Bitcoin Wiki - User contributions [en]

Running Bitcoin

2011-06-26T10:17:49Z

M!nus: added -port option

There are two variations of the official bitcoin program available; one with a graphical user interface (usually referred to as just “Bitcoin”), and a 'headless' version (called [[bitcoind]]). They are completely compatible with each other, and take the same command-line arguments, read the same configuration file, and read and write the same data files. You can run one copy of either Bitcoin or bitcoind on your system at a time (if you accidently try to launch another, the copy will let you know that Bitcoin or bitcoind is already running and will exit).

__TOC__
==Command-line arguments==

Give Bitcoin (or bitcoind) the -? or –help argument and it will print out a list of the most commonly used command-line arguments and then exit:

Usage:
bitcoin [options]
bitcoin [options] <command> [params] Send command to -server or bitcoind
bitcoin [options] help List commands
bitcoin [options] help <command> Get help for a command
Options:
-conf=<file> Specify configuration file (default: bitcoin.conf)
-gen Generate coins
-gen=0 Don't generate coins
-min Start minimized
-datadir=<dir> Specify data directory
-proxy=<ip:port> Connect through socks4 proxy
-addnode=<ip> Add a node to connect to
-connect=<ip> Connect only to the specified node
-nolisten Don't accept connections from outside
-noupnp Don't attempt to use UPnP to map the listening port
-upnp Attempt to use UPnP to map the listening port
-paytxfee=<amt> Fee per KB to add to transactions you send
-server Accept command line and JSON-RPC commands
-daemon Run in the background as a daemon and accept commands
-testnet Use the test network
-port=<port> Connect to the Network from <port> (default: 8333; 18333 for testnet)
-rpcuser=<user> Username for JSON-RPC connections
-rpcpassword=<pw> Password for JSON-RPC connections
-rpcport=<port> Listen for JSON-RPC connections on <port> (default: 8332)
-rpcallowip=<ip> Allow JSON-RPC connections from specified IP address
-rpcconnect=<ip> Send commands to node running on <ip> (default: 127.0.0.1)
-keypool=<n> Set key pool size to <n> (default: 100)
-rescan Rescan the block chain for missing wallet transactions
-rpcssl Use OpenSSL (https) for JSON-RPC connections
-? This help message

==Bitcoin.conf Configuration File==
All command-line options (except for -datadir and -conf) may be specified in a configuration file, and all configuration file options may also be specified on the command line. Command-line options override values set in the configuration file.

The configuration file is a list of setting=value pairs, one per line, with optional comments starting with the '#' character.

The configuration file is not automatically created; you can create it using your favorite plain-text editor. By default, Bitcoin (or bitcoind) will look for a file named 'bitcoin.conf' in the bitcoin [[data directory]], but both the data directory and the configuration file path may be changed using the -datadir and -conf command-line arguments.
{|
! Operating System
! Default bitcoin datadir
! Typical path to configuration file
|-
| Windows
| %APPDATA%\Bitcoin\
| :\Documents and Settings\username\Application Data\Bitcoin\bitcoin.conf
|-
| Linux
| $HOME/.bitcoin/
| /home/username/.bitcoin/bitcoin.conf
|-
| Mac OSX
| $HOME/Library/Application Support/Bitcoin/
| /Users/username/Library/Application Support/Bitcoin/bitcoin.conf
|}

==Sample Bitcoin.conf==
Here is a sample bitcoin.conf file, containing every option set to its default value.

# bitcoin.conf configuration file. Lines beginning with # are comments.

# Network-related settings:

# Run on the test network instead of the real bitcoin network.
#testnet=1

# Connect via a socks4 proxy
#proxy=127.0.0.1:9050

##############################################################
## Quick Primer on addnode vs connect ##
## Let's say for instance you use addnode=4.2.2.4 ##
## addnode will connect you to and tell you about the ##
## nodes connected to 4.2.2.4. In addition it will tell ##
## the other nodes connected to it that you exist so ##
## they can connect to you. ##
## connect will not do the above when you 'connect' to it. ##
## It will *only* connect you to 4.2.2.4 and no one else.##
## ##
## So if you're behind a firewall, or have other problems ##
## finding nodes, add some using 'addnode'. ##
## ##
## If you want to stay private, use 'connect' to only ##
## connect to "trusted" nodes. ##
## ##
## If you run multiple nodes on a LAN, there's no need for ##
## all of them to open lots of connections. Instead ##
## 'connect' them all to one node that is port forwarded ##
## and has lots of connections. ##
## Thanks goes to [Noodle] on Freenode. ##
##############################################################

# Use as many addnode= settings as you like to connect to specific peers
#addnode=69.164.218.197
#addnode=10.0.0.2:8333

# ... or use as many connect= settings as you like to connect ONLY
# to specific peers:
#connect=69.164.218.197
#connect=10.0.0.1:8333

# Do not use Internet Relay Chat (irc.lfnet.org #bitcoin channel) to
# find other peers.
#noirc=1

# Maximum number of inbound+outbound connections.
#maxconnections=

# JSON-RPC options (for controlling a running Bitcoin/bitcoind process)

# server=1 tells Bitcoin to accept JSON-RPC commands.
#server=1

# You must set rpcuser and rpcpassword to secure the JSON-RPC api
#rpcuser=Ulysseys
#rpcpassword=YourSuperGreatPasswordNumber_385593

# How many seconds bitcoin will wait for a complete RPC HTTP request.
# after the HTTP connection is established.
rpctimeout=30

# By default, only RPC connections from localhost are allowed. Specify
# as many rpcallowip= settings as you like to allow connections from
# other hosts (and you may use * as a wildcard character):
#rpcallowip=10.1.1.34
#rpcallowip=192.168.1.*

# Listen for RPC connections on this TCP port:
rpcport=8332

# You can use Bitcoin or bitcoind to send commands to Bitcoin/bitcoind
# running on another host using this option:
rpcconnect=127.0.0.1

# Use Secure Sockets Layer (also known as TLS or HTTPS) to communicate
# with Bitcoin -server or bitcoind
#rpcssl=1

# OpenSSL settings used when rpcssl=1
rpcsslciphers=TLSv1+HIGH:!SSLv2:!aNULL:!eNULL:!AH:!3DES:@STRENGTH
rpcsslcertificatechainfile=server.cert
rpcsslprivatekeyfile=server.pem

# Miscellaneous options

# Set gen=1 to attempt to generate bitcoins
gen=0

# Use SSE instructions to try to generate bitcoins faster.
#4way=1

# Pre-generate this many public/private key pairs, so wallet backups will be valid for
# both prior transactions and several dozen future transactions.
keypool=100

# Pay an optional transaction fee every time you send bitcoins. Transactions with fees
# are more likely than free transactions to be included in generated blocks, so may
# be validated sooner.
paytxfee=0.00

# Allow direct connections for the 'pay via IP address' feature.
#allowreceivebyip=1

# User interface options

# Start Bitcoin minimized
#min=1

# Minimize to the system tray
#minimizetotray=1

==Platforms==
===Windows===

====Start automatically====
To configure the Bitcoin client to start automatically:

Settings -> Options

then mark the checkbox titled:
[X] Start Bitcoin on window system startup
[[{{ns:file}}:Client_Settings_Options.png]]

====Generate on startup====
To configure the Bitcoin client so that mining on startup is automatic:
Configure bitcoin.conf as follows:
gen=1

===Mac===

===Linux===
[[Category:Technical]][[Category:Developer]]

Mining hardware comparison

2011-05-14T21:04:28Z

M!nus: /* AMD */

Below are some statistics about the mining performance of various hardware used in a [[mining rig]].

The table shows (mostly) stock clock numbers. 10-20% performance improvement can be achieved via overclocking.

'''Note:''' Clock refers to the Shader clock only with nVidia cards (not Core or Memory). With AMD card the shader clock is not separate, but is part of the GPU clock.

==Graphics cards==

===AMD===
To get the maximum performance use the 2.1 release of the ATI Stream SDK. 2.2 wastes CPU time, and 2.3/2.4 drop mining performance by 5-10%.

{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! W !! Clock !! SP !! SDK !! Slot !! Miner !! Notes
|-
| 3XXX || || || || || || || || OpenCL Not Supported
|-
| 42XX || || || || || || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || || OpenCL Not Supported (intergrated/mobile GPU)
|-
| 4350 || 6.93 || 0.346 || 20 || 575 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors
|-
| 4550 || 7.23 || 0.289 || 25 || 600 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors
|-
| 4650 || 31.33 || 0.653 || 48 || 650 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors
|-
| 4670 || 36.14 || 0.613 || 59 || 750 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors
|-
| 4670 || 40.11 || || 59 || 800 || 320 || || AGP x8 || poclbm/Ubuntu 10.10 w/ H == 0 mod [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.msg85236#msg85236 source] || -w 32 -f 0, don't use vectors
|-
| 4730 || 72.29 || 0.657 || 110 || 750 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||
|-
| 4770 || 72.29 || 0.904 || 80 || 750 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||
|-
| 4830 || 55.42 || 0.583 || 95 || 575 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||
|-
| 4850 || 75.30 || 0.685 || 110 || 625 || 800 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||
|-
| 4850 || 101 || || || 817 || 500 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer || -f 0, core 817mhz(default 625)@1.123v , mem downclock to 500mhz (default 993) [http://www.smpake.com/?p=6 source]
|-
| 4860 || 67.47 || 0.519 || 130 || 700 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||
|-
| 4870 || 90.36 || 0.602 || 150 || 750 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || clmine ||
|-
| 4870 || 78 || || || || || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/Vista 64bit || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source]
|-
| 4890 || 102.41 || 0.539 || 190 || 850 || 800 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||
|-
| 4890 || 108.3 || || 190 || 975 || 800 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||
|-
| 4850X2 || 150.60 || 0.602 || 250 || 625 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||
|-
| 4870X2 || 180.72 || 0.632 || 286 || 750 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||
|-
| 4870X2 || 180.6 || || 286 || 800 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||
|-
| 5450 || 11.99 || 0.631 || 19 || 650 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||
|-
| 5550 || 40.59 || 1.041 || 39 || 550 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 59.96 || 1.538 || 39 || 650 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 64 || 1.641 || 39 || 650 || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|-
| 5650 || 48 || 2.5-3.2 ? || 15-19 ? || || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source] [http://www.notebookcheck.net/ATI-Mobility-Radeon-HD-5650.23697.0.html source]
|-
| 5670 || 71.49 || 1.117 || 64 || 775 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||
|-
|style="background:#EEFFEE;"| 5670 || 72 || 1.64 || 44 || 850 || || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm-mod (Win7-64) || Sapphire 100287VGAL card is low power
|-
| 5670 || 85 || || || 900 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128
|-

