of trading bitcoins on an exchange but not buying goods and services.
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Trade

Talk:Main Page

2011-09-15T12:30:43Z

Phelix:

Mining hardware comparison

2011-08-29T16:02:04Z

Phelix: /* AMD (ATI) */

Below are some statistics about the mining performance of various hardware used in a [[mining rig]].

The table shows (mostly) stock clock numbers. 10-20% performance improvement can be achieved with [[GPU overclocking tools]].

'''Notes:'''
* Mhash/s = millions hashes per second (raw speed performance ; may not be very energy efficient with some models)
* Mhash/J = millions hashes per joule (energy efficiency ; 1 joule of energy is spent for 1 watt in 1 second)
* W = watt (maximum power consumption, i.e. energy per unit of time : 1 W = 1 J/s)
* Clock (in MHz) refers to the Shader clock only with nVidia cards (not Core or Memory). With AMD card the shader clock is not separate, but is part of the GPU clock.
* SP = Stream processors (Shader Units)

==Graphics cards==
=== Popular Mining Cards ===
These tables have been included to make choosing a card easier. The cards selected are generally readily available online. Once you have purchased a card or cards, use the tables below to compare different configurations and setups.
==== Single Card Setups ====
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! Price <ref name=amazon>Price from http://amazon.com/ on 2011-07-02</ref> !! Availability !! Avg. Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! Mhash/$
|----
|5770
|$136
|Moderate
|212.83
|1.45
|1.56
|----
|5830
|$140
|Moderate
|286.45
|1.4
|2.05
|----
|5850
|$250
|Limited
|325.49
|1.73
|1.3
|----
|5870
|$350
|Limited
|393.46
|1.9
|1.12
|----
|5970
|$730
|V. Limited
|655.83
|2.01
|0.90
|----
|6750
|$116
|Easy
|167.59
|
|1.44
|----
|6770
|$137
|Easy
|196.67
|
|1.44
|----
|6850
|$160
|Easy
|213.7
|1.35
|1.34
|----
|6870
|$190
|Easy
|278.31
|1.73
|1.46
|----
|6950
|$250
|Easy
|360.62
|1.8
|1.44
|----
|6970
|$350
|Easy
|389.55
|1.72
|1.11
|----
|6990
|$770
|Limited
|758.82
|1.91
|0.99
|----
|}

==== Multi-Card Setups ====
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! Price <ref name=amazon/> !! Availability !! Avg. Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! Mhash/$
|----
|5830x2
|$360
|Moderate
|525
|
|1.46
|----
|5850x4
|$644
|Limited
|1360
|1.94
|2.11
|----
|5870x2
|$700
|Limited
|787.5
|0.84
|1.13
|----
|6770x2
|$274
|Easy
|464
|
|1.69
|----
|6950x4
|$1,000
|Easy
|1316
|1.51
|1.32
|----
|6970x2
|$700
|Easy
|769
|1.6
|1.10
|----
|6990x2
|$1,540
|Limited
|1568
|1.7
|1.02
|----
|6990x3
|$2,310
|Limited
|2094
|1.8
|0.91
|----
|}
<references>
</references>

===AMD (ATI)===
To get the maximum performance use the 2.1 release of the ATI Stream SDK. 2.2 wastes CPU time, and 2.3/2.4 drop mining performance by 5-10% unless using the Phoenix phatk kernel. ''Note: This statement is not entirely accurate. '''YMMV'''.''

{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! Mhash / $<ref name='amazon_20110625'/> !! Watts !! Clock !! SP !! SDK !! Slot !! Miner !! Notes

|-
| 3410 || 0.89 || 0.074 || ? || 12(?) || 222 || 40 || 1.4 beta || PCI-E 1.1 x8 || A custom Brook+ miner || Using 16,384 length streams

|-
| 3XXX || || || || || || || || || || OpenCL Not Supported

|-
| 42XX || || || || || || || || || || OpenCL Not Supported (integrated/mobile GPU)

|-
| 4350 || 6.93 || 0.346 ||0.16 || 20 || 575 || 80 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors
|-
| 4350 || 8.14 || -|| 0.19 || - || 730 || 80 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Diablo/Windows7 || -w 32. Model: Asus EAH4350 Silent. Memory at 400MHz. Runs at 60°C with ambient at 25°C.

|-
| 4550 || 7.23 || 0.289 ||0.13 || 25 || 600 || 80 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors

|-
| 4550 || 7.8 || || || || || || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer /phoenix || worksize=64 VECTORS

|-
| 4570M || 8.02 || 0.297 || ? || 27 || 680 || 80 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Diablo/Windows7 || -w 64, SDK 2.4, Cat 11.4. Model: Sony Vaio NW

|-
| 4570M || 9.6 || 0.300|| ? || 32 || 825(OC) || 80 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Diablo/Windows7 || -w 64, SDK 2.4, Cat 11.4. Model: Sony Vaio NW. OC core 680->825. U/C memory 800->500.

|-
| 4650 || 31.33 || 0.653|| 0.44 || 48 || 650 || 320 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors

|-
| 4670 || 36.14 || 0.613|| 0.34 || 59 || 750 || 320 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors
|-
| 4670 || 40.11 || 0.679|| 0.38 || 59 || 800 || 320 || - || AGP x8 || poclbm/Ubuntu 10.10 w/ H == 0 mod || -w 32 -f 0, don't use vectors [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.msg85236#msg85236 source]
|-
| 4670 || 50 || - || 0.47 || 60 || 800 || 320 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer || 2 miners set up i7 920 (130W), CPU: Ufasoft, GPU: OpenCL; the CPU is getting about 40 Mhash/s while the GPU goes from 10-20 Mhash/s

|-
| 4730 || 72.29 || 0.657|| ? || 110 || 750 || 640 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - ||

|-
| 4770 || 72.29 || 0.904|| 0.72 || 80 || 750 || 640 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - ||

|-
| 4830 || 55.42 || 0.583|| || 95 || 575 || 640 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - ||
|-
| 4830 || 66.12 || 0.503|| || 105 || 700 || 1005 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - ||

|-
| 4830 || 61.7 || - || || - || 700 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm-mod || Fedora 14 ||
|-
| 4830 || 64.9 || - || || - || 700 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm-mod || Fedora 14 ||

|-
| 4850 || 75.30 || 0.685 || || 110 || 625 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - ||
|-
| 4850 || 84.3 || 0.766|| || 110 || 725 || 300 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - || -w64 fan at 70% temp 73C, stock voltage -gui miner
|-
| 4850 || 90.1 || 0.819 || || 110 || 800 || 500 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer || -f 30; Tried phoenix and phatk, got same max
|-
| 4850 || 101 || 0.918 || || 110 || 817 || 500 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer || -f 0, core 817mhz(default 625)@1.123v , mem downclock to 500mhz (default 993) [http://www.smpake.com/?p=6 source]
|-
| 4850x2 || 150.60 || 0.602 || || 250 || 625 || 1600 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - ||

|-
| 4860 || 67.47 || 0.519|| || 130 || 700 || 640 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - ||

|-
|style="background:#F8F8FF;"| 4870 || 92.84 || 0.6189333(?)|| || 150(?) || 830(OC) || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 || -k poclbm AGGRESSION=5 (Windows 7 64-Bit, GPU OC 750->830MHz, VRAM UC 900->450MHz, BIOS modded)
|-
|style="background:#F8F8FF;"| 4870 || 104.6 || 0.872|| || 120 || 830(OC) || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 256 -f 1, Windows 7 64-Bit, GPU Core OC to 830 MHz, GPU Memory UC to 190 MHz (saves 30 watts at outlet)
|-
|style="background:#F8F8FF;"| 4870 || 90.36 || 0.602|| || 150 || 750 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || clmine ||
|-
|style="background:#F8F8FF;"| 4870 || 78 || 0.520|| || 150 || - || - || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/Vista 64bit || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source]
|-
|style="background:#F8F8FF;"| 4870x2 || 180.72|| 0.632|| || 286 || 750 || 1600 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - ||
|-
|style="background:#F8F8FF;"| 4870x2 || 180.6|| 0.632|| || 286 || 800 || 1600 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - ||

|-
| 4890 || 97.1 || 0.511|| || 190 || 870(OC) || 1050 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-01-21 Solo settings || Sapphire fab. No flags options helped. Close all browsers and do full restart of GUIMiner and then Bitcoin via GUIMiner server starter or the browsers GPU accl. will limit to 56~ ish Mhash/s - I can now start browser without slowdowns
|-
| 4890 || 102.41 || 0.539|| || 190 || 850 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - ||
|-
| 4890 || 108.3 || 0.57|| || 190 || 975 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - ||
|-
| 4890 || 121.5 || -|| || 190 || 1025 (OC) || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || no flags, Vcore 1.4 ||
|-
|style="background:#FFF8EF;"| 5450 || 11.99|| 0.631|| || 19 || 650 || 80 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - ||
|-
|style="background:#FFF8EF;"| 5450 || 13.74|| || - || - || 700 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/Linuxcoin v0.2 || -v -w128 tried several options, seems to work best.
|-
|style="background:#FFF8EF;"| 5450 || 14.12|| || - || - || 700 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix/Linuxcoin v0.2 || Flags: "DEVICE=0 VECTORS AGGRESSION=4 -v FASTLOOP BFI_INT WORKSIZE=64" Kernel: "phatk"
|-
|style="background:#FFF8EF;"| 5450 || 15.36|| || - || - || 700 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix || Flags: "DEVICE=0 VECTORS AGRESSION=8 FASTLOOP BFI_ING WORKSIZE=128" Kernel: "phatk" - MagicSata
|-
|style="background:#FFF8EF;"| 5450 || 18.10|| || - || - || 774 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 1 774.66MHz/300.37MHz
|-
| 5550 || 40.59 || 1.041|| || 39 || 550 || 320 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - ||
|-
|-
| 5550 || 62.10 || - || - || - || 700 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix || 700MHz core 800MHz ram, phatk mod, Flags: "-k phatk worksize=128 vectors aggression=4 bfi_int"
|-
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 59.96 || 1.538|| || 39 || 650 || 400 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - ||
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 64 || 1.641|| || 39 || 650 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 62 || 1.59|| || 39 || 650 || 400 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 OpenCL/Linux x86_64 || -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS AGGRESSION=4 -v FASTLOOP BFI_INT WORKSIZE=64
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 73 || 1.872|| || 39 || 700 || 400 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 OpenCL/Linux x86_64 || -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS AGGRESSION=4 -v FASTLOOP BFI_INT WORKSIZE=64
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 102 || 1.46(+)|| || 75(-) || 950 || 400 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 OpenCL/Windows 7 x86 (no Aero) || -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS AGGRESSION=7 -v FASTLOOP BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 (Reference Sapphire card, 2 additional 120mm coolers, temperature is 79-82C)

|-
| 5650 || 48 || 1.37|| || 35(?) || - || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source] [http://www.notebookcheck.net/ATI-Mobility-Radeon-HD-5650.23697.0.html source] -- not TDP but load
|-
| 5650 || 61.2 || || || 35 || || || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.50 OpenCL/Windows 7 x64 || -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128 AGGRESSION=9
|-
|style="background:#EEFFEE;"| 5670 || 71.49 || 1.117|| || 64 || 775 || 400 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - ||
|-
|style="background:#EEFFEE;"| 5670 || 72 || 1.64|| || 44 || 850 || - || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm-mod (Win7-64) || Sapphire 100287VGAL card is low power
|-
|style="background:#EEFFEE;"| 5670 || 85|| || - || - || 900 || 400 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128
|-
|style="background:#EEFFEE;"| 5670 || 91|| || - || - || 890 || 400 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer 2011-06-09 poclbm catalyst 11.2 win7 x86 || -v -f 0 -w 128
|-
|style="background:#EEFFEE;"| 5670 || 100|| || - || - || 890 || 400 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || cgminer 1.5.6 || GPU/Mem 890/800 temp 72C
|-
|style="background:#EEFFEE;"| 5670 || 103 || -|| || - || 900/275 || 400 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x1 || phoenix-1.50 / phatk-mod / Ubuntu 11.04 || VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=256 / small fan, under 50 deg C, no voltage tweaks... catfish
|-
| 5750 || 105 || - || - || - || - || - || - || - || poclbm || Apple iMac 27inch (Mid 2010), Mac OSX 10.7 Lion ||
|-
| 5750 || 116.24 || 1.352|| || 86 || 700 || 720 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - ||
|-
| 5750 || 137 || ||- || - || 710 || - || - || PCI-E 1.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128 using stock memory and GPU clocks
|-
| 5750 || 146.4 || || - || - || 775 || - || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-21 || -v -w128, AMD Catalyst overclock (775MHz GPU / 1225 MHz Memory)
|-
| 5750 || 154.56 || 1.45|| || 106 || 830 || 720 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - || -v -w128 -f20 underclocked memory clocks from 1150MHz to 300MHz
|-
| 5750 || 170 || - || || - || 870 || - || - || PCI-E 1.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128 patched BIOS to underclock memory to 300MHz
|-
| 5750 || 173 || - || ||- || 875 || - || - || PCI-E 1.1 x16 || phoenix || 875/300 w/MSI Afterburner, BFI_INT VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 FASTLOOP=FALSE -k phatk
|-
| 5750 || 190 || - || ||- || 930/290 || - || atistream sdk || PCI-E 1.1 x16 || poclbm || 930gpu / 290mem (O.S. Ubuntu 10.10 x64, overclock gpu & underclock mem) with poclbm options -v -f 0 -w 256
|-
| 5750x2 CF || 356 || - || ||- || 870 || 720x2 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=28402.0 cgminer v1.5.1] (Win7 64bit) || 870MHz GPU / -I 8 / 2x [http://www.gigabyte.com/products/product-page.aspx?pid=3402#sp GIGABYTE GV-R575SL-1GI] cards + [http://www.gigabyte.com/products/product-page.aspx?pid=3258#sp GIGABYTE GA-790FXTA-UD5] MB + 1x [http://www.noctua.at/main.php?show=productview&products_id=9&lng=en 80mm], 1x [http://www.noctua.at/main.php?show=productview&products_id=16&lng=en 90mm] Noctua coolers
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 156.83 || 1.452|| || 108 || 850 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 Hawk || 182 || ||- || - || 875 || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm/GUIMiner/Win7-64 || -v -w 128 (875MHz is stock for 5770 Hawk)
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 180 || 1.406(*)|| || 128(*) || 950(OC) || 800 || 2.4RC1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 30 (*: Overclocked wattage calculated [http://bakkap.free.fr/Misc/wCalc.html here])
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 185 || - || ||- || 850 || 1200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128 FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=7
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 205.58 || - || ||- || 935 || 300 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-04-28 || -v -w 256
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 214.5 || 1.95(-)|| || 108(+) || 950 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.50/GUIMiner/Win7-64 || mem underclocked 300 mhz, 1.1vcore, 950mhz core, @69°C/57%FAN VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=12 -k phatk WORKSIZE=256
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 214.7 || 1.95(-)|| || 108(+) || 950 || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / win7x86 || mem underclocked 309 mhz, -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 216.5 || -|| || - || 955 || || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.5 /phatk || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=23067.0 Modified phatk kernel] and stock voltage for Sapphire (1.125V) VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 -k phatk WORKSIZE=256
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 218.35 || -|| || - || 1000 || 1401 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || DiabloMiner || -w 128 -v 2 (Overclocked to 1Ghz core with 1.2 voltage and Scythe Setsugen 2 cooling system)
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 222.60 || -|| || - || 960 || 300 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.60 /phatk2 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=23067.0 Modified phatk kernel] and stock voltage for Sapphire (1.125V) VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=9
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 223 || 2.23(-)|| || 100(+) || 1050 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer || -v -w256 [http://www.smpake.com/?p=59 source]
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 227 || -|| || - || 1030 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || DiabloMiner || -w 256 -v 2 (Overclocked to 1030 core/300 mem with 1.2 voltage and Scythe Setsugen 2 cooling system)
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 236 || -|| || - || 1033/275 || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix-1.50 / phatk-mod / Ubuntu 10.04 || VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=256 / big fans, under 75 deg C, no voltage tweaks... catfish
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 233 || 2.23(-)|| || 100(+) || 1050 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 || VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 -k phatk WORKSIZE=256 [http://www.smpake.com/?p=59 source]
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 240.61 || 2.3632(-)|| || 100(+) || 1080 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x1 || phoenix 1.48 || VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 -k phatk WORKSIZE=256 (OC'd and OV'd 1080/300 1.25v)
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 241 || - || - || 100(+) || 1045 || 250 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.50 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 -k phatk WORKSIZE=256 (OC 1020/300) XFX@1.1 volts. +Kernel function improve 5%
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770x2 || 425 || - || - || 225(+) || 960 || 800x2 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm (guiminer) Win7x64 || -v -w128 (OC 960/1200)
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 244 || 1.36|| || 179 || 800 || 1000 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 OpenCL/Linux x86_64 || -k phatk DEVICE=1 VECTORS AGGRESSION=6 -v FASTLOOP WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 267 || -|| || - || 875 || 1000 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x1 || Phoenix 1.48 OpenCL/Linux x86_64 || -k phatk DEVICE=1 VECTORS AGGRESSION=6 -v FASTLOOP WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 245 || 1.28|| || 192 || 880 || 900 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm (guiminer) || -v -w 256
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 248 || 1.29|| || 192 || 880 || 500 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.46 || -k poclbm VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 256 || -|| || - || 900 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 || -k poclbm VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=7
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 272 || 1.52|| || 179 || 875 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / LinuxCoin || 275Mhz Memory clock, 1.125 V (from 1.163), VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 275 || 1.5714|| || 175 || 900 || 500 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm (guiminer) Win7x64 || -v -w64 -f10, XFX stock w/ v2.4 SDK = 230Mh/s, v2.1 SDK = +10Mh/s, overclocking core clock by 100 = +30Mh/s, underclocking memory to 500 (ran cooler), and changing workload to -w64 = +5Mh/s.
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 285 || - ||1.58 || - || 960 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.47 / poclbm / Win7 64 || VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 290 || -|| || - || 930 || - || 2.2 || PCI-E x16/x4/x1 || GUIMiner / phoenix 1.5 / POCLBM / Win 7 64 || POCLBM VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 AGGRESSION=12 FASTLOOPS=false / Memory 300Mhz, VCore standard
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 290 || -|| || - || 996 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.4 / poclbm / Win7 64 || VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 295 || -|| || - || 980 || 1120 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIMiner / poclbm / Win XP 32 || Extra flags -v -w 128
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 297 || -|| || - || 970 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer / phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 64 || 300Mhz Memory clock, 44% fan-speed, -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=8 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 300 || -|| || - || 960|| 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIMiner / poclbm / Win 7 64 || Extra flags -v -w 256 (Sapphire Extreme 71 degrees @ 52% fan)
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 300 || -|| || - || 970 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.47 / pheonix 1.48 / Win7 64 || (sapphire xtreme) VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 300 || -|| || - || 970 || 1120 || 2.1 || PCI-E x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 64 || 300Mhz memory clock BFI_INT AGGRESSION=12 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 305 || -|| || - || 984 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.4 / phatk / Win7 32 || 400Mhz Memory clock, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 307 || -|| || - || 996 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 64 || VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 308 || -|| || - || 990 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.50 / poclbm / Xubuntu 11.04 x64 || VECTORS AGGRESSION=11 BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 308 || -|| || - || 990 || 375 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 32 || @ stock voltage VECTORS AGGRESSION=11 -v FASTLOOP=false BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 black || 310 || ||- || - || 990 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x8 || LinuxCoin 0.2b, phoenix/phatk || (XFX Brand) -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 AGGRESSION=11 FASTLOOPS=false
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 311 || -|| || - || 1000 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.50 / phatk / Linux || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 315 || -|| || - || 970 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.6.1 / phatk2 / CrunchBang Linux || memory @ 300mhz VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=9 WORKSIZE=256
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 316.35 || ||- || - || 1015 || 375 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 32 || @ stock voltage VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 -v FASTLOOP=false BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 319 || -|| 1.77 || - || 1030 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Xp 64 || 1.2v 355Mhz Memory, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 321 || -|| || - || 1000 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.50 / phatk-mod / Linux || 1000Mhz GPU, 350Mhz RAM, 1.15V, 90% fan, ~60c Temp, VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128; phatk kernel found [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=25135.0 here]
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 328 || - || - || - || 1040 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || LinuxCoin 0.2.1b / phoenix / phatk || 1.195 V, RAM @ 325 Mhz, fan @90%, no case, extra 10K RPM fan (62 deg.C in full-load); options: -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=256; brand: Sapphire Xtreme; bord is stable up to 1060 Mhz ~ 335 MHash, but produces some visual artefacts;
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 333 || - || - || - || 1040 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || LinuxCoin 0.2.1b / phoenix-1.50 / phatk-[http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=25135.0 mod] || + ~5 Mhash increase using the modified phatk from the user above. I am the same guy with 330 @ 1040 MHz Sapphire Xtreme, all other settings the same, board stable, no increase in rejected
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 334 || -|| || - || 1030 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.50 / phatk 2.0 / Win7 64 || Stock voltage, 385Mhz Memory, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=256 BFI_INT -- (upped from 330 achieved with diapolo mod [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=25135.0 here]), now using phatk 2.0 found [http://forum.bitcoin.org/?topic=7964.0 here]
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 342 || - || - || - || 1045 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk 2.2 / WinSvr 2008 R2 64 || Stock voltage, 385Mhz Memory, VECTORS VECTORS4 FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=14 BFI_INT -k phatk-2.2
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830x2 CF || 480 || -|| || - || 800 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Guiminer/ - / Win7 64bit |Guiminer -v -f70 -w128||
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830x2 || 570 || -|| || - || 950 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x8 || Guiminer/ - / Win7 64bit poclbm || poclbm -v -w256 -f10 MEMORYCLOCK 300MHZ GPUCLOCK 950MHZ FAN 52% 72°C||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 282.75 ||style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 3.06|| - || 92.25|| 666 (UC) || 1440|| 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix/WinXP || undervolted to 0.95V; phatk2 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=256; driver 10.12; [http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=9982.0 clocktweak] for setting values; [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=40056 thread]
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 240.77 || 1.595|| 1.49 || 151 || 725 || 1440 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 250.26 || 1.657|| || 151 || 725 || 1440 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || opencl client || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 252 || 1.575|| || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-01-25 ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850x4 || 1360 || 1.94|| || 700@wall || 900 || || || || poclbm||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 255.3 || 1.593|| || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-01-25 ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 264 || 1.748|| || 151 || 725 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 1.0 x8 || guiminer-20110501 || -v -w128
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 280 || 1.75|| || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.3 || with BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 280 || - || ||- || 725 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.50 / Fedora 14 || -v -k poclbm VECTORS AGGRESSION=8 WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT FASTLOOP=true
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 292 || 1.825|| || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-04-28 -v -f 1 ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 298 || 1.8620|| || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-04-28 -v -f 1 -w 64 ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 300 || 1.5460|| || 194 || 925(OC) || 1440 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 314 || 1.8362|| || 171 || 820(OC) || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 1.0 x8 || poclbm || -v -w128
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 328 || TBD|| || TBD || 875 @ Stock voltage || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix || 70C @42% fan, mem @ 500mhz; -v -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=8 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=128 ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 330 || - || ||- || 850 @ Stock voltage || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix || EAH5850, miner arguments: -k poclbm DEVICE=1 VECTORS AGGRESSION=8 WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 331 || - || ||- || 725 (Stock) || || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Diablo Win7 64bits|| Sapphire 5850 Xtreme, Arguments: -v 2 -w 192 (by Swapper 2011-07-05)
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 335 || 1.8611|| || 180 || 890(OC) || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || poclbm || -v -w128, Memory downclocked to 300Mhz
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 344 || 1.8594|| || 185 || 890(OC) || 1440 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 347 || -|| || - || 876 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer / phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 64 || 300Mhz Memory clock, 50% fan-speed, -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 354 || -|| || - || 900(OC) || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || diablo -v 2 -w 128 || Ubuntu 11.04 64-bit [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=9239.0 Headless], catalyst 11.5, memory downclocked to 300mhz, stock voltage. flashed with atiflash [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9AxNmOy6_0 video]
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 355 || -|| || - || 900(OC) || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk || Ubuntu 11.04 64-bit, Memory downclocked to 200MHz, VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 355 || -|| || - || 900 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Ubuntu 11.04 x64 || 300Mhz Memory clock, 60% fan-speed, -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 359 || -|| || - || 900 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.50 / phatk / Ubuntu 11.04 x64 || 300Mhz Memory clock, 66% fan-speed, -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 365 || -|| || - || 920 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 64 || 300Mhz memory clock VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 367.5 || -|| || - || 900(OC) || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 1.0 x16 || diablo with bitless's hack, -v 2 -w 128 || RHEL 5U5 x86_64, catalyst 11.5, Sapphire HD 5850 Xtreme, Memory downclocked to 300MHz, core voltage 1.145V, BIOS modded with RBE
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 369.4 || -|| || - || 930 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 1.0 x16 || guiminer / phoenix / phatk / Win7 32 || Catalyst 11.5, XFX HD5850, Memory downclocked to 322MHz, -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=256
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 375 || -|| || - || 940 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.50 / phatk / Ubuntu 10.04 || 300Mhz memory clock VECTORS AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=256 BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 381 || -|| || - || 940 || 1440 || 2.5 || PCI-E 1.0 x16 || phoenix / phatk / Win7 x64 / Catalyst 11.6 || MSI Afterburner 500MHz memory clock,-k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 AGGRESSION=13
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 382 || 1.8454|| || 207 || 995(OC) || 1440 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || phoenix || OC 1.177v on core
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 386 || -|| || - || 970 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16(@x8) || guiminer / phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 64 || 5870 bios flash, Mem @300, fan@58%, Temp@80oC, 1.163Vcore, -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256 (two concurrent miners, each miner with diff CPU affinity)
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 391 || -|| || - || 1000 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16(@x8) || phoenix 1.5 / phatk / Win7 64 || Mem @ 280, fan @ 100%, Temp @ 71, 1.163 V core, -v -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256, The name is Mautobu
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 392 || -||2.43 || - || 990 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix-svn (AUR) / phatk / Arch Linux || Memory: 180MHz, -v -q 1 -k phatk WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 408 || -|| - || - || 999/275 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.50 / phatk-mod / Ubuntu 10.04 || Fan 70%, temp < 60 deg C, Sapphire 5 heatpipe card, same flags as above/below (edit1- oops, no voltage tweaks... edit2- wow, phatk-mod makes a difference... catfish)
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 400 || -|| || - || 1000 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.5 Win7 x64 || Memory 600MHz, Vcore 1.225, 73C, -k phatk WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false, 3% phatk mod
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 420 || -|| || - || 1055 || 300 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.0 1x>16x || phoenix 1.5 / phatk 3% mod / Win7 64 11.6 || Fan 80%, 66C, 1.250 Vcore, -k phatk PLATFORM=0 DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=8 And proof: http://i.imgur.com/s9hqs.png
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 397 || -|| || - || 950 || 1440 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.1 16x || phoenix 1.5 / phatk 2.2 / Win7 64, catalyst 11.6 || Mem speed 350Mhz, Fan 85%, 70C, 1.083 Vcore, -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=12 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 412 || -|| || - || 1010 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 1x>16x || phoenix 1.5 / phatk 3% mod / Win7 64 11.5 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=12 -k phatk
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 414.8 || -|| || - || 1018 || 450 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 16x || GUIMiner / Win7 64 11.7 || I use Sapphire HD5850 Toxic 2GB and for OC TRIXX Sapphire Tweak Utility v4.0.2. 72 deg C, fan 100%, core 1018mhz, mem 450Mhz, stock voltage (1.163). proof: http://img23.imageshack.us/img23/2367/414upload.png GUIMiner parameters: -v -w256 -f1
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 431 || -|| || - || 1040 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 4x>16x || phoenix-svn / phatk kernel / Debian Wheezy AMD64 + fglrx 11.6 || fan 100%, vcore 1.1750 V, 72C, VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=15 FASTLOOP=false -k phatk, proof: http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/199/431u.png/
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850x3 || 1,010 || -|| || - || 850 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 (x3) || GUIMiner || -v -w128 | MSI Afterburner settings: 850MHz core clock and 500MHz memory clock ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870M || 152.5 || -|| || - || 750(OC) || 1000 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || gui-miner (win-7) ||||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870M || 189.2 || -|| || - || 850(OC) || 1000 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Wins 7 64/gui-miner (win-7) || -v -w128 -f0 Graphics Overdrive setting 700->850 core clock & 900->1030memory clock . +35mhs over stock settings||
|-
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 313.65 || 1.668||1.65 || 188 || 850 || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 313 || 1.665|| || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo/Linux ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 343 || 1.824|| || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo/Linux ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 355 || 1.888|| || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/Linux ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 340 || 1.809|| || 188 || 850 || 1600 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 360 || 1.6822|| || 214 || 970 || 700 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL w7-64 || -f 0 -v -w 128 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=6144.msg91959#msg91959 source]
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 379 || 2.015|| || 188 || 850 || 1600 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha || -D -G2
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 397 || -|| || - || 930 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=10 WORKSIZE=128
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 408 || 1.8888|| || 216 || 980 || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm/Win7x64 || -f 20 -v -w 128, BIT_ALIGN, BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 400 || 1.9047|| || 210 || 950 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || Phoenix 1.3 || -k poclbm VECTORS AGGRESSION=7 FASTLOOP BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 421.5 || 2.007|| || 201 || 950 || 1600 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha || -D -G2 (GPU OC to 900, memory downclocked to 900)
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 414 || 1.9255|| || 215 || 975 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer/w7x64 || -k poclbm -v -w 256 -f 1 VECTORS BITALIGN BFI_INT -- Memory Clock 300
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 420 || 2.0000|| || 210 || 950 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=14 WORKSIZE=256 -- Memory Clock 300Mhz
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 421 || 1.9581|| || 215 || 975 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.47 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 -k phatk
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 440 || 2.0000|| || 220 || 995 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 438 || 1.9819|| || 221 || 1000(OC) || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm/Linux || -v -w 64 -f 1
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 458 || -|| || - || 1040 || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm/Windows 7 64 || -v -w 256 -f 1 Crossfired, Water cooled, 916 Mhash/s total. Best dual gpu setup me thinks? The name is Mautobu.
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 435 || -|| || - || 990 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || LinuxCoin v0.2b phoenix/phatk || (Powercolor brand) -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 AGGRESSION=11 FASTLOOPS=false
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 445 || 2.28||2.34 || 195 || 1005 || 335 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x4 || Ubuntu 11.04 phoenix/phatk || (Asus brand, volts = 1'072) -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 AGGRESSION=12 FASTLOOPS=false -a 7 (-a 10)
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 430 || || || || 980 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.48/Windows 7 64 || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=14 WORKSIZE=256 -- Memory Clock 300Mhz
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 453 || || || || 980 || 1600 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.50/Windows 7 64 catalyst 11.6 phatk 2.2 || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=256 FASTLOOPS=false -- Memory Clock 350Mhz Vcore 1.163v
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 460 || || || || 1050 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Guiminer || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=14 WORKSIZE=256 -- Memory Clock 300Mhz vcore @ 1225mV
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 460 || || || || 1020 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.50/Windows 7 64 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=256 -k phatk -- Memory Clock 300Mhz vcore @ 1225mV, 3% phatk mod
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870x2 (CF) || 864 || -|| || - || 900 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer || -k phatk VECTORS FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=7 BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128 (Same flags per GPU)
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870x2 (Ares) || 620 || -|| || - || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer || -v -w 128
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870x2 (Ares) || 826 || 0.751|| || 1100 || 950 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.4 w/ Phtak || AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT Memory @ 300MHz
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870x2 (Ares) || 826 || 1.18|| || 700 || 935 || 3200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 w/ Phatk || AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=256 VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false, memory @ 319 MHz, Windows 7 32-bit
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870x2 (Ares) || 878 || 0.585|| || 1500 || 1000 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.7 w/ Phtak || AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT Memory @ 300MHz

