https://en.bitcoin.it/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&feedformat=atom&user=Pampa 2026-05-14T17:39:52Z User contributions MediaWiki 1.43.8 https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Taras&diff=54903 2015-03-05T20:20:15Z

<p>Pampa: </p> <hr /> <div>Could you remove bitcoin fog advertisment from bitcoin wiki, because it scammed a lot of people?<br /> <br /> {{archive}}__TOC__<br /> == Can you at least consult with me ==<br /> <br /> ...before editing &quot;every&quot; thing I write. Isn't that the point of this being a community wiki and not a centralized wiki?<br /> <br /> Why did you rename the PS Coin page (see how I'm consulting first before just undo-ing)?<br /> <br /> Additionally, I changed the &quot;planned&quot; template you edited back to &quot;soon&quot; which I originally had made - there is a very literal distinction between those words. Planned would imply uncertainty. We've already tackled the sufficient regulatory hurdles necessary, minus one additional step which we're in the process of completing now.<br /> <br /> {{unsigned|Bliljerk101|23:41, 8 February 2015 (UTC)}}<br /> <br /> :Is [[PS Coin]] really called &quot;PS Coin - incentivized exchange&quot;? They write that down as their name all the time? If it is, go ahead and put it back.<br /> <br /> :: I just feel the distinction would help in this case, since it's radically different than other exchanges (no other exchanges have an incentivized algorithm like PS Coin - it really should be in a category of its own) [[User:Bliljerk101|Bliljerk101]] ([[User talk:Bliljerk101|talk]]) 18:29, 11 February 2015 (UTC)<br /> <br /> :Also, &quot;Planned&quot; does not imply uncertainty. It is only used when implementation is imminent. [[User:Taras|Taras]] ([[User talk:Taras|talk]]) 14:37, 9 February 2015 (UTC)<br /> <br /> :: &quot;Planned&quot; implies the inherent uncertainty of any future event. Until it happens, it is always uncertain. --[[User:Luke-jr|Luke-jr]] ([[User talk:Luke-jr|talk]]) 06:09, 11 February 2015 (UTC)<br /> <br /> ::: Do you think we should keep the &quot;soon&quot; template or otherwise distinguish scheduled implementations from dry internal speculation? [[User:Taras|Taras]] ([[User talk:Taras|talk]]) 14:26, 11 February 2015 (UTC)<br /> <br /> :::: [[User:Luke-jr|Luke-jr]], Thanks for your input here. [[User:Taras|Taras]], I think there is no reason to not keep both templates. However, in the case of [[PS Coin]] the &quot;Soon&quot; template should be used. Other exchanges may appropriately need to use a &quot;planned&quot; template instead. [[User:Bliljerk101|Bliljerk101]] ([[User talk:Bliljerk101|talk]]) 18:29, 11 February 2015 (UTC)</div>

Pampa https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Talk:Bitcoin_Fog&diff=54902 2015-03-05T20:19:20Z

<p>Pampa: </p> <hr /> <div><br /> It would be nice, if you enable editing this page, because Bitcoin Fog scammed a lot of people.<br /> [https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=713095.0 Related thread] --[[User:Taras|Taras]] ([[User talk:Taras|talk]]) 19:23, 14 August 2014 (UTC)<br /> <br /> == Protecting links ==<br /> <br /> In order to prevent the insertion of malicious or fraudulent links onto this page, I will be locking the page. It can still be edited at [[Template:Bitcoin Fog content]]. This is so that users can contribute information without being able to tamper with the links. [[User:Taras|Taras]] ([[User talk:Taras|talk]]) 15:49, 14 September 2014 (UTC)</div>

Pampa