| 5750 || 116.24 || 1.352 || 86 || 700 || 720 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||
|-
| 5750 || 137 || || || 710 || || || PCI-E 1.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128 using stock memory and GPU clocks
|-
| 5750 || 154.56 || 1.45 || 106 || 830 || 720 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||-v -w128 -f20 underclocked memory clocks from 1150MHz to 300MHz
|-
| 5770 || 156.83 || 1.452 || 108 || 850 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 180 || 1.406 || 128[*] || 950 || 800 || 2.4RC1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 30 (*Overclocked wattage calculated [http://bakkap.free.fr/Misc/wCalc.html here] )
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 205.58 || || || 935 || 300 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-04-28 || -v -w 256
|-
|style="background:#FFFFFF;"| 5830 || 206.64 || 1.181 || 175 || 800 || 1120 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||
|-
|style="background:#FFFFFF;"| 5830 || 241 || 1.377 || 175 || 1006 || || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-03-11 / Win7 64 ||
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 248 || 1.42 || 175 || 880 || 500 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.46 || -k poclbm VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 245 || 1.4 || 175 || 880 || 900 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm (guiminer) || -v -w 256
|-
|style="background:#FFFFFF;"| 5830 || 290 || || || 996 || || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.4 / poclbm / Win7 64 || vectors, aggr 12, BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 240.77 || 1.595 || 151 || 725 || 1440 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 250.26 || 1.657 || 151 || 725 || 1440 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || opencl client || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 252 || 1.575 || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-01-25 ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 255.3 || 1.593 || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-01-25 ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 264 || 1.748 || 151 || 725 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 1.0 x8 || guiminer-20110501 || -v -w128
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 280 || 1.75 || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.3 || with BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 292 || 1.825 || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-04-28 -v -f 1 ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 298 || 1.862|| 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-04-28 -v -f 1 -w 64 ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 300 || 1.546 || 194 || 925 (OC) || 1440 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 314 || ? || ? || 820(OC) || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 1.0 x8 || poclbm || -v -w128
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 344 || 1.8594 || 185 || 890 (OC) || 1440 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 355 || ? || ? || 915 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || poclbm 2011-04-28 -v -f 20 -w128 || Running two in CFX for total of 695-725 MH/s
|-
| 5870M || 116.5 || ? || ? || ? || ? || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || gui-miner (win-7) ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 313.65 || 1.668 || 188 || 850 || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 313 || 1.665 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo/Linux ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 343 || 1.824 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo/Linux ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 355 || 1.888 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/Linux ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 340 || 1.809 || 188 || 850 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 360 || || || 970 || 700 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL w7-64 || -f 0 -v -w 128 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=6144.msg91959#msg91959 source]
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 408 || || || 980 || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm/Win7x64 || -f 20 -v -w 128, BIT_ALIGN, BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 400 || || || 950 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || Phoenix 1.3 || -k poclbm VECTORS AGGRESSION=7 FASTLOOP BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 530 || 1.803 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.4.595.10 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/201103.beta3/Windows || -v -w128 -f60
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 535.06 || 1.820 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 560 || 1.905 || 294 || 725 || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo ||
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 565 || 1.922 || 294 || || || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine2 ||
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 604 || 2.054 || 294 || || || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 645 || 1.875|| 344 || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || -f1, Debian 6, fglrx-driver 10.9.3
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 740 || 2.1511 || 344 || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix/1.3 || AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT, memory clock @ 300MHz
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 755 || 2.2076 || 342 || 848 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 28-04-11 || -f 1 -w 256 -v, Ubuntu 10.10, fglrx 11.4, memory clock @ 300MHz
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 802 || 2.31 || 347 || 850 || 3200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix || -q 6 -k poclbm AGGRESSION=19 WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT VECTORS, Ubuntu 11.04, fglrx 11.4, memory clock @ 1000MHz
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5870x2 || 620 || || || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer || -v -w 128
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5870x2 || 826 || || || 950 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.4 w/ Phtak || AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT Memory @ 300MHz
|-
| 6310M || 9.821 || 0.545 || 18 || 500 || 80 || 2.4 || Integrated/APU || poclbm-gui -v -w128 || HP DM1z 18W TDP is shared with the CPU
|-
| 6490M || 16.289 || 0.708 || 23 || || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm-mod (Mac OS X 10.6.7) || MacBook Pro early 2011
|-
| 6850 || 171.59 || 1.351 || 127 || 775 || 960 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||
|-
| 6850 || 196 || || || 850 || 960 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 0
|-
| 6850 || 234.8 || || || 940 || 960 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.3 AGGRESSION=8 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 220 || 1.236 || 178[*] || 1000 || 960 || 2.4RC1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 30 (*Overclocked wattage calculated [http://bakkap.free.fr/Misc/wCalc.html here] )
|-
| 6870 || 232.47 || 1.540 || 151 || 900 || 1120 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm -v -w 128 ||
|-
| 6870 || 277.47 || || || 940 || 1120 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.3 AGGRESSION=8 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT ||
|-
| 6870 || 260.1 || 1.611 || 175 || 1001 || 1150 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm-gui windows7x86 cat 11.3 || -v -w 128 -f 1
|-
| 6870 || 272 || 1.802 (?) || 151 (?) || 900 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha cat 11.4 sdk 2.4 || -G2 -D stock clocks, debian linux 64bit [http://img690.imageshack.us/img690/853/gpumine1.png source]
|-
| 6870 || 300.06 || 1.830 || 164 || 1020 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.4 cat 11.4 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=8 fastloop mem clock 344
|-
| 6870 || 302 || 1.726 (?) || 175 (?) || 1000 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha cat 11.4 sdk 2.4 || -G2 -D overclocked to 1000, debian linux 64bit [http://img814.imageshack.us/img814/6646/gpumine2.png source]
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 300 || 1.72 || 174 || 1038 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm windows7x86 cat 11.4 || -v -w128 -f1 mem clock 360, fan 100% temp 73C
|-
| 6950 || 295 || || 160 (?) || 810 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250
|-
| 6950 || 325 || || 200 (?) || 885 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250
|-
| 6950 || 360 || || 200 (?) || 970 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250
|-
| 6970 || 323 || 1.468 || 220 || 880 || 1536 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -w 64, SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.
|-
| 6970 || 372 || || 220 (?) || 900 || || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix (svn trunk 05.14.2011) || clock 900/1375, VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11 WORKSIZE=128, fan 45% (auto) / temp 90C
|-
| 6990 || 708 || 2.05 || 346 || 830 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]. SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.
|-
| 6990 || 746 || 1.82 || 410 || 880 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]. SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.
|-
| 6990 || 771 || 1.8804 || 410 || 880 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx. Memory clock @ 1280Mhz.
|-
| 6990 || 772 || 1.8380 || 420 || 900 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix & Poclbm || Overclock switch ON + overclocked to 900 mhz, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128
|-
|FirePro V8700 || 84.8 || || || 750 || 800 || || || poclbm-mod.03.24.2011 ||
|-
|FirePro M5800 || 61.4 || || || 650 || || || || poclbm-mod.03.24.2011 || Ubuntu ||
|-
|}

===Nvidia===

{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! W !! Clock !! SP !! Comment
|-
| 8200 mGPU || 1.2 || || || 1200 || 16 || 128 MB shared memory, "poclbm -w 128 -f 0"
|-
| 8400 GS || 2.3 || || || || || "poclbm -w 128"
|-
| 8600M GT || 4.93 || || || || 32 ||
|-
| 8600GT || 5.66 || || || 1188 || 32 ||
|-
| 8600GT OC || 7.3 || || || 1602 || 32 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.0 poclbm] -w 128 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg72833#msg72833 source]
|-
| 8800GT || 25 || 0.24 || 105 || 1300 || ||
|-
| 8800GT || 24.5 || 0.23 || 105 || 1300 || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]
|-
| 8800GTS || 16.8 || 0.109 || 154 || || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source] [http://www.techspot.com/review/79-geforce-8800-gts-512/page11.html source]
|-
| 8800 GTS || 18.7 || 0.124 || 150 || 1200 || || poclbm -w 64 no vectors
|-
| 9300GE || 1.57 || || || 1300 || 8 ||
|-
| 9300GS || 1.69 || || || 1400 || 8 ||
|-
| 9300/nForce 730i || 2.15 || || || 1200 || 16 ||
|-
| 9400GT || 3.37 || 0.067 || 50 || 1400 || 16 ||
|-
| 9400M (MacBook) || 1.90 || 0.32 || 6 || 700 || || poclbm -f 8 no vectors
|-
| 9500GT || 6.75 || 0.135 || 50 || 1400 || 32 ||
|-
| 9600GSO || 19.88 || 0.237 || 84 || 1375 || 96 ||
|-
| 9600GSO512 || 11.75 || 0.131 || 90 || 1625 || 48 ||
|-
| 9600GT || 15.66 || 0.165 || 95 || 1625 || 64 ||
|-
| 9600GT Zotac || 15 || || || 1650 || 64 ||
|-
| 9600GT OC || 18.8 || <0.198 || >95 || 1981 || 64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.0 poclbm] -w 128 -f 10 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg74610#msg74610 source] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg73353#msg73353 source]
|-
| 9800GT || 30.36 || 0.289 || 105 || 1800 || 112 ||
|-
| 9800GTX || 32.54 || 0.232 || 140 || 1688 || 128 ||
|-
| 9800GTX+ || 35.39 || 0.251 || 141 || 1836 || 128 ||
|-
|style="background-color:#FFEFEF"| 9800GX2 || 57.83 || 0.294 || 197 || || 2x128 ||
|-
|style="background-color:#FFEFEF"| 9800GX2 || 28 || 0.142 || 197 || || 2x128 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]
|-
| G210 || 3.38 || 0.111 || 30.5 || 1402 || 16 ||
|-
| G210 || 3.79 || 0.124 || 30.5 || 1402 || 16 || poclbm -f 1
|-
| GT220 || 9.83 || 0.170 || 58 || 1360 || 48 ||
|-
| GT240 || 19.37 || 0.281 || 69 || 1340 || 96 ||
|-
| GT240 || 21.24 || || || || 96 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4291.0 poclbm-mod] -f 0 -v [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg73383#msg73383 source]
|-
| GTS250 || 35.39 || 0.244 || 145 || 1836 || 128 ||
|-
| GTS250 || 35.2 || 0.243 || 145 || 1836 || 128 ||
|-
| GTS250 OC || 37 || 0.255 || 145 || 2047 || 128 ||
|-
| GTX260 || 35.91 || 0.178 || 202 || 1242 || 192 ||
|-
| GTX260 || 44 || 0.242 || 182 || 1242 || 216 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|-
| GTX260c216 || 40.40 || 0.236 || 171 || 1242 || 216 ||
|-
| GTX260c216 OC || 52.0 || || || 1461 || 216 || "poclbm -w 256 -f 1"
|-
| GTX275 || 50.75 || 0.232 || 219 || 1404 || 240 ||
|-
| GTX275 || 58 || || || 729/1458 || 240 || poclbm -f 0 -w 256
|-
| GTX280 || 46.84 || 0.198 || 236 || 1296 || 240 ||
|-
| GTX285 || 53.35 || 0.262 || 204 || 1476 || 240 ||
|-
| GTX295 || 89.78 || 0.311 || 289 || 1242 || 480 ||
|-
| GT 320M (MacBook Air) || 6.12 || || || 1212 || 48 ||
|-
| GT 330M (Sony Vaio Z) || 7.8 || 0.71 ( 0.3 total) || 11 (26w total) || 1045 || 48 ||
|-
| GT430 || 20.24 || 0.413 || 49 || 1400 || 96 ||
|-
| GTS450 || 45.28 || 0.427 || 106 || 1566 || 192 ||
|-
| GTX460SE || 56.39 || 0.376 || 150 || 1300 || 288 ||
|-
| GTX460 || 68.31 || 0.427 || 160 || 1350 || 336 ||
|-
| GTX460 (2 cards) || 102 || 0.319? || 320? || 1350 || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]
|-
| GTX460 (2 cards) OC || 127 || 0.374 || 340 || 1620 || 2x 336 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2444.0 rpcminer-cuda] -gpugrid=128 -gputhreads=128 ver.20110227
|-
| GTX465 || 64.41 || 0.322 || 200 || 1215 || 352 ||
|-
| GTX470 || 81.98 || 0.381 || 215 || 1215 || 448 ||
|-
| GTX470 || 94.7 || || || 1414 || ||
|-
| GTX470 || 111.9 || || 215 || 1650 || 448 ||
|-
| GTX480 || 101.28 || 0.405 || 250 || 1401 || 480 ||
|-
| GTX560 Ti || 67.7 || 0.39 || 170 || 1700 || 384 || standard EVGA 560, no overclock
|-
| GTX560 OC || 86.7 || <0.51 || >170 || 1800 || 384 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2444.0 rpcminer-cuda] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg72816#msg72816 source]
|-
| GTX570 || 105.83 || 0.483 || 219 || 1464 || 480 ||
|-
| GTX580 || 140.05 || --- || 244 || 1544 || 512 ||
|-
| Quadro FX 580 || 5.7 || 0.14 || 40 || 1125 || 4 ||rpcminer-cuda, Win, -gpugrid=128 -gputhreads=512
|-
| Quadro FX 1600M || 6 || 0.12 || 50 || 625 || 32 ||rpcminer-cuda, Win
|-
| Quadro NVS 135M || 1.05 || 0.1 || 10 || 800 || 1 ||
|-
| Quadro NVS 3100M || 3.6 || 0.257 || 14 || 600 || 16 || rpcminer-cuda, Win, CUDA 3.1.1
|-
| Tesla M2050 || 79.8 || || || || || DiabloMiner
|-
| Tesla M2050 || [http://glennfrancismurray.com/cost-defective-mining-with-gpu-clusters-amazo 100] || 0 || 0 || - || 512 || Amazon AWS [http://glennfrancismurray.com/cost-defective-mining-with-gpu-clusters-amazo CUDA RPC Miner & CUDA 2.0]
|-
|}