|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 530 || 1.803||0.53 ? || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.4.595.10 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/201103.beta3/Windows || -v -w128 -f60
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 535.06 || 1.820|| || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 560 || 1.905|| || 294 || 725 || 3200 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo ||
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 565 || 1.922|| || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine2 ||
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 604 || 2.054|| || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 645 || 1.875|| || 344 || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || -f1, Debian 6, fglrx-driver 10.9.3
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 740 || 2.1511|| || 344 || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix/1.3 || AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT, memory clock @ 300MHz
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 755 || 2.2076|| || 342 || 848 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 28-04-11 || -f 1 -w 256 -v, Ubuntu 10.10, fglrx 11.4, memory clock @ 300MHz
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 802 || 2.31|| || 347 || 850 || 3200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix poclbm Ubuntu 11.04 || -q 6 -k AGGRESSION=19 WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT VECTORS, fglrx 11.4, mem clock @ 1000MHz
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 822.2 || -|| || - || 950 || 3200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix win7 || -k phatk -q 6 AGGRESSION=20 WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT VECTORS, but with this increasing difficulty mining becomes pretty pointless
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 863.4 || -|| || - || 955 || 3200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo - Debian || -v 2 -w 256 (XFX Radeon HD 5970 Black Edition)

|-
| 6310M || 9.821 || 0.545|| || 18 || 500 || 80 || 2.4 || Integrated/APU || poclbm-gui -v -w128 || HP DM1z 18W TDP is shared with the CPU

|-
| 6470M || 24.1 || - || ||- || - || - || 2.1 || Integrated/APU || guiminer ||
|-
| 6470M || 31.0 || - || ||- || - || - || 2.1 || Integrated/APU || phoenix 1.48 ||
|-
| 6490M || 17.18 || - || ||- || - || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoneix 1.50 with poclbm, Mac OS X 10.6.7 || MacBook Pro 2,8 VRAM: 256MB. phoenix -k poclbm VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP
|-
| 6490M || 16.289 || 0.708|| || 23 || - || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm-mod (Mac OS X 10.6.7) || MacBook Pro early 2011
|-
| 6490M || 15.21 || - || ||- || - || - || - || - || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8994.0 DiabloMiner GUI] v2011-05-22 / Mac OS X 10.6.7 || Model: MacBookPro8,2 VRAM: 256MB
|-
| 6490M || 32.1 || - || ||- || - || - || - || - || guiminer 2011-07-01 with poclbm (Win7-x64) ||MacBookPro8,2 (WinX64) -v -w128 -f0
|-
| 6520G || 33.8 || - || || - || 400 || 320 || - || Integrated/APU || guiminer 2011-07-01 with OpenCL (Win7-64bit) || -v -w128 on Toshiba L775D-S7222
|-
|style="background:#FFDD00;"| 6570 || 68.0 || 1.133|| || 60 || 650 || 480 || 2.4 || PCI-E x16 || guiminer 2011-05-21 with poclbm (Win7-32bit) || no extra option for miner . Sapphire 6570 gddr5 512mb
|-
|style="background:#FFDD00;"| 6570 || 82.1 || 1.368|| || 60 || 650 || 480 || 2.4 || PCI-E x16 || guiminer 2011-05-21 with poclbm (Win7-32bit) || -v -w128 . Sapphire 6570 gddr5 512mb
|-
| 6550D || 67.6 || -|| || - || 600 || 400 || 2.5 || FM-1 || guiminer 2011-07-01 with OpenCL (Win7-64bit) || -v -w128 -f2
|-
| 6630M || 48.80 || -|| || - || - || - || - || - || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8994.0 DiabloMiner GUI] v2011-06-18 / Mac OS X 10.7 || Mac Mini 2011 MC816D/A
|-
| 6670 || 102.20 || -|| || - || 800 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/Debian sid || -v -f 0 -w 128
|-
| 6670 || 104.00 || - || 1.0 || - || 820 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer(poclbm)/Win 7|| -v -a4 -f15 -d0 -w64
|-
| 6750 || 167.59 || -|| || - || 870 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer || -v -f30 -w128
|-
| 6750M || 41.48 || -|| || - || 870 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || diablominer ||
|-
| 6770 || 180 || -|| || - || 850 || 1200 || - || - || guiminer || -v -w128 , this was an XFX (OEM) model, GPU @ 850 MHz, mem @ 1200 MHz; I pushed it up to 190 Mhash/s briefly by overclocking, but it crashed the system above that
|-
| 6770 || 202 || -|| || - || 960 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x1,x4,x8,x16 || phoenix 1.48 || Sapphire 6770 (standard) -q2 -k poclbm DEVICE=0 AGGRESSION=10 VECTORS WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT FASTLOOP (The PCI-E speed does not affect the mining speed)

|-
| 6770 || 217 || -|| || - || 960 || 800 || - || PCI-E x16 || Guiminer with phoenix || Sapphire 6770 -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128 FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 with https://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=22965.0 modification
|-
| 6770 || 235 || -|| || - || 1010 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || Phoenix 1.50 || Sapphire 6770 -k phatk PLATFORM=0 DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=13 3% mod https://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=22965.0 and AS5 paste on core w/ external 12" fan 50C full load. Stock voltage.
|-
| 6770x2 || 470 || -|| || - || 1010 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || Phoenix 1.50 || Sapphire 6770 -k phatk PLATFORM=0 DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=13 3% mod https://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=22965.0 and AS5 paste on core w/ external 12" fan 50C full load. Stock voltage.
|-
| 6790 || 220 || 1.467|| || 150 || 800 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 || -k phatk BFI_INT FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=12 VECTORS OC'd to 1ghz, underclocked mem to 300, voltage at 1175
|-
| 6790 || 219 || 1.467|| || 150 || 960 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer || -v -f0 -w128 / GPU OC to 960MHz under Windows7 64bit
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 171.59 || 1.351||1.07 || 127 || 775 || 960 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 196 || -|| || - || 850 || 960 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 0
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 220 || 1.236(*)|| || 178(*) || 1000(OC) || 960 || 2.4RC1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 30 (*: Overclocked wattage calculated [http://bakkap.free.fr/Misc/wCalc.html here] )
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 234.8 || ||- || - || 940 || 960 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.3 || AGGRESSION=8 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 236.0 || ||- || - || 940 || 960 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.4 || -k phatk AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT, Core @ 900MHz, Memory @ 300MHz
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 244.2 || ||- || - || 960 || 960 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm june-2011 || -v -w 128
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 245.1 || ||- || 200 || 940 || 960 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer (Phoenix) || Sapphire 6850 (Memory @1000MHz); Win7 64bit; flags: -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=14 WORKSIZE=128
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 250 || 1.612(*) ||- || 155(*) || 940 (OC) || 960 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || AOCLBF 1.74 (Phoenix 1.5**) @Win7/x64 || XFX 6850 (Memory @840MHz; Vdcc @1.148V; Fan @74%; Temp @70C; System @39C); flags: -k phatk BFI_INT FASTLOOP VECTORS AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128 (*: Overclocked wattage calculated [http://bakkap.free.fr/Misc/wCalc.html here] / **: [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=22965.0 Tainted Kernel])
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 267.2 || ||1.67 || - || 1010(OC) || 960 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer / phoenix 1.50 || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 worksize=128 FASTLOOP=false
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 301.4 || ||1.67 || - || || || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer / poclbm || -v -f 2 -w 128 clock @ 985 mem @ 890
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 232.47 || 1.540||1.22 || 151 || 900 || 1120 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm -v -w 128 ||
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 277.47 || -|| || - || 940 || 1120 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.3 || AGGRESSION=8 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 271 || 1.807|| || 150 || 940 || 1120|| 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm -v -w 128 || Debian 6.0.1 x86_64
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 260.1 || 1.611|| || 175 || 1001 || 1120|| 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm-gui windows7x86 cat 11.3 || -v -w 128 -f 1
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 279 || 1.847(?)|| || 151(?) || 900 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha cat 11.4 sdk 2.4 || -G2 -D stock clocks, debian linux 64bit
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 281.7 || 1.172 (stock)|| || - || 980 || 1120|| 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer-v2011-06-09 || xfx6870, flags: -v 19 -w 128, win7 32-bit
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 293.13 || || ||- || 945 || 1050|| 2.5 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.5 Phatk || xfx6870, Catalyst 11.6, 1.5 Phoenix flags: -k phatk FASTLOOP=false DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128; http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=25860.0 Kernel Patch; http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=6458.0 Cmd; http://developer.amd.com/tools/gDEBugger/Pages/default.aspx No Crossfire Required; runs faster without crossfire 1% + additional 3% from update
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 294 || || ||- || 980 || 1120|| 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix phatk || xfx6870, 340MHz memory clock, Catalyst 11.6, flags: BFI_INT VECTORS AGGRESSION=9 WORKSIZE=256
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 300.06 || 1.830|| || 164 || 1020 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.4 cat 11.4 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=8 fastloop mem clock 344
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 311 || 1.777(?)|| || 175(?) || 1000 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha cat 11.4 sdk 2.4 || -G2 -D overclocked to 1000, debian linux 64bit
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 300 || 1.72|| || 174 || 1038 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm windows7x86 cat 11.4 || -v -w128 -f1 mem clock 360, fan 100% temp 73C
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 310 || -|| || - || 1035 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 phatk 11.5 sdk 2.4 || BFI_INT VECTORS FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=128, mem clock @ 300MHz, voltage @ 1.300
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 314 || -|| || - || 1030 || 1120|| 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.50 / phatk / Linux || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 316 || -|| || - || 1030 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer 2011-06-09 using phoenix (Win7-32bit) || -k phatk platform=0 device=0 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 worksize=128 FASTLOOP=false, mem clock @ 228MHz, voltage @ 1.25, Fan @ 40%, Temp @ 73C
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 322 || 1.882|| || 170 || 1050 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.47 phatk 11.5 sdk 2.4 || BFI_INT VECTORS FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=256, mem clock @ 400MHz
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 329 || -|| || - || 1075 || 1120|| 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 phatk 11.5 sdk 2.4 || BFI_INT VECTORS FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=256
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 245|| -|| || - || 900|| 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ph rising 1.45 phoenix 1.50 phatk 11.5 sdk 2.4 || HD5xxx+ Fastloop phatk AGGRESSION=10
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 297|| -|| || - || 1000|| 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ph rising 1.62 phoenix 1.50 phatk 11.5 sdk 2.4 || Vectors HD5xxx+ Fastloop phatk AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 321|| -|| || - || 1050|| 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x8 ||aoclbf 1.7 phoenix 1.50 11.6|| Vectors HD5xxx+ phatk AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=256, Memory=325MHz, Volts=1.3V, Fan~55%, Temps~70C
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 332 || -||1.74 || - || 1050 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer 2011-06-14 using phoenix (Win7-32bit) || -k phatk platform=0 device=0 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 worksize=128 FASTLOOP=false, mem clock @ 228MHz, voltage @ 1.3, Fan @ 60%, Temp @ 74C, flash and browser hardware acceleration disabled, aero enabled.
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 295 || 2.02||1.64 || 146 || 950 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || hashkill latest as of 7/6/11 (ubuntu 11.4) || hashkill-gpu -p bitcoin user:pass:server -D, mem clock 850, voltage @ 1.175, Fan @ 70%, Temp @ 71C.
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870x4 || 1180 || -|| - || 145 || 950 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/debian32bit || -v -w128, Gigabyte SOC. voltage 1.175 (default), GPU default 950 MHz, Mem downclocked to 300 MHz, Fan 4x100% (+ 2x12cm fun 1300rpm), Temp 4x75C (in summer).
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870x4 || 1200 || -|| - || 150 || 970 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/debian32bit || -v -w128, Gigabyte SOC. voltage 1.175 (default), GPU overclocked from 950 to 970 MHz, Mem downclocked to 300 MHz, Fan 4x100% (+ 2x12cm fun 1300rpm), Temp 4x75C (in summer). Unstable with GPU@975 MHz.
|-
| 6950 || 272 || -||0.90 || - || 900 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48/poclbm || max stable @ 1150 mV, AGGRESSION = 7, BFI_INT, MSI 6950
|-
| 6950 || 291 || -|| || - || 920 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48/poclbm || max stable @ 1200mV, AGGRESSION = 7, BFI_INT, MSI 6950
|-
| 6950 || 295 || -|| || - || 930 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48/poclbm || max stable @ 1275mV, AGGRESSION = 7, BFI_INT, MSI 6950
|-
| 6950 || 300 || -|| || - || 940 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48/poclbm || max stable @ 1300mV, AGGRESSION = 7, BFI_INT, MSI 6950
|-
| 6950 || 295 || 1.844(?)|| || 160(?) || 810 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250
|-
| 6950 || 314 || -|| || - || 800 || 1408 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 05-01-11 || -v -f30 -w128 default mem 1250 Stock Sapphire 6950 1gb
|-
| 6950 || 325 || 1.635(?)|| || 200(?) || 885 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250
|-
| 6950 || 332 || ~1.95 || ~1.2 || ~170 || 840 || 1408 || 2.5.684.212 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 2011-06-14 || -v -w 128 -f 0, WinXP x86, Cat11.6b, desktop on IGP, Sapphire 1GB w/ HW locked BIOS, +40MHz GPU OC, 160W ACP + 5% OC = 170W new estimated ACP
|-
| 6950 || 333 || ~1.95 || ~1.2 || ~170 || 840 || 1408 || 2.4.650.9 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 2011-06-14 || -v -w 128 -f 0, WinXP x86, Cat11.6, desktop on IGP, Sapphire 1GB w/ HW locked BIOS, +40MHz GPU OC, 160W ACP + 5% OC = 170W new estimated ACP
|-
| 6950 || 338 || ~1.84 || - || ~184 || 860 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.50/poclbm kernel || Sapphire 2GB card w/ HW locked BIOS; Cat 11.6, Win7 x64; core @ 860MHz & 1087mV (OC + undervolt), mem @ 860MHz; cmd line args: VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128; power and MH/J calculated using Power = C*f*v^2 w/ assumption of 175 W at stock settings w/ 100% GPU util. (not measured)
|-
| 6950 || 340 || - || ||- || 895 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 05-21-11 || -v -w 128, mem @ 500, 1200 mV, MSI 6950
|-
| 6950 || 340 || - || ||- || 800 || 1536 ||(?) || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 05-21-11 || -v -f30 -w128 default mem 1250,Sapphire 6950 1gb, unlocked shaders
|-
| 6950 || 343 || 2.14 || - || 160 || 840 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 06-27-11 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128 FASTLOOP=false, HIS H695FN2G2M 2GB, mem @ 720, Kill-a-Watt measured
|-
| 6950 || 344 || ~2.02 || ~1.27 || ~170 || 840 || 1408 || 2.5.684.212 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/20110709 || -v -w 128 -f 0, WinXP x86, Cat11.6b, desktop on IGP, Sapphire 1GB w/ HW locked BIOS, +40MHz GPU OC, 160W ACP + 5% OC = 170W new estimated ACP
|-
| 6950 || 349 || 1.745(?)|| || 200(?) || 800 || 1408 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 05-21-11 || -v -f30 -w128, xfx 6950 xxx 1gb, locked shaders, core 900, mem 650, 79° C
|-
| 6950 || 351 || ~1.91 || - || ~184 || 860 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIminer/poclbm v2011-07-01 || Sapphire 2GB card w/ HW locked BIOS; Cat 11.6, Win7 x64; core @ 860MHz & 1087mV (OC + undervolt), mem @ 860MHz; cmd line args: -v -w 128 -f 0; (same system as the 338 MH/s result above using Phoenix)
|-
| 6950 || 360 || 1.8(?)|| || 200(?) || 970 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250
|-
| 6950 || 360 || -|| || - || 870 || 1375 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || flashed with 6970 BIOS, -v -f30 -w128
|-
| 6950 || 365 || -|| || - || 925 || 1408 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || stock bios, -v -f0 -w128, MSI twinfrozr III 2GB
|-
| 6950 || 344.4 || -|| || - || 800 || 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || Powercolor 6950 @ shadermod on original Bios 6950 / 1000mV 850/730, +20% powertune, Fan @ 60%, -v -w128 -f1.
|-
| 6950 || 352.8 || -|| || - || 820 || 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || Powercolor 6950 @ shadermod on original Bios 6950 / 1000mV 850/730, +20% powertune, Fan @ 60%, -v -w128 -f1.
|-
| 6950 || 366.4 || -|| || - || 850 || 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || Powercolor 6950 @ shadermod on original Bios 6950 / 1000mV 850/730, +20% powertune, Fan @ 60%, -v -w128 -f1.
|-
| 6950 || 383 || -|| || - || 975 || 1408 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || stock bios, -v -f0 -w128, voltage 1.274 @72c MSI twinfrozr III 2GB
|-
| 6950 || 388.4 || -|| || - || 900 || 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || Powercolor 6950 @ shadermod on original Bios 6950 / 1000mV 850/730, +20% powertune, Fan @ 60%, -v -w128 -f1.
|-
| 6950 || 403 || -|| || - || 939 || 685 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix-1.50/phatk || ASUS EAH6950 ([http://www.techpowerup.com/vgabios/90661/Asus.HD6970.2048.101124.html (Ref. 6950 Flashed -> 6970)]) / +10% overdrive volt., Fan @ 90%, VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128 AGGRESSION=13. Overclocked from 880 -> 939 with MSI Aferburner
|-
| 6950 || 410.4 || -|| || - || 950 || 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || Powercolor 6950 @ shadermod on original Bios 6950 / 1000mV 850/730, +20% powertune, Fan @ 60%, -v -w128 -f1.
|-
| 6950 || 418.8 || -|| || - || 940|| 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || Gigabyte OC 1GB, shadermod, voltage locked 1.175, mem 450, -w128 -v -f0, ATI Tray Tool
|-
| 6950 || 432.4 || -|| || - || 1000 || 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || Powercolor 6950 @ shadermod on original Bios 6950 / 1000mV 850/730, +20% powertune, Fan @ 60%, -v -w128 -f1.
|-
| 6950 || 454.4 || -|| || - || 1050 || 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || Powercolor 6950 @ shadermod on original Bios 6950 / 1000mV 850/730, +20% powertune, Fan @ 60%, -v -w128 -f1.
|-
| 6950 || 417 || 2.085(?)|| || 200(?) || 975 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || unlocked shaders, +20% overdrive, mem @ 1250, fan @ 77%, temp 64C, -v -w128, gpu core @ 1145mV
|-
| 6950 || 428 || 2.14(?)|| || 200(?) || 1000 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || unlocked shaders, +20% overdrive, mem @ 1250, fan @ 80%, temp 64C, -v -w128, gpu core @ 1160mV
|-
| 6950 || 440 || || || || 990 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/phatk || unlocked shaders, mem @ 1375, VGPU 1.21v, Watercooled (MCW60), temp 54C, VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 -k phatk
|-
| 6950 || 432 || 2.16(?)||1.44 || 200(?) || 1000 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || unlocked shaders, +20% overdrive, mem @ 520, fan @ 80%, temp 76C, -v -w128 -f 2, gpu core @ 1275mV
|-
|style="background:#FFAFAF;"| 6950x2 CF || 720 || - || - || ~400 || 900 || 1408 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-07-01 || MSI Afterburner - gpu @ 900 (870 stock), mem @ 900 (1250 stock), temp 69-71C(bottom vga) fan@94% / 77-81C(top vga) fan@99% - 31C enviornment, -v -f 1 -w 128 BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFAFAF;"| 6950x2 CF || 731 || - || - || ~400 || 900 || 1408 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-07-01 || MSI Afterburner - gpu @ 900 (870 stock), mem @ 900 (1250 stock), temp 68C(bottom vga) fan@90% / 73C(top vga) fan@99% - 28C enviornment, -v -f 1 -w 128 BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13
|-
| 6950x3 || 1081 || -|| || - || 860 || 1408 || 2.4(?) || PCI-E 2.1 x8 || guiminer/poclbm 07-01 || Sapphire 2GB stock bios, stock voltage, locked shaders: +20% overdrive, mem@650, fan@95%, temp 94C, -v -f0 -w128, 93c
|-
| 6950x4 || 1316 || 1.513|| || 870 || 840 || 1408 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || locked shaders, default mem 1250, dual fan 75C typical
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 323 || 1.468||0.92 || 220 || 880 || 1536 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -w 64, SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 370 || -|| || - || 880 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || -v -w128, fan @ 50%/temp 72C, stock card
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 372 || 1.691(?)|| || 220(?) || 900 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix (svn trunk 05.14.2011) || clock 900/1375, VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128, fan 45% (auto) / temp 90C
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 388 || -|| || - || 900 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || -v -w128, fan @ 50%/temp 72C, stock voltage of 1.175v
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 385 || 1.964|| || 196 || 900 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || -v -w128, memory downclocked to 684Mhz, fan @ 70%/temp 81C
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 380 || -|| || - || - || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w128 export GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS=1 # to reduce poclbm CPU from 100% to 2%
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 403 || -|| || - || MAX || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || clock Max/50%+stock, -v -w128, fan= 100%/temp 72C (Note: Overclocked using CCC utility under Windows 7, Clock set to Max value w/ 50% increase to memory and 5% increase to voltage)
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 406 || -|| || - || 950 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.50/phatk || GPU Overclocked to Max (950MHz) using aticonfig, Memory Underclocked using AMDOverdriveCtrl (850MHz). Temp ~ 82C. VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 407 || -|| || - || 955 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w128, fan 75%/temp 75C, voltage +10%
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 414 || -|| || - || 960 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || -v -w128, fan @ 53%/temp 73C, stock voltage of 1.175v, high air flow case
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 420 || -|| || - || 975 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || -v -w128 -f0, clocks 975MHz/685MHz MSI Lightning
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 423 || -||1.20 || - || 995 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48/poclbm || ATI Tray Tools, Clocks=995/331.25, WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 VECTORS ,68C @ 65% Fan, HAF932 Case
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970x2 || 710 || -|| || - || 900/880 || 1536 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -w 256
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970x2 || 828|| -|| || - || 940 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w128, fans 74%/82%, temp 74C/82C, powertune +20% (via CCC), memory underclock 825MHz (via MSI Afterburner), with 'Maj' fix
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970x3 || 1220|| -|| || 1000+ || 900 || 1536 || 2.5 || 2x16, 1x8 || cgminer 1.5.6 || fans ~90%, temp 88C/84C/69C, GPU 900/ memory 775 (via MSI Afterburner), ATI 11.7 APP 2.5

