<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://en.bitcoin.it/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Dlo</id>
	<title>Bitcoin Wiki - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://en.bitcoin.it/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Dlo"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Special:Contributions/Dlo"/>
	<updated>2026-04-28T14:32:34Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.8</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Talk:Block&amp;diff=7156</id>
		<title>Talk:Block</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Talk:Block&amp;diff=7156"/>
		<updated>2011-04-11T20:28:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Dlo: /* What if I&amp;#039;m 1% towards calculating a block and...? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== What if I&#039;m 1% towards calculating a block and...? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;There&#039;s no such thing as being 1% towards solving a block. You don&#039;t make progress towards solving it.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is this true?  I don&#039;t know if there&#039;s a nonce which will solve any given block, but for a block that is solvable, it&#039;s possible to be 1% of the way towards finding it.  Supposing it takes 10 million attempts to &#039;solve&#039; a block, then after 100,000 attempts you could say you were 1% towards solving it.  You&#039;re certainly closer to solving it than you were before those 100,000 failed attempts, aren&#039;t you? [[User:Dooglus|Dooglus]] 05:05, 15 January 2011 (GMT)&lt;br /&gt;
:No one can know how many tries it will take to solve the block. After the fact you might say that at some point you had finished 1% of the necessary calculation for that block, but this was not really &amp;quot;progress&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If you go back in time after completing a block and don&#039;t generate for one of the days that you did originally, then you could actually end up getting the block &#039;&#039;sooner&#039;&#039;, as the work required is random. [[User:Theymos|theymos]] 11:06, 15 January 2011 (GMT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Probabilistically speaking, one can make a &amp;quot;best guess&amp;quot; for how long it will take to solve a block. A problem with probabilistic estimation, for example, is that it may say it will take 10 hours to solve the block, with a standard deviation of 15 hours. How much more work do you have when you&#039;ve worked on it for 10 hours? The answer is that you have ~10 hours more work :).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But assuming all incorrect hashes are exhausted first, the maximal number of tries needed to solve the block is ~2&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;256&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. So, there exists an upper limit (albeit, it is an obscenely large one!) on the amount of work you can do. Progress is made, just very slowly. --[[User:Dlo|Dlo]] 20:28, 11 April 2011 (GMT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Dlo</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>