==CPUs/APUs==

A lot of nice data can be pulled from [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.0 this thread] to seed this section. Also from [https://www.bitcoin.org/wiki/doku.php?id=bitcoin_miners this page on the old wiki].

===AMD===
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! nprocs !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! TDP [W] !! CPU Clock !! Mhash/s CPU !! Mhash/s GPU !! GPU !! GPU Clock !! SP !! Software !! Notes
|-
| 4x Opteron 6174 || 48 || 115 || 0.36 || 320W || 2.2 GHz || 2.4
|colspan=4|
| cpuminer v0.8.1 || --alg 4way --threads 48
|-
| 2x Opteron 6128 || 16 || 32.4 || 0.141 || 230W || 2 GHz || 32.4
|colspan=4|
| 0.3.19 || -4way
|-
| Athlon XP 2000+ || 2 || 0.62 || 0.009 || 70W || 1.67 GHz || 0.62
|colspan=4|
| 0.3.18/Ubuntu || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source] [http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm?articleid=914&page=4 source]
|-
| Athlon 64 3500+ || 1 || 1.18 || 0.013 || 89W || 2.54 GHz || 1.18
|colspan=4|
| ufasoft v0.4 || overclocked (originally 2.2 GHz)
|-
| Athlon 64 X2 3800+ || 2 || 1.73 || 0.03 || 65 W || 2.00 GHz || 1.73
|colspan=4|
| cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || -algo=4way
|-
| Athlon 64 X2 4000+ || 2 || 1.9 || 0.02 || 65W || 2.1 GHz || 1.9
|colspan=4|
| rpc-miner
|-
| Athlon 64 X2 4400+ || || 2.09 || 0.032 || 65W || 2.3GHz || 2.09
|colspan=4|
| 0.3.19/Win x64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]
|-
| Athlon 64 X2 6000+ || 2 || 2.81 || 0.02 || 125W || 3 GHz || 2.81
|colspan=4|
| || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg22881#msg22881 source]
|-
| Athlon 64 X2 6400+ Black Edition || 2 || 2.9 || 0.023 || 125W || 3.2 GHz || 2.9
|colspan=4|
| 0.3.20.2 BETA/Win 7 x64 || -4way
|-
| Athlon II X2 240e || 2 || 2.71 || 0.06 || 45W || 2.81 GHz || 2.71
|colspan=4|
| bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Athlon II X4 630 || 4 || 10.7 || 0.11 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 10.7
|colspan=4|
| bitcoin-miner 0.4 ||
|-
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 3.8 || 0.04 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 3.8
|colspan=4|
| 0.3.1x/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|-
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 7.2 || 0.08 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 7.2
|colspan=4|
| cpu-miner 0.2.1/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|-
| Phenom II X4 955 || 4 || 11 || 0.09 || 125W || 3.2 GHz || 11
|colspan=4|
| rpcminer-4way ||
|-
| Phenom II X4 965 || 4 || 12 || 0.09 || 140W || 3.4 GHz || 11
|colspan=4|
| rpcminer-4way ||
|-
| Phenom II X6 1055T || 6 || 15.84 || 0.13 || 125W || 2.82 GHz || 15.84
|colspan=4|
| bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Phenom II X6 1100T || 6 || 22 || 0.176 || 125W || 3.82 GHz || 22
|colspan=4|
| bitcoin-miner || Aciid#bitcoin-dev
|-
| Zacate E-350 || 2 || 11 || 0.615 || 18W || 1.6 Ghz || 1.231 || 9.831 || HD6310M || 492 Mhz || 80 || poclbm -v -w128 + Ufasoft 0.7 || stock speeds
|-
| Zacate E-350 || 2 || 12
|colspan=2|
| 1.648 Ghz || 1.252 || 10.87 || HD6310M || 492 Mhz || 80 || poclbm -v -w 256 -f 1 || "autotune" speed with ASUS EFI BIOS
|}

===ARM===
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment
|-
| Cortex A8 || 1 || 0.125 || 0.36 || 0.35 W || 0.6 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || Nokia N900: 'cryptopp'
|-
| Cortex A8 || 1 || 0.2 || 0.57 || 0.35 W || 0.6 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || Nokia N900: 'c' algo
|-
| Tegra 250 (2xCortex-A9) || 2 || 0.57 || 1.14 || 0.5 W || 1.0 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-24) || Toshiba AC100, ubuntu, 'c' algo
|-
| ARM 11 || 1 || 0.11 || ? || ? || 0.528 GHz || cpuminer git || T-Mobile Pulse, inside Debian chroot, 'c' algo
|}

===Intel===
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment
|-
| Pentium III mobile ? || 1 || 0.3 || 0.014 || 21W || 1.07 GHz || 0.3.1x/Win2K || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source] [http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=27380 source]
|-
| Old Xeon 512k (Dual) || 2x1/2 || 2.0 || ? || ? || 3.06GHz || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || HT disabled, algo=4way (twice as fast as the 2nd best algo)
|-
| Pentium 4 2.0A || 1 || 0.85 || || || 2.0 GHz || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft-0.4]/WinXP || -g no -t 2
|-
| Pentium Dual-Core E5400 || 2/2 || 2.27 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.7 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Celeron E330 || 2/2 || 2.2 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.5 GHz || 0.3.19/Ubuntu10.04 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]
|-
| Core 2 Quad Q9400 || 4/4 || 4.35 || 0.046 || 95W || 2.66 GHz || ||
|-
| Core i3 530 || 2/4 || 8.31 || 0.10 || 80W || 3.66 GHz || Ufasoft 0.7 || -v -a5 -g no -t 4
|-
| Core i3 M350 || 2/4 || 1.48 || 0.04 || 35W || 2.27 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Core i5 M450 || 2/4 || 1.8 || 0.05 || 35W || 1.2 GHz || 0.3.17/Win7-54 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source]
|-
| Core i5-650 || 2/4 || 5.1 || 0.04 ? || || 3.2 GHz || cpuminer-0.7 || -4way
|-
| Core i5 ? || 4/? || 6.5 || || || || client from svn || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37621#msg37621 source]
|-
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 4.5 || 0.05 || 95W || 3.1 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-01-22) || cryptopp_asm32
|-
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 14 || 0.15 || 95W || 3.1 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || sse2_64
|-
| Core i7 920 || 4/8 || 19.2 || 0.10 || 195 || 4.0 GHz (x21) || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] || -a 5
|-
| Core i7 950 || 4/8 || 5.88 || 0.039 || 150W || 3.83 GHz (x23) || bitcoin-0.3.20.2 Win7-64 ||
|-
| Core i7 950 || 4/8 || 18.9 || 0.126 || 150W || 3.83 GHz (x23) || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] v0.4 ||
|-
| Core i7 980x || 6/12 || 19.2 || 0.15 || 130 || 4.4 GHz (x33) || cpuminer/Win7-64 ||
|-
| Core i7 980x || 6/12 || 8.7 || || || 3.9 GHz (x27) || 0.3.17/Win7-64 ||
|-
| Core i7 620M || 2/4 || 6.3 || 0.18 || 35 || 2.66 GHz || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] v0.4 ||
|-
| Core 2 Duo E6550 || 1/2 || 2.45 || ? || ? || 2.33 GHz || cpuminer 0.7.1 (Linux) || --algo=sse2_64
|-
| Core 2 Duo E6850 || 2/2 || 6.75 || 0.10 || 65W || 3.0 Ghz || ufasoft-0.3 ||
|-
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 7.76 || 0.11 || 70W || 3.33 GHz (o/c?) || ufasoft-0.3 || miner optimized for Intel Core
|-
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 2.52 || 0.04 || 65W || 2.66 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Core 2 Duo E8400 || 2/2 || 6.9 || ? || ? || 3.0 GHz || ufasoft v0.10|| windows 7/64bit (-t 2)
|-
| Core 2 Duo T6400 || 2/2 || 4.2 || 0.12 || 35 W || 2.00 GHz || cpuminer git (Linux) || --algo=sse2_64
|-
| Xeon 3060 || 1/2 || 2.03 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.4GHz || cpuminer 0.8.1 (Linux) || --algo=cryptopp_asm32
|-
| Xeon Prestonia 2.4 (dual) || 2x1/2 || 2.16 || 0.017 || 130W || 2.4 GHz || ufasoft v0.4 ||
|-
| Xeon X5355 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 10.13 || 0.16 || 120W || 2.66GHz || bitcoind || Roughly the same speed as the "c" algo in cpuminer
|-
| Xeon X5355 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 22.76 || 0.09 || 120W || 2.66GHz || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || -O2 -march=core2, algo=sse2_64
|-
| Xeon E5440 || 4/8 || 7.3 || ? || 80W || 2.66 GHz|| Kiv's poclbm-gui || FIXME: Either wrong model # or wrong threads/speed info
|-
| Xeon E5520 || 4/8 || 6.5 || 0.08 || 80W || 2.27 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Xeon E5530 || 4/8 || 7.14 || 0.09 || 80W || 2.4 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Xeon E5630 (dual) || 2x4/8 || 8 || 0.1 || 80W || 2.53 GHz || 0.3.17/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]
|-
| Xeon E6520 (dual) || 2x4/8 || 24.7 || ? || ? || 2.53 GHz || ufasoft v0.10 || windows 2008 R2 64bit (-t 16)
|-
| Atom N270 || 1 || 0.42 || '''0.17''' || 2.5W || 1.6 GHz || 0.3.1x/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|}

