Bitcoin Wiki - User contributions [en]

Mining hardware comparison

2011-03-08T16:35:41Z

Compro01: /* Nvidia */ added my 8800GTS and corrected other 8800GTS' wattage

{{stub}}

Below are some statistics about the mining performance of various hardware used in a [[mining rig]]. The GPU lists were originally compiled by ArtForz.

The table shows stock clock numbers. 10-20% performance improvement can be achieved via overclocking.

=Graphics cards=

==AMD==
To get the maximum performance use the 2.1 or 2.2 release of the ATI Stream SDK. 2.3 performance drops by 5-10%.

{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! W !! Clock !! SP !! SDK !! Miner !! Notes
|-
| 3XXX || || || || || || || || OpenCL Not Supported
|-
| 4350 || 6.93 || 0.346 || 20 || 575 || 80 || || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors
|-
| 4550 || 7.23 || 0.289 || 25 || 600 || 80 || || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors
|-
| 4650 || 31.33 || 0.653 || 48 || 650 || 320 || || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors
|-
| 4670 || 36.14 || 0.613 || 59 || 750 || 320 || || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors
|-
| 4730 || 72.29 || 0.657 || 110 || 750 || 640 || || ||
|-
| 4770 || 72.29 || 0.904 || 80 || 750 || 640 || || ||
|-
| 4830 || 55.42 || 0.583 || 95 || 575 || 640 || || ||
|-
| 4850 || 75.30 || 0.685 || 110 || 625 || 800 || || ||
|-
| 4860 || 67.47 || 0.519 || 130 || 700 || 640 || || ||
|-
| 4870 || 90.36 || 0.602 || 150 || 750 || 800 || 2.1 || clmine ||
|-
| 4870 || 78 || || || || || || m0mchil's OpenCL/Vista 64bit || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source]
|-
| 4890 || 102.41 || 0.539 || 190 || 850 || 800 || || ||
|-
| 4850X2 || 150.60 || 0.602 || 250 || 625 || 1600 || || ||
|-
| 4870X2 || 180.72 || 0.632 || 286 || 750 || 1600 || || ||
|-
| 5450 || 11.99 || 0.631 || 19 || 650 || 80 || || ||
|-
| 5550 || 40.59 || 1.041 || 39 || 550 || 320 || || ||
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 59.96 || 1.538 || 39 || 650 || 400 || || ||
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 64 || 1.641 || 39 || 650 || || || m0mchil's OpenCL/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|-
| 5650 || 48 || 2.5-3.2 ? || 15-19 ? || || || || m0mchil's OpenCL/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source] [http://www.notebookcheck.net/ATI-Mobility-Radeon-HD-5650.23697.0.html source]
|-
| 5670 || 71.49 || 1.117 || 64 || 775 || 400 || || ||
|-
| 5750 || 116.24 || 1.352 || 86 || 700 || 720 || || ||
|-
| 5770 || 156.83 || 1.452 || 108 || 850 || 800 || 2.1 || clmine ||
|-
|style="background:#FFFFFF;"| 5830 || 206.64 || 1.181 || 175 || 800 || 1120 || || ||
|-
|style="background:#FFFFFF;"| 5830 || 241 || 1.377 || 175 || 1006 || || 2.3 || poclbm 2011-02-04 ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 240.77 || 1.595 || 151 || 725 || 1440 || || ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 252 || 1.669 || 151 || 765 || || 2.3 || poclbm 2011-01-25 ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 255.3 || 1.690 || 151 || 765 || || 2.2 || poclbm 2011-01-25 ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 300 || 1.987 || 151 || || || || m0mchil's OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 250.26 || 1.657 || 151 || || || || opencl client || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 313.65 || 1.668 || 188 || 850 || 1600 || 2.1 || clmine ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 313 || 1.665 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.3 || Diablo/Linux ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 343 || 1.824 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || Diablo/Linux ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 355 || 1.888 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || poclbm/Linux ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 340 || 1.809 || 188 || 850 || 1600 || || m0mchil's OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 535.06 || 1.820 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || clmine ||
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 560 || 1.905 || 294 || 725 || || || Diablo ||
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 565 || 1.922 || 294 || || || 2.1 || clmine2 ||
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 604 || 2.054 || 294 || || || 2.1 || clmine ||
|-
| 6850 || 171.59 || 1.351 || 127 || 775 || 960 || 2.1 || clmine ||
|-
| 6870 || 232.47 || 1.540 || 151 || 900 || 1120 || || ||
|-
| 6870 || 282.23 || 1.611 || 175 || 1047 || 1120 || 2.2 || poclbm windows cat 11.2 || -v -w 128 -f 0 mem clock 300
|-
| 6970 || 323 || 1.468 || 220 || 880 || 1536 || 2.3 || poclbm || -w 64
|-
|}

