<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://en.bitcoin.it/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Mrb</id>
	<title>Bitcoin Wiki - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://en.bitcoin.it/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Mrb"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Special:Contributions/Mrb"/>
	<updated>2026-05-25T00:16:33Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.8</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Bitcoin_Market&amp;diff=63942</id>
		<title>Bitcoin Market</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Bitcoin_Market&amp;diff=63942"/>
		<updated>2017-09-19T18:45:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mrb: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The &#039;&#039;&#039;Bitcoin Market&#039;&#039;&#039; is a former [[bitcoin]] [[currency exchange]] site owned and operated by dwdollar. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trading on the site began on March 17th, 2010&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=20.msg748#msg748 Announcement by dwdollar]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A major update to the site occurred in March, 2011.  Among the changes were: smaller minimum trade size, 24 X 7 trading, and some steps to help ensure that payment will be made for trades that execute.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Though the site at one time was used for trading using PayPal as payment method, fraud caused the exchange to discontinue PayPal trading on June 4, 2011&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=12678 Recent Events At Bitcoin Market]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Important information can also be gained from the Bitcoin Market website homepage which shows a graph of the Bitcoin exchange rate (to US Dollars). This data is also offered in the JSON format.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Buying bitcoins]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://darknetmarkets.co/ Darknet Bitcoin Markets list]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.bitcoinmarket.com/ Bitcoin Market]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;References /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mrb</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Poolservers&amp;diff=32837</id>
		<title>Poolservers</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Poolservers&amp;diff=32837"/>
		<updated>2012-11-21T11:03:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mrb: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{| class=&#039;wikitable&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
! colspan=&#039;9&#039; | information&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Info !! bitcoind !! ecoinpool !! Eloipool !! PoolServerJ !! pushpool !! p2pool !! BitPenny !! Slush&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| language || C++ || Erlang || Python3 || Java || C || Twisted || C++ || Python2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| license || MIT || GPL-3 || AGPL-3 || GPL-3 || GPL-2 || GPL-3 || {{No}} || {{No}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ref. pool || || [[BTCServ]] || [[Eligius]] || || || [[P2Pool]] || [[BitPenny]] || [[Slush&#039;s pool]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| website || [http://sf.net/projects/bitcoin link] || [https://ecoinpool.p2k-network.org/ link] || [http://gitorious.org/bitcoin/eloipool link] || [http://poolserverj.org/ link] || [https://github.com/jgarzik/pushpool link] || [https://github.com/forrestv/p2pool/ link] || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! colspan=&#039;9&#039; | miner protocols&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Protocol !! bitcoind !! ecoinpool !! Eloipool !! PoolServerJ !! pushpool !! p2pool !! BitPenny || Slush&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[getwork]] || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || {{No}} || {{Yes}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[UBBP]] || {{No}} || {{No}} || {{No}} || {{No}} || {{Yes}} || {{No}} || {{No}} || {{No}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[getblocktemplate]] || {{Yes}} || {{No}} || {{Yes}} || {{No}} || {{No}} || {{No}} || {{No}} || {{No}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[BlkPrep]] || {{No}} || {{No}} || {{No}} || {{No}} || {{No}} || {{No}} || {{Yes}} || {{No}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Stratum|StratumMP]] || {{No}} || {{No}} || {{Yes}} || {{No}} || {{No}} || {{No}} || {{No}} ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! colspan=&#039;9&#039; | getwork extensions&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Extension !! bitcoind !! ecoinpool !! Eloipool !! PoolServerJ !! pushpool !! p2pool !! BitPenny !! Slush&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| hostlist || {{No}} || {{No}} || {{No}} || {{No}} || {{No}} || {{No}} || n/a || {{No}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| longpoll || {{No}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || n/a || {{Yes}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| midstate || {{No}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || {{No}} || {{No}} || {{No}} || n/a || {{No}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| noncerange || {{No}} || {{No}} || {{No}} || || {{Patch|uri=http://gitorious.org/~Luke-Jr/bitcoin/luke-jrs-pushpool/commit/2dd2ad48e7d21f917dae3b5d9186563c78942e38}} || {{No}} || n/a || {{No}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| reject-reason || {{No}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || {{No}} || n/a || {{No}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rollntime || {{NotAdv}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || n/a || {{Yes}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| expire=N || {{No}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || n/a || {{No}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| submitold || {{No}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || {{No}} || {{Patch}} || {{Yes}} || n/a || {{No}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| switchto || {{No}} || {{No}} || {{No}} || {{No}} || {{No}} || {{No}} || n/a || {{No}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! colspan=&#039;9&#039; | getblocktemplate/BlkPrep functionality&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Function !! bitcoind !! ecoinpool !! Eloipool !! PoolServerJ !! pushpool !! p2pool !! BitPenny !! Slush&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| longpoll || {{No}} || n/a || {{Yes}} || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| noncerange || {{No}} || n/a || {{No}} || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| proposal || {{No}} || n/a || {{No}} || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| serverlist || {{No}} || n/a || {{No}} || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a || n/a&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! colspan=&#039;9&#039; | getblocktemplate/BlkPrep variations&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Variation !! bitcoind !! ecoinpool !! Eloipool !! PoolServerJ !! pushpool !! p2pool !! BitPenny !! Slush&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| coinbase/append || {{Yes}} || n/a || {{Yes}} || n/a || n/a || n/a || {{Yes}} || n/a&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| coinbase (set) || {{Yes}} || n/a || {{No}} || n/a || n/a || n/a || || n/a&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| generation || {{Yes}} || n/a || {{No}} || n/a || n/a || n/a || {{No}} || n/a&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| share/coinbase || n/a || n/a || {{Yes}} || n/a || n/a || n/a || || n/a&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| share/merkle || n/a || n/a || {{No}} || n/a || n/a || n/a || || n/a&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| share/truncate || n/a || n/a || {{No}} || n/a || n/a || n/a || || n/a&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| time/increment || {{Yes}} || n/a || {{Yes}} || n/a || n/a || n/a || || n/a&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| time/decrement || {{Yes}} || n/a || {{Yes}} || n/a || n/a || n/a || || n/a&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| txns/add || {{Yes}} || n/a || {{No}} || n/a || n/a || n/a || || n/a&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| txns/remove || {{Yes}} || n/a || {{No}} || n/a || n/a || n/a || || n/a&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| prevblock || {{Yes}} || n/a || {{No}} || n/a || n/a || n/a || || n/a&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! colspan=&#039;9&#039; | share targets&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Feature !! bitcoind !! ecoinpool !! Eloipool !! PoolServerJ !! pushpool !! p2pool !! BitPenny !! Slush&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| default || network || 1 || 1 || 1 || 1 || 1 || 8 || 1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| config || {{No}} || || {{Yes}} || || {{No}} || || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| dynamic || {{No}} || {{No}} || {{Yes}} || {{No}} || {{No}} || || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! colspan=&#039;9&#039; | work generation&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Feature !! bitcoind !! ecoinpool !! Eloipool !! PoolServerJ !! pushpool !! p2pool !! BitPenny !! Slush&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| getwork || {{No}} || {{No}} || {{No}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || {{No}} || {{No}} || {{Yes}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ntime roll || {{No}} || {{No}} || {{No}} || || {{Patch|uri=http://gitorious.org/~Luke-Jr/bitcoin/luke-jrs-pushpool/commits/ntimes}} || {{Yes}} || {{No}} || {{No}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| getmemorypool || {{No}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || {{No}} || {{Yes}} || {{No}} || {{No}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[getblocktemplate]] || {{No}} || {{No}} || {{Yes}} || {{No}} || {{No}} || {{No}} || {{No}} || {{No}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| coinbaser || {{No}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || || {{No}} || {{No}} || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| gotwork || {{No}} || {{No}} || {{Yes}} || {{No}} || {{No}} || {{No}} || || {{No}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| setworkaux || {{No}} || {{No}} || {{Yes}} || {{No}} || {{No}} || {{No}} || || {{No}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| getauxblock || {{No}} || {{No}} || {{No}} || {{Yes}} || {{No}} || {{Yes}} || || {{No}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|title=&#039;merged-mining getmemorypool&#039;| MM gmp&lt;br /&gt;
| {{No}} || {{Yes}} || {{No}} || || {{No}} || {{No}} || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| full node || {{Yes}} || {{No}} || {{No}} || {{No}} || {{No}} || {{No}} || {{Yes}} ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! colspan=&#039;9&#039; | account management&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Feature !! bitcoind !! ecoinpool !! Eloipool !! PoolServerJ !! pushpool !! p2pool !! BitPenny !! Slush&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| multiuser || {{No}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| explicit users || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || {{No}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || {{No}} || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| anon users || {{No}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| explicit workers || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || {{No}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || {{No}} || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| anon workers || {{No}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| saved worklog || {{No}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || {{No}} || {{No}} || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| saved sockets || {{No}} || || {{No}} || || {{No}} || {{No}} || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| share logging || {{No}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| invalid logging || {{No}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || {{No}} || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! colspan=&#039;9&#039; | databases&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Database !! bitcoind !! ecoinpool !! Eloipool !! PoolServerJ !! pushpool !! p2pool !! BitPenny !! Slush&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| couchdb || {{No}} || {{Yes}} || {{No}} || {{No}} || {{No}} || {{No}} || ||{{No}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| mysql || {{No}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || {{No}} || || {{Yes}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| plaintext || {{No}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || ||{{No}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| postgres || {{No}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || {{No}} || ||{{No}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rrd || {{No}} || || {{No}} || || {{No}} || {{Yes}} || ||{{No}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| sqlite || {{No}} || {{No}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || {{Yes}} || {{No}} || ||{{No}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mrb</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Why_a_GPU_mines_faster_than_a_CPU&amp;diff=16098</id>
		<title>Why a GPU mines faster than a CPU</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Why_a_GPU_mines_faster_than_a_CPU&amp;diff=16098"/>
		<updated>2011-09-05T01:55:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mrb: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Some Bitcoin users might wonder why there is a huge disparity between the mining output of a CPU versus a GPU.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, just to clarify, the CPU, or &#039;&#039;central processing unit&#039;&#039;, is the part of the computer that performs the will of the software loaded on the computer.  It&#039;s the main executive for the entire machine.  It is the master that tells all the parts of the computer what to do - in accordance with the program code of the software, and, hopefully, the will of the user.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most computers have multi-core CPUs nowadays (which is almost the same thing as having multiple CPU&#039;s in a single physical package)., and some computers (such as the Mac Pro)  even have multiple CPUs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CPU is usually a removable component that plugs into the computer&#039;s main circuit board, or &#039;&#039;motherboard&#039;&#039; and sits underneath a large, metallic heat sink which usually has a fan, a few are cooled by water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The GPU, or &#039;&#039;graphics processing unit&#039;&#039;, is a part of the video rendering system of a computer. The typical function of a GPU is to assist with the rendering of 3D graphics and visual effects so that the CPU doesn&#039;t have to.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Servers usually have very limited or no GPU facilities as they are mostly managed over a text-based remote interface. Most mainstream computers have much slower but less power consuming and cheaper IGPs (Integrated Graphics Processor), which are GPUs as well but integrated directly into the chipset and soldered onto the motherboard, rather than separate, more powerful but power consuming AGP or PCIe cards with GPUs, but separate GPUs. Powerful GPUs are needed mostly for graphic intensive task such as gaming or video editing. For example, the translucent windows in Windows 7, or technologies like Mac OS X&#039;s Quartz, which powers the Aqua desktop and it&#039;s beautiful, water-like graphical effects and animations such as bulging the Dock in a smooth animation when the mouse is moved to the lower edge of the screen  or &amp;quot;sucking&amp;quot; windows into the Dock when they are minimized - these are powered by GPUs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A GPU is like a CPU, but there are important internal differences that make them suited toward their special tasks.  These are the differences that make Bitcoin mining far more favorable on a GPU.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Short Answer ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A  CPU core can execute &#039;&#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039;&#039; 32-bit instructions per clock (using a 128-bit SSE instruction) or &#039;&#039;&#039;8&#039;&#039;&#039; via AVX (256-Bit), whereas a GPU like the Radeon HD 5970 can execute &#039;&#039;&#039;3200&#039;&#039;&#039; 32-bit instructions per clock (using its 3200 ALUs or shaders). This is a difference of &#039;&#039;&#039;800 (or 400 in case of AVX) times more instructions per clock&#039;&#039;&#039;. As of 2011, the fastest CPUs have up to 6, 8, or 12 cores and a somewhat higher frequency clock (2000-3000 MHz vs. 725 MHz for the Radeon HD 5970), but one HD5970 is still more than five times faster than four 12-core CPUs at 2.3GHz (which would also set you back about $4700 rather than $350 for the HD5970).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A CPU is an executive ==&lt;br /&gt;
A CPU is designed primarily to be an executive and make decisions, as directed by the software.  For example, if you type a document and save it, it is the CPU&#039;s job to turn your document into the appropriate file type and direct the hard disk to write it as a file.  CPU&#039;s can also do all kinds of math, as inside every CPU is one or more &amp;quot;Arithmetic/Logic Units&amp;quot; (ALU&#039;s).  CPU&#039;s are also highly capable of following instructions of the &amp;quot;if this, do that, otherwise do something else&amp;quot;.  A large bulk of the structures inside a CPU are concerned with making sure that the CPU is ready to deal with having to switch to a different task on a moment&#039;s notice when needed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CPU&#039;s also have to deal with quite a few other things which add complexity, including:&lt;br /&gt;
* enforcing privilege levels and the boundaries between user programs and the operating system&lt;br /&gt;
* creating the illusion of &amp;quot;virtual memory&amp;quot; to programs&lt;br /&gt;
* for the most popular processors, being backwards compatible with legacy code&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A GPU is a laborer ==&lt;br /&gt;
A GPU is very different.  Yes, a GPU can do math, and can also do &amp;quot;this&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;that&amp;quot; based on specific conditions.  However, GPU&#039;s have been designed so they are very good at doing video processing, and less executive work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Video processing is a lot of repetitive work, since it is constantly being told to do the same thing to large groups of pixels on the screen.  In order to make this run efficiency, video processors are far heavier on the ability to do repetitive work, than the ability to rapidly switch tasks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
GPU&#039;s have large numbers of ALU&#039;s, more so than CPU&#039;s.  As a result, they can do large amounts of bulky mathematical labor in a greater quantity than CPU&#039;s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Analogy==&lt;br /&gt;
One way to visualize it is a CPU works like a small group of very smart people who can quickly do any task given to them.  A GPU is a large group of relatively dumb people who aren&#039;t individually very fast or smart, but who can be trained to do repetitive tasks, and collectively can be more productive just due to the sheer number of people.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It&#039;s not that a CPU is fat, spoiled, or lazy.  Both CPUs and GPUs are creations made from billions of microscopic transistors crammed on a small piece of silicon.  On silicon chips, size is expensive.  The structures that make CPUs good at what they do take up lots of space.  When those structures are omitted, that leaves plenty of room for many &amp;quot;dumb&amp;quot; ALU&#039;s, which individually are very small.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ALUs of a GPU are partitioned into groups, and each group of ALUs shares management, so members of the group cannot be made to work on separate tasks.  They can either all work on nearly identical variations of one single task, in perfect sync with one another, or nothing at all.  Trying different hashes repeatedly - the process behind Bitcoin mining - is a very repetitive task suitable for a GPU, with each attempt varying only by the changing of one number (called a &amp;quot;nonce&amp;quot;) in the data being hashed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ATI Radeon 5970 is a popular video card for Bitcoin mining and, to date, offers the best known performance of any video card for this purpose.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This particular card has 3,200 &amp;quot;Stream Processors&amp;quot;, which can be thought of as 3,200 very dumb execution units that can be trained to all do the same repetitive task, just so long as they don&#039;t have to make any decisions that interrupts their flow. Those execution units are contained in blocks. The 5970 uses a VLIW-5 architecture, which means the 3,200 Stream Processors are actually 640 &amp;quot;Cores,&amp;quot; Each able to process 5 instruction per clock cycle. Nvidia would call these cores &amp;quot;Cuda Cores&amp;quot;, but as mentioned in this article, they are not VLIW, meaning they cannot do as much work per cycle. This is why comparing graphics cards by core count alone is not an accurate method of determining performance, and this is also why nVidia lags so far behind ATI in SHA-256 hashing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since ALU&#039;s are what do all the work of Bitcoin mining, the number of available ALU&#039;s has a direct effect on the hash output.  Compare that to a 4-core CPU that can switch tasks on a dime, but has ALU&#039;s in some small multiple of four, if not just four ALU&#039;s alone.  Trying a single SHA256 hash in the context of Bitcoin mining requires around 1,000 simple mathematical steps that must be performed entirely by ALU&#039;s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That, in a nutshell, is why GPU&#039;s can mine Bitcoins so much faster than CPU&#039;s.  Bitcoin mining requires no decision making - it is repetitive mathematical work for a computer.  The only decision making that must be made in Bitcoin mining is, &amp;quot;do I have a valid block&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;do I not&amp;quot;.  That&#039;s an excellent workload to run on a GPU.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Why are AMD GPUs faster than Nvidia GPUs?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Firstly, AMD designs GPUs with many simple ALUs/shaders (VLIW design) that run at a relatively low frequency clock (typically 1120-3200 ALUs at 625-900 MHz), whereas Nvidia&#039;s microarchitecture consists of fewer more complex ALUs and tries to compensate with a higher shader clock (typically 448-1024 ALUs at 1150-1544 MHz). Because of this VLIW vs. non-VLIW difference, Nvidia uses up more square millimeters of die space per ALU, hence can pack fewer of them per chip, and they hit the frequency wall sooner than AMD which prevents them from increasing the clock high enough to match or surpass AMD&#039;s performance. This translates to a raw ALU performance advantage for AMD:&lt;br /&gt;
* AMD Radeon HD 6990: 3072 ALUs x 830 MHz = 2550 billion 32-bit instruction per second&lt;br /&gt;
* Nvidia GTX 590: 1024 ALUs x 1214 MHz = 1243 billion 32-bit instruction per second&lt;br /&gt;
This approximate &#039;&#039;&#039;2x-3x&#039;&#039;&#039; performance difference exists across the entire range of AMD and Nvidia GPUs. It is very visible in all ALU-bound GPGPU workloads such as Bitcoin, password bruteforcers, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Secondly, another difference favoring Bitcoin mining on AMD GPUs instead of Nvidia&#039;s is that the mining algorithm is based on SHA-256, which makes heavy use of the 32-bit integer right rotate operation. This operation can be implemented as a single hardware instruction on AMD GPUs (BIT_ALIGN_INT), but requires three separate hardware instructions to be emulated on Nvidia GPUs (2 shifts + 1 add). This alone gives AMD another &#039;&#039;&#039;1.7x&#039;&#039;&#039; performance advantage (~1900 instructions instead of ~3250 to execute the SHA-256 compression function).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Combined together, these 2 factors make AMD GPUs overall &#039;&#039;&#039;3x-5x&#039;&#039;&#039; faster when mining Bitcoins.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mining hardware comparison]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[:Category:Miners|Miners]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[:Category:Pool Operators|Pool Operators]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mining]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mrb</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Why_a_GPU_mines_faster_than_a_CPU&amp;diff=16097</id>
		<title>Why a GPU mines faster than a CPU</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Why_a_GPU_mines_faster_than_a_CPU&amp;diff=16097"/>
		<updated>2011-09-05T01:54:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mrb: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Some Bitcoin users might wonder why there is a huge disparity between the mining output of a CPU versus a GPU.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, just to clarify, the CPU, or &#039;&#039;central processing unit&#039;&#039;, is the part of the computer that performs the will of the software loaded on the computer.  It&#039;s the main executive for the entire machine.  It is the master that tells all the parts of the computer what to do - in accordance with the program code of the software, and, hopefully, the will of the user.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most computers have multi-core CPUs nowadays (which is almost the same thing as having multiple CPU&#039;s in a single physical package)., and some computers (such as the Mac Pro)  even have multiple CPUs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CPU is usually a removable component that plugs into the computer&#039;s main circuit board, or &#039;&#039;motherboard&#039;&#039; and sits underneath a large, metallic heat sink which usually has a fan, a few are cooled by water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The GPU, or &#039;&#039;graphics processing unit&#039;&#039;, is a part of the video rendering system of a computer. The typical function of a GPU is to assist with the rendering of 3D graphics and visual effects so that the CPU doesn&#039;t have to.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Servers usually have very limited or no GPU facilities as they are mostly managed over a text-based remote interface. Most mainstream computers have much slower but less power consuming and cheaper IGPs (Integrated Graphics Processor), which are GPUs as well but integrated directly into the chipset and soldered onto the motherboard, rather than separate, more powerful but power consuming AGP or PCIe cards with GPUs, but separate GPUs. Powerful GPUs are needed mostly for graphic intensive task such as gaming or video editing. For example, the translucent windows in Windows 7, or technologies like Mac OS X&#039;s Quartz, which powers the Aqua desktop and it&#039;s beautiful, water-like graphical effects and animations such as bulging the Dock in a smooth animation when the mouse is moved to the lower edge of the screen  or &amp;quot;sucking&amp;quot; windows into the Dock when they are minimized - these are powered by GPUs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A GPU is like a CPU, but there are important internal differences that make them suited toward their special tasks.  These are the differences that make Bitcoin mining far more favorable on a GPU.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Short Answer ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A  CPU core can execute &#039;&#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039;&#039; 32-bit instructions per clock (using a 128-bit SSE instruction) or &#039;&#039;&#039;8&#039;&#039;&#039; via AVX (256-Bit), whereas a GPU like the Radeon HD 5970 can execute &#039;&#039;&#039;3200&#039;&#039;&#039; 32-bit instructions per clock (using its 3200 ALUs or shaders). This is a difference of &#039;&#039;&#039;800 (or 400 in case of AVX) times more instructions per clock&#039;&#039;&#039;. As of 2011, the fastest CPUs have up to 6, 8, or 12 cores and a somewhat higher frequency clock (2000-3000 MHz vs. 725 MHz for the Radeon HD 5970), but one HD5970 is still more than five times faster than four 12-core CPUs at 2.3GHz (which would also set you back about $4700 rather than $350 for the HD5970).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A CPU is an executive ==&lt;br /&gt;
A CPU is designed primarily to be an executive and make decisions, as directed by the software.  For example, if you type a document and save it, it is the CPU&#039;s job to turn your document into the appropriate file type and direct the hard disk to write it as a file.  CPU&#039;s can also do all kinds of math, as inside every CPU is one or more &amp;quot;Arithmetic/Logic Units&amp;quot; (ALU&#039;s).  CPU&#039;s are also highly capable of following instructions of the &amp;quot;if this, do that, otherwise do something else&amp;quot;.  A large bulk of the structures inside a CPU are concerned with making sure that the CPU is ready to deal with having to switch to a different task on a moment&#039;s notice when needed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CPU&#039;s also have to deal with quite a few other things which add complexity, including:&lt;br /&gt;
* enforcing privilege levels and the boundaries between user programs and the operating system&lt;br /&gt;
* creating the illusion of &amp;quot;virtual memory&amp;quot; to programs&lt;br /&gt;
* for the most popular processors, being backwards compatible with legacy code&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A GPU is a laborer ==&lt;br /&gt;
A GPU is very different.  Yes, a GPU can do math, and can also do &amp;quot;this&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;that&amp;quot; based on specific conditions.  However, GPU&#039;s have been designed so they are very good at doing video processing, and less executive work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Video processing is a lot of repetitive work, since it is constantly being told to do the same thing to large groups of pixels on the screen.  In order to make this run efficiency, video processors are far heavier on the ability to do repetitive work, than the ability to rapidly switch tasks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
GPU&#039;s have large numbers of ALU&#039;s, more so than CPU&#039;s.  As a result, they can do large amounts of bulky mathematical labor in a greater quantity than CPU&#039;s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Analogy==&lt;br /&gt;
One way to visualize it is a CPU works like a small group of very smart people who can quickly do any task given to them.  A GPU is a large group of relatively dumb people who aren&#039;t individually very fast or smart, but who can be trained to do repetitive tasks, and collectively can be more productive just due to the sheer number of people.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It&#039;s not that a CPU is fat, spoiled, or lazy.  Both CPUs and GPUs are creations made from billions of microscopic transistors crammed on a small piece of silicon.  On silicon chips, size is expensive.  The structures that make CPUs good at what they do take up lots of space.  When those structures are omitted, that leaves plenty of room for many &amp;quot;dumb&amp;quot; ALU&#039;s, which individually are very small.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ALUs of a GPU are partitioned into groups, and each group of ALUs shares management, so members of the group cannot be made to work on separate tasks.  They can either all work on nearly identical variations of one single task, in perfect sync with one another, or nothing at all.  Trying different hashes repeatedly - the process behind Bitcoin mining - is a very repetitive task suitable for a GPU, with each attempt varying only by the changing of one number (called a &amp;quot;nonce&amp;quot;) in the data being hashed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ATI Radeon 5970 is a popular video card for Bitcoin mining and, to date, offers the best known performance of any video card for this purpose.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This particular card has 3,200 &amp;quot;Stream Processors&amp;quot;, which can be thought of as 3,200 very dumb execution units that can be trained to all do the same repetitive task, just so long as they don&#039;t have to make any decisions that interrupts their flow. Those execution units are contained in blocks. The 5970 uses a VLIW-5 architecture, which means the 3,200 Stream Processors are actually 640 &amp;quot;Cores,&amp;quot; Each able to process 5 instruction per clock cycle. Nvidia would call these cores &amp;quot;Cuda Cores&amp;quot;, but as mentioned in this article, they are not VLIW, meaning they cannot do as much work per cycle. This is why comparing graphics cards by core count alone is not an accurate method of determining performance, and this is also why nVidia lags so far behind ATI in SHA-256 hashing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since ALU&#039;s are what do all the work of Bitcoin mining, the number of available ALU&#039;s has a direct effect on the hash output.  Compare that to a 4-core CPU that can switch tasks on a dime, but has ALU&#039;s in some small multiple of four, if not just four ALU&#039;s alone.  Trying a single SHA256 hash in the context of Bitcoin mining requires around 1,000 simple mathematical steps that must be performed entirely by ALU&#039;s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That, in a nutshell, is why GPU&#039;s can mine Bitcoins so much faster than CPU&#039;s.  Bitcoin mining requires no decision making - it is repetitive mathematical work for a computer.  The only decision making that must be made in Bitcoin mining is, &amp;quot;do I have a valid block&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;do I not&amp;quot;.  That&#039;s an excellent workload to run on a GPU.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Why are AMD GPUs faster than Nvidia GPUs?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Firstly, AMD designs GPUs with many simple ALUs/shaders (VLIW design) that run at a relatively low frequency clock (typically 1120-3200 ALUs at 625-900 MHz), whereas Nvidia&#039;s microarchitecture consists of fewer more complex ALUs and tries to compensate with a higher shader clock (typically 448-1024 ALUs at 1150-1544 MHz). Because of this VLIW vs. non-VLIW difference, Nvidia uses up more square millimeters of die space per ALU, hence can pack fewer of them per chip, and they hit the frequency wall sooner than AMD which prevents them from increasing the clock high enough to match or surpass AMD&#039;s performance. This translates to a raw ALU performance advantage for AMD:&lt;br /&gt;
* AMD Radeon HD 6990: 3072 ALUs x 830 MHz = 2550 billion 32-bit instruction per second&lt;br /&gt;
* Nvidia GTX 590: 1024 ALUs x 1214 MHz = 1243 billion 32-bit instruction per second&lt;br /&gt;
This approximate &#039;&#039;&#039;2x-3x&#039;&#039;&#039; performance difference exists across the entire range of AMD and Nvidia GPUs. It is noticeably visible in all ALU-bound GPGPU workloads such as Bitcoin, password bruteforcers, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Secondly, another difference favoring Bitcoin mining on AMD GPUs instead of Nvidia&#039;s is that the mining algorithm is based on SHA-256, which makes heavy use of the 32-bit integer right rotate operation. This operation can be implemented as a single hardware instruction on AMD GPUs (BIT_ALIGN_INT), but requires three separate hardware instructions to be emulated on Nvidia GPUs (2 shifts + 1 add). This alone gives AMD another &#039;&#039;&#039;1.7x&#039;&#039;&#039; performance advantage (~1900 instructions instead of ~3250 to execute the SHA-256 compression function).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Combined together, these 2 factors make AMD GPUs overall &#039;&#039;&#039;3x-5x&#039;&#039;&#039; faster when mining Bitcoins.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mining hardware comparison]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[:Category:Miners|Miners]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[:Category:Pool Operators|Pool Operators]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mining]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mrb</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Mining_hardware_comparison&amp;diff=9270</id>
		<title>Mining hardware comparison</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Mining_hardware_comparison&amp;diff=9270"/>
		<updated>2011-05-30T13:34:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mrb: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Below are some statistics about the mining performance of various hardware used in a [[mining rig]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The table shows (mostly) stock clock numbers. 10-20% performance improvement can be achieved via overclocking.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Note:&#039;&#039;&#039; Clock refers to the Shader clock only with nVidia cards (not Core or Memory). With AMD card the shader clock is not separate, but is part of the GPU clock.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Graphics cards==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===AMD===&lt;br /&gt;
To get the maximum performance use the 2.1 release of the ATI Stream SDK. 2.2 wastes CPU time, and 2.3/2.4 drop mining performance by 5-10%.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! W !! Clock !! SP !! SDK  !! Slot !! Miner !! Notes&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3XXX || || || || || || || || OpenCL Not Supported&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 42XX || || || || || || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || || OpenCL Not Supported (intergrated/mobile GPU)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4350 || 6.93 || 0.346 ||  20 || 575 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don&#039;t use vectors &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4550 || 7.23 || 0.289 || 25 || 600 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don&#039;t use vectors &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4570M || 8.02 || 0.297 || 27 || 680 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Diablo/Windows7 || -w 64, SDK 2.4, Cat 11.4. Model: Sony Vaio NW&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4570M || 9.6 || 0.300 || 32 || 825 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Diablo/Windows7 || -w 64, SDK 2.4, Cat 11.4. Model: Sony Vaio NW. O/C core 680-&amp;gt;825. U/C memory 800-&amp;gt;500.&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4650 || 31.33 || 0.653 || 48 || 650 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don&#039;t use vectors &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4670 || 36.14 || 0.613 || 59 || 750 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don&#039;t use vectors&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4670 || 40.11 ||       || 59 || 800 || 320 || || AGP x8        || poclbm/Ubuntu 10.10 w/ H == 0 mod || -w 32 -f 0, don&#039;t use vectors [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.msg85236#msg85236 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4730 || 72.29 || 0.657 || 110 || 750 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4770 || 72.29 || 0.904 || 80 || 750 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4830 || 55.42 || 0.583 || 95 || 575 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4850 || 75.30 || 0.685 || 110 || 625 || 800 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4850 || 101 || || || 817 || 500 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer || -f 0, core 817mhz(default 625)@1.123v , mem downclock to 500mhz (default 993) [http://www.smpake.com/?p=6 source] &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4860 || 67.47 || 0.519 || 130 || 700 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4870 || 90.36 || 0.602 || 150 || 750 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || clmine ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4870 || 78    ||       ||     ||     ||     || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || m0mchil&#039;s OpenCL/Vista 64bit || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4890 || 102.41 || 0.539 || 190 || 850 || 800 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4890 || 108.3 || || 190 || 975 || 800 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4850X2 || 150.60 || 0.602 || 250 || 625 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4870X2 || 180.72 || 0.632 || 286 || 750 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4870X2 || 180.6 || || 286 || 800 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 5450 || 11.99 || 0.631 || 19 || 650 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 5550 || 40.59 || 1.041 || 39 || 550 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5570 || 59.96 || 1.538 || 39 || 650 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5570 || 64 || 1.641 || 39 || 650 || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil&#039;s OpenCL/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5570 || 62 || 1.59 || 39 || 650 || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 OpenCL/Linux x86_64 || -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS AGGRESSION=4 -v FASTLOOP BFI_INT WORKSIZE=64&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5570 || 73 ||  || 39 || 700 || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 OpenCL/Linux x86_64 || -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS AGGRESSION=4 -v FASTLOOP BFI_INT WORKSIZE=64&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 5650 || 48    || 1.37 || 35 ? ||  ||  ||  || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil&#039;s OpenCL/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source] [http://www.notebookcheck.net/ATI-Mobility-Radeon-HD-5650.23697.0.html source] -- not TDP but load&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 5670 || 71.49 || 1.117 || 64 || 775 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EEFFEE;&amp;quot;| 5670 || 72 || 1.64 || 44 || 850 || || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm-mod (Win7-64) || Sapphire 100287VGAL card is low power&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 5670 || 85 || || || 900 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 5750 || 116.24 || 1.352 || 86 || 700 || 720 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5750 || 137 || || || 710 || || || PCI-E 1.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128 using stock memory and GPU clocks&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5750 || 154.56 || 1.45 || 106 || 830 || 720 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 ||  ||-v -w128 -f20 underclocked memory clocks from 1150MHz to 300MHz&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 5750 || 170 || || || 870 || || || PCI-E 1.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128 patched BIOS to underclock memory to 300MHz&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5750 || 173 || || || 875 || || || PCI-E 1.1 x16 || phoenix || 875/300 w/MSI Afterburner, BFI_INT VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 FASTLOOP=FALSE -k phatk&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5770 || 156.83 || 1.452 || 108 || 850 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5770 || 180 || 1.406 || 128[*] || 950 || 800 || 2.4RC1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 30 (*Overclocked wattage calculated [http://bakkap.free.fr/Misc/wCalc.html here] )&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5770 || 205.58 || || || 935 || 300 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-04-28 || -v -w 256&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5770 || 223 || || 100+ || 1050 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer || -v -w256 [http://www.smpake.com/?p=59 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFFFF;&amp;quot;| 5830 || 206.64 || 1.181 || 175 || 800 || 1120 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFFFF;&amp;quot;| 5830 || 241    || 1.377 || 175 || 1006 || || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-03-11 / Win7 64 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFDDD;&amp;quot;| 5830 || 245 || 1.4 || 175 || 880 || 900 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm (guiminer) || -v -w 256&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFDDD;&amp;quot;| 5830 || 248 || 1.42 || 175 || 880 || 500 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.46 || -k poclbm VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFFFF;&amp;quot;| 5830 || 285   ||  ||  || 960 || || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.47 / poclbm / Win7 64 || VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFFFF;&amp;quot;| 5830 || 290   ||  ||  || 996 || || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.4 / poclbm / Win7 64 || VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFFFF;&amp;quot;| 5830 || 307   ||  ||  || 996 || || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 64 || VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 240.77 || 1.595 || 151 || 725 || 1440 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 250.26 || 1.657 || 151 || 725 || 1440 ||  || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || opencl client || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 252    || 1.575 || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-01-25 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 255.3  || 1.593 || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-01-25 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 264  || 1.748 || 151 || 725 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 1.0 x8 || guiminer-20110501 || -v -w128 &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 280  || 1.75 || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.3 || with BFI_INT&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 292  || 1.825 || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-04-28 -v -f 1 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 298  || 1.8620 || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-04-28 -v -f 1 -w 64 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 300  || 1.5460 || 194 || 925 (OC) || 1440 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil&#039;s OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 314  || 1.8362 || 171 || 820 (OC) || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 1.0 x8 || poclbm || -v -w128 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 335 || 1.8611 || 180 || 890 (OC) || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || poclbm || -v -w128, Memory downclocked to 300Mhz&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 344  || 1.8594 || 185 || 890 (OC) || 1440 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix || &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 382  || 1.8454 || 207 || 995 (OC) || 1440 || || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || phoenix || OC 1.177v on core&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5870M || 116.5 || ? || ? || ? || ? || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || gui-miner (win-7) ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 313.65 || 1.668 || 188 || 850 || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 313  || 1.665 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo/Linux ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 343  || 1.824 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo/Linux ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 355  || 1.888 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/Linux ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 340  || 1.809 || 188 || 850 || 1600 ||  || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil&#039;s OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 360  || 1.6822 || 214 || 970 || 700 ||  || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || m0mchil&#039;s OpenCL w7-64 || -f 0 -v -w 128 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=6144.msg91959#msg91959 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 377  || 2.008 || 188 || 850 || 1600 ||  || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha || -D -G2 &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 408  || 1.8888 ||  216 || 980 || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm/Win7x64 || -f 20 -v -w 128, BIT_ALIGN, BFI_INT&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 400  || 1.9047 || 210 || 950 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || Phoenix 1.3 || -k poclbm VECTORS AGGRESSION=7 FASTLOOP BFI_INT&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 398  || 1.980 || 201 || 900 || 1600 ||  || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha || -D -G2 (GPU OC to 900, memory downclocked to 900)&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 420  || 2.0000 ||  210 || 950 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=14 WORKSIZE=256 -- Memory Clock 300Mhz&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 421  || 1.9581 || 215 || 975 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.47 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 -k phatk &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 440  || 2.0000 ||  220 || 995 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix || &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 438  || 1.9819 || 221 || 1000 (OC) || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm/Linux || -v -w 64 -f 1 &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 530 || 1.803 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.4.595.10 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/201103.beta3/Windows || -v -w128 -f60&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 535.06 || 1.820 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 560  || 1.905 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 565  || 1.922 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine2 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 604  || 2.054 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 645  || 1.875|| 344 || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || -f1, Debian 6, fglrx-driver 10.9.3&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 740  || 2.1511 || 344 || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix/1.3 || AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT, memory clock @ 300MHz&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 755  || 2.2076 || 342 || 848 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 28-04-11 || -f 1 -w 256 -v, Ubuntu 10.10, fglrx 11.4, memory clock @ 300MHz&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 802  || 2.31 || 347 || 850 || 3200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix poclbm Ubuntu 11.04 || -q 6 -k AGGRESSION=19 WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT VECTORS, fglrx 11.4, mem clock @ 1000MHz&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870x2 || 620    ||       ||     || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer || -v -w 128&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870x2 || 826    ||       || 1100 || 950 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.4 w/ Phtak || AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT Memory @ 300MHz&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870x2 || 826    ||       || 700 || 935 || 3200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 w/ Phatk || AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=256 VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false, memory @ 319 MHz, Windows 7 32-bit&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870x2 || 878    ||       || 1500 || 1000 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.7 w/ Phtak || AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT Memory @ 300MHz&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6310M || 9.821 || 0.545 || 18  || 500 || 80 || 2.4 || Integrated/APU || poclbm-gui -v -w128 || HP DM1z 18W TDP is shared with the CPU&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6470M || 24.1 || ? || ? || ? || ? || 2.1 || Integrated/APU || guiminer || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-   &lt;br /&gt;