|-
| 6990 || 670 || 1.94||0.89 || 346 || 830 || 3072 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || Catalyst 11.4 [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=2949.msg106238#msg106238 source].
|-
| 6990 || 704 || || || || 830 || 3072 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo Win7 64bits || Catalyst 11.4, Arguments: -v 2 -w 128 (by Swapper 2011-07-07)
|-
| 6990 || 708 || 2.05|| || 346 || 830 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || BIOS switch at "default" position 2, see [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]
|-
| 6990 || 744 || || || || 830 || 3072 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo Win7 64bits || Catalyst 11.6b, Arguments: -v 2 -w 128 (by Swapper 2011-07-14)
|-
| 6990 || 746 || 1.82|| || 410 || 880 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || BIOS switch at "overclocked" position 1, see [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]
|-
| 6990 || 758 || -|| || - || 880 || - || 2.4 || - || Phoenix with Poclbm || Catalyst 11.4, OC switch ON, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128 FASTLOOP=false
|-
| 6990 || 771 || 1.8804|| || 410 || 880 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx. Memory clock @ 1280Mhz.
|-
| 6990 || 772 || 1.8380|| || 420 || 900 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix & Poclbm || OC switch ON + overclocked to 900 mhz, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128
|-
| 6990 || 790 || -|| || - || 900 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || BIOS switch at "overclocked" position 1; with "aticonfig --odsc=900,1260" to further overclock the GPU to 900 MHz and mem to 1260 MHz, see [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]
|-
| 6990 || 795 || -|| || - || - || - || 2.4 || || Diablo's miner || BIOS switch at "overclocked" position 1; On Windows Vista, Clocks set at 955,1250. Power control at 20.
Diablo's args: -w 128 -g 5 -v 2 -f 0
|-
| 6990 || 802 || -|| || - || 915 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || BIOS switch at "overclocked" position 1; with "aticonfig --odsc=915,1260" to further overclock the GPU to 915 MHz and mem to 1260 MHz, see [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]
|-
| 6990 || 835 || -||1.11 || - || 890/860 || 3072 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix || BIOS switch at "overclocked" position 1; with "aticonfig --adapter=1 --odsc=990,890 and aticonfig --adapter=0 --odsc=960,860" (GPU 0 runs hot). Currently, aticonfig can only underclock RAM to 100mhz below core speed. Command line: phoenix.py -k poclbm VECTORS AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT
|-
| 6990x2 || 1436 || 1.848|| || 777 || 880 || 6144 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 x2 || guiminer 2011.05.11 || AUSUM switch set to 1 on both cards; Core left at 880MHz, memory left at 1250MHz; VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128
|-
| 6990x2 || 1700 || 1.416|| || 1200 || 1010 || 3072 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 x16 || guiminer 2011.06.14 || GPU 1010MHz, Memory 900MHz; VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128 FASTLOOP=false
|-
| 6990x3 || 2094 || -|| || - || 900 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 x8 x4 || poclbm || GPU 900MHz, Memory 1250MHz; poclbm.py -f 0 -w 256
|-
| 5870x4 || 1784 || || 1.29|| || 960 || - || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x1 || phoenix 1.50 + phatk + [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=7964.0 Version 2.2 Improvement] || Cards are clocked with BIOS flash @ 960Mhz Core and 300Mhz Memory. More information and pictures: http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=7216.msg324521#msg324521
|-
| 5870 || 437 || || 1.90|| || 960 || - || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x1 || phoenix 1.50 + phatk || Card is clocked with BIOS flash @ 960Mhz Core and 300Mhz Memory. More information and pictures: http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=7216.msg324521#msg324521
|-
| FirePro V4800 || 79.7 || -|| || - || 775 || 400 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-01 ||
|-
| FirePro V8700 || 84.8 || -|| || - || 750 || 800 || - || - || poclbm-mod.03.24.2011 ||

|-
| FirePro M5800 || 61.4 || -|| || - || 650 || - || - || - || poclbm-mod.03.24.2011 || Ubuntu
|-
| FirePro M5800 || 69.3 || -|| || - || 650 || 400 || 2.1 || - || GUIMiner v2011-04-26 || -v -w128, Windows 7 32bit
|-
| FirePro V5800 || 119 || -|| || - || 690 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-01 || Windows 7 32bit
|-
| FirePro V5800 || 144 || -|| || - || 690 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-01 || -v -w128 (Windows 7 32bit)
|-
| FirePro V5800 || 161 || -|| || - || 780 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-01 || -v -w128 (Windows 7 32bit)
|-
| FirePro V7750 || 35.7 || -|| || - || - || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-21 || Windows 7 64bit
|-
| FirePro V7800 || 254.85 || -|| || - || - || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 with poclbm || Debian Squeeze
|-
| FirePro M7740 (M97 GL) [DELL] || 63.0 || -|| || - || 650 || - || 2.1 || PCIe v2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-06-14 || Windows 7 64bit / only SDK2.1 works
|-
| FirePro M7820 || 150.0 || -|| || - || 700 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-06-09 / poclbm || Memory downclocked to 500 from 1000MHz, 169MH/s@800MHz, 181MH/s@860Mhz (max.), only SDK2.1 works, Windows 7 x86
|}

<references>
<ref name='amazon_20110625'>$ Prices from http://www.amazon.com on 2011-06-25</ref>
</references>

===Nvidia===

{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! Watts !! Clock !! SP !! Comment
|-
| ION || 1.8 || 0.067 || 27 || || 16 || poclbm; power consumption incl. CPU
|-
| 8200 mGPU || 1.2 || || || 1200 || 16 || 128 MB shared memory, "poclbm -w 128 -f 0"
|-
| 8400 GS || 2.3 || || || || || "poclbm -w 128"
|-
| 8400 GS || 1.6 || 0.013 || 128 || 1238 || || DiabloMiner -w 128 -f 1 [https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/User:Knightmb source]
|-
| 8400M GS || 2.0 || || || || ||
|-
| 8500GT || 2.4 || || || 918 || 16 || poclbm under GUIMiner
|-
| 8600M GT || 4.93 || || || || 32 ||
|-
| 8600M GT || 3.8 || || || || || Macbook Pro running Diablo
|-
| 8600GT || 5.66 || || || 1188 || 32 ||
|-
| 8600GT OC || 7.3 || || || 1602 || 32 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.0 poclbm] -w 128 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg72833#msg72833 source]
|-
| 8800GT || 25 || 0.24 || 105 || 1300 || ||
|-
| 8800GT || 24.5 || 0.23 || 105 || 1300 || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]
|-
| 8800GT || 31.1 || 0.296 || 105 || 1855 || || Overclocked 715 GPU / 1030 Memory / 1855 Shader; GuiMiner v2011-05-21
|-
| 8800GT || 31.8 || 0.303 || 105 || 1836 || 112 || 713 gpu, 1026 memory. win7x86, phoenix 1.48, -k poclbm WORKSIZE=64 AGGRESSION=5
|-
| 8800GT || 34.0 || || 105 || 1998 || || gpu 756M, mem 1123M, shader 1998M, temp 65C. winXP, phoenix 1.50, -k poclbm WORKSIZE=64 AGGRESSION=6 -- same settings get 32.7 MH/s with aggression 2
|-
| 8800GTS || 16.8 || 0.109 || 154 || || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source] [http://www.techspot.com/review/79-geforce-8800-gts-512/page11.html source]
|-
| 8800 GTS || 18.7 || 0.124 || 150 || 1200 || || poclbm -w 64 no vectors
|-
| 8800 GTS || 33.5 || || 150 || OC || || CUDA mining via GUIminer. Win7 64bit. poclbm -v -w128 -f0. OC'd Core@799MHz, Mem@1080MHz, Shader@1905MHz. Fan 70%, GPU temp @ 66C in comfortable room temp.
|-
| 8800 GTX || 27.5 || || || 1404 || || phoenix 1.48, poclbm, no vectors, 83C with 50C ambient
|-
| 8800m GTX || 16.3 || || || || || rpcminer-cuda Win7-64
|-
| 9300GE || 1.57 || || || 1300 || 8 ||
|-
| 9300GS || 1.69 || || || 1400 || 8 ||
|-
| 9300/nForce 730i || 2.15 || || || 1200 || 16 ||
|-
| 9400GT || 3.37 || 0.067 || 50 || 1400 || 16 ||
|-
| 9400M (MacBook) || 1.90 || 0.32 || 6 || 700 || || poclbm -f 8 no vectors
|-
| 9500GT || 6.75 || 0.135 || 50 || 1400 || 32 ||
|-
| 9500GT || 7.10 || 0.135 || 50 || 1767 || 32 || rpcminer-cuda, Overclocked 707 GPU / 500 Memory / fan 100% 73C steady
|-
| 9600GSO || 19.88 || 0.237 || 84 || 1375 || 96 ||
|-
| 9600GSO512 || 11.75 || 0.131 || 90 || 1625 || 48 ||
|-
| 9600GT || 15.66 || 0.165 || 95 || 1625 || 64 ||
|-
| 9600GT Zotac || 15 || || || 1650 || 64 ||
|-
| 9600GT OC || 18.8 || <0.198 || >95 || 1981 || 64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.0 poclbm] -w 128 -f 10 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg74610#msg74610 source] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg73353#msg73353 source]
|-
| 9600M GS || 4.0 || || || 1075 || 32 || rpcminer-cuda
|-
| 9800GT || 30.36 || 0.289 || 105 || 1800 || 112 ||
|-
| 9800GT EE || 19.7 || 0.263 || 75 || 1375 || 112 || rpcminer-cuda
|-
| 9800GT OC || 29.5 || 0.283 || 105 || 1836 || 112 || poclbm.py, no options. Memory underclocked to 850Mhz, GPU overclocked to 733Mhz
|-
| 9800GTX || 32.54 || 0.232 || 140 || 1688 || 128 ||
|-
| 9800GTX+ || 32.6 || 0.232 || 140 || 1688 || 128 || win7x64 275.33 Overclocked to 756/1890/1102 using a CUDA-specific miner (instead of phoenix, yay for ZERO stales!)
|-
| 9800GTX+ || 35.39 || 0.251 || 141 || 1836 || 128 ||
|-
| 9800GTX+ || 36 || || || || || factory OC ubuntu polclbm.py -w 128 -f 10 -a 10 (DO NOT USE -v)
|-
| 9800GTX+ || 37.23 || 0.266 || 140 || 1890 || 128 || win7x64 275.27 phoenix(1.48) -k poclbm AGGRESSION=3 WORKSIZE=64 (may cause 75%+ stale count, in which case use a CUDA-specific miner instead)
|-
| 9800GTX+ || 40.20 || 0.287 || 140 || 835 || 128 || lowered memory clock higher core, unstable if going higher
|-
|style="background-color:#FFEFEF"| 9800GX2 || 57.83 || 0.294 || 197 || || 2x128 ||
|-
|style="background-color:#FFEFEF"| 9800GX2 || 28 || 0.142 || 197 || || 2x128 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]
|-
| G210 || 3.38 || 0.111 || 30.5 || 1402 || 16 ||
|-
| G210 || 3.79 || 0.124 || 30.5 || 1402 || 16 || poclbm -f 1
|-
| GT220 || 10.8 || 0.084 || 128 || 1360 || || DiabloMiner -w 128 -f 1000 [https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/User:Knightmb source]
|-
| GT230 || 15.5 || 0.161 || 96 || 650 || 64 || (9600GT rebranded one from in a medion pc)
|-
| GT240 || 19.37 || 0.281 || 69 || 1340 || 96 ||
|-
| GT240 || 21.24 || || || || 96 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4291.0 poclbm-mod] -f 0 -v [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg73383#msg73383 source]
|-
| GT240 || 28.1 || || || || 96 || poclbm -f0 -v (Gainward GT240 1024DDR5 OC core@670/stockmem@1700/shader@1700 - stable; max.temp=73)
|-
| GT240M || 9.8 || 0.426 || 23 || 550 || 48 || poclbm -f 0 -w 256
|-
| GTS250 || 35.39 || 0.244 || 145 || 1836 || 128 ||
|-
| GTS250 || 35.2 || 0.243 || 145 || 1836 || 128 ||
|-
| GTS250 OC || 37 || 0.255 || 145 || 2047 || 128 ||
|-
| GTX260M || 22.5 || || || 500 || 112 || poclbm 4/28/2011 Asus G71GX runs ~90c without cooling pad
|-
| GTX260 || 35.91 || 0.178 || 202 || 1242 || 192 ||
|-
| GTX260 || 44 || 0.242 || 182 || 1242 || 216 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|-
| GTX260c216 || 40.40 || 0.236 || 171 || 1242 || 216 ||
|-
| GTX260c216 || 47.4 || 0.260 || 182 || 1348 || 216 || poclbm -w 256
|-
| GTX260c216 || 50.00 || || || 1050 || 216 || m0mchil GPU client, Windows 7 64-bit, x6 @ 3.5ghz
|-
| GTX260c216 OC || 52.0 || || || 1461 || 216 || "poclbm -w 256 -f 1"
|-
| GTX260c216 OC || 58.9 || || || 756/400 || 216 || Core overclocked, Memory underclocked, Ubuntu 11.04 Classic Session(No Effects) "poclbm -w 256 -f 1"
|-
| GTX260c216 OC || 60.1 || || || 1706 || 216 || Core: 364 MHz, Shaders: 1706 MHz, Memory: 594 MHz, VDDC: 1.1800V. "poclbm-mod -w 256 -f 1"
|-
| GTX275 || 50.75 || 0.232 || 219 || 1404 || 240 ||
|-
| GTX275 || 58 || || || 729/1458 || 240 || poclbm -f 0 -w 256
|-
| GTX280 || 46.84 || 0.198 || 236 || 1296 || 240 ||
|-
| GTX280 || 64.34 || 0.289 || 245 || 1296 || 240 || phoenix.exe -k poclbm AGGRESSION=6 WORKSIZE=128 (61*C with Accelero XTREME GTX280)
|-
| GTX285 || 64.8 || || || 1607 || 240 || GuiMiner - Not sure about wattage yet. Still testing. Card runs around 74 C
|-
|-
| GTX285 || 53.35 || 0.262 || 204 || 1476 || 240 ||
|-
| GTX295 || 89.78 || 0.311 || 289 || 1242 || 480 ||
|-
| GTX295 || 120.70 || 0.418 || 289 || 1242 || 480 || GUIMiner no oc.
|-
| GTX295 || 117.30 || 0.406 || 289 || 1476 || 490 ||
|-
| GT 320M (MacBook Air) || 6.12 || || || 1212 || 48 ||
|-
| 320M (Mac mini 2010) || 7.0 || 0.35 || 20 || 450 || 32 || poclbm no extra options, windows 7 x64
|-
| GT 325M || 7.5 || || || 990 || 48 || rpcminer-cuda
|-
| GT 325M || 10.5 || || || 325/650(mem)/1300(shaders) || || rpcminer-cuda, 71 degrees
|-
| GT 325M || 7.99 || || || || || poclbm -f 0 -w 256
|-
| GT330 || 21.65 || || || || || poclbm -f 0 -w 256
|-
| GT 330M || 7.97 || || || || || Model: MacBookPro6,2 VRAM: 512MB Software: [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8994.0 DiabloMiner GUI] v2011-05-22 / Mac OS X 10.6.7
|-
| GT 330M (Sony Vaio Z) || 7.8 || 0.71 ( 0.3 total) || 11 (26w total) || 1045 || 48 ||
|-
| GTS 350M (Toshiba A665-3DV) || 17.0 || 1.214 || 14 || 1080 || || DiabloMiner-Windows.exe
|-
| GTS 360M || 25.0 || || || || || [toshiba qosmio laptop, ~150-165*F stock fans]
|-
| GTS 360M (ASUS G60jx) || 20.0 || || || || || everythins is stock, it cannot sustain. it reaches 90 degrees and freezes.
|-
| GT430 || 20.24 || 0.413 || 49 || 1400 || 96 ||
|-
| GT440 || 20.4 || || || 1645 || 96 || rpcminer-cuda -aggression=8; winxp x64 driver 275.33
|-
| GT540M || 16.0 || || || || || rpcminer-cuda
|-
| GT550M || 17.08 || || || || || rpcminer-cuda -aggression=8
|-
| GTS450 || 45.28 || 0.427 || 106 || 1566 || 192 ||
|-
| GTX460SE || 56.39 || 0.376 || 150 || 1300 || 288 ||
|-
| GTX460 || 66.32 || || || 814 || 336 || rpcminer-cuda 20110605, Graphics Clock @ 814MHz, Memory @ 1555MHz
|-
| GTX460 || 68.31 || 0.427 || 160 || 1350 || 336 ||
|-
| GTX460 768MB || 57.8 || || ? || 1350 || 336 || rpcminer-cuda -gputhreads=320 -gpugrid=336
|-
| GTX460 768MB (MSI Cyclone 768D5/OC) || 75.1 || || ? || 930 || 336 || rpcminer-cuda on Win7 x64 with ForceWare 275.33. [http://event.msi.com/vga/afterburner/download.htm MSI Afterburner] set to core: 930MHz, shader: 1850MHz, core voltage: 1.087V, memory: 1600MHz. Runs at 58°C with fan at 75% (ambient 25°C).
|-
| GTX460 1GB DirectCU || 72.3 || ? || ? || 1672 || 336 || rpcminer-cuda -gputhreads=320 -gpugrid=336
|-
| GTX460 (2 cards) || 102 || 0.319? || 320? || 1350 || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]
|-
| GTX460 (2 cards) OC || 127 || 0.374 || 340 || 1620 || 2x 336 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2444.0 rpcminer-cuda] -gpugrid=128 -gputhreads=128 ver.20110227
|-
| GTX465 || 64.41 || 0.322 || 200 || 1215 || 352 ||
|-
| GTX470 || 81.98 || 0.381 || 215 || 1215 || 448 ||
|-
| GTX470 || 94.7 || || || 1414 || ||
|-
| GTX470 || 111.9 || 0.520 || 215 || 1650 || 448 ||
|-
| GTX470 || 115 || || || 1616 || || phoenix 1.46 poclbm VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=6
|-
| GTX480 || 101.28 || 0.405 || 250 || 1401 || 480 ||
|-
| GTX480 || 140.43 || || || 1700 || 480 || rpcminer-cuda -gpugrid=512 -gputhreads=480
|-
| GTX480 AMP!Zotac|| 140.1 || || || 1700|| 480 || rpcminer-cuda -gpugrid=480 -gputhreads=480 (vCore-1050,Core Clock-851, Shader Clock-1702, Memory Clock-2033, t-79°c, Water 43°c, stable temperature and work)
|-
| GTX560 Ti || 67.7 || 0.39 || 170 || 1700 || 384 || standard EVGA 560, no overclock
|-
| GTX560 Ti || 74.8 || 0.41 || 180 || 1700 || 384 || gigabyte 900Mhz clock; -w 512 -v
|-
| GTX560 OC || 86.7 || <0.51 || >170 || 1800 || 384 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2444.0 rpcminer-cuda] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg72816#msg72816 source]
|-
| GTX570 || 105.83 || 0.483 || 219 || 1464 || 480 ||
|-
| GTX570 || 140 || 0.639 || 219 || 750 || 480 || rpcminer-cuda.exe -aggression=10 -gpugrid=480 -gputhreads=960; display driver stops working with aggression=11 under win7 x64 driver 270.61
|-
| GTX570 || 157 || 0.717 || 219 || 850 || 480 || rpcminer-cuda.exe -aggression=11 -gpugrid=120 -gputhreads=960
|-
| GTX580 || 140.05 || 0.574 || 244 || 1544 || 512 ||
|-
| GTX590 || 193.1 || --- || --- || 1215 || 2x 512 || poclbm -v -w 256, Win
|-
| GTX590 || 2x 121.48 || --- || --- || 750 || 2x 512 ||
|-
| Quadro FX 580 || 5.7 || 0.14 || 40 || 1125 || 4 ||rpcminer-cuda, Win, -gpugrid=128 -gputhreads=512
|-
| Quadro FX 770M || 5.75 || || || 500 || 32 || DiabloMiner-Windows.exe BFI_INT FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=6, Win
|-
|Quadro FX 770M || 6.39 || || || 500 || 32 || DiabloMiner-Windows.exe BFI_INT FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=6 w 64, Win 7x64
|-
|Quadro FX 880M || 9.6 || || || || || poclbm/guiminer
|-
| Quadro FX 1600M || 6 || 0.12 || 50 || 625 || 32 ||rpcminer-cuda, Win
|-
| Quadro FX 2000M || 23 || 0.397 || 58 || || || phoenix 1.48, -k poclbm, VECTORS, AGGRESION=6, Lenovo W520 platform
|-
| Quadro FX 2800M || 22 || 0.293 || 75 || 600 || 96 ||DiabloMiner, win
|-
| Quadro FX 3600M || 36 || 0.514 || 70 || 500 || 96 ||
|-
| Quadro FX 3800 || 33.3 || || || || || poclbm/guiminer -f0 -w128
|-
| Quadro NVS 135M || 1.05 || 0.1 || 10 || 800 || 1 ||
|-
| Quadro NVS 295 || 1.7 || 0.07 || 23 || 567 || 8 || phoenix
|-
| Quadro NVS 3100M || 3.6 || 0.257 || 14 || 600 || 16 || rpcminer-cuda, Win, CUDA 3.1.1
|-
| Quadro 5000 || 67.7 || 0.445 || 152 || 513 || 352 || rpcminer-cuda.exe -aggression=7 gpugrid=352 gputhreads=704;
|-
| Tesla C1060 || 52.5 || || || 1296 || 240 || poclbm, Win7x64
|-
| Tesla M2050 || 79.8 || || || 1550 || 448 || DiabloMiner
|-
| Tesla S1070 || 155.2 || || || || || rpcminer-cuda, Linux, CUDA 3.2, 4 instances (-gpu=0 through -gpu=3)
|-
| GTX280x2 || 102.7 || || || || ||
|-
|}

==CPUs/APUs==

A lot of nice data can be pulled from [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.0 this thread] to seed this section.

Might you wish to throttle CPU load a bit, so it doesn't reach 100°C, it can be done with Battle Encoder Shirase to a margin, like, -15% of available CPU cycles.

Often, the best combination to be is to throttle CPU miner to -5% '''AND''' set it to least of priority levels, so as not to choke GPU miner up.

===AMD===
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! nprocs !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! TDP [W] !! CPU Clock !! Mhash/s CPU !! Mhash/s GPU !! GPU !! GPU Clock !! SP !! Software !! Notes
|-
| 4x Opteron 6174 || 48 || 115 || 0.36 || 320W || 2.2 GHz || 2.4
|colspan=4|
| cpuminer v0.8.1 || --alg 4way --threads 48
|-
| 2x Opteron 6128 || 16 || 32.4 || 0.141 || 230W || 2 GHz || 32.4
|colspan=4|
| 0.3.19 || -4way
|-
| Athlon XP 2000+ || 2 || 0.62 || 0.009 || 70W || 1.67 GHz || 0.62
|colspan=4|
| 0.3.18/Ubuntu || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source] [http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm?articleid=914&page=4 source]
|-
| Athlon 64 3500+ || 1 || 1.18 || 0.013 || 89W || 2.54 GHz || 1.18
|colspan=4|
| ufasoft v0.4 || overclocked (originally 2.2 GHz)
|-
| Athlon 64 X2 3800+ || 2 || 1.73 || 0.03 || 65 W || 2.00 GHz || 1.73
|colspan=4|
| cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || -algo=4way
|-
| Athlon 64 X2 4000+ || 2 || 1.9 || 0.02 || 65W || 2.1 GHz || 1.9
|colspan=4|
| rpc-miner ||
|-
| Athlon 64 X2 4400+ || || 2.09 || 0.032 || 65W || 2.3GHz || 2.09
|colspan=4|
| 0.3.19/Win x64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]
|-
| Athlon 64 X2 6000+ || 2 || 2.81 || 0.02 || 125W || 3 GHz || 2.81
|colspan=4|
| || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg22881#msg22881 source]
|-
| Athlon 64 X2 6400+ Black Edition || 2 || 2.9 || 0.023 || 125W || 3.2 GHz || 2.9
|colspan=4|
| 0.3.20.2 BETA/Win 7 x64 || -4way
|-
| Athlon II X2 240e || 2 || 2.71 || 0.06 || 45W || 2.81 GHz || 2.71
|colspan=4|
| bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Athlon II X2 250 || 2 || 5.6 || 0.09 || 65W || 3.01GHz || 5.6
|colspan=4|
| bitcoin-miner 0.11 ||
|-
| Athlon II X4 630 || 4 || 10.7 || 0.11 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 10.7
|colspan=4|
| bitcoin-miner 0.4 ||
|-
| Opteron 8220 x16 || 16 || 25 || || || 2.8Ghz || 1.5
|colspan=4|
| ufasoft / OpenSuse 64bit || running default, but had to copy 32bit binaries over to get curl and ufasoft running. might be better when using native 32bit system w/o other users on the machine ||
|-
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 3.8 || 0.04 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 3.8
|colspan=4|
| 0.3.1x/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|-
| Phenom X4 9950 BE || 4 || 9.3 || 0.07 || 126W || 2.6 GHz || 2.32
|colspan=4|
| bitcoin-miner 0.13/WinXP || No GPU
|-
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 7.2 || 0.08 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 7.2
|colspan=4|
| cpu-miner 0.2.1/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|-
| Phenom II X4 810 || 4 || 5.0 || || 95W || 2.8 GHz ||
|colspan=4|
| rpcminer-cpu ||
|-
| Phenom II X4 810 || 4 || 9.5 || || 95W || 2.8 GHz ||
|colspan=4|
| rpcminer-4way ||
|-
| Phenom II X4 810 || 4 || 10.5 || || 95W || 2.8 GHz ||
|colspan=4|
| ufasoft v0.10 ||
|-
| Phenom II X4 810 || 4 || 11.5 || || 95W || 2.8 GHz ||
|colspan=4|
| cgminer 1.5.3 || "cgminer 1.5.3 --algo 4way" on Ubuntu 11.10 alpha 2 (64 bit), built by GCC 4.6.1 with "-O3 -Wall -march=native"
|-
| Phenom II X4 955 || 4 || 11 || 0.09 || 125W || 3.2 GHz || 11
|colspan=4|
| rpcminer-4way ||
|-
| Phenom II X4 965 || 4 || 12 || 0.09 || 140W || 3.4 GHz || 11
|colspan=4|
| rpcminer-4way ||
|-
| Phenom II X6 1055T || 6 || 15.84 || 0.13 || 125W || 2.82 GHz || 15.84
|colspan=4|
| bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Phenom II X6 1075T || 6 || 21.3 || || 125W|| ||
|colspan=4|
| minerd || Ubuntu 11.04 amd64 runlevel=1 -algo=4way -threads=6
|-
| Phenom II X6 1090T || 6 || 18|| || 141W|| 3.50 GHz || 3
|colspan=4|
| minerd ||
|-
| Phenom II X6 1100T || 6 || 22 || 0.176 || 125W || 3.82 GHz || 22
|colspan=4|
| bitcoin-miner || Aciid#bitcoin-dev
|-
| Sempron 3000+ || 2 || 0.8 || || 62W || 1.6 GHz || 0.8
|colspan=4|
| cpuminer || --alg 4way
|-
| Turion X2 RM-70 || 2 || 1.9 || || 65W || 2.1 GHz || 1.9
|colspan=4|
| cpuminer || --alg 4way
|-
| Zacate E-350 || 2 || 11 || 0.615 || 18W || 1.6 Ghz || 1.231 || 9.831 || HD6310M || 492 Mhz || 80 || poclbm -v -w128 + Ufasoft 0.7 || stock speeds
|-
| Zacate E-350 || 2 || 12
|colspan=2|
| 1.648 Ghz || 1.252 || 10.87 || HD6310M || 492 Mhz || 80 || poclbm -v -w 256 -f 1 || "autotune" speed with ASUS EFI BIOS
|-
| Ontario C-50 || 2 || 6.2 || 0.68 || 9W || 1.0 Ghz || 1.200 || 6.2 || HD6250M || 277 Mhz || 80 || poclbm -v -w128 -f5 -r5 ||
|-
| A8-3850 || 1 || 60 || || 100W || Stock || || 60 || HD6550D || Stock || 400 || poclbm.exe, Win7-32, 4GB RAM || All running at stock speeds, and set to auto in BIOS.
|}