==Intel==

{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! W !! Clock !! SP !! SDK !! Miner
|-
| HD 2000 || 0.65 || || || || || 2.2 || poclbm 2011-01-25
|-
|}

==Nvidia==

{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! W !! Clock !! SP !! Comment
|-
| 8600M GT || 4.93 || || || || 32 ||
|-
| 8600GT || 5.66 || || || 1188 || 32 ||
|-
| 8800GT || 25 || 0.24 || 105 || 1300 || ||
|-
| 8800GT || 24.5 || 0.23 || 105 || 1300 || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]
|-
| 8800GTS || 16.8 || 0.109 || 154 || || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source] [http://www.techspot.com/review/79-geforce-8800-gts-512/page11.html source]
|-
| 8800 GTS || 18.7 || 0.124 || 150 || 1200 || || poclbm -w 64 no vectors
|-
| 9300GE || 1.57 || || || 1300 || 8 ||
|-
| 9300GS || 1.69 || || || 1400 || 8 ||
|-
| 9400GT || 3.37 || 0.067 || 50 || 1400 || 16 ||
|-
| 9500GT || 6.75 || 0.135 || 50 || 1400 || 32 ||
|-
| 9600GSO || 19.88 || 0.237 || 84 || 1375 || 96 ||
|-
| 9600GSO512 || 11.75 || 0.131 || 90 || 1625 || 48 ||
|-
| 9600GT || 15.66 || 0.165 || 95 || 1625 || 64 ||
|-
| 9800GT || 30.36 || 0.289 || 105 || 1800 || 112 ||
|-
| 9800GTX || 32.54 || 0.232 || 140 || 1688 || 128 ||
|-
| 9800GTX+ || 35.39 || 0.251 || 141 || 1836 || 128 ||
|-
|style="background-color:#FFEFEF"| 9800GX2 || 57.83 || 0.294 || 197 || || 2x128 ||
|-
|style="background-color:#FFEFEF"| 9800GX2 || 28 || 0.142 || 197 || || 2x128 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]
|-
| G210 || 3.38 || 0.111 || 30.5 || 1402 || 16 ||
|-
| GT220 || 9.83 || 0.170 || 58 || 1360 || 48 ||
|-
| GT240 || 19.37 || 0.281 || 69 || 1340 || 96 ||
|-
| GTS250 || 35.39 || 0.244 || 145 || 1836 || 128 ||
|-
| GTX260 || 35.91 || 0.178 || 202 || 1242 || 192 ||
|-
| GTX260 || 44 || 0.242 || 182 || 1242 || 216 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|-
| GTX260c216 || 40.40 || 0.236 || 171 || 1242 || 216 ||
|-
| GTX275 || 50.75 || 0.232 || 219 || 1404 || 240 ||
|-
| GTX280 || 46.84 || 0.198 || 236 || 1296 || 240 ||
|-
| GTX285 || 53.35 || 0.262 || 204 || 1476 || 240 ||
|-
| GTX295 || 89.78 || 0.311 || 289 || 1242 || 480 ||
|-
| 320M (MacBook Air) || 6.12 || || || 1212 || 48 ||
|-
| GT430 || 20.24 || 0.413 || 49 || 1400 || 96 ||
|-
| GTS450 || 45.28 || 0.427 || 106 || 1566 || 192 ||
|-
| GTX460SE || 56.39 || 0.376 || 150 || 1300 || 288 ||
|-
| GTX460 || 68.31 || 0.427 || 160 || 1350 || 336 ||
|-
| GTX460 (2 cards) || 102 || 0.319? || 320? || 1350 || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]
|-
| GTX465 || 64.41 || 0.322 || 200 || 1215 || 352 ||
|-
| GTX470 || 81.98 || 0.381 || 215 || 1215 || 448 ||
|-
| GTX480 || 101.28 || 0.405 || 250 || 1401 || 480 ||
|-
| GTX570 || 105.83 || 0.483 || 219 || 1464 || 480 ||
|-
| GTX580 || 119.06 || 0.488 || 244 || 1544 || 512 ||
|-
|}

=CPUs=

A lot of nice data can be pulled from [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.0 this thread] to seed this section. Also from [https://www.bitcoin.org/wiki/doku.php?id=bitcoin_miners this page on the old wiki].