===Other===
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment
|-
| Cell || 6 || 21 || 0.35 || 60W || 3.2 GHz || cellminer || Sony Playstation 3 (FAT): Needs custom firmware (no links to it, potential issues with Sony assholes.) [https://github.com/verement/cellminer source] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4704.20 source] Total power usage of PS3 fat is 120W but only the Cell cpu is active.
|-
| Cell || 6 || 21 || 0.7 || 35W || 3.2 GHz || cellminer || Sony Playstation 3 (SLIM): Total power usage of PS3 slim is 70W but only the Cell cpu is active.
|}

==See Also==

* [[Mining rig]]
* [[Generation Calculator]]
* [[Power Calc]]
* [[OpenCL miner]]
* [http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=745 ATI Stream vs. NVIDIA CUDA - GPGPU computing battle royale]

[[Category:Mining]]

Poclbm

2011-05-13T14:14:00Z

M!nus: /* Download */ Updated download link.

Poclbm (PyOpenCL bitcoin miner) is a python GPU bitcoin miner that uses the [[OpenCL miner|OpenCL]] framework to quickly perform the hashing computations. Works with AMD - 4xxx and up, Nvidia - 8xxx and up, video cards.

==Download==
[http://github.com/downloads/m0mchil/poclbm/poclbm_py2exe_20110428.7z Latest miner.]

[https://github.com/m0mchil/poclbm/archives/master Sources.]

==Flags to Use==

ATI/AMD Radeon HD 5xxx cards (for example, HD 5770): use '-v -w128'

If you find the desktop laggy while mining, use '-f60'. This may decrease performance slightly.

Please update this section if you find better settings, or good settings for a card not listed here.

==FAQ==
[http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.msg14875#msg14875 Introductory post FAQ.]

==Founder==
[http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?action=profile;u=33 m0mchil]

==Guides and Installation==

===Windows===
[http://www.newslobster.com/random/how-to-get-started-using-your-gpu-to-mine-for-bitcoins-on-windows How to get started using your GPU to mine for Bitcoins on Windows]

===Ubuntu===
[http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2636 Easy Ubuntu python OpenCL mining setup]

===Gentoo===
An poclbm ebuild can be found [http://github.com/bitcoin-gentoo/bitcoin_gentoo_ebuild here]

===OpenSUSE===

This works on 11.4, it might work on other versions (11.3 is more than likely to work) just replace the "11.4" in the repo URLs with your version number. This also assumes that you are already familiar with running getting the BitCoin client running (to run the GUI version on OpenSUSE you will need libpng12-0 installed).

Add the Python devel repo:

<code># zypper ar -r http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/devel:/languages:/python/openSUSE_11.4/devel:languages:python.repo</code>

and this user repo, which provides PyOpenCL (take a moment to appreciate this because if "scorot" didn't package it this would be a lot harder):

<code># zypper ar -r http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/scorot/openSUSE_11.4/home:scorot.repo</code>

Refresh your repos:

<code># zypper ref</code>

You will asked to accept the repo keys, respond with 'a' each time.

Install PyOpenCL:

<code># zypper in python-pyopencl</code>

Get the latest version of poclbm with git (`zypper in git` if you don't have git installed):

<code>$ git clone git://github.com/m0mchil/poclbm.git</code>

This will create a poclbm folder in your current directory. Change to it:

<code>$ cd poclbm</code>

And run it:

<code>$ python poclbm.py --user=user --pass=pass --device=0 [add whatever other flags you use]</code>

==License==
public domain<ref name="license">[http://github.com/m0mchil/poclbm/blob/master/LICENSE]License file on github</ref>

==See Also==

* [[poclbm-gui]] GUI frontend
* A highly efficient version: [[poclbm-mod]] by [[Bitcoin Pool]]
* [[Pooled mining]]
* [[Why a GPU mines faster than a CPU]]

==External Links==

* [http://github.com/m0mchil/poclbm Poclbm] project page on GitHub
* [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.0 Project Thread]

==References==
<references />

[[Category:Miners]]
[[Category:Free Software]]
[[Category:License/Public Domain]]
[[Category:Open Source]]

Mining hardware comparison

2011-05-13T14:09:54Z

M!nus: /* AMD */

Below are some statistics about the mining performance of various hardware used in a [[mining rig]].

The table shows (mostly) stock clock numbers. 10-20% performance improvement can be achieved via overclocking.

'''Note:''' Clock refers to the Shader clock only with nVidia cards (not Core or Memory). With AMD card the shader clock is not separate, but is part of the GPU clock.

==Graphics cards==

===AMD===
To get the maximum performance use the 2.1 release of the ATI Stream SDK. 2.2 wastes CPU time, and 2.3/2.4 drop mining performance by 5-10%.

{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! W !! Clock !! SP !! SDK !! Slot !! Miner !! Notes
|-
| 3XXX || || || || || || || || OpenCL Not Supported
|-
| 42XX || || || || || || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || || OpenCL Not Supported (intergrated/mobile GPU)
|-
| 4350 || 6.93 || 0.346 || 20 || 575 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors
|-
| 4550 || 7.23 || 0.289 || 25 || 600 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors
|-
| 4650 || 31.33 || 0.653 || 48 || 650 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors
|-
| 4670 || 36.14 || 0.613 || 59 || 750 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors
|-
| 4670 || 40.11 || || 59 || 800 || 320 || || AGP x8 || poclbm/Ubuntu 10.10 w/ H == 0 mod [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.msg85236#msg85236 source] || -w 32 -f 0, don't use vectors
|-
| 4730 || 72.29 || 0.657 || 110 || 750 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||
|-
| 4770 || 72.29 || 0.904 || 80 || 750 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||
|-
| 4830 || 55.42 || 0.583 || 95 || 575 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||
|-
| 4850 || 75.30 || 0.685 || 110 || 625 || 800 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||
|-
| 4850 || 101 || || || 817 || 500 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || guiminer || -f 0, core 817mhz(default 625)@1.123v , mem downclock to 500mhz (default 993)
|-
| 4860 || 67.47 || 0.519 || 130 || 700 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||
|-
| 4870 || 90.36 || 0.602 || 150 || 750 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || clmine ||
|-
| 4870 || 78 || || || || || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/Vista 64bit || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source]
|-
| 4890 || 102.41 || 0.539 || 190 || 850 || 800 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||
|-
| 4890 || 108.3 || || 190 || 975 || 800 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||
|-
| 4850X2 || 150.60 || 0.602 || 250 || 625 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||
|-
| 4870X2 || 180.72 || 0.632 || 286 || 750 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||
|-
| 4870X2 || 180.6 || || 286 || 800 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||
|-
| 5450 || 11.99 || 0.631 || 19 || 650 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||
|-
| 5550 || 40.59 || 1.041 || 39 || 550 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 59.96 || 1.538 || 39 || 650 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 64 || 1.641 || 39 || 650 || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|-
| 5650 || 48 || 2.5-3.2 ? || 15-19 ? || || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source] [http://www.notebookcheck.net/ATI-Mobility-Radeon-HD-5650.23697.0.html source]
|-
| 5670 || 71.49 || 1.117 || 64 || 775 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||
|-
|style="background:#EEFFEE;"| 5670 || 72 || 1.64 || 44 || 850 || || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm-mod (Win7-64) || Sapphire 100287VGAL card is low power
|-
| 5670 || 85 || || || 900 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128
|-