| 6470M || 31.0 || ? || ? || ? || ? || 2.1 || Integrated/APU || phoenix 1.48 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-   &lt;br /&gt;
| 6490M || 16.289 || 0.708 || 23  ||  ||  ||  || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm-mod (Mac OS X 10.6.7) || MacBook Pro early 2011&lt;br /&gt;
|-  &lt;br /&gt;
| 6490M || 15.21 || ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8994.0 DiabloMiner GUI] v2011-05-22 / Mac OS X 10.6.7|| Model: MacBookPro8,2 VRAM: 256MB&lt;br /&gt;
|-  &lt;br /&gt;
| 6750 || 167.59 ||       ||     || 870 ||     ||     || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer || -v -f30 -w128&lt;br /&gt;
|-  &lt;br /&gt;
| 6850 || 171.59 || 1.351 || 127 || 775 || 960 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6850 || 196 || || || 850 || 960 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 0&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6850 || 234.8 || || || 940 || 960 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.3 || AGGRESSION=8 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 6850 || 220 || 1.236 || 178[*] || 1000 || 960 || 2.4RC1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 30 (*Overclocked wattage calculated [http://bakkap.free.fr/Misc/wCalc.html here] )&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFF00;&amp;quot;| 6870 || 232.47 || 1.540 || 151 || 900 || 1120 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm -v -w 128 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFF00;&amp;quot;| 6870 || 277.47 ||  ||  || 940 || 1120 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.3 || AGGRESSION=8 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFF00;&amp;quot;| 6870 || 260.1 || 1.611 || 175 || 1001 || 1150 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm-gui windows7x86 cat 11.3 || -v -w 128 -f 1 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFF00;&amp;quot;| 6870 || 276 || 1.828 (?) || 151 (?) || 900 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha cat 11.4 sdk 2.4 || -G2 -D stock clocks, debian linux 64bit &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFF00;&amp;quot;| 6870 || 300.06 || 1.830 || 164 || 1020 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.4 cat 11.4 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=8 fastloop mem clock 344&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFF00;&amp;quot;| 6870 || 306 || 1.748 (?) || 175 (?) || 1000 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha cat 11.4 sdk 2.4 || -G2 -D overclocked to 1000, debian linux 64bit &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFF00;&amp;quot;| 6870 || 300 || 1.72 || 174 || 1038 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm windows7x86 cat 11.4 || -v -w128 -f1 mem clock 360, fan 100% temp 73C&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFF00;&amp;quot;| 6870 || 322 || 1.882 || 170 || 1050 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.47 phatk 11.5 sdk 2.4 || BFI_INT VECTORS FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=256, mem clock @ 400MHz&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6950 || 295 ||  || 160 (?) || 810 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6950 || 314 ||  || (?) || 800 || 1408 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 05-01-11 ||  -v -f30 -w128 default mem 1250 Stock Sapphire 6950 1gb&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6950 || 325 ||  || 200 (?) || 885 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6950 || 340 ||  || (?) || 800 || 1536 || (?) || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 05-21-11  ||-v -f30 -w128 default mem 1250,Sapphire 6950 1gb, unlocked shaders&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6950 || 360 ||  || 200 (?) || 970 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6950 || 360 ||  || (?) || 870 || 1375 || (?) || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm  ||flashed with 6970 BIOS, -v -f30 -w128&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6950 || 417 ||  || +200? || 975 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || unlocked shaders, +20% overdrive, mem @ 1250, fan @ 77%, temp 64C, -v -w128, gpu core @ 1145mV&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#F0FF0F;&amp;quot;| 6970 || 323 || 1.468 || 220 || 880 || 1536 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -w 64, SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#F0FF0F;&amp;quot;| 6970 || 372 ||  || 220 (?) || 900 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix (svn trunk 05.14.2011) || clock 900/1375, VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128, fan 45% (auto) / temp 90C&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#F0FF0F;&amp;quot;| 6970 || 385 || 1.964 || 196 || 900 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || -v -w128, memory downclocked to 684Mhz, fan @ 70%/temp 81C&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#F0FF0F;&amp;quot;| 6970 || 403 ||  || (?) || MAX || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || clock Max/50%+stock, -v -w128, fan= 100%/temp 72C (Note: Overclocked using CCC utility under Windows 7, Clock set to Max value w/ 50% increase to memory and 5% increase to voltage)&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6990 || 670 || 1.94 || 346 || 830 || 3072 || 2.4 ||  PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || Catalyst 11.4 [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=2949.msg106238#msg106238 source].&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6990 || 708 || 2.05 || 346 || 830 || 3072 || 2.3 ||  PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb&#039;s hdminer || BIOS switch at &amp;quot;default&amp;quot; position 2, see [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6990 || 746 || 1.82 || 410 || 880 || 3072 || 2.3 ||  PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb&#039;s hdminer || BIOS switch at &amp;quot;overclocked&amp;quot; position 1, see [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6990 || 758 || ||  || 880 ||  || 2.4 ||  || Phoenix with Poclbm || Catalyst 11.4, OC switch ON, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128 FASTLOOP=false&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6990 || 771 || 1.8804 || 410 || 880 || 3072 || 2.3 ||  PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb&#039;s hdminer || SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx. Memory clock @ 1280Mhz.&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6990 || 772 || 1.8380 || 420 || 900 || 3072 || 2.3 ||  PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix &amp;amp; Poclbm || OC switch ON + overclocked to 900 mhz, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6990 || 790 ||  || || 900 || 3072 || 2.3 ||  PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb&#039;s hdminer || BIOS switch at &amp;quot;overclocked&amp;quot; position 1; with &amp;quot;aticonfig --odsc=900,1260&amp;quot; to further overclock the GPU to 900 MHz and mem to 1260 MHz, see [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6990 || 802 ||  || || 915 || 3072 || 2.3 ||  PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb&#039;s hdminer || BIOS switch at &amp;quot;overclocked&amp;quot; position 1; with &amp;quot;aticonfig --odsc=915,1260&amp;quot; to further overclock the GPU to 915 MHz and mem to 1260 MHz, see [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|FirePro V4800 || 79.7 ||  ||  || 775 || 400 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-01 || &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|FirePro V8700 || 84.8 ||  ||  || 750 || 800 ||  || || poclbm-mod.03.24.2011 || &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|FirePro M5800 || 61.4 ||  ||  || 650 ||     ||  || || poclbm-mod.03.24.2011 || Ubuntu || &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Nvidia===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! W !! Clock !! SP !! Comment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8200 mGPU || 1.2 || || || 1200 || 16 || 128 MB shared memory, &amp;quot;poclbm -w 128 -f 0&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8400 GS || 2.3 || || ||  ||  || &amp;quot;poclbm -w 128&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8400 GS || 1.6 || || 128 || 1238 ||  || DiabloMiner -w 128 -f 1 [https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/User:Knightmb source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8600M GT || 4.93 ||  ||  ||  || 32 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8600GT || 5.66 ||  ||  || 1188 ||  32 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8600GT OC || 7.3 ||  ||  || 1602 || 32 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.0 poclbm] -w 128 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg72833#msg72833 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8800GT || 25   || 0.24 || 105 || 1300 ||  ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8800GT || 24.5 || 0.23 || 105 || 1300 ||  || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8800GT || 31.1   || || 105 || 1855 ||  || Overclocked 715 GPU / 1030 Memory / 1855 Shader; GuiMiner v2011-05-21&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8800GTS || 16.8 || 0.109 || 154 ||  ||  || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source] [http://www.techspot.com/review/79-geforce-8800-gts-512/page11.html source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8800 GTS || 18.7 || 0.124 || 150 || 1200 ||  || poclbm -w 64 no vectors&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8800m GTX || 16.3 || || || || || rpcminer-cuda Win7-64&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9300GE || 1.57 ||  ||  || 1300 ||  8 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9300GS || 1.69 ||  ||  || 1400 ||  8 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9300/nForce 730i || 2.15 ||  ||  || 1200 ||  16 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9400GT || 3.37 || 0.067 || 50 || 1400 || 16 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9400M (MacBook) || 1.90 || 0.32 || 6 || 700 ||  || poclbm -f 8 no vectors&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9500GT || 6.75 || 0.135 || 50 || 1400 || 32 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9600GSO || 19.88 || 0.237 || 84 || 1375 || 96 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9600GSO512 || 11.75 || 0.131 || 90 || 1625 || 48 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9600GT || 15.66 || 0.165 || 95 || 1625 || 64 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9600GT Zotac || 15 ||  ||  || 1650 || 64 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9600GT OC || 18.8 || &amp;lt;0.198 || &amp;gt;95 || 1981 || 64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.0 poclbm] -w 128 -f 10 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg74610#msg74610 source] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg73353#msg73353 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9800GT || 30.36 || 0.289 || 105 || 1800 || 112 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9800GTX || 32.54 || 0.232 || 140 || 1688 || 128 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9800GTX+ || 35.39 || 0.251 || 141 || 1836 || 128 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9800GTX+ || 37.23 || 0.266 || 140 || 1890 || 128 || win7x64 275.27 phoenix(1.48) -k poclbm AGGRESSION=3 WORKSIZE=64&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background-color:#FFEFEF&amp;quot;| 9800GX2 || 57.83 || 0.294 || 197 ||  || 2x128 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background-color:#FFEFEF&amp;quot;| 9800GX2 || 28 || 0.142 || 197 ||  || 2x128 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| G210 || 3.38 || 0.111 || 30.5 || 1402 || 16 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| G210 || 3.79 || 0.124 || 30.5 || 1402 || 16 || poclbm -f 1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GT220 || 10.8 || || 128 || 1360 || || DiabloMiner -w 128 -f 1000 [https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/User:Knightmb source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GT240 || 19.37 || 0.281 || 69 || 1340 || 96 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GT240 || 21.24 ||  ||  ||  || 96 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4291.0 poclbm-mod] -f 0 -v [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg73383#msg73383 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTS250 || 35.39 || 0.244 || 145 || 1836 || 128 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTS250 || 35.2 || 0.243 || 145 || 1836 || 128 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTS250 OC || 37 || 0.255 || 145 || 2047 || 128 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX260 || 35.91 || 0.178 || 202 || 1242 || 192 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX260 || 44 || 0.242 || 182 || 1242 || 216 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX260c216 || 40.40 || 0.236 || 171 || 1242 || 216 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX260c216 || 50.00 ||      ||    || 1050 || 216 || m0mchil GPU client, Windows 7 64-bit, x6 @ 3.5ghz&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX260c216 OC || 52.0 || || || 1461 || 216 || &amp;quot;poclbm -w 256 -f 1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX260c216 OC || 58.9 || || || 756/400 || 216 || Core overclocked, Memory underclocked, Ubuntu 11.04 Classic Session(No Effects) &amp;quot;poclbm -w 256 -f 1&amp;quot; ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX275 || 50.75 || 0.232 || 219 || 1404 || 240 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX275 || 58 || || || 729/1458 || 240 || poclbm -f 0 -w 256&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX280 || 46.84 || 0.198 || 236 || 1296 || 240 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX285 || 53.35 || 0.262 || 204 || 1476 || 240 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX295 || 89.78 || 0.311 || 289 || 1242 || 480 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GT 320M (MacBook Air) || 6.12 ||  ||  || 1212 || 48 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GT 330M || 7.97 ||  ||  || || || Model: MacBookPro6,2 VRAM: 512MB Software: [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8994.0 DiabloMiner GUI] v2011-05-22 / Mac OS X 10.6.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GT 330M (Sony Vaio Z) || 7.8 || 0.71 ( 0.3 total) || 11 (26w total) || 1045 || 48 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GT430 || 20.24 || 0.413 || 49 || 1400 || 96 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTS450 || 45.28 || 0.427 || 106 || 1566 || 192 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX460SE || 56.39 || 0.376 || 150 || 1300 || 288 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX460 || 68.31 || 0.427 || 160 || 1350 || 336 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX460 (2 cards) || 102 || 0.319? || 320? || 1350 ||  || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX460 (2 cards) OC || 127 || 0.374 || 340 || 1620 || 2x 336 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2444.0 rpcminer-cuda] -gpugrid=128 -gputhreads=128 ver.20110227&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX465 || 64.41 || 0.322 || 200 || 1215 || 352 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX470 || 81.98 || 0.381 || 215 || 1215 || 448 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX470 || 94.7 || || || 1414 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX470 || 111.9 || || 215 || 1650 || 448 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX470 || 115 || || || 1616 || || phoenix 1.46 poclbm VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX480 || 101.28 || 0.405 || 250 || 1401 || 480 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX560 Ti || 67.7 || 0.39  || 170 || 1700 || 384 || standard EVGA 560, no overclock&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX560 Ti || 74.8 || 0.41  || 180 || 1700 || 384 || gigabyte 900Mhz clock; -w 512 -v&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX560 OC || 86.7 || &amp;lt;0.51 || &amp;gt;170 || 1800 || 384 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2444.0 rpcminer-cuda] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg72816#msg72816 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX570 || 105.83 || 0.483 || 219 || 1464 || 480 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX580 || 140.05 || --- || 244 || 1544 || 512 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Quadro FX 580 || 5.7 || 0.14 || 40 || 1125 || 4 ||rpcminer-cuda, Win, -gpugrid=128 -gputhreads=512&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Quadro FX 770M || 5.75 ||  ||  || 500 || 32 || DiabloMiner-Windows.exe BFI_INT FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=6, Win&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Quadro FX 1600M || 6 || 0.12 || 50 || 625 || 32 ||rpcminer-cuda, Win&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Quadro NVS 135M || 1.05 || 0.1 || 10 || 800 || 1 || &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Quadro NVS 3100M || 3.6 || 0.257 || 14 || 600 || 16 || rpcminer-cuda, Win, CUDA 3.1.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Tesla M2050 || 79.8 || ||  || ||  || DiabloMiner&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Tesla M2050 || [http://glennfrancismurray.com/cost-defective-mining-with-gpu-clusters-amazo 100] || 0 || 0 || - || 512 || Amazon AWS [http://glennfrancismurray.com/cost-defective-mining-with-gpu-clusters-amazo CUDA RPC Miner &amp;amp; CUDA 2.0]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==CPUs/APUs==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A lot of nice data can be pulled from [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.0 this thread] to seed this section. Also from [https://www.bitcoin.org/wiki/doku.php?id=bitcoin_miners this page on the old wiki].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Might you wish to throttle CPU load a bit, so it doesn&#039;t reach 100&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;C, it can be done with Battle Encoder Shirase to a margin, like, -15% of available CPU cycles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I found the best combination to be is to throttle CPU miner to -5% _AND_ set it to least of priority levels, so as not to choke GPU miner up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===AMD===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Model !! nprocs !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! TDP [W] !! CPU Clock !! Mhash/s CPU !! Mhash/s GPU !! GPU !! GPU Clock !! SP !! Software !! Notes&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4x Opteron 6174 || 48 || 115 || 0.36 || 320W || 2.2 GHz || 2.4&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=4|&lt;br /&gt;
| cpuminer v0.8.1 || --alg 4way --threads 48&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2x Opteron 6128 || 16 || 32.4 || 0.141 || 230W || 2 GHz || 32.4&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=4|&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.3.19 || -4way&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon XP 2000+ || 2 || 0.62 || 0.009 || 70W || 1.67 GHz || 0.62&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=4|&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.3.18/Ubuntu || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source] [http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm?articleid=914&amp;amp;page=4 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon 64 3500+ || 1 || 1.18 || 0.013 || 89W || 2.54 GHz || 1.18&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=4|&lt;br /&gt;
| ufasoft v0.4 || overclocked (originally 2.2 GHz)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon 64 X2 3800+ || 2 || 1.73 || 0.03 || 65 W || 2.00 GHz || 1.73&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=4|&lt;br /&gt;
| cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || -algo=4way&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon 64 X2 4000+ || 2 || 1.9 || 0.02 || 65W || 2.1 GHz || 1.9&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=4|&lt;br /&gt;
| rpc-miner&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon 64 X2 4400+ ||   || 2.09 || 0.032 || 65W || 2.3GHz || 2.09&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=4|&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.3.19/Win x64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon 64 X2 6000+ || 2 || 2.81 || 0.02 || 125W || 3 GHz || 2.81&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=4|&lt;br /&gt;
| || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg22881#msg22881 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon 64 X2 6400+ Black Edition || 2 || 2.9 || 0.023 || 125W || 3.2 GHz || 2.9&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=4|&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.3.20.2 BETA/Win 7 x64 || -4way&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon II X2 240e || 2 || 2.71 || 0.06 || 45W || 2.81 GHz || 2.71&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=4|&lt;br /&gt;
| bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon II X4 630 || 4 || 10.7 || 0.11 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 10.7&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=4|&lt;br /&gt;
| bitcoin-miner 0.4 || &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 3.8 || 0.04 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 3.8&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=4|&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.3.1x/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 7.2 || 0.08 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 7.2&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=4|&lt;br /&gt;
| cpu-miner 0.2.1/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Phenom II X4 955 || 4 || 11 || 0.09 || 125W || 3.2 GHz || 11&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=4|&lt;br /&gt;
| rpcminer-4way ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Phenom II X4 965 || 4 || 12 || 0.09 || 140W || 3.4 GHz || 11&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=4|&lt;br /&gt;
| rpcminer-4way ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Phenom II X6 1055T || 6 || 15.84 || 0.13 || 125W || 2.82 GHz || 15.84&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=4|&lt;br /&gt;
| bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Phenom II X6 1090T || 6 || 18|| || 141W|| 3.50 GHz || 3&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=4|&lt;br /&gt;
| minerd || &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Phenom II X6 1100T || 6 || 22 || 0.176 || 125W || 3.82 GHz || 22&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=4|&lt;br /&gt;
| bitcoin-miner || Aciid#bitcoin-dev&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Zacate E-350 || 2 || 11 || 0.615 || 18W || 1.6   Ghz || 1.231 || 9.831 || HD6310M || 492 Mhz || 80 || poclbm -v -w128 + Ufasoft 0.7 || stock speeds&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Zacate E-350 || 2 || 12&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=2|&lt;br /&gt;
| 1.648 Ghz || 1.252 || 10.87 || HD6310M || 492 Mhz || 80 || poclbm -v -w 256 -f 1 || &amp;quot;autotune&amp;quot; speed with ASUS EFI BIOS&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===ARM===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ARM1136EJ-S || 1 || 0.11 || ? || ? || 0.528 GHz || cpuminer git || T-Mobile Pulse, inside Debian chroot, &#039;c&#039; algo&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Cortex-A8 || 1 || 0.125 || 0.36 || 0.35 W || 0.6 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || Nokia N900: &#039;cryptopp&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Cortex-A8 || 1 || 0.2 || 0.57 || 0.35 W || 0.6 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || Nokia N900: &#039;c&#039; algo&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2x Cortex-A9 || 2 || 0.57 || 1.14 || 0.5 W || 1.0 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-24) || Toshiba AC100, ubuntu, &#039;c&#039; algo&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Intel===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Pentium III mobile ? || 1 || 0.3 || 0.014 || 21W || 1.07 GHz || 0.3.1x/Win2K || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source] [http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=27380 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Pentium M 1.6ghz || 1 || .4 ||  ||  || 1.6 GHZ || minerd (jgarzik&#039;s 1.0) || cryppto, Windows 7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Pentium M 1.73ghz || 1 || .5 ||  ||  || 1.73 GHZ || minerd (jgarzik&#039;s 1.0) || cryppto, Windows 7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Old Xeon 512k (Dual) || 2x1/2 || 2.0 || ? || ? || 3.06GHz || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || HT disabled, algo=4way (twice as fast as the 2nd best algo)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Pentium 4 2.0A || 1 || 0.85 || || || 2.0 GHz || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft-0.4]/WinXP || -g no -t 2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Pentium Dual-Core E2180 || 2/2 || 1.75 || || || 2.0 GHz || rpcminer-cpu || Win7-64&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Pentium Dual-Core E2180 || 2/2 || 4.5 || || || 2.0 GHz || ufasoft v0.11 || Win7-64&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Pentium Dual-Core E5400 || 2/2 || 2.27 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.7 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Celeron E330 || 2/2 || 2.2  || 0.03 || 65W || 2.5 GHz || 0.3.19/Ubuntu10.04 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core 2 Quad Q6600 || 4/4 || 11.0 ||  || 105W || 2.40 GHz || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || -a 60 -g no -t 4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core 2 Quad Q9400 || 4/4 || 11 || 0.046 || 95W || 2.66 GHz || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || -a 60 -g no -t 4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core 2 Quad Q9650 || 4/4 || 18.67 ||  || 95W || 4.00 GHz || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || -a 60 -g no -t 4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i3 530 || 2/4 || 8.31 || 0.10 || 80W || 3.66 GHz || Ufasoft 0.7 || -v -a5 -g no -t 4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i3 M350 || 2/4 || 1.48 || 0.04 || 35W || 2.27 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| Core i5 M450 || 2/4 || 1.8  || 0.05 || 35W || 1.2 GHz || 0.3.17/Win7-54 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| Core i5-650  || 2/4 || 5.1 || 0.04 ? ||  || 3.2 GHz || cpuminer-0.7 || -4way&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i5 ?  || 4/? || 6.5 ||  ||  ||  || client from svn || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37621#msg37621 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 4.5 || 0.05 || 95W || 3.1 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-01-22) || cryptopp_asm32&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 14 || 0.15 || 95W || 3.1 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || sse2_64&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i7 620M   || 2/4 || 1.888 || || || 2.66 GHz || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8994.0 RPCMiner GUI] v2011-05-22 / Mac OS X 10.6.7 || Model: MacBookPro6,2 RAM: 4GB&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i7 920   || 4/8 || 19.2 || 0.10 || 195 || 4.0 GHz (x21) || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] || -a 5&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i7 950   || 4/8 || 5.88 || 0.039 || 150W || 3.83 GHz (x23) || bitcoin-0.3.20.2 Win7-64 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i7 950   || 4/8 || 18.9 || 0.126 || 150W || 3.83 GHz (x23) || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] v0.4 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i7 980x   || 6/12 || 19.2 || 0.15 || 130 || 4.4 GHz (x33) || cpuminer/Win7-64 || &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| Core i7 980x   || 6/12 || 8.7 ||  ||  || 3.9 GHz (x27) || 0.3.17/Win7-64 || &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| Core i7 2635QM   || 4/8 || 2.93 || || || 2.00 GHz || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8994.0 RPCMiner GUI] v2011-05-22 / Mac OS X 10.6.7 || Model: MacBookPro8,2 RAM: 4GB&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| Core i7 620M   || 2/4 || 6.3 || 0.18 || 35 || 2.66 GHz || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] v0.4 || &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core 2 Duo U7600 || 1 || 1.1 ||  ||  || 1.2 GHZ || minerd (jgarzik&#039;s 1.0) || cryppto, Windows 7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core 2 Duo E5200 || 2/2 || 6.2 || 0.086 || 72W || 2.76 Ghz || Ufasoft/Win7-64 || TDP is 65W + 7W overclock&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core 2 Duo E6550 || 1/2 || 2.45 || ? || ? || 2.33 GHz || cpuminer 0.7.1 (Linux) || --algo=sse2_64&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core 2 Duo E6850 || 2/2 || 6.75 || 0.10 || 65W || 3.0 Ghz || ufasoft-0.3 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 7.76 || 0.11 || 70W || 3.33 GHz (o/c?) || ufasoft-0.3 || miner optimized for Intel Core&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 2.52 || 0.04 || 65W || 2.66 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core 2 Duo E8400 || 2/2 || 6.9 || ? || ? || 3.0 GHz || ufasoft v0.10|| windows 7/64bit (-t 2)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core 2 Duo T6400 || 2/2 || 4.2 || 0.12 || 35 W || 2.00 GHz || cpuminer git (Linux) || --algo=sse2_64&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core 2 Extreme X9000 || 2/2 || 2.37 || || || 2.8 GHz || rpcminer-cpu || Win7-64&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core 2 Extreme X9000 || 2/2 || 6.2 || || || 2.8 GHz || ufasoft v0.11 || Win7-64&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core 2 Extreme X9000 || 2/2 || 7.2 || || || 3.2 GHz || ufasoft v0.11 || Win7-64 Overclocked from 2.8 GHz to 3.2 GHz&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon 3060 || 1/2 || 2.03 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.4GHz || cpuminer 0.8.1 (Linux) || --algo=cryptopp_asm32&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon Prestonia 2.4 (dual) || 2x1/2 || 2.16 || 0.017 || 130W || 2.4 GHz || ufasoft v0.4 || &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon X5355 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 10.13 || 0.16 || 120W || 2.66GHz || bitcoind || Roughly the same speed as the &amp;quot;c&amp;quot; algo in cpuminer&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon X5355 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 22.76 || 0.09 || 120W || 2.66GHz || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || -O2 -march=core2, algo=sse2_64&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon E5440 || 4/8 || 7.3 || ? || 80W || 2.66 GHz|| Kiv&#039;s poclbm-gui || FIXME: Either wrong model # or wrong threads/speed info&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon E5520 || 4/8 || 6.5 || 0.08 || 80W || 2.27 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon E5530 || 4/8 || 7.14 || 0.09 || 80W || 2.4 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon E5630 (dual) || 2x4/8 || 8 || 0.1 || 80W || 2.53 GHz || 0.3.17/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon E6520 (dual) || 2x4/8 || 24.7 || ? || ? || 2.53 GHz || ufasoft v0.10 || windows 2008 R2 64bit (-t 16)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon E7520 (dual) || 2x4/16 || 18 || ? || 95W || 1.87 GHz || ufasoft v0.10 || windows 2008 R2 64bit (-t 16)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Atom N270 || 2 || 1.19 || 0.24 || 5W || 1.6 GHz || ufasoft v0.10 || &lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Other===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Cell || 6 || 21 || 0.35 || 60W || 3.2 GHz || cellminer || Sony Playstation 3 (FAT): Needs custom firmware (no links to it, potential issues with Sony assholes.) [https://github.com/verement/cellminer source] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4704.20 source] Total power usage of PS3 fat is 120W but only the Cell cpu is active.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Cell || 6 || 21 || 0.7 || 35W || 3.2 GHz || cellminer || Sony Playstation 3 (SLIM): Total power usage of PS3 slim is 70W but only the Cell cpu is active.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| MIPS || 1 || 0.026 || ? || ? || 200 MHz || cpuminer || ASUS WL-500G Deluxe router running [http://openwrt.org/ OpenWrt]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mining rig]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Generation Calculator]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Power Calc]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[OpenCL miner]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=745 ATI Stream vs. NVIDIA CUDA - GPGPU computing battle royale]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mining]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mrb</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Mining_hardware_comparison&amp;diff=9269</id>
		<title>Mining hardware comparison</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Mining_hardware_comparison&amp;diff=9269"/>
		<updated>2011-05-30T13:13:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mrb: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Below are some statistics about the mining performance of various hardware used in a [[mining rig]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The table shows (mostly) stock clock numbers. 10-20% performance improvement can be achieved via overclocking.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Note:&#039;&#039;&#039; Clock refers to the Shader clock only with nVidia cards (not Core or Memory). With AMD card the shader clock is not separate, but is part of the GPU clock.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Graphics cards==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===AMD===&lt;br /&gt;