==AMD==
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! nprocs !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment
|-
| 2x Opteron 6128 || 16 || 32.4 || 0.203 || 160W || 2 GHz || 0.3.19 || -4way
|-
| Athlon X2 4000+ || 2 || 1.9 || 0.02 || 65W || 2.1 GHz || rpc-miner ||
|-
| Athlon X2 4400+ || || 2.09 || 0.32 || 65W || 2.3GHz || 0.3.19/Win x64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]
|-
| Athlon X2 6000+ || 2 || 2.81 || 0.02 || 125W || 3 GHz || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg22881#msg22881 source]
|-
| Athlon XP 2000+ || 2 || 0.62 || 0.009 || 70W || 1.67 GHz || 0.3.18/Ubuntu || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source] [http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm?articleid=914&page=4 source]
|-
| Athlon II X2 240e || 2 || 2.71 || 0.06 || 45W || 2.81 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Phenom II X6 1055T || 6 || 15.84 || 0.13 || 125W || 2.82 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Phenom II X6 1100T || 6 || 22 || 0.176 || 125W || 3.82 GHz || bitcoin-miner || Aciid#bitcoin-dev
|-
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 3.8 || 0.04 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 0.3.1x/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|-
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 7.2 || 0.08 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || cpu-miner 0.2.1/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|}

==Intel==
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment
|-
| Pentium III mobile ? || 1 || 0.3 || 0.014 || 21W || 1.07 GHz || 0.3.1x/Win2K || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source] [http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=27380 source]
|-
| Pentium Dual-Core E5400 || 2/2 || 2.27 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.7 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Celeron E330 || 2/2 || 2.2 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.5 GHz || 0.3.19/Ubuntu10.04 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]
|-
| Core i3 M350 || 2/4 || 1.48 || 0.04 || 35W || 2.27 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Core i5 M450 || 2/4 || 1.8 || 0.05 || 35W || 1.2 GHz || 0.3.17/Win7-54 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source]
|-
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 4.5 || 0.05 || 95W || 3.1 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-01-22) || cryptopp_asm32
|-
| Core i5-550 ? || 2/4 || 5.1 || 0.04 ? || || 3.2 GHz || cpuminer-0.7 || -4way
|-
| Core i5 ? || 4/? || 6.5 || || || || client from svn || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37621#msg37621 source]
|-
| Core i7 920 || 4/8 || 19.2 || 0.10 || 195 || 4.0 GHz (x21) || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3486.0 ufasoft] || -a 5
|-
| Core i7 980x || 6/12 || 19.2 || 0.15 || 130 || 4.4 GHz (x33) || cpuminer/Win7-64 ||
|-
| Core i7 980x || 6/12 || 8.7 || || || 3.9 GHz (x27) || 0.3.17/Win7-64 ||
|-
| Core 2 Duo E6550 || 1/2 || 2.45 || ? || ? || 2.33 GHz || cpuminer 0.7.1 (Linux) || --algo=sse2_64
|-
| Core 2 Duo E6850 || 2/2 || 6.75 || 0.10 || 65W || 3.0 Ghz || ufasoft-0.3 ||
|-
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 7.76 || 0.11 || 70W || 3.33 GHz (o/c?) || ufasoft-0.3 || miner optimized for Intel Core
|-
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 2.52 || 0.04 || 65W || 2.66 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Xeon E5520 || 4/8 || 6.5 || 0.08 || 80W || 2.27 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Xeon E5530 || 4/8 || 7.14 || 0.09 || 80W || 2.4 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Xeon E5630 (dual) || 2x4/8 || 8 || 0.1 || 80W || 2.53 GHz || 0.3.17/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]
|-
| Atom N270 || 1 || 0.42 || '''0.17''' || 2.5W || 1.6 GHz || 0.3.1x/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|}

[[Category:Mining]]

Mining hardware comparison

2011-03-07T18:49:54Z

Compro01: /* Intel */ added core 2 duo E6850

{{stub}}

Below are some statistics about the mining performance of various hardware used in a [[mining rig]]. The GPU lists were originally compiled by ArtForz.

