<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://en.bitcoin.it/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=ByteCoin</id>
	<title>Bitcoin Wiki - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://en.bitcoin.it/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=ByteCoin"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Special:Contributions/ByteCoin"/>
	<updated>2026-06-12T17:32:50Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.8</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Talk:Tonal_Bitcoin&amp;diff=11517</id>
		<title>Talk:Tonal Bitcoin</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Talk:Tonal_Bitcoin&amp;diff=11517"/>
		<updated>2011-06-24T17:27:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;ByteCoin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The point of Bitcoin is that it is a decentralized peer to peer currency. &lt;br /&gt;
That is the novelty about Bitcoin; the novelty is NOT that it comes along with a funky new way of counting things.&lt;br /&gt;
So please stop using Bitcoin to promote your own agenda ; this is just going to confuse people.&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to introduce a new method for counting currency, I suggest you go talk to the FED and propose the Tonal Dollar, or whatever.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:ThomasV|ThomasV]] 14:33, 20 February 2011 (GMT)&lt;br /&gt;
* If Bitcoin has only one purpose, then it will never succeed. There are about as many people that care about a &amp;quot;decentralized peer to peer currency&amp;quot; as there are that care about Tonal. If you want BitCoin to succeed, you should support as many (legal) reasons to use it as possible. Also, whether it&#039;s ever enforced or not, vandalism and trolling should be bannable offenses. --[[User:Luke-jr|Luke-jr]] 04:43, 21 February 2011 (GMT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This page should be deleted.&lt;br /&gt;
Nothing against Tonal, if there was a Hexadecimal Bitcoin or an Octal Bitcoin I would suggest those get deleted, too.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is silly. I thought you&#039;d removed this already, but it&#039;s seeping across to other pages despite me never seeing it in the wild. It serves only to confuse [[User:Gigitrix|Gigitrix]] 01:41, 13 June 2011 (GMT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I agree with Gavin that this page should be deleted. Regardless of my personal opinion or the technical merits of tonal v. decimal, it&#039;s fair to say that tonal attracts scorn and ridicule from the vast majority of the population if they hear about it. Bitcoin&#039;s reputation suffers from the association. [[User:ByteCoin|ByteCoin]] 24 June 2011 (GMT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ByteCoin</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>