| 5750 || 116.24 || 1.352 || 86 || 700 || 720 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||
|-
| 5750 || 137 || || || 710 || || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128 using stock memory settings
|-
| 5750 || 154.56 || 1.45 || 106 || 830 || 720 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||-v -w128 -f20 underclocked memory clocks from 1150MHz to 300MHz
|-
| 5770 || 156.83 || 1.452 || 108 || 850 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 180 || 1.406 || 128[*] || 950 || 800 || 2.4RC1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 30 (*Overclocked wattage calculated [http://bakkap.free.fr/Misc/wCalc.html here] )
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 205.58 || || || 935 || 300 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-04-28 || -v -w 256
|-
|style="background:#FFFFFF;"| 5830 || 206.64 || 1.181 || 175 || 800 || 1120 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||
|-
|style="background:#FFFFFF;"| 5830 || 241 || 1.377 || 175 || 1006 || || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-03-11 / Win7 64 ||
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 248 || 1.42 || 175 || 880 || 500 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.46 || -k poclbm VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=11
|-
|style="background:#FFFDDD;"| 5830 || 245 || 1.4 || 175 || 880 || 900 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm (guiminer) || -v -w 256
|-
|style="background:#FFFFFF;"| 5830 || 290 || || || 996 || || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.4 / poclbm / Win7 64 || vectors, aggr 12, BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 240.77 || 1.595 || 151 || 725 || 1440 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 250.26 || 1.657 || 151 || 725 || 1440 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || opencl client || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 252 || 1.575 || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-01-25 ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 255.3 || 1.593 || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-01-25 ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 264 || 1.748 || 151 || 725 || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 1.0 x8 || guiminer-20110501 || -v -w128
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 280 || 1.75 || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.3 || with BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 292 || 1.825 || 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-04-28 -v -f 1 ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 298 || 1.862|| 160 || 765 || 1440 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-04-28 -v -f 1 -w 64 ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 300 || 1.546 || 194 || 925 (OC) || 1440 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 314 || ? || ? || 820(OC) || 1440 || 2.4 || PCI-E 1.0 x8 || poclbm || -v -w128
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 344 || 1.8594 || 185 || 890 (OC) || 1440 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || phoenix ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 355 || ? || ? || 915 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || poclbm 2011-04-28 -v -f 20 -w128 || Running two in CFX for total of 695-725 MH/s
|-
| 5870M || 116.5 || ? || ? || ? || ? || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || gui-miner (win-7) ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 313.65 || 1.668 || 188 || 850 || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 313 || 1.665 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo/Linux ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 343 || 1.824 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo/Linux ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 355 || 1.888 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/Linux ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 340 || 1.809 || 188 || 850 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 360 || || || 970 || 700 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL w7-64 || -f 0 -v -w 128 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=6144.msg91959#msg91959 source]
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 398 || || || 950 || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm/Win7x64 || -f 30 -v -w 128, BIT_ALIGN, BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 400 || || || 950 || 1600 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.0 x8 || Phoenix 1.3 || -k poclbm VECTORS AGGRESSION=7 FASTLOOP BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 530 || 1.803 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.4.595.10 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/201103.beta3/Windows || -v -w128 -f60
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 535.06 || 1.820 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 560 || 1.905 || 294 || 725 || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo ||
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 565 || 1.922 || 294 || || || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine2 ||
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 604 || 2.054 || 294 || || || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 645 || 1.875|| 344 || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || -f1, Debian 6, fglrx-driver 10.9.3
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 740 || 2.1511 || 344 || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix/1.3 || AGGRESSION=12 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT, memory clock @ 300MHz
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 755 || 2.2076 || 342 || 848 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 28-04-11 || -f 1 -w 256 -v, Ubuntu 10.10, fglrx 11.4, memory clock @ 300MHz
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 802 || 2.31 || 347 || 850 || 3200 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix || -q 6 -k poclbm AGGRESSION=19 WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT VECTORS, Ubuntu 11.04, fglrx 11.4, memory clock @ 1000MHz
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5870x2 || 620 || || || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || guiminer || -v -w 128
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5870x2 || 826 || || || 950 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || phoenix 1.4 w/ Phtak || AGGRESSION=13 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT Memory @ 300MHz
|-
| 6310M || 9.821 || 0.545 || 18 || 500 || 80 || 2.4 || Integrated/APU || poclbm-gui -v -w128 || HP DM1z 18W TDP is shared with the CPU
|-
| 6490M || 16.289 || 0.708 || 23 || || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm-mod (Mac OS X 10.6.7) || MacBook Pro early 2011
|-
| 6850 || 171.59 || 1.351 || 127 || 775 || 960 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||
|-
| 6850 || 196 || || || 850 || 960 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 0
|-
| 6850 || 234.8 || || || 940 || 960 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.3 AGGRESSION=8 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 220 || 1.236 || 178[*] || 1000 || 960 || 2.4RC1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 30 (*Overclocked wattage calculated [http://bakkap.free.fr/Misc/wCalc.html here] )
|-
| 6870 || 232.47 || 1.540 || 151 || 900 || 1120 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm -v -w 128 ||
|-
| 6870 || 277.47 || || || 940 || 1120 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.3 AGGRESSION=8 WORKSIZE=128 VECTORS BFI_INT ||
|-
| 6870 || 260.1 || 1.611 || 175 || 1001 || 1150 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm-gui windows7x86 cat 11.3 || -v -w 128 -f 1
|-
| 6870 || 272 || 1.802 (?) || 151 (?) || 900 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha cat 11.4 sdk 2.4 || -G2 -D stock clocks, debian linux 64bit [http://img690.imageshack.us/img690/853/gpumine1.png source]
|-
| 6870 || 300.06 || 1.830 || 164 || 1020 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix 1.4 cat 11.4 || VECTORS BFI_INT AGGRESSION=8 fastloop mem clock 344
|-
| 6870 || 302 || 1.726 (?) || 175 (?) || 1000 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || hashkill-0.2.5 alpha cat 11.4 sdk 2.4 || -G2 -D overclocked to 1000, debian linux 64bit [http://img814.imageshack.us/img814/6646/gpumine2.png source]
|-
|style="background:#FFFF00;"| 6870 || 300 || 1.72 || 174 || 1038 || 1120 || 2.4 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm windows7x86 cat 11.4 || -v -w128 -f1 mem clock 360, fan 100% temp 73C
|-
| 6950 || 295 || || 160 (?) || 810 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250
|-
| 6950 || 325 || || 200 (?) || 885 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250
|-
| 6950 || 360 || || 200 (?) || 970 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250
|-
| 6970 || 323 || 1.468 || 220 || 880 || 1536 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -w 64, SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.
|-
| 6990 || 708 || 2.05 || 346 || 830 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]. SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.
|-
| 6990 || 746 || 1.82 || 410 || 880 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2949 source]. SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.
|-
| 6990 || 771 || 1.8804 || 410 || 880 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx. Memory clock @ 1280Mhz.
|-
| 6990 || 772 || 1.8380 || 420 || 900 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Phoenix & Poclbm || Overclock switch ON + overclocked to 900 mhz, VECTORS AGGRESSION=12 BFI_INT WORKSIZE=128
|-
|FirePro V8700 || 84.8 || || || 750 || 800 || || || poclbm-mod.03.24.2011 ||
|-
|FirePro M5800 || 61.4 || || || 650 || || || || poclbm-mod.03.24.2011 || Ubuntu ||
|-
|}

===Nvidia===

{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! W !! Clock !! SP !! Comment
|-
| 8200 mGPU || 1.2 || || || 1200 || 16 || 128 MB shared memory, "poclbm -w 128 -f 0"
|-
| 8400 GS || 2.3 || || || || || "poclbm -w 128"
|-
| 8600M GT || 4.93 || || || || 32 ||
|-
| 8600GT || 5.66 || || || 1188 || 32 ||
|-
| 8600GT OC || 7.3 || || || 1602 || 32 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.0 poclbm] -w 128 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg72833#msg72833 source]
|-
| 8800GT || 25 || 0.24 || 105 || 1300 || ||
|-
| 8800GT || 24.5 || 0.23 || 105 || 1300 || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]
|-
| 8800GTS || 16.8 || 0.109 || 154 || || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source] [http://www.techspot.com/review/79-geforce-8800-gts-512/page11.html source]
|-
| 8800 GTS || 18.7 || 0.124 || 150 || 1200 || || poclbm -w 64 no vectors
|-
| 9300GE || 1.57 || || || 1300 || 8 ||
|-
| 9300GS || 1.69 || || || 1400 || 8 ||
|-
| 9300/nForce 730i || 2.15 || || || 1200 || 16 ||
|-
| 9400GT || 3.37 || 0.067 || 50 || 1400 || 16 ||
|-
| 9400M (MacBook) || 1.90 || 0.32 || 6 || 700 || || poclbm -f 8 no vectors
|-
| 9500GT || 6.75 || 0.135 || 50 || 1400 || 32 ||
|-
| 9600GSO || 19.88 || 0.237 || 84 || 1375 || 96 ||
|-
| 9600GSO512 || 11.75 || 0.131 || 90 || 1625 || 48 ||
|-
| 9600GT || 15.66 || 0.165 || 95 || 1625 || 64 ||
|-
| 9600GT Zotac || 15 || || || 1650 || 64 ||
|-
| 9600GT OC || 18.8 || <0.198 || >95 || 1981 || 64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.0 poclbm] -w 128 -f 10 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg74610#msg74610 source] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg73353#msg73353 source]
|-
| 9800GT || 30.36 || 0.289 || 105 || 1800 || 112 ||
|-
| 9800GTX || 32.54 || 0.232 || 140 || 1688 || 128 ||
|-
| 9800GTX+ || 35.39 || 0.251 || 141 || 1836 || 128 ||
|-
|style="background-color:#FFEFEF"| 9800GX2 || 57.83 || 0.294 || 197 || || 2x128 ||
|-
|style="background-color:#FFEFEF"| 9800GX2 || 28 || 0.142 || 197 || || 2x128 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]
|-
| G210 || 3.38 || 0.111 || 30.5 || 1402 || 16 ||
|-
| G210 || 3.79 || 0.124 || 30.5 || 1402 || 16 || poclbm -f 1
|-
| GT220 || 9.83 || 0.170 || 58 || 1360 || 48 ||
|-
| GT240 || 19.37 || 0.281 || 69 || 1340 || 96 ||
|-
| GT240 || 21.24 || || || || 96 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4291.0 poclbm-mod] -f 0 -v [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg73383#msg73383 source]
|-
| GTS250 || 35.39 || 0.244 || 145 || 1836 || 128 ||
|-
| GTS250 || 35.2 || 0.243 || 145 || 1836 || 128 ||
|-
| GTS250 OC || 37 || 0.255 || 145 || 2047 || 128 ||
|-
| GTX260 || 35.91 || 0.178 || 202 || 1242 || 192 ||
|-
| GTX260 || 44 || 0.242 || 182 || 1242 || 216 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|-
| GTX260c216 || 40.40 || 0.236 || 171 || 1242 || 216 ||
|-
| GTX260c216 OC || 52.0 || || || 1461 || 216 || "poclbm -w 256 -f 1"
|-
| GTX275 || 50.75 || 0.232 || 219 || 1404 || 240 ||
|-
| GTX275 || 58 || || || 729/1458 || 240 || poclbm -f 0 -w 256
|-
| GTX280 || 46.84 || 0.198 || 236 || 1296 || 240 ||
|-
| GTX285 || 53.35 || 0.262 || 204 || 1476 || 240 ||
|-
| GTX295 || 89.78 || 0.311 || 289 || 1242 || 480 ||
|-
| GT 320M (MacBook Air) || 6.12 || || || 1212 || 48 ||
|-
| GT 330M (Sony Vaio Z) || 7.8 || 0.71 ( 0.3 total) || 11 (26w total) || 1045 || 48 ||
|-
| GT430 || 20.24 || 0.413 || 49 || 1400 || 96 ||
|-
| GTS450 || 45.28 || 0.427 || 106 || 1566 || 192 ||
|-
| GTX460SE || 56.39 || 0.376 || 150 || 1300 || 288 ||
|-
| GTX460 || 68.31 || 0.427 || 160 || 1350 || 336 ||
|-
| GTX460 (2 cards) || 102 || 0.319? || 320? || 1350 || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]
|-
| GTX460 (2 cards) OC || 127 || 0.374 || 340 || 1620 || 2x 336 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2444.0 rpcminer-cuda] -gpugrid=128 -gputhreads=128 ver.20110227
|-
| GTX465 || 64.41 || 0.322 || 200 || 1215 || 352 ||
|-
| GTX470 || 81.98 || 0.381 || 215 || 1215 || 448 ||
|-
| GTX470 || 94.7 || || || 1414 || ||
|-
| GTX470 || 111.9 || || 215 || 1650 || 448 ||
|-
| GTX480 || 101.28 || 0.405 || 250 || 1401 || 480 ||
|-
| GTX560 Ti || 67.7 || 0.39 || 170 || 1700 || 384 || standard EVGA 560, no overclock
|-
| GTX560 OC || 86.7 || <0.51 || >170 || 1800 || 384 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2444.0 rpcminer-cuda] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg72816#msg72816 source]
|-
| GTX570 || 105.83 || 0.483 || 219 || 1464 || 480 ||
|-
| GTX580 || 140.05 || --- || 244 || 1544 || 512 ||
|-
| Quadro FX 580 || 5.7 || 0.14 || 40 || 1125 || 4 ||rpcminer-cuda, Win, -gpugrid=128 -gputhreads=512
|-
| Quadro FX 1600M || 6 || 0.12 || 50 || 625 || 32 ||rpcminer-cuda, Win
|-
| Quadro NVS 135M || 1.05 || 0.1 || 10 || 800 || 1 ||
|-
| Quadro NVS 3100M || 3.6 || 0.257 || 14 || 600 || 16 || rpcminer-cuda, Win, CUDA 3.1.1
|-
| Tesla M2050 || 79.8 || || || || || DiabloMiner
|-
| Tesla M2050 || [http://glennfrancismurray.com/cost-defective-mining-with-gpu-clusters-amazo 100] || 0 || 0 || - || 512 || Amazon AWS [http://glennfrancismurray.com/cost-defective-mining-with-gpu-clusters-amazo CUDA RPC Miner & CUDA 2.0]
|-
|}