===ARM===
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! Mhash/$ /€ !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment
|-
| ARM1136EJ-S || 1 || 0.11 || ? || ? || ? || 0.528 GHz || cpuminer git || T-Mobile Pulse, inside Debian chroot, 'c' algo
|-
| Cortex-A8 || 1 || 0.125 || 0.36 || <0.01 || 0.35 W || 0.6 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || Nokia N900: 'cryptopp'
|-
| Cortex-A8 || 1 || 0.2 || 0.57 || <0.01 || 0.35 W || 0.6 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || Nokia N900: 'c' algo
|-
| 2x Cortex-A9 || 2 || 0.57|| 1.14 ||<0.01 || 0.5 W || 1.0 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-24) || Toshiba AC100, ubuntu, 'c' algo
|-
| Marvel Feroceon (88FR131) || 1 || 0.195 || 0.224 ||<0.01|| 0.87 W || 1.2 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-06-15) || Marvell SheevaPlug, Debian, 'c' algo
|}

===Intel===
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! Mhash / $<ref name='amazon_20110625'/>/€<ref name='geizhals_20110625'/> !! ACP [W] !! Clock [GHz] !! Version !! Comment
|-
| Pentium III mobile ? || 1 || 0.3 || 0.014 |||| 21 || 1.07 || 0.3.1x/Win2K || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source] [http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=27380 source]
|-
| Pentium M 1.6ghz || 1 || .4 || || || || 1.6 || minerd (jgarzik's 1.0) || cryppto, Windows 7
|-
| Pentium M 1.73ghz || 1 || .5 || || || || 1.73 || minerd (jgarzik's 1.0) || cryppto, Windows 7
|-
| Old Xeon 512k (Dual) || 2x1/2 || 2.0 || || || || 3.0 || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || HT disabled, algo=4way (twice as fast as the 2nd best algo)
|-
| Pentium 4 2.0A || 1 || 0.85 || || || || 2.0 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft-0.4]/WinXP || -g no -t 2
|-
| Pentium Dual-Core E2180 || 2/2 || 1.75 || || || || 2.0 || rpcminer-cpu || Win7-64
|-
| Pentium Dual-Core E2180 || 2/2 || 4.1 || || || || 2.0 || cpuminer || sse2_64
|-
| Pentium Dual-Core E2180 || 2/2 || 4.5 || || || || 2.0 || ufasoft v0.11 || Win7-64
|-
| Pentium Dual-Core E5400 || 2/2 || 2.27 || 0.03 || || 65 || 2.7 || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Celeron E330 || 2/2 || 2.2 || 0.03 || || 65 || 2.5 || 0.3.19/Ubuntu10.04 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]
|-
|-
| Celeron E3400 || 2/2 || 5.9 || - || - || - || 2.6 || Ufasoft v0.13 / GUIMiner v2011-06-14 || WinXP 32 bit, SSE2, Flags "-g no"
|-
| Core 2 Quad Q6600 || 4/4 || 11.0 || || 0.02/0.06 || 105 || 2.40 || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || -a 60 -g no -t 4
|-
| Core 2 Quad Q8200 || 4/4 || 10.9 || || 0.06/0.10 || || 2.33 || Ufasoft 0.14 || -g no -l yes -t 4
|-
| Core 2 Quad Q9400 || 4/4 || 11 || 0.046 || 0.06/0.07 || 95 || 2.66 || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || -a 60 -g no -t 4
|-
| Core 2 Quad Q9650 || 4/4 || 18.67 || || 0.05/0.06 || 95 || 4.00 || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || -a 60 -g no -t 4
|-
| Core i3 530 || 2/4 || 8.31 || 0.10 || 0.06/0.10 || 80 || 3.66 || Ufasoft 0.7 || -v -a5 -g no -t 4
|-
| Core i3 M350 || 2/4 || 1.48 || 0.04 || || 35 || 2.27 || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Core i5 M450 || 2/4 || 1.8 || 0.05 || || 35 || 1.2 || 0.3.17/Win7-54 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source]
|-
| Core i5-650 || 2/4 || 5.1 || 0.04 ? || 0.02/0.03 || || 3.2 || cpuminer-0.7 || -4way
|-
| Core i5-750 || 4/4 || 14 || || 0.06/0.10 || || 3.2 || bitcoin-miner 0.11 || -a 5 -g no -t 4
|-
| Core i5 ? || 4/? || 6.5 || || || || || client from svn || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37621#msg37621 source]
|-
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 4.5 || 0.05 || 0.02/0.03 || 95 || 3.1 || cpuminer git (2011-01-22) || cryptopp_asm32
|-
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 14 || 0.15 || 0.07/0.09 || 95 || 3.1 || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || sse2_64
|-
| Core i5 2500K || 4/4 || 20.6 || ||0.10/0.12 || || 4.2 || bitcoin-miner || -g no
|-
| Core i5 2600K || 4/8 || 17.3 || || || 75 || 3.4 || bitcoin-miner || -g no. 75W for the whole System without monitor (MSI Board). CPU underclocked to 3,4Ghz and undervolted to 1,012Vcore. Passive Cooling! 3.6ghz results in 18,4 Mhash/s
|-
| Core i7 620M || 2/4 || 1.888 || || || || 2.66 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8994.0 RPCMiner GUI] v2011-05-22 / Mac OS X 10.6.7 || Model: MacBookPro6,2 RAM: 4GB
|-
| Core i7 720QM || 4/8 || 7.9 || ?|| || 45 || 2.8 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] || stream processors overclocked from 1.6 GHz; Dell Precision M6500, Win7-64, 8GB DDR3
|-
| Core i7 820 || 4/8 || 13.8 || || || || 2.8 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] || -t 8
|-
| Core i7 920 || 4/8 || 19.2 || 0.10 || || 195 || 4.0 (x21) || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] || -a 5
|-
| Core i7 950 || 4/8 || 5.88 || 0.039 || || 150 || 3.83 (x23) || bitcoin-0.3.20.2 Win7-64 ||
|-
| Core i7 950 || 4/8 || 18.9 || 0.126 || || 150 || 3.83 (x23) || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] v0.4 ||
|-
| Core i7 980x || 6/12 || 19.2 || 0.15 || || 130 || 4.4 (x33) || cpuminer/Win7-64 ||
|-
| Core i7 980x || 6/12 || 8.7 || || || || 3.9 (x27) || 0.3.17/Win7-64 ||
|-
| Core i7 990x || 6/12 || 33.3 || || || || 4.5 (x32) || ufasoft/Win2008 R2-64 || Ram - 12Gb, Rampage III BlackEdition, Water cooling
|-
| Core i7 2635QM || 4/8 || 2.93 || || || || 2.00 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8994.0 RPCMiner GUI] v2011-05-22 / Mac OS X 10.6.7 || Model: MacBookPro8,2 RAM: 4GB
|-
| Core i7 620M || 2/4 || 6.3 || 0.18 || || 35 || 2.66 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] v0.4 ||
|-
| Core i7 2600k || 4/4 || 6.7 || || || || 4.00 || phoenix 0.48 ||
|-
| Core 2 Duo U7600 || 1 || 1.1 || || || || 1.2 || minerd (jgarzik's 1.0) || cryppto, Windows 7
|-
| Core 2 Duo E5200 || 2/2 || 6.2 || 0.086 || || 72 || 2.76 || Ufasoft/Win7-64 || TDP is 65W + 7W overclock
|-
| Core 2 Duo E6550 || 1/2 || 2.45 || || || || 2.33 || cpuminer 0.7.1 (Linux) || --algo=sse2_64
|-
| Core 2 Duo E6850 || 2/2 || 6.75 || 0.10 || || 65 || 3.0 || ufasoft-0.3 ||
|-
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 7.76 || 0.11 || || 70 || 3.33 || ufasoft-0.3 || uncertain of overclock; miner optimized for Intel Core
|-
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 2.52 || 0.04 || || 65 || 2.66 || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Core 2 Duo E8200 || 2/2 || 2.3 || 0.035 || || 65 || 2.66 || rpcminer-cpu ||
|-
| Core 2 Duo E8400 || 2/2 || 6.9 || 0.106 || || 65 || 3.0 || ufasoft v0.10 || windows 7/64bit (-t 2)
|-
| Core 2 Duo E8500 || 1/2 || 3.6 || || || || 3.16 || guiminer v2011-06-14 || windows vista 32bit
|-
| Core 2 Duo E8500 || 2/2 || 7.2 || || || || 3.16 || guiminer v2011-06-14 || windows vista 32bit
|-
| Core 2 Duo T5450 || 2/2 || 2.5 || 0.07 || || 35 || 1.63 || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || Ubuntu 11.04
|-
| Core 2 Duo T6400 || 2/2 || 4.2 || 0.12 || || 35 || 2.00 || cpuminer git (Linux) || --algo=sse2_64
|-
| Core 2 Duo T7250 || 2/2 || 4.5 || 0.13 || || 35 || 2.00 || bitcoin-miner 0.13/WinXP || No GPU
|-
| Core 2 Duo T7450 || 2/2 || 3.7 || 0.10 || || 35 || 2.13 || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || Ubuntu 11.04
|-
| Core 2 Duo T9400 || 2/2 || 4.2 || || || || 2.53 || ufasoft v0.13 || Win7-64
|-
| Core 2 Extreme X9000 || 2/2 || 2.37 || || || || 2.8 || rpcminer-cpu || Win7-64
|-
| Core 2 Extreme X9000 || 2/2 || 6.2 || || || || 2.8 || ufasoft v0.11 || Win7-64
|-
| Core 2 Extreme X9000 || 2/2 || 7.2 || || || || 3.2 || ufasoft v0.11 || Win7-64 Overclocked from 2.8 GHz to 3.2 GHz
|-
| Xeon 2.8 || 2/2 || 0.8 || || || || 2.8 || cpuminer || cryptopp_asm32
|-
| Xeon 3060 || 1/2 || 2.03 || 0.03 || || 65 || 2. || cpuminer 0.8.1 (Linux) || --algo=cryptopp_asm32
|-
| Xeon Prestonia 2.4 (dual) || 2x1/2 || 2.16 || 0.017 || || 130 || 2.4 || ufasoft v0.4 ||
|-
| Xeon X5355 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 10.13 || 0.16 || || 120 || 2.6 || bitcoind || Roughly the same speed as the "c" algo in cpuminer
|-
| Xeon X5355 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 22.76 || 0.09 || || 120 || 2.6 || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || -O2 -march=core2, algo=sse2_64
|-
| Xeon X5365 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 26.00 || ? || || ? || 3.0 || cpuminer git (2011-06-15) || algo=sse2_64
|-
| Xeon X5650 || 2x6/24 || 28.6 || ? || ? || ? || 2.67 || cpuminer 1.0.2 || --algo 4way
|-
| Xeon E5335 || 4/4 || 9.35 || 0.12 || || 80 || 2.00 || ufasoft v0.11 || Vista-32
|-
| Xeon E5410 || 4/4 || 9.8 || ? || || 80 || 2.33|| ufasoft v0.10 || CentOS 5.5 x64
|-
| Xeon E5440 || 4/8 || 7.3 || ? || || 80 || 2.66|| Kiv's poclbm-gui || FIXME: Either wrong model # or wrong threads/speed info
|-
| Xeon E5506 || 4/4 || 9.6 || ? || || 80 || 2.13|| ufasoft v0.10 || CentOS 5.5 x64
|-
| Xeon E5520 || 4/8 || 6.5 || 0.08 || || 80 || 2.27 || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Xeon E5530 || 4/8 || 7.14 || 0.09 || || 80 || 2.4 || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Xeon E5620 || 4/8 || 11.2 || ? || || 80 || 2.4 || ufasoft v0.10 -t 4 || CentOS 5.5 x64 Hyper-Threading is off
|-
| Xeon E5630 (dual) || 2x4/8 || 8 || 0.1 || || 80 || 2.53 || 0.3.17/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]
|-
| Xeon E6520 (dual) || 2x4/8 || 24.7 || || || || 2.53 || ufasoft v0.10 || windows 2008 R2 64bit (-t 16)
|-
| Xeon E7220 || 2/2 || 6.3 || ? || || 80 || 2.93|| ufasoft v0.10 || CentOS 5.5 x64
|-
| Xeon E7320 (dual) || 2x2 || 1.5 || || || || 2.8 || cgminer v1.2.8 || 2x2.8ghz dual core running Ubuntu 11.04 x86 (individual cores get 0.4 MH/s)
|-
| Xeon E7450 (quad) || 4x6/24 || 60 || || || || 2.40 || ufasoft v0.13 || -t 24
|-
| Xeon E7520 (dual) || 2x4/16 || 18 || || || 95 || 1.87 || ufasoft v0.10 || windows 2008 R2 64bit (-t 16)
|-
| Xeon W3680 || 6/12 || 18 || || || 130 || 3.33 || cpuminer v1.0.2 --algo=4way || Ubuntu 11.04 64bit
|-
| Atom Z520 || 1/2 || 1.20 || || || 2 || 1.7 || ufasoft 1.18 || Asus Eee 1101HA with overclocking capabilities
|-
| Atom N230 || 1/2 || 0.375 || || || 4 || 1.6 || rpcminer-cpu ||
|-
| Atom N230 || 1/2 || 0.245 || || || 4 || 1.6 || rpcminer-4way ||
|-
| Atom N230 || 1/2 || 0.97 || || || 4 || 1.6 || ufasoft v0.10 ||
|-
| Atom N270 || 1/2 || 1.19 || 0.24 || || 5 || 1.6 || ufasoft v0.10 ||
|-
| Atom 330 || 2/4 || 1.80 || || || 8 || 1.6 || ufasoft v0.13 || -t 4
|-
| Atom D510 || 2/4 || 1.00 || || || || 1.6 || cpuminer w cryptopp_asm32 || debian linux 6.0, headless system, 2 GB RAM, running from usb-flash
|-
| Atom D510 || 4/4 || 2.3 || 0.07 || || 30 || 1.6 || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || Ubuntu 11.04 Server
|}

<references>
<ref name='amazon_20110625'>$ Prices from http://www.amazon.com on 2011-06-25</ref>
<ref name='geizhals_20110625'>€ Prices from http://geizhals.at/eu on 2011-06-25</ref>
</references>

===Other===
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! Mhash/$ !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment
|-
| Cell || 6 || 21 || 0.35 || 0.07 || 60W || 3.2 GHz || Cellminer || Sony Playstation 3 (FAT): Needs custom firmware. [https://github.com/verement/cellminer source] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4704.20 source] Total power usage of PS3 fat is 120W but only the Cell cpu is active.
|-
| Cell || 7 || 26.6 || ? || ? || 60W || 3.2 GHz || Cellminer || Sony Playstation 3 (FAT): Needs custom firmware. [https://github.com/verement/cellminer source] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4704.20 source] Running with 7th spu enabled and both ppe cores.
|-
| Cell || 6 || 21 || 0.7 || 0.07 || 35W || 3.2 GHz || cellminer || Sony Playstation 3 (SLIM): Total power usage of PS3 slim is 70W but only the Cell cpu is active.
|-
| ARM || 1 || 0.187 || ? || ? || ? || 1200 MHz || cpuminer || Seagate Dockstar [http://archlinuxarm.org/platforms/armv5/seagate-dockstar ArchLinux]
|-
| MIPS || 1 || 0.026 || ? || ? || ? || 200 MHz || cpuminer || ASUS WL-500G Deluxe Router Running [http://openwrt.org/ OpenWrt]
|-
| VIA Eden || 1 || 1.3 || 0.17 || || 8W || 1600 MHz || cpuminer || VIA Eden w/ padlock
|-
| PowerPC 7447A || 1 || 0.53 || || || || 1420 MHz || cpuminer ||
|-
| PowerPC 750 (G3) || 1 || 0.140 || || || || 600 MHz || cpuminer || iBook G3 600 w/ Cryptopp
|}

===FPGA Devices===

{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! FPGA Model !! Cores !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! Mhash/$ !! Power [W] !! Board price !! Clock !! Version !! Board !! Comment
|-
| Altera EP4CE115C7 || 1 || 80 || 18.18 || 0.13 || 4.4 || $595 ($299 academic) <ref>price from http://www.terasic.com.tw/cgi-bin/page/archive.pl?No=502 on 2011-06-26</ref> || 80 MHz || fpgaminer 0.03 || Terasic DE2-115 || Unoptimized Pipelined Version
|-
| Altera EP4CE115C7 || 1 || 109 || || 0.18 || || $595 ($299 academic) <ref>Price from http://www.terasic.com.tw/cgi-bin/page/archive.pl?No=502 on 2011-06-26</ref> || 109 MHz || fpgaminer 0.03-makomk || Terasic DE2-115 || Makomk's Improvements
|-
| Xilinx XC5VLX110T-1FF1136 || 1 || 120 || || 0.06 || || $1999 ($750 academic) <ref>Price from http://www.digilentinc.com/Products/Detail.cfm?NavPath=2,400,795&Prod=XUPV5 on 2011-06-26</ref> || 120 MHz || fpgaminer virtex5 || XUPV5-LX110T || Original non-configurable fully-unrolled Xilinx VHDL Design
|-
| Xilinx XC3S500E-FG320-5 || 1 || 3.125 || 4.0 || 0.02 || 0.78 || $149 ($99 academic) <ref>Price from http://www.digilentinc.com/Products/Detail.cfm?Prod=NEXYS2 on 2011-06-26</ref> || 100 MHz || fpgaminer Verilog Xilinx port || Digilent Nexys 2 500K ||
|-
| Xilinx XC6SLX150T-3FGG676 || 1 || 100 || ~25 || || ~4.0 || $995 <ref>Price from http://www.xilinx.com/products/boards-and-kits/AES-S6DEV-LX150T-G.htm on 2011-07-26</ref> || 100 MHz || fpgaminer makomk Xilinx port || Avnet Spartan-6 LX150T Development Kit || -3N 484-pin chip is ~$150, 0.67Mhash/$
|-
| Altera EP4CE22F17C6 || 1 || 6.25 || ?? || ?? || ?? || 79$ || 50 MHz || Makomk-partial-unroll-speed, LOG2_LOOP=3 || Terasic DE0-Nano || 16k LEs from 22k used
|-
| Xilinx XC6VLX240T-1FFG1156 || 3 || 375 || 23 || 0.21 || 16 || $1795 <ref>Price from Avnet on Aug 11, 2011</ref> || 125MHz || Modified verilog xilinx fpga miner port (modified for 3 cores, a PCIe interface and use of DSP48s)|| Xilinx ML605 development kit || Uses PCIe interface instead of serial interface. ML605 power manager must have its current limit increased to meet power demands. DSP48s used to reduce logic resources.
|}

<references>
</references>

==See Also==

* [[Mining rig]]
* [[Generation Calculator]]
* [[Power Calc]]
* [[OpenCL miner]]
* [http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=745 ATI Stream vs. NVIDIA CUDA - GPGPU computing battle royale]
* [http://bitminer.info/ Bitminer.info]
* [http://www.pcper.com/reviews/Graphics-Cards/Bitcoin-Currency-and-GPU-Mining-Performance-Comparison Bitcoin Mining Performance Compared]
** [http://www.pcper.com/reviews/Graphics-Cards/Bitcoin-Mining-Update-Power-Usage-Costs-Across-United-States Bitcoin Mining Power Costs Compared]

[[Category:Mining]]

Mining hardware comparison

2011-08-29T15:58:34Z

Phelix: added high efficiency 5850

Below are some statistics about the mining performance of various hardware used in a [[mining rig]].

The table shows (mostly) stock clock numbers. 10-20% performance improvement can be achieved with [[GPU overclocking tools]].

'''Notes:'''
* Mhash/s = millions hashes per second (raw speed performance ; may not be very energy efficient with some models)
* Mhash/J = millions hashes per joule (energy efficiency ; 1 joule of energy is spent for 1 watt in 1 second)
* W = watt (maximum power consumption, i.e. energy per unit of time : 1 W = 1 J/s)
* Clock (in MHz) refers to the Shader clock only with nVidia cards (not Core or Memory). With AMD card the shader clock is not separate, but is part of the GPU clock.
* SP = Stream processors (Shader Units)

==Graphics cards==
=== Popular Mining Cards ===
These tables have been included to make choosing a card easier. The cards selected are generally readily available online. Once you have purchased a card or cards, use the tables below to compare different configurations and setups.
==== Single Card Setups ====
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! Price <ref name=amazon>Price from http://amazon.com/ on 2011-07-02</ref> !! Availability !! Avg. Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! Mhash/$
|----
|5770
|$136
|Moderate
|212.83
|1.45
|1.56
|----
|5830
|$140
|Moderate
|286.45
|1.4
|2.05
|----
|5850
|$250
|Limited
|325.49
|1.73
|1.3
|----
|5870
|$350
|Limited
|393.46
|1.9
|1.12
|----
|5970
|$730
|V. Limited
|655.83
|2.01
|0.90
|----
|6750
|$116
|Easy
|167.59
|
|1.44
|----
|6770
|$137
|Easy
|196.67
|
|1.44
|----
|6850
|$160
|Easy
|213.7
|1.35
|1.34
|----
|6870
|$190
|Easy
|278.31
|1.73
|1.46
|----
|6950
|$250
|Easy
|360.62
|1.8
|1.44
|----
|6970
|$350
|Easy
|389.55
|1.72
|1.11
|----
|6990
|$770
|Limited
|758.82
|1.91
|0.99
|----
|}

==== Multi-Card Setups ====
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! Price <ref name=amazon/> !! Availability !! Avg. Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! Mhash/$
|----
|5830x2
|$360
|Moderate
|525
|
|1.46
|----
|5850x4
|$644
|Limited
|1360
|1.94
|2.11
|----
|5870x2
|$700
|Limited
|787.5
|0.84
|1.13
|----
|6770x2
|$274
|Easy
|464
|
|1.69
|----
|6950x4
|$1,000
|Easy
|1316
|1.51
|1.32
|----
|6970x2
|$700
|Easy
|769
|1.6
|1.10
|----
|6990x2
|$1,540
|Limited
|1568
|1.7
|1.02
|----
|6990x3
|$2,310
|Limited
|2094
|1.8
|0.91
|----
|}
<references>
</references>

===AMD (ATI)===
To get the maximum performance use the 2.1 release of the ATI Stream SDK. 2.2 wastes CPU time, and 2.3/2.4 drop mining performance by 5-10% unless using the Phoenix phatk kernel. ''Note: This statement is not entirely accurate. '''YMMV'''.''