The table shows stock clock numbers. 10-20% performance improvement can be achieved via overclocking.

=Graphics cards=

==AMD==
To get the maximum performance use the 2.1 or 2.2 release of the ATI Stream SDK. 2.3 performance drops by 5-10%.

{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! W !! Clock !! SP !! SDK !! Miner !! Notes
|-
| 3XXX || || || || || || || || OpenCL Not Supported
|-
| 4350 || 6.93 || 0.346 || 20 || 575 || 80 || || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors
|-
| 4550 || 7.23 || 0.289 || 25 || 600 || 80 || || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors
|-
| 4650 || 31.33 || 0.653 || 48 || 650 || 320 || || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors
|-
| 4670 || 36.14 || 0.613 || 59 || 750 || 320 || || poclbm || -w 32, don't use vectors
|-
| 4730 || 72.29 || 0.657 || 110 || 750 || 640 || || ||
|-
| 4770 || 72.29 || 0.904 || 80 || 750 || 640 || || ||
|-
| 4830 || 55.42 || 0.583 || 95 || 575 || 640 || || ||
|-
| 4850 || 75.30 || 0.685 || 110 || 625 || 800 || || ||
|-
| 4860 || 67.47 || 0.519 || 130 || 700 || 640 || || ||
|-
| 4870 || 90.36 || 0.602 || 150 || 750 || 800 || 2.1 || clmine ||
|-
| 4870 || 78 || || || || || || m0mchil's OpenCL/Vista 64bit || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source]
|-
| 4890 || 102.41 || 0.539 || 190 || 850 || 800 || || ||
|-
| 4850X2 || 150.60 || 0.602 || 250 || 625 || 1600 || || ||
|-
| 4870X2 || 180.72 || 0.632 || 286 || 750 || 1600 || || ||
|-
| 5450 || 11.99 || 0.631 || 19 || 650 || 80 || || ||
|-
| 5550 || 40.59 || 1.041 || 39 || 550 || 320 || || ||
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 59.96 || 1.538 || 39 || 650 || 400 || || ||
|-
|style="background:#FFFFEF;"| 5570 || 64 || 1.641 || 39 || 650 || || || m0mchil's OpenCL/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|-
| 5650 || 48 || 2.5-3.2 ? || 15-19 ? || || || || m0mchil's OpenCL/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source] [http://www.notebookcheck.net/ATI-Mobility-Radeon-HD-5650.23697.0.html source]
|-
| 5670 || 71.49 || 1.117 || 64 || 775 || 400 || || ||
|-
| 5750 || 116.24 || 1.352 || 86 || 700 || 720 || || ||
|-
| 5770 || 156.83 || 1.452 || 108 || 850 || 800 || 2.1 || clmine ||
|-
|style="background:#FFFFFF;"| 5830 || 206.64 || 1.181 || 175 || 800 || 1120 || || ||
|-
|style="background:#FFFFFF;"| 5830 || 241 || 1.377 || 175 || 1006 || || 2.3 || poclbm 2011-02-04 ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 240.77 || 1.595 || 151 || 725 || 1440 || || ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 252 || 1.669 || 151 || 765 || || 2.3 || poclbm 2011-01-25 ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 255.3 || 1.690 || 151 || 765 || || 2.2 || poclbm 2011-01-25 ||
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 300 || 1.987 || 151 || || || || m0mchil's OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|-
|style="background:#EFEFFF;"| 5850 || 250.26 || 1.657 || 151 || || || || opencl client || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 313.65 || 1.668 || 188 || 850 || 1600 || 2.1 || clmine ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 313 || 1.665 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.3 || Diablo/Linux ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 343 || 1.824 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || Diablo/Linux ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 355 || 1.888 || 188 || 900? || 1600 || 2.1 || poclbm/Linux ||
|-
|style="background:#EFFFEF;"| 5870 || 340 || 1.809 || 188 || 850 || 1600 || || m0mchil's OpenCL || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 535.06 || 1.820 || 294 || 725 || 3200 || 2.1 || clmine ||
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 560 || 1.905 || 294 || 725 || || || Diablo ||
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 565 || 1.922 || 294 || || || 2.1 || clmine2 ||
|-
|style="background:#FFEFEF;"| 5970 || 604 || 2.054 || 294 || || || 2.1 || clmine ||
|-
| 6850 || 171.59 || 1.351 || 127 || 775 || 960 || 2.1 || clmine ||
|-
| 6870 || 232.47 || 1.540 || 151 || 900 || 1120 || || ||
|-
| 6970 || 323 || 1.468 || 220 || 880 || 1536 || 2.3 || poclbm || -w 64
|-
|}

