<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://en.bitcoin.it/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Clefru</id>
	<title>Bitcoin Wiki - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://en.bitcoin.it/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Clefru"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Special:Contributions/Clefru"/>
	<updated>2026-04-06T05:30:24Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.8</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Address_reuse&amp;diff=53796</id>
		<title>Address reuse</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Address_reuse&amp;diff=53796"/>
		<updated>2015-01-13T17:39:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Clefru: Insert reference for private key recovery from weak signatures&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Address reuse is the practice of sending multiple transactions to the same address.&lt;br /&gt;
This works by &amp;quot;accident&amp;quot;, not by design.&lt;br /&gt;
It is considered a bad practice, and not something that should be done.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Problems ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Privacy ===&lt;br /&gt;
Address reuse harms the privacy of not only yourself, but also others - including many not related to the transaction.&lt;br /&gt;
In some cases, these risks are serious enough that they are likely in violation of reasonable consumer protection laws.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Security ===&lt;br /&gt;
Bitcoin does not, at a low level, have any concept of addresses, only individual coins.&lt;br /&gt;
Address reuse, at this layer, requires producing multiple digital signatures when you spend bitcoins.&lt;br /&gt;
Multiple situations have been found where more than one digital signature can be used to calculate the private key needed to spend bitcoins.&lt;br /&gt;
Even if you spend all the bitcoins claimed by this private key at once, it is still possible to double-spend them in theft before they confirm.&lt;br /&gt;
While the situations for finding the private key from signatures have been fixed, it is not prudent to assume there aren&#039;t more such situations yet unknown.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the case of spending all the TXOs in a single transaction, there is an additional risk if someone is actively monitoring the network for vulnerable transactions:&lt;br /&gt;
upon receiving such a transaction, they can split up their double spends such that there is only one ECDSA verification per transaction (making a single transaction for each TXO);&lt;br /&gt;
this will cause the attacker&#039;s transactions to relay across the rest of the nodes &#039;&#039;faster&#039;&#039; than the legitimate one, increasing success of a double spend.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Known attacks ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Same K in multiple signatures, see [http://www.nilsschneider.net/2013/01/28/recovering-bitcoin-private-keys.html Recovering Bitcoin private keys using weak signatures from the blockchain].&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://eprint.iacr.org/2014/140.pdf Timing sidechannel]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Accidental loss ===&lt;br /&gt;
In Bitcoin abstraction, an address is an invoice for a specific payment.&lt;br /&gt;
Once that payment is made, the receiving party has no reason to retain the data for the address (technical details simplified) and may discard it.&lt;br /&gt;
Even if someone does not choose to discard that data, it may have since been lost in an accident or compromised.&lt;br /&gt;
In any of these situations, any future payments to the same address would go in to a &amp;quot;black hole&amp;quot;, and be forever lost through no fault of the recipient.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Confusion ===&lt;br /&gt;
Users who see addresses reused may incorrectly be led to believe they function similarly to wallets or bank accounts.&lt;br /&gt;
Often this is manifested in people talking about nonsense like &amp;quot;[[Address#Address_balances|address balance]]&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;wallet address&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;[[From_address|from address]]&amp;quot;, and similar [[Address#Misconceptions|misconceptions]] that don&#039;t actually exist in Bitcoin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Notable offenders ==&lt;br /&gt;
Some notable Bitcoin software and services encourage or require address reuse:&lt;br /&gt;
* Many bitcoin mining pools (especially [[Eligius]])&lt;br /&gt;
* Various wallets (usually BitcoinJ-based) reuse addresses for change.&lt;br /&gt;
* Electrum displays addresses in a way that encourages confusion and address reuse and misuse.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Clefru</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>