To get the maximum performance use the 2.1 release of the ATI Stream SDK. 2.2 wastes CPU time, and 2.3/2.4 drop mining performance by 5-10%.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! W !! Clock !! SP !! SDK  !! Slot !! Miner !! Notes&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3XXX || || || || || || || || OpenCL Not Supported&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 42XX || || || || || || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || || OpenCL Not Supported (intergrated/mobile GPU)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4350 || 6.93 || 0.346 ||  20 || 575 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don&#039;t use vectors &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4550 || 7.23 || 0.289 || 25 || 600 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don&#039;t use vectors &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4570M || 8.02 || 0.297 || 27 || 680 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Diablo/Windows7 || -w 64, SDK 2.4, Cat 11.4. Model: Sony Vaio NW&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4570M || 9.6 || 0.300 || 32 || 825 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Diablo/Windows7 || -w 64, SDK 2.4, Cat 11.4. Model: Sony Vaio NW. O/C core 680-&amp;gt;825. U/C memory 800-&amp;gt;500.&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4650 || 31.33 || 0.653 || 48 || 650 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don&#039;t use vectors &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4670 || 36.14 || 0.613 || 59 || 750 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don&#039;t use vectors&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4670 || 40.11 ||       || 59 || 800 || 320 || || AGP x8        || poclbm/Ubuntu 10.10 w/ H == 0 mod || -w 32 -f 0, don&#039;t use vectors [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.msg85236#msg85236 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4730 || 72.29 || 0.657 || 110 || 750 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4770 || 72.29 || 0.904 || 80 || 750 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4830 || 55.42 || 0.583 || 95 || 575 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4850 || 75.30 || 0.685 || 110 || 625 || 800 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4850 || 101 || || || 817 || 500 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer || -f 0, core 817mhz(default 625)@1.123v , mem downclock to 500mhz (default 993) [http://www.smpake.com/?p=6 source] &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4860 || 67.47 || 0.519 || 130 || 700 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4870 || 90.36 || 0.602 || 150 || 750 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || clmine ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4870 || 78    ||       ||     ||     ||     || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || m0mchil&#039;s OpenCL/Vista 64bit || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4890 || 102.41 || 0.539 || 190 || 850 || 800 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4890 || 108.3 || || 190 || 975 || 800 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4850X2 || 150.60 || 0.602 || 250 || 625 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4870X2 || 180.72 || 0.632 || 286 || 750 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4870X2 || 180.6 || || 286 || 800 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 5450 || 11.99 || 0.631 || 19 || 650 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 5550 || 40.59 || 1.041 || 39 || 550 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5570 || 59.96 || 1.538 || 39 || 650 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5570 || 64 || 1.641 || 39 || 650 || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil&#039;s OpenCL/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5570 || 62 || 1.59 || 39 || 650 || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 OpenCL/Linux x86_64 || -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS AGGRESSION=4 -v FASTLOOP BFI_INT WORKSIZE=64&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5570 || 73 ||  || 39 || 700 || 800 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 OpenCL/Linux x86_64 || -k phatk DEVICE=0 VECTORS AGGRESSION=4 -v FASTLOOP BFI_INT WORKSIZE=64&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 5650 || 48    || 1.37 || 35 ? ||  ||  ||  || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil&#039;s OpenCL/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source] [http://www.notebookcheck.net/ATI-Mobility-Radeon-HD-5650.23697.0.html source] -- not TDP but load&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 5670 || 71.49 || 1.117 || 64 || 775 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EEFFEE;&amp;quot;| 5670 || 72 || 1.64 || 44 || 850 || || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm-mod (Win7-64) || Sapphire 100287VGAL card is low power&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 5670 || 85 || || || 900 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 5750 || 116.24 || 1.352 || 86 || 700 || 720 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5750 || 137 || || || 710 || || || PCI-E 1.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128 using stock memory and GPU clocks&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5750 || 154.56 || 1.45 || 106 || 830 || 720 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 ||  ||-v -w128 -f20 underclocked memory clocks from 1150MHz to 300MHz&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 5750 || 170 || || || 870 || || || PCI-E 1.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128 patched BIOS to underclock memory to 300MHz&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5750 || 173 || || || 875 || || || PCI-E 1.1 x16 || phoenix || 875/300 w/MSI Afterburner, BFI_INT VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 FASTLOOP=FALSE -k phatk&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5770 || 156.83 || 1.452 || 108 || 850 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5770 || 180 || 1.406 || 128[*] || 950 || 800 || 2.4RC1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 30 (*Overclocked wattage calculated [http://bakkap.free.fr/Misc/wCalc.html here] )&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5770 || 205.58 || || || 935 || 300 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-04-28 || -v -w 256&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5770 || 223 || || 100+ || 1050 || 300 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer || -v -w256 [http://www.smpake.com/?p=59 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFFFF;&amp;quot;| 5830 || 206.64 || 1.181 || 175 || 800 || 1120 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFFFF;&amp;quot;| 5830 || 241    || 1.377 || 175 || 1006 || || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-03-11 / Win7 64 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFDDD;&amp;quot;| 5830 || 245 || 1.4 || 175 || 880 || 900 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm (guiminer) || -v -w 256&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFDDD;&amp;quot;| 5830 || 248 || 1.42 || 175 || 880 || 500 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.46 || -k poclbm VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFFFF;&amp;quot;| 5830 || 285   ||  ||  || 960 || || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.47 / poclbm / Win7 64 || VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFFFF;&amp;quot;| 5830 || 290   ||  ||  || 996 || || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.4 / poclbm / Win7 64 || VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFFFF;&amp;quot;| 5830 || 307   ||  ||  || 996 || || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 / phatk / Win7 64 || VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 240.77 || 1.595 || 151 || 725 || 1440 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 250.26 || 1.657 || 151 || 725 || 1440 ||  || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || opencl client || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 252    || 1.575 || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-01-25 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 255.3  || 1.593 || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-01-25 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 264  || 1.748 || 151 || 725 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 1.0 x8 || guiminer-20110501 || -v -w128 &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 280  || 1.75 || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.3 || with BFI_INT&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 292  || 1.825 || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-04-28 -v -f 1 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 298  || 1.8620 || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-04-28 -v -f 1 -w 64 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 300  || 1.5460 || 194 || 925 (OC) || 1440 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil&#039;s OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 314  || 1.8362 || 171 || 820 (OC) || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 1.0 x8 || poclbm || -v -w128 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 335 || 1.8611 || 180 || 890 (OC) || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || poclbm || -v -w128, Memory downclocked to 300Mhz&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 344  || 1.8594 || 185 || 890 (OC) || 1440 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix || &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 382  || 1.8454 || 207 || 995 (OC) || 1440 || || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || phoenix || OC 1.177v on core&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5870M || 116.5 || ? || ? || ? || ? || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || gui-miner (win-7) ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 313.65 || 1.668 || 188 || 850 || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 313  || 1.665 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo/Linux ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 343  || 1.824 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo/Linux ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 355  || 1.888 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/Linux ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 340  || 1.809 || 188 || 850 || 1600 ||  || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil&#039;s OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 360  || 1.6822 || 214 || 970 || 700 ||  || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || m0mchil&#039;s OpenCL w7-64 || -f 0 -v -w 128 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=6144.msg91959#msg91959 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 377  || 2.008 || 188 || 850 || 1600 ||  || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha || -D -G2 &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 408  || 1.8888 ||  216 || 980 || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm/Win7x64 || -f 20 -v -w 128, BIT_ALIGN, BFI_INT&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 400  || 1.9047 || 210 || 950 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || Phoenix 1.3 || -k poclbm VECTORS AGGRESSION=7 FASTLOOP BFI_INT&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 398  || 1.980 || 201 || 900 || 1600 ||  || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha || -D -G2 (GPU OC to 900, memory downclocked to 900)&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 420  || 2.0000 ||  210 || 950 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.48 || -k phatk VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=14 WORKSIZE=256 -- Memory Clock 300Mhz&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 421  || 1.9581 || 215 || 975 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix 1.47 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=13 -k phatk &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 440  || 2.0000 ||  220 || 995 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || Phoenix || &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 438  || 1.9819 || 221 || 1000 (OC) || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm/Linux || -v -w 64 -f 1 &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 530 || 1.803 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.4.595.10 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/201103.beta3/Windows || -v -w128 -f60&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 535.06 || 1.820 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 560  || 1.905 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 565  || 1.922 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine2 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 604  || 2.054 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 645  || 1.875|| 344 || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || -f1, Debian 6, fglrx-driver 10.9.3&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 740  || 2.1511 || 344 || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix/1.3 || AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT, memory clock @ 300MHz&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 755  || 2.2076 || 342 || 848 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 28-04-11 || -f 1 -w 256 -v, Ubuntu 10.10, fglrx 11.4, memory clock @ 300MHz&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 802  || 2.31 || 347 || 850 || 3200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix poclbm Ubuntu 11.04 || -q 6 -k AGGRESSION=19 WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT VECTORS, fglrx 11.4, mem clock @ 1000MHz&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870x2 || 620    ||       ||     || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer || -v -w 128&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870x2 || 826    ||       || 1100 || 950 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.4 w/ Phtak || AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT Memory @ 300MHz&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870x2 || 826    ||       || 700 || 935 || 3200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.48 w/ Phatk || AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=256 VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP=false, memory @ 319 MHz, Windows 7 32-bit&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870x2 || 878    ||       || 1500 || 1000 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.7 w/ Phtak || AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT Memory @ 300MHz&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6310M || 9.821 || 0.545 || 18  || 500 || 80 || 2.4 || Integrated/APU || poclbm-gui -v -w128 || HP DM1z 18W TDP is shared with the CPU&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6470M || 24.1 || ? || ? || ? || ? || 2.1 || Integrated/APU || guiminer || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-   &lt;br /&gt;
| 6470M || 31.0 || ? || ? || ? || ? || 2.1 || Integrated/APU || phoenix 1.48 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-   &lt;br /&gt;
| 6490M || 16.289 || 0.708 || 23  ||  ||  ||  || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm-mod (Mac OS X 10.6.7) || MacBook Pro early 2011&lt;br /&gt;
|-  &lt;br /&gt;
| 6490M || 15.21 || ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8994.0 DiabloMiner GUI] v2011-05-22 / Mac OS X 10.6.7|| Model: MacBookPro8,2 VRAM: 256MB&lt;br /&gt;
|-  &lt;br /&gt;
| 6750 || 167.59 ||       ||     || 870 ||     ||     || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer || -v -f30 -w128&lt;br /&gt;
|-  &lt;br /&gt;
| 6850 || 171.59 || 1.351 || 127 || 775 || 960 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6850 || 196 || || || 850 || 960 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 0&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6850 || 234.8 || || || 940 || 960 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.3 || AGGRESSION=8 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 6850 || 220 || 1.236 || 178[*] || 1000 || 960 || 2.4RC1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 30 (*Overclocked wattage calculated [http://bakkap.free.fr/Misc/wCalc.html here] )&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFF00;&amp;quot;| 6870 || 232.47 || 1.540 || 151 || 900 || 1120 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm -v -w 128 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFF00;&amp;quot;| 6870 || 277.47 ||  ||  || 940 || 1120 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.3 || AGGRESSION=8 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFF00;&amp;quot;| 6870 || 260.1 || 1.611 || 175 || 1001 || 1150 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm-gui windows7x86 cat 11.3 || -v -w 128 -f 1 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFF00;&amp;quot;| 6870 || 276 || 1.828 (?) || 151 (?) || 900 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha cat 11.4 sdk 2.4 || -G2 -D stock clocks, debian linux 64bit &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFF00;&amp;quot;| 6870 || 300.06 || 1.830 || 164 || 1020 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.4 cat 11.4 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=8 fastloop mem clock 344&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFF00;&amp;quot;| 6870 || 306 || 1.748 (?) || 175 (?) || 1000 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha cat 11.4 sdk 2.4 || -G2 -D overclocked to 1000, debian linux 64bit &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFF00;&amp;quot;| 6870 || 300 || 1.72 || 174 || 1038 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm windows7x86 cat 11.4 || -v -w128 -f1 mem clock 360, fan 100% temp 73C&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFF00;&amp;quot;| 6870 || 322 || 1.882 || 170 || 1050 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.47 phatk 11.5 sdk 2.4 || BFI_INT VECTORS FASTLOOP=false AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=256, mem clock @ 400MHz&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6950 || 295 ||  || 160 (?) || 810 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6950 || 314 ||  || (?) || 800 || 1408 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 05-01-11 ||  -v -f30 -w128 default mem 1250 Stock Sapphire 6950 1gb&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6950 || 325 ||  || 200 (?) || 885 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6950 || 340 ||  || (?) || 800 || 1536 || (?) || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm 05-21-11  ||-v -f30 -w128 default mem 1250,Sapphire 6950 1gb, unlocked shaders&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6950 || 360 ||  || 200 (?) || 970 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6950 || 360 ||  || (?) || 870 || 1375 || (?) || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm  ||flashed with 6970 BIOS, -v -f30 -w128&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6950 || 417 ||  || +200? || 975 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || unlocked shaders, +20% overdrive, mem @ 1250, fan @ 77%, temp 64C, -v -w128, gpu core @ 1145mV&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#F0FF0F;&amp;quot;| 6970 || 323 || 1.468 || 220 || 880 || 1536 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -w 64, SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#F0FF0F;&amp;quot;| 6970 || 372 ||  || 220 (?) || 900 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix (svn trunk 05.14.2011) || clock 900/1375, VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128, fan 45% (auto) / temp 90C&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#F0FF0F;&amp;quot;| 6970 || 385 || 1.964 || 196 || 900 || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || -v -w128, memory downclocked to 684Mhz, fan @ 70%/temp 81C&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#F0FF0F;&amp;quot;| 6970 || 403 ||  || (?) || MAX || 1536 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer/poclbm || clock Max/50%+stock, -v -w128, fan= 100%/temp 72C (Note: Overclocked using CCC utility under Windows 7, Clock set to Max value w/ 50% increase to memory and 5% increase to voltage)&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6990 || 670 || 1.94 || 346 || 830 || 3072 || 2.4 ||  PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || Catalyst 11.4 [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=2949.msg106238#msg106238 source].&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6990 || 708 || 2.05 || 346 || 830 || 3072 || 2.3 ||  PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb&#039;s hdminer || Factory default BIOS switch at position 2 = GPU at 830 MHz, see [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6990 || 746 || 1.82 || 410 || 880 || 3072 || 2.3 ||  PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb&#039;s hdminer || Performance mode with BIOS switch at position 1 = GPU at 880 MHz, see [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6990 || 758 || ||  || 880 ||  || 2.4 ||  || Phoenix with Poclbm || Catalyst 11.4, OC switch ON, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128 FASTLOOP=false&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6990 || 771 || 1.8804 || 410 || 880 || 3072 || 2.3 ||  PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb&#039;s hdminer || SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx. Memory clock @ 1280Mhz.&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6990 || 772 || 1.8380 || 420 || 900 || 3072 || 2.3 ||  PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix &amp;amp; Poclbm || OC switch ON + overclocked to 900 mhz, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6990 || 790 ||  || || 900 || 3072 || 2.3 ||  PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb&#039;s hdminer || Factory default BIOS switch at position 2, but with GPU overclocked to 900 MHz and mem overclocked to 1260 MHz with aticonfig(1), see [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6990 || 802 ||  || || 915 || 3072 || 2.3 ||  PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb&#039;s hdminer || Factory default BIOS switch at position 2, but with GPU overclocked to 915 MHz and mem overclocked to 1260 MHz with aticonfig(1), see [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|FirePro V4800 || 79.7 ||  ||  || 775 || 400 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || GUIMiner v2011-05-01 || &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|FirePro V8700 || 84.8 ||  ||  || 750 || 800 ||  || || poclbm-mod.03.24.2011 || &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|FirePro M5800 || 61.4 ||  ||  || 650 ||     ||  || || poclbm-mod.03.24.2011 || Ubuntu || &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Nvidia===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! W !! Clock !! SP !! Comment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8200 mGPU || 1.2 || || || 1200 || 16 || 128 MB shared memory, &amp;quot;poclbm -w 128 -f 0&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8400 GS || 2.3 || || ||  ||  || &amp;quot;poclbm -w 128&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8400 GS || 1.6 || || 128 || 1238 ||  || DiabloMiner -w 128 -f 1 [https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/User:Knightmb source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8600M GT || 4.93 ||  ||  ||  || 32 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8600GT || 5.66 ||  ||  || 1188 ||  32 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8600GT OC || 7.3 ||  ||  || 1602 || 32 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.0 poclbm] -w 128 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg72833#msg72833 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8800GT || 25   || 0.24 || 105 || 1300 ||  ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8800GT || 24.5 || 0.23 || 105 || 1300 ||  || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8800GT || 31.1   || || 105 || 1855 ||  || Overclocked 715 GPU / 1030 Memory / 1855 Shader; GuiMiner v2011-05-21&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8800GTS || 16.8 || 0.109 || 154 ||  ||  || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source] [http://www.techspot.com/review/79-geforce-8800-gts-512/page11.html source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8800 GTS || 18.7 || 0.124 || 150 || 1200 ||  || poclbm -w 64 no vectors&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8800m GTX || 16.3 || || || || || rpcminer-cuda Win7-64&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9300GE || 1.57 ||  ||  || 1300 ||  8 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9300GS || 1.69 ||  ||  || 1400 ||  8 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9300/nForce 730i || 2.15 ||  ||  || 1200 ||  16 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9400GT || 3.37 || 0.067 || 50 || 1400 || 16 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9400M (MacBook) || 1.90 || 0.32 || 6 || 700 ||  || poclbm -f 8 no vectors&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9500GT || 6.75 || 0.135 || 50 || 1400 || 32 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9600GSO || 19.88 || 0.237 || 84 || 1375 || 96 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9600GSO512 || 11.75 || 0.131 || 90 || 1625 || 48 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9600GT || 15.66 || 0.165 || 95 || 1625 || 64 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9600GT Zotac || 15 ||  ||  || 1650 || 64 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9600GT OC || 18.8 || &amp;lt;0.198 || &amp;gt;95 || 1981 || 64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.0 poclbm] -w 128 -f 10 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg74610#msg74610 source] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg73353#msg73353 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9800GT || 30.36 || 0.289 || 105 || 1800 || 112 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9800GTX || 32.54 || 0.232 || 140 || 1688 || 128 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9800GTX+ || 35.39 || 0.251 || 141 || 1836 || 128 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9800GTX+ || 37.23 || 0.266 || 140 || 1890 || 128 || win7x64 275.27 phoenix(1.48) -k poclbm AGGRESSION=3 WORKSIZE=64&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background-color:#FFEFEF&amp;quot;| 9800GX2 || 57.83 || 0.294 || 197 ||  || 2x128 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background-color:#FFEFEF&amp;quot;| 9800GX2 || 28 || 0.142 || 197 ||  || 2x128 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| G210 || 3.38 || 0.111 || 30.5 || 1402 || 16 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| G210 || 3.79 || 0.124 || 30.5 || 1402 || 16 || poclbm -f 1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GT220 || 10.8 || || 128 || 1360 || || DiabloMiner -w 128 -f 1000 [https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/User:Knightmb source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GT240 || 19.37 || 0.281 || 69 || 1340 || 96 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GT240 || 21.24 ||  ||  ||  || 96 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4291.0 poclbm-mod] -f 0 -v [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg73383#msg73383 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTS250 || 35.39 || 0.244 || 145 || 1836 || 128 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTS250 || 35.2 || 0.243 || 145 || 1836 || 128 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTS250 OC || 37 || 0.255 || 145 || 2047 || 128 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX260 || 35.91 || 0.178 || 202 || 1242 || 192 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX260 || 44 || 0.242 || 182 || 1242 || 216 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX260c216 || 40.40 || 0.236 || 171 || 1242 || 216 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX260c216 || 50.00 ||      ||    || 1050 || 216 || m0mchil GPU client, Windows 7 64-bit, x6 @ 3.5ghz&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX260c216 OC || 52.0 || || || 1461 || 216 || &amp;quot;poclbm -w 256 -f 1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX260c216 OC || 58.9 || || || 756/400 || 216 || Core overclocked, Memory underclocked, Ubuntu 11.04 Classic Session(No Effects) &amp;quot;poclbm -w 256 -f 1&amp;quot; ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX275 || 50.75 || 0.232 || 219 || 1404 || 240 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX275 || 58 || || || 729/1458 || 240 || poclbm -f 0 -w 256&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX280 || 46.84 || 0.198 || 236 || 1296 || 240 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX285 || 53.35 || 0.262 || 204 || 1476 || 240 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX295 || 89.78 || 0.311 || 289 || 1242 || 480 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GT 320M (MacBook Air) || 6.12 ||  ||  || 1212 || 48 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GT 330M || 7.97 ||  ||  || || || Model: MacBookPro6,2 VRAM: 512MB Software: [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8994.0 DiabloMiner GUI] v2011-05-22 / Mac OS X 10.6.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GT 330M (Sony Vaio Z) || 7.8 || 0.71 ( 0.3 total) || 11 (26w total) || 1045 || 48 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GT430 || 20.24 || 0.413 || 49 || 1400 || 96 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTS450 || 45.28 || 0.427 || 106 || 1566 || 192 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX460SE || 56.39 || 0.376 || 150 || 1300 || 288 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX460 || 68.31 || 0.427 || 160 || 1350 || 336 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX460 (2 cards) || 102 || 0.319? || 320? || 1350 ||  || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX460 (2 cards) OC || 127 || 0.374 || 340 || 1620 || 2x 336 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2444.0 rpcminer-cuda] -gpugrid=128 -gputhreads=128 ver.20110227&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX465 || 64.41 || 0.322 || 200 || 1215 || 352 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX470 || 81.98 || 0.381 || 215 || 1215 || 448 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX470 || 94.7 || || || 1414 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX470 || 111.9 || || 215 || 1650 || 448 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX470 || 115 || || || 1616 || || phoenix 1.46 poclbm VECTORS BFI_INT FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX480 || 101.28 || 0.405 || 250 || 1401 || 480 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX560 Ti || 67.7 || 0.39  || 170 || 1700 || 384 || standard EVGA 560, no overclock&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX560 Ti || 74.8 || 0.41  || 180 || 1700 || 384 || gigabyte 900Mhz clock; -w 512 -v&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX560 OC || 86.7 || &amp;lt;0.51 || &amp;gt;170 || 1800 || 384 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2444.0 rpcminer-cuda] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg72816#msg72816 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX570 || 105.83 || 0.483 || 219 || 1464 || 480 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX580 || 140.05 || --- || 244 || 1544 || 512 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Quadro FX 580 || 5.7 || 0.14 || 40 || 1125 || 4 ||rpcminer-cuda, Win, -gpugrid=128 -gputhreads=512&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Quadro FX 770M || 5.75 ||  ||  || 500 || 32 || DiabloMiner-Windows.exe BFI_INT FASTLOOP AGGRESSION=6, Win&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Quadro FX 1600M || 6 || 0.12 || 50 || 625 || 32 ||rpcminer-cuda, Win&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Quadro NVS 135M || 1.05 || 0.1 || 10 || 800 || 1 || &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Quadro NVS 3100M || 3.6 || 0.257 || 14 || 600 || 16 || rpcminer-cuda, Win, CUDA 3.1.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Tesla M2050 || 79.8 || ||  || ||  || DiabloMiner&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Tesla M2050 || [http://glennfrancismurray.com/cost-defective-mining-with-gpu-clusters-amazo 100] || 0 || 0 || - || 512 || Amazon AWS [http://glennfrancismurray.com/cost-defective-mining-with-gpu-clusters-amazo CUDA RPC Miner &amp;amp; CUDA 2.0]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==CPUs/APUs==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A lot of nice data can be pulled from [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.0 this thread] to seed this section. Also from [https://www.bitcoin.org/wiki/doku.php?id=bitcoin_miners this page on the old wiki].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Might you wish to throttle CPU load a bit, so it doesn&#039;t reach 100&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;C, it can be done with Battle Encoder Shirase to a margin, like, -15% of available CPU cycles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I found the best combination to be is to throttle CPU miner to -5% _AND_ set it to least of priority levels, so as not to choke GPU miner up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===AMD===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Model !! nprocs !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! TDP [W] !! CPU Clock !! Mhash/s CPU !! Mhash/s GPU !! GPU !! GPU Clock !! SP !! Software !! Notes&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4x Opteron 6174 || 48 || 115 || 0.36 || 320W || 2.2 GHz || 2.4&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=4|&lt;br /&gt;
| cpuminer v0.8.1 || --alg 4way --threads 48&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2x Opteron 6128 || 16 || 32.4 || 0.141 || 230W || 2 GHz || 32.4&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=4|&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.3.19 || -4way&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon XP 2000+ || 2 || 0.62 || 0.009 || 70W || 1.67 GHz || 0.62&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=4|&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.3.18/Ubuntu || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source] [http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm?articleid=914&amp;amp;page=4 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon 64 3500+ || 1 || 1.18 || 0.013 || 89W || 2.54 GHz || 1.18&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=4|&lt;br /&gt;
| ufasoft v0.4 || overclocked (originally 2.2 GHz)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon 64 X2 3800+ || 2 || 1.73 || 0.03 || 65 W || 2.00 GHz || 1.73&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=4|&lt;br /&gt;
| cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || -algo=4way&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon 64 X2 4000+ || 2 || 1.9 || 0.02 || 65W || 2.1 GHz || 1.9&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=4|&lt;br /&gt;
| rpc-miner&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon 64 X2 4400+ ||   || 2.09 || 0.032 || 65W || 2.3GHz || 2.09&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=4|&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.3.19/Win x64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon 64 X2 6000+ || 2 || 2.81 || 0.02 || 125W || 3 GHz || 2.81&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=4|&lt;br /&gt;
| || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg22881#msg22881 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon 64 X2 6400+ Black Edition || 2 || 2.9 || 0.023 || 125W || 3.2 GHz || 2.9&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=4|&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.3.20.2 BETA/Win 7 x64 || -4way&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon II X2 240e || 2 || 2.71 || 0.06 || 45W || 2.81 GHz || 2.71&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=4|&lt;br /&gt;
| bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon II X4 630 || 4 || 10.7 || 0.11 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 10.7&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=4|&lt;br /&gt;
| bitcoin-miner 0.4 || &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 3.8 || 0.04 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 3.8&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=4|&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.3.1x/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 7.2 || 0.08 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 7.2&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=4|&lt;br /&gt;
| cpu-miner 0.2.1/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Phenom II X4 955 || 4 || 11 || 0.09 || 125W || 3.2 GHz || 11&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=4|&lt;br /&gt;
| rpcminer-4way ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Phenom II X4 965 || 4 || 12 || 0.09 || 140W || 3.4 GHz || 11&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=4|&lt;br /&gt;
| rpcminer-4way ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Phenom II X6 1055T || 6 || 15.84 || 0.13 || 125W || 2.82 GHz || 15.84&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=4|&lt;br /&gt;
| bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Phenom II X6 1090T || 6 || 18|| || 141W|| 3.50 GHz || 3&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=4|&lt;br /&gt;
| minerd || &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Phenom II X6 1100T || 6 || 22 || 0.176 || 125W || 3.82 GHz || 22&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=4|&lt;br /&gt;
| bitcoin-miner || Aciid#bitcoin-dev&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Zacate E-350 || 2 || 11 || 0.615 || 18W || 1.6   Ghz || 1.231 || 9.831 || HD6310M || 492 Mhz || 80 || poclbm -v -w128 + Ufasoft 0.7 || stock speeds&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Zacate E-350 || 2 || 12&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=2|&lt;br /&gt;
| 1.648 Ghz || 1.252 || 10.87 || HD6310M || 492 Mhz || 80 || poclbm -v -w 256 -f 1 || &amp;quot;autotune&amp;quot; speed with ASUS EFI BIOS&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===ARM===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ARM1136EJ-S || 1 || 0.11 || ? || ? || 0.528 GHz || cpuminer git || T-Mobile Pulse, inside Debian chroot, &#039;c&#039; algo&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Cortex-A8 || 1 || 0.125 || 0.36 || 0.35 W || 0.6 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || Nokia N900: &#039;cryptopp&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Cortex-A8 || 1 || 0.2 || 0.57 || 0.35 W || 0.6 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || Nokia N900: &#039;c&#039; algo&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2x Cortex-A9 || 2 || 0.57 || 1.14 || 0.5 W || 1.0 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-24) || Toshiba AC100, ubuntu, &#039;c&#039; algo&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Intel===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Pentium III mobile ? || 1 || 0.3 || 0.014 || 21W || 1.07 GHz || 0.3.1x/Win2K || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source] [http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=27380 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Pentium M 1.6ghz || 1 || .4 ||  ||  || 1.6 GHZ || minerd (jgarzik&#039;s 1.0) || cryppto, Windows 7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Pentium M 1.73ghz || 1 || .5 ||  ||  || 1.73 GHZ || minerd (jgarzik&#039;s 1.0) || cryppto, Windows 7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Old Xeon 512k (Dual) || 2x1/2 || 2.0 || ? || ? || 3.06GHz || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || HT disabled, algo=4way (twice as fast as the 2nd best algo)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Pentium 4 2.0A || 1 || 0.85 || || || 2.0 GHz || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft-0.4]/WinXP || -g no -t 2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Pentium Dual-Core E2180 || 2/2 || 1.75 || || || 2.0 GHz || rpcminer-cpu || Win7-64&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Pentium Dual-Core E2180 || 2/2 || 4.5 || || || 2.0 GHz || ufasoft v0.11 || Win7-64&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Pentium Dual-Core E5400 || 2/2 || 2.27 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.7 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Celeron E330 || 2/2 || 2.2  || 0.03 || 65W || 2.5 GHz || 0.3.19/Ubuntu10.04 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core 2 Quad Q6600 || 4/4 || 11.0 ||  || 105W || 2.40 GHz || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || -a 60 -g no -t 4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core 2 Quad Q9400 || 4/4 || 11 || 0.046 || 95W || 2.66 GHz || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || -a 60 -g no -t 4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core 2 Quad Q9650 || 4/4 || 18.67 ||  || 95W || 4.00 GHz || bitcoin-miner 0.10 || -a 60 -g no -t 4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i3 530 || 2/4 || 8.31 || 0.10 || 80W || 3.66 GHz || Ufasoft 0.7 || -v -a5 -g no -t 4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i3 M350 || 2/4 || 1.48 || 0.04 || 35W || 2.27 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| Core i5 M450 || 2/4 || 1.8  || 0.05 || 35W || 1.2 GHz || 0.3.17/Win7-54 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| Core i5-650  || 2/4 || 5.1 || 0.04 ? ||  || 3.2 GHz || cpuminer-0.7 || -4way&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i5 ?  || 4/? || 6.5 ||  ||  ||  || client from svn || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37621#msg37621 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 4.5 || 0.05 || 95W || 3.1 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-01-22) || cryptopp_asm32&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 14 || 0.15 || 95W || 3.1 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || sse2_64&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i7 620M   || 2/4 || 1.888 || || || 2.66 GHz || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8994.0 RPCMiner GUI] v2011-05-22 / Mac OS X 10.6.7 || Model: MacBookPro6,2 RAM: 4GB&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i7 920   || 4/8 || 19.2 || 0.10 || 195 || 4.0 GHz (x21) || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] || -a 5&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i7 950   || 4/8 || 5.88 || 0.039 || 150W || 3.83 GHz (x23) || bitcoin-0.3.20.2 Win7-64 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i7 950   || 4/8 || 18.9 || 0.126 || 150W || 3.83 GHz (x23) || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] v0.4 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i7 980x   || 6/12 || 19.2 || 0.15 || 130 || 4.4 GHz (x33) || cpuminer/Win7-64 || &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| Core i7 980x   || 6/12 || 8.7 ||  ||  || 3.9 GHz (x27) || 0.3.17/Win7-64 || &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| Core i7 2635QM   || 4/8 || 2.93 || || || 2.00 GHz || [http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=8994.0 RPCMiner GUI] v2011-05-22 / Mac OS X 10.6.7 || Model: MacBookPro8,2 RAM: 4GB&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| Core i7 620M   || 2/4 || 6.3 || 0.18 || 35 || 2.66 GHz || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] v0.4 || &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core 2 Duo U7600 || 1 || 1.1 ||  ||  || 1.2 GHZ || minerd (jgarzik&#039;s 1.0) || cryppto, Windows 7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core 2 Duo E5200 || 2/2 || 6.2 || 0.086 || 72W || 2.76 Ghz || Ufasoft/Win7-64 || TDP is 65W + 7W overclock&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core 2 Duo E6550 || 1/2 || 2.45 || ? || ? || 2.33 GHz || cpuminer 0.7.1 (Linux) || --algo=sse2_64&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core 2 Duo E6850 || 2/2 || 6.75 || 0.10 || 65W || 3.0 Ghz || ufasoft-0.3 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 7.76 || 0.11 || 70W || 3.33 GHz (o/c?) || ufasoft-0.3 || miner optimized for Intel Core&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 2.52 || 0.04 || 65W || 2.66 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core 2 Duo E8400 || 2/2 || 6.9 || ? || ? || 3.0 GHz || ufasoft v0.10|| windows 7/64bit (-t 2)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core 2 Duo T6400 || 2/2 || 4.2 || 0.12 || 35 W || 2.00 GHz || cpuminer git (Linux) || --algo=sse2_64&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core 2 Extreme X9000 || 2/2 || 2.37 || || || 2.8 GHz || rpcminer-cpu || Win7-64&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core 2 Extreme X9000 || 2/2 || 6.2 || || || 2.8 GHz || ufasoft v0.11 || Win7-64&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core 2 Extreme X9000 || 2/2 || 7.2 || || || 3.2 GHz || ufasoft v0.11 || Win7-64 Overclocked from 2.8 GHz to 3.2 GHz&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon 3060 || 1/2 || 2.03 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.4GHz || cpuminer 0.8.1 (Linux) || --algo=cryptopp_asm32&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon Prestonia 2.4 (dual) || 2x1/2 || 2.16 || 0.017 || 130W || 2.4 GHz || ufasoft v0.4 || &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon X5355 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 10.13 || 0.16 || 120W || 2.66GHz || bitcoind || Roughly the same speed as the &amp;quot;c&amp;quot; algo in cpuminer&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon X5355 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 22.76 || 0.09 || 120W || 2.66GHz || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || -O2 -march=core2, algo=sse2_64&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon E5440 || 4/8 || 7.3 || ? || 80W || 2.66 GHz|| Kiv&#039;s poclbm-gui || FIXME: Either wrong model # or wrong threads/speed info&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon E5520 || 4/8 || 6.5 || 0.08 || 80W || 2.27 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon E5530 || 4/8 || 7.14 || 0.09 || 80W || 2.4 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon E5630 (dual) || 2x4/8 || 8 || 0.1 || 80W || 2.53 GHz || 0.3.17/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon E6520 (dual) || 2x4/8 || 24.7 || ? || ? || 2.53 GHz || ufasoft v0.10 || windows 2008 R2 64bit (-t 16)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon E7520 (dual) || 2x4/16 || 18 || ? || 95W || 1.87 GHz || ufasoft v0.10 || windows 2008 R2 64bit (-t 16)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Atom N270 || 2 || 1.19 || 0.24 || 5W || 1.6 GHz || ufasoft v0.10 || &lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Other===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Cell || 6 || 21 || 0.35 || 60W || 3.2 GHz || cellminer || Sony Playstation 3 (FAT): Needs custom firmware (no links to it, potential issues with Sony assholes.) [https://github.com/verement/cellminer source] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4704.20 source] Total power usage of PS3 fat is 120W but only the Cell cpu is active.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Cell || 6 || 21 || 0.7 || 35W || 3.2 GHz || cellminer || Sony Playstation 3 (SLIM): Total power usage of PS3 slim is 70W but only the Cell cpu is active.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| MIPS || 1 || 0.026 || ? || ? || 200 MHz || cpuminer || ASUS WL-500G Deluxe router running [http://openwrt.org/ OpenWrt]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mining rig]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Generation Calculator]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Power Calc]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[OpenCL miner]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=745 ATI Stream vs. NVIDIA CUDA - GPGPU computing battle royale]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mining]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mrb</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Why_a_GPU_mines_faster_than_a_CPU&amp;diff=8497</id>
		<title>Why a GPU mines faster than a CPU</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Why_a_GPU_mines_faster_than_a_CPU&amp;diff=8497"/>
		<updated>2011-05-18T05:58:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mrb: add missing &amp;#039;billion&amp;#039; word&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Some Bitcoin users might wonder why there is a huge disparity between the mining output of a CPU versus a GPU.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, just to clarify, the CPU, or &#039;&#039;central processing unit&#039;&#039;, is the part of the computer that performs the will of the software loaded on the computer.  It&#039;s the main executive for the entire machine.  It is the master that tells all the parts of the computer what to do - in accordance with the program code of the software, and, hopefully, the will of the user.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some computers have multiple CPU&#039;s, and some CPU&#039;s have multiple cores (which is almost the same thing as having multiple CPU&#039;s in a single physical package).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CPU is usually a removable component that plugs into the computer&#039;s main circuit board, or &#039;&#039;motherboard&#039;&#039; and sits underneath a large metallic heat sink or fan.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The GPU, or &#039;&#039;graphics processing unit&#039;&#039;, is a part of the video rendering system in a computer.  In many cases, the GPU is located on a separate circuit board called a video card, which is in turn plugged into a slot on the motherboard.  The typical function of a GPU is to assist with the rendering of 3D graphics and visual effects so that the CPU doesn&#039;t have to.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many computers don&#039;t have GPU&#039;s at all.  A GPU isn&#039;t a requirement, it&#039;s just that they are appearing as standard equipment in computers nowadays, since newer operating systems support enhanced visual effects that depend on the GPU.  For example, the translucent windows in Windows 7, or the row of icons in Mac OS X that bulges near the mouse pointer - these are effects that are made feasible with a GPU.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A GPU is like a CPU, but there are important internal differences that make them suited toward their special tasks.  These are the differences that make Bitcoin mining far more favorable on a GPU.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Short Answer ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A typical CPU core can execute &#039;&#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039;&#039; 32-bit instructions per clock (using a 128-bit SSE instruction), whereas a GPU like the Radeon HD 5970 can execute &#039;&#039;&#039;3200&#039;&#039;&#039; 32-bit instructions per clock (using its 3200 ALUs or shaders). This is a difference of &#039;&#039;&#039;800 times more instructions per clock&#039;&#039;&#039;. As of 2011, the fastest CPUs have up to 6, 8, or 12 cores and a somewhat higher frequency clock (2000-3000 MHz vs. 725 MHz for the Radeon HD 5970), but this is far from enough to compensate for this huge difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A CPU is an executive ==&lt;br /&gt;
A CPU is designed primarily to be an executive and make decisions, as directed by the software.  For example, if you type a document and save it, it is the CPU&#039;s job to turn your document into the appropriate file type and direct the hard disk to write it as a file.  CPU&#039;s can also do all kinds of math, as inside every CPU is one or more &amp;quot;Arithmetic/Logic Units&amp;quot; (ALU&#039;s).  CPU&#039;s are also highly capable of following instructions of the &amp;quot;if this, do this, otherwise do that&amp;quot;.  A large bulk of the structures inside a CPU are concerned with making sure that the CPU is ready to deal with having to switch to a different task on a moment&#039;s notice when needed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CPU&#039;s also have to deal with quite a few other things which add complexity, including:&lt;br /&gt;
* enforcing privilege levels and the boundaries between user programs and the operating system&lt;br /&gt;
* creating the illusion of &amp;quot;virtual memory&amp;quot; to programs&lt;br /&gt;
* for the most popular processors, being backwards compatible with legacy code&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A GPU is a laborer ==&lt;br /&gt;
A GPU is very different.  Yes, a GPU can do math, and can also do &amp;quot;this&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;that&amp;quot; based on specific conditions.  However, GPU&#039;s have been designed so they are very good at doing video processing, and less executive work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Video processing is a lot of repetitive work, since it is constantly being told to do the same thing to large groups of pixels on the screen.  In order to make this run efficiency, video processors are far heavier on the ability to do repetitive work, than the ability to rapidly switch tasks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
GPU&#039;s have large numbers of ALU&#039;s, more so than CPU&#039;s.  As a result, they can do large amounts of bulky mathematical labor in a greater quantity than CPU&#039;s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Analogy==&lt;br /&gt;