==CPUs/APUs==

A lot of nice data can be pulled from [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.0 this thread] to seed this section. Also from [https://www.bitcoin.org/wiki/doku.php?id=bitcoin_miners this page on the old wiki].

===AMD===
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! nprocs !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! TDP [W] !! CPU Clock !! Mhash/s CPU !! Mhash/s GPU !! GPU !! GPU Clock !! SP !! Software !! Notes
|-
| 4x Opteron 6174 || 48 || 115 || 0.36 || 320W || 2.2 GHz || 2.4
|colspan=4|
| cpuminer v0.8.1 || --alg 4way --threads 48
|-
| 2x Opteron 6128 || 16 || 32.4 || 0.141 || 230W || 2 GHz || 32.4
|colspan=4|
| 0.3.19 || -4way
|-
| Athlon XP 2000+ || 2 || 0.62 || 0.009 || 70W || 1.67 GHz || 0.62
|colspan=4|
| 0.3.18/Ubuntu || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source] [http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm?articleid=914&page=4 source]
|-
| Athlon 64 3500+ || 1 || 1.18 || 0.013 || 89W || 2.54 GHz || 1.18
|colspan=4|
| ufasoft v0.4 || overclocked (originally 2.2 GHz)
|-
| Athlon 64 X2 3800+ || 2 || 1.73 || 0.03 || 65 W || 2.00 GHz || 1.73
|colspan=4|
| cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || -algo=4way
|-
| Athlon 64 X2 4000+ || 2 || 1.9 || 0.02 || 65W || 2.1 GHz || 1.9
|colspan=4|
| rpc-miner
|-
| Athlon 64 X2 4400+ || || 2.09 || 0.032 || 65W || 2.3GHz || 2.09
|colspan=4|
| 0.3.19/Win x64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]
|-
| Athlon 64 X2 6000+ || 2 || 2.81 || 0.02 || 125W || 3 GHz || 2.81
|colspan=4|
| || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg22881#msg22881 source]
|-
| Athlon 64 X2 6400+ Black Edition || 2 || 2.9 || 0.023 || 125W || 3.2 GHz || 2.9
|colspan=4|
| 0.3.20.2 BETA/Win 7 x64 || -4way
|-
| Athlon II X2 240e || 2 || 2.71 || 0.06 || 45W || 2.81 GHz || 2.71
|colspan=4|
| bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Athlon II X4 630 || 4 || 10.7 || 0.11 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 10.7
|colspan=4|
| bitcoin-miner 0.4 ||
|-
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 3.8 || 0.04 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 3.8
|colspan=4|
| 0.3.1x/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|-
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 7.2 || 0.08 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 7.2
|colspan=4|
| cpu-miner 0.2.1/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|-
| Phenom II X4 955 || 4 || 11 || 0.09 || 125W || 3.2 GHz || 11
|colspan=4|
| rpcminer-4way ||
|-
| Phenom II X4 965 || 4 || 12 || 0.09 || 140W || 3.4 GHz || 11
|colspan=4|
| rpcminer-4way ||
|-
| Phenom II X6 1055T || 6 || 15.84 || 0.13 || 125W || 2.82 GHz || 15.84
|colspan=4|
| bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Phenom II X6 1100T || 6 || 22 || 0.176 || 125W || 3.82 GHz || 22
|colspan=4|
| bitcoin-miner || Aciid#bitcoin-dev
|-
| Zacate E-350 || 2 || 11 || 0.615 || 18W || 1.6 Ghz || 1.231 || 9.831 || HD6310M || 492 Mhz || 80 || poclbm -v -w128 + Ufasoft 0.7 || stock speeds
|-
| Zacate E-350 || 2 || 12
|colspan=2|
| 1.648 Ghz || 1.252 || 10.87 || HD6310M || 492 Mhz || 80 || poclbm -v -w 256 -f 1 || "autotune" speed with ASUS EFI BIOS
|}

===ARM===
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment
|-
| Cortex A8 || 1 || 0.125 || 0.36 || 0.35 W || 0.6 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || Nokia N900: 'cryptopp'
|-
| Cortex A8 || 1 || 0.2 || 0.57 || 0.35 W || 0.6 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || Nokia N900: 'c' algo
|-
| Tegra 250 (2xCortex-A9) || 2 || 0.57 || 1.14 || 0.5 W || 1.0 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-24) || Toshiba AC100, ubuntu, 'c' algo
|-
| ARM 11 || 1 || 0.11 || ? || ? || 0.528 GHz || cpuminer git || T-Mobile Pulse, inside Debian chroot, 'c' algo
|}

===Intel===
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment
|-
| Pentium III mobile ? || 1 || 0.3 || 0.014 || 21W || 1.07 GHz || 0.3.1x/Win2K || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source] [http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=27380 source]
|-
| Old Xeon 512k (Dual) || 2x1/2 || 2.0 || ? || ? || 3.06GHz || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || HT disabled, algo=4way (twice as fast as the 2nd best algo)
|-
| Pentium 4 2.0A || 1 || 0.85 || || || 2.0 GHz || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft-0.4]/WinXP || -g no -t 2
|-
| Pentium Dual-Core E5400 || 2/2 || 2.27 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.7 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Celeron E330 || 2/2 || 2.2 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.5 GHz || 0.3.19/Ubuntu10.04 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]
|-
| Core 2 Quad Q9400 || 4/4 || 4.35 || 0.046 || 95W || 2.66 GHz || ||
|-
| Core i3 530 || 2/4 || 8.31 || 0.10 || 80W || 3.66 GHz || Ufasoft 0.7 || -v -a5 -g no -t 4
|-
| Core i3 M350 || 2/4 || 1.48 || 0.04 || 35W || 2.27 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Core i5 M450 || 2/4 || 1.8 || 0.05 || 35W || 1.2 GHz || 0.3.17/Win7-54 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source]
|-
| Core i5-650 || 2/4 || 5.1 || 0.04 ? || || 3.2 GHz || cpuminer-0.7 || -4way
|-
| Core i5 ? || 4/? || 6.5 || || || || client from svn || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37621#msg37621 source]
|-
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 4.5 || 0.05 || 95W || 3.1 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-01-22) || cryptopp_asm32
|-
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 14 || 0.15 || 95W || 3.1 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || sse2_64
|-
| Core i7 920 || 4/8 || 19.2 || 0.10 || 195 || 4.0 GHz (x21) || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] || -a 5
|-
| Core i7 950 || 4/8 || 5.88 || 0.039 || 150W || 3.83 GHz (x23) || bitcoin-0.3.20.2 Win7-64 ||
|-
| Core i7 950 || 4/8 || 18.9 || 0.126 || 150W || 3.83 GHz (x23) || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] v0.4 ||
|-
| Core i7 980x || 6/12 || 19.2 || 0.15 || 130 || 4.4 GHz (x33) || cpuminer/Win7-64 ||
|-
| Core i7 980x || 6/12 || 8.7 || || || 3.9 GHz (x27) || 0.3.17/Win7-64 ||
|-
| Core i7 620M || 2/4 || 6.3 || 0.18 || 35 || 2.66 GHz || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] v0.4 ||
|-
| Core 2 Duo E6550 || 1/2 || 2.45 || ? || ? || 2.33 GHz || cpuminer 0.7.1 (Linux) || --algo=sse2_64
|-
| Core 2 Duo E6850 || 2/2 || 6.75 || 0.10 || 65W || 3.0 Ghz || ufasoft-0.3 ||
|-
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 7.76 || 0.11 || 70W || 3.33 GHz (o/c?) || ufasoft-0.3 || miner optimized for Intel Core
|-
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 2.52 || 0.04 || 65W || 2.66 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Core 2 Duo E8400 || 2/2 || 6.9 || ? || ? || 3.0 GHz || ufasoft v0.10|| windows 7/64bit (-t 2)
|-
| Core 2 Duo T6400 || 2/2 || 4.2 || 0.12 || 35 W || 2.00 GHz || cpuminer git (Linux) || --algo=sse2_64
|-
| Xeon 3060 || 1/2 || 2.03 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.4GHz || cpuminer 0.8.1 (Linux) || --algo=cryptopp_asm32
|-
| Xeon Prestonia 2.4 (dual) || 2x1/2 || 2.16 || 0.017 || 130W || 2.4 GHz || ufasoft v0.4 ||
|-
| Xeon X5355 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 10.13 || 0.16 || 120W || 2.66GHz || bitcoind || Roughly the same speed as the "c" algo in cpuminer
|-
| Xeon X5355 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 22.76 || 0.09 || 120W || 2.66GHz || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || -O2 -march=core2, algo=sse2_64
|-
| Xeon E5440 || 4/8 || 7.3 || ? || 80W || 2.66 GHz|| Kiv's poclbm-gui || FIXME: Either wrong model # or wrong threads/speed info
|-
| Xeon E5520 || 4/8 || 6.5 || 0.08 || 80W || 2.27 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Xeon E5530 || 4/8 || 7.14 || 0.09 || 80W || 2.4 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Xeon E5630 (dual) || 2x4/8 || 8 || 0.1 || 80W || 2.53 GHz || 0.3.17/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]
|-
| Xeon E6520 (dual) || 2x4/8 || 24.7 || ? || ? || 2.53 GHz || ufasoft v0.10 || windows 2008 R2 64bit (-t 16)
|-
| Atom N270 || 1 || 0.42 || '''0.17''' || 2.5W || 1.6 GHz || 0.3.1x/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|}