==Intel==

{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! W !! Clock !! SP !! SDK !! Miner
|-
| HD 2000 || 0.65 || || || || || 2.2 || poclbm 2011-01-25
|-
|}

==Nvidia==

{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! W !! Clock !! SP !! Comment
|-
| 8600M GT || 4.93 || || || || 32 ||
|-
| 8600GT || 5.66 || || || 1188 || 32 ||
|-
| 8800GT || 25 || 0.24 || 105 || 1300 || ||
|-
| 8800GT || 24.5 || 0.23 || 105 || 1300 || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]
|-
| 8800GTS || 16.8 || 0.05 || 291 ? || || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg25069#msg25069 source] [http://www.techspot.com/review/79-geforce-8800-gts-512/page11.html source]
|-
| 9300GE || 1.57 || || || 1300 || 8 ||
|-
| 9300GS || 1.69 || || || 1400 || 8 ||
|-
| 9400GT || 3.37 || 0.067 || 50 || 1400 || 16 ||
|-
| 9500GT || 6.75 || 0.135 || 50 || 1400 || 32 ||
|-
| 9600GSO || 19.88 || 0.237 || 84 || 1375 || 96 ||
|-
| 9600GSO512 || 11.75 || 0.131 || 90 || 1625 || 48 ||
|-
| 9600GT || 15.66 || 0.165 || 95 || 1625 || 64 ||
|-
| 9800GT || 30.36 || 0.289 || 105 || 1800 || 112 ||
|-
| 9800GTX || 32.54 || 0.232 || 140 || 1688 || 128 ||
|-
| 9800GTX+ || 35.39 || 0.251 || 141 || 1836 || 128 ||
|-
|style="background-color:#FFEFEF"| 9800GX2 || 57.83 || 0.294 || 197 || || 2x128 ||
|-
|style="background-color:#FFEFEF"| 9800GX2 || 28 || 0.142 || 197 || || 2x128 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]
|-
| G210 || 3.38 || 0.111 || 30.5 || 1402 || 16 ||
|-
| GT220 || 9.83 || 0.170 || 58 || 1360 || 48 ||
|-
| GT240 || 19.37 || 0.281 || 69 || 1340 || 96 ||
|-
| GTS250 || 35.39 || 0.244 || 145 || 1836 || 128 ||
|-
| GTX260 || 35.91 || 0.178 || 202 || 1242 || 192 ||
|-
| GTX260 || 44 || 0.242 || 182 || 1242 || 216 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|-
| GTX260c216 || 40.40 || 0.236 || 171 || 1242 || 216 ||
|-
| GTX275 || 50.75 || 0.232 || 219 || 1404 || 240 ||
|-
| GTX280 || 46.84 || 0.198 || 236 || 1296 || 240 ||
|-
| GTX285 || 53.35 || 0.262 || 204 || 1476 || 240 ||
|-
| GTX295 || 89.78 || 0.311 || 289 || 1242 || 480 ||
|-
| 320M (MacBook Air) || 6.12 || || || 1212 || 48 ||
|-
| GT430 || 20.24 || 0.413 || 49 || 1400 || 96 ||
|-
| GTS450 || 45.28 || 0.427 || 106 || 1566 || 192 ||
|-
| GTX460SE || 56.39 || 0.376 || 150 || 1300 || 288 ||
|-
| GTX460 || 68.31 || 0.427 || 160 || 1350 || 336 ||
|-
| GTX460 (2 cards) || 102 || 0.319? || 320? || 1350 || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26363#msg26363 source]
|-
| GTX465 || 64.41 || 0.322 || 200 || 1215 || 352 ||
|-
| GTX470 || 81.98 || 0.381 || 215 || 1215 || 448 ||
|-
| GTX480 || 101.28 || 0.405 || 250 || 1401 || 480 ||
|-
| GTX570 || 105.83 || 0.483 || 219 || 1464 || 480 ||
|-
| GTX580 || 119.06 || 0.488 || 244 || 1544 || 512 ||
|-
|}

=CPUs=

A lot of nice data can be pulled from [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.0 this thread] to seed this section. Also from [https://www.bitcoin.org/wiki/doku.php?id=bitcoin_miners this page on the old wiki].