{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! Mhash / $<ref name='amazon_20110625'/> !! Watts !! Clock !! SP !! SDK !! Slot !! Miner !! Notes

|-
| 3410 || 0.89 || 0.074 || ? || 12(?) || 222 || 40 || 1.4 beta || PCI-E 1.1 x8 || A custom Brook+ miner || Using 16,384 length streams

|-
| 3XXX || || || || || || || || || || OpenCL Not Supported

|-
| 42XX || || || || || || || || || || OpenCL Not Supported (integrated/mobile GPU)

|-
| 4350 || 6.93 || 0.346 ||0.16 || 20 || 575 || 80 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors
|-
| 4350 || 8.14 || -|| 0.19 || - || 730 || 80 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Diablo/Windows7 || -w 32. Model: Asus EAH4350 Silent. Memory at 400MHz. Runs at 60°C with ambient at 25°C.

|-
| 4550 || 7.23 || 0.289 ||0.13 || 25 || 600 || 80 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors

|-
| 4550 || 7.8 || || || || || || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer /phoenix || worksize=64 VECTORS

|-
| 4570M || 8.02 || 0.297 || ? || 27 || 680 || 80 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Diablo/Windows7 || -w 64, SDK 2.4, Cat 11.4. Model: Sony Vaio NW

|-
| 4570M || 9.6 || 0.300|| ? || 32 || 825(OC) || 80 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Diablo/Windows7 || -w 64, SDK 2.4, Cat 11.4. Model: Sony Vaio NW. OC core 680->825. U/C memory 800->500.

|-
| 4650 || 31.33 || 0.653|| 0.44 || 48 || 650 || 320 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors

|-
| 4670 || 36.14 || 0.613|| 0.34 || 59 || 750 || 320 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors
|-
| 4670 || 40.11 || 0.679|| 0.38 || 59 || 800 || 320 || - || AGP x8 || poclbm/Ubuntu 10.10 w/ H == 0 mod || -w 32 -f 0, don't use vectors [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.msg85236#msg85236 source]
|-
| 4670 || 50 || - || 0.47 || 60 || 800 || 320 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer || 2 miners set up i7 920 (130W), CPU: Ufasoft, GPU: OpenCL; the CPU is getting about 40 Mhash/s while the GPU goes from 10-20 Mhash/s

|-
| 4730 || 72.29 || 0.657|| ? || 110 || 750 || 640 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - ||

|-
| 4770 || 72.29 || 0.904|| 0.72 || 80 || 750 || 640 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - ||

|-
| 4830 || 55.42 || 0.583|| || 95 || 575 || 640 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - ||
|-
| 4830 || 66.12 || 0.503|| || 105 || 700 || 1005 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - ||

|-
| 4830 || 61.7 || - || || - || 700 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm-mod || Fedora 14 ||
|-
| 4830 || 64.9 || - || || - || 700 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm-mod || Fedora 14 ||

|-
| 4850 || 75.30 || 0.685 || || 110 || 625 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - ||
|-
| 4850 || 84.3 || 0.766|| || 110 || 725 || 300 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - || -w64 fan at 70% temp 73C, stock voltage -gui miner
|-
| 4850 || 90.1 || 0.819 || || 110 || 800 || 500 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer || -f 30; Tried phoenix and phatk, got same max
|-
| 4850 || 101 || 0.918 || || 110 || 817 || 500 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer || -f 0, core 817mhz(default 625)@1.123v , mem downclock to 500mhz (default 993) [http://www.smpake.com/?p=6 source]
|-
| 4850x2 || 150.60 || 0.602 || || 250 || 625 || 1600 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - ||

|-
| 4860 || 67.47 || 0.519|| || 130 || 700 || 640 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - ||

|-
|style="background:#F8F8FF;"| 4870 || 92.84 || 0.6189333(?)|| || 150(?) || 830(OC) || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 || -k poclbm AGGRESSION=5 (Windows 7 64-Bit, GPU OC 750->830MHz, VRAM UC 900->450MHz, BIOS modded)
|-
|style="background:#F8F8FF;"| 4870 || 104.6 || 0.872|| || 120 || 830(OC) || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 256 -f 1, Windows 7 64-Bit, GPU Core OC to 830 MHz, GPU Memory UC to 190 MHz (saves 30 watts at outlet)
|-
|style="background:#F8F8FF;"| 4870 || 90.36 || 0.602|| || 150 || 750 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || clmine ||
|-
|style="background:#F8F8FF;"| 4870 || 78 || 0.520|| || 150 || - || - || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/Vista 64bit || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source]
|-
|style="background:#F8F8FF;"| 4870x2 || 180.72|| 0.632|| || 286 || 750 || 1600 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - ||
|-
|style="background:#F8F8FF;"| 4870x2 || 180.6|| 0.632|| || 286 || 800 || 1600 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - ||

|-
| 4890 || 97.1 || 0.511|| || 190 || 870(OC) || 1050 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-01-21 Solo settings || Sapphire fab. No flags options helped. Close all browsers and do full restart of GUIMiner and then Bitcoin via GUIMiner server starter or the browsers GPU accl. will limit to 56~ ish Mhash/s - I can now start browser without slowdowns
|-
| 4890 || 102.41 || 0.539|| || 190 || 850 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - ||
|-
| 4890 || 108.3 || 0.57|| || 190 || 975 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || - ||
|-
| 4890 || 121.5 || -|| || 190 || 1025 (OC) || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || no flags, Vcore 1.4 ||
|-
|style="background:#FFF8EF;"| 5450 || 11.99|| 0.631|| || 19 || 650 || 80 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - ||
|-
|style="background:#FFF8EF;"| 5450 || 13.74|| || - || - || 700 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/Linuxcoin v0.2 || -v -w128 tried several options, seems to work best.
|-
|style="background:#FFF8EF;"| 5450 || 14.12|| || - || - || 700 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix/Linuxcoin v0.2 || Flags: "DEVICE=0 VECTORS AGGRESSION=4 -v FASTLOOP BFI_INT WORKSIZE=64" Kernel: "phatk"
|-
|style="background:#FFF8EF;"| 5450 || 15.36|| || - || - || 700 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix || Flags: "DEVICE=0 VECTORS AGRESSION=8 FASTLOOP BFI_ING WORKSIZE=128" Kernel: "phatk" - MagicSata
|-
|style="background:#FFF8EF;"| 5450 || 18.10|| || - || - || 774 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 1 774.66MHz/300.37MHz
|-
| 5550 || 40.59 || 1.041|| || 39 || 550 || 320 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - ||
|-
|-
| 5550 || 62.10 || - || - || - || 700 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix || 700MHz core 800MHz ram, phatk mod, Flags: "-k phatk worksize=128 vectors aggression=4 bfi_int"
|-
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 59.96 || 1.538|| || 39 || 650 || 400 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - ||
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 64 || 1.641|| || 39 || 650 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 62 || 1.59|| || 39 || 650 || 400 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 OpenCL/Linux x86_64 || -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS AGGRESSION=4 -v FASTLOOP BFI_INT WORKSIZE=64
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 73 || 1.872|| || 39 || 700 || 400 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 OpenCL/Linux x86_64 || -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS AGGRESSION=4 -v FASTLOOP BFI_INT WORKSIZE=64
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 102 || 1.46(+)|| || 75(-) || 950 || 400 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 OpenCL/Windows 7 x86 (no Aero) || -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS AGGRESSION=7 -v FASTLOOP BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 (Reference Sapphire card, 2 additional 120mm coolers, temperature is 79-82C)

|-
| 5650 || 48 || 1.37|| || 35(?) || - || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source] [http://www.notebookcheck.net/ATI-Mobility-Radeon-HD-5650.23697.0.html source] -- not TDP but load
|-
| 5650 || 61.2 || || || 35 || || || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.50 OpenCL/Windows 7 x64 || -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128 AGGRESSION=9
|-
|style="background:#EEFFEE;"| 5670 || 71.49 || 1.117|| || 64 || 775 || 400 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - ||
|-
|style="background:#EEFFEE;"| 5670 || 72 || 1.64|| || 44 || 850 || - || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm-mod (Win7-64) || Sapphire 100287VGAL card is low power
|-
|style="background:#EEFFEE;"| 5670 || 85|| || - || - || 900 || 400 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128
|-
|style="background:#EEFFEE;"| 5670 || 91|| || - || - || 890 || 400 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer 2011-06-09 poclbm catalyst 11.2 win7 x86 || -v -f 0 -w 128
|-
|style="background:#EEFFEE;"| 5670 || 100|| || - || - || 890 || 400 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || cgminer 1.5.6 || GPU/Mem 890/800 temp 72C
|-
|style="background:#EEFFEE;"| 5670 || 103 || -|| || - || 900/275 || 400 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x1 || phoenix-1.50 / phatk-mod / Ubuntu 11.04 || VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=256 / small fan, under 50 deg C, no voltage tweaks... catfish
|-
| 5750 || 105 || - || - || - || - || - || - || - || poclbm || Apple iMac 27inch (Mid 2010), Mac OSX 10.7 Lion ||
|-
| 5750 || 116.24 || 1.352|| || 86 || 700 || 720 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - ||
|-
| 5750 || 137 || ||- || - || 710 || - || - || PCI-E 1.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128 using stock memory and GPU clocks
|-
| 5750 || 146.4 || || - || - || 775 || - || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-21 || -v -w128, AMD Catalyst overclock (775MHz GPU / 1225 MHz Memory)
|-
| 5750 || 154.56 || 1.45|| || 106 || 830 || 720 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - || -v -w128 -f20 underclocked memory clocks from 1150MHz to 300MHz
|-
| 5750 || 170 || - || || - || 870 || - || - || PCI-E 1.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128 patched BIOS to underclock memory to 300MHz
|-
| 5750 || 173 || - || ||- || 875 || - || - || PCI-E 1.1 x16 || phoenix || 875/300 w/MSI Afterburner, BFI_INT VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 FASTLOOP=FALSE -k phatk
|-
| 5750 || 190 || - || ||- || 930/290 || - || atistream sdk || PCI-E 1.1 x16 || poclbm || 930gpu / 290mem (O.S. Ubuntu 10.10 x64, overclock gpu & underclock mem) with poclbm options -v -f 0 -w 256
|-
| 5750x2 CF || 356 || - || ||- || 870 || 720x2 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=28402.0 cgminer v1.5.1] (Win7 64bit) || 870MHz GPU / -I 8 / 2x [http://www.gigabyte.com/products/product-page.aspx?pid=3402#sp GIGABYTE GV-R575SL-1GI] cards + [http://www.gigabyte.com/products/product-page.aspx?pid=3258#sp GIGABYTE GA-790FXTA-UD5] MB + 1x [http://www.noctua.at/main.php?show=productview&products_id=9&lng=en 80mm], 1x [http://www.noctua.at/main.php?show=productview&products_id=16&lng=en 90mm] Noctua coolers
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 156.83 || 1.452|| || 108 || 850 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 Hawk || 182 || ||- || - || 875 || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm/GUIMiner/Win7-64 || -v -w 128 (875MHz is stock for 5770 Hawk)
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 180 || 1.406(*)|| || 128(*) || 950(OC) || 800 || 2.4RC1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 30 (*: Overclocked wattage calculated [http://bakkap.free.fr/Misc/wCalc.html here])
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 185 || - || ||- || 850 || 1200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128 FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=7
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 205.58 || - || ||- || 935 || 300 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-04-28 || -v -w 256
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 214.5 || 1.95(-)|| || 108(+) || 950 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.50/GUIMiner/Win7-64 || mem underclocked 300 mhz, 1.1vcore, 950mhz core, @69°C/57%FAN VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=12 -k phatk WORKSIZE=256
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 214.7 || 1.95(-)|| || 108(+) || 950 || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / win7x86 || mem underclocked 309 mhz, -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 216.5 || -|| || - || 955 || || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.5 /phatk || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=23067.0 Modified phatk kernel] and stock voltage for Sapphire (1.125V) VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 -k phatk WORKSIZE=256
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 218.35 || -|| || - || 1000 || 1401 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || DiabloMiner || -w 128 -v 2 (Overclocked to 1Ghz core with 1.2 voltage and Scythe Setsugen 2 cooling system)
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 222.60 || -|| || - || 960 || 300 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.60 /phatk2 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=23067.0 Modified phatk kernel] and stock voltage for Sapphire (1.125V) VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=9
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 223 || 2.23(-)|| || 100(+) || 1050 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer || -v -w256 [http://www.smpake.com/?p=59 source]
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 227 || -|| || - || 1030 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || DiabloMiner || -w 256 -v 2 (Overclocked to 1030 core/300 mem with 1.2 voltage and Scythe Setsugen 2 cooling system)
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 236 || -|| || - || 1033/275 || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix-1.50 / phatk-mod / Ubuntu 10.04 || VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=256 / big fans, under 75 deg C, no voltage tweaks... catfish
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 233 || 2.23(-)|| || 100(+) || 1050 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 || VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 -k phatk WORKSIZE=256 [http://www.smpake.com/?p=59 source]
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 240.61 || 2.3632(-)|| || 100(+) || 1080 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x1 || phoenix 1.48 || VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 -k phatk WORKSIZE=256 (OC'd and OV'd 1080/300 1.25v)
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 241 || - || - || 100(+) || 1045 || 250 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.50 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 -k phatk WORKSIZE=256 (OC 1020/300) XFX@1.1 volts. +Kernel function improve 5%
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770x2 || 425 || - || - || 225(+) || 960 || 800x2 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm (guiminer) Win7x64 || -v -w128 (OC 960/1200)
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 244 || 1.36|| || 179 || 800 || 1000 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 OpenCL/Linux x86_64 || -k phatk DEVICE=1 VECTORS AGGRESSION=6 -v FASTLOOP WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 267 || -|| || - || 875 || 1000 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x1 || Phoenix 1.48 OpenCL/Linux x86_64 || -k phatk DEVICE=1 VECTORS AGGRESSION=6 -v FASTLOOP WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 245 || 1.28|| || 192 || 880 || 900 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm (guiminer) || -v -w 256
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 248 || 1.29|| || 192 || 880 || 500 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.46 || -k poclbm VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 256 || -|| || - || 900 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 || -k poclbm VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=7
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 272 || 1.52|| || 179 || 875 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / LinuxCoin || 275Mhz Memory clock, 1.125 V (from 1.163), VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 275 || 1.5714|| || 175 || 900 || 500 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm (guiminer) Win7x64 || -v -w64 -f10, XFX stock w/ v2.4 SDK = 230Mh/s, v2.1 SDK = +10Mh/s, overclocking core clock by 100 = +30Mh/s, underclocking memory to 500 (ran cooler), and changing workload to -w64 = +5Mh/s.
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 285 || - ||1.58 || - || 960 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.47 / poclbm / Win7 64 || VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 290 || -|| || - || 930 || - || 2.2 || PCI-E x16/x4/x1 || GUIMiner / phoenix 1.5 / POCLBM / Win 7 64 || POCLBM VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 AGGRESSION=12 FASTLOOPS=false / Memory 300Mhz, VCore standard
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 290 || -|| || - || 996 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.4 / poclbm / Win7 64 || VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 295 || -|| || - || 980 || 1120 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIMiner / poclbm / Win XP 32 || Extra flags -v -w 128
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 297 || -|| || - || 970 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer / phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 64 || 300Mhz Memory clock, 44% fan-speed, -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=8 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 300 || -|| || - || 960|| 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIMiner / poclbm / Win 7 64 || Extra flags -v -w 256 (Sapphire Extreme 71 degrees @ 52% fan)
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 300 || -|| || - || 970 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.47 / pheonix 1.48 / Win7 64 || (sapphire xtreme) VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 300 || -|| || - || 970 || 1120 || 2.1 || PCI-E x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 64 || 300Mhz memory clock BFI_INT AGGRESSION=12 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 305 || -|| || - || 984 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.4 / phatk / Win7 32 || 400Mhz Memory clock, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 307 || -|| || - || 996 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 64 || VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 308 || -|| || - || 990 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.50 / poclbm / Xubuntu 11.04 x64 || VECTORS AGGRESSION=11 BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 308 || -|| || - || 990 || 375 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 32 || @ stock voltage VECTORS AGGRESSION=11 -v FASTLOOP=false BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 black || 310 || ||- || - || 990 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x8 || LinuxCoin 0.2b, phoenix/phatk || (XFX Brand) -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 AGGRESSION=11 FASTLOOPS=false
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 311 || -|| || - || 1000 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.50 / phatk / Linux || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 315 || -|| || - || 970 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.6.1 / phatk2 / CrunchBang Linux || memory @ 300mhz VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=9 WORKSIZE=256
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 316.35 || ||- || - || 1015 || 375 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 32 || @ stock voltage VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 -v FASTLOOP=false BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 319 || -|| 1.77 || - || 1030 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Xp 64 || 1.2v 355Mhz Memory, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 321 || -|| || - || 1000 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.50 / phatk-mod / Linux || 1000Mhz GPU, 350Mhz RAM, 1.15V, 90% fan, ~60c Temp, VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128; phatk kernel found [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=25135.0 here]
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 328 || - || - || - || 1040 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || LinuxCoin 0.2.1b / phoenix / phatk || 1.195 V, RAM @ 325 Mhz, fan @90%, no case, extra 10K RPM fan (62 deg.C in full-load); options: -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=256; brand: Sapphire Xtreme; bord is stable up to 1060 Mhz ~ 335 MHash, but produces some visual artefacts;
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 333 || - || - || - || 1040 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || LinuxCoin 0.2.1b / phoenix-1.50 / phatk-[http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=25135.0 mod] || + ~5 Mhash increase using the modified phatk from the user above. I am the same guy with 330 @ 1040 MHz Sapphire Xtreme, all other settings the same, board stable, no increase in rejected
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 334 || -|| || - || 1030 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.50 / phatk 2.0 / Win7 64 || Stock voltage, 385Mhz Memory, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=256 BFI_INT -- (upped from 330 achieved with diapolo mod [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=25135.0 here]), now using phatk 2.0 found [http://forum.bitcoin.org/?topic=7964.0 here]
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 342 || - || - || - || 1045 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk 2.2 / WinSvr 2008 R2 64 || Stock voltage, 385Mhz Memory, VECTORS VECTORS4 FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=14 BFI_INT -k phatk-2.2
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830x2 CF || 480 || -|| || - || 800 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Guiminer/ - / Win7 64bit |Guiminer -v -f70 -w128||
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830x2 || 570 || -|| || - || 950 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x8 || Guiminer/ - / Win7 64bit poclbm || poclbm -v -w256 -f10 MEMORYCLOCK 300MHZ GPUCLOCK 950MHZ FAN 52% 72°C||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 282.75 ||style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 3.06|| - || 92.25|| 666 (UC) || 1440|| 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix/WinXP || phatk2 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=256; driver 10.12; [http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=9982.0 clocktweak] for setting values; [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=40056 thread]
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 240.77 || 1.595|| 1.49 || 151 || 725 || 1440 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || - ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 250.26 || 1.657|| || 151 || 725 || 1440 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || opencl client || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 252 || 1.575|| || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-01-25 ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850x4 || 1360 || 1.94|| || 700@wall || 900 || || || || poclbm||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 255.3 || 1.593|| || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-01-25 ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 264 || 1.748|| || 151 || 725 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 1.0 x8 || guiminer-20110501 || -v -w128
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 280 || 1.75|| || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.3 || with BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 280 || - || ||- || 725 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.50 / Fedora 14 || -v -k poclbm VECTORS AGGRESSION=8 WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT FASTLOOP=true
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 292 || 1.825|| || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-04-28 -v -f 1 ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 298 || 1.8620|| || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-04-28 -v -f 1 -w 64 ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 300 || 1.5460|| || 194 || 925(OC) || 1440 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 314 || 1.8362|| || 171 || 820(OC) || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 1.0 x8 || poclbm || -v -w128
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 328 || TBD|| || TBD || 875 @ Stock voltage || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix || 70C @42% fan, mem @ 500mhz; -v -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=8 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=128 ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 330 || - || ||- || 850 @ Stock voltage || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix || EAH5850, miner arguments: -k poclbm DEVICE=1 VECTORS AGGRESSION=8 WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 331 || - || ||- || 725 (Stock) || || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Diablo Win7 64bits|| Sapphire 5850 Xtreme, Arguments: -v 2 -w 192 (by Swapper 2011-07-05)
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 335 || 1.8611|| || 180 || 890(OC) || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || poclbm || -v -w128, Memory downclocked to 300Mhz
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 344 || 1.8594|| || 185 || 890(OC) || 1440 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 347 || -|| || - || 876 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer / phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 64 || 300Mhz Memory clock, 50% fan-speed, -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 354 || -|| || - || 900(OC) || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || diablo -v 2 -w 128 || Ubuntu 11.04 64-bit [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=9239.0 Headless], catalyst 11.5, memory downclocked to 300mhz, stock voltage. flashed with atiflash [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9AxNmOy6_0 video]
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 355 || -|| || - || 900(OC) || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk || Ubuntu 11.04 64-bit, Memory downclocked to 200MHz, VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 355 || -|| || - || 900 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Ubuntu 11.04 x64 || 300Mhz Memory clock, 60% fan-speed, -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 359 || -|| || - || 900 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.50 / phatk / Ubuntu 11.04 x64 || 300Mhz Memory clock, 66% fan-speed, -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 365 || -|| || - || 920 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 64 || 300Mhz memory clock VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 367.5 || -|| || - || 900(OC) || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 1.0 x16 || diablo with bitless's hack, -v 2 -w 128 || RHEL 5U5 x86_64, catalyst 11.5, Sapphire HD 5850 Xtreme, Memory downclocked to 300MHz, core voltage 1.145V, BIOS modded with RBE
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 369.4 || -|| || - || 930 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 1.0 x16 || guiminer / phoenix / phatk / Win7 32 || Catalyst 11.5, XFX HD5850, Memory downclocked to 322MHz, -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=256
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 375 || -|| || - || 940 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix 1.50 / phatk / Ubuntu 10.04 || 300Mhz memory clock VECTORS AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=256 BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 381 || -|| || - || 940 || 1440 || 2.5 || PCI-E 1.0 x16 || phoenix / phatk / Win7 x64 / Catalyst 11.6 || MSI Afterburner 500MHz memory clock,-k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 AGGRESSION=13
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 382 || 1.8454|| || 207 || 995(OC) || 1440 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || phoenix || OC 1.177v on core
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 386 || -|| || - || 970 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16(@x8) || guiminer / phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 64 || 5870 bios flash, Mem @300, fan@58%, Temp@80oC, 1.163Vcore, -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256 (two concurrent miners, each miner with diff CPU affinity)
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 391 || -|| || - || 1000 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16(@x8) || phoenix 1.5 / phatk / Win7 64 || Mem @ 280, fan @ 100%, Temp @ 71, 1.163 V core, -v -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256, The name is Mautobu
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 392 || -||2.43 || - || 990 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix-svn (AUR) / phatk / Arch Linux || Memory: 180MHz, -v -q 1 -k phatk WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 408 || -|| - || - || 999/275 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.50 / phatk-mod / Ubuntu 10.04 || Fan 70%, temp < 60 deg C, Sapphire 5 heatpipe card, same flags as above/below (edit1- oops, no voltage tweaks... edit2- wow, phatk-mod makes a difference... catfish)
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 400 || -|| || - || 1000 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.5 Win7 x64 || Memory 600MHz, Vcore 1.225, 73C, -k phatk WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 FASTLOOP=false, 3% phatk mod
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 420 || -|| || - || 1055 || 300 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.0 1x>16x || phoenix 1.5 / phatk 3% mod / Win7 64 11.6 || Fan 80%, 66C, 1.250 Vcore, -k phatk PLATFORM=0 DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=8 And proof: http://i.imgur.com/s9hqs.png
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 397 || -|| || - || 950 || 1440 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.1 16x || phoenix 1.5 / phatk 2.2 / Win7 64, catalyst 11.6 || Mem speed 350Mhz, Fan 85%, 70C, 1.083 Vcore, -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=12 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 412 || -|| || - || 1010 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 1x>16x || phoenix 1.5 / phatk 3% mod / Win7 64 11.5 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=12 -k phatk
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 414.8 || -|| || - || 1018 || 450 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 16x || GUIMiner / Win7 64 11.7 || I use Sapphire HD5850 Toxic 2GB and for OC TRIXX Sapphire Tweak Utility v4.0.2. 72 deg C, fan 100%, core 1018mhz, mem 450Mhz, stock voltage (1.163). proof: http://img23.imageshack.us/img23/2367/414upload.png GUIMiner parameters: -v -w256 -f1
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 431 || -|| || - || 1040 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 4x>16x || phoenix-svn / phatk kernel / Debian Wheezy AMD64 + fglrx 11.6 || fan 100%, vcore 1.1750 V, 72C, VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=15 FASTLOOP=false -k phatk, proof: http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/199/431u.png/
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850x3 || 1,010 || -|| || - || 850 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 (x3) || GUIMiner || -v -w128 | MSI Afterburner settings: 850MHz core clock and 500MHz memory clock ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870M || 152.5 || -|| || - || 750(OC) || 1000 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || gui-miner (win-7) ||||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870M || 189.2 || -|| || - || 850(OC) || 1000 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Wins 7 64/gui-miner (win-7) || -v -w128 -f0 Graphics Overdrive setting 700->850 core clock & 900->1030memory clock . +35mhs over stock settings||
|-
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 313.65 || 1.668||1.65 || 188 || 850 || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 313 || 1.665|| || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo/Linux ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 343 || 1.824|| || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo/Linux ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 355 || 1.888|| || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/Linux ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 340 || 1.809|| || 188 || 850 || 1600 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 360 || 1.6822|| || 214 || 970 || 700 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL w7-64 || -f 0 -v -w 128 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=6144.msg91959#msg91959 source]
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 379 || 2.015|| || 188 || 850 || 1600 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha || -D -G2
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 397 || -|| || - || 930 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=10 WORKSIZE=128
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 408 || 1.8888|| || 216 || 980 || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm/Win7x64 || -f 20 -v -w 128, BIT_ALIGN, BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 400 || 1.9047|| || 210 || 950 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || Phoenix 1.3 || -k poclbm VECTORS AGGRESSION=7 FASTLOOP BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 421.5 || 2.007|| || 201 || 950 || 1600 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha || -D -G2 (GPU OC to 900, memory downclocked to 900)
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 414 || 1.9255|| || 215 || 975 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer/w7x64 || -k poclbm -v -w 256 -f 1 VECTORS BITALIGN BFI_INT -- Memory Clock 300
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 420 || 2.0000|| || 210 || 950 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=14 WORKSIZE=256 -- Memory Clock 300Mhz
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 421 || 1.9581|| || 215 || 975 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.47 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 -k phatk
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 440 || 2.0000|| || 220 || 995 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 438 || 1.9819|| || 221 || 1000(OC) || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm/Linux || -v -w 64 -f 1
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 458 || -|| || - || 1040 || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm/Windows 7 64 || -v -w 256 -f 1 Crossfired, Water cooled, 916 Mhash/s total. Best dual gpu setup me thinks? The name is Mautobu.
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 435 || -|| || - || 990 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || LinuxCoin v0.2b phoenix/phatk || (Powercolor brand) -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 AGGRESSION=11 FASTLOOPS=false
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 445 || 2.28||2.34 || 195 || 1005 || 335 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x4 || Ubuntu 11.04 phoenix/phatk || (Asus brand, volts = 1'072) -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 AGGRESSION=12 FASTLOOPS=false -a 7 (-a 10)
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 430 || || || || 980 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.48/Windows 7 64 || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=14 WORKSIZE=256 -- Memory Clock 300Mhz
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 453 || || || || 980 || 1600 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.50/Windows 7 64 catalyst 11.6 phatk 2.2 || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=256 FASTLOOPS=false -- Memory Clock 350Mhz Vcore 1.163v
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 460 || || || || 1050 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Guiminer || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=14 WORKSIZE=256 -- Memory Clock 300Mhz vcore @ 1225mV
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 460 || || || || 1020 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.50/Windows 7 64 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=256 -k phatk -- Memory Clock 300Mhz vcore @ 1225mV, 3% phatk mod
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870x2 (CF) || 864 || -|| || - || 900 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer || -k phatk VECTORS FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=7 BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128 (Same flags per GPU)
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870x2 (Ares) || 620 || -|| || - || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer || -v -w 128
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870x2 (Ares) || 826 || 0.751|| || 1100 || 950 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.4 w/ Phtak || AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT Memory @ 300MHz
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870x2 (Ares) || 826 || 1.18|| || 700 || 935 || 3200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 w/ Phatk || AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=256 VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false, memory @ 319 MHz, Windows 7 32-bit
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870x2 (Ares) || 878 || 0.585|| || 1500 || 1000 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.7 w/ Phtak || AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT Memory @ 300MHz

|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 530 || 1.803||0.53 ? || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.4.595.10 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/201103.beta3/Windows || -v -w128 -f60
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 535.06 || 1.820|| || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 560 || 1.905|| || 294 || 725 || 3200 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo ||
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 565 || 1.922|| || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine2 ||
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 604 || 2.054|| || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 645 || 1.875|| || 344 || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || -f1, Debian 6, fglrx-driver 10.9.3
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 740 || 2.1511|| || 344 || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix/1.3 || AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT, memory clock @ 300MHz
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 755 || 2.2076|| || 342 || 848 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 28-04-11 || -f 1 -w 256 -v, Ubuntu 10.10, fglrx 11.4, memory clock @ 300MHz
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 802 || 2.31|| || 347 || 850 || 3200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix poclbm Ubuntu 11.04 || -q 6 -k AGGRESSION=19 WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT VECTORS, fglrx 11.4, mem clock @ 1000MHz
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 822.2 || -|| || - || 950 || 3200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix win7 || -k phatk -q 6 AGGRESSION=20 WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT VECTORS, but with this increasing difficulty mining becomes pretty pointless
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 863.4 || -|| || - || 955 || 3200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo - Debian || -v 2 -w 256 (XFX Radeon HD 5970 Black Edition)

