<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://en.bitcoin.it/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Gronager</id>
	<title>Bitcoin Wiki - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://en.bitcoin.it/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Gronager"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Special:Contributions/Gronager"/>
	<updated>2026-05-24T23:26:47Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.8</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Talk:BIP_0013&amp;diff=24126</id>
		<title>Talk:BIP 0013</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Talk:BIP_0013&amp;diff=24126"/>
		<updated>2012-02-20T10:51:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Gronager: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Personally, I don&#039;t like the nomenclature &amp;quot;version&amp;quot;.  It&#039;s signalling far more than just a version.  How about &amp;quot;address class&amp;quot;?&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Andyparkins|Andyparkins]] 11:49, 9 December 2011 (GMT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;version&amp;quot; portion of the address has so far been labeled &amp;quot;network id&amp;quot;, and signals from which network and which chain the address can be used for. I thin that this change from network id to version is much more fundamental and should not just be squeezed in alone with bip16/17.&lt;br /&gt;
The right way to do this is to structure the bitcoin address into:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
base58-encode: [one-byte network ID][20-byte hash][one-byte address class][3-byte checksum]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This will move the possibility of using a faulty address from 1 to 4bill to 1 to 24mio. Recall that for most other payment systems this checksum is 1 to 9! So it should be sufficient.&lt;br /&gt;
An old client will then render the new addresses as useless and they will still maintain their old familiar 1xxx look - the whole point in multisig is that it should not be a matter of the paying party to worry about securing wallet of the receiver, hence he should not be bothered with a new &amp;quot;3&amp;quot; kind of address now...&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:gronager|Michael Gronager/libcoin]] 10:49, 20 February 2012 (GMT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Gronager</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Talk:BIP_0013&amp;diff=24125</id>
		<title>Talk:BIP 0013</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Talk:BIP_0013&amp;diff=24125"/>
		<updated>2012-02-20T10:50:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Gronager: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Personally, I don&#039;t like the nomenclature &amp;quot;version&amp;quot;.  It&#039;s signalling far more than just a version.  How about &amp;quot;address class&amp;quot;?&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Andyparkins|Andyparkins]] 11:49, 9 December 2011 (GMT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;version&amp;quot; portion of the address has so far been labeled &amp;quot;network id&amp;quot;, and signals from which network and which chain the address can be used for. I thin that this change from network id to version is much more fundamental and should not just be squeezed in alone with bip16/17.&lt;br /&gt;
The right way to do this is to structure the bitcoin address into:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
base58-encode: [one-byte version][20-byte hash][1-bytes one for version][3-byte checksum]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This will move the possibility of using a faulty address from 1 to 4bill to 1 to 24mio. Recall that for most other payment systems this checksum is 1 to 9! So it should be sufficient.&lt;br /&gt;
An old client will then render the new addresses as useless and they will still maintain their old familiar 1xxx look - the whole point in multisig is that it should not be a matter of the paying party to worry about securing wallet of the receiver, hence he should not be bothered with a new &amp;quot;3&amp;quot; kind of address now...&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:gronager|Michael Gronager/libcoin]] 10:49, 20 February 2012 (GMT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Gronager</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Talk:BIP_0013&amp;diff=24124</id>
		<title>Talk:BIP 0013</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Talk:BIP_0013&amp;diff=24124"/>
		<updated>2012-02-20T10:50:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Gronager: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Personally, I don&#039;t like the nomenclature &amp;quot;version&amp;quot;.  It&#039;s signalling far more than just a version.  How about &amp;quot;address class&amp;quot;?&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Andyparkins|Andyparkins]] 11:49, 9 December 2011 (GMT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;version&amp;quot; portion of the address has so far been labeled &amp;quot;network id&amp;quot;, and signals from which network and which chain the address can be used for. I thin that this change from network id to version is much more fundamental and should not just be squeezed in alone with bip16/17.&lt;br /&gt;
The right way to do this is to structure the bitcoin address into:&lt;br /&gt;
base58-encode: [one-byte version][20-byte hash][1-bytes one for version][3-byte checksum]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This will move the possibility of using a faulty address from 1 to 4bill to 1 to 24mio. Recall that for most other payment systems this checksum is 1 to 9! So it should be sufficient.&lt;br /&gt;