One way to visualize it is a CPU works like a small group of very smart people who can quickly do any task given to them.  A GPU is a large group of relatively dumb people who aren&#039;t individually very fast or smart, but who can be trained to do repetitive tasks, and collectively can be more productive just due to the sheer number of people.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It&#039;s not that a CPU is fat, spoiled, or lazy.  Both CPUs and GPUs are creations made from billions of microscopic transistors crammed on a small piece of silicon.  On silicon chips, size is expensive.  The structures that make CPUs good at what they do take up lots of space.  When those structures are omitted, that leaves plenty of room for many &amp;quot;dumb&amp;quot; ALU&#039;s, which individually are very small.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ALUs of a GPU are partitioned into groups, and each group of ALUs shares management, so members of the group cannot be made to work on separate tasks.  They can either all work on nearly identical variations of one single task, in perfect sync with one another, or nothing at all.  Trying different hashes repeatedly - the process behind Bitcoin mining - is a very repetitive task suitable for a GPU, with each attempt varying only by the changing of one number (called a &amp;quot;nonce&amp;quot;) in the data being hashed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ATI Radeon 5970 is a popular video card for Bitcoin mining and, to date, offers the best known performance of any video card for this purpose.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This particular card has 3,200 &amp;quot;Stream Processors&amp;quot;, which can be thought of as 3,200 very dumb execution units that can be trained to all do the same repetitive task, just so long as they don&#039;t have to make any decisions that interrupts their flow. Those execution units are contained in blocks. The 5970 uses a VLIW-5 architecture, which means the 3,200 Stream Processors are actually 640 &amp;quot;Cores,&amp;quot; Each able to process 5 instruction per clock cycle. Nvidia would call these cores &amp;quot;Cuda Cores&amp;quot;, but as mentioned in this article, they are not VLIW, meaning they cannot do as much work per cycle. This is why comparing graphics cards by core count alone is not an accurate method of determining performance, and this is also why nVidia lags so far behind ATI in SHA-256 hashing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since ALU&#039;s are what do all the work of Bitcoin mining, the number of available ALU&#039;s has a direct effect on the hash output.  Compare that to a 4-core CPU that can switch tasks on a dime, but has ALU&#039;s in some small multiple of four, if not just four ALU&#039;s alone.  Trying a single SHA256 hash in the context of Bitcoin mining requires around 1,000 simple mathematical steps that must be performed entirely by ALU&#039;s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That, in a nutshell, is why GPU&#039;s can mine Bitcoins so much faster than CPU&#039;s.  Bitcoin mining requires no decision making - it is repetitive mathematical work for a computer.  The only decision making that must be made in Bitcoin mining is, &amp;quot;do I have a valid block&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;do I not&amp;quot;.  That&#039;s an excellent workload to run on a GPU.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Why are AMD GPUs faster than Nvidia GPUs?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Firstly, AMD designs GPUs with many simple ALUs/shaders (VLIW design) that run at a relatively low frequency clock (typically 1120-3200 ALUs at 625-900 MHz), whereas Nvidia&#039;s microarchitecture consists of fewer more complex ALUs and tries to compensate with a higher shader clock (typically 448-1024 ALUs at 1150-1544 MHz). Because of this VLIW vs. non-VLIW difference, Nvidia uses up more square millimeters of die space per ALU, hence can pack fewer of them per chip, and they hit the frequency wall sooner than AMD which prevents them from increasing the clock high enough to match or surpass AMD&#039;s performance. This translates to a raw ALU performance advantage for AMD:&lt;br /&gt;
* AMD Radeon HD 6990: 3072 ALUs x 830 MHz = 2550 billion 32-bit instruction per second&lt;br /&gt;
* Nvidia GTX 590: 1024 ALUs x 1214 MHz = 1243 billion 32-bit instruction per second&lt;br /&gt;
This approximate &#039;&#039;&#039;2x-3x&#039;&#039;&#039; performance difference exists across the entire range of AMD and Nvidia GPUs. It is noticeably visible in all ALU-bound GPGPU workloads such as Bitcoin, password bruteforcers, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Secondly, another difference favoring Bitcoin mining on AMD GPUs instead of Nvidia&#039;s is that the mining algorithm is based on SHA-256, which makes heavy use of the 32-bit integer right rotate operation. This operation can be implemented as a single hardware instruction on AMD GPUs, but requires three separate hardware instructions to be emulated on Nvidia GPUs (2 shifts + 1 add). This alone gives AMD another &#039;&#039;&#039;1.7x&#039;&#039;&#039; performance advantage (~1900 instructions instead of ~3250 to execute the SHA-256 compression function).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Combined together, these 2 factors make AMD GPUs overall &#039;&#039;&#039;3x-5x&#039;&#039;&#039; faster when mining Bitcoins.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mining hardware comparison]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[:Category:Miners|Miners]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[:Category:Pool Operators|Pool Operators]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mining]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mrb</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Mining_hardware_comparison&amp;diff=8178</id>
		<title>Mining hardware comparison</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Mining_hardware_comparison&amp;diff=8178"/>
		<updated>2011-05-09T13:32:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mrb: fix Mhash/s/W for HD 6990 @ 830 MHz&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Below are some statistics about the mining performance of various hardware used in a [[mining rig]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The table shows (mostly) stock clock numbers. 10-20% performance improvement can be achieved via overclocking.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Note:&#039;&#039;&#039; Clock refers to the Shader clock only with nVidia cards (not Core or Memory). With AMD card the shader clock is not separate, but is part of the GPU clock.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Graphics cards==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===AMD===&lt;br /&gt;
To get the maximum performance use the 2.1 release of the ATI Stream SDK. 2.2 wastes CPU time, and 2.3/2.4 drop mining performance by 5-10%.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! W !! Clock !! SP !! SDK  !! Slot !! Miner !! Notes&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3XXX || || || || || || || || OpenCL Not Supported&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 42XX || || || || || || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || || OpenCL Not Supported (intergrated/mobile GPU)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4350 || 6.93 || 0.346 || 20 || 575 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don&#039;t use vectors &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4550 || 7.23 || 0.289 || 25 || 600 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don&#039;t use vectors &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4650 || 31.33 || 0.653 || 48 || 650 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don&#039;t use vectors &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4670 || 36.14 || 0.613 || 59 || 750 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don&#039;t use vectors&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4670 || 40.11 ||       || 59 || 800 || 320 || || AGP x8        || poclbm/Ubuntu 10.10 w/ H == 0 mod [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.msg85236#msg85236 source] || -w 32 -f 0, don&#039;t use vectors&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4730 || 72.29 || 0.657 || 110 || 750 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4770 || 72.29 || 0.904 || 80 || 750 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4830 || 55.42 || 0.583 || 95 || 575 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4850 || 75.30 || 0.685 || 110 || 625 || 800 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4860 || 67.47 || 0.519 || 130 || 700 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4870 || 90.36 || 0.602 || 150 || 750 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || clmine ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4870 || 78    ||       ||     ||     ||     || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || m0mchil&#039;s OpenCL/Vista 64bit || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4890 || 102.41 || 0.539 || 190 || 850 || 800 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4890 || 108.3 || || 190 || 975 || 800 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4850X2 || 150.60 || 0.602 || 250 || 625 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4870X2 || 180.72 || 0.632 || 286 || 750 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4870X2 || 180.6 || || 286 || 800 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 5450 || 11.99 || 0.631 || 19 || 650 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 5550 || 40.59 || 1.041 || 39 || 550 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5570 || 59.96 || 1.538 || 39 || 650 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5570 || 64 || 1.641 || 39 || 650 || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil&#039;s OpenCL/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 5650 || 48    || 2.5-3.2 ? || 15-19 ? ||  ||  ||  || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil&#039;s OpenCL/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source] [http://www.notebookcheck.net/ATI-Mobility-Radeon-HD-5650.23697.0.html source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 5670 || 71.49 || 1.117 || 64 || 775 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EEFFEE;&amp;quot;| 5670 || 72 || 1.64 || 44 || 850 || || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm-mod (Win7-64) || Sapphire 100287VGAL card is low power&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 5670 || 85 || || || 900 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 5750 || 116.24 || 1.352 || 86 || 700 || 720 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 5750 || 154.56 || 1.45 || 106 || 830 || 720 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 ||  ||-v -w128 -f20 underclocked memory clocks from 1150MHz to 300MHz&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 5770 || 156.83 || 1.452 || 108 || 850 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5770 || 180 || 1.406 || 128[*] || 950 || 800 || 2.4RC1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 30 (*Overclocked wattage calculated [http://bakkap.free.fr/Misc/wCalc.html here] )&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5770 || 205.58 || || || 935 || 300 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-04-28 || -v -w 256&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFFFF;&amp;quot;| 5830 || 206.64 || 1.181 || 175 || 800 || 1120 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFFFF;&amp;quot;| 5830 || 241    || 1.377 || 175 || 1006 || || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-03-11 / Win7 64 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|| 5830 || 245 || 1.4 || 175 || 880 || 900 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm (guiminer) || -v -w 256&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFFFF;&amp;quot;| 5830 || 280   ||  ||  || 993 || || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.4 / poclbm / Win7 64 || vector aggr 12, BFI_INT&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 240.77 || 1.595 || 151 || 725 || 1440 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 250.26 || 1.657 || 151 || 725 || 1440 ||  || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || opencl client || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 252    || 1.575 || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-01-25 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 255.3  || 1.593 || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-01-25 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 264  || 1.748 || 151 || 725 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 1.0 x8 || guiminer-20110501 || -v -w128 &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 280  || 1.75 || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.3 || with BFI_INT&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 292    || 1.825 || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-04-28 -v -f 1 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 298    || 1.862|| 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-04-28 -v -f 1 -w 64 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 300    || 1.546 || 194 || 925 (OC) || 1440 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil&#039;s OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 344    || 1.8594 || 185 || 890 (OC) || 1440 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix || &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5870M || 116.5 || ? || ? || ? || ? || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || gui-miner (win-7) ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 313.65 || 1.668 || 188 || 850 || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 313    || 1.665 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo/Linux ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 343    || 1.824 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo/Linux ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 355    || 1.888 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/Linux ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 340    || 1.809 || 188 || 850 || 1600 ||  || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil&#039;s OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 360    ||  ||  || 970 || 700 ||  || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || m0mchil&#039;s OpenCL w7-64 || -f 0 -v -w 128 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=6144.msg91959#msg91959 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 385    ||  ||  || 980 || 1600 ||  || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm-mod/Win7-64 || -f 0 -v -w 128&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 400    ||  ||  || 950 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || Phoenix 1.3 || -k poclbm VECTORS AGGRESSION=7 FASTLOOP BFI_INT&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 530 || 1.803 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.4.595.10 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/201103.beta3/Windows || -v -w128 -f60&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 535.06 || 1.820 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 560    || 1.905 || 294 || 725 || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 565    || 1.922 || 294 || || || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine2 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 604    || 2.054 || 294 || || || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 645    || 1.875|| 344 || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || -f1, Debian 6, fglrx-driver 10.9.3&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 740    || 2.1511 || 344 || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix/1.3 || AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT, memory clock @ 300MHz&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 755    || 2.2076 || 342 || 848 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 28-04-11 || -f 1 -w 256 -v, Ubuntu 10.10, fglrx 11.4, memory clock @ 300MHz&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 802    || 2.31 || 347 || 850 || 3200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix || -q 6 -k poclbm AGGRESSION=19 WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT VECTORS, Ubuntu 11.04, fglrx 11.4, memory clock @ 1000MHz&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870x2 || 620    ||       ||     || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer || -v -w 128&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870x2 || 820    ||       ||     || 975 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix/1.3 || AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT Memory @ 300MHz&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6310M || 9.821 || 0.545 || 18  || 500 || 80 || 2.4 || Integrated/APU || poclbm-gui -v -w128 || HP DM1z 18W TDP is shared with the CPU&lt;br /&gt;
|-  &lt;br /&gt;
| 6490M || 16.289 || 0.708 || 23  ||  ||  ||  || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm-mod (Mac OS X 10.6.7) || MacBook Pro early 2011&lt;br /&gt;
|-  &lt;br /&gt;
| 6850 || 171.59 || 1.351 || 127 || 775 || 960 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6850 || 196 || || || 850 || 960 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 0&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6850 || 234.8 || || || 940 || 960 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.3 AGGRESSION=8 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 6850 || 220 || 1.236 || 178[*] || 1000 || 960 || 2.4RC1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 30 (*Overclocked wattage calculated [http://bakkap.free.fr/Misc/wCalc.html here] )&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6870 || 232.47 || 1.540 || 151 || 900 || 1120 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm -v -w 128 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6870 || 277.47 ||  ||  || 940 || 1120 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.3 AGGRESSION=8 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT || &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6870 || 260.1 || 1.611 || 175 || 1001 || 1150 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm-gui windows7x86 cat 11.3 || -v -w 128 -f 1 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6870 || 272 || 1.802 (?) || 151 (?) || 900 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha cat 11.4 sdk 2.4 || -G2 -D stock clocks, debian linux 64bit [http://img690.imageshack.us/img690/853/gpumine1.png source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6870 || 300.06 || 1.830 || 164 || 1020 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.4 cat 11.4 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=8 fastloop mem clock 344&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6870 || 302 || 1.726 (?) || 175 (?) || 1000 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha cat 11.4 sdk 2.4 || -G2 -D overclocked to 1000, debian linux 64bit [http://img814.imageshack.us/img814/6646/gpumine2.png source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFF00;&amp;quot;| 6870 || 300 || 1.72 || 174 || 1038 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm windows7x86 cat 11.4 || -v -w128 -f1 mem clock 360, fan 100% temp 73C&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6950 || 295 ||  || 160 (?) || 810 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6950 || 325 ||  || 200 (?) || 885 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6950 || 360 ||  || 200 (?) || 970 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6970 || 323 || 1.468 || 220 || 880 || 1536 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -w 64, SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6990 || 708 || 2.05 || 346 || 830 || 3072 || 2.3 ||  PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb&#039;s hdminer || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]. SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6990 || 746 || 1.82 || 410 || 880 || 3072 || 2.3 ||  PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb&#039;s hdminer || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]. SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6990 || 771 || 1.8804 || 410 || 880 || 3072 || 2.3 ||  PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb&#039;s hdminer || SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx. Memory clock @ 1280Mhz.&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6990 || 772 || 1.8380 || 420 || 900 || 3072 || 2.3 ||  PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix &amp;amp; Poclbm || Overclock switch ON + overclocked to 900 mhz, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|FirePro V8700 || 84.8 ||  ||  || 750 || 800 ||  || || poclbm-mod.03.24.2011 || &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|FirePro M5800 || 61.4 ||  ||  || 650 ||     ||  || || poclbm-mod.03.24.2011 || Ubuntu || &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Nvidia===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! W !! Clock !! SP !! Comment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8200 mGPU || 1.2 || || || 1200 || 16 || 128 MB shared memory, &amp;quot;poclbm -w 128 -f 0&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8400 GS || 2.3 || || ||  ||  || &amp;quot;poclbm -w 128&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8600M GT || 4.93 ||  ||  ||  || 32 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8600GT || 5.66 ||  ||  || 1188 ||  32 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8600GT OC || 7.3 ||  ||  || 1602 || 32 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.0 poclbm] -w 128 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg72833#msg72833 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8800GT || 25   || 0.24 || 105 || 1300 ||  ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8800GT || 24.5 || 0.23 || 105 || 1300 ||  || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8800GTS || 16.8 || 0.109 || 154 ||  ||  || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source] [http://www.techspot.com/review/79-geforce-8800-gts-512/page11.html source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8800 GTS || 18.7 || 0.124 || 150 || 1200 ||  || poclbm -w 64 no vectors&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9300GE || 1.57 ||  ||  || 1300 ||  8 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9300GS || 1.69 ||  ||  || 1400 ||  8 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9300/nForce 730i || 2.15 ||  ||  || 1200 ||  16 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9400GT || 3.37 || 0.067 || 50 || 1400 || 16 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9400M (MacBook) || 1.90 || 0.32 || 6 || 700 ||  || poclbm -f 8 no vectors&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9500GT || 6.75 || 0.135 || 50 || 1400 || 32 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9600GSO || 19.88 || 0.237 || 84 || 1375 || 96 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9600GSO512 || 11.75 || 0.131 || 90 || 1625 || 48 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9600GT || 15.66 || 0.165 || 95 || 1625 || 64 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9600GT Zotac || 15 ||  ||  || 1650 || 64 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9600GT OC || 18.8 || &amp;lt;0.198 || &amp;gt;95 || 1981 || 64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.0 poclbm] -w 128 -f 10 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg74610#msg74610 source] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg73353#msg73353 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9800GT || 30.36 || 0.289 || 105 || 1800 || 112 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9800GTX || 32.54 || 0.232 || 140 || 1688 || 128 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9800GTX+ || 35.39 || 0.251 || 141 || 1836 || 128 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background-color:#FFEFEF&amp;quot;| 9800GX2 || 57.83 || 0.294 || 197 ||  || 2x128 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background-color:#FFEFEF&amp;quot;| 9800GX2 || 28 || 0.142 || 197 ||  || 2x128 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| G210 || 3.38 || 0.111 || 30.5 || 1402 || 16 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| G210 || 3.79 || 0.124 || 30.5 || 1402 || 16 || poclbm -f 1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GT220 || 9.83 || 0.170 || 58 || 1360 || 48 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GT240 || 19.37 || 0.281 || 69 || 1340 || 96 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GT240 || 21.24 ||  ||  ||  || 96 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4291.0 poclbm-mod] -f 0 -v [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg73383#msg73383 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTS250 || 35.39 || 0.244 || 145 || 1836 || 128 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTS250 || 35.2 || 0.243 || 145 || 1836 || 128 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTS250 OC || 37 || 0.255 || 145 || 2047 || 128 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX260 || 35.91 || 0.178 || 202 || 1242 || 192 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX260 || 44 || 0.242 || 182 || 1242 || 216 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX260c216 || 40.40 || 0.236 || 171 || 1242 || 216 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX260c216 OC || 52.0 || || || 1461 || 216 || &amp;quot;poclbm -w 256 -f 1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX275 || 50.75 || 0.232 || 219 || 1404 || 240 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX275 || 58 || || || 729/1458 || 240 || poclbm -f 0 -w 256&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX280 || 46.84 || 0.198 || 236 || 1296 || 240 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX285 || 53.35 || 0.262 || 204 || 1476 || 240 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX295 || 89.78 || 0.311 || 289 || 1242 || 480 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GT 320M (MacBook Air) || 6.12 ||  ||  || 1212 || 48 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GT 330M (Sony Vaio Z) || 7.8 || 0.71 ( 0.3 total) || 11 (26w total) || 1045 || 48 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GT430 || 20.24 || 0.413 || 49 || 1400 || 96 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTS450 || 45.28 || 0.427 || 106 || 1566 || 192 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX460SE || 56.39 || 0.376 || 150 || 1300 || 288 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX460 || 68.31 || 0.427 || 160 || 1350 || 336 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX460 (2 cards) || 102 || 0.319? || 320? || 1350 ||  || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX460 (2 cards) OC || 127 || 0.374 || 340 || 1620 || 2x 336 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2444.0 rpcminer-cuda] -gpugrid=128 -gputhreads=128 ver.20110227&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX465 || 64.41 || 0.322 || 200 || 1215 || 352 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX470 || 81.98 || 0.381 || 215 || 1215 || 448 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX470 || 94.7 || || || 1414 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX470 || 111.9 || || 215 || 1650 || 448 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX480 || 101.28 || 0.405 || 250 || 1401 || 480 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX560 Ti || 67.7 || 0.39  || 170 || 1700 || 384 || standard EVGA 560, no overclock&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX560 OC || 86.7 || &amp;lt;0.51 || &amp;gt;170 || 1800 || 384 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2444.0 rpcminer-cuda] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg72816#msg72816 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX570 || 105.83 || 0.483 || 219 || 1464 || 480 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX580 || 140.05 || --- || 244 || 1544 || 512 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Quadro FX 580 || 5.7 || 0.14 || 40 || 1125 || 4 ||rpcminer-cuda, Win, -gpugrid=128 -gputhreads=512&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Quadro FX 1600M || 6 || 0.12 || 50 || 625 || 32 ||rpcminer-cuda, Win&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Quadro NVS 135M || 1.05 || 0.1 || 10 || 800 || 1 || &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Quadro NVS 3100M || 3.6 || 0.257 || 14 || 600 || 16 || rpcminer-cuda, Win, CUDA 3.1.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Tesla M2050 || 79.8 || ||  || ||  || DiabloMiner&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==CPUs/APUs==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A lot of nice data can be pulled from [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.0 this thread] to seed this section. Also from [https://www.bitcoin.org/wiki/doku.php?id=bitcoin_miners this page on the old wiki].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===AMD===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Model !! nprocs !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! TDP [W] !! CPU Clock !! Mhash/s CPU !! Mhash/s GPU !! GPU !! GPU Clock !! SP !! Software !! Notes&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4x Opteron 6174 || 48 || 115 || 0.36 || 320W || 2.2 GHz || 2.4&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=4|&lt;br /&gt;
| cpuminer v0.8.1 || --alg 4way --threads 48&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2x Opteron 6128 || 16 || 32.4 || 0.141 || 230W || 2 GHz || 32.4&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=4|&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.3.19 || -4way&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon XP 2000+ || 2 || 0.62 || 0.009 || 70W || 1.67 GHz || 0.62&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=4|&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.3.18/Ubuntu || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source] [http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm?articleid=914&amp;amp;page=4 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon 64 3500+ || 1 || 1.18 || 0.013 || 89W || 2.54 GHz || 1.18&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=4|&lt;br /&gt;
| ufasoft v0.4 || overclocked (originally 2.2 GHz)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon 64 X2 3800+ || 2 || 1.73 || 0.03 || 65 W || 2.00 GHz || 1.73&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=4|&lt;br /&gt;
| cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || -algo=4way&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon 64 X2 4000+ || 2 || 1.9 || 0.02 || 65W || 2.1 GHz || 1.9&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=4|&lt;br /&gt;
| rpc-miner&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon 64 X2 4400+ ||   || 2.09 || 0.032 || 65W || 2.3GHz || 2.09&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=4|&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.3.19/Win x64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon 64 X2 6000+ || 2 || 2.81 || 0.02 || 125W || 3 GHz || 2.81&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=4|&lt;br /&gt;
| || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg22881#msg22881 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon 64 X2 6400+ Black Edition || 2 || 2.9 || 0.023 || 125W || 3.2 GHz || 2.9&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=4|&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.3.20.2 BETA/Win 7 x64 || -4way&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon II X2 240e || 2 || 2.71 || 0.06 || 45W || 2.81 GHz || 2.71&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=4|&lt;br /&gt;
| bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon II X4 630 || 4 || 10.7 || 0.11 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 10.7&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=4|&lt;br /&gt;
| bitcoin-miner 0.4 || &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 3.8 || 0.04 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 3.8&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=4|&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.3.1x/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 7.2 || 0.08 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 7.2&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=4|&lt;br /&gt;
| cpu-miner 0.2.1/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Phenom II X4 955 || 4 || 11 || 0.09 || 125W || 3.2 GHz || 11&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=4|&lt;br /&gt;
| rpcminer-4way ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Phenom II X4 965 || 4 || 12 || 0.09 || 140W || 3.4 GHz || 11&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=4|&lt;br /&gt;
| rpcminer-4way ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Phenom II X6 1055T || 6 || 15.84 || 0.13 || 125W || 2.82 GHz || 15.84&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=4|&lt;br /&gt;
| bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Phenom II X6 1100T || 6 || 22 || 0.176 || 125W || 3.82 GHz || 22&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=4|&lt;br /&gt;
| bitcoin-miner || Aciid#bitcoin-dev&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Zacate E-350 || 2 || 11 || 0.615 || 18W || 1.6   Ghz || 1.231 || 9.831 || HD6310M || 492 Mhz || 80 || poclbm -v -w128 + Ufasoft 0.7 || stock speeds&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Zacate E-350 || 2 || 12&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=2|&lt;br /&gt;
| 1.648 Ghz || 1.252 || 10.87 || HD6310M || 492 Mhz || 80 || poclbm -v -w 256 -f 1 || &amp;quot;autotune&amp;quot; speed with ASUS EFI BIOS&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Intel===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Pentium III mobile ? || 1 || 0.3 || 0.014 || 21W || 1.07 GHz || 0.3.1x/Win2K || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source] [http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=27380 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Old Xeon 512k (Dual) || 2x1/2 || 2.0 || ? || ? || 3.06GHz || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || HT disabled, algo=4way (twice as fast as the 2nd best algo)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Pentium 4 2.0A || 1 || 0.85 || || || 2.0 GHz || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft-0.4]/WinXP || -g no -t 2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Pentium Dual-Core E5400 || 2/2 || 2.27 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.7 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Celeron E330 || 2/2 || 2.2  || 0.03 || 65W || 2.5 GHz || 0.3.19/Ubuntu10.04 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core 2 Quad Q9400 || 4/4 || 4.35 || 0.046 || 95W || 2.66 GHz ||  ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i3 530 || 2/4 || 8.31 || 0.10 || 80W || 3.66 GHz || Ufasoft 0.7 || -v -a5 -g no -t 4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i3 M350 || 2/4 || 1.48 || 0.04 || 35W || 2.27 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| Core i5 M450 || 2/4 || 1.8  || 0.05 || 35W || 1.2 GHz || 0.3.17/Win7-54 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| Core i5-650  || 2/4 || 5.1 || 0.04 ? ||  || 3.2 GHz || cpuminer-0.7 || -4way&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i5 ?  || 4/? || 6.5 ||  ||  ||  || client from svn || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37621#msg37621 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 4.5 || 0.05 || 95W || 3.1 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-01-22) || cryptopp_asm32&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 14 || 0.15 || 95W || 3.1 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || sse2_64&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i7 920   || 4/8 || 19.2 || 0.10 || 195 || 4.0 GHz (x21) || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] || -a 5&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i7 950   || 4/8 || 5.88 || 0.039 || 150W || 3.83 GHz (x23) || bitcoin-0.3.20.2 Win7-64 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i7 950   || 4/8 || 18.9 || 0.126 || 150W || 3.83 GHz (x23) || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] v0.4 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i7 980x   || 6/12 || 19.2 || 0.15 || 130 || 4.4 GHz (x33) || cpuminer/Win7-64 || &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| Core i7 980x   || 6/12 || 8.7 ||  ||  || 3.9 GHz (x27) || 0.3.17/Win7-64 || &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| Core i7 620M   || 2/4 || 6.3 || 0.18 || 35 || 2.66 GHz || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] v0.4 || &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core 2 Duo E6550 || 1/2 || 2.45 || ? || ? || 2.33 GHz || cpuminer 0.7.1 (Linux) || --algo=sse2_64&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core 2 Duo E6850 || 2/2 || 6.75 || 0.10 || 65W || 3.0 Ghz || ufasoft-0.3 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 7.76 || 0.11 || 70W || 3.33 GHz (o/c?) || ufasoft-0.3 || miner optimized for Intel Core&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 2.52 || 0.04 || 65W || 2.66 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon 3060 || 1/2 || 2.03 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.4GHz || cpuminer 0.8.1 (Linux) || --algo=cryptopp_asm32&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon Prestonia 2.4 (dual) || 2x1/2 || 2.16 || 0.017 || 130W || 2.4 GHz || ufasoft v0.4 || &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon X5355 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 10.13 || 0.16 || 120W || 2.66GHz || bitcoind || Roughly the same speed as the &amp;quot;c&amp;quot; algo in cpuminer&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon X5355 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 22.76 || 0.09 || 120W || 2.66GHz || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || -O2 -march=core2, algo=sse2_64&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon E5440 || 4/8 || 7.3 || ? || 80W || 2.66 GHz|| Kiv&#039;s poclbm-gui || FIXME: Either wrong model # or wrong threads/speed info&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon E5520 || 4/8 || 6.5 || 0.08 || 80W || 2.27 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon E5530 || 4/8 || 7.14 || 0.09 || 80W || 2.4 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon E5630 (dual) || 2x4/8 || 8 || 0.1 || 80W || 2.53 GHz || 0.3.17/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Atom N270 || 1 || 0.42 || &#039;&#039;&#039;0.17&#039;&#039;&#039; || 2.5W || 1.6 GHz || 0.3.1x/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Other Devices==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Consoles===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Device !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Sony Playstation 3 (FAT) || 6 || 21 || 0.35 || 60W || 3.2 GHz || cellminer || Needs custom firmware (no links to it, potential issues with Sony assholes.) [https://github.com/verement/cellminer source] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4704.20 source] Total power usage of PS3 fat is 120W but only the Cell cpu is active.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Sony Playstation 3 (SLIM) || 6 || 21 || 0.7 || 35W || 3.2 GHz || cellminer || Total power usage of PS3 slim is 70W but only the Cell cpu is active.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===ARM devices===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Cortex A8 || 1 || 0.125 || 0.36 || 0.35 W || 0.6 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || Nokia N900: &#039;cryptopp&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Cortex A8 || 1 || 0.2 || 0.57 || 0.35 W || 0.6 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || Nokia N900: &#039;c&#039; algo&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Tegra 250 (2xCortex-A9) || 2 || 0.57 || 1.14 || 0.5 W || 1.0 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-24) || Toshiba AC100, ubuntu, &#039;c&#039; algo&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mining rig]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Generation Calculator]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Power Calc]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[OpenCL miner]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=745 ATI Stream vs. NVIDIA CUDA - GPGPU computing battle royale]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mining]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mrb</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Mining_hardware_comparison&amp;diff=7793</id>
		<title>Mining hardware comparison</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Mining_hardware_comparison&amp;diff=7793"/>
		<updated>2011-04-28T06:16:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mrb: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Below are some statistics about the mining performance of various hardware used in a [[mining rig]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The table shows (mostly) stock clock numbers. 10-20% performance improvement can be achieved via overclocking.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Graphics cards==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===AMD===&lt;br /&gt;
To get the maximum performance use the 2.1 or 2.2 release of the ATI Stream SDK. 2.3 performance drops by 5-10%.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! W !! Clock !! SP !! SDK  !! Slot !! Miner !! Notes&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3XXX || || || || || || || || OpenCL Not Supported&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 42XX || || || || || || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || || OpenCL Not Supported (intergrated/mobile GPU)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4350 || 6.93 || 0.346 || 20 || 575 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don&#039;t use vectors &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4550 || 7.23 || 0.289 || 25 || 600 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don&#039;t use vectors &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4650 || 31.33 || 0.653 || 48 || 650 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don&#039;t use vectors &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4670 || 36.14 || 0.613 || 59 || 750 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don&#039;t use vectors&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4670 || 40.11 ||       || 59 || 800 || 320 || || AGP x8        || poclbm/Ubuntu 10.10 w/ H == 0 mod [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.msg85236#msg85236 source] || -w 32 -f 0, don&#039;t use vectors&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4730 || 72.29 || 0.657 || 110 || 750 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4770 || 72.29 || 0.904 || 80 || 750 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4830 || 55.42 || 0.583 || 95 || 575 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4850 || 75.30 || 0.685 || 110 || 625 || 800 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4860 || 67.47 || 0.519 || 130 || 700 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4870 || 90.36 || 0.602 || 150 || 750 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || clmine ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4870 || 78    ||       ||     ||     ||     || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || m0mchil&#039;s OpenCL/Vista 64bit || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4890 || 102.41 || 0.539 || 190 || 850 || 800 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4850X2 || 150.60 || 0.602 || 250 || 625 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4870X2 || 180.72 || 0.632 || 286 || 750 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 5450 || 11.99 || 0.631 || 19 || 650 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 5550 || 40.59 || 1.041 || 39 || 550 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5570 || 59.96 || 1.538 || 39 || 650 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5570 || 64 || 1.641 || 39 || 650 || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil&#039;s OpenCL/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 5650 || 48    || 2.5-3.2 ? || 15-19 ? ||  ||  ||  || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil&#039;s OpenCL/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source] [http://www.notebookcheck.net/ATI-Mobility-Radeon-HD-5650.23697.0.html source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 5670 || 71.49 || 1.117 || 64 || 775 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EEFFEE;&amp;quot;| 5670 || 72 || 1.64 || 44 || 850 || || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm-mod (Win7-64) || Sapphire 100287VGAL card is low power&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 5670 || 85 || || || 900 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 5750 || 116.24 || 1.352 || 86 || 700 || 720 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 5770 || 156.83 || 1.452 || 108 || 850 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5770 || 180 || 1.406 || 128[*] || 950 || 800 || 2.4RC1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 30 (*Overclocked wattage calculated [http://bakkap.free.fr/Misc/wCalc.html here] )&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFFFF;&amp;quot;| 5830 || 206.64 || 1.181 || 175 || 800 || 1120 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFFFF;&amp;quot;| 5830 || 241    || 1.377 || 175 || 1006 || || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-03-11 / Win7 64 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 240.77 || 1.595 || 151 || 725 || 1440 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 252    || 1.669 || 151 || 765 || || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-01-25 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 255.3  || 1.690 || 151 || 765 || || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-01-25 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 300    || 1.987 || 151 || 925 (OC) ||      || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil&#039;s OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 250.26 || 1.657 || 151 ||     ||      ||  || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || opencl client || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 313.65 || 1.668 || 188 || 850 || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 313    || 1.665 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo/Linux ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 343    || 1.824 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo/Linux ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 355    || 1.888 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/Linux ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 340    || 1.809 || 188 || 850 || 1600 ||  || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil&#039;s OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 360    ||  ||  || 970 || 700 ||  || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || m0mchil&#039;s OpenCL w7-64 || -f 0 -v -w 128 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=6144.msg91959#msg91959 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 385    ||  ||  || 980 || 1600 ||  || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm-mod/Win7-64 || -f 0 -v -w 128&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 530 || 1.803 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.4.595.10 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/201103.beta3/Windows || -v -w128 -f60&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 535.06 || 1.820 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 560    || 1.905 || 294 || 725 || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 565    || 1.922 || 294 || || || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine2 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 604    || 2.054 || 294 || || || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 645    ||       ||     || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || -f1, Debian 6, fglrx-driver 10.9.3&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 730    ||       ||     || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix/v1.2 || AGGRESSION=8 VECTORS BFI_INT&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6310M || 9.821 || 0.545 || 18  || 500 || 80 || 2.4 || Integrated/APU || poclbm-gui -v -w128 || HP DM1z 18W TDP is shared with the CPU&lt;br /&gt;