|-
| 6310M || 9.821 || 0.545|| || 18 || 500 || 80 || 2.4 || Integrated/APU || poclbm-gui -v -w128 || HP DM1z 18W TDP is shared with the CPU

|-
| 6470M || 24.1 || - || ||- || - || - || 2.1 || Integrated/APU || guiminer ||
|-
| 6470M || 31.0 || - || ||- || - || - || 2.1 || Integrated/APU || phoenix 1.48 ||
|-
| 6490M || 17.18 || - || ||- || - || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoneix 1.50 with poclbm, Mac OS X 10.6.7 || MacBook Pro 2,8 VRAM: 256MB. phoenix -k poclbm VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP
|-
| 6490M || 16.289 || 0.708|| || 23 || - || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm-mod (Mac OS X 10.6.7) || MacBook Pro early 2011
|-
| 6490M || 15.21 || - || ||- || - || - || - || - || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8994.0 DiabloMiner GUI] v2011-05-22 / Mac OS X 10.6.7 || Model: MacBookPro8,2 VRAM: 256MB
|-
| 6490M || 32.1 || - || ||- || - || - || - || - || guiminer 2011-07-01 with poclbm (Win7-x64) ||MacBookPro8,2 (WinX64) -v -w128 -f0
|-
| 6520G || 33.8 || - || || - || 400 || 320 || - || Integrated/APU || guiminer 2011-07-01 with OpenCL (Win7-64bit) || -v -w128 on Toshiba L775D-S7222
|-
|style="background:#FFDD00;"| 6570 || 68.0 || 1.133|| || 60 || 650 || 480 || 2.4 || PCI-E x16 || guiminer 2011-05-21 with poclbm (Win7-32bit) || no extra option for miner . Sapphire 6570 gddr5 512mb
|-
|style="background:#FFDD00;"| 6570 || 82.1 || 1.368|| || 60 || 650 || 480 || 2.4 || PCI-E x16 || guiminer 2011-05-21 with poclbm (Win7-32bit) || -v -w128 . Sapphire 6570 gddr5 512mb
|-
| 6550D || 67.6 || -|| || - || 600 || 400 || 2.5 || FM-1 || guiminer 2011-07-01 with OpenCL (Win7-64bit) || -v -w128 -f2
|-
| 6630M || 48.80 || -|| || - || - || - || - || - || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8994.0 DiabloMiner GUI] v2011-06-18 / Mac OS X 10.7 || Mac Mini 2011 MC816D/A
|-
| 6670 || 102.20 || -|| || - || 800 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/Debian sid || -v -f 0 -w 128
|-
| 6670 || 104.00 || - || 1.0 || - || 820 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer(poclbm)/Win 7|| -v -a4 -f15 -d0 -w64
|-
| 6750 || 167.59 || -|| || - || 870 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer || -v -f30 -w128
|-
| 6750M || 41.48 || -|| || - || 870 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || diablominer ||
|-
| 6770 || 180 || -|| || - || 850 || 1200 || - || - || guiminer || -v -w128 , this was an XFX (OEM) model, GPU @ 850 MHz, mem @ 1200 MHz; I pushed it up to 190 Mhash/s briefly by overclocking, but it crashed the system above that
|-
| 6770 || 202 || -|| || - || 960 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x1,x4,x8,x16 || phoenix 1.48 || Sapphire 6770 (standard) -q2 -k poclbm DEVICE=0 AGGRESSION=10 VECTORS WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT FASTLOOP (The PCI-E speed does not affect the mining speed)

|-
| 6770 || 217 || -|| || - || 960 || 800 || - || PCI-E x16 || Guiminer with phoenix || Sapphire 6770 -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128 FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 with https://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=22965.0 modification
|-
| 6770 || 235 || -|| || - || 1010 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || Phoenix 1.50 || Sapphire 6770 -k phatk PLATFORM=0 DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=13 3% mod https://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=22965.0 and AS5 paste on core w/ external 12" fan 50C full load. Stock voltage.
|-
| 6770x2 || 470 || -|| || - || 1010 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || Phoenix 1.50 || Sapphire 6770 -k phatk PLATFORM=0 DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=13 3% mod https://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=22965.0 and AS5 paste on core w/ external 12" fan 50C full load. Stock voltage.
|-
| 6790 || 220 || 1.467|| || 150 || 800 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 || -k phatk BFI_INT FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=12 VECTORS OC'd to 1ghz, underclocked mem to 300, voltage at 1175
|-
| 6790 || 219 || 1.467|| || 150 || 960 || - || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer || -v -f0 -w128 / GPU OC to 960MHz under Windows7 64bit
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 171.59 || 1.351||1.07 || 127 || 775 || 960 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 196 || -|| || - || 850 || 960 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 0
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 220 || 1.236(*)|| || 178(*) || 1000(OC) || 960 || 2.4RC1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 30 (*: Overclocked wattage calculated [http://bakkap.free.fr/Misc/wCalc.html here] )
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 234.8 || ||- || - || 940 || 960 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.3 || AGGRESSION=8 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 236.0 || ||- || - || 940 || 960 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.4 || -k phatk AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT, Core @ 900MHz, Memory @ 300MHz
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 244.2 || ||- || - || 960 || 960 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm june-2011 || -v -w 128
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 245.1 || ||- || 200 || 940 || 960 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer (Phoenix) || Sapphire 6850 (Memory @1000MHz); Win7 64bit; flags: -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=14 WORKSIZE=128
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 250 || 1.612(*) ||- || 155(*) || 940 (OC) || 960 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || AOCLBF 1.74 (Phoenix 1.5**) @Win7/x64 || XFX 6850 (Memory @840MHz; Vdcc @1.148V; Fan @74%; Temp @70C; System @39C); flags: -k phatk BFI_INT FASTLOOP VECTORS AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128 (*: Overclocked wattage calculated [http://bakkap.free.fr/Misc/wCalc.html here] / **: [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=22965.0 Tainted Kernel])
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 267.2 || ||1.67 || - || 1010(OC) || 960 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer / phoenix 1.50 || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 worksize=128 FASTLOOP=false
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 301.4 || ||1.67 || - || || || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer / poclbm || -v -f 2 -w 128 clock @ 985 mem @ 890
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 232.47 || 1.540||1.22 || 151 || 900 || 1120 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm -v -w 128 ||
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 277.47 || -|| || - || 940 || 1120 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.3 || AGGRESSION=8 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 271 || 1.807|| || 150 || 940 || 1120|| 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm -v -w 128 || Debian 6.0.1 x86_64
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 260.1 || 1.611|| || 175 || 1001 || 1120|| 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm-gui windows7x86 cat 11.3 || -v -w 128 -f 1
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 279 || 1.847(?)|| || 151(?) || 900 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha cat 11.4 sdk 2.4 || -G2 -D stock clocks, debian linux 64bit
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 281.7 || 1.172 (stock)|| || - || 980 || 1120|| 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer-v2011-06-09 || xfx6870, flags: -v 19 -w 128, win7 32-bit
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 293.13 || || ||- || 945 || 1050|| 2.5 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.5 Phatk || xfx6870, Catalyst 11.6, 1.5 Phoenix flags: -k phatk FASTLOOP=false DEVICE=0 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128; http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=25860.0 Kernel Patch; http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=6458.0 Cmd; http://developer.amd.com/tools/gDEBugger/Pages/default.aspx No Crossfire Required; runs faster without crossfire 1% + additional 3% from update
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 294 || || ||- || 980 || 1120|| 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix phatk || xfx6870, 340MHz memory clock, Catalyst 11.6, flags: BFI_INT VECTORS AGGRESSION=9 WORKSIZE=256
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 300.06 || 1.830|| || 164 || 1020 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.4 cat 11.4 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=8 fastloop mem clock 344
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 311 || 1.777(?)|| || 175(?) || 1000 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha cat 11.4 sdk 2.4 || -G2 -D overclocked to 1000, debian linux 64bit
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 300 || 1.72|| || 174 || 1038 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm windows7x86 cat 11.4 || -v -w128 -f1 mem clock 360, fan 100% temp 73C
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 310 || -|| || - || 1035 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 phatk 11.5 sdk 2.4 || BFI_INT VECTORS FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=128, mem clock @ 300MHz, voltage @ 1.300
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 314 || -|| || - || 1030 || 1120|| 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.50 / phatk / Linux || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 FASTLOOP=false WORKSIZE=256
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 316 || -|| || - || 1030 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer 2011-06-09 using phoenix (Win7-32bit) || -k phatk platform=0 device=0 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 worksize=128 FASTLOOP=false, mem clock @ 228MHz, voltage @ 1.25, Fan @ 40%, Temp @ 73C
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 322 || 1.882|| || 170 || 1050 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.47 phatk 11.5 sdk 2.4 || BFI_INT VECTORS FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=256, mem clock @ 400MHz
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 329 || -|| || - || 1075 || 1120|| 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 phatk 11.5 sdk 2.4 || BFI_INT VECTORS FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=256
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 245|| -|| || - || 900|| 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ph rising 1.45 phoenix 1.50 phatk 11.5 sdk 2.4 || HD5xxx+ Fastloop phatk AGGRESSION=10
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 297|| -|| || - || 1000|| 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ph rising 1.62 phoenix 1.50 phatk 11.5 sdk 2.4 || Vectors HD5xxx+ Fastloop phatk AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 321|| -|| || - || 1050|| 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x8 ||aoclbf 1.7 phoenix 1.50 11.6|| Vectors HD5xxx+ phatk AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=256, Memory=325MHz, Volts=1.3V, Fan~55%, Temps~70C
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 332 || -||1.74 || - || 1050 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer 2011-06-14 using phoenix (Win7-32bit) || -k phatk platform=0 device=0 VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 worksize=128 FASTLOOP=false, mem clock @ 228MHz, voltage @ 1.3, Fan @ 60%, Temp @ 74C, flash and browser hardware acceleration disabled, aero enabled.
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 295 || 2.02||1.64 || 146 || 950 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || hashkill latest as of 7/6/11 (ubuntu 11.4) || hashkill-gpu -p bitcoin user:pass:server -D, mem clock 850, voltage @ 1.175, Fan @ 70%, Temp @ 71C.
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870x4 || 1180 || -|| - || 145 || 950 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/debian32bit || -v -w128, Gigabyte SOC. voltage 1.175 (default), GPU default 950 MHz, Mem downclocked to 300 MHz, Fan 4x100% (+ 2x12cm fun 1300rpm), Temp 4x75C (in summer).
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870x4 || 1200 || -|| - || 150 || 970 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/debian32bit || -v -w128, Gigabyte SOC. voltage 1.175 (default), GPU overclocked from 950 to 970 MHz, Mem downclocked to 300 MHz, Fan 4x100% (+ 2x12cm fun 1300rpm), Temp 4x75C (in summer). Unstable with GPU@975 MHz.
|-
| 6950 || 272 || -||0.90 || - || 900 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48/poclbm || max stable @ 1150 mV, AGGRESSION = 7, BFI_INT, MSI 6950
|-
| 6950 || 291 || -|| || - || 920 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48/poclbm || max stable @ 1200mV, AGGRESSION = 7, BFI_INT, MSI 6950
|-
| 6950 || 295 || -|| || - || 930 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48/poclbm || max stable @ 1275mV, AGGRESSION = 7, BFI_INT, MSI 6950
|-
| 6950 || 300 || -|| || - || 940 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48/poclbm || max stable @ 1300mV, AGGRESSION = 7, BFI_INT, MSI 6950
|-
| 6950 || 295 || 1.844(?)|| || 160(?) || 810 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250
|-
| 6950 || 314 || -|| || - || 800 || 1408 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 05-01-11 || -v -f30 -w128 default mem 1250 Stock Sapphire 6950 1gb
|-
| 6950 || 325 || 1.635(?)|| || 200(?) || 885 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250
|-
| 6950 || 332 || ~1.95 || ~1.2 || ~170 || 840 || 1408 || 2.5.684.212 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 2011-06-14 || -v -w 128 -f 0, WinXP x86, Cat11.6b, desktop on IGP, Sapphire 1GB w/ HW locked BIOS, +40MHz GPU OC, 160W ACP + 5% OC = 170W new estimated ACP
|-
| 6950 || 333 || ~1.95 || ~1.2 || ~170 || 840 || 1408 || 2.4.650.9 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 2011-06-14 || -v -w 128 -f 0, WinXP x86, Cat11.6, desktop on IGP, Sapphire 1GB w/ HW locked BIOS, +40MHz GPU OC, 160W ACP + 5% OC = 170W new estimated ACP
|-
| 6950 || 338 || ~1.84 || - || ~184 || 860 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.50/poclbm kernel || Sapphire 2GB card w/ HW locked BIOS; Cat 11.6, Win7 x64; core @ 860MHz & 1087mV (OC + undervolt), mem @ 860MHz; cmd line args: VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128; power and MH/J calculated using Power = C*f*v^2 w/ assumption of 175 W at stock settings w/ 100% GPU util. (not measured)
|-
| 6950 || 340 || - || ||- || 895 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 05-21-11 || -v -w 128, mem @ 500, 1200 mV, MSI 6950
|-
| 6950 || 340 || - || ||- || 800 || 1536 ||(?) || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 05-21-11 || -v -f30 -w128 default mem 1250,Sapphire 6950 1gb, unlocked shaders
|-
| 6950 || 343 || 2.14 || - || 160 || 840 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 06-27-11 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128 FASTLOOP=false, HIS H695FN2G2M 2GB, mem @ 720, Kill-a-Watt measured
|-
| 6950 || 344 || ~2.02 || ~1.27 || ~170 || 840 || 1408 || 2.5.684.212 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/20110709 || -v -w 128 -f 0, WinXP x86, Cat11.6b, desktop on IGP, Sapphire 1GB w/ HW locked BIOS, +40MHz GPU OC, 160W ACP + 5% OC = 170W new estimated ACP
|-
| 6950 || 349 || 1.745(?)|| || 200(?) || 800 || 1408 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 05-21-11 || -v -f30 -w128, xfx 6950 xxx 1gb, locked shaders, core 900, mem 650, 79° C
|-
| 6950 || 351 || ~1.91 || - || ~184 || 860 || 1408 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIminer/poclbm v2011-07-01 || Sapphire 2GB card w/ HW locked BIOS; Cat 11.6, Win7 x64; core @ 860MHz & 1087mV (OC + undervolt), mem @ 860MHz; cmd line args: -v -w 128 -f 0; (same system as the 338 MH/s result above using Phoenix)
|-
| 6950 || 360 || 1.8(?)|| || 200(?) || 970 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250
|-
| 6950 || 360 || -|| || - || 870 || 1375 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || flashed with 6970 BIOS, -v -f30 -w128
|-
| 6950 || 365 || -|| || - || 925 || 1408 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || stock bios, -v -f0 -w128, MSI twinfrozr III 2GB
|-
| 6950 || 344.4 || -|| || - || 800 || 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || Powercolor 6950 @ shadermod on original Bios 6950 / 1000mV 850/730, +20% powertune, Fan @ 60%, -v -w128 -f1.
|-
| 6950 || 352.8 || -|| || - || 820 || 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || Powercolor 6950 @ shadermod on original Bios 6950 / 1000mV 850/730, +20% powertune, Fan @ 60%, -v -w128 -f1.
|-
| 6950 || 366.4 || -|| || - || 850 || 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || Powercolor 6950 @ shadermod on original Bios 6950 / 1000mV 850/730, +20% powertune, Fan @ 60%, -v -w128 -f1.
|-
| 6950 || 383 || -|| || - || 975 || 1408 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || stock bios, -v -f0 -w128, voltage 1.274 @72c MSI twinfrozr III 2GB
|-
| 6950 || 388.4 || -|| || - || 900 || 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || Powercolor 6950 @ shadermod on original Bios 6950 / 1000mV 850/730, +20% powertune, Fan @ 60%, -v -w128 -f1.
|-
| 6950 || 403 || -|| || - || 939 || 685 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix-1.50/phatk || ASUS EAH6950 ([http://www.techpowerup.com/vgabios/90661/Asus.HD6970.2048.101124.html (Ref. 6950 Flashed -> 6970)]) / +10% overdrive volt., Fan @ 90%, VECTORS BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128 AGGRESSION=13. Overclocked from 880 -> 939 with MSI Aferburner
|-
| 6950 || 410.4 || -|| || - || 950 || 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || Powercolor 6950 @ shadermod on original Bios 6950 / 1000mV 850/730, +20% powertune, Fan @ 60%, -v -w128 -f1.
|-
| 6950 || 418.8 || -|| || - || 940|| 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || Gigabyte OC 1GB, shadermod, voltage locked 1.175, mem 450, -w128 -v -f0, ATI Tray Tool
|-
| 6950 || 432.4 || -|| || - || 1000 || 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || Powercolor 6950 @ shadermod on original Bios 6950 / 1000mV 850/730, +20% powertune, Fan @ 60%, -v -w128 -f1.
|-
| 6950 || 454.4 || -|| || - || 1050 || 1536 || - || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || Powercolor 6950 @ shadermod on original Bios 6950 / 1000mV 850/730, +20% powertune, Fan @ 60%, -v -w128 -f1.
|-
| 6950 || 417 || 2.085(?)|| || 200(?) || 975 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || unlocked shaders, +20% overdrive, mem @ 1250, fan @ 77%, temp 64C, -v -w128, gpu core @ 1145mV
|-
| 6950 || 428 || 2.14(?)|| || 200(?) || 1000 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || unlocked shaders, +20% overdrive, mem @ 1250, fan @ 80%, temp 64C, -v -w128, gpu core @ 1160mV
|-
| 6950 || 440 || || || || 990 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/phatk || unlocked shaders, mem @ 1375, VGPU 1.21v, Watercooled (MCW60), temp 54C, VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 -k phatk
|-
| 6950 || 432 || 2.16(?)||1.44 || 200(?) || 1000 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || unlocked shaders, +20% overdrive, mem @ 520, fan @ 80%, temp 76C, -v -w128 -f 2, gpu core @ 1275mV
|-
|style="background:#FFAFAF;"| 6950x2 CF || 720 || - || - || ~400 || 900 || 1408 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-07-01 || MSI Afterburner - gpu @ 900 (870 stock), mem @ 900 (1250 stock), temp 69-71C(bottom vga) fan@94% / 77-81C(top vga) fan@99% - 31C enviornment, -v -f 1 -w 128 BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFAFAF;"| 6950x2 CF || 731 || - || - || ~400 || 900 || 1408 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-07-01 || MSI Afterburner - gpu @ 900 (870 stock), mem @ 900 (1250 stock), temp 68C(bottom vga) fan@90% / 73C(top vga) fan@99% - 28C enviornment, -v -f 1 -w 128 BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13
|-
| 6950x3 || 1081 || -|| || - || 860 || 1408 || 2.4(?) || PCI-E 2.1 x8 || guiminer/poclbm 07-01 || Sapphire 2GB stock bios, stock voltage, locked shaders: +20% overdrive, mem@650, fan@95%, temp 94C, -v -f0 -w128, 93c
|-
| 6950x4 || 1316 || 1.513|| || 870 || 840 || 1408 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || locked shaders, default mem 1250, dual fan 75C typical
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 323 || 1.468||0.92 || 220 || 880 || 1536 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -w 64, SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 370 || -|| || - || 880 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || -v -w128, fan @ 50%/temp 72C, stock card
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 372 || 1.691(?)|| || 220(?) || 900 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix (svn trunk 05.14.2011) || clock 900/1375, VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128, fan 45% (auto) / temp 90C
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 388 || -|| || - || 900 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || -v -w128, fan @ 50%/temp 72C, stock voltage of 1.175v
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 385 || 1.964|| || 196 || 900 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || -v -w128, memory downclocked to 684Mhz, fan @ 70%/temp 81C
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 380 || -|| || - || - || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w128 export GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS=1 # to reduce poclbm CPU from 100% to 2%
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 403 || -|| || - || MAX || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || clock Max/50%+stock, -v -w128, fan= 100%/temp 72C (Note: Overclocked using CCC utility under Windows 7, Clock set to Max value w/ 50% increase to memory and 5% increase to voltage)
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 406 || -|| || - || 950 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.50/phatk || GPU Overclocked to Max (950MHz) using aticonfig, Memory Underclocked using AMDOverdriveCtrl (850MHz). Temp ~ 82C. VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 407 || -|| || - || 955 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w128, fan 75%/temp 75C, voltage +10%
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 414 || -|| || - || 960 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || -v -w128, fan @ 53%/temp 73C, stock voltage of 1.175v, high air flow case
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 420 || -|| || - || 975 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || -v -w128 -f0, clocks 975MHz/685MHz MSI Lightning
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970 || 423 || -||1.20 || - || 995 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48/poclbm || ATI Tray Tools, Clocks=995/331.25, WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 VECTORS ,68C @ 65% Fan, HAF932 Case
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970x2 || 710 || -|| || - || 900/880 || 1536 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -w 256
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970x2 || 828|| -|| || - || 940 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w128, fans 74%/82%, temp 74C/82C, powertune +20% (via CCC), memory underclock 825MHz (via MSI Afterburner), with 'Maj' fix
|-
|style="background:#F0FF0F;"| 6970x3 || 1220|| -|| || 1000+ || 900 || 1536 || 2.5 || 2x16, 1x8 || cgminer 1.5.6 || fans ~90%, temp 88C/84C/69C, GPU 900/ memory 775 (via MSI Afterburner), ATI 11.7 APP 2.5

|-
| 6990 || 670 || 1.94||0.89 || 346 || 830 || 3072 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || Catalyst 11.4 [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=2949.msg106238#msg106238 source].
|-
| 6990 || 704 || || || || 830 || 3072 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo Win7 64bits || Catalyst 11.4, Arguments: -v 2 -w 128 (by Swapper 2011-07-07)
|-
| 6990 || 708 || 2.05|| || 346 || 830 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || BIOS switch at "default" position 2, see [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]
|-
| 6990 || 744 || || || || 830 || 3072 || 2.5 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo Win7 64bits || Catalyst 11.6b, Arguments: -v 2 -w 128 (by Swapper 2011-07-14)
|-
| 6990 || 746 || 1.82|| || 410 || 880 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || BIOS switch at "overclocked" position 1, see [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]
|-
| 6990 || 758 || -|| || - || 880 || - || 2.4 || - || Phoenix with Poclbm || Catalyst 11.4, OC switch ON, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128 FASTLOOP=false
|-
| 6990 || 771 || 1.8804|| || 410 || 880 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx. Memory clock @ 1280Mhz.
|-
| 6990 || 772 || 1.8380|| || 420 || 900 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix & Poclbm || OC switch ON + overclocked to 900 mhz, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128
|-
| 6990 || 790 || -|| || - || 900 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || BIOS switch at "overclocked" position 1; with "aticonfig --odsc=900,1260" to further overclock the GPU to 900 MHz and mem to 1260 MHz, see [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]
|-
| 6990 || 795 || -|| || - || - || - || 2.4 || || Diablo's miner || BIOS switch at "overclocked" position 1; On Windows Vista, Clocks set at 955,1250. Power control at 20.
Diablo's args: -w 128 -g 5 -v 2 -f 0
|-
| 6990 || 802 || -|| || - || 915 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || BIOS switch at "overclocked" position 1; with "aticonfig --odsc=915,1260" to further overclock the GPU to 915 MHz and mem to 1260 MHz, see [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]
|-
| 6990 || 835 || -||1.11 || - || 890/860 || 3072 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix || BIOS switch at "overclocked" position 1; with "aticonfig --adapter=1 --odsc=990,890 and aticonfig --adapter=0 --odsc=960,860" (GPU 0 runs hot). Currently, aticonfig can only underclock RAM to 100mhz below core speed. Command line: phoenix.py -k poclbm VECTORS AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT
|-
| 6990x2 || 1436 || 1.848|| || 777 || 880 || 6144 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 x2 || guiminer 2011.05.11 || AUSUM switch set to 1 on both cards; Core left at 880MHz, memory left at 1250MHz; VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128
|-
| 6990x2 || 1700 || 1.416|| || 1200 || 1010 || 3072 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 x16 || guiminer 2011.06.14 || GPU 1010MHz, Memory 900MHz; VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128 FASTLOOP=false
|-
| 6990x3 || 2094 || -|| || - || 900 || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 x8 x4 || poclbm || GPU 900MHz, Memory 1250MHz; poclbm.py -f 0 -w 256
|-
| 5870x4 || 1784 || || 1.29|| || 960 || - || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x1 || phoenix 1.50 + phatk + [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=7964.0 Version 2.2 Improvement] || Cards are clocked with BIOS flash @ 960Mhz Core and 300Mhz Memory. More information and pictures: http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=7216.msg324521#msg324521
|-
| 5870 || 437 || || 1.90|| || 960 || - || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x1 || phoenix 1.50 + phatk || Card is clocked with BIOS flash @ 960Mhz Core and 300Mhz Memory. More information and pictures: http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=7216.msg324521#msg324521
|-
| FirePro V4800 || 79.7 || -|| || - || 775 || 400 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-01 ||
|-
| FirePro V8700 || 84.8 || -|| || - || 750 || 800 || - || - || poclbm-mod.03.24.2011 ||

|-
| FirePro M5800 || 61.4 || -|| || - || 650 || - || - || - || poclbm-mod.03.24.2011 || Ubuntu
|-
| FirePro M5800 || 69.3 || -|| || - || 650 || 400 || 2.1 || - || GUIMiner v2011-04-26 || -v -w128, Windows 7 32bit
|-
| FirePro V5800 || 119 || -|| || - || 690 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-01 || Windows 7 32bit
|-
| FirePro V5800 || 144 || -|| || - || 690 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-01 || -v -w128 (Windows 7 32bit)
|-
| FirePro V5800 || 161 || -|| || - || 780 || 800 || - || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-01 || -v -w128 (Windows 7 32bit)
|-
| FirePro V7750 || 35.7 || -|| || - || - || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-21 || Windows 7 64bit
|-
| FirePro V7800 || 254.85 || -|| || - || - || - || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 with poclbm || Debian Squeeze
|-
| FirePro M7740 (M97 GL) [DELL] || 63.0 || -|| || - || 650 || - || 2.1 || PCIe v2.0 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-06-14 || Windows 7 64bit / only SDK2.1 works
|-
| FirePro M7820 || 150.0 || -|| || - || 700 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-06-09 / poclbm || Memory downclocked to 500 from 1000MHz, 169MH/s@800MHz, 181MH/s@860Mhz (max.), only SDK2.1 works, Windows 7 x86
|}

<references>
<ref name='amazon_20110625'>$ Prices from http://www.amazon.com on 2011-06-25</ref>
</references>