==AMD==
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! nprocs !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment
|-
| 2x Opteron 6128 || 16 || 32.4 || 0.203 || 160W || 2 GHz || 0.3.19 || -4way
|-
| Athlon X2 4000+ || 2 || 1.9 || 0.02 || 65W || 2.1 GHz || rpc-miner ||
|-
| Athlon X2 4400+ || || 2.09 || 0.32 || 65W || 2.3GHz || 0.3.19/Win x64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source]
|-
| Athlon X2 6000+ || 2 || 2.81 || 0.02 || 125W || 3 GHz || || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg22881#msg22881 source]
|-
| Athlon XP 2000+ || 2 || 0.62 || 0.009 || 70W || 1.67 GHz || 0.3.18/Ubuntu || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37592#msg37592 source] [http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm?articleid=914&page=4 source]
|-
| Athlon II X2 240e || 2 || 2.71 || 0.06 || 45W || 2.81 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Phenom II X6 1055T || 6 || 15.84 || 0.13 || 125W || 2.82 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Phenom II X6 1100T || 6 || 22 || 0.176 || 125W || 3.82 GHz || bitcoin-miner || Aciid#bitcoin-dev
|-
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 3.8 || 0.04 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || 0.3.1x/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|-
| Phenom II X3 720 || 3 || 7.2 || 0.08 || 95W || 2.8 GHz || cpu-miner 0.2.1/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|}

==Intel==
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Model !! p/t !! Mhash/s !! Mhash/W !! ACP [W] !! Clock !! Version !! Comment
|-
| Pentium III mobile ? || 1 || 0.3 || 0.014 || 21W || 1.07 GHz || 0.3.1x/Win2K || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source] [http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=27380 source]
|-
| Pentium Dual-Core E5400 || 2/2 || 2.27 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.7 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Celeron E330 || 2/2 || 2.2 || 0.03 || 65W || 2.5 GHz || 0.3.19/Ubuntu10.04 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37620#msg37620 source]
|-
| Core i3 M350 || 2/4 || 1.48 || 0.04 || 35W || 2.27 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Core i5 M450 || 2/4 || 1.8 || 0.05 || 35W || 1.2 GHz || 0.3.17/Win7-54 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg26292#msg26292 source]
|-
| Core i5-2400 || 4/4 || 4.5 || 0.05 || 95W || 3.1 GHz || cpuminer git (2011-01-22) || cryptopp_asm32
|-
| Core i5-550 ? || 2/4 || 5.1 || 0.04 ? || || 3.2 GHz || cpuminer-0.7 || -4way
|-
| Core i5 ? || 4/? || 6.5 || || || || client from svn || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg37621#msg37621 source]
|-
| Core i7 980x || 6/12 || 19.2 || 0.15 || 130 || 4.4 GHz (x33) || cpuminer/Win7-64 ||
|-
| Core i7 980x || 6/12 || 8.7 || || || 3.9 GHz (x27) || 0.3.17/Win7-64 ||
|-
| Core 2 Duo E6850 || 2/2 || 6.75 || 0.10 || 65W || 3.0 Ghz || ufasoft-0.3 ||
|-
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 7.76 || 0.11 || 70W || 3.33 GHz (o/c?) || ufasoft-0.3 || miner optimized for Intel Core
|-
| Core 2 Duo E7300 || 2/2 || 2.52 || 0.04 || 65W || 2.66 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Xeon E5520 || 4/8 || 6.5 || 0.08 || 80W || 2.27 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Xeon E5530 || 4/8 || 7.14 || 0.09 || 80W || 2.4 GHz || bitcoind || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg19426#msg19426 source]
|-
| Xeon E5630 (dual) || 2x4/8 || 8 || 0.1 || 80W || 2.53 GHz || 0.3.17/Win7-64 || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg29471#msg29471 source]
|-
| Atom N270 || 1 || 0.42 || '''0.17''' || 2.5W || 1.6 GHz || 0.3.1x/WinXP || [http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=1628.msg24699#msg24699 source]
|}

[[Category:Mining]]