|-  &lt;br /&gt;
| 6490M || 16.289 || 0.708 || 23  ||  ||  ||  || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm-mod (Mac OS X 10.6.7) || MacBook Pro early 2011&lt;br /&gt;
|-  &lt;br /&gt;
| 6850 || 171.59 || 1.351 || 127 || 775 || 960 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6850 || 196 || || || 850 || 960 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 0&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6850 || 214.8 || || || 940 || 960 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm -v -w 128&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 6850 || 220 || 1.236 || 178[*] || 1000 || 960 || 2.4RC1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 30 (*Overclocked wattage calculated [http://bakkap.free.fr/Misc/wCalc.html here] )&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6870 || 232.47 || 1.540 || 151 || 900 || 1120 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm -v -w 128 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6870 || 249.47 ||  ||  || 940 || 1120 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6870 || 260.1 || 1.611 || 175 || 1001 || 1150 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm-gui windows7x86 cat 11.3 || -v -w 128 -f 1 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6870 || 282.23 || 1.611 || 175 || 1047 || 1120 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm windows cat 11.2 || -v -w 128 -f 0 mem clock 300&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6950 || 295 ||  || 160 (?) || 810 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6950 || 325 ||  || 200 (?) || 885 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6950 || 360 ||  || 200 (?) || 970 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6970 || 323 || 1.468 || 220 || 880 || 1536 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -w 64, SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6990 || 708 || 1.97 || 346 || 830 || 3072 || 2.3 ||  PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb&#039;s hdminer || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]. SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6990 || 746 || 1.82 || 410 || 880 || 3072 || 2.3 ||  PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb&#039;s hdminer || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]. SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6990 || 771 || (?) || (?) || 880 || 3072 || 2.3 ||  PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb&#039;s hdminer || SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx. Memory clock @ 1280Mhz.&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6990 || 772 || ||  || 900 || 3072 || 2.3 ||  PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix || Overclock switch ON + overclocked to 900 mhz, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|FirePro V8700 || 84.8 ||  ||  || 750 || 800 ||  || || poclbm-mod.03.24.2011 || &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|FirePro M5800 || 61.4 ||  ||  || 650 ||     ||  || || poclbm-mod.03.24.2011 || Ubuntu || &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Nvidia===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! W !! Clock !! SP !! Comment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8200 mGPU || 1.2 || || || 1200 || 16 || 128 MB shared memory, &amp;quot;poclbm -w 128 -f 0&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8600M GT || 4.93 ||  ||  ||  || 32 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8600GT || 5.66 ||  ||  || 1188 ||  32 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8600GT OC || 7.3 ||  ||  || 1602 || 32 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.0 poclbm] -w 128 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg72833#msg72833 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8800GT || 25   || 0.24 || 105 || 1300 ||  ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8800GT || 24.5 || 0.23 || 105 || 1300 ||  || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8800GTS || 16.8 || 0.109 || 154 ||  ||  || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source] [http://www.techspot.com/review/79-geforce-8800-gts-512/page11.html source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8800 GTS || 18.7 || 0.124 || 150 || 1200 ||  || poclbm -w 64 no vectors&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9300GE || 1.57 ||  ||  || 1300 ||  8 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9300GS || 1.69 ||  ||  || 1400 ||  8 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9400GT || 3.37 || 0.067 || 50 || 1400 || 16 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9400M (MacBook) || 1.90 || 0.32 || 6 || 700 ||  || poclbm -f 8 no vectors&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9500GT || 6.75 || 0.135 || 50 || 1400 || 32 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9600GSO || 19.88 || 0.237 || 84 || 1375 || 96 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9600GSO512 || 11.75 || 0.131 || 90 || 1625 || 48 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9600GT || 15.66 || 0.165 || 95 || 1625 || 64 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9600GT OC || 18.8 || &amp;lt;0.198 || &amp;gt;95 || 1981 || 64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.0 poclbm] -w 128 -f 10 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg74610#msg74610 source] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg73353#msg73353 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9800GT || 30.36 || 0.289 || 105 || 1800 || 112 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9800GTX || 32.54 || 0.232 || 140 || 1688 || 128 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9800GTX+ || 35.39 || 0.251 || 141 || 1836 || 128 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background-color:#FFEFEF&amp;quot;| 9800GX2 || 57.83 || 0.294 || 197 ||  || 2x128 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background-color:#FFEFEF&amp;quot;| 9800GX2 || 28 || 0.142 || 197 ||  || 2x128 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| G210 || 3.38 || 0.111 || 30.5 || 1402 || 16 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GT220 || 9.83 || 0.170 || 58 || 1360 || 48 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GT240 || 19.37 || 0.281 || 69 || 1340 || 96 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GT240 || 21.24 ||  ||  ||  || 96 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4291.0 poclbm-mod] -f 0 -v [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg73383#msg73383 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTS250 || 35.39 || 0.244 || 145 || 1836 || 128 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX260 || 35.91 || 0.178 || 202 || 1242 || 192 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX260 || 44 || 0.242 || 182 || 1242 || 216 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX260c216 || 40.40 || 0.236 || 171 || 1242 || 216 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX260c216 OC || 52.0 || || || 1461 || 216 || &amp;quot;poclbm -w 256 -f 1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX275 || 50.75 || 0.232 || 219 || 1404 || 240 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX275 || 58 || || || 729/1458 || 240 || poclbm -f 0 -w 256&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX280 || 46.84 || 0.198 || 236 || 1296 || 240 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX285 || 53.35 || 0.262 || 204 || 1476 || 240 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX295 || 89.78 || 0.311 || 289 || 1242 || 480 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GT 320M (MacBook Air) || 6.12 ||  ||  || 1212 || 48 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GT 330M (Sony Vaio Z) || 7.8 || 0.71 ( 0.3 total) || 11 (26w total) || 1045 || 48 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GT430 || 20.24 || 0.413 || 49 || 1400 || 96 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTS450 || 45.28 || 0.427 || 106 || 1566 || 192 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX460SE || 56.39 || 0.376 || 150 || 1300 || 288 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX460 || 68.31 || 0.427 || 160 || 1350 || 336 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX460 (2 cards) || 102 || 0.319? || 320? || 1350 ||  || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX460 (2 cards) OC || 127 || 0.374 || 340 || 1620 || 2x 336 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2444.0 rpcminer-cuda] -gpugrid=128 -gputhreads=128 ver.20110227&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX465 || 64.41 || 0.322 || 200 || 1215 || 352 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX470 || 81.98 || 0.381 || 215 || 1215 || 448 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX470 || 94.7 || || || 1414 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX480 || 101.28 || 0.405 || 250 || 1401 || 480 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX560 Ti || 67.7 || 0.39  || 170 || 1700 || 384 || standard EVGA 560, no overclock&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX560 OC || 86.7 || &amp;lt;0.51 || &amp;gt;170 || 1800 || 384 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2444.0 rpcminer-cuda] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg72816#msg72816 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX570 || 105.83 || 0.483 || 219 || 1464 || 480 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX580 || 140.05 || --- || 244 || 1544 || 512 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Quadro FX 580 || 5.7 || 0.14 || 40 || 1125 || 4 ||rpcminer-cuda, Win, -gpugrid=128 -gputhreads=512&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Quadro FX 1600M || 6 || 0.12 || 50 || 625 || 32 ||rpcminer-cuda, Win&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Quadro NVS 135M || 1.05 || 0.1 || 10 || 800 || 1 || &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Quadro NVS 3100M || 3.6 || 0.257 || 14 || 600 || 16 || rpcminer-cuda, Win, CUDA 3.1.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Tesla M2050 || 79.8 || ||  || ||  || DiabloMiner&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==CPUs==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A lot of nice data can be pulled from [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.0 this thread] to seed this section. Also from [https://www.bitcoin.org/wiki/doku.php?id=bitcoin_miners this page on the old wiki].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===AMD===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Model !! nprocs !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2x Opteron 6128 || 16 || 32.4 || 0.203 || 160W || 2 GHz || 0.3.19 || -4way&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon 64 3500+ || 1 || 1.18 || 0.018 || 65 W || 2.54 GHz || ufasoft v0.4 || overclocked (originally 2.2 GHz)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon X2 3800+ || 2 || 1.73 || 0.03 || 65 W || 2.00 GHz || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || -algo=4way&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon X2 4000+ || 2 || 1.9 || 0.02 || 65W || 2.1 GHz || rpc-miner || &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon X2 4400+ ||   || 2.09 || 0.032 || 65W || 2.3GHz || 0.3.19/Win x64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon X2 6000+ || 2 || 2.81 || 0.02 || 125W || 3 GHz || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg22881#msg22881 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon X2 6400+ Black Edition || 2 || 2.9 || 0.023 || 125W || 3.2 GHz || 0.3.20.2 BETA/Win 7 x64 || -4way&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon XP 2000+ || 2 || 0.62 || 0.009 || 70W || 1.67 GHz || 0.3.18/Ubuntu || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source] [http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm?articleid=914&amp;amp;page=4 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon II X2 240e || 2 || 2.71 || 0.06 || 45W || 2.81 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon II X4 630 || 4 || 10.7 || 0.11 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || bitcoin-miner 0.4 || &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Phenom II X6 1055T || 6 || 15.84 || 0.13 || 125W || 2.82 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Phenom II X6 1100T || 6 || 22 || 0.176 || 125W || 3.82 GHz || bitcoin-miner || Aciid#bitcoin-dev&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 3.8 || 0.04 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 0.3.1x/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 7.2 || 0.08 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || cpu-miner 0.2.1/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Phenom II x4 955 || 4 || 11 || 0.09 || 125W || 3.2 GHz || rpcminer-4way ||&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===AMD APU===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Model !! Nprocs !! CPU Clock !! Gpu !! GPU Clock !! SP !! Mhash/s CPU !! Mhash/s GPU !! TDP [W] !! Mhash/W [CPU+GPU] !! Miner/s !! Notes&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Zacate E-350 || 2 || 1.6 Ghz || HD6310M || 500 Mhz || 80 || 1.231 || 9.831 || 18W || 0.614 || poclbm -v -w128 + Ufasoft 0.7 || stock speeds&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Zacate E-350 || 2 || 1.648 Ghz || HD6310M || 492 Mhz || 80 || 1.252 || 10.87 || N/A || N/A || poclbm -v -w 256 -f 1 || &amp;quot;autotune&amp;quot; speed with ASUS EFI BIOS&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===ARM===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Cortex A8 || 1 || 0.125 || 0.36 || 0.35 W || 0.6 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || Nokia N900: &#039;cryptopp&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Cortex A8 || 1 || 0.2 || 0.57 || 0.35 W || 0.6 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || Nokia N900: &#039;c&#039; algo&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Tegra 250 (2xCortex-A9) || 2 || 0.57 || 1.14 || 0.5 W || 1.0 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-24) || Toshiba AC100, ubuntu, &#039;c&#039; algo&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Intel===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Pentium III mobile ? || 1 || 0.3 || 0.014 || 21W || 1.07 GHz || 0.3.1x/Win2K || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source] [http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=27380 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Old Xeon 512k (Dual) || 2x1/2 || 2.0 || ? || ? || 3.06GHz || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || HT disabled, algo=4way (twice as fast as the 2nd best algo)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Pentium 4 2.0A || 1 || 0.85 || || || 2.0 GHz || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft-0.4]/WinXP || -g no -t 2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Pentium Dual-Core E5400 || 2/2 || 2.27 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.7 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Celeron E330 || 2/2 || 2.2  || 0.03 || 65W || 2.5 GHz || 0.3.19/Ubuntu10.04 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i3 530 || 2/4 || 8.31 || 0.10 || 80W || 3.66 GHz || Ufasoft 0.7 || -v -a5 -g no -t 4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i3 M350 || 2/4 || 1.48 || 0.04 || 35W || 2.27 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| Core i5 M450 || 2/4 || 1.8  || 0.05 || 35W || 1.2 GHz || 0.3.17/Win7-54 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| Core i5-650  || 2/4 || 5.1 || 0.04 ? ||  || 3.2 GHz || cpuminer-0.7 || -4way&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i5 ?  || 4/? || 6.5 ||  ||  ||  || client from svn || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37621#msg37621 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 4.5 || 0.05 || 95W || 3.1 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-01-22) || cryptopp_asm32&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 14 || 0.15 || 95W || 3.1 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || sse2_64&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i7 920   || 4/8 || 19.2 || 0.10 || 195 || 4.0 GHz (x21) || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] || -a 5&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i7 950   || 4/8 || 5.88 || 0.039 || 150W || 3.83 GHz (x23) || bitcoin-0.3.20.2 Win7-64 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i7 950   || 4/8 || 18.9 || 0.126 || 150W || 3.83 GHz (x23) || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] v0.4 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i7 980x   || 6/12 || 19.2 || 0.15 || 130 || 4.4 GHz (x33) || cpuminer/Win7-64 || &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| Core i7 980x   || 6/12 || 8.7 ||  ||  || 3.9 GHz (x27) || 0.3.17/Win7-64 || &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| Core i7 620M   || 2/4 || 6.3 || 0.18 || 35 || 2.66 GHz || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] v0.4 || &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core 2 Duo E6550 || 1/2 || 2.45 || ? || ? || 2.33 GHz || cpuminer 0.7.1 (Linux) || --algo=sse2_64&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core 2 Duo E6850 || 2/2 || 6.75 || 0.10 || 65W || 3.0 Ghz || ufasoft-0.3 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 7.76 || 0.11 || 70W || 3.33 GHz (o/c?) || ufasoft-0.3 || miner optimized for Intel Core&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 2.52 || 0.04 || 65W || 2.66 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon 3060 || 1/2 || 2.03 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.4GHz || cpuminer 0.8.1 (Linux) || --algo=cryptopp_asm32&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon Prestonia 2.4 (dual) || 2x1/2 || 2.16 || 0.017 || 130W || 2.4 GHz || ufasoft v0.4 || &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon X5355 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 10.13 || 0.16 || 120W || 2.66GHz || bitcoind || Roughly the same speed as the &amp;quot;c&amp;quot; algo in cpuminer&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon X5355 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 22.76 || 0.09 || 120W || 2.66GHz || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || -O2 -march=core2, algo=sse2_64&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon E5440 || 4/8 || 7.3 || ? || 80W || 2.66 GHz|| Kiv&#039;s poclbm-gui || FIXME: Either wrong model # or wrong threads/speed info&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon E5520 || 4/8 || 6.5 || 0.08 || 80W || 2.27 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon E5530 || 4/8 || 7.14 || 0.09 || 80W || 2.4 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon E5630 (dual) || 2x4/8 || 8 || 0.1 || 80W || 2.53 GHz || 0.3.17/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Atom N270 || 1 || 0.42 || &#039;&#039;&#039;0.17&#039;&#039;&#039; || 2.5W || 1.6 GHz || 0.3.1x/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mining rig]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Generation Calculator]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Power Calc]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[OpenCL miner]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=745 ATI Stream vs. NVIDIA CUDA - GPGPU computing battle royale]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mining]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mrb</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Mining_hardware_comparison&amp;diff=7102</id>
		<title>Mining hardware comparison</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Mining_hardware_comparison&amp;diff=7102"/>
		<updated>2011-04-10T22:15:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mrb: /* AMD */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Below are some statistics about the mining performance of various hardware used in a [[mining rig]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The table shows (mostly) stock clock numbers. 10-20% performance improvement can be achieved via overclocking.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Graphics cards==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===AMD===&lt;br /&gt;
To get the maximum performance use the 2.1 or 2.2 release of the ATI Stream SDK. 2.3 performance drops by 5-10%.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! W !! Clock !! SP !! SDK  !! Slot !! Miner !! Notes&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3XXX || || || || || || || || OpenCL Not Supported&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 42XX || || || || || || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || || OpenCL Not Supported (intergrated/mobile GPU)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4350 || 6.93 || 0.346 || 20 || 575 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don&#039;t use vectors &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4550 || 7.23 || 0.289 || 25 || 600 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don&#039;t use vectors &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4650 || 31.33 || 0.653 || 48 || 650 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don&#039;t use vectors &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4670 || 36.14 || 0.613 || 59 || 750 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don&#039;t use vectors &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4730 || 72.29 || 0.657 || 110 || 750 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4770 || 72.29 || 0.904 || 80 || 750 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4830 || 55.42 || 0.583 || 95 || 575 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4850 || 75.30 || 0.685 || 110 || 625 || 800 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4860 || 67.47 || 0.519 || 130 || 700 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4870 || 90.36 || 0.602 || 150 || 750 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || clmine ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4870 || 78    ||       ||     ||     ||     || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || m0mchil&#039;s OpenCL/Vista 64bit || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4890 || 102.41 || 0.539 || 190 || 850 || 800 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4850X2 || 150.60 || 0.602 || 250 || 625 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4870X2 || 180.72 || 0.632 || 286 || 750 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 5450 || 11.99 || 0.631 || 19 || 650 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 5550 || 40.59 || 1.041 || 39 || 550 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5570 || 59.96 || 1.538 || 39 || 650 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5570 || 64 || 1.641 || 39 || 650 || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil&#039;s OpenCL/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 5650 || 48    || 2.5-3.2 ? || 15-19 ? ||  ||  ||  || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil&#039;s OpenCL/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source] [http://www.notebookcheck.net/ATI-Mobility-Radeon-HD-5650.23697.0.html source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 5670 || 71.49 || 1.117 || 64 || 775 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EEFFEE;&amp;quot;| 5670 || 72 || 1.64 || 44 || 850 || || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm-mod (Win7-64) || Sapphire 100287VGAL card is low power&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 5670 || 85 || || || 900 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 5750 || 116.24 || 1.352 || 86 || 700 || 720 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 5770 || 156.83 || 1.452 || 108 || 850 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFFFF;&amp;quot;| 5830 || 206.64 || 1.181 || 175 || 800 || 1120 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFFFF;&amp;quot;| 5830 || 241    || 1.377 || 175 || 1006 || || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-03-11 / Win7 64 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 240.77 || 1.595 || 151 || 725 || 1440 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 252    || 1.669 || 151 || 765 || || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-01-25 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 255.3  || 1.690 || 151 || 765 || || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-01-25 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 300    || 1.987 || 151 || 925 (OC) ||      || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil&#039;s OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 250.26 || 1.657 || 151 ||     ||      ||  || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || opencl client || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 313.65 || 1.668 || 188 || 850 || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 313    || 1.665 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo/Linux ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 343    || 1.824 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo/Linux ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 355    || 1.888 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/Linux ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 340    || 1.809 || 188 || 850 || 1600 ||  || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil&#039;s OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 530 || 1.803 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.4.595.10 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/201103.beta3/Windows || -v -w128 -f60&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 535.06 || 1.820 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 560    || 1.905 || 294 || 725 || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 565    || 1.922 || 294 || || || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine2 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 604    || 2.054 || 294 || || || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 645    ||       ||     || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || -f1, Debian 6, fglrx-driver 10.9.3&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6490M || 16.289 || 0,708 || 23  ||  ||  ||  || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm-mod (Mac OS X 10.6.7) || MacBook Pro early 2011&lt;br /&gt;
|-  &lt;br /&gt;
| 6850 || 171.59 || 1.351 || 127 || 775 || 960 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6850 || 196 || || || 850 || 960 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 0&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6870 || 232.47 || 1.540 || 151 || 900 || 1120 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6870 || 260.1 || 1.611 || 175 || 1001 || 1150 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm-gui windows7x86 cat 11.3 || -v -w 128 -f 1 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6870 || 282.23 || 1.611 || 175 || 1047 || 1120 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm windows cat 11.2 || -v -w 128 -f 0 mem clock 300&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6950 || 295 ||  || 160 (?) || 810 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6950 || 325 ||  || 200 (?) || 885 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6950 || 360 ||  || 200 (?) || 970 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6970 || 323 || 1.468 || 220 || 880 || 1536 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -w 64, SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6990 || 683 || 1.97 || 346 || 830 || 3072 || 2.3 ||  PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb&#039;s hdminer || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=5444.msg83507#msg83507 source]. SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6990 || 746 || 1.82 || 410 || 880 || 3072 || 2.3 ||  PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb&#039;s hdminer || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=5444.msg83507#msg83507 source]. SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|FirePro V8700 || 84.8 ||  ||  || 750 || 800 ||  || || poclbm-mod.03.24.2011 || &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|FirePro M5800 || 61.4 ||  ||  || 650 ||     ||  || || poclbm-mod.03.24.2011 || Ubuntu || &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Nvidia===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! W !! Clock !! SP !! Comment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8200 mGPU || 1.2 || || || 1200 || 16 || 128 MB shared memory, &amp;quot;poclbm -w 128 -f 0&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8600M GT || 4.93 ||  ||  ||  || 32 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8600GT || 5.66 ||  ||  || 1188 ||  32 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8600GT OC || 7.3 ||  ||  || 1602 || 32 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.0 poclbm] -w 128 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg72833#msg72833 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8800GT || 25   || 0.24 || 105 || 1300 ||  ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8800GT || 24.5 || 0.23 || 105 || 1300 ||  || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8800GTS || 16.8 || 0.109 || 154 ||  ||  || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source] [http://www.techspot.com/review/79-geforce-8800-gts-512/page11.html source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8800 GTS || 18.7 || 0.124 || 150 || 1200 ||  || poclbm -w 64 no vectors&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9300GE || 1.57 ||  ||  || 1300 ||  8 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9300GS || 1.69 ||  ||  || 1400 ||  8 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9400GT || 3.37 || 0.067 || 50 || 1400 || 16 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9400M (MacBook) || 1.90 || 0.32 || 6 || 700 ||  || poclbm -f 8 no vectors&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9500GT || 6.75 || 0.135 || 50 || 1400 || 32 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9600GSO || 19.88 || 0.237 || 84 || 1375 || 96 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9600GSO512 || 11.75 || 0.131 || 90 || 1625 || 48 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9600GT || 15.66 || 0.165 || 95 || 1625 || 64 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9600GT OC || 18.8 || &amp;lt;0.198 || &amp;gt;95 || 1981 || 64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.0 poclbm] -w 128 -f 10 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg74610#msg74610 source] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg73353#msg73353 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9800GT || 30.36 || 0.289 || 105 || 1800 || 112 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9800GTX || 32.54 || 0.232 || 140 || 1688 || 128 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9800GTX+ || 35.39 || 0.251 || 141 || 1836 || 128 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background-color:#FFEFEF&amp;quot;| 9800GX2 || 57.83 || 0.294 || 197 ||  || 2x128 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background-color:#FFEFEF&amp;quot;| 9800GX2 || 28 || 0.142 || 197 ||  || 2x128 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| G210 || 3.38 || 0.111 || 30.5 || 1402 || 16 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GT220 || 9.83 || 0.170 || 58 || 1360 || 48 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GT240 || 19.37 || 0.281 || 69 || 1340 || 96 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GT240 || 21.24 ||  ||  ||  || 96 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4291.0 poclbm-mod] -f 0 -v [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg73383#msg73383 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTS250 || 35.39 || 0.244 || 145 || 1836 || 128 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX260 || 35.91 || 0.178 || 202 || 1242 || 192 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX260 || 44 || 0.242 || 182 || 1242 || 216 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX260c216 || 40.40 || 0.236 || 171 || 1242 || 216 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX260c216 OC || 52.0 || || || 1461 || 216 || &amp;quot;poclbm -w 256 -f 1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX275 || 50.75 || 0.232 || 219 || 1404 || 240 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX275 || 58 || || || 729/1458 || 240 || poclbm -f 0 -w 256&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX280 || 46.84 || 0.198 || 236 || 1296 || 240 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX285 || 53.35 || 0.262 || 204 || 1476 || 240 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX295 || 89.78 || 0.311 || 289 || 1242 || 480 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GT 320M (MacBook Air) || 6.12 ||  ||  || 1212 || 48 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GT 330M (Sony Vaio Z) || 7.8 || 0.71 ( 0.3 total) || 11 (26w total) || 1045 || 48 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GT430 || 20.24 || 0.413 || 49 || 1400 || 96 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTS450 || 45.28 || 0.427 || 106 || 1566 || 192 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX460SE || 56.39 || 0.376 || 150 || 1300 || 288 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX460 || 68.31 || 0.427 || 160 || 1350 || 336 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX460 (2 cards) || 102 || 0.319? || 320? || 1350 ||  || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX460 (2 cards) OC || 127 || 0.374 || 340 || 1620 || 2x 336 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2444.0 rpcminer-cuda] -gpugrid=128 -gputhreads=128 ver.20110227&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX465 || 64.41 || 0.322 || 200 || 1215 || 352 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX470 || 81.98 || 0.381 || 215 || 1215 || 448 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX470 || 94.7 || || || 1414 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX480 || 101.28 || 0.405 || 250 || 1401 || 480 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX560 Ti || 67.7 || 0.39  || 170 || 1700 || 384 || standard EVGA 560, no overclock&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX560 OC || 86.7 || &amp;lt;0.51 || &amp;gt;170 || 1800 || 384 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2444.0 rpcminer-cuda] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg72816#msg72816 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX570 || 105.83 || 0.483 || 219 || 1464 || 480 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX580 || 119.06 || 0.488 || 244 || 1544 || 512 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Quadro FX 580 || 5.7 || 0.14 || 40 || 1125 || 4 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Quadro FX 1600M || 6 || 0.12 || 50 || 625 || 32 ||rpcminer-cuda, Win&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Quadro NVS 135M || 1.05 || 0.1 || 10 || 800 || 1 || &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Quadro NVS 3100M || 3.6 || 0.257 || 14 || 600 || 16 || rpcminer-cuda, Win, CUDA 3.1.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==CPUs==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A lot of nice data can be pulled from [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.0 this thread] to seed this section. Also from [https://www.bitcoin.org/wiki/doku.php?id=bitcoin_miners this page on the old wiki].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===AMD===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Model !! nprocs !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2x Opteron 6128 || 16 || 32.4 || 0.203 || 160W || 2 GHz || 0.3.19 || -4way&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon 64 3500+ || 1 || 1.18 || 0.018 || 65 W || 2.54 GHz || ufasoft v0.4 || overclocked (originally 2.2 GHz)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon X2 3800+ || 2 || 1.73 || 0.03 || 65 W || 2.00 GHz || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || -algo=4way&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon X2 4000+ || 2 || 1.9 || 0.02 || 65W || 2.1 GHz || rpc-miner || &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon X2 4400+ ||   || 2.09 || 0.32 || 65W || 2.3GHz || 0.3.19/Win x64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon X2 6000+ || 2 || 2.81 || 0.02 || 125W || 3 GHz || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg22881#msg22881 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon X2 6400+ Black Edition || 2 || 2.9 || 0.023 || 125W || 3.2 GHz || 0.3.20.2 BETA/Win 7 x64 || -4way&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon XP 2000+ || 2 || 0.62 || 0.009 || 70W || 1.67 GHz || 0.3.18/Ubuntu || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source] [http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm?articleid=914&amp;amp;page=4 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon II X2 240e || 2 || 2.71 || 0.06 || 45W || 2.81 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon II X4 630 || 4 || 10.7 || 0.11 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || bitcoin-miner 0.4 || &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Phenom II X6 1055T || 6 || 15.84 || 0.13 || 125W || 2.82 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Phenom II X6 1100T || 6 || 22 || 0.176 || 125W || 3.82 GHz || bitcoin-miner || Aciid#bitcoin-dev&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 3.8 || 0.04 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 0.3.1x/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 7.2 || 0.08 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || cpu-miner 0.2.1/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Phenom II x4 955 || 4 || 11 || 0.09 || 125W || 3.2 GHz || rpcminer-4way ||&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===ARM===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Cortex A8 || 1 || 0.125 || 0.36 || 0.35 W || 0.6 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || Nokia N900: &#039;cryptopp&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Cortex A8 || 1 || 0.2 || 0.57 || 0.35 W || 0.6 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || Nokia N900: &#039;c&#039; algo&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Tegra 250 (2xCortex-A9) || 2 || 0.35 || 0.70 || 0.5 W || 1.0 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-24) || Toshiba AC100, ubuntu, &#039;c&#039; algo&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Intel===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Pentium III mobile ? || 1 || 0.3 || 0.014 || 21W || 1.07 GHz || 0.3.1x/Win2K || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source] [http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=27380 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Old Xeon 512k (Dual) || 2x1/2 || 2.0 || ? || ? || 3.06GHz || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || HT disabled, algo=4way (twice as fast as the 2nd best algo)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Pentium 4 2.0A || 1 || 0.85 || || || 2.0 GHz || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft-0.4]/WinXP || -g no -t 2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Pentium Dual-Core E5400 || 2/2 || 2.27 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.7 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Celeron E330 || 2/2 || 2.2  || 0.03 || 65W || 2.5 GHz || 0.3.19/Ubuntu10.04 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i3 M350 || 2/4 || 1.48 || 0.04 || 35W || 2.27 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| Core i5 M450 || 2/4 || 1.8  || 0.05 || 35W || 1.2 GHz || 0.3.17/Win7-54 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| Core i5-650  || 2/4 || 5.1 || 0.04 ? ||  || 3.2 GHz || cpuminer-0.7 || -4way&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i5 ?  || 4/? || 6.5 ||  ||  ||  || client from svn || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37621#msg37621 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 4.5 || 0.05 || 95W || 3.1 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-01-22) || cryptopp_asm32&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 14 || 0.15 || 95W || 3.1 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || sse2_64&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i7 920   || 4/8 || 19.2 || 0.10 || 195 || 4.0 GHz (x21) || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] || -a 5&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i7 950   || 4/8 || 5.88 || 0.039 || 150W || 3.83 GHz (x23) || bitcoin-0.3.20.2 Win7-64 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i7 950   || 4/8 || 18.9 || 0.126 || 150W || 3.83 GHz (x23) || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] v0.4 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i7 980x   || 6/12 || 19.2 || 0.15 || 130 || 4.4 GHz (x33) || cpuminer/Win7-64 || &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| Core i7 980x   || 6/12 || 8.7 ||  ||  || 3.9 GHz (x27) || 0.3.17/Win7-64 || &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| Core i7 620M   || 2/4 || 6.3 || 0.18 || 35 || 2.66 GHz || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] v0.4 || &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core 2 Duo E6550 || 1/2 || 2.45 || ? || ? || 2.33 GHz || cpuminer 0.7.1 (Linux) || --algo=sse2_64&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core 2 Duo E6850 || 2/2 || 6.75 || 0.10 || 65W || 3.0 Ghz || ufasoft-0.3 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 7.76 || 0.11 || 70W || 3.33 GHz (o/c?) || ufasoft-0.3 || miner optimized for Intel Core&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 2.52 || 0.04 || 65W || 2.66 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon 3060 || 1/2 || 2.03 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.4GHz || cpuminer 0.8.1 (Linux) || --algo=cryptopp_asm32&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon Prestonia 2.4 (dual) || 2x1/2 || 2.16 || 0.017 || 130W || 2.4 GHz || ufasoft v0.4 || &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon X5355 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 10.13 || 0.16 || 120W || 2.66GHz || bitcoind || Roughly the same speed as the &amp;quot;c&amp;quot; algo in cpuminer&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon X5355 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 22.76 || 0.09 || 120W || 2.66GHz || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || -O2 -march=core2, algo=sse2_64&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon E5440 || 4/8 || 7.3 || ? || 80W || 2.66 GHz|| Kiv&#039;s poclbm-gui || FIXME: Either wrong model # or wrong threads/speed info&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon E5520 || 4/8 || 6.5 || 0.08 || 80W || 2.27 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon E5530 || 4/8 || 7.14 || 0.09 || 80W || 2.4 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon E5630 (dual) || 2x4/8 || 8 || 0.1 || 80W || 2.53 GHz || 0.3.17/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Atom N270 || 1 || 0.42 || &#039;&#039;&#039;0.17&#039;&#039;&#039; || 2.5W || 1.6 GHz || 0.3.1x/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mining rig]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[OpenCL miner]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=745 ATI Stream vs. NVIDIA CUDA - GPGPU computing battle royale]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mining]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mrb</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Mining_hardware_comparison&amp;diff=7101</id>
		<title>Mining hardware comparison</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Mining_hardware_comparison&amp;diff=7101"/>
		<updated>2011-04-10T22:14:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mrb: /* AMD */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Below are some statistics about the mining performance of various hardware used in a [[mining rig]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The table shows (mostly) stock clock numbers. 10-20% performance improvement can be achieved via overclocking.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Graphics cards==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===AMD===&lt;br /&gt;