===Nvidia===

{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! Watts !! Clock !! SP !! Comment
|-
| ION || 1.8 || 0.067 || 27 || || 16 || poclbm; power consumption incl. CPU
|-
| 8200 mGPU || 1.2 || || || 1200 || 16 || 128 MB shared memory, "poclbm -w 128 -f 0"
|-
| 8400 GS || 2.3 || || || || || "poclbm -w 128"
|-
| 8400 GS || 1.6 || 0.013 || 128 || 1238 || || DiabloMiner -w 128 -f 1 [https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/User:Knightmb source]
|-
| 8400M GS || 2.0 || || || || ||
|-
| 8500GT || 2.4 || || || 918 || 16 || poclbm under GUIMiner
|-
| 8600M GT || 4.93 || || || || 32 ||
|-
| 8600M GT || 3.8 || || || || || Macbook Pro running Diablo
|-
| 8600GT || 5.66 || || || 1188 || 32 ||
|-
| 8600GT OC || 7.3 || || || 1602 || 32 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.0 poclbm] -w 128 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg72833#msg72833 source]
|-
| 8800GT || 25 || 0.24 || 105 || 1300 || ||
|-
| 8800GT || 24.5 || 0.23 || 105 || 1300 || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]
|-
| 8800GT || 31.1 || 0.296 || 105 || 1855 || || Overclocked 715 GPU / 1030 Memory / 1855 Shader; GuiMiner v2011-05-21
|-
| 8800GT || 31.8 || 0.303 || 105 || 1836 || 112 || 713 gpu, 1026 memory. win7x86, phoenix 1.48, -k poclbm WORKSIZE=64 AGGRESSION=5
|-
| 8800GT || 34.0 || || 105 || 1998 || || gpu 756M, mem 1123M, shader 1998M, temp 65C. winXP, phoenix 1.50, -k poclbm WORKSIZE=64 AGGRESSION=6 -- same settings get 32.7 MH/s with aggression 2
|-
| 8800GTS || 16.8 || 0.109 || 154 || || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source] [http://www.techspot.com/review/79-geforce-8800-gts-512/page11.html source]
|-
| 8800 GTS || 18.7 || 0.124 || 150 || 1200 || || poclbm -w 64 no vectors
|-
| 8800 GTS || 33.5 || || 150 || OC || || CUDA mining via GUIminer. Win7 64bit. poclbm -v -w128 -f0. OC'd Core@799MHz, Mem@1080MHz, Shader@1905MHz. Fan 70%, GPU temp @ 66C in comfortable room temp.
|-
| 8800 GTX || 27.5 || || || 1404 || || phoenix 1.48, poclbm, no vectors, 83C with 50C ambient
|-
| 8800m GTX || 16.3 || || || || || rpcminer-cuda Win7-64
|-
| 9300GE || 1.57 || || || 1300 || 8 ||
|-
| 9300GS || 1.69 || || || 1400 || 8 ||
|-
| 9300/nForce 730i || 2.15 || || || 1200 || 16 ||
|-
| 9400GT || 3.37 || 0.067 || 50 || 1400 || 16 ||
|-
| 9400M (MacBook) || 1.90 || 0.32 || 6 || 700 || || poclbm -f 8 no vectors
|-
| 9500GT || 6.75 || 0.135 || 50 || 1400 || 32 ||
|-
| 9500GT || 7.10 || 0.135 || 50 || 1767 || 32 || rpcminer-cuda, Overclocked 707 GPU / 500 Memory / fan 100% 73C steady
|-
| 9600GSO || 19.88 || 0.237 || 84 || 1375 || 96 ||
|-
| 9600GSO512 || 11.75 || 0.131 || 90 || 1625 || 48 ||
|-
| 9600GT || 15.66 || 0.165 || 95 || 1625 || 64 ||
|-
| 9600GT Zotac || 15 || || || 1650 || 64 ||
|-
| 9600GT OC || 18.8 || <0.198 || >95 || 1981 || 64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.0 poclbm] -w 128 -f 10 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg74610#msg74610 source] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg73353#msg73353 source]
|-
| 9600M GS || 4.0 || || || 1075 || 32 || rpcminer-cuda
|-
| 9800GT || 30.36 || 0.289 || 105 || 1800 || 112 ||
|-
| 9800GT EE || 19.7 || 0.263 || 75 || 1375 || 112 || rpcminer-cuda
|-
| 9800GT OC || 29.5 || 0.283 || 105 || 1836 || 112 || poclbm.py, no options. Memory underclocked to 850Mhz, GPU overclocked to 733Mhz
|-
| 9800GTX || 32.54 || 0.232 || 140 || 1688 || 128 ||
|-
| 9800GTX+ || 32.6 || 0.232 || 140 || 1688 || 128 || win7x64 275.33 Overclocked to 756/1890/1102 using a CUDA-specific miner (instead of phoenix, yay for ZERO stales!)
|-
| 9800GTX+ || 35.39 || 0.251 || 141 || 1836 || 128 ||
|-
| 9800GTX+ || 36 || || || || || factory OC ubuntu polclbm.py -w 128 -f 10 -a 10 (DO NOT USE -v)
|-
| 9800GTX+ || 37.23 || 0.266 || 140 || 1890 || 128 || win7x64 275.27 phoenix(1.48) -k poclbm AGGRESSION=3 WORKSIZE=64 (may cause 75%+ stale count, in which case use a CUDA-specific miner instead)
|-
| 9800GTX+ || 40.20 || 0.287 || 140 || 835 || 128 || lowered memory clock higher core, unstable if going higher
|-
|style="background-color:#FFEFEF"| 9800GX2 || 57.83 || 0.294 || 197 || || 2x128 ||
|-
|style="background-color:#FFEFEF"| 9800GX2 || 28 || 0.142 || 197 || || 2x128 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]
|-
| G210 || 3.38 || 0.111 || 30.5 || 1402 || 16 ||
|-
| G210 || 3.79 || 0.124 || 30.5 || 1402 || 16 || poclbm -f 1
|-
| GT220 || 10.8 || 0.084 || 128 || 1360 || || DiabloMiner -w 128 -f 1000 [https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/User:Knightmb source]
|-
| GT230 || 15.5 || 0.161 || 96 || 650 || 64 || (9600GT rebranded one from in a medion pc)
|-
| GT240 || 19.37 || 0.281 || 69 || 1340 || 96 ||
|-
| GT240 || 21.24 || || || || 96 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4291.0 poclbm-mod] -f 0 -v [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg73383#msg73383 source]
|-
| GT240 || 28.1 || || || || 96 || poclbm -f0 -v (Gainward GT240 1024DDR5 OC core@670/stockmem@1700/shader@1700 - stable; max.temp=73)
|-
| GT240M || 9.8 || 0.426 || 23 || 550 || 48 || poclbm -f 0 -w 256
|-
| GTS250 || 35.39 || 0.244 || 145 || 1836 || 128 ||
|-
| GTS250 || 35.2 || 0.243 || 145 || 1836 || 128 ||
|-
| GTS250 OC || 37 || 0.255 || 145 || 2047 || 128 ||
|-
| GTX260M || 22.5 || || || 500 || 112 || poclbm 4/28/2011 Asus G71GX runs ~90c without cooling pad
|-
| GTX260 || 35.91 || 0.178 || 202 || 1242 || 192 ||
|-
| GTX260 || 44 || 0.242 || 182 || 1242 || 216 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|-
| GTX260c216 || 40.40 || 0.236 || 171 || 1242 || 216 ||
|-
| GTX260c216 || 47.4 || 0.260 || 182 || 1348 || 216 || poclbm -w 256
|-
| GTX260c216 || 50.00 || || || 1050 || 216 || m0mchil GPU client, Windows 7 64-bit, x6 @ 3.5ghz
|-
| GTX260c216 OC || 52.0 || || || 1461 || 216 || "poclbm -w 256 -f 1"
|-
| GTX260c216 OC || 58.9 || || || 756/400 || 216 || Core overclocked, Memory underclocked, Ubuntu 11.04 Classic Session(No Effects) "poclbm -w 256 -f 1"
|-
| GTX260c216 OC || 60.1 || || || 1706 || 216 || Core: 364 MHz, Shaders: 1706 MHz, Memory: 594 MHz, VDDC: 1.1800V. "poclbm-mod -w 256 -f 1"
|-
| GTX275 || 50.75 || 0.232 || 219 || 1404 || 240 ||
|-
| GTX275 || 58 || || || 729/1458 || 240 || poclbm -f 0 -w 256
|-
| GTX280 || 46.84 || 0.198 || 236 || 1296 || 240 ||
|-
| GTX280 || 64.34 || 0.289 || 245 || 1296 || 240 || phoenix.exe -k poclbm AGGRESSION=6 WORKSIZE=128 (61*C with Accelero XTREME GTX280)
|-
| GTX285 || 64.8 || || || 1607 || 240 || GuiMiner - Not sure about wattage yet. Still testing. Card runs around 74 C
|-
|-
| GTX285 || 53.35 || 0.262 || 204 || 1476 || 240 ||
|-
| GTX295 || 89.78 || 0.311 || 289 || 1242 || 480 ||
|-
| GTX295 || 120.70 || 0.418 || 289 || 1242 || 480 || GUIMiner no oc.
|-
| GTX295 || 117.30 || 0.406 || 289 || 1476 || 490 ||
|-
| GT 320M (MacBook Air) || 6.12 || || || 1212 || 48 ||
|-
| 320M (Mac mini 2010) || 7.0 || 0.35 || 20 || 450 || 32 || poclbm no extra options, windows 7 x64
|-
| GT 325M || 7.5 || || || 990 || 48 || rpcminer-cuda
|-
| GT 325M || 10.5 || || || 325/650(mem)/1300(shaders) || || rpcminer-cuda, 71 degrees
|-
| GT 325M || 7.99 || || || || || poclbm -f 0 -w 256
|-
| GT330 || 21.65 || || || || || poclbm -f 0 -w 256
|-
| GT 330M || 7.97 || || || || || Model: MacBookPro6,2 VRAM: 512MB Software: [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8994.0 DiabloMiner GUI] v2011-05-22 / Mac OS X 10.6.7
|-
| GT 330M (Sony Vaio Z) || 7.8 || 0.71 ( 0.3 total) || 11 (26w total) || 1045 || 48 ||
|-
| GTS 350M (Toshiba A665-3DV) || 17.0 || 1.214 || 14 || 1080 || || DiabloMiner-Windows.exe
|-
| GTS 360M || 25.0 || || || || || [toshiba qosmio laptop, ~150-165*F stock fans]
|-
| GTS 360M (ASUS G60jx) || 20.0 || || || || || everythins is stock, it cannot sustain. it reaches 90 degrees and freezes.
|-
| GT430 || 20.24 || 0.413 || 49 || 1400 || 96 ||
|-
| GT440 || 20.4 || || || 1645 || 96 || rpcminer-cuda -aggression=8; winxp x64 driver 275.33
|-
| GT540M || 16.0 || || || || || rpcminer-cuda
|-
| GT550M || 17.08 || || || || || rpcminer-cuda -aggression=8
|-
| GTS450 || 45.28 || 0.427 || 106 || 1566 || 192 ||
|-
| GTX460SE || 56.39 || 0.376 || 150 || 1300 || 288 ||
|-
| GTX460 || 66.32 || || || 814 || 336 || rpcminer-cuda 20110605, Graphics Clock @ 814MHz, Memory @ 1555MHz
|-
| GTX460 || 68.31 || 0.427 || 160 || 1350 || 336 ||
|-
| GTX460 768MB || 57.8 || || ? || 1350 || 336 || rpcminer-cuda -gputhreads=320 -gpugrid=336
|-
| GTX460 768MB (MSI Cyclone 768D5/OC) || 75.1 || || ? || 930 || 336 || rpcminer-cuda on Win7 x64 with ForceWare 275.33. [http://event.msi.com/vga/afterburner/download.htm MSI Afterburner] set to core: 930MHz, shader: 1850MHz, core voltage: 1.087V, memory: 1600MHz. Runs at 58°C with fan at 75% (ambient 25°C).
|-
| GTX460 1GB DirectCU || 72.3 || ? || ? || 1672 || 336 || rpcminer-cuda -gputhreads=320 -gpugrid=336
|-
| GTX460 (2 cards) || 102 || 0.319? || 320? || 1350 || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]
|-
| GTX460 (2 cards) OC || 127 || 0.374 || 340 || 1620 || 2x 336 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2444.0 rpcminer-cuda] -gpugrid=128 -gputhreads=128 ver.20110227
|-
| GTX465 || 64.41 || 0.322 || 200 || 1215 || 352 ||
|-
| GTX470 || 81.98 || 0.381 || 215 || 1215 || 448 ||
|-
| GTX470 || 94.7 || || || 1414 || ||
|-
| GTX470 || 111.9 || 0.520 || 215 || 1650 || 448 ||
|-
| GTX470 || 115 || || || 1616 || || phoenix 1.46 poclbm VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=6
|-
| GTX480 || 101.28 || 0.405 || 250 || 1401 || 480 ||
|-
| GTX480 || 140.43 || || || 1700 || 480 || rpcminer-cuda -gpugrid=512 -gputhreads=480
|-
| GTX480 AMP!Zotac|| 140.1 || || || 1700|| 480 || rpcminer-cuda -gpugrid=480 -gputhreads=480 (vCore-1050,Core Clock-851, Shader Clock-1702, Memory Clock-2033, t-79°c, Water 43°c, stable temperature and work)
|-
| GTX560 Ti || 67.7 || 0.39 || 170 || 1700 || 384 || standard EVGA 560, no overclock
|-
| GTX560 Ti || 74.8 || 0.41 || 180 || 1700 || 384 || gigabyte 900Mhz clock; -w 512 -v
|-
| GTX560 OC || 86.7 || <0.51 || >170 || 1800 || 384 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2444.0 rpcminer-cuda] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg72816#msg72816 source]
|-
| GTX570 || 105.83 || 0.483 || 219 || 1464 || 480 ||
|-
| GTX570 || 140 || 0.639 || 219 || 750 || 480 || rpcminer-cuda.exe -aggression=10 -gpugrid=480 -gputhreads=960; display driver stops working with aggression=11 under win7 x64 driver 270.61
|-
| GTX570 || 157 || 0.717 || 219 || 850 || 480 || rpcminer-cuda.exe -aggression=11 -gpugrid=120 -gputhreads=960
|-
| GTX580 || 140.05 || 0.574 || 244 || 1544 || 512 ||
|-
| GTX590 || 193.1 || --- || --- || 1215 || 2x 512 || poclbm -v -w 256, Win
|-
| GTX590 || 2x 121.48 || --- || --- || 750 || 2x 512 ||
|-
| Quadro FX 580 || 5.7 || 0.14 || 40 || 1125 || 4 ||rpcminer-cuda, Win, -gpugrid=128 -gputhreads=512
|-
| Quadro FX 770M || 5.75 || || || 500 || 32 || DiabloMiner-Windows.exe BFI_INT FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=6, Win
|-
|Quadro FX 770M || 6.39 || || || 500 || 32 || DiabloMiner-Windows.exe BFI_INT FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=6 w 64, Win 7x64
|-
|Quadro FX 880M || 9.6 || || || || || poclbm/guiminer
|-
| Quadro FX 1600M || 6 || 0.12 || 50 || 625 || 32 ||rpcminer-cuda, Win
|-
| Quadro FX 2000M || 23 || 0.397 || 58 || || || phoenix 1.48, -k poclbm, VECTORS, AGGRESION=6, Lenovo W520 platform
|-
| Quadro FX 2800M || 22 || 0.293 || 75 || 600 || 96 ||DiabloMiner, win
|-
| Quadro FX 3600M || 36 || 0.514 || 70 || 500 || 96 ||
|-
| Quadro FX 3800 || 33.3 || || || || || poclbm/guiminer -f0 -w128
|-
| Quadro NVS 135M || 1.05 || 0.1 || 10 || 800 || 1 ||
|-
| Quadro NVS 295 || 1.7 || 0.07 || 23 || 567 || 8 || phoenix
|-
| Quadro NVS 3100M || 3.6 || 0.257 || 14 || 600 || 16 || rpcminer-cuda, Win, CUDA 3.1.1
|-
| Quadro 5000 || 67.7 || 0.445 || 152 || 513 || 352 || rpcminer-cuda.exe -aggression=7 gpugrid=352 gputhreads=704;
|-
| Tesla C1060 || 52.5 || || || 1296 || 240 || poclbm, Win7x64
|-
| Tesla M2050 || 79.8 || || || 1550 || 448 || DiabloMiner
|-
| Tesla S1070 || 155.2 || || || || || rpcminer-cuda, Linux, CUDA 3.2, 4 instances (-gpu=0 through -gpu=3)
|-
| GTX280x2 || 102.7 || || || || ||
|-
|}

==CPUs/APUs==

A lot of nice data can be pulled from [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.0 this thread] to seed this section.

Might you wish to throttle CPU load a bit, so it doesn't reach 100°C, it can be done with Battle Encoder Shirase to a margin, like, -15% of available CPU cycles.

Often, the best combination to be is to throttle CPU miner to -5% '''AND''' set it to least of priority levels, so as not to choke GPU miner up.

===AMD===
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! nprocs !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! TDP [W] !! CPU Clock !! Mhash/s CPU !! Mhash/s GPU !! GPU !! GPU Clock !! SP !! Software !! Notes
|-
| 4x Opteron 6174 || 48 || 115 || 0.36 || 320W || 2.2 GHz || 2.4
|colspan=4|
| cpuminer v0.8.1 || --alg 4way --threads 48
|-
| 2x Opteron 6128 || 16 || 32.4 || 0.141 || 230W || 2 GHz || 32.4
|colspan=4|
| 0.3.19 || -4way
|-
| Athlon XP 2000+ || 2 || 0.62 || 0.009 || 70W || 1.67 GHz || 0.62
|colspan=4|
| 0.3.18/Ubuntu || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source] [http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm?articleid=914&page=4 source]
|-
| Athlon 64 3500+ || 1 || 1.18 || 0.013 || 89W || 2.54 GHz || 1.18
|colspan=4|
| ufasoft v0.4 || overclocked (originally 2.2 GHz)
|-
| Athlon 64 X2 3800+ || 2 || 1.73 || 0.03 || 65 W || 2.00 GHz || 1.73
|colspan=4|
| cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || -algo=4way
|-
| Athlon 64 X2 4000+ || 2 || 1.9 || 0.02 || 65W || 2.1 GHz || 1.9
|colspan=4|
| rpc-miner ||
|-
| Athlon 64 X2 4400+ || || 2.09 || 0.032 || 65W || 2.3GHz || 2.09
|colspan=4|
| 0.3.19/Win x64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]
|-
| Athlon 64 X2 6000+ || 2 || 2.81 || 0.02 || 125W || 3 GHz || 2.81
|colspan=4|
| || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg22881#msg22881 source]
|-
| Athlon 64 X2 6400+ Black Edition || 2 || 2.9 || 0.023 || 125W || 3.2 GHz || 2.9
|colspan=4|
| 0.3.20.2 BETA/Win 7 x64 || -4way
|-
| Athlon II X2 240e || 2 || 2.71 || 0.06 || 45W || 2.81 GHz || 2.71
|colspan=4|
| bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Athlon II X2 250 || 2 || 5.6 || 0.09 || 65W || 3.01GHz || 5.6
|colspan=4|
| bitcoin-miner 0.11 ||
|-
| Athlon II X4 630 || 4 || 10.7 || 0.11 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 10.7
|colspan=4|
| bitcoin-miner 0.4 ||
|-
| Opteron 8220 x16 || 16 || 25 || || || 2.8Ghz || 1.5
|colspan=4|
| ufasoft / OpenSuse 64bit || running default, but had to copy 32bit binaries over to get curl and ufasoft running. might be better when using native 32bit system w/o other users on the machine ||
|-
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 3.8 || 0.04 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 3.8
|colspan=4|
| 0.3.1x/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|-
| Phenom X4 9950 BE || 4 || 9.3 || 0.07 || 126W || 2.6 GHz || 2.32
|colspan=4|
| bitcoin-miner 0.13/WinXP || No GPU
|-
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 7.2 || 0.08 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 7.2
|colspan=4|
| cpu-miner 0.2.1/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|-
| Phenom II X4 810 || 4 || 5.0 || || 95W || 2.8 GHz ||
|colspan=4|
| rpcminer-cpu ||
|-
| Phenom II X4 810 || 4 || 9.5 || || 95W || 2.8 GHz ||
|colspan=4|
| rpcminer-4way ||
|-
| Phenom II X4 810 || 4 || 10.5 || || 95W || 2.8 GHz ||
|colspan=4|
| ufasoft v0.10 ||
|-
| Phenom II X4 810 || 4 || 11.5 || || 95W || 2.8 GHz ||
|colspan=4|
| cgminer 1.5.3 || "cgminer 1.5.3 --algo 4way" on Ubuntu 11.10 alpha 2 (64 bit), built by GCC 4.6.1 with "-O3 -Wall -march=native"
|-
| Phenom II X4 955 || 4 || 11 || 0.09 || 125W || 3.2 GHz || 11
|colspan=4|
| rpcminer-4way ||
|-
| Phenom II X4 965 || 4 || 12 || 0.09 || 140W || 3.4 GHz || 11
|colspan=4|
| rpcminer-4way ||
|-
| Phenom II X6 1055T || 6 || 15.84 || 0.13 || 125W || 2.82 GHz || 15.84
|colspan=4|
| bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Phenom II X6 1075T || 6 || 21.3 || || 125W|| ||
|colspan=4|
| minerd || Ubuntu 11.04 amd64 runlevel=1 -algo=4way -threads=6
|-
| Phenom II X6 1090T || 6 || 18|| || 141W|| 3.50 GHz || 3
|colspan=4|
| minerd ||
|-
| Phenom II X6 1100T || 6 || 22 || 0.176 || 125W || 3.82 GHz || 22
|colspan=4|
| bitcoin-miner || Aciid#bitcoin-dev
|-
| Sempron 3000+ || 2 || 0.8 || || 62W || 1.6 GHz || 0.8
|colspan=4|
| cpuminer || --alg 4way
|-
| Turion X2 RM-70 || 2 || 1.9 || || 65W || 2.1 GHz || 1.9
|colspan=4|
| cpuminer || --alg 4way
|-
| Zacate E-350 || 2 || 11 || 0.615 || 18W || 1.6 Ghz || 1.231 || 9.831 || HD6310M || 492 Mhz || 80 || poclbm -v -w128 + Ufasoft 0.7 || stock speeds
|-
| Zacate E-350 || 2 || 12
|colspan=2|
| 1.648 Ghz || 1.252 || 10.87 || HD6310M || 492 Mhz || 80 || poclbm -v -w 256 -f 1 || "autotune" speed with ASUS EFI BIOS
|-
| Ontario C-50 || 2 || 6.2 || 0.68 || 9W || 1.0 Ghz || 1.200 || 6.2 || HD6250M || 277 Mhz || 80 || poclbm -v -w128 -f5 -r5 ||
|-
| A8-3850 || 1 || 60 || || 100W || Stock || || 60 || HD6550D || Stock || 400 || poclbm.exe, Win7-32, 4GB RAM || All running at stock speeds, and set to auto in BIOS.
|}

===ARM===
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! Mhash/$ /€ !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment
|-
| ARM1136EJ-S || 1 || 0.11 || ? || ? || ? || 0.528 GHz || cpuminer git || T-Mobile Pulse, inside Debian chroot, 'c' algo
|-
| Cortex-A8 || 1 || 0.125 || 0.36 || <0.01 || 0.35 W || 0.6 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || Nokia N900: 'cryptopp'
|-
| Cortex-A8 || 1 || 0.2 || 0.57 || <0.01 || 0.35 W || 0.6 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || Nokia N900: 'c' algo
|-
| 2x Cortex-A9 || 2 || 0.57|| 1.14 ||<0.01 || 0.5 W || 1.0 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-24) || Toshiba AC100, ubuntu, 'c' algo
|-
| Marvel Feroceon (88FR131) || 1 || 0.195 || 0.224 ||<0.01|| 0.87 W || 1.2 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-06-15) || Marvell SheevaPlug, Debian, 'c' algo
|}