An old client will then render the new addresses as useless and they will still maintain their old familiar 1xxx look - the whole point in multisig is that it should not be a matter of the paying party to worry about securing wallet of the receiver, hence he should not be bothered with a new &amp;quot;3&amp;quot; kind of address now...&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:gronager|Michael Gronager/libcoin]] 10:49, 20 February 2012 (GMT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Gronager</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Talk:BIP_0013&amp;diff=24123</id>
		<title>Talk:BIP 0013</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Talk:BIP_0013&amp;diff=24123"/>
		<updated>2012-02-20T10:50:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Gronager: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Personally, I don&#039;t like the nomenclature &amp;quot;version&amp;quot;.  It&#039;s signalling far more than just a version.  How about &amp;quot;address class&amp;quot;?&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Andyparkins|Andyparkins]] 11:49, 9 December 2011 (GMT)&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;version&amp;quot; portion of the address has so far been labeled &amp;quot;network id&amp;quot;, and signals from which network and which chain the address can be used for. I thin that this change from network id to version is much more fundamental and should not just be squeezed in alone with bip16/17.&lt;br /&gt;
The right way to do this is to structure the bitcoin address into:&lt;br /&gt;
base58-encode: [one-byte version][20-byte hash][1-bytes one for version][3-byte checksum]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This will move the possibility of using a faulty address from 1 to 4bill to 1 to 24mio. Recall that for most other payment systems this checksum is 1 to 9! So it should be sufficient.&lt;br /&gt;
An old client will then render the new addresses as useless and they will still maintain their old familiar 1xxx look - the whole point in multisig is that it should not be a matter of the paying party to worry about securing wallet of the receiver, hence he should not be bothered with a new &amp;quot;3&amp;quot; kind of address now...&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:gronager|Michael Gronager/libcoin]] 10:49, 20 February 2012 (GMT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Gronager</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Data_directory&amp;diff=15911</id>
		<title>Data directory</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Data_directory&amp;diff=15911"/>
		<updated>2011-09-02T09:12:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Gronager: wallet.dat does use BDB and also added adds.dat&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The location where Bitcoin&#039;s data files are stored, including the [[Wallet|wallet]] data file.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Default Location==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Windows ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Go to Start -&amp;gt; Run (or press WinKey+R) and run this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 explorer %APPDATA%\Bitcoin&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bitcoin&#039;s data folder will open. For most users, this is the following locations:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 C:\Documents and Settings\YourUserName\Application data\Bitcoin (XP)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
 C:\Users\YourUserName\Appdata\Roaming\Bitcoin (Vista and 7)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;AppData&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Application data&amp;quot; are hidden by default.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Linux ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By default Bitcoin will put its data here:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 ~/.bitcoin/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You need to do a &amp;quot;ls -a&amp;quot; to see directories that start with a dot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If that&#039;s not it, you can do a search like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 find / -name wallet.dat -print 2&amp;gt;/dev/null&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Mac ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By default Bitcoin will put its data here:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 ~/Library/Application Support/Bitcoin/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Directory Contents==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Subdirectories===&lt;br /&gt;
* database&lt;br /&gt;
**Contains journaling files for the block database  &lt;br /&gt;
* testnet&lt;br /&gt;
**Contains testnet versions of these files (if running with -testnet)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Files===&lt;br /&gt;
* .lock&lt;br /&gt;
**BDB lock file&lt;br /&gt;
* bitcoin.conf [optional]&lt;br /&gt;
**Contains [[Running_Bitcoin#Bitcoin.conf_Configuration_File|configuration options]].  &lt;br /&gt;
* blk&#039;&#039;xxxx&#039;&#039;.dat&lt;br /&gt;
**Contains concatenated raw blocks&lt;br /&gt;
* blkindex.dat&lt;br /&gt;
**Indexing information used with blk&#039;&#039;xxxx&#039;&#039;.dat&lt;br /&gt;
* __db.&#039;&#039;xxx&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**Used by BDB&lt;br /&gt;
* db.log&lt;br /&gt;
* debug.log&lt;br /&gt;
**Bitcoin&#039;s verbose log file. Automatically trimmed from time to time.&lt;br /&gt;
* wallet.dat&lt;br /&gt;
**Storage for keys, transactions, metadata, and options.&lt;br /&gt;
* addr.dat&lt;br /&gt;
** Storage for ip addresses to make a reconnect easier&lt;br /&gt;
The data, index and log files are used by Oracle [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berkeley_DB Berkeley DB], the embedded key/value data store that Bitcoin uses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Securing your wallet]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Technical]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Gronager</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>