To get the maximum performance use the 2.1 or 2.2 release of the ATI Stream SDK. 2.3 performance drops by 5-10%.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! W !! Clock !! SP !! SDK  !! Slot !! Miner !! Notes&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3XXX || || || || || || || || OpenCL Not Supported&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 42XX || || || || || || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || || OpenCL Not Supported (intergrated/mobile GPU)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4350 || 6.93 || 0.346 || 20 || 575 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don&#039;t use vectors &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4550 || 7.23 || 0.289 || 25 || 600 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don&#039;t use vectors &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4650 || 31.33 || 0.653 || 48 || 650 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don&#039;t use vectors &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4670 || 36.14 || 0.613 || 59 || 750 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don&#039;t use vectors &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4730 || 72.29 || 0.657 || 110 || 750 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4770 || 72.29 || 0.904 || 80 || 750 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4830 || 55.42 || 0.583 || 95 || 575 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4850 || 75.30 || 0.685 || 110 || 625 || 800 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4860 || 67.47 || 0.519 || 130 || 700 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4870 || 90.36 || 0.602 || 150 || 750 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || clmine ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4870 || 78    ||       ||     ||     ||     || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || m0mchil&#039;s OpenCL/Vista 64bit || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4890 || 102.41 || 0.539 || 190 || 850 || 800 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4850X2 || 150.60 || 0.602 || 250 || 625 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4870X2 || 180.72 || 0.632 || 286 || 750 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 5450 || 11.99 || 0.631 || 19 || 650 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 5550 || 40.59 || 1.041 || 39 || 550 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5570 || 59.96 || 1.538 || 39 || 650 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5570 || 64 || 1.641 || 39 || 650 || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil&#039;s OpenCL/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 5650 || 48    || 2.5-3.2 ? || 15-19 ? ||  ||  ||  || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil&#039;s OpenCL/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source] [http://www.notebookcheck.net/ATI-Mobility-Radeon-HD-5650.23697.0.html source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 5670 || 71.49 || 1.117 || 64 || 775 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EEFFEE;&amp;quot;| 5670 || 72 || 1.64 || 44 || 850 || || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm-mod (Win7-64) || Sapphire 100287VGAL card is low power&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 5670 || 85 || || || 900 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 5750 || 116.24 || 1.352 || 86 || 700 || 720 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 5770 || 156.83 || 1.452 || 108 || 850 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFFFF;&amp;quot;| 5830 || 206.64 || 1.181 || 175 || 800 || 1120 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFFFF;&amp;quot;| 5830 || 241    || 1.377 || 175 || 1006 || || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-03-11 / Win7 64 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 240.77 || 1.595 || 151 || 725 || 1440 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 252    || 1.669 || 151 || 765 || || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-01-25 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 255.3  || 1.690 || 151 || 765 || || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-01-25 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 300    || 1.987 || 151 || 925 (OC) ||      || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil&#039;s OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 250.26 || 1.657 || 151 ||     ||      ||  || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || opencl client || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 313.65 || 1.668 || 188 || 850 || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 313    || 1.665 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo/Linux ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 343    || 1.824 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo/Linux ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 355    || 1.888 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/Linux ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 340    || 1.809 || 188 || 850 || 1600 ||  || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil&#039;s OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 530 || 1.803 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.4.595.10 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/201103.beta3/Windows || -v -w128 -f60&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 535.06 || 1.820 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 560    || 1.905 || 294 || 725 || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 565    || 1.922 || 294 || || || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine2 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 604    || 2.054 || 294 || || || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 645    ||       ||     || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || -f1, Debian 6, fglrx-driver 10.9.3&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6490M || 16.289 || 0,708 || 23  ||  ||  ||  || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm-mod (Mac OS X 10.6.7) || MacBook Pro early 2011&lt;br /&gt;
|-  &lt;br /&gt;
| 6850 || 171.59 || 1.351 || 127 || 775 || 960 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6850 || 196 || || || 850 || 960 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 0&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6870 || 232.47 || 1.540 || 151 || 900 || 1120 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6870 || 260.1 || 1.611 || 175 || 1001 || 1150 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm-gui windows7x86 cat 11.3 || -v -w 128 -f 1 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6870 || 282.23 || 1.611 || 175 || 1047 || 1120 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm windows cat 11.2 || -v -w 128 -f 0 mem clock 300&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6950 || 295 ||  || 160 (?) || 810 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6950 || 325 ||  || 200 (?) || 885 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6950 || 360 ||  || 200 (?) || 970 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6970 || 323 || 1.468 || 220 || 880 || 1536 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -w 64, SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6990 || 683 || 1.97 || 346 || 830 || 3072 || 2.3 ||  PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb&#039;s hdminer || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=5444.msg80154#msg80154 source]. SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6990 || 746 || 1.82 || 410 || 880 || 3072 || 2.3 ||  PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb&#039;s hdminer || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=5444.msg80154#msg80154 source]. SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|FirePro V8700 || 84.8 ||  ||  || 750 || 800 ||  || || poclbm-mod.03.24.2011 || &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|FirePro M5800 || 61.4 ||  ||  || 650 ||     ||  || || poclbm-mod.03.24.2011 || Ubuntu || &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Nvidia===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! W !! Clock !! SP !! Comment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8200 mGPU || 1.2 || || || 1200 || 16 || 128 MB shared memory, &amp;quot;poclbm -w 128 -f 0&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8600M GT || 4.93 ||  ||  ||  || 32 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8600GT || 5.66 ||  ||  || 1188 ||  32 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8600GT OC || 7.3 ||  ||  || 1602 || 32 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.0 poclbm] -w 128 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg72833#msg72833 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8800GT || 25   || 0.24 || 105 || 1300 ||  ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8800GT || 24.5 || 0.23 || 105 || 1300 ||  || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8800GTS || 16.8 || 0.109 || 154 ||  ||  || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source] [http://www.techspot.com/review/79-geforce-8800-gts-512/page11.html source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8800 GTS || 18.7 || 0.124 || 150 || 1200 ||  || poclbm -w 64 no vectors&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9300GE || 1.57 ||  ||  || 1300 ||  8 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9300GS || 1.69 ||  ||  || 1400 ||  8 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9400GT || 3.37 || 0.067 || 50 || 1400 || 16 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9400M (MacBook) || 1.90 || 0.32 || 6 || 700 ||  || poclbm -f 8 no vectors&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9500GT || 6.75 || 0.135 || 50 || 1400 || 32 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9600GSO || 19.88 || 0.237 || 84 || 1375 || 96 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9600GSO512 || 11.75 || 0.131 || 90 || 1625 || 48 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9600GT || 15.66 || 0.165 || 95 || 1625 || 64 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9600GT OC || 18.8 || &amp;lt;0.198 || &amp;gt;95 || 1981 || 64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.0 poclbm] -w 128 -f 10 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg74610#msg74610 source] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg73353#msg73353 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9800GT || 30.36 || 0.289 || 105 || 1800 || 112 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9800GTX || 32.54 || 0.232 || 140 || 1688 || 128 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9800GTX+ || 35.39 || 0.251 || 141 || 1836 || 128 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background-color:#FFEFEF&amp;quot;| 9800GX2 || 57.83 || 0.294 || 197 ||  || 2x128 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background-color:#FFEFEF&amp;quot;| 9800GX2 || 28 || 0.142 || 197 ||  || 2x128 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| G210 || 3.38 || 0.111 || 30.5 || 1402 || 16 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GT220 || 9.83 || 0.170 || 58 || 1360 || 48 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GT240 || 19.37 || 0.281 || 69 || 1340 || 96 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GT240 || 21.24 ||  ||  ||  || 96 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4291.0 poclbm-mod] -f 0 -v [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg73383#msg73383 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTS250 || 35.39 || 0.244 || 145 || 1836 || 128 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX260 || 35.91 || 0.178 || 202 || 1242 || 192 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX260 || 44 || 0.242 || 182 || 1242 || 216 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX260c216 || 40.40 || 0.236 || 171 || 1242 || 216 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX260c216 OC || 52.0 || || || 1461 || 216 || &amp;quot;poclbm -w 256 -f 1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX275 || 50.75 || 0.232 || 219 || 1404 || 240 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX275 || 58 || || || 729/1458 || 240 || poclbm -f 0 -w 256&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX280 || 46.84 || 0.198 || 236 || 1296 || 240 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX285 || 53.35 || 0.262 || 204 || 1476 || 240 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX295 || 89.78 || 0.311 || 289 || 1242 || 480 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GT 320M (MacBook Air) || 6.12 ||  ||  || 1212 || 48 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GT 330M (Sony Vaio Z) || 7.8 || 0.71 ( 0.3 total) || 11 (26w total) || 1045 || 48 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GT430 || 20.24 || 0.413 || 49 || 1400 || 96 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTS450 || 45.28 || 0.427 || 106 || 1566 || 192 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX460SE || 56.39 || 0.376 || 150 || 1300 || 288 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX460 || 68.31 || 0.427 || 160 || 1350 || 336 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX460 (2 cards) || 102 || 0.319? || 320? || 1350 ||  || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX460 (2 cards) OC || 127 || 0.374 || 340 || 1620 || 2x 336 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2444.0 rpcminer-cuda] -gpugrid=128 -gputhreads=128 ver.20110227&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX465 || 64.41 || 0.322 || 200 || 1215 || 352 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX470 || 81.98 || 0.381 || 215 || 1215 || 448 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX470 || 94.7 || || || 1414 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX480 || 101.28 || 0.405 || 250 || 1401 || 480 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX560 Ti || 67.7 || 0.39  || 170 || 1700 || 384 || standard EVGA 560, no overclock&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX560 OC || 86.7 || &amp;lt;0.51 || &amp;gt;170 || 1800 || 384 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2444.0 rpcminer-cuda] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg72816#msg72816 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX570 || 105.83 || 0.483 || 219 || 1464 || 480 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX580 || 119.06 || 0.488 || 244 || 1544 || 512 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Quadro FX 580 || 5.7 || 0.14 || 40 || 1125 || 4 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Quadro FX 1600M || 6 || 0.12 || 50 || 625 || 32 ||rpcminer-cuda, Win&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Quadro NVS 135M || 1.05 || 0.1 || 10 || 800 || 1 || &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Quadro NVS 3100M || 3.6 || 0.257 || 14 || 600 || 16 || rpcminer-cuda, Win, CUDA 3.1.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==CPUs==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A lot of nice data can be pulled from [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.0 this thread] to seed this section. Also from [https://www.bitcoin.org/wiki/doku.php?id=bitcoin_miners this page on the old wiki].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===AMD===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Model !! nprocs !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2x Opteron 6128 || 16 || 32.4 || 0.203 || 160W || 2 GHz || 0.3.19 || -4way&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon 64 3500+ || 1 || 1.18 || 0.018 || 65 W || 2.54 GHz || ufasoft v0.4 || overclocked (originally 2.2 GHz)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon X2 3800+ || 2 || 1.73 || 0.03 || 65 W || 2.00 GHz || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || -algo=4way&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon X2 4000+ || 2 || 1.9 || 0.02 || 65W || 2.1 GHz || rpc-miner || &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon X2 4400+ ||   || 2.09 || 0.32 || 65W || 2.3GHz || 0.3.19/Win x64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon X2 6000+ || 2 || 2.81 || 0.02 || 125W || 3 GHz || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg22881#msg22881 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon X2 6400+ Black Edition || 2 || 2.9 || 0.023 || 125W || 3.2 GHz || 0.3.20.2 BETA/Win 7 x64 || -4way&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon XP 2000+ || 2 || 0.62 || 0.009 || 70W || 1.67 GHz || 0.3.18/Ubuntu || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source] [http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm?articleid=914&amp;amp;page=4 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon II X2 240e || 2 || 2.71 || 0.06 || 45W || 2.81 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon II X4 630 || 4 || 10.7 || 0.11 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || bitcoin-miner 0.4 || &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Phenom II X6 1055T || 6 || 15.84 || 0.13 || 125W || 2.82 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Phenom II X6 1100T || 6 || 22 || 0.176 || 125W || 3.82 GHz || bitcoin-miner || Aciid#bitcoin-dev&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 3.8 || 0.04 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 0.3.1x/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 7.2 || 0.08 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || cpu-miner 0.2.1/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Phenom II x4 955 || 4 || 11 || 0.09 || 125W || 3.2 GHz || rpcminer-4way ||&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===ARM===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Cortex A8 || 1 || 0.125 || 0.36 || 0.35 W || 0.6 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || Nokia N900: &#039;cryptopp&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Cortex A8 || 1 || 0.2 || 0.57 || 0.35 W || 0.6 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || Nokia N900: &#039;c&#039; algo&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Tegra 250 (2xCortex-A9) || 2 || 0.35 || 0.70 || 0.5 W || 1.0 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-24) || Toshiba AC100, ubuntu, &#039;c&#039; algo&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Intel===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Pentium III mobile ? || 1 || 0.3 || 0.014 || 21W || 1.07 GHz || 0.3.1x/Win2K || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source] [http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=27380 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Old Xeon 512k (Dual) || 2x1/2 || 2.0 || ? || ? || 3.06GHz || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || HT disabled, algo=4way (twice as fast as the 2nd best algo)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Pentium 4 2.0A || 1 || 0.85 || || || 2.0 GHz || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft-0.4]/WinXP || -g no -t 2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Pentium Dual-Core E5400 || 2/2 || 2.27 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.7 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Celeron E330 || 2/2 || 2.2  || 0.03 || 65W || 2.5 GHz || 0.3.19/Ubuntu10.04 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i3 M350 || 2/4 || 1.48 || 0.04 || 35W || 2.27 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| Core i5 M450 || 2/4 || 1.8  || 0.05 || 35W || 1.2 GHz || 0.3.17/Win7-54 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| Core i5-650  || 2/4 || 5.1 || 0.04 ? ||  || 3.2 GHz || cpuminer-0.7 || -4way&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i5 ?  || 4/? || 6.5 ||  ||  ||  || client from svn || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37621#msg37621 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 4.5 || 0.05 || 95W || 3.1 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-01-22) || cryptopp_asm32&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 14 || 0.15 || 95W || 3.1 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || sse2_64&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i7 920   || 4/8 || 19.2 || 0.10 || 195 || 4.0 GHz (x21) || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] || -a 5&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i7 950   || 4/8 || 5.88 || 0.039 || 150W || 3.83 GHz (x23) || bitcoin-0.3.20.2 Win7-64 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i7 950   || 4/8 || 18.9 || 0.126 || 150W || 3.83 GHz (x23) || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] v0.4 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i7 980x   || 6/12 || 19.2 || 0.15 || 130 || 4.4 GHz (x33) || cpuminer/Win7-64 || &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| Core i7 980x   || 6/12 || 8.7 ||  ||  || 3.9 GHz (x27) || 0.3.17/Win7-64 || &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| Core i7 620M   || 2/4 || 6.3 || 0.18 || 35 || 2.66 GHz || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] v0.4 || &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core 2 Duo E6550 || 1/2 || 2.45 || ? || ? || 2.33 GHz || cpuminer 0.7.1 (Linux) || --algo=sse2_64&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core 2 Duo E6850 || 2/2 || 6.75 || 0.10 || 65W || 3.0 Ghz || ufasoft-0.3 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 7.76 || 0.11 || 70W || 3.33 GHz (o/c?) || ufasoft-0.3 || miner optimized for Intel Core&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 2.52 || 0.04 || 65W || 2.66 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon 3060 || 1/2 || 2.03 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.4GHz || cpuminer 0.8.1 (Linux) || --algo=cryptopp_asm32&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon Prestonia 2.4 (dual) || 2x1/2 || 2.16 || 0.017 || 130W || 2.4 GHz || ufasoft v0.4 || &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon X5355 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 10.13 || 0.16 || 120W || 2.66GHz || bitcoind || Roughly the same speed as the &amp;quot;c&amp;quot; algo in cpuminer&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon X5355 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 22.76 || 0.09 || 120W || 2.66GHz || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || -O2 -march=core2, algo=sse2_64&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon E5440 || 4/8 || 7.3 || ? || 80W || 2.66 GHz|| Kiv&#039;s poclbm-gui || FIXME: Either wrong model # or wrong threads/speed info&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon E5520 || 4/8 || 6.5 || 0.08 || 80W || 2.27 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon E5530 || 4/8 || 7.14 || 0.09 || 80W || 2.4 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon E5630 (dual) || 2x4/8 || 8 || 0.1 || 80W || 2.53 GHz || 0.3.17/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Atom N270 || 1 || 0.42 || &#039;&#039;&#039;0.17&#039;&#039;&#039; || 2.5W || 1.6 GHz || 0.3.1x/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mining rig]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[OpenCL miner]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=745 ATI Stream vs. NVIDIA CUDA - GPGPU computing battle royale]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mining]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mrb</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Mining_hardware_comparison&amp;diff=7099</id>
		<title>Mining hardware comparison</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Mining_hardware_comparison&amp;diff=7099"/>
		<updated>2011-04-10T21:58:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mrb: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Below are some statistics about the mining performance of various hardware used in a [[mining rig]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The table shows (mostly) stock clock numbers. 10-20% performance improvement can be achieved via overclocking.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Graphics cards==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===AMD===&lt;br /&gt;
To get the maximum performance use the 2.1 or 2.2 release of the ATI Stream SDK. 2.3 performance drops by 5-10%.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! W !! Clock !! SP !! SDK  !! Slot !! Miner !! Notes&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3XXX || || || || || || || || OpenCL Not Supported&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 42XX || || || || || || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || || OpenCL Not Supported (intergrated/mobile GPU)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4350 || 6.93 || 0.346 || 20 || 575 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don&#039;t use vectors &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4550 || 7.23 || 0.289 || 25 || 600 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don&#039;t use vectors &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4650 || 31.33 || 0.653 || 48 || 650 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don&#039;t use vectors &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4670 || 36.14 || 0.613 || 59 || 750 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don&#039;t use vectors &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4730 || 72.29 || 0.657 || 110 || 750 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4770 || 72.29 || 0.904 || 80 || 750 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4830 || 55.42 || 0.583 || 95 || 575 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4850 || 75.30 || 0.685 || 110 || 625 || 800 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4860 || 67.47 || 0.519 || 130 || 700 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4870 || 90.36 || 0.602 || 150 || 750 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || clmine ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4870 || 78    ||       ||     ||     ||     || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || m0mchil&#039;s OpenCL/Vista 64bit || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4890 || 102.41 || 0.539 || 190 || 850 || 800 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4850X2 || 150.60 || 0.602 || 250 || 625 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4870X2 || 180.72 || 0.632 || 286 || 750 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 5450 || 11.99 || 0.631 || 19 || 650 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 5550 || 40.59 || 1.041 || 39 || 550 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5570 || 59.96 || 1.538 || 39 || 650 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5570 || 64 || 1.641 || 39 || 650 || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil&#039;s OpenCL/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 5650 || 48    || 2.5-3.2 ? || 15-19 ? ||  ||  ||  || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil&#039;s OpenCL/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source] [http://www.notebookcheck.net/ATI-Mobility-Radeon-HD-5650.23697.0.html source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 5670 || 71.49 || 1.117 || 64 || 775 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EEFFEE;&amp;quot;| 5670 || 72 || 1.64 || 44 || 850 || || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm-mod (Win7-64) || Sapphire 100287VGAL card is low power&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 5670 || 85 || || || 900 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 5750 || 116.24 || 1.352 || 86 || 700 || 720 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 5770 || 156.83 || 1.452 || 108 || 850 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFFFF;&amp;quot;| 5830 || 206.64 || 1.181 || 175 || 800 || 1120 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFFFF;&amp;quot;| 5830 || 241    || 1.377 || 175 || 1006 || || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-03-11 / Win7 64 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 240.77 || 1.595 || 151 || 725 || 1440 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 252    || 1.669 || 151 || 765 || || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-01-25 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 255.3  || 1.690 || 151 || 765 || || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-01-25 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 300    || 1.987 || 151 || 925 (OC) ||      || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil&#039;s OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 250.26 || 1.657 || 151 ||     ||      ||  || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || opencl client || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 313.65 || 1.668 || 188 || 850 || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 313    || 1.665 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo/Linux ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 343    || 1.824 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo/Linux ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 355    || 1.888 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/Linux ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 340    || 1.809 || 188 || 850 || 1600 ||  || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil&#039;s OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 530 || 1.803 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.4.595.10 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/201103.beta3/Windows || -v -w128 -f60&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 535.06 || 1.820 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 560    || 1.905 || 294 || 725 || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 565    || 1.922 || 294 || || || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine2 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 604    || 2.054 || 294 || || || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 645    ||       ||     || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || -f1, Debian 6, fglrx-driver 10.9.3&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6490M || 16.289 || 0,708 || 23  ||  ||  ||  || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm-mod (Mac OS X 10.6.7) || MacBook Pro early 2011&lt;br /&gt;
|-  &lt;br /&gt;
| 6850 || 171.59 || 1.351 || 127 || 775 || 960 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6850 || 196 || || || 850 || 960 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 0&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6870 || 232.47 || 1.540 || 151 || 900 || 1120 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6870 || 260.1 || 1.611 || 175 || 1001 || 1150 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm-gui windows7x86 cat 11.3 || -v -w 128 -f 1 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6870 || 282.23 || 1.611 || 175 || 1047 || 1120 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm windows cat 11.2 || -v -w 128 -f 0 mem clock 300&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6950 || 295 ||  || 160 (?) || 810 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6950 || 325 ||  || 200 (?) || 885 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6950 || 360 ||  || 200 (?) || 970 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6970 || 323 || 1.468 || 220 || 880 || 1536 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -w 64, SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6990 || 683 ||  ||  || 830 || 3072 || 2.3 ||  PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb&#039;s hdminer || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=5444.msg80154#msg80154 source]. SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6990 || 746 ||  ||  || 880 || 3072 || 2.3 ||  PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb&#039;s hdminer || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=5444.msg80154#msg80154 source]. SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|FirePro V8700 || 84.8 ||  ||  || 750 || 800 ||  || || poclbm-mod.03.24.2011 || &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|FirePro M5800 || 61.4 ||  ||  || 650 ||     ||  || || poclbm-mod.03.24.2011 || Ubuntu || &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Nvidia===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! W !! Clock !! SP !! Comment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8200 mGPU || 1.2 || || || 1200 || 16 || 128 MB shared memory, &amp;quot;poclbm -w 128 -f 0&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8600M GT || 4.93 ||  ||  ||  || 32 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8600GT || 5.66 ||  ||  || 1188 ||  32 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8600GT OC || 7.3 ||  ||  || 1602 || 32 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.0 poclbm] -w 128 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg72833#msg72833 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8800GT || 25   || 0.24 || 105 || 1300 ||  ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8800GT || 24.5 || 0.23 || 105 || 1300 ||  || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8800GTS || 16.8 || 0.109 || 154 ||  ||  || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source] [http://www.techspot.com/review/79-geforce-8800-gts-512/page11.html source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8800 GTS || 18.7 || 0.124 || 150 || 1200 ||  || poclbm -w 64 no vectors&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9300GE || 1.57 ||  ||  || 1300 ||  8 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9300GS || 1.69 ||  ||  || 1400 ||  8 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9400GT || 3.37 || 0.067 || 50 || 1400 || 16 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9400M (MacBook) || 1.90 || 0.32 || 6 || 700 ||  || poclbm -f 8 no vectors&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9500GT || 6.75 || 0.135 || 50 || 1400 || 32 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9600GSO || 19.88 || 0.237 || 84 || 1375 || 96 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9600GSO512 || 11.75 || 0.131 || 90 || 1625 || 48 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9600GT || 15.66 || 0.165 || 95 || 1625 || 64 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9600GT OC || 18.8 || &amp;lt;0.198 || &amp;gt;95 || 1981 || 64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.0 poclbm] -w 128 -f 10 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg74610#msg74610 source] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg73353#msg73353 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9800GT || 30.36 || 0.289 || 105 || 1800 || 112 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9800GTX || 32.54 || 0.232 || 140 || 1688 || 128 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9800GTX+ || 35.39 || 0.251 || 141 || 1836 || 128 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background-color:#FFEFEF&amp;quot;| 9800GX2 || 57.83 || 0.294 || 197 ||  || 2x128 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background-color:#FFEFEF&amp;quot;| 9800GX2 || 28 || 0.142 || 197 ||  || 2x128 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| G210 || 3.38 || 0.111 || 30.5 || 1402 || 16 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GT220 || 9.83 || 0.170 || 58 || 1360 || 48 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GT240 || 19.37 || 0.281 || 69 || 1340 || 96 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GT240 || 21.24 ||  ||  ||  || 96 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4291.0 poclbm-mod] -f 0 -v [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg73383#msg73383 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTS250 || 35.39 || 0.244 || 145 || 1836 || 128 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX260 || 35.91 || 0.178 || 202 || 1242 || 192 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX260 || 44 || 0.242 || 182 || 1242 || 216 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX260c216 || 40.40 || 0.236 || 171 || 1242 || 216 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX260c216 OC || 52.0 || || || 1461 || 216 || &amp;quot;poclbm -w 256 -f 1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX275 || 50.75 || 0.232 || 219 || 1404 || 240 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX275 || 58 || || || 729/1458 || 240 || poclbm -f 0 -w 256&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX280 || 46.84 || 0.198 || 236 || 1296 || 240 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX285 || 53.35 || 0.262 || 204 || 1476 || 240 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX295 || 89.78 || 0.311 || 289 || 1242 || 480 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GT 320M (MacBook Air) || 6.12 ||  ||  || 1212 || 48 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GT 330M (Sony Vaio Z) || 7.8 || 0.71 ( 0.3 total) || 11 (26w total) || 1045 || 48 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GT430 || 20.24 || 0.413 || 49 || 1400 || 96 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTS450 || 45.28 || 0.427 || 106 || 1566 || 192 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX460SE || 56.39 || 0.376 || 150 || 1300 || 288 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX460 || 68.31 || 0.427 || 160 || 1350 || 336 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX460 (2 cards) || 102 || 0.319? || 320? || 1350 ||  || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX460 (2 cards) OC || 127 || 0.374 || 340 || 1620 || 2x 336 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2444.0 rpcminer-cuda] -gpugrid=128 -gputhreads=128 ver.20110227&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX465 || 64.41 || 0.322 || 200 || 1215 || 352 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX470 || 81.98 || 0.381 || 215 || 1215 || 448 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX470 || 94.7 || || || 1414 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX480 || 101.28 || 0.405 || 250 || 1401 || 480 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX560 Ti || 67.7 || 0.39  || 170 || 1700 || 384 || standard EVGA 560, no overclock&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX560 OC || 86.7 || &amp;lt;0.51 || &amp;gt;170 || 1800 || 384 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2444.0 rpcminer-cuda] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg72816#msg72816 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX570 || 105.83 || 0.483 || 219 || 1464 || 480 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX580 || 119.06 || 0.488 || 244 || 1544 || 512 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Quadro FX 580 || 5.7 || 0.14 || 40 || 1125 || 4 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Quadro FX 1600M || 6 || 0.12 || 50 || 625 || 32 ||rpcminer-cuda, Win&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Quadro NVS 135M || 1.05 || 0.1 || 10 || 800 || 1 || &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Quadro NVS 3100M || 3.6 || 0.257 || 14 || 600 || 16 || rpcminer-cuda, Win, CUDA 3.1.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==CPUs==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A lot of nice data can be pulled from [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.0 this thread] to seed this section. Also from [https://www.bitcoin.org/wiki/doku.php?id=bitcoin_miners this page on the old wiki].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===AMD===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Model !! nprocs !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2x Opteron 6128 || 16 || 32.4 || 0.203 || 160W || 2 GHz || 0.3.19 || -4way&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon 64 3500+ || 1 || 1.18 || 0.018 || 65 W || 2.54 GHz || ufasoft v0.4 || overclocked (originally 2.2 GHz)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon X2 3800+ || 2 || 1.73 || 0.03 || 65 W || 2.00 GHz || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || -algo=4way&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon X2 4000+ || 2 || 1.9 || 0.02 || 65W || 2.1 GHz || rpc-miner || &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon X2 4400+ ||   || 2.09 || 0.32 || 65W || 2.3GHz || 0.3.19/Win x64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon X2 6000+ || 2 || 2.81 || 0.02 || 125W || 3 GHz || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg22881#msg22881 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon X2 6400+ Black Edition || 2 || 2.9 || 0.023 || 125W || 3.2 GHz || 0.3.20.2 BETA/Win 7 x64 || -4way&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon XP 2000+ || 2 || 0.62 || 0.009 || 70W || 1.67 GHz || 0.3.18/Ubuntu || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source] [http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm?articleid=914&amp;amp;page=4 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon II X2 240e || 2 || 2.71 || 0.06 || 45W || 2.81 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon II X4 630 || 4 || 10.7 || 0.11 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || bitcoin-miner 0.4 || &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Phenom II X6 1055T || 6 || 15.84 || 0.13 || 125W || 2.82 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Phenom II X6 1100T || 6 || 22 || 0.176 || 125W || 3.82 GHz || bitcoin-miner || Aciid#bitcoin-dev&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 3.8 || 0.04 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 0.3.1x/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 7.2 || 0.08 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || cpu-miner 0.2.1/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Phenom II x4 955 || 4 || 11 || 0.09 || 125W || 3.2 GHz || rpcminer-4way ||&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===ARM===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Cortex A8 || 1 || 0.125 || 0.36 || 0.35 W || 0.6 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || Nokia N900: &#039;cryptopp&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Cortex A8 || 1 || 0.2 || 0.57 || 0.35 W || 0.6 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || Nokia N900: &#039;c&#039; algo&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Tegra 250 (2xCortex-A9) || 2 || 0.35 || 0.70 || 0.5 W || 1.0 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-24) || Toshiba AC100, ubuntu, &#039;c&#039; algo&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Intel===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Pentium III mobile ? || 1 || 0.3 || 0.014 || 21W || 1.07 GHz || 0.3.1x/Win2K || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source] [http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=27380 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Old Xeon 512k (Dual) || 2x1/2 || 2.0 || ? || ? || 3.06GHz || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || HT disabled, algo=4way (twice as fast as the 2nd best algo)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Pentium 4 2.0A || 1 || 0.85 || || || 2.0 GHz || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft-0.4]/WinXP || -g no -t 2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Pentium Dual-Core E5400 || 2/2 || 2.27 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.7 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Celeron E330 || 2/2 || 2.2  || 0.03 || 65W || 2.5 GHz || 0.3.19/Ubuntu10.04 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i3 M350 || 2/4 || 1.48 || 0.04 || 35W || 2.27 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| Core i5 M450 || 2/4 || 1.8  || 0.05 || 35W || 1.2 GHz || 0.3.17/Win7-54 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| Core i5-650  || 2/4 || 5.1 || 0.04 ? ||  || 3.2 GHz || cpuminer-0.7 || -4way&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i5 ?  || 4/? || 6.5 ||  ||  ||  || client from svn || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37621#msg37621 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 4.5 || 0.05 || 95W || 3.1 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-01-22) || cryptopp_asm32&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 14 || 0.15 || 95W || 3.1 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || sse2_64&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i7 920   || 4/8 || 19.2 || 0.10 || 195 || 4.0 GHz (x21) || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] || -a 5&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i7 950   || 4/8 || 5.88 || 0.039 || 150W || 3.83 GHz (x23) || bitcoin-0.3.20.2 Win7-64 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i7 950   || 4/8 || 18.9 || 0.126 || 150W || 3.83 GHz (x23) || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] v0.4 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i7 980x   || 6/12 || 19.2 || 0.15 || 130 || 4.4 GHz (x33) || cpuminer/Win7-64 || &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| Core i7 980x   || 6/12 || 8.7 ||  ||  || 3.9 GHz (x27) || 0.3.17/Win7-64 || &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| Core i7 620M   || 2/4 || 6.3 || 0.18 || 35 || 2.66 GHz || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] v0.4 || &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core 2 Duo E6550 || 1/2 || 2.45 || ? || ? || 2.33 GHz || cpuminer 0.7.1 (Linux) || --algo=sse2_64&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core 2 Duo E6850 || 2/2 || 6.75 || 0.10 || 65W || 3.0 Ghz || ufasoft-0.3 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 7.76 || 0.11 || 70W || 3.33 GHz (o/c?) || ufasoft-0.3 || miner optimized for Intel Core&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 2.52 || 0.04 || 65W || 2.66 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon 3060 || 1/2 || 2.03 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.4GHz || cpuminer 0.8.1 (Linux) || --algo=cryptopp_asm32&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon Prestonia 2.4 (dual) || 2x1/2 || 2.16 || 0.017 || 130W || 2.4 GHz || ufasoft v0.4 || &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon X5355 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 10.13 || 0.16 || 120W || 2.66GHz || bitcoind || Roughly the same speed as the &amp;quot;c&amp;quot; algo in cpuminer&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon X5355 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 22.76 || 0.09 || 120W || 2.66GHz || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || -O2 -march=core2, algo=sse2_64&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon E5440 || 4/8 || 7.3 || ? || 80W || 2.66 GHz|| Kiv&#039;s poclbm-gui || FIXME: Either wrong model # or wrong threads/speed info&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon E5520 || 4/8 || 6.5 || 0.08 || 80W || 2.27 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon E5530 || 4/8 || 7.14 || 0.09 || 80W || 2.4 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon E5630 (dual) || 2x4/8 || 8 || 0.1 || 80W || 2.53 GHz || 0.3.17/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Atom N270 || 1 || 0.42 || &#039;&#039;&#039;0.17&#039;&#039;&#039; || 2.5W || 1.6 GHz || 0.3.1x/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mining rig]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[OpenCL miner]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=745 ATI Stream vs. NVIDIA CUDA - GPGPU computing battle royale]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mining]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mrb</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Mining_hardware_comparison&amp;diff=6892</id>
		<title>Mining hardware comparison</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Mining_hardware_comparison&amp;diff=6892"/>
		<updated>2011-04-07T11:31:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mrb: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Below are some statistics about the mining performance of various hardware used in a [[mining rig]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The table shows stock clock numbers. 10-20% performance improvement can be achieved via overclocking.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Graphics cards==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===AMD===&lt;br /&gt;