===Intel===
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! Mhash / $<ref name='amazon_20110625'/>/€<ref name='geizhals_20110625'/> !! ACP [W] !! Clock [GHz] !! Version !! Comment
|-
| Pentium III mobile ? || 1 || 0.3 || 0.014 |||| 21 || 1.07 || 0.3.1x/Win2K || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source] [http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=27380 source]
|-
| Pentium M 1.6ghz || 1 || .4 || || || || 1.6 || minerd (jgarzik's 1.0) || cryppto, Windows 7
|-
| Pentium M 1.73ghz || 1 || .5 || || || || 1.73 || minerd (jgarzik's 1.0) || cryppto, Windows 7
|-
| Old Xeon 512k (Dual) || 2x1/2 || 2.0 || || || || 3.0 || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || HT disabled, algo=4way (twice as fast as the 2nd best algo)
|-
| Pentium 4 2.0A || 1 || 0.85 || || || || 2.0 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft-0.4]/WinXP || -g no -t 2
|-
| Pentium Dual-Core E2180 || 2/2 || 1.75 || || || || 2.0 || rpcminer-cpu || Win7-64
|-
| Pentium Dual-Core E2180 || 2/2 || 4.1 || || || || 2.0 || cpuminer || sse2_64
|-
| Pentium Dual-Core E2180 || 2/2 || 4.5 || || || || 2.0 || ufasoft v0.11 || Win7-64
|-
| Pentium Dual-Core E5400 || 2/2 || 2.27 || 0.03 || || 65 || 2.7 || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Celeron E330 || 2/2 || 2.2 || 0.03 || || 65 || 2.5 || 0.3.19/Ubuntu10.04 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]
|-
|-
| Celeron E3400 || 2/2 || 5.9 || - || - || - || 2.6 || Ufasoft v0.13 / GUIMiner v2011-06-14 || WinXP 32 bit, SSE2, Flags "-g no"
|-
| Core 2 Quad Q6600 || 4/4 || 11.0 || || 0.02/0.06 || 105 || 2.40 || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || -a 60 -g no -t 4
|-
| Core 2 Quad Q8200 || 4/4 || 10.9 || || 0.06/0.10 || || 2.33 || Ufasoft 0.14 || -g no -l yes -t 4
|-
| Core 2 Quad Q9400 || 4/4 || 11 || 0.046 || 0.06/0.07 || 95 || 2.66 || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || -a 60 -g no -t 4
|-
| Core 2 Quad Q9650 || 4/4 || 18.67 || || 0.05/0.06 || 95 || 4.00 || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || -a 60 -g no -t 4
|-
| Core i3 530 || 2/4 || 8.31 || 0.10 || 0.06/0.10 || 80 || 3.66 || Ufasoft 0.7 || -v -a5 -g no -t 4
|-
| Core i3 M350 || 2/4 || 1.48 || 0.04 || || 35 || 2.27 || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Core i5 M450 || 2/4 || 1.8 || 0.05 || || 35 || 1.2 || 0.3.17/Win7-54 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source]
|-
| Core i5-650 || 2/4 || 5.1 || 0.04 ? || 0.02/0.03 || || 3.2 || cpuminer-0.7 || -4way
|-
| Core i5-750 || 4/4 || 14 || || 0.06/0.10 || || 3.2 || bitcoin-miner 0.11 || -a 5 -g no -t 4
|-
| Core i5 ? || 4/? || 6.5 || || || || || client from svn || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37621#msg37621 source]
|-
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 4.5 || 0.05 || 0.02/0.03 || 95 || 3.1 || cpuminer git (2011-01-22) || cryptopp_asm32
|-
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 14 || 0.15 || 0.07/0.09 || 95 || 3.1 || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || sse2_64
|-
| Core i5 2500K || 4/4 || 20.6 || ||0.10/0.12 || || 4.2 || bitcoin-miner || -g no
|-
| Core i5 2600K || 4/8 || 17.3 || || || 75 || 3.4 || bitcoin-miner || -g no. 75W for the whole System without monitor (MSI Board). CPU underclocked to 3,4Ghz and undervolted to 1,012Vcore. Passive Cooling! 3.6ghz results in 18,4 Mhash/s
|-
| Core i7 620M || 2/4 || 1.888 || || || || 2.66 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8994.0 RPCMiner GUI] v2011-05-22 / Mac OS X 10.6.7 || Model: MacBookPro6,2 RAM: 4GB
|-
| Core i7 720QM || 4/8 || 7.9 || ?|| || 45 || 2.8 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] || stream processors overclocked from 1.6 GHz; Dell Precision M6500, Win7-64, 8GB DDR3
|-
| Core i7 820 || 4/8 || 13.8 || || || || 2.8 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] || -t 8
|-
| Core i7 920 || 4/8 || 19.2 || 0.10 || || 195 || 4.0 (x21) || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] || -a 5
|-
| Core i7 950 || 4/8 || 5.88 || 0.039 || || 150 || 3.83 (x23) || bitcoin-0.3.20.2 Win7-64 ||
|-
| Core i7 950 || 4/8 || 18.9 || 0.126 || || 150 || 3.83 (x23) || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] v0.4 ||
|-
| Core i7 980x || 6/12 || 19.2 || 0.15 || || 130 || 4.4 (x33) || cpuminer/Win7-64 ||
|-
| Core i7 980x || 6/12 || 8.7 || || || || 3.9 (x27) || 0.3.17/Win7-64 ||
|-
| Core i7 990x || 6/12 || 33.3 || || || || 4.5 (x32) || ufasoft/Win2008 R2-64 || Ram - 12Gb, Rampage III BlackEdition, Water cooling
|-
| Core i7 2635QM || 4/8 || 2.93 || || || || 2.00 || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8994.0 RPCMiner GUI] v2011-05-22 / Mac OS X 10.6.7 || Model: MacBookPro8,2 RAM: 4GB
|-
| Core i7 620M || 2/4 || 6.3 || 0.18 || || 35 || 2.66 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] v0.4 ||
|-
| Core i7 2600k || 4/4 || 6.7 || || || || 4.00 || phoenix 0.48 ||
|-
| Core 2 Duo U7600 || 1 || 1.1 || || || || 1.2 || minerd (jgarzik's 1.0) || cryppto, Windows 7
|-
| Core 2 Duo E5200 || 2/2 || 6.2 || 0.086 || || 72 || 2.76 || Ufasoft/Win7-64 || TDP is 65W + 7W overclock
|-
| Core 2 Duo E6550 || 1/2 || 2.45 || || || || 2.33 || cpuminer 0.7.1 (Linux) || --algo=sse2_64
|-
| Core 2 Duo E6850 || 2/2 || 6.75 || 0.10 || || 65 || 3.0 || ufasoft-0.3 ||
|-
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 7.76 || 0.11 || || 70 || 3.33 || ufasoft-0.3 || uncertain of overclock; miner optimized for Intel Core
|-
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 2.52 || 0.04 || || 65 || 2.66 || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Core 2 Duo E8200 || 2/2 || 2.3 || 0.035 || || 65 || 2.66 || rpcminer-cpu ||
|-
| Core 2 Duo E8400 || 2/2 || 6.9 || 0.106 || || 65 || 3.0 || ufasoft v0.10 || windows 7/64bit (-t 2)
|-
| Core 2 Duo E8500 || 1/2 || 3.6 || || || || 3.16 || guiminer v2011-06-14 || windows vista 32bit
|-
| Core 2 Duo E8500 || 2/2 || 7.2 || || || || 3.16 || guiminer v2011-06-14 || windows vista 32bit
|-
| Core 2 Duo T5450 || 2/2 || 2.5 || 0.07 || || 35 || 1.63 || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || Ubuntu 11.04
|-
| Core 2 Duo T6400 || 2/2 || 4.2 || 0.12 || || 35 || 2.00 || cpuminer git (Linux) || --algo=sse2_64
|-
| Core 2 Duo T7250 || 2/2 || 4.5 || 0.13 || || 35 || 2.00 || bitcoin-miner 0.13/WinXP || No GPU
|-
| Core 2 Duo T7450 || 2/2 || 3.7 || 0.10 || || 35 || 2.13 || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || Ubuntu 11.04
|-
| Core 2 Duo T9400 || 2/2 || 4.2 || || || || 2.53 || ufasoft v0.13 || Win7-64
|-
| Core 2 Extreme X9000 || 2/2 || 2.37 || || || || 2.8 || rpcminer-cpu || Win7-64
|-
| Core 2 Extreme X9000 || 2/2 || 6.2 || || || || 2.8 || ufasoft v0.11 || Win7-64
|-
| Core 2 Extreme X9000 || 2/2 || 7.2 || || || || 3.2 || ufasoft v0.11 || Win7-64 Overclocked from 2.8 GHz to 3.2 GHz
|-
| Xeon 2.8 || 2/2 || 0.8 || || || || 2.8 || cpuminer || cryptopp_asm32
|-
| Xeon 3060 || 1/2 || 2.03 || 0.03 || || 65 || 2. || cpuminer 0.8.1 (Linux) || --algo=cryptopp_asm32
|-
| Xeon Prestonia 2.4 (dual) || 2x1/2 || 2.16 || 0.017 || || 130 || 2.4 || ufasoft v0.4 ||
|-
| Xeon X5355 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 10.13 || 0.16 || || 120 || 2.6 || bitcoind || Roughly the same speed as the "c" algo in cpuminer
|-
| Xeon X5355 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 22.76 || 0.09 || || 120 || 2.6 || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || -O2 -march=core2, algo=sse2_64
|-
| Xeon X5365 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 26.00 || ? || || ? || 3.0 || cpuminer git (2011-06-15) || algo=sse2_64
|-
| Xeon X5650 || 2x6/24 || 28.6 || ? || ? || ? || 2.67 || cpuminer 1.0.2 || --algo 4way
|-
| Xeon E5335 || 4/4 || 9.35 || 0.12 || || 80 || 2.00 || ufasoft v0.11 || Vista-32
|-
| Xeon E5410 || 4/4 || 9.8 || ? || || 80 || 2.33|| ufasoft v0.10 || CentOS 5.5 x64
|-
| Xeon E5440 || 4/8 || 7.3 || ? || || 80 || 2.66|| Kiv's poclbm-gui || FIXME: Either wrong model # or wrong threads/speed info
|-
| Xeon E5506 || 4/4 || 9.6 || ? || || 80 || 2.13|| ufasoft v0.10 || CentOS 5.5 x64
|-
| Xeon E5520 || 4/8 || 6.5 || 0.08 || || 80 || 2.27 || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Xeon E5530 || 4/8 || 7.14 || 0.09 || || 80 || 2.4 || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Xeon E5620 || 4/8 || 11.2 || ? || || 80 || 2.4 || ufasoft v0.10 -t 4 || CentOS 5.5 x64 Hyper-Threading is off
|-
| Xeon E5630 (dual) || 2x4/8 || 8 || 0.1 || || 80 || 2.53 || 0.3.17/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]
|-
| Xeon E6520 (dual) || 2x4/8 || 24.7 || || || || 2.53 || ufasoft v0.10 || windows 2008 R2 64bit (-t 16)
|-
| Xeon E7220 || 2/2 || 6.3 || ? || || 80 || 2.93|| ufasoft v0.10 || CentOS 5.5 x64
|-
| Xeon E7320 (dual) || 2x2 || 1.5 || || || || 2.8 || cgminer v1.2.8 || 2x2.8ghz dual core running Ubuntu 11.04 x86 (individual cores get 0.4 MH/s)
|-
| Xeon E7450 (quad) || 4x6/24 || 60 || || || || 2.40 || ufasoft v0.13 || -t 24
|-
| Xeon E7520 (dual) || 2x4/16 || 18 || || || 95 || 1.87 || ufasoft v0.10 || windows 2008 R2 64bit (-t 16)
|-
| Xeon W3680 || 6/12 || 18 || || || 130 || 3.33 || cpuminer v1.0.2 --algo=4way || Ubuntu 11.04 64bit
|-
| Atom Z520 || 1/2 || 1.20 || || || 2 || 1.7 || ufasoft 1.18 || Asus Eee 1101HA with overclocking capabilities
|-
| Atom N230 || 1/2 || 0.375 || || || 4 || 1.6 || rpcminer-cpu ||
|-
| Atom N230 || 1/2 || 0.245 || || || 4 || 1.6 || rpcminer-4way ||
|-
| Atom N230 || 1/2 || 0.97 || || || 4 || 1.6 || ufasoft v0.10 ||
|-
| Atom N270 || 1/2 || 1.19 || 0.24 || || 5 || 1.6 || ufasoft v0.10 ||
|-
| Atom 330 || 2/4 || 1.80 || || || 8 || 1.6 || ufasoft v0.13 || -t 4
|-
| Atom D510 || 2/4 || 1.00 || || || || 1.6 || cpuminer w cryptopp_asm32 || debian linux 6.0, headless system, 2 GB RAM, running from usb-flash
|-
| Atom D510 || 4/4 || 2.3 || 0.07 || || 30 || 1.6 || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || Ubuntu 11.04 Server
|}

<references>
<ref name='amazon_20110625'>$ Prices from http://www.amazon.com on 2011-06-25</ref>
<ref name='geizhals_20110625'>€ Prices from http://geizhals.at/eu on 2011-06-25</ref>
</references>

===Other===
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! Mhash/$ !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment
|-
| Cell || 6 || 21 || 0.35 || 0.07 || 60W || 3.2 GHz || Cellminer || Sony Playstation 3 (FAT): Needs custom firmware. [https://github.com/verement/cellminer source] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4704.20 source] Total power usage of PS3 fat is 120W but only the Cell cpu is active.
|-
| Cell || 7 || 26.6 || ? || ? || 60W || 3.2 GHz || Cellminer || Sony Playstation 3 (FAT): Needs custom firmware. [https://github.com/verement/cellminer source] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4704.20 source] Running with 7th spu enabled and both ppe cores.
|-
| Cell || 6 || 21 || 0.7 || 0.07 || 35W || 3.2 GHz || cellminer || Sony Playstation 3 (SLIM): Total power usage of PS3 slim is 70W but only the Cell cpu is active.
|-
| ARM || 1 || 0.187 || ? || ? || ? || 1200 MHz || cpuminer || Seagate Dockstar [http://archlinuxarm.org/platforms/armv5/seagate-dockstar ArchLinux]
|-
| MIPS || 1 || 0.026 || ? || ? || ? || 200 MHz || cpuminer || ASUS WL-500G Deluxe Router Running [http://openwrt.org/ OpenWrt]
|-
| VIA Eden || 1 || 1.3 || 0.17 || || 8W || 1600 MHz || cpuminer || VIA Eden w/ padlock
|-
| PowerPC 7447A || 1 || 0.53 || || || || 1420 MHz || cpuminer ||
|-
| PowerPC 750 (G3) || 1 || 0.140 || || || || 600 MHz || cpuminer || iBook G3 600 w/ Cryptopp
|}

===FPGA Devices===

{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! FPGA Model !! Cores !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! Mhash/$ !! Power [W] !! Board price !! Clock !! Version !! Board !! Comment
|-
| Altera EP4CE115C7 || 1 || 80 || 18.18 || 0.13 || 4.4 || $595 ($299 academic) <ref>price from http://www.terasic.com.tw/cgi-bin/page/archive.pl?No=502 on 2011-06-26</ref> || 80 MHz || fpgaminer 0.03 || Terasic DE2-115 || Unoptimized Pipelined Version
|-
| Altera EP4CE115C7 || 1 || 109 || || 0.18 || || $595 ($299 academic) <ref>Price from http://www.terasic.com.tw/cgi-bin/page/archive.pl?No=502 on 2011-06-26</ref> || 109 MHz || fpgaminer 0.03-makomk || Terasic DE2-115 || Makomk's Improvements
|-
| Xilinx XC5VLX110T-1FF1136 || 1 || 120 || || 0.06 || || $1999 ($750 academic) <ref>Price from http://www.digilentinc.com/Products/Detail.cfm?NavPath=2,400,795&Prod=XUPV5 on 2011-06-26</ref> || 120 MHz || fpgaminer virtex5 || XUPV5-LX110T || Original non-configurable fully-unrolled Xilinx VHDL Design
|-
| Xilinx XC3S500E-FG320-5 || 1 || 3.125 || 4.0 || 0.02 || 0.78 || $149 ($99 academic) <ref>Price from http://www.digilentinc.com/Products/Detail.cfm?Prod=NEXYS2 on 2011-06-26</ref> || 100 MHz || fpgaminer Verilog Xilinx port || Digilent Nexys 2 500K ||
|-
| Xilinx XC6SLX150T-3FGG676 || 1 || 100 || ~25 || || ~4.0 || $995 <ref>Price from http://www.xilinx.com/products/boards-and-kits/AES-S6DEV-LX150T-G.htm on 2011-07-26</ref> || 100 MHz || fpgaminer makomk Xilinx port || Avnet Spartan-6 LX150T Development Kit || -3N 484-pin chip is ~$150, 0.67Mhash/$
|-
| Altera EP4CE22F17C6 || 1 || 6.25 || ?? || ?? || ?? || 79$ || 50 MHz || Makomk-partial-unroll-speed, LOG2_LOOP=3 || Terasic DE0-Nano || 16k LEs from 22k used
|-
| Xilinx XC6VLX240T-1FFG1156 || 3 || 375 || 23 || 0.21 || 16 || $1795 <ref>Price from Avnet on Aug 11, 2011</ref> || 125MHz || Modified verilog xilinx fpga miner port (modified for 3 cores, a PCIe interface and use of DSP48s)|| Xilinx ML605 development kit || Uses PCIe interface instead of serial interface. ML605 power manager must have its current limit increased to meet power demands. DSP48s used to reduce logic resources.
|}

<references>
</references>

==See Also==

* [[Mining rig]]
* [[Generation Calculator]]
* [[Power Calc]]
* [[OpenCL miner]]
* [http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=745 ATI Stream vs. NVIDIA CUDA - GPGPU computing battle royale]
* [http://bitminer.info/ Bitminer.info]
* [http://www.pcper.com/reviews/Graphics-Cards/Bitcoin-Currency-and-GPU-Mining-Performance-Comparison Bitcoin Mining Performance Compared]
** [http://www.pcper.com/reviews/Graphics-Cards/Bitcoin-Mining-Update-Power-Usage-Costs-Across-United-States Bitcoin Mining Power Costs Compared]

[[Category:Mining]]

Talk:BIP 0020

2011-07-25T15:22:58Z

Phelix: moved "URI End / Ignored part" to the end, is obsolete

See [[Talk:Main_Page#Header_capitalisation]] before continuing ;) [[User:Genjix|Genjix]] 08:02, 10 January 2011 (GMT)

Also, consider using SI prefixes. They are standard throughout the world (except America). [[User:Genjix|Genjix]] 08:04, 10 January 2011 (GMT)
* SI/decimal is the inferior competition/enemy of the superior Tonal system. That is, to be avoided. (Chinese is a standard language throughout most of the world too! And whatever the currency of China is-- should we not use bitcoins??) [[User:Luke-jr|Luke-jr]] 15:05, 10 January 2011 (GMT)

Has anybody thought about including network addresses (IPv4/IPv6) of the receiving client into the URL? This way, a payment transaction could be sent directly (in addition to
sending P2P of course). --[[User:Goonie|Goonie]] 11:21, 23 July 2011 (GMT)

== Exponents ==
* Wouldn't it be better if we used the more standard "e" to represent the exponent? e.g. 5e8 = 500,000,000. [[User:Weavejester|Weavejester]] 11:18 PM, 18 April 2011 (GMT)
: An older draft used this, but when implementing, it was quickly noted to conflict with the 'e' hexadecimal digit. --[[User:Luke-jr|Luke-jr]] 16:04, 19 April 2011 (GMT)
:: Thanks for the response! I noticed that flaw shortly after I asked the question, but it looks like the wiki lost the update I posted. Out of interest, what's the benefit for allowing both decimal and hexidecimal notation? [[User:Weavejester|Weavejester]] 20:02 PM, 19 April 2011 (GMT)
::: So people can at least some some degree of readability for [[Tonal BitCoin|TBC]] amounts. --[[User:Luke-jr|Luke-jr]] 20:33, 19 April 2011 (GMT)

* Why are exponents even used to begin with? It is far, far simpler to just use the decimal values and I would almost guarantee that most people will always write their URIs using decimal amounts as its far simpler to write and is still valid. [[User:BlueMatt|BlueMatt]] 12:46, 20 April 2011 (GMT)

== Fallback URI ==
On Android an app can register to open with a normal web URI. This has the advantage of acting as a fallback URI in case there is no app that supports '''bitcoin:'''. For example we could propose '''<nowiki>https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Send/<address>[?][amount=<size>][&][label=<label>][&][message=<message>]</nowiki>'''. If the user had a mobile app that supported bitcoin it would have registered '''<nowiki>https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Send/</nowiki>''' and be launched. If the user did not have such an app their browser would launch and be directed to '''https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Send/'''. This page could then inform the user about various apps that support bitcoin transfers and possibly have a link to [[MyBitcoin]] as well. Maybe '''https://bitcoin.org/Send/''' would be more appropriate, though that one might not be updated often enough.
* iPhone support
There is even a way to have this work on iOS devices. Have the web page redirect to the standard '''bitcoin:''' scheme. If an app is present to support this the app will launch, if not the browser the will stay open at the explanation page.
* Upshot
This fallback proposal will make bitcoin QR codes meaningful regardless of if the user has a bitcoin app installed.--[[User:BitMark|BitMark]] 16:05, 2 April 2011 (GMT)

== Use-cases - buy this link ==
On the buy-this link, perhaps we should also incorporate an optional transaction id or something which would be passed along to the bitcoin client. Not really transaction but some sort of arbitrary data, only meaningful to the merchant. Something an online merchant can use to verify which transaction it has received is relevant to a purchase. [[User:Dantman|Dantman]] 20:45, 18 April 2011 (GMT)

== Tonal/Hex support ==
Why is Tonal/Hex part of the spec? If a couple users want to use a different unit system that is fine, but that doesn't mean we need to complicate the protocol for them. Tonal already needs to be converted to normal BTC before transferring, why is that not part of this spec. Also, jgarzik/others showed no interest in implementing URI in the main bitcoin client as long as there is tonal/hex support in the spec. [[User:BlueMatt|BlueMatt]] 12:51, 20 April 2011 (GMT)

== Incorrect Syntax ==
The proposed syntax doesn't seem to capture the intent of the design. Here's how it reads on the wiki page:

bitcoin:<address>[?][amount=<size>][&][label=<label>][&][message=<message>]

The above syntax describes the question mark and ampersands as optional, but really they should be mandatory as a separator if multiple parameters are included. According to the proposed specification, above, the following would be an acceptable URI, which I don't believe is a good thing (note the absence of the optional question mark and ampersands):

bitcoin:1NS17iag9jJgTHD1VXjvLCEnZuQ3rJED9Lamount=50X8label=Luke-Jrmessage=Donation%20for%20project%20xyz

Perhaps a more exact/correct way to describe the proposed syntax would be:

bitcoin:<address>[?<parameters-list>]
where <parameters-list> is one or more of the following, separated by ampersand
[amount=<size>]
[label=<label>]
[message=<message>]

The BNF gets close to describing this, but also has issues. The most glaring to me is this line:

messageparam = "label=" *uchar

(Seems to me that messageparam should have the literal "message=", as opposed to "label=".)

In addition, the BNF includes a parameter named "version" (which is not in the earlier specification), and also doesn't state that parameters are separated by ampersands.

[[User:Jerfelix|Jerfelix]] 04:09, 13 June 2011 (GMT)

== URI End / Ignored part ==
Edit by OP (phelix): Not necessary - found out a way how to realize this in the QR-Code world.

For some QR applications it might come in handy to add some characters that are not part of the URI any more. Does a space end the URI? Can everything after a # be ignored?
* An "end-of-URI" delimiter would be a QR-Code issue. I'm not sure how the existing implementations would handle a # either, though that seems like it could be logical. Might also try adding &dummy=... --[[User:Luke-jr|Luke-jr]] 13:25, 26 May 2011 (GMT)

GPU overclocking tools

2011-06-18T10:10:24Z

Phelix:

[[Category:Mining]]

With these tools it is possible to change the clock speeds of Radeon graphic cards to increase hashrate and thus mining profitability.

Usually core clock is increased and memory clock is decreased to lower temperatures and save power.

==Windows==
* '''AMD GPU clock tool''' - GUI / command line, http://www.techpowerup.com/downloads/1128/AMD_GPU_Clock_Tool_v0.9.8.html
* '''AMD / ATI Tray Tools''' - GUI, http://www.guru3d.com/article/ati-tray-tools-/
* '''ClockTweak''' - command line, not free, multiple cards, http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=9982.0
* '''MSI Afterburner''' - fancy GUI, multiple cards, needs to be unlocked, http://event.msi.com/vga/afterburner/
* '''RBE Radeon BIOS editor''' - GUI, can also be used to overclock, http://www.techpowerup.com/rbe/
* '''Sapphire TriXX''' - fancy GUI, multiple cards with crossfire only?, http://www.sapphiretech.com/ssc/TriXX/

==Linux==
* '''AMDOverdriveCtrl''' - GUI, http://sourceforge.net/projects/amdovdrvctrl/

==MacOS==
...

GPU overclocking tools

2011-06-18T10:09:58Z

Phelix: added category

Talk:GPU overclocking tools

2011-06-17T09:38:41Z

Phelix: Created page with "table would be cool with comparison of features better title: List of... / comparison of..."

table would be cool with comparison of features

better title: List of... / comparison of...

Mining hardware comparison

2011-06-17T09:37:06Z

Phelix: added link to overclocking tools; Whash-->Mhash

GPU overclocking tools

2011-06-17T09:27:18Z

Phelix: Initial entry

With these tools it is possible to change the clock speeds of Radeon graphic cards to increase hashrate and thus mining profitability.

Usually core clock is increased and memory clock is decreased to lower temperatures and save power.

==Windows==
* '''AMD GPU clock tool''' - GUI / command line, http://www.techpowerup.com/downloads/1128/AMD_GPU_Clock_Tool_v0.9.8.html
* '''AMD / ATI Tray Tools''' - GUI, http://www.guru3d.com/article/ati-tray-tools-/
* '''ClockTweak''' - command line, not free, multiple cards, http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=9982.0
* '''MSI Afterburner''' - fancy GUI, multiple cards, needs to be unlocked, http://event.msi.com/vga/afterburner/
* '''RBE Radeon BIOS editor''' - GUI, can also be used to overclock, http://www.techpowerup.com/rbe/
* '''Sapphire TriXX''' - fancy GUI, multiple cards with crossfire only?, http://www.sapphiretech.com/ssc/TriXX/

==Linux==
* '''AMDOverdriveCtrl''' - GUI, http://sourceforge.net/projects/amdovdrvctrl/

==MacOS==

Talk:BIP 0020

2011-05-26T08:30:29Z

Phelix: URI End / Ignored part

Generation Calculator

2011-04-28T09:45:44Z

Phelix:

Shows an estimate of the amount of time, on average, that you will need to do mining at the specified hash rate before you will generate a [[blocks|block]] and earn bitcoins. Additionally, the optimistic (50% probability) and pessimistic (95% probability) estimates are shown as well.

The hash rate refers to the rate that your mining hardware is performing at as reported by your miner software or from an estimate obtained from the [[mining hardware comparison]] tables.

The calculation is performed like this:
*Get the current [[target]].
*Divide by 115792089237316195423570985008687907853269984665640564039457584007913129639935, which is the maximum value of a 256-bit number. You now have the probability of a single hash solving a block.
*Take the reciprocal of the probability to get the average number of hashes to solve a block.
*Divide the average number of hashes by your hash/s (''not'' khash/s) to get the average number of seconds required to solve a block.

==See Also==

* [[Power Calc]]
* [[Profitability Calculator]]

==External Links==
* [http://www.alloscomp.com/bitcoin/calculator.php Generation Calculator] website

[[Category:Mining]]

Power Calc

2011-04-28T09:44:43Z

Phelix:

A site that will show the cost for electrical power to generate a 50 BTC block given a hash rate, power usage and cost of electricity as inputs.

* [[Difficulty]] field: BlockExplorer provides the [http://blockexplorer.com/q/getdifficulty current difficulty].
* Hash rate field: the value can determined from your [[:Category:Miners|miner]] client, or from the [[mining hardware comparison]].
* Power usage field: the value for a GPU card itself can be determined from the [[mining hardware comparison]]. More accurate values would come from a measurement such as that provided by a Kill-A-Watt device, for example.
* Cost of electricity: Because mining adds to your existing electrical consumption, the rate for mining is the cost of the next kWh, not necessarily your average cost per kWh. Your utility bill will provide the most accurate picture of what rate you'll be charged for additional consumption (your marginal electrical consumption rate).
** U.S. [http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/epm/table5_6_a.html power costs per state]
** EU: [http://www.energy.eu/#Domestic domestic] [http://www.energy.eu/#Industrial industrial]

==Example==
A typical [[mining rig]] with a single ATI HD 5970 with the minimum components (PSU, mobo, HD, graphics card) will consume about 380W. At the difficulty level on April 9, 2011 (82347) using a modern miner that hash about 600MHash/S with that hardware, the cost of electricity to generate a block is $6.84 USD, using the typical U.S. residential rate (about $0.11/kWh).

Given that a block is 50 BTC and the BTC/USD market rate on that date was about $0.75 USD, then over 18% of the proceeds from mining went to pay the cost of electricity required to mine that block.

==See Also==

* [[Generation Calculator]]
* [[Profitability Calculator]]
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electricity_pricing#Global_electricity_price_comparison Global electricity price comparison] on Wikipedia
* [http://www.bitcoinminer.com/post/2361900289 Where To Mine - Prices of Electricity]
* [http://www.bitcoinminer.com/post/2858427974 Time-of-use electric pricing irrelevant — Mining is 24x7]

==External Links==

* [http://lorelei.kaverit.org/cgi/calc.py Power Calc] web site

[[Category:Mining]]

Profitability Calculator

2011-04-15T09:27:43Z

Phelix: Initial entry

Aids in estimating mining profits at current network and market conditions.

The current [[difficulty]] is obtained from [[Bitcoin Block Explorer]] and the USD exchange rate is taken from the highest bid on the [[Currency Exchange]] [[MtGox]].

==External Links==
* [http://bitcoinX.com/profit/ Mining Profitability Calculator] website

[[Category:Mining]]