===Other===
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment
|-
| Cell || 6 || 21 || 0.35 || 60W || 3.2 GHz || cellminer || Sony Playstation 3 (FAT): Needs custom firmware (no links to it, potential issues with Sony assholes.) [https://github.com/verement/cellminer source] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4704.20 source] Total power usage of PS3 fat is 120W but only the Cell cpu is active.
|-
| Cell || 6 || 21 || 0.7 || 35W || 3.2 GHz || cellminer || Sony Playstation 3 (SLIM): Total power usage of PS3 slim is 70W but only the Cell cpu is active.
|}

==See Also==

* [[Mining rig]]
* [[Generation Calculator]]
* [[Power Calc]]
* [[OpenCL miner]]
* [http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=745 ATI Stream vs. NVIDIA CUDA - GPGPU computing battle royale]

[[Category:Mining]]

Mining hardware comparison

2011-04-23T14:12:22Z

M!nus: /* AMD */

Below are some statistics about the mining performance of various hardware used in a [[mining rig]].

The table shows (mostly) stock clock numbers. 10-20% performance improvement can be achieved via overclocking.

==Graphics cards==

===AMD===
To get the maximum performance use the 2.1 or 2.2 release of the ATI Stream SDK. 2.3 performance drops by 5-10%.

{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! W !! Clock !! SP !! SDK !! Slot !! Miner !! Notes
|-
| 3XXX || || || || || || || || OpenCL Not Supported
|-
| 42XX || || || || || || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || || OpenCL Not Supported (intergrated/mobile GPU)
|-
| 4350 || 6.93 || 0.346 || 20 || 575 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors
|-
| 4550 || 7.23 || 0.289 || 25 || 600 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors
|-
| 4650 || 31.33 || 0.653 || 48 || 650 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors
|-
| 4670 || 36.14 || 0.613 || 59 || 750 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors
|-
| 4670 || 40.11 || || 59 || 800 || 320 || || AGP x8 || poclbm/Ubuntu 10.10 w/ H == 0 mod [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.msg85236#msg85236 source] || -w 32 -f 0, don't use vectors
|-
| 4730 || 72.29 || 0.657 || 110 || 750 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||
|-
| 4770 || 72.29 || 0.904 || 80 || 750 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||
|-
| 4830 || 55.42 || 0.583 || 95 || 575 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||
|-
| 4850 || 75.30 || 0.685 || 110 || 625 || 800 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||
|-
| 4860 || 67.47 || 0.519 || 130 || 700 || 640 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||
|-
| 4870 || 90.36 || 0.602 || 150 || 750 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || clmine ||
|-
| 4870 || 78 || || || || || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/Vista 64bit || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source]
|-
| 4890 || 102.41 || 0.539 || 190 || 850 || 800 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||
|-
| 4850X2 || 150.60 || 0.602 || 250 || 625 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||
|-
| 4870X2 || 180.72 || 0.632 || 286 || 750 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || ||
|-
| 5450 || 11.99 || 0.631 || 19 || 650 || 80 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||
|-
| 5550 || 40.59 || 1.041 || 39 || 550 || 320 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 59.96 || 1.538 || 39 || 650 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 64 || 1.641 || 39 || 650 || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|-
| 5650 || 48 || 2.5-3.2 ? || 15-19 ? || || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source] [http://www.notebookcheck.net/ATI-Mobility-Radeon-HD-5650.23697.0.html source]
|-
| 5670 || 71.49 || 1.117 || 64 || 775 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||
|-
|style="background:#EEFFEE;"| 5670 || 72 || 1.64 || 44 || 850 || || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm-mod (Win7-64) || Sapphire 100287VGAL card is low power
|-
| 5670 || 85 || || || 900 || 400 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -f 0 -w 128
|-

| 5750 || 116.24 || 1.352 || 86 || 700 || 720 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||
|-
| 5770 || 156.83 || 1.452 || 108 || 850 || 800 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5770 || 180 || 1.406 || 128[*] || 950 || 800 || 2.4RC1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 30 (*Overclocked wattage calculated [http://bakkap.free.fr/Misc/wCalc.html here] )
|-
|style="background:#FFFFFF;"| 5830 || 206.64 || 1.181 || 175 || 800 || 1120 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||
|-
|style="background:#FFFFFF;"| 5830 || 241 || 1.377 || 175 || 1006 || || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-03-11 / Win7 64 ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 240.77 || 1.595 || 151 || 725 || 1440 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 252 || 1.669 || 151 || 765 || || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-01-25 ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 255.3 || 1.690 || 151 || 765 || || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm 2011-01-25 ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 300 || 1.987 || 151 || 925 (OC) || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 250.26 || 1.657 || 151 || || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || opencl client || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 313.65 || 1.668 || 188 || 850 || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 313 || 1.665 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo/Linux ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 343 || 1.824 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo/Linux ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 355 || 1.888 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/Linux ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 340 || 1.809 || 188 || 850 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 360 || || || 970 || 700 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || m0mchil's OpenCL w7-64 || -f 0 -v -w 128 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=6144.msg91959#msg91959 source]
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 385 || || || 980 || 1600 || || PCI-E 2.0 x16 || poclbm-mod/Win7-64 || -f 0 -v -w 128
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 530 || 1.803 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.4.595.10 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm/201103.beta3/Windows || -v -w128 -f60
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 535.06 || 1.820 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 560 || 1.905 || 294 || 725 || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || Diablo ||
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 565 || 1.922 || 294 || || || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine2 ||
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 604 || 2.054 || 294 || || || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 645 || || || 850 || 3200 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || -f1, Debian 6, fglrx-driver 10.9.3
|-
| 6490M || 16.289 || 0.708 || 23 || || || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm-mod (Mac OS X 10.6.7) || MacBook Pro early 2011
|-
| 6850 || 171.59 || 1.351 || 127 || 775 || 960 || 2.1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || clmine ||
|-
| 6850 || 196 || || || 850 || 960 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 0
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 6850 || 220 || 1.236 || 178[*] || 1000 || 960 || 2.4RC1 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -v -w 128 -f 30 (*Overclocked wattage calculated [http://bakkap.free.fr/Misc/wCalc.html here] )
|-
| 6870 || 232.47 || 1.540 || 151 || 900 || 1120 || || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || ||
|-
| 6870 || 260.1 || 1.611 || 175 || 1001 || 1150 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm-gui windows7x86 cat 11.3 || -v -w 128 -f 1
|-
| 6870 || 282.23 || 1.611 || 175 || 1047 || 1120 || 2.2 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm windows cat 11.2 || -v -w 128 -f 0 mem clock 300
|-
| 6950 || 295 || || 160 (?) || 810 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250
|-
| 6950 || 325 || || 200 (?) || 885 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250
|-
| 6950 || 360 || || 200 (?) || 970 || 1536 || 2.4.595.0 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || m0mchil/poclbm 03-07-11 || unlocked shaders, default mem 1250
|-
| 6970 || 323 || 1.468 || 220 || 880 || 1536 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || poclbm || -w 64, SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.
|-
| 6990 || 683 || 1.97 || 346 || 830 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=5444.msg83507#msg83507 source]. SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.
|-
| 6990 || 746 || 1.82 || 410 || 880 || 3072 || 2.3 || PCI-E 2.1 x16 || mrb's hdminer || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=5444.msg83507#msg83507 source]. SDK 2.1 not supported on 69xx.
|-
|FirePro V8700 || 84.8 || || || 750 || 800 || || || poclbm-mod.03.24.2011 ||
|-
|FirePro M5800 || 61.4 || || || 650 || || || || poclbm-mod.03.24.2011 || Ubuntu ||
|-
|}

===Nvidia===

{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/J !! W !! Clock !! SP !! Comment
|-
| 8200 mGPU || 1.2 || || || 1200 || 16 || 128 MB shared memory, "poclbm -w 128 -f 0"
|-
| 8600M GT || 4.93 || || || || 32 ||
|-
| 8600GT || 5.66 || || || 1188 || 32 ||
|-
| 8600GT OC || 7.3 || || || 1602 || 32 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.0 poclbm] -w 128 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg72833#msg72833 source]
|-
| 8800GT || 25 || 0.24 || 105 || 1300 || ||
|-
| 8800GT || 24.5 || 0.23 || 105 || 1300 || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]
|-
| 8800GTS || 16.8 || 0.109 || 154 || || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source] [http://www.techspot.com/review/79-geforce-8800-gts-512/page11.html source]
|-
| 8800 GTS || 18.7 || 0.124 || 150 || 1200 || || poclbm -w 64 no vectors
|-
| 9300GE || 1.57 || || || 1300 || 8 ||
|-
| 9300GS || 1.69 || || || 1400 || 8 ||
|-
| 9400GT || 3.37 || 0.067 || 50 || 1400 || 16 ||
|-
| 9400M (MacBook) || 1.90 || 0.32 || 6 || 700 || || poclbm -f 8 no vectors
|-
| 9500GT || 6.75 || 0.135 || 50 || 1400 || 32 ||
|-
| 9600GSO || 19.88 || 0.237 || 84 || 1375 || 96 ||
|-
| 9600GSO512 || 11.75 || 0.131 || 90 || 1625 || 48 ||
|-
| 9600GT || 15.66 || 0.165 || 95 || 1625 || 64 ||
|-
| 9600GT OC || 18.8 || <0.198 || >95 || 1981 || 64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1334.0 poclbm] -w 128 -f 10 [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg74610#msg74610 source] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg73353#msg73353 source]
|-
| 9800GT || 30.36 || 0.289 || 105 || 1800 || 112 ||
|-
| 9800GTX || 32.54 || 0.232 || 140 || 1688 || 128 ||
|-
| 9800GTX+ || 35.39 || 0.251 || 141 || 1836 || 128 ||
|-
|style="background-color:#FFEFEF"| 9800GX2 || 57.83 || 0.294 || 197 || || 2x128 ||
|-
|style="background-color:#FFEFEF"| 9800GX2 || 28 || 0.142 || 197 || || 2x128 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]
|-
| G210 || 3.38 || 0.111 || 30.5 || 1402 || 16 ||
|-
| GT220 || 9.83 || 0.170 || 58 || 1360 || 48 ||
|-
| GT240 || 19.37 || 0.281 || 69 || 1340 || 96 ||
|-
| GT240 || 21.24 || || || || 96 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4291.0 poclbm-mod] -f 0 -v [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg73383#msg73383 source]
|-
| GTS250 || 35.39 || 0.244 || 145 || 1836 || 128 ||
|-
| GTX260 || 35.91 || 0.178 || 202 || 1242 || 192 ||
|-
| GTX260 || 44 || 0.242 || 182 || 1242 || 216 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|-
| GTX260c216 || 40.40 || 0.236 || 171 || 1242 || 216 ||
|-
| GTX260c216 OC || 52.0 || || || 1461 || 216 || "poclbm -w 256 -f 1"
|-
| GTX275 || 50.75 || 0.232 || 219 || 1404 || 240 ||
|-
| GTX275 || 58 || || || 729/1458 || 240 || poclbm -f 0 -w 256
|-
| GTX280 || 46.84 || 0.198 || 236 || 1296 || 240 ||
|-
| GTX285 || 53.35 || 0.262 || 204 || 1476 || 240 ||
|-
| GTX295 || 89.78 || 0.311 || 289 || 1242 || 480 ||
|-
| GT 320M (MacBook Air) || 6.12 || || || 1212 || 48 ||
|-
| GT 330M (Sony Vaio Z) || 7.8 || 0.71 ( 0.3 total) || 11 (26w total) || 1045 || 48 ||
|-
| GT430 || 20.24 || 0.413 || 49 || 1400 || 96 ||
|-
| GTS450 || 45.28 || 0.427 || 106 || 1566 || 192 ||
|-
| GTX460SE || 56.39 || 0.376 || 150 || 1300 || 288 ||
|-
| GTX460 || 68.31 || 0.427 || 160 || 1350 || 336 ||
|-
| GTX460 (2 cards) || 102 || 0.319? || 320? || 1350 || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]
|-
| GTX460 (2 cards) OC || 127 || 0.374 || 340 || 1620 || 2x 336 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2444.0 rpcminer-cuda] -gpugrid=128 -gputhreads=128 ver.20110227
|-
| GTX465 || 64.41 || 0.322 || 200 || 1215 || 352 ||
|-
| GTX470 || 81.98 || 0.381 || 215 || 1215 || 448 ||
|-
| GTX470 || 94.7 || || || 1414 || ||
|-
| GTX480 || 101.28 || 0.405 || 250 || 1401 || 480 ||
|-
| GTX560 Ti || 67.7 || 0.39 || 170 || 1700 || 384 || standard EVGA 560, no overclock
|-
| GTX560 OC || 86.7 || <0.51 || >170 || 1800 || 384 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=2444.0 rpcminer-cuda] [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4967.msg72816#msg72816 source]
|-
| GTX570 || 105.83 || 0.483 || 219 || 1464 || 480 ||
|-
| GTX580 || 119.06 || 0.488 || 244 || 1544 || 512 ||
|-
| Quadro FX 580 || 5.7 || 0.14 || 40 || 1125 || 4 ||
|-
| Quadro FX 1600M || 6 || 0.12 || 50 || 625 || 32 ||rpcminer-cuda, Win
|-
| Quadro NVS 135M || 1.05 || 0.1 || 10 || 800 || 1 ||
|-
| Quadro NVS 3100M || 3.6 || 0.257 || 14 || 600 || 16 || rpcminer-cuda, Win, CUDA 3.1.1
|-
| Tesla M2050 || 79.8 || || || || || DiabloMiner
|-
|}

==CPUs==

A lot of nice data can be pulled from [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.0 this thread] to seed this section. Also from [https://www.bitcoin.org/wiki/doku.php?id=bitcoin_miners this page on the old wiki].

===AMD===
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! nprocs !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment
|-
| 2x Opteron 6128 || 16 || 32.4 || 0.203 || 160W || 2 GHz || 0.3.19 || -4way
|-
| Athlon 64 3500+ || 1 || 1.18 || 0.018 || 65 W || 2.54 GHz || ufasoft v0.4 || overclocked (originally 2.2 GHz)
|-
| Athlon X2 3800+ || 2 || 1.73 || 0.03 || 65 W || 2.00 GHz || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || -algo=4way
|-
| Athlon X2 4000+ || 2 || 1.9 || 0.02 || 65W || 2.1 GHz || rpc-miner ||
|-
| Athlon X2 4400+ || || 2.09 || 0.032 || 65W || 2.3GHz || 0.3.19/Win x64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]
|-
| Athlon X2 6000+ || 2 || 2.81 || 0.02 || 125W || 3 GHz || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg22881#msg22881 source]
|-
| Athlon X2 6400+ Black Edition || 2 || 2.9 || 0.023 || 125W || 3.2 GHz || 0.3.20.2 BETA/Win 7 x64 || -4way
|-
| Athlon XP 2000+ || 2 || 0.62 || 0.009 || 70W || 1.67 GHz || 0.3.18/Ubuntu || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source] [http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm?articleid=914&page=4 source]
|-
| Athlon II X2 240e || 2 || 2.71 || 0.06 || 45W || 2.81 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Athlon II X4 630 || 4 || 10.7 || 0.11 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || bitcoin-miner 0.4 ||
|-
| Phenom II X6 1055T || 6 || 15.84 || 0.13 || 125W || 2.82 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Phenom II X6 1100T || 6 || 22 || 0.176 || 125W || 3.82 GHz || bitcoin-miner || Aciid#bitcoin-dev
|-
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 3.8 || 0.04 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 0.3.1x/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|-
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 7.2 || 0.08 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || cpu-miner 0.2.1/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|-
| Phenom II x4 955 || 4 || 11 || 0.09 || 125W || 3.2 GHz || rpcminer-4way ||
|}

===ARM===
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment
|-
| Cortex A8 || 1 || 0.125 || 0.36 || 0.35 W || 0.6 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || Nokia N900: 'cryptopp'
|-
| Cortex A8 || 1 || 0.2 || 0.57 || 0.35 W || 0.6 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || Nokia N900: 'c' algo
|-
| Tegra 250 (2xCortex-A9) || 2 || 0.57 || 1.14 || 0.5 W || 1.0 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-24) || Toshiba AC100, ubuntu, 'c' algo
|}

===Intel===
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment
|-
| Pentium III mobile ? || 1 || 0.3 || 0.014 || 21W || 1.07 GHz || 0.3.1x/Win2K || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source] [http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=27380 source]
|-
| Old Xeon 512k (Dual) || 2x1/2 || 2.0 || ? || ? || 3.06GHz || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || HT disabled, algo=4way (twice as fast as the 2nd best algo)
|-
| Pentium 4 2.0A || 1 || 0.85 || || || 2.0 GHz || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft-0.4]/WinXP || -g no -t 2
|-
| Pentium Dual-Core E5400 || 2/2 || 2.27 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.7 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Celeron E330 || 2/2 || 2.2 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.5 GHz || 0.3.19/Ubuntu10.04 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]
|-
| Core i3 M350 || 2/4 || 1.48 || 0.04 || 35W || 2.27 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Core i5 M450 || 2/4 || 1.8 || 0.05 || 35W || 1.2 GHz || 0.3.17/Win7-54 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source]
|-
| Core i5-650 || 2/4 || 5.1 || 0.04 ? || || 3.2 GHz || cpuminer-0.7 || -4way
|-
| Core i5 ? || 4/? || 6.5 || || || || client from svn || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37621#msg37621 source]
|-
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 4.5 || 0.05 || 95W || 3.1 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-01-22) || cryptopp_asm32
|-
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 14 || 0.15 || 95W || 3.1 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-03-26) || sse2_64
|-
| Core i7 920 || 4/8 || 19.2 || 0.10 || 195 || 4.0 GHz (x21) || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] || -a 5
|-
| Core i7 950 || 4/8 || 5.88 || 0.039 || 150W || 3.83 GHz (x23) || bitcoin-0.3.20.2 Win7-64 ||
|-
| Core i7 950 || 4/8 || 18.9 || 0.126 || 150W || 3.83 GHz (x23) || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] v0.4 ||
|-
| Core i7 980x || 6/12 || 19.2 || 0.15 || 130 || 4.4 GHz (x33) || cpuminer/Win7-64 ||
|-
| Core i7 980x || 6/12 || 8.7 || || || 3.9 GHz (x27) || 0.3.17/Win7-64 ||
|-
| Core i7 620M || 2/4 || 6.3 || 0.18 || 35 || 2.66 GHz || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] v0.4 ||
|-
| Core 2 Duo E6550 || 1/2 || 2.45 || ? || ? || 2.33 GHz || cpuminer 0.7.1 (Linux) || --algo=sse2_64
|-
| Core 2 Duo E6850 || 2/2 || 6.75 || 0.10 || 65W || 3.0 Ghz || ufasoft-0.3 ||
|-
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 7.76 || 0.11 || 70W || 3.33 GHz (o/c?) || ufasoft-0.3 || miner optimized for Intel Core
|-
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 2.52 || 0.04 || 65W || 2.66 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Xeon 3060 || 1/2 || 2.03 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.4GHz || cpuminer 0.8.1 (Linux) || --algo=cryptopp_asm32
|-
| Xeon Prestonia 2.4 (dual) || 2x1/2 || 2.16 || 0.017 || 130W || 2.4 GHz || ufasoft v0.4 ||
|-
| Xeon X5355 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 10.13 || 0.16 || 120W || 2.66GHz || bitcoind || Roughly the same speed as the "c" algo in cpuminer
|-
| Xeon X5355 (dual) || 2x4/4 || 22.76 || 0.09 || 120W || 2.66GHz || cpuminer (v0.8.1-1-g69529c3) || -O2 -march=core2, algo=sse2_64
|-
| Xeon E5440 || 4/8 || 7.3 || ? || 80W || 2.66 GHz|| Kiv's poclbm-gui || FIXME: Either wrong model # or wrong threads/speed info
|-
| Xeon E5520 || 4/8 || 6.5 || 0.08 || 80W || 2.27 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Xeon E5530 || 4/8 || 7.14 || 0.09 || 80W || 2.4 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Xeon E5630 (dual) || 2x4/8 || 8 || 0.1 || 80W || 2.53 GHz || 0.3.17/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]
|-
| Atom N270 || 1 || 0.42 || '''0.17''' || 2.5W || 1.6 GHz || 0.3.1x/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|}

==See Also==

* [[Mining rig]]
* [[Generation Calculator]]
* [[Power Calc]]
* [[OpenCL miner]]
* [http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=745 ATI Stream vs. NVIDIA CUDA - GPGPU computing battle royale]

[[Category:Mining]]