To get the maximum performance use the 2.1 or 2.2 release of the ATI Stream SDK. 2.3 performance drops by 5-10%.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! W !! Clock !! SP !! SDK  !! Slot !! Miner !! Notes&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3XXX || || || || || || || || OpenCL Not Supported&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 42XX || || || || || || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || || OpenCL Not Supported (intergrated/mobile GPU)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4350 || 6.93 || 0.346 || 20 || 575 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don&#039;t use vectors &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4550 || 7.23 || 0.289 || 25 || 600 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don&#039;t use vectors &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4650 || 31.33 || 0.653 || 48 || 650 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don&#039;t use vectors &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4670 || 36.14 || 0.613 || 59 || 750 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don&#039;t use vectors &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4730 || 72.29 || 0.657 || 110 || 750 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4770 || 72.29 || 0.904 || 80 || 750 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4830 || 55.42 || 0.583 || 95 || 575 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4850 || 75.30 || 0.685 || 110 || 625 || 800 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4860 || 67.47 || 0.519 || 130 || 700 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4870 || 90.36 || 0.602 || 150 || 750 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || clmine ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4870 || 78    ||       ||     ||     ||     || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || m0mchil&#039;s OpenCL/Vista 64bit || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4890 || 102.41 || 0.539 || 190 || 850 || 800 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4850X2 || 150.60 || 0.602 || 250 || 625 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4870X2 || 180.72 || 0.632 || 286 || 750 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 5450 || 11.99 || 0.631 || 19 || 650 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 5550 || 40.59 || 1.041 || 39 || 550 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5570 || 59.96 || 1.538 || 39 || 650 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5570 || 64 || 1.641 || 39 || 650 || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil&#039;s OpenCL/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 5650 || 48    || 2.5-3.2 ? || 15-19 ? ||  ||  ||  || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil&#039;s OpenCL/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source] [http://www.notebookcheck.net/ATI-Mobility-Radeon-HD-5650.23697.0.html source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 5670 || 71.49 || 1.117 || 64 || 775 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EEFFEE;&amp;quot;| 5670 || 72 || 1.64 || 44 || 850 || || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm-mod (Win7-64) || Sapphire 100287VGAL card is low power&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 5670 || 85 || || || 900 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 5750 || 116.24 || 1.352 || 86 || 700 || 720 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 5770 || 156.83 || 1.452 || 108 || 850 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFFFF;&amp;quot;| 5830 || 206.64 || 1.181 || 175 || 800 || 1120 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFFFF;&amp;quot;| 5830 || 241    || 1.377 || 175 || 1006 || || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-03-11 / Win7 64 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 240.77 || 1.595 || 151 || 725 || 1440 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 252    || 1.669 || 151 || 765 || || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-01-25 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 255.3  || 1.690 || 151 || 765 || || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-01-25 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 300    || 1.987 || 151 || 925 (OC) ||      || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil&#039;s OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 250.26 || 1.657 || 151 ||     ||      ||  || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || opencl client || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 313.65 || 1.668 || 188 || 850 || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 313    || 1.665 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo/Linux ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 343    || 1.824 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo/Linux ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 355    || 1.888 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/Linux ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 340    || 1.809 || 188 || 850 || 1600 ||  || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil&#039;s OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 535.06 || 1.820 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 560    || 1.905 || 294 || 725 || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 565    || 1.922 || 294 || || || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine2 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 604    || 2.054 || 294 || || || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 645    ||       ||     || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || -f1, Debian 6, fglrx-driver 10.9.3&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6850 || 171.59 || 1.351 || 127 || 775 || 960 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6850 || 196 || || || 850 || 960 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 0&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6870 || 232.47 || 1.540 || 151 || 900 || 1120 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6870 || 260.1 || 1.611 || 175 || 1001 || 1150 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm-gui windows7x86 cat 11.3 || -v -w 128 -f 1 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6870 || 282.23 || 1.611 || 175 || 1047 || 1120 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm windows cat 11.2 || -v -w 128 -f 0 mem clock 300&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6950 || 295 ||  || 160 (?) || 810 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6950 || 325 ||  || 200 (?) || 885 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6950 || 360 ||  || 200 (?) || 970 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6970 || 323 || 1.468 || 220 || 880 || 1536 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -w 64, SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6990 || 682 ||  ||  || 830 || 3072 || 2.3 ||  PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb&#039;s hdminer [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=5444.msg80154#msg80154 source] || SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6990 || 746 ||  ||  || 880 || 3072 || 2.3 ||  PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb&#039;s hdminer [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949.msg81165#msg81165 source] || SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|FirePro V8700 || 84.8 ||  ||  || 750 || 800 ||  || || poclbm-mod.03.24.2011 || &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Nvidia===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! W !! Clock !! SP !! Comment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8200 mGPU || 1.2 || || || 1200 || 16 || 128 MB shared memory, &amp;quot;poclbm -w 128 -f 0&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8600M GT || 4.93 ||  ||  ||  || 32 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8600GT || 5.66 ||  ||  || 1188 ||  32 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8600GT OC || 7.3 ||  ||  || 1602 || 32 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.0 poclbm] -w 128 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg72833#msg72833 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8800GT || 25   || 0.24 || 105 || 1300 ||  ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8800GT || 24.5 || 0.23 || 105 || 1300 ||  || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8800GTS || 16.8 || 0.109 || 154 ||  ||  || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source] [http://www.techspot.com/review/79-geforce-8800-gts-512/page11.html source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8800 GTS || 18.7 || 0.124 || 150 || 1200 ||  || poclbm -w 64 no vectors&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9300GE || 1.57 ||  ||  || 1300 ||  8 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9300GS || 1.69 ||  ||  || 1400 ||  8 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9400GT || 3.37 || 0.067 || 50 || 1400 || 16 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9500GT || 6.75 || 0.135 || 50 || 1400 || 32 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9600GSO || 19.88 || 0.237 || 84 || 1375 || 96 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9600GSO512 || 11.75 || 0.131 || 90 || 1625 || 48 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9600GT || 15.66 || 0.165 || 95 || 1625 || 64 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9600GT OC || 18.8 || &amp;lt;0.198 || &amp;gt;95 || 1981 || 64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.0 poclbm] -w 128 -f 10 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg74610#msg74610 source] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg73353#msg73353 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9800GT || 30.36 || 0.289 || 105 || 1800 || 112 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9800GTX || 32.54 || 0.232 || 140 || 1688 || 128 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9800GTX+ || 35.39 || 0.251 || 141 || 1836 || 128 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background-color:#FFEFEF&amp;quot;| 9800GX2 || 57.83 || 0.294 || 197 ||  || 2x128 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background-color:#FFEFEF&amp;quot;| 9800GX2 || 28 || 0.142 || 197 ||  || 2x128 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| G210 || 3.38 || 0.111 || 30.5 || 1402 || 16 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GT220 || 9.83 || 0.170 || 58 || 1360 || 48 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GT240 || 19.37 || 0.281 || 69 || 1340 || 96 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GT240 || 21.24 ||  ||  ||  || 96 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4291.0 poclbm-mod] -f 0 -v [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg73383#msg73383 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTS250 || 35.39 || 0.244 || 145 || 1836 || 128 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX260 || 35.91 || 0.178 || 202 || 1242 || 192 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX260 || 44 || 0.242 || 182 || 1242 || 216 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX260c216 || 40.40 || 0.236 || 171 || 1242 || 216 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX260c216 OC || 52.0 || || || 1461 || 216 || &amp;quot;poclbm -w 256 -f 1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX275 || 50.75 || 0.232 || 219 || 1404 || 240 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX275 || 58 || || || 729/1458 || 240 || poclbm -f 0 -w 256&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX280 || 46.84 || 0.198 || 236 || 1296 || 240 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX285 || 53.35 || 0.262 || 204 || 1476 || 240 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX295 || 89.78 || 0.311 || 289 || 1242 || 480 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GT 320M (MacBook Air) || 6.12 ||  ||  || 1212 || 48 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GT 330M (Sony Vaio Z) || 7.8 || 0.71 ( 0.3 total) || 11 (26w total) || 1045 || 48 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GT430 || 20.24 || 0.413 || 49 || 1400 || 96 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTS450 || 45.28 || 0.427 || 106 || 1566 || 192 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX460SE || 56.39 || 0.376 || 150 || 1300 || 288 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX460 || 68.31 || 0.427 || 160 || 1350 || 336 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX460 (2 cards) || 102 || 0.319? || 320? || 1350 ||  || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX460 (2 cards) OC || 127 || 0.374 || 340 || 1620 || 2x 336 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2444.0 rpcminer-cuda] -gpugrid=128 -gputhreads=128 ver.20110227&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX465 || 64.41 || 0.322 || 200 || 1215 || 352 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX470 || 81.98 || 0.381 || 215 || 1215 || 448 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX470 || 94.7 || || || 1414 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX480 || 101.28 || 0.405 || 250 || 1401 || 480 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX560 Ti || 67.7 || 0.39  || 170 || 1700 || 384 || standard EVGA 560, no overclock&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX560 OC || 86.7 || &amp;lt;0.51 || &amp;gt;170 || 1800 || 384 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2444.0 rpcminer-cuda] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg72816#msg72816 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX570 || 105.83 || 0.483 || 219 || 1464 || 480 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX580 || 119.06 || 0.488 || 244 || 1544 || 512 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Quadro FX 580 || 5.7 || 0.14 || 40 || 1125 || 4 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Quadro FX 1600M || 6 || 0.12 || 50 || 625 || 32 ||rpcminer-cuda, Win&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Quadro NVS 135M || 1.05 || 0.1 || 10 || 800 || 1 || &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Quadro NVS 3100M || 3.6 || 0.257 || 14 || 600 || 16 || rpcminer-cuda, Win, CUDA 3.1.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==CPUs==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A lot of nice data can be pulled from [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.0 this thread] to seed this section. Also from [https://www.bitcoin.org/wiki/doku.php?id=bitcoin_miners this page on the old wiki].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===AMD===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Model !! nprocs !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2x Opteron 6128 || 16 || 32.4 || 0.203 || 160W || 2 GHz || 0.3.19 || -4way&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon X2 3800+ || 2 || 1.73 || 0.03 || 65 W || 2.00 GHz || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || -algo=4way&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon X2 4000+ || 2 || 1.9 || 0.02 || 65W || 2.1 GHz || rpc-miner || &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon X2 4400+ ||   || 2.09 || 0.32 || 65W || 2.3GHz || 0.3.19/Win x64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon X2 6000+ || 2 || 2.81 || 0.02 || 125W || 3 GHz || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg22881#msg22881 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon X2 6400+ Black Edition || 2 || 2.9 || 0.023 || 125W || 3.2 GHz || 0.3.20.2 BETA/Win 7 x64 || -4way&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon XP 2000+ || 2 || 0.62 || 0.009 || 70W || 1.67 GHz || 0.3.18/Ubuntu || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source] [http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm?articleid=914&amp;amp;page=4 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon II X2 240e || 2 || 2.71 || 0.06 || 45W || 2.81 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon II X4 630 || 4 || 10.7 || 0.11 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || bitcoin-miner 0.4 || &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Phenom II X6 1055T || 6 || 15.84 || 0.13 || 125W || 2.82 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Phenom II X6 1100T || 6 || 22 || 0.176 || 125W || 3.82 GHz || bitcoin-miner || Aciid#bitcoin-dev&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 3.8 || 0.04 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 0.3.1x/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 7.2 || 0.08 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || cpu-miner 0.2.1/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Phenom II x4 955 || 4 || 11 || 0.09 || 125W || 3.2 GHz || rpcminer-4way ||&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===ARM===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Cortex A8 || 1 || 0.125 || || || 0.6 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || Nokia N900: &#039;cryptopp&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Cortex A8 || 1 || 0.2 || || || 0.6 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || Nokia N900: &#039;c&#039; algo&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Intel===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Pentium III mobile ? || 1 || 0.3 || 0.014 || 21W || 1.07 GHz || 0.3.1x/Win2K || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source] [http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=27380 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Old Xeon 512k (Dual) || 2x1/2 || 2.0 || ? || ? || 3.06GHz || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || HT disabled, algo=4way (twice as fast as the 2nd best algo)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Pentium 4 2.0A || 1 || 0.85 || || || 2.0 GHz || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft-0.4]/WinXP || -g no -t 2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Pentium Dual-Core E5400 || 2/2 || 2.27 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.7 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Celeron E330 || 2/2 || 2.2  || 0.03 || 65W || 2.5 GHz || 0.3.19/Ubuntu10.04 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i3 M350 || 2/4 || 1.48 || 0.04 || 35W || 2.27 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| Core i5 M450 || 2/4 || 1.8  || 0.05 || 35W || 1.2 GHz || 0.3.17/Win7-54 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| Core i5-650  || 2/4 || 5.1 || 0.04 ? ||  || 3.2 GHz || cpuminer-0.7 || -4way&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i5 ?  || 4/? || 6.5 ||  ||  ||  || client from svn || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37621#msg37621 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 4.5 || 0.05 || 95W || 3.1 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-01-22) || cryptopp_asm32&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 14 || 0.15 || 95W || 3.1 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || sse2_64&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i7 920   || 4/8 || 19.2 || 0.10 || 195 || 4.0 GHz (x21) || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] || -a 5&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i7 950   || 4/8 || 5.88 || 0.039 || 150W || 3.83 GHz (x23) || bitcoin-0.3.20.2 Win7-64 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i7 950   || 4/8 || 18.9 || 0.126 || 150W || 3.83 GHz (x23) || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] v0.4 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i7 980x   || 6/12 || 19.2 || 0.15 || 130 || 4.4 GHz (x33) || cpuminer/Win7-64 || &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| Core i7 980x   || 6/12 || 8.7 ||  ||  || 3.9 GHz (x27) || 0.3.17/Win7-64 || &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| Core i7 620M   || 2/4 || 6.3 || 0.18 || 35 || 2.66 GHz || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] v0.4 || &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core 2 Duo E6550 || 1/2 || 2.45 || ? || ? || 2.33 GHz || cpuminer 0.7.1 (Linux) || --algo=sse2_64&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core 2 Duo E6850 || 2/2 || 6.75 || 0.10 || 65W || 3.0 Ghz || ufasoft-0.3 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 7.76 || 0.11 || 70W || 3.33 GHz (o/c?) || ufasoft-0.3 || miner optimized for Intel Core&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 2.52 || 0.04 || 65W || 2.66 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon 3060 || 1/2 || 2.03 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.4GHz || cpuminer 0.8.1 (Linux) || --algo=cryptopp_asm32&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon X5355 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 10.13 || 0.16 || 120W || 2.66GHz || bitcoind || Roughly the same speed as the &amp;quot;c&amp;quot; algo in cpuminer&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon X5355 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 22.76 || 0.09 || 120W || 2.66GHz || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || -O2 -march=core2, algo=sse2_64&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon E5440 || 4/8 || 7.3 || ? || 80W || 2.66 GHz|| Kiv&#039;s poclbm-gui || FIXME: Either wrong model # or wrong threads/speed info&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon E5520 || 4/8 || 6.5 || 0.08 || 80W || 2.27 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon E5530 || 4/8 || 7.14 || 0.09 || 80W || 2.4 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon E5630 (dual) || 2x4/8 || 8 || 0.1 || 80W || 2.53 GHz || 0.3.17/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Atom N270 || 1 || 0.42 || &#039;&#039;&#039;0.17&#039;&#039;&#039; || 2.5W || 1.6 GHz || 0.3.1x/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mining rig]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[OpenCL miner]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=745 ATI Stream vs. NVIDIA CUDA - GPGPU computing battle royale]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mining]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mrb</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Why_a_GPU_mines_faster_than_a_CPU&amp;diff=6887</id>
		<title>Why a GPU mines faster than a CPU</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Why_a_GPU_mines_faster_than_a_CPU&amp;diff=6887"/>
		<updated>2011-04-07T07:34:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mrb: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Some Bitcoin users might wonder why there is a huge disparity between the mining output of a CPU versus a GPU.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, just to clarify, the CPU, or &#039;&#039;central processing unit&#039;&#039;, is the part of the computer that performs the will of the software loaded on the computer.  It&#039;s the main executive for the entire machine.  It is the master that tells all the parts of the computer what to do - in accordance with the program code of the software, and, hopefully, the will of the user.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some computers have multiple CPU&#039;s, and some CPU&#039;s have multiple cores (which is almost the same thing as having multiple CPU&#039;s in a single physical package).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CPU is usually a removable component that plugs into the computer&#039;s main circuit board, or &#039;&#039;motherboard&#039;&#039; and sits underneath a large metallic heat sink or fan.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The GPU, or &#039;&#039;graphics processing unit&#039;&#039;, is a part of the video rendering system in a computer.  In many cases, the GPU is located on a separate circuit board called a video card, which is in turn plugged into a slot on the motherboard.  The typical function of a GPU is to assist with the rendering of 3D graphics and visual effects so that the CPU doesn&#039;t have to.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many computers don&#039;t have GPU&#039;s at all.  A GPU isn&#039;t a requirement, it&#039;s just that they are appearing as standard equipment in computers nowadays, since newer operating systems support enhanced visual effects that depend on the GPU.  For example, the translucent windows in Windows 7, or the row of icons in Mac OS X that bulges near the mouse pointer - these are effects that are made feasible with a GPU.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A GPU is like a CPU, but there are important internal differences that make them suited toward their special tasks.  These are the differences that make Bitcoin mining far more favorable on a GPU.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Short Answer ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A typical CPU core can execute &#039;&#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039;&#039; 32-bit instructions per clock (using a 128-bit SSE instruction), whereas a GPU like the Radeon HD 5970 can execute &#039;&#039;&#039;3200&#039;&#039;&#039; 32-bit instructions per clock (using its 3200 ALUs or shaders). This is a difference of &#039;&#039;&#039;800 times more instructions per clock&#039;&#039;&#039;. As of 2011, the fastest CPUs have up to 6, 8, or 12 cores and a somewhat higher frequency clock (2000-3000 MHz vs. 725 MHz for the Radeon HD 5970), but this is far from enough to compensate for this huge difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A CPU is an executive ==&lt;br /&gt;
A CPU is designed primarily to be an executive and make decisions, as directed by the software.  For example, if you type a document and save it, it is the CPU&#039;s job to turn your document into the appropriate file type and direct the hard disk to write it as a file.  CPU&#039;s can also do all kinds of math, as inside every CPU is one or more &amp;quot;Arithmetic/Logic Units&amp;quot; (ALU&#039;s).  CPU&#039;s are also highly capable of following instructions of the &amp;quot;if this, do this, otherwise do that&amp;quot;.  A large bulk of the structures inside a CPU are concerned with making sure that the CPU is ready to deal with having to switch to a different task on a moment&#039;s notice when needed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CPU&#039;s also have to deal with quite a few other things which add complexity, including:&lt;br /&gt;
* enforcing privilege levels and the boundaries between user programs and the operating system&lt;br /&gt;
* creating the illusion of &amp;quot;virtual memory&amp;quot; to programs&lt;br /&gt;
* for the most popular processors, being backwards compatible with legacy code&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A GPU is a laborer ==&lt;br /&gt;
A GPU is very different.  Yes, a GPU can do math, and can also do &amp;quot;this&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;that&amp;quot; based on specific conditions.  However, GPU&#039;s have been designed so they are very good at doing video processing, and less executive work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Video processing is a lot of repetitive work, since it is constantly being told to do the same thing to large groups of pixels on the screen.  In order to make this run efficiency, video processors are far heavier on the ability to do repetitive work, than the ability to rapidly switch tasks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
GPU&#039;s have large numbers of ALU&#039;s, more so than CPU&#039;s.  As a result, they can do large amounts of bulky mathematical labor in a greater quantity than CPU&#039;s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Analogy==&lt;br /&gt;
One way to visualize it is a CPU works like a small group of very smart people who can quickly do any task given to them.  A GPU is a large group of relatively dumb people who aren&#039;t individually very fast or smart, but who can be trained to do repetitive tasks, and collectively can be more productive just due to the sheer number of people.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It&#039;s not that a CPU is fat, spoiled, or lazy.  Both CPUs and GPUs are creations made from billions of microscopic transistors crammed on a small piece of silicon.  On silicon chips, size is expensive.  The structures that make CPUs good at what they do take up lots of space.  When those structures are omitted, that leaves plenty of room for many &amp;quot;dumb&amp;quot; ALU&#039;s, which individually are very small.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ALUs of a GPU are partitioned into groups, and each group of ALUs shares management, so members of the group cannot be made to work on separate tasks.  They can either all work on nearly identical variations of one single task, in perfect sync with one another, or nothing at all.  Trying different hashes repeatedly - the process behind Bitcoin mining - is a very repetitive task suitable for a GPU, with each attempt varying only by the changing of one number (called a &amp;quot;nonce&amp;quot;) in the data being hashed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ATI Radeon 5970 is a popular video card for Bitcoin mining and, to date, offers the best known performance of any video card for this purpose.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This particular card has 3,200 &amp;quot;stream processors&amp;quot;, which can be thought of as 3,200 very dumb cores that can be trained to all do the same repetitive task, just so long as they don&#039;t have to make any decisions that interrupts their flow.  In addition, each of those stream processors have 5 ALU&#039;s - the part that does math.  So an ATI Radeon 5970 has 16,000 ALU&#039;s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since ALU&#039;s are what do all the work of Bitcoin mining, the number of available ALU&#039;s has a direct effect on the hash output.  Compare that to a 4-core CPU that can switch tasks on a dime, but has ALU&#039;s in some small multiple of four, if not just four ALU&#039;s alone.  Trying a single SHA256 hash in the context of Bitcoin mining requires around 1,000 simple mathematical steps that must be performed entirely by ALU&#039;s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That, in a nutshell, is why GPU&#039;s can mine Bitcoins so much faster than CPU&#039;s.  Bitcoin mining requires no decision making - it is repetitive mathematical work for a computer.  The only decision making that must be made in Bitcoin mining is, &amp;quot;do I have a valid block&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;do I not&amp;quot;.  That&#039;s an excellent workload to run on a GPU.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Why are AMD GPUs faster than Nvidia GPUs?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Firstly, AMD designs GPUs with many simple ALUs/shaders (VLIW design) that run at a relatively low frequency clock (typically 1120-3200 ALUs at 625-900 MHz), whereas Nvidia&#039;s microarchitecture consists of fewer more complex ALUs and tries to compensate with a higher shader clock (typically 448-1024 ALUs at 1150-1544 MHz). Because of this VLIW vs. non-VLIW difference, Nvidia uses up more square millimeters of die space per ALU, hence can pack fewer of them per chip, and they hit the frequency wall sooner than AMD which prevents them from increasing the clock high enough to match or surpass AMD&#039;s performance. This translates to a raw ALU performance advantage for AMD:&lt;br /&gt;
* AMD Radeon HD 6990: 3072 ALUs x 830 MHz = 2550 32-bit instruction per second&lt;br /&gt;
* Nvidia GTX 590: 1024 ALUs x 1214 MHz = 1243 32-bit instruction per second&lt;br /&gt;
This approximate &#039;&#039;&#039;2x-3x&#039;&#039;&#039; performance difference exists across the entire range of AMD and Nvidia GPUs. It is noticeably visible in all ALU-bound GPGPU workloads such as Bitcoin, password bruteforcers, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Secondly, another difference favoring Bitcoin mining on AMD GPUs instead of Nvidia&#039;s is that the mining algorithm is based on SHA-256, which makes heavy use of the 32-bit integer right rotate operation. This operation can be implemented as a single hardware instruction on AMD GPUs, but requires three separate hardware instructions to be emulated on Nvidia GPUs (2 shifts + 1 add). This alone gives AMD another &#039;&#039;&#039;1.7x&#039;&#039;&#039; performance advantage (~1900 instructions instead of ~3250 to execute the SHA-256 compression function).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Combined together, these 2 factors make AMD GPUs overall &#039;&#039;&#039;3x-5x&#039;&#039;&#039; faster when mining Bitcoins.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mining hardware comparison]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[:Category:Miners|Miners]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[:Category:Pool Operators|Pool Operators]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mining]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mrb</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Why_a_GPU_mines_faster_than_a_CPU&amp;diff=6886</id>
		<title>Why a GPU mines faster than a CPU</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Why_a_GPU_mines_faster_than_a_CPU&amp;diff=6886"/>
		<updated>2011-04-07T07:33:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mrb: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Some Bitcoin users might wonder why there is a huge disparity between the mining output of a CPU versus a GPU.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, just to clarify, the CPU, or &#039;&#039;central processing unit&#039;&#039;, is the part of the computer that performs the will of the software loaded on the computer.  It&#039;s the main executive for the entire machine.  It is the master that tells all the parts of the computer what to do - in accordance with the program code of the software, and, hopefully, the will of the user.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some computers have multiple CPU&#039;s, and some CPU&#039;s have multiple cores (which is almost the same thing as having multiple CPU&#039;s in a single physical package).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CPU is usually a removable component that plugs into the computer&#039;s main circuit board, or &#039;&#039;motherboard&#039;&#039; and sits underneath a large metallic heat sink or fan.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The GPU, or &#039;&#039;graphics processing unit&#039;&#039;, is a part of the video rendering system in a computer.  In many cases, the GPU is located on a separate circuit board called a video card, which is in turn plugged into a slot on the motherboard.  The typical function of a GPU is to assist with the rendering of 3D graphics and visual effects so that the CPU doesn&#039;t have to.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many computers don&#039;t have GPU&#039;s at all.  A GPU isn&#039;t a requirement, it&#039;s just that they are appearing as standard equipment in computers nowadays, since newer operating systems support enhanced visual effects that depend on the GPU.  For example, the translucent windows in Windows 7, or the row of icons in Mac OS X that bulges near the mouse pointer - these are effects that are made feasible with a GPU.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A GPU is like a CPU, but there are important internal differences that make them suited toward their special tasks.  These are the differences that make Bitcoin mining far more favorable on a GPU.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Short Answer ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A typical CPU core can execute &#039;&#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039;&#039; 32-bit instructions per clock (using a 128-bit SSE instruction), whereas a GPU like the Radeon HD 5970 can execute &#039;&#039;&#039;3200&#039;&#039;&#039; 32-bit instructions per clock (using its 3200 ALUs or shaders). This is a difference of &#039;&#039;&#039;800 times more instructions per clock&#039;&#039;&#039;. As of 2011, the fastest CPUs have up to 6, 8, or 12 cores and a somewhat higher frequency clock (2000-3000 MHz vs. 725 MHz for the Radeon HD 5970), but this is far from enough to compensate for this huge difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A CPU is an executive ==&lt;br /&gt;
A CPU is designed primarily to be an executive and make decisions, as directed by the software.  For example, if you type a document and save it, it is the CPU&#039;s job to turn your document into the appropriate file type and direct the hard disk to write it as a file.  CPU&#039;s can also do all kinds of math, as inside every CPU is one or more &amp;quot;Arithmetic/Logic Units&amp;quot; (ALU&#039;s).  CPU&#039;s are also highly capable of following instructions of the &amp;quot;if this, do this, otherwise do that&amp;quot;.  A large bulk of the structures inside a CPU are concerned with making sure that the CPU is ready to deal with having to switch to a different task on a moment&#039;s notice when needed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CPU&#039;s also have to deal with quite a few other things which add complexity, including:&lt;br /&gt;
* enforcing privilege levels and the boundaries between user programs and the operating system&lt;br /&gt;
* creating the illusion of &amp;quot;virtual memory&amp;quot; to programs&lt;br /&gt;
* for the most popular processors, being backwards compatible with legacy code&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A GPU is a laborer ==&lt;br /&gt;
A GPU is very different.  Yes, a GPU can do math, and can also do &amp;quot;this&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;that&amp;quot; based on specific conditions.  However, GPU&#039;s have been designed so they are very good at doing video processing, and less executive work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Video processing is a lot of repetitive work, since it is constantly being told to do the same thing to large groups of pixels on the screen.  In order to make this run efficiency, video processors are far heavier on the ability to do repetitive work, than the ability to rapidly switch tasks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
GPU&#039;s have large numbers of ALU&#039;s, more so than CPU&#039;s.  As a result, they can do large amounts of bulky mathematical labor in a greater quantity than CPU&#039;s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Analogy==&lt;br /&gt;
One way to visualize it is a CPU works like a small group of very smart people who can quickly do any task given to them.  A GPU is a large group of relatively dumb people who aren&#039;t individually very fast or smart, but who can be trained to do repetitive tasks, and collectively can be more productive just due to the sheer number of people.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It&#039;s not that a CPU is fat, spoiled, or lazy.  Both CPUs and GPUs are creations made from billions of microscopic transistors crammed on a small piece of silicon.  On silicon chips, size is expensive.  The structures that make CPUs good at what they do take up lots of space.  When those structures are omitted, that leaves plenty of room for many &amp;quot;dumb&amp;quot; ALU&#039;s, which individually are very small.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ALUs of a GPU are partitioned into groups, and each group of ALUs shares management, so members of the group cannot be made to work on separate tasks.  They can either all work on nearly identical variations of one single task, in perfect sync with one another, or nothing at all.  Trying different hashes repeatedly - the process behind Bitcoin mining - is a very repetitive task suitable for a GPU, with each attempt varying only by the changing of one number (called a &amp;quot;nonce&amp;quot;) in the data being hashed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ATI Radeon 5970 is a popular video card for Bitcoin mining and, to date, offers the best known performance of any video card for this purpose.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This particular card has 3,200 &amp;quot;stream processors&amp;quot;, which can be thought of as 3,200 very dumb cores that can be trained to all do the same repetitive task, just so long as they don&#039;t have to make any decisions that interrupts their flow.  In addition, each of those stream processors have 5 ALU&#039;s - the part that does math.  So an ATI Radeon 5970 has 16,000 ALU&#039;s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since ALU&#039;s are what do all the work of Bitcoin mining, the number of available ALU&#039;s has a direct effect on the hash output.  Compare that to a 4-core CPU that can switch tasks on a dime, but has ALU&#039;s in some small multiple of four, if not just four ALU&#039;s alone.  Trying a single SHA256 hash in the context of Bitcoin mining requires around 1,000 simple mathematical steps that must be performed entirely by ALU&#039;s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That, in a nutshell, is why GPU&#039;s can mine Bitcoins so much faster than CPU&#039;s.  Bitcoin mining requires no decision making - it is repetitive mathematical work for a computer.  The only decision making that must be made in Bitcoin mining is, &amp;quot;do I have a valid block&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;do I not&amp;quot;.  That&#039;s an excellent workload to run on a GPU.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Why are AMD GPUs faster than Nvidia GPUs?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Firstly, AMD designs GPUs with many simple ALUs/shaders (VLIW design) that run at a relatively low frequency clock (typically 1120-3200 ALUs at 625-900 MHz), whereas Nvidia&#039;s microarchitecture consists of fewer more complex ALUs and tries to compensate with a higher shader clock (typically 448-1024 ALUs at 1150-1544 MHz). Because of this VLIW vs. non-VLIW difference, Nvidia uses up more square millimeters of die space per ALU, hence can pack fewer of them per chip, and they hit the frequency wall sooner than AMD which prevents them from increasing the clock high enough to match or surpass AMD&#039;s performance. This translates to a raw ALU performance advantage for AMD:&lt;br /&gt;
* AMD Radeon HD 6990: 3072 ALUs x 830 MHz = 2550 32-bit instruction per second&lt;br /&gt;
* Nvidia GTX 590: 1024 ALUs x 1214 MHz = 1243 32-bit instruction per second&lt;br /&gt;
This approximate &#039;&#039;&#039;2x-3x&#039;&#039;&#039; performance difference exists across the entire range of AMD and Nvidia GPUs. It is noticeably visible in all ALU-bound GPGPU workloads such as Bitcoin, password bruteforcers, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Secondly, another difference favoring Bitcoin mining on AMD GPUs instead of Nvidia&#039;s is that the mining algorithm is based on SHA-256, which makes heavy use of the 32-bit integer right rotate operation. This operation can be implemented as a single hardware instruction on AMD GPUs, but requires three separate hardware instructions to be emulated on Nvidia GPUs (2 shifts + 1 add). This alone gives AMD another &#039;&#039;&#039;1.7x&#039;&#039;&#039; performance advantage (~1900 instructions instead of ~3250 to execute the SHA-256 compression function).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Combined together, these 2 factors make AMD GPUs overall a &#039;&#039;&#039;3x-5x&#039;&#039;&#039; faster.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mining hardware comparison]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[:Category:Miners|Miners]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[:Category:Pool Operators|Pool Operators]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mining]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mrb</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Why_a_GPU_mines_faster_than_a_CPU&amp;diff=6885</id>
		<title>Why a GPU mines faster than a CPU</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Why_a_GPU_mines_faster_than_a_CPU&amp;diff=6885"/>
		<updated>2011-04-07T07:32:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mrb: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Some Bitcoin users might wonder why there is a huge disparity between the mining output of a CPU versus a GPU.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, just to clarify, the CPU, or &#039;&#039;central processing unit&#039;&#039;, is the part of the computer that performs the will of the software loaded on the computer.  It&#039;s the main executive for the entire machine.  It is the master that tells all the parts of the computer what to do - in accordance with the program code of the software, and, hopefully, the will of the user.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some computers have multiple CPU&#039;s, and some CPU&#039;s have multiple cores (which is almost the same thing as having multiple CPU&#039;s in a single physical package).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CPU is usually a removable component that plugs into the computer&#039;s main circuit board, or &#039;&#039;motherboard&#039;&#039; and sits underneath a large metallic heat sink or fan.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The GPU, or &#039;&#039;graphics processing unit&#039;&#039;, is a part of the video rendering system in a computer.  In many cases, the GPU is located on a separate circuit board called a video card, which is in turn plugged into a slot on the motherboard.  The typical function of a GPU is to assist with the rendering of 3D graphics and visual effects so that the CPU doesn&#039;t have to.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many computers don&#039;t have GPU&#039;s at all.  A GPU isn&#039;t a requirement, it&#039;s just that they are appearing as standard equipment in computers nowadays, since newer operating systems support enhanced visual effects that depend on the GPU.  For example, the translucent windows in Windows 7, or the row of icons in Mac OS X that bulges near the mouse pointer - these are effects that are made feasible with a GPU.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A GPU is like a CPU, but there are important internal differences that make them suited toward their special tasks.  These are the differences that make Bitcoin mining far more favorable on a GPU.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Short Answer ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A typical CPU core can execute &#039;&#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039;&#039; 32-bit instructions per clock (using a 128-bit SSE instruction), whereas a GPU like the Radeon HD 5970 can execute &#039;&#039;&#039;3200&#039;&#039;&#039; 32-bit instructions per clock (using its 3200 ALUs or shaders). This is a difference of &#039;&#039;&#039;800 times more instructions per clock&#039;&#039;&#039;. As of 2011, the fastest CPUs have up to 6, 8, or 12 cores and a somewhat higher frequency clock (2000-3000 MHz vs. 725 MHz for the Radeon HD 5970), but this is far from enough to compensate for this huge difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A CPU is an executive ==&lt;br /&gt;
A CPU is designed primarily to be an executive and make decisions, as directed by the software.  For example, if you type a document and save it, it is the CPU&#039;s job to turn your document into the appropriate file type and direct the hard disk to write it as a file.  CPU&#039;s can also do all kinds of math, as inside every CPU is one or more &amp;quot;Arithmetic/Logic Units&amp;quot; (ALU&#039;s).  CPU&#039;s are also highly capable of following instructions of the &amp;quot;if this, do this, otherwise do that&amp;quot;.  A large bulk of the structures inside a CPU are concerned with making sure that the CPU is ready to deal with having to switch to a different task on a moment&#039;s notice when needed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CPU&#039;s also have to deal with quite a few other things which add complexity, including:&lt;br /&gt;
* enforcing privilege levels and the boundaries between user programs and the operating system&lt;br /&gt;
* creating the illusion of &amp;quot;virtual memory&amp;quot; to programs&lt;br /&gt;
* for the most popular processors, being backwards compatible with legacy code&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A GPU is a laborer ==&lt;br /&gt;
A GPU is very different.  Yes, a GPU can do math, and can also do &amp;quot;this&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;that&amp;quot; based on specific conditions.  However, GPU&#039;s have been designed so they are very good at doing video processing, and less executive work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Video processing is a lot of repetitive work, since it is constantly being told to do the same thing to large groups of pixels on the screen.  In order to make this run efficiency, video processors are far heavier on the ability to do repetitive work, than the ability to rapidly switch tasks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
GPU&#039;s have large numbers of ALU&#039;s, more so than CPU&#039;s.  As a result, they can do large amounts of bulky mathematical labor in a greater quantity than CPU&#039;s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Analogy==&lt;br /&gt;
One way to visualize it is a CPU works like a small group of very smart people who can quickly do any task given to them.  A GPU is a large group of relatively dumb people who aren&#039;t individually very fast or smart, but who can be trained to do repetitive tasks, and collectively can be more productive just due to the sheer number of people.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It&#039;s not that a CPU is fat, spoiled, or lazy.  Both CPUs and GPUs are creations made from billions of microscopic transistors crammed on a small piece of silicon.  On silicon chips, size is expensive.  The structures that make CPUs good at what they do take up lots of space.  When those structures are omitted, that leaves plenty of room for many &amp;quot;dumb&amp;quot; ALU&#039;s, which individually are very small.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ALUs of a GPU are partitioned into groups, and each group of ALUs shares management, so members of the group cannot be made to work on separate tasks.  They can either all work on nearly identical variations of one single task, in perfect sync with one another, or nothing at all.  Trying different hashes repeatedly - the process behind Bitcoin mining - is a very repetitive task suitable for a GPU, with each attempt varying only by the changing of one number (called a &amp;quot;nonce&amp;quot;) in the data being hashed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ATI Radeon 5970 is a popular video card for Bitcoin mining and, to date, offers the best known performance of any video card for this purpose.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This particular card has 3,200 &amp;quot;stream processors&amp;quot;, which can be thought of as 3,200 very dumb cores that can be trained to all do the same repetitive task, just so long as they don&#039;t have to make any decisions that interrupts their flow.  In addition, each of those stream processors have 5 ALU&#039;s - the part that does math.  So an ATI Radeon 5970 has 16,000 ALU&#039;s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since ALU&#039;s are what do all the work of Bitcoin mining, the number of available ALU&#039;s has a direct effect on the hash output.  Compare that to a 4-core CPU that can switch tasks on a dime, but has ALU&#039;s in some small multiple of four, if not just four ALU&#039;s alone.  Trying a single SHA256 hash in the context of Bitcoin mining requires around 1,000 simple mathematical steps that must be performed entirely by ALU&#039;s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That, in a nutshell, is why GPU&#039;s can mine Bitcoins so much faster than CPU&#039;s.  Bitcoin mining requires no decision making - it is repetitive mathematical work for a computer.  The only decision making that must be made in Bitcoin mining is, &amp;quot;do I have a valid block&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;do I not&amp;quot;.  That&#039;s an excellent workload to run on a GPU.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Why are AMD GPUs faster than Nvidia GPUs?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Firstly, AMD designs GPUs with many simple ALUs/shaders (VLIW design) that run at a relatively low frequency clock (typically 1120-3200 ALUs at 625-900 MHz), whereas Nvidia&#039;s microarchitecture consists of fewer more complex ALUs and tries to compensate with a higher shader clock (typically 448-1024 ALUs at 1150-1544 MHz). Because of this fundamental difference, Nvidia uses up more square millimeters of die space per ALU, hence can pack fewer of them per chip, and they hit the frequency wall sooner than AMD which prevents them from increasing the clock high enough to match or surpass AMD&#039;s performance. This translates to a raw ALU performance advantage for AMD:&lt;br /&gt;
* AMD Radeon HD 6990: 3072 ALUs x 830 MHz = 2550 32-bit instruction per second&lt;br /&gt;
* Nvidia GTX 590: 1024 ALUs x 1214 MHz = 1243 32-bit instruction per second&lt;br /&gt;
This approximate &#039;&#039;&#039;2x-3x&#039;&#039;&#039; performance difference exists across the entire range of AMD and Nvidia GPUs. It is noticeably visible in all ALU-bound GPGPU workloads such as Bitcoin, password bruteforcers, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Secondly, another difference favoring Bitcoin mining on AMD GPUs instead of Nvidia&#039;s is that the mining algorithm is based on SHA-256, which makes heavy use of the 32-bit integer right rotate operation. This operation can be implemented as a single hardware instruction on AMD GPUs, but requires three separate hardware instructions to be emulated on Nvidia GPUs (2 shifts + 1 add). This alone gives AMD another &#039;&#039;&#039;1.7x&#039;&#039;&#039; performance advantage (~1900 instructions instead of ~3250 to execute the SHA-256 compression function).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Combined together, these 2 factors make AMD GPUs overall a &#039;&#039;&#039;3x-5x&#039;&#039;&#039; faster.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mining hardware comparison]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[:Category:Miners|Miners]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[:Category:Pool Operators|Pool Operators]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mining]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mrb</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Mining_hardware_comparison&amp;diff=6883</id>
		<title>Mining hardware comparison</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Mining_hardware_comparison&amp;diff=6883"/>
		<updated>2011-04-07T06:30:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mrb: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Below are some statistics about the mining performance of various hardware used in a [[mining rig]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The table shows stock clock numbers. 10-20% performance improvement can be achieved via overclocking.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Graphics cards==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===AMD===&lt;br /&gt;
To get the maximum performance use the 2.1 or 2.2 release of the ATI Stream SDK. 2.3 performance drops by 5-10%.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! W !! Clock !! SP !! SDK  !! Slot !! Miner !! Notes&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3XXX || || || || || || || || OpenCL Not Supported&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 42XX || || || || || || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || || OpenCL Not Supported (intergrated/mobile GPU)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4350 || 6.93 || 0.346 || 20 || 575 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don&#039;t use vectors &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4550 || 7.23 || 0.289 || 25 || 600 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don&#039;t use vectors &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4650 || 31.33 || 0.653 || 48 || 650 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don&#039;t use vectors &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4670 || 36.14 || 0.613 || 59 || 750 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don&#039;t use vectors &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4730 || 72.29 || 0.657 || 110 || 750 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4770 || 72.29 || 0.904 || 80 || 750 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4830 || 55.42 || 0.583 || 95 || 575 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4850 || 75.30 || 0.685 || 110 || 625 || 800 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4860 || 67.47 || 0.519 || 130 || 700 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4870 || 90.36 || 0.602 || 150 || 750 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || clmine ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4870 || 78    ||       ||     ||     ||     || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || m0mchil&#039;s OpenCL/Vista 64bit || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4890 || 102.41 || 0.539 || 190 || 850 || 800 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4850X2 || 150.60 || 0.602 || 250 || 625 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4870X2 || 180.72 || 0.632 || 286 || 750 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 5450 || 11.99 || 0.631 || 19 || 650 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 5550 || 40.59 || 1.041 || 39 || 550 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5570 || 59.96 || 1.538 || 39 || 650 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5570 || 64 || 1.641 || 39 || 650 || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil&#039;s OpenCL/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 5650 || 48    || 2.5-3.2 ? || 15-19 ? ||  ||  ||  || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil&#039;s OpenCL/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source] [http://www.notebookcheck.net/ATI-Mobility-Radeon-HD-5650.23697.0.html source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 5670 || 71.49 || 1.117 || 64 || 775 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EEFFEE;&amp;quot;| 5670 || 72 || 1.64 || 44 || 850 || || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm-mod (Win7-64) || Sapphire 100287VGAL card is low power&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 5670 || 85 || || || 900 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 5750 || 116.24 || 1.352 || 86 || 700 || 720 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 5770 || 156.83 || 1.452 || 108 || 850 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFFFF;&amp;quot;| 5830 || 206.64 || 1.181 || 175 || 800 || 1120 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFFFFF;&amp;quot;| 5830 || 241    || 1.377 || 175 || 1006 || || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-03-11 / Win7 64 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 240.77 || 1.595 || 151 || 725 || 1440 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 252    || 1.669 || 151 || 765 || || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-01-25 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 255.3  || 1.690 || 151 || 765 || || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-01-25 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 300    || 1.987 || 151 || 925 (OC) ||      || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil&#039;s OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFEFFF;&amp;quot;| 5850 || 250.26 || 1.657 || 151 ||     ||      ||  || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || opencl client || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 313.65 || 1.668 || 188 || 850 || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 313    || 1.665 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo/Linux ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 343    || 1.824 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo/Linux ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 355    || 1.888 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/Linux ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#EFFFEF;&amp;quot;| 5870 || 340    || 1.809 || 188 || 850 || 1600 ||  || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil&#039;s OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 535.06 || 1.820 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 560    || 1.905 || 294 || 725 || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 565    || 1.922 || 294 || || || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine2 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 604    || 2.054 || 294 || || || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background:#FFEFEF;&amp;quot;| 5970 || 645    ||       ||     || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || -f1, Debian 6, fglrx-driver 10.9.3&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6850 || 171.59 || 1.351 || 127 || 775 || 960 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6850 || 196 || || || 850 || 960 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 0&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6870 || 232.47 || 1.540 || 151 || 900 || 1120 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6870 || 260.1 || 1.611 || 175 || 1001 || 1150 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm-gui windows7x86 cat 11.3 || -v -w 128 -f 1 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6870 || 282.23 || 1.611 || 175 || 1047 || 1120 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm windows cat 11.2 || -v -w 128 -f 0 mem clock 300&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6950 || 295 ||  || 160 (?) || 810 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6950 || 325 ||  || 200 (?) || 885 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6950 || 360 ||  || 200 (?) || 970 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6970 || 323 || 1.468 || 220 || 880 || 1536 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -w 64, SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6990 || 682 ||  ||  || 830 || 3072 || 2.3 ||  PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb&#039;s hdminer [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=5444.msg80154#msg80154 source] || SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 6990 || 723 ||  ||  || 880 || 3072 || 2.3 ||  PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb&#039;s hdminer [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=5444.msg80154#msg80154 source] || SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|FirePro V8700 || 84.8 ||  ||  || 750 || 800 ||  || || poclbm-mod.03.24.2011 || &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Nvidia===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! W !! Clock !! SP !! Comment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8200 mGPU || 1.2 || || || 1200 || 16 || 128 MB shared memory, &amp;quot;poclbm -w 128 -f 0&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8600M GT || 4.93 ||  ||  ||  || 32 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8600GT || 5.66 ||  ||  || 1188 ||  32 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8600GT OC || 7.3 ||  ||  || 1602 || 32 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.0 poclbm] -w 128 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg72833#msg72833 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8800GT || 25   || 0.24 || 105 || 1300 ||  ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8800GT || 24.5 || 0.23 || 105 || 1300 ||  || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8800GTS || 16.8 || 0.109 || 154 ||  ||  || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source] [http://www.techspot.com/review/79-geforce-8800-gts-512/page11.html source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8800 GTS || 18.7 || 0.124 || 150 || 1200 ||  || poclbm -w 64 no vectors&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9300GE || 1.57 ||  ||  || 1300 ||  8 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9300GS || 1.69 ||  ||  || 1400 ||  8 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9400GT || 3.37 || 0.067 || 50 || 1400 || 16 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9500GT || 6.75 || 0.135 || 50 || 1400 || 32 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9600GSO || 19.88 || 0.237 || 84 || 1375 || 96 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9600GSO512 || 11.75 || 0.131 || 90 || 1625 || 48 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9600GT || 15.66 || 0.165 || 95 || 1625 || 64 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9600GT OC || 18.8 || &amp;lt;0.198 || &amp;gt;95 || 1981 || 64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.0 poclbm] -w 128 -f 10 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg74610#msg74610 source] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg73353#msg73353 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9800GT || 30.36 || 0.289 || 105 || 1800 || 112 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9800GTX || 32.54 || 0.232 || 140 || 1688 || 128 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9800GTX+ || 35.39 || 0.251 || 141 || 1836 || 128 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background-color:#FFEFEF&amp;quot;| 9800GX2 || 57.83 || 0.294 || 197 ||  || 2x128 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background-color:#FFEFEF&amp;quot;| 9800GX2 || 28 || 0.142 || 197 ||  || 2x128 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| G210 || 3.38 || 0.111 || 30.5 || 1402 || 16 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GT220 || 9.83 || 0.170 || 58 || 1360 || 48 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GT240 || 19.37 || 0.281 || 69 || 1340 || 96 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GT240 || 21.24 ||  ||  ||  || 96 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4291.0 poclbm-mod] -f 0 -v [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg73383#msg73383 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTS250 || 35.39 || 0.244 || 145 || 1836 || 128 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX260 || 35.91 || 0.178 || 202 || 1242 || 192 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX260 || 44 || 0.242 || 182 || 1242 || 216 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX260c216 || 40.40 || 0.236 || 171 || 1242 || 216 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX260c216 OC || 52.0 || || || 1461 || 216 || &amp;quot;poclbm -w 256 -f 1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX275 || 50.75 || 0.232 || 219 || 1404 || 240 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX275 || 58 || || || 729/1458 || 240 || poclbm -f 0 -w 256&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX280 || 46.84 || 0.198 || 236 || 1296 || 240 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX285 || 53.35 || 0.262 || 204 || 1476 || 240 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX295 || 89.78 || 0.311 || 289 || 1242 || 480 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GT 320M (MacBook Air) || 6.12 ||  ||  || 1212 || 48 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GT 330M (Sony Vaio Z) || 7.8 || 0.71 ( 0.3 total) || 11 (26w total) || 1045 || 48 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GT430 || 20.24 || 0.413 || 49 || 1400 || 96 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTS450 || 45.28 || 0.427 || 106 || 1566 || 192 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX460SE || 56.39 || 0.376 || 150 || 1300 || 288 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX460 || 68.31 || 0.427 || 160 || 1350 || 336 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX460 (2 cards) || 102 || 0.319? || 320? || 1350 ||  || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX460 (2 cards) OC || 127 || 0.374 || 340 || 1620 || 2x 336 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2444.0 rpcminer-cuda] -gpugrid=128 -gputhreads=128 ver.20110227&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX465 || 64.41 || 0.322 || 200 || 1215 || 352 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX470 || 81.98 || 0.381 || 215 || 1215 || 448 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX470 || 94.7 || || || 1414 || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX480 || 101.28 || 0.405 || 250 || 1401 || 480 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX560 Ti || 67.7 || 0.39  || 170 || 1700 || 384 || standard EVGA 560, no overclock&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX560 OC || 86.7 || &amp;lt;0.51 || &amp;gt;170 || 1800 || 384 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2444.0 rpcminer-cuda] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg72816#msg72816 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX570 || 105.83 || 0.483 || 219 || 1464 || 480 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GTX580 || 119.06 || 0.488 || 244 || 1544 || 512 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Quadro FX 580 || 5.7 || 0.14 || 40 || 1125 || 4 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Quadro FX 1600M || 6 || 0.12 || 50 || 625 || 32 ||rpcminer-cuda, Win&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Quadro NVS 135M || 1.05 || 0.1 || 10 || 800 || 1 || &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Quadro NVS 3100M || 3.6 || 0.257 || 14 || 600 || 16 || rpcminer-cuda, Win, CUDA 3.1.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==CPUs==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A lot of nice data can be pulled from [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.0 this thread] to seed this section. Also from [https://www.bitcoin.org/wiki/doku.php?id=bitcoin_miners this page on the old wiki].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===AMD===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Model !! nprocs !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2x Opteron 6128 || 16 || 32.4 || 0.203 || 160W || 2 GHz || 0.3.19 || -4way&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon X2 3800+ || 2 || 1.73 || 0.03 || 65 W || 2.00 GHz || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || -algo=4way&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon X2 4000+ || 2 || 1.9 || 0.02 || 65W || 2.1 GHz || rpc-miner || &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon X2 4400+ ||   || 2.09 || 0.32 || 65W || 2.3GHz || 0.3.19/Win x64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon X2 6000+ || 2 || 2.81 || 0.02 || 125W || 3 GHz || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg22881#msg22881 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon X2 6400+ Black Edition || 2 || 2.9 || 0.023 || 125W || 3.2 GHz || 0.3.20.2 BETA/Win 7 x64 || -4way&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon XP 2000+ || 2 || 0.62 || 0.009 || 70W || 1.67 GHz || 0.3.18/Ubuntu || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source] [http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm?articleid=914&amp;amp;page=4 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon II X2 240e || 2 || 2.71 || 0.06 || 45W || 2.81 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athlon II X4 630 || 4 || 10.7 || 0.11 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || bitcoin-miner 0.4 || &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Phenom II X6 1055T || 6 || 15.84 || 0.13 || 125W || 2.82 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Phenom II X6 1100T || 6 || 22 || 0.176 || 125W || 3.82 GHz || bitcoin-miner || Aciid#bitcoin-dev&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 3.8 || 0.04 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 0.3.1x/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 7.2 || 0.08 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || cpu-miner 0.2.1/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Phenom II x4 955 || 4 || 11 || 0.09 || 125W || 3.2 GHz || rpcminer-4way ||&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===ARM===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Cortex A8 || 1 || 0.125 || || || 0.6 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || Nokia N900: &#039;cryptopp&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Cortex A8 || 1 || 0.2 || || || 0.6 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || Nokia N900: &#039;c&#039; algo&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Intel===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Pentium III mobile ? || 1 || 0.3 || 0.014 || 21W || 1.07 GHz || 0.3.1x/Win2K || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source] [http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=27380 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Old Xeon 512k (Dual) || 2x1/2 || 2.0 || ? || ? || 3.06GHz || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || HT disabled, algo=4way (twice as fast as the 2nd best algo)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Pentium 4 2.0A || 1 || 0.85 || || || 2.0 GHz || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft-0.4]/WinXP || -g no -t 2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Pentium Dual-Core E5400 || 2/2 || 2.27 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.7 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Celeron E330 || 2/2 || 2.2  || 0.03 || 65W || 2.5 GHz || 0.3.19/Ubuntu10.04 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i3 M350 || 2/4 || 1.48 || 0.04 || 35W || 2.27 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| Core i5 M450 || 2/4 || 1.8  || 0.05 || 35W || 1.2 GHz || 0.3.17/Win7-54 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| Core i5-650  || 2/4 || 5.1 || 0.04 ? ||  || 3.2 GHz || cpuminer-0.7 || -4way&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i5 ?  || 4/? || 6.5 ||  ||  ||  || client from svn || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37621#msg37621 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 4.5 || 0.05 || 95W || 3.1 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-01-22) || cryptopp_asm32&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 14 || 0.15 || 95W || 3.1 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || sse2_64&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i7 920   || 4/8 || 19.2 || 0.10 || 195 || 4.0 GHz (x21) || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] || -a 5&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i7 950   || 4/8 || 5.88 || 0.039 || 150W || 3.83 GHz (x23) || bitcoin-0.3.20.2 Win7-64 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i7 950   || 4/8 || 18.9 || 0.126 || 150W || 3.83 GHz (x23) || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] v0.4 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core i7 980x   || 6/12 || 19.2 || 0.15 || 130 || 4.4 GHz (x33) || cpuminer/Win7-64 || &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| Core i7 980x   || 6/12 || 8.7 ||  ||  || 3.9 GHz (x27) || 0.3.17/Win7-64 || &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| Core i7 620M   || 2/4 || 6.3 || 0.18 || 35 || 2.66 GHz || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] v0.4 || &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core 2 Duo E6550 || 1/2 || 2.45 || ? || ? || 2.33 GHz || cpuminer 0.7.1 (Linux) || --algo=sse2_64&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core 2 Duo E6850 || 2/2 || 6.75 || 0.10 || 65W || 3.0 Ghz || ufasoft-0.3 ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 7.76 || 0.11 || 70W || 3.33 GHz (o/c?) || ufasoft-0.3 || miner optimized for Intel Core&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 2.52 || 0.04 || 65W || 2.66 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon 3060 || 1/2 || 2.03 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.4GHz || cpuminer 0.8.1 (Linux) || --algo=cryptopp_asm32&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon X5355 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 10.13 || 0.16 || 120W || 2.66GHz || bitcoind || Roughly the same speed as the &amp;quot;c&amp;quot; algo in cpuminer&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon X5355 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 22.76 || 0.09 || 120W || 2.66GHz || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || -O2 -march=core2, algo=sse2_64&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon E5440 || 4/8 || 7.3 || ? || 80W || 2.66 GHz|| Kiv&#039;s poclbm-gui || FIXME: Either wrong model # or wrong threads/speed info&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon E5520 || 4/8 || 6.5 || 0.08 || 80W || 2.27 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon E5530 || 4/8 || 7.14 || 0.09 || 80W || 2.4 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Xeon E5630 (dual) || 2x4/8 || 8 || 0.1 || 80W || 2.53 GHz || 0.3.17/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Atom N270 || 1 || 0.42 || &#039;&#039;&#039;0.17&#039;&#039;&#039; || 2.5W || 1.6 GHz || 0.3.1x/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mining rig]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[OpenCL miner]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=745 ATI Stream vs. NVIDIA CUDA - GPGPU computing battle royale]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mining]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mrb</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Why_a_GPU_mines_faster_than_a_CPU&amp;diff=6882</id>
		<title>Why a GPU mines faster than a CPU</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Why_a_GPU_mines_faster_than_a_CPU&amp;diff=6882"/>
		<updated>2011-04-07T06:23:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mrb: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Some Bitcoin users might wonder why there is a huge disparity between the mining output of a CPU versus a GPU.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, just to clarify, the CPU, or &#039;&#039;central processing unit&#039;&#039;, is the part of the computer that performs the will of the software loaded on the computer.  It&#039;s the main executive for the entire machine.  It is the master that tells all the parts of the computer what to do - in accordance with the program code of the software, and, hopefully, the will of the user.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some computers have multiple CPU&#039;s, and some CPU&#039;s have multiple cores (which is almost the same thing as having multiple CPU&#039;s in a single physical package).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CPU is usually a removable component that plugs into the computer&#039;s main circuit board, or &#039;&#039;motherboard&#039;&#039; and sits underneath a large metallic heat sink or fan.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The GPU, or &#039;&#039;graphics processing unit&#039;&#039;, is a part of the video rendering system in a computer.  In many cases, the GPU is located on a separate circuit board called a video card, which is in turn plugged into a slot on the motherboard.  The typical function of a GPU is to assist with the rendering of 3D graphics and visual effects so that the CPU doesn&#039;t have to.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many computers don&#039;t have GPU&#039;s at all.  A GPU isn&#039;t a requirement, it&#039;s just that they are appearing as standard equipment in computers nowadays, since newer operating systems support enhanced visual effects that depend on the GPU.  For example, the translucent windows in Windows 7, or the row of icons in Mac OS X that bulges near the mouse pointer - these are effects that are made feasible with a GPU.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A GPU is like a CPU, but there are important internal differences that make them suited toward their special tasks.  These are the differences that make Bitcoin mining far more favorable on a GPU.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Short Answer ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A typical CPU core can execute &#039;&#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039;&#039; 32-bit instructions per clock (using a 128-bit SSE instruction), whereas a GPU like the Radeon HD 5970 can execute &#039;&#039;&#039;3200&#039;&#039;&#039; 32-bit instructions per clock (using its 3200 ALUs or shaders). This is a difference of &#039;&#039;&#039;800 times more instructions per clock&#039;&#039;&#039;. As of 2011, the fastest CPUs have up to 6, 8, or 12 cores and a somewhat higher frequency clock (2000-3000 MHz vs. 725 MHz for the Radeon HD 5970), but this is far from enough to compensate for this huge difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A CPU is an executive ==&lt;br /&gt;
A CPU is designed primarily to be an executive and make decisions, as directed by the software.  For example, if you type a document and save it, it is the CPU&#039;s job to turn your document into the appropriate file type and direct the hard disk to write it as a file.  CPU&#039;s can also do all kinds of math, as inside every CPU is one or more &amp;quot;Arithmetic/Logic Units&amp;quot; (ALU&#039;s).  CPU&#039;s are also highly capable of following instructions of the &amp;quot;if this, do this, otherwise do that&amp;quot;.  A large bulk of the structures inside a CPU are concerned with making sure that the CPU is ready to deal with having to switch to a different task on a moment&#039;s notice when needed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CPU&#039;s also have to deal with quite a few other things which add complexity, including:&lt;br /&gt;
* enforcing privilege levels and the boundaries between user programs and the operating system&lt;br /&gt;
* creating the illusion of &amp;quot;virtual memory&amp;quot; to programs&lt;br /&gt;
* for the most popular processors, being backwards compatible with legacy code&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A GPU is a laborer ==&lt;br /&gt;
A GPU is very different.  Yes, a GPU can do math, and can also do &amp;quot;this&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;that&amp;quot; based on specific conditions.  However, GPU&#039;s have been designed so they are very good at doing video processing, and less executive work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Video processing is a lot of repetitive work, since it is constantly being told to do the same thing to large groups of pixels on the screen.  In order to make this run efficiency, video processors are far heavier on the ability to do repetitive work, than the ability to rapidly switch tasks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
GPU&#039;s have large numbers of ALU&#039;s, more so than CPU&#039;s.  As a result, they can do large amounts of bulky mathematical labor in a greater quantity than CPU&#039;s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Analogy==&lt;br /&gt;
One way to visualize it is a CPU works like a small group of very smart people who can quickly do any task given to them.  A GPU is a large group of relatively dumb people who aren&#039;t individually very fast or smart, but who can be trained to do repetitive tasks, and collectively can be more productive just due to the sheer number of people.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It&#039;s not that a CPU is fat, spoiled, or lazy.  Both CPUs and GPUs are creations made from billions of microscopic transistors crammed on a small piece of silicon.  On silicon chips, size is expensive.  The structures that make CPUs good at what they do take up lots of space.  When those structures are omitted, that leaves plenty of room for many &amp;quot;dumb&amp;quot; ALU&#039;s, which individually are very small.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ALUs of a GPU are partitioned into groups, and each group of ALUs shares management, so members of the group cannot be made to work on separate tasks.  They can either all work on nearly identical variations of one single task, in perfect sync with one another, or nothing at all.  Trying different hashes repeatedly - the process behind Bitcoin mining - is a very repetitive task suitable for a GPU, with each attempt varying only by the changing of one number (called a &amp;quot;nonce&amp;quot;) in the data being hashed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ATI Radeon 5970 is a popular video card for Bitcoin mining and, to date, offers the best known performance of any video card for this purpose.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This particular card has 3,200 &amp;quot;stream processors&amp;quot;, which can be thought of as 3,200 very dumb cores that can be trained to all do the same repetitive task, just so long as they don&#039;t have to make any decisions that interrupts their flow.  In addition, each of those stream processors have 5 ALU&#039;s - the part that does math.  So an ATI Radeon 5970 has 16,000 ALU&#039;s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since ALU&#039;s are what do all the work of Bitcoin mining, the number of available ALU&#039;s has a direct effect on the hash output.  Compare that to a 4-core CPU that can switch tasks on a dime, but has ALU&#039;s in some small multiple of four, if not just four ALU&#039;s alone.  Trying a single SHA256 hash in the context of Bitcoin mining requires around 1,000 simple mathematical steps that must be performed entirely by ALU&#039;s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That, in a nutshell, is why GPU&#039;s can mine Bitcoins so much faster than CPU&#039;s.  Bitcoin mining requires no decision making - it is repetitive mathematical work for a computer.  The only decision making that must be made in Bitcoin mining is, &amp;quot;do I have a valid block&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;do I not&amp;quot;.  That&#039;s an excellent workload to run on a GPU.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mining hardware comparison]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[:Category:Miners|Miners]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[:Category:Pool Operators|Pool Operators]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mining]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mrb</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Why_a_GPU_mines_faster_than_a_CPU&amp;diff=6881</id>
		<title>Why a GPU mines faster than a CPU</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Why_a_GPU_mines_faster_than_a_CPU&amp;diff=6881"/>
		<updated>2011-04-07T06:22:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mrb: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Some Bitcoin users might wonder why there is a huge disparity between the mining output of a CPU versus a GPU.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, just to clarify, the CPU, or &#039;&#039;central processing unit&#039;&#039;, is the part of the computer that performs the will of the software loaded on the computer.  It&#039;s the main executive for the entire machine.  It is the master that tells all the parts of the computer what to do - in accordance with the program code of the software, and, hopefully, the will of the user.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some computers have multiple CPU&#039;s, and some CPU&#039;s have multiple cores (which is almost the same thing as having multiple CPU&#039;s in a single physical package).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CPU is usually a removable component that plugs into the computer&#039;s main circuit board, or &#039;&#039;motherboard&#039;&#039; and sits underneath a large metallic heat sink or fan.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The GPU, or &#039;&#039;graphics processing unit&#039;&#039;, is a part of the video rendering system in a computer.  In many cases, the GPU is located on a separate circuit board called a video card, which is in turn plugged into a slot on the motherboard.  The typical function of a GPU is to assist with the rendering of 3D graphics and visual effects so that the CPU doesn&#039;t have to.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many computers don&#039;t have GPU&#039;s at all.  A GPU isn&#039;t a requirement, it&#039;s just that they are appearing as standard equipment in computers nowadays, since newer operating systems support enhanced visual effects that depend on the GPU.  For example, the translucent windows in Windows 7, or the row of icons in Mac OS X that bulges near the mouse pointer - these are effects that are made feasible with a GPU.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A GPU is like a CPU, but there are important internal differences that make them suited toward their special tasks.  These are the differences that make Bitcoin mining far more favorable on a GPU.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Short Answer ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A typical CPU core can execute *4* 32-bit instructions per clock (using a 128-bit SSE instruction), whereas a GPU like the Radeon HD 5970 can execute *3200* 32-bit instructions per clock (using its 3200 ALUs or shaders). This is a difference of *800 times more instructions per clock*. As of 2011, the fastest CPUs have up to 6, 8, or 12 cores and a somewhat higher frequency clock (2000-3000 MHz vs. 725 MHz for the Radeon HD 5970), but this is far from enough to compensate for this huge difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A CPU is an executive ==&lt;br /&gt;
A CPU is designed primarily to be an executive and make decisions, as directed by the software.  For example, if you type a document and save it, it is the CPU&#039;s job to turn your document into the appropriate file type and direct the hard disk to write it as a file.  CPU&#039;s can also do all kinds of math, as inside every CPU is one or more &amp;quot;Arithmetic/Logic Units&amp;quot; (ALU&#039;s).  CPU&#039;s are also highly capable of following instructions of the &amp;quot;if this, do this, otherwise do that&amp;quot;.  A large bulk of the structures inside a CPU are concerned with making sure that the CPU is ready to deal with having to switch to a different task on a moment&#039;s notice when needed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CPU&#039;s also have to deal with quite a few other things which add complexity, including:&lt;br /&gt;
* enforcing privilege levels and the boundaries between user programs and the operating system&lt;br /&gt;
* creating the illusion of &amp;quot;virtual memory&amp;quot; to programs&lt;br /&gt;
* for the most popular processors, being backwards compatible with legacy code&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A GPU is a laborer ==&lt;br /&gt;
A GPU is very different.  Yes, a GPU can do math, and can also do &amp;quot;this&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;that&amp;quot; based on specific conditions.  However, GPU&#039;s have been designed so they are very good at doing video processing, and less executive work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Video processing is a lot of repetitive work, since it is constantly being told to do the same thing to large groups of pixels on the screen.  In order to make this run efficiency, video processors are far heavier on the ability to do repetitive work, than the ability to rapidly switch tasks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
GPU&#039;s have large numbers of ALU&#039;s, more so than CPU&#039;s.  As a result, they can do large amounts of bulky mathematical labor in a greater quantity than CPU&#039;s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Analogy==&lt;br /&gt;
One way to visualize it is a CPU works like a small group of very smart people who can quickly do any task given to them.  A GPU is a large group of relatively dumb people who aren&#039;t individually very fast or smart, but who can be trained to do repetitive tasks, and collectively can be more productive just due to the sheer number of people.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It&#039;s not that a CPU is fat, spoiled, or lazy.  Both CPUs and GPUs are creations made from billions of microscopic transistors crammed on a small piece of silicon.  On silicon chips, size is expensive.  The structures that make CPUs good at what they do take up lots of space.  When those structures are omitted, that leaves plenty of room for many &amp;quot;dumb&amp;quot; ALU&#039;s, which individually are very small.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ALUs of a GPU are partitioned into groups, and each group of ALUs shares management, so members of the group cannot be made to work on separate tasks.  They can either all work on nearly identical variations of one single task, in perfect sync with one another, or nothing at all.  Trying different hashes repeatedly - the process behind Bitcoin mining - is a very repetitive task suitable for a GPU, with each attempt varying only by the changing of one number (called a &amp;quot;nonce&amp;quot;) in the data being hashed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ATI Radeon 5970 is a popular video card for Bitcoin mining and, to date, offers the best known performance of any video card for this purpose.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This particular card has 3,200 &amp;quot;stream processors&amp;quot;, which can be thought of as 3,200 very dumb cores that can be trained to all do the same repetitive task, just so long as they don&#039;t have to make any decisions that interrupts their flow.  In addition, each of those stream processors have 5 ALU&#039;s - the part that does math.  So an ATI Radeon 5970 has 16,000 ALU&#039;s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since ALU&#039;s are what do all the work of Bitcoin mining, the number of available ALU&#039;s has a direct effect on the hash output.  Compare that to a 4-core CPU that can switch tasks on a dime, but has ALU&#039;s in some small multiple of four, if not just four ALU&#039;s alone.  Trying a single SHA256 hash in the context of Bitcoin mining requires around 1,000 simple mathematical steps that must be performed entirely by ALU&#039;s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That, in a nutshell, is why GPU&#039;s can mine Bitcoins so much faster than CPU&#039;s.  Bitcoin mining requires no decision making - it is repetitive mathematical work for a computer.  The only decision making that must be made in Bitcoin mining is, &amp;quot;do I have a valid block&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;do I not&amp;quot;.  That&#039;s an excellent workload to run on a GPU.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mining hardware comparison]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[:Category:Miners|Miners]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[:Category:Pool Operators|Pool Operators]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mining